All posts by medical

2020 CRC scholarship recipients announced – Austin Daily Herald – Austin Herald

Cooperative Response Center, Inc. (CRC) has announce the eight recipients of its 2020 scholarship program, each awarded $1,000 for their post-secondary education costs.

This years scholarship recipients are as follows:

Malina Luke, sister of CRC employee Rena Cooley and a 2020 graduate of Southland Senior High in Adams, plans to attend Riverland Community College to pursue a degree in nursing.

Katherine Schramek, daughter of CRC employee Julie Schramek, is a 2020 graduate of Austin High School. Katherine will attend Riverland Community College in the fall and plans to pursue a degree in environmental education.

Avery Thompson, daughter of CRC employee Paul Thompson, is a 2020 graduate of Austin High School as well. Avery plans to attend the College of St. Scholastica in Duluth, Minn., to study exercise physiology and kinesiology.

Mia Fjelsta, the daughter of CRC employee Brad Fjelsta, is a 2020 graduate of Albert Lea Senior High School in Albert Lea, Minn. Mia plans to attend Wayne State College in Wayne, Neb., to double major in accounting and forensic science.

Winners from outside the state included Hudson Hawkins (Cooper High School, Abilene, Texas), Paige Narrramore (Sequatchie County High School, Dunlap, Tennessee), Amber Palmer (Cooper High School, Abilene, Texas), Emily Beavers (Sequatchie County High School, Dunlap, Tennessee).

This is the 12th year CRC has offered a scholarship program to local graduates. In October 2019, students in the communities in which CRC has offices Austin, Dunlap, and Abilene were invited to apply for a 2020 CRC scholarship. The scholarship recipients were selected in May.

As these students wrap up an unexpectedly difficult final high school year due to stay-at-home orders, we hope receiving one of CRCs $1,000 scholarships offers them comfort and support as they continue their educational journeys, said Chris Holt, CRCs president and CEO. Congratulations to the students on their high school achievements. Their hard work, dedication, and commitment to community are to be commended.

Excerpt from:
2020 CRC scholarship recipients announced - Austin Daily Herald - Austin Herald

CCAC prepared to move into green phase of reopening – WTAE Pittsburgh

With Allegheny County moving into the green phase of reopening, the Community College of Allegheny County is getting ready for face-to-face classes again."We are very excited for the opportunity to launch our green phase this summer, which we plan to have our first face-to-face classes starting on June 29 and then continuing on in the fall," CCAC President Quintin Bullock said Friday.Students have been taking online classes. But when it comes to in-person learning, Bullock said the campus will look different, including students and staff wearing masks. The college will also have smaller class sizes."Classes that would traditionally be classes of 24 will probably be now a class of eight, to be able to maintain that social distancing," said Bullock.In some cases, instead of having the traditional 15-week course, students will have one week of face-to-face classes followed by online instruction."Programs that require hands-on work, such as many of the science labs and physiology, welding, construction, megatronics, because they have to learn those hands-on skills sets," Bullock said.The Pennsylvania Department of Education has released guidance for schools reopening.CCAC will follow guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Bullock is depending on students to follow the rules too."We're hoping that they come back with learned skills already specific to what the Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health, as well as PDE, has been speaking about over the last several weeks, which are face coverings, social distancing and maintaining very good hygiene," he said.The college won't be able to hold non-educational events with more than 250 people.

With Allegheny County moving into the green phase of reopening, the Community College of Allegheny County is getting ready for face-to-face classes again.

"We are very excited for the opportunity to launch our green phase this summer, which we plan to have our first face-to-face classes starting on June 29 and then continuing on in the fall," CCAC President Quintin Bullock said Friday.

Students have been taking online classes. But when it comes to in-person learning, Bullock said the campus will look different, including students and staff wearing masks. The college will also have smaller class sizes.

"Classes that would traditionally be classes of 24 will probably be now a class of eight, to be able to maintain that social distancing," said Bullock.

In some cases, instead of having the traditional 15-week course, students will have one week of face-to-face classes followed by online instruction.

"Programs that require hands-on work, such as many of the science labs and physiology, welding, construction, megatronics, because they have to learn those hands-on skills sets," Bullock said.

The Pennsylvania Department of Education has released guidance for schools reopening.

CCAC will follow guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Bullock is depending on students to follow the rules too.

"We're hoping that they come back with learned skills already specific to what the Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health, as well as PDE, has been speaking about over the last several weeks, which are face coverings, social distancing and maintaining very good hygiene," he said.

The college won't be able to hold non-educational events with more than 250 people.

Link:
CCAC prepared to move into green phase of reopening - WTAE Pittsburgh

Lost On The Frontline: Nearly 600 And Counting U.S. Health Workers Have Died Of COVID-19 – WMFE

Kaiser Health News and The Guardian have launched Lost on the Frontline, a project to document and verify health care workers who have died from COVID-19.

Nearly 600 front-line health care workers appear to have died of COVID-19, according to Lost on the Frontline, a project launched by The Guardian and KHN that aims to count, verify and memorialize every health care worker who dies during the pandemic.

The tally includes doctors, nurses and paramedics, as well as crucial health care support staff such as hospital janitors, administrators and nursing home workers, who have put their own lives at risk during the pandemic to help care for others. Lost on the Frontline has now published the names and obituaries for more than 100 workers.

A majority of those documented were identified as people of color, mostly African American and Asian/Pacific Islander. Profiles of more victims, and an updated count, will be added to the news sites twice weekly going forward.

There is no other comprehensive accounting of U.S. health care workers deaths. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has counted 368 COVID deaths among health care workers, but acknowledges its tally is an undercount. The CDC does not identify individuals.

The Guardian and KHN are building an interactive, public-facing database that will also track factors such as race and ethnicity, age, profession, location and whether the workers had adequate access to protective gear. The database to be released this summer will offer insight into the workings and failings of the U.S. health care system during the pandemic.

In addition to tracking deaths, Lost on the Frontline reports on the challenges health care workers are facing during the pandemic. Many were forced to reuse masks countless times amid widespread equipment shortages. Others had only trash bags for protection. Some deaths have been met with employers silence or denials that they were infected at work.

The number released today reflects the 586 names currently in the Lost on the Frontline internal database, which have been collected from family members, friends and colleagues of the deceased, health workers unions, media reports, unions, among other sources. Reporters at KHN and The Guardian are independently confirming each death by contacting family members, employers, medical examiners and others before publishing names and obituaries on our sites. More than a dozen journalists across two newsrooms as well as student journalists are involved in the project.

Many of the health care workers included here studied physiology and anatomy for years. They steeled themselves against the long hours theyd endure. Emergency medical technicians raced by ambulance to help. Others did the cleanup, maintenance, security or transportation jobs needed to keep operations running smoothly.

They undertook their work with passion and dedication. They were also beloved spouses, parents, friends, military veterans and community activists.

None started 2020 knowing that simply showing up to work would expose them to a virus that would kill them.

This project aims to capture the human stories, compassion and heroism behind the statistics. Among those lost were Dr. Priya Khanna, a nephrologist, who continued to review her patients charts until she was put on a ventilator. Her father, a retired surgeon, succumbed to the disease just days after his daughter.

Susana Pabatao, one of thousands of Philippine health providers in the United States, became a nurse in her late 40s. Susana died just days after her husband, Alfredo, who was also infected with COVID-19.

Dr. James Goodrich, a renowned pediatric neurosurgeon, acclaimed for separating conjoined twins, was also remembered as a renaissance man who collected antique medical books, loved fine wines and played the didgeridoo.

Some of the first to die faced troubling conditions at work. Rose Harrison, 60, a registered nurse, wore no mask while taking care of a COVID-19 patient at an Alabama nursing home, according to her daughter. She felt pressured to work until the day she was hospitalized. The nursing home did not respond to requests for comment.

Thomas Soto, 59, a Brooklyn radiology clerk faced delays in accessing protective gear, including a mask, even as the hospital where he worked was overwhelmed with COVID-19 patients, his son said. The hospital did not respond to requests for comment.

The Lost on the Frontline team is documenting other worrying trends. Health care workers across the U.S. said failures in communication left them unaware they were working alongside people infected with the virus. And occupational safety experts raised alarms about CDC guidance permitting workers treating COVID patients to wear surgical masks which are far less protective than N95 masks.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the federal agency responsible for protecting workers, has launched dozens of fatality investigations into health workers deaths. But recent agency memos raise doubts that many employers will be held responsible for negligence.

As public health guidelines have largely prevented traditional gatherings of mourners, survivors have found new ways to honor the dead: In Manhattan, a medical resident played a violin tribute for a fallen co-worker; a nurses union placed 88 pairs of shoes outside the White House commemorating those who had died among their ranks; fire departments have lined up trucks for funeral processions and held last call ceremonies for EMTs.

The Lost on the Frontline death toll includes only health care workers who were potentially exposed while caring for or supporting COVID-19 patients. It does not, for example, include retired doctors who died from the virus but were not working during the pandemic.

