Stejskal: Trump and the Anatomy of a Con – ticklethewire.com

The writer, an FBI agent for 31 years, retired as resident agent in charge of the Ann Arbor office in 2006. He is a graduate of the University of Nebraska Lincoln Law School.

By Greg Stejeskal

During my time in the FBI, I investigated several frauds involving cons or grifts of varying sophistication. One relatively savvy con artist told me the first step is to convince yourself the scam is true. It is easier to sell if on some level you believe its real. (Im guessing its easier to convince yourself if you are narcissist.)

The Set Up

President Trump has some history of running cons like Trump University, his former charitable foundation, etc. In effect his whole attack on the presidential election has been a con. Since the beginning of his campaign for reelection, Trump has said the only way he could lose was if the election were rigged.

He elaborated that absentee ballots were inherently fraudulent, although significant fraud hasnt occuyrred in states where theyre used regularly.

Covid made mail and dropoff voting options prevalent in most states, endorsed by both Republicans and Democrats. But they was embraced more by the Democrats than Republicans at least in part because of Trumps attacks.

I dont know if Trump convinced himself that the only way he could lose was if the election were rigged, but he did manage to convince millions of his supporters. Part of the con was that Trump was predictably ahead early in the counting on election day. This was because more Republicans voted in person at the polls than Democrats who used mail balloting. Another factor was that many Republican-controlled legislatures prohibit absentee ballots from being validated or processed until Election Day. That means theyre not counted until well after in-person ballots are tabulated.

As the counting continued into the next few days, it became clear that Trump was losing. Trump even called for the counting to stop in the early morning hours after Election Day. Despite rigorous oversight by both parties and no credible evidence of widespread fraud, Trump railed that there were numerous incidents of shenanigans, but never produced any credible evidence.

Ultimately all the counting was finished, and Joe Biden was declared the winner. By Trumps own standard it was a landslide, 306-232 electoral votes. Trumps appointed Attorney General William Barr and FBI Director Christopher Wray reported there was no evidence of significant fraud that would have affected the outcome.

The director of cybersecurity, Christopher Krebs, also a Trump appointee said it was a clean election with no evidence of cyber interference or fraud. (Because Krebs contradicted Trumps claims, the president fired him. Trump also criticized Barr, leading to his resignation effective next Wednesday.)There is some speculation that Trump is challenging the results at least partly as a fund-raising scheme. Donations are solicited to pay for legal expenses and supporters have given over $200 million so far. Little of the money raised is going for legal challenges to the election. It is going into a campaign fund thats use is indeterminate a slush fund.

This seems reminiscent of Mel Brooks movie and musical, The Producers, where Broadway producer Max Blalystock and his accountant figure out that they can make more money on a failed play than a successful one. The intended flop is titled Springtime for Hitler. Apparently, Trump has figured out a way to make money on a failed campaign, Springtime for Trump.

But Trumps challenge to the result and refusal to concede his defeat has far more dire consequences. His millions of fervent supporters believe his baseless claims of election fraud and that the election was stolen from him.

This is further exacerbated by many in the leadership of the Republican Party enabling Trumps con to continue by supporting his claims and over 50 failed legal challenges.

Court challenges reached a crescendo with a lawsuit filed at the U.S. Supreme Court by the Texas Attorney General, Ken Paxton, backed by 17 other Republican attorneys general and 126 Republican members of the House of Representatives. The lawsuit challenged the election procedures of four states Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania nd Wisconsin and asked the court to nullify about 20 million votes. The Supreme Court summarily rejected the suit in a one-page order.

A recent book, Lincoln On The Verge by Ted Widmer, follows Lincolns circuitous 13-day train trip from Springfield, Ill., to Washington, D.C., for his inauguration on March 4, 1861.(The Constitution prescribed thatinauguration date until it was changed to Jan. 20by the 20th Amendment in 1933.) I was struck by some of the similarities between that presidential transition and our present one.

