Researchers discover genetic markers that drive the timing of first sex and birth – News-Medical.Net

An Oxford-led team, working with Cambridge and international scholars, has discovered hundreds of genetic markers driving two of life's most momentous milestones - the age at which people first have sex and become parents.

In a paper published today in Nature Human Behaviour, the team linked 371 specific areas of our DNA, called genetic variants (known locations on chromosomes), 11 of which were sex-specific, to the timing of first sex and birth. These variants interact with environmental factors, such as socioeconomic status and when you were born, and are predictors of longevity and later life disease.

The researchers conducted a Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS), a search across the entire human genome, to see if there is a relationship between reproductive behaviour and a particular genetic variant. In the largest genomic study ever conducted to date, they combined multiple data sources to examine age at first sex (N=387,338) and birth (N=542,901) in men and women. They then calculated a genetic score, with all genetic loci combined explaining around 5-6% of the variability in the average age at sexual debut or having a first child.

Our study has discovered hundreds additional genetic markers that shape this most fundamental part of our lives and have the potential for deeper understanding of infertility, later life disease and longevity."

Professor Melinda Mills, Director of the Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science at the University of Oxford and Nuffield College, and Study's First Author

The genetic signals were driven by social factors and the environment but also by reproductive biology, with findings related to follicle-stimulating hormone, implantation, infertility, and spermatid differentiation.

Professor Mills adds 'We already knew that childhood socioeconomic circumstances or level of education were important predictors of the timing of reproduction. But we were intrigued to find literally not only hundreds of new genetic variants, but also uncover a relationship with substance abuse, personality traits such as openness and self-control, ADHD and even predictive of some diseases and longevity .'

Professor Mills says, 'We demonstrated that it is a combination of genetics, social predictors and the environment that drives early or late reproductive onset. It was incredible to see that the genetics underlying early sex and fertility were related to behavioural dis-inhibition, like ADHD, but also addiction and early smoking. Or those genetically prone to postpone sex or first birth had better later life health outcomes and longevity, related to a higher socioeconomic status in during childhood.'

Genetic factors driving reproductive behaviour are strongly related to later life diseases such as Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

'It is exciting that the genetics underlying these reproductive behaviours may help us understand later life disease.'

Professor Mills concludes, 'Starting your sexual journey early is rooted in childhood inequality but also has links with health problems, such as cervical cancer and depression. We found particularly strong links between early sexual debut, ADHD and substance abuse, such as early age at smoking. We hope our findings lead to better understanding of teenage mental and sexual health, infertility, later life disease and treatments to help.'

Source:

Journal reference:

Mills, M.C., et al. (2021) Identification of 371 genetic variants for age at first sex and birth linked to externalising behaviour. Nature Human Behaviour. doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01135-3.

See the rest here:
Researchers discover genetic markers that drive the timing of first sex and birth - News-Medical.Net

Genetics, Socioeconomic Factors Each Tied to Diabetes and Obesity – MedPage Today

Genetic and socioeconomic factors were each independently associated with increased risk for both type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity, according to a biobank study of Americans of European ancestry.

Among more than 27,000 white individuals in the Mass General Brigham Biobank, those in the highest genetic risk quintile were 5.7 times more likely to have T2D and 4.8 times more likely to have obesity compared with those in the lowest risk quintile, reported Sara Cromer, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

Overall, people in both the highest genetic risk and socioeconomic status (SES) risk quintiles were 15.7 and 9.7 times more likely to have T2D and obesity, respectively, than those in the lowest risk quintiles (P<0.05 for both), according to findings presented at the virtual American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions.

"Both of these factors should be considered when counseling patients about their individual risk and when considering interventions ... at the population level," Cromer said during her presentation.

In adjusted models, various factors were independently associated with T2D risk:

Similarly, these factors were independently associated with obesity risk:

For their study, researchers examined population data on 27,224 patients with available genetic information using electronic health care data and the Mass General Brigham Biobank. Mean age of participants was 61, while 53% were female.

To start, Cromer's team looked at several census tract-level SES measures in Boston, including education, income, and employment status. Here, scoring high on the social deprivation index (SDI) and lower population levels of college education strongly correlated with T2D and obesity, after adjusting for age and sex.

T2D status was determined based on a machine-learning phenotype, and obesity based on the phenotype or a maximum BMI 30. Genetic quintiles were determined via global extended polygenic risk scores.

For diabetes, those in the highest risk quintiles for college degree preponderance and for SDI were, respectively, 1.7 times and 1.7 times more likely to have T2D than those in the lowest risk quintiles. For obesity, these measures were 2.3 times and 1.9 times more likely for the highest versus lowest risk quintiles.

