Listen to this male snow leopard’s love song in the Eastern Sayan … – The Siberian Times

Many people still believe that these large secretive cats can't roar due to the physiology of their throat. Picture: Following Snow Leopard Volunteers Expedition

Spotted by a camera trap in the Republic of Buryatia, this snow leopard has debunked the 'no roar' theory about snow leopards, says a leading Russian authority on the wild animals.

Dmitry Medvedev, president of the Irklutsk-based Snow Leopard Foundation, says the mating season cry is proof.

'Many people still believe that these large secretive cats can't roar due to the physiology of their throat, unlike lions, tigers and leopard,' he said.

'This video proves that they can. It shows a large male roaring loudly during a mating season high in the Eastern Sayan mountains.'

Listen to this male snow leopard's love song in the Eastern Sayan mountains.Pictures: Gazeta Pskov, Dmitry Medvedev

The video which hasn't been previously shared was filmed in March 2014 near the snow leopard research base in Buryatia, and won a video trap competition for cats in 2016.

Website snowleopard.org says the endangered animals 'make sounds similar to those made by other large cats, including a purr, mew, hiss, growl, moan, and yowl.

'However, snow leopards cannot roar due to the physiology of their throat, and instead make a non-aggressive puffing sound called a 'chuff'.'

Yet the sound on this video seems more than a 'chuff'.

Endemic to high and rugged mountains in southern Siberia and central Asia, scientists estimate that there may be as few as 3,920 snow leopards left in the wild.

See original here:
Listen to this male snow leopard's love song in the Eastern Sayan ... - The Siberian Times

Salivary salt modifies cheese’s tang – Chemistry World (subscription)

If your Christmas was anything like mine, then you ate an awful lot of cheese. I love mature cheddar, and Im partial to brie, but dont offer me anything blue. I always thought my taste buds dictated my choices but recent research has shown that your physiology can affect how you perceive food.

To test for a link between physiology and taste, Elisabeth Guichard from the French National Institute for Agricultural Research, and colleagues combined cheddar, soft cheese, butter, protein powder, salt and water in different proportions to create four model cheeses with differing fat content and firmness. They then trained 14 taste testers to recognise the odour of two specific compounds nonan-2-one, which gives blue cheese its notable smell, and ethyl propanoate, which gives cheese a fruity odour and rate their perception of these two compounds in the cheese they tasted. At the same time the researchers recorded the testers chewing activity and saliva composition.

Chewing mixes food with saliva. During this step, aroma compounds within the food transfer to the saliva and are then released into the nasal cavity. It is already known that food texture and composition will affect this aroma compound release. What Guichard has now discovered is that saliva composition plays a role as well. The aroma of cheeses is perceived differently by humans due to differences in their salivary composition and the way they process the cheese in their mouth. Humans with a low salt content in saliva and high lipolysis [the ability of the body to break down fats in the cheese] activity perceived the cheeses as being more salty, more cheesy and less fruity, says Guichard.

Flavia Gasperi, head of the sensory quality research group at the Edmund Mach Foundation in Italy, agrees with Guichard that both chemical and physiological parameters can influence a foods perceived quality. The highlight of this study is that the researchers are not scared, as often happens, by the complexity of this interaction between food and consumer. They successfully take into account different aspects of food composition and texture, but also the physicochemical and cognitive mechanisms related to the subjects responses, says Gasperi.

Taste perception can also change with time, as eating salty foods alters saliva composition over the course of a day and sense of smell decreases with age. This research could help the food industry tailor their products to the physiology of specific populations. So maybe one day I will like blue cheese, but for now, just pass me the cheddar.

Read the original:
Salivary salt modifies cheese's tang - Chemistry World (subscription)

Optogenetics: What Makes It a Powerful Neuroscience Tool? – Labiotech.eu (blog)

Its a brand-new field and possibilities seem infinite. Heres what you need to know about its rapid development intoa powerful genetic tool.

What if you could activate and deactivate neurons by simply switching on the lights? Thats the basis of optogenetics, the control of cell behavior via light-sensitive proteins.

Optogenetics is a very young field, thought to have started back in 2002, which has significantly grown over the last decade. Since then, it has been explored as a method to restore eyesight, to treat arrhythmiaand toprecisely control the growth ofbacteria.

But one of the areas where it presents more potential is neuroscience. The technology allows for the control of specific neurons in living animals and monitoring the effects in real time. It can be used to preciselymap brain circuits responsible for a particular behavior, such as fear or drug addiction, and as a therapy for neurological diseases like epilepsyor Parkinsons. Neurons can be easily controlled using a method that is fast, with responses at the millisecond scale, reversible and cell specific.

As it name indicates, optogenetics relies on genes to introduce light-sensitive proteins in specific cells. These proteins are most commonlyopsins, membrane proteins that transform optical input into electrochemical signals within the cell. These proteins can be found in the retina, but those used in optogenetics are typically of microbial originbecause they have a simpler structure and transmit signals faster.

When the opsin is excited, it induces the exchange of ions across the membrane, changing its potential and either activating or inhibiting neuronal activity. The fast reaction time of the proteins allows a researcher to test how different frequencies in the light pulses affect behavior. And since different opsins are excited by light atspecific wavelengthsit is possible to combine several of them in a single animal.

