New light shed on genetics and social mobility – Times LIVE

New light shed on genetics and social mobility

KATHARINE CHILD | 2017-03-02 07:06:54.0

DNA molecule. File photo.

Scientists are learning the first few years of a child's life can be a good predictor of whether they will have a successful life or be condemned to poverty.

Now an international study conducted in South Africa shows that genetics can determine whether an underprivileged baby will respond to interventions to help them.

The study was published in the journal PLOS this week.

Peter Singer, CEO of Grand Challenges Canada, said: "This is a startling finding that changes the way I think about child development. Why is that important? Because child development is the ladder of social mobility to climb out the hole of inequity for millions of children all over this inequitable world."

The first study was conducted by Stellenbosch Professor Mark Tomlinson between 1999 and 2003 in which caregivers taught about 220 Khayelitsha mothers to communicate and engage with their babies to help them form good bonds, a process dubbed "attachment".

Attachment is a psychological measure of a child's bond with its mother and can predict future wellbeing.

Another 220 mothers received no training. Their children were assessed at 18 months and compared with babies whose mothers received training.

The trial was described as only "moderately" successful, registering a small improvement.

But researchers recently found 220 of the original children and analysed if they had a short or long form of SLC6A4 - the serotonin transporter gene, which is involved in nerve signalling, and which has been linked to anxiety and depression.

Children with the short form of the gene, and whose pregnant mothers were mentored, were almost four times more likely to be securely attached to their mothers at 18 months old than children carrying the short form whose mothers did not receive help.

Meanwhile, children with the long form of the serotonin transporter gene did equally well regardless of the mentoring.

Tomlinson told The Times they didn't want to genetically screen children as it would be "morally wrong".

"This raises more questions than answers," he said.

Link:
New light shed on genetics and social mobility - Times LIVE

3 Big Stock Charts for Thursday: Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN), Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT) and Nucor Corporation (NUE) – Investorplace.com

For weeks, the market and certain sectors have been operating under uncertainty as doubts over the direction of President Trumps administration were growing. After Tuesday nights speech, investors are beginning to get some clarity, allowing a number of companies that have been locked in a range to begin showing signs that they are ready to move higher.

Todays three big stock charts look at Myriad Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ:MYGN), Wal-Mart Stores Inc (NYSE:WMT) and Nucor Corporation (NYSE:NUE). These three companies have experienced recent technical trends that suggest they areready to shift back into rally mode.

Myriad, along with a large portion of the health care and biotechnology sectors, has been held back by uncertainty around the repeal and replacement of Obamacare. With this option becoming less likely, these stocks are starting to rally again.

MYGN shares recently broke above their 50- and 100-day moving averages as volume on the stock saw an increase. This suggests that the technical traders are now getting behind the shift in trends.

While breaking above the 50-day, this trendline has started to transition into a rising pattern for Myriad. Our stock modeling programs show that MYGNand other stocks are twice as likely to continue their trend when the 50-day is moving higher.

Myriad shares are coming off an overbought reading after the recent positive earnings results. This suggests that we may see a short-term decline in MYGNshares theres a catch here though.

From a long-term perspective, the market technicals view Myriad Genetics as an oversold, undervalued stock. This means that MYGNshares could more easily remain in short-term overbought territory as the crowd is only beginning to migrate into the stock.

Watch for a pause at $20, but from there the shares should find plenty of technical strength to rally higher.

The retail sector has taken a beating as of late, as the fourth-quarter earnings results have been underwhelming to say the least. One standout, at least from a technical perspective, is Walmart. The SPDR S&P Retail (ETF) (NYSEARCA:XRT) is trading 2.5% lower over the last 12 months compared to the 6% return for WMTshares.

Now, the technical picture for Walmart shares isimproving from an intermediate-term perspective.

Last week, WMT shares broke above the 200-day moving average on a positive earnings report. This move also broke Walmart stock into a technically overbought reading that we expected to see force a pullback, which is exactly what happened.

Now, WMT shares are consolidating around the 200-day trendline, just above $70. The support from this trendline suggests that the stock is now gaining technical strength. Supporting that theory is the fact that Walmarts 50-day trendline is now moving higher. This bullish transition improved the technical outlook for the largest retailer.

Weve seen overhead resistance at $75 for WMT shares since June 2016; however, the growing momentum looks to overtake this hurdle over the next few weeks.

Next Page

Here is the original post:
3 Big Stock Charts for Thursday: Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN), Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT) and Nucor Corporation (NUE) - Investorplace.com

Studying genetics of potatoes – Nevada Appeal

When most people think of potatoes, the word research does not usually follow. But with their Mr. Potato head mascot watching over the lab, the University of Nevada Reno's plant biology tag team, Dylan Kosma and Patricia Santos, are searching for ways to reduce potato crop losses during storage.

The University's Kosma-Santos lab, in the College of Agriculture, Biotechnology and Natural Resources, was recently awarded a $1.37 grant by the National Science Foundation to investigate the molecular-genetics and biochemistry that underlies potato crop losses during tuber storage. As the number one vegetable crop in the United States and a top five crop for the state of Nevada, potato crop losses can be economically devastating to farmers and the potato industry as a whole. A large proportion of these crop losses are due to factors such as rapid water loss and disease while in storage.

In 2013, approximately 33 percent of the U.S. crop was lost, which equated to $1.2 billion in lost profits for farmers. Kosma, assistant biochemistry professor, and Santos, assistant research professor, are focusing their research on reducing this number.

