Our Education: SIUE faculty members examine the origins of Thanksgiving – Alton Telegraph

EDWARDSVILLE As Thanksgiving nears, two faculty members of the Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Department of Historical Studies and Native American Studies, provided an opportunity to discuss some of the historical facts surrounding the holiday.

Robert Paulett, PhD, associate professor; and Rowena McClinton, professor, served as facilitators of the topic, Understanding Thanksgiving and its Connection to Native American History, on Friday, Nov. 15 in the Morris University Center, Center for Student Diversity and Inclusion (CSDI).

We want to provide a brief introduction to the history of Thanksgiving and the origins of the Pilgrim story we all learned, which became defined over the next century into the holiday we know today, said Paulett.

The discussion was based on the excerpts from the publication known as Morts Relation, published in 1622 by George Mourton and written by Edward Winslow and William Bradford. The writing was made accessible in a modern, online edition by Caleb Johnson of the General Society of Mayflower Descendants.

In its original form, this was a pretty typical document of exploration a description of exploration, settlement, violence, diplomacy and outright theft in some places, said Paulett. But at the end, there is a brief paragraph describing an English harvest feast that played host to their new Wampanoag trading partners. When this 1622 document was rediscovered in the 1840s, Americans seized on this brief paragraph, ignored the rest, and began to celebrate this myth and turned it into the national idea of Thanksgiving.

America in the 1800-1900s was trying to define itself as this generous, benevolent, Christian empire on the world stage. Look at our generosity, peacefulness, benevolence. That becomes the 20th century Thanksgiving weve all grown up with.

We all have a lot more to learn about Thanksgiving and about Native American experiences in our history, said Paul Rose, PhD, professor of psychology, and associate dean of the School of Education, Health and Human Behavior. Most of us have missed out on a lot of the facts of American history.

After the discussion, senior psychology major Angel Williams said she was glad to have learned a little more on the subject. The subject matter wasnt new, she added. But it was more in depth than what I learned in high school. In high school, we just learned about the good things. Hearing it now, does give me bad vibes, but its still a holiday that most people will celebrate.

The discussion refreshed some of the subject matter for me. I had studied some Native American history before coming to this discussion, said Kelly Moroney, New Students Transition coordinator. It didnt change my view of the holiday. I have mixed feelings. I like the idea of a peaceful union, but it is not an accurate representation of the history between Native American people and colonizers. I do like how the holiday is hallmarked as a time for family, because family is important to me.

More:
Our Education: SIUE faculty members examine the origins of Thanksgiving - Alton Telegraph

To boost recycling, reward consumers with discounts, deals and social connections | Opinion – TCPalm

You finish that last sip of morning coffee and stare at the empty paper cup in your hand. Should it go into the recycling bin, compost, or be landfilled or incinerated?

You are not alone. Most Americans are confused about recycling, and thecrisisdriven by Chinasdecision to stop accepting most foreign scrap materialis worsening the problem. At this point its hard to be sure that items put in the recycling bin are recycled.

Research shows that more often than not, Americans give up trying to sort their recyclables. Or they engage inwishful recycling, tossing nonrecyclables into the bin. Even so, most waste never gets that far. People feel intimidated by the task.

Antowain Person, foreman of the Indian River County Landfill, takes photos of a contaminated recycling bin while conducting a field audit on Wednesday, July 17, 2019, in Indian River County. Person, along with a small group of county and Waste Management employees and members of Keep Indian River Beautiful, inspected the bins of repeat offenders at households that use the blue bins for household garbage. Residents could receive a warning for the infraction or pay a fine.(Photo: PATRICK DOVE/TCPALM)

The average American generates about4.5 poundsof waste each day. Only1.5 poundsof it is recycled or composted. This means that over an average lifetime of 78.7 years, one American would send 67,000 pounds of waste to landfills. Thats more than twice the weight ofa cruise ship anchor.

Although many communities and advocates have adopted regulations and action plans centered on moving toward a circular economy, major barriers still make it hard for individuals to reduce, reuse and recycle. Existing policies have been developed based on insights from engineering and economics, and give little consideration of how human behavior at the individual level fits into the system.

My colleagues andIuse behavior science to foster goals ranging fromenergy conservationtocommunity solidarity. In a recentpaper, economistMarieke Huysentruyt, Ph.D. candidateEmma Barnoskyand I uncovered promising solutions to the recycling crisis driven by personal benefits and social connections.

Why is getting Americans to recycle more so challenging? First, many of them dont understand waste problems and recycling strategies. Few are aware of the environmental problems waste causes, and most have a hard time connecting individual actions to those problems.

Most people dont know where their waste goes, whether it includes recyclables or what can be made from them. They may know what day to put out curbside trash and recycling, but are unsure which materials the companies accept. In a 2019surveyof 2,000 Americans, 53% erroneously believed greasy pizza boxes could be recycled, and 68% thought the same for used plastic utensils.

More: Fun and easy ways to get in the recycling habit

More: 'Recycling grannies' get new uses from plastic bags

More: County to continue strong recycling policing

Another 39% of respondents cited inconvenience and poor access to recycling facilities as major barriers. California pays a 5- to 10-cent redemption fee for each beverage container, but the facilities often are inconvenient to reach. For example, the closest to my home in Los Angeles is eight miles away, which can involve driving for an hour or more. Thats not worth it for the few cans my family produces.

Ethel Ford, left, and Nannette Wall hang their bags made of plastic grocery bags on a display in the gift shop of the Fishing Museum on Tuesday, Aug. 20, 2019 at the Sebastian Inlet State Park. Dubbed the "Recycling Grannies" by park staff, Ford and Wall were given space in the gift shop to sell their creations with all the proceeds going back to the park.(Photo: PATRICK DOVE/TCPALM)

Most U.S. consumers are opposed to pollution, of course, but research shows that theyseldom view themselves as significant contributors. As taxpayers, they hold local governments responsible for recycling. Many are not sure what happens next, or whether their actions make a difference.

What can be done to address these barriers? Better messaging, such as emphasizing how waste can be transformed into new objects,can make a difference.

But as I argue in my 2018 book,The Green Bundle: Pairing the Market With the Planet, information alone cant drive sustainable behavior. People must feel motivated, and the best motivations bundle environmental benefits with personal benefits, such as economic rewards, increased status or social connections.