The possibilities seem unlimited, butfor the technique to work properly, efficient delivery and expression of opsin genes to the target neuronsare critical.

Lentiviral vectors are one of the tools of choice for genetic engineering in optogenetics. Viral vectorstake less effort and time than creating transgenic lines. And among them, lentiviral vectors have a larger capacity, which allows including several elements, such as largepromoter andreporter genes, in the final construct.

Here is where GEG Tech comes in. The French company has an extensivecatalog of lentiviral vectors to choose from, with a big selection for optogenetics applications. Its scientists have edited and created lentiviral vectors with different features to match the needs of any particular application. For example, theycan control if gene expression is eithertransient or long-term and whether the genetic material is integrated into the host, as well as include multiple promoters and reporters. And if aclient needs another promoter or another reporter, GEG Tech will design a customized new lentiviral vector.

The company also offers help for lentiviral vector users through explanatory videos, online protocols and extensive information on the properties, safety and regulations concerning the genetic tools. If you want to know more, pay a visit to GEG Techswebsite!

Despite being a very young field, optogenetics is alreadystarting to make noise in the biotech industry. Well bring you the latest news as more and more applications of the technology emerge in coming years.

Images from Sergey Nivens /Shutterstock; Biological Psychiatry (2015) 71, 12;Deisseroth K. et al.; 2015; GEG Tech

Link:
Optogenetics: What Makes It a Powerful Neuroscience Tool? - Labiotech.eu (blog)

Tools for neuroscience research – Scientist Live

Amsbio has published a new 25-page Neuroscience catalogue that details its extensive range of specific tools and reagents to enable researchers stay at the forefront of their field.

Cellular models are key tools that open the door to numerous neuroscience applications including neurodegeneration, neurogensis and developmental diseases.

With the discovery that neural stem cells exist in the adult brain many researchers are now seeking to use these cells in in vitro studies.

To restore normal function in numerous disorders, including Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimers Disease, neural stem cell transplantation is an important emerging strategy.

Furthermore, the recent advent of iPSC and genome editing technology, including CRISPR, has transformed the scope of neuroscience research allowing the generation of isogenic models and the ability to obtain large numbers of neural stem cells, which had been traditionally difficult to obtain.

As many researchers acknowledge the importance of studying the behaviour of neurons, glial cells and neural stem cells with a physiologically relevant context the importance of 3D cell culture has grown.

Beautifully illustrated the new catalogue provides detailed information on the latest neural stem cells, cell culture media/supplements, matrices, scaffolds, cryopreservation media and neural transfection products available from Amsbio.

Link:
Tools for neuroscience research - Scientist Live

Neuroscience firm plots Barnsley expansion – Insider Media

One of the UK's largest neuroscience research companies is to open a new site in Barnsley this month, creating 12 jobs.

MAC Clinical Research, which has operations in Manchester, Leeds, Blackpool, Cannock and Liverpool, specialises in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, osteoarthritis, eczema, psoriasis, central nervous system conditions and depression.

It currently employs a workforce of 150.

Now, it is moving into 4,800 sq ft office space at Wentworth Office Park.

MAC has invested 500,000 in the site and has been supported by Enterprising Barnsley, the business development arm of Barnsley Council.

Dr Mark Dale, chief executive of MAC Clinical Research, said: "The move into Barnsley is a natural expansion for us and will see us get more heavily involved in the South Yorkshire market.

"In the not too distant future, we're looking to open up more research sites across Yorkshire."

Martin Beasley, Enterprising Barnsley group leader, added: "MAC Clinical Research is now starting to get the staff in place to become fully operational. We wish them all the best and look forward to working with them in the future."

Read the rest here:
Neuroscience firm plots Barnsley expansion - Insider Media

Frontier Pharma: Versatile Innovation in Immunology – Substantial Deal Making Activity Observed Over the Past … – Yahoo Finance

DUBLIN, Feb 15, 2017 /PRNewswire/ --

Research and Markets has announced the addition of the "Frontier Pharma: Versatile Innovation in Immunology - Large Therapy Area Pipeline with a High Degree of Repositioning Potential" drug pipelines to their offering.

Research and Markets Logo

Immunology is a large therapy area characterized by disorders of the immune system - specifically an aberrant immune response against healthy tissues present in the body, leading to chronic or acute inflammation. Depending on the specific site affected, this can lead to various types of chronic pain and loss of mobility, and have a negative impact on quality of life.

This disease area has a total of 2,145 products in active development, trailing only oncology, infectious diseases and central nervous system disorders in terms of pipeline size. There are a total of 529 immunology pipeline products that act on first-in-class molecular targets, representing approximately 40% of the total immunology pipeline for which the molecular target was disclosed.

Due to a degree of crossover between immunology indications in terms of their underlying pathophysiology, it is not uncommon for products being developed for this therapy area to have developmental programs testing them across multiple indications.

Approximately one-fifth of first-in-class pipeline products are in development for two or more indications within the therapy area. This presents an opportunity for companies to develop innovative products across multiple immune disorders, and therefore reach a larger pool of patients than products developed for single indications.

