Harvey Weinstein Rape Accuser Reveals Graphic Details About His Anatomy: I Thought He Was Deformed – The Inquisitr News

One of Harvey Weinsteins rape accusers shared graphic details about his anatomy on the witness stand, telling a jury that the disgraced movie mogul does not have testicles and appeared deformed.

Actress Jessica Mann testified against Weinstein during his rape trial, telling members of the jury about alleged instances where he forced her into sex. During this testimony, Mann claimed that Weinstein had a very distinct anatomy.

The first time I saw him fully naked, I thought he was deformed and intersex, she said, via Vulture. He has an extreme scarring that I didnt know, maybe [he] was a burn victim

Mann went on to add that it appeared Weinstein does not have testicles. As the report noted, Weinstein held his head down as he listened to the testimony. Prosecutor Joan Illuzzi went on to ask more embarrassing questions, including ones about the movie producers personal hygiene.

It was very bad, Mann testified. He smelled like sh*t excuse me, sorry, like poop. He just was dirty.

As the BBC reported, Mann testified that Weinstein subjecting her to degrading abuse, including urinating on her. She detailed a time that he trapped her in a hotel bedroom and raped her.

Weinsteins trial has stretched into the fourth week, with a number of women accusing him of forcing them into sex. Mann told the court that she entered into what she believed to be a real relationship with Weinstein as she had ambitions of becoming an actress. Mann explained that after the instances where Weinstein forced her into sex, she stayed with him out of fear, describing his short temper.

If he heard the word no, it was like a trigger for him, she said.

There was plenty of drama leading up to the trial as well, the BBC reported, with prosecutors accusing his defense team of systemically eliminating young white women from the jury pool. Model Gigi Hadid was also selected as a potential juror, though she was eliminated.

Judge James Burke also instructed the jury to not look beyond the accusations against Weinstein, saying that the trial was not a referendum on the #MeToo movement or on sexual harassment but only the allegations facing the movie mogul.

At the same time, Weinsteins defense team has been accused of playing up his physical ailments in a bid to seek sympathy, showing him using a walker to help him enter the courtroom. As the Los Angeles Times reported, prosecutors are trying to overcome the image of him as harmless.

See the article here:
Harvey Weinstein Rape Accuser Reveals Graphic Details About His Anatomy: I Thought He Was Deformed - The Inquisitr News

A Retooled CBS Pilot That Starred This ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Actress Lands at The CW – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

After it was in development at CBS and passed over last year, a television project that was set to be fronted by a former Greys Anatomy star is back in the works at a new network.

During the 2019 pilot season, The Republic of Sarah was ordered as a pilot at CBS.

The logline of the series reads: A small New Hampshire town is thrust onto the world stage when the discovery of a valuable resource within its borders compels the residents to declare themselves an independent nation, setting the unlikely young mayor and her cabinet of inexperienced locals on the path of running a brand new country.

Sarah Drew of Greys Anatomy fame was the lead and titular Sarah. The main cast also included Kirsten Nelson, James Lesure, Kimberly Guerrero, Daniel Ings, Annie Funke, Jonathan Slavin, Carlos Leal.

CBS ended up passing on the series and it did not move forward. The shows that did get series orders at the network included Mike Colter in Evil and Simone Missick in All Rise.

A year after the initial pilot was ordered at CBS, The Republic of Sarah is back in development. This time, it is in the works at CBSs sibling network, The CW. Both networks are under ViacomCBS, along with other ones like Showtime, MTV, BET, and more.

While the general theme of the show is the same, several key components of the original pilot script have been changed.

Deadline reports, The Republic of Sarahis said to have aNorthern Exposurefeel. Faced with the destruction of her town at the hands of a greedy mining company, rebellious high school teacher Sarah Cooper utilizes an obscure cartographical loophole to declare independence. Now Sarah must lead a young group of misfits as they attempt to start their own country from scratch.

As far as we know, Drew will not be in this new pilot. The new Sarah, as well as the main cast, should be announced in the coming weeks.

We will find out around May if The Republic of Sarah will get picked up to series at The CW.

