All posts by medical

CA: Because of coronavirus we’re doing things differently. How long will that last? – MassTransitMag.com

It isnt easy to change habits, as those who have tried to go a day without touching their face have found, but the coronavirus outbreak is threatening to modify human behavior, culture, business and yes habits in ways that could permanently alter our way of life.

The COVID-19 pandemic has already disrupted American society, causing the stock market to plummet, and workplaces, theaters and sports leagues to close down as people across the country stockpile food and hole up at home.

Locally, ridership on BART and other mass transit has declined, and movie theaters, bars and restaurants are virtually empty. Handshakes, hugs, high-fives and kisses on the cheek have become almost taboo. Even the untidy among us have become germophobes, incessantly washing our hands and wiping down surfaces.

The impacts of the growing pandemic are far reaching, but the biggest changes are in the business realm, where experts say increased teleconferencing, automation and e-commerce could become standard even after the virus threat is gone.

Companies will put in infrastructure to enable remote working, to make sure people can operate seamlessly and communicate well regardless of where they are on the planet, said Darren Murph, head of remote for GitLab, a software company whose 1,150-plus employees all work remotely.

He thinks the coronavirus will make telecommuting the norm for people who now only occasionally work from home when they are waiting for a repair person or attending a childs school event.

This is like a get-out-of-jail-free card that every major city in the world never saw coming but will be so grateful for, Murph said. Were already way oversubscribed with people on public transit and in cars on the road. This will reduce strain on the infrastructure without spending any money.

The changes will be necessary, given that it could take 12 months or longer before a vaccine is developed. And restrictions could get more draconian as the number of infections grow, including mandatory home quarantines.

It is unlikely that many cities and regions could be isolated, like has happened in China and New Rochelle, N.Y. But the fast-spreading disease has forced Italy into a lockdown and the United States is, by all accounts, still in the beginning stages of infection.

Experts say the disease is likely to have long-term implications on how much people fly or take mass transit and even whether they greet people with a handshake or the newly fashionable elbow bump.

But major changes in our personal habits are unlikely, said Russell Poldrack, a neuroscientist at Stanford University and an expert on habit-forming behavior. Once the threat is over, he said, people will probably go back to touching their faces, shaking hands, hugging, kissing and failing to wash their hands frequently.

Whether (new behaviors) become permanent depends on how long this lasts and how bad it gets, Poldrack said. Take handshakes. They are so deeply ingrained in our fabric, but it could well be that the virus drives people to worry enough about disease transmission that they change to some other greeting.

New technologies, if not new habits, are more likely to catch on and become permanent as the virus spreads, said Ken Goldberg, a professor of engineering and robotics at UC Berkeley.

I think it will accelerate that tendency to order things online, especially things like food and groceries, Goldberg said. That, in turn, will increase a demand for robots to fulfill these orders.

An example of a technology that could boom during the crisis, he said, are robots that collect items in warehouses and package them for online shoppers, an industry that is now booming in China as a result of the new coronavirus.

Fear of infection among health care workers could also drive innovations in telemedicine, including remote-control robots that can help doctors examine patients without having to be there in person, he said. An Israeli startup, TytoCare, has developed such a system, allowing doctors to guide patients from afar as they perform medical tests on themselves using a handheld exam kit.

Similarly, the reluctance of people to go to large meetings and conferences will likely increase demand for tele-robots, with video screens and microphones, that could attend a conference in a persons place, allowing virtual delegates to network while lounging at home in their pajamas. Such robots are available now, but they are rare.

I think its a game changer in that (telecommuting) may be our new normal, said Bernard Coleman, head of employee engagement at Gusto, a payroll, benefits and human resources platform for small businesses.

One offshoot could be rethinking work hours.

Do the hours of 9 to 5 even make sense anymore? Coleman said. What if people are more productive from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m.?

A reduction of in-person conferences could force many professional societies to develop new business models, since the income from annual meetings helps fund their advocacy, training, research and other activities. But replacing large annual meetings with virtual conferences isnt all bad, said Dr. Dan Diekema, director of the infectious disease division at the University of Iowa.

There has been pressure building on this from an environmental standpoint because of the emissions produced by travel, Diekema said in an email. Now perhaps a tipping point will be reached.

Another example of a potentially permanent change is happening at UC Berkeley, Stanford and many other major universities around the country, where classes are being taught exclusively online as a result of the COVID-19 scare.

The technology obviously is never going to be as good as being there, but as people get used to going to classes, religious services and other places remotely, it could catch on, Goldberg said. Maybe we will adapt and in 20 years, it will be normal for people to have remote meetings.

