Anatomy of a Price Gouging Case – JD Supra (press release)

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide

The rest is here:
Anatomy of a Price Gouging Case - JD Supra (press release)

After failed phase 3, Accera appoints neuroscience vet to help revive fortunes – FierceBiotech

Two months ago, Accera registered a late-stage flop for its much-derided brain food candidate AC-1204 in Alzheimers, but now the company is looking to doggedly keep going, and has taken on neuroscience veteran Judith Walker, M.D., F.R.C.P.(C), as its chief medical officer to try and make this med work.

Walker comes to Accera from biopharma service provider QuintilesIMS, where she was VP of product development for drugs in neurology and pain; previously, she was senior director of medical affairs at Tevas neuroscience unit. She also served a stint at the neurology unit from German Merck unit Serono.

She has the credentials and the experience, but she will need it, as she faces a mammoth task: her new employer has charged her with leading its efforts on AC-1204, following its failure in March (and adding to the pile of failed Alzheimers medicines across the biopharma industry for the last decade), and trying to do it with a drug with that comes with some questionable science.

In the recent phase 3 failed study, Accera enrolled more than 400 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimers and randomized them to receive daily doses of AC-1204 or a placebo.

The idea was to improve scores on an Alzheimers diseases scale by addressing the slowdown in cerebral metabolism associated with the condition. AC-1204 is designed to restore the energy supply to the brain by giving it a source of ketones to top up the dwindling power it derives from glucose.

In phase 2b, a subgroup analysis of patients who lack the APOE4 gene gave Accera the confidence to move into phase 3. But, like many big names before it, Accera has found it impossible to turn a hint of potential in phase 2 into success in phase 3.

Accera, again following a well-trodden path, has however refused to let the setback scuttle the program, and plans to keep going.

Prior to the results from the first phase 3, Accera was gearing up to start a second late-stage study that would tee it up to win approval in 2020. The plan now is to finalize the clinical development strategy for AC-1204 and discuss next steps with FDA. Its website still touts 2020 as the year slated for a potential approval.

That talk with the FDA will put Accera in the room with an agency that has slammed some of its activities. Accera began life as a developer of Axona, a product it marketed as a medical food for use in Alzheimers.

FDA hit Accera with a warning letter in 2013 on the grounds its marketing materials caused Axona to be classed as a drug. Accera continues to market Axona as a medical food for Alzheimers, but has tweaked its website since the warning letter.

Axona and AC-1204 both provide patients with a source of caprylic triglyceridealso known as fractionated coconut oilthat is intended to increase the availability of ketones to the brain. The potential of the therapeutic approach has enabled Accera to pull in more than $150 million from backers including Nestl, according to SEC filings.

But this candidate has been met with much derision from bio-Twitter; Walker, however, is betting her career move that it will work out.

She said in a statement: Accera has one of the few drugs in late stage development for Alzheimer's disease which addresses a differentiated and well-validated target. I am delighted to be joining Accera at this exciting time in the program.

More:
After failed phase 3, Accera appoints neuroscience vet to help revive fortunes - FierceBiotech

The 1 Thing You Need to Write Down Every Night for Better Sleep, According to Neuroscience – Inc.com

Tossing and turning all night is the epitome of crappiness. If you've already tried the usual recommendations for heading into Dreamland--for example, turning off electronics, meditating or wearing a sleep mask--it might be time to try one more fix. According to neuroscience, writing out a to-do list before you head to bed might be just what you need to finally drift off.

The ability to get to sleep depends to a large degree on your body's ability to switch from your sympathetic nervous system, which tells you to be alert and physically at the ready, and your parasympathetic nervous system, which tells you to rest and recuperate. Techniques like meditation and deep breathing are often very helpful in facilitating this transition, with physical cues from the body telling your brain you're safe and can take a break.

But stress is a sneaky and dastardly little bugger. As David Spiegel, M.D., director of the Center on Stress and Health at Stanford School of Medicine, explains, stress activates your body's fight-or-flight response and keeps the sympathetic nervous system engaged. Subsequently, your brain doesn't want to shut down.

For many people, not having a game plan for the next day is part of the stress they experience. "When will I time find for that report?" "What if Joe comes in and gabs at me for half an hour again?" "How can I make my presentation better?" But when you make a to-do list, you force yourself to think about and prioritize everything that is on your plate. Sometimes just having that basic direction can be a relief. But take it one step further. Once you know what the priorities need to be, break them down into the steps you need to take to make them happen or reach your goal. Making your priorities actionable takes some of the uncertainty we all hate out of the future, which helps you feel more confident, capable and secure. With those feelings solid, stress levels stay under control, your sympathetic nervous system backs off and you can relax into sleep.

