Johnson & Johnson: The Pharma Giant That Continues To Grow – Seeking Alpha

I do not paint a portrait to look like the subject, rather does the person grow to look like his portrait. - Salvador Dali

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ), the worlds biggest pharmaceutical company by market cap, has enjoyed a great end to the year after its stock hit a fresh 2019 high of $147.84 in the previous week. Despite the recent litigation, the company is well positioned to continue growing thanks to its impressive pharmaceutical portfolio.

Most recently, the company has faced legal headwinds in the context of its alleged involvement in the opioid crisis. However, the latest test results released by the company show that J&Js baby powder did not contain asbestos. Previously, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration studies showed that the product contained the material.

The tests that were conducted are part of a large-scale effort by J&J to prove the safety of its widely used consumer product after the test by the FDA prompted J&J to undertake a nationwide recall of one lot of Johnsons Baby Powder in October.

A crisis involving baby powder didnt stop the banking titan Barclays to upgrade the JNJ stock from Equal Weight to Overweight.

In our view, litigation concerns are more than priced in and the risk/reward is attractive. We think J&J checks a lot of boxes heading into 2020, leaving risk/reward skewed to the upside. said Kristen Stewart, an analyst at Barclays.

Furthermore, the bank raised the price target to $173. The stock closed yesterday's trading session at $145.30.

This is the second time J&Js stock was upgraded in one week. Previously, Morgan Stanley analyst David Lewis made the same upgrade - from Equal Weight to Overweight, describing the companys stock as an attractive buying opportunity.

Out of 19 analysts covering Johnson & Johnson, 13 have upgraded the stock to either Buy or Overweight.

The upgrades didnt surprise many as the after the company reported in October that Q3 earnings and revenue beat estimates, thanks to growing sales of cancer and other prescription drugs, regardless of multi-million-dollar legal issues the company.

The pharmaceutical giant reported adjusted earnings of $2.12 per share, beating the expected $2.01 per share. The reported revenue was $20.73, again higher than the expected $20.07 billion. Overall, the companys three main components reported better-than-expected results.

Technically, the price is trading just below the all-time high of $148.99, printed in December 2018. The stock has been rallying since the Q3 earnings report was released on October 23, a day after the stock printed a 9-month low of $126.10. In around two months time, JNJ has managed to increase its market cap by around 15%.

The price action is supported by the horizontal support near the $145 mark, the previous 2019 high, and $141.50 where the broken descending trend line that connects two previous lower highs sits.

If the bulls continue to move the price higher, the initial target is the zone around the $150 mark where the 127.2% Fibonacci extensions of the June 19-October 19 correction lower lie. Overall, any move above $149 will mark a new all-time high for shares of JNJ.

As I mentioned in the Lead-Lag Report, the US stock market is well-positioned to continue rising in 2020, hence a future upside is a strong possibility for a healthy businesses such as Johnson & Johnson.

Arguably the biggest strength of the company is portfolio diversification. JNJ continues to impress with its performance in the areas of oncology and immunology, where its products such as Imbruvica, Stelara and Tremfya continue to yield profits. For instance, Tremfyas portfolio increased as much as 69% in the third quarter.

I wouldnt be surprised if the company goes aggressive on the expansion front. It is expected that the growth in the pharmaceutical sector should further pick up in 2020, which should benefit the company given the historical correlation between J&J's stock and pharma growth.

Johnson & Johnson finds itself in a great financial shape as its operations in the healthcare industry are unrivaled. Thanks to the diversified portfolio, especially within the oncology and immunology fields, shares of Johnson & Johnson appear to be a solid investment option as the bulls look determined to push the price north of $150.

*Like this article? Don't forget to hit the follow button above!

How To Avoid the Most Common Trading Mistakes

Sometimes, you might not realize your biggest portfolio risks until its too late.

Thats why its important to pay attention to the right market data, analysis, and insights on a daily basis. Being a passive investor puts you at unnecessary risk. When you stay informed on key signals and indicators, you'll take control of your financial future.

My award-winning market research gives you everything you need to know each day, so you can be ready to act when it matters most.

Click here to gain access and try the Lead-Lag Report FREE for 14 days.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: This writing is for informational purposes only and Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC undertakes no obligation to update this article even if the opinions expressed change. It does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction. It also does not offer to provide advisory or other services in any jurisdiction. The information contained in this writing should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing.

Here is the original post:
Johnson & Johnson: The Pharma Giant That Continues To Grow - Seeking Alpha

New Way to Deliver Old Tuberculosis Vaccine Provides ‘Incredible Protection’ in Monkeys – ScienceAlert

What if you could make the tuberculosis vaccine much more powerful, not by altering the ingredients, but just by changing the way it is given to people? It would help prevent the infection that kills more people every year than any other microbe.