Lincoln won with a plurality of only about 40 percent of the vote, but got a majority of electoral votes. The Democratic Party had split into Southern and Northern factions. Stephen Douglas was the Northern candidate and John Breckinridge; the sitting vice president, was the Southern candidate. Southern Democrats vilified Lincoln and when he won, some of states began to secede, starting with South Carolina.

This time, after the Supreme Court on Dec. 11 rejected the Texas suit brought on Trumps behalf, some of the Texas Republican leadership suggested: Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a union of states that will abide by the Constitution. That implies secession, an act of insurrection and this statement has been characterized as seditious. (Sedition is the inciting of an insurrectionary movement tending towards treason.)

Final Act in Election Drama

Last Monday, Electoral College members in each state and cast 306 votes for Biden and 232 for Trump. That will be formally accepted by Congress on Jan. 6unless challenged by at least one House member of the House and one senator.

A movement is afoot by some Republican members of the House to interfere with Congress formal acceptance by objecting to some states electoral votes. Vice President Mike Pence will preside. This would probably be a futile effort, and certainly foment more discord and disunity.

When Lincoln made his first inaugural address, he closed with the following:

We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over the broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, where again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.

It was not to be.

Despite Trumps baseless claims that the election was stolen, hes the one whos trying to steal the election by any means from a duly elected Joe Biden. Maybe Trump will come to realize, like the Grinch who tried to steal Christmas, that despite all his efforts to overturn the election, the inauguration of new president will come just as Christmas will.

See the rest here:
Stejskal: Trump and the Anatomy of a Con - ticklethewire.com

Naomi Scott to star in Netflixs upcoming anthology Anatomy of a Scandal – Republic World

English actor Naomi Scott has been roped in to join the cast of Netflix anthology Anatomy of a Scandal. The actor would be seen sharing the screen with Sienna Miller, Michelle Dockery and Rupert Friend. The 27 year old actor, Naomi was previously seen in Aladdin, Charlies Angels, Power Rangers and Terra Nova.

A report in Hollywood Reporter suggests that in Netflixs Anatomy of a Scandal, Scott will be seen portraying the character of Olivia Lytton. According to the media portal, Naomis character is a parliamentary researcher with a bright future. Reportedly, her character will be seen facing a powerful adversary.

The show is adapted from the best selling novel of the same name by Sarah Vaughan. The show is made by David E. Kelly who has been associated with shows like Big Little Lies, The Practice and Big Sky. According to the media portal, David would be reuniting with Big Little Lies exec producer Bruna Papandrea for this show.

Naomi Scott has received immense love from her fans for her on-screen performances throughout her career. In Charlies Angels, she starrer opposite Kristen Stewart and the film is available to watch on Amazon Prime. However, the actor is best known for her leading role as Princess Jasmine in Disneys Aladdin that was a live-action film. Apart from Anatomy of a Scandal, Naomi will be seen next in Distant. Reportedly, she will be seen sharing the screen with Anthony Ramos.

Read Also |'High Time The Truth Came Out': Govinda After Krushna Abhishek's 'defamatory' Comments

Read Also |Payal Ghosh Poses Question On 'credentials' Of Actors Amid Ongoing Drug Probe

As per reports in Hollywood Reporter, the show will be written by David E. Kelly and Melissa James Gibson. The shall also be associated with the show as its showrunners and exec producers. Reportedly, S.J. Clarkson will direct the episodes of the show.

A report in the media portal suggests that each episode will be one hour long and there are a total of six episodes in the series. However, the series is intended to be an anthology, implying that each episode will showcase a new story. The list of exec producers includes Liza Chasin, Bruna Papandrea, Steve Hutensky and Allie Goss.

