War on alcohol: An experiment that was a ‘catastrophic failure’ – TribLIVE

The United States was a battleground before World War I with armies of people opposed to liquor and saloons lobbying politicians and marching on Washington, D.C., in their mission to outlaw what they considered a scourge on nations morality alcohol.

Prohibition had been a long time in coming, dating back to colonial times and the early 19th century, when opponents were concerned that husbands spending hard-earned money on liquor could lead to family poverty and domestic violence, said Jeanine Mazak-Kahne, who teaches American history at Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

A whole lot of people believe it (alcohol) destroys families, Mazak-Kahne said.

The Anti-Saloon League and Womens Christian Temperance Union, with the enthusiastic backing from Protestant evangelicals mixed in with a dose of anti-Catholic sentiment, gained more influence in the early 1900s. This highlighted the natural tension between the rural white Protestants and the diverse urban population, Mazak-Kahne said.

They saw it as a womens issue. This is one of the key movements to improve family life, said Laura Tuennerman, a California University of Pennsylvania history professor.

As women fought the right to vote, these groups convinced male legislators to pass various anti-liquor laws in 12 states by 1914.

They thought they could fix the problem (of drinking) with a law. They saw a need to clean up society, Tuennerman said. Some pushing Prohibition had a religious fervor and anti-immigrant bent, feeling it was those rapid waves of immigrants flooding the country from Eastern and Southern Europe who brought with them a propensity for drinking and needed to be controlled, Tuennerman said.

They also won the support of powerful industrialists wanting no part of a less-productive, hungover workforce on Blue Monday, Mazak-Kahne said.

The opposition to alcohol created unusual political alliances, no stranger than the strong support they received from the Ku Klux Klan, said Mazak-Kahne. The Klan, which hated African-Americans, Catholics and Jews, was a willing partner in the anti-alcohol movement, yet also backed the Suffragette movement to give women the right to vote, she noted. Women finally gained the right to vote with the passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920.

By the time America entered the war in Europe in April 1917, 26 of the countrys 48 states banned the sale of alcohol, spurred on no doubt by the need to feed the troops with the grain that had been devoted to making all that alcohol.

By December 1917, the 18th Amendment was submitted to the states and ratified by January 1919. The amendment lacked the measures to enforce the restrictions, which was remedied with the passage of the Volstead Act, giving the feds the authority to arrest violators. Congress passed it over President Woodrow Wilsons veto.

The call for repealing the 18th Amendment began as early as 1923 and gained more traction in 1925, as criminals rose to fill the void left by banning alcohol, Mazak-Kahne said. Preventing the production of illegal alcohol, and bootleggers bringing it in across the Canadian border, was near impossible.

With three Republican presidents in the 1920s Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover and the Republican Party toeing the Prohibition line, the repeal movement could not gain traction.

It took the election of President Franklin Roosevelt to break the deadlock over Prohibition. By the 1930s, even womens groups were pushing for the end of Prohibition, Mazak-Kahne said.

Within a few weeks of FDRs March inauguration, the Democrats pushed through Congress the Beer and Wine Revenue Act, levying a federal tax on the sale of beer with 3.2% alcohol content and wine, thus permitting the first legal sale of alcohol. It raised revenue for the cash-starved federal government struggling through the Great Depression.

In a sense, Prohibition worked because it reduced alcohol consumption, but it did not end alcohol consumption. Nothing really changes human behavior, said Tuennerman, the California University of Pennsylvania professor.

That modification of the Volstead Act cleared the path for passage of the 21st Amendment, which repealed the 18th Amendment.

Americas experiment to control peoples behavior in terms of drinking was a catastrophic failure, Tuennerman said. Most Americans broke the law. Its the law that made the average American a criminal. Everybody drank a little.

Prohibition proved, Mazak-Kahne said, you cant legislate morality. It never really works.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [emailprotected] or via Twitter .