Researchers did not find any interaction between SES and genetic risk, Cromer noted. So, for example, living in a neighborhood with less SES risk does not help people overcome "bad genetics" when it comes to T2D or obesity risk, she told MedPage Today.

Cromer's team is currently conducting similar analyses of their Black and Hispanic biobank populations, she told MedPage Today. They plan to eventually conduct meta-analysis of the entire sample, featuring all the ethnicities and races. This first study was limited to white participants because the biobank population is about 15-20 times more white than either Black or Hispanic, she said, and because the available instruments are more reliable to assess those with European ancestry.

Ryan Basen reports for MedPages enterprise & investigative team. He has worked as a journalist for more than a decade, earning national and state honors for his investigative work. He often writes about issues concerning the practice and business of medicine. Follow

Disclosures

Cromer's spouse works for Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies. Co-authors reported consultant work or other relationships with XY.ai, Goldfinch Bio, and Novo Nordisk. One co-author has a spouse who works for Emulate, and reported stock holdings in Invitae.

See the article here:
Genetics, Socioeconomic Factors Each Tied to Diabetes and Obesity - MedPage Today

Is It Too Late to Buy Fulgent Genetics Stock? – The Motley Fool

Fulgent Genetics(NASDAQ:FLGT) is arguably the cheapest coronavirus stock on the market -- if not the cheapest biotech of any type out here, with a price-to-earnings (P/E) valuation of just 6.6. What's more, the company has about $697.4 million in cash on its balance sheet and negligible debt. Subtract that from the company's $2.43 billion market cap, and Fulgent appears even more undervalued in terms of its enterprise value (EV).

Investors, however, are not buying into the discount story. After all, the company is heavily dependent on providing billable COVID-19 tests in the U.S., where the pandemic is largely subsiding as the government's mass vaccination campaign has successfully inoculated more than half of all adults already. Meanwhile, the stock is sitting on a 462% year-over-year gain. Given all that, is it too late for new investors to buy Fulgent Genetics?

Image source: Getty Images.

In the first quarter, Fulgent's revenue increased by a stunning 4,500% year over year to $359.4 million. Simultaneously, its net income rose to $200.7 million from a loss of $1.956 million in the prior-year period. The company billed for 3.8 million tests during the quarter -- about 290 times its test volume in Q1 2020.

Unfortunately, the company anticipates revenue from its non-COVID testing services to amount to just $100 million for the full year (gaining 174% year over year). If we assume that Fulgent's COVID tests will become irrelevant in the near future, then the stock is trading for about 17 times EV-to-sales. That is pretty expensive indeed.

Investors are probably giving the company less credit than it deserves. While new COVID-19 cases have declined sharply in many areas of the U.S. to levels below where they were in March 2020, that's simply not the case in many other areas in the world. In fact, Americans who want to travel internationally would still need to grab a negative COVID-19 test result, usually three days before departure, before heading to their destination.

That's not all; back in February, Fulgent was one of four labs selected to provide COVID-19 testing solutions to the Department of Defense. That contract is worth $2 billion in total and will last for up to five years. With all these coronavirus variants spreading, the company has a pretty sound value proposition in providing tests for national defense purposes and could supply many more in the future.

Aside from testing for COVID, Fulgent provides chromosome and gene-sequencing services that help physicians better detect cardiovascular illnesses, epilepsy, and hereditary risk factors for various types of cancer. Since many patients postponed getting these types of discretionary tests done during the pandemic, the company's gene-sequencing business is now experiencing a tailwind as people start visiting their doctors again for non-urgent reasons.

Overall, due to continued demand for COVID-19 tests for people traveling internationally, the possibility of more defense department stockpiling of such tests, and the company's solid gene-testing business, I think Fulgent has a fair shot of achieving its $830 million revenue guidance for the full year.

That number represents a 97% increase year over year, which seems enticing relative to its stock valuation -- even more so since the biotech's stock price fell sharply in February. It's now down 50% from its peak. So for those who have been thinking about buying this stock on the dip, now seems like a great time to do so.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the official recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium advisory service. Were motley! Questioning an investing thesis -- even one of our own -- helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer.

See the original post here:
Is It Too Late to Buy Fulgent Genetics Stock? - The Motley Fool

Genetics Research May Help Identify More Dangerous Strains of the Virus That Causes COVID-19 – SciTechDaily

Viral mutations during the COVID-19 pandemic could cause the SARS-CoV-2 virus to become more dangerous. A new study published inGenetic Epidemiologyhas examined the genetic code of SARS-CoV-2 viruses that have infected patients, looking for links between different mutations and patient deaths.