Key Topics Covered:

1 Table of Contents

2 Executive Summary

2.1 Large Therapy Area Characterized by a High Degree of Pathophysiological Crossover

2.2 Strong Pipeline Shows High Level of Versatile Innovation

2.3 Substantial Deal Making Activity Observed over the Past Decade

3 The Case for Innovation in the Immunology Market

3.1 Growing Opportunities for Biologic Products

3.2 Diversification of Molecular Targets

3.3 Innovative First-in-Class Product Developments Remain Attractive

3.4 Regulatory and Reimbursement Policy Shifts Favor First-in-Class Product Innovation

3.5 Sustained Innovation

4 Introduction

4.1 Therapy Area Introduction

4.2 Symptoms

4.3 Etiology and Pathophysiology

4.3.1 Innate Immunity

4.3.2 Adaptive Immunity

4.3.3 The Role of Cytokines

4.3.4 Autoimmunity

4.3.5 Etiologic Factors for Autoimmunity and Allergies

4.3.6 Conclusion

4.4 Co-morbidities and Complications

4.5 Epidemiology

4.6 Treatment

4.6.1 Non-Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs

4.6.2 Glucocorticoids

4.6.3 Biologics and Targeted Therapies

5 Pipeline Landscape Assessment

5.1 Overview

5.2 Pipeline Development Landscape

5.3 Molecular Targets in the Pipeline

5.4 Comparative Distribution of Programs between the Oncology Market and Pipeline by Therapeutic Target Family

5.5 First-in-Class and Versatile Pipeline Programs

5.6 First-in-Class Immunology Products by Phase, Molecule Type and Molecular Target

5.7 Versatility of First-in-Class Pipeline Products

6 Immunology Signaling Network, Disease Causation and Innovation Alignment

6.1 Complexity of Signaling Networks

6.2 Signaling Pathways and First-in-Class Molecular Target Integration

6.3 First-in-Class Matrix Assessment

7 First-in-Class Target and Pipeline Program Evaluation

Read More

7.1 Pipeline Programs Targeting Toll-Like Receptors 3, 6 and 8

7.2 Pipeline Programs Targeting Spleen Tyrosine Kinase

7.3 Pipeline Programs Targeting IL-7R

7.4 Pipeline Programs Targeting C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 6

7.5 Pipeline Programs Targeting P2RX7

7.6 Pipeline Programs Targeting ITK

7.7 Pipeline Programs Targeting IRAK4

7.8 Pipeline Programs Targeting Orai1

7.9 Pipeline Programs Targeting Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 5

7.10 Conclusion

8 Strategic Consolidations

8.1 Industry-Wide First-in-Class Deals

8.2 Licensing Deals

8.2.1 Deals by Region, Year and Value

8.2.2 Deals by Stage of Development and Value

8.2.3 Deals by Molecule Type and Value

8.2.4 Deals by Molecular Target and Value

8.3 Co-development Deals

8.3.1 Deals by Region, Year and Value

8.3.2 Deals by Stage of Development and Value

8.3.3 Deals by Molecule Type and Value

8.3.4 Deals by Molecular Target and Value

8.4 List of First-in-Class Pipeline Products with and Without Prior Deal Involvement

9 Appendix

9.1 Abbreviations

9.2 References

9.3 Research Methodology

9.3.1 Data integrity

9.3.2 Innovative and meaningful analytical techniques and frameworks

9.3.3 Evidence based analysis and insight

9.4 Secondary Research

9.4.1 Market Analysis

9.4.2 Pipeline Analysis

9.4.3 Licensing and Co-development Deals

For more information about this drug pipelines report visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/lgc9s8/frontier_pharma

Media Contact:

Research and Markets

Laura Wood, Senior Manager

press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470

For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630

For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907

Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/frontier-pharma-versatile-innovation-in-immunology---substantial-deal-making-activity-observed-over-the-past-decade---research-and-markets-300407842.html

Read this article:
Frontier Pharma: Versatile Innovation in Immunology - Substantial Deal Making Activity Observed Over the Past ... - Yahoo Finance

Google’s AI Learns Betrayal and "Aggressive" Actions Pay Off | Big … – Big Think

As the development of artificial intelligence continues at breakneck speed, questions about whether we understand what we are getting ourselves into persist. One fear is that increasingly intelligent robots will take all our jobs. Another fear is that we will create a world where a superintelligence will one day decide that it has no need for humans. This fear is well-explored in popular culture, through books and films like the Terminator series.

Another possibility is maybe the one that makes the most sense - since humans are the ones creating them, the machines and machine intelligences are likely to behave just like humans. For better or worse. DeepMind, Googles cutting-edge AI company, has shown just that.

The accomplishments of the DeepMind program so far include learning from its memory, mimicking human voices, writing music, and beating the best Go player in the world.

Recently, the DeepMind team ran a series of tests to investigate how the AI would respond when faced with certain social dilemmas. In particular, they wanted to find out whether the AI is more likely to cooperate or compete.

One of the tests involved 40 million instances of playing the computer game Gathering, during which DeepMind showed how far its willing to go to get what it wants. The game was chosen because it encapsulates aspects of the classic Prisoners Dilemma from game theory.