Prohibition TimelineCalls to ban the production and sale of alcohol in the U.S. started nearly a century before Prohibition, with the creation of temperance societies and growing support of the abstinence movement. Here are some key dates in the push for Prohibition and its eventual repeal:1826: American Society for the Promotion of Temperance formed in Boston.1836: American Temperance Union forms through merger of two national groups.1851: Maine becomes first state to prohibit manufacturing and sale of alcohol. (Repealed five years later.)1873: World's Woman's Christian Temperance Union formed in Hillsboro, Ohio.1893: Anti-Saloon League founded in Oberlin, Ohio, then organized as a national society in 1895.1913: Women's Christian Temperance Union and Anti-Saloon League march on Washington to demand a Prohibition constitutional amendment.May 9, 1917: Rotary Club of Pittsburgh calls for a temporary prohibition of alcohol during World War I as a means of preserving wheat, corn, rye and barley used by distillers and brewers for the war effort.Dec. 18, 1917: Congress passes the 18th Amendment, which would restrict the manufacture and sale of alcohol.Jan. 16, 1919: 18th Amendment is ratified when Nebraska becomes 36th state to bar the "manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes." 46 of 48 states eventually support prohibition, with Connecticut and Rhode Island as the only holdouts. (Alaska and Hawaii were not yet states.)June 30, 1919: Wartime Prohibition Act took effect, restricting the sale of beverages containing more than 2.75% alcohol.July 1, 1919: Commonly referred to at the time as June "Thirsty-First" the first day after wartime prohibition started.Oct. 28, 1919: Congress overrode President Woodrow Wilson's veto of the Volstead Act, which made it illegal to manufacture beverages with more than a half percent of alcohol and provided enforcement of the 18th Amendment. It was named for Andrew Volstead, a Minnesota Republican who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and introduced the bill.Jan. 17, 1920: The United States goes dry.Dec. 5, 1933: 21st Amendment repealing Prohibition is ratified, followed by announcement from President Franklin D. Roosevelt.Sources: Library of Congress, National Archives, National Constitution Center, Tribune-Review research

TribLIVE's Daily and Weekly email newsletters deliver the news you want and information you need, right to your inbox.

More Westmoreland Stories

Read more:
War on alcohol: An experiment that was a 'catastrophic failure' - TribLIVE

Scientists find immune cells that fight tumours from within – The Straits Times

TOKYO Lurking deep inside some tumours are "factories" full of immune cells that help the body fight a rearguard action against cancer and are key to helping some patients recover, new research has shown.

In recent years, doctors have turned to a new treatment for cancer - immunotherapy - that works by leveraging the body's immune system to fight tumours.

The technique has largely focused on white blood cells called T-cells, which are "trained" to recognise and attack cancer cells.

But the innovative treatment works well for only around 20 per cent of patients, so researchers have been trying to understand why some people respond better than others.

Three papers published last Thursday in the journal Nature point the way, identifying a key formation inside some tumours: tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS).

TLS function like factories or schools for immune cells that help the body fight cancer, said Professor Wolf Fridman, a professor emeritus of immunology at the Cordeliers Research Centre of the Paris Descartes University medical school, who led one of the studies.

He said the cells need to be educated in "schools" - the TLS - where they learn to recognise and attack cancer cells.

Key to the findings is that T-cells are far from the only immune cells capable of taking the fight to cancer. Researchers found the TLS were full of B-cells, a kind of immune cell that produces antibodies.

"We have been T-cell addicts for 15 years in cancer," Prof Fridman said. "We analysed these sarcomas to see what groups they had and what's striking is that these B-cells appeared."

Dr Beth Helmink, a fellow in surgical oncology at the University of Texas' MD Anderson Cancer Centre, who worked on a second study, said the research had changed perceptions of the role of B-cells in immunotherapy.

"Through these studies, we find that B-cells are not just innocent bystanders, but are themselves contributing in a meaningful way to the anti-tumour immune response," she said in a statement from the centre.

The discovery is a surprise, as an abundance of B-cells in cancer patients has sometimes been seen as a marker for poor prognosis.

But the studies found patients with high levels of B-cells inside TLS in their tumours were more likely to respond well to immunotherapy.

Dr Louisa James, a lecturer in immunology at Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, said: "This series of studies is exciting because (it represents) real progress in the treatment of different types of cancer."

Dr James, who was not involved in the studies, added: "In the short term, these results provide a new tool to help predict which patients are likely to benefit from treatment with immunotherapy and may also pave the way for improved treatments in the future."

There are still many unanswered questions, including why TLS form in some tumours and not others.

While it now seems clear that B-cells inside the structures play a key role in the success of immunotherapy, scientists are not sure precisely how.