Based on the above neuroscience and psychology, using a to-do list is not all that different from using a worry journal to vent your frustrations and concerns, a technique that's been proven to reduce stress. But it's distinct because, as Joe Ojile, M.D., founder and CEO of the Clayton Sleep Institute in St. Louis, MO and a board member of the National Sleep Foundation, notes, worry journals don't give you an actionable plan for how to solve whatever problem you're having the way that a to-do list does

Writing a to-do list and coming up with action points forces you to make decisions rather quickly. Although it might seem counterintuitive, research indicates that there's good reason to go with your gut in decision-making. Not only is your instinct trustworthy, based on subconscious emotional memory and concepts, but fast decision-making has been shown to lead to more ethical outcomes and better confidence. To-do lists thus are a tool you can use to get past the bottleneck lots of choices sometimes bring to the creative process and overall productivity.

Secondly, when you go from awake to sleeping, your brain wave frequencies slow down. But this doesn't mean your brain isn't working--itmerely means that it's in a different mode. Slower brain waves are associated with creative thinking and imagination, so if you finally get more sleep thanks to your to-do lists, you might conjure up innovative concepts and solutions from in your subconscious. Finally getting a good night's rest can improve health and mood, too, leaving you more ready to collaborate, go out on a limb and tackle work issues.

As you give to-do list writing a try, keep in mind, insomnia isn't always related to stress alone. It's always good to talk to your doctor if your sleeplessness has become an ongoing problem, as it can connect to underlying health conditions. Similarly, stress from trauma or similar issues might require help from a qualified psychologist or psychiatrist. When in doubt, always talk it out.

More:
The 1 Thing You Need to Write Down Every Night for Better Sleep, According to Neuroscience - Inc.com

This Is Your Brain on Business – Fortune

Im what some people call a neurogeek, passionate about everything related to our brains, from the way they shape our behavior to the way they interact with technology.

Most of you readers probably assume that people like me belong to the scientific and the medical worldsthat we live, eat, breathe, sleep and operate in hospitals and research labs, isolated from the business world. And certainly theres plenty for us to do there, given the societal impact of brain health. According to the Society for Neuroscience, the Kavli Foundation and the Gatsby charitable foundation , the cost to the global economy of neurological and mental-health disorders such as dementia and Alzheimers disease, including healthcare expenses, loss of productivity in the workplace and impact on families, reached $2.5 trillion in 2010, and could reach $6 trillion by 2030. By then, the economic burden of brain health will be higher than those of cancer, diabetes and respiratory conditions combined .

But neuroscience and neurotechnologies matter far beyond their scientific and medical applications. We are not just our brains, of course. We interact with physical, digital and social worlds that are in turn impacted by how well our brains function, from performance at the workplace to personal relations. That fundamental truth has opened a wealth of interest in neuroscience, in leadership sectors far beyond medicine. Ill illustrate where that interest comes from, and why, in essays I call Your Brain On Business.

The military offers just one example. In 2014, President Obama only half-jokingly announced that the U.S. government was building Iron Man , in the form of a "smart armor" known as TALOS. Soldiers of the very near future will be equipped with brain-computer interfaces allowing them to simultaneously control armor-like exoskeletons and rely on powerful databases, enabling them to be stronger, faster, and more resistant while making optimal decisions.

Science fiction? Ask the hundreds of millions of TV viewers who, that same year, witnessed a paraplegic man kicking off the Soccer FIFA World Cup in Brazil , moving the ball with help from his mind-controlled robotic exoskeleton. For me and a lot of the kids who grew up reading superhero comics, this was one of the coolest things ever. And even if we were far from Iron Man territorythe kick was gentle and slow, the equipment bulkyin the public eye, the neurotech revolution had started. And heres a sign of how quickly things move in neuroscience: Earlier this year, another paraplegic man, Rodrigo Hbner Mendes, became the first person to drive a race car solely with his mind .

Some might even argue that mind controlled driving is not as impressive as making paralyzed people move their limbssince for neuroscientists, controlling objects thanks to cutting-edge brain-computer interfaces has become quite common. What is noteworthy in Hbner Mendes driving performance is that the device he employed to control the race car a portable and wireless wearable headset monitoring brainwaves manufactured by Emotiv, a San Francisco-based company that I advisecan be ordered online for the price of an X-Box console.

