Anatomy of a Lie: How Iran Covered Up the Downing of an Airliner – The New York Times

When the Revolutionary Guards officer spotted what he thought was an unidentified aircraft near Tehrans international airport, he had seconds to decide whether to pull the trigger.

Iran had just fired a barrage of ballistic missiles at American forces, the country was on high alert for an American counterattack, and the Iranian military was warning of incoming cruise missiles.

The officer tried to reach the command center for authorization to shoot but couldnt get through. So he fired an antiaircraft missile. Then another.

The plane, which turned out to be a Ukrainian jetliner with 176 people on board, crashed and exploded in a ball of fire.

Within minutes, the top commanders of Irans Revolutionary Guards realized what they had done. And at that moment, they began to cover it up.

For days, they refused to tell even President Hassan Rouhani, whose government was publicly denying that the plane had been shot down. When they finally told him, he gave them an ultimatum: come clean or he would resign.

Only then, 72 hours after the plane crashed, did Irans supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, step in and order the government to acknowledge its fatal mistake.

The New York Times pieced together a chronology of those three days by interviewing Iranian diplomats, current and former government officials, ranking members of the Revolutionary Guards and people close to the supreme leaders inner circle and by examining official public statements and state media reports.

The reporting exposes the governments behind-the-scenes debate over covering up Irans responsibility for the crash while shocked Iranians, grieving relatives and countries with citizens aboard the plane waited for the truth.

The new details also demonstrate the outsize power of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, which effectively sidelined the elected government in a moment of national crisis, and could deepen what many Iranians already see as a crisis of legitimacy for the Guards and the government.

The bitter divisions in Irans government persist and are bound to affect the investigation into the crash, negotiations over compensation and the unresolved debate over accountability.

Around midnight on Jan. 7, as Iran was preparing to launch a ballistic-missile attack on American military posts in Iraq, senior members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps deployed mobile antiaircraft defense units around a sensitive military area near Tehrans Imam Khomeini Airport.

Iran was about to retaliate for the American drone strike that had killed Irans top military commander, Gen. Qassim Suleimani, in Baghdad five days earlier, and the military was bracing for an American counterstrike. The armed forces were on at war status, the highest alert level.

But in a tragic miscalculation, the government continued to allow civilian commercial flights to land and take off from the Tehran airport.

Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, commander of the Guards Aerospace Force, said later that his units had asked officials in Tehran to close Irans airspace and ground all flights, to no avail.

Iranian officials feared that shutting down the airport would create mass panic that war with the United States was imminent, members of the Guards and other officials told The Times. They also hoped that the presence of passenger jets could act as a deterrent against an American attack on the airport or the nearby military base, effectively turning planeloads of unsuspecting travelers into human shields.

After Irans missile attack began, the central air defense command issued an alert that American warplanes had taken off from the United Arab Emirates and that cruise missiles were headed toward Iran.

The officer on the missile launcher near the airport heard the warnings but did not hear a later message that the cruise missile alert was a false alarm.

The warning about American warplanes may have also been wrong. United States military officials have said that no American planes were in or near Iranian airspace that night.

When the officer spotted the Ukrainian jet, he sought permission to fire. But he was unable to communicate with his commanders because the network had been disrupted or jammed, General Hajizadeh said later.

The officer, who has not been publicly identified, fired two missiles, less than 30 seconds apart.

General Hajizadeh, who was in western Iran supervising the attack on the Americans, received a phone call with the news.

I called the officials and told them this has happened and its highly possible we hit our own plane, he said later in a televised statement.

By the time General Hajizadeh arrived in Tehran, he had informed Irans top three military commanders: Maj. Gen. Abdolrahim Mousavi, the armys commander in chief, who is also the chief of the central air defense command; Maj. Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of the Armed Forces; and Maj. Gen. Hossein Salami, commander in chief of the Revolutionary Guards.

The Revolutionary Guards, an elite force charged with defending Irans clerical rule at home and abroad, is separate from the regular army and answers only to the supreme leader. At this point, the leaders of both militaries knew the truth.

General Hajizadeh advised the generals not to tell the rank-and-file air defense units for fear that it could hamper their ability to react quickly if the United States did attack.

It was for the benefit of our national security because then our air defense system would be compromised, Mr. Hajizadeh said in an interview with Iranian news media this week. The ranks would be suspicious of everything.

The military leaders created a secret investigative committee drawn from the Guards aerospace forces, from the armys air defense, and from intelligence and cyberexperts. The committee and the officers involved in the shooting were sequestered and ordered not to speak to anyone.

The committee examined data from the airport, the flight path, radar networks, and alerts and messages from the missile operator and central command. Witnesses the officer who had pulled the trigger, his supervisors and everyone involved were interrogated for hours.