"Even a 5 percent reduction in potato losses during storage would improve the economic return for the producers and the potato industry by $170 million," Kosma said.

The research delves into comprehending how different potato varieties can have different storage lives. They are using one variety that stores very well and another that stores very poorly to understand the molecular basis of this differential storage capacity. From a basic science perspective, no one has yet figured this out.

Specifically, Kosma is interested in the corky lipid polymer that comprises a large proportion of the skin. This polymer is referred to as "suberin." Suberin can be found in nearly every plant, and although it is widespread, there is still little known about its makeup and function.

Kosma and Santos want people to know that potatoes do not just go straight from the field to the store. Potatoes are grown and harvested in the fall and kept in cold storage until sold and distributed. The problem occurs when potatoes are not stored properly, which then impacts profits.

When potatoes are harvested in the field, they tend to get damaged and form "scabs" or wound periderm that prevent the sugars and water from coming out and also keeps bacteria and fungi from getting in. This wound-healing tissue is made up of suberin. These are the rough raises we tend to see on potatoes from the supermarket. It is important for potatoes to form this wound-repairing tissue to prolong storage life.

The idea of this research is to ultimately improve how potatoes heal with this wound suberin deposition and how to, in turn, improve their lasting storability.

A native of Illinois, Kosma showed an interest in plant biology from a young age. Although he jokes that he was not tremendously influenced by potatoes growing up, he always enjoyed going outside to forage wild foods and plants for both fun and to satisfy his general curiosity about the natural world. He received both his bachelors and master's degrees in plant biology from Southern Illinois University, and furthered his education at Purdue University, where he received his doctorate degree. His post-doctorate work led him to Michigan State University where he met Santos, his wife and research partner. Santos, an assistant research professor, has an emphasis in plant pathology with specific interests in plant-microbe interactions.

Both are interested in plant stress tolerance in relation to the environment, and found that Nevada well suited those research interests. They have been a part of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at the University of Nevada, Reno for two years, having moved here in January 2015.

The two are extremely passionate about their work, and this project is something that had been stewing in Kosma's thoughts well before their move to Nevada.

"In Michigan, two years prior to moving here Dylan was already talking about writing a project about potatoes and how cool it would be," Santos said.

Since then, their research team has grown to include: Professor Karen Sclauch, who specializes in bioinformatics at the University; Professor Dave Douches, a potato breeder out of Michigan State University; and Professor Ray Hammerschmidt, a plant pathologist also from Michigan State. They have one graduate student and numerous undergraduates working with them in their lab.

The $1.37 million National Science Foundation grant will keep this research going for the next four years.

Visit link:
Studying genetics of potatoes - Nevada Appeal

Biologists confirm genetics of first ShareLunker offspring – Paris News

In March 2006, angler Edward Reid pulled a staggering 14.48 pound largemouth bass from the depths of Lake Conroe near Houston. On Feb. 10, nearly 11 years later and more than 234 miles away, angler Ryder Wicker caught the 13.07-pound offspring of that fish from Marine Creek Lake near Fort Worth.

The Lake Conroe fish, later called ShareLunker 410, was able to leave a legacy of her big-bass genetics to the state thanks to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Departments Toyota ShareLunker Program, which has been selectively breeding and stocking angler-caught largemouth bass over 13 pounds since 1986 with the goal of increasing the production of trophy-sized fish in Texas reservoirs.

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qmp7E6C #6:5 5@?2E65 $92C6{F?<6C c`_ E@ E96 AC@8C2> 😕 a__e[ %!(s x?=2?5 u:D96C:6D 3:@=@8:DED E@@< 96C E@ E96 =F?<6C3F?<6C 2E E96 %6I2D uC6D9H2E6C u:D96C:6D r6?E6C :? pE96?D E@ A2:C FA H:E9 2 >2=6 $92C6{F?<6C @77DAC:?8] %92E A2:C:?8 @7 AFC6 u=@C:52 =2C86>@FE9 32DD AC@5F465 E9@FD2?5D @7 7:?86C=:?8D E92E H6C6 DE@4<65 :? |2C:?6 rC66< {2<6 2?5 @E96C AF3=:4 %6I2D C6D6CG@:CD 2 76H >@?E9D =2E6C[ @?6 @7 H9:49 8C6H :?E@ E96 `b]_f A@F?56C #J56C 42F89E =2DE H66