In fact, its already being used by thousands of gamers to move their avatars in virtual worlds with their mind, freeing their hands to shoot monsters. Others use the headset to monitor their sleep or meditate. The automotive industry is using it to monitor the level of attention of drivers and have cars stop automatically or sound an alarm when the drivers start falling asleep. It is being used in other sectors where attention to information is a life-and-death matter, by airline traffic controllers and nuclear plant operators. What was science fiction not so long ago is now just a couple of clicks away from everyones mailbox.

And yes, this is a big business. For devices alone, Neurotech Report projected a $7.6 billion market in 2016 that could reach $12 billion by 2020. And todays hardware market is just the tip of the iceberg, as illustrated by an analysis of more than 10,000 IP filings worldwide by market research firm SharpBrains, in a report to which I contributed . The overall financial impact of such neurotechnologies is tremendous. Overall, if you include the medical uses of neurotech, other devices, and all the businesses that can benefit from brain-related technologies, this is a field that's generating well over $150 billion in revenues annually.

I hope youre beginning to understand why my life as a neurogeek does not consist of being locked in my research lab 24/7. Over the past 15 years, I have helped scores of partners apply neuroscience to improve their efforts, working with public authorities to improve preventive medicine campaigns , with health-care providers to better understand the behavior of caregivers and patients, and with the retail industry to assess the gap between what consumers say and what they really do while shopping . Ive used neuroscience to improve safety measures in transportation, even in nuclear plants, and helped banks train their staff to deal better with stress and improve decision-making processes while trading. Ive been able to do all of this thanks to insights from behavioral and brain sciences and portable neurotech that allows to collect on-site data. I guess Im a neurogeek with a strong business twist.

And Im far from the only person thinking this way. The true revolution has just begun. In just the last few weeks, Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg revealed that, in their own way, each is investing time, effort, and significant money to improve our lives with neurotechnologies.

Musk, the CEO of Tesla, announced that he is launching Neuralink , a company "developing ultra high bandwidth brain-machine interfaces." This new breed of neurotechnology will allow the merging of the human brain with the power of machines in order empower humans to keep up with artificial intelligence. We are not only talking about being able to beat computers at chess again but to boost our information processing and creativity--to accelerate medical discoveries that cure cancers, for example. And at F8, the developer conference for Facebook, the company shared that its working on scalable neurotech that will allow silent brain-to-brain communication .

When one man who has disrupted the energy, automotive and space industries, and another who connected nearly 2 billion individuals in the same social network, make major moves in neuroscience, somehow it feels like science fiction is evolving into history, and that our lives are about to change in unprecedented ways.

Olivier Oullier ( @emorationality ), PhD, is a neuroscientist and a strategist.

Read the original:
This Is Your Brain on Business - Fortune

Pfizer cuts neuroscience meds from pipeline – FierceBiotech

Alongside its first-quarter financials today, Pfizer also sneakedin details of its discontinued projects, this year, which includes meds from its CV and metabolism pipeline and from its neuroscience unit.

The ax swungin the last few months forPF-06291874, a midstage med in testing for Type 2 diabetes;PF-06815345 for hyperlipidemia;and PF-06412562 for cognitive disorders, andPF-02545920, a PDE10 inhibitor in phase 2 for Huntington's disease saw the chop inthe first quarter.

Its diabetes med was a glucagon receptor antagonist, while its hyperlipidemia candidatewas, according to its FY update last February, new in to its pipeline for phase 1 testing, but with precious few other details about its MOA. The same goes for PF-06412562, also a phase 1 candidate, in its neuroscience and pain unit.

The phase 2 Huntington's disease candidate, out of its neuroscience department, was a small molecule NME that had orphan status in the U.S. According to clinicaltrials.gov, the: "Study terminated on 15 Dec. 2016 due to study A8241021 showing no significant difference on primary endpoint between PF-02545920 & placebo. No safety concerns."

In its financials, Pfizer also revealed that it spent $1.7 billion in R&D in the first quarter, a 1% decline on last year.