A range of domino effects could occur if working from home becomes more commonplace. Some would benefit society: less traffic and thus fewer emissions. But the flip side would be fewer people on public transit, hurting agencies that depend on fare revenues. There would also be fewer patrons at restaurants that depend on workers for lunchtime business, and fewer customers in stores.

Businesses also might need less office space if there is a permanent increase in telecommuting, causing building vacancies and reducing rents. That could actually help San Francisco, which has a serious office space shortage, said Jay Cheng, public policy director of the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce.

Paid sick leave could be a long-lasting legacy of the coronavirus pandemic. Currently, the U.S. has no mandate for employers to offer paid sick leave, or paid family medical leave, which typically is longer. As a result, one quarter of workers about 30 million people who lack the benefit must decide whether to forgo a paycheck or risk going to work and transmitting or contracting disease.

The crisis has ignited debate on Capitol Hill and elsewhere, with proponents highlighting studies that mandatory paid leave decreases flu rates. Historically, Democrats have pushed for paid sick leave, while Republicans have opposed it as hurting businesses.

Now, folks on both sides of the aisle are talking about the need to do something, said Ruth Martin, chief workplace justice officer for MomsRising, a nationwide advocacy group pushing the Healthy Families Act, which would require businesses with at least 15 employees to provide seven days a year of paid sick leave.

In fact, the emergency relief plan that Congress passed early Saturday with broad bipartisan support includes two weeks of paid sick leave and up to three months of paid family and medical leave, as well as expanded unemployment insurance. While they are temporary and only for people affected by the coronavirus, those benefits lay the groundwork for similar future legislative action.

David Levine, a professor at the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley, said change usually happens slowly, and even in this situation probably needs a push.

This (disease) is forcing many places and schools to try something new, and once the fixed cost of learning new software, new routines and changing the norm is over, some of them are going to say, Hey, this is a better way, Levine said. But the way to make necessary changes systematic is not to rely on individuals. To the extent that organizations institute safe routines there can be lasting change. When you walk into a doctors office, they should ask you to wash your hands.

Peter Fimrite and Carolyn Said are San Francisco Chronicle staff writers. Email:pfimrite@sfchronicle.com,csaid@sfchronicle.comTwitter:@pfimrite,@CSaid

2020 the San Francisco Chronicle

Visit the San Francisco Chronicle atwww.sfchronicle.com

Distributed byTribune Content Agency, LLC.

Read the original here:
CA: Because of coronavirus we're doing things differently. How long will that last? - MassTransitMag.com

Commission announces winners of its first coronavirus research call – Science Business

Two of 17 projects selected by the European Commission in its first research call to tackle COVID-19 are developing vaccines against the disease.

The two vaccine projects are led by researchers at Karolinska Institutet, Swedens top medical university and AdaptVac, a Danish biotech start-up.

Karolinska researchers Matti Sllberg and Gustaf Ahln plan to start testing their vaccine candidate in animal models within a couple of weeks and hope to be able to begin the first trials in COVID-19 patients in 2021 at the Karolinska University Hospital.

With the EU grant, the project, called Opencorona, now has a large part of the money needed to come up with a vaccine candidate and see it through a phase I clinical study. It is a relief to know that we are now financed all the way to studies in humans, said Sllberg.

For the second vaccine project, Prevent-nCoV, AdaptVac has been awarded a 2.7 million grant to apply its synthetic virus-like particle technology. In common with a number of companies that are now turning their hands to developing COVID-19 vaccines, AdaptVac has previously been applying the technology to cancer vaccines. It aims to complete safety and efficacy testing of a COVID-19 vaccine within 12 months.

We strongly believe that this technology will be a key player in global emergencies, such as the COVID 19 epidemic said AdaptVac CEO Wian de Jongh.

Three projects at Karolinska

In addition to the vaccine project, Karolinska researchers have won two other grants from the EUs pop-up call, totalling 9 million for the university. The funds are to be split equally between the three teams and will cover a period of two years.

Researchers Qiang Pan Hammarstrm, Harold Marcotte and Lennart Hammarstrm will lead a project on a passive immunotherapy against the new coronavirus, based on antibodies found in blood of recovered COVID-19 patients.

We believe that antibodies represent a weapon of choice to treat the disease and prevent continued spread of the virus globally, Pan Hammarstrm said.

At Karolinksas department of microbiology, tumour and cell biology, Benjamin Murrell, Gerald McInerney and Gunilla Karlsson Hedestam will work on the development of antibodies that could block the virus from infecting cells.

