Top Diet and Nutrition Issues to be Highlighted during Jan. 29 Media-only Event – Newswise

MEDIA CONTACT

Available for logged-in reporters only

Newswise Nebraska food scientists are at the forefront in some of the hottest food and nutrition issues in the country the microbiome, which some predict to be one of the top nutrition issues in 2020; obesity, which continues to be a major health issue for the nation; food allergens, with the CDC reporting rising prevalence of food alelrgies in children; and food choice behavior.

On Jan. 29, a dozen researchers and scientists will be at the Food Innovation Center (1901 N. 21stSt., Lincoln, Nebraska) at Nebraska Innovation Campus to discuss their groundbreaking work with the media. The event begins at 11 a.m. with a brief overview of each research program. After a provided box lunch, media in attendance will have six 15-minute sessions to interview researchers. At 2 p.m., optional laboratory tours will be available for photos and b-roll. The event will be live-streamed for media who cannot attend in person.

Participating laboratories:

Nebraska Food for Health Center,Andy Benson, director, professor of food science and technology; Amanda Ramer-Tait, associate professor of food science and technology; and Robert Hutkins, Khem Shahani Professor of Food Science and Technology. The center is located in the Food Innovation Center, 1901 N. 21stSt., on the Nebraska Innovation Campus of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.https://foodforhealth.unl.edu

Nebraska Center for Prevention of Obesity Diseases,Janos Zempleni, director, Cather Professor of Nutrition and Health Sciences; Jiujiu Yu, assistant professor of nutrition and health sciences; Xinghui Sun, assistant professor of biochemistry; Yongjun Wang, research assistant professor of nutrition and health sciences; Edward Harris, associate professor of biochemistry; Alice Ngu, graduate research assistant in nutrition and health sciences. The center is located at 316C Leverton Hall, 1700 N. 35thSt., on the University of Nebraska-Lincoln East Campus.https://cehs.unl.edu/npod

Food Allergy Research and Resource Program,Joseph Baumert, director, associate professor of food science and technology; Melanie Downs, assistant professor of food science and technology; Philip Johnson, assistant professor of food science and technology; and Richard E. Rick Goodman, research professor of food science and technology. The program is located in the Food Innovation Center, 1901 N. 21stSt. on the Nebraska Innovation Campus of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.https://farrp.unl.edu

Food Choice Economics,Christopher Gustafson, associate professor of agricultural economics, 314A Filley Hall, 1625 Arbor Drive on the University of Nebraska-Lincoln East Campus.

The Food for Health Center, a $40.3 million collaboration among academics, food and drug manufacturers and philanthropists, was established in 2017 to use microbiome research to link agriculture and food production to wellness and disease prevention.

Launched in 2014, the Nebraska Center for the Prevention of Obesity Diseases has received nearly $23 million from the National Institutes of Health to determine the molecular mechanisms that lead to obesity and to identify consumer friendly remedies.

For nearly 25 years, the Food Allergy Research and Resource Program has worked in partnership with the food industry to detect and eliminate allergens in the food supply.

Behavioral economist Christopher Gustafson is identifying the hidden factors that cause people to add an extra dollop of mayo to their sandwich or select an apple, not a brownie for a post-workout snack.

Please contact Leslie Reed at 402-472-2059 orlreed5@unl.eduto reserve your space, including lunch, parking and optional lab tours.

More:
Top Diet and Nutrition Issues to be Highlighted during Jan. 29 Media-only Event - Newswise

EXPLORER scanner captures real-time videos of blood flow and heart function – News-Medical.net

Positron Emission Tomography, or PET scanning, a technique for tracing metabolic processes in the body, has been widely applied in clinical diagnosis and research spanning physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology.

Now researchers at the University of California, Davis and Fudan University, Shanghai have shown how to use an advanced reconstruction method with an ultrasensitive total-body PET scanner to capture real-time videos of blood flow and heart function.

The work paves the way for looking at the function of multiple organs, such as the brain and heart, at the same time. The researchers published their findings Jan. 20 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The project makes use of the EXPLORER PET/CT total body scanner, originally developed by a team led by Professor Simon Cherry, UC Davis Department of Biomedical Engineering and Ramsey Badawi, professor of radiology in the UC Davis School of Medicine.

A commercial version named uEXPLORER is manufactured by United Imaging Healthcare of Shanghai, and an FDA-approved model is now in clinical use at UC Davis.

The breakthrough in this work is to capture the ultrafast whole-body dynamic tracer imaging with EXPLORER at the same time. We can see global changes with improved image quality at a timescale of 100 milliseconds, which was never seen before using any medical imaging modalities."

Jinyi Qi, professor of biomedical engineering, UC Davis

Qi and project scientist Xuezhu Zhang developed methods to reduce noise and reconstruct images from the raw data from EXPLORER scans of volunteers. They were able to see changes on a scale of 100 milliseconds, or one-tenth of a second and use these to create high quality real-time movies of the scans.

In a scan shown in the paper, a volunteer was injected in the lower leg with a short-lived radioactive tracer (PET scans work by following radioactive tracers in the body). The resulting video shows the tracer moving up the body to the heart, flowing through the right ventricle to the lungs, back through the left ventricle and on to the rest of the body.

"It's a combination of the scanner and advanced data reconstruction methods that makes this possible. This has applications in real-time tracking of blood flow over the human circulatory system, motion-frozen heart beating and breathing monitoring for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease and analysis of respiratory system function," Zhang said.