View post:
A Retooled CBS Pilot That Starred This 'Grey's Anatomy' Actress Lands at The CW - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

‘Grey’s Anatomy’: Fans Are Outraged Over the ‘Cheap Twist’ with Amelia’s Baby and Begging For A Paternity Test – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Fans of televisions longest-running medical drama should beused to the twistsby now. However, the latest plot-line turn of events withAmelia Shepherd(Caterina Scorsone) has viewers distraught. Lets take a look at the new surprising details onGreys Anatomythis week.

[Warning: Greys Anatomy Season 16 spoilers ahead]

Viewers found out in the midseason finale back in November 2019 thatAmelias baby might not be Lincs(Chris Carmack). However, a new turn of events happened when she broke the news to the excited soon-to-be father this week.

Linc, I hate this, Amelia began. I promise you that no blood test can change the way I feel about you. I am more pregnant than I thought, which means there is a chance that you arent the father. It took me a few days to work up the nerve to tell you.

Fans were pleasantly surprised that she didnt drag out the news until the end of the episode. However, that gave Linc more time to think about the entire situation. Amelia does not want to get a paternity test, and at first, Linc is on board with that.

I dont need a paternity test to know I want to be with you, Amelia tells him. I love what we have. I love your kindness. I love our ease. I love that you make me laugh all the time and you have let me cry. Im in love with you, and genetics dont matter.

After the colossal bomb Amelia dropped on Linc, he confides in his longtime friend, Jo Wilson (Camilla Luddington). She cannot believe that he would agree not to get a paternity test. Jo also cannot believe how calmly Linc is taking the entire thing.

You can love her and be mad at her at the same time, Jo tells Linc. Both things can be true.

Linc thinks about what Jo said to him and came to the conclusion that he does want to know whether or not he is the father.

There are a bunch of people involved in this, and they deserve to know. Linc tells Amelia. I deserve to know.

The surgeon continues by telling her that he wants to be the guy who doesnt care who the father is, but he cant predict how he is going to react when he hears the truth. The bottom line is that he wants her to get a paternity test.

I am pissed that they ruined Amelias storyline by making the baby possibly her exs,one fan wrote on Reddit. Linc is SO excited, and so was she. Let her have that damnit!

Many other fans of Greys Anatomy agree. They wish the producers could give Amelia a chance to be happy.

Totally agree. Cheap is the right word, another Redditor added. I will never understand why and how these writers start potentially good storylines and completely ruin them by cheap twists. They HAVE to know this is not only very unpopular but also completely useless.

Viewers have come up with an excellent idea for how they would like Amelia and Linc to determine who the father is. Fans are also committed to making sure that Owen is not the father of Amelias baby.

Being Owens is not an option,one fan insists. Telling Owen it might be his is not an option. Therefore Amelia has to steal Owens DNA to get her paternity test done. OK, it would be easier to just test Linc, but where is the fun in that?

Fans agree that with Jo that Linc needs to find out the true paternity of the baby. However, they hope it is not Owens baby. Find out next week when Greys Anatomy returns on Thursday at 9 p.m. ET on ABC.

More here:
'Grey's Anatomy': Fans Are Outraged Over the 'Cheap Twist' with Amelia's Baby and Begging For A Paternity Test - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Greys Anatomy Season 17: Release Date, Cast, Story, And Other Details – OtakuKart

Greys Anatomyis a long-running TV series that first premiered on 27 March 2005, ABC, which as amid-season replacement. There has been a lot of season of this show, and it is still going strong to this day. The show has a total of 16 seasons, and it was recently renewed for a 17 season. Here is everything you need to know about it.

The show is developed by Shonda Rhimes and, to this day, continues to write for the series. Furthermore, she is also an executive producer alongside Betsy Beers,Mark Gordon,Krista Vernoff,Rob Corn,Mark Wilding, andAllan Heinberg. The show takes place in a fictional Seattle called Grace Hospital, and it is mostly filmed in Los Angeles,California.

In general, the story of the show revolves around the life of surgical interns, residents, and also attendings at the Grey-Sloan Memorial Hospital. As time goes on, these interns gradually go through many changes in their character as well as because of seasoned doctors through the mentoring of their residents, attendings, and chiefs of surgery. Each of the seasons shows us just how much the characters have developed over the season.

As for the 17th season, there hasnt been that many things revealed, but the fans of the series have a much better idea of what will have in the upcoming season. Moreover, Pompeo is very focused on the show because he doesnt want to disappoint the fans of the series. He gave the example of Game of Thrones, which enraged its fans to a point they start a petition in order to remake the last season of their beloved franchise.

