From homelessness to hope: Anatomy of a London turnaround – The London Free Press

London has a bold plan to tackle its deadly homeless crisis, involving up to 15 service hub shelters and 600 supported housing units. It came together with a whos who list of people listening and talking to one another. It all began with regret. Randy Richmond reports

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

The apologies stunned.

The first thing she did was apologize.

I dont remember the exact words, she recalls in an interview with The London Free Press. I said that some of the things that have happened, policies and actions, have caused harm. And I apologized.

Other leaders at the summit, such as London Health Sciences Centre chief executive Jackie Schleifer Taylor, also acknowledged past mistakes.

The hospital had earned a reputation as a barrier to helping homeless people, and hadnt joined community efforts to solve Londons crisis.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

You might as well call it out, Schleifer Taylor says of her acknowledgement. Im just asking for the opportunity for LHSC to re-earn the trust of the community.

The acknowledgements of mistakes laid the groundwork for three successful summits that developed an entirely new system for homelessness in London, say the more than a dozen participants interviewed by The Free Press.

And they all point to Livingstone as the key to the success of the summits.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Only a few months ago, few in the social service field would pick anyone from city hall as the person to bring about uniting them all.

Even before the pandemic, social organizations often worked in silos and had to compete for city, provincial and federal dollars in funding streams that still ignore how addiction, mental illness, poverty, homelessness and health care are connected.

COVID-19 interrupted plans for follow-up forums and coverage, as the newspaper focused on the pandemic.

Those pandemic years werent kind to city halls reputation on homelessness. In the fall of 2020, people living in tents downtown were directed by city officials to encampments along the Thames River, which advocates and residents considered isolated and unsafe.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Advocates say there were a growing number of people sleeping and living rough outside, a contention city hall at first refuted.

In response to the coming winter, city hall and agencies worked together to build shelter and resting spaces. But by the next winter, the demand had grown and the city hall response building a shelter far from the core drew criticism.

I used to keep a sheet of paper on the wall in my office, and I would write peoples names down as we lost them, Dr. Andrea Sereda, a coalition leader and physician at London InterCommunity Health Centre (LIHC), says.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Then the page got filled up and I added a second, and then I tore it all off, because I couldnt look at it anymore. There were just too many names.

The citys initial response to the hunger strike was dismissive, Sereda says.

We were written off, patted on the head: Awesome, you advocates for homeless people. Now go back and do your day job.

Click here for a subscriber-only Q&A session with our Randy Richmond, starting at 9 a.m. on Monday Feb. 27.

But everyone could see the pandemic changed everything and now everything had to change, Livingstone says.

We werent seeing this number of folks struggling on the streets. We were not seeing this level of acuity before. I dont think anyone anticipated the boomerang impact . . . the explosion that the pandemic unleashed, she said.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Just walk through our community, look at the suffering. That was the spark that something different needs to be done.

In the summer, Livingstone began inviting the leaders at Londons hospitals and public health unit to discuss homelessness.

This is not just a homelessness issue. This is a health and housing issue, she says. When you have something impossible to solve, the way you do it is you bring everybody together, because thats how you get to solutions. And Londons done that a million times.

Those discussions led to the creation of a fall summit, one that first appeared to be about hospital and city hall officials leading a discussion that community agencies were invited to join.

I thought, here we go again, Scott Courtice, LIHC executive director, recalls. Theres a crisis and the city needs to do some sort of large public relations exercise to show that theyre taking it seriously.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Livingstone invited him to meet and chat one on one, Courtice says.

That really turned it around for me, because I really believe that she was thinking about doing something differently. The hunger strike earlier had created some tension and strain in our relationship as organizations and as leaders. It was a chance to talk about how that shook out and why it shook out in that way.

After an hour conversation, he committed full-out to the effort, Courtice says.

Livingstones apology at the summit made me really emotional because it had felt like so long that we were fighting this thing alone and like we were being gaslit, being told that actually youre not seeing what youre seeing with your eyes, holding peoples hands when theyre dying, he says.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

He had a similar response to Schleifer Taylors talk about LHSC, Courtice says.

