Nature therapies can save trillions in health care costs – PRI

The impact can feel immediate. Anecdotally, walking outside and into sunshine feels reinvigorating.

Science has long proven this to be true: Research shows that time spent outdoors can reduce stress, improve cognition and increase sleep quality. Now, a new study has put a dollar value on the improvement in well-being due to park visits.

Researchers at Griffith University in Australia suggest that national parks and protected areas save an approximate $6 trillion globally in mental health care costs. Lead study author Ralf Buckley said while that is a conservative estimate, its still 10 times greater than the global value of park tourism and 100 times greater than the global value of park agency budgets.

Researchers surveyed a population-representative sample of nearly 20,000 in the Australian states of Queensland and Victoria. Study participants described their own mental health and reported how often they visit parks both recently and over the span of their life. Buckley said his team then used a statistical regression technique to identify what proportion of their well-being was due to park visits, he added.

The researchers found that 2.5 to 3% of a persons mental health is based on how often they visit parks. While the percentage seems low, its about the same as the effect of additional income on a persons mental health, according to the study.

The researchers found that 2.5 to 3% of a persons mental health is based on how often they visit parks. While the percentage seems low, its about the same as the effect of additional income on a persons mental health.

Researchers calculated what they define as the "health services value" for Australia's national parks to be about $100 billion before extrapolating the figure to a global scale. Their findings suggest that national parks contribute about $6 billion to the global economy, though the figure ranges anywhere between $5-31 trillion per year. The big range is a reflection of the researchers caution in what the numbers mean exactly.

You can scale up by mental health factors; quality-adjusted life years; population. You can scale up by GDP. You can scale up by number of park visits, Buckley said. We dont know which will prove to be the best scaling factor. Depending which of those factors we use, we get a different number. And thats why we have that big range.

Ideally, Buckley said, he and his team would have identical studies in countries worldwide and added up the numbers.

The study adds to a growing body of research that quantifies the economic benefits of being outside. A 2016 study in England looked at green exercise, which include activities done outside, such as dog walking, running, horseback riding and mountain biking. Researchers estimated that these green activities can save around $2.7 billion per year.

But committing to a hiking trip every weekend is not necessary to reap these rewards. Previous research has shown that spending a mere 20 minutes in a park even if you sit on a bench and dont exercise is enough to improve a persons mental health.

Studies show that being outside is good for your physical health, as well. Research published in 2016 suggests nearly 10% of people with high blood pressure could regulate their levels by going outside for at least 30minutes every week.

Scientists have also found nature to have a psychological effect on humans well-being. Researchers at Chiba University in Japan pointed to the fact that of the 7 million years of human evolution, less than 0.01% of our species history has been spent in modern surroundings.

The gap between the natural setting, for which our physiological functions are adapted, and the highly urbanized and artificial setting that we inhabit is a contributing cause of the stress state in modern people, the 2016 Chiba University study said. In the future, the researchers added, long-term data over days, weeks, and months will be needed to clarify natures impact on humans physiology.

Considering the significance of quality of life in our modern stressful society, the importance of nature therapy will further increase. The therapeutic effects of natural stimulation suggest a simple, accessible, and cost-effective method to improve the quality of life and health of modern people, the study continued.

Some countries have long known about the healing effects of nature. One of the most long-standing nature therapies in transcontinental Japan and China is shinrin-yoku, or forest therapies. Chiba Universitys Miyazaki Yoshifumi is widely considered to be the father of shinrin-yoku.

Professor Emerita Margaret Hansen of the University of San Francisco, is a self-proclaimed nature enthusiast who learned about shinrin-yoku in 2015. Shinrin-yoku is an ancient Japanese practice that surfaced in the 1980s, when the Japanese government started to act on its citizens highly stressed state. The government began developing forest bathing areas throughout Japan, focusing efforts in urban areas where green space is more rare.

In 2017, she published a review of 63 scientific articles primarily out of Japan, Korea and China that studied forest bathing and nature therapys impact. Her mission was to educate health professionals in the United States about the therapy so they could contemplate using it in practice.

In 2018, Hansen traveled to Chiba University in Japan to meet with Yoshifumi. There, she walked the first-ever forest therapy path developed by the government. But, Hansen said, forest therapy is not just about being active; its about really slow movement through a forest.