See the original post:
Pfizer cuts neuroscience meds from pipeline - FierceBiotech

Foreign Specialists at Neuroscience Workshop – Financial Tribune

A two-week international workshop on neuroscience opened in Tehran on April 29 sponsored jointly the International Brain Research Organization and Tarbiat Modarres University and Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Specialists and experts from the US, Britain, Germany, Switzerland and Iran as well as students from regional countries are attending. Similar workshops have been held in the past by the Tarbiat Modarres and Shahid Beheshti universities and the Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences in cooperation with international experts. This year, however, the event is more specialized and deals with newer realms of the science. Besides, fewer applicants have been admitted and the duration is longer so that participants would have in-depth and qualitative learning about the latest advancement in the field, said Yaqoub Fathollahi, research deputy at Tarbiat Modarres University, IRNA reported. In recent years, PhD and post PhD students as well as young faculty members from China, Turkey, India, Pakistan and Indonesia have shown interest in the event. Over 100 researchers registered for the current workshop but only 14 from Iran and regional countries were accepted, said the official. This years event is focusing on the effectiveness of research projects and their role in the development of neurosciences in the region. The workshop will close on May 12. IBRO is the global federation of neuroscience organizations that aims to promote and support neuroscience training, teaching, collaborative research and advocacy around the world. More than 80 international, national and regional scientific organizations constitute IBROs Governing Council, which together with the five IBRO Regional Committees, addresses the needs and advances the work of individual scientists and research communities. IBROs mission is to develop, support, coordinate and promote scientific research in fields related to the brain; promote international collaboration and sharing of scientific information on brain research throughout the world; provide for and assist in education and dissemination of information relating to brain research. Most advanced workshops of the IBRO in Asia have so far been hosted by Japan, China and South Korea.

View post:
Foreign Specialists at Neuroscience Workshop - Financial Tribune

Facebook Explores Neuroscience For Next Typing Revolution – MediaFile

Facebook announced last week that it is researching and developing a neural interface that would allow people to type using their brains instead of their fingers. Users could type 100 words per minute with a silent speech system, enabling paralysis patients to communicate more efficiently with the world around them.

The neural interface system would not broadcast a users every thought onto the platform. Rather, it would work with the users thought process by sharing or typing only what he or she commands it to.

Facebooks 10-year game plan, published on its newsroom blog, outlining new technologies they want to create for the future of the platform.

This is about decoding those words youve already decided to share by sending them to the speech center of your brain, a Facebook newsroom blog post about its F8 2017 future of technology event said. We want to do this with non-invasive, wearable sensors that can be manufactured at scale.

The neuroscience behind this technological advancement has existed for over 10 years now, Dr. Henry Mahncke, the CEO of Posit Science, said in an interview with MediaFile.

Dr. Mahncke, who holds a Ph.D. in neuroscience from University of California San Francisco (UCSF), studies and creates software based brain training programs. These training programs test for brain plasticity, the brains ability to change itself at any age or any condition.

The brain is not fixed like a computer chip; it is constantly rebuilding and reorganizing itself, Dr. Mahncke said. When you learn to play piano, you are literally rewiring your brain. Everything you do or learn causes those changes.

A 3D brain scan from Posit Sciences Brain Image Gallery, depicting a brains connections and pathways between neurons.

Dr. Mahncke explained that Facebooks project does not want to open up a users skull to implant some sort of device, but would instead use a device to read his or her thoughts with a sensor. This kind of technology uses Near Infrared light (NIR) and a sensitive camera to focus on a specific part of the brain to detect activity. According to Dr. Mahncke, the camera would make strong guesses on what you were thinking by penetrating your skull with a particular wavelength of light.

I think weve entered a time where a lot of basic research of neuroscience is being realized, Dr. Mahncke said. Now its not just in a research setting, there are real world applications for it. We are entering a really fun and exciting age of applied neuroscience.

Dr. Mahncke also said that social media is here to stay, and believes we will create many more ways to share information in social media in the years to come. He added that the future of science and media are linked, but said it was hard to predict which will win and advance faster. He is excited to see the results, when or if Facebook lets this technology loose to the market.

One thing that interests me about these technologies [is that] there is a brain training component of them. A person is going to need to learn to control their brain activity in order for the camera to read them accurately. You will end up teaching yourself to organize your brain activity so the machine can read them most accurately. Its another way we have begun to adapt how we think to make it easier for the machines around us to work with us.

Facebook has been slowly moving from functioning as just a social media website to functioning as a technology company as its impact and innovation grows. Its innovations now have weight and legitimacy akin to Apple Inc. and other major technology influencers. With this potential technology, the way we communicate could change drastically in unforeseen ways. To Dr. Mahncke, what Facebook has begun to do is a neat next step in human cultural evolution in parallel with technological development.