The researchers have started working on animal models and hope to identify antibody candidates that could be used for treating COVID-19 patients. Access to an arsenal of efficient anti-viral antibodies will be important to help control the spread of [COVID-19], Murrell said.

Pandemic modelling

The second largest consortium announced by the commission, Exscalate4CoV, led by the Italian pharmaceutical company Dompe farmaceutici SpA, will resolve the 3D structures of essential viral proteins, which will then be used to generate computer models of likely future mutations of the virus, and as the basis for in silico screening of compound libraries (either from repurposing libraries or from proprietary or commercial compound libraries).

The researchers will use the Exscalate supercomputing platform, which can process three million molecules every second and has a database of 500 billion molecules.

The protein structure lab of a former European Research Council grantee, Marcin Nowotny is one of the 17 partners in Exscalate4CoV. Nowotny and his team in Warsaw will work on the crystal structure of functional proteins in the novel coronavirus and compare them to other viral proteins. Drug development is very tricky, but if we are lucky, we may be able to find a substance which can be repurposed, which we know is safe in humans, and test it in patients, Nowotny said.

Epidemiology

A team of researchers at the University of Antwerp have won an award for the Recover project in which they will work on a survey to understand the impact of COVID-19 on EU citizens, a study on household transmission of the disease and a study how children contribute to the spread of the virus. The aim is to draw up recommendations for the EU on ensuring the safety of health workers during the epidemic.

In Sweden, the Hanken School of Economics has brought together 11 partners from six countries to work on Heros, a project that aims to improve the response to the virus outbreak. The researchers will use the 2.8 million grant to come up with better guidelines for crisis governance and public health emergencies.

A total of 89 partners from across Europe are involved in the projects announced by the commission. The full list is available here.

Read more:
Commission announces winners of its first coronavirus research call - Science Business

COVID-19: What does your local hospital need, and how can you get it to them? – Mission Local

Its no secret: Our hospitals are already lacking basic medical necessities to combat COVID-19 and the worst is yet to come.

Your donations of needed supplies are welcome. Ethan Garner, a molecular and cell biology professor at Harvard, has created a national spreadsheet.

Reader Lukas Bergstrom kindly culled the local hospitals into the spreadsheet below.

Read more here:
COVID-19: What does your local hospital need, and how can you get it to them? - Mission Local

How long can COVID-19 live on surfaces? – The Hub at Johns Hopkins

BySamuel Volkin

According to a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, can live in the air and on surfaces between several hours and several days. The study found that the virus is viable for up to 72 hours on plastics, 48 hours on stainless steel, 24 hours on cardboard, and 4 hours on copper. It is also detectable in the air for three hours.

Carolyn Machamer, a professor of cell biology whose lab at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine has studied the basic biology of coronaviruses for years, joined Johns Hopkins MPH/MBA candidate Samuel Volkin for a brief discussion of these findings and what they mean for efforts to protect against spread of the virus. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

Machamer: What's getting a lot of press and is presented out of context is that the virus can last on plastic for 72 hourswhich sounds really scary. But what's more important is the amount of the virus that remains. It's less than 0.1% of the starting virus material. Infection is theoretically possible but unlikely at the levels remaining after a few days. People need to know this.

What you need to know

Resources and updates for the Johns Hopkins community, including travel guidance, information on university operations, and tips for preventing the spread of illness

While the New England Journal of Medicine study found that the COVID virus can be detected in the air for 3 hours, in nature, respiratory droplets sink to the ground faster than the aerosols produced in this study. The experimental aerosols used in labs are smaller than what comes out of a cough or sneeze, so they remain in the air at face-level longer than heavier particles would in nature.

You are more likely to catch the infection through the air if you are next to someone infected than off of a surface. Cleaning surfaces with disinfectant or soap is very effective because once the oily surface coat of the virus is disabled, there is no way the virus can infect a host cell. However, there cannot be an overabundance of caution. Nothing like this has ever happened before.

The CDC guidelines on how to protect yourself include:

Coverage of how the COVID-19 pandemic is affecting operations at JHU and how Hopkins experts and scientists are responding to the outbreak

There is no evidence one way or the other. The virus's viability in exposure to heat or cold has not been studied. But it does bear pointing out that the New England Journal of Medicine study was performed at about room temperature, 21-23 degrees Celsius.

SARS-CoV-2 behaves like a typical respiratory coronavirus in the basic mechanisms of infection and replication. But several mutations allow it to bind tighter to its host receptor and increase its transmissibility, which is thought to make it more infectious.