The number of reported deaths is expected to grow. But as reporters work to confirm each case, individual deaths may not meet our criteria for inclusion and, therefore, may be removed from our count.

You can read our first 100 profiles here. And if you know of a health care worker who died of COVID-19, please share their story with us.

Continued here:
Lost On The Frontline: Nearly 600 And Counting U.S. Health Workers Have Died Of COVID-19 - WMFE

Graduates sum up their MSU experience in one word – The Wichitan

Ashma Henry. Photo courtesy of Ashma Henry.

Ashma Henry | Computer science graduate

One word: fulfilling.

I use this word as in most cases individuals dont know their own strength until strength is the only thing you can rely on to get through the semester. These past years have definitely pushed me past what I thought was my limit, allowing me to develop the abilities and characteristics that I assumed were dormant: fulfillment not only in the educational field but also as it pertains to being well rounded. Joining different organizations and working with different personalities has definitely changed my perspective of life and I will always value this experience.

Jocelyn Miranda | Business administration graduate

One word: worried.

I chose the word worried, because I have always been the type of person to know what comes next and who always has a plan, but graduating was really the last part of my life that I truly had planned for. Im not sure what the future holds, and its kind of intimidating to not know what comes next especially with everything going on right now in the world.

Yelena Nemchen-Rueda | Exercise physiology graduate

One word: excited.

There is so much more to explore in this world, and I will finally be able to have a weekend to do whatever I want and not spend it doing homework and getting the assignments done.

Yelena Nemchen-Rueda | Exercise physiology graduate

One word: excited.

There is so much more to explore in this world, and I will finally be able to have a weekend to do whatever I want and not spend it doing homework and getting the assignments done.

Ramon Rueda | Exercise physiology graduate

One word: motivation.

I think that now I have sufficient knowledge as well as experience to share with children as I want to teach high school and coach track and field.

Alexis Walsh | Nursing graduate

One word: accomplished.

Ive worked really hard to get to where I am at today, and this achievement just solidifies that all the struggles were worth it!!

Brendan Wynne | mass communication graduate

One word: lackluster.

Dont get me wrong, I couldnt be more thrilled to be done, but I didnt realize that March 11 was the last day I was going to see most of my classmates, you know? I didnt realize that the whole world would suffer a pandemic, or that my graduation would be null and void.

I didnt get the chance to make the documentary that I had intended, but I got to make something very different and unique in its place. So, I am also grateful.

Hannah Mattinson | Education graduate

One word: excited.

I know thats corny and about as basic as can be but Im ready for the next step in life. I had a great time at MSU but I think Im ready to move on and start what Ive been preparing for. Were leaving Wichita Falls and getting jobs and its exciting to have this huge change and to keep moving forward.

Javier Fuerte | Sport and leisure studies graduate

One word: proud.

[I chose proud] because I am a first-generation Hispanic student and it brings me and my family a ton of emotions and overall feeling of pride to be able to have achieved this goal.

Sarah Glawe | Education graduate

One word: excited.

While I am sad about leaving MSU, I cant wait to see what the next chapter holds!

Jernelle Baptiste | Management information systems graduate

When I think of graduation, I think of the word accomplishment.

Being the eldest sibling and a first generation student, I felt compelled to do well. I wanted to be a great role model for my siblings. I wanted to show them that they can accomplish anything they set their mind to.

Read more here:
Graduates sum up their MSU experience in one word - The Wichitan

Immunology- An Overview of Immune System, its Types, Disorders

ImmunologyDefinition

The study of the immune system, the cell-mediated and humoral aspects of immunity and immune responses.

Immunology is a branch of the biology involved with the study of the immune system,components of the immune system, its biological process,the physiological functioning of the immune system, types, its disorder and lot more.

The immune system acts as a bodys defence system by protecting our body cells, tissues and organs from invading infection through various lines of defence. Overall,the immune system functions as a physical barrier and avoid the entry of pathogens including theharmful microorganisms and other disease-causing microbes.

Under certain conditions, when ourimmune system stops functioning, then this results in infectious diseases, such as allergies, fever, flu, and may also lead to a dreadful disease like cancer and etc.

Also Read: Immunity

Let us have a detailed look at Immunology to learn about the immune system, its different parts, functions and other significances of Immunology.

Immune System consists of different types of cells and molecules which protect our body against pathogens.Pathogens are defined as everything from parasites to fungi, bacteria, viruses, and haptens. Haptens are molecules that may cause an immune response when comes in contact with a protein. All these cells and molecules are distributed in all the tissues of the body as well as lymphoid organs which eliminate or prevent microbial infectious diseases to decrease the growth of tumours and starts the repairing process of damaged tissues.

The tissues and organs of the immune system act as security forces where cells act as the security guards while molecules act as the guns & bullets and use the communication system to protect you.

We, humans, havetwo typesof Immune System and are classified based on itsresistance power against theinfectious agents.

Immune System fights against microbes.

Innate Immune System is composed of cells and proteins that are present and always ready to fight against microbes in the infection area. InnateImmune System is present from the time of our birth.

Main elements of the innate immune system are

The Adaptive Immune System is required to fight against pathogens that can control innate immune defences. It is also referred to as the Acquired Immune System because it is acquired during the course of life.

All the components of the adaptive immune system are generally inactive however when activated; these components adjust to the presence of all the infectious agents by proliferating and developing a potent mechanism for eliminating the microbes.

Two Types of adaptive responses are humoral immunity moderated by antibodies which are developed by B lymphocytes and cell-mediated immunity, moderated by T Lymphocytes.

Normally, the diseaseoccurs because of fundamental defects in the immune system. In this situation, the immune system is challenged and evoke responses that damage cells and tissues rather than protecting. All the immunodeficiency diseases increase the risk of tumours and infections and are caused by malnutrition, gene mutations, and viruses HIV.

Also Refer:Antigens and Immunology

This is an experimental method used for studying the structure and functions of the immune system. There are differenttechniques, which includes:

Immunology is widely used in numerousdisciplines, including inmedicine, in the fields of organ transplantation, bacteriology, oncology, virology, parasitology, Rheumatic diseases, psychiatric disorders, and dermatology. TheImmunology of transplantation mainly deals with the process oftransplantationfrom a donor to the recipient.

This was a brief introduction toImmunology, for more information onImmunology, immune system, itstechniques, notes forImmunology class 12, visit us at Byjus Biology.

See the article here:
Immunology- An Overview of Immune System, its Types, Disorders

Inhibition of Bruton tyrosine kinase in patients with severe COVID-19 – Science

Abstract

Patients with severe COVID-19 have a hyperinflammatory immune response suggestive of macrophage activation. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) regulates macrophage signaling and activation. Acalabrutinib, a selective BTK inhibitor, was administered off-label to 19 patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 (11 on supplemental oxygen; 8 on mechanical ventilation), 18 of whom had increasing oxygen requirements at baseline. Over a 10-14 day treatment course, acalabrutinib improved oxygenation in a majority of patients, often within 1-3 days, and had no discernable toxicity. Measures of inflammation C-reactive protein and IL-6 normalized quickly in most patients, as did lymphopenia, in correlation with improved oxygenation. At the end of acalabrutinib treatment, 8/11 (72.7%) patients in the supplemental oxygen cohort had been discharged on room air, and 4/8 (50%) patients in the mechanical ventilation cohort had been successfully extubated, with 2/8 (25%) discharged on room air. Ex vivo analysis revealed significantly elevated BTK activity, as evidenced by autophosphorylation, and increased IL-6 production in blood monocytes from patients with severe COVID-19 compared with blood monocytes from healthy volunteers. These results suggest that targeting excessive host inflammation with a BTK inhibitor is a therapeutic strategy in severe COVID-19 and has led to a confirmatory international prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is a new pandemic disease caused by a single-stranded RNA zoonotic virus termed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (1). The spectrum of COVID-19 ranges from a mild respiratory illness to a severe disease requiring hospitalization in up to a third of patients, with frequent progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and a high mortality (2). It has been reported that COVID-19 patients can have a biphasic clinical course with deterioration following initial improvement, consistent with a delayed and exaggerated immune activation (24). A virus-induced hyperinflammatory response or cytokine storm (5) has been hypothesized to be a major pathogenic mechanism of ARDS in these patients through modulation of pulmonary macrophages, dendritic cells and/or neutrophils (610). Indeed, patients with COVID-19 have elevated blood levels of multiple inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-, IP-10, MCP-1, and MIP-1), and those requiring admittance to an intensive care unit have even higher levels of many of these (11, 12). The hyperinflammatory response in COVID-19 shares biological characteristics with macrophage activation syndrome, suggesting that targeting the innate immune system may be an effective strategy (13).