The video shows the motion of the heart with exceptional clarity. Changes in the cardiac contraction are well captured with clear delineation of the end-systolic and end-diastolic phases. While other techniques are available to measure heart function, EXPLORER's full-body scans provide opportunities for new studies that look at the dynamic function of multiple organs, such as the brain and heart, at the same time.

The scan shown in the paper was conducted at United Health Imaging and supervised by Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai. The researchers are continuing to collect images from volunteers at UC Davis.

Read the original post:
EXPLORER scanner captures real-time videos of blood flow and heart function - News-Medical.net

Postdoc Position, Department of Biology job with MASARYK UNIVERSITY | 193197 – Times Higher Education (THE)

POSTDOC POSITION in Characterization of factors involved in metabolism of stalled replication forks and their possible disease relevance

Department Department of BiologyFaculty of Medicine

Deadline 29 Feb 2020

Start date March/April 2020 or upon agreement but no later than by 30th November 2020

Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic invites excellent scientists to apply for POSTDOC POSITION in Characterization of factors involved in metabolism of stalled replication forks and their possible disease relevance

Description:

The integrity of DNA continually resists the presence of physical and chemical carcinogens in our environment. In addition to exogenous agents, DNA undergoes spontaneous decay, including replication errors, oxidative and other damages which arise from common metabolic processes. The repair of damaged DNA is vital for the maintenance of genome integrity, and as aresult, all organisms have evolved awide variety of DNA repair pathways that can restore DNA structure and its genetic information.

The main objective of our research is to decipher the intrinsic functions of homologous recombination (HR) which has adual role in the maintenance of genome stability. First, it promotes the faithful repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) belonging among of the most lethal forms of DNA damage. Moreover, HR is responsible for the creation of genetic variability during meiosis by directing the formation of reciprocal crossovers that result in random combinations of alleles and traits. Changes in the execution and regulation of recombination are linked to human infertility, miscarriage and genetic diseases, particularly cancer thus emphasizing the importance of better understanding the mechanism and regulation of this pathway.

To achieve our goals, we utilize awide range of different methods from biochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, structural biology, and biophysics that are well established in our lab. Since we believe that interdisciplinary approach is needed to fully understand the fundamental biological processes, we also collaborate with numerous specialists.

The successful candidate should:

Specific criteria can be filled, i.e.:

The application should include:

MU offers the opportunity to get:

Anticipated start date:The position is available from March/April 2020 or upon agreement but no later than by 30th November 2020.

The submission deadline is29th February 2020.

Please submit your application by e-mail tovrablikova@med.muni.cz

Areview of applications will commence immediately after the deadline. Short-listed candidates will be invited for interview within one month of the deadline.

Further information about:

prof. MUDr. Martin Repko, Ph.D.dkan

See the original post:
Postdoc Position, Department of Biology job with MASARYK UNIVERSITY | 193197 - Times Higher Education (THE)

UHS approves affiliation of 29 institutes – The News International

UHS approves affiliation of 29 institutes

LAHORE: The syndicate of University of Health Sciences (UHS) has approved the affiliation of 29 institutes for start of 56 new postgraduate and undergraduate programmes.

The 58th meeting of UHS Syndicate was held here on Monday with Vice Chancellor Prof Javed Akram in the chair. The other members who were present included Prof Talat Naseer Pasha, Prof Khawaja Sadiq Hussain, Prof Humaira Akram, Prof Nadia Naseem, Prof Nasir Shah, Dr Asad Zaheer and representatives of Punjab Specialized Healthcare and Medical Education (SHC&ME) and Finance departments.

The syndicate approved affiliation, extension in affiliation and enhancement of seats in various institutions after considering inspection reports of the affiliation committee. It approved Doctor of Medicine (MD) in the disciplines of psychiatry, radiology, gastroenterology, nephrology, cardiology, medicine, and paediatrics to be offered in different public sector institutions of the province.

Similarly, recommendations of the affiliation committee were approved for start of Master of Surgery (MS) in cardiac surgery, ophthalmology, neurosurgery, urology, and paediatric surgery.

The body also approved BSc programmes in the disciplines of nursing, Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT), medical laboratory technology, dental technology, dental hygiene, nutrition, cardiac perfusion, medical imaging technology, orthotics and prosthetics, optometry and Orthoptics, and audiology to be started in different public and private sector institutions of Punjab.

Moreover, approval was also granted for start of MPhil Biochemistry, MSc Nursing, Diploma in Anaesthesia, and Diploma in Child Health.

The syndicate also approved the recommendations of MD/MS/MDS Reforms Committee to conduct intermediate examination on completion of 18 months of training rather than 24 months.

The policy of negative marking was also abolished for both intermediate and abridged examination in all disciplines in Central Induction Policy (CIP) scheme of MD/MS/MDS programmes.

It was also decided that the candidates who would pass written component of an examination in MD/MS/MDS, but fail in clinical and oral component, would be allowed a maximum of three attempts to clear clinical and oral component of that examination, failing which they would have to take the entire examination, including written component, afresh.

The syndicate also endorsed the VCs proposal to invite online applications for grant of affiliation in future besides creation of a dedicated directorate of affiliation in the University to deal with matters related to affiliation.

The members also approved award of PhD degree to Dr Rabiea Munir in the subject of pharmacology.