In a 2014 survey, 41% of respondents said that money or rewards were themost effective way to get them to recycle. Take-back systems, such as deposits on cans and bottles, have proven effective in some contexts. Such systems need to be more convenient, however.

More: Stuart becomes first on Treasure Coast to ban straws

Returning bottles directly to stores is one possibility, but novel strategies are being deployed across the country. Pay-as-you-throw policies charge customers based on how much solid waste they discard, thus incentivizing waste reduction, reuse and more sustainable purchasing behavior.Recyclebank, a New York company, rewards people for recycling with discounts and deals from local and national businesses.

Social status also motivates people. The zero-waste lifestyle has become a sensation on social media, driving the rise of Instagram influencers such asBea Johnson,Lauren SingerandKathryn Kellogg, who are competing to leave behind the smallest quantity of waste. Visibility of conservation behavior matters, and could be a powerful component in pay-as-you-throw schemes.

Its also nice to have support. Mutual help organizations, or community-led groups, trigger behavioral change through social connections and face-to-face interactions. They have the potential to transfer empowering information and sustain long-term commitment.

One famous example isAlcoholics Anonymous, which relies on member expertise instead of instructions from health care specialists. Similarly,Weight Watchersfocuses on open communication, group celebration of weight loss progress and supportive relationships among members.

Magali (Maggie) Delmas(Photo: CONTRIBUTED PHOTO FROM THE CONVERSATION)

French startupYoyo, founded in 2017, is applying this strategy to recycling. Yoyo connects participants with coaches, who can be individuals or businesses, to help them sort recyclables into orange bags. Coaches train and encourage sorters, who earn points and rewards such as movie tickets for collecting and storing full Yoyo bags.

The process also confers status, giving sorterspositive social visibilityfor work that is ordinarily considered thankless. And because rewards tend to be local, Yoyos infrastructure has the potential to improve members community connections, strengthening the perceived and actual social power of the group.

This system offers a convenient, social, incentive-based approach. In two years the community has grown to 450 coaches and 14,500 sorters and collected almost 4.3 million plastic bottles.

Such novel behavior-based programs alone cannot solve back-end aspects of the global waste crisis, such as recycling capacity and fluctuating scrap material prices. But our research has shown that by leveraging technology and human behavior, behavioral science can encourage people to recycle much more effectively than simplistic campaigns or slogans.

Magali (Maggie) Delmas is professor of the Management Institute of the Environment & Sustainability, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles.

Read or Share this story: https://www.tcpalm.com/story/opinion/contributors/2019/11/21/heres-how-boost-recycling-your-community/4247362002/

Read this article:
To boost recycling, reward consumers with discounts, deals and social connections | Opinion - TCPalm

We need to talk about cameras right now – The Times of Israel

Israel is rolling up its sleeves for a third round of elections. If those of 2015 will be remembered for the Arabs are streaming to the polls, and those of April 2019 for the social media bots, the September 2019 do-over will go down in history as the camera elections. It is true that matters that seem to be of world-shattering importance during the week before Election Day deflate very quickly after the votes are counted. Nevertheless, we ought to inquire what it was about the storm over cameras in the polling stations that fit so well with todays reality.

There are cameras in every supermarket and every hospital so whats the problem? mused Benjamin Netanyahu, in opening the Government meeting a week before Election Day. Even though Netanyahu, who likes to sees himself as the leader of the start-up nation, does not always understand the issues of privacy and data security, this time he got his facts right.

Over the last decade we have networked ourselves to death. We have inundated our schools, supermarkets, hospitals, parks, and roads, with cameras of every type. We did so because we could, since taking photos and sending them from the camera to a central processor and storage unit, has become so very cheap and simple.

On top of that, we came to feel that here technology is interfacing with one of the fundamental principles of western wisdom, according to which seeing is believing, knowing and understanding. We say that one picture is worth a thousand words; we talk about perspectives, and try to foresee the future. This spawned the cameras symbolic status as the unblinking eye of an objective deity that can document the absolute truth, pass it on, and use it to prove that something did indeed take place, and, in this way, confirm and validate the reality. As we have increasingly turned into a post-truth society, swallowed up by alternative facts and disinformation, our desire for cameras has escalated.

The problem is that while all this was going on, we never stopped to ask whether we were turning our paradigm of citizenship from one based on values and obligations, to one that rests on fear of the all-knowing and punitive eye. Is there really a correlation between cameras and the prevention of violence, crime and fraud? (There is no unequivocal proof that such a connection exists; sometimes the violence migrates out of camera range, and forgers find new techniques.) Do we pay a price in our emotional wellbeing when we live in an aquarium and feel that we are always being watched? Of course we do. Children have a need to play cat-and-mouse games with adults. And adults, for their part, have to have some space where they can do whatever they want without violating the norms of human behavior and without the need to placate someone else. Have we replaced conversation, explanations, and listening, with an obsessive expectation of solid proof, as if every municipal inspector or school principal has to be a one-person detective agency?

We never paused to ask these questions or conduct a public debate about them, and never considered that it may be of vital importance to enshrine the conclusions in legislation. Then, quite unexpectedly, over the last two years the technological advances in video content processing based on artificial intelligence have substantially altered what can be produced from the output of surveillance cameras. It is no longer just about the ability to identify a specific n person in a specific place at a specific time, but rather the capacity to formulate a psychological and behavioral profile for people, based on their actions captured on camera. This includes their sexual orientation, whether they pose an immediate criminal threat, and more. Suddenly, today, we are witnessing signs of panic about the depth of vision and understandings that video processing enables, and about the intrusive exposure that the cameras bring with them and all our fears have surfaced with even greater intensity.

It is no accident that we are beginning to hear voices calling for a ban on the use of these cameras. The American Civil Liberties Union published a harsh and uncompromising report on the subject; San Francisco has banned the use of outdoor facial recognition technology; in Britain, the privacy watchdog has launched an investigation into the use of that technology in the Kings Cross precinct; and the European Data Protection Board has adopted new guidelines on the processing of personal data through video devices. So anyone who asserts today, as Netanyahu did before the last elections, that the use of surveillance cameras should be permitted in polling stations simply because they are everywhere, does not fully understand the capabilities and implications of video analytics.