We became aware of the role of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) in human innate immune responses from our studies of the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib in lymphoma, in which some patients developed invasive aspergillosis during treatment (14). Moreover, we demonstrated that BTK-deficient mice are unable to control infection with this fungus, which is normally kept in check by monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils (1416). While this is an uncommon complication, it raised the possibility that BTK inhibitors may modulate human inflammatory responses dominated by macrophages, as is the case in COVID-19 (17, 18) and in a mouse model of this infection (Fig. 1) (19). In macrophages, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognize single-stranded RNA from viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and initiate signaling through BTK-dependent activation of NF-B, triggering the production of multiple inflammatory cytokines and chemokines as well as phagocytosis (Fig. 1) (2023). In addition, BTK plays a key role in the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, resulting in maturation and secretion of IL-1 (2426). Moreover, in a mouse influenza model, BTK inhibition decreased inflammatory mediators and rescued mice from lethal acute lung injury, suggesting that it may mitigate virally-induced lung damage driven by excessive inflammation (27).

Binding of SARS-CoV2 to ACE2 on respiratory epithelia initiates infection. Hypothetically, macrophages may participate in the COVID-19 inflammatory response by phagocytic uptake of viral particles or cellular debris containing viral single-stranded RNA (ssRNA). ssRNA can bind to TLR7 and TLR8, thereby recruiting and activating BTK and MYD88 (51, 52). Downstream of TLR engagement, BTK-dependent NF-B activation results in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (53), a cytokine storm that could increase the recruitment of monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils during the late phase of severe COVID-19 infection. BTK inhibitors such as acalabrutinib block TLR-dependent NF-B activation in macrophages (20, 21), thereby dampening the production of pro-inflammatory mediators, as occurs in an influenza-induced lung injury model (27). During severe COVID-19, the heightened levels of IL-1 in several COVID-19 patients (11, 12) indicates the formation of an NLRP3 inflammasome that converts pro-IL-1 to mature IL-1 (54). BTK binds to and phosphorylates NLRP3, thereby promoting its oligomerization and assembly into an inflammasome (2426). BTK inhibitors such as acalabrutinib inhibit inflammasome-mediated production of IL-1, as observed in a model of influenza-induced lung injury (27). SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; TLR, Toll-like receptor; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; BTK, Bruton tyrosine kinase; NF-B, nuclear factor kappa B; NLRP3, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3; ASC, Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain; ORF3a, open reading frame 3a; IFN-, interferon gamma; IL, interleukin; IL-12R, IL-12 receptor; CCL2, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2; CXCL1, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1; CXCR2, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2.

Based on these considerations, we hypothesized that dysregulated BTK-dependent macrophage signaling is central to the exaggerated inflammatory responses and pulmonary sequelae of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and potentially other single-stranded RNA viruses. In an effort to reduce inflammation and improve clinical outcome of patients with severe COVID-19, we administered acalabrutinib, a highly specific covalent inhibitor of BTK approved in the United States for the treatment of lymphoid malignancies (28). Herein, we present a prospective off-label clinical study of 19 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia who also had evidence of inflammation and/or severe lymphopenia.

This prospective off-label clinical study includes 19 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 who received off-label acalabrutinib between March 20, 2020 (date of treatment of the first patient) through April 10, 2020 with formal data collection completed on April 23, 2020 (Table S1). Entry criteria for this study were confirmed COVID-19 requiring hospitalization for hypoxemia (room air blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 94% or less) and evidence of inflammation (C-reactive protein (CRP) > 10 mg/dL and/or ferritin > 500 ng/mL) and/or lymphopenia (absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) < 1000 cells/L). Among these patients, 13 (68%) were men and the median age was 61 years with a range of 45 to 84 years (Table 1). Eleven (58%) patients were receiving supplemental oxygen for a median of 2 days (range: 1-12), 7/11 (64%) of whom were on high flow nasal cannula at the time they began acalabrutinib (supplemental oxygen cohort). All but one patient had an increasing oxygen demand at the time of treatment initiation. In addition, 8 (42%) patients were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for a median of 1.5 (range: 1-22) days prior to acalabrutinib administration (mechanical ventilation cohort). Coexisting medical conditions included hypertension in 16/19 (84%), obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m2) in 13/19 (68%), and diabetes mellitus in 7/19 (37%) with a median (range) of 2 (0-5) co-morbid conditions per patient.

Obesity is defined as body mass index 30 kg/m2, morbid obesity is defined as body mass index 40 kg/m2.

In the supplemental oxygen cohort, concomitant drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 included steroids and/or hydroxychloroquine in 5/11 (45%) patients each, and in the mechanical ventilation cohort, 6/8 (75%) and 3/8 (38%) patients, respectively, received these drugs. No patients received an anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody or remdesivir.

Laboratory evidence of inflammation with elevated CRP and/or ferritin was present in 18/19 (95%) patients with significantly elevated baseline laboratory abnormalities prior to acalabrutinib dosing including elevated CRP (> 10 mg/dL) in 15/19 (79%) patients [median (range) of 18.7 (2-31.5)]; ferritin (> 500 ng/mL) in 16/19 (84%) patients [median (range) 1240 (155-4168)]; fibrinogen (> 400 mg/dl) in 10/10 (100%) patients [median (range) 605 (409- >1000)]; D-dimer (> 0.5 mcg/mL) in 15/17 (88%) patients [median (range) 1.65 (0.48- >20)]; IL-6 ( 15 pg/mL) in 9/9 (100%) patients [median (range) 44 (25-89.8)]; and severely decreased ALC ( 1000 cells/L) in 15/18 (83%) patients [median (range) 675 (250-1700)] (Table 1). A patient with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (Patient 11) was excluded from the analysis of lymphocytes.

To provide an estimate of a patients oxygen requirement, given different supplemental oxygen flow rates and concentrations, we computed the ratio of the percent blood oxygen saturation to the concentration of delivered oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) with higher values representing an improved oxygen uptake efficiency (Fig. 2, 3). The oxygen delivery rate, method of administration, delivered oxygen concentration (FiO2) and oxygen saturation values (SpO2/FiO2) are provided in Tables S2, S3.

Shown are measures of oxygen uptake requirement SpO2/FiO2 (% blood oxygen saturation (SpO2)/fraction of delivered oxygen (FiO2)), a ratio that accounts for both oxygen delivery and uptake (theoretical maximum 476 for 100% oxygen saturation on room air). Also shown are measures of inflammation (C-reactive protein mg/dL) and absolute lymphocyte count (cells/L) at all available timepoints before and after acalabrutinib treatment, which was started on day 1 (dotted line). Notable clinical parameters are shown as indicated (extubation, breathing on room air, transfer to rehabilitation, hospital discharge, death). The duration of mechanical ventilation (Vent.) is indicated.

See legend for Fig. 2.

Among 11 patients in the supplemental oxygen cohort, the median duration of follow-up from the initiation of acalabrutinib treatment was 12 (range 10-14) days. All but one patient received at least 10 days of acalabrutinib, which was the anticipated treatment duration. At the time of formal data collection, 8 (73%) patients no longer required supplemental oxygen and had been discharged from the hospital. Among 3 patients still requiring oxygen, one was on 4L/min by nasal cannula and one was on a ventilator, both with decreasing oxygen requirements, and one patient was on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with a stable oxygen requirement (Fig. 2).

Eight patients on invasive mechanical ventilation were followed for a median of 12 days (range 7-30) from the initiation of acalabrutinib treatment and received the anticipated treatment duration of 10 to 14 days, with the exception of 2 patients who died (Fig. 3). In this patient group, 4/8 (50%) were extubated, two of whom were discharged, one was on 4 L/min of oxygen and weaning, and one died of an acute pulmonary embolism. Four patients remained intubated and included three patients with oscillating oxygen requirements, and one patient who died after withdrawal of support. Two of these ventilated patients had organ dysfunction due to sepsis and renal failure.

While these results are based on our prespecified cutoff for full data analysis of April 23, 2020, we obtained an outcome update as of May 28, 2020 to assess if any patients had a disease recurrence off of acalabrutinib. In the supplementary oxygen cohort, 9 patients had been discharged on room air and remained clinically well, one was still hospitalized, and one died. In the mechanical ventilation cohort, 3 patients were discharged on room air and remained well, one was discharged to rehabilitation, and 4 patients died. In all, 12 patients achieved normal oxygenation on room air (2 more that at our formal data cutoff) and none have had a recurrence.

Laboratory measures of inflammation were monitored during treatment (Fig. 2 and 3; Tables S4, S5). The earliest and most consistent indicator of decreased inflammation was the CRP level. In the 11 patients on supplemental oxygen, CRP returned to normal in 10 (91%) patients and was decreasing in one (9%) patient (Fig. 2, 3). Available serial IL-6 levels showed normalization in 3/5 (60%) patients, and a 3-fold and 13-fold reduction from the peak value in 2 additional patients. Changes in D-dimer and fibrinogen were variable over the treatment course and did not show a clear pattern. Similarly, ferritin was quite variable and oscillated over the treatment period. In 10 patients in whom ALC was evaluable, 7 (70%) patients had increased levels on acalabrutinib, with normalization in 6, and 3 (30%) patients had decreased levels at the last available measurement (Tables S6, S7).

