‘Grey’s Anatomy’: Amelia Rejected Link’s Marriage Proposal to Protect Him, Fan Theory Suggests – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Greys Anatomy, as one of the longest-running and most successful medical dramas of all time, is a show that has tackled many tough issues over the years.

From divorce and abortion to amnesia and child loss, fans have seen many troubling storylines over the years. However, the recent plotline involving Amelia and her addiction might be one of the toughest and most heart-wrenching yet. Amelia Shepherd is a character who has appeared in several shows in the Greys Anatomy universe, including Private Practice, and her struggles have been well-documented. It is her longstanding battle with addiction, in fact, that has given birth to an interesting fan theory, which could explain why Amelia rejected Links recent marriage proposal.

Amelia Shepherd is a character who first appeared in the series Private Practice, and although her sunny personality endeared her to fans, she has not had an easy journey. Over the course of her time on Private Practice, Amelia struggled with multiple addictions. First, she dealt with a crippling alcoholism problem, eventually switching over to pills, and finally, becoming hooked on heroin.

By the time Amelia Shepherd made the move to Greys Anatomy, becoming a part of the regular cast, she had left most of her problems with addiction behind her. Still, the pain that her drug use caused her has never quite left her, and she has been able to turn to her experience with addiction in order to help and guide other characters in Greys Anatomy over the course of the past season.

While Amelia hasnt reverted to hard drug use, recent episodes have shown that she has been struggling with the temptation to relapse especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fans on Reddit have been speculating that Amelias urges could be why she made the shocking decision to reject Links recent marriage proposal.

i think at any other point in time, amelia wouldve been ready to marry link. but due to the pandemic, shes experiencing the urge to relapse and she isnt coping well. therefore, she doesnt want to drag Link (and another child) into the mess, one poster noted, going on to detail how she even said to link im wired for self destruction, meaning that she knows shes a ticking time bomb and is seriously close to relapsing. she isnt being selfish by not wanting to marry link, shes trying to protect him and scout. this makes me even more worried for her. Another fan wrote that Amelia has been very self aware of her addiction and her urges to fall back on that. I think so too that her saying no and not wanting any more kids is just her way of protecting her family because she knows she cant make Link really understand what shes going through.

While Amelias ongoing addiction issues could be one reason why she rejected Link, some fans also think that it could be a way of setting up a romance between Link and Jo. In the same Reddit thread, one fan wrote I think the writers just decided they want him to be with Jo now that shes single. Still, not everyone is on board with that theory one fan even noted that it just doesnt make sense why theyd make amelia & link have scout just for link to end up with jo.

Ultimately, its anyones guess what twists and turns Amelias storyline could take. Stay tuned to Showbiz Cheat Sheet for all the latest entertainment news!

RELATED:Greys Anatomy: Ellen Pompeo Hints at the Shows Ending Im Not Trying to Stay on the Show Forever

View original post here:
'Grey's Anatomy': Amelia Rejected Link's Marriage Proposal to Protect Him, Fan Theory Suggests - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Anatomy of San Francisco Now: Fewer People, Jobs, Tourists, & Businesses, But More Spending by the Hangers-on (But that Was Inflation) – WOLF…

The recovery as it were, after everything went to heck but didnt.ByWolf RichterforWOLF STREET.

San Francisco is one of the most touristy cities in the US both for leisure and for business and it is also a tech and social-media center, a startup Petri dish, and the epicenter of working from home. During the Pandemic, the city has lost large chunk of jobs and a significant number of its residents. So here is an anatomy of the San Francisco economy where it currently stands, based on a report by the City of San Franciscos Office of Economic Analysis and based on some data from other sources that I added to the mix.

Despite the loss of jobs and population, the remaining residents in the city are doing what theyre supposed to do as good consumers: Theyre spending money. By May, credit card spending had fully recovered and was up 5% from the pre-Covid baseline in January 2020, according to credit card spending data, seasonally adjusted (Chart via the Office of Economic Analysis, citing data from the nonprofit Opportunity Insights and Affinity):

So locals spent 5% more with their credit cards than they did before the pandemic and this was just inflation since CPI jumped 5% year-over-year in May. And theyre spending less in brick-and-mortar retail stores, many of which remain shuttered, and more online, and theyre also spending at restaurants and other leisure activities.

There is now a thriving restaurant scene. Indoor dining is back, and now there are about 1,500 parklets where restaurants have created outside-dining areas on curbside parking spots, wide sidewalks, back patios, and public areas. Some restaurant streets are closed to traffic at night, and there have never been so many people visible on the street, milling around and sitting around in these parklets, as now. The whole ambiance has changed.

Restaurants with parklets now have more tables than they did before they built the parklets, and they can accommodate more business than before. And all kinds of new restaurants have sprung up.

But brick and mortar retail stores are in deep trouble. The sight of shuttered stores and for lease signs are everywhere. Nail salons and other services-based businesses are sprouting, but brick-and-mortar retail was already in trouble before the Pandemic, and so many stores were vacant and forming a blight that the city imposed a vacancy tax to incentivize landlords to find tenants.

As of June 2, 43% of San Franciscos small businesses remain closed, compared to the already beaten down baseline of January 2020 (green line), based on payment and payroll data from Opportunity Insights, cited by the Citys report.

Working from home is huge in the San Francisco metro, and office attendance is still minuscule. According to data from Kastle, which provides electronic access systems for office buildings, office attendance as measured by people entering offices in the five-county San Francisco metro (red line) was at 18% of the level in January 2020, meaning office attendance was still down 82%, but creeping up. For comparison, in Austin, TX (blue line), attendance is at about half the level compared to January 2020.

The number of residents in San Francisco who are working took a massive dive in April 2020 and has only partially recovered. In May, the number of working people was still down by 9.5%, or by 54,500 people, from February 2020, according to data from the California Employment Development Department (EDD). And as well see in a moment, some of those people have left San Francisco:

In early May, the California Department of Finance released its annual population estimate. By the end of 2020, the state of California had lost 182,000 people compared to a year earlier, the first population loss since the data had been tracked. San Francisco lost 14,800 people or 1.7% of its population (red column), now down to 875,000 (red line), the lowest since 2015:

Traffic across the Golden Gate Bridge into San Francisco in May was down only 15% from the 2019 average. Traffic congestion on the freeways is back, and average speeds have slowed to pre-Covid averages of 31 mph, down from 60 mph in March and early April 2020. Lots of people are driving who had been taking mass-transit. And plenty of tourists from other parts of California or the US are driving into San Francisco. The weekend congestion is back. We live on a busy street, and its busy as heck, especially on weekends:

The Cable Cars are still shut down. Buses and streetcar lines operate at reduced levels. Ridership on the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system, the train system that links the East Bay to San Francisco and Silicon Valley, was still down 84% in May from May 2019. When people do go to work, theyre driving:

Despite the prevalence of working from home for office workers, and the near ghost-town atmosphere of the Financial District though its much less so now than last August when I documented the ghost town Financial District with photos many businesses are open and require workers to be there, from restaurants and repair shops to construction sites.