With humility, acknowledging that theyve got a lot of work to do, and wanting to be part of the team, it felt like, I dont know, like I would run through fire for everybody in that room.

As the frontline doctor at LIHC, Sereda had been a vocal critic of city hall homelessness policies. She had long insisted that the health care the centre provided could only do so much as long as people couldnt find shelter.

Very quickly, the tone was set that this was very intentionally trying to be different, she says of the first summit.

For the first time, executives of hospitals and agencies sat side by side with frontline workers from other organizations, she says.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

We were actually able to talk face to face with with folks that weve never been able to communicate with before. And I think that humanizes both sides as a starting point, she says.

To a person, summit participants interviewed for this story say a key to the success of the effort was the chance to sit with different people and listen.

I felt like I was a sponge, sitting at tables with people . . . running shelters for families and kids and youth, just to hear them talk about their realities, says Roy Butler, chief executive at St. Josephs Health Care London.

Everybodys putting skin in the game. That cross-pollination starts to create relationships and knock down walls.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

The sheer number and range of participants inspired, says Chuck Lazenby, executive director of the Unity Project shelter.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

London Health Sciences Centre is a big player that weve wanted to add to the table in a genuine way for a very long time, she says.

Having business owners and developers at the table to participate in understanding what homelessness is in our community, and asking how they can help, that is inspiring.

Livingstone refuses to take personal credit for bringing so many people from so many different sectors to the summits, saying any city manager would have done the same, and it took a city hall team to organize.

As well, she emphasizes that the new system was developed by the 200 people at the summits, and is a community plan, not a city hall plan.

I think that the city had an important role to play in creating the space for this conversation to happen. The city has an important role to continue to play to support this work, Livingstone says.The city has been told, clearly, we need to look at our policies, we probably need to look at some bylaws. We need to maybe fund things in a different way.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

All she will say about praise from participants is: That is very, very kind of people to say, very nice.

She does acknowledge that it was daunting to stand up and acknowledge city mistakes in front of 200 leaders and frontline workers.

Yes, absolutely. But it was necessary, right? If were going to have a different outcome, we have to be different.

Clockwise from top left: Steve Williams, Marcus Plowright, Alex Summers, Brian Lester, Lynne Livingstone, and Chuck Lazenby

Jackie Schleifer Taylor, chief executive, London Health Sciences Centre: Some of our wonderful community partners need our help on the human resources side for support and education. They need us to work with them to harmonize policies where the transitions of patients from our emergency department arent smooth. How can we share our resources for all of our patients together? How can we ensure people get the best care where and when they need it?

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Roy Butler, chief executive, St. Josephs Health Care chief executive: Even though Im proud of the work weve done as an organization, if there are better ways to integrate, better ways to support hubs and networks that provide a continuum of housing, and be more preventative, were in to see how we can lead and participate.

Chuck Lazenby, executive director, Unity Project: A big part of the hubs is ensuring you have places for people to stay that are stable and accessible and diverse and have some choice and accommodate everyone, regardless of how they present. We are going to need options where couples can stay together, women only, single occupancy or shared space. What makes people feel safe and supported until theres a permanent solution?

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Scott Courtice, executive director, London InterCommunity Health Centre: Weve been organized like, if you were to build a hockey team, where youve got the goalie, the defence, the offence, all with different coaches, all practicing in different arenas, bringing them together and expecting them to win. Weve never had a head coach, weve never had a coordinated approach. And thats what we so sorely need.

Mike Wallace, executive director, London Development Institute, an umbrella group for developers: We were direct with Lynn Livingstone: In the next round, you need to start formulating. Where can we help? What is it you truly need? How many square feet? How many people (are) you holding? Whats the layout? Where do you want the hubs? When were sitting in front of the minister, or a bureaucrat, well be saying, These people have the expertise in providing the service but sitting beside them is the industry thats able to deliver the physical plant.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Anne Armstrong, executive director, London Cares: I started to talk to my staff about some of the things that might be coming and how this direction is shifting. And you could just see their eyes light up. Hope will be the inoculation against the moral injury theyre suffering. Theyre so frustrated at banging their heads against a brick wall.