The group also investigated the possibility that the United States or Israel may have hacked Irans defense system or jammed the airwaves.

By Wednesday night, the committee had concluded that the plane was shot down because of human error.

We were not confident about what happened until Wednesday around sunset, General Salami, the commander in chief of the Guards, said later in a televised address to the Parliament. Our investigative team concluded then that the plane crashed because of human errors.

Ayatollah Khamenei was informed. But they still did not inform the president, other elected officials or the public.

Senior commanders discussed keeping the shooting secret until the planes black boxes the flight data and cockpit voice recorders were examined and formal aviation investigations completed, according to members of the Guards, diplomats and officials with knowledge of the deliberations. That process could take months, they argued, and it would buy time to manage the domestic and international fallout that would ensue when the truth came out.

The government had violently crushed an anti-government uprising in November. But the American killing of General Suleimani, followed by the strikes against the United States, had turned public opinion around. Iranians were galvanized in a moment of national unity.

The authorities feared that admitting to shooting down the passenger plane would undercut that momentum and prompt a new wave of anti-government protests.

They advocated covering it up because they thought the country couldnt handle more crisis, said a ranking member of the Guards who, like others interviewed for this article, spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. At the end, safeguarding the Islamic Republic is our ultimate goal, at any cost.

That evening, the spokesman for the Joint Armed Forces, Brig. Gen. Abolfazl Shekarchi, told Iranian news media that suggestions that missiles struck the plane were an absolute lie.

On Thursday, as Ukrainian investigators began to arrive in Tehran, Western officials were saying publicly that they had evidence that Iran had accidentally shot down the plane.

A chorus of senior Iranian officials from the director of civil aviation to the chief government spokesman issued statement after statement rejecting the allegations, their claims amplified on state media.

The suggestion that Iran would shoot down a passenger plane was a Western plot, they said, psychological warfare aimed at weakening Iran just as it had exercised its military muscle against the United States.

But in private, government officials were alarmed and questioning whether there was any truth to the Western claims. Mr. Rouhani, a seasoned military strategist himself, and his foreign minister, Javad Zarif, deflected phone calls from world leaders and foreign ministers seeking answers. Ignorant of what their own military had done, they had none to give.

Domestically, public pressure was building for the government to address the allegations.

Among the planes passengers were some of Irans best and brightest. They included prominent scientists and physicians, dozens of Irans top young scholars and graduates of elite universities, and six gold and silver medal winners of international physics and math Olympiads.

There were two newlywed couples who had traveled from Canada to Tehran for their weddings just days earlier. There were families and young children.

Their relatives demanded answers. Iranian social media began to explode with emotional commentary, some accusing Iran of murdering its own citizens and others calling such allegations treason.

Persian-language satellite channels operating from abroad, the main source of news for most Iranians, broadcast blanket coverage of the crash, including reports from Western governments that Iran had shot down the plane.

Mr. Rouhani tried several times to call military commanders, officials said, but they did not return his calls. Members of his government called their contacts in the military and were told the allegations were false. Irans civil aviation agency called military officials with similar results.

Thursday was frantic, Ali Rabiei, the government spokesman, said later in a news conference. The government made back-to-back phone calls and contacted the armed forces asking what happened, and the answer to all the questions was that no missile had been fired.

On Friday morning, Mr. Rabiei issued a statement saying the allegation that Iran had shot down the plane was a big lie.

Several hours later, the nations top military commanders called a private meeting and told Mr. Rouhani the truth.

Mr. Rouhani was livid, according to officials close to him. He demanded that Iran immediately announce that it had made a tragic mistake and accept the consequences.

The military officials pushed back, arguing that the fallout could destabilize the country.

Mr. Rouhani threatened to resign.

Canada, which had the most foreign citizens on board the plane, and the United States, which as Boeings home country was invited to investigate the crash, would eventually reveal their evidence, Mr. Rouhani said. The damage to Irans reputation and the public trust in the government would create an enormous crisis at a time when Iran could not bear more pressure.

As the standoff escalated, a member of Ayatollah Khameneis inner circle who was in the meeting informed the supreme leader. The ayatollah sent a message back to the group, ordering the government to prepare a public statement acknowledging what had happened.

Mr. Rouhani briefed a few senior members of his government. They were rattled.

Mr. Rabiei, the government spokesman who had issued a denial just that morning, broke down. Abbas Abdi, a prominent critic of Irans clerical establishment, said that when he spoke to Mr. Rabiei that evening, Mr. Rabiei was distraught and crying.

Everything is a lie, Mr. Rabiei said, according to Mr. Abdi. The whole thing is a lie. What should I do? My honor is gone.