Tuberculosis is caused by a bacterium, called Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which causes a lung infection that progresses slowly but can destroy the lungs if not treated. Although we might not think of it too often here in the United States, it remains a major killer worldwide.

In 2018 alone, there were 10 million new cases of active TB and almost 1.5 million deaths from TB infections. What makes the disease particularly insidious is that because symptoms are slow to manifest and can resemble other diseases, it takes a long time before people with TB are diagnosed and given treatment.

But until a person with TB gets treated with drugs, they can pass it on to other people - and this bacterium spreads fast through coughing, sneezing, and even singing.

You might be surprised to learn that most of the people who die from TB were actually vaccinated as a baby, using a vaccine called bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG). BCG has been used for almost 100 years and is a live but crippled version of a similar bacterium to the one that causes TB.

This vaccine is pretty good at preventing certain types of TB in children, but not adolescents or adults. My team here in Pittsburgh together with collaborators at the National Institutes of Health have figured out a better way to administer this vaccine to prevent this devastating disease which often affects the poorest people in the world.

(Timonina/Shutterstock.com)

I was originally trained as a microbiologist, studying bacteria that cause disease, and later developed an interest in how the body's immune system fights off infections. Combining my passions for microbiology and immunology, I began investigating tuberculosis almost 30 years ago.

I started my own lab at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine with the goal of understanding TB disease and how we might prevent it.

I started by using mice to study TB. But then, 20 years ago, I began using monkeys and discovered that monkeys develop the same type of TB disease that humans do. Studying TB in monkeys was a breakthrough that enabled me to begin the search for new vaccines against this deadly disease.

TB is such a fascinating disease and has been causing illness in humans for thousands of years. Anthropologists have discovered, for example, tuberculosis in Egyptian mummies. It infects nearly all mammals.

Yet, even though the cause of TB has been known since the late 1800s, it is still not clear why some humans can suppress the infection and not become sick while others are more vulnerable and develop disease.

I wanted to use my understanding of this complicated bacterium to find more effective ways to prevent the disease.

My colleague Robert Seder, a vaccine expert at the National Institutes of Health, had discovered that delivering a malaria vaccine directly into the bloodstream, through a vein, was much more effective than any other route of delivery such as the skin or muscle, and was a much better way to prevent the disease.

Together, we decided to try a similar approach with TB using the current BCG vaccine. We vaccinated monkeys with BCG by injecting the vaccine under the skin (the usual route for babies), by aerosolizing the vaccine and spraying it directly into the lungs, or injecting it directly into the the blood using an IV.

After two months we found that when the vaccine was delivered via IV, the numbers of specialized immune cells, called T cells, which can recognize and kill the bacteria, increased by 100-fold in the lungs. Then, months later, we exposed the monkeys to M. tuberculosis.

Unvaccinated monkeys developed severe TB disease within a few months. BCG administered through the skin or into the lungs gave a little bit of protection, but the monkeys still had signs of TB.

The IV vaccine provided incredible protection. In most of the animals, there were no M. tuberculosis bacteria in the entire monkey. We also used specialized imaging, called PET-CT, and showed that the lungs of most of these monkeys were free of any disease. This means that BCG vaccine prevented TB infection and disease when given intravenously.

This is an exciting breakthrough in the field of TB, since most vaccines tested in any models provide relatively limited protection. If we can figure out how BCG IV prevents M. tuberculosis infection, we may be on the path to developing a new vaccine for humans.

Although we have a long way to go before it is ready for humans, the lessons we learn from the BCG IV studies will be critical in developing new TB vaccines and, we hope, saving millions of lives.

JoAnne L. Flynn, Professor of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Read more from the original source:
New Way to Deliver Old Tuberculosis Vaccine Provides 'Incredible Protection' in Monkeys - ScienceAlert

Changed route of immunization dramatically improves efficacy of TB vaccine – National Institutes of Health

Media Advisory

Thursday, January 2, 2020

NIH scientists report results from animal study.

Tuberculosis (TB), an ancient disease, is the leading infectious cause of death globally, yet the worlds only licensed TB vaccine, Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG), was developed a century ago. Given to infants via a needle placed just under the skin, BCG protects babies from a form of the disease called disseminated TB but is far less effective at preventing pulmonary TB, the major cause of illness and deaths, in teens or adults.

Now, researchers from the National Institutes of Healths National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and their colleagues have shown that simply changing the dose and route of administration from intradermal (ID) to intravenous (IV) greatly increases the vaccines ability to protect rhesus macaques from infection following exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the bacterium that causes TB. The findings provide a new understanding of the mechanisms of BCG-elicited protection against tuberculosis infection and disease. In addition, the findings support investigation of IV BCG administration in clinical trials to determine whether this route improves its effectiveness in teens and adults.