Pitting AI-controlled characters (called agents) against each other, DeepMind had them compete to gather the most virtual apples. Once the amount of available apples got low, the AI agents started to display "highly aggressive" tactics, employing laser beams to knock each other out. They would also steal the opponents apples.

Heres how one of those games played out:

The DeepMind AI agents are in blue and red. The apples are green, while the laser beams are yellow.

The DeepMind team described their test in a blog postthis way:

We let the agents play this game many thousands of times and let them learn how to behave rationally using deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. Rather naturally, when there are enough apples in the environment, the agents learn to peacefully coexist and collect as many apples as they can. However, as the number of apples is reduced, the agents learn that it may be better for them to tag the other agent to give themselves time on their own to collect the scarce apples.

Interestingly, what appears to have happened is that the AI systems began to develop some forms of human behavior.

This model... shows that some aspects of human-like behaviour emerge as a product of the environment and learning. Less aggressive policies emerge from learning in relatively abundant environments with less possibility for costly action.The greed motivation reflects the temptation to take out a rival and collect all the apples oneself, said Joel Z. Leibo from the DeepMind team to Wired.

Besides the fruit gathering, the AI was also tested via a Wolfpack hunting game. In it, two AI characters in the form of wolves chased a third AI agent - the prey. Here the researchers wanted to see if the AI characters would choose to cooperate to get the prey because they were rewarded for appearing near the prey together when it was being captured.

"The idea is that the prey is dangerous - a lone wolf can overcome it, but is at risk of losing the carcass to scavengers. However, when the two wolves capture the prey together, they can better protect the carcass from scavengers, and hence receive a higher reward, wrote the researchers in their paper.

Indeed, the incentivized cooperation strategy won out in this instance, with the AI choosing to work together.

This is how that test panned out:

The wolves are red, chasing the blue dot (prey), while avoiding grey obstacles.

If you are thinking Skynet is here, perhaps the silver lining is that the second test shows how AIs self-interest can include cooperation rather than the all-out competitiveness of the first test. Unless, of course, its cooperation to hunt down humans.

Here's a chart showing the results of the game tests that shows a clear increase in aggression during "Gathering":

Movies aside, the researchers are working to figure out how AI can eventually control complex multi-agent systems such as the economy, traffic systems, or the ecological health of our planet all of which depend on our continued cooperation.

One nearby AI implementation where this could be relevant - self-driving cars which will have to choose safest routes, while keeping the objectives of all the parties involved under consideration.

The warning from the tests is that if the objectives are not balanced out in the programming, the AI might act selfishly, probably not for everyones benefit.

Whats next for the DeepMind team? Joel Leibo wants the AI to go deeper into the motivations behind decision-making:

Going forward it would be interesting to equip agents with the ability to reason about other agents beliefs and goals, said Leibo to Bloomberg.

More here:
Google's AI Learns Betrayal and "Aggressive" Actions Pay Off | Big ... - Big Think

Sitting Is Deadly. Could Banning Chairs Help? – Co.Design (blog)

By now the health deficits of sitting all day are so widely studied and well-documented that they're impossible to ignore. Studies show that sitting increases lower back pain, slows our metabolisms, and shortens our life-spans, among a host of other things. Not even daily exercise is enough to offset the damage. What's a health-conscious person to do?

The End of Sitting. [Photo: Ricky Rijkenberg via RAAAF]

One answer: Eliminate chairs altogether. At the interdisciplinary Dutch design studio RAAAF (Rietveld Architecture-Art-Affordances), brothers and cofounders Ronald and Erik Rietveld have been studying how radically redesigning the workplace and home might affect how sedentary we are. Their installations The End of Sitting, which debuted in 2014, and Breaking Habits, opening at the Mondriaan Fund for Visual Arts in Amsterdam February 16, present chair-free environments that encourage people to get up and move. As Erik puts it, "As long as there are chairs present, people will sit in them habitually."

Though grounded in scientific research, the Rietveld's installations are mostly conceptual; they're about researching how we can manipulate an environment's design to impact sedentary behavior. But they bring up an interesting idea: What if we did banish chairs altogether? Is that even possible? And would that solve our societal sitting problem, or just open up the door to new problems?

The design of the structures in the Rietveld's project are the result of years of research and a series of experiments. Ronald is a practicing architect, and Erik is a philosopher, whose research project "The Landscape of Affordances: Situating the Embodied Mind," funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), forms the basis for the design work. The pair's research revolves around the scientific concept of affordancesput simply, the idea that human behavior is learned by picking up the information that is relevant to survival, and ignoring the rest. Throughout history, trees have afforded climbing on, for example, and holes have afforded hiding in. And for centuries in Western society, chairs have afforded sitting in. The easiest ways to change human behavior is to radically change our surrounding environment.

Working together, Erik and Ronald have taken the idea of affordances and applied it to the prospect of a chair-less and table-less future. "The easiest ways to change human behavior is to radically change our surrounding environment," says Erik. Three years ago, the studio reimagined the office as a labyrinth of concrete and plywoodwithout traditional desks or chairsfor The End of Sitting. In Breaking Habits, they expanded the scope to include the home, with a futuristic and surreal "domestic landscape."