Dr, Alex Summers, the London areas chief medical officer of health: We have people who are on the streets who have nowhere to go. So we need to create spaces for them to go and services to support them once theyre there. We need to find ways to resource them adequately. The amount of housing we have in our community that is affordable for people, needs to be increased. The amount of social supports available through a disability cheque needs to be higher than it is. These are preventive components that we need to address, as well.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Kapil Lakhotia, chief executive, London Economic Development Corp: We want to reduce (building) vacancy in our core, we want to bring more creative talent, more tech- and knowledge-based industries downtown. How are we going to fill the vacancies downtown until we achieve a certain level of vibrancy and safety? In order for us to continue sustainable economic growth in London, we have to build a strong foundation. The health and homelessness summit has clearly identified key issues that we need to rally around in order for that foundation to stay strong.

Marcus Plowright, realtor and donation organizer: We are at this enormous convergence of money and community engagement and brilliant solutions at the same moment in time. This is something enormously different to help people suffering and those frontline workers watching people die.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

London police chief Steve Williams: Quite often were the only 24/7 response. We can apply Band-aids to the immediate problem, but we cant really address the underlying issues. If we have another tool at our disposal, such as these hubs, then we can be more effective in handing individuals to the most appropriate service. There will be some training and education on our part to change our mindset, that were not alone.

Beth Mitchell, co-leader, Thames Valley Addiction and Mental Health Services: We have to listen to what people say they need instead of saying this is what we have, and you have to lie there. During the pandemic, we had the opportunity to experiment with some things. That funding all ends. To have something we can create that is sustainable, that when we hire staff we can say, this is a permanent job, you can invest in your career, that would be a game-changer.

See the original post:
From homelessness to hope: Anatomy of a London turnaround - The London Free Press

One Grey’s Anatomy Storyline Was Even Worse Than Infamous … – Startefacts

In the world of Grey's Anatomy, fans have been dealt their fair share of shockers over the years.

They were just starting to believe that the show was done with crazy, irrational storylines, and then came to the season 18 finale.

At the top of the list for the worst storyline was the infamous "ghost sex" scene that took place in season 5 when Izzie ends up having sex with the ghost of her departed husband Denny.

Despite the show's usual dedication to medical accuracy and science, this storyline made fans feel like all logic had been thrown out the window, and they were left uncomfortably scratching their heads.

It took fans a while to move on from that, and they eventually did, but then Grey's Anatomy writers and producers came up with a new storyline that fans feel is even worse than the one about ghost sex.

And no, it wasn't the one about Alex Karev leaving his friends and wife to be with Izze and start a family with the twins she had been raising that were his. (Although there seems to be a pattern with Izzie and weird storylines).

The storyline that was even more perplexing than the Ghost Sex was none other than Owen Hunt and Teddy Altman's dramatic exit.

This storyline has been dubbed by fans as the worst one to date, as it pushes the limits of believability and reality and makes the medical drama feel more like a soap opera.

Leading up to their departure, Owen was revealed to have been illegally giving drugs to dying veterans to ease their suffering and speed up their death.

When he refused a man's request to help his wife die peacefully, the man reported him to Bailey, who gave them a head start before calling authorities. With the police on their tail, Owen, Teddy, and their two children fled on a plane to an unknown destination.

Where are they going? What is going to happen next? Will they end up in jail?

The season 18 finale left fans with many questions and uncertainties. With the family now on the run, fans will have to wait for season 19 to see how it all unfolds. Grey's Anatomy is known for its dramatic twists and turns, and this latest plot has taken that to the extreme, and possibly, a little too far.

Visit link:
One Grey's Anatomy Storyline Was Even Worse Than Infamous ... - Startefacts

Reddit Has Spoken: These 5 Grey’s Anatomy Storylines Were Total … – Startefacts

Grey's Anatomy has been a beloved staple in television for over a decade, with fans following the lives of doctors at Seattle Grace Hospital since its debut in 2005. However, not every storyline has been a hit with viewers.

