Genetics + Family Environment Impact Childhood Obesity – PsychCentral.com

A new international study finds that around 35-40 percent of a childs BMI (Body Mass Index) how fat or thin they are is inherited from their parents.

Investigators say that for the most obese children, the proportion rises to 55-60 percent, thus more than half of their tendency towards obesity is determined by genetics and family environment.

University of Sussex researchers used data on the heights and weights of 100,000 children and their parents across the world, including the U.K., U.S., China, Indonesia, Spain, and Mexico.

Investigators found that the intergenerational transmission of BMI is approximately constant at around 0.2 per parent; i.e., each childs BMI is, on average, 20 percent due to the mother and 20 percent due to the father.

The pattern of results, said lead author Professor Peter Dolton of the University of Sussex, is remarkably consistent across all countries, irrespective of their stage of economic development, degree of industrialization, or type of economy.

Professor Dolton says, Our evidence comes from trawling data from across the world with very diverse patterns of nutrition and obesity, from one of the most obese populations USA to two of the least obese countries in the world, China and Indonesia.

This gives an important and rare insight into how obesity is transmitted across generations in both developed and developing countries.We found that the process of intergenerational transmission is the same across all the different countries.

The findings are published in the journal Economics and Human Biology.

Interestingly, the effect of parents BMI on their childrens BMI depends on what the BMI of the child is. Researchers discovered that consistently, across all populations studied, the parental effect was lowest for the thinnest children and highest for the most obese children.

For the thinnest child their BMI is 10 percent due to their mother and 10 percent due to their father. For the fattest child this transmission is closer to 30 percent due to each parent.

Said Dolton, This shows that the children of obese parents are much more likely to be obese themselves when they grow up the parental effect is more than double for the most obese children what it is for the thinnest children.

These findings have far-reaching consequences for the health of the worlds children. They should make us rethink the extent to which obesity is the result of family factors, and our genetic inheritance, rather than decisions made by us as individuals.

Source: University of Sussex

APA Reference Nauert PhD, R. (2017). Genetics + Family Environment Impact Childhood Obesity. Psych Central. Retrieved on February 22, 2017, from https://psychcentral.com/news/2017/02/21/genetics-family-environment-impact-childhood-obesity/116702.html

Here is the original post:
Genetics + Family Environment Impact Childhood Obesity - PsychCentral.com

BRIEF-DE Shaw reports 5 pct passive stake in Myriad Genetics – Reuters

Northern Trust uses blockchain for private equity record-keeping

NEW YORK, Feb 22 Northern Trust Corp has deployed a new blockchain-based system built with International Business Machines Corp to record information on transactions involving private equity funds, in one of the first commercial deployments of the nascent technology.

Read more here:
BRIEF-DE Shaw reports 5 pct passive stake in Myriad Genetics - Reuters

Swedroe: Investing Habits Affected By Genetics – ETF.com

Its been well-documented that, on average, retail investors are dumb money. For example, on average, the stocks they buy go on to underperform and the stocks they sell go on to outperform. Investors, sadly, even manage to underperform the very mutual funds in which they invest.

Research from the field of behavioral finance has provided explanations for these poor results. In short, theyre the product of a long list of investment biases exhibited by individual investors. Among these biases are: Investors lack portfolio diversification due to overconfidence and a preference for investing in familiar securities (a home-country bias); they tend to trade too much (overconfidence again); they are reluctant to realize their losses (it is too painful to admit mistakes); they extrapolate recent superior returns into the future (the hot-hands fallacy); and they have a preference for skewness and lottery-type investments (which is explained by prospect theory).

While studies have shown that individual investors, on average, exhibit investment biases, little research has been devoted to uncovering their origins and the differences in them across investors. This, in turn, raises two questions: Are investors genetically endowed with certain predispositions that manifest themselves as investment biases? Or, do investors exhibit biases as a result of parenting or individual-specific experiences or events?

Investment Biases And Genetics

Henrik Cronqvist and Stephan Siegel contribute to the literature on investment biases with their study, The Genetics of Investment Biases, which appeared in the August 2014 issue of the Journal of Financial Economics.

To answer these questions, they used a unique data set, the worlds largest twin registry, the Swedish Twin Registry, and then matched it with detailed data on twins investment behaviors. This enabled them to decompose differences across individuals into genetic versus environmental components.

The decomposition was based on an intuitive insight: Identical twins share 100% of their genes, while the average proportion of shared genes is only 50% for fraternal twins. If identical twins exhibit more similarity with respect to these investment biases than do fraternal twins, then there is evidence that these behaviors are influenced, at least in part, by genetic factors.