But things are even more serious than that. The most important question we have failed to ask about the cameras is whether they really are essential for ascertaining the truth, or, at least, for fully understanding what is going on around us. By its very nature, the cameras output is enclosed in a frame and documents only part of any significant event. It can be edited and manipulated, as is done on television. The emerging technology of facial recognition based on video cameras still has a significant margin of error, not to mention the potential evil of deep-fake videos. Nor are we currently able to understand the processing of recorded information, the algorithms employed to do so, and the social biases of deep-learning machines that are supposed to decide who is a suspect, who should be arrested, or who should be sent to jail.

In short, our desire to have cameras provide us with the meaning and validity of what takes place is understandable and natural. But the belief that without a camera, we cannot be convinced of the truth, and that, when it comes to our surroundings, pictures are the gold standard of proof is, quite simply, childish. This belief can also provide a bonus to liars, who will hunt out the cracks in video documentations capacity to convey the truth. An embarrassing video was published about them? Its a fake, theyll insist and well be even more confused than we used to be.

So instead of asserting that today everything must be captured on film and that surveillance cameras are the only way to deal with fraud at the polls, we need to think about what it is appropriate and permitted to film, what it is appropriate and permitted to process from the video data, and the extent to which the processing of such data needs to be clear and transparent. And also needless to say where we as human beings are located on this grid.

Dr. Tehilla Shwartz-Altshuler is a Senior Fellow of the Israel Democracy Institute.

Dr. Tehilla Shwartz Altshuler is head of the Israel Democracy Institutes Media Reform project.

More:
We need to talk about cameras right now - The Times of Israel

Psychologists say there are 2 types of narcissists: Which one are you? – Inverse

Narcissists, like sharks, get a bad press. Both are generally seen as menacing, negative forces to be feared and avoided.

But as any biologist will tell you, sharks play a vital role in the marine ecosystem. And it may be that narcissists also have a necessary part to play in human society.

This, of course, goes against the widely accepted perception of personality traits that it is good to be agreeable and outgoing and bad to be narcissistic.

After all, narcissistic people engage in risky behavior, hold an unrealistic superior view of themselves, are overconfident, show little empathy for others, and have little shame or guilt. But if narcissism is so socially toxic, why does it persist and why is it said to be on the rise in modern societies?

The answer is that human nature is complex. And while narcissism is often associated with dark traits like psychopathy and sadism, it also has aspects which are widely considered to be positive, such as extroversion and confidence.

In saying this, I do not mean to defend or excuse the worst examples of narcissistic behavior. Instead, I want to highlight the potentially beneficial elements which could then enable society to harness the positive potential of dark personalities while also curtailing their potential for harm.

There are two main types of narcissism: grandiose and vulnerable. Vulnerable narcissists are likely to be more defensive and view the behavior of others as hostile, whereas grandiose narcissists usually have an over inflated sense of importance and a preoccupation with status and power.

The results from our studies (on the personality trait of sub-clinical narcissism, not narcissistic personality disorder) show that grandiose narcissism correlates with highly positive components of mental toughness. These include confidence and a focus on achieving goals, which help protect against symptoms of depression and stress.

The association between narcissism and mental toughness may help to explain the variation in symptoms of depression in society. If a person is more mentally tough, they are likely to embrace challenges head on, rather than viewing them as a hurdle.

So while not all dimensions of narcissism are good, certain aspects can lead to positive outcomes. And a little bit of narcissism can be a useful tool when faced with stressful situations, providing that extra bit of mental toughness we need to get through.

Its a bit like having the ability to run when walking is not enough. The idea is that people need to be flexible. They need to walk when thats all that is required, but run when thats whats necessary. Likewise, the ability to call on a little bit of narcissism when faced with a challenge, socially or professionally, is a useful skill.

Recent research from our lab suggests that narcissism may act as a bridge connecting the dark (anti-social) and light (pro-social) sides of the human personality. Put simply, individuals can cross that bridge to use their dark traits when facing a challenge, and pro-social characteristics when in a safe environment.

Our work suggests that instead of perceiving human personality as a dichotomy (narcissistic versus agreeable), we should treat it as a constantly changing spectrum.

It is not about promoting grandiosity over healthy self-esteem and modesty. Instead it is about promoting diversity of people and ideas by advocating that dark traits, such as narcissism, should not be seen as either good or bad. They are products of evolution, and expressions of human nature that may be beneficial or harmful depending on the context.

This may help to reduce the marginalization of individuals that score high on dark traits, and work out how best to cultivate some manifestations of these traits, while discouraging others, for the collective good.

It is too simplistic to say that personality traits like narcissism, which help individual empowerment, are socially toxic. People are trying to adapt, survive, and succeed in a social, political, and economic environment that promotes the self-made man or woman, and if they exhibit antagonistic traits such as narcissism, they receive negative attention. Yet grandiose narcissism may be the key to protecting individuals from such needless pressure.

Nor do I think there are individuals who live without narcissism. In common with other psychological traits, it exists on a spectrum, with some individuals scoring higher than others.

Elsewhere in the natural world, a human fear and distrust of sharks has led to a widespread attitude of us versus them. After the movie Jaws was released, according to one conservationist there was a collective testosterone rush which led to thousands of anglers targeting and killing sharks off the American coast.

Shark numbers have dropped dramatically (by up to 92%) in the past half century. So just as we are starting to understand the importance of sharks for the marine ecosystem, we have run out of sharks to study.

We should not let narcissists be similarly marginalized just because we dont understand them. Instead of demonizing parts of our personality, we need to celebrate all of its aspects and work out how best to use them, for our own benefit and the benefit of society.

This article was originally published on The Conversation by Kostas Papageorgiou. Read the original article here.

See the article here:
Psychologists say there are 2 types of narcissists: Which one are you? - Inverse

I Had No Idea What the Outcome Was Going to Be: What Three Non-Performance Artists Learned by Doing Their First Performa Commissions – artnet News

Performa, the New York performance biennial thats now in its 16th year, has developed a reputation for forcing artists into unfamiliar territory. Indeed, for many artists, Performa commissions are their first opportunities to arrange events, which presents unique challenges.

The learning curve can be steep, and artists often have to learn on the fly.For many artists, the unpredictability is precisely the appeal: the chance to take a big risk can be a transformative opportunity.

As Performa comes to a close this weekend, we spoke with three artists doing live events for the first time to see what they learned from their experiences.

Paul Pfeiffer, University of Georgia Redcoat Band Live (2019). Photo: Paula Court.