It may be that the B-cells are on the front lines, producing antibodies that attack cancer cells efficiently - or they may be bolstering T-cells, or perhaps even doing both.

And not all TLS are created equal: The researchers found three categories, but only one type was "mature" enough to churn out cancer-fighting immune cells.

The research opens up promising new avenues, the authors said.

Initially, the findings could help doctors screen patients to see which of them are most likely to respond well to immunotherapy.

It could eventually mean more patients are successfully treated with the technique, said Professor Goran Jonsson, a professor of oncology and pathology at Lund University in Sweden, who worked on a third study.

"If we come up with a treatment that could enhance TLS formation, we could combine this with current immunotherapy regimens," he said. "Most likely, this would lead to more patients responding to immunotherapy."

AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE

Original post:
Scientists find immune cells that fight tumours from within - The Straits Times

Will Maddox be the reason for the reunion of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt? – Morning Picker

Broken hearts, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, Oscar-winning actress, filed for divorce on Sept. 19, 2016. The amazing couple was as one 12 years, however, wedded for two. They share six exquisite kids (Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, and twins Knox and Vivienne), and lets be honest; these two were among the most beautiful pairings on earth, isnt that so? So what was the deal?

Jolie wasnt messing around with the part, at first enlisting big-name separate from attorney Laura Wasser to rep her a similar legal counselor who spoke to Johnny Depp in his ugly different separate from on-screen character Amber Heard.

Sources told TMZ that Jolies choice to end the marriage originated from conflicts with Pitt about child-rearing and his associations with the youngsters, yet it turns out this once-brilliant couple may have had a clothing rundown of reasons why it simply didnt work. We should investigate the stunning defeat of Brangelina.

In 2003, Brad Pitt, who was then hitched to Friends star Jennifer Aniston, marked on to star in Mr. whats more, Mrs. Smith. Initially, Nicole Kidman was set to play inverse the handsome hunk; however, Pitt supposedly didnt feel enough science with her and dropped out of the film. Kidman proceeded onward to Stepford Wives.

According to News.com.au, Producer Arnon Milchan said following he give [Jolie] a role as the female lead, Pitt got back to him to state he was glad to play Mr. to her Mrs. Filming began on January 2004, and gossipy tidbits before long started to twirl that the pair was attaching.

In May 2004, Pitt took then-spouse Aniston to the Troy debut, potentially to calm the shameful gab. That August, paparazzi caught Pitt and Jolie looking comfortable, which Mr. whats more, Mrs. Smith insiders rejected as being in character. In December 2004, Pitt traveled with Aniston, and after one month, in January 2005, they declared their detachment. That March, Aniston sought a legal separation. In April 2005, Pitt and Jolie were shot traveling with Jolies child, Maddox, and the rest is history.

Maddox | Angelina Jolie

Recently, Maddox, Maddox turned 18 today and decided to Educate himself further. According to a Peoplesource, Maddox had decided to South Koreas Yonsei University to study biochemistry. The news came after he and his Jolie were spotted visiting universities in South Korea back in November 2018.

Read the rest here:
Will Maddox be the reason for the reunion of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt? - Morning Picker

Trends in the Ready To Use Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) Market 2019-2024 Dagoretti News – Dagoretti News

In 2018, the market size of Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) Market is million US$ and it will reach million US$ in 2025, growing at a CAGR of from 2018; while in China, the market size is valued at xx million US$ and will increase to xx million US$ in 2025, with a CAGR of xx% during forecast period.

In this report, 2018 has been considered as the base year and 2018 to 2025 as the forecast period to estimate the market size for Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) .

This report studies the global market size of Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) , especially focuses on the key regions like United States, European Union, China, and other regions (Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia).

Request Sample Report @ https://www.marketresearchhub.com/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=2534347&source=atm

This study presents the Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) Market production, revenue, market share and growth rate for each key company, and also covers the breakdown data (production, consumption, revenue and market share) by regions, type and applications. Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) history breakdown data from 2014 to 2018, and forecast to 2025.

For top companies in United States, European Union and China, this report investigates and analyzes the production, value, price, market share and growth rate for the top manufacturers, key data from 2014 to 2018.