The Japanese practice is using all of your five senses. Even cupping your ears to bring in more sound of nature. Or doing some exercises to enhance your peripheral vision when youre in nature, Hansen said. Smelling taking some leaves or pine cones and crunching them and putting them up to your nose.

The Japanese practice is using all of your five senses. Even cupping your ears to bring in more sound of nature. Or doing some exercises to enhance your peripheral vision when youre in nature. Smelling taking some leaves or pine cones and crunching them and putting them up to your nose.

Buckley said nature-based therapies should be designed, insured and prescribed more often. More and more providers are joining the trend.

Both Buckley and Hansen said its largely the governments responsibility to secure budgets for park agencies and protect natural lands, which often suffer from budgetary constraints, the researchers noted.

Chelsea Sullivan, public affairs specialist at the National Park Service, said in an emailed statement to The World that the improvements to visitor facilities, campgrounds, trails, and backbone infrastructure are essential to providing a world-class experience to our more than 300 million annual visitors. Addressing the $11.9 billion in backlogged maintenance in our national parks is critical to our core mission and remains a top priority.

Sullivan added that NPS supports the link the researchers identified between enjoyable recreation experiences and healthy landscapes, through programs like the Healthy Parks Healthy People initiative, noting that these needed to be balanced with preservation and conservation needs.

Now retired from teaching, Hansen is training to be a forest therapy guide through the Association of Nature and Forest Therapy. She continues to research forest bathing, though, and is currently analyzing the tie between nature and a persons spirituality. While researchers continue to test the link between nature and well-being, Hansen said the connection is simple and it makes sense.

I cant get enough of nature, she said. Im not going to stop.

See the original post here:
Nature therapies can save trillions in health care costs - PRI

Neuroscience Researcher Todd Murphy Says: Consciousness is the Subjective Experience of the Brain’s Magnetic Fields – PRNewswire

SAN FRANCISCO, Nov. 14, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- A new theory on the source of consciousness has been published. It proposes that consciousness is an intrinsic feature of magnetic fields. Feedback between consciousness and perception is an essential feature of all experience. The human brain contains 5 million organically-formed magnetite crystals per gram. Each of these has a north and south pole, serving as in/out information channels, the basis for awareness. The brain's magnetic fields are extremely complex, and capable of supporting vast feedback mechanisms. They broadcast their information throughout the brain at a fraction of the speed of light, unifying conscious experience.

The brain experiences its own activity through its magnetism, and subjective experiences are actually the brain's magnetic field, resonating with the brain's electrical activity.

Consciousness is how magnetic each pole of a magnetic field experiences the other. Both the earth, with its geomagnetic field, and ordinary magnets, with just two poles, are conscious, but in such a rudimentary way that no one could imagine what they might experience.

Invoking the basic laws for electricity and magnetism ("Maxwell's Equations"), Prof. Todd Murphy points out that electrical currents (including the ones that run through brain cells), create magnetism, which influence the brain's magnetic fields. Its conscious magnetic field(s) "pick up," or resonate with, the brain's electrical activity, receiving its information and making organisms conscious of both mind and body. The brain may choose what to be aware of according to the information in its ongoing electrical signals and magnetic fields, possibly through specific signals that appear in response to potentially important events, especially threats and opportunities.

Prof. Todd Murphy, associated with Laurentian University's Neuroscience Program since 1998, also proposes that simple magnetic fields, from fewer magnets, support simple consciousness, such as in invertebrates with rudimentary senses (like an eye that only detects light or darkness). More complex consciousness, like that of humans or other primates, would require more developed nervous systems, and much larger numbers of magnetite crystals. Their greater nuances of thought and emotion give humans more to be aware of.

It will be a challenge to prove absolutely, because science can't prove that anything is conscious. The only way to know consciousness exists is through subjective experiences, which aren't admissible as scientific evidence. However, Murphy proposes several tests that would tend to support his theory.

Murphy's paper, "Solving the "Hard Problem":Consciousness as an Intrinsic Property of Magnetic Fields" appears in the Journal of Consciousness Exploration and Research. He's also published several journal articles, and three books in neuroscience.