Read Also |Milind Soman Replies To Fan Who Asks Him To Recreate Beach Running Picture In Cold Weather

Read Also |Australia's Platypus Habitat Declines By 22 Percent Over 30 Years: Study

Get the latest entertainment news from India & around the world. Now follow your favourite television celebs and telly updates. Republic World is your one-stop destination for trending Bollywood news. Tune in today to stay updated with all the latest news and headlines from the world of entertainment.

See more here:
Naomi Scott to star in Netflixs upcoming anthology Anatomy of a Scandal - Republic World

You Do Not Want to Mess With This Virus Research Strongly Suggests COVID-19 Virus Enters the Brain – SciTechDaily

The S1 protein likely causes the brain to release inflammatory products causing a storm in the brain, researchers said. Credit: Alice Gray

A study published in Nature Neuroscience shows how spike protein crosses the blood-brain barrier.

More and more evidence is coming out that people with COVID-19 are suffering from cognitive effects, such as brain fog and fatigue.

And researchers are discovering why. The SARS-CoV-2 virus, like many viruses before it, is bad news for the brain. In a study published on December 16, 2020, in Nature Neuroscience, researchers found that the spike protein, often depicted as the red arms of the virus, can cross the blood-brain barrier in mice.

This strongly suggests that SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19, can enter the brain.

The spike protein, often called the S1 protein, dictates which cells the virus can enter. Usually, the virus does the same thing as its binding protein, said lead author William A. Banks, a professor of medicine at the University of Washington School of Medicine and a Puget Sound Veterans Affairs Healthcare System physician and researcher. Banks said binding proteins like S1 usually by themselves cause damage as they detach from the virus and cause inflammation.

The S1 protein likely causes the brain to release cytokines and inflammatory products, he said.

In science circles, the intense inflammation caused by the COVID-19 infection is called a cytokine storm. The immune system, upon seeing the virus and its proteins, overreacts in its attempt to kill the invading virus. The infected person is left with brain fog, fatigue and other cognitive issues.

Banks and his team saw this reaction with the HIV virus and wanted to see if the same was happening with SARS CoV-2.

Banks said the S1 protein in SARS-CoV2 and the gp 120 protein in HIV-1 function similarly. They are glycoproteins proteins that have a lot of sugars on them, hallmarks of proteins that bind to other receptors. Both these proteins function as the arms and hand for their viruses by grabbing onto other receptors. Both cross the blood-brain barrier and S1, like gp120, is likely toxic to brain tissues.

It was like dj vu, said Banks, who has done extensive work on HIV-1, gp120, and the blood-brain barrier.

The Banks lab studies the blood-brain barrier in Alzheimers, obesity, diabetes, and HIV. But they put their work on hold and all 15 people in the lab started their experiments on the S1 protein in April. They enlisted long-time collaborator Jacob Raber, a professor in the departments of Behavioral Neuroscience, Neurology, and Radiation Medicine, and his teams at Oregon Health & ScienceUniversity.

The study could explain many of the complications from COVID-19.

We know that when you have the COVID infection you have trouble breathing and thats because theres infection in your lung, but an additional explanation is that the virus enters the respiratory centers of the brain and causes problems there as well, said Banks.

Raber said in their experiments transport of S1 was faster in the olfactory bulb and kidney of males than females. This observation might relate to the increased susceptibility of men to more severe COVID-19 outcomes.

As for people taking the virus lightly, Banks has a message:

You do not want to mess with this virus, he said. Many of the effects that the COVID virus has could be accentuated or perpetuated or even caused by virus getting in the brain and those effects could last for a very long time.

Reference: The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the bloodbrain barrier in mice by Elizabeth M. Rhea, Aric F. Logsdon, Kim M. Hansen, Lindsey M. Williams, May J. Reed, Kristen K. Baumann, Sarah J. Holden, Jacob Raber, William A. Banks and Michelle A. Erickson, 16 December 2020, Nature Neuroscience.DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-00771-8

This study was partially supported by a National Institute on Aging-funded COVID-19 supplement to a shared RF1 grant of Banks and Raber.