In global Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) market, the following companies are covered:

Jinhe Biotechnology (China)Pucheng Chia Tai Biochemistry (China)CP Group (China)Neimeng Kaisheng (China)Alpharmal Inc (USA)

Segment by RegionsNorth AmericaEuropeChinaJapanSoutheast AsiaIndia

Segment by TypeGranulesPowderTabletsOther

Segment by ApplicationPig FeedChicken FeedOther

Make An EnquiryAbout This Report @ https://www.marketresearchhub.com/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=2534347&source=atm

The content of the study subjects, includes a total of 15 chapters:

Chapter 1, to describe Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) product scope, market overview, market opportunities, market driving force and market risks.

Chapter 2, to profile the top manufacturers of Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) , with price, sales, revenue and global market share of Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) in 2017 and 2018.

Chapter 3, the Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) competitive situation, sales, revenue and global market share of top manufacturers are analyzed emphatically by landscape contrast.

Chapter 4, the Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) breakdown data are shown at the regional level, to show the sales, revenue and growth by regions, from 2014 to 2018.

Chapter 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, to break the sales data at the country level, with sales, revenue and market share for key countries in the world, from 2014 to 2018.

You can Buy This Report from Here @ https://www.marketresearchhub.com/checkout?rep_id=2534347&licType=S&source=atm

Chapter 10 and 11, to segment the sales by type and application, with sales market share and growth rate by type, application, from 2014 to 2018.

Chapter 12, Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) market forecast, by regions, type and application, with sales and revenue, from 2018 to 2024.

Chapter 13, 14 and 15, to describe Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) sales channel, distributors, customers, research findings and conclusion, appendix and data source.

View post:
Trends in the Ready To Use Chlortetracycline (Feed Grade) Market 2019-2024 Dagoretti News - Dagoretti News

Cobb-Vantress appoints genetics executive – The Poultry Site

Today, Cobb-Vantress appointed Dr Mark Cooper as managing director of genetics to oversee the companys global genetic program. Effective immediately, Dr Cooper will continue work to achieve genetic gains and competitive advantage through alignment of Cobbs breeding program with its product strategy, developing a portfolio of products to meet growing global market needs. He will report to Dr Aldo Rossi, vice president of research and development (R&D).

In his new role, Dr Cooper will lead a global, multifunctional team, including Dr Rachel Hawken, senior director of genetics; Dr Manouchehr Katanbaf, senior geneticist; and Dr Sriram Krishna, senior geneticist. Prior to this appointment, Dr Cooper previously worked as director of product testing. Since joining Cobb, he has also served as pedigree geneticist responsible for male line development, European director of genetics, director of genetics for all of Cobbs breeding programs, and director of product management.

Cobb has been dedicated to genetic research and the responsible use of technology for over 100 years, said Dr Rossi. Dr Cooper has made a big impact in his nearly 20 years with Cobb, and were looking forward to the continued advancements we expect him to accomplish in this new position.

In his time at Cobb, Dr Coopers research has focused on technology development and implementation in the breeding program, welfare parameters and meat quality. He has also spent time with global business leaders and customers to understand and update the R&D team on the product portfolio needed for the future. Most recently, he led Cobbs product testing team, helping to evaluate the companys product performance and development.

Im honored to take on the position of managing director of genetics, said Dr Cooper. Im fortunate because Cobb invests a significant percentage revenue into research and development, allowing us to continue leading the way in genetic progress.

Dr Cooper earned a bachelors degree in poultry science from Texas A&M University, a masters degree in poultry genetics from the University of Georgia, and a PhD in poultry genetics from the University of Arkansas.

Read more:
Cobb-Vantress appoints genetics executive - The Poultry Site

Healthy Headlines: Four common myths about genetic testing and why they are not accurate – User-generated content

St. Elizabeth Healthcare

If you could take a simple test that would identify your risks of developing a potentially deadly disease so you could prevent it or treat it sooner, wouldnt you?

A proactive genetic test can do just that. Caroline Ewart, Genetic Counselor in the Center for Precision Medicine and Genomic Health at St. Elizabeth Healthcare, says, Understanding your family tree is important for your future health. Genetics play a big role in what diseases we will develop in the future. The more we understand the family, the more you can proactively do to protect your health.

Many people dont consider genetic testing because they think it is too expensive, not accurate enough, or doesnt screen for the diseases that run in their family. Ewart is helping us bust some of the common myths of genetic testing.