Go here to see the original:
UHS approves affiliation of 29 institutes - The News International

Science Talk – Tell me more about telomeres: how ‘basic’ science can help us treat cancer – The Institute of Cancer Research

Image: Chromosomes and their telomeres (visualised in red). Credit: Thomas Ried, NCI Center for Cancer Research

You might not have heard of telomeres but theyre incredibly important they are the caps that protect the end of chromosomes. They work like the plastic tips that stop your shoelaces from fraying.

All cancers alter telomeres in order to survive, so by doing basic research to try to understand how telomere replication and processing works, Max and his team hope to identify possible new ways to target and treat cancer.

Having joined the Division of Cancer Biology in October 2019, Dr Max Douglasis now one of the newest Team Leaders at the ICR. I met him at our Chester Beatty Laboratories in Chelsea, where he told me more about his work.

Max studied for his PhD in biochemistry and cell biology at the University of Cambridge. He then joined Dr John Diffleys team in Londons Clare Hall Laboratories which later became part of the Francis Crick Institute where he focused on studying the early stages of DNA replication.

At the Crick, he helped establish in detail how a protein complex called the CMG replicative helicase that helps unwind DNA during replication, is assembled and activated.

Now at the ICR, Max leads his own research team studying DNA replication but in the context of telomeres and cancer.

My main project is to rebuild telomeres in the lab and then unpick how they work how they are replicated and how they are processed. This knowledge is generally useful, but we will focus on studying it in the context of cancer, explained Max.

Lets finish it:help us revolutionise cancer treatment. We aim to discover a new generation of cancer treatments so smart and targeted, that more patients will defeat their cancer and finish what they started.

Support our work

When a cell becomes cancerous, it divides more often and every time it divides, its telomeres become shorter and shorter. Once there is no telomere left, the DNA unravels, like a shoelace fraying, and the cell dies. This eventually happens in most healthy cells telomeres shorten over time until cell division is no longer possible, leading to cell death.

While this loss of telomere protection can cause cancer cells and healthy cells to die, it can also lead to a state of genome instability that helps cancer survive and spread.

We also know that cancer cells can escape death by making telomerase, an enzyme that prevents telomeres from getting short. Certain cells in our body, such as stem cells, are able to divide over and over again thanks to telomerase. Cancer cells take advantage of this enzyme and hijack it to maintain telomere length which enables them to continue to divide and spread.

In other words, telomeres seem to play a role in the death of cancer cells but theyre also crucial for their survival. However, the molecular steps that guide telomere replication and processing remain poorly understood.

By using genetics and replicating cellular processes in a test tube, through a technique known as reconstitution biochemistry, Max and his team hope to better understand how telomeres are processed, and how they are inherited from one generation of cells to the next.

If Max and his team can dissect how telomeres work and clarify their link to cancer, maybe well figure out new ways to treat it.

His research might seem quite distant from the clinic, but Max knows he belongs at the ICR, which has an exemplary track record in making discoveries that ultimately benefit people with cancer.

I really value the ICRs commitment to doing basic, laboratory science. Good basic science is necessary to understand cancer, and the ICR values that. Here, I can figure out how to use my findings to benefit people, and that, in turn, will also hugely benefit my work, Max said.

I feel very lucky to work at an institution with a mission, being able to do what I love while getting opportunities to make discoveries that could help people.

As a new Team Leader, Max is currently the only member of his team but a higher scientific officer will be joining this month, as well as a post-doctoral training fellow, who will be joining in March. They will also start recruiting for a PhD student. As he told me, he cant wait for the new team members to join him in January.

Im excited to supervise other people for the first time. I want to build a strong team and a good environment for them to thrive in.

Read more here:
Science Talk - Tell me more about telomeres: how 'basic' science can help us treat cancer - The Institute of Cancer Research

Understanding Human Behavior – A Physiological Approach …

As fantastically (and fanatically) self-aware organisms, we humans tend to ascribe great importance to our intellectual processes: Were rational and reasoning creatures, we assert, capable of stepping back and assessing our own behavior through an analytical lens.

Like any other biological entity, however, were interacting with and responding to our environment in myriad ways well beyond the realm of our conscious perception. We usually take these subconscious, autonomic aspects of our being for granted, but naturally, theyre fundamental to both our appreciation of the world around us and, critically, our day-to-day survival.

We dont need to compel ourselves to shiver when the mercury drops; our hand recoils at the lick of the flame or the bite of the dog. Thankfully, we dont have to think our way through the mechanics of walking in order to pull it off start trying to, and youre liable to beeline for the pavement.

The conscious and the nonconscious, the voluntary and the involuntary: When it comes to Homo sapiens, these processes arent either-or propositions. Theyre thoroughly intertwined, influencing and echoing one another. In short, human beings (breaking news) are complicated systems, and the study of human behavior a complex task. Parsing out behavioral and emotional nuances requires zoomed-in looks at the tempos and intensities of all kinds of physical and psychological networks and a holistic, big-picture perspective of how those networks interface with one another.

Researchers interested in how humans respond to stimuli, therefore whether its an Internet ad or an interpersonal encounter can enhance their investigations by employing biosensors that document psychophysiological patterns.

Self-assessment/ self-reporting remains a powerful and useful tool for understanding the how and the why of human behavior but has some major limitations.