Todd Murphy can be contacted at: 229184@email4pr.com or (415) 368-3667His author page can be seen here:https://tinyurl.com/murphy-todd

End.Kirschivink, Joseph L., (et al.). "Magnetite biomineralization in the Human Brain", Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 1992, 89 7683-7687

Murphy, Todd "Solving the "Hard Problem": Consciousness as an Intrinsic Property of Magnetic Fields" Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research, 2019, 10(8) p. 800-813Link: https://jcer.com/index.php/jcj/article/view/835/850

SOURCE Todd Murphy

Originally posted here:
Neuroscience Researcher Todd Murphy Says: Consciousness is the Subjective Experience of the Brain's Magnetic Fields - PRNewswire

Fake news grabs our attention, produces false memories and appeals to our emotions – The Conversation CA

Fake news is a relatively new term, yet its now seen as one of the greatest threats to democracy and free debate. In the Netflix documentary The Great Hack which chronicled the rise and fall of Cambridge Analytica we saw how Facebook data was used to target potential voters with insidious right-wing propaganda packaged as if it were news.

But how does fake news work? Neuroscience can provide at least some insight.

The first job of fake news is to catch our attention, and for this reason, novelty is key. Psychologists Gordon Pennycook and David Rand suggested that one of the reasons hyperpartisan claims are so successful is that they tend to be outlandish.

In a world full of surprises, humans have developed an exquisite ability to rapidly detect and orient towards unexpected information or events. Novelty is an essential concept underlying the neural basis of behavior, and plays a role at nearly all stages of neural processing.

Sensory neuroscience has shown that only unexpected information can filter through to higher stages of processing. The sensory cortex may have therefore evolved to adapt to, to predict, and to quiet down the expected regularities of our experiences, focusing on events that are unpredictable or surprising. Neural responses gradually reduce each time we are exposed to the same information, as the brain learns that this stimulus has no reward associated with it.

Novelty itself is related to motivation. Dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with reward anticipation, increases when we are confronted by novelty. When we see something new, we recognize its potential for rewarding us in some way. Further studies show that the ability of the hippocampus to create new synaptic connections between neurons (a process known as plasticity) is increased by the influence of novelty. By increasing the plasticity of the brain, the potential for learning new concepts is increased.

The primary region involved in responding to novel stimuli the substantia nigra/ventral segmental area or SN/VTA is closely linked to the hippocampus and the amygdala, both of which play important roles in learning and memory. While the hippocampus compares stimuli against existing memories, the amygdala responds to emotional stimuli and strengthens associated long-term memories.

This aspect of learning and memory formation is of particular interest to my own lab, where we study brain oscillations involved in long-term memory consolidation. This process occurs during sleep, a somewhat limited time frame to integrate all of our daily information. For this reason, the brain is adapted to prioritise certain types of information. Highly emotionally provocative information stands a stronger chance of lingering in our minds and being incorporated into long-term memory banks.

The allure of fake news is therefore reinforced by its relationship to memory formation. A recent study, published in Psychological Science, highlighted that exposure to propaganda may induce false memories. In one of the largest false-memory experiments to date, scientists gathered up registered voters in the Republic of Ireland in the week preceding the 2018 abortion referendum.

Half of the participants reported a false memory for at least one fabricated event, with more than one third of participants reporting a specific, eye-witness memory. In-depth analysis revealed that voters were most susceptible to forming false memories for fake news that closely aligned with their beliefs, particularly if they had low cognitive ability.

The ability of fake news to grab our attention and then highjack our learning and memory circuitry goes a long way to explaining its success. But its strongest selling point is its ability to appeal to our emotions. Studies of online networks show text spreads more virally when it contains a high degree of moral emotion, which drives everything we do.

Decisions are often driven by deep-seated emotion that can be difficult to identify. In the process of making a judgment, people consult or refer to an emotion catalogue carrying all the positive and negative tags consciously or unconsciously associated with a given context.

We rely on our ability to place information into an emotional frame of reference that combines facts with feelings. Our positive or negative feelings about people, things and ideas arise much more rapidly than our conscious thoughts, long before were aware of them. This processing operates with exposures to emotional content as short as 1/250th of a second, an interval so brief that there is no recognition or recall of the stimulus.

Merely being exposed to a fake news headline can increase later belief in that headline, so scrolling through social media feeds laden with emotionally provocative content has the power to change the way we see the world and make political decisions.