Mr. Abdi said the governments actions had gone far beyond just a lie.

There was a systematic cover-up at the highest levels that makes it impossible to get out of this crisis, he said.

Irans National Security Council held an emergency meeting and drafted two statements, the first to be issued by the Joint Armed Forces followed by a second one from Mr. Rouhani.

As they debated the wording, some suggested claiming that the United States or Israel may have contributed to the accident by jamming Irans radars or hacking its communications networks.

But the military commanders opposed it. General Hajizadeh said the shame of human error paled compared with admitting his air defense system was vulnerable to hacking by the enemy.

Irans Civil Aviation Agency later said that it had found no evidence of jamming or hacking.

At 7 a.m., the military released a statement admitting that Iran had shot down the plane because of human error.

The bombshell revelation has not ended the division within the government. The Revolutionary Guards want to pin the blame on those involved in firing the missiles and be done with it, officials said. The missile operator and up to 10 others have been arrested but officials have not identified them or said whether they had been charged.

Mr. Rouhani has demanded a broader accounting, including an investigation of the entire chain of command. The Guards accepting responsibility, he said, is the first step and needs to be completed with other steps. His spokesman and lawmakers have demanded to know why Mr. Rouhani was not immediately informed.

Mr. Rouhani touched on that concern when he put out his statement an hour and 15 minutes later. The first line said that he had found out about the investigative committees conclusion about cause of the crash a few hours ago.

It was a stunning admission, an acknowledgment that even the nations highest elected official had been shut out from the truth, and that as Iranians, and the world, turned to the government for answers, it had peddled lies.

What we thought was news was a lie. What we thought was a lie was news, said Hesamedin Ashna, Mr. Rouhanis top adviser, on Twitter. Why? Why? Beware of cover-ups and military rule.

Read the rest here:
Anatomy of a Lie: How Iran Covered Up the Downing of an Airliner - The New York Times

Grey’s Anatomy Sparked Major Backlash Over the Confusing ‘Station 19’ Crossover – countryliving.com

Greys Anatomy has finally returned from its winter hiatus after leaving us all holding a collective breath after a grippingand potentially fatalfall finale.

Fortunately, the series is back on the air to finally address the aftermath of the car that plowed into Joes Bar, putting several of our favorite doctors, and later Station 19 firefighters, in grave danger.

ABC used the drama to create one one, big two-hour crossover episode with both the medical mainstay and its popular spinoff. At a glance, two hours of our favorite hotshots sounds too good to be true. However, some Greys fans lashed out on Twitter for a few different reasons.

The first was that Grey's and Station 19 are swapping times, with Station 19 now airing first on Thursdays at 8 p.m. EST followed by Grey's at 9 p.m.

Others were upset that they missed the first half of the two-episode event, unaware that they needed to tune in for both.

But even more seemed enraged over feeling forced to watch the spinoff in order to understand the new Greys that followed.

Since most of the overlapping events happened during the first hour as firefighters worked to free the victims from the rubble, it does sound pretty imperative to watch both.

Those who have never watched Station 19 seemed particularly annoyed, since they had to sit through a show in which they aren't familiar with the characters and arent super invested in.

It's not the first time the shows have overlapped, and it looks like more crossovers are to come. Krista Vernoff, the showrunner of both series, told Variety that plots will continue to intersect throughout the season. However, it sounds like it will be on a smaller scale, as Krista said that characters in Station 19 might become patients in the following episode of Greys (hence the time change).

Some fans picked up on the storyline possibilities with the shift in schedule as well.

Either way, it sounds like Thursday nights just got even more interesting!

Link:
Grey's Anatomy Sparked Major Backlash Over the Confusing 'Station 19' Crossover - countryliving.com

Bowen Yang of S.N.L. Is a Smash. And a Mensch. – The New York Times

Once the therapy was complete, his father let Bowen go to New York University, where his sister, already a student there, could chaperone him.

The irony of it all is I went to the gayest undergrad in the country, he says, smiling, about his alma mater, which he mocks in stand-up routines as a real estate firm, celebrity day care center and a multicomplex head-shot studio.

I spent freshman year trying straightness on for size and failing miserably, he says. I sort of tricked myself into having a crush on a girl but it was just kind of a weird, weird, weird pit stop. Then I would look at a boy and be like, Oh, I want to talk to him. Mr. Yang has a tattoo on his arm, drawn by a nonbinary Chinese tattoo artist, with ancient signets. They represent his parents last names. He never got mad at them.

I had this second coming out with them while I was in college and went through this whole flare-up again with them, where they couldnt accept it, Mr. Yang says. And then eventually, I just got to this place of standing firm and being like, This is sort of a fixed point, you guys. I cant really do anything about this. So either you meet me here or you dont meet me.