The authors database included more than 15,000 sets of twins. Following is a summary of their findings:

Read this article:
Swedroe: Investing Habits Affected By Genetics - ETF.com

Jurors In Toxic Tort Litigation Take Genetics Seriously – Law360 (subscription)

Kirk Hartley Can jurors grasp the role of genetics in personal injury claims alleged to arise from exposure to specific chemicals? Can judges grasp the issues well enough to really help expert witnesses present the issues clearly, and to help jurors understand?

Not long ago, we saw the first asbestos trial making explicit reference to a plaintiff with BAP1 mutations and the alleged role of those mutations in the causation story. The point of this article is to provide some more specific information from...

To view the full article, register now.

View original post here:
Jurors In Toxic Tort Litigation Take Genetics Seriously - Law360 (subscription)

Embryology program started by Lincoln Northeast Kiwanis Club – Lincoln Journal Star

Lincoln Northeast Kiwanian Dick Earl, who recently passed away at the age of 95, managed a hatchery in Lincoln. He thought learning about embryology would be a great educational tool for kids and helped start the program in 1975. Dick worked with the Lancaster County Extension Service to get this program started. Lincoln third graders have benefited from Embryology in their classroom for over 40 years.

What started out in three classrooms at one school has turned into every third-grade classroom in the Lincoln Public School system as well as Waverly, Norris and many parochial schools.

Embryology has been a part of the core (required) science curriculum in LPS since 1993. Students learn about embryonic development and the life cycle during the 21-day incubation process of chicken eggs. They care for the eggs, witness the hatching process and then care for the baby chicks for 23 days. Last spring, 3,513 third graders from 165 classrooms and 54 schools participated during three sessions. Last fall, a new session added four new schools and 137 students in home schools.

This year, Embryology plans to increase to 186 classrooms. Each classroom receives one dozen fertilized chicken eggs. Students turn the eggs three times a day and provide water for humidity in the incubators.

After seven days of incubation, Extension staff candle the eggs with the students. By candling (shining a bright light) on the eggs, students can see if the eggs are developing (viable), have stopped developing (died), or were never fertile.

This is an exciting time for students and teachers with much anticipation of what they will see. For many students, this is the first time they have experienced seeing a developing embryo and for many, it is the first time theyve experienced life and death. Students are also learning respect for living creatures.

Because the program grew so much, a partnership was formed with a hatchery in Iowa which donates nearly 200 dozen eggs per year. Kiwanis club members from Lincoln Northeast drive 200 miles to Spencer, Iowa, three times a year to get the eggs so we can keep Dick Earl's dream alive for thousands of third graders each year.

More:
Embryology program started by Lincoln Northeast Kiwanis Club - Lincoln Journal Star

How to make a ‘three-parent’ baby – Science News for Students (blog)

A baby born in April 2016 may have opened the door to a new world of reproductive medicine. This boy became one of the first intentional three-parent babies. The vast majority of this boys DNA came from his mother and his father. A small bit of extra DNA came from an unrelated woman. This child got some of his genetic inheritance from each of these adults.

Because of that bonus DNA from the unrelated woman, some people say babies like this boy have three parents.

Scientists didnt go to all of the effort to mix the DNA from these three people as an experiment. In fact, they did it to overcome a problem in the boys mother. That woman had a problem with her mitochondria (MY-toh-KON-dree-uh). These are important little structures or organelles present in her cells.

Many cells, including those that make up humans, contain special components that function like little organs. That gives rise to their name, organelles, which actually means little organs. Organelles perform special tasks for their parent cells. And one of the more notable of these organelles is the mitochondrion. Its main job is to help power its cell. To do this, the mitochondria harvest energy contained in the bonds linking atoms in the cells fuel (such as glucose). Mitochondria then use that energy to create another molecule, known as ATP (for adenosine triphosphate). That ATP actually serves as the energy source for cells.

Story continues below image

Mitochondria, one of several types of organelles found within the cytoplasm of a cell, contain a small amount of DNA. A mutation in that DNA can cause disease.

ttsz/iStockphoto

But some of the mitochondria in the boys mother have a mutation. That genetic alteration causes Leigh syndrome, a fatal disorder. Most of her mitochondria work properly. That's whythe mom does not have the killer disease. But she can pass on DNA from the faulty mitochondria to her children. And this can put them at risk of Leigh syndrome. Two of her children had already died from the disease. She also had suffered four miscarriages.

It was in hopes of giving this couple a healthy baby that doctors worked to find healthy mitochondria to substitute for her unhealthy ones. Normally, a woman passes on her mitochondria to her offspringthrough her egg (dads sperm dont contribute any). These organelles also contain a small amount of DNA just 37 genes. (Most of the roughly 20,000 protein-producing genes needed to make a human are stored in a compartment called the nucleus.) Mutations in some mitochondrial genes most often pose a risk to organs that need lots of energy, such as the brain and muscles. There is no cure or effective treatment for many of these mitochondrial diseases.