Originally posted here:
Facebook Explores Neuroscience For Next Typing Revolution - MediaFile

Student enters insanity plea in killing of neuroscience professor – Daily Trojan Online

David Jonathan Brown pled not guilty by reason of insanity in the murder of professor Bosco Tjan on Wednesday. He also reaffirmed his not guilty plea in the use of a knife in Tjans death.

Browns mental state will be evaluated by Risa Grand, a forensic psychiatrist for the Los Angeles County Superior Court and former assistant clinical professor at USC.

Brown, a graduate neuroscience student, is charged with first-degree murder, including a special allegation of using a deadly and dangerous weapon to kill Tjan.

If Brown is found not guilty by reason of insanity, he could be sentenced to life in a state mental health institution, according to Deputy District Attorney Beth Silverman. If he is found guilty of first-degree murder, he could serve from 25 years to life in prison. If Brown is found guilty of second-degree murder, he could serve a lower sentence of 15 years to life in prison.

Brown was arrested at the scene of the crime in December, and police said Tjans murder was driven by a personal dispute. He worked in Tjans lab and had taken a leave of absence for personal reasons last year, according to the New York Daily News.

Browns next preliminary hearing is scheduled for June 21.

See the rest here:
Student enters insanity plea in killing of neuroscience professor - Daily Trojan Online

Why are lawyers using brain damage as a criminal defense? The science doesn’t support it – Los Angeles Times

When his criminal trial begins next week, attorneys for Andres Andy Avalos, a Florida man charged with murdering his wife, a neighbor and a local pastor, will mount an insanity defense on behalf of their client because, as they announced last summer, a PET scan revealed that Avalos has a severely abnormal brain. In March, shortly after an Israeli American teenager was arrested on suspicion that he made bomb threats against Jewish institutions in the U.S. and abroad, his lawyer declared that the teenager had a brain tumor that might have affected his behavior. Both cases are part of a growing movement in which attorneys use brain damage in service of a legal defense.

To support such claims in court, lawyers are turning to neuroscience. The defense brings in hired guns to testify that brain scans can identify areas of dysfunction linked to antisocial behavior, poor decision-making and lack of impulse control. The prosecution calls their own expert witnesses to argue that what a scientist might observe in brain scans shows nothing about that persons state of mind or past actions.

The truth is that even the most sophisticated brain scans cannot show direct correlations between brain dysfunction and specific criminal behavior, nor can they prove whether someone is legally insane. What neuroscience can show is that a persons decision to commit a crime or to do anything in life for that matter is triggered by a series of chemical and electrical interactions in the brain. It can also show approximately where those interactions are occurring.

Consider the case of Charles Whitman, who killed 14 people from a perch atop the Texas Tower at the University of Austin in 1966. (He killed his wife and mother the night before.) In a note he left before going on his killing rampage, Whitman wrote of having severe headaches and suggested that an autopsy might reveal a physical anomaly.

He had a brain tumor, it turned out, the size of a pecan. It was nestled between the thalamus, which relays sensory and motor information and regulates sleep, and the amygdala, which is associated with emotional regulation and behavior. Many of Whitmans family members and friends wanted to believe the tumor was responsible for triggering his actions. Yet a doctor reported that he didnt think the tumor was related to Whitmans psychiatric complaints or headaches, and certainly not to his homicidal rampage.

Texas Gov. John Connally called a state commission to review Whitmans case. In its final report, the commission allowed that the tumor conceivably could have contributed to his inability to control his emotions and actions, but said that it could not establish that the tumor actually caused the killings.

The tumor, then, didnt change Whitmans standing. As long as a person understands the difference between right and wrong and can appreciate the nature and consequences of his or her actions, he or she cannot be found legally insane. Whitmans crimes took care, planning and forethought. It would have been impossible to prove that the tumor qualified him as legally insane.

Its not yet clear if the lawyer representing the Israeli American suspect will submit evidence of his brain tumor in court, but it is clear that the teens actions required forethought and premeditation. He used Tor, a type of software that allows users to hide their computers identifying IP address. He also disguised his voice, an indication that he knew what he was doing and that there would be consequences if he was caught.

Though decades of research tell us that brain damage can alter peoples behavior and impair their ability to make sound judgments and rational decisions, in the legal realm, thats not enough for a successful criminal defense. There is, however, one limited area in which neuroscience can be applied appropriately and responsibly in the courtroom: sentencing.