In addition, locals have discovered the beauty of outdoor areas, the parks and shore line while tourists were largely gone. I have never seen so many people swim in the Bay while pools were closed. Locals were doing lots of stuff and getting out. But many of them were just not going to work, but were working at home or were not working at all. Now the swim teams have returned to heated pools. But people are still not going to the office (chart via the Office of Economic Analysis, based on data from Google Mobility and Opportunity Insights):

Tourism, a huge industry in San Francisco, is still way down. The crucial tourism from Asia is still dead, and business tourism is also still dead. But domestic tourism is thriving, and these people drive from other places in California and from other states into San Francisco, as demonstrated by the traffic jams on weekends. But far fewer people are flying in.

According to data from the San Francisco International Airport, the number of people getting on a plane in April such as business and leisure tourists going home, and locals heading out was still at 31% from the 2019 average. Part of this is the collapse in traffic between San Francisco and Asia (chart via the Office of Economic Analysis):

The average daily room rate has risen to $160 per night. But thats only about half the average rate in 2019 of around $319 a night.

And hotel occupancy, which in 2019 averaged around 79%, was still only 35% in May. This is figured of total room inventory (TRI), which counts all hotel rooms whether or not the hotel had re-opened (chart via the Office of Economic Analysis):

So there are fewer people living in San Francisco and fewer people have jobs, and apartment vacancy rates are high, and there is a huge amount of churn, with tenants trying to get better deals and nicer apartments. This has been going on for over a year.

In June, the median asking rent for one-bedroom apartments was $2,790, according to Zumper, down 25% from July 2019, after having been down as much as 30%.

But these are asking rents. Theyre a way for landlords to find out what the market will bear. If the unit sits vacant long enough, theyll drop the asking rent or offer other inducements, such as two months free. Asking rents are not actual rents or effective rents. Theyre advertised rents; theyre the rents at which a landlord is trying to make a deal; theyre a form of price discovery, and in uncertain times like these, they can be all over the place.

So this is the economy of San Francisco. Fewer residents, fewer tourists, fewer jobs, fewer businesses, a still dead Financial District, lower rents, lower hotel room rates, near-empty BART trains, and lots of closed stores, but busy restaurants and lots of spending by the people that hung on.

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? Using ad blockers I totally get why but want to support the site? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:

Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.

metal roofs.

Go here to see the original:
Anatomy of San Francisco Now: Fewer People, Jobs, Tourists, & Businesses, But More Spending by the Hangers-on (But that Was Inflation) - WOLF...

10 Greys Anatomy actors you forgot were on Law & Order – Monsters and Critics

Ellen Pompeo, Kate Walsh and Chandra Wilson Pic credit: NBC

Over its seventeen seasons, Greys Anatomy has seen a score of actors pass through its walls. Some of them were unknowns when they joined the show while others were TV veterans.

Given their long histories, it should be no surprise that some Greys folks popped up in the other long-running TV franchise, Law & Order. Given that the shows been running since 1990 with several spinoffs, the odds of a few Greys actors dropping in on L&O is obvious.

It can be fun seeing some future Greys stars popping up in an L&O episode. There are also times when a former Greys star guested on L&O after leaving Seattle-Grace.

Sign up for our TV newsletter!

Whats more notable is that some of Greys actors didnt just do one appearance but multiple ones as different characters. At least one Greys star can claim a trifecta of L&O appearances and a few others are close behind.

Here are 10 Greys Anatomy stars fans may have forgotten were on Law & Order.

Isaiah Washington can be a controversial name for Greys fans. While his role as Burke was a key early role for the series, Washington got in trouble for some backstage comments made about his castmates that led to his exit.

Washington already had a good TV career with a brief stop in the second season L&O episode Out of Control. The detectives have to investigate a brutal attack on a young woman with Washington among the suspects.

After leaving Greys, Washington guest-starred in the L.A. spinoff. As with many L&O cases, what looked like a simple murder ended up more complex as the victim had been working on a controversial voting measure.

Washington was a worker of the victim, which lead to him being arrested. His reverend father (Charles S. Dutton) defended him in court, but it wasnt long before the cops figured there was a bigger case.

The actor was good, making viewers wonder if he was guilty or not, which added to the complexity that made Burke so divisive.

This season, Greys fans had to say goodbye to Jesse Williams as Jackson Avery left the hospital to become an advocate.

As it happens, Williams very first acting credit came with Law & Order. It was a brief role in the opening scene of America Inc.

Williams was among the friends watching a basketball game on TV when a bullet ripped through the set without warning.

It was from the shooting of a military contractor next door that sent the cops on a complex case. It got more complicated when McCoy faced the military and the state department on a possible terrorist attack.

It was just a few moments, but it did get Williams foot in the door on TV for a fun future famous face cameo.

The latest season of Greys had a brief return of Sarah Drews loveable and bright character April. She sure wasnt innocent in the SVU episode Responsible.

When a teenager died after too much drinking, the team found a pack of party-loving classmates. Drew played Becca, the more innocent of the bunch.

She was as shocked as the audience coming home and finding her boyfriend in bed with her own mother who was the one supplying the teens with alcohol.

As the case continued, it turned out Becca was an even bigger lush than any of her classmates which lead to tragedy.

Its a striking image of a more innocent-looking Drew who turned out to have a lot of darkness in her to fit this difficult case.

Greys fans have come to know Greg Germann as the arrogant Tom Koracick. But SVU fans got to love to hate him first in a few episodes as Derek Strauss.

He first arrived in Undercover Blue as a special prosecutor who focused on police-related cases. He tried Brian Cassidy for assault, pushing him as a true scumbag with the team barely able to prove Cassidys innocence.

Then in Amaros One-Eighty, Strauss tried to indict Amaro for a hate crime after he shot a suspect. Straus topped himself in Post-Mortem Blues by trying to indict Benson for murdering a suspect.

Season 18s Genes revealed Strauss had switched sides to become a defense attorney. Its thus possible that Germann returns to plague the SVU team once more.

Law & Order loves to cast actors from New Yorks vibrant Broadway community. That afforded Sara Ramirez a chance to appear on SVU.

At the time, the actress was a few years off from her Tony-winning performance in Spamalot. She had a brief role at the start of the SVU episode Chameleon as a worker at a party the cops busted up.

She claimed one cop felt her up, which got SVU involved. They figured the girl was just making it up to avoid jail time. But she got involved in areal case when another womans body was found on the scene.

It was a brief role that got Ramirez attention before landing the more familiar part of Callie on Greys, which made her a huge fan favorite.