It never got to the point of, I wont come home again. I was just like, Im not going to argue with them. Like my dad every now and then will be like, So, when are you going to meet a girl? And Ill just calmly be like, Dad, its not going to happen. I mean, its O.K. Both my parents are doing a lot of work to just try to understand and I cant rush them. I cant resent them for not arriving at any place sooner than theyre able to get there.

His parents and sister proudly came to his first show as a cast member last fall.

Bowen went to pre-med classes, got a chemistry degree, and took the MCAT, partly influenced by the character played by his idol Sandra Oh on Greys Anatomy.

See original here:
Bowen Yang of S.N.L. Is a Smash. And a Mensch. - The New York Times

Did Amelia Owen’s Baby on "Grey’s Anatomy"? It is a total mess – Daily Gaming Worlld

Advertisement

It wouldnt be another season of Greys Anatomy without anything going wrong in Amelias life. Shes got a bad hand in life right now and although Link did everything right, it could turn out that her unborn baby is Owens instead of that of her good-natured younger friend. In the autumn finale of season 16, she found that she was more advanced in pregnancy than originally thought, which means that her relationship with Link and her relationship with Owen overlap somewhat.

Now everyone is talking about whether Amelia Owens will have a baby or not. At this point, the baby could be either Link or Owens, but in either case, the conversations Amelia has to have to determine paternity will be uncomfortable at best. Hopefully it will work out for them someday, but it will definitely not be an easy way to get there.

Advertisement

See the article here:
Did Amelia Owen's Baby on "Grey's Anatomy"? It is a total mess - Daily Gaming Worlld

The Facts: Women, Age and Fertility – THISDAY Newspapers

AGE RELATED INFERTILITY(ARI)Part 1

Scientific evidence shows thatin women,fertility peaks in mid 20sand starts a steep decline in mid 30s despitethisso many people still postponestarting a family.Somemodern womenwant tofocus on education,buildtheircareer,and of course some wantstable financial base, or theright manmay not be coming,so the need to wait forthe perfect partner. Whatever the reasonsfor delaying parenthood are, it is however unfortunate that the natural clock doesnt stop ticking hence the human body keeps aging inevitably.It is a fact that in todays society, inability to conceive due to age is becoming much more common because women arewaiting until their 30s and 40s to have children. Although many women are healthier in later lifeand taking better care of themselves, this doesnot stopthe natural age-related decline in fertility. Recent reports from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) haveshown that more women are delaying childbearing at the present time than previously. This trend is expected to cause a corresponding rise in the mean age at which women first present with infertility and thisbringsusto the discussion for this week:AGE RELATED INFERTILITYas it affects both males and females.

WHAT IS AGE RELATED INFERTILITY: This is the decline in fertilitythat comeswith age, seen in bothmen and women.It is a known fact thatage relatedInfertilityaffects both sexes, its effect ishoweverseen much earlier in women than in men. Women30years and abovehave reducedquantity and qualityof eggs in their ovaries while male fertility starts to decline after 40 years when sperm quality begins to decrease. Allthese automatically increasetheriskfor chromosomal abnormalities like having too many or too few chromosomes(aneuploidy)which might result in conditions suchas,implantation failure,Down syndromeandeven higher chances ofmiscarriages. Older women are alsomorelikely to have health problems that may interfere with fertility makingpregnancy and delivery of a live birth more difficult.

The Facts: Women, Age and Fertility

Womenin their 20shave a20-25% chance of achieving pregnancy during their ovulation period. This drops to15-20% for women between the ages of 31 years and 35 years and to less than 10% for women ages 35 years and older. By 40years womentypically only havea 5% and by 45-49 years a 1%chanceof becoming pregnant without fertility treatmentper month.

Women are born with all the eggs they will ever have, unlike men who typically make new sperm throughout their life. Each month many eggs begin to develop, onlyone or tworeaches maturation and eventually ovulates(releases), the others undergoa process called atresia (degeneration). This process occurs in intrauterine life(before birth), before puberty, and during a womans reproductive years, even while pregnant or on oral contraceptive.

This progressive loss of eggs over a lifespan results in low egg numbers(quantity)that resultin lower pregnancy rate beginning usually in the 40s. There is also a corresponding loss in the quality of the eggs over time. As eggs age,they becomeless able to fertilize or evenimplantnormallyand aremore likely to result in a pregnancy that miscarries.

In addition,for a variety of reasons theprocess is accelerated in somewomen whose egg quantity and quality is low at a muchyounger age e.g.those diagnosedwith Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI).