Study investigators at the NIAID Vaccine Research Center were led by Robert A. Seder, M.D., and Mario Roederer, Ph.D. Their collaborators included JoAnne L. Flynn, Ph.D., of University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

To control Mtb infection and prevent clinical disease, a TB vaccine must elicit strong, sustained responses from the immune systems T cells, specifically those in the lungs. However, the standard, ID, route of BCG administration may not generate enough of these critical cells in the lungs. The NIAID researchers and their colleagues hypothesized that administration of BCG by IV or aerosol (AE) routes would overcome this hurdle and thus confer substantially better protection from infection and/or disease in rhesus macaques following challenge with virulent Mtb.

In their study, groups of animals received the BGC vaccine by ID, AE or IV routes. The scientists assessed immune responses in blood and in fluid drawn from the lungs for a 24-week period following vaccination. IV BCG vaccination resulted in the highest durable levels of T cells in the blood and lungs.

Six months after vaccination, the researchers exposed groups of vaccinated rhesus macaques (immunized via ID, AE or IV routes) and a group of unvaccinated macaques to a virulent strain of Mtb by introducing the bacteria directly into the animals lungs. They then tracked the infection and disease development over three months. Nine out of 10 animals vaccinated with IV BCG were highly protected; six showed no detectable infection in any tissue tested and three had only very low counts of Mtb bacteria in lung tissue. All unvaccinated animals and those immunized via ID or AE routes showed signs of significantly greater infection.

The investigators concluded that IV BCG conferred an unprecedented degree of protection in an animal model of severe TB and represents a major step forward in the field of TB vaccine research.

PA Darrah et al. Prevention of tuberculosis in macaques after intravenous BCG immunization. Nature DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1817-8 (2020).

NIAID Director Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., is available to comment. Dr. Seder, chief, Cellular Immunology Section, Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, is also available.

This research was funded, in part, by the NIAID Intramural Research Program and through NIH grants 5U24AI118672 and 2RM1HG006193.

NIAID conducts and supports research at NIH, throughout the United States, and worldwide to study the causes of infectious and immune-mediated diseases, and to develop better means of preventing, diagnosing and treating these illnesses. News releases, fact sheets and other NIAID-related materials are available on the NIAID website.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH):NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit http://www.nih.gov.

NIHTurning Discovery Into Health

###

Read the rest here:
Changed route of immunization dramatically improves efficacy of TB vaccine - National Institutes of Health

Author Angie Fox and Artist Craig Skaggs at The Toyman Toy Show in St. Louis Sunday January 12th – We Are Movie Geeks

TheToyman Toy Showin St. Louis has been going strong for 30 years now and just keeps getting bigger and better! The fun now takes place nine times a year at The Machinists Hall 12365 St Charles Rock Road in Bridgeton, MO 63044. There areover 120 vendors at the Toyman Toy Show spread out over220 tables. all selling vintage toys, comics, dolls, diecast cars, movie memorabilia, and more as well as cosplayers and artists. Its an unbelievable amount of fun for only $5! A Facebook invite for the event can be found HERE

The next Toyman Show is Sunday, January 12th from 9:00a to 3:00p and Author Angie Fox and Artist Craig Skaggs will be special guests.

Angie Fox is the New York Times bestselling author of the Accidental Demon Slayer series. She claims that researching her books can be just as much fun as writing them. In the name of fact-finding, Angie has ridden with Harley biker gangs, explored the tunnels underneath Hoover Dam and found an interesting recipe for Mamma Coalpots Southern Skunk Surprise (shes still trying to get her courage up to try it).Angie earned a Journalism degree from the University of Missouri. She worked in television news and then in advertising before beginning her career as an author.She also enjoys making up fun quizzes and thinks you should take one right now.

Craig Skaggs started his career as an artist in 1983 illustrating childrens books for a small publishing company when he was a junior in high school. In the early nineties he became a full-time freelancer working for multiple advertising agencies, and publishers of teaching material. he was then picked by Skywalker Ranch to illustrate licensed Star Wars art when they were re-releasing episodes 4, 5 and 6 with new special effects. he also began designing all kinds of toys and products for over thirty companies, doing illustrations for several magazine, game, comic, childrens book and journal publishers, and he was a cover artist for Random House Pub. and Wings Press for several years. Seven years ago he became a lead medical illustrator for the American College of Cardiology, and the Journal of Allergy and Immunology. About three years ago he started doing conventions, and fine art gallery shows. Just recently hes started doing illustrations for Altered Creatures Pub., and toy design work for SG labs.

Over 125+ Vendors on 225+ tables of Toys, Comics, Games, Movie posters, Barbie, Hot Wheels, Die-Cast, Models, Pop Culture and a TOTALLY OPEN BALCONY.