Read more:
You Do Not Want to Mess With This Virus Research Strongly Suggests COVID-19 Virus Enters the Brain - SciTechDaily

Study reveals individuals with high ADHD-traits are more vulnerable to insomnia – EdexLive

Image for representational purpose only

Individuals with high ADHD-traits that do not meet the criteria for a diagnosis are less able to perform tasks involving attentional regulation or emotional control after a sleepless night than individuals with low ADHD-traits, suggest the findings a new study. The study from Karolinska Institutet published in Biological Psychofiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging reports.

While it can cause multiple cognitive impairments, there is considerable individual variation in sensitivity to the effects of insomnia. The reason for this variability has been an unresolved research question for long. In the present study, KI researchers investigated how sleep deprivation affects our executive functions, which is to say the central cognitive processes that govern our thoughts and actions. They also wanted to ascertain if people with ADHD tendencies are more sensitive to insomnia, with more severe functional impairments as a result.

ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) is characterised by inattention, impulsiveness and hyperactivity; however, the symptoms vary from person to person and often also include emotional instability. "You could say that many people have some subclinical ADHD-like symptoms but a diagnosis is only made once the symptoms become so prominent that they interfere with our everyday lives," says Predrag Petrovic, consultant and associate professor in psychiatry at the Department of Clinical Neuroscience at Karolinska Institutet, Sweden, who led the study along with Tina Sundelin and John Axelsson, both researchers at Karolinska Institutet and the Stress Research Institute at Stockholm University.

The study included 180 healthy participants between the ages of 17 and 45 without an ADHD diagnosis. Tendencies towards inattentiveness and emotional instability were assessed on the Brown Attention Deficit Disorder (B-ADD) scale. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups, one that was allowed to sleep normally and one that was deprived of sleep for one night. They were then instructed to perform a test that measures executive functions and emotional control the following day (a Stroop test with neutral and emotional faces).

The researchers found that the sleep-deprived group showed worse performance in the experimental tasks (including more cognitive response variability). Moreover, people with high ADHD-traits were more vulnerable to sleep deprivation and showed greater impairment than those with low ADHD-traits. The effects were also related to the most prominent type of subclinical ADHD-like symptom, in that after being deprived of sleep, the participants who displayed more everyday problems with emotional instability had larger problems with the cognitive task involving emotional regulation, and those who had more everyday inattention symptoms had larger problems with the non-emotional cognitive task.

"One of the reasons why these results are important is that we know that young people are getting much less sleep than they did just ten years ago," explains Dr Petrovic. "If young people with high ADHD-traits regularly get too little sleep they will perform worse cognitively and, what's more, their symptoms might even end up at a clinically significant level."

View post:
Study reveals individuals with high ADHD-traits are more vulnerable to insomnia - EdexLive

Anatomy (2000) – IMDb

1 win & 3 nominations. See more awards Learn more More Like This

Horror | Sci-Fi | Thriller

The doctor and soccer player in the leisure time Jo Hauser decides to move to Berlin and be an intern in a famous clinic, expecting to increase his knowledge and expertize, and help his ... See full summary

Director:Stefan Ruzowitzky

Stars:Ariane Schnug,August Diehl,Herbert Knaup

Horror | Thriller

As a young girl Ana was a rebellious child. She was also tormented by images of death and a shadowy, ominous figure in black. Now an adult, she is once again tormented by shadowy, other-worldly forms.

Directors:Hlne Cattet,Bruno Forzani

Stars:Cassandra Fort,Charlotte Eugne Guibeaud,Marie Bos

Certificate: GP Horror | Sci-Fi

A mad scientist implants an electronic device into the brain of an injured soldier, which turns him into a psychotic killer.

Director:Al Adamson

Stars:John Carradine,Kent Taylor,Tommy Kirk

Drama | Thriller

When their deeply religious mother dies, the seven Hook children bury her in the garden and continue life as normal. Then their absent father, Charlie, reappears...