Teddy Altman has been a great character on Greys from wrestling with feelings between Owen and David to personal drama. Kim Raver is a TV veteran of several series, so its logical a L&O appearance would be among them.

In Homesick, when an infant died, the police suspected his British nanny abused him. Raver played the boys mother, naturally grief-stricken, and wanted someone to pay for it.

As the case continued, it became clear the mother was more interested in her career than her child and the defense even suggested she was to blame.

Raver is gorgeous in the role but also had a cold side that leaves the audience guessing with the cops. Even if shes not the perp, its clear by the end she played a part in this tragedy.

Coming in as the first unpopular Addison, Kate Walsh won over fans to the point of earning her own spinoff, Private Practice.

Walsh had been bouncing around TV for a while and landed a spot in the L&O episode Navy Blues. As the title implies, it involved a murder of a Navy officer with Walsh as a possible witness.

It turns out she was having an affair with the victim and the cops suspected she killed him when he tried to cut it off.

With icy-blonde hair, Walsh was terrific as her pilot claimed it was self-defense, and shed been set up by the Navy. Even when she was found guilty, she continued her defense.

Its interesting seeing L&O tackle a case belonging to NCIS and Walsh as the villainess.

As the loveable and stunningly unlucky George OMalley, T.R. Knight won over fans who hoped the guy could catch a break.

His bad luck continued in his appearances in the Law & Order world. In the Criminal Intent episode F.P.S., Knight was one of the two bosses of a computer company suspected of killing their female partner.

Knight played mostly the sad-sack, but the cops realized he was far smarter than he seemed and might have been part of the murder.

After leaving Greys, Knight appeared on SVU. Rollins believed shed tracked down a rapist from an old case, and the DNA matched Knights family man. He protested his innocence and Amaro slowly believed him.

In a huge twist, the gang realized the actual perp was the twin brother the man never knew he had. Knight was terrific in both roles as the nice guy and a monster to truly put George behind him.

As the tough-as-nails but warm-hearted Bailey, Chandra Wilson has been with Greys since the start and not likely to leave soon.

Before that, Wilson can boast a trifecta of different L&O roles. In the second season L&O episode Cradle to Grave, she had a big role as a woman accused of being involved in the death of a child she was babysitting. Wilson was subdued in the role to leave the viewers guessing if she was guilty.

Wilson then made a cameo in the SVU episode Waste when the cops were investigating a woman in a coma who was pregnant. Her smart-mouthed nurse would remind fans of Bailey.

The later SVU episode 911 had Wilson showing up as an FBI tech who aided Benson in tracking down a kidnapped girl calling for help.

All three roles showed a different side of Wilson than Greys fans know.

As Meredith Grey, Ellen Pompeo has been the heart and soul of Greys since it began. Thats a far cry from her two L&O appearances.

In the Season 6 episode Savior, Pompeo was the victim of an attack on her family, which her father barely survived. The detectives suspected the man himself was behind this to salvage some lost money. Pompeo refused to believe it, which led to a dramatic courtroom showdown.

Pompeo then appeared in the Season 10 episode Fools For Love. A crime spree led the cops to catch a man who attacked and killed the sister of his girlfriend, played by Pompeo.

At first, she was heartbroken and rocked. But as the investigation continued, the cops began to suspect she might have been deeply involved in the scam.

Pompeos two roles are miles away from the warm-hearted Meredith either as a shell-shocked woman or a secret schemer.

Greys Anatomy seasons 1-17 on Hulu and Netflix. Law & Order, Law & Order: SVU and Law & Order: Criminal Intent on Peacock. Law & Order: Los Angeles on AppleTV.

Go here to see the original:
10 Greys Anatomy actors you forgot were on Law & Order - Monsters and Critics

Greys Anatomy: 10 Things Fans Love About Cristina (According To Reddit) – Times News Express

Of all the main characters on Greys Anatomywho are no longer around, Cristina Yang is one of the most beloved and memorable. This strong, intelligent, determined doctor only ever wanted to be the best surgeon that she could be, and many fans became heavily invested in her friendship with Meredith Grey.

RELATED:10 Greys Anatomy Quotes That Live Rent-Free In Fans Heads

While not every fan thinks that Cristina is a great character, manyGreys Anatomyfans enjoy looking back on her best moments. Several have talked on Reddit about what makes her such a popular and significant part of the hospital drama.

A fan shared in a thread on Reddit that they related to Cristinas storyline about notwanting children. The fan said that shes well-written and explained, Cristina was one of the first characters on prime time television that really felt familiar to me and was written in a way that managed to (mostly) avoid clich.

Many fans appreciated that Cristina was honest about not wanting to be a parent and when she fell in love with Owen, their differing opinions became a big reason why they couldnt stay together. Cristina shared her feelings without apology, and this meant a lot to viewers who are going through the same thing.

Another fan noted on Reddit that they love watching Cristina care about her career. They praised her as a role model and said, She has always put her career first, and when love has found its way into her life she still found a way to balance her career and never lost her drive.

It was definitely exciting watching Cristina move up at the hospital, and since she always cared about her career, this made her romantic relationships more dramatic and compelling. She wasnt one to drop everything for a new partner, and viewers appreciate that about her.

AnotherGreys Anatomy viewer said that Cristina is blunt and open,and thats why they love her.

RELATED:10 Romances Nobody Saw Coming On Greys Anatomy

Fans love Cristinas strong and honest quotes. No matter what she was talking about, shealways sounded intelligent and perceptive. Cristina cared more about becoming a brilliant surgeon than making awkward small talk or being likable, and thats why she has gained such a huge fanbasein the years since her first appearance on the show. Its important to have a main character who tells it like it is, even if its not alwaysthe nicest thing to say, as it moves the plot and emotion in each scene forward.

A fan said that Meredith and Cristina are the true love story of the show, and this is a sentiment that many share. Its impossible to talk about Cristina without bringing up this epic friendship as the characters found each other as interns and leaned on each other.

Since theyre both strong, smart, ambitious people who dont suffer fools and dont get along with everyone, their bond makes a lot of sense, and its one that has endured. While Cristina is no longer on the show, it seems that she and Meredith are still close, and fans want to believe that they will always be in each others lives.

A fan mentioned the scene when Derek taught Cristina to fishand explained in a Reddit thread, It seems like other scenes with them together was them joining forces to help Mer. But this is just about Cristina and Derek helping her. Gets me emotional.

In the season 7 episode Adrift and At Peace, Derek brought Cristina fishing, and fans loved this episode as Derek taught Cristina to relax, stop thinking so much, and try to live in the moment.The fact that Cristina caught a huge fish was sweet and moving, andfans liked seeing the rare bond between Derek and Cristina.