People arent always entirely honest when describing how something makes them feel not necessarily because theyre trying to be duplicitous or crafty, but because they may feel pressured by the formal self-critical exercise to give what they think is the right answer (or the least embarrassing one).

Furthermore, its often exceedingly difficult to explain in coherent sentences our response to a piece of information, or our mood at a given moment. We may not know exactly why we favor one product over another, or why were feeling generally joyful or generally depressed (there are many techniques for honing a surveys efficacy you can learn more in one of ourblog posts).

Meanwhile, physiological data such as the rate of our heartbeat, the degree of our perspiration, and the direction and rhythm of our eye movements can shed light on behavioral phenomena our conscious minds may deny, distort, or completelyfail to register.

The academic and commercial applications of the psychophysiological studies considering such data are virtually limitless, relevant tofields as diverse as neuroscience, psychotherapy, marketing, and design.

Whats remarkable about such studies are the incredibly fine-scale insights into the human emotion that can be gleaned from the minute subconscious or involuntary phenomena.

Consider galvanic skin response or GSR. This is a measure of electrodermal activity: the relative conductance of our skin from perspiration. Sweating is an utterly autonomic operation that, in addition to its role in thermoregulation, is a reaction to arousal, from general excitement to flat-out terror. By measuring sweat production via skin conductance, GSR can reveal evidence for a stimulated, agitated state of being thats beyond a persons deliberate control including arousal too subtle to manifest on the self-aware spectrum.

Electrocardiography (ECG) registers the electrical signature of a heartbeat, revealing intricacies of their rate and variability that, like GSR, can demonstrate physiological, emotional, or psychological arousal.

Then theres electroencephalography (EEG), which tracks brainwaves via scalp-affixed electrodes that measure the electrical pulses produced by mass neuron firings. An EEG readout indicates the moment-by-moment geography of brain activity which cortex is excited when, basically as well as the brains overall state at a given time.

Eye tracking, meanwhile, quantifies when and where a subjects gaze lingers, the rhythm of reading, and other optical minutiae, while facial expression analysis looks up-close at the configuration of the faces musculature for clues to a persons emotions.

The information outputted by a single kind of biosensor can be intriguing and useful, but only to a point. For instance, GSR and ECG readings can suggest the condition of arousal, but not its valence, or emotional character. In other words, sweaty palms or a ramped-up heartbeat doesnt reveal whether were dealing with a love-at-first-sight (i.e., a positive stimulus) sort of situation or a figure-looming-out-of-the-shadows (i.e., a negative stimulus) deal.

Integrate those electrodermal and cardiac data with EEG, facial expression analysis, eye tracking, and other analyses, and youve got a much more multifaceted picture. Thats what iMotions is all about.

As we noted earlier, psychophysiological investigations have wide-ranging utility whether its a company trying to gauge the appeal of a new product design to a prospective shopper, or its a therapist treating a patient with post-traumatic stress disorder.

As research into human behavior continues to expand in concert with improvements in the technology and methodology for implementing that research it goes without saying that its applications will as well.

Read more:
Understanding Human Behavior - A Physiological Approach ...

Understanding the 10 Most Destructive Human Behaviors …

Why we do stupid stuff

Compared with most animals, we humans engage in a host of behaviors that are destructive to our own kind and to ourselves. We lie, cheat and steal, carve ornamentations into our own bodies, stress out and kill ourselves, and of course kill others. Science has provided much insight into why an intelligent species seems so nasty, spiteful, self-destructive and hurtful. Inside you'll learn what researchers know about some of our most destructive behaviors.

Editor's Note: This list was first published in 2011 and was updated in March 2016 to include the latest studies and new information.

Nobody knows for sure why humans lie so much, but studies find that it's common, and that it's often tied to deep psychological factors.

"It's tied in with self-esteem," says University of Massachusetts psychologist Robert Feldman. "We find that as soon as people feel that their self-esteem is threatened, they immediately begin to lie at higher levels."

Feldman has conducted studies in which people lie frequently, with 60 percent lying at least once during a 10-minute conversation.

And lying is not easy. One study concluded that lying takes 30 percent longer than telling the truth.

Recent studies have found that people lie in workplace e-mail more than they did with old-fashioned writing.

It's a whole other matter whether people really mean to lie in many instances. Figuring that out requires coming up with a complicated definition of lying.

"Certain conditions have to be in place for a statement to rise to the level of a lie," explains philosophy professor James E. Mahon of Washington and Lee University. "First, a person must make a statement and must believe that the statement is false. Second, the person making the statement must intend for the audience to believe that the statement is true. Anything else falls outside the definition of lying that I have defended."

However, a study in 2014 found that white lies, for the right reasons, can can strengthen relationships

Animals are also known to be capable of deception, and even robots have learned to lie, in an experiment where they were rewarded or punished depending on performance in a competition with other robots.

Scroll up to click to the next item: Violence

The oldest evidence of human warfare dates back 10,000 years ago. Skeletons of 27 people show signs of projectile wounds and blunt force trauma. And so it has been ever since.

Some researchers figure we crave violence, that it's in our genes and affects reward centers in our brains. However, going back millions of years, evidence suggests our ancient human ancestors were more peace-loving than people today, though there are signs of cannibalism among the earliest pre-history humans.

A study in 2008 concluded that humans seem to crave violence just like they do sex, food, or drugs. The study, reported in the journal Psychopharmacology, found that in mice, clusters of brain cells involved in other rewards are also behind their craving for violence. The researchers think the finding applies to human brains.