When Paul Pfeiffer planned to bring the University of Georgias marching band to New York for his Performa outing, he envisioned them playing in an empty stadium. The original idea was to recontextualize how the band is perceived (they usually perform at football games)by placing them in an arena with no athletes in sight.

Pfeiffereven had one of the citys major stadiums lined up for the performance. But late in the process, the NBA swooped in and outbid the artist for the venue.

The irony that the NBA quashed his performancewhich emphasizes the corporate spectacle of professional sportswas not lost onPfeiffer. But it still left him with a problem to solve: where would the 50-member band play now? Eventually, he locked down the historic Apollo Theater in Harlem, which opened up new possibilities, Pfeiffer explains.

The band is nothing if not a machine; they are constantly on script, the artist says. To turn them into performers in a different context was a total unknown. And to an extent beyond what I anticipated, they performed their roles as hype generators in an amazing way. The audience had access to them, not just as a group, but individually. There were interactions happening that I did not expect. Individual personalities of the band members came out.

Paul Pfeiffer, University of Georgia Redcoat Band Live (2019). Photo: Paula Court.

The change also spurred Pfeiffer to expand the piece: while some members of the band played in New York, those who didnt make the trip performedsimultaneously at the vacant University of Georgia stadium. Their performance was then live-streamed at the Apollo.

The whole thing was an improvised negotiation happening in real-time, Pfeiffer says.

Theres a grey area between the notion that performance is something that happens on a stage, and a wider idea of performance as all human behavior, he adds. Thats absolutely fascinating to me. Thats what makes performance so exciting and pertinent right now. As an artist, thats where the action is.

Installation view of Tara Subkoffs DEEPFAKE, 2019. Courtesy of the Hole.

It was a very personal piece, says Tara Subkoff of her Performa commission, Deepfake.

An exploration of chaos theory and the way in which our lives are shaped by the choices we make moment-to-moment, the work was simultaneously staged at four different locations, which forced viewers to pick just one perspective on the sprawling event. Dancers moved to a capella renditions of a Nina Simone song at two separate churches uptown, while in Brooklyn, another group performed a water ballet.

And at the Hole, the gallery where Subkoff currently has a solo show, she staged a three-ring circus with jugglers, a mime, a magician, and a contortionist. As they pranced about,the artist chased her daughter around in a circle while her cousin, a tap dancer, performed nearby.

Subkoff didnt plan on being in the piece herself. (The one time she starred in her own work was, according to her, the worst piece shes ever done. It was worse than the time I sang karaoke in Tokyo and cleared the room, she says.) But her three-year-old daughter insisted on being part of the work, and so Subkoff decided to participate too.

It was a comedic version of what its like to be a female in our society, trying to be all these things to all these people at the same time, Subkoff says of the performance. As a single mom, I feel like Im always running in circles and juggling.

va Mag, Stand Up, still (2015). Courtesy of the artist.

Theres a Swedish expression (kpa grisen i scken, which translates roughly tobuy a pig in a sack) thats used to describe a situation in which you agree to do something without really knowing what it is.

va Mag, a Swedish sculptor and performance artist, says Performa was her pig in a sack.

It was a challenge for me to understand what this is, who the artists are, and how I fit in, Mag says. Im doing a project I havent done before in a new environment. I had to figure out how to get the help I needed. I had no idea what the outcome was going to be.

As a performer, Mag explains, you have to learn not to be totally nervous and freeze, but actually trust yourself and go on.

Mags work,Dead Matter Moves, is a durational performance that took place across six nights at the historic Judson Memorial Church. It features 10 performers erecting lifesize figures of clay and stuffing them into patchwork skins made of found textiles.

Mag says that talking with Performa curator Kathy Noble played a big part in shaping the piece, as did working with a production teamsomething shes never done before.

They helped with small details like scheduling throughout the day, and setting up the space for me to totally develop myself and investigate my techniques, says the artist.They pushed me to do more and to grow. That is really Americanyou can dream big!

See the original post here:
I Had No Idea What the Outcome Was Going to Be: What Three Non-Performance Artists Learned by Doing Their First Performa Commissions - artnet News

Uncovering Colonial Williamsburg’s LGBTQ history – Lynchburg News and Advance

Aubrey Moog-Ayers was outside of an apothecary shop a few years ago, working as an orientation interpreter at Colonial Williamsburg in Virginia, when two men pulled her aside.

The men, who said they were partners, asked her questions that stayed with her years later: What did she know about queer people in 18th-century America? Did anyone ever cross dress?

Moog-Ayers, who identifies as queer, told them about her own research about gathering places for gay men in 18th-century England, known as molly houses, and about a Virginia colonist who dressed as a man and as a woman.

But stories about what today would be considered the LGBTQ community never have been a formal part of the programming at Colonial Williamsburg. For the past four years, Moog-Ayers has been encouraging the living-history museum to fill this void.

Im queer, and I wanted to see if that was something that existed, if I could see myself in the past, said Moog-Ayers, now an apprentice weaver at Colonial Williamsburg.

This year, Moog-Ayers and other front-line staff members signed a petition calling for a push to study queer history at the popular tourist attraction, with the aim of telling a more complete story about those who lived in early America.

The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation agreed and recently launched a committee to research the history of gender and sexually nonconforming people. The group plans to create a source book for interpreters and guides to use while interacting with the half a million people who visit the historical site every year.

Human beings who operate outside of sexual and gender expectations have always existed within and contributed to our history, Beth Kelly, vice president of the Education, Research and Historical Interpretation Division at the foundation, wrote in an internal memo about the plans in April. Sharing this history is vital if we are committed to telling a holistic narrative of our past.

The foundations efforts are part of a growing effort across the country to include LGBTQ history in educational settings. At least five states, including Maryland earlier this year, have taken steps to require public schools to teach lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender history. About five years ago, the National Park Service also launched a project exploring and preserving the legacy of LGBTQ people.

I think gradually were seeing this woven into the fabric of American education, said Michael Bronski, a Harvard University professor and author of A Queer History of the United States for Young People. An important part of that effort, he said, will be incorporating these stories in museums, exhibits, libraries and historical sites such as Colonial Williamsburg.

Still, Bronski said he was surprised to see such an initiative in a place as prominent as Colonial Williamsburg, particularly on a topic that still is considered controversial among many Americans.