The technique used to create the baby boy is new and controversial. His birth, though, caps nearly three decades of work to to produce healthy human eggs by manipulatingthe organelle. The new baby appears to have been saved from a deadly genetic disease. Still, there are ethical and safety concerns about his three-parent heritage.

And a three-parent baby girl born in January raises even more concerns in part, just because she is a girl.

Researchers first began swapping mitochondria between egg cells to treat infertility problems almost 20 years ago. Jacques Cohen was one of those researchers.

Hes a scientist who studies human embryos. In the late 1990s, he and colleagues at Saint Barnabas Medical Center in Livingston, N.J., were looking for a way to help women who were unable to have children by in vitro fertilization. Also known as IVF, this process involves taking egg cells from a woman and sperm cells from a man, then incubating them in a dish. Some of those eggs and sperm will combine to form embryos the first stages of creating a new individual.

With in vitro fertilization, or IVF, an embryo that developed in a laboratory dish is transferred into a womans womb where it may develop into a baby.

herbap/iStockphoto

Doctors then transfer some of those embryos into the womans womb. With luck, one or more will develop into a baby. But some couples embryos never developed normally. No one knows why. Cohens group thought a dose of cytoplasm the jellylike guts of a cell from a donor egg might give the implanted embryos a better shot at success.

Cytoplasm is the most complicated fluid in the universe, says Cohen. It contains mitochondria, other organelles, proteins and other molecules that do the work of the cell. The mother's egg normally supplies all the goodies an embryo needs to live for the first few steps of development. But Cohen thought that some of his patients eggs might need extra help.

So he extracted 10 to 15 percent of the cytoplasm from an egg donated by another woman. He injected this along with a single sperm cell into a recipient egg. From 1996 to 2001, he performed the procedure 37 times. And this technique proved quite successful. It produced 17 babies for 13 couples!

Cohen later tested eight of the children born this way. Two carried some mitochondria that had come from the donor. That was in addition to some that came from the childs actual mother. Some of the other six children may have had donor mitochondria at levels too low for his tests to see back then, Cohen now says. But the finding made him curious.

So Cohen and his colleagues tracked down 13 of the 17 children. All were now teenagers. In surveys, their parents said that the kids seemed basically healthy. Cohen doesnt know whether mitochondria or other parts of the cytoplasm played a role in producing the children. His group stopped performing the technique in 2001 (because of regulatory issues).

Other scientists have also tried to replace faulty mitochondria more intentionally. The first such attempt in 1983. And it involved mice.

Pronuclei are the central, DNA-containing parts of fertilized eggs. One comes from the egg and another comes from dads sperm. At this early stage in development, the two have not yet fused into a single nucleus. (Nuclei is the plural form of nucleus.)

In a technique known as pronuclear transfer, researchers fertilized the mother mouses egg and a donor egg at the same time. The pronuclei were removed from the donor's fertilized egg and discarded. Those from the mothers fertilized egg were sucked out and then injected into the empty donor egg.

Story continues below image

Pronuclear transfer was the first technique that scientists tried in their attempts to keep diseases due to faulty mitochondria from being passed from a mother to her child.

T. Tibbitts; Third scientific review of the safety and efficacy of methods to avoid mitochondrial disease through assisted conception, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, June 2014

Talk of applying thistechnique in humans promptly raised a few concerns.

Some people claimed that it is not ethical. They argued that it manipulates maybe even destroys two embryos.

Thats one issue. Scientists have a more technical one. They note that mitochondria tend to glom onto the nuclei. So unacceptably high numbers of mitochondria from the mothers egg including disease-carrying ones may still find their way into the donor egg, notes Shoukhrat Mitalipov. He is a mitochondrial biologist at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland.

Last June, scientists reported they had refined pronuclear transfer to reduce the number of disease-carrying mitochondria that could enter embryos. Fewer than 2 percent of the mitochondria from the mothers egg made it into the donors egg. But an earlier study suggested that even a half that amount might be dangerous. Thats because mutant mitochondria may copy themselves. Eventually, they might take over the cell and cripple its energy production.

Fertility clinics in the United Kingdom are allowed to use pronuclear transfer to make human babies where there was a high risk of mitochondrial diseases. In fact, none has done so. yet New York fertility doctor John Zhang is involved in the new baby boys case. He tried the pronuclear-transfer technique with colleagues at Sun-Yat Sen University of Medical Science in Guangzhou, China. That was more than 10 years ago. Five embryos that were made this way were implanted into a 30-year-old woman. Three grew into fetuses. None, however, survived to birth. Zhang published these results last year in Reproductive Biomedicine Online.