Although the average age of menopause (no remaining egg) is about 51years. The decrease in the ability to conceive due to low egg quality and quantity occurs long before,usually beginning in the 30s and becoming more pronounced in the early 40s.Womenin their late40s rarely have a spontaneous pregnancy and if so, one in three will miscarry. It is due to this sense of urgency that women 35 years and aboveshouldconsider visitingfertilityexpertsforevaluation and havetheir fertility profiling doneas soon as they suspectdifficulty becoming pregnant.

If a womans egg quality or egg number is lower than expected for her age, there may be a discoverable treatablecause.

Are thereotherfactors that can decrease ovarian functionin women apart from agesuch asEndometriosis,Severe pelvic adhesion,Previous chemotherapy or radiation,history of smoking, ovarian surgery or removal ofa portionor all of an ovaryor both, genetics (Turners syndrome)etc.

However, decreased ovarian functioncan also occur in women without these predisposing factors. The cause of an early loss of eggs in some women is sometimes not clear, but it is thought to be due togenetic factors with or without a family history of early menopause.

The rule of 3s- ifa healthy woman irrespective of age, has conceived and made it up the first trimester, her odds of the pregnancy resulting in a live birth are almost the same regardless of age. The chances of having a good outcome and a healthy baby are very high. Of course all routine testing are still recommended during prenatal care.

It isworthy ofnote that the process of egg loss happens at a predictable and steady rate even if a woman takes good care of her health and looks young physically.Both egg quantity and quality determines a womans ability to conceive and both are influenced by ageand it is important to note that pregnancy is often possible with the right combination of treatment by fertility specialists.

To be continued.

Visit link:
The Facts: Women, Age and Fertility - THISDAY Newspapers

Highs and lows of human behavior in two great books: Bill Ruehlmanns picks – Daily Press

He entered the vault, its hundreds of large white steel cabinets standing in rows like sentries, and got to work. ... Quivering beneath his fingertips were a dozen Red-ruffed Fruitcrows, gathered by naturalists and biologists over hundreds of years from the forests and jungles of South America and fastidiously preserved by generations of curators for the benefit of future research. He unzipped the suitcase and began filling it with the birds, emptying one drawer after another. He didnt know exactly how many hed be able to fit into his suitcase, but he managed forty-seven of the museums forty-eight male specimens before wheeling his bag on to the next cabinet.

See more here:
Highs and lows of human behavior in two great books: Bill Ruehlmanns picks - Daily Press

To find intelligent alien life, humans may need to start thinking like an extraterrestrial – Space.com

HONOLULU Our hunt for aliens has a potentially fatal flaw we're the ones searching for them.

That's a problem because we're a unique species, and alien-seeking scientists are an even stranger and more specialized bunch. As a result, their all-too human assumptions may get in the way of their alien-listening endeavors. To get around this, the Breakthrough Listen project, a $100-million initiative scouring the cosmos for signals of otherworldly beings as part of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI), is asking anthropologists to help unmask some of these biases.

"It's kind of a joke at Breakthrough Listen," Claire Webb, an anthropology and history of science student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said here on Jan. 8 at the 235th meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) in Honolulu. "They tell me: 'We're studying aliens, and you're studying us.'"

Related: 9 Strange, Scientific Excuses for We Havent Found Aliens Yet

Since 2017, Webb has worked with Breakthrough Listen to examine how SETI researchers think about aliens, produce knowledge, and perhaps inadvertently place anthropocentric assumptions into their work.

She sometimes describes her efforts as "making the familiar strange."

For instance, your life might seem perfectly ordinary maybe involving being hunched over at a desk and shuttling electrons around between computers until examined through an anthropological lens, which points out that this is not exactly a universal state of affairs. At the conference, Webb presented a poster looking at how Breakthrough Listen scientists use artificial intelligence (AI) to sift through large data sets and try to uncover potential technosignatures, or indicators of technology or tool use by alien organisms.

"Researchers who use AI tend to disavow human handicraft in the machines they build," Webb told Live Science. "They attribute a lot of agency to those machines. I find that somewhat problematic and at the worst untrue."

Any AI is trained by human beings, who present it with the types of signals they think an intelligent alien might produce. In doing so, they predispose their algorithms to certain biases. It can be incredibly difficult to recognize such thinking and overcome its limitations, Webb said.

Most SETI research assumes some level of commensurability, or the idea that beings on different worlds will understand the universe in the same way and be able to communicate about it with one another, Webb said. Much of this research, for example, presumes a type of technological commensurability, in which aliens broadcast messages using the same radio telescopes we have built, and that we will be able to speak to them using a universal language of science and math.