"Aggression occurs among virtually all vertebrates and is necessary to get and keep important resources such as mates, territory and food," said study team member Craig Kennedy, professor of special education and pediatrics at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee. "We have found that the reward pathway in the brain becomes engaged in response to an aggressive event and that dopamine is involved."

Many researchers believe violence in humans is an evolved tendency that helped with survival.

"Aggressive behavior has evolved in species in which it increases an individual's survival or reproduction, and this depends on the specific environmental, social, reproductive, and historical circumstances of a species. Humans certainly rank among the most violent of species," says biologist David Carrier of the University of Utah.

Scroll up to click to the next item: Stealing

Theft can be motivated by need. But for kleptomaniacs, stealing can be motivated by the sheer thrill of it. One study of 43,000 people found 11 percent admitted to having shoplifted at least once.

"These are people who steal even though they can easily afford not to," says Jon E. Grant of the University of Minnesota School of Medicine.

In a study in 2009, participants either took a placebo or the drug naltrexone known to curb addictive tendencies toward alcohol, drugs and gambling. Naltrexone blocks the effects of substances called endogenous opiates that the researchers suspect are released during stealing and which trigger the sense of pleasure in the brain.

The drug reduced the urges to steal and stealing behavior, Grant and colleagues wrote in the journal Biological Psychiatry.

Theft may be in our genes. After all, even monkeys do it. Capuchin monkeys use predator alarm calls to warn fellow monkeys to scatter and avoid threats. But some will make fake calls, and then steal food left by those that scattered.

Scroll up to click to the next item: Cheating

Few human traits are more fascinating. While most people would say honesty is a virtue, nearly one in five Americans think cheating on taxes is morally acceptable or is not a moral issue, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center. About 10 percent are equally ambivalent about cheating on a spouse.

People who espouse high moral standards are among the worst cheats, studies have shown. The worst cheaters tend to be those with high morals who also, in some twisted way, consider cheating to be an ethically justifiable behavior in certain situations.

Cheating on spouses by celebrities and politicians thought to be moral leaders has become rampant. The behavior has a simple explanation, experts say: Guys are wired to want sex, a lot, and are more likely than gals to cheat. The behavior may be particularly likely for men with power.

"People don't necessarily practice what they preach," says Lawrence Josephs, a clinical psychologist at Adelphi University in New York. "It's not clear to what extent people's ethical values are actually running what they do or don't do."

Experts say there are two main reasons people cheat on their spouses: Either they bored with their sex life or they are unhappy with their relationship. A 2015 study found that a person who is economically dependent on their spouse is more likely to cheat than those in a financially equitable relationship.

Scroll up to click to the next item: Clinging to bad habits

Perhaps everything else on this list would be far less problematic if we were not such creatures of habit. In fact, studies have found that even when the risks of a particular bad habit are well-known, people find it hard to quit.

"It's not because they haven't gotten the information that these are big risks," says Cindy Jardine of the University of Alberta. "We tend to sort of live for now and into the limited future not the long term."

Jardine, who has studied why people cling to bad habits, cites these reasons: innate human defiance, need for social acceptance, inability to truly understand the nature of risk, individualistic view of the world and the ability to rationalize unhealthy habits, and a genetic predisposition to addiction.

People tend to justify bad habits, she says, by noting exceptions to known statistics, such as: "It hasn't hurt me yet," or, "My grandmother smoked all her life and lived to be 90."

Scroll up to click to the next item: Bullying

Bullying in childhood can leave worse mental scars than child abuse, and being bullied as a teen doubles the risk of depression as an adult, according to two separate studies in 2015.

Studies have found that half or more of grade-school children experience bullying. A European study found that children who bully at school are likely to also bully their siblings at home. That led a researcher involved in the study to speculate that bullying behavior often starts at home.

"It is not possible to tell from our study which behavior comes first, but it is likely that if children behave in a certain way at home, bullying a sibling for instance, if this behavior goes unchecked they may take this behavior into school," said Ersilia Menesini of the Universita degli Studi di Firenze, Italy.

But bullying is not just child's play. One study found that almost 30 percent of U.S. office workers experience bullying by bosses or coworkers, from withholding of information critical to getting the job done to insulting rumors and other purposeful humiliation. And once it starts, it tends to get worse.

"Bullying, by definition, is escalatory. This is one of the reasons its so difficult to prevent it, because it usually starts in really small ways, says Sarah Tracy, director of the Project for Wellness and Work-Life at Arizona State University.

Experts say to combat workplace bullies, respond rationally, specifically, and consistently.

Why do we do it? To gain status and power, psychologists say. And for some, it may be hard to resist the behavior. Researchers have seen bullying behavior in monkeys and speculate that the behavior may stretch way back in our evolutionary tree.

Scroll up to click to the next item: Nipping, tucking and plumping

Americans spent a record $13.5 billion on surgical and nonsurgical "aesthetic procedures" in 2014, the latest year for which data is available. Some 17 percent of U.S. residents now get cosmetic procedures, the industry estimates. Some would call it self-edification, of course, or art, or a way to kill time or perhaps rebel against authority. But in general, and given that people have died from cosmetic surgery procedures, what makes so many people so intent on artificially remaking themselves?