The cut-away office space in The End Of Sitting structure was rigid and confining. Based on feedback from participants in a study they conducted in the installation, the Rietvelds determined that softer material would make the act of not sitting more comfortable. As a result, the new installation is made from large swaths of carpet-like materiala proprietary mix of wool threads and a felt basethat are draped over stainless-steel rollers suspended from the ceiling.

In Breaking Habits, the spareness of the environment eliminates more than just chairs: There are no desks on which to put a laptop, thereby discouraging sitting and working at home. There are no hard surfaces for a TV to watch Netflix from bed. Visitors to the installation are invited to use the spaceto interact with it, and to lean, stand, or lie against the soft surfaces. In turn, the Rietvelds will observe those interactions in an informal manner. They also invite behavioral scientists to bring study groups to the installation, and use it as a place for more formal scientific study on how people might use and adapt to this type of new environment. (Though no scientific studies are scheduled at the moment, the Rietvelds say the Mondriaan Fund appears open to letting scientists use the space in that way.)

Breaking Habits

RAAAF's futuristic landscapes aren't necessarily homey and comfortable, but they aren't supposed to be. They are meant to explore new possibilities for our spaces, not represent the exact blueprint of our house.

One of the most important aspects of RAAAF's experimental environments is that they encourage the user to shift positions frequently. In Breaking Habits, for instance, some pieces of fabric are configured into pyramids or perpendicular walls on which to lean; others are suspended like a hammock for lying down on when your legs muscles inevitably get tired. The goal was "temporary comfort, not permanent comfort," says Ronald.

This idea addresses one of the main health risks of sitting: the slow-down of our metabolism. When we sit for a prolonged amount of time, our skeletal muscles remain inactive and the metabolic pathways linked to these muscles that regulate how we store fats and break down sugars become less efficient. Moving around, stretching, oscillating between standing up and sitting back down againthese are things that scientists recommend to help combat the onset of metabolic-related diseases like type 2 diabetes, some cancers, and heart disease. The rungs hanging from the ceiling and the more flexible landscape in Breaking Habits were built to aid and allow for stretching, the brothers say, and since leaning against fabric is only comfortable for so long, moving around is also a necessity.

According to Avi Biswas, PhD candidate at the Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation at the University of Toronto (who was not involved in the RAAAF project), the way environments are designed can make a significant difference in offsetting the metabolism slow-down. Biswas, whose post-doctoral work (he defends his dissertation at the end of the month) will focus on the influence of the workplace environment on sedentary behavior of workers, says that any place that encourages you to get up, take a walk, and move around is helpful in slowing down the health risks of sitting.

However, he also notes that not all movement is created equal: Tasks that require exerting more energy will burn more calories, and will have the greatest effect on your metabolism. In that regard, merely shifting positions is not as helpful as, say, taking a lap around the office. It's the same way that having a standing desk is beneficial, but not quite as much so as walking on a treadmill while working. Ultimately, we need to both exercise and move more to remove the risks of sedentary behaviorand while RAAAF's installations do encourage movement, they don't necessarily guide people in exerting the kind of energy that would be most helpful in counteracting slowing metabolisms.

The End of Sitting [Photo: Jan Kempenaers via RAAAF]

So eliminating chairs won't automatically get us to exercise, but will it encourage us to invent other resting positions out of necessity? And if so, will those positions be better than sitting?

From a behavioral perspective, people interact with the environment that we are exposed to, says Lucas Carr, an assistant professor and director of the Behavioral Medicine Lab at the University of Iowa (who is also uninvolved with RAAAF's project). But even without chairs, "humans are still going to rest for long periods of time," says Carr. "It's how we were designed."

So eliminating all chairs without replacing them with better resting options simply wouldn't work. Just like sitting all day is bad for your health, standing for too long is unhealthy, too. It causes fatigue and blood begins to pool in the legs, among other things. And leaning against something isn't necessarily much better.

As Carr points out, prior to being conditioned to sit still in chairs for long periods of time, young children instinctively sit in more natural resting positions that include sitting on their heels, sitting cross-legged, and sitting in a squatting position. The latter is an effective middle ground between standing and sitting, and it's actually a position that Carr would still recommend todaythough he acknowledges it's not a position most people want to take in public. (As a sidenote, Carr says he doesn't know of any products or environments that would normalize or support that position, but suggests it's an area that might be helpful if designers explored.)

Meanwhile, Breaking Habits gives designers something to mull over between now and 2025, the year that RAAAF set for its futuristic home. Our living rooms may never look like the installation, but it wouldn't hurt to drape a few carpets and get serious about chair alternatives just in casethe best way to kick a bad habit is to replace it with a good one.

Slideshow Credits: 01 / Photo: Jan Kempenaers via RAAAF; 02 / Photo: Jan Kempenaers via RAAAF; 03 / Photo: Jan Kempenaers via RAAAF; 04 / Photo: Ricky Rijkenberg via RAAAF; 05 / Photo: Ricky Rijkenberg via RAAAF;

See the rest here:
Sitting Is Deadly. Could Banning Chairs Help? - Co.Design (blog)

The Next Pseudoscience Health Craze Is All About Genetics – Gizmodo

Illustration: Angelica Alzona/Gizmodo

Recently, Vitaliy Husar received results from a DNA screening that changed his life. It wasnt a gene that suggested a high likelihood of cancer or a shocking revelation about his family tree. It was his diet. It was all wrong.