Read more: How fake news gets into our minds, and what you can do to resist it

The novelty and emotional conviction of fake news, and the way these properties interact with the framework of our memories, exceeds our brains analytical capabilities. Though its impossible to imagine a democratic structure without disagreement, no constitutional settlement can function if everything is a value judgement based on misinformation.

In the absence of any authoritative perspective on reality, we are doomed to navigate our identities and political beliefs at the mercy of our brains more basal functions. The capacity to nurture and sustain peaceful disagreement is a positive characteristic of a truly democratic political system.

But before democratic politics can begin, we must be able to distinguish between opinions and facts, fake news and objective truth.

[ Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversations newsletter. ]

Visit link:
Fake news grabs our attention, produces false memories and appeals to our emotions - The Conversation CA

Deep brain stimulation may offer a new tool to fight opioid addiction – PhillyVoice.com

West Virginia University researchers are exploring whether deep brain stimulation can help patients with opioid use disorder who haven't responded to other types of treatment.

The clinical trial the first of its kind in the United States comes as opioid addiction remains a major health crisis throughout the U.S.

About 130 Americans die each day from an opioid overdose, according to theU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2017, about 19.7 million American adults had a substance use disorder, the National Survey on Drug Use and Healthreported.

Unfortunately, current treatment plans are not always effective. But the trial, led by Dr. Ali Rezai, executive chair of the WVU Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute and funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, offers some hope.

Rezai and his research team have implanted a Medtronic DBS device in the trial's first participant, a 33-year-old man with a history of opioid and benzodiazepine use.

The DBS device, similar to a cardiac pacemaker, uses tiny electrodes to regulate certain areas of the brain. It is inserted into the brain's reward centers.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration already has approved it for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, essential tremor dystonia, epilepsy, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. But Rezai believes it may help people battling addiction, too.

"Our team at the [Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute] is working hard to find solutions to help those affected by addiction," Dr. Rezai said in a press release."Addiction is a brain disease involving the reward centers in the brain, and we need to explore new technology, such as the use of DBS to help those severely impacted by opioid use disorder."

This first phase of the clinical trial includes four participants with opioid use disorder. All of them have tried and failed the standard of care for addiction recovery at WVU Medicine.

"Despite our best efforts using current evidence-based treatment modalities, there exist a number of patients who simply don't respond," said Dr. James Berry,interim chair of the WVU Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry and director of addiction services at the Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute."Some of these patients remain at very high risk for ongoing catastrophic health problems and even death. DBS could prove to be a valuable tool in our fight to keep people alive and well."

The trend of surgically implanting machines into humans, especially the brain, raises ethical concerns for some in scientific communities.

Rezai told BBC News that this technology is not for consumer use.

"I think it is very good for science and we need more science to advance the field and learn more about the brain," he said. "This is not for augmenting humans and that is very important. This is not consumer technology."

He added, "surgery has inherent risks and is not trivial. It is only for those with chronic disease who have failed all other treatments and are without hope."

View original post here:
Deep brain stimulation may offer a new tool to fight opioid addiction - PhillyVoice.com

Here’s The Truth About That Bizarre Catfish-Egg-Coke-Mentos Video – ScienceAlert

What began as a day like any other ended with a haunting quest to source a viral video of a man apparently capturing catfish using Coca-Cola brand soda, Mentos, and an ordinary egg.

If all that left you feeling puzzled, you're not alone. Originally posted to YouTube on November 1, the video in question shows an unidentified man adding Coke, Mentos, and an egg yolk to a muddy hole.

The man then reaches into the hole and produces - presto! - not one, not two, but three catfish.

Clips of the video started circulating on both Twitter and Reddit this past Wednesday, spawning questions about where the fish came from and how or why the trick would ever work.

The dominant theory, prematurely endorsed by some blogs, was that the hole must likely be connected to a larger body of water. The fish, according to the theory, was attracted by the egg, and swam into the hole before "suffocating" on the Coke and Mentos solution.

Far more likely, according to a detailed Futurism investigation, is that the video is at least partially a hoax.

Another possibility we considered was that the video was a bizarre viral marketing scheme, so Futurism reached out to both the Coke and Mentos brands to ask.