The 8 patients who began acalabrutinib while on mechanical ventilation showed a more variable and blunted change in laboratory values compared to those on supplemental oxygen. The CRP normalized in 2 (25%) patients, both of whom were extubated, and decreased in 3 (37%) other patients (Table S5). Three patients showed oscillating levels of CRP, one of whom was extubated and two of whom had multiorgan failure. Serial IL-6 levels available in 2 patients oscillated, and both patients had intercurrent infections. ALC values improved in a majority of these patients, with normalized values in 5/8 (63%) and oscillating values in 3/8 (37%) (Table S7).

Mixed-effect regression analysis showed that over time, patients in the supplemental oxygen cohort generally increased their oxygen uptake efficiency (p= 3.65E-6) and ALC (p= 0.0252) and decreased their CRP levels (p=1.15E-4) (Table S8), as illustrated by the trend lines in Fig. 4A. Moreover, CRP levels were inversely associated with ALC values in the supplemental oxygen cohort (p=5.53E-3). Similar trends were observed in the mechanical ventilation cohort but did not achieve statistical significance. CRP levels were inversely associated with oxygen uptake efficiency in both the supplemental oxygen cohort (p=1.82E-3) and in the mechanical ventilation cohort (p=1.46E-2) (Fig. 4B). ALC was directly associated with oxygen uptake efficiency in the supplemental oxygen cohort (p=2.11E-4), but not in the mechanical ventilation cohort (Fig. 4B). These results demonstrate a relatively consistent association of the CRP and ALC biomarkers with clinical improvement as measured by oxygen uptake efficiency, particularly in the supplemental oxygen cohort.

Plots of oxygen uptake efficiency (SpO2/FiO2), CRP and ALC levels versus days of acalabrutinib treatment for all patients at all time points. Patients in the supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilation cohorts are indicated in red and blue, respectively. The trend lines shown represent the regression from a linear mixed-effect model blocked by patient. The reported p-values test the null hypothesis that the trend line has zero slope. B. Plots of oxygen uptake efficiency (SpO2/FiO2) versus either CRP or ALC. Trend lines and p-values as above.

No treatment emergent toxicities attributable to acalabrutinib were observed. Toxicities of special interest associated with acalabrutinib including cardiac arrhythmias, grade 3 or higher bleeding, diarrhea, and opportunistic infections were not observed during the treatment period (Table S9).

To examine whether the target of acalabrutinib, BTK, was activated in patients with COVID-19, we studied BTK autophosphorylation at residue Y223 in whole blood samples from 3 patients with severe COVID-19 (Table S10) and in 5 healthy volunteers (Fig. S1). We observed a significantly increased mean fluorescence intensity of phosphorylated BTK in CD14+ monocytes from patients with severe COVID-19 relative to that observed in healthy volunteers, an increase that was not due to differential levels of total BTK (Fig. 5A). We next examined expression of IL-6 protein by immune cells in the blood of COVID-19 patient since the production of this cytokine is known to be increased by BTK activity in normal human monocytes/macrophages (Fig. S2). Flow cytometric analysis of unstimulated whole blood samples revealed a significant increase in the percentage of IL-6+ CD14+ monocytes in patients with severe COVID-19 (n=4) compared with healthy volunteers (n=5; Fig. 5B). Treatment of these whole blood samples with the small molecule R848, a mimic of TLR7 and TLR8 activation by single strand RNA, increased the percentage of IL-6+ blood monocytes, with significantly higher levels in samples from COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls (Fig. 5B). Of note, the percentage of IL-6+ monocytes in patients with severe COVID-19 without ex-vivo restimulation was comparable to that observed in monocytes from healthy volunteers following R848 stimulation (Fig. 5B). BTK phosphorylation and IL-6 production were not observed in B cells in the same whole blood samples, demonstrating that BTK was specifically activated in monocytes from COVID-19 patients. In keeping with these findings, blood IL-6 levels in COVID-19 patients on our clinical study decreased during acalabrutinib treatment (p=6.5E-4) (Fig. 5C).

Left panels: histograms of BTK phosphorylation in CD14+ blood monocytes from 3 patients with severe COVID-19 (A, B, C; Table S10) and 4 healthy volunteers, as indicated. Right panels: Summary data showing significant increase in mean fluorescence intensity of phosphorylated BTK (residue Y223) in CD14+ monocytes from 3 COVID-19 patients compared with 5 healthy volunteers, with no evident BTK phosphorylation in CD19+ B cells. Total BTK levels in blood monocytes shown in the far right panel were comparable in 3 COVID-19 patients and 5 healthy volunteers. B. Left panels: Representative contour plots of intracellular IL-6 production in CD14+ monocytes from a patient with severe COVID-19 (Patient C; Table S10) and a healthy volunteer, either as unstimulated ex vivo cells or following R848 (10 M) stimulation, as indicated. Right panels: Summary data showing significant increase in the percent of IL-6+ CD14+ monocytes from 4 COVID-19 patients (A, B, C, D; Table S10) compared with 5 healthy volunteers, before and after R848 stimulation, with no evident IL-6 production by CD19+ B cells. C. Plot of blood IL-6 concentrations (pg/ml) on a log scale versus days of acalabrutinib treatment for patients in whom there were at least two IL-6 measurements during the plotted time course. Patients in the supplemental oxygen (n=5) and mechanical ventilation (n=3) cohorts are indicated in red and blue, respectively. The trend line shown represents the regression from a linear mixed-effect model blocked by patient for the combined cohorts due to limited data in each group. The reported p-value tests the null hypothesis that the trend line has zero slope. All quantitative data in 5A and 5B represent means SEM.

Our clinical and correlative laboratory studies have revealed that BTK is a likely instigator of the pathological inflammatory response in severe COVID-19. In accordance with World Health Organizations guidance (29), we prospectively administered acalabrutinib off-label with therapeutic intent to 19 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, based on the known role of BTK in innate immune cells. All but one patient had increasing oxygen requirements at the time of treatment initiation, and all but 4 patients were on high-flow oxygen or invasive mechanical ventilation, indicating the severity of the disease in this series. The oxygenation and clinical status of most patients on supplemental oxygen improved relatively rapidly following acalabrutinib initiation, which was temporally associated with a normalization of inflammatory markers. Although the patients on mechanical ventilation had a more variable clinical response to acalabrutinib, improved oxygenation in half of these patients allowed them to be extubated. Our laboratory studies of ex vivo blood samples from patients hospitalized with COVID-19 revealed significantly elevated BTK phosphorylation in peripheral blood monocytes compared with healthy volunteers, demonstrating that the target of acalabrutinib is activated in these innate immune cells. This finding supports our view that the apparent beneficial effect of acalabrutinib in these patients was due to on-target inhibition of BTK. More generally, this study highlights the opportunity to improve outcomes in severe COVID-19 by modulating the host inflammatory response.

While most patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 have a limited disease not requiring hospitalization, the patients in this series had progressed to a hyperinflammatory phase of this infection that can be fatal and for which there are no proven treatment strategies. All patients in our series had elevated inflammatory markers including CRP, ferritin and/or IL-6 (2, 30, 31). The majority of patients also had increased D-dimer levels, which can be associated with a coagulopathy that is common in COVID-19. Many patients in this series had a severely depressed ALC, which has also been associated with severe COVID-19. Acalabrutinib administration was temporally associated with a change in several of these biomarkers of inflammation suggesting that BTK activation was triggering this pathology. In the majority of patients, levels of the inflammatory marker CRP normalized or decreased substantially, as did IL-6 levels. Likewise, lymphopenia rapidly normalized in most patients, possibly related to decreased inflammatory cytokines or chemokines (3032). A link between improved pulmonary function and decreased inflammation was strongly suggested by the inverse relationship between a measure of oxygen uptake efficiency (SpO2/FiO2) and CRP levels.

The apparent beneficial effect of acalabrutinib was clearly different between patients who were on supplemental oxygen and those who required mechanical ventilation. In the supplemental oxygen cohort, oxygenation improved in 82%, with 73% discharged on room air despite high preexisting oxygen requirements in most. Though the benefit of acalabrutinib was less dramatic in patients on ventilators, half were extubated after receiving acalabrutinib. The association between oxygen uptake efficiency and normalization of CRP was also evident in the mechanical ventilation cohort. These patients were quite heterogeneous clinically, including patients who had major organ dysfunction such as renal failure or who had been ventilated for an extended period prior to acalabrutinib administration. Though we expected that the optimal time to initiate anti-inflammatory treatment would be prior to deterioration requiring intubation, these results suggest that BTK inhibition may provide significant benefit to a subset of patients with COVID-19 on ventilators. Further correlative studies will be needed to understand the basis for response or resistance to BTK inhibition in patients with such advanced disease.