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qm%96 86?6E:4 =:?< H2D 4@?7:C>65 u63] `f[ ;FDE 52JD 27E6C %uur DE277 EC2?DA@CE65 2 7:? 4=:A E@ E96 p]t] (@@5 w2E496CJ 😕 $2? |2C4@D] %96 E6DED 4@?7:C>65 H92E 3:@=@8:DED 2=C625J DFDA64E65 32D65 @? E96 C6DF=ED @7 D42??:?8 2 E28 ?62C E96 7:D9D 9625 E9:D H2D 2 52F89E6C AC@5F465 3J $92C6{F?<6C c`_ 2?5 2 >2=6 7:D9 H:E9 2 >@C6 6D@E6C:4 ?2>6[k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQm_{q_d_c]k^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qm$92C6{F?<6C dee :D E96 7:CDE `b A@F?5 @C =2C86C u=@C:52 =2C86>@FE9 32DD DF3>:EE65 E@ E96 %@J@E2 $92C6{F?<6C AC@8C2> D@ 72C E9:D D62D@?[ 3FE 2?8=6CD 92G6 F?E:= |2C49 b` E@ DF3>:E E96:C 42E49 7@C %!(s E@ 4@==64E 2D 3C@@5 DE@4< 7@C DA2H?:?8] p?8=6CD 42? 6?E6C `b A@F?5 @C 962G:6C 32DD :?E@ E96 AC@8C2> 7@C 46CE:7:65 H6:89E[ s}p D2>A=6 2?5 :>>65:2E6 C6=62D6 E9C@F89 pAC:= b_] {2<6 r@?C@6[ E96 7:D96CJ E92E AC@5F465 $92C6{F?<6C c`_ 2?5 `e @E96C $92C6{F?<6CD[ :D 9@DE:?8 E96 q2DD>2DE6C r=2DD:4 E@FC?2>6?E |2C49 acae[ H9:49 4@F=5 J:6=5 2?@E96C 255:E:@? E@ E96 AC@8C2>]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qm%96 %@J@E2 $92C6{F?<6C !C@8C2> 😀 >256 A@DD:3=6 3J 2 8C2?E E@ E96 %6I2D !2CAj (:=5=:76 u@F?52E:@? 7C@> vF=7 $E2E6D %@J@E2] %@J@E2 😀 2 =@?8E:>6 DFAA@CE6C @7 E96 u@F?52E:@? 2?5 %6I2D !2C6?E[ AC@G:5:?8 >2;@C 7F?5:?8 7@C 2 H:56 G2C:6EJ @7 65F42E:@?[ 7:D9[ A2C

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmAC@;64ED]k^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qmu@C FA52E6D @? E96 $92C6{F?<6C AC@8C2> 2?5 E@ G:6H A9@E@D @7 $92C6{F?<6C dee[ G:D:E k2 9C67lQ9EEAi^^72463@@<]4@>^$92C6{F?<6CAC@8C2>^Qm72463@@<]4@>^$92C6{F?<6CAC@8C2>^k^2m]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAbQmk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAcQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`QmkDEC@?8mu:D9:?8 #6A@CEDk^DEC@?8mk^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`QmkDEC@?8m!2E |2JD6ik^DEC@?8m w:89 H:?5D 92G6 <6AE 2 =@E @7 7:D96C>6? @77 E96 =2<6D] %96 7@C642DE 7@C E9:D H66< :D 42==:?8 7@C 4@@= ?:89ED[ 3FE H2C>:?8 FA :?E@ E96 e_D >:552J 2?5 27E6C?@@?] (2E6C E6>AD @? @FC =2<6D 2C6 9:896C E92? FDF2= 7@C E9:D E:>6 @7 J62C ?:89ED 2C6 :?E@ E96 9:89 b_D E@ =@H6C c_D 2?5 E96 H2E6C E6>AD 2C6 C6>2:?:?8 E96 D2>6 2D =2DE H66<] (:E9 E96D6 H2C>6C H2E6C E6>AD[ E96 4J4=6 @7 E96 7:D9 😀 29625 @7 D4965F=6 2?5 😕 E96 D>2==6C =2<6D[ 7:D9 2C6 2=C625J AC6A2C:?8 365D] %9:D :D 2=D@ 8@:?8 @? :? E96 =2C86C =2<6D E92E 92G6 AC@E64E65 4@G6D ;FDE =@@< 7@C 4@G6D CF??:?8 >@C6 62DE E@ H6DE 2?5 2=D@ E96 324< @7 ?@CE96C? 4@G6D E92E 92G6 ?64@C6 AC@E64E65 7C@> E96 9:89 H:?5D 2?5 H:== 86E >@C6 5:C64E DF? H96? H6 92G6 :E] p 8@@5 D:8? 😀 :7 J@F 42? =@42E6 7C6D9 8C66? 8C2DD @C >2J36 D@>6 8C66?6C 42EE2:=D @C 6G6? D@>6 3FEE@?D:K6 A25D] %96D6 2C62D H:== 92G6 32:E7:D9 2?5 7:D9]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qmx 2E:@?[ 3FE :E 9@=5D ECF6 7@C 2== 2C62 =2<6D] r964< J@FC >2AD @? H92E6G6C =2<6 J@F 49@@D6 E@ 7:D9 2?5 D66 :7 E96C6 :D 2 C2>A 😕 DF49 2 4@G6] x7 D@[ :E H:== 36 2 =@E 62D:6C @? J@F 3642FD6 J@F H@?E 92G6 E@ 3F4< H2G6D @C E2<6 2 362E:?8 7C@> C@F89 H2E6C]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qm!C@5F4E:G6 32:ED 7@C E96D6 2C62D ?@H 2C6 C286 3=256D[ 492EE6C32:ED[ DA:??6C32:ED[ ;:8D[ DE:4<32:ED[ ;6C<32:ED 2?5 DBF2C63:== 4C2?6 2=H2JD 92G6 @?6 @7 E96D6 E:65 @?] pD H2E6C E6>AD C:D6 :?E@ E96 9:89 e_D[ E96 D2>6 32:ED H:== AC@5F46[ 3FE D@7E A=2DE:4D H:== 36 AC@5F4E:G6 2D H6== 2D E@AH2E6CD] pD E96 E6>AD C:D6 :?E@ E96 e_D[ >@DE =:<6=J H6 H:== DE:== 92G6 2C62D H:E9 D@>6 DE2:?[ 2?5 E9:D 😀 H96C6 2 E@AH2E6C DF49 2D 2 3FKK32:E 4@>6D :?E@ A=2J]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qmu:D9 @? 365D 42?E DE2?5 E92E ?@:DJ 32:E 4@>:?8 @G6C E96:C 9625D] $@>6E:>6D E96J H:== 62E :E 2?5 D@>6E:>6D E96J ;FDE