Other historical sites have faced backlash recently for grappling with topics some visitors see as polarizing. At Monticello, Mount Vernon and other plantations, they have complained about staff efforts to speak more honestly about slavery.

The changes come amid declining attendance at Colonial Williamsburg, which is attracting less than half of the visitors it did in the 1980s, according to an annual report from 2017. In 2018, ticketed attendance was 550,171.

Bronski anticipated possible pushback not just from some conservative visitors, but also from certain historians who oppose labeling people from centuries ago through the lens of the modern-day LGBTQ community.

Colonial Williamsburg historian Kelly Arehart acknowledged the challenges that come with researching sexuality and gender identity during the period, using language that didnt exist at the time.

There are all these gaps, she said. Its like chasing shadows.

Researchers plan to comb through available court documents, particularly from trials for those prosecuted under sodomy laws. Other clues can be found in letters or in poetry and art.

One local example mentioned by the Colonial Williamsburg researchers is the story of an indentured servant named Thomas Hall, who was born female and raised in England as a girl named Thomasine Hall. As an adult, Hall joined the army and began presenting as a man, with short hair and mens clothing. In colonial Virginia, Hall continued to live as both a man and a woman.

After speculation by Halls neighbors and a forced physical examination, a Virginia court was unable to determine Halls sex. The court found Hall is a man and a woman, and as a punishment, it ordered Hall to wear both mens and womens clothing.

Thomasine was not allowed to choose gender for themselves, said Kara French, an associate history professor at Salisbury University who is working as an outside consultant for Colonial Williamsburgs researchers. This idea that someone might be changing their gender or shifting their gender was not to be tolerated.

Historians also point to Baron Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben, a Prussian officer who was enlisted to train the Continental Army. At the time, rumors spread that he was fired from the Prussian military for being gay. He nevertheless rose to the rank of major general, commanding an American division at the battle of Yorktown, according to LGBTQ America: A Theme Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer History, published in 2016 by the National Park Service and the National Park Foundation.

His sexuality does seem to have been an open secret, French said. His expertise and his status allowed him certain privileges that the ordinary might not have had.

Other examples cited by historians are not quite as clear-cut. For example, Alexander Hamilton wrote letters to Lt. Col. John Laurens that would seem intimate and almost romantic by todays standards.

Cold in my professions, warm in [my] friendships, I wish, my Dear Laurens, it m[n] be in my power, by action rather than words, [to] convince you that I love you, Hamilton wrote in April 1779. I shall only tell you that till you bade us Adieu, I hardly knew the value you had taught my heart to set upon you.

It was not uncommon for men in the 18th and 19th centuries to experience romantic friendships, French said. Men and women lived very segregated lives at the time, she said, and many primary attachments were going to be with people of the same sex.

They were brothers in arms, they were part of this close-knit group, French said. Were not always sure about how deep these romantic friendships went.

French also mentioned Deborah Sampson, who disguised herself as a man and joined the Patriot forces during the American Revolution. She was the only woman to earn a full military pension for participation in the Revolutionary War. She later co-wrote a memoir that boasted of flirtations from other women mistaking her for a man, French said.

It will never be possible to determine whether people like Sampson and Hamilton would identify with modern-day ideas of what it means to be queer. But thats not necessarily the point of such research, Bronski said.

Its not about finding gay people in history, Bronski said, so much as its actually expanding our notions of human relationships and the complexity of human behavior.

See the original post here:
Uncovering Colonial Williamsburg's LGBTQ history - Lynchburg News and Advance

This Mom Is Buying Mutant Mice From China To Find A Cure For Her Sons Rare Genetic Disease – BuzzFeed News

When Amber Freed first told doctors her baby boy wasnt able to move his hands, they said that wasnt possible.

Freed had given birth to twins in March 2017. While her baby girl, Riley, squirmed and babbled and crawled through the first year of her life, her fraternal twin, Maxwell, was different. He didnt crawl or babble like Riley did. I would fill out their baby books each month, and Riley had met all of these milestones. Maxwell didnt reach one, she said. Most alarmingly, however, Freed noticed that he never moved his hands.

She knew the news was going to be bad when they sent her to the sad room at the hospital, a featureless conference space filled with grim-faced doctors, to hear the diagnosis.

You take your baby to the doctor and you say, He cant move his hands. And they look at you and they say, Of course he can, said Freed.

Then they look for themselves, and you can see from the look on their faces that they have never seen anything like this.

On June 14, 2018, at the Children's Hospital Colorado in Denver, Maxwell was diagnosed with a genetic disease called SLC6A1. The diagnosis explained why the infant hadnt moved his hands or learned how to speak for the first year of his life, while Riley was thriving. But it didnt explain much else: All the doctors who diagnosed Maxwell knew about the genetic disease came from a single five-page study published in 2014, the year of its discovery. It was too rare to even have a name, she was told, so the doctors just called it by the name of the affected gene: SLC6A1.

Now her 2-year-old son is at the center of a multimillion-dollar race against time, one thats come to include genetics researchers whom Freed personally recruited, paid for by $1 million that Freed and her husband, Mark, have raised themselves. At the center of their research will be specially crafted mutant mice that Freed paid scientists in China to genetically alter to have the same disease as Maxwell. The four mice are scheduled to arrive stateside next week, but Freed said shes prepared to smuggle them into the US disguised as pets if there are any problems.

In total, Amber and Mark will need to raise as much as $7 million to test a genetic treatment for their child. And unless they can find and fund a cure, SLC6A1 will condemn Maxwell to severe epileptic seizures, most likely starting before he turns 3. The seizures may trigger developmental disabilities for a lifetime, often accompanied by aggressive behavior, hand flapping, and difficulty speaking.

And the Freeds will have to do it largely alone there are only an estimated 100 other people diagnosed with SLC6A1 in the world. This is the rarest of the rare diseases, pediatric geneticist Austin Larson of the Children's Hospital Colorado told BuzzFeed News.

SLC6A1 is just one of thousands of untreatable rare diseases, and the perilous path it has set up for Freed, half science quarterback and half research fundraiser, is one that few parents can follow. My dream is to create a playbook of how I did this for those that come after me, said Freed. I never want there to be another family that has suffered like this.

You can think of SLC6A1 as a vacuum cleaner in the brain, genetic counselor Katherine Helbig of the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, told BuzzFeed News. Helbig will speak at the first conference on the gene at the American Epilepsy Society meeting in Baltimore on Dec. 5, an effort organized by Freed.