For the study, investigators analyzed 7,548 SARS-CoV-2 genomes of COVID-19 patients worldwide and looked for an association between genomic variants and mortality. In total, 29,891 locations in the viral genome were assessed.

One location was significantly linked with patient mortality. Mutations at this location cause changes in part of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which plays a key role in viral entry into host cells.

When, in the fall of 2020, we applied methodology from genome-wide association studies to COVID-19 genomes, we noticed one locus in the COVID-19 genomes from Brazil that was associated with mortality and that later became part of the definition of the P.1 strain from Brazil, said co-lead author Georg Hahn, PhD, of Harvard University. The P1. strain was behind a deadly COVID-19 surge in the Latin American country. Its more contagious and more resistant to antibodies than the original strain.

For more on this research, see Genome-Wide Association Studies Accurately Flag More Deadly COVID-19 Variants.

Referemce: Genome-wide association analysis of COVID-19 mortality risk in SARS-CoV-2 genomes identifies mutation in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that colocalizes with P.1 of the Brazilian strain by Georg Hahn, Chloe M. Wu, Sanghun Lee, Sharon M. Lutz, Surender Khurana, Lindsey R. Baden, Sebastien Haneuse, Dandi Qiao, Julian Hecker, Dawn L. DeMeo, Rudolph E. Tanzi, Manish C. Choudhary, Behzad Etemad, Abbas Mohammadi, Elmira Esmaeilzadeh, Michael H. Cho, Jonathan Z. Li, Adrienne G. Randolph, Nan M. Laird, Scott T. Weiss, Edwin K. Silverman, Katharina Ribbeck and Christoph Lange, 22 June 2021, Genetic Epidemiology.DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22421

Read more:
Genetics Research May Help Identify More Dangerous Strains of the Virus That Causes COVID-19 - SciTechDaily

4 new weed products to try from Compound Genetics, Papa & Barkley, and more – Weedmaps News

With so many great cannabis brands releasing exciting new products in new markets, it can be hard to keep track of every release. So we're rounding up a few significant releases. This week, we look at releases by Insane, Kal, and more.

Insane just came out with a new strain available at all Dr. Greenthumb dispensaries in California. Stuffed French Toast is a cross between Paris OG and Faceoff OG, and appeals to the wake 'n' bake crowd with a flavor profile of cinnamon, pine, and orange, tasting just like the breakfast staple it was named after.

Available: California

California-based topicals brand Papa & Barkley just announced infused THC capsules to its lineup. The two-ingredient, whole-plant THC Releaf Capsules are made from coconut and cannabis oils and contain 25 to 50 milligrams of THC.

Available: California

Compound Genetics started dropping three strains at the June 26 grand opening of the Cookies Santa Ana location. These strains include Apples and Bananas, Gummiez, dropping on July 1, and Pav, which was made in collaboration with rapper Quavo.

Available: California

Kal will be dropping new flavors on July 2 in its seltzer line in time for summer. Each 12-ounce can of Kal contains 15 milligrams of hemp-derived CBD and 2 grams of sugar. The new flavors include black cherry, ruby red grapefruit, ginger lemonade, and blood orange mango.

Available: Nationwide

High Tales, a video series produced by Monogram, the cannabis line from Jay-Z, just dropped its latest episode featuring rapper Curren$y. The episode shows Curren$y's very own grilled-cheese recipe, along with weed-related stories he's experienced throughout his life and career.

Available: Nationwide

Featured image by Gina Coleman/Weedmaps

Hannah is a Seattle-based writer and editor. Shes worked in the cannabis industry for three years and continues to learn and explore.

More:
4 new weed products to try from Compound Genetics, Papa & Barkley, and more - Weedmaps News

These 12 individuals have a rare genetic quirk that prevents ‘self-eating’ in cells – Livescience.com

Scientists uncovered a rare genetic quirk in 12 people, from five different families, that leaves their cells unable to properly recycle their worn-out parts. Such mutations could be lethal, but these individuals have survived and instead live with neurodevelopmental conditions.

Normally, cells dispose of broken internal machinery, dysfunctional proteins, toxins and pathogens through a process called autophagy, which translates from Greek as "self-eating." In the process, cells package all their trash into special bags, called autophagosomes, which then fuse with the cell's garbage disposal, the lysosome. Lysosomes contain digestive enzymes that break down all the trash so that the component parts can be reused by the cell.

In humans, when autophagy goes awry, the subsequent buildup of cellular junk can contribute to various diseases, from neurodegenerative disorders to cancer, according to a 2020 report in the New England Journal of Medicine. This dysfunction can occur when mutations crop up in one of about 20 key genes involved in autophagy.