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`QmkDEC@?8mq@3 $2?5=:?ik^DEC@?8m (2E6C =:89E=J DE2:?65j dgea 568C66Dj _]b_ 766E 9:89] q=24< 32DD 2C6 72:C @? 3=2565 ;:8D[ =:A=6DD 4C2?<32:ED[ 2?5 DA:??6C32:ED] rC2AA:6 2C6 72:C @? >:??@HD 2?5 ;:8D] (9:E6 32DD 2C6 72:C @? D=23D] r2E7:D9 2C6 D=@H @? EC@E=:?6D]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`QmkDEC@?8mq@?92>ik^DEC@?8m (2E6C DE2:?65j dee_ 568C66Dj a]fc 766E =@H] q=24< 32DD 2C6 D=@H @? #2E { %C2AD[ ;6C<32:ED[ ;:8D 2?5 3=2565 ;:8D] rC2AA:6 2C6 D=@H @? >:??@HD 2?5 ;:8D 2=@?8 4C66< 492??6=D] r2E7:D9 2C6 8@@5 5C:7E:?8 4FE 32:E]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`QmkDEC@?8mr255@ik^DEC@?8m (2E6C DE2:?65j dge` 568C66Dj `]_` 766E 9:89] q=24< 32DD 2C6 8@@5 @? %6I2D C:8865 4C2HD[ =:A=6DD 4C2?<32:ED 2?5 3=2565 ;:8D] rC2AA:6 2C6 72:C @? >:??@HD] r2E7:D9 2C6 72:C @? EC@E=:?6D 2?5 4FE D925]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`QmkDEC@?8mu@C:??@HD 2?5 ;:8D] r2E7:D9 2C6 72:C @?k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmEC@E=:?6D]k^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`QmkDEC@?8m|@?E:46==@ik^DEC@?8m (2E6C DE2:?65j fcg_ 568C66Dj _]ea 766E 9:89] q=24< 32DD 2C6 8@@5 @? DA:??6C32:ED[ H2<6 32:ED 2?5 %6I2D C:8865 4C62EFC6 32:ED] rC2AA:6 2C6 8@@5 @? >:??@HD] r2E7:D9 2C6 8@@5 @? EC@E=:?6D 2?5 4FE D925]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`QmkDEC@?8m%6I@>2ik^DEC@?8m (2E6C DE2:?65j dddh 568C66Dj `]cb 766E =@H] q=24< 32DD 2C6 8@@5 @? D92D[ D92==@H 4C2?<32:ED 2?5 H6:89E=6DD u=F<6D] rC2AA:6 2C6 8@@5 @? >:??@HD] $EC:A65 32DD 2C6 8@@5 @? D=23D] r2E7:D9 2C6 72:C @? EC@E=:?6D]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qmu:D9 D>2CE[ 36 D276k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qm2?5 x== D66 J@F @? E96 =2<6]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAcQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qmk^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qmk6>my:> q=2DD:?82>6 😀 2 !2C:D C6D:56?E 2?5 2? 2G:5 2?8=6C]k^6>mk^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAbQmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qmk^DA2?mk^Am

Read this article:
Biologists confirm genetics of first ShareLunker offspring - Paris News

Pro-Life Pondered: Abortion is not a reproductive right – The Post

One of the famous phrases that Planned Parenthood uses is reproductive rights. A lot of the time, one of the reproductive rights theyre referring to is abortion. As a lover of science and embryology, if I dont first laugh at this, I certainly get disappointed and frustrated.

What is a reproductive right? Presumably, by the name, a reproductive right is the right to reproduce. And what is reproduction? According to biology, reproduction is the production of offspring by organized bodies. Therefore, a reproductive right is the right to produce offspring. Someone wanting to limit reproductive rights would be one wanting to limit, ban or control how much one reproduces. An example of this would be the one-child policy that China had. This policy regulated how often one could reproduce. By this, the Chinese government was taking away a womans right to reproduce her reproductive rights.

However, abortion is not a reproductive right. Why? Because by the time an abortion happens, reproduction has already taken place. I am not trying to limit how many children a mother has. As a matter of fact, I encourage everyone to bring as many wonderful children into the world as a husband and wife can. I would never support any legislation forcing mothers to have children. The fact that I believe that a mother should not be able to kill her child does not control how many times she can reproduce; it just means that she should not be able to kill the children which she has already reproduced.

Im not saying this because Im against abortion; Im saying this because I find it important to be literate of modern science. Even if youre pro-choice, you shouldnt use unscientific terms in order to further your cause. Anyone, no matter what his or her stance is, should embrace science and what it teaches. To say that abortion has anything to do with reproduction is scientifically inaccurate. Furthermore, if you use the term reproductive right whenever talking about abortion to somebody who is well-versed in embryology, you will look very ignorant and lose your credibility, as science has no place for emotion.

These conversations are important ones to have; make sure if you have them, youre providing facts, not spewing out emotional rhetoric in a science-based conversation.