Since our study investigated the effect of a limited course of acalabrutinib in severe COVID-19, we were interested in whether the disease recurred after acalabrutinib cessation. Among 12 patients who achieved room air status on acalabrutinib, none have had a recurrence suggesting that a short course of acalabrutinib was sufficient to quell the disease clinically.

While all patients fulfilled pre-specified treatment characteristics, limited patient numbers and the absence of a control group may lead to an inaccurate estimate of treatment efficacy and safety. The safety of any drug is always of paramount concern but is further heightened when used in an untested disease state such as severe COVID-19 in which multi-organ dysfunction occurs. It is within this context that we administered acalabrutinib with careful consideration of risks and potential benefits. The safety profile of acalabrutinib is well defined in the context of long-term use over months to years in patients with chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (33). Acalabrutinib has greater kinase selectivity than other clinically available BTK inhibitors, which likely contributes to its favorable safety profile (34). The most common adverse events associated with long-term acalabrutinib therapy include low-grade headache, diarrhea, pyrexia and upper respiratory tract infections with rare grade 3 or 4 toxicity (33). While ibrutinib has been associated with major hemorrhage and atrial fibrillation, these side effects occur rarely in patients treated with acalabrutinib. Inhibition of the innate immune system by BTK inhibitors has been associated with a small increase in opportunistic infections, particularly in the setting of combination chemotherapy or high dose corticosteroids and/or long-term use (14, 35). It is notable that we did not observe any of the above toxicities attributable to acalabrutinib treatment, suggesting that in the context of COVID-19, acalabrutinib is relatively well tolerated. However, since we have only treated a small cohort of patients, the safety profile of acalabrutinib in patients with severe COVID-19 needs to be confirmed in a prospective clinical trial.

Ex vivo analysis of blood samples from patients with severe COVID-19 revealed BTK activation in monocytes in all cases, as evidenced by significantly increased BTK phosphorylation compared with monocytes from healthy volunteers. Notably, blood B cells did not have evidence of BTK activation, suggesting that monocytes/macrophages may be the relevant in vivo target of acalabrutinib in COVID-19. Consistent with this hypothesis, IL-6 production was elevated in monocytes from COVID-19 patients while there was no evidence of IL-6 production in B cells. Notably, BTK was apparently active in the entire population of blood monocytes, given the shift of the entire histogram of BTK phosphorylation to higher levels. This finding is less likely attributable to trafficking of a subpopulation of activated monocytes from the lung to the blood but more consistent with systemic activation of BTK in monocytes, either by the virus, viral RNA, or another circulating inflammatory mediator. This pervasive activation of BTK in monocytes/macrophages argues that the clinical benefit of acalabrutinib stemmed from its ability to turn off pathological BTK signaling in innate immune cells, which in turn extinguished the hyperinflammatory process in these patients.

Acalabrutinib may have been effective because it targets a source of cytokine production in innate immune cells rather than the downstream effector functions of individual cytokines. Other therapeutic strategies have been considered for COVID-19, including corticosteroids. These agents provided little or no benefit in previous coronavirus epidemics and are not recommended for COVID-19 (36). Despite the absence of documented benefit, more than half of the patients in our series received steroid support. Hydroxychloroquine was administered to 42% of our patients despite also having no proven benefit in severe COVID-19. Other immunomodulatory strategies have been proposed, such as monoclonal antibodies targeting the IL-6 or IL-1 receptors, which were not administered to patients in our series (11). Since multiple inflammatory cytokines and chemokines are elevated in patients with COVID-19 (12) inhibition of any one inflammatory mediator may only partially reduce the inflammatory process. While BTK inhibitors interfere with B cell activation and could potentially lower anti-viral antibody titers, this concern may be mitigated by the timing of administration to patients with severe COVID-19, who are typically hospitalized 7 or more days following initial infection. A more complete understanding how BTK inhibitors modulate the immune pathophysiology of COVID-19 will require the use of preclinical model systems in concert with detailed immune profiling of patients with COVID-19, before and during treatment with a BTK inhibitor.

After we initiated our prospective off-label clinical study of acalabrutinib in COVID-19, investigators interested in the role of BTK in COVID-19 reported that among 6 patients with confirmed COVID-19 who were taking the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib chronically for their hematologic malignancy, only one patient was hospitalized (37). In the reported median age of 66 years for these patients, however, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a hospitalization rate of 12.2%, which is in fact lower that the hospitalization rate in this small series (16.6%) (38). Furthermore, since the authors provide no information on comorbidities that are associated with severe COVID-19, it is impossible to conclude that ibrutinib ameliorated the disease course. In one hospitalized patient who was already on ibrutinib, the authors reported a clinical improvement following an increase in the ibrutinib dose, possibly representing a salutary effect or alternatively attributable to other factors in this clinically complicated case. Mechanistically, the authors proposed that ibrutinib inhibited TLR-mediated signaling and pulmonary inflammation by targeting hematopoietic cell kinase (HCK), but acalabrutinib has no significant inhibitory activity against HCK (34), arguing against its relevance.

If BTK inhibition is of clinical benefit in severe COVID-19, as is supported by our data, it raises the question of which BTK inhibitor would be optimal in this clinical setting given the association of COVID-19 with arrythmias and other serious systemic sequelae of the inflammatory process. Acalabrutinib, unlike ibrutinib, has no detectable inhibitory activity against the immunologically important kinase ITK or against EGFR, a key signaling receptor in epithelial cells. While the efficacies of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib are comparable in hematological malignancies, the BTK selectivity of acalabrutinib may reduce unwanted clinical toxicities. In this regard, ibrutinib has a higher incidence of serious bleeding and pro-arrhythmic side effects than acalabrutinib, toxicities that may worsen the outcome of patients with severe COVID-19 (39).

The clinical and laboratory findings in patients with severe COVID-19 are indicative of macrophage activation syndrome (40), which occurs in diverse clinical settings and is characterized by elevated CRP, IL-6 and other inflammatory cytokines, suggesting that the immunopathology of severe COVID-19 involves dysregulation of macrophage homeostasis. Consistent with this hypothesis, post-mortem examination of COVID-19 lungs revealed an increased preponderance of monocyte/macrophage cells in pulmonary alveoli (17, 18). BTK activation occurs in macrophages when TLRs bind single-stranded RNA, as may occur in SARS-CoV-2 infection, leading to NF-B-dependent expression of multiple inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including IL-6 which we observed was induced in COVID-19 monocytes and decreased in plasma following acalabrutinib treatment (Fig. 1). BTK also regulates the formation of NLRP3 inflammasomes in macrophages by physically associating with NLRP3 and phosphorylating its linker domain, triggering oligomerization and formation of inflammasomes (2426). BTK inhibition, either genetically or pharmacologically, markedly attenuates inflammasome formation in response to diverse stimuli (24). Although we have focused our model on macrophages, BTK is also known to control signaling in neutrophils (41), megakaryocytes (42), and platelets (43), which may also contribute to the immunopathology of severe COVID-19 and be kept in check by BTK inhibitors.

Several co-morbidities that are associated with severe COVID-19 (44) obesity, hypertension, atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes have been linked individually and as part of the metabolic syndrome to a heightened inflammatory state characterized by inflammasome activation in macrophages (45, 46). These comorbidities could conceivably establish a heightened inflammatory set point that affects how macrophages respond to SARS-CoV-2 infections. This concept has been variously called trained immunity or innate immune memory and results from epigenetic changes in gene expression in response to disease states or infections (47). Since infectious agents are powerful modifiers of innate immune memory (47), it will be important to gauge whether SARS-CoV-2 infection exacerbates comorbid disease states and whether BTK inhibitors can prevent this.

This prospective study of patients with severe COVID-19 highlights the potential benefit of BTK inhibition and has led to a confirmatory international prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Given the activation of BTK and production of IL-6 that we detected in COVID-19 monocytes, we propose that BTK inhibitors target pathological monocyte/macrophage activation and dampen the cytokine storm, which consequently may improve outcomes in these patients. More broadly, our findings raise the prospect that the morbidity of other disease states associated with macrophage activation, including severe influenza infections (27), may similarly depend on BTK function, supporting clinical trial evaluation of BTK inhibitors in these clinical settings as well.

We developed a list of selection criteria to identify patients who would potentially benefit from the off-label use of acalabrutinib to block the excessive host inflammatory response and improve clinical outcome. Patients at high risk for toxicity from acalabrutinib including a known history of fungal infections, bleeding disorders, recent hemorrhagic stroke, ventricular arrythmias, malabsorption syndromes, or patients who required strong CYP3A4 inhibitors were not considered for acalabrutinib. The selection criteria included hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 and hypoxia (room air blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 94% or less) requiring supplemental oxygen and ferritin 500 ng/mL, C-reactive protein 10 mg/dL and/or an absolute lymphocyte count < 1000 cells/L. Patients were 18 years, capable of swallowing pills or had an enteric feeding tube and were not pregnant or breast feeding. We communicated with physicians at five hospitals to identify hospitalized patients who met these criteria and had individual case-based discussions with the treating physicians regarding the use of acalabrutinib as an off-label treatment for patients who were either deteriorating or not improving on best supportive care.