In fact, fans on Reddit have made their opinions known on the show's storylines that just didn't make the cut. From love triangles to unexplained plot holes, Grey's Anatomy has had its fair share of disappointing moments.

Amelia And Owen's Adoption Battle

Despite being Derek's sister and such a good doctor, Amelia never earned as much love from Grey's fans as her brother did. Most fans on the Reddit thread labeled her a drama queen especially because of how she went about her relationship with Owen. The entire adoption fight for many felt like a baseless filler storyline.

Ellen's Idea for Grey's Anatomy Finale Is Better Than Anything Writers Can Come Up With

Amelia dragged Owen to the courts because she apparently loved Leo more than she hated him, only to pull out of the adoption at the end. She did it despite claiming she loved Leo and wanted to be in his life. Besides, she previously admitted she didn't want kids therefore fighting Owen for a child he single-handedly adopted just didn't make any sense.

The Entire Minnick Story

Eliza Minnick had one of the worst storylines in Grey's Anatomy which is why the character failed to click despite having such a great actor in Marika Domiczyk. Some fans think that the "Minnick saga" was a mass character assassination since it made Bailey and the other characters less likable.

Minnick was supposed to make the residency program better but her supposed innovative approach nearly ended it altogether. Everything about the character including a supposed romantic connection with Arizona ended in disaster. She disagreed with everyone and turned the ORs into war rooms destroying the very core of the show.

Izzie Dating George

There must be something really wrong with their romance if fans admit they'd rather see Izzy with Danny's ghost again than her relationship with George.

Izzie and Alex made a great couple, while George deserved some peace in his marriage to Callie, which is why it made no sense for the show to complicate the relationships.

After all those years of working together and staying professional, their sexual encounter ruined everything. The storyline proved to be even dumber when the two decided to stay as friends after discovering that they had no chemistry. The entire storyline only seemed like an excuse to break up George and Callie.

Meredith In Purgatory

The drowning scene wasn't bad in itself but getting Meredith stuck in purgatory with the likes of Dennis, Dylan, and her mother's scrub nurse didn't make any sense. Why she suddenly got so close with Dennis and Dylan when she hardly talked about them on the show when she was alive?

Interns Operating On Each Other

The "Interns practicing surgeries on one another in the basement" storyline didn't contribute to any part of the show's plot. The only excuse that Lexie gave for the whole thing was that it was the only thing she did that wasn't about George noticing her.

Surely the interns had received enough basic medical training to know better than try an appendectomy without the proper equipment and knowledge. Being frustrated by residents doesn't qualify as enough motivation for people to go suicidal. This storyline ended up doing just one thing making the entire group of interns look reckless and dumb.

Here is the original post:
Reddit Has Spoken: These 5 Grey's Anatomy Storylines Were Total ... - Startefacts

Thursday TV Ratings: Greys Anatomy, Call Me Kat, Walker, CSI: Vegas, Law & Order – TV Series Finale

Thursday, February 23, 2023 ratings New episodes: Station 19, Greys Anatomy, Next Level Chef, Animal Control, Call Me Kat, Law & Order, Law & Order: SVU, Law & Order: Organized Crime, Walker, andWalker: Independence. Reruns: So Help Me Todd, Young Sheldon, Ghosts, CSI: Vegas, and The Company You Keep.

Note: If youre not seeing the updated charts, please try reloading the page or go here.

These are the fast affiliate ratings. The percentages represent the change since the previous original episode. (Percentages arent given for reruns or specials.) To see past ratings for a particular show, click the shows link. The show pages are updated with the daily final ratings when they become available. Those pages include season averages to date.

What were you watching last night? Original network programming, reruns, cable, or something else?

You are currently viewing the mobile version of our site. View the full site to get free email alerts, vote on your favorite shows, comment, and more.