In January 2017, doctors in Ukraine announced that a baby girl was born from this method. Her parents had tried IVF. But, like Cohens patients, the couples fertilized eggs never grew into an embryo that could be implanted. Instead of adding cytoplasm from a donor egg as Cohen had, fertility doctor Valery Zukin at the Nadiya Clinic in Kiev instead used pronuclear transfer. And they report success a baby girl.

Labs in Ukraine and Germany confirmed that most of the babys DNA is from her mother and father. Only her mitochondrial DNA comes from an egg donor. Zukin used the same technique again. Another couple is now expecting a baby boy next month.

Some people are concerned that these babies might have health problems later. Some people also may see this as an ethical problem. Why? The technique was not used to prevent mitochondrial diseases, but instead as a type of fertility treatment.

Marcy Darnovsky is one of the critics. She is executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society in Berkeley, Calif. Doctors such as Zukin are selling unproven and possibly dangerous services to customers, she charges. This is the ugly face of commercial and status incentives driving unscientific human experimentation, she said in statement about the baby girls birth.

Doctors used a different technique spindle transfer to produce the baby boy born last April. The bodys genes reside in the DNA found in the bodys 46 different chromosomes. When a cell divides to create egg or sperm cells, it splits those 46 chromosomes into two equal sets of 23. To get portioned out properly, those chromosomes attach themselves to protein fibers. Those fibers are known asspindles. The new transplant technique gets its name from those fibers.

The technique starts with two unfertilized egg cells. One comes from the mother and the other from a donor. In both cells, a membrane surrounding the nucleus has broken down. The spindle in each has not, however, completed a separation of the chromosomes.

Researchers removethe spindle and its attached chromosomes from the donor egg and discardthem. Then they dothe same to the mothers egg except that they keep her spindle and chromosomes. These they injectinto the donors nearly empty egg. Then the researchers add the dads sperm cell into this egg to fertilize it.

Story continues below image

The three-parent baby boy born last year was created using a this technique, called spindle transfer.

T. Tibbitts; Third scientific review of the safety and efficacy of methods to avoid mitochondrial disease through assisted conception, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, June 2014

Mitalipov in Portland pioneered spindle transfer. In 2009 he showed that he could produce healthy baby monkeys with it. Those experiments showed that fewer of the moms mitochondria made it into the donor egg than with pronuclear transfer. Typically, the carryover amounted to 1 percent or less.

But Mitalipov would like to do even better. This 1 percent is haunting us, he says.

Spindle transfer has another possible downside: Chromosomes may fall off the spindle. That could result in an embryo with too few chromosomes or too many if some are left in the egg from the donor. Both cases usually result in abnormal development. Of the five embryos on which Zhang performed spindle transfer, only one developed normally. That was the baby boy born last April.

Tests reportedly found that he has 1 percent of his moms mitochondrial DNA. At 3 months old, he appeared healthy. What his health will look like, long-term, however, is unknown. Besides the risk of even trace levels of mitochondria ballooning, another study suggests that the childs health, over time, might be affected by mismatches between the parents nuclear DNA (which is not from mitochondria) and the donors mitochondrial DNA.

Some researchers take issue with the moniker three-parent baby. Cohen, for one, says the term is wrong. Mitochondrial DNA does not contribute to a persons traits. So, he argues, the person who donates mitochondrial DNA is hardly a "parent."

Andrew R. La Barbera agrees. He is chief scientific officer of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. A persons essence as a human being comes from their nuclear genetic material, he says, not their mitochondrial genetic material." So children conceived using mitochondrial transfer have just two parents, he maintains.

But there are bigger controversies here than what makes a parent. Opponents of these techniques worry that none has been fully tested.

Darnovsky says, We wish the baby and family well, and hope the baby stays healthy. But until these techniques are shown to be safe, she says, I have a lot of concerns about this child and about future efforts to use these techniques.

Zhang also drew fire for going to Mexico to perform the procedure. In America, researchers are banned from doing things that could alter human DNA in a way that can be passed from generation to generation. Spindle and pronuclear transfer both do this. The worry is that genetic changes of future generations wont stop with preventing diseases. Policy makers wanted to outlaw efforts to make genetically enhanced designer babies.

However, a panel of experts said in February 2016 that it is ethical to make three-parent baby boys. But not girls. Why? Fathers almost never pass mitochondria on to their babies. So baby boys born through such techniques should never pass along the donors mitochondria.

A baby girl, though? That would be a very different story.

More:
How to make a 'three-parent' baby - Science News for Students (blog)

Molecular biology: Fingerprinting cell identities – Science Daily

Every cell has its own individual molecular fingerprint, which is informative for its functions and regulatory states. Researchers from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet (LMU) in Munich have now carried out a comprehensive comparison of methodologies that quantify RNAs of single cells.