A spokesperson for the Mentos brand denied involvement and added, "this is not a practice our company or our brands would condone," while the Coca-Cola company has not responded at the time of publication.

The source of the video is a fledgling, vaguely surreal YouTube channel called Technique Tools. According to YouTube, it was created in 2015 and attracted modest attention until its most recent catfish post, which has accrued an impressive 1.8 million views at press time.

Technique Tools doesn't list contact information, but its account offers other clues. One playlist of Technique Tools' videos includes several in which Coke and Mentos are being poured on various animals, sometimes along with other substances such as toothpaste or eggs.

The descriptions of some videos offer puzzling disclaimers.

"The crocodile is our pet. Coca Cola and mentos [sic] react nothing with the crocodile," reads one.

"Action in this video made b [sic] a professional. Do not repeat! It Can [sic] be dangerous," reads another.

The most telling, though, comes from a video similar to the viral post, also uploaded this month. It claims the videos are planned, scripted, and made for fun, as well as disclaimer that the fish in this instance, "come out by pushing behind the video at the left side."

On the reaction of catfish to eggs and Coca-Cola, the science is more exact.

Most catfish have a sharp sense of taste and some, including the Channel Catfish, which appears to be our viral star based on its four sets of whiskers, have taste receptors on their bodies.

Channel Catfish feed primarily on small fishes and aquatic insects but have been known to eat small birds, according to the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The effectiveness of eggs as catfish bait isn't something that appears to have been tested in the lab setting, however.

As for the Coke and Mentos, it's much easier to explain why dumping soda on animals isn't a nice idea.

In humans, our lungs work to exchange oxygen from the air to replenish our blood cells and exhale waste gasses. In fish, gills work similarly. When oxygenated water is passed over specialized tissues, oxygen from the water is exchanged into the fish's bloodstream.

When there isn't enough oxygen in the water fish can indeed suffocate, which is actually a big problem in the ecology of our modern oceans where shifting currents have created pockets of low-oxygen water. Diluting the oxygen concentration in water by adding carbon dioxide from soda makes extracting oxygen much more difficult, which can cause a fish to panic and try to escape.

As a science lesson, this video offers several insights into animal - and human - behavior. However, as a fishing tactic, this method probably isn't likely to net you a whopping catfish.

Still, we can always count on the depths of the internet to inspire the human imagination.

This article was originally published by Futurism. Read the original article.

See the article here:
Here's The Truth About That Bizarre Catfish-Egg-Coke-Mentos Video - ScienceAlert

Expert Reveals Effective Ways To Break Bad Habits – Medical Daily

Many, if not all of us, have some bad habits that we like to change in ourselves. For some, it might be something as simple as biting our fingernails a lot. For others, it might be something as life-changing as losing weight, eating healthier and becoming an overall better person for it. No matter what bad habit we have to change though, recognizing it as one is the first step, and is just as valid as the others.

Unfortunately, most never get past this first step and just end up getting stuck with their bad habits. Thats not to say, however, that you didnt try since human behavior is a complex thing and we know changing a bad habit isnt as simple as it sounds.

Thankfully, world willpower expert Dr. Heather McKee is here to give you some tips to help break down your bad habits and make some good ones from here on forward. Heres how you should do it, according to her:

So this is why it's so hard to break a habit. Charles BERNELAS; CC by 2.0

More here:
Expert Reveals Effective Ways To Break Bad Habits - Medical Daily

From "Se Biser" to "Se Boujouter": the Regional Variations on "La Bise" in France – Frenchly

Learn more

Subscribe toLe Point: get a digital subscriptionhere, or a print subscriptionhere.

Do you really know how to faire la bise in Marseille? In Lille? Which cheek do you start on? And how many times? This ritual and its name, faire la bise, can be incomprehensible to those who are unfamiliar with this bisou or bcot, so familiar and routine at the same time.

Advertisement

Its to better explore this phenomenon that I decided to map it in my forthcoming book, Parlez-vous [les] franais? Atlas des expressions de nos rgions (Armand Colin, October 2019). Thanks to an online survey system set up a few years ago, I was able to collect information from internet users about their use of French. This allowed me to clarify the area of extension and vitality of a number of linguistic regionalisms, and to examine, in a new light, the debate of pain au chocolat vs. chocolatine.