The New England Journal of Medicine study suggests that the stability of SARS-CoV-2 is very similar to that of SARS-CoV1, the virus that caused the 2002-2003 SARS global outbreak. But, researchers believe people can carry high viral loads of the SARS-CoV-2 in the upper respiratory tract without recognizing any symptoms, allowing them to shed and transmit the virus while asymptomatic.

View post:
How long can COVID-19 live on surfaces? - The Hub at Johns Hopkins

Study reveals major changes that occur in mammalian skin cells during wound healing – The Medical News

Reviewed by Emily Henderson, B.Sc.Mar 19 2020

A team of University of California, Irvine researchers have published the first comprehensive overview of the major changes that occur in mammalian skin cells as they prepare to heal wounds. Results from the study provide a blueprint for future investigation into pathological conditions associated with poor wound healing, such as in diabetic patients.

This study is the first comprehensive dissection of the major changes in cellular heterogeneity from a normal state to wound healing in skin."

Xing Dai, PhD, professor of biological chemistry and dermatology in the UCI School of Medicine, and senior author

This work also showcases the collaborative efforts between biologists, mathematician and physicists at UCI, with support from the National Institute of Arthritis & Musculoskeletal & Skin Diseases-funded UCI Skin Biology Resource-based Center and the NSF-Simons Center for Multiscale Cell Fate Research.

The study, titled, "Defining epidermal basal cell states during skin homeostasis and wound healing using single-cell transcriptomics," was published this week in Cell Reports.

"Our research uncovered at least four distinct transcriptional states in the epidermal basal layer as part of a 'hierarchical-lineage' model of the epidermal homeostasis, or stable state of the skin, clarifying a long-term debate in the skin stem cell field," said Dai.

Using single-cell RNA sequencing coupled with RNAScope and fluorescence lifetime imaging, the team identified three non-proliferative and one proliferative basal cell state in homeostatic skin that differ in metabolic preference and become spatially partitioned during wound re-epithelialization, which is the process by which the skin and mucous membranes replace superficial epithelial cells damaged or lost in a wound.

Epithelial tissue maintenance is driven by resident stem cells, the proliferation and differentiation dynamics of which need to be tailored to the tissue's homeostatic and regenerative needs. However, our understanding of tissue-specific cellular dynamics in vivo at single-cell and tissue scales is often very limited.

"Our study lays a foundation for future investigation into the adult epidermis, specifically how the skin is maintained and how it can robustly regenerate itself upon injury," said Dai.

Source:

Journal reference:

Haensel, D., et al. (2020) Defining Epidermal Basal Cell States during Skin Homeostasis and Wound Healing Using Single-Cell Transcriptomics. Cell Reports. doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.091.

Read the original here:
Study reveals major changes that occur in mammalian skin cells during wound healing - The Medical News

Organ-Chips provide human-relevant insights into diseases and toxicity mechanisms – The Medical News

Organs-on-Chips technology has entered the mainstream and has reached 150 installations for use by researchers across many industries, including 10 of the top 25 biopharmaceutical companies, as well as leading international academic research centers and U.S. government laboratories, including the U.S. FDA through a collaborative agreement and the U.S. Army.

Organ-Chips that are currently available for use in the lab-ready platform developed by Emulate, Inc., include the Liver-Chip, Kidney-Chip, and new Intestine-Chip, launched commercially earlier this year. Ongoing R&D is supporting the development of additional Organ-Chips, such as the Brain-Chip, and new applications in key areas of biology and diseases, including applications in neurodegenerative disease, gastrointestinal diseases, and infectious diseases, such as COVID-19.

Combining biology and microengineering, Organ-Chips contain tiny hollow channels lined with tens of thousands of living human cells and tissues and can be used to predict human response. For early adopters conducting R&D related to drug discovery and development, the Organ-Chip platform provides human-relevant insights and answers to the complex questions required for disease modeling, target validation, and safety assessment in drug development.

Researchers can culture the chips--including the Liver-Chip, Kidney-Chip, and Intestine-Chip--using Emulate's portfolio of protocols, enabling research to understand how the human body responds to disease, medicines, chemicals, and foods. The lab-ready platform - including the Zo Culture Module, Organ-Chips, and application tools - recreates key factors of the body's dynamic cellular microenvironment, including tissue-to-tissue interfaces, fluid flow, and mechanical forces.

The lab-ready platform enables researchers with no prior experience with Organs-on-Chips to conduct studies, using the platform's supporting protocols and software to collect, analyze, and share data. This platform integrates into the workflows of researchers developing new drugs and products, providing human-relevant mechanistic data on toxicity and diseases that researchers can use to assess safety risks and make informed, efficient decisions throughout the drug discovery and development process.