Related: Greetings, Earthlings! 8 Ways Aliens Might Contact Us

But how universal is our language of science, and how inevitable is our technological evolution? Do alien scientists gather in large buildings and present their work to one another via slides and lectures and posters? And what bearing do such human rituals have on the types of scientific knowledge researchers produce?

It was almost like trying to take the perspective of a creature on another planet, who might wonder about humanity and our odd modern-day practices. "If E.T. was looking at us, what would they see?" Webb asked.

The assumptions and anxieties of alien-hunters can creep in in other ways. Because of the vast distances involved in sending a signal through space, many SETI researchers have imagined receiving a message from an older technological society. As astronomer and science popularizer Carl Sagan famously said in his 1980 book and television series "Cosmos," that might mean E.T. has lived through a "technological adolescence" and survived nuclear proliferation or an apocalyptic climate meltdown.

But those statements are based on the specific anxieties of our era, namely nuclear war and climate change, and we can't automatically assume that the history of another species will unfold in the same way, Webb said.

Veteran SETI scientist Jill Tarter has told Webb that, in some ways, we are looking for a better version of ourselves, speculating that a message from the heavens will include blueprints for a device that can provide cheap energy and help alleviate poverty.

The ideal of progress is embedded in such narratives, Webb said, first of scientific and technological progress, but also an implicit assumption of moral advancement. "It's the idea that, as your technology develops, so does your sense of ethics and morality," she said. "And I think that's something that can be contested."

Even our hunt for organisms like ourselves suggests "a yearning for connectivity, reflective to me of a kind of postmodern loneliness and isolation in the universe," she said.

Webb joked that SETI researchers don't always understand the point of her anthropological and philosophical examinations. But, she said, they are open to being challenged in their ideas and knowing that they are not always seeing the whole picture.

"One thing Jill [Tarter] has said many times is, 'We reserve the right to get smarter,'" she said. "We are doing what we think makes sense now, but we might one day be doing something totally different."

Ultimately, the point of this work is to get SETI researchers to start "noticing human behavior in ways that could push SETI to do novel kinds of searches," Webb said. "Inhabiting other mindscapes is potentially a very powerful tool in cultivating new ways to do science."

Perhaps beings on another planet might use gravitational waves, or neutrinos, or even some other unknown aspect of reality we have yet to come across to send messages into the heavens.

Originally published on Live Science.

Read more:
To find intelligent alien life, humans may need to start thinking like an extraterrestrial - Space.com

Gail Fisher’s ‘Dog Tracks’: Don’t be fooled by puppy behavior to skip early training – The Union Leader

SOMEONE ASKED me recently how long it takes to train a dog. Theres no simple answer. It depends on many factors such as the dogs age, temperament and personality, breed or mixed breed characteristics, prior training if any, the chosen training method, and so much more.

A puppy younger than 3 or 4 months has a relatively clean slate, so training progresses quickly. A lot can be accomplished in just a few months, but the job continues. As the dog goes through adolescence, the owner needs to keep practicing to get through that teenage period.

An adolescent or adult dog, even one that hasnt had any formal training, has prior learning gleaned from experiences. Consequently, the dog has responses and behaviors that might affect training. For example, if a dog hasnt been trained to come when called, he likely has learned to ignore Come! or doesnt know that it means Right now without stopping to smell the roses. It will take longer to overcome that prior learning. Or if a dog learned to respond to the command sit ... Sit ... SIT ... SIT! ... SIT DARN IT!! it will generally take time to teach him to respond to a calm, quiet, sit.

When starting a young puppys training, learning happens quickly. But then comes adolescence. Just as with human adolescents, teenage dogs test the boundaries, often become self-assertive, are easily distracted and frustrate owners in other ways they might not be prepared for.

Puppy owners often tell us they dont need to start training classes (yet) because their puppy seems to have been born trained. He never leaves their property, always follows them closely when they walk with it off-leash (in a safe place, of course) and always comes when called. I smile, say how fortunate they are and then say, Just wait for adolescence. Actually, Im not quite that passive about it. I explain that teenagers push the envelope, and in a month or two, these born trained behaviors will likely disappear unless they are solidified through training.

The differences between puppy and adolescent behaviors can be observed in the dogs relative, the wolf, which makes the purpose of the developmental stages clear.

Several periods of a dogs psychological development relate to a wild canines very survival. Lets take the homebound behavior that owners report, in which the puppy doesnt wander from the yard, and the following off-leash that many owners enjoy in a young puppy. These two Velcro-like behaviors radically change in adolescence. Where previously the puppy was glued to the property, the adolescent is eager to explore the world outside the property line and might roam.