Follow this link:
Thursday TV Ratings: Greys Anatomy, Call Me Kat, Walker, CSI: Vegas, Law & Order - TV Series Finale

Ellen’s Idea for Grey’s Anatomy Finale Is Better Than Anything … – Startefacts

Grey's Anatomy has been a TV phenomenon since it first premiered in 2005, captivating audiences with its gripping storylines, complex characters, and romance. But all good things come to an end one day, and the hit medical drama is no exception.

While we may not know what will happen in the big finale, whenever that takes place, it certainly promises to be an emotional rollercoaster.

However, it seems that the show's longtime star and executive producer, Ellen Pompeo, has an idea for the finale that surpasses anything the writers can come up with.

Throughout Grey's Anatomy's long tenure, the series has seen a revolving door of cast members, with only a handful of the show's original cast making regular appearances. The medical series has welcomed and bid farewell to many talented actors, including Sandra Oh, T.R. Knight, and Patrick Dempsey. These departures have left a lasting impact on the show, with each exit shaping the narrative in many ways.

However, with last year's announcement regarding Ellen Pompeo's decision to step away from her role as the titular character Meredith Grey, changes are definitely on the horizon.

Following this news, many devoted fans have started to wonder how much longer the medical show will remain on the air. Some are even speculating that the current season could be final, and if that's the case, viewers are eager to see how the show will bring its long journey to a close.

But while there's no real sign of the show coming to an end just yet, Pompeo has expressed her own idea for what she'd like to see in the big finale. When the actress appeared on The Late Late Show with James Corden in 2019, she revealed that she would love to have some of the original cast members reunite.

"The original cast is just like [puts hands over her heart]," she said before adding, "That probably won't happen, but that would be the most amazing way to [end it]."

Now, the reason why it's unlikely to happen is that some of the characters were killed off on the show. That said, regardless of how difficult it would be to pull this off, fans are excited about Pompeo's idea, with some even stating this would be the only right way to conclude the show.

With the future of the series unknown, it's anyone's guess how it will end. But no matter what happens, there is one thing fans can count on: Grey's Anatomy will go out with a bang, just like it has for the past two decades.

More here:
Ellen's Idea for Grey's Anatomy Finale Is Better Than Anything ... - Startefacts

What is Biochemistry? – Definition, History, Examples, Importance …

Have you ever observed how chemical reactions or processes occur within the human body? How do metabolic activities take place? Yes, you will get to know all these life processes through Biochemistry.

The branch of science dealing with the study of all the life processes such as control and coordination within a living organism is called Biochemistry.

This term was introduced to us by Carl Neuberg, the father of biochemistry in the year 1930. This field combines biology as well as chemistry to study the chemical structure of a living organism. The biochemists get into the investigation of the chemical reactions and combinations which are involved in various processes like reproduction, heredity, metabolism, and growth, thus performing research in different kinds of laboratories.

Introduction to Biochemistry includes wide areas of molecular biology as well as cell biology. It is relevant to molecules that make up the structure of organs and cells which is the molecular anatomy. It describes carbon compounds and the reactions they undergo in living organisms. It also describes molecular physiology, which is the functions of molecules in carrying out the requirements of the cells and organs.

It mainly deals with the study of the structure and functions of the biomolecules such as carbohydrates, proteins, acids, and lipids. Hence, it is also called Molecular biology.

The primary branches of biochemistry are listed in this subsection.

It is also referred to as the roots of Biochemistry. It deals with the study of functions of the living systems. This field of biology explains all the interactions between DNA, proteins, and RNA and their synthesis.

Cell biology

Cell Biology deals with the structure and functions of cells in living organisms. It is also called Cytology. Cell biology primarily focuses on the study of cells of the eukaryotic organisms and their signalling pathways, rather than focussing on prokaryotes- the topics that will be covered under microbiology.

Metabolism

Metabolism is one of the most important processes taking place in all living things. It is nothing but the transformations or the series of activities that happens when food is converted into energy in a human body. One example of metabolism is the process of digestion.