The hypotheses on the origins of la bise are numerous, and often unverifiable. Is it the ritualization of ancestral behaviors, such as sniffing each other to recognize each other or reproducing an emotional expression related to childhood? On this point, historians, anthropologists and other specialists in human behavior have not reached a consensus. Its said that faire la bise (or se faire un schmoutz, se biser, or donner une baise) is a habit that many Anglo-Saxons believe is typically French.

But its not: people also kiss each other in the countries in Southern Europe, in the Catholic or Orthodox tradition, in Russia, in some Arab countries and sub-Saharan Africa. Historically, it would seem that the ritual dates back to Antiquity, and that it has had its ups and downs in the history of modern humanity, sometimes prohibited, sometimes valued.

The question becomes even more complex when we try to take into account the context (saying hello, saying goodbye, wishing each other a happy new year, etc.), the family relationship of the people involved (la bise seems to have long been reserved for familial relations), or their gender. La bise between men has long been stigmatized.

What is certain is that this ritual has been regularly stirring the internet for the past fifteen years or so. Part of the discussion is about the number of kisses given. The question first caused a buzz in 2003, following the launch of the combiendebises website.

The ritual also prompted British stand-up comedian and expat Paul Taylor to post a humorous video about it, which quickly won over audiences (more than three million views on YouTube).

The data we collected as part of our surveys conducted between 2016 and 2019 allowed us to provide new insights to continue the debate.

Our first map was created using the responses of more than 18,600 internet users who reported having spent most of their youth in Belgium, France or Switzerland; and to whom the question How many bises do you do to greet someone close to you? Internet users were asked if they made one, two, three, four, or five or more kisses. We calculated the percentage of responses for each area in Belgium, France and Switzerland.

For each of these area, we used the answer that was most frequently the response:

In Belgium, most internet users reported a single kiss (rates are around 100%), as in the northern part of the Finistre department (Morlaix and Brest, where rates are a little lower, 70%). It seems that the demands of the organization demandingla bise be a single kiss, Groupement de rhabilitation de lusage de la bise unique, have been heard!

Mostly, the French give two kisses, except in Languedoc and in the southern part of the former Rhne-Alpes region. Its a behavior that can be found in French-speaking Switzerland. In the northern part of France, the yellow areas indicate where there are still four kisses. However, analysis of the data shows that, in these regions, the four kisses are highly competitive with the two kisses. Kissing four times is a more common habit among older people than younger people. The future will tell us if the four kisses will continue to be reproduced in the years to come, or if they will become a distant memory.

The origin of these differences remains unknown. An internet user pointed out to me that the three kiss-region covered approximately the Protestant area of the 17th century, and that they would have been a sign of recognition of the Holy Trinity. For the four kisses, the idea would seem to be that everyone can kiss each others cheeks.

The second debate concerns the cheek that should be turned first when you faire la bise. Of the just over 11,000 participants we interviewed, 15% of respondents admitted not knowing or replied both could be first. We excluded the responses of these participants, and generated the following map based on the remaining responses:

We can see that the territory is roughly divided into two parts. In southeastern and eastern France, the left cheek is turned first. In the other hemisphere, it is the right. However, it should be noted that there are two islets in each of these large regions: in the blue zone, French-speaking Switzerland stands out. In the brown zone, Haute-Normandie is the one that stands apart.

Again, it is difficult to explain the rationale for such a distribution, as the area drawn on the map does not correspond to any other known area that would explain it.

Finally, it is a less well-known fact, the way we call the act of faire la bise (and sometimes more generally, the act of faire un bisou to say hello or not) varies from one region to another. Our surveys allowed us to accurately map the area of seven regional verbs and expressions.

Most of the words on this map belong to the same family as the contemporary French word bise (of which bisou is a derivative). The verb se biser, for example, has now emerged in conversational usage, but it is found in the writings of many early 20th-century authors (notably Raymond Queneau), and it still appears in some dictionaries (noted as a familiar term). It is still used in west-central France, where it coexists with the se biger variant, probably passed into regional French through the local dialects (Poitou, Angevin and/or Tourangeau) that were still commonly spoken by our ancestors a century ago.