Director:Jack Clayton

Stars:Dirk Bogarde,Margaret Leclere,Pamela Franklin

Comedy | Drama

Agla Lanctot, 25-years-old, is as insecure as can be. As a result of being 'brought up' by an irresponsible mother and by an absent father, she can now find her balance only in a ... See full summary

Director:Eric Gravel

Stars:India Hair,Julie Depardieu,Yolande Moreau

Biography | Drama | Romance

The story of Mussolini's secret lover, Ida Dalser, and their son Albino.

Director:Marco Bellocchio

Stars:Giovanna Mezzogiorno,Filippo Timi,Fausto Russo Alesi

Action | Drama | Romance

A young woman deals in her own personal way with the trials of adolescence and young adulthood in early 1900s England.

Director:Ken Russell

Stars:Sammi Davis,Amanda Donohoe,Paul McGann

Horror

Tales of the Bible are warped into grotesque visual stories, marked by their inventive, but equally terrifying twists on the familiar.

Director:Davide Pesca

Stars:Nicola Fugazza,Mery Rubes

Crime | Drama | Horror

Wanted for a long time, serial killer Gabriel Engel gets arrested in a spectacular police raid. Small town cop Michael Martens travels to the big city to interrogate him and finds out more then he is looking for.

Director:Christian Alvart

Stars:Norman Reedus,Christian von Aster,Andr Hennicke

Comedy | Drama | Sport

Will Clark loves his job as radio announcer for the local high school football team, the Nowata Possums. He loves it so much that he continues announcing even after the town decides to ... See full summary

Director:Max Burnett

Stars:Mac Davis,Cynthia Sikes,Greg Coolidge

Horror

A murderer is caught after terrorizing and killing people on Christmas night over the past 13 years in Norway.

Director:Reinert Kiil

Stars:Jrgen Langhelle,Marte Steren,Sondre Krogtoft Larsen

Comedy | Drama

A young teacher is given the toughest classroom in the school. Based on the TV series.

Director:Tya Sat

Stars:Yukie Nakama,Katsuhisa Namase,Aya Hirayama

Medical student Paula Henning wins a place at an exclusive Heidelberg medical school. When the body of a young man she met on the train turns up on her dissection table, she begins to investigate the mysterious circumstances surrounding his death, and uncovers a gruesome conspiracy perpetrated by an Antihippocratic secret society operating within the school. Written byAlexander Lum

Budget:DEM8,400,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend USA: $5,725,10 September 2000

Gross USA: $9,660

Cumulative Worldwide Gross: $10,501,958

Runtime: 103 min

Aspect Ratio: 2.35 : 1

No need to waste time endlessly browsinghere's the entire lineup of new movies and TV shows streaming on Netflix this month.

See the full list

View post:
Anatomy (2000) - IMDb

Greys Anatomy Showrunner Confirms Patrick Dempsey Will Be Back Again! and Teases Shows Future – Variety

Greys Anatomy has been tackling coronavirus for the entirety of Season 17, and although the pandemic has inspired intense storytelling that mirrors the real state of the world, the medical drama also had a major boost of brightness recently with the return of Patrick Dempseys Derek Shepherd.

The beloved character, who was killed off in Season 11 after a fatal car crash, appeared in Meredith Greys (Ellen Pompeo) dreams, as she was fighting COVID-19 from her hospital bed.

Shepherd, better known as McDreamy, surprised fans with the appearance earlier in the season, showing up on a beach in Merediths dreams. But, good news for Greys Anatomy fans: McDreamy will be back again.

You will see McDreamy again in the back half of the season, showrunner Krista Vernoff tellsVariety.

Other than confirming Dereks return in the episodes airing in 2021, Vernoff is staying mum on who else might make an appearance. But she is hopeful to recruit more of the actors who used to star on the medical drama, which has seen a number of characters die over the past 17 seasons.