First, it's worth noting that while options at the body shop have never been more varied, the practice is ancient, often tied to cults and religions or power and status, and in fact much of the modern nip, tuck, paint, poke and plump procedures are benign compared with some ancient practices. People have reshaped their heads, elongated their necks, stretched their ears and lips, painted their bodies or affixed permanent jewelry for thousands of years.

Perhaps the strongest motivations nowadays are to be beautiful, however one might define that, or simply to fit in with a particular group.

The lure of beauty can't be denied as a prime motivator to nip and tuck. Studies have shown that shoppers buy more from attractive salespeople; attractive people capture our attention more quickly than others; and skinny people have an easier time getting hired and promoted.

"There's this idea that if you look better you'll be happier. You'll feel better about yourself," says psychologist Diana Zuckerman, president of the National Research Center for Women & Families. "And logically that makes so much sense, because we live in a society where people do care what you look like."

A sign of the times, as Baby Boomer age: While cosmetic surgery sales sagged during the Great Recession a few years back, wrinkle-blasting laser treatments skyrocketed. In 2015, the industry said cosmetic procedures for men were up 43 percent over the past 5 years.

Scroll up to click to the next item: Stress!

Stress can be deadly, raising the risk for heart problems and even cancer. Stress can lead to depression, which can lead to suicide yet another destructive behavior that's uniquely human (and glaringly not on this list).

But exactly why we stress is difficult to pin down. These truths will resonate with many, however: The modern workplace is a source of significant stress for many people, as are children.

More than 600 million people around the world put in 48-hour-plus workweeks, according to the International Labor Organization. And advances in technology smartphones and broadband Internet mean a blurring of the lines between work and free time. About half of Americans bring work home, according to a recent study.

The stress of being a parent while also working is borne out by a 2007 study that found older people feel less stress. However, research in 2015 found high-stress jobs raise the risk of stroke, and stress can increase the risk of memory problems in older people.

"Many older workers are empty-nesters," says researcher Gwenith Fisher, an organizational psychologist at the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research (ISR). "They don't have the same work-personal conflicts that younger and middle-aged workers deal with, juggling responsibilities to children along with their jobs and their personal needs."

Health experts suggest exercise and adequate sleep are two of the best ways to battle stress. [More Tips]

Scroll up to click to the next item: Gambling

Gambling, too, seems to be in our genes and hard-wired into our brains, which might explain why such a potentially ruinous behavior is so common.

Even monkeys gamble. A study that measured monkeys' desire to gamble for juice rewards found that even as potential rewards diminished, the primates acted irrationally and gambled for the chance to get a wee bit more.

A study published in the journal Neuron last year found that almost winning activates win-related circuitry within the brain and enhances the motivation to gamble. "Gamblers often interpret near-misses as special events, which encourage them to continue to gamble," said Luke Clark of the University of Cambridge. "Our findings show that the brain responds to near-misses as if a win has been delivered, even though the result is technically a loss."

Other studies have also shown that losing causes gamblers to get carried away. When people plan in advance how much to gamble, they're coldly rational, a study last year found. But if they lose, rationality goes out the window, and they change the game plan and bet even more.

Scroll up to click to the last item: Gossiping

Gossiping is a social skill, not a character flaw, argues psychology researcher Frank T. McAndrew at Knox College in a 2016 op-ed article.

We humans are evolutionarily set up to judge and talk about others, no matter how hurtful it might be, researchers say. Here's how Oxford primatologist Robin Dunbar sees it: Baboons groom each other to keep social ties strong. But we humans are more evolved, so we use gossip as social glue. Both are learned behaviors.

Gossip establishes group boundaries and boosts self-esteem, studies have found.

In many instances, the goal of gossip is not truth or accuracy. What matters is the bond that gossiping can forge, often at the expense of a third party.

People are mostly likely to spread a story if it's about someone familiar to them, and if the story is particularly "juicy," according to a 2014 study. "When two people share a dislike of another person, it [gossip] brings them closer," says Jennifer Bosson, a professor of psychology at the University of South Florida.

See the rest here:
Understanding the 10 Most Destructive Human Behaviors ...

What is Classical Conditioning, and How Does it Impact Psychology – The Good Men Project

Classical conditioning is a type of learning where a conditioned stimulus is associated with a particular unconditioned stimulus to produce a response. The response is a behavior in reaction to the stimulus. The conditioned response is something that the participant learns. Ivan Pavlov, a renowned physiologist, did many experiments with animal and human behavior, and coined the term classical conditioning. He made the participants elicit a response in various studies. Pavlov had a famous study where he researched the behavior of dogs and how he could condition them to salivate upon hearing a sound. He would make a sound, and the dogs would respond by drooling. Even if there was no food involved, just by making the sound, the dogs associated the sound with the food, and so they began to salivate. He developed multiple experiments to prove his theory that classical conditioning could produce behavioral responses.

The conditioning is successful when the affiliation has been made between stimuli and a response that wasnt affiliated, to begin with. In the case of Pavlovs dogs, this was the bell and the salivation.

Think about how responses to stimuli occur in our brains. For example, when a dog sees food, several senses are involved, their vision and smell, that are sending information to their brains and different neural pathways that cause them to salivate. Our conditioning is displayed in a variety of ways. For example, if we have a bad experience every day at school, well begin to affiliate school with bad experiences and might start to fear to go to school. We can also purposefully condition ourselves, which would relate to conditioned stimulus and conditioned responses rather than unconditioned stimulus and responses. An example of this is if we give ourselves a reward for completing a task. For example, if we allow ourselves to watch television after completing homework, well start to look forward to finishing our homework because it means that we now get to watch the television show that we were looking forward to.