Jacob is a sophomore studying pre-law at Ohio University. Please note that the views and opinions of the columnists do not reflect those of The Post. Do you think of scientific discussion? Let Jacob know by tweeting him @JacobHoback.

Continued here:
Pro-Life Pondered: Abortion is not a reproductive right - The Post

Critical thinkers don’t ignore scientific facts – Lethbridge Herald

By Letter to the Editor on March 2, 2017.

Tony Ouwerkerks passing reference to Darwin being wrong on several theories (Feb. 23) is typical of the cherry-picked facts constantly promulgated by Creationists. He asserts that a one-thousandth accuracy quoted in a National Geographic article is shaky evidence.

The November 2004 article included a subsequent statement conveniently omitted from Ouwerkerks assertion. That statement, far from confirming shaky evidence, pointed out that dozens of intermediate forms have subsequently been found. (It was referring to a 40-million-year-old whale fossil and so-called missing links.)

The entire article begins with the question Was Darwin wrong? Using biogeography, embryology, morphology and paleontology, the author correctly answers the question with a resounding No. He further explains his answer using more recent discoveries: Similarities between genetic makeup of species comparing the human genome with that of a mouse, bacterial drug resistance, viral mutations, extinctions and anatomical similarities between species. These latter examples being largely unknown to science in the 19th century.

In Darwins day, chromosomes had yet to be discovered and somewhat earlier, Galileo had been branded a heretic for challenging Catholic earth-centric dogma. Scientific discoveries continue across our world and beyond. Such findings may or may not confirm a particular hypothesis. Science has never relied upon blind faith to stubbornly cling to an outdated line of thinking.

In fact, it was not just Darwin who introduced the then radical idea of Evolution. A.R. Wallace, a contemporary of Darwins, introduced a similar concept. Today, that theory is backed by observation and experiment. It is not just a theory.

That the letter writer insists he is a critical thinker is interesting. Such a thinker must include all the facts and not simply use those that seemingly agree with a point of view or indeed, ignore those that would be critical of an observation. Ouwerkerk fails this test.

The very fact that his letter was defending publicly funded Christian schools and resorted to critiquing a valid component of science (Darwinism, call it what you will), is reason enough to question exactly what sort of scientific education children attending such schools, are receiving.

No doubt that as I write this, there are many of Ouwerkerks persuasion, who think the newly discovered Earth-like planets orbiting a distant star are simply an aberration. After all, the Earth is flat, our sun orbits the Earth and dinosaurs walked with our ancestors.

Science 101, right?

John P. Nightingale

Lethbridge

You must be logged in to post a comment.

See the article here:
Critical thinkers don't ignore scientific facts - Lethbridge Herald

Unexplained abnormalities in stem cells prompt Columbia researchers to pull diabetes paper – Retraction Watch (blog)

Researchers at Columbia University have retracted a 2013 paper in The Journal of Clinical Investigation, after uncovering abnormalities in the stem cell lines that undermined the conclusions in the paper.

Last year, corresponding author Dieter Eglidiscoveredhe could notreproduce key data in the 2013 paper because almost all the cell lines first author Haiqing Hua used contained abnormalities, casting doubt on the overall findings. When Egli reached out to Hua foranswers, Hua could not explain the abnormalities. As a result, Hua and Egli agreed the paper should be retracted.

Since some of the details of how the paper ended up relying on abnormal cells remain unclear, the university confirmed to us that it is investigating the matter.

Heres the retraction notice for iPSC-derived cells model diabetes due to glucokinase deficiency, cited 42 times:

The corresponding authors were made aware of karyotype abnormalities through a routine quality control test of pluripotent stem cells used in the studies reported in this paper. After extensive internal review and genetic analysis, they found that the karyotypes of some of the cells used for the experiments reported were abnormal and that the normal karyotypes shown in Figure 1 and Supplemental Figure 2 were not from cell lines used in the study. They also cannot confirm the endonuclease-mediated correction of the mutant GCK G299R allele. H. Hua takes responsibility for the characterization and presentation of cell line karyotypes and the genetic manipulations. Because of these discrepancies, the authors wish to retract the article. They apologize for these errors and for any inconvenience caused to others.

In the fall of 2009, Hua joined Rudolph Leibels diabetes and nutrition lab at Columbia University, under the co-supervision ofEgli, who brought an expertise in stem cell biology. Hua told us:

The aim of my research project was to leverage the expertise of both Dr. Egli (on stem cell biology) and Dr. Leibel (on diabetes) and to demonstrate the concept that the islet cells generated in the lab from diabetic patients through stem cell technology would present comparable dysfunction as the islet cells in the patients body. Because we chose patients with genetic mutations that cause diabetes, we were hoping to demonstrate that correction of the mutations would restore the normal function of the islet cells.

But, Hua noted, he wasnt and still isnt an expert in stem cell biology, so he had to learn on the job:

When I began the project, I never worked with cells before and had no experience or understanding of cell line karyotype.

Hua started by generating several cell lines from a diabetic patient. To check that the genetic makeup of these cell lines were the same, he sent several for analysis to a contracted service, which examines 20 cells per cell line and generates a report:

I did karyotype analysis for the cell lines right after I derived them, probably in 2011, before I started to do any experiments on them. The reports came back with some cells being normal and some being abnormal. To be fair, I thought what I learned from Dr. Egli was that it is a normal phenomenon that some cells are abnormal as long as the number is not high.