In Belgium, faire une baise quelquun is not sexual: the word baise corresponds to the noun kiss (we find it in the somewhat outdated word baisemain). The baisse variant, which is found in part of Picardy, is also related to the local form of the word for kiss in the dialects of this region.

The verb se boujouter, typical of Normandy, is built on the word boujou, which is the dialectal form of the French word bonjour in this region of France (so its nothing to do with the cheek).

In French-speaking Switzerland, the word bec, which is used in the expression se faire un becquer, is a phrase formed from the verb becquer, which is still used in French, and which essentially means peck with the beak, then take by the beak. We can compare bec to its equivalent in familiar French bcot (which also created the verb bcotter, se faire des embous, sembrasser amoureusement).

As for the word schmoutz, which is found in the phrase se faire un schmoutz, it is of German origin and means bisou in French (or smacker in English). It is exclusively used in the departments of France where Germanic dialects were still spoken for the most part at the beginning of the 20th century.

In a territory as large as that of the French-speaking world of Europe, it is not surprising that, from one region to another, the greetings, politeness or denominations of this or that object or action dont go by the same name. In the past, in the days of our great-grandparents, dialects provided this community function. French has now taken over, but online social networks make it possible to highlight this beautiful diversity, much to the great pleasure of linguists.

This article was published in partnership with Le Point.

Featured image:Stock Photosfrom Iakov Filimonov /Shutterstock

Subscribe toLe Point: get a digital subscriptionhere, or a print subscriptionhere.

Read the original:
From "Se Biser" to "Se Boujouter": the Regional Variations on "La Bise" in France - Frenchly

Is That Viral Catfish/Egg/Coke/Mentos Vid Real? An Investigation – Futurism

What began as a day like any other ended with a haunting quest to source a viral video of a man apparently capturing catfish using Coca-Cola brand soda, Mentos, and an ordinary egg.

If all that left you feeling puzzled, youre not alone. Originally posted to YouTube on November 1, the video in question shows an unidentified man adding Coke, Mentos, and an egg yolk to a muddy hole. The man then reaches into the hole and produces presto! not one, not two, but three catfish.

Clips of the video started circulating on both Twitter and Reddit this past Wednesday, spawningquestions about where the fish came from and how or why the trick would ever work. The dominant theory, prematurely endorsed by some blogs, was that the hole must likely be connected to a larger body of water. The fish, according to the theory, was attracted by the egg, and swam into the hole before suffocating on the Coke and Mentos solution.

Far more likely, according to a detailed Futurism investigation, is that the video isat least partially a hoax.

Another possibility we considered was that the video was a bizarre viral marketing scheme, so Futurism reached out to both the Coke and Mentos brands to ask. A spokesperson for the Mentos brand denied involvement and added, this is not a practice our company or our brands would condone, while the Coca-Cola company has not responded at the time of publication.

The source of the video is a fledgling, vaguely surreal YouTube channel called Technique Tools.According to YouTube, it was created in 2015 and attracted modest attention until its most recent catfish post, which has accruedan impressive 1.8 million views at press time.

Technique Tools doesnt list contact information, but its account offersother clues. One playlist of Technique Tools videos includes several in which Coke and Mentos are being poured on various animals, sometimes along with other substances such as toothpaste or eggs. The descriptions of some videos offer puzzling disclaimers.

The crocodile is our pet. Coca Cola and mentos [sic] react nothing with the crocodile, reads one. Action in this video made b [sic] a professional. Do not repeat! It Can [sic] be dangerous, reads another.

The most telling,though, comes from avideo similar to the viral post, also uploaded this month. It claims the videos are planned, scripted, and made for fun, as well as disclaimer that the fish in this instance, come out by pushing behind the video at the left side.

On the reaction of catfish to eggs and Coca-Cola, the science is more exact.

Most catfish have a sharp sense of taste and some, including the Channel Catfish, which appears to be our viral star based on its four sets of whiskers, have taste receptors on their bodies.

Channel Catfish feed primarily on small fishes and aquatic insects but have been known to eat small birds, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The effectiveness of eggs as catfish bait isnt something that appears to have been tested in the lab setting, however.

As for the Coke and Mentos, its much easier to explain why dumping soda on animals isnt a nice idea.