We are excited to see researchers in industry, government, and academia use our Organs-on-Chips platform for a range of applications, including human-relevant disease modeling and studies to gain insights related to new drug modalities and disease mechanisms that are not feasible with conventional animal models or cell cultures. Organs-on-Chips technology provides a window into the inner workings of human biology and disease, and by putting the technology in the hands of researchers, we are changing the way medications and products are evaluated to help improve human health and bring new cures to patients."

Geraldine A. Hamilton, President and Chief Scientific Officer of Emulate, Inc

Emulate's platform is comprised of the following key components:

Emulate's lab-ready platform has its origins in a $37 million grant from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 2012 to the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University to create Organs-on-Chips to study complex human physiology outside the body. This foundational research enabled the development of chips with a level of human-relevant biological complexity not feasible with conventional cell-based systems, as well as instrumentation designed to enable any researcher to use the technology in their laboratories. Based on the success of this early research, Harvard established a worldwide license agreement to form the start-up company, Emulate, and the company became operational in January 2015. The Emulate team accelerated development of Organs-on-Chips technology to create the platform that is now commercially available, working with an extensive community of collaborators across industry, academia, and government agencies.

In addition to applications in drug discovery and development, Emulate's platform can be used in other industries, including cosmetics, food, chemical-based consumer products, and personalized health, to enable new understanding of human response to products.

Follow this link:
Organ-Chips provide human-relevant insights into diseases and toxicity mechanisms - The Medical News

Understanding the Brain in High-Definition: Rapid, Automatic Identification of Individual, Live Brain Cells – SciTechDaily

Nerve cells are shaped like young plants: big round seeds (cell bodies) surrounded by a nest of frizzy roots in one direction (dendrites) and a single long stem stretching out in the other direction (axon). This image shows variations in the location of some neuron cell bodies between different animals as ellipses. Each neuron is randomly colored. Neurons are arranged top-to-bottom and left-to-right in the graph as they are located nose-to-tail (anterior-posterior) and back-to-belly (dorsal-ventral) in a worm. Credit: Toyoshima et al., 2020, DOI: 10.1186/s12915-020-0745-2, CC BY-ND 4.0

Researchers working towards understanding the brain in high-definition, single-cell level of detail have designed a new computer program to identify each nerve cell in fluorescent microscope images of living worms. Previous attempts to automate the identification of individual nerve cells have been thwarted by the fact that the same cell can be in vastly different locations in different worms.

The worms areC. elegans, tiny roundworms common in soil and research labs around the world. Each of the 959 cells in the animals transparent, 1 millimeter-long bodies has been identified, named and mapped, including their 302 nerve cells.

Scientists completed the first map of theC. elegansnervous system in 1986 and have been improving it ever since. More recent projects include OpenWorm, an ongoing global effort to design a cell-by-cell and behaviorally accurate virtualC. elegans a research-worthy version of a Tamagotchi pet.

The central DNA-containing cell bodies of C. elegans neurons are shown with the three fluorescent colors used in the genetically modified strain of C. elegans developed by the research team. Note how neighboring cells are different colors. Successfully annotated neurons are labeled with letters and cells whose identity could not be annotated are labeled with numbers. Not all 302 C. elegans neurons are present in this image. Credit: Toyoshima et al., 2020, DOI: 10.1186/s12915-020-0745-2, CC BY-ND 4.0

Despite their value, generalized brain atlases, so-called connectome maps, are still no help for identifying neurons in individual, live, wriggling worms.

Imagine if you knew the names of all the cities on a map, but the cities moved each time you looked. That is what its like, trying to compare current brain atlases to living organisms, said Professor Yuichi Iino from the University of Tokyo, co-last author of the recent research paper published in BMC Biology.

Iinos research group wants to identify and map each nerve cell in livingC. elegansso that they can chart the pathways of electrical impulses that make behaviors, learning and memory possible.

C. elegans brain neurons are not trapped in a skull, but just form a loosely packed group of 150 neurons in the head region of the animal.

The neurons are tiny, and in the head ofC. elegans they are surrounding this large bulb thats part of the digestive system, so they get pushed and pulled around a lot as the animal moves or eats, explained Iino.

Researchers began by finding unique combinations of genes that, when artificially attached to fluorescent protein tags, would cause 35 different small groups of neurons to glow under a microscope.

These new genetically modified strains ofC. elegansmade all of the researchers subsequent image studies and computer programming work possible.