Myth #1: Genetic Testing is Too Expensive

When proactive genetic testing started, it was very expensive, and only a few select laboratories across the country performed the testing. Today, genetic testing is very affordable. Many health insurance companies will provide some coverage for testing, and the laboratories now have a limit on what they can charge.

A proactive screening in the Center for Precision Medicine and Genomic at St. Elizabeth Healthcare is just $395. That includes an initial genetic counseling visit, coordination of blood tests, carrier status screening, and a comprehensive consultation discussing your results. Individuals with a Flexible Spending Account (FSA) or Health Savings Account (HSA) may be able to use these funds to pay for the cost of the screening.

Myth #2: Genetic Testing Only Finds Breast Cancers

Its true, when genetic testing was in its infancy, we only tested for BRCA1 and 2 genes which detect breast and ovarian cancers, says Ewart. But the tests today are far more sophisticated. We now test for over 100 different gene mutations looking for a range of diseases and cancers.

Inherited conditions the tests screen for, include:

Breast cancer

Cardiovascular diseases

Colorectal cancer

Cutaneous melanoma

Gastric cancer

Ovarian cancer

Pancreatic cancer

Renal cell cancer

Thyroid cancer

Myth #3: Genetic Testing Doesnt Help the Treatment of Diseases like Cancer

Genetic testing is used not only to proactively screen for certain diseases, but it is used to treat cancer as well.

If you have been diagnosed with cancer, the gene mutation may guide treatment. It can also help your team manage increased risks of developing other types of cancers, says Ewart.

More importantly, the results of proactive genetic testing can guide your healthcare teams recommendations for screenings of cancer and cardiovascular diseases. This may include starting screenings at an earlier age, increasing the frequency of screenings or suggesting more advance screenings.

By screening early, we can find the disease early, when it is most treatable, says Caroline.

Myth #4: Genetic Testing isnt Accurate

Ewart says, Certainly there are limitations to testing, but our process is more than just a blood test. By gathering a thorough family history we can determine your risk factors for developing certain diseases, even if a blood test comes back negative.

At St. Elizabeth Healthcare, if you are found to be at high risk or test positive for genetic cancers, you are referred to the Heredity Cancer Clinic to develop a plan for future cancer screenings. They may also recommend your family members be tested, so you can get a full picture of your familys health. St. Elizabeth has many types of genetic screenings. To find the one that best fits your needs, pleasestelizabeth.com/dna or call 859-301-GENE (4363).

See original here:
Healthy Headlines: Four common myths about genetic testing and why they are not accurate - User-generated content

Do genetic ancestry tests know if you’re Palestinian? A cautionary tale of race and science – ABC News

The personal, the political, and the science of ancestry tests.

Palestinian-American cartoonist and illustrator MargueriteDabaiespat into a test-tube and sent her DNA off to the genetic testing company, 23andMe.

To her surprise the results told her somethingsignificantlydifferent to what she understood about herself and her family.

Then, two years later, 23andMe sent her an update, andthe resultsradicallychanged.

Whats going on? And, with what consequences?Is genomic science way too white?

This is one of your and our favourite Science Friction features from the year for ABC RN's Summer Season.

One of your and our favourite Science Friction programs from 2019 for the RN Summer Season.

GUESTSMargueriteDabaieCartoonist and illustrator, New YorkDr Joanna MountainSenior Director of Research23andMe, USAProfessor SarahTishkoffDavid and LynSilfenUniversity Professor in Genetics and BiologyUniversity of Pennsylvania, USA

FURTHER INFORMATION23andMe doesnt know what makes a PalestinianCartoon by MargueriteDabaie(The Nib, 2019)

23andMes Global Genetics Project

The missing diversity in human genetics studiesGiorgioSirugo, Scott M. Williams, Sarah A.TishkoffCell,177, March212019

Presenter:Natasha Mitchell

Producers:Natasha Mitchell and Jane Lee

Sound engineer:Ariel Gross

See original here:
Do genetic ancestry tests know if you're Palestinian? A cautionary tale of race and science - ABC News

Genetics might explain the difference in our ability to ward off gut infections – ETHealthworld.com

Lausanne: Individuals vary in the capability of their immune systems to ward off gut infections due to bacteria viruses and other pathogens, but the latest research suggests that part of this can be explained by genetic factors.