Patients received the approved acalabrutinib dose of 100 mg orally or per enteric feeding tube twice daily for 10 days (patients on supplemental oxygen) and 14 days (patients on mechanical ventilation). We recommended that acalabrutinib be discontinued in patients who developed significant drug-related toxicity, which was not observed. Guidance was provided regarding the safe preparation of an acalabrutinib solution for patients who required an enteric feeding tube (see Supplementary Materials).

Supportive care was up to the treating physicians but with the following guidance: avoid the use of concomitant corticosteroids, including inhaled steroids based on the observation that the use of steroids with BTK inhibitors may slightly increase the risk of Aspergillus infections (14). Furthermore, anecdotal reports suggest that corticosteroids may adversely affect COVID-19 (36). Patients who are receiving corticosteroids for COVID-19 at the time of acalabrutinib institution should be weaned off as appropriate. Avoid the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and substitute H2 blockers if possible to reduce adverse effects on drug absorption. Patients receiving a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor should be switched to an alternative medication as medically indicated to reduce their effects on drug clearance. Off-label use of hydroxychloroquine may increase the risk of cardiac toxicity (48).

Local institutional practice guidelines were followed regarding indications for supplemental oxygen delivery, need for mechanical ventilation, and laboratory studies of complete blood counts with differential cell counts, and full chemistry panels. We used the oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (SFR) to monitor daily changes in the patients oxygenation status (49). To monitor for signs of inflammation, we recommended, where possible, frequent monitoring of CRP, ferritin, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and IL-6 levels, which are non-experimental tests. All other studies were as per the local physicians.

The study involved the off-label administration of an FDA-approved drug in the setting of a pandemic for which there were no known effective treatments. Because this study was not conducted under an approved protocol, consultation with local institutional review boards by each individual hospital was undertaken to ensure that use of off-label acalabrutinib was ethically justified for the clinical situation. The local institutional review board and/or the appropriate clinical leadership of each institution approved the use of clinical data in this report. Ethical guidance for the use of off-label drugs during a global pandemic is provided by a World Health Organization document that addresses the use of unproven interventions during infectious disease outbreaks (29). In the context of an outbreak characterized by high mortality, it is considered ethical to offer patients experimental interventions on an emergency basis and outside of clinical trials provided: 1. there are no proven effective treatments; 2. it is not possible to initiate clinical studies immediately; 3. preliminary data exists to support a drugs off-label use; 4. the risk-benefit ratio for the patient is favorable; 5. a qualified scientific advisory committee has approved the drugs use; 6. the patients informed consent is obtained; and 7. the treatment results are documented and shared with the scientific community in a timely manner. The present report adheres to these guidelines. Patients and normal volunteers who participated in the correlative component of this report were enrolled on a National Institutes of Health approved clinical protocol (NCT00001467; NCT01200953).

Each patient or their legally authorized representative underwent oral informed consent by a physician experienced with acalabrutinib at each hospital, which included a discussion of treatment risk and benefit, and was documented in the medical record. We explained that the off-label use of acalabrutinib to block the excessive host inflammatory response in viral pneumonia had not been tested in clinical trials, was only of theoretical benefit, and potential benefits and safety in this setting were unknown. We also discussed the clinical experience with acalabrutinib and its known safety profile. The treating physician was included in these discussions to inform on other treatment options for severe COVID-19. On a case-by-case basis, we explained the risks/benefits to the patient or their legally authorized representative in order to make them aware of all potential treatment alternatives during their severe COVID-19 illness. We explained that the risk of adverse events associated with 10 to 14 days of treatment was low, but included the possibility of increased secondary infections, new onset of cardiac arrhythmias, increased risk of bleeding, and gastrointestinal disturbances such as diarrhea or worsening liver test abnormalities. Patients and normal volunteers who participated in the correlative study were enrolled on a National Institutes of Health approved clinical protocol (NCT00001467; NCT01200953) and provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Four patients who were hospitalized with severe COVID-19 at the NIH Clinical Center (n = 2) or George Washington University Hospital (n = 2) enrolled in NIH IRB-approved protocols (NCT00001467; NCT01200953). All four patients had confirmed COVID-19 by PCR testing, were hypoxemic (SpO2 < 94% on room air) with bilateral pulmonary infiltrates on imaging, and increased CRP levels (Table S10). Five healthy volunteers enrolled in a NIH IRB-approved protocol (NCT01386437). Each COVID-19 patient was tested on a different day with 1 or 2 different healthy volunteers each time. Patient and accompanying healthy volunteer blood samples were harvested in the morning and were processed for flow cytometry-based analyses of BTK phosphorylation and IL-6 within 2-3 hours of blood harvesting as described below. All study participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Heparinized whole blood was aliquoted in round-bottom polystyrene tubes (Corning) to which live/dead fixable blue stain (Thermo Fisher) and mouse antibodies against human CD14 (clone M5E2; Biolegend) and human CD19 (clone HIB19; Biolegend) were added, mixed and incubated at 37C for 20 min. Subsequently, the cells in whole blood were fixed by adding 2 mL pre-warmed Phosflow Lyse/Fix buffer (BD Biosciences) for 10 min in a water bath at 37C with intermittent mixing. The fixed cells were then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 6 min, Lyse/Fix buffer was removed, and the cells were washed with ice-cold PBS. The fixed cells were then permeabilized using 100% ice-cold methanol (Thermo Fisher). After 30 min of incubation in methanol, the cells were washed once with ice-cold PBS. After two additional washes with PBS containing 0.5% BSA (Thermo Fisher) and 0.01% NaN3, cells were incubated overnight at 4C with a rabbit antibody against human BTK phosphorylated at Y223 (clone EP420Y; Abcam) and mouse antibody against total human BTK (clone 53; BD Biosciences), along with mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher) to minimize non-specific binding. The next morning, cells were washed twice with FACS buffer (PBS containing 0.5% BSA and 0.01% NaN3) and stained using an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Abcam, cat# ab150077) along with mouse antibodies against human HLA-DR (clone G46.6; BD Biosciences) and CD16 (clone 3G8; Biolegend). Mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher) was added to minimize non-specific binding. After 30 min of incubation on ice, the cells were washed twice with FACS buffer, resuspended in FACS buffer and analyzed using a 5-laser LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The data were exported and analyzed using FlowJo (TreeStar). CD14+ monocytes were defined as live, single, HLA-DR+ CD14+ cells and B cells were defined as live, single, HLA-DR+ CD19+ cells.

Heparinized whole blood was aliquoted in round-bottom polystyrene tubes (Corning) and brefeldin A (10 g/mL; BD Biosciences), monensin (2 M; Biolegend) and antibodies against human CD3 (clone SK7; Thermo Fisher) and CD4 (clone RPA-T4; BD Biosciences) were added. The blood was either left unstimulated or was stimulated with R848 (10 M; Invivogen). After 4h of incubation at 37C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2, cells in whole blood were washed with PBS and stained using antibodies against CD123 (clone 6H6; Thermo Fisher), CD56 (clone NCAM16.2; BD Biosciences), CD8 (clone SK1; Biolegend), HLA-DR (clone G46-6; BD Biosciences), CD19 (clone HIB19; Biolegend), CD14 (clone MP9; BD Biosciences) and CD16 (clone 3G8; BD Biosciences). Mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher) was added along with staining antibodies to minimize non-specific binding. After incubation with the staining antibodies, cells were washed with PBS and stained using live/dead fixable blue stain (Thermo Fisher). Subsequently, the cells were washed with PBS containing 1% fetal bovine serum (R&D Systems) and were fixed with paraformaldehyde (2% w/v; Thermo Fisher). Fixed cells were then washed with FACS buffer (PBS containing 0.5% BSA and 0.01% NaN3) and stored overnight at 4C. The next morning, cells were permeabilized using FACS buffer containing saponin (Sigma). Permeabilized cells were then stained for intracellular IL-6 using mouse anti-human IL-6 antibody (clone MQ2-13A5; Biolegend), in the presence of mouse IgG to minimize non-specific binding. Staining was carried out in FACS buffer containing saponin, after which the cells were washed, resuspended in FACS buffer and analyzed using a 5-laser LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The data were exported and analyzed using FlowJo (TreeStar). CD14+ monocytes were defined as live, single, HLA-DR+ CD14+ cells and B cells were defined as live, single, HLA-DR+ CD19+ cells.

Comparison of the frequency of IL-6+ CD14+ monocytes or B cells under unstimulated or stimulated conditions and of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of phosphorylated BTK in CD14+ monocytes or B cells between patients with severe COVID-19 and healthy volunteers were performed using an unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney test where appropriate, using GraphPad Prism 8.0 and were presented as means SEM.