Our judicial system has long recognized that people who suffer from psychiatric or mental illnesses should not be treated in the same way as their mentally healthy counterparts. Medical diagnoses of psychiatric conditions or cognitive impairment are considered mitigating circumstances that raise the possibility of alternatives to harsher punishments. Neuroscientific evidence can be used to support such diagnoses.

Although the legal system should recognize the value of neuroscience, it must also understand its limitations and guard against its abuse. When neuroscience is applied responsibly, it can mean treatment instead of incarceration, life instead of the death penalty.

Kevin Davis is a Chicago-based journalist and author of The Brain Defense: Murder in Manhattan and the Dawn of Neuroscience in Americas Courtrooms.

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion or Facebook

See the rest here:
Why are lawyers using brain damage as a criminal defense? The science doesn't support it - Los Angeles Times

The shock tactics set to shake up immunology – Nature.com

Patrick T. Fallon for Nature

An implantable stimulator from SetPoint Medical would deliver shocks to the vagus nerve. It has not yet been tested in humans.

Six times a day, Katrin pauses whatever she's doing, removes a small magnet from her pocket and touches it to a raised patch of skin just below her collar bone. For 60 seconds, she feels a soft vibration in her throat. Her voice quavers if she talks. Then, the sensation subsides.

The magnet switches on an implanted device that emits a series of electrical pulses each about a milliamp, similar to the current drawn by a typical hearing aid. These pulses stimulate her vagus nerve, a tract of fibres that runs down the neck from the brainstem to several major organs, including the heart and gut.

The technique, called vagus-nerve stimulation, has been used since the 1990s to treat epilepsy, and since the early 2000s to treat depression. But Katrin, a 70-year-old fitness instructor in Amsterdam, who asked that her name be changed for this story, uses it to control rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune disorder that results in the destruction of cartilage around joints and other tissues. A clinical trial in which she enrolled five years ago is the first of its kind in humans, and it represents the culmination of two decades of research looking into the connection between the nervous and immune systems.

For Kevin Tracey, a neurosurgeon at the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, New York, the vagus nerve is a major component of that connection, and he says that electrical stimulation could represent a better way to treat autoimmune diseases, such as lupus, Crohn's disease and more.

Several pharmaceutical companies are investing in 'electroceuticals' devices that can modulate nerves to treat cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. But Tracey's goal of controlling inflammation with such a device would represent a major leap forward, if it succeeds.

He is a pioneer who got a lot of people onboard and doing research in this area, says Dianne Lorton, a neuroscientist at Kent State University in Ohio, who has spent 30 years studying nerves that infiltrate immune organs such as the lymph nodes and spleen. But she and other observers caution that the neural circuits underlying anti-inflammatory effects are not yet well understood.

Tracey acknowledges this criticism, but still sees huge potential in electrical stimulation. In our lifetime, we will see devices replacing some drugs, he says. Delivering shocks to the vagus or other peripheral nerves could provide treatment for a host of diseases, he argues, from diabetes to high blood pressure and bleeding. This is the beginning of a field.

It was only by accident that Tracey first wandered down the path of neuroimmunity. In 1998, he was studying an experimental drug designated CNI-1493, which curbed inflammation in animals by reducing levels of a potent immune protein called tumour-necrosis factor- (TNF-). CNI-1493 was usually administered through the bloodstream, but one day, Tracey decided to inject it into a rat's brain. He wanted to see whether it would lower TNF- in the brain during a stroke. But what happened surprised him.

CNI-1493 in the brain reduced production of TNF- throughout the animal's body. Other experiments showed that it did this about 100,000 times more potently than when injected straight into the bloodstream1. Tracey surmised that the drug was acting on neural signals.

His follow-up experiments supported this idea. Minutes after he injected CNI-1493 into the brain, Tracey saw a burst of activity rippling down the rat's vagus nerve2. This neural highway regulates a handful of involuntary functions, including heart rate, breathing and the muscle contractions that push food through the gut. Tracey reasoned that it might also control inflammation. When he severed the nerve and the drug's potent effect disappeared, he was convinced. That was a game-changer, says Tracey. The finding meant that if one could stimulate the vagus nerve, the drug wouldn't even be necessary.

And so he tried a pivotal experiment. He injected a rat with a fatal dose of endotoxin, a component of the bacterial cell wall that sends animals into a spiral of inflammation, organ failure and death. The drug's effects roughly mirror septic shock in humans. Then, Tracey stimulated the animal's vagus nerve using an electrode. The treated rats had only one-quarter as much TNF- in the bloodstream as untreated animals, and they didn't go into shock3.