The fans have a lot of questions about this, one of which is that this will be the final season of the show. Well, Pompeo was hinting that theshow couldnt go on forever. She said that the idea appeals to get, but the truth is that she has three kids and doesnt love to travel and leave them behind. She further said that she doesnt want to live in hotels and because of the network make such offers that continue to incentivize. Will this be the last season, who knows maybe it might be.

There have been many characters coming on going to the show, but some are in the show from the beginning. It hasnt been revealed who will be in the 17th season but the following members will most likely be present. Ellen Pompeo as Meredith Grey, Martin Henderson as Nathan Riggs, Giacomo Gianniotti as Andrew DeLuca, Jake Borelli as Levi Schmitt, Greg Germann as Thomas Koracick, Chris Carmack as Atticus Lincoln. Chandra Wilson as Miranda Bailey, James Pickens Jr. as Richard Webber, and many more.

So, lets talk about the episode count, Greys Anatomy is pretty unpredictable on how many episodes its season will have. According to the previous seasons, we can expect the show to have at least 20-27 episodes.

Greys Anatomy Season 17 will be released in September 2020. And I think it will drop in the middle of the month. This is it from me hope you guys enjoyed and I will see you guys in the next one.

More here:
Greys Anatomy Season 17: Release Date, Cast, Story, And Other Details - OtakuKart

Big Bang Theory cast: Who is Kelli Goss? Meet the Greys Anatomy star – Express.co.uk

The episode, which was the 21st of the series, was aired back in April 2015.

She has now landed a new role in a CBS comedy pilot called United States of Al.

She said she was beyond excited to be a part of the project.

The move comes as her series on Netflix, The Ranch, comes to an end.

The Big Bang Theory is available to view on Netflix and E4

See the article here:
Big Bang Theory cast: Who is Kelli Goss? Meet the Greys Anatomy star - Express.co.uk

He ordered coffee while wearing an AirPod. The barista refused to serve him – ZDNet

Some people wear them all the time.

Apple AirPods Pro

Active noise cancellation for immersive sound. Three sizes of soft, tapered silicone tips for a customizable fit. Available at Amazon.

Read More

I'm becoming unreasonably fascinated with Apple's AirPods. And not just because CEO Tim Cook says Apple's wearables are selling in glorious numbers.

Recently, I wrote about how teens are now exchanging single AirPods so that they can have fun with text-and-speech apps during class. (Surely you're trying it in meetings by now.)

This led to one or two readers telling me I was an OK person. Well, OK Boomer to be precise.

I'm still struggling, however, with the whole ethos of these things. And now I've discovered there's an apparent resistance against them in certain businesses.

Chicago-based culinary site The Takeout offered a story that, I fear, will have many AirPod-wearers taking sides.

You see, a reader called Kevin (I'm being unusually hopeful that this person is real) wrote to the site's etiquette columnist -- the much-revered Salty Waitress -- and complained: "Dear Salty, I was at the coffee shop counter, and the cashier wouldn't take my order until I took off my AirPod! And it was only in one ear! Am I the asshole here?"

It was only in one ear, judge. How can anyone be offended by that?

The Salty Waitress was not at one with such a view. She replied, in part: "I am trying hard here to give you the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps you were in the middle of a very important phone call/podcast/guitar riff that could not be paused for the 30 or so seconds it takes to order a cup of coffee. In which case, you very politely step aside to conclude your business and then order your coffee."

Doesn't that seem reasonable? Or have we already meandered most of the way down the route to Santiago de Compostheap, the saintly march of technology giving us permission to be as rude as we like?

I'm in my world. So what is it you want?

The Salty Waitress was undeterred in her resistance. She explained that if Kevin wanted to embrace technology, he could push off to Starbucks or Dunkin', order via an app and pick up his coffee without the burden of any human interaction.

She then warmed to her theme, mustering a fine froth: "Because that's the thing, sweetie pie. THE CASHIER IS A HUMAN BEING! JUST LIKE YOU! Their role in your life may be temporary and functional, but they've got feelings and hopes and dreams and aspirations. And like you (probably) they would like your full and undivided attention while you ask them to perform a service for you."

She explained that this is true for all service workers and should, indeed, work both ways. I was glad she said that, as I've had two visits to AT&T stores where the salespeople were wearing a single AirPod and listening to their own music.