The cell is the fundamental unit of all living organisms. Hence, in order to understand essential biological processes and the perturbations that give rise to disease, one must first dissect the functions of cells and the mechanisms that regulate them. Modern high-throughput protein and nucleic-acid sequencing techniques have become an indispensable component of this endeavor. In particular, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) permits one to determine the levels of RNA molecules -- the gene copies -- that are expressed in a given cell, and several versions of the methodology have been described in recent years. The spectrum of genes expressed in a given cell amounts to a molecular fingerprint, which yields a detailed picture of its current functional state. "For this reason, the technology has become an extraordinarily valuable tool, not only for basic research but also for the development of new approaches to treat diseases," says LMU biologist Wolfgang Enard. Enard and his team have now undertaken the first comprehensive comparative analysis of the various RNA sequencing techniques, with regard to their sensitivity, precision and cost efficiency. Their results appear in the leading journal Molecular Cell.

The purpose of scRNA-seq is to identify the relative amounts of the messenger RNA (mRNA) molecules present in the cells of interest. mRNAs are the blueprints that specify the structures of all the proteins made in the cell, and represent "transcribed" copies of the corresponding genetic information encoded in specific segments of the genomic DNA in the cell nucleus. In the cytoplasm surrounding the nucleus, the nucleotide sequences of mRNAs are "translated" into the amino-acid sequences of proteins by molecular machines called ribosomes. Thus a complete catalog of the mRNAs in a cell provides a comprehensive view of the proteins that it produces, and tells one what subset of the thousands of genes in the genome are active and how their activity is regulated. Furthermore, aberrant patterns of gene activity point to disturbances in gene expression and cell function, and reveal the presence of specific pathologies. The scRNA-seq procedure itself can be carried out using commercially available kits, but many researchers prefer to assemble the components required for their preferred formulations themselves.

In order to ascertain which of the methods currently in use is most effective and economical, Enard and his colleagues applied six different methods to mouse embryonal stem cells and compared the spectra of mRNAs detected by each of them. They then used this data to compute how much it costs for each method to reliably detect differently expressed genes between two cell types. "This comparison revealed that some of the commercial kits are ten times more expensive than the corresponding home-made versions," Enard says. However, the researchers point out that the choice of the optimal method largely depends on the conditions and demands of the individual experiment. "It does make a difference whether one wants to analyze the activity of hundreds of genes in thousands of individual cells, or thousands of genes in hundreds of cells," Enard says. "We were able to demonstrate which method is best for a given purpose, and we also obtained data that will be useful for the further development of the technology."

The new findings are of particular interest in the field of genomics. For example, scRNA-seq is a fundamental prerequisite for the success of the effort to assemble a Human Cell Atlas -- one of the most ambitious international projects in genomics since the initial sequencing of the human genome. It aims to provide no less than a complete inventory of all the cell types and subtypes in the human body at all stages of development from embryo to adult on the basis of their patterns of gene activity. It is estimated that the total number of cells in the human body is on the order of 3.5 1013. Scientists expect that such an atlas would revolutionize our knowledge of human biology and our understanding of disease processes.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt Mnchen. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

View post:
Molecular biology: Fingerprinting cell identities - Science Daily

Protein once thought exclusive to neurons helps some cancers grow, spread, defy death – Medical Xpress

February 21, 2017 Dr. Ping-Hung Chen, Dr. Sandra Schmid, Dr. Marcel Mettlen and other research team members determined that aggressive cancer cells adapt nerve cell mechanisms to maintain or squelch signals needed to survive and grow. Credit: UT Southwestern

How we think and fall in love are controlled by lightning-fast electrochemical signals across synapses, the dynamic spaces between nerve cells. Until now, nobody knew that cancer cells can repurpose tools of neuronal communication to fuel aggressive tumor growth and spread.

UTSouthwestern Medical Center researchers report those findings in two recent studies, one in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) and the second in Developmental Cell

"Many properties of aggressive cancer growth are driven by altered cell signaling," said Dr. Sandra Schmid, senior author of both papers and Chair of Cell Biology at UTSouthwestern. "We found that cancer cells are taking a page from the neuron's signaling playbook to maintain certain beneficial signals and to squelch signals that would harm the cancer cells."

The two studies find that dynamin1 (Dyn1) - a protein once thought to be present only in nerve cells of the brain and spinal cord - is also found in aggressive cancer cells. In nerve cells, or neurons, Dyn1 helps sustain neural transmission by causing rapid endocytosis - the uptake of signaling molecules and receptors into the cell - and their recycling back to the cell surface. These processes ensure that the neurons keep healthy supplies at the ready to refire in rapid succession and also help to amplify or suppress important nerve signals as necessary, Dr. Schmid explained.