Now, scientists at EPFL's Institute of Bioengineering have published two papers in Genome Biology that make significant headway in uncovering the mechanisms by which genetics influences the ability of an organism to mount an immune reaction to an invading gut pathogen. The research was carried out by Michael Frochaux and Maroun Bou Sleiman from Bart Deplancke's research group at EPFL.

The scientists turned to the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to study this phenomenon since it shares many of the biological pathways involved in fighting gut infections in humans.

The scientists studied a large panel of genetically distinct fruit fly lines, which vary greatly in their ability to resist gut infection by the severe pathogen Pseudomonas entomophila. To better understand the molecular origin of this variation, the researchers isolated infected guts from each fly line and explored them using a wide array of approaches.

"It is as if the organism intends to add more information in these mRNAs that could then be exploited to further fine-tune the overall gut immune response," says Deplancke. The change in mRNA length seems to be mediated through a protein called Lark, which binds RNA to form a complex involved in gene expression. When this complexing ability is lost, the fruit flies were less able to recover from a severe gut infection, clearly demonstrating the importance of this process in gut immunity.

The second paper reports the discovery of a number of genetic variants that alter the levels of gene expression in the gut following infection. One particular variant could be directly linked to variation in infection resistance because it modulates the expression level of a gene called Nutcracker. More resistant fly lines showed higher Nutcracker expression compared to less resistant ones.

"This study provides an intriguing example of how variation in the non-coding part of the genome could still critically affect complex traits such as height or disease susceptibility," says Deplancke. "In this case, this includes gut immunocompetence, so we need to consider the whole genome and not just its genes".

Go here to read the rest:
Genetics might explain the difference in our ability to ward off gut infections - ETHealthworld.com

SUNY Poly students learn anatomy with synthetic cadaver – The Times Telegram

One of SUNY Polytechnic Institute's newest teachers just goes by one name: Syndi.

That's because she's a real dummy, a synthetic cadaver donated to the school's College of Health Sciences in Marcy to help students learn anatomy.

Syndi is a nickname, chosen by biology and chemistry lecturer Megan Dischiavo, for the silicone cadaver, which is officially known by its brand name, SynDaver.

"It's such a beneficial tool to teaching anatomy because you can teach the body as an entity, rather than using separate models," Dischiavo said in an email. "This really gives the student a global perspective of how the body works rather than learning bits and pieces on the cat or separate models.

"I've already had them relate their own bodies to the SynDaver. For example, when I showed one student the appendix, she immediately said, 'I had that taken out.' She then understood why she had pain right where the appendix is."

And students can learn all that, she said, without the "emotional experience" or chemical involved in dissecting human cadavers.

The almost $75,000 synthetic cadaver was bought by four donors, including the Dorothy Griffin Foundation, M&T Bank/Partners Trust Bank Charitable Fund, SUNY Performance Improvement Fund and an anonymous donor who gave in memory of a "remarkable man."

It is the only life-sized SynDaver in Upstate New York, according to the college. It includes bones, joints, organs and tendons, which can be exposed to let students see anatomical structures as they would appear in a real human body.

With Syndi, students see things in the same perspective they would on a patient, Dischiavo said.

"It's also helpful so they can start moving the SynDaver just as they would their patients from day one of learning," she said. "For example, we can show them how to take a radial pulse in the exact location they would on a human or the blood vessel cardiac surgeons take from the leg to use in the heart with bypass surgery."

Sign up for daily e-mailWake up to the day's top news, delivered to your inbox

Go here to read the rest:
SUNY Poly students learn anatomy with synthetic cadaver - The Times Telegram

The Top 13 Greys Anatomy Deaths Ranked – Variety

If theres anyone that knows how to deliver a heart-wrenching death scene, its the team behind ABCs Greys Anatomy. Created by Shonda Rhimes, the broadcast medical drama came out of the gate in 2005 with literal life and death stakes for its characters. Being set in a hospital meant that mortality was a constant theme that touched the lives of every one who walked through the doors, be they of-the-week patients or support staff, or full-time cast members no one is immune to the cold touch of death.

Now showrun by Krista Vernoff, Greys Anatomy has become the longest-running medical drama on television and, as such, the show has accumulated a record-high body count.