Related: 5 ways your cells deal with stress

And according to animal studies, if any of these 20 genes are severely impaired or completely disabled, it's usually impossible for the animal to survive. For instance, genetically modified mouse pups born without an essential autophagy gene called ATG7 die within 24 hours of birth, according to various reports. And deleting the same gene from adult mice causes them to die of infection or neurodegeneration within months, according to a 2014 report in the journal Cancer Discovery.

"The studies from mice suggest you can't live without them," meaning the 20 core genes, said senior author Robert Taylor, a professor of mitochondrial pathology at Newcastle University in England. "So, we thought that was the same in humans." But now, Taylor and his team have identified 12 people with defective ATG7 genes that leave them with little to none of the protein that the gene encodes, they reported June 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

The ATG7 protein jumpstarts the process of building autophagosomes, the cell's special garbage bags, supposedly making it crucial to the entire autophagy process. The fact that the 12 identified individuals have survived, albeit with neurological disorders, "tells us something, that there is something that we don't know yet about autophagy biology that must be compensating for this process in humans," Taylor said.

"An obvious question is what allows these patients to survive so long with greatly diminished autophagic capacity?" said Daniel Klionsky, a cell biologist and professor at the University of Michigan's Life Sciences Institute, who was not involved in the study. If other mechanisms do compensate for the lack of ATG7, the next step is to identify them and determine whether those mechanisms can be manipulated as a form of treatment for such genetic disorders, Klionsky told Live Science in an email.

Since mutations in autophagy-related genes often have lethal consequences, "it is difficult to find an adequate number of patients to have meaningful results" when researching such genetic changes in humans, Klionsky noted. The fact that the team was able to find this number of people with ATG7 mutations "makes the findings more robust," he said.

The researchers found the first two study participants through a clinic that specializes in mitochondrial diseases, as some of their symptoms seemed consistent with mitochondrial conditions, Taylor said. The patients two sisters whose respective ages were 28 and 18 both showed mild-to-moderate learning difficulties, muscle weakness and a lack of coordination, known as ataxia, as well as hearing loss, eye abnormalities and facial dysmorphisms.

Brain scans taken of the elder sister revealed cerebellar hypoplasia, a condition where the cerebellum, located behind the brainstem, fails to develop properly. This region of the brain is critical for coordinating movement. The corpus callosum, a bundle of nerves that connects the two halves of the brain, also appeared unusually thin toward the back of the brain.

In seeing the shared symptoms between the sisters and striking brain scans from the eldest, "We realized that the best way to approach this was genetically, and we took it from there," Taylor said. The team found that both sisters carried recessive mutations in the ATG7 gene that greatly reduced or eliminated its ability to make ATG7 protein.

"And we thought, 'This can't be right,'" given the disastrous effects of ATG7 deficiencies seen in mice, Taylor said. "And yet we were able to show ... that actually, we can't detect ATG7 in the muscle [or] in the cells that we've grown from the first family." Hoping to better understand these counterintuitive results, the team went in search for more individuals with similar ATG7 mutations to the sisters.

Related: Genetics by the numbers: 10 tantalizing tales

"You can't make a compelling case with one family," whereas finding several families with the same combination of genetic mutations and clinical symptoms would strengthen their findings, Taylor said. "Then you start to kind of do the detective work that puts all this together and makes you think, 'We're onto something.'"

So the study's lead author Jack Collier, then a doctoral student in Taylor's lab, used an online tool called GeneMatcher to find the 10 other patients in the researchs cohort of 12. The tool, developed with support from the Baylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics, is intended to connect patients, researchers and clinicians with an interest in the same genes.

Through GeneMatcher, the team identified four more families, located in France, Switzerland, Germany and Saudi Arabia. The family members who carried ATG7 mutations ranged from 6 weeks to 71 years in age and showed a similar suite of neurological symptoms, although the severity of the symptoms varied between individuals. In general, the patients showed neurodevelopmental deficits, facial dysmorphisms and ataxia. One or more patients from each family also underwent brain scans, and like the first patient, had underdeveloped cerebellums and thin corpus callosums.

In all but the first two patients, the team found some residual ATG7 protein in sampled muscle cells, as well as in fibroblasts cells in connective tissue that secrete collagen that the team grew from patient samples. And even in the first two sisters, some proteins involved in autophagy still cropped up in their cells, albeit in very low quantities. This hinted that the individuals' genetic mutations didn't completely suppress autophagy.

Looking closer at the mutations, the researchers found that each patient carried slightly different variations of the ATG7 gene, Taylor said. A mutation occurs when one DNA building block is swapped out for another, and the location of this swap along the DNA strand determines how the mutation will change the resulting protein. Using computer models, the team mapped out where all the patients' mutations appeared and found a general theme: The mutations cropped up in highly conserved portions of the DNA sequence, meaning they're usually the same across a wide range of organisms, from yeast to mice to humans.