AGreys Anatomyfan shared in a Reddit that they liked watching Teddy and Cristina. They wrote, I actually really love the Cristina/Teddy relationship that forms. The way she makes her get back to the basics, the dramatic moment when Teddys 1 condition is Owen.

When Teddy first arrived at the hospital, she was supposed to mentor Cristina, but it quickly became clear that she loved Owen. Owen wanted to be with Cristina, but Cristina said she would leave Owen if it meant she could learn from Teddy, which spoke to Cristinas constant desire to improve and keep her eye on the prize of her medical career. While this didnt happen, it would have been a huge sacrifice that not everyone would be willing to make.

According to this Reddit post from a fan, they love Cristina because shes so strong: they wrote, Cristina is such a complex, well-developed and uncompromising character who is pushing to be the absolute best in a male-dominated field.

RELATED:10 Friendships Nobody Saw Coming On Greys Anatomy

Indeed, Cristina doesnt do what other people want her to do, and she always remembers who she is. While many of the main characters on the show are strong and have good work ethics, Cristina stands out as she can be much tougher than the others around her. While sometimes Cristina can be stubborn, this is actually a good thing, and fans felt passionately about the storyline when Hahn didnt want to teach Cristina as it proved how deeply Cristina identified with her career.

A fan shared in a Reddit thread that they find Cristina to be a really funny character and they mentioned the season 6 scene when Cristina was working with Arizona and a little girl was hiding under the covers.

Arizona wanted to play hide and seek, and Cristina refused at first. When Arizona said that Mr. Bear wanted to look at the little girls scar, Cristina pretended to be the scary voice of Mr. Bear.This moment definitely stood out, as Cristina wasnt even trying to be funny, but she proved that she could be light-hearted at times.

In season 6, Lexie wore a diaper during surgery, and a fan mentioned in a thread on Reddit that they loved how Cristinafound it to be a brilliant idea. This was one of Cristinas best moments, and while it might have been a small scene in the grand scheme of the show, it stood out to viewers for a few different reasons.

For one thing, it proved that Cristina was both open-minded and also focused on anything that could help her become a more successful surgeon. And for another, it showed that Cristina cared about the other characters, as she was willing to praise Lexie and think outside the box.

The best acting often happens without any words at all, and thats something that a fan loves about Cristina. They wrote on Reddit that they like the scene when Bailey brought up the fact that Cristina was dating Burke and Cristina said a lot by just looking at Bailey.

The fan said that Cristinas face is expressive and All you can see is her eyes, but they are saying: Yes, me and Burke. Do you approve? I want you to approve of this, I need you to approve.' Fans are torn about Cristina and Burkes romance. Still, nomatter how someone feels about their love story, it was devastating when Burke left Cristina at the altar, and this is a classic moment that showed Cristinas vulnerability for one of the first times.

NEXT:The Most Shocking Things Meredith Ever Did On Greys Anatomy

NextNaruto: The Main Characters Ranked By Fighting Ability

About The Author

Aya Tsintziras is a freelance writer who writes about pop culture and TV. She loves watching TV, (particularly 90s teen dramas and reality shows), coffee, barre classes, and avocado. She lives in Toronto with her husband.

More From Aya Tsintziras

See the original post here:
Greys Anatomy: 10 Things Fans Love About Cristina (According To Reddit) - Times News Express

The neuroscience behind why your brain may need time to adjust to ‘un-social distancing’ – The Conversation US

With COVID-19 vaccines working and restrictions lifting across the country, its finally time for those now vaccinated whove been hunkered down at home to ditch the sweatpants and reemerge from their Netflix caves. But your brain may not be so eager to dive back into your former social life.

Social distancing measures proved essential for slowing COVID-19s spread worldwide preventing upward of an estimated 500 million cases. But, while necessary, 15 months away from each other has taken a toll on peoples mental health.

In a national survey last fall, 36% of adults in the U.S. including 61% of young adults reported feeling serious loneliness during the pandemic. Statistics like these suggest people would be itching to hit the social scene.

But if the idea of making small talk at a crowded happy hour sounds terrifying to you, youre not alone. Nearly half of Americans reported feeling uneasy about returning to in-person interaction regardless of vaccination status.

So how can people be so lonely yet so nervous about refilling their social calendars?

Well, the brain is remarkably adaptable. And while we cant know exactly what our brains have gone through over the last year, neuroscientists like me have some insight into how social isolation and resocialization affect the brain.

Humans have an evolutionarily hardwired need to socialize though it may not feel like it when deciding between a dinner invite and rewatching Schitts Creek.

From insects to primates, maintaining social networks is critical for survival in the animal kingdom. Social groups provide mating prospects, cooperative hunting and protection from predators.

But social homeostasis the right balance of social connections must be met. Small social networks cant deliver those benefits, while large ones increase competition for resources and mates. Because of this, human brains developed specialized circuitry to gauge our relationships and make the correct adjustments much like a social thermostat.

Social homeostasis involves many brain regions, and at the center is the mesocorticolimbic circuit or reward system. That same circuit motivates you to eat chocolate when you crave something sweet or swipe on Tinder when you crave well, you get it.

And like those motivations, a recent study found that reducing social interaction causes social cravings producing brain activity patterns similar to food deprivation.

So if people hunger for social connection like they hunger for food, what happens to the brain when you starve socially?

Scientists cant shove people into isolation and look inside their brains. Instead, researchers rely on lab animals to learn more about social brain wiring. Luckily, because social bonds are essential in the animal kingdom, these same brain circuits are found across species.

One prominent effect of social isolation is you guessed it increased anxiety and stress.

Many studies find that removing animals from their cage buddies increases anxiety-like behaviors and cortisol, the primary stress hormone. Human studies also support this, as people with small social circles have higher cortisol levels and other anxiety-related symptoms similar to socially deprived lab animals.

Evolutionarily this effect makes sense animals that lose group protection must become hypervigilant to fend for themselves. And it doesnt just occur in the wild. One study found that self-described lonely people are more vigilant of social threats like rejection or exclusion.

Another important region for social homeostasis is the hippocampus the brains learning and memory center. Successful social circles require you to learn social behaviors such as selflessness and cooperation and recognize friends from foes. But your brain stores tremendous amounts of information and must remove unimportant connections. So, like most of your high school Spanish if you dont use it, you lose it.

Several animal studies show that even temporary adulthood isolation impairs both social memory like recognizing a familiar face and working memory like recalling a recipe while cooking.

And isolated humans may be just as forgetful. Antarctic expeditioners had shrunken hippocampi after just 14 months of social isolation. Similarly, adults with small social circles are more likely to develop memory loss and cognitive decline later in life.

So, human beings might not be roaming the wild anymore, but social homeostasis is still critical to survival. Luckily, as adaptable as the brain is to isolation, the same may be true with resocialization.

Though only a few studies have explored the reversibility of the anxiety and stress associated with isolation, they suggest that resocialization repairs these effects.