Indeed, Egli, an assistant professor of stem cell biology at Columbia University Medical Center, confirmed that pluripotent stem cells are often prone to undergo abnormalities:

Karyotypic abnormalities are common, and occur in many cells upon extended cultures, so this is not in and of itself a concern. Often one can go back to earlier cultures that are normal.

Hua published the work in 2013, along with a relatedpaper in Diabetes in 2014, -Cell Dysfunction Due to Increased ER Stress in a Stem Cell Model of Wolfram Syndrome. Hua believes, at a conceptual level, both papers achieved the goal of demonstrating that the correction of the mutations would restore the normal function of the islet cells.

In 2014, Hua told usthat he moved back to China for family reasons.

Last year, other investigators asked Egli to share the cells lines from the 2013 study. To ensure he was providing high quality material, Egli sent what he believed to be normal cell lines from the study for quality control testing. Egli said thats when he learned many of the cell lines contained abnormalities.

To suss out the problem, Egli went back to the cell lines stored in the lab to look for normal cells:

Dr. Hua had already left the University at that time and so I personally started to look for karyotypically normal cells. There were no normal cells to be found.

Egli explained what the abnormalities meant for the study results:

You could best describe the abnormalities of the [cell] lines [Hua] used as mumbo-jumbo. There were multiple rearrangements in the chromosomes in the cell lines and thus you wouldnt know if the effects you saw were due to gene modifications or simply due to those rearrangements. Essentially, the abnormal cell lines question the entire paper, and its very unlikely the paper would have been accepted at the journal.

When Egli failed to reproduce the data from the 2013 paper, he contacted Hua to find out where the normal cell lines were. But Hua was not sure in fact, he told us it was a surprise to learn that most of the cell lines he had used contained abnormalities, adding:

another layer of complication is that when cells became karyotype abnormal, they could behave like cancer cells, namely they could start as minor portion in the culture but later on took over and became majority. So another mistake we made was that we didnt perform karyotype analysis at the end of the study to make sure that after all the experiments we did, the cells were still normal.

A spokesperson at Columbia University verified that the university is conducting an investigation into the issues:

I could confirm that there is an ongoing investigation.

When Hua was informed of these issues, he suggested the study be retracted:

Immediately, I proposed to Dr. Egli and Dr. Leibel that we should retract the publication because we were not certain about the conclusion any more.

Hua takes responsibility for what happened, adding:

So this was done at very early phase of my research, and I was busy with a lot of parallel projects since I was the first post-doc of Dr. EgliBecause I wasnt understanding the problem correctly, I put up the figures with normal karyotype as first figure for the publication and continued my research with one particular cell line.

Egli also talked about the experience of retracting a paper:

Retracting a paper is not a rewarding process, and often reports stay in the literature even if they should not. Retracting the paper exposes us to the possibility of damage. I took proactive steps to investigate and retract because I wanted to correct the record. This would not have happened without my initiative involving 2-3 months of benchwork.

Hua described this as a truly unfortunate and painful chapter, which he hopes others can learn from:

The health of academic world and advance of science really depends on correction of previous mistakes and clearance of uncertainties. [A]voiding overwhelming multitasking is important. At the first year of my research, I was setting the lab together with Dr. Egli and meanwhile performed more than 100 experiments. Each of them would took more than 10 days and I was really stacking all the experiments. This particular project was about one fourth of my effort at that time. My biggest recommendation or reflection would be that it is very very very important to quality control and characterize starting materials of a project. Many people, including myself, are more focused on rushing the project forward and do not realized that if the starting materials are flawed, anything built on them has no solid foundation.

Hat tip: Rolf Degen

Like Retraction Watch? Consider making a tax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, sign up on our homepage for an email every time theres a new post, or subscribe to our daily digest. Click here to review our Comments Policy. For a sneak peek at what were working on, click here.

The rest is here:
Unexplained abnormalities in stem cells prompt Columbia researchers to pull diabetes paper - Retraction Watch (blog)

Biochemical ‘fossil’ shows how life may have emerged without phosphate – Phys.Org

March 2, 2017 A schematic depiction of how an early metabolism could have expanded from an initial set of prebiotic molecules, with thioester (S) vs. phosphate (P) as the main driving force. Credit: Joshua Goldford and Daniel Segr

One major mystery about life's origin is how phosphate became an essential building block of genetic and metabolic machinery in cells, given its poor accessibility on early Earth. In a study published on March 9 in the journal Cell, researchers used systems biology approaches to tackle this long-standing conundrum, providing compelling, data-driven evidence that primitive life forms may not have relied on phosphate at all. Instead, a few simple, abundant molecules could have supported the emergence of a sulfur-based, phosphate-free metabolism, which expanded to form a rich network of biochemical reactions capable of supporting the synthesis of a broad category of key biomolecules.

"The significance of this work is that future efforts to understand life's origin should take into account the concrete possibility that phosphate-based processes, which are essential today, may not have been around when the first life-like processes started emerging," says senior study author Daniel Segr of Boston University. "An early phosphate-independent metabolism capable of producing several key building blocks of living systems is in principle viable."

Phosphate is essential for all living systems and is present in a large proportion of known biomolecules. A sugar-phosphate backbone forms the structural framework of nucleic acids, including DNA and RNA. Moreover, phosphate is a critical component of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which transports chemical energy within cells, and a compound called NADH, which has several essential roles in metabolism. But it is unclear how phosphate could have assumed these central roles on primordial Earth, given its scarcity and poor accessibility.