Tracey instantly saw medical potential for vagus-nerve stimulation as a way to block surges in TNF- and other inflammatory molecules. Companies were already selling implantable stimulators to treat epilepsy. But to extend the technique to inflammatory conditions, Tracey would need to present a clearer picture of how it might work and what the side effects might be.

Over the next 15 years, Tracey's team performed a series of animal experiments to identify where and how vagus-nerve stimulation acted. They tried cutting the nerve in different places4 and using drugs that block specific neurotransmitters5. These experiments seemed to show that when the vagus is zapped with electricity, a signal pulses down it into the abdomen, and then through a second nerve into the spleen.

The spleen serves as an immunological truck stop of sorts, where circulating immune cells periodically park for a while before returning to the bloodstream. Tracey's team found that the nerve entering the spleen releases a neurotransmitter called noradrenaline6, which communicates directly with white blood cells in the spleen called T cells. The junctions between nerve and T cell actually resemble synapses between two nerve cells; the T cells are acting almost like neurons, Tracey says. When stimulated, the T cells release another neurotransmitter, called acetylcholine, which then binds to macrophages in the spleen. It is these immune cells that normally spew TNF- into the bloodstream when an animal receives endotoxin. Exposure to acetylcholine, however, prevents macrophages from producing the inflammatory protein (see 'A shock to the immune system').

Tracey's findings lent new significance to research that had been going on for decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, David Felten, a neuroanatomist then at the University of Rochester in New York, captured microscopic images of hybrid neuronT-cell synapses in various animals7 not just in the spleen, where Tracey saw them, but also in the lymph nodes, thymus and gut. These neurons belong to what is called the sympathetic nervous system, which regulates body responses to certain stressors. Just as Tracey found in the spleen, Felten observed that these sympathetic neurons stimulate their T-cell partners by secreting noradrenaline and often, this stimulation serves to blunt inflammation.

In 2014, neuroimmunologist Akiko Nakai of Osaka University in Japan reported evidence that sympathetic-nerve stimulation of T cells limits them from exiting the lymph nodes and entering the circulation, where they might stir up inflammation in other parts of the body8. But in many autoimmune diseases, this neural signalling is disrupted.

Lorton and her twin sister, neuroscientist Denise Bellinger of Loma Linda University in California, have found sympathetic-nerve pathways to be altered in rat models of autoimmune disorders9. The same is seen in humans. Sympathetic nerves are damaged by over-release of noradrenaline, which causes them to withdraw from the immune cells that they should be moderating. As the disease progresses, these nerves advance back into the tissues that they abandoned but they do so in abnormal ways, making connections with different subsets of immune cells. These rearranged neural pathways actually maintain inflammation rather than dampen it9. It happens in places such as the spleen, lymph nodes and joints, and is causing a lot of pathology, says Bellinger.

But she, Lorton and others are sceptical of Tracey's account of the pathway by which vagus-nerve stimulation lowers inflammation. Robin McAllen, a neuroscientist at the University of Melbourne in Australia, has searched for connections between the vagus nerve and the nerve that stimulates T cells in the spleen but so far, he has found none.

Vagal stimulation is acting indirectly through other nerves, says Bellinger. It's important that these neural circuits are properly mapped before moving onto treatment in people, she says. The anatomy makes a big difference in what kind of side effects you might see.

Yet, even these sceptics see potential in Tracey's methods. Bellinger points out that in many autoimmune diseases, not only do sympathetic nerves become overactive as they rearrange themselves into proinflammatory circuits, but also the vagus nerve, which opposes them, becomes underactive. Vagal stimulation might partially restore the balance between these two neural systems. It's a first step, she says. I believe that they will introduce it to the clinic, and they will show remarkable effects.

People given vagus-nerve stimulation for seizures or depression experience some side effects pain and tightening in the larynx, or straining in their voice, for example; Katrin feels a minor version of this when she stimulates her vagus. Shocking this nerve can also lower the heart rate or increase stomach acid, among other effects.

In this respect, Tracey has cause for optimism. The human vagus nerve contains around 100,000 individual nerve fibres, which branch out to reach various organs. But the amount of electricity needed to trigger neural activity can vary from fibre to fibre by as much as 50-fold.