Genetics

Genetics is a branch of biochemistry that deals with the study of genes, their variations and the heredity characteristics in living organisms.

The other branches include Animal and Plant Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Molecular Chemistry, Genetic engineering, Endocrinology, Pharmaceuticals, Neurochemistry, Nutrition, Environmental, Photosynthesis, Toxicology, etc.

Biochemistry is essential to understand the following concepts.

To learn more about biochemistry and other important branches of chemistry, such as physical chemistry, register with BYJUS now!

Read more:
What is Biochemistry? - Definition, History, Examples, Importance ...

Biochemistry: Definition And Explanation – University of the People

Biochemistry is exciting and fascinating science, and this article will tell you everything youve been wanting to know about the field. Well give you the full biochemistry definition: the basics, the history, as well as the promising degrees and careers you can expect in the biochemists laboratory and beyond.

Biochemistry, or biological chemistry, is the branch of science that studies chemical and physicochemical processes within living organisms.

As a combination of biology and chemistry, biochemistry studies the chemical substances and processes which occur within the biology of the body or any living organisms.

Biochemists study large molecules such as carbohydrates and proteins in relation to metabolism and other important processes within the body. Other molecules that biochemists may study include enzymes and DNA. These types of molecules are important for understanding the complex processes which occur in all living organisms.

The term biochemistry was created by Carl Neuberg, a German chemist, in 1902. But the study itself has been around for over 400 years, essentially since the invention of the microscope in 1665 by Robert Hooke. The microscope made it possible to study cells.

In 1674, Anton van Leeuwenhoek was the first to observe live plant cells under the microscope, which opened up many more possibilities than the dead cells which were being observed up until then. Live cells allowed scientists to observe chemical processes that occurred within and between them.

In the 18th century, a notable discovery in the field was made by the French scientist, Antoine Lavoisier, who proposed the concept of photosynthesis, a process in which plants convert water, sunlight, and carbon dioxide into their nutrients. Lavoisier was also the first person to study cell respiration, which is the process of making the energy molecule in the cells mitochondria.

In the 20th century, DNA was acknowledged as the genetic material which made up the cell. This was established by James Watson and Francis Crick based on the research work of Rosalind Franklin.

Most recently, new technology continues to advance scientific studies in areas such as recombinant DNA, gene splicing, radioisotopic labeling, and electron microscopy.

A career in biochemistry is recommended for those who enjoy research, as it is generally a career in laboratory science. Most careers in the field require at least a bachelors degree, such as a position as a laboratory technician. Other positions, such as laboratory managers or principal investigators of research, will require a masters degree or a Ph.D.

Laboratory technicians engage in bench work and help perform experiments in the lab under the instruction of the principal investigators. Technicians need a bachelors degree in order to be qualified, but more education and research will allow for more independence in the lab.

Lab managers carry more responsibility in the laboratory and may conduct independent research under the guidance of the principal investigator.

Though a masters degree in the field will require an emphasis on research, a Ph.D. prepares biochemists for a career in independent research, principal investigators of research in laboratories, and lecturers in university.

There are also many industry positions available to biochemists. Biochemists may also work in governmental labs or for companies in agriculture, pharmaceuticals, public health, or biotechnology. Some biochemists may also work in services such as toxicology and forensics.

As one may imagine, a contender for biochemistry needs to have a good understanding of both biology and chemistry. Some universities may offer a specific biochemistry track, or students can begin their education by taking a bachelors degree in either biology or chemistry, with a minor in the other.

Biochemists also need to have a good grasp of mathematics and statistics in order to conduct research. As students advance in their studies, they will begin to hone in on their particular interests.

Similar studies include health sciences, which offer courses in biology, anatomy, biostatistics, and disease prevention. Universities such as the University of the People (UoPeople) offer associates and bachelors degrees in health science completely online and tuition-free. The university also offers potential certificate programs in health science that can give ones career the right boost.

As weve seen, the biochemistry definition includes a rich history and an exciting future for further discoveries. Since the invention of the microscope, biochemists have been investigating the complex, hidden world of cells and molecules.