That was, at least, according to DNA Lifestyle Coach, a startup that offers consumers advice on diet, exercise and other aspects of daily life based on genetics alone. Husar, a 38-year-old telecom salesman, had spent most of his life eating the sort of Eastern European fare typical of his native Ukraine: lots of meat, potatoes, salt and saturated fats. DNA Lifestyle Coach suggested his body might appreciate a more Mediterranean diet instead.

They show you which genes are linked to what traits, and link you to the research, Husar told Gizmodo. There is science behind it.

DNA Lifestyle Coach isnt the only company hoping to turn our genetics into a lifestyle product. In the past decade, DNA sequencing has gotten really, really cheap, positioning genetics to become the next big consumer health craze. The sales pitcha roadmap for life encoded in your very own DNAcan be hard to resist. But scientists are skeptical that weve decrypted enough about the human genome to turn strings of As, Ts, Cs and Gs into useful personalized lifestyle advice.

Indeed, that lifestyle advice has a tendency to sound more like it was divined from a health-conscious oracle than from actual science. Take, for instance, DNA Lifestyle Coachs recommendation that one client drink 750ml of cloudy apple juice everyday to lose body fat.

Millions of people have had genotyping done, but few people have had their whole genome sequenced, Eric Topol, a geneticist at Scripps in San Diego, told Gizmodo. Most consumer DNA testing companies, like 23andMe, offer genotyping, which examines small snippets of DNA for well-studied variations. Genome sequencing, on the other hand, decodes a persons entire genetic makeup. In many cases, there just isnt enough science concerning the genes in question to accurately predict, say, whether you should steer clear of carbs.

We need billions of people to get their genome sequenced to be able to give people information like what kind of diet to follow, Topol said.

Husar stumbled upon the Kickstarter page for DNA Lifestyle Coach after getting his DNA tested via 23andMe a few years earlier. He wondered whether there was more information to be gleaned from his results. So six months ago, he downloaded his 23andMe data and uploaded it to DNA Lifestyle Coach. Each test costs between $60 and $70.

Im always looking for some ways to learn about my health, myself, my body, said Husar, who contributed to the companys Kickstarter back in 2015.

The advice he got back was incredibly specific. According to DNA Lifestyle Coach, he needed to start taking supplements of vitamins B12, D and E. He needed more iodine in his diet, and a lot less sodium. DNA Lifestyle Coach recommended that 55 percent of his fat consumption come from monounsaturated fats like olive oil, rather than the sunflower oil popular in Ukraine. Oh, and he needed to change his workout to focus more on endurance and less on speed and power.

He switched up his workout and his diet, and added vitamin supplements to his daily routine. The results, he found, were hard to dispute: He lost six pounds, and for the first time in memory didnt spend Kievs long harsh winter stuck with a bad case of the winter blues.

For now, DNA Lifestyle Coachs interpretation engine only offers consumers advice on diet and exercise, but in the coming months it plans to roll out genetics-based guidance on skin care, dental care and stress management. The company wants to tell you what SPF of sunscreen to use to decrease your risk of cancer, and which beauty products to use to delay the visible effects of aging. Its founders told Gizmodo that eventually they envision being able to offer their customers recipes for specific meals to whip up for dinner, optimized for their genetic makeup.

DNA Lifestyle Coach joins a growing list of technology companies attempting to spin DNA testing results into a must-have product. The DNA sequencing company Helix plans to launch an app store for genetics later this year. One of its partners is Vinome, a wine club that for $149 a quarter sends you wine selected based on your DNA. Orig3n offers genetics-based assessments of fitness, mental health, skin, nutrition and evenobviously unscientificwhich superpower you are most likely to have. The CEO of the health-focused Veritas Genetics told Gizmodo that the company hopes to create a Netflix for genetics, where consumers pay for a subscription to receive updated information on their genome for the rest of their life.

Its not going to happen overnight, but we believe that DNA will become an integrated part of everyday life, Helix co-founder Justin Kao told Gizmodo. The same way people use data to determine which movie to see or which restaurant to eat at, people will one day use their own DNA data to help guide everyday experiences.

Few would debate that our capability to decipher information from our genetic code is getting a lot more sophisticated. Just a decade ago, a bargain-basement deal on whole genome sequencing would run you $300,000. Recently, DNA sequencing company Illumina announced plans do it for just $100 within the next decade. Every day, researchers discover new links between our health, our environment, and our genetics.

But much of this research is still preliminary, and many of the studies are small. DNA Lifestyle Coachs advice to drink 750ml of cloudy apple juice for fat loss, for instance, stemmed from a study of just 68 non-smoking men. Those results, while promising, still require much larger studies to confirm. Suggesting that the same regiment might work for consumers is a little like reading the leaves at the bottom of a tea cupextracting meaning from patterns that arent necessarily there.