In fact, the ATG7 gene is highly conserved in all eukaryotic cells the complex cells that make up animals, plants, fungi and protists. Because of this, the team could test how mouse and yeast cells were affected by the mutations seen in the human patients. In lab dish studies, the mutations reduced or eliminated autophagy in both mouse and yeast cells, strengthening the case that the same was happening in the human patients' bodies.

"It is difficult to carry out experiments with humans," Klionsky said. "Certainly, the inclusion of data from mouse and yeast studies makes the results much stronger."

Related: How to speak genetics: A glossary

That said, many questions about these mysterious mutations remain unanswered. Namely, how do people survive when their cells can't "eat themselves" through the usual means?

The cells must be dealing with dysfunctional proteins and broken machinery to some degree, "because accumulations of cellular 'junk' was not observed," Ian Ganley, a principal investigator whose lab studies autophagy at the University of Dundee in Scotland, wrote in a commentary in NEJM. This indicates that some other mechanism fills in for the lack of ATG7-related autophagy, Ganley wrote.

Identifying such mechanisms will be key to developing treatments to syndromes where autophagy is impaired, whether due to a genetic quirk as described in the new study or in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's, he added. Such treatments could include drugs that boost the activity of these alternative mechanisms, helping cells to rid themselves of junk more efficiently, Taylor said. Another option could be gene therapy, where working copies of faulty autophagy genes are inserted into the genome to replace the mutant versions, Klionsky said.

For now, Taylor and his team plan to run experiments in cells to better understand how the mutations impact specific tissues, such as the brain and muscles, Taylor said. To this end, the team has already begun developing a line of induced pluripotent stem cells those that can mature into any cell in the body from patient samples. With those stem cells, the researchers can create fibroblasts and brain cells to see how the mutation impacts those cells.

"At the moment, we're still trying to understand some of the biology but want to do that in a relevant system," Taylor said. Only then can the team tackle the question of which potential treatments might be able to boost autophagy when it falters.

Originally published on Live Science.

See more here:
These 12 individuals have a rare genetic quirk that prevents 'self-eating' in cells - Livescience.com

Penn scientists correct genetic blindness with single injection into the eye – Big Think

This article was originally published on our sister site, Freethink.

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania have reversed a genetic form of blindness in a patient using just one course of antisense oligonucleotide therapy, Clinical OMICS reports.

The therapy, which takes aim at mutant RNA, was injected into the patient's eyes a year ago, in a trial treating Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA). LCA predominantly affects the retina, leaving people with severely impaired vision from birth, according to the NIH.

The trial, held at the Scheie Eye Institute at Penn's Perelman School of Medicine, focused on using antisense oligonucleotide therapy to treat LCA patients with one of the disease's most common mutations.

Antisense oligonucleotide therapy works by altering the RNA, the messenger that carries instructions from your DNA to crank out proteins.

An article in Nature Reviews Neurology describes antisense oligonucleotides as "short, synthetic, single-strand" molecules, which can alter RNA to cause protein creation to be reduced, enhanced, or modified.

In the Penn study, the targeted protein was created by the mutated LCA gene.

The team, led by professors Artur V. Cideciyan and Samuel G. Jacobson, injected an antisense oligonucleotide (called sepofarsen) into the eyes of 11 patients.

In a previous study, according to Clinical OMICS, the team had shown that administering the therapy every three months increased the amount of the proper protein levels in 10 patient's eyes, improving their sight in daytime conditions.

But it's the experience of the eleventh patient that's the subject of their new paper, published in Nature Medicine.

That eleventh patient chose to receive only one course of sepofarsen and turned down the additional doses.

The patient had suffered from poor visual acuity, reduced fields of view, and zero night vision, Clinical OMICS reports, but after one shot, the patient showed remarkable improvement over the course of the next 15 months similar to people who got multiple, regular injections.

"Our results set a new standard of what biological improvements are possible with antisense oligonucleotide therapy in LCA caused by CEP290 mutations," Cideciyan told Clinical OMICS.

Interestingly, the effects of the shot had a delayed onset; while improvement was shown after one month, the gains peaked around three months later, the authors write. That slow uptake was unexpected, and it may hold insights into treating other diseases that impact retinal cell's cilia (aka, those little vibrating hairs), the physical cause of LCA.

Antisense oligonucleotide therapy may be effective because the tiny molecules can slip inside the cell's nucleus, but don't get swept out too quickly, so they can stick around until the job's done.

The therapy's success, and the unexpected success of a single injection, is inspiring other clinical trials.