Adult Admission at the Toyman Show: $5.00 Children 16 & under free. Sunday: 9:00am 3:00pm. Early Bird @ 8:00a $12.00 * FREE PARKING *

The Toyman Toy Show site can be foundHERE

View original post here:
Author Angie Fox and Artist Craig Skaggs at The Toyman Toy Show in St. Louis Sunday January 12th - We Are Movie Geeks

Something’s in the Air: San Antonio Enters Peak Cedar Fever Season – Rivard Report

Eyelids feel like sandpaper? Sneezing nonstop? Welcome to cedar fever, an annual malady thatplagues San Antonio and Central Texas every winter.

Ashe juniper trees, commonly known as mountain cedars, cause the seasonal affliction. As part of their reproductive cycle, male trees produce smallpollen cones, while the female trees produce small seed cones that look like blueberries, explained Estelle Levetin, PhD and a professor of biological science at the University of Tulsa who has studied Ashe juniper for decades. Upon maturity, the male trees release billions of pollen granules into the wind usually on a cold, breezy day.That yellow pollen dust, filled with myriad allergenic compounds, can travel up to 200 miles.

The bushy evergreens are native from southern Missouri to northern Mexico, but are especially dense in Central Texas and the Hill Country.

Cedar fever season typically starts after Thanksgiving and continues through February. But climate change may cause those who suffer its effects to adjust to a longer, more intense season. Warming temperatures appear to be extending the trees reproductive cycle and boosting pollen counts, according to the Fourth Annual Climate Change Assessment.

We are early into the season, said Dr. Eliseo Villalobos, an internist and Fellow of the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) at the Allergy Institute of San Antonio. Villalobos said that conditions this season seem pretty typical, but that the highest allergy counts are coming earlier in the season.

Usually it peaks mid-January, but the counts last year peaked around late December which it seems to be doing again this year, he said.

The AAAAI pollen counter haslisted San Antonio in the red zone with pollen counts rated very high every day since Dec. 23.

Monika Maeckle for the Rivard Report

Female Ashe juniper trees produce blueberry-like berries.

Allergists point out that cedar pollen is especially bothersome to human beings.

A single tree can produce up to 500 billion pollen grains, said Daniel Katz, a postdoctoral research fellow at the Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin. He added that the pollen itself contains many allergenic compounds and is especially susceptible to bursting, which releases the allergens into the air.

Texas State Botanist Chris Best speculated that the super-abundance of Ashe Juniper trees in Central Texas is a major factor in the severity of local cedar fever.

Just look at the pollen counts during a bad season many thousands, even tens of thousands of particles per cubic meter, he said. Compare that to other pollen or mold spores that reach peaks of hundreds to low thousands per cubic meter.

Cedar fever is so bothersome and pervasive that Katz and other scientists at the University of Texas at Austin recently launched Pollen Trackers,a citizen scienceproject that will gather data on allergens in the atmosphere. Tracking mountain cedar pollen will be the focus of Pollen Trackers first campaign.

The program asksvolunteers to monitor and report data on local cedar trees to alert the community when they release their pollen into the atmosphere.

We dont know yet how much pollen people are exposed to in their daily lives, said Katz. If we can predict airborne pollen concentrations, we can warn people about pollen hotspots in advance and help them maximize the benefits from their allergy medication.

Katz described Ashe junipers phenomenal amount of pollen production, combined with its massive tree population and its particular pollen structure as the perfect storm of allergies. Thats why why cedar fever is one of the worst allergies in the U.S., he said.

So does he recommend getting out the chainsaws and clearing all the cedar, as some Hill Country landowners attempt to do?

I wouldnt go that far, he said, noting that pollen-producing male trees would be better candidates for cutting down than clearing cedar indiscriminately.

The tree species is an important part of the regional ecosystem. Ashe juniper provides food, shelter, and nesting materials for wildlife, specifically the endangered golden-cheeked warbler. Ashe juniper trees also provides a unique, rich bed for particular native plants that thrive in its mulch.

Trees do a lot of benefit for us. Allergenic pollen is just one of the things we need to weigh, he said.

Read the original post:
Something's in the Air: San Antonio Enters Peak Cedar Fever Season - Rivard Report

Epilepsy and Genes – Epilepsy Foundation

Is epilepsy genetic?

Advances in science and medicine over the last decade have led to a better understanding of the ways genetic factors contribute to epilepsy.

Not all epilepsies that are due to genetic causes are inherited.

The genetics of epilepsy is a new and emerging field. For some individuals, it is not yet possible to determine whether their seizures are due to genetic factors.

In general, if a person has a first-degree relative (mother, father, sibling) with epilepsy, the risk of developing epilepsy by the age of 40 is less than 1 in 20 (Peljto et al. 2014). The risk differs somewhat between focal and generalized epilepsy. There is an increased risk of developing epilepsy if the first-degree relative has a generalized epilepsy rather than focal epilepsy (Peljto et al. 2014; Helbig et al. 2016). These estimates come from population-based studies, meaning they are based on the average across a large group and may not apply for all individuals.