There have been quite a few of memorable ones that caused tears to be shed but not buckets to be cried. Those include Bonnie Crasnoff (Monica Keena), who was admitted after a train crash which left her impaled with a stranger in the sixth episode of Season 2; Harold OMalley (George Dzundza), a member of the bomb squad who was sent into the hospital to disable a bomb in the 12th episode of the third season, only for a projectile from a bazooka to explode in his arms;Susan Grey (Mare Winningham), who died due to complications from a procedure to treat hiccups in the 23rd episode of Season 3; Gary Clark (Michael ONeill), a mass shooter who took his grief over the death of his wife out on the hospital and ultimately killed himself in the sixth season finale; Dr. Craig Thomas (William Daniels), who died of a heart attack while performing an operation in the fifth episode of Season 9;Heather Brooks (Tina Majorino), part of the second class of surgical interns who died from accidental electrocution in the second episode of Season 10; Jimmy Evans (James Remar), who died in Season 10 from complications of endocarditis, which he developed after years of heroin use; Francesca McNeil (Harley Graham) who was admitted for cardiomyopathy and received an artificial heart but who passed away after the transplant in the 21st episode of Season 10;Olive Warner (Mary Kay Place), Dr. Richard Webbers (James Pickens Jr.) Alcoholics Anonymous sponsor, who died due to cardiomyopathy related to liver failure in Season 14; and Paul Stadler (Matthew Morrison),Dr. Jo Wilsons (Camilla Luddington) estranged and abusive husband, who was attacked in a hit-and-run in the 10th episode of Season 14 and whose organs were donated to save others, allowing him to do something good for once.

In anticipation of the final half of Season 16, Varietyscoured the graveyard of Seattle Grace Mercy West/Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital to compile a definitive list of the saddest character deaths. Read on for the Top 13.

13. Thatcher Grey (Season 15, Episode 11)

Like so many of the relationships on Greys, amends were sadly made just a little too late. Meredith (Ellen Pompeo) and Thatcher (Jeff Perry) had a rocky relationship as father and daughter, but as she warmed up to her sister Lexie (Chyler Leigh), she grew to care for her father as well which made his death somber, as Meredith put off seeing him. When she finally did visit, the two carried on a somewhat terse conversation before he ultimately died in his sleep.

12. Ellis Grey (Season 3, Episode 17)

Lets be honest, Ellis (Kate Burton) wasnt the best mother. So when she coded after struggling with Alzheimers in Season 3, there may have been few dry eyes in the house. Merediths included. It was only through flashbacks in episodes to come that the audience fully came to appreciate her as the formidable surgeon and intense woman she was.

11. Diane Pierce (Season 13, Episode 18)

Maggie Pierce (Kelly McCreary) was a wreck after her adoptive mother died, as many people would be. How deeply affected the people she left behind were was what made losing Diane Pierce (LaTanya Richardson Jackson) so sad. It also serves as a stark contrast to Merediths reaction to her mothers death. Maggie sobbed after putting down the nail polish, realizing her mother had died. But, the silver lining in this Greys cloud is the budding relationship she began with Jackson Avery (Jesse Williams).

10. Adele Webber (Season 9, Episode 10)

After a lengthy battle with Alzheimers and a successful brain surgery to correct her aneurysm, Adele (Loretta Devine) died of a heart attack. The saddest part of Adeles death which occurred offscreen was watching Richard and his wife dancing together in his imagination. The only reason this death isnt ranked higher is because it was overshadowed in the episode by Miranda Baileys (Chandra Wilson) wedding to universal heartthrob Ben (Jason George).

9. Samuel Norbert Avery (Season 11, Episode 11)

It would be hard to watch any newborn die, and it was even harder to watch Jackson (Jesse Williams) and Aprils (Sarah Drew) preemie succumb to his rare bone disease. After learning that their sons bones were breaking in the womb, the parents decided to induce labor at 24 weeks and held him for a few minutes. This heartbreaking episode came a little too early in the season.

8. Doc the Dog (Season 2, Episode 27)

Just because Docs presence on the series was only the result of Merediths escapism, it doesnt mean he deserved to die. He loyally served his role of bringing Derek (Patrick Dempsey), Addison (Kate Walsh) and Meredith together all throughout Season 2, only to be put down and overshadowed by Denny Duquettes (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) death. Doc eventually returned (but just in Merediths mind) following Merediths near-death experience in Elliott Bay in Season 3.