"There are now, at least in the eye field, a series of clinical trials using antisense oligonucleotides for different genetic defects spawned by the success of the work in CEP290-associated LCA from Drs. Cideciyan and Jacobson," Joan O'Brien, chair of ophthalmology and director of the Scheie Eye Institute, told Clinical OMICS.

Multiple antisense therapies have already been approved by the FDA, particularly for neurological conditions, and have shown success in treating spinal muscular atrophy and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Per Neurology Genetics, antisense oligonucleotide therapy trials are currently being developed for Huntington's, Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's disease, among others.

And now add genetic blindness to that list.

"This work represents a really exciting direction for RNA antisense therapy. It's been 30 years since there were new drugs using RNA antisense oligonucleotides," Jacobson told Clinical OMICS, "even though everybody realized that there was great promise for these treatments."

Related Articles Around the Web

Read the original:
Penn scientists correct genetic blindness with single injection into the eye - Big Think

Epigenetics The spirituality of genetics – The Financial Express

SHAERI NAWAR | Published: June 30, 2021 12:56:05

Imagine a twin - Rahim and Karim. One day they visited a festival where Karim got lost and had ever since lived on the roadside. Rahim grew up in a stable normal family household while Karim grew up with less stability, less access to nutritious food and education but more laborious activity.

Forty years later, Rahim unexpectedly found his long lost sibling. More than the reunion with his brother, what shocked Rahim was the fact that his twin brother was not like him. Karim was shorter than him, had a deeper voice and no longer suffered from any genetically inherited disease that they both had in childhood.

As the traits are genetically inherited, Rahim decided to consult a genetic scientist. The scientist studied their genetic code and found that their DNA is exactly the same as it used to be when they were born. However, it turns out that they dont just look different but they actually have become genetically different just by living in different conditions despite having the same genetic codes. This is where epigenetics comes in the picture.

Epigenetics is the study of how the environment influences our genetic makeup. According to the national public health agency of the United States, The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC,) it is the study of how your behaviours and environment can cause changes that affect the way your genes work. Unlike genetic changes, epigenetic changes are reversible and do not change your DNA sequence, but they can change how your body reads a DNA sequence.

An example can help to understand it better. Say, our genome is a paragraph and all of the letters and punctuations would be in the exact same order and give the paragraph a meaning. Now keeping the letters in the same order while shuffling the punctuations would potentially change the message of the paragraph for a reader. Similarly, no cell of the body will be able to read and follow the instructions in the DNA sequence as it results in epigenetic changes. Epigenetics literally means above genetics where a change is evident without a physical change in the DNA sequence.

What causes epigenetic changes?

Diet, physical activity, smoking, environmental pollutants, family relationships, psychological stress, working on night shifts, financial status and many more are the core causes of epigenetic changes.

How epigenetics works

The genetic mechanism of epigenetics is quite complex following a cascade of biological reactions. Nonetheless, a simplified explanation for the curious minds has been presented.

Genes act as the switch that controls everything our body does. Specific genes are there to do specific functions and show specific traits. This genetic switch needs to be turned on or off in order for a gene to work. This turning on/off phenomenon is controlled by a chemical (a methyl group) being added or removed from that gene. This phenomenon is called DNA methylation. For example, a gene that is normally supposed to remain off and if a methyl group is added to turn the gene on, then that could result in epigenetic changes.

The placebo effects

Placebo is a substance or treatment, based on the idea that our brain can convince our body into accepting a fake treatment and thus having a cure somewhat. But have you ever pondered about the mechanism behind it? How does a supposedly fake treatment magically improve health like real ones? Many would answer it happens because we are conditioned to think that we are getting treated which is partially correct.

Our thoughts influence the level of our hormones which run some of the brain functions. The brain sends signals to the cell to function in a certain way. The cell signals to switch a gene on or off to carry the cellular function. As a result, it all comes down to the regulation of the genetic switch. The bottom line is that our mind-body connection is reinforced by epigenetics.

For instance, the genome is the actual hardware of the computer (your body), then epigenome is more like the software which tells the hardware what to do even though the genome is going to do all the work. The fact is that you can influence your genetic expression.

Interestingly, epigenetic characteristics are passed on to children from parents as well. If somebody is a chain smoker, thats bad for the individual but it is thought that he wouldnt necessarily be harming his unborn child in any measurable way. However, this idea is changing pretty rapidly because some of the epigenetic information get stuck on the genomes and are passed from generation to generation. So, if you are a chain smoker, chances are your kids would have more affinity towards smoking than a non-smokers kid.

Epigenetic anomalies

Over the last few decades, numerous scientific studies have been conducted to decode the science behind male infertility. As a matter of fact, the valid cause behind the mechanism of more than 50 per cent of male infertility cases is unknown. Owing to this concern, a number of studies have been conducted, which have inferred that the abnormal methylation of the sperm is highly correlated with male infertility.