After Pavlovs famous experiment with dogs, there have been many more research studies conducted that show that classical conditioning works with humans. In the study of Little Albert, which was conducted by John B. Watson, a hammer would bang every time a boy interacted with a rat. The hammer taught him to be afraid of rats, whereas prior to the experiment, the young child was not at all afraid of animals. This experiment is one of the many pieces of proof which taught us that classical conditioning can be used on both animals and humans. With this knowledge, weve been able to make strides in the world of both psychology and education.

Human behavior is complex and multi-faceted. Sometimes, we dont understand why we do the things that we do, or we want to change our behavior, which is why therapy can be so helpful. Its essential to learn about yourself so that you can foster healthy relationships. A therapist can support you in understanding your behavior and make changes if needed. You can work with an online therapist or someone in your local area and work on your mental health.

Stock photo ID:528903494

Link:
What is Classical Conditioning, and How Does it Impact Psychology - The Good Men Project

Column: Two views on the state’s poverty rate – Hickory Daily Record

Garbage in, garbage out. This rule of thumb applies to every field of human behavior very much including politics. For example, our political conversation about poverty is based on a fact that most political actors think is true but really isnt: that a persistently high share of the population lives in poverty.

Progressives who believe it contend that federal, state and local governments spend too little tax money combating poverty. Conservatives who believe it contend that governments have wasted gobs of tax money combating poverty with little to show for it. While the two groups draw different conclusions, they are assuming the same fact to be true.

Theyre mistaken. When you see an apocalyptic news report about our high poverty rate, you should discount it. This statistic is fundamentally flawed and routinely misinterpreted.

There are, of course, desperately poor people in North Carolina and the rest of America. There are hungry people. There are abused and neglected children, with addicted or absent parents, for whom academic achievement and life prospects are severely impaired. As fellow human beings, we should care about their plight and offer our time, efforts and resources to assist them. Our government should also expend our tax dollars on temporary assistance for jobless adults and their dependents, education and other interventions for disadvantaged children, and long-term assistance for those with severe disabilities.

Still, no good policy ideas can come from believing there are massive numbers of people who, even after taking such assistance into account, continue to live below the poverty line.

The official poverty measure leaves out free health care, free housing, free food, and other public assistance other than cash. It relies on data from income-tax returns and thus leaves out lots of off-the-books income. For poverty rates over time, government statisticians significantly overstate the effects of inflation. For these and other reasons, the official poverty rate is at best a measure of the extent of government dependency among low-income families, not the extent of material deprivation.

How big is the mismeasurement? Consider the most recent analysis from Bruce Meyer at the University of Chicago and James Sullivan at the University of Notre Dame. For years, Meyer and Sullivan have calculated a measure of consumption poverty based on what low-income households consume rather than the income they report to the IRS.

According to the standard poverty measure, the rate of American households in poverty was 13 percent in 1980. In 2018, it was 11.8 percent. Hardly an impressive improvement.

But watch what happens when Meyer and Sullivan used a more realistic inflation adjustment and include all forms of income consumed by households: the true poverty rate drops from 13 percent in 1980 to 3.3 percent in 2018.

Want to go further back in time? The official poverty rate was 19.5 percent in the early 1960s. By 2018, it had fallen 7.7 points to 11.8 percent. But measured properly, the decline in poverty was far larger roughly 25 percentage points!

I know thats a lot of numbers to digest. The policy nutrition is worth it, though.

When conservatives suggest that throwing tax money at poor people doesnt make any difference because they will still remain poor, conservatives are drawing the wrong conclusion from the wrong data. Government threw lots of tax money at the War on Poverty. The poverty rate declined dramatically. (Wiser conservatives point out that dependency didnt decline and single parenthood rose.)

As for progressives, while they might cheer the effects of government redistribution on an accurately measured poverty rate, they will find it hard to admit that the current poverty rate is in the low single digits, including for children (3.7 percent). A comprehensive and honest look at child poverty, observes American Enterprise Institute scholar Angela Rachidi, shows that American children are doing better than ever.

That doesnt mean there arent problems left to address. But how can we chart the right course for the future if we lack a clear picture of the past and present?

John Hood (@JohnHoodNC) is chairman of the John Locke Foundation and appears on NC SPIN, broadcast statewide Fridays at 7:30 p.m. and Sundays at 12:30 p.m. on UNC-TV.

See more here:
Column: Two views on the state's poverty rate - Hickory Daily Record

HBO’s ‘Avenue 5’ Is the First Great Comedy of the 2020s and a ‘Crushing Existential Nightmare’ – The Daily Beast

While researching their new HBO series Avenue 5, which takes place on a space cruise ship 40 years in the future, Armando Iannucci (creator of Veep and The Thick of It) and Hugh Laurie (the actor best known for House) spent time with the people from Virgin Galactic, SpaceX, and the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

Scientists explained to them, with a casual, almost unsettling seriousness, that when planning a long-distance journey, like to Mars, for example, it is of the utmost importance that astronauts continue to produce fecal matter, as one of the best ways to protect from radiation poisoning while in outer space is to pack the walls of a spacecraft with human waste.

Iannucci and Laurie, two men hoping to create a comedy series at least somewhat rooted in fact, looked at each other with glee. Actual space science was serving them comedy on a silver platter.