In light of this puzzle, some have proposed that early metabolic pathways did not rely on phosphate. In many of these scenarios, sulfur and iron found on mineral surfaces are thought to have fulfilled major catalytic and energetic functions prior to the appearance of phosphate. One notable origin-of-life scenario suggests that the role of ATP was originally assumed by sulfur-containing compounds called thioesters, which are widely involved in protein, carbohydrate, and lipid metabolism. Despite the availability of iron and sulfur on early Earth, concrete evidence supporting these scenarios has been lacking.

To test the feasibility of the "iron-sulfur world hypothesis" and the "thioester world scenario," Segr and his team used computational systems biology approaches originally developed for large-scale analyses of complex metabolic networks. The researchers used a large database to assemble the complete set of all known biochemical reactions. After exploring this so-called "biosphere-level metabolism," the researchers identified a set of eight phosphate-free compounds thought to have been available in prebiotic environments. They then used an algorithm that simulated the emergence of primitive metabolic networks by compiling all possible reactions that could have taken place in the presence of these eight compounds, which included formate, acetate, hydrogen sulfide, ammonium, carbon dioxide, water, bicarbonate, and nitrogen gas.

This analysis revealed that a few simple prebiotic compounds could support the emergence of a rich, phosphate-independent metabolic network. This core network, consisting of 315 reactions and 260 metabolites, was capable of supporting the biosynthesis of a broad category of key biomolecules such as amino acids and carboxylic acids. Notably, the network was enriched for enzymes containing iron-sulfur clusters, bolstering the idea that modern biochemistry emerged from mineral geochemistry. Moreover, thioesters rather than phosphate could have enabled this core metabolism to overcome energetic bottlenecks and expand under physiologically realistic conditions.

"Before our study, other researchers had proposed a sulfur-based early biochemistry, with hints that phosphate may not have been necessary until later," Segr says. "What was missing until now was data-driven evidence that these early processes, rather than scattered reactions, could have constituted a highly connected and relatively rich primitive metabolic network."

Although this non-experimental evidence does not definitively prove that life started without phosphate, it provides compelling support for the iron-sulfur world hypothesis and the thioester world scenario. At the same time, the study calls into question the "RNA world hypothesis," which proposes that self-replicating RNA molecules were the precursors to all current life on Earth. Instead, the results support the "metabolism-first hypothesis," which posits that a self-sustaining phosphate-free metabolic network predated the emergence of nucleic acids. In other words, nucleic acids could have been an outcome of early evolutionary processes rather than a prerequisite for them.

"Evidence that an early metabolism could have functioned without phosphate indicates that phosphate may have not been an essential ingredient for the onset of cellular life," says first author Joshua Goldford of Boston University. "This proto-metabolic system would have required an energy source and may have emerged either on the Earth's surface, with solar energy as the main driving force, or in the depth of the oceans near hydrothermal vents, where geochemical gradients could have driven the first life-like processes."

In future studies, the researchers will continue to apply systems biology approaches to study the origin of life. "My hope is that these findings will motivate further studies of the landscape of possible historical paths of metabolism, as well as specific experiments for testing the feasibility of a phosphate-free sulfur-based core biochemistry," Segr says. "The idea of analyzing metabolism as an ecosystem-level or even planetary phenomenon, rather than an organism-specific one, may also have implications for our understanding of microbial communities. Furthermore, it will be interesting to revisit the question of how inheritance and evolution could have worked prior to the appearance of biopolymers."

Explore further: Metabolism may have started in our early oceans before the origin of life

More information: Cell, Goldford et al: "Remnants of an Ancient Metabolism without Phosphate" http://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(17)30133-2 , DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.001

Journal reference: Cell

Provided by: Cell Press

The chemical reactions behind the formation of common metabolites in modern organisms could have formed spontaneously in the earth's early oceans, questioning the events thought to have led to the origin of life.

The phosphate ion is almost insoluble and is one of the most inactive of Earth's most abundant phosphate minerals. So how could phosphate have originally been incorporated into ribonucleotides, the building blocks of RNA, ...

(Phys.org)A gigantic number of chemical reactions take place inside our bodies every second, all synchronizing with each other to produce the energy and chemical compounds that we need to survive. Together these reactions ...

On the early Earth, light came not only from the sun but also from the incessant bombardment of fireball meteorites continually striking the planet. Now, the recent work of University of South Florida (USF) associate professor ...

(Phys.org) A trio of researchers at the University of Nevada has found that phosphate found in minerals on Mars, is far more soluble than it is in natural Earth minerals. In their paper published in the journal Nature ...

Inorganic phosphate is an essential building block of cell membranes, DNA and proteins. It is also a main component of ATP, the "cell currency" of energy transfer. All cells therefore need to maintain a sufficient concentration ...

Biophysicists at JILA have measured protein folding in more detail than ever before, revealing behavior that is surprisingly more complex than previously known. The results suggest that, until now, much about protein behavior ...

One major mystery about life's origin is how phosphate became an essential building block of genetic and metabolic machinery in cells, given its poor accessibility on early Earth. In a study published on March 9 in the journal ...

(Phys.org)A team of researchers affiliated with several institutions in China has found that adding a certain type of salt to liquid pesticides greatly reduces waste due to splashing. In their paper published in the journal ...