We all have hopes, but we dont have anything new to report yet, Vernoff says.

When asked specifically about Eric Danes character, Mark Sloan, otherwise known as McSteamy, one of the all-time fan-favorite characters in Greys Anatomy history who was killed in a plane crash at the beginning of Season 9, Vernoff laughs, You can ask, but I cant answer!

At the time of Dempseys return, social media erupted with excitement, and a screenshot from IMDb.com was floating around Twitter, circulated by fans. The image appeared to show that many former Greys actors including Katherine Heigl, Sandra Oh, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Sara Ramirez and more were billed as part of the current season, causing fans to theorize that those characters would possibly show up in Merediths dreams.

Vernoff has seen the screenshot on social media, but says the information is incorrect.

My stepson sent me that picture, and my answer was, Oh my god! I wish! But no, Vernoff says. No, no, thats not that was some glitch on IMDb.

With a laugh, she lovingly pokes fun at the shows devoted audience, adding, Debbie Allen said to me, Theyre so greedy! You just gave them McDreamy!'

Greys Anatomy is the longest-running medical drama in television history, having surpassed ER. The show has not been renewed for an 18th season yet, though it remains one of ABCs top-rated shows, a stunning victory for any series, let alone one so far along in its TV life.

Creator Shonda Rhimes has said on multiple occasions that she will end the show whenever Pompeo is ready to call it quits. Pompeo, who serves as a producer, has starred as the shows titular character since it premiered in 2005. Her contract is up this year, but earlier this fallPompeo told Variety that no one knows when the show will sign off.

We dont know when the show is really ending yet.But the truth is, this year could be it, Pompeo recently said. Im constantly fighting for the show as a whole to be as good as it can be. As a producer, I feel like I have permission to be able to do that. I mean, this is the last year of my contract right now. I dont know that this is the last year? But it very well could be.

During an interview about last nights midseason finale, when asked about the future of the show, Vernoff also said she was unsure when Greys Anatomy will ultimately end.

I dont know is the honest answer, Vernoff says. I dont know. And so, I planned a phenomenal season, and Ive planned what can be a season finale or what could be a series finale.

I never really believe its really over until everybody sits me down theyre all going to have to come together and sit me down and tell me its really over, Vernoff continues. But you always have to plan for both contingencies. We have a plan for how the season is going to end, and I feel really good about that plan, but I will say that at this point in any given season, we usually have a plan for where the season is going to end and it doesnt always end where we think it will. So, you never know.

Greys Anatomy airs Thursdays at 9 p.m. on ABC.

Read the original:
Greys Anatomy Showrunner Confirms Patrick Dempsey Will Be Back Again! and Teases Shows Future - Variety

Anatomy of . . . Hollie Doyle | Sport | The Sunday Times – The Times

In the bloodRacing courses through Doyles veins. Her father, Mark, was born in Clonmel, Co Tipperary, and rode professionally in Britain and Ireland. Her mother, Caroline, bred and raced Arabian horses and was still riding when she was five months pregnant with Hollie

Hard graftDoyle rode just six winners from 99 rides across her first three seasons between 2013 to 2015. Her fathers experience of the industry, however, ensured that she had the drive to keep going. He told her: Youve got to keep working hard. Youre a girl. Youve got to work twice as hard. Just to get a ride, youve got to be first in the yard and youve got to be the last to leave.

Physical changesWhen she

See the original post here:
Anatomy of . . . Hollie Doyle | Sport | The Sunday Times - The Times

Anatomy of A Collapse: Indias Batting Woes Are Not Entirely Shocking – The Wire

For the white ball leg of Indias current outing in Australia, the Indian team donned a kit that resembled the one from early 1990s.