Not to mention that the information our genes offer up is probabilistic, not deterministic. You may have run into this if youve done an ancestry DNA test and received results indicating that your parents are only very likely your parents. More often than not, many genes contribute to a specific traitlike tasteand how those genes all interact is complex and poorly understood web. To complicate matters further, the expression of genes is often impacted by our behavior and the environment. If you have a gene that raises the risk for skin cancer, but live in overcast Seattle and dont ever go outside, your chances of getting cancer are probably slimmer than someone who lives in Los Angeles and spends every day in the sun without slapping on some sunblock.

DNA Lifestyle Coach, though, wants to offer its customers simple, actionable advice, and so omits all this confusing gray area from its results. Instead, the recommendations are clear and specific, from how much Vitamin A to take to how many cups of coffee a day are most beneficial. Its a bit reminiscent of a long-term weather forecast spitting out predictions for sunshine or rain 30 days in advanceyes, such predictions can be made, but most meteorologists will tell you theyre borderline useless.

We use a series of algorithms which rank studies by reliability of results, the company website explains. Studies are then analyzed for their relation to real-world dietary and nutritional needs, and the user is given straightforward recommendations.

Pressed on the questionable nature of that apple juice study, DNA Lifestyle Coachs founders responded that the data is not as strong as the the other studies it pulls from. But it is a harmless recommendation, the company said.

When asked whether it was possible that DNA Lifestyle Coachs claims might have any validity, Topol laughed.

One day, he said, its likely well have some genomic insight into what types of diets are better suited for certain people. But, he added, its unlikely that we will ever accurately predict the sort of granular details DNA Lifestyle Coach hopes to, like exactly what SPF of sunscreen you should be using on your skin.

There are limits, he said.

DNA Lifestyle Coach was founded by a chemist and a business consultant who met over an interest in the biohacker scene, a subculture focused on ideas like DIY life extension. The company that runs DNA Lifestyle Coach, Titanovo, actually started as a blog. The name is meant to invoke superhumans. Its like the rise of the titans, said Corey McCarren, the business side of the duo, when Gizmodo met with him at a health moonshots conference last month.

Their first foray into genetics was a home telomere length test, which launched in 2015 with help of $10,000 raised on Indiegogo. Telomeres are little bits of DNA at the end of chromosomes. Each time a cell divides, its telomeres get shorter, and so they provide some insight into our biological age. Titanovo wanted to develop an easy test to tell consumers how long or short their telomeres were. The company initially pitched the test as a way to measure both longevity and health, but eventually was forced to clarify for customers that it is not at present possible to discern biological age from telomeres alone, after receiving emails from customers panicked about their own short telomeres.

Instead, they suggest, the $150 telomere testing kit is a way to discern information about health. One finding from their data: vegetarians and vegans who use the service have, on average, longer telomeres. The company recommends going veg if you find your telomeres are in need of a boost. Even this, however, seems like a stretch: data on telomere length, like genomics, is not quite ready for public consumption. For every paper that finds a potential cause of telomere shorting, theres one that finds the opposite effect.

Undaunted by the rocky rollout of its telomere testing kit, Titanovo is now pressing forward into genomics. The Kickstarter campaign for DNA Lifestyle Coach wound up raising more than $30,000. The company says it now has more than 1,000 customers who either pay $215 for the full DNA testing kit along with one panel, or the $60 to $70 to run panels with data from services like 23andMe.

While it might seem harmless to take part in a little science-based superstition and find out whether youre more Batman or Superman, such indulgence can have serious side effects. For years, weve been sold on DNA as the answer to almost everything. Decode the human genome, and decode the mysteries of the human spirit. This gives companies like DNA Lifestyle Coach dangerous authority. If your DNA testing results say youre prone to obesity, why spend time exercising and eating right when your health seems beyond your control?

Joshua Knowles, a Stanford Cardiologist who studies applied genetics, told Gizmodo that he recently had a patient who was unwilling to try a certain class of drug based on their genotyping, even though they had a high risk of heart disease that might be drastically reduced by use of those medications.

Were doing a poor job of educating patients on risk-benefit analysis, Knowles said. In some cases, when it comes to genetics, were placing a lot of weight on some things that have very small overall effects.

In 2008, an European Journal of Human Geneticsarticleargued for better regulatory control of direct-to-consumer genetic testing, asking whether in the end, tests ran the risk of being little better than horoscopes that told people information they were already predisposed to believe.

It was these kinds of concerns that moved the Food and Drug Administration to crack down on 23andMe in 2013, ordering the company to cease providing analyses of peoples risk factors for disease until the tests accuracy could be validated. The company now provides assessments on a small fraction of 254 diseases and conditions it once scanned forit still processes the same information, but is restricted in what it can tell consumers. Where it once reported health risks alongside specific tips and guidance on how to reduce them, it now reports on your carrier status, framing the results in terms of whether you might pass down a specific genetic variant to your offspring rather that whether you might develop the condition yourself.

Companies like DNA Lifestyle Coach have moved in offer the sort of tips 23andMe no longer can.

We have much too many companies doing nutrigenomics and other unproven things like that, said Topol. That can give consumer genomics a really bad name. Thats unfortunate.

Kao, of Helix, said that educating consumers on what these results really mean alongside actionable information will be the industrys greatest challengeand what distinguishes it from just another pseudoscientific health fad.

Its typically been very hard to interpret DNA information, Kao said. DNA is most valuable with context, rather than as the only piece of the puzzle.