The likelihood of inheriting epilepsy may differ significantly if a person has a relative with a known genetic epilepsy diagnosis. In this case, the chance of developing epilepsy depends on the specific gene and inheritance pattern involved.

To fully appreciate this, we first need to review a few basic genetic terms.

Genes are sequences of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) that determine different proteins made in the body. These proteins have a variety of functions and ultimately determine how we develop, grow and function. There are about 20,000 genes in the human genome. With a few exceptions, humans have two copies of every gene: one inherited from each parent.

A genetic variant is a change in the DNA sequence, which can cause the gene not to work properly and ultimately can affect how the gene (protein) functions.

A de novo genetic variant arises for the first time in one individual. Usually, this is caused by a random change in the DNA of the egg or the sperm cell of the parent but is not otherwise present in either parent.

For some genetic conditions, not everyone with a disease-causing variant will develop the symptoms of the disease. This phenomenon is called incomplete penetrance.

Certain types of epilepsy are associated with specific genetic changes, including changes in an individual gene or changes in a chromosome.

Research is currently ongoing in many medical centers and laboratories around the world to help understand the role of genetics in the development of epilepsy. One long term goal of this research is precision medicine. This means individuals with genetic epilepsies would be treated with approaches specifically targeted to their genetic diagnosis.

Although there are many types of research studies, three main types relate to the field of epilepsy genetics:

Learn More

There are currently a limited number of clinical trials available to individuals and families with some forms of genetic epilepsies, but we anticipate the number of trials will continue to increase. The following links are a good place to start for information about currently available trials for genetic epilepsies:

Helbig I, Heinzen EL, Mefford HC, and Ilae Genetics Commission. Primer Part 1-The building blocks of epilepsy genetics. Epilepsia, 57 (2016): 861-8.

Peljto AL, Barker-Cummings, Vasoli VM, Leibson CL, Hauser WA, Buchhalter JR, and Ottman R. Familial risk of epilepsy: a population-based study. Brain, 137 (2014): 795-805.

National Library of Medicine (US). Adapted from Genetics Home Reference [Internet]: ghr.nlm.nih.gov. Bethesda (MD): The Library; 2013 Sep 16.

Visit link:
Epilepsy and Genes - Epilepsy Foundation

Gene editing breakthroughs that cured genetic diseases in 2019 – The Star Online

IN the summer of 2019, a mother in Nashville, Tennessee in the United States, with a seemingly incurable genetic disorder finally found an end to her suffering by editing her genome.

Victoria Grays recovery from sickle cell disease, which had caused her painful seizures, came in a year of breakthroughs in one of the hottest areas of medical research gene therapy.

I have hoped for a cure since I was about 11, the 34-year-old said.

Since I received the new cells, I have been able to enjoy more time with my family without worrying about pain or an out-of-the-blue emergency.

Over several weeks, Grays blood was drawn so that doctors could get to the cause of her illness stem cells from her bone marrow that were making deformed red blood cells.

The stem cells were sent to a Scottish laboratory, where their DNA was modified using Crispr/Cas9 pronounced Crisper a new tool informally known as a molecular scissors.

The genetically-edited cells were transfused back into Grays veins and bone marrow. A month later, she was producing normal blood cells.

Medics warn that caution is necessary, but theoretically, she has been cured.

This is one patient. This is early results. We need to see how it works out in other patients, said her doctor, Haydar Frangoul, at the Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville.

But these results are really exciting.

In Germany, a 19-year-old woman was treated with a similar method for a different blood disease beta thalassemia.

She had previously needed 16 blood transfusions per year. Nine months later, she is completely free of that burden.

For decades, the DNA of living organisms such as corn and salmon has been modified. But Crispr, invented in 2012, made gene editing more widely accessible.

It is much simpler than preceding technology, cheaper and easy to use in small labs.

The technique has given new impetus to the perennial debate over the wisdom of humanity manipulating life itself.

Its all developing very quickly, said French geneticist Emmanuelle Charpentier, one of Crisprs inventors and the co-founder of Crispr Therapeutics, the biotech company conducting the clinical trials involving Gray and the German patient.

Gene cures

Crispr was the latest breakthrough in a year of great strides in gene therapy, a medical adventure that started three decades ago, when the first TV telethons were raising money for children with muscular dystrophy.

Scientists practising the technique insert a normal gene into cells containing a defective gene.

It does the work the original could not, such as making normal red blood cells in Grays case or making tumour-killing super white blood cells for a cancer patient.

Crispr goes even further: instead of adding a gene, the tool edits the genome itself.

After decades of research and clinical trials on a genetic fix to genetic disorders, 2019 saw a historic milestone: approval to bring to market the first gene therapies for a neuromuscular disease in the US and a blood disease in the European Union.

They join several other gene therapies bringing the total to eight approved in recent years to treat certain cancers and an inherited blindness.