Also, epigenetic changes are now considered as one of the hallmarks of many cancers. Disruption of epigenetic processes can lead to altered gene function and transform cells causing malignancies and cancer.

However, as the old saying goes, the cure lies in the problem. Epigenetics both causes and cures cancer. In a study published in the Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, it has been found that methylation that takes place in tissues and that is non-cancerous acts as a signal to identify the risk of tumour formation. So, this is emerging as a target for cancer prevention.

Epigenetic drugs

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved seven epigenetic drugs for the treatment of haematological malignancies or cancer. Some of these drugs have been acquired from the enzymes that function during epigenetic occurrences.

All in all, from being the cause of some potential diseases and cure of some, epigenetics has enormous advantages. It gives one the power to shape oneself and as a matter of fact, soon epigenetics would be the personalised healthcare tool for individuals.

Shaeri Nawar is a life science researcher. He is currently a research fellow at Asian Network for Research on Antidiabetic Plants (ANRAP). E-mail: [emailprotected]

View original post here:
Epigenetics The spirituality of genetics - The Financial Express

Study shows genetic link to age of first sex, childbirth – New Zealand Herald

Lifestyle

1 Jul, 2021 11:24 PM2 minutes to read

You might think that your first time was linked to a number of factors, such as love, lust, morality or social mores.

But new research has revealed that the age we lose our virginity may actually be tied to our unique genetic code.

An international team of scientists, led by Oxford University and including input from New Zealand, found 371 regions of our DNA that influence milestones such as when we first have sex and have our first baby, both for women and men.

"This is one of these studies where you wonder, did my genes make me do it?" Andrew Shelling, head of the University of Auckland's Medical Genetics Research Group, told The AM Show.

Shelling also revealed that environmental factors do play a bigger part, saying: "Just because they found a correlation with a gene doesn't mean to say that's going to cause us to have sex at an earlier age than anyone else."

The study's leader, Professor Melinda Mills at the Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science at the University of Oxford, said that the research could have wide-ranging implications.

"Age at first sexual intercourse and age at first birth have implications for health and evolutionary fitness. We anticipate that our results will address important interventions in infertility, teenage sexual and mental health," she said.

Professor Mills told the Daily Mail that the study shows an "interaction of both nature and nurture".

According to a 2016 survey by condom makers Durex, New Zealand had one of the youngest average ages of first sex in the countries surveyed.

Kiwis had an average age of 17.5, compared to 18.4 in the US and 21.2 in China.

30 Jun, 2021 09:46 PMQuick Read

1 Jul, 2021 03:32 AMQuick Read

1 Jul, 2021 10:10 PMQuick Read

25 May, 2021 10:50 PMQuick Read

Brazil 17.3 New Zealand 17.5 Germany 17.8 UK 18.3 US 18.4 Canada 18.5 France 18.7 Ireland 18.7 Mexico 19.1 Spain 19.5 Japan 20.4 China 21.2 India 22.5 Malaysia 23.7

However, an earlier study from a Kiwi sex toy retailer showed that our sexual confidence doesn't peak until our late 20s, spiking again in our early 50s.

Original post:
Study shows genetic link to age of first sex, childbirth - New Zealand Herald

Daniel M Davis: Unbelievable things will come from biological advances – The Guardian

Daniel M Davis is a professor of immunology at the University of Manchester. He has published over 130 academic papers and two lauded popular science books, The Compatibility Gene and The Beautiful Cure. His third, The Secret Body, describes the forthcoming revolution in human health.

As an immunologist, when you overhear conversations about antibodies or T-cells in the pub (when regulations permit), is it pleasing to you that these aspects of science have entered the public domain?Many terrible things have happened because of this pandemic, but the science of viruses and infections has come right to the foreground. As an immunologist I always thought my subject was quite important, but right now its become blatantly clear to everyone how critical it is to understand how the immune system works and how viruses evolve, and how infections spread between people. Without that deep understanding there wouldnt have been progress in creating vaccines and many, many, many more people would have died.

Particularly at the beginning of the pandemic there were lots of stories in the media about what you could do to boost your immune system. As an immunologist does that make you groan a little?I do understand where it comes from. Even before the pandemic, if I gave a public talk, that was the question I would get asked the most. Essentially, we dont really know the answer because an experiment isolating a food or supplement to see if it boosted your immune system is really hard to do. The only thing most scientists would agree on which does affect the ability of your immune system to respond to an infection is stress. And theres a molecular level of understanding of why that is: because when you are stressed the cortisol levels in your blood go up and that quietens down the immune system because you divert energy to the fight-or-flight response. So if you have chronic stress you may have a long-term quieting of the immune system, which could be a problem. My message would be to be very sceptical of anything which makes a claim to boost your immune system.