One study, for example, found that formerly isolated marmosets first had higher stress and cortisol levels when resocialized but then quickly recovered. Adorably, the once-isolated animals even spent more time grooming their new buddies.

Social memory and cognitive function also seem to be highly adaptable.

Mouse and rat studies report that while animals cannot recognize a familiar friend immediately after short-term isolation, they quickly regain their memory after resocializing.

And there may be hope for people emerging from socially distanced lockdown as well. A recent Scottish study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic found that residents had some cognitive decline during the harshest lockdown weeks but quickly recovered once restrictions eased.

Unfortunately, studies like these are still sparse. And while animal research is informative, it likely represents extreme scenarios since people werent in total isolation over the last year. Unlike mice stuck in cages, many in the U.S. had virtual game nights and Zoom birthday parties (lucky us).

So power through the nervous elevator chats and pesky brain fog, because un-social distancing should reset your social homeostasis very soon.

[Understand new developments in science, health and technology, each week. Subscribe to The Conversations science newsletter.]

Read more:
The neuroscience behind why your brain may need time to adjust to 'un-social distancing' - The Conversation US

Neuroscience reveals social distancing effects on the brain – Fast Company

With COVID-19 vaccines working and restrictions lifting across the country, its finally time for those now vaccinated whove been hunkered down at home to ditch the sweatpants and reemerge from their Netflix caves. But your brain may not be so eager to dive back into your former social life.

Social distancing measures proved essential for slowing COVID-19s spread worldwidepreventing upward of an estimated 500 million cases. But, while necessary, 15 months away from each other has taken a toll on peoples mental health.

In a national survey last fall, 36% of adults in the U.S.including 61% of young adultsreported feeling serious loneliness during the pandemic. Statistics like these suggest people would be itching to hit the social scene.

But if the idea of making small talk at a crowded happy hour sounds terrifying to you, youre not alone. Nearly half of Americans reported feeling uneasy about returning to in-person interaction regardless of vaccination status.

So how can people be so lonely yet so nervous about refilling their social calendars?

Well, the brain is remarkably adaptable. And while we cant know exactly what our brains have gone through over the last year, neuroscientists like me have some insight into how social isolation and resocialization affect the brain.

Humans have an evolutionarily hardwired need to socializethough it may not feel like it when deciding between a dinner invite and rewatching Schitts Creek.

From insects to primates, maintaining social networks is critical for survival in the animal kingdom. Social groups provide mating prospects, cooperative hunting, and protection from predators.

But social homeostasisthe right balance of social connectionsmust be met. Small social networks cant deliver those benefits, while large ones increase competition for resources and mates. Because of this, human brains developed specialized circuitry to gauge our relationships and make the correct adjustmentsmuch like a social thermostat.

Social homeostasis involves many brain regions, and at the center is the mesocorticolimbic circuitor reward system. That same circuit motivates you to eat chocolate when you crave something sweet or swipe on Tinder when you crave . . . well, you get it.

And like those motivations, a recent study found that reducing social interaction causes social cravingsproducing brain activity patterns similar to food deprivation.

So if people hunger for social connection like they hunger for food, what happens to the brain when you starve socially?

Scientists cant shove people into isolation and look inside their brains. Instead, researchers rely on lab animals to learn more about social brain wiring. Luckily, because social bonds are essential in the animal kingdom, these same brain circuits are found across species.

Another important region for social homeostasis is the hippocampusthe brains learning and memory center. Successful social circles require you to learn social behaviorssuch as selflessness and cooperationand recognize friends from foes. But your brain stores tremendous amounts of information and must remove unimportant connections. So, like most of your high school Spanishif you dont use it, you lose it.

Several animal studies show that even temporary adulthood isolation impairs both social memory, like recognizing a familiar face, and working memory, like recalling a recipe while cooking.

And isolated humans may be just as forgetful. Antarctic expeditioners had shrunken hippocampi after just 14 months of social isolation. Similarly, adults with small social circles are more likely to develop memory loss and cognitive decline later in life.

So, human beings might not be roaming the wild anymore, but social homeostasis is still critical to survival. Luckily, as adaptable as the brain is to isolation, the same may be true with resocialization.

Though only a few studies have explored the reversibility of the anxiety and stress associated with isolation, they suggest that resocialization repairs these effects.

One study, for example, found that formerly isolated marmosets first had higher stress and cortisol levels when resocialized but then quickly recovered. Adorably, the once-isolated animals even spent more time grooming their new buddies.

Social memory and cognitive function also seem to be highly adaptable.

Mouse and rat studies report that while animals cannot recognize a familiar friend immediately after short-term isolation, they quickly regain their memory after resocializing.

And there may be hope for people emerging from socially distanced lockdown as well. A recent Scottish study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic found that residents had some cognitive decline during the harshest lockdown weeks but quickly recovered once restrictions eased.

Unfortunately, studies like these are still sparse. And while animal research is informative, it likely represents extreme scenarios since people werent in total isolation over the last year. Unlike mice stuck in cages, many in the U.S. had virtual game nights and Zoom birthday parties (lucky us).

So power through the nervous elevator chats and pesky brain fog, because un-social distancing should reset your social homeostasis very soon.

Kareem Clark is a postdoctoral associate in neuroscience at Virginia Tech.

Read more:
Neuroscience reveals social distancing effects on the brain - Fast Company

UK Neuroscience Research Priority Area Brings Diverse Groups Together to Advance Studies – UKNow

LEXINGTON, Ky. (June 30, 2021) The University of Kentuckys Neuroscience Research Priority Area (NRPA) supports a "collaborative matrix," bringing together diverse groups of investigators, trainees and research groups from nine different colleges across the University of Kentucky campus.

The key underlying strategy of the NRPA is to provide broad-based support for basic, translational and clinical neuroscience-related research across campus, said NRPA Co-Director Dr. Larry Goldstein, Ruth Louise Works Endowed professor and chairman of UK College of Medicines Department of Neurology. We can uniquely bring together investigators from different laboratories or groups to develop synergies advancing collaborations and supporting trainees, particularly those from underrepresented groups.

The NRPA members collaborate as well as utilize valuable resources within the NRPA, including statistical support and UKs NeuroBank. The NeuroBank, one of the initial NRPA initiatives, collects a variety of biospecimens from subjects being evaluated and treated for neurologic conditions at the UK's Albert B. Chandler Hospital and the Kentucky Neuroscience Institute.

Dr. Tritia Yamasaki,assistant professor of neurology, focuses her research on Parkinson's disease and related neurodegenerative conditions. As a movement disorder specialist, she sees individuals in clinic with these conditions and shes in charge of UKs NeuroBank.

My role in NeuroBank has allowed me to work with a great group of people to promote research utilizing human samples, Yamasaki said. There is amazing research going on across campus by hundreds of neuroscientists.