"This role is what the cancer cells have figured out. Aggressive cancer cells have usurped the mechanisms that neurons use for the rapid uptake and recycling of neural transmitters. Instead of neural transmitters, the cancer cells use Dyn1 for rapid uptake and recycling of EGF (epidermal growth factor) receptors. Mutations in EGF receptors are drivers of breast and lung cancers," she said of the Developmental Cell study.

In order to thrive, cancer cells must multiply faster than nearby noncancerous cells. EGF receptors help them do that, she explained.

Cancer cell survival is another factor in disease progression. In the PNAS study, the Schmid lab found that aggressive cancer cells appear to have adapted neuronal mechanisms to thwart a key cancer-killing pathway triggered by activating "death receptors" (DRs) on cancer cells. Specifically, aggressive cancer cells appear to have adapted ways to selectively activate Dyn1 to suppress DR signaling that usually leads to cancer cell death.

"It is amazing that the aggressive cancers use a signaling pathway to increase the activity of EGF and also turn on Dyn1 pathways to suppress cancer death - so you have this vicious circle," said Dr. Schmid, who holds the Cecil H. Green Distinguished Chair in Cellular and Molecular Biology.

She stressed that less aggressive cancers respond to forms of chemotherapy that repress EGF signaling and/or die in response to the TRAIL-DR pathway. However, aggressive lung and breast cancer cells have adapted ways to commandeer the neuronal mechanisms identified in these studies.

The hope is that this research will someday lead to improved strategies to fight the most aggressive cancers, she said. Currently, her laboratory is conducting research to identify Dyn1 inhibitors as potential anticancer drugs using a 280,000-compound library in a shared facility at UTSouthwestern.

"Cancer is a disease of cell biology. To grow, spread, and survive, cancer cells modify normal cellular behavior to their advantage. They can't reinvent the underlying mechanisms, but can adapt them. In these studies, we find that some cancer cells repurpose tools that neurons use in order to get a competitive advantage over nearby normal cells," she said.

Explore further: Research suggests new possibility for treating aggressive ovarian cancer

A recent discovery by researchers from the Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (CSI Singapore) at the National University of Singapore (NUS) may lead to a new treatment strategy for an aggressive ovarian cancer subtype.

Cancer rewires the metabolism of tumor cells, converting them into lean, mean, replicating machines. But like Olympic athletes who rely on special diets to perform, tumor cells' amped-up metabolism can also make them dependent ...

The Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen) has discovered potential drug targets to reduce pain in pancreatic cancer patients.

In the Age of Personalized Medicine, we've learned that one size doesn't fit all, least of all in cancer. Cancer is a disease of your cells, and sorting out your cancer from all others is a daunting challenge but one that ...

The fight against cancer is a marathon, fought step by step, inch by inch. While breakthroughs may be rare, a new study from the Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry is giving greater insight into the growth of cancer cells and ...

A possible cancer treatment strategy might in fact lead to increased metastasis in some cases. This finding from a team of LACDR researchers led by Erik Danen made the cover of the February 11 edition of Science Signaling.

In order for cancer to spread, malignant cells must break away from a tumor and through the tough netting of extracellular matrix, or ECM, that surrounds it. To fit through the holes in this net, those cancerous cells must ...

How we think and fall in love are controlled by lightning-fast electrochemical signals across synapses, the dynamic spaces between nerve cells. Until now, nobody knew that cancer cells can repurpose tools of neuronal communication ...

Treating multiple myeloma (MM) with myxoma virus (MYXV) eliminated a majority of malignant cells in preclinical studies, report investigators at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) and elsewhere in an article ...

Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine have uncovered a novel genetic mechanism of thyroid cancer, as well as a marker that may predict response to a particular class of drugs, not just in patients ...

A Michigan State University breast cancer researcher has shown that effective treatment options can be predicted based on the way certain breast cancer genes act or express themselves.

Having high levels of a certain biomarker is linked to poor prognosis in African-American patients with triple-negative breast cancer, while the same biomarker doesn't influence disease outcomes in white patients, according ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Read more here:
Protein once thought exclusive to neurons helps some cancers grow, spread, defy death - Medical Xpress

Grey’s Anatomy Round Table: Is Bailey Cut Out For Being Chief? – TV Fanatic

OnGrey's Anatomy Season 13 Episode 13the friction between members of the hospital got infinitely worse, and sides were being taken amongst the attendings. The other attendings, Maggie in particular, made April's first day as interim Chief of Surgery, difficult.

Eliza begin the second phase of her teaching program, which allowed Ben and Stephanie to perform solo surgeries with no aid. Ben's surgery was successful but Stephanie's went badly.