The industry, he argues, is young, but will get more accurate the more consumers use DNA-testing products. Just as Netflix improves the more you rate shows you watch, so would many DNA-based products, he said.

Husar told Gizmodo that he got blood work done to confirm what he could about his DNA Lifestyle Coach results. The tests indeed confirmed that he was low on vitamins B12, D and E, as DNA Lifestyle Coach had suggested. Of course, Hussar still cant be sure his genes are responsible. It could be that hes simply not eating enough meat or cheese. Still, the blood work was enough to convince Husar that DNA Lifestyle Coachs analysis was worth taking seriously. And, for the most part, the results felt rightit made sense that a boost of vitamin B12 might counteract the emotional toll of winter, and that cutting out potatoes and saturated fats might be benefical.

The testss fitness results though, he did find a tad shocking.

I was really surprised to learn that Im not fast or powerful, but I have a high endurance, he said. I can do Iron Man. This is what my genetics say. Im trying to change my workout to see if thats true.

Husar may never be sure whether the advice divined from his genetics was really helpful. He can only hope it doesnt hurt.

The rest is here:
The Next Pseudoscience Health Craze Is All About Genetics - Gizmodo

Clemson Center for Human Genetics unveils new facility on Greenwood Genetic Center campus – Clemson Newsstand

GREENWOOD Self Regional Hall, a new 17,000-square-foot, state-of-the art facility that will house the Clemson University Center for Human Genetics, has opened on the campus of the Greenwood Genetic Center.

Self Regional Hall, a new 17,000-square-foot, state-of-the art facility that will house the Clemson University Center for Human Genetics. Image Credit: Craig Mahaffey / Clemson University

The facility will enable Clemsons growing genetics program to collaborate closely with the long tradition of clinical and research excellence at the Greenwood Genetic Center, combining basic science and clinical care. The center will initially focus on discovering and developing early diagnostic tools and therapies for autism, cognitive developmental disorders, oncology and lysosomal disorders.

Opening Self Regional Hall means that we will be able to do even more to help children with genetic disorders, and their families, and to educate graduate students who will go out into the world and make their own impact, said Clemson University President James P. Clements.

As the parent of a child with special needs the kind of research that you are doing here is especially meaningful and important to me and my family, Clements said during the event. As you all know, an early diagnosis can make a huge difference for a child and their family because the earlier you can figure out what a child needs the earlier you can intervene and begin treatment.

Jim Pfeiffer (left), president and CEO of Regional Healthcare, and Clemson President James P. Clements unveil a commemorative plaque. Image Credit: Craig Mahaffey / Clemson University

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one in six children between the ages of 3 and 17, roughly 15 percent, suffers from a developmental disorder.

Self Regional Hall is a state-of-the-art facility that provides the resources our scientists need to understand the genetic underpinnings of disorders, said Mark Leising, interim dean of the College of Science at Clemson. This facility, and its proximity to the Greenwood Genetic Center, elevates our ability to attract the brightest scientific talent to South Carolina and enhances our efforts to tackle genetic disorders.

The building will house eight laboratories and several classrooms, conference rooms and offices for graduate students and faculty.

The facilitys name recognizes the ongoing support from Self Regional Healthcare, a healthcare system in Upstate South Carolina that has grown from the philanthropy of the late James P. Self, a textile magnate who founded Self Memorial Hospital in 1951.

The ribbon-cutting ceremony was originally scheduled for September 2016, but was delayed because of the death of state Sen. John Drummond, an ardent supporter of the Greenwood Genetic Center who helped bring Self Regional Hall to fruition.

Image Credit: Craig Mahaffey / Clemson University

Self Regional Healthcares vision is to provide superior care, experience and value. This vision includes affording our patients with access to cutting-edge technology and the latest in healthcare innovation and genomic medicine, without a doubt, is the future of healthcare, said Jim Pfeiffer, president and CEO of Self Regional Healthcare. The research and discoveries that will originate from this center will provide new options for those individuals facing intellectual and developmental disabilities, and will provide our organization with innovative capabilities and treatment options for our patients.

We are pleased to welcome Clemson University to Greenwood as the first academic partner on our Partnership Campus, added Dr. Steve Skinner, director of the Greenwood Genetic Center. This is the next great step in a collaboration that has been developing over the past 20-plus years. We look forward to our joint efforts with both Clemson and Self Regional Healthcare to advance the research and discoveries that will increase our understanding and treatment of human genetic disorders.

END

Greenwood Genetic CenterThe Greenwood Genetic Center (GGC), founded in 1974, is a nonprofit organization advancing the field of medical genetics and caring for families impacted by genetic disease and birth defects. At its home campus in Greenwood, South Carolina, a talented team of physicians and scientists provides clinical genetic services, diagnostic laboratory testing, educational programs and resources, and research in the field of medical genetics.GGCs faculty and staff are committed to the goal of developing preventive and curative therapies for the individuals and families they serve.GGC extends its reach as a resource to all residents of South Carolina with satellite offices in Charleston, Columbia, Florence and Greenville. For more information about GGC, please visitwww.ggc.org.

Original post:
Clemson Center for Human Genetics unveils new facility on Greenwood Genetic Center campus - Clemson Newsstand