Biochemistry is an exciting and constantly evolving field of science with an emphasis on research and laboratory technology. Different levels of education open up many opportunities for working in the field. If you have a passion for this science, then biochemistry may be a meaningful career choice for you.

More:
Biochemistry: Definition And Explanation - University of the People

What is biochemistry? | New Scientist

Biochemistry is the study of the chemicals that make up life and how they behave. It seeks to explain how inanimate chemicals like carbohydrates and proteins can give rise to living organisms.

Biochemistry as a scientific discipline began in the 1700s and 1800s, with early studies of phenomena like fermentation and the discovery of the first enzyme. However, it blossomed in the 20th century, thanks in part to new techniques like X-ray crystallography that allowed biochemists to study the precise three-dimensional structures of molecules.

Perhaps the most famous biochemical molecule is deoxyribonucleic acid or DNA, the material that carries our genes. The structure of DNA was discovered in 1953 after a frantic (and at times disreputable) race. Famously, DNA is a double helix, made up of two strands that coil around each other. Each strand carries a sequence of letters, which are the basis of genes.

In the wake of this discovery, biochemists like Francis Crick realised that the information on DNA is used to make proteins, which are long chains of smaller molecules called amino acids. Proteins are the workhorses of living cells, doing everything from digesting food to pushing waste out of the cell. The long chains fold up into remarkably intricate structures, which are crucial to the proteins function.

However, before proteins can be made the information from DNA is first copied onto a third kind of molecule called RNA (ribonucleic acid), which is similar to DNA. RNA can also act as an enzyme, as proteins do. Its ability to perform so many tasks has led some biochemists to suggest that it played a key role in the origin of life on Earth, before DNA and protein arose.

Besides genetics, a second key area of biochemistry is metabolism: the processes by which organisms extract energy from their environment (for instance from food) and use it to move and build their bodies. Metabolism involves elaborate sequences of chemical reactions, some of which are cyclic so the original chemicals are recreated at the end. Complex chemicals are broken down into simpler ones to provide energy, and that energy is used to build new chemicals that the organism can use. Different organisms can have radically different metabolisms.

Biochemistry has also revealed that living cells have structural molecules. Some form the walls and membranes that surround cells and hold them together, while others link up into a kind of scaffolding called the cytoskeleton.

Other biochemical molecules are remarkable feats of evolutionary engineering. There are molecular motors and even rotating axles.

Biochemists are still discovering new things about natural organisms (although reports that some organisms can incorporate arsenic into their DNA appear to be false). They have also started designing new biochemistries, for example adding new letters to the DNA alphabet or swapping out some of the amino acids used to make proteins. This synthetic biology may lead to new medicines and other biotechnologies, as well as shedding light on the nature of life.

View post:
What is biochemistry? | New Scientist

Department of Neuroscience School of Medicine and Public Health UW …

Neuroscience, which has had a longstanding tradition of excellence at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, has now entered an exciting new era by the creation of a Department of Neuroscience in the School of Medicine and Public Health. This department brings together research and teaching in wide ranging areas of neuroscience including the study of ion channels, synaptic transmission, neural development, sensory and cognitive physiology and neural circuits. The recent move of the department to a new research building, the second wing of the Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research (WIMR) has further strengthened collaboration and innovation through shared interests, techniques, equipment and facilities. Proximity of WIMR to the Waisman Center and University Hospitals has also promoted collaborative efforts to apply the findings of basic research in neuroscience to the study and treatment of human disease.

Continue reading here:
Department of Neuroscience School of Medicine and Public Health UW ...

Computers in Human Behavior Reports | Journal – ScienceDirect

Computers in Human Behavior Reports is an open access scholarly journal dedicated to examining human computer interactions and impact of computers on human behavior from diverse interdisciplinary angles. As a companion journal to Computers in Human Behavior (CHB), CHB Reports is a forum for both theoretical and practical implications of human-centered computing.

See original here:
Computers in Human Behavior Reports | Journal - ScienceDirect