Researchers identified individual neurons in 311 worms in total, about 10 worms for each of the 35 neuron groups, and measured the distances and relative positions between pairs of neurons in the microscopy images.

Although neurons were known to shift within each worm, no one expected the neurons to have different home base locations in different individuals. The positions of the central cell body of some neurons can vary by more than 0.02 millimeter between different animals, a significant distance for an animal only 1-millimeter long.

IndividualC. elegansare thought to be uniform because they all have almost the same cell lineages and a stereotyped neural circuit. It was really surprising, though, how large the positional differences are between individual animals, said Assistant Professor Yu Toyoshima, a co-first author of the recent research paper and member of the Iino lab.

The research team then used their new position variation data and theC. elegansconnectome brain atlas to develop a computer program to automatically identify neurons. The program uses a mathematical algorithm to analyze a microscopy image of theC. elegansbrain and assign the statistically most likely identity to each neuron based on that neurons position in relation to other neurons.

The algorithm is only 60 percent accurate, which is too low for fully automatic cell identification, but it speeds up our work enough to make other projects possible to understand neural networks based on whole-brain imaging data, said Toyoshima.

Part of what made this project possible inC. elegansis that every neuron was already known and named. Using a similar technique in other animals would require fine-tuned genetic manipulation to cause groups of neurons to glow under a microscope and knowing how many neurons need to be identified.

The human brain has billions of neurons, so understanding our own brains at the single-cell level would be extremely difficult.C. eleganshave small brains, but they can still learn and change behaviors, so they could allow us to understand how networks of neurons create behavior, said Iino.

Reference: Neuron ID dataset facilitates neuronal annotation for whole-brain activity imaging ofC. elegans by Yu Toyoshima, Stephen Wu, Manami Kanamori, Hirofumi Sato, Moon Sun Jang, Suzu Oe, Yuko Murakami, Takayuki Teramoto, Chanhyun Park, Yuishi Iwasaki, Takeshi Ishihara, Ryo Yoshida and Yuichi Iino, 19 March 2020, BMC Biology.DOI: 10.1186/s12915-020-0745-2

Read more from the original source:
Understanding the Brain in High-Definition: Rapid, Automatic Identification of Individual, Live Brain Cells - SciTechDaily

HeyHuman’s Neil Davidson: how neuroscience can find new ways to tell ad stories – More About Advertising | Insights into Advertising

Weve been telling stories since advertisings embryonic flutters, baby steps and terrible teens as such, some of the industrys most memorable moments have been narrative-heavy.

And traditional storytelling still demands attention. No matter what you think of them, those John Lewis Christmas ads get people talking every year, and there is a reason for that. Even as storytelling is increasingly informed and enabled by technology and data; as were bombarded with so much more stuff on a daily basis, our brains are still partial to an old-fashioned tall tale.

And it can be proven with neuroscience.

Neuroscience testing tells us that people are 22 times more likely to remember information when its woven into a story. More recently, research has shown how stories can stimulate neural coupling, which basically means a link is created between storyteller and listener. As the advertising space becomes more cluttered with the aforementioned stuff, that link between brand and customer is vital.

And as the choice of platforms available to us grows, the concept of a story is becoming ever more fluid. A story is an arc, and that doesnt necessarily have to be carried out via traditional methods experiential and social are both prime examples.

But first, lets look at more traditional storytelling spots like John Lewis Excitable Edgar or Apples The Surprise; both are cracking displays of narrative, with the product and brand taking a few steps back. Instead, its the loveable characters, heartwarming stories and lengthy run times leading the way, melding the art of advertising with short film. These are powerful stories and they evoke powerful reactions.

But you dont need to create a five-minute mini-epic to connect with consumers. If you can condense your narrative down, you stand a better chance of capturing peoples ever-shortening attention spans. For example, YouTubes pre-roll ads are a real creative challenge for advertisers with just six seconds to promote products (possibly even less time than that, when scrolling is taken into account.) Brands have to be more efficient than ever to convey messages.

And yes, although theres only really seven basic plots, there are more than seven ways to memorably execute said plots. The current advertising landscape is well placed for experimentation, and if you can begin to toy with the storytelling format, then you stand a better chance than most. Pushing the boat out can be scary, but theres a way to anchor it. And its calleddrumrollneuroscience.

Last year, we worked with Guinness Africa on its Flavour Rooms project. The brief was simple enough: engage Africans aged between 18 to 34-years-old, with the brand through a physical experience. Why? The legacy Guinness story wasnt resonating with that younger demographic. Naturally, we used neuroscience to conduct research on our target audience, and discovered words like bold, rich, refreshing and bittersweet to be the most motivating.