The protein made by the gene acts as a stop sign to message-carrying chemicals in the brain, halting them by vacuuming them up once they reach their destination brain cell, Helbig explained.

When one of the two copies of the SLC6A1 gene in every brain cell is damaged, like in Maxwells case, too little of its protein is available to perform its vacuuming duties, leading to miscommunication between cells, developmental disorders, autism-like symptoms, and, often, severe epileptic seizures.

Maxwell is about the age when epileptic seizures typically start in kids with the genetic disease, said Helbig, adding, There probably are many more children out there who have it, but they just havent had the right test to find it. At least 100 similar genetic defects cause similar kinds of epilepsy, afflicting about 1 in 2,000 kids, she said.

I was the one who presented this diagnosis to Amber, said Larson of the Children's Hospital Colorado. There was no medicine or diet or any other treatment for SLC6A1. It wasnt an easy conversation. Most of the time when we present a diagnosis for a genetic condition, there is not a specific treatment available.

At that moment, it was just vividly clear that the only option was for me to create our own miracle, said Freed. Nobody else was going to help.

Half the battle with a rare genetic disease is getting researchers interested, said Helbig.

At that moment, it was just vividly clear that the only option was for me to create our own miracle. Nobody else was going to help.

So that is what Freed set out to do. She quit her job as a financial analyst and started making phone calls to scientists, calling 300 labs in the first three months. For those who didnt respond, she sent them snacks via Uber Eats.

Her search, and a rapid-fire education on genetic diseases, led her to conclude the best hope for helping Maxwell was an experimental technique called gene therapy.

All the roads zeroed in on one scientist: Steven Gray of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. In 2018, a team headed by Gray reported the first human experiments of gene transfer by spinal injection, conducted in 5 to 10 children with mutations in a gene called GAN that causes swelling in brain cells.

The GAN gene transfer in that experiment, first tested in mice, attached a corrected version of the damaged gene to a harmless virus. Viruses reproduce by infecting cells and hijacking their DNA machinery to reproduce their own genes, making more viruses. The gene therapy virus in turn leaves behind a corrected gene in the DNA of cells they infect. Injected into the spinal cord, Grays virus can travel straight to the brain, leaving behind the corrected gene after the virus has run its course.

I gave him my 30-second equity analyst pitch. I told him why Maxwell was a good patient, that we would raise $4 million to $7 million, and quarterback every step of the research, she said. And it worked. He agreed to make it a priority if we could raise the money.

The SLC6A1 researchers with the Freeds at a science meeting. From left: Terry Jo Bichell, Frances Shaffo, Amber Freed, Katty Kang, and Mark Freed.

Less than a month after meeting Gray, Freed contacted a lab at Tongji University in Shanghai that was also researching SLC6A1. The lab agreed to develop a mouse with Maxwells specific mutation for less than $50,000, using a gene modification technology called CRISPR that has revolutionized genetic engineering in the lab. CRISPR mice are much more expensive in the US, and this lab had experience with the gene, said Freed.

By July of this year, an experiment with a gene therapy virus that corrects SLC6A1 was tested on normal lab mice, which showed no sign of a toxic response, an encouraging sign. And by September, a line of CRISPR mice with Maxwells exact genetic mutation had been created at Tongji University.

It is the literal mouse version of him, said Freed. Testing a therapy in this mouse is as close as science can get to testing in my son directly.

To pay for all this, Maxwells family started fundraising last November and organized the first medical symposium on SLC6A1 in New Orleans that same month. They opened a GoFundMe account, which has raised $600,000, and held 35 fundraisers, which raised an additional $400,000 by October. In one charity competition, Larson from the Colorado Childrens Hospital, who diagnosed Maxwell, personally helped her raise $75,000.

It is the literal mouse version of him. Testing a therapy in this mouse is as close as science can get to testing in my son directly.

That money is helping to pay for the next step getting the CRISPR mice to Grays lab to test the SLC6A1-correcting virus on them. But its not as simple as putting the mice in a box and shipping them by mail. The mice will be transferred through a lab at Vanderbilt University headed by Katty Kang, an expert on the neurotransmitter disrupted by Maxwells mutation.

Amber is helping us to advance science, and everyone is making this a priority because of the young lives at stake not just Maxwell, but other children this could help, Kang told BuzzFeed News.

Once the four mice arrive, they will spend several weeks in quarantine, be tested to make sure they have Maxwells specific point mutation in the SLC6A1 gene, and breed with normal lab mice to produce generations of mixed-inheritance mice to serve as controls in future experiments. The mutant mice will be closely monitored before they head to UT Southwestern to make sure that they demonstrate the same problems and genetics as human patients with SLC6A1 and can therefore be used in any future clinical trials of gene therapy.

Right now at UT Southwestern, results from a safety test of the gene therapy virus conducted by Grays lab on young, normal lab mice is awaiting publication. If that works out, once the Chinese mice are sent over, they will also receive the gene-correcting virus. His team will see if their symptoms improve and to what extent their brain cells accept the corrected gene.

Maxwell's brain cells seen through a microscope (left), and a sample of his cells in a petri dish.

And then, Freed just needs another $5.5 million. Half a million dollars will go to test the virus in a second SLC6A1 animal model, likely a rat, as another safety step. Two million dollars will go toward creating more of the gene-correcting virus for a human safety study if that proves to be safe. And finally, if all that works out, $3 million will be needed to conduct the experiment on Maxwell and other children next year, following the path of the GAN clinical trial led by Gray.

Its a really horrible realization that the only thing standing in the way of a cure for your 2-year-old is money, said Freed.

Freed acknowledges that she has only been able to pursue a cure for Maxwell because her family has the resources to do so which she would never have had growing up in small towns in Texas, Montana, and Colorado in a poor family affected by alcoholism. I grew up visiting my parents in rehab and knew what to say to put a family member on a 72-hour psychiatric hold by age 12, she said. She dug herself out to build a career in finance, and hoped her kids would never have to experience the struggles she did growing up.

Even so, the fight hasnt been easy on them or on Maxwells sister, Riley.

Freed worries her daughter is growing up in doctors' waiting rooms, waiting on treatments for her brother to end. Maxwells disease has progressed, causing him to constantly clench his fingers, and sometimes pull his sisters hair. His 3-year-old sister will gently remind him, Soft hands, Maxie.