At degree and PhD level, you studied physics. What led you to pivot to the outer reaches of the cosmos to our insides?As a young kid I always wanted to be a scientist. And in my youth physics felt to me like it was the most fundamental science. It was science about rules that work across the whole universe motion and gravity, electromagnetic waves thats why I should study it. But as I got older I really felt that life was more fundamental and that understanding life is perhaps most special. Moreover, physics is a very mature science.

You felt you could make a bigger contribution to biology?There are so many questions that just instantly catapult you to the frontier of biology. In biology were at that point where everything is kicking off in a big way. Unbelievable things are going to come about because of the biological advances that are happening now. In the same way that early 19th-century physics led to the internet, biology now will lead to, I dont know what its just going to be insane.

Last month a study was published about a baby in San Diego who was admitted to neonatal intensive care with unexplained symptoms. His genome was sequenced and within 43 hours, a gene defect had been diagnosed, treatment ordered and symptoms resolved. How commonplace can this therapy become?Yes, this is surely going to be a part of medical practice more and more. In fact, I think all sorts of new ways to analyse our health will eventually come online. Not tomorrow, but in years or decades to come. For example, microbiome compositions might one day be used to help diagnosis of any number of illnesses. Small packets of proteins and fat molecules called exosomes, which circulate in our blood, as well as circulating cell-free DNA, are less well understood right now, but they too are likely to vary across different states of health and disease, and might be used diagnostically in the future. How about analysis of breath or the sweat from the palms of hands? This is science fiction right now, but it is the direction of travel.

Does the future of personalised medicine depend on context and regulation, ie whether youre a patient in an insurance-based system or how much you trust the authorities with your genomic data?I think this is very important. To be honest, its not that I know the answers, its just that I know we should be talking about it. Across all the different aspects of the human body, its clear that everything is kicking off and we are soon going to be exposed to all sorts of difficult personal decisions. I think that whatever legislation is in place or wherever you live, each of us will need to decide for ourselves if and when to use new science thats available to us. Again, not tomorrow but sometime in the future. For example, would you want to take personal nutritional advice from an algorithm that has analysed the components of your own stool and blood?

What makes you think individuals will act on these insights? Broadly speaking, we all know its good for our health to exercise, drink less, eat wholefoods and so on, but many people dont bother.That is true, but as things get more detailed, it will have an effect. For example, lots of people diet to try to lose weight, but if it became clear that a personalised diet plan based on analysis of your microbiome and other aspects of your body was more effective, people would consider that path.

Quite a lot of data about our potential health outcomes are already accessible through something like a 23andMe genetic test. However, some people would rather not know about their chances of developing Alzheimers disease and all the rest of it. Do you sympathise with that position?It comes down to where the knowledge is. With a lot of things, it doesnt help you to know because theres not much you can do about it. Famously, Angelina Jolie had a mastectomy on the basis of BRCA1 mutation, but she had relatively clear facts from which to make a decision.

Most other things are a bit too fuzzy to make clear decisions about. But it is going to come. There will be an onslaught of information about ourselves as knowledge progresses and people are going to have difficult decisions to make about their own lives. This is where were heading, but at the moment its a bit fuzzy.

On one hand The Secret Body is about scientists making insights and identifying mechanisms, but its also about scientists inventing new instruments to see what was previously obscured. Is there a fantasy instrument which would advance your own work?Because of my background in physics, one of the things that enabled me to make inroads in the immune system was to use high-powered microscopes to look at immune cells interacting. The super-resolution microscope we have now is a complete dream compared to what we had 20 years ago. The next level would be to see a molecular view of the immune system within the human body. A lot of the high-powered microscopes I use inside my lab are restricted to looking at cells interacting with each other in a dish.

Many of the breakthroughs you describe come about through chance meetings between scientists at conferences. Are you worried that, post-pandemic, these kinds of expensive events involving lots of air travel will be less likely to happen? Can serendipity occur on Zoom?I think about that a lot because, personally, Im not a great fan of travelling around to conferences, because you miss your family, its exhausting and bad for the environment. Yet it is definitely true that an informal face-to-face interaction is where things spark. So Im hoping the technology could improve. Surely some type of virtual reality headset can put me in a conference situation. Certainly you cant get a lot of banter on Zoom.

The Secret Body by Daniel M Davis is published by The Bodley Head (20). To support the Guardian and Observer, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply

Read this article:
Daniel M Davis: Unbelievable things will come from biological advances - The Guardian