Yamasaki meets with investigators to hear about the research they are conducting, and her team then helps figure out how to best support their projects with human samples. Often this involves thinking creatively about how to integrate sample collection into the clinical workflow to obtain the material needed for the research.

She says they do this by approaching patients in the ambulatory clinic and various hospital settings. Additionally, they work with the pathology department, neurosurgeons, the clinical laboratory, and the epilepsy monitoring unit to obtain patient consent and participation.

There are thousands of patients with neurologic diseases being seen by physicians in our hospitals and clinics daily, some with rare types of conditions about which very little is known, or others who are in desperate need of effective therapies to halt neurodegenerative conditions, Yamasaki said.

The NeuroBank leader says being able to combine resources in UKs clinical settings with the vast research community on campus, is an extremely effective way to advance their work in understanding neurological diseases and developing therapies. Animal models are a crucial part of research, but the ultimate test for any discovery about human disease will be whether the same phenomenon is also seen in the human condition, which is much more complex, given the interplay of genetic and environmental influences, said Yamasaki.

Ramon Sun, Ph.D., is an assistant professor of neuroscience in the UK College of Medicine and works with the Markey Cancer Center, Sanders-Brown Center on Aging (SBCoA) and Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center (SCoBIRC). He is one of the researchers who knows firsthand the value of being a part of the NRPA and having access to resources in the NeuroBank.

The highly collaborative nature of the investigators in the NRPA allows for transdisciplinary, high-impact, cutting-edge research, Sun said. The rich resources of the NRPA that include equipment, banked human specimens, and core services allow for rapid advances in both basic and clinical research in neuroscience.

The collaborative work cultivated within the NRPA recently led Sun and Matthew Gentry, Ph.D., professor of molecular and cellular biochemistry and director of the Lafora Epilepsy Cure Initiative at the UK College of Medicine, to discover that glucose the sugar used for cellular energy production was not the only sugar contained in glycogen in the brain. Brain glycogen also contained another sugar called glucosamine. Thefull study was recently published in Cell Metabolism.

While looking at various components, factors and diseases of the human brain is what most people might think of when they hear neuroscience research, there is much more that plays into the far-reaching category including the Western honey bee.

It is a species with a deep behavioral research history, extensive neuroscience and genomics tools, and it has one of the most sophisticated social lives on the planet, said Clare Rittschof, Ph.D., assistant professor, UK College of Agriculture, Food, and Environment'sDepartment of Entomology.

Rittschofs research is focused on brain metabolic regulation, its links to behavior in the honeybee, and its links to human brain health. She says the NRPA has given her an exciting opportunity to grow a new and unusual area of her research.

Brain metabolic processes are best studied in a medical context as they are associated with neurodegenerative disease and dementia, Rittschof said. However, they are also tied to honeybee aggression, a behavior I have studied for about 10 years.

Thanks to the NRPA, Rittschof has been collaborating with colleagues in the UK College of Medicine, and together they have discovered that honeybee brain metabolism shares many of the features of metabolism in the brains of mammals and humans. However, there also may be key differences that can be leveraged to improve human brain function.

Working at a large research university with a medical college has been invaluable for me, said Rittschof. There are resources, and most importantly, scientists at UK that would not be available on a smaller, less diverse campus. I love working on projects that span discipline boundaries in unusual ways.

Rittschof and others like Josh Morganti, Ph.D., an assistant professor of neuroscience who works with SBCoA and SCoBIRC, also acknowledge the important role the NRPA plays in providing funds for the groundwork of their various research projects that then allows them to seek funding for their ideas from resources such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Morgantis lab recently received a large R01 grant from the National Institute on Aging of the NIH to examine how inflammatory responses of glia regulate age-related neurodegeneration following traumatic brain injury.

Being a part of the NRPA has allowed a great facilitation for collaboration and collaborative projects, which has helped in terms of funding as well as project completion using cutting-edge approaches across multiple labs, said Morganti.

While Morganti has been collaborating at UK for a few years now, the NRPA also benefits new researchers on campus like Lauren Whitehurst, Ph.D., assistant professor, College of Arts andSciences'Department of Psychology.

The offerings of this office are really invaluable to the development of new faculty members like me, she said.

Whitehurst, who just completed her first year as a faculty member at UK, studies the importance of sleep for our health and well-being, while also trying to understand how stress and sleep interact to affect how we think, learn and remember information. In her first year, she says shes already engaged within the NRPA in multiple ways.

I submitted two pilot grants to support some new research in my lab examining sleeps role in neurodegenerative disease and its impact on memory in trauma-exposed women, Whitehurstsaid. I have also been fortunate to mentor an undergraduate student who received funding through the NEURO summer fellowship sponsored by the NRPA, as well.

Each of these researchers ongoing projects and personal experiences exemplify exactly what the NRPA was established for to build upon and leverage existing strengths and relationships while providing infrastructure and support to promote research collaborations and raise internal and external recognition of the depth of neuroscience-related research atUK. The NRPA is doing all of this with the goals of growing extramural support, increasing academic productivity, enhancing recruitment of faculty and trainees, and providing new knowledge to address the needs of the citizens of the Commonwealth and beyond.

The NRPA is a valuable part of the UK research community because it provides an infrastructure and resources that benefit neuroscience research broadly across the campus, said NRPA Co-Director Linda Van Eldik, Ph.D., SBCoA director, professor of neuroscience, and Dr. E. Vernon Smith and Eloise C. Smith Alzheimer's Research Endowed Chair. The NRPA is facilitating exciting new collaborations and interactions between basic/translational and clinical teams.

The NRPA is part of the UK Research Priorities Initiative, funded by the Office of the Vice President for Research. This initiative encompasses seven priority areas: cancer, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes & obesity, diversity & inclusion, energy, neuroscience, and substance use disorder. These areas were chosen based onlocal relevance,existing funding strength, sustainability and disciplinary scholarly diversity.

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers R35NS116824 and P01NS097197, the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award NumbersR01AG066653,R01AG062550 and R01AG070830, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes ofHealth under Award Number R01DK27221, andtheNational Cancer Instituteof the National Institutes of Health under AwardNumberP30CA177558. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Continued here:
UK Neuroscience Research Priority Area Brings Diverse Groups Together to Advance Studies - UKNow

AMSA and Sunovion Neuroscience Peer Teaching Program Reaches More Than 400 Students Over Three Years – Business Wire

MARLBOROUGH, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Advanced Math & Science Academy Charter School (AMSA) and Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Sunovion) today announced completion of the third year of a program to help students understand Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) life science career paths within a pharmaceutical company, gain professional skillsets and foster a deeper knowledge of neuroscience. More than 400 students have participated in the program, including 16 AMSA seniors and juniors who were coached by Sunovions team for their peer teaching roles to deliver neuroscience content to seventh grade students at AMSA between 2019 and 2021.