This time frame corresponds to the wolfs development. When adult wolves go off to hunt, young pups stick close to the den, playing together and waiting for mom and dad to return. Starting around 4 or 5 months of age, the youngsters begin to explore away from the den. This willingness to leave the safe confines of home corresponds with the time a wolf pack moves from its summer quarters, where the new pups are born, to the packs winter home, following a caribou herd for example. Nature has created this inborn safety net for the pups: Stay close to safe harbor, and when the time comes, a switch is flipped, and the adolescent is bold enough (and big enough) to travel.

While this developmental period has great significance in wild canids, it is no less apparent in dogs, and is called the Flight Instinct period. Generally starting between 4 and 6 months of age, the now-adolescent dog takes off on his own for the first time or doesnt come when called. Having your puppy in training before this happens often avoids issues, so this transition to adolescence might pass without any significant undesirable learning.

Regardless of how long it takes to train a dog, just start. The younger the better, but its never too late. Lay a solid training foundation, then use it throughout your dogs life. Youll both love the results.

Gail Fisher, author of The Thinking Dog and a dog behavior consultant, runs All Dogs Gym & Inn in Manchester. To suggest a topic for this column, which appears every other Sunday, email gail@alldogsgym.com or write c/o All Dogs Gym, 505 Sheffield Road, Manchester, NH 03103. Past columns are on her website.

See the original post:
Gail Fisher's 'Dog Tracks': Don't be fooled by puppy behavior to skip early training - The Union Leader

Clay Christensens Lasting Impact On How We Think About Innovation – Forbes

Clayton M. Christensen, Professor of Business Administration at the Harvard Business School

The Innovators Dilemma was published in 1997 by Harvard Business School professor Clayton M. Christensen. The Economist named it one of the six most important books about business ever written. George Gilder, author, and supply-side economics pioneer, called it a masterpiece...the most profound and useful business book ever written about innovation.

The book was a revolutionary work that helped explain how well-run companies can fail when innovation creates new competition. This may seem like a subject reserved for tech entrepreneurs or business school faculty, but ultimately innovation affects everyones life in some capacity. Clays theory of disruptive innovation has become a must-read for anybody interested in innovation and has shaped the thinking of business leaders around the world.

A firsthand encounter with the innovators dilemma

Cree Research (now Cree) was an early pioneer in the development of blue LEDs. This is the technology that would power the LED lighting revolution and the eventual obsolescence of the Edison light bulb. But in the 1990s, it could be intimidating for small companies like Cree working on these disruptive new products. Cree believed in the incredible potential of the technology, but the big lighting companies werent interested. What did they know that Cree didnt? These companies had been in the lighting business for over 100 years and controlled over 70% of the worlds market for light bulbs. They had orders of magnitude more resources, hundreds of years more experience in both business and technology development, and far more financial resources. Why couldnt they see the potential of this new technology?

The light bulb goes off

When The Innovators Dilemma came out in 1997, what was happening at the big lighting companies started to make sense. These companies were well aware of the new technology; they just couldnt change their thinking to take advantage of it. They had become too good at making light bulbs.

One of the core principles of Clays theory is: the things that make well-managed companies successful are the same things that eventually lead to their downfall.

While technology is often the means to enable disruptive innovation, the opportunity comes from understanding human behavior. These organizations are able to maximize achievement over a long period of time, but their success inherently becomes focused on shorter-term metrics. These metrics make it nearly impossible to take big risks, invest in longer-term ideas, and react to potentially disruptive new technology or business models. These businesses become a victim of their own success as they fall into the trap of you get what you measure.

While this book was a revelation for the team at Cree, it doesnt contain any examples of LEDs or lighting. The book talks about disruption in the steel industry, mechanical excavators, and disk drives, but what it really describes is behaviors; why these companies and the people running them act the way they do. And that is why it is still relevant today. Innovation is ultimately about people. The book doesnt teach you what to think about problems; it teaches you how to think about problems.

Thinking beyond business

In 2010, Clayton Christensen published an article titled How Will You Measure Your Life, which talks about the three questions he asks his business school students to think about on the last day of class. They are:

While these questions might seem unrelated to his previous work on innovation, they are some of the same concepts applied to a different contextour personal lives. Most people wait until too late in their careers to ask themselves these questions. Ultimately, in both business and life, its not just about doing things right, its about doing the right things and their impact on those around you.

Clayton M. Christen passed away on Friday, January 24, 2020. I never met him in person, only through his books, papers, and talks that are available on YouTube, but his work shaped much of my thinking about innovation. As Clay said, I had thought the destination was what was important, but it turned out it was the journey. His journey inspired me and continues to inspire the next generation of innovators and leaders.

Read this article:
Clay Christensens Lasting Impact On How We Think About Innovation - Forbes

Close-up nature: non-human animals that seem to imitate our behavior, attribute human actions and thoughts to them may be imaginative, but we can undo…

Advertisement

Videographer Judy Lehmberg from Sunday Morning.