In humans, our lungs work to exchange oxygen from the air to replenish our blood cells and exhale waste gasses. In fish, gills work similarly. When oxygenated water is passed over specialized tissues, oxygen from the water is exchanged into the fishs bloodstream.

When there isnt enough oxygen in the water fish can indeed suffocate, which is actually a big problem in the ecology of our modern oceans where shifting currents have created pockets of low-oxygen water. Diluting the oxygen concentration in water by adding carbon dioxide from soda makes extracting oxygen much more difficult, which can cause a fish to panic and try to escape.

As a science lesson, this video offers several insights into animal and human behavior. However, as a fishing tactic, this method probably isnt likely to net you a whopping catfish. Still, we can always count on the depths of the internet to inspire the human imagination.

View original post here:
Is That Viral Catfish/Egg/Coke/Mentos Vid Real? An Investigation - Futurism

The Science of Policing – WHYY

Police forces in democratic societies are supposed to safeguard the rights of citizens, and protect their lives and well-being. We think of their role in terms of laws, rules, and regulations but ultimately, so much of what they do is about psychology and human behavior. Its about how people react to threats, what they do when they panic, and how far a person will go when they feel they have nothing left to lose. What does behavioral science say about these situations? Could research help predict peoples behavior, and suggest effective and safe tactics? We take a look at what role behavioral science could play in creating better police forces, from crowd control to foot patrol and adding female officers to departments.

Also heard on this weeks episode:

Read the rest here:
The Science of Policing - WHYY

Editorial: Giving their precious time distinguishes gala honorees – The-review

Most of us are willing to share when we have a little extra.

Few, though, are willing to give something that exists in finite supply, a precious commodity where theres never any extra like our time.

On Friday evening at the Historic Onesto Hotel and Event Center in downtown Canton, this newspaper honored eight individuals and a foundation for Moving Our Community Forward.

Recipients of the awards at our second annual recognition event have demonstrated that giving isnt limited to opening a checkbook and offering a cash donation to sustain the agencies and programs doing meaningful work in our community.

Not that such magnanimity isnt needed, appreciated and welcomed. Of course it is. And those honored Friday have shared financial blessings graciously, some with excess generosity.

More notable, though, is the time each of the individuals has given to our community. Time spent on others rather than on themselves. And while some of the eight might be able to tap into a larger checking account, none has any more minutes in his or her daily bank than the rest of us.

Its how we, and they, choose to use time and how and when we give it to others that stands above all else.

What would impress us more: a millionaire giving $1,000 to a soup kitchen to buy potatoes or a millionaire giving two hours of time peeling those potatoes for the soup kitchen?

Exactly.

Bob and Linda DeHoff and Bob Gessner werent among the six honorees selected to receive a Clayton G. Horn Award of Excellence because they individually or through their family foundations have spearheaded philanthropic efforts throughout Stark County with direct financial contributions. Rather, they were chosen because of the time they contribute to worthy causes and their desire to pass along to future generations a world made better.

Can anyone measure the depth to which Cyndi Morrow has affected kids lives in the nearly 30 years she has been directing Wishes Can Happen? Thirty years! Or how many children heading down a wrong path in life have found a positive redirection after meeting LaMar Sharpe and coming under the influence of his Be A Better Me Foundation? Each was named a Peoples Champion Award winner because they represent living embodiment of the award itself.

Add in the lifelong devotion to this community of Horn Award winners Barb Bennett, Lisa Warburton-Gregory and Kirk Schuring, along with the myriad ways Stark Community Foundation, under the leadership of CEO Mark Samolczyk, has worked with hundreds of donor partners to lift and support others, and its easy to see why we see this years class of honorees as exceedingly special.

In the 500 or so years since theologian Martin Luther said, Show me where a man spends his time and money, and I'll show you his god little has changed in human behavior.

Many people talk about helping others. Some people share their financial good fortune with others. Few people make time for others.

The willingness of Barb Bennett, Bob and Linda DeHoff, Bob Gessner, Lisa Warburton-Gregory, Kirk Schuring, Cyndi Morrow, LaMar Sharpe and the staff at Stark Community Foundation to devote their most precious resource for the good of others serves as a model and inspiration for all of us.

When you see one of them in our community, take a moment of your valuable time simply to say, Thank you.

Visit link:
Editorial: Giving their precious time distinguishes gala honorees - The-review