Serge Braun, the scientific director of the French Muscular Dystrophy Association, sees 2019 as a turning point that will lead to a medical revolution.

Twenty-five, 30 years, thats the time it had to take, he said. It took a generation for gene therapy to become a reality. Now, its only going to go faster.

Just outside Washington, at the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), researchers are also celebrating a breakthrough period.

We have hit an inflection point, said US NIHs associate director for science policy Carrie Wolinetz.

These therapies are exorbitantly expensive, however, costing up to US$2 million (RM8.18 million) meaning patients face grueling negotiations with their insurance companies.

They also involve a complex regimen of procedures that are only available in wealthy countries.

Gray spent months in hospital getting blood drawn, undergoing chemotherapy, having edited stem cells reintroduced via transfusion and fighting a general infection.

You cannot do this in a community hospital close to home, said her doctor.

However, the number of approved gene therapies will increase to about 40 by 2022, according to Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) researchers.

They will mostly target cancers and diseases that affect muscles, the eyes and the nervous system.

In this Oct 10, 2018, photo, He speaks during an interview at his laboratory in Shenzhen, China. The scientist was recently sentenced to three years in prison for practicing medicine illegally and fined 3 million yuan (RM1.76 million). AP

Bioterrorism potential

Another problem with Crispr is that its relative simplicity has triggered the imaginations of rogue practitioners who dont necessarily share the medical ethics of Western medicine.

In 2018 in China, scientist He Jiankui triggered an international scandal and his excommunication from the scientific community when he used Crispr to create what he called the first gene-edited humans.

The biophysicist said he had altered the DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) of human embryos that became twin girls Lulu and Nana.

His goal was to create a mutation that would prevent the girls from contracting HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), even though there was no specific reason to put them through the process.

That technology is not safe, said Kiran Musunuru, a genetics professor at the University of Pennsylvania, explaining that the Crispr scissors often cut next to the targeted gene, causing unexpected mutations.

Its very easy to do if you dont care about the consequences, he added.

Despite the ethical pitfalls, restraint seems mainly to have prevailed so far.

The community is keeping a close eye on Russia, where biologist Denis Rebrikov has said he wants to use Crispr to help deaf parents have children without the disability.

There is also the temptation to genetically edit entire animal species, e.g. malaria-causing mosquitoes in Burkina Faso or mice hosting ticks that carry Lyme disease in the US.

The researchers in charge of those projects are advancing carefully however, fully aware of the unpredictability of chain reactions on the ecosystem.

Charpentier doesnt believe in the more dystopian scenarios predicted for gene therapy, including American biohackers injecting themselves with Crispr technology bought online.

Not everyone is a biologist or scientist, she said.

And the possibility of military hijacking to create soldier-killing viruses or bacteria that would ravage enemies crops?

Charpentier thinks that technology generally tends to be used for the better.

Im a bacteriologist -- weve been talking about bioterrorism for years, she said. Nothing has ever happened. AFP Relaxnews

More here:
Gene editing breakthroughs that cured genetic diseases in 2019 - The Star Online

Finding the right mix of genetics balancing and costs – High Plains Journal

In challenging times, beef producers are looking for an edge and genetics, nutrition and production are all part of the equation.

Finding the balance is the key for producers, according to Frank Goedeken, was one of the speakers at the first Cattle U and Trade Show, a High Plains Journal event July 29 to 30, at the United Wireless Arena in Dodge City, Kansas.

Goedeken has been a consulting nutritionist in the High Plains since 1989, including 15 years at Purina Mills and as an owner of Integrated Beef Consultants LLC. Priorities of his practice have been gain, conversion, cost of gain and out weight.

The challenge for producers continues to be to bring these advances together without compromising cattle health, properly growing and developing the cattle are required to reverse the trend of increased death loss and medicine costs.

As he visits with clients one of his goals is to not only look at the facility where the calves are located but also to help them envision the final product so the consumer has an enjoyable eating experience. He noted it all starts with the calves and all phases, from the cow-calf producer, to the backgrounder to the feeder all need to be on the same page.

If you talk to most feedyards and say, Youre going to bring in 100 calves that are being weaned on the truck? Hes not going to be very happy, Goedeken said. Why is that? Health is going to be an issue. So youre trying to improve the health of the cattle with good nutrition and good management.

At the same time producers need to keep tabs on feed costs and commodity prices, he said.

A cow-calf producer also needs to study the genetics of his herd and how the calves perform beyond the boundaries of the ranch, Goedeken said.

From his observations, Goedeken has noticed the comfort level of cattle is not always tied to feed. Good questions producers need to ask include do the cattle have the right pens and configurations? Should the producer do something different?

Sometimes the right environment for the cattle can make a big difference, too.

Have you ever noticed that cattle do not like to lay on bare dirt? You go out in your pasture, wheat stubble or whatever, he said. Very seldom would you see him or her lay on bare dirt. If you put some hay down or some straw out there theyd all be laying down. So thats kind of what we start with. Providing a comfortable environment is important.