Join TV Fanatics Tiffany, Amanda, and Jasmine as they discuss whether it was fair that the others ostracizedApril, whether a truce is on the horizon amongst the fractured group of friends, and much more.

Do you think it was fair that the other doctors ostracized April for taking Meredith's position?

Tiffany: I know it may seem childish but yes. I didn't buy April's argument that she was just doing her job. I think she saw an opportunity to have a higher position, even if it belonged to someone else, and took it.

I understand it, a lot of people who do it but don't pretend like you did it for some other, nobler reason. Especially considering how strongly she felt about Webber's cause right before that.

Amanda: I think it was really unfair for the doctors to turn their backs. Was April really supposed to say no? The patients would suffer. Someone needs to help out and take charge without Meredith there.

I also find it really annoying that Meredith seems to do no wrong in the eyes of her friends, but April is constantly criticized or made fun of. The girl went into a war zone and helped people. That's a lot more than a lot of these other doctors have done. Give the woman some credit. She's a great doctor.

Jasmine: I'll fall somewhere in the middle with this. It was childish, but I completely understand it and I probably would have been the same way. It didn't spill over into them not being able to do their jobs.

I don't think April was being opportunistic. I do think that April is a chronic do-gooder, obsessively so, and that has been an issue for her ever since Derek brought her back after her mistake.

I feel like in April's mind she had to take it. She knew what it was like to lose her job before, and she didn't want a repeat of that again. She was offered the position after Meredith was suspended, so I get feeling like she had no choice.

Plus, if she didn't take it, and no one else would touch it, then somebody knew would potentially be brought in, and that is the root of the problem as it is. I don't like April's choice, and I would have shut her out too, but I get why she did it. And I agree with Amanda about Meredith. It's irritated me for all thirteen seasons.

Watch Grey's Anatomy Season 13 Episode 13 Online

Did finding out that Eliza never lost a child before this one make you sympathize with her more? Or does it make you question her methods even further?

Tiffany: Nope, still hate her. It was definitely her fault they lost the little boy. Stephanie is a great resident and I initially thought she'd be fine but why in the world would you risk a kid's life on a first-time solo surgery?

I think they got a little too caught up in their excitement and it became more about the surgery than the patient. This seems to happen a lot with Minnick. She's so focused on her methods and the residents that she doesn't consider anyone or anything else.

Amanda: I don't feel one way or the other about Eliza, but it does seem unrealistic that she would make it this far in her career without seeing a child die. If her reaction was any indication, she's a lot more fragile than she's been letting on.

Jasmine: Words cannot describe how little I care about Eliza. I'm just done with her. I find her character incredibly irritating for so many reasons. One of which, what Tiffany mentioned above. I can't deal with this woman's total disregard for patients.

She makes Yang look like Mother Theresa. I find her attitude and approach abhorrent, and the fact that she never lost a kid before, and has limited experience in things outside of her field, tells me she's not a good fit here.

Quotables from Week Ending February 17, 2017

Start Gallery

Is Bailey cut out for being Chief or do you think it would be better if someone else took over?

Tiffany: I think Bailey will ultimately be a great chief, but right now she's not acting like Bailey, she's impersonating Catherine and Catherine would not make a good chief. She's pushy, arrogant, stubborn, and thinks she knows what's best for everyone.

It was her whispering in Bailey's ear that caused all these problems to begin with. Bailey could have upgraded the teaching program and brought in Minnick without blindsiding Webber and pushing him out altogether. Now it's gone so far I think she's just too proud to stop it. At this point, I only see things getting worse.

Amanda: I think Bailey is a wonderful Chief. She has made some missteps along the way, but she's ultimately trying to do what she thinks is best for the hospital. Sometimes being the boss means you won't be popular with your employees when you make difficult decisions.

Jasmine: I think Bailey worked her whole life to get to this point. Hell, Richard trained and mentored her to get to this point. She's his legacy. I think she's great when she handles things on her own.

But the Bailey of late, she's not walking her own path and she's being too easily influenced by too many outside forces. I love Bailey. She's a force of nature, but I'm not seeing much of that Bailey right now.

13 Fabulous Looks & Lines of Diane Lockhart

Start Gallery

Do you think we're closer to a truce being called between the doctors involved in this Bailey and Eliza versus Richard and Meredith debacle?

Tiffany: I don't think so. If anything it looks like sides are forming -- Bailey, Minnick, Catherine and April against everyone else.

Amanda: I don't see an end in sight right now. Everyone is still fuming and both sides are drawing firmer lines in the sand.

Jasmine: Initially, I was thinking we may have been closer to a truce, what with Eliza breaking down and Bailey and Webber getting to share some of their feelings with each other, but now I'm thinking it's going to be a while.