The pleasantly surprising move allowed the fans to indulge in a nostalgic drive while witnessing some quality cricket. During the first one-day match however, Sanjay Manjrekar on commentary remarked that along with the kit, Indias fielding standards too were reminiscent of those the team was known for back in the 90s. Manjrekar is somewhat infamous for having a few sarcastic swipes at the Indian team from time to time and few would have raised their eyebrows over it.

In fact, India finished the limited overs leg with fairly respectable returns. But for a few fielding lapses in an odd game, nothing about the teams effort would bring back the less than pleasing memories of the 90s. Nothing for the fans to lose sleep over. Well, not yet anyway. Except that the horrors of the 90s were reserved for the 3rd innings of the opening Test at Adelaide. The humiliating capitulation on Saturday morning that saw India register its lowest total ever in a Test innings was not a sight entirely unfamiliar to a generation having lived through the ordeals from Durban to Bridgetown and from Hamilton to Ahmedabad.

But with the constant emphasis in the media on this teams superior pedigree to those in the past, the fans could be forgiven for thinking those tribulations were something theyd never be subjected to again. And even if one accounts for an odd aberration that isnt thematic of the teams quality, this Test had no business being one of the occasions considering the position of authority that Virat Kohlis men had secured at the end of the second days play.

Also read: Naming Names for the Massacre at Adelaide

India went into the third innings with a handy 53 run lead, though it could have been a much more substantial one with neater catching. India had lost opener Prithvi Shaw late on day 2 but Shaw hasnt inspired much confidence of late and with the experienced senior pros in the middle order still in the dugout, India looked at building a solid ground to defend, perhaps even batting Australia out of the Test. But that obviously didnt go according to plans.

Nightwatchman Jasprit Bumrah succumbed to Pat Cummins in the second over of the day. That was on expected lines. Bumrah had already played his part. In walked Cheteshwar Pujara. Opener Mayank Agarwal was just looking like he was ready to see out the new ball despite having had a lifeline the previous night. This was the critical partnership India was counting on. Agarwal and Pujara had to bat long and wear the Australian bowlers down to provide a platform for Kohli, Ajinkya Rahane, and Hanuma Vihari to capitalise on later in the day.

The next thirty odd minutes proved to be Indias death knell as Cummins and Josh Hazlewood delivered an exhibition of peerless fast bowling reducing Indian batsmen to mere spectators resigned to fate. From being only one down for 15 runs at one point, India lost 8 more adding another 16 runs to the scoreboard. Cummins and Hazlewood ran in, consistently hit the three quarter length, exploited bounce, and ensured the seam movement was just about enough to take the batsmans edge almost every single time.

Virat Kohli walks off the field after being run-out by Australia in the first innings during the test match at the Adelaide Oval in Adelaide. Photo: PTI/AP

Pujara found himself playing the wrong line, Rahane and Agarwal got caught in the crease, Vihari played with hard hands, and Kohli not for the first time in his life chased a wide one after committing himself on the front foot. The pitch too played quite visibly quicker than it did for the first two days. The bounce was true and the ball carried above the keepers shoulders. The edges were no longer carrying short to the slips. Add to it, two of the worlds best bowlers extracting nasty seam movement constantly threatening both the edges of the bat.

These were not the most conducive of conditions for batting. The Australian batsmen themselves found it incredibly tough to find any rhythm on this pitch against an attack slightly less potent than their own. But that does not explain away a chink in the armour that India has refused to address for a while now that this batting unit is not quite as good as it is often made out to be.

Also read: A Softened Up India-Australia Rivalry Is a Sign of Where The Power Lies

That Indias bowling attack is the most potent one in the world across conditions is no longer an opinion now. The claim has demonstrable evidence. But the same cannot be said about batting. Earlier this year, India played two Tests in New Zealand in daunting conditions and threw in the towel rather easily. It must be clarified India lost the toss in both Tests and therefore had to bear the brunt of a green seaming wicket first up. But interestingly, it is the second innings on both occasions that the Indian batting got skittled out rather cheaply the phase of a Test match most batting friendly in New Zealand.