7. Henry Burton (Season 8, Episode 10)

From a patient without insurance to Teddy Altmans (Kim Raver) adoring husband, Henry (Scott Foley) became an important part of the Greys family, so his death hit hard. If their marriage remained an insurance fraud contract, there wouldnt have been as great a reaction to the obvious fate of the chronically ill Henry. But watching a usually stoic Teddy try to keep her cool eventually giving way to one runny mascaraed tear over Henrys dead body in the morgue was simply too much for a midseason episode.

6. Seattle Grace/Mercy West shooting victims (Season 6, Episodes 23-24; Season 7, Episode 6) Reed Adamson, Dr. Charles Percy, Mary Portman

Among the numerous nameless victims of one of Greys most traumatic episodes, a few of the Seattle Grace-Mercy West residents also died. While she may not have been well liked, Reed Adamson (Nora Zehetner) certainly didnt need to be killed off in such an abrupt and violent manner. It was almost like a quick hit if it werent so random. The writers at least gave fans a chance to feel some sort of sympathy for Charles Percy (Robert Baker); at first another unpopular character, by drawing out his death, his vulnerable side was shown.

Mary Portman (Mandy Moore) was a different story: Viewers were introduced to Mary as a patient in the hospital shooting who actually bore witness to Dr. Percys death and spent the entire episode trying to help Dr. Miranda Bailey get him to an operating room. After she escaped the hospital, she eventually returned to get another surgery for a colostomy bag removal. Its after the surgery that she fell into a coma and died. Her death served to tie up the final loose end from the episode, but also felt even more tragic after all she had been through.

5. Lexie Grey (Season 8, Episode 24)

As the first to die from the plane crash, Lexie Grey deserved better. She was a latecomer to Meredith Greys life and it took at least three seasons before she was loved by her sister. She had finally given up the tormenting relationship with Mark Sloan (Eric Dane) after he had a baby with Callie Torres (Sara Ramirez), but she hadnt even stepped into her prime yet before her life was cut short. To see Mark, first in denial, finally declare his love for her as she was dying only made the scene more heartbreaking.

4. Mark Sloan (Season 9, Episode 1)

Did McSteamy really have to die? If you compare him to Lexie who died an episode earlier he made it through the plane crash unscathed, only to succumb to his injuries and be pulled off life support in the dramatic Season 9 premiere. Marks character growth endeared him to audiences as more than a set of washboard abs and sexy salt and pepper goatee: At the time of his death, he served as a decent best friend, mentor, father and true love to Lexie Grey. But to play devils advocate, maybe it would have been unfair to have the tragic couple wait to spend eternity together.

3. Derek Shepard (Season 11, Episode 24)

There wasnt enough wine in the world to prepare Greys fans for Derek Shepards untimely passing. A day that began with McDreamy saving a family, ended in his death as the incapacitated neurosurgeon described the missing steps in his own emergency intake and surgery. Then, if only to drive the knife further into the hearts of fans, once Meredith found Derek, braindead and alone in the fiscally deficient hospital, she was forced to pull the plug on the love of her life.

2. George OMalley (Season 5, Episode 24)

The world collectively gasped when George (T.R. Knight) was revealed to be on the other side of the elevator doors, dressed in his Army uniform, ready to guide Izzie (Katherine Heigl) to the afterlife. This intense Season 5 ending was the audiences first time witnessing the death of a main circle doctor, forever raising the stakes to come. From Callie recognizing the freckle, to John Doe tracing 007 into Merediths palm, each moment created goosebumps. The underdog of the interns didnt deserve to go out being dragged under a bus, but its only fitting that he did it to save someone elses life.

1. Denny Duquette (Season 2, Episode 27)

Love makes people do crazy things; but, unfortunately cutting L-Vad wires, breaking the law, and Izzie almost losing her job couldnt save Denny Duquette from death. Isabel and Dennys love story was the first flame that couldve shone brighter than Meredith and Dereks. Its largely why the death of Denny was so heartbreakingly tragic. Although Izzie seemed to move on, Dennys ghostly cameo in Season 5 made it clear the love story was always doomed.

Go here to read the rest:
The Top 13 Greys Anatomy Deaths Ranked - Variety