It looks like more lines are being drawn in the sand, and with Alex coming back...who knows what's going to happen next? They may be more divided than ever.

Sneak Peek of Underground's Season 2 Posters!

Start Gallery

Are there other storylines or plots that you miss? Or are you enjoying the Webber and Minnick one?

Tiffany: I'm not necessarily enjoying the Webber/Minnick storyline but I'm definitely invested (#TeamWebber). I'm ready for Alex to come back to the hospital and wondering when we'll finally see Owen's mysterious sister.

Amanda: I want to get to Alex's transition back to working at the hospital. I have hated this Webber/Minnick storyline from day one. Everyone is acting like a child and it needs to stop!

Jasmine: I, too, am invested enough in this arc to not be too bothered by it. I like the fact that it does involve multiple characters. I just want some resolution on a few things, like the Omelia situation.

I also feel like they teased this potential story arc about Owen's sister, and we haven't seen anything else. And there are a few characters that are so underused or misused right now. It wouldn't kill them to show some other things too.

19 Steamy Grey's Moments That Will Put You In The Mood

Start Gallery

What was your favorite and/or least favorite part of the episode?

Tiffany: I think my least favorite part was seeing April and Catherine celebrate over dinner. One of the best doctors is suspended, there is nothing but conflict within the hospital staff, and they just lost a child but yeah, celebrate.

I'm all about strong females but the two of them, along with Bailey and Minnick, have created an unhappy, cantankerous, atmosphere and the way they're forcing their new found power down everyone's throats bothers me.

Amanda: I liked seeing April stand up for herself against Jackson. She was right when she said no one takes her seriously. Someone needed to help out, and she had every right to step in and work with the patients.

Jasmine: My least favorite part was almost the entire situation with the kid. Stephanie reminds me of Yang sometimes, which I like, but I seriously disliked the way she got dragged into Eliza's cavalier attitude towards patients.

I can't quite put my finger on what makes it so different than what the original characters (especially Christina) used to do or say, but it is. Somehow it's...too far and unbecoming.

My favorite scene was Webber comforting Stephanie. Fantastic scene.

9 Times Michael Cordero Stole Our Hearts

Start Gallery

Who was the MVP?

Tiffany: Webber. He was resistant at first but when he joined Warren in the OR it really seemed like he was ready to assist him. Then after Bailey butted in, and screamed at him, he still stepped up for Stephanie when Minnick flaked on her.

Amanda: Arizona was great at playing both sides of the feud at the hospital. She's obviously on Webber's side, but she was still able to lend an ear to Minnick and give her some advice.

Jasmine: Ben. He kicked ass on his first solo surgery and it made me so proud. He also called Bailey and Webber out on behaving like children and ruining his moment, and I loved that. Go Ben!

Do you agree with our Round Table? Hit the comments below!

You can watch Grey's Anatomy online right here via TV Fanatic!

Grey's Anatomy Photo Preview of "Back Where You Belong"

Start Gallery

Jasmine Blu is a staff writer for TV Fanatic. Follow her on Twitter.

See more here:
Grey's Anatomy Round Table: Is Bailey Cut Out For Being Chief? - TV Fanatic

9 ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Actors Who Were Close to Being Series Regulars – Wetpaint

}8o;brcQ=;V{QHH[dfqk9MIpL--Weu;)Xg"l)1rACo,8h]HDv8Zh=.A#11VzM;0"b|~IQf#(*/9Hi25pAGxDD/8h<3$vhoQJr(FEW-:J$RY|(RsI8smaK3=q`6Y*ELopih NY,"OIsl-}m|~~:I i>M@;_vv,D a(K33"Ys[ (?N4a*KU_b+60J'G~1tSW>j[~F5$rW@C]0tv&sT&,nA#QB9mW`T9G@[TXbx&b~{H I/002*l($`qlB^"B=N)DU@yb>t1YAND(V-68_fPOipUICU1Qhp4,'(HpTJtBs}l@Kqy6^M*Y;s3~&Sl'.;_W7kj !n&{NJh%zm1 S:>[;w8gOORKHa/b/yyvr>RCcybw~w;u^I#/lcY=)_>FK%a;`PJ-7]wm%>kZRp o$gk1B. "QbP=zdc-c)i/G#ve&Qad @"09OaKT;OKK+UR8-3Bw/)na};mUcMNwg1P|E1exe;B)X:sbWHFRr;|p971myw'<]saY]vjlYvvwf^c(KDk_q'=+{KZ^8w`U.{ SCS_QbhD4}B@ES^nF#$kON[d+S5^yANZ6gW#wXJh~S ddReun

Visit link:
9 'Grey's Anatomy' Actors Who Were Close to Being Series Regulars - Wetpaint