Ive been thinking and reading a lot about non-human animal intelligence lately. One thought that continues to go through my head is the meaning of the word anthropomorphic. The more I think and read, the more I feel that there is a word that shouldnt exist.

Anthropomorphic, from Anthropos (human) and Morphe (form), means attributing human actions and thoughts to non-human animals. Fine. Except who developed from whom? No other animals have developed from us. We, Homo Sapiens, are just 200,000 years old and one of the new children on earth. We didnt develop directly from wolves, elk or elephants, but they were here first. It is therefore logical that our thoughts and feelings developed later than those of another animal.

Advertisement

And since we share a lot of similar structures and DNA with other organisms that were here first, it is logical to assume that our brain has evolved in a similar way and has some of the same intelligence and emotions. We should be talking about gorillaopomorphic or chimpomorphic or even animalmorphic, not anthropomorphic. They dont imitate us; we emulate them because they did it first.

The more time I spend watching animals, the more people I see in them. We have all heard stories about elephants mourning their dead, including the absence of a family member. Crows and ravens can pull up long cords that are attached to a horizontal bar with a piece of meat at the other end. They pull the line up as far as possible, catch it with one foot and repeat until the bite is within reach. A chimpanzee was discovered in a Swedish zoo, who spent his early morning hours hiding stones behind trunks and haystacks he had created and later using them to attack zoo visitors. I guess he didnt want company! I saw a fox woman bury the remains of one of her babies after a badger killed and ate most of it. Ive seen bisons and moose mourn their babies for hours, sometimes all day, after a wolf or bear has got them. We once saw a bison mother who had given birth to a stillborn calf fending off wolves for hours until she was exhausted. She then suddenly left just to return with some of her friends as reinforcements. There are many, many other examples.

One of the reasons I was thinking about animal intelligence was a story I heard years ago about an orangutan in a zoo that kept coming out of its closed enclosure and letting the rest of the orangutans out with it. I believed this story because I knew that orangutans were smart, but I had no evidence that it was true until the animal keeper in charge told it on NPRs Radiolab.

Jerry Stones was the chief zookeeper at the Omaha Zoo in Nebraska in the 1960s. One day, some of his guards came to him and said all orangutans were loose and up in the trees near the elephants. They all ran to the orangs, lured them back to their enclosure, and then tried to figure out how they got out. Jerry was certain that one of the guards had forgotten to lock the closet door. Over the next few weeks, this happened several times with the same results. The guards swore they would make sure the door was locked carefully. Jerry threatened to fire someone. A few days after the last escape, one of the guards ran to Jerry and said, You have to come to see this. They sneaked over to the orangutan enclosure and watched Fu Manchu, the dominant man, fumble at the door lock. There was something in his hand, but they couldnt find out what it was. When they saw, they found that he had a piece of wire that he pushed into the slot between the door and the door stopper and skillfully guided around the door latch. Then he pulled on both ends of the wire and the latch pulled out of its hole. You were free!

Jerry and the other guards were amazed, but they still had what it takes to stop the orangutans and confiscate the wire. They later noticed that Fu Manchu hid the wire in the area between his lower lip and teeth.

He wasnt just using a tool; He used a tool that he had never been taught before and kept it for later use. I guess his only mistake was that he was too naive to watch out for people spying on him.

We know that an increasing number of animals, from Darwins finches to chimpanzees, are able to use tools. But here an animal hid a tool that he knew would lose if it was discovered, and planned to use it in the future.

Two of the Goodall chimpanzees: On the left, Glitter watches her sister Gaia dig for termites.

Many biologists who study animal behavior reject the idea of a non-human higher intelligence or emotion. I had a very respected college animal behavior professor who was a young, uneducated woman who had the audacity to go to Africa to study chimpanzees, and horror of terror! She also had the nerve to give them human names, like David Greybeard and Frodo, instead of Chimpanzee 1, Chimpanzee 2, Chimpanzee 3 etc. Of course, this young woman was Jane Goodall, who has contributed so much to our knowledge of chimpanzees and is valid today as the worlds leading chimpanzee expert.

I wonder what we would discover if we were smart enough to understand their language. And if we really are the smartest species, why are we destroying the earth through overpopulation, global warming, habitat destruction, etc.? Maybe we should learn from them.

Judy Lehmberg is a former university lecturer in biology who is now shooting nature videos.

See also:

To see the extended Sunday Morning nature videos, click here!

Advertisement

Continued here:
Close-up nature: non-human animals that seem to imitate our behavior, attribute human actions and thoughts to them may be imaginative, but we can undo...