The chemical industry can learn a lot from the common mussel. Not only are the mollusc's mother of pearl and tough threads with which it clings to the seafloor remarkable, but the way in which these materials are produced ...

In an age of booming biotechnology, it might be easy to forget how much we still rely on the bounty of the natural world. Some microbes make us sick, some keep us healthy, while others continue to give us some of our best ...

Using 3-D electron microscopy, structural biologists from the University of Zurich succeeded in elucidating the architecture of the lamina of the cell nucleus at molecular resolution for the first time. This scaffold stabilizes ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Continued here:
Biochemical 'fossil' shows how life may have emerged without phosphate - Phys.Org

Women’s Health Research Leads to CSU Award, Graduate School – CSUF News

Cal State Fullerton undergraduate Miguel Tellez is an aspiring biomedical researcher who wants to contribute to a better understanding of the human body and use that knowledge to develop novel therapies for human diseases.

To accomplish this goal, he is conducting research in the lab of Maria C. Linder, professor of chemistry and biochemistry, focusing on an aspect of copper metabolism in the body that holds promise for new discoveries.

For his research efforts, Tellez has received a $3,500Howell-CSUPERB Research Scholar Awardfrom the California State University Program for Education and Research in Biotechnology (CSUPERB) for his project on the "Purification and Characterization of a Small Copper Carrier From Blood Plasma A Structural and Physiological Study." CSUPERB partners with the Doris A. Howell Foundation for Women's Health Research to fund undergraduate student research projects on topics related to women's health.

Tellez's research centers on purifying and characterizing a copper-containing component that is present in the blood plasma of most mammals and is elevated in conditions where copper accumulates in the liver. This occurs in certain genetic diseases; it is also common in dogs, who frequently die of copper overload, said Linder.

"My project will allow me to contribute to the field of copper research by bringing to light the identity of small copper-carrying components," said Tellez, a biochemistry major who is on track to graduate in May and is the first in his family to attend college. He plans to begin his doctoral studies this summer in the biochemistry, cellular and molecular biology graduate program at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Tellez is a research scholar in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) program, led by Linder, and a past scholar in the CSU Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation program.

"He is a young man of enormous potential," Linder said. "His project is exciting and is likely to lead to a breakthrough in the field of copper metabolism."

During pregnancy, copper transport and metabolism during embryogenesis involves aspects of copper metabolism, which are still poorly understood. Yet, every cell in a developing fetus needs copper. Additionally, we have evidence that when women take estrogen-based birth control, it changes the distribution of copper in plasma and elicits large amounts of small copper carrying components. As such, understanding these small copper carriers in the blood plasma is paramount to understanding healthy copper metabolism in women during menstruation and pregnancy.

Because of this research project, I have learned many analytical and biochemical techniques. I've also had the opportunity to present my work at conferences, and by being a part of the HHMI undergraduate program, I learned how to read scientific literature and now better understand other areas of science.

After working with Dr. Linder, I discovered what it meant to be a researcher. She has given me encouragement and has helped me down the academic pathway to earn a doctorate.

In the first grade, I became interested in science after I fed a caterpillar. After some time, it turned into a butterfly, and I was in awe. I wanted to understand what I was seeing. My love for science pushed me to do well in school so I could pursue a career as a scientist.

More:
Women's Health Research Leads to CSU Award, Graduate School - CSUF News

Why Isn’t Grey’s Anatomy on Tonight? – Heavy.com

Tonight, ABC will be airing a special, When We Rise, in place of Greys Anatomy. But dont worry, our favorite doctors will be back next week at their usual time for an all-new episode.

Next weeks episode is titled Civil War, and the synopsis reads: A grueling trauma case is complicated by hospital politics. Meanwhile, Amelia confronts her feelings regarding Owen; and Meredith finds herself stuck in the middle as Nathan and Alex butt heads over a patient.

So where did Greys leave off? Last week, Alex finally came back to Grey Sloan Memorial for work, and Meredith agreed to return to the hospital, too. Alexs first day back was, well, heavy. He was assigned to a mother-to-son kidney transplant, but things quickly turned dramatic when the boys father showed up to the hospital uninvited.

We learned that Cynthia (the mom) was a victim of domestic abuse at the hands of her husband, and after hearingthis, Jo toldOwen to ask the man to leave. But after that it all got worse. Cynthias second kidney failed and the doctors still needed to give her sona kidney to live. As it turns out, the husband never actually left the hospital, and he overheard the doctors conversation. He said he wanted to give up his kidney to save his son, putting the doctors in a moral dilemma. Should they save Chris with a kidney from his father, who abused his mother? Ultimately, they diduse the fathers kidney, but Jo secretly snuck into the OR to convince him to donate it anonymously and never admit to his wife or son that it was his kidney.

Another (maybe not-so-secret) secret that was revealed? Arizona and Eliza Minnick are togetherish. Theyve been meeting in the parking lot, hiding theirsteamy romance. Oh, and everyone seems to love to vocalize their disdain for Minnick in front of Arizona, which makes for an interesting juxtaposition.

Dont miss a new episode of Greys Anatomy, which will return to ABC on March 9 at 8 p.m. ET.

Why isn't How to Get Away with Murder on TV Tonight? When will HTGAWM be back for next season? Get the details here.

See the original post:
Why Isn't Grey's Anatomy on Tonight? - Heavy.com