Yaakov Levine, a former graduate student of Tracey's, has worked out that the nerve fibres involved in reducing inflammation have a low activation threshold. They can be turned on with as little as 250-millionths of an amp one-eighth the amount often used to suppress seizures. And although people treated for seizures require up to several hours of stimulation per day, animal experiments have suggested that a single, brief shock could control inflammation for a long time10. Macrophages hit by acetylcholine are unable to produce TNF- for up to 24 hours, says Levine, who now works in Manhasset at SetPoint Medical, a company established to commercialize vagus-nerve stimulation as a medical treatment.

By 2011, Tracey was ready to try his technique in humans, thanks to his animal studies, Levine's optimization of electrical stimulation, and funding from SetPoint. That first trial was overseen by Paul-Peter Tak, a rheumatologist at the University of Amsterdam. Over the course of several years, 18 people with rheumatoid arthritis have been implanted with stimulators, including Katrin.

She and 11 other participants saw their symptoms improve over a period of 6 weeks. Lab tests showed that their blood levels of inflammatory molecules, such as TNF- and interleukin-6, decreased. These improvements vanished when the devices were shut off for 14 days and then returned when stimulation was resumed.

Katrin, who has continued to use the stimulator ever since, still takes weekly injections of the anti-rheumatic drug methotrexate, as well as a daily dose of an anti-inflammatory pill called diclofenac but she was able to stop taking high-dose, immune-suppressive steroids, and her joints improved enough for her to return to work. The results of this trial were published last July in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences11.

In our lifetime, we will see devices replacing some drugs.

Findings from another vagal-stimulation trial were published around the same time12. Bruno Bonaz, a gastroenterologist at the University Hospital in Grenoble, France, implanted stimulators into seven people with Crohn's disease. Over a period of six months, five of them reported experiencing fewer symptoms, and endoscopies of their guts showed reduced tissue damage. SetPoint is also midway through a clinical trial of its own, using vagus-nerve stimulation to treat Crohn's disease.

Tracey and Bonaz aren't the only people looking to harness neural circuits to treat inflammation. Raul Coimbra, a trauma surgeon at the University of California, San Diego, is studying it as a way to treat septic shock, which affects hundreds of thousands of people each year. Many people who die from the condition are pushed past the point of no return by a singular event: the rapid deterioration of the gut lining, which releases bacteria into the body triggering inflammation that damages organs, including the lungs and kidneys.

Like Tracey, Coimbra has successfully counteracted this fatal sequence in animals by stimulating the vagus nerve, either with electricity13 or by administering an experimental drug called CPSI-121 (ref. 14). Coimbra hopes to carry this work into a clinical trial. But his research has also unearthed another major challenge that vagus-nerve stimulation must overcome: unlike rats, some humans are probably resistant to the technique.

The human genome codes for an extra, non-functioning acetylcholine receptor protein not found in other animals. Todd Costantini, a collaborator of Coimbra's also at the University of California, San Diego, has discovered that if this abnormal receptor is produced in sufficient quantities, it can disrupt signalling and render macrophages unresponsive to acetylcholine. They may then continue releasing TNF- despite vagal stimulation15. There's a 200-fold range in the amount of this protein that people produce, says Costantini. He plans to test people to determine whether high levels really block the anti-inflammatory effects of vagal stimulation. Anecdotal evidence suggests that this might be the case.

The small clinical trials run so far have revealed that some people don't respond to vagal stimulation. It may be that testing could determine who will benefit from the treatment before people receive implants.

Despite the uncertainties, however, the field of electroceuticals is starting to gain momentum. Last October, the US National Institutes of Health announced a programme called Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions (SPARC), which will provide US$238 million in funding until 2021 to support research updating the maps of neural circuitry in the thoracic and abdominal cavities.

The UK pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline is also showing interest. It has invested in SetPoint, and it announced last year the formation of a joint venture with Google called Galvani Bioelectronics that will develop therapies for a range of conditions, including inflammatory diseases. Tak, who ran the rheumatoid-arthritis trial for Setpoint, joined GlaxoSmithKline in 2016.

Whether vagus-nerve stimulation lives up to expectations remains to be seen. The number of people who have been treated so far is minuscule just 25 individuals in 2 completed trials. And treatments often look promising in early trials such as these, but then flop in larger ones.

But people with autoimmune disorders are starting to take notice. Treatments for rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease carry some risks, and they don't help everyone. Katrin was one of more than 1,000 people who inquired about the trial for vagal stimulation. I had nothing else, she says. I wanted it.

See original here:
The shock tactics set to shake up immunology - Nature.com