The Daily Beasts Obsessed

Everything we cant stop loving, hating, and thinking about this week in pop culture.

We sort of looked at each other and I said, Wouldnt it be funny if there was a puncture? Iannucci recalls. You know, because not only is there the comedy of just seeing a stream of shit flying out of the ship, but also the real danger that youre going to die of space cancer if somebody doesnt go out and sort that out. Sort out the gushing pipeline of human waste. That science requires for actual space travel. Poop in space.

Avenue 5, which debuts Sunday on HBO, takes place on a massive spacecraft making its eight-week maiden cruise around Saturn, on which passengers can swan around in kaftans, take yoga classes, and luxuriate in spas while participating in a revolutionary mission through the solar system. Yes, after all the fetishizing about the future of space travel and the glamour that may come from the possibilities technology may provide, in the end were just going to use it to push off a shitty cruise in space.

When a gravitational hiccup violently sends everyone careening to one end of the ship, the Avenue 5 is knocked off its orbit. The eight-week cruise is now on track to last three and a half years. If youve ever seen how entitled travelers react when things beyond their control go wrong during their trips, imagine how that mindset presents itself with four more decades of narcissistic incubation and the stakes being an additional two years and eight months spent 1.02 billion miles from earth.

Laurie stars as the ships fearless captain, who turns out not to be a captain at all, but an actor meant to keep up appearances. Josh Gad is an Elizabeth Holmes, Billy McFarland-esque tech grifter whose company owns the ship. Zach Woods is a hapless customer service rep with no tact, while Suky Nakamura, Nikki Amuka-Bird, and Lenora Crichlow all play the adults in the roomthe people with the smarts to actually stave off certain disaster, mutiny, or both.

Meanwhile on the passenger side, theres a couple (Jessica St. Clair and Kyle Bornheimer) who thought a little cruise adventure might save their marriage, only now to be trapped stewing in their toxicity for what may be years. Appointing herself as a de facto voice of the aggrieved is the futures version of the Id like to speak to the manager woman, played by Rebecca Front. Her name is, of course, Karen.

(Iannucci explodes with laughter upon learning about the Karen meme. He had no idea when he named the character. There must be some collective subconscious at work.)

For fans of Veep or The Thick of It, it might be surprising, and maybe even confusing, to learn that the man responsible for some of the greatest political insights, satirizations, and deconstructions in modern television is making what seems to be a sci-fi comedy. I dont call it sci-fi, Iannucci grins. I call it a crushing existential nightmare. But with a light touch!

You quickly learn that this sci-fi comedy/crushing existential nightmare has much to say about our current state of affairs as a society on the brink of a collective panic attack.

Not only is there the comedy of just seeing a stream of shit flying out of the ship, but also the real danger that youre going to die of space cancer if somebody doesnt go out and sort that out.

Armando Ianucci

I wouldnt claim that Avenue 5 has reduced the entire human condition to a single half-hour comedy, because you wouldnt believe that if I said it, Laurie says, flashing a wry grin. But what it has in common with Veep and The Thick of It is seeing how structures survive and what people are prepared to do to make it through the day when theyre under pressure.

The subject matter may be different from those political comedies. But its still one gigantic Stanford prison experiment, Laurie continues. Iannucci is professor Philip Zimbardo in the metaphor, the man who investigated the psychological effects of perceived power by focusing in on prisoners and prison officers.

He relishes putting people in stressful, compressed situations and seeing how will they survive, how will they struggle, who will go up, who will go down, how will they compete and make alliances with each other, and how long will the structure last before everything just gets ripped to pieces.

On the one hand, there is the threat of utter doom and destruction as the change in course could have fatal consequences, a danger that is met in the ships executive suites with concern for shareholders more than for the affected travelers. On the other hand, in the face of life-changing circumstances, customers are still bitching about towel service and the restaurant being out of tiramisutogether, dual indictments of corporate cynicism in tandem with our vapid human instinct.

Our anxieties seem to operate simultaneously on so many different levels, Laurie says. We have the why are we here, what happens after we die? kind of questions. And we also have why are the nuts so salty? questions.

Its as much a coping mechanism as anything else, Iannucci ventures. He remembers when he was working on his film The Death of Stalin, a historical comedy chronicling the power struggle following the death of Joseph Stalin, being struck by the reality that, facing the bleakest possibilities, people still find ways to get through the day. How the hell else would they get through the years?

It was a low-level fear under Stalin, he says. You couldnt be hyper, like, Im going to get shot at any minute, because you wouldnt last. So you had to just get through the day thinking, I might be shot today. I dont know. But Ive got to do the shopping.

Dark? Yes. Nihilistic. Of course. This is the man who brought you Veep, after all. Accurate to human behavior? Irrefutably.

At the same time, Laurie is quick to qualify, one of the things that I think gives the show a sort of merry kind of optimism is that it at least postulates a future.

He thinks about films like Blade Runner and its copycats, where things were so dystopian that audiences were left wondering if there would be a future at all.

We may be starting to feel that now, he continues. You look at the footage of Australia on fire, and you wonder whether were going to be around [until the time Avenue 5 takes place]. This at least postulates the idea that were actually going to exist. The space cruise awaits.

See more here:
HBO's 'Avenue 5' Is the First Great Comedy of the 2020s and a 'Crushing Existential Nightmare' - The Daily Beast