Families like the Freeds are at the forefront of efforts to turn diagnoses of rare genetic ailments, which often used to be the stopping point for medicine, into treatments. A similar case saw the family of a 3-year-old girl, Mila Makovec, raise $3 million for gene therapy to cure her Batten disease, a deadly genetic brain disease that affects 2 to 4 of every 100,000 children born in the US.

In a New England Journal of Medicine editorial on that case published in October, FDA officials questioned how high the agency should set the safety bar for such treatments, meant for severe diseases affecting so few people. In these cases, parents are often collaborators in developing treatments, and might not want to stop efforts that come with high risks. Even in rapidly progressing, fatal illnesses, precipitating severe complications or death is not acceptable, so what is the minimum assurance of safety that is needed? wrote senior FDA officials Janet Woodcock and Peter Marks.

This is way beyond what anyone expects of families.

Finally, Woodcock and Marks wrote, finding sustainable funding for such interventions may prove challenging, because the cost of production can be quite substantial, particularly for gene therapies.

In our era of financial inequality, the specter of wealthy parents buying custom genetic treatments for their childrens ailments while other parents desperately resort to GoFundMe accounts, or else do nothing looms as a possibility.

This is way beyond what anyone expects of families, said Larson. The pathway has been opened up by the brave new world of improved genetic diagnoses, and the coming of age of rapid genetic engineering tools like CRISPR.

But only 20 years ago, an experimental gene therapy that relied on a harmless virus killed an 18-year-old volunteer, Jesse Gelsinger, in a research misconduct case that brought gene therapy to a standstill. Now more than 2,500 gene therapy clinical trials have been conducted, and more than 370 are underway. The human genome was not sequenced until 2000; today, mapping an entire human gene map costs around $700. In this new era, customized treatments for rare genetic diseases like Maxwells are suddenly possible.

What I hope is that we are paving the way for other parents to help their children, said Freed.

Families of children with rare genetic diseases are also working together to make treatments like the one Freed is spearheading possible, said Larson.

They support each other and work together, he said. The best example might be the families of children with cystic fibrosis, who through the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and the discovery of the gene responsible for the disease in 1989 have pushed for the discovery of new drug treatments. In October, the FDA approved a breakthrough pharmaceutical that could treat 90% of cases.

It is easier working with FDA on this kind of approach rather than starting from scratch, Gray told BuzzFeed News by email. After all, he said, its easier to follow a path that youve already walked down.

Similarly, Freed hopes the SLC6A1 Connect advocacy group she started can lead to similar treatments for other children with genetic epilepsies caused by the gene.

I dont think any parent should be expected to single-handedly cure his or her childs rare disease, said Helbig. Amber is a very tenacious and persistent person, and she will fight tooth and nail for her kids. But a lot of people dont have the resources and they shouldnt have to.

Helbig says that cautious optimism is appropriate on the chances of research yielding a genetic therapy for children like Maxwell. For SLC6A1, its really too early to say whether this is going to work.

But if it works, it might lead many more parents to get genetic tests for children that will reveal undiagnosed problems, she said. Many doctors discourage extensive genetic tests, thinking they wont find anything helpful. In the absence of known treatments, insurers are also reluctant to pay for such tests, discouraging all but the most fortunate and resourceful parents. Even for them, there are no guarantees.

The other tough reality is the possibility this treatment wont be completed in time to help Maxwell, said Freed. I love him with every ounce of my being, and I want him to know that I did everything humanly possible to change his outcome.

Originally posted here:
This Mom Is Buying Mutant Mice From China To Find A Cure For Her Sons Rare Genetic Disease - BuzzFeed News

Hershey native tapped for new administrative position at Texas A&M – North Platte Telegraph

DALLAS Dr. Kathy Svoboda, Regents Professor in biomedical sciences at Texas A&M College of Dentistry, has been named assistant dean of the oral biology graduate program after serving as the director since 2009. Svoboda is a Hershey native.

Looking at Kathys background and expertise, I could think of no one better to serve in this capacity, said Dr. Lawrence Wolinsky, College of Dentistry dean. She is an asset to this institution and I am confident she will continue to move the oral biology graduate program in the right direction.

Svoboda was trained as a developmental biologist and anatomist at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. She continued her training in a postdoctoral position in the Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology at Harvard Medical School.

Svoboda had an active research laboratory and taught gross anatomy, histology and human development at Harvard and Boston University School of Medicine before joining the College of Dentistry faculty in 1998.

She was promoted to professor, with tenure, in 2001 and named a Regents Professor in 2009. She has been a member of the Oral Biology Graduate Committee since 2003.

Svobodas research focuses on signal transduction pathways controlling developmental processes and cell biology of adult tissues. She currently serves as a guest editor for Anatomical Record, and on the editorial boards of Developmental Dynamics and FASEB BioAdvances. She has served on the executive board of the American Association of Anatomists, including the offices of program co-chair, vice president and president.

Svoboda also was named an AAA Fellow in 2009 and received the AJ Ladman Exemplary Service Medal in 2014. She served the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology and received its Gold Fellow Award in 2014.

In 2017, Svoboda received the Institutional Service Award from the College of Dentistry for her leadership of the graduate program and other committees.

Excerpt from:
Hershey native tapped for new administrative position at Texas A&M - North Platte Telegraph

AI helps cells pull themselves together – Cosmos

By Paul Biegler

US scientists have overcome a major stumbling block in the creation of mini-organs, programming cells to take on the desired shape rather than relying on 3D printing or external scaffolds.

This inside out approach, described in a paper in the journal Cell Systems, could signal a paradigm shift in how mini-hearts, kidneys and brains are grown on the lab bench a technique used to study disease that may one day lead to personalised organ transplants.

The team, led by bioengineer Todd McDevitt at Gladstone Institutes in the US, was driven by an enduring issue with state-of-the-art ways of producing mini-organs such as 3D printing. The cells just wont stay put.

Making a mini-organ or organoid starts when scientists take a persons skin cell and, using the right mix of agents, turn it into an induced pluripotent stem cell. This IPS cell is the blank cheque of biology, capable of becoming almost any cell type.

Grow it into a mini-kidney, say, and you can reproduce kidney diseases and test treatments in a dish sitting on your lab bench. But how faithful that model is depends on the physical organisation of the cells; to mimic a real deal kidney, 3D printing is often used.