The statistical associations among time, SpO2/FiO2, CRP, ALC and log IL-6 concentration were modeled as a linear mixed-effect regression, with the time points for each patient treated as independent observations, and with the intercept and slope estimates being blocked by patient. The model was fit using the lmer function from the lme4 R-package (50). P-values were calculated via a Wald test and are two-sided.

Comparisons of the frequency of IL-6+ CD14+ monocytes or B cells under unstimulated or stimulated conditions and of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of phosphorylated BTK in CD14++monocytes or B cells between patients with severe COVID-19 and healthy volunteers were performed using an unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney test where appropriate, using GraphPad Prism 8.0 and were presented as means SEM.

immunology.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/5/48/eabd0110/DC1

Supplementary Methods (instructions on preparation of acalabrutinib for an enteric feeding tube)

Figure S1. Gating strategy for flow cytometric analysis of phosphorylated and total BTK.

Figure S2. Gating strategy for flow cytometric analysis of IL-6.

Table S1. Treatment centers.

Table S2. Clinical course of supplemental oxygen cohort.

Table S3. Clinical course of mechanical ventilation cohort.

Table S4. Laboratory tests for inflammatory markers during acalabrutinib treatment in supplemental oxygen cohort.

Table S5. Laboratory tests for inflammatory markers during acalabrutinib treatment in mechanical ventilation cohort.

Table S6. Other laboratory tests during acalabrutinib treatment in supplemental oxygen cohort.

Table S7. Other laboratory tests during acalabrutinib treatment in mechanical ventilation cohort.

Table S8. Statistical analysis of laboratory changes related to oxygenation status.

Table S9. Adverse events of special interest during treatment with acalabrutinib.

Table S10. Characteristics of COVID-19 patients who underwent flow cytometry-based immunological analyses.

Table S11. Raw data file (Excel spreadsheet).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Go here to read the rest:
Inhibition of Bruton tyrosine kinase in patients with severe COVID-19 - Science

Memorial Sloan Kettering Hackensack Meridian Health Partnership Announces Funding for Inaugural Immunology Research Collaboration Projects – Newswise

Newswise HACKENSACK, NJ, AND NEW YORK CITY, NY,June 4, 2020 As part of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Hackensack Meridian Health Partnership, the two organizations have formed an Immunology Research Collaboration. Through this joint initiative, researchers can apply for funding to support innovative investigations to explore the power of the immune system and ways it may be harnessed to fight cancer.

The three researchers with projects selected in 2020 for funding support over one to two years are:

"Immunotherapy has become an essential pillar of cancer treatment, but much remains to be discovered about the immune system and new ways to take advantage of its power to treat cancer effectively," said Paul Sabbatini, M.D., deputy physician-in-chief for clinical research at Memorial Sloan Kettering. "The Immunology Research Collaboration between Memorial Sloan Kettering and Hackensack Meridian Health gives researchers an opportunity to delve deeply into unexplored facets of the immune system, both in the lab and clinic, and speed discoveries that will ultimately contribute to reducing the burden of cancer on our patients, their families, and the world. We are enthusiastic about the potential of these three research projects and look forward to their results."

"While immunotherapy is revolutionizing cancer treatment, it benefits are not always sustainable over the long term," noted Andrew Goy, M.D., M.S., chairman and executive director of John Theurer Cancer Center and physician-in-chief of the Hackensack Meridian Health Oncology Care Transformation Service. "The work of these investigators will expand our knowledge of the immune system and glean new insights which may lead to novel immunotherapeutics that are more powerful and more durable than those we are using today. These projects capture the collaborative spirit of this initiative and could have a significant impact on patient outcomes."

ABOUTHACKENSACKMERIDIAN HEALTH

Hackensack Meridian Health is a leading not-for-profit health care organization that is the largest, most comprehensive and truly integrated health care network in New Jersey, offering a complete range of medical services, innovative research and life-enhancing care.

Hackensack Meridian Health comprises 17 hospitals from Bergen to Ocean counties, which includes three academic medical centers Hackensack University Medical Center in Hackensack, Jersey Shore University Medical Center in Neptune, JFK Medical Center in Edison; two childrens hospitals - Joseph M. Sanzari Childrens Hospital in Hackensack, K. Hovnanian Childrens Hospital in Neptune; nine community hospitals Bayshore Medical Center in Holmdel, Mountainside Medical Center in Montclair, Ocean Medical Center in Brick, Palisades Medical Center in North Bergen, Pascack Valley Medical Center in Westwood, Raritan Bay Medical Center in Old Bridge, Raritan Bay Medical Center in Perth Amboy, Riverview Medical Center in Red Bank, and Southern Ocean Medical Center in Manahawkin; a behavioral health hospital Carrier Clinic in Belle Mead; and two rehabilitation hospitals - JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute in Edison and Shore Rehabilitation Institute in Brick.

Additionally, the network has more than 500 patient care locations throughout the state which include ambulatory care centers, surgery centers, home health services, long-term care and assisted living communities, ambulance services, lifesaving air medical transportation, fitness and wellness centers, rehabilitation centers, urgent care centers and physician practice locations. Hackensack Meridian Health has more than 35,000 team members, and 7,000 physicians and is a distinguished leader in health care philanthropy, committed to the health and well-being of the communities it serves.

The networks notable distinctions include having four hospitals among the top in New Jersey by U.S. News and World Report. Other honors include consistently achieving Magnet recognition for nursing excellence from the American Nurses Credentialing Center and being named to Beckers Healthcares 150 Top Places to Work in Healthcare/2019 list.

The Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University opened in 2018, the first private medical school in New Jersey in more than 50 years, welcomed its second class of 96 students in 2019 to its ON3 campus in Nutley and Clifton. Additionally, the network partnered with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to find more cures for cancer faster while ensuring that patients have access to the highest quality, most individualized cancer care when and where they need it.

Hackensack Meridian Health is a member of AllSpire Health Partners, an interstate consortium of leading health systems, to focus on the sharing of best practices in clinical care and achieving efficiencies.

ABOUT MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING

As the worlds oldest and largest private cancer center, Memorial Sloan Kettering has devoted more than 135 years to exceptional patient care, influential educational programs, and innovative research to discover more effective strategies to prevent, control and, ultimately, cure cancer. MSK is home to more than 20,000 physicians, scientists, nurses, and staff united by a relentless dedication to conquering cancer. Today, we are one of 51 National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers, with state-of-the-art science and technology supporting groundbreaking clinical studies, personalized treatment, and compassionate care for our patients. We also train the next generation of clinical and scientific leaders in oncology through our continually evolving educational programs, here and around the world. Year after year, we are ranked among the top two cancer hospitals in the country, consistently recognized for our expertise in adult and pediatric oncology specialties. http://www.mskcc.org.

Follow this link:
Memorial Sloan Kettering Hackensack Meridian Health Partnership Announces Funding for Inaugural Immunology Research Collaboration Projects - Newswise

Global Immunology Drug Market 2020 with (Covid-19) Impact Key Players Analysis, Business Growth and Forecast by 2025 – Surfacing Magazine

The latest market report namely Global Immunology Drug Market 2020 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025 presents a thorough analysis and careful investigation of the market, allowing clients to analyze the gains and predict exact executions. The report is committed to fulfilling the necessities of the clients by offering them an analysis of the growth rates and the threats of new entrants. The report provides insightful information to the clients enhancing their basic leadership capacity identified. It assembles drivers and restrictions after the entire understanding of the global Immunology Drug market. It calculates the market share and respective growth rates between the various application segments.

NOTE: Our analysts monitoring the situation across the globe explains that the market will generate remunerative prospects for producers post COVID-19 crisis. The report aims to provide an additional illustration of the latest scenario, economic slowdown, and COVID-19 impact on the overall industry.

DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT: https://www.researchstore.biz/sample-request/11507

Report Description:

Further, the report highlights the profiling of major competitors in the global Immunology Drug market along with their core competencies and investments, current developments. The market data is briefly explained using table, figure, charts, TOCs, and chapters. The report also incorporates investment strategies, marketing strategies, and product development plans. Overall research covers market characteristics, size, growth, and global segmentation, as well as covers regional divisions, competitive landscape, market shares, trends and business plans for future improvements. Additionally, information about the size of the market, companies that are most likely to scale up their competitive abilities, leading segments, and challenges impeding the growth of the market are given.

For competitor segment, the report covers the following global Immunology Drug market key players and some other small players: Abbott Laboratories, Genentech, Autoimmune Inc., Active Biotech, Seattle Genetics, Eli Lilly and Company, Eisai Co., GlaxoSmithKline plc, Pfizer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Bayer AG, Sanofi Aventis LLC.