That all fed into our multi-sensory Flavour Rooms activation, which comprised a room dedicated to each of those Guinness characteristics. These ranged from an eye-popping room celebrating the boldness of African culture to a room adorned with lavish, silky textures all of which enhanced different aspects of the famous Guinness flavour.

It was a new way to tell an old story. It was what I like to call unusual everyday: using unconventional methods to frame an established drink in a completely different light. It completely switched up the narrative.

Its always good to have a story that you think your consumers will engage with, sure. But its better to have one that you know they will. In a world where campaigns potentially live or die based on their narrative, why wouldnt you want to know what consumers are thinking before you embark on yours?

Read the original:
HeyHuman's Neil Davidson: how neuroscience can find new ways to tell ad stories - More About Advertising | Insights into Advertising

IMMERSION NEUROSCIENCE INDEX REVEALS THE PUBLIC CRAVES DIRECTION FROM ITS ELECTED LEADERS, NOT CELEBRITIES, DURING A CRISIS – Multichannel News

LOS ANGELES Immersion Neuroscience, the worlds most advanced predictive software company unlocking neuroscience to measure what people love, announced today a new Immersion Index revealing people's reaction to celebrities vs. elected officials communications about the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Immersion researched the most effective way to share information with the public about coronavirus. This new study compares celebrities and their social media messages with elected officials.

The best way to determine if communication is effective is to measure how well it "sticks" in the brain. Science has established that when the brain is immersed in information, it is remembered, shared with others, and acted on. Highly immersive information is what will reduce the spread of the coronavirus and save lives, said Dr. Paul J. Zak, Founder of Immersion.

The research study: Immersion asked participants to turn on their Apple watches or other wearable sensors and emailed them six videos to view online. The videos ran for one-and-a-half to two minutes and featured President Trump; Vice President Pence, who leads the White House Coronavirus Task Force; Dr. Anthony Fauci, who leads the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and is a member of the Coronavirus Task Force; Georgia Governor Brian Kemp; singer Cardi B; and actor and former governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger, all speaking about the coronavirus outbreak.

The study revealed that communication about coronavirus by government leaders is significantly more effective than a celebrity rant or an offbeat video with miniature horses, for example.

The Immersion platform aggregated neurologic responses and returned an average Immersion value from 1-10 for each video.

Immersion Index results for communication effectiveness are:

Vice President Pence generated neurologic immersion that was 48% higher than the next most immersive speakers, a tie between President Trump and Governor Kemp. Dr. Fauci was a close third at 53% less immersive, while Arnold and Cardi B were at the bottom of the list at 61% and 64% less immersive than Mr. Pence.

The results show that fact-based videos from elected officials, delivered without theatrics were significantly more immersive, meaning these are more likely to motivate actions by citizens.

We salute celebrities for reminding the public to be safe. But, when times are tough, this study shows that brains know that experts provide the most valuable information. If you ask people which videos they "like" or find "entertaining," they will choose the stars over the experts. Extensive research has shown that "liking" has no relationship to what people do. In this time of crisis, action is what matters. That is why measuring neurologic immersion is so important, said Immersion CEO Scott Brown.

Fifteen years of peer-reviewed research has proven that when the brain produces a specific set of unconscious responses called "immersion," it identifies an experience as valuable.

Immersions proprietary solution and software is the world's most accurate way to measure the brain's unconscious emotional responses to virtually any type of content whether its video, music, live events, training, educational resources and more. Developed by distinguished research scientists, Immersions simple to use and scalable predictive SaaS platform democratizes neuroscience so that anyone can measure what people love at scale.

The Immersion platform is unique in its ability to perform distributed neuroscience which becomes essential at a time when the world is sheltering in place. Immersion measures brain responses any place that people are using a mobile app that sends data to cloud servers. Algorithms developed by Immersion scientists infer brain activity from a small wearable sensor.

To learn more about Immersion, visit http://www.getimmersion.com.

For more information, contact:

Andrew Laszacs

Bob Gold & Associates

310-320-2010

immersion@bobgoldpr.com

Read the rest here:
IMMERSION NEUROSCIENCE INDEX REVEALS THE PUBLIC CRAVES DIRECTION FROM ITS ELECTED LEADERS, NOT CELEBRITIES, DURING A CRISIS - Multichannel News

A Community That Writes Together – Duke Today

Write!

For Sarah Gaither, this command reminds her what she needs to make time to do. As an assistant professor of psychology & neuroscience at Duke, she balances a robust teaching and research load with administrative duties, meetings with collaborators and students, leadership of the Duke Identity & Diversity Lab and more. Advancing her own scholarship can get squeezed to the margins, but she cant allow that to happen during this critical period in her career.