The AMSA high school students developed lesson plans about the central and peripheral nervous systems that they taught seventh grade students at AMSA via video or in-person classroom settings, with the goal to enhance and complement their existing biology class curriculum. This neuroscience content was developed in consultation with a cross-functional team from Sunovion with a range of expertise. The students also received coaching from Sunovion related to potential career paths, presentation development and delivery skills, as well as other skillsets for professional work environments.

AMSA students are benefitting from the immediate and longer-term impacts of this program with Sunovion, which has not only helped to enhance our science education but also has provided professional skillsets that will empower them to succeed in the workplace, said Ellen Linzey, Executive Director, AMSA. We are proud of this programs alignment with our focus on instilling a love for learning, as well as the integrated curriculum that we have developed in partnership with students, faculty and the Sunovion team.

With Sunovions leadership in the Central Nervous System (CNS) area, we feel a responsibility to impart this knowledge to next generation innovators. The passion and commitment of AMSA peer teachers and students to gain an understanding of the complexities of neurobiology is impressive and our employee coaches have been delighted to share their expertise, said Ken Koblan, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer, who serves as Sunovions executive sponsor of the program with AMSA. Seeing the positive impact of this program over three years is rewarding and we value the close collaboration with AMSA administration and faculty to help inspire the futures of these students.

The 2021 Sunovion-AMSA program student teachers, five seniors and two juniors, were honored during a virtual ceremony on May 27, 2021. Upon completion of their Capstone Project, seniors were provided with certificates of completion and scholarships to encourage their academic careers and consideration of further learning in healthcare, the life sciences and neurobiology. The program was initiated in 2019 through the collaboration of Mark Vital, Community Outreach Manager, AMSA and Wendy Scoppa, Senior Manager, Community Relations, Sunovion. A video of the ceremony and project can be viewed here.

About Advanced Math & Science Academy (AMSA)

Ranked as the #3 public high school in Massachusetts by U.S. News & World Report, The Advanced Math & Science Academy Charter School (AMSA) was chartered by the Massachusetts Department of Education in February 2004 and opened in September 2005. AMSAs teaching model is centered on rigorous college-oriented education for all students. AMSAs teaching philosophy involves starting challenging abstract learning, typically expected for high school students, early in the middle school grades. AMSA creates an atmosphere of celebration of knowledge where children of all backgrounds and abilities excel in all subjects, especially in math, science and technology, empowering them to succeed in the workplace in our modern, high-tech world. AMSA's core values are collective and individual values: Model Integrity, Pursue Your Excellence and Foster Community. Learn more about AMSA at http://www.amsacs.org and join AMSA on social media at http://www.amsacs.org/social.

About Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Sunovion)

Sunovion is a global biopharmaceutical company focused on the innovative application of science and medicine to help people with serious medical conditions. Sunovions vision is to lead the way to a healthier world. The companys spirit of innovation is driven by the conviction that scientific excellence paired with meaningful advocacy and relevant education can improve lives. With patients at the center of everything it does, Sunovion has charted new paths to life-transforming treatments that reflect ongoing investments in research and development and an unwavering commitment to support people with psychiatric, neurological and respiratory conditions. Headquartered in Marlborough, Mass., Sunovion is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Europe Ltd., based in London, England, and Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., based in Mississauga, Ontario, are wholly-owned direct subsidiaries of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. Additional information can be found on the companys web sites: http://www.sunovion.com, http://www.sunovion.eu and http://www.sunovion.ca. Connect with Sunovion on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and YouTube.

Originally posted here:
AMSA and Sunovion Neuroscience Peer Teaching Program Reaches More Than 400 Students Over Three Years - Business Wire

The NIHs Diversity Obsession Subverts Science – The Wall Street Journal

The National Institutes of Health supports a multidisciplinary neuroscience initiative to expand understanding of the brain. Research applications include treatments for Alzheimers, Parkinsons, autism and depression. On June 10, NIH director Francis Collins announced a new requirement for participating in the brain initiative. Neurologists, molecular biologists and nanophysicists seeking NIH funding must now submit a plan showing how they will enhance diverse perspectives throughout their research. Scores on the plan for enhancing diverse perspectives will inform funding decisions.

This new requirement is part of Dr. Collinss continuing effort to atone for what he calls biomedical sciences stain of structural racism. The NIH already supports more than 60 diversity and inclusion initiatives, but those have apparently failed to eradicate NIHs own systemic and structural racism.

Each plan for enhancing diverse perspectives must show how the principal investigator will empower individuals from groups traditionally underrepresented in biomedical research, such as blacks, the disabled, women and the poor. Institutions are also covered by the diversity mandate. Researchers working on an NIH neuroscience grant should be drawn from institutions that are traditionally underrepresented in biomedical research, including community-based organizations.

Dr. Collins provided no evidence for structural racism other than demographic data on NIHs grant applicants and recipients. Black applicants are present in far fewer numbers compared with their representation in the US population, 13.4%, according to Dr. Collinss announcement. In 2020 black scientists made up 2.3% of the 30,061 funding applications the NIH received. Less than 2% of NIH grants go to black principal investigators.

To Dr. Collins and his academic peers, such disparities are virtually irrefutable evidence of discrimination, though grant reviewers dont see an applicants race. But the use of population data as a benchmark for assessing institutional racism ignores racial disparities in academic skills, achievement and study practices that the NIH didnt cause and couldnt possibly do anything to remedy.

Continued here:
The NIHs Diversity Obsession Subverts Science - The Wall Street Journal

How do babies perceive the world? – MIT Technology Review

Its Ursulas third time in the functional MRI machine. Heather Kosakowski, a PhD student in cognitive neuroscience, is hoping to get just two precious minutes of data from her session. Even though Ursula has been booked to have her brain scanned for two hours, its far from a sure thing. Her first two sessions, also booked for two hours each, yielded only eight minutes of usable material combined.

The task verges on the impossible. Kosakowski needs Ursula to stay both awake, watching projected images of faces and scenes, and very still, ideally for seconds or even minutes at a time. Every twitch and wiggle blurs the MRIs scan, obscuring the image and rendering it useless. But Ursula tends to squirm and then, inevitably, fall asleepexactly what you would expect from a six-month-old baby.

Scanning infants brains while theyre awake is incredibly difficult and time consuming, and theres always a risk that a session will produce no data at all. A motivated adult is capable of staying perfectly still for two hours, yielding brain images that read like an open book. Ursulas sessions produce something more akin to a book thats been torn up and thrown in a river. Kosakowski, who is jointly advised by cognitive neuroscience professors Nancy Kanwisher 80, PhD 86, and Rebecca Saxe, PhD 03, needs to carefully fish out the usable sections and stitch them together before she can read the story they reveal.