Paying attention to nutrition is essential because of the life stages and physiological needs of the animal changes as they grow and mature and wrong decisions can even cause death to a young animal, he said.

Managing stress for the calf is also important, the consulting nutritionist said. A new environment can be a factor others may seem trite but are important, too, such as the water may taste different or the calfs mother is no longer with her calf. Goedeken said sometimes with all the stress, it can be wrongly assumed that all the calves are under stress. Then we run through, shoot, tag them and vaccinate.

He said, on the surface, it sounds like the right approach but it does not mean the situation was managed best for the cattle.

The more we stress the cattle the less likely they are to respond to challenges to their immune system, he said. They are less likely to respond to vaccines and the less likely they are to be healthy their entire life.

He also noted that timing of vaccines can make a difference and working with veterinarians is essential.

Nutritional stress occurs while trying to get those animals quickly up to speed to meet delivery needs but he says energy has to be balanced with health of the animals. In making a point he says distillers grain is an example in which feeders thought was a magic bullet but he says studies show the key remains balance in feeding nutrients.

A healthy animal means he is less likely to be stressed as a more stressed animal means more medication is needed, Goedeken said. Also, immune functions might become compromised and that can lead to unexpected death.

In looking at nutritional matters, he said striving to get to the right level of energy, protein and other nutrients in the diet does pay. Supplementing the diet with zinc can help producers because zinc is tied to muscle development and immune functions.

Stress negatively affects health and performance. As an industry, we need to pay more attention to that. When I grew up in the business I thought, Man, lets get all that stress over with, lets process them and lets get them into their pens? But it may not have been the right time to process those cattle based on what we talked about.

Healthier cattle perform better, he said, and that dynamic has not changed and much more information is available with studies to back it up.

Continue reading here:
Finding the right mix of genetics balancing and costs - High Plains Journal

‘Counting On’: Amy Duggar Just Started A Debate About Genetics On Her Instagram Page and It’s Hilarious – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Well, its official, AmyDuggar doesnt want to be associated with the Duggar family any longer. Fanshave long suspected that cousin Amy has been slowly removing herself from theinner workings of the Duggar clan ever since MaryDuggar, the famed grandmother of 20 children, passed away unexpectedly inJune 2019. Now, Amy wants to make sure people know that her son, DaxtonRyan, isnt a Duggar, and its created quite the debate on Instagram.

Amy recently took to Instagram to share a photo of her youngson. The themed photo was all about ringing in the New Year, but followersseemed to want to discuss genetics and the Duggar name. One commentercomplimented Amy, claiming her son was beautiful because he was a Duggar. Apparently,Amy couldnt let that one go and reminded the commenter that while sheappreciated the sentiment her son, Daxton, was a King.

Amy married DillonKing in September 2015. Amy promptly changed her name to her husbands lastname. Their first child, Daxton Ryan, was born on Oct. 9, according to People.Since his birth, Amy has been postingalmost nonstop snapshots of the chubby baby, and while fans are absolutelyloving her pictures, they all seem to insist hes a Duggar. Amy wants everyoneto know he is not. Her most recent reminder kicked off a debate about geneticsand lineage.

The second Amy suggested her son was not a Duggar, thefamilys most prominent supporters came crawling out to comment. While manyinsist that he is a Duggar because Amy is a Duggar, their understanding of geneticsseems a little elementary. Yes, technically, Daxton is 25% Duggar because hismother, Amy, is 50% Duggar. Remember, Amy has a father, too. Daxton also shareshalf of his genetics with his father, Dillion. That means this child is not justa Duggar and not only a King.

While fans might be correct that he has Duggar blood, he carrieshis fathers surname, which appears to be what Amy was really trying to pointout. While several fans took it as a sign of disrespect, when you think about it,Duggar fans are actually the ones being disrespectful. Since Amy and Dillon havechosen to give their child the King name, fans should probably respect him aspart of that family.

Amy might be related to the Duggar clan through her mother,Deanna Duggar, but that doesnt mean she wants to be associated with their values.It has been clear, for years, that Amy was raised markedly different from her19 cousins. She was allowed to date, didnt need a chaperone, and while still aChristian, isnt a part of the ultra-conservative Christian ministry the Duggarfamily belongs to. She also was not homeschooled.

While Amy remains friendly with some of her cousins, shedoesnt seem to be particularly interested in being a part of the largerfamily. Back in November 2019, Amyinsisted she knew nothing about the rumored raids on the Duggar property,stating that she had no idea why people would think her aunt and uncle would tellher anything. Fans took the statement to mean that Amy isnt particularly closeto the supersized family.