From manuscripts, grants and book chapters to opinion pieces and responses to editors, junior faculty need to write to build their tenure files and advance in rank.

Protected writing time is key. And for Black scholars like Gaither, a supportive community can be a big help in navigating this stage of faculty life.

Seed Funding for Faculty Initiatives

Dukes Office of the Vice Provost for Faculty Advancement has provided seed funding for WRAP since 2018. Faculty Advancement Seed Grants provide a financial head start for faculty-led initiatives aiming to foster a sense of community, build networks and promote a welcoming and respectful climate for all members of Dukes academic units.

The seed grants program is part of the offices multifaceted approach to faculty development and advancement, whose goals are to support hiring and retention, to provide resources and programs to help faculty succeed as scholars and mentors and to foster a welcoming and professional environment.

When faculty mobilize around campus, that influences the whole ecosystem here, says Sherilynn Black, associate vice provost for faculty advancement. Everyone can benefit, including postdocs, students and staff.

A member of the Duke community for the past two decades, Black earned her Ph.D. in neurobiology, followed by a postdoc position and an appointment as assistant professor of the practice of medical education.

Being with the group is like exhaling, says Black, who is an active participant in WRAP herself. Its implicitly understood what youre going through.

WRAPs seed grant covers food at campus-based meetings along with lodging, meals and travel related to the writing retreats.

Gaither joined the Writing and ReseArch Productivity (WRAP) Group for Underrepresented Faculty shortly after coming to Duke. Today she serves as co-leader along with Tyson Brown, associate professor of sociology, who founded the group in 2016. WRAP offers weekly writing sessions, weekend writing retreats and other programming. The aim is to build community among Black faculty, increase their publication rates and enhance their sense of inclusion on campus

With very few minority faculty in my department, WRAP has been essential in creating a support system for my faculty life transition, Gaither says, and the guided writing time has been critical during my first years on the tenure track.

As universities pursue efforts to improve the racial climate on their campuses, Brown says that faculty of color often do a disproportionate share of racial equity labor such as serving on diversity committees, helping to navigate racial incidents and recruiting and training students of color. While racial equity labor is essential, it can also be taxing and take away from time for research.

WRAP members participate in a weekly two-hour writing session. In the first 10 to 15 minutes, we talk about our goals for that session, Gaither says. We go around the table and hear from each person. Then we do 90 minutes of writing. We close by taking 15 minutes and asking each person to assess the success of that session as well as how things are going with research, teaching and life in general.

If faculty are not on campus, they can join the group virtually.

Each week an average of seven members show up and a total of 22 faculty and postdocs have participated. They represent 14 disciplines and units across campus.

Its like a triple accountability system, Gaither says. Youve got the time blocked, and people mark their calendars. And when were writing with similar people, we want to see how things are going; if someone doesnt show, Ill call them and ask where they were. Theres also a shared Google sheet. Everyone logs the hours and minutes they spend every week on writing.

In addition to the weekly sessions, two weekend-long writing retreats are offered during the year to increase the groups writing time. Each person aims to create a publication-ready article by engaging in structured writing sessions.

As the group evolves, Brown and Gaither are adding some new components. They see a need for making connections between faculty ranks and plan to encourage Black associate professors and visiting faculty to join. Senior faculty members and campus leaders will also bridge the gap by serving as guest speakers.

A one-day writing retreat in Durham will supplement the weekend retreats and accommodate faculty for whom overnight travel is a challenge.

WRAP members help each other by reviewing drafts and discussing strategies for navigating job situations. A listserv with 30 members supplements in-person conversations.

Co-leading and participating in WRAP programmatic activities has greatly enhanced my productivity, and led to opportunities and connections with faculty in other units across the university, Brown says. Ive found that meeting weekly to write alongside others has been useful for providing accountability and protected time for writing. Participating in the group has also fostered a sense of community and provided opportunities for us to discuss our scholarship, teaching and unique experiences.

Other members report improved daily writing habits, greater self-confidence both academically and personally, increases in research productivity and enhanced feelings of inclusion and community.

At last count, Brown and Gaither identified a substantial output among members over the past two years: collectively they submitted 28 papers, 17 grant proposals and 14 conference abstracts, and they have two books in preparation.

Perhaps most importantly, they are doing this work together as a community. The group has been so supportive, says Gaither. It has made my Duke experience better!

Read this article:
A Community That Writes Together - Duke Today