Market research supported product sort includes: Monoclonal Antibodies (mAb), Antibody Drug Conjugates, Interferon and Cytokine therapies, Immunosuppressive medication,

Market research supported application coverage: Hospitals, Clinics, Cancer Research Centers and Institutes,

Based on regions, the market is classified into: North America (United States, Canada and Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia and Australia), South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia), Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

Moreover, the global Immunology Drug market report provides an overview with growth analysis and historical & futuristic cost, revenue, demand and supply data. It gives an elegant description of the value chain and its distributor analysis. It identifies the products and end users driving revenue growth and profitability. It underlines the competition trends, concentration rate, and numerous other attributes of the business space. The study also discloses the revenue generated by each region alongside the growth rate attained by each geography over the analysis timeframe.

ACCESS FULL REPORT: https://www.researchstore.biz/report/global-immunology-drug-market-11507

Important Aspects of Report:

Customization of the Report:This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team (sales@researchstore.biz), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1-201-465-4211 to share your research requirements.

About Us

Researchstore.biz is a fully dedicated global market research agency providing thorough quantitative and qualitative analysis of extensive market research.Our corporate is identified by recognition and enthusiasm for what it offers, which unites its staff across the world.We are desired market researchers proving a reliable source of extensive market analysis on which readers can rely on. Our research team consist of some of the best market researchers, sector and analysis executives in the nation, because of which Researchstore.biz is considered as one of the most vigorous market research enterprises. Researchstore.biz finds perfect solutions according to the requirements of research with considerations of content and methods. Unique and out of the box technologies, techniques and solutions are implemented all through the research reports.

Contact UsMark StoneHead of Business DevelopmentPhone: +1-201-465-4211Email: sales@researchstore.bizWeb: http://www.researchstore.biz

Go here to read the rest:
Global Immunology Drug Market 2020 with (Covid-19) Impact Key Players Analysis, Business Growth and Forecast by 2025 - Surfacing Magazine

Global Immunology Market 2020 with (Covid-19) Impact Key Players Analysis, Business Growth and Forecast by 2025 – Surfacing Magazine

Global Immunology Market 2020 by Company, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025 features detailed insights and deep research on some of the major and unique aspects of the market. The report throws light on the important factors of the market including historic data, market size, untapped opportunities, current trends, and developments shaping the global Immunology market. The report forecasts market size in terms of revenue from the base year 2020 to 2025. The research report splits the market on the basis of key parameters such as type, application, end-users, key companies, and key regions to forecast the revenue of the industry over the estimated period.

Competitive Landscape:

The chapter of the global Immunology market research report focuses exclusively on the competitive landscape. It examines the main market players. In addition to a brief overview of the business, analysts provide information on their assessment and development. The list of important products in preparation is also mentioned. The competitive landscape is analyzed by understanding the companies strategies and the initiatives they have taken in recent years to overcome high competition. It covers sales, revenue, and market share for each player for a period between 2015 and 2020.

NOTE: This report takes into account the current and future impacts of COVID-19 on this industry and offers you an in-dept analysis of Immunology market.

DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT: https://www.researchstore.biz/sample-request/11508

The market report mainly contains the following manufacturers: AbbVie, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Johnson& Johnson, Amgen, Cellectar Biosciences, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Celgene, Bionor Pharma

Regional Market Analysis: There are two different sections: one for regional production analysis and the other for regional consumption analysis. Here, the analysts share gross margin, price, revenue, production, CAGR, and other factors that indicate the growth of all regional markets studied in the report. On the basis of Geography, the report covers: North America (United States, Canada and Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia and Australia), South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia), Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

By types, the report includes: Immuno Boosters, Immunosuppressants,

By applications, the report contains: Autoimmune Diseases, Oncology, Organ Transplantation, Others,

What Benefits Does This Research Study Provide:

ACCESS FULL REPORT: https://www.researchstore.biz/report/global-immunology-market-11508

Moreover, the report provides information on the situation and trends of competition, including mergers and acquisitions and expansion, the market shares of the leading main players and the concentration of the market. The document allows for a closer look at the elements that could determine its evolution. It also estimates the current situation and the future of the global Immunology market by using the forecast horizon. In addition, this market report provides a detailed study on the growth, investment opportunities, market statistics, growing competition analysis, major key players, industry facts, important figures, sales, prices, revenues, gross margins, market shares, business strategies, top regions, demand, and developments.

Customization of the Report:This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team (sales@researchstore.biz), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1-201-465-4211 to share your research requirements.

About Us

Researchstore.biz is a fully dedicated global market research agency providing thorough quantitative and qualitative analysis of extensive market research.Our corporate is identified by recognition and enthusiasm for what it offers, which unites its staff across the world.We are desired market researchers proving a reliable source of extensive market analysis on which readers can rely on. Our research team consist of some of the best market researchers, sector and analysis executives in the nation, because of which Researchstore.biz is considered as one of the most vigorous market research enterprises. Researchstore.biz finds perfect solutions according to the requirements of research with considerations of content and methods. Unique and out of the box technologies, techniques and solutions are implemented all through the research reports.

Contact UsMark StoneHead of Business DevelopmentPhone: +1-201-465-4211Email: sales@researchstore.bizWeb: http://www.researchstore.biz

See more here:
Global Immunology Market 2020 with (Covid-19) Impact Key Players Analysis, Business Growth and Forecast by 2025 - Surfacing Magazine

Long-term (48-week) Data Show Treatment with Berotralstat Provides Robust and Durable Reductions in HAE Attacks and Improvements in Quality of Life…

Data presented at European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Digital Congress

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N.C., June 06, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BCRX) today announced new data from the APeX-2 and APeX-S clinical trials, which showed that hereditary angioedema (HAE) patients taking oral, once-daily berotralstat experienced sustained decreases in their attack frequency and improvements in quality of life (QoL) scores over 48 weeks. Berotralstat was also safe and generally well-tolerated over 48 weeks in both APeX-2 and APeX-S.

The data were presented at the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Digital Congress.

As HAE patients continue in our longterm clinical trials, we are seeing reductions in attack rate and increases in QoL scores which highlight the impact oral, once-daily berotralstat could have in reducing the burden of disease for patients currently dependent on injectable or infused prophylaxis options, said Dr. William Sheridan, chief medical officer of BioCryst.

An integrated 48-week analysis across both APeX-2 and APeX-S showed no new safety findings. Berotralstat was safe and generally well tolerated in a total of 342 patients with a total of 232 patient-years of daily oral dosing. The most common adverse event was the common cold, which occurred with similar frequency in berotralstat and placebo patients. Gastrointestinal events led to discontinuation of berotralstat in 3.2 percent of patients. Drug-related serious adverse events occurred in three of 342 subjects (0.9 percent) and resolved after stopping or interrupting berotralstat dosing.

About BioCryst Pharmaceuticals BioCryst Pharmaceuticals discovers novel, oral, small-molecule medicines that treat rare diseases in which significant unmet medical needs exist and an enzyme plays a key role in the biological pathway of the disease. BioCryst has several ongoing development programs including berotralstat (BCX7353), an oral treatment for hereditary angioedema, BCX9930, an oral Factor D inhibitor for the treatment of complement-mediated diseases, galidesivir, a potential treatment for COVID-19, Marburg virus disease and Yellow Fever, and BCX9250, an ALK-2 inhibitor for the treatment of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. RAPIVAB (peramivir injection), a viral neuraminidase inhibitor for the treatment of influenza, is BioCryst's first approved product and has received regulatory approval in the U.S., Canada, Australia, Japan, Taiwan, Korea and the European Union. Post-marketing commitments for RAPIVAB are ongoing. For more information, please visit the Company's website at http://www.BioCryst.com.

Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding future results, performance or achievements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause BioCrysts actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could affect the forward-looking statements contained herein include: that the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic could create challenges in all aspects of our business, including without limitation delays, stoppages, difficulties and increased expenses with respect to our and our partners development, regulatory processes and supply chains, could negatively impact our ability to access the capital or credit markets to finance our operations, or could have the effect of heightening many of the risks described below or in the documents we file periodically with the Securities and Exchange Commission; that developing any HAE product candidate may take longer or may be more expensive than planned; that ongoing and future preclinical and clinical development of BCX9930, BCX9250 and galidesivir may not have positive results; that BioCryst may not be able to enroll the required number of subjects in planned clinical trials of product candidates; that BioCryst may not advance human clinical trials with product candidates as expected; that the FDA, EMA, PMDA or other applicable regulatory agency may require additional studies beyond the studies planned for product candidates, or may not provide regulatory clearances which may result in delay of planned clinical trials, or may impose a clinical hold with respect to such product candidates, or withhold market approval for product candidates; that actual financial results may not be consistent with expectations, including that 2020 operating expenses and cash usage may not be within management's expected ranges. Please refer to the documents BioCryst files periodically with the Securities and Exchange Commission, specifically BioCrysts most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, all of which identify important factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contained in BioCrysts projections and forward-looking statements.

Story continues

See the original post:
Long-term (48-week) Data Show Treatment with Berotralstat Provides Robust and Durable Reductions in HAE Attacks and Improvements in Quality of Life...