Likely, shes not, to be honest. Her values dont jive withthe Duggars, and her husband recently investedin a whiskey lounge, a business that is undoubtedly not Duggar approved.Amy is also a business owner herself, meaning she works outside the home,another decision that is verboten in the Duggars social circle. Likely, Amyhas quietly been distancing herself from the large family for years, but a bombshellreason for the rift probably doesnt exist.

Go here to read the rest:
'Counting On': Amy Duggar Just Started A Debate About Genetics On Her Instagram Page and It's Hilarious - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

The supercells’ that cured an infants genetic illness – Jamaica Observer

'); } else { $(".fotorama-caption").addClass("remove_caption"); } }) .fotorama();

MCLEAN, United States (AFP) When a person's immune system is impaired by a genetic disease a bone marrow transplant can be a powerful therapeutic tool, but with a major downside during the first few months the recipient's defences against viruses are severely weakened. The slightest infection can lead to a hospital trip.

A still-experimental type of treatment known as T-cell therapy aims to assist during this vulnerable period the months during which the body is rebuilding its natural defences. After two decades of clinical trials, the technology has been refined and is being used to treat more and more patients, many of them children.

A boy named Johan is one of them.

Today he is a mischievous, smiling toddler, with a thick shock of light-brown hair, who never tires, playfully tormenting the family's puppy, Henry.

There is no sign of the three-year-long medical and emotional roller coaster ride he and his family, who live in an affluent Washington suburb, have been on.

The first traumatic surprise came with the results of a pregnancy test Johan was not planned.

That was a huge shock. I cried, said his mother, 39-year-old Maren Chamorro.

Risky procedure

She had known since childhood that she carried a gene that can be fatal in a child's first 10 years, chronic granulomatous disease (CGD).

Her brother died of it at the age of seven. The inexorable laws of genetics meant that Maren had a one in four chance of transmitting it to her child.

For their first children, she and her husband Ricardo had chosen invitro fertilisation, allowing the embryos to be genetically tested before implantation.

Their twins Thomas and Joanna were born both disease-free seven and a half years ago.

But in Johan's case, a post-birth genetic test quickly confirmed the worst: He had CGD.

After conferring with experts at Children's National Hospital in Washington, the couple took one of the most important decisions of their lives, Johan would receive a bone marrow transplant a risky procedure but one that would give him a chance of a cure.

Obviously, the fact that Maren had lost a sibling at a young age from the disease played a big role, Ricardo confided.

Bone marrow, the spongy tissue inside bones, serves as the body's factory for the production of blood cells both red and white.

His brother's immune system

Johan's white blood cells were incapable of fighting off bacteria and fungal infections. A simple bacterial infection, of negligible concern in a healthy child, could spread out of control in his young body.

Luckily, Johan's brother Thomas, six years old at the time, was a perfect match. In April 2018, doctors first cleansed Johan's marrow using chemotherapy. They then took a small amount of marrow from Thomas's hip bones using a long, thin needle.

From that sample they extracted supercells, as Thomas calls them stem cells, which they reinjected into Johan's veins. Those cells would eventually settle in his bone marrow and begin producing normal white blood cells.

The second step was preventive cell therapy, under an experimental programme led by immunologist Michael Keller at Children's National Hospital.

The part of the immune system that protects against bacteria can be rebuilt in only a matter of weeks; but for viruses, the natural process takes at least three months.

Hurdles remain

From Thomas's blood, doctors extracted specialised white blood cells T-cells that had already encountered six viruses.

Keller grew them for 10 days in an incubator, creating an army of hundreds of millions of those specialised T-cells. The result: A fluffy white substance contained in a small glass vial.

Those T-cells were then injected into Johan's veins, immediately conferring protection against the six viruses.

He has his brother's immune system, said Keller, an assistant professor at Children's National.

Johan's mother confirmed as much: Today, when Thomas and Johan catch a cold they have the same symptoms, and for nearly the same amount of time.

I think it's pretty cool to have immunity from your big brother, Maren Chamorro said.

This therapeutic approach boosting the body's immune system using cells from a donor or one's own genetically modified cells is known as immunotherapy.

Its main use so far has been against cancer, but Keller hopes it will soon become available against viruses for patients, like Johan, who suffer from depressed immune systems.

The chief obstacles to that happening are the complexity of the process and the costs, which can run to many thousands of dollars. These factors currently restrict the procedure to some 30 medical centres in the United States.

For Johan, a year and a half after his bone marrow transplant, everything points to a complete success.

It's neat to see him processing things, and especially play outside in the mud, his mother said.

You know, what a gift!

Her only concern now is the same as any mother would have that when her son does fall ill, others in the family might catch the same bug.

Now you can read the Jamaica Observer ePaper anytime, anywhere. The Jamaica Observer ePaper is available to you at home or at work, and is the same edition as the printed copy available at http://bit.ly/epaperlive

Read the rest here:
The supercells' that cured an infants genetic illness - Jamaica Observer