But cells, much like unruly teenagers, have a mind of their own and will often wander away from their printed position.

McDevitts team wanted to own those cellular minds and so took control of two genes that together make up something of a joystick that directs how the cells organise.

CDH1 and ROCK1 figure heavily in the complex moves that lead to the final configuration of a group of cells. The pair influences stickiness and repulsion between cells, the surface tension that makes them spherical and their overall speed of migration.

The researchers used the editing tool CRISPR to knock out the two genes at various stages in the evolution of a clump of cells. Their aim was to make a bulls eye pattern, a shape thats common in human development, including in early embryo formation.

To detect that aspirational pattern, they engineered another tweak making the cells fluoresce when CDH1 and ROCK1 were neutralised.

But there was a problem.

Factor in all the potential time points where the genes could be knocked out, the proportion of cells to be targeted, and a host of other variables, and the researchers calculated theyd need to do nearly 9000 trial-and-error experiments.

So they called on AI. They trained a machine learning model to compute the precise pattern of gene knockouts needed to realise their dream shape.

Machine learning can predict what movie you might like based on your viewing history, but it can also generate new insights into biological systems by mimicking them, says co-author Demarcus Briers, from the Boston University Bioinformatics Program.

Our machine-learning model allows us to predict new ways that stem cells can organise themselves, and produces instructions for how to recreate these predictions in the lab.

That model hit a bulls eye, quite literally, allowing the team to produce the concentric pattern of cells they were aiming at.

"We've shown how we can leverage the intrinsic ability of stem cells to organise," says McDevitt. "This gives us a new way of engineering tissues, rather than a printing approach where you try to physically force cells into a specific configuration."

Ultimately, that concrete target shape will give way to a target in the abstract, one with potential to shift the life course.

"We're now on the path to truly engineering multicellular organization, which is the precursor to engineering organs," McDevitt says. "When we can create human organs in the lab, we can use them to study aspects of biology and disease that we wouldn't otherwise be able to."

Read more:
AI helps cells pull themselves together - Cosmos

Boundless Bio Announces Publication in Nature Elucidating the Role of Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) Structure in Cancer Biology – Business Wire

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Boundless Bio, a company interrogating and targeting extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) in aggressive cancers, today announced that research describing new mechanisms by which ecDNA drive cancer growth, resistance, and recurrence has been published in the journal Nature. The manuscript, Circular ecDNA promote accessible chromatin and high oncogene expression, was co-authored by Boundless Bios scientific founders Paul Mischel, M.D., Distinguished Professor at the University of California San Diego (UC San Diego) School of Medicine and a member of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research; Vineet Bafna, Ph.D., Professor of Computer Science & Engineering, UC San Diego; Howard Chang, M.D., Ph.D., Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Professor of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Stanford University; and Roel Verhaak, Ph.D., Professor and Associate Director of Computational Biology, The Jackson Laboratory. Boundless Bio scientists Kristen Turner, Ph.D. and Nam Nguyen, Ph.D. were co-lead authors on the manuscript as well.

The paper describes, for the first time, how ecDNA encode information not only in their sequence but also in their shape, enabling a new understanding of how ecDNA drive aggressive tumor growth. ecDNA differ profoundly in their shape from human chromosomal DNA in ways that have not been well-understood, and until now, the impact of the physical shape of ecDNA on cancer biology has remained a mystery. Mischel and his collaborators conducted an in-depth analysis of the structure of ecDNA in cancer, revealing a circular structure that is organized around protein cores in a different way than normal chromosomal DNA. They showed that ecDNA are wound around protein cores in a fashion that permits a far greater level of accessibility to the transcriptional machinery than occurs on chromosomes. As a result of this unique architecture, along with the very high number of ecDNA particles inside a tumor cell, oncogenes that are amplified on ecDNA are amongst the most highly transcribed genes in a tumor.

The researchers also showed that the circular architecture of ecDNA permits new regulatory interactions that might be important in controlling gene expression in cancer. These findings enabled the team to construct topologically informed circular maps of ecDNA that may potentially prove to be of value in guiding treatment for patients. These new findings build on and expand the impact of previous work from the team, which showed that ecDNA amplification is common in cancer and that it can drive aggressive growth and treatment resistance in part through the way that DNA is passed from mother cells to daughter cells (Turner et al., Nature, 2017; Verhaak et al., Nature Reviews Cancer, 2019; de Carvalho et al., Nature Genetics, 2018; Nathanson et al., Science, 2014).

The findings published in Nature represent a major leap forward in our understanding of both the structure of ecDNA and of the significant role that ecDNA play in promoting cancer growth and resistance, said Zachary Hornby, President and Chief Executive Officer of Boundless Bio. This new research arms us with essential knowledge that will enable our team at Boundless Bio to develop the first medicines capable of targeting the underlying biology that causes overexpressed oncogenes to develop and perpetuate in tumors that historically have been difficult-to-treat.

This new study sheds light on how the three-dimensional architecture of ecDNA plays a critical role in driving aggressive cancer growth and provides an important bridge between cancer genomics and epigenetics, said Dr. Mischel. These are exciting findings that we believe will propel Boundless Bios efforts to develop transformative new cancer medicines that eliminate cancer cells ability to employ ecDNA to drive cancer.

About ecDNA

Extrachromosomal DNA, or ecDNA, are large circles of DNA containing genes that are outside the cells chromosomes and can make many copies of themselves. ecDNA can be rapidly replicated within the cell, causing high numbers of oncogene copies, a trait that can be passed to daughter cells in asymmetric ways during cell division. Cells have the ability to upregulate or downregulate ecDNA and resulting oncogenes to ensure survival under selective pressures, including chemotherapy or radiation, making ecDNA one of cancer cells primary mechanisms of recurrence and treatment evasion. ecDNA are rarely seen in healthy cells but are found in many solid tumor cancers. They are a key driver of the most aggressive and difficult-to-treat cancers, specifically those characterized by high copy number amplification of oncogenes.

About Boundless Bio

Boundless Bio is a biotechnology company focused on interrogating a novel area of cancer biology, extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA), to deliver transformative therapies to patients with previously intractable cancers. For more information, visit http://www.boundlessbio.com.

Originally posted here:
Boundless Bio Announces Publication in Nature Elucidating the Role of Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) Structure in Cancer Biology - Business Wire