Heather is probably the most skilled person alive today at getting high-quality functional MRI data from human infants, says Kanwisher, the Walter A. Rosenblith Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience.

If Kosakowski doesnt get the two minutes of still brain images she needs, its possible Ursulas two previous visits will have been for nothing. But if she can get a clear fMRI reading, she will be one step closer to answering one of the most profound questions in modern neuroscience: What are the physical underpinnings of the human mind?

Kosakowski is no stranger to overcoming obstacles. Her childhood was characterized by the sort of instability that made any kind of higher education feel unattainable. Her father was in the military, so her family moved around a lot. Then her parents divorced, and the difficulties multiplied. When she was about seven, she and her mother moved into a homeless shelter, and at 11, Kosakowski was put into foster care in Western Massachusetts. Having a bachelors degree was always my dream, she says, but she calls her first attempt at college a dismal failure.

RACHEL FRITTS

I dropped out, I was homeless and had no job, and then I totaled my car and I was like, what am I going to do with my life? she recalls. She decided to enter the Marine Corps but hoped she might someday get a second shot at college.

After several years in the military, Kosakowski left the Marines and returned to Massachusetts, enrolling part time at Massachusetts Bay Community College. Maybe, she thought, a bachelors degree wasnt so far out of reach after all. She set her sights on Smith College, where she was admitted. But around the time she received that piece of news, she also got another: she was pregnant.

Kosakowski didnt go to college anywhere that fall, but her eagerness to learn persisted. Her natural curiosity found an outlet in her baby, Hannah, who was born that October. She watched Hannah experience grass for the first time in the spring, delighting at how she reacted to this strange new material covering the ground. As Hannah explored her environment, Kosakowski kept wondering what things looked like from her perspective. What was she experiencing? How was she making sense of the world around her?

When Hannah was two, Kosakowski got a job at a nonprofit that was working to speed up research on multiple sclerosis, giving her the opportunity to attend a neuroscience conference. After that I was kind of hooked, she says. I was like, okay, the thing I really want to be doing is research, and in order to do research I need a degree. I have to go back to school.

Kosakowski was accepted to Wellesley Collegea school she had written off years before because it was so competitive. She became fascinated with neuroscience, peppering her professors with questions until one said, Heather, some of the questions you ask, nobody knows the answer. You should get a PhD.

Just as Kosakowski graduated from Wellesley, Saxe was looking for a manager for her lab, which happened to be one of the only labs in the world studying babies in MRIs while they are awakeand consequently one of the only ones that could answer Kosakowskis questions about the nature of infant cognition. She applied for the position and got it.

When her foster sister had a baby, Kosakowski went to Saxe and asked if she could learn how to use the fMRI to scan the infants brain. I think she thought Id just scan my niece and be done with it, Kosakowski says. But I just kept scanning, and she never told me to stop. Saxe, impressed with Kosakowskis work and determination, agreed to take her on as a graduate student. In 2017, she left her job as lab manager and began her first semester as a PhD candidate at MIT.

Kanwisher still remembers the first time she saw Kosakowski scan a baby in the MRI. She was considering working with Kosakowski and Saxe on their infant study, but at first she was highly skeptical. This kid is squealing like crazy. The mom is nervous. The whole thing is stressful. And this goes on and on and Heathers not giving up, she says. Thenboom. The clouds part, the kid smiles, Heather pops the kid into the MRI scanner, and like a minute later she scans beautiful data. Just the persistence, the skill, is spectacular.

Kosakowskis current study focuses on how the brains of babies just two to nine months old respond to short videos of faces or bodiesand how that differs from their response to scenes without people. She is the first to find evidence of this kind of specialization in children under five years old. The information shes after can only be measured with fMRI. Magnetic resonance imaging allows researchers to take high-resolution pictures of cross-sections of the brain. Functional MRI adds another layer to this, recording images of brain activity in real time. When neurons in one section of the brain are particularly active, blood flow increases to fuel that region. This shows up as a bright spot on fMRI scans.

Researchers have spent decades using fMRI to prove that sections of the adult brain are highly specialized for certain tasks, and to pinpoint exactly which areas are specialized for which functions. The mind and brain have all this structure. Were not just generically smart. Were smart in very particular ways about very particular things that humans do, Kanwisher says. If you look at the structure, you see this set of dozens of regions of the brain, each that does a very distinctive, different thing Its impossible to look at that and not wonder, How did that structure get wired up?

When adults look at faces, for instance, a section of the brain called the fusiform face area, or FFA, lights up. In other words, if researchers put adults in MRI machines and show them images of both faces and objects, the FFA will only respond to faces. The parahippocampal place area (PPA), meanwhile, responds most strongly to depictions of scenes. Kanwisher herself named the FFA after leading the team that discovered it in 1997, and she led the effort to pinpoint and describe the PPA in 1998. She and her colleagues also discovered the brain section known as the extrastriate body area (EBA), which responds strongly to pictures of body parts, in 2001.

[Heather is] scanning the youngest awake humans that anybody can scan and asking what structure is in the brain within a few months of birth, Kanwisher says. And thats just one of the most thrilling questions in all of psychology, neuroscience, and deep philosophy: What is the structure of our minds and where does it come from?

Preliminary results from Kosakowskis study provide some of the strongest evidence yet that some functions of our brain may be innate rather than learned. Babies also have selective responses for faces, bodies, and scenes in the FFA, EBA, and PPA, Kosakowski says. Nobody has ever found that before. And it was completely not expected that we would find that.

HEATHER KOSAKOWSKI

The covid-19 pandemic, though, has brought its own set of challenges. The fMRI sessions had to be put on hold, and she has spent much of the last year analyzing her data at home. Covid-19 has greatly impacted me in that I am working from home full time and also a single parentthe same way its impacted lots of families with children, Kosakowski says. She hopes to have the opportunity to scan more infantsto begin studying their auditory processing before graduating in May 2022. But Ursulas session in late 2019 turns out to have been one of her last chances to get precious data for her dissertation.

In that session, Ursula had fallen asleep in the scanner, but Kosakowski was in high spirits as it wrapped up. She was pretty sure shed managed to get the dataand shed later confirm she was right. As Ursulas mother left to change out of MRI-friendly scrubs, Kosakowski scooped up the groggy baby and held her as she sat in front of a computer. The unflappable grad student has an uncanny ability to keep babies happy and relaxeda skill no PhD program will teach you, but one thats invaluable when every extra second of clean data helps.

Finally, she pulled up the image shed been looking for, pointing toward the screen as Ursulas gaze followed her finger. Someday, thanks to their combined efforts, we might have a better understanding of how Ursula perceived the image before her. Look! Kosakowski told the baby in her arms. Thats your brain!

View post:
How do babies perceive the world? - MIT Technology Review