On their 2018 South Africa tour, India conceded the Test series under similarly testing conditions. In the two Tests they lost, India lost seven wickets for less than 100 in three out of four innings. Things didnt change much later that year in England either as India similarly found themselves wanting against the moving ball be it at Edgbaston, Lords, or The Oval. And when one views Saturdays debacle at Adelaide under the weight of this recent historical context, things suddenly do not seem all that shocking. In fact, the showdown from Cummins and Hazlewood mustve painfully reminded the Indian fans of their teams travails at Old Trafford in 2014 when James Anderson and Stuart Broad kept pitching the ball up and the Indian top order kept guiding everything to the slip cordon. Three out of Indias top six have remained the same across the six years between these two Tests but the demons have not been put to rest yet.

Now, no team in the world is comfortable batting against sustained quality of fast bowling when the conditions assist the bowlers so much. And despite some glaring technical problems with Indias batsmen, the scorecard from this innings does not fairly appraise the teams bating reserves. It was one of those freakish passages of play where everything that could have gone wrong did go wrong. It is entirely possible Cummins and Hazlewood will bowl even better at some point in the remainder of the series than they did today without coming anywhere close to replicating the same returns. And at the same time, Indian batsmen too will at some point get away with playing more profligate shots outside off stump.

Having said that, Indias batting woes outside the subcontinent very much continue to remain and are unlikely to go away any time soon. Indias fast bowling stocks are stronger than ever though and that allows the team to produce results from time to time that flatter to deceive. Over the course of Test crickets history, rarely have teams thoroughly cracked what would qualify as alien conditions. It is perfectly normal for teams to take a beating down when odds are so heavily stacked against them.

The current Indian team is no exception. They still remain an extremely formidable force in their own backyard and that enviable home record is something that deserves to be written about much more. But away from home, contrary to what the fans have been led to believe, this batting unit is hardly any stronger than the ones India has produced since the turn of the century and remains just as vulnerable as ever. No amount of boisterousness in front of press by Ravi Shastri is going to change it.

Parth Pandya is an Ahmedabad-based freelance sports writer.

Visit link:
Anatomy of A Collapse: Indias Batting Woes Are Not Entirely Shocking - The Wire

Thursday Night Football And Its OT Finish Tops Ratings; Greys Anatomy Fall Finale Dips – Deadline

The Los Angeles Chargers and Las Vegas Raiders went to overtime last night on , which helped spike the ratings for Foxs midweek primetime game.

The Chargers overtime victory in the showdown of West(ish) Coast rivals drew a night-leading 2.2 rating and 8.64 million viewers, which is actually off a tenth in the demo and down in viewers from the early Nielsen Live+Same Day numbers of last weeks higher-profile Rams-Patriots game, though last nights numbers will likely be adjusted in the finals.

Elsewhere, ABCs trio of Thursday dramas wrapped up their fall runs last night, with Greys Anatomy (1.0, 5.55M) off a tenth from last week but still primetimes top-rated scripted offering. Station 19 (0.9, 5.39M) bumped up a tenth, while A Million Little Things (0.5, 3.31M) was steady.

CBS comedy block returned to originals last night and was down a tenth across the board with Young Sheldon (0.7, 6.69M), the nights most-watched scripted show, followed by B Positive (0.5, 4.57M), Mom (0.5, 4.49M) and The Unicorn (0.4, 3.28M). Star Trek: Discovery (0.2, 1.72M).

On NBC, an encore of Dolly Partons Coat of Many Colors TV movie led into a fresh Dateline (0.4, 3.13M).

The CW aired a pair of specials, Dogs of the Year (0.1, 820,000) and Worlds Funniest Animals (0.1, 600K).

More here:
Thursday Night Football And Its OT Finish Tops Ratings; Greys Anatomy Fall Finale Dips - Deadline