Worse, I recently happened to be in a lovely Miami hotel, the Marlin, where one of the reception staff had two AirPods in at all times. I have a feeling it wasn't to receive messages from the manager.

The Salty Waitress wasn't just explaining the basics of human behavior. She added that one of the reasons to take your AirPod out is to ensure your order is taken accurately.

Naturally, her expressive defense of actual human behavior led to a spirited discussion. Many didn't take her side. They explained one has no idea whether Kevin was listening to anything at all. Some people, after all, wear their AirPods all the time, as if they're mere tasteless earrings.

Some added that the barista may have no idea whether this isn't an AirPod, but a hearing aid. As one commenter observed: "The way around it is to assume good intentions and that the person is giving you their attention until they prove otherwise. Then you won't offend someone with hearing problems by making everyone aware of their hearing aids."

Then again, another observed: "Even if your AirPod/earbud is turned off, it looks like you aren't listening to the person you are interacting with."

I fear this isn't the last time AirPods will cause controversy. Wearing them often demands a certain adjustment in others.

Why should others, though, make that adjustment?

See the rest here:
He ordered coffee while wearing an AirPod. The barista refused to serve him - ZDNet

New Truist logo revealed this week | Business – NorthcentralPa.com

In June 2019, BB&T Corporation (NYSE: BBT) and SunTrust Banks, Inc., (NYSE: STI) announced Truist as the name for their merger of equals. Just this week the bank revealed its new logo and identity.

When the name was announced in June, TheFinancialBrand.com reported heavy criticism. Some people have said it makes them sound drunk when they say the word, according to an article. Speculation went so far as to suggest the two banks might start from scratch with a brand new identity.

The company persevered, and following the complete merger between BB&T and SunTrust in December 2019, they declared a bold new look and feel with a signature color and modern monogram logo. The visual identity further signals the company's commitment to inspire and build a better future for clients and communities, according to a company news release.

"As a brand, we will innovate and redefine the client experience, making Truist the most client-centric financial services company," said Dont Wilson, chief digital and client experience officer for Truist. "Our visual brand identity speaks to the importance of human touch and dynamic technology in delivering trusted solutions to our clients, and is a powerful depiction of our commitment to building the future of finance."

Building the brand

Truist Purple, the defining color of the new brand, is the combination of heritage BB&T burgundy and SunTrust blue. With the help of human behavior experts, Truist fashioned a signature color that stands out as rich, bold and distinctive, yet warm and inviting, according to the release.

The monogram is made up of two T's that mirror the Truist name and represent Touch + Technology. Beginning with the stable and familiar shape of a square, Truist then rounded its corners to demonstrate the security and accessibility that the digital world of today expects.

"This striking visual expression is not what most would expect from a financial institution, and we're proud of that," said Susan Somersille Johnson, chief marketing officer for Truist. "Our identity is a symbol of the merger of equals between BB&T and SunTrust, which has brought the best of both brands together to build not only a better bank, but a better future for all who engage with Truist."

Now the sixth-largest U.S. bank holding company serving more than 10 million households in the U.S., including local branches in Muncy and Williamsport, Truist says they are building on 275 years of combined history and culture.

In the weeks and months to come, says Truist, clients will soon see more of this bold new look on digital platforms, in branches and out-of-home advertising in Miami leading up to the Superbowl being held there.

For now, Truist says they will continue to serve clients through their respective BB&T and SunTrust branches, websites, mobile apps, financial advisors and relationship managers. The transition to the full Truist experience will occur as systems are integrated over the next 18-24 months.

Excerpt from:
New Truist logo revealed this week | Business - NorthcentralPa.com

Sundance 2020 Review: Edson Oda’s Nine Days Offers a Rare and Special Time to Reflect – The Moveable Fest

Were making a moment, Kyo (Benedict Wong) tells Emma (Zazie Beetz), as hes building a wooden frame to hang a screen on in Nine Days, a physical effort to facilitate a psychological response not unlike the one Edson Oda undertakes in his provocative and ultimately deeply edifying feature debut. Emma has found her way into one of the back rooms in the house of Will (Winston Duke), an administrator of sorts a cog in the wheel, he says when one of hIs guests essentially asks if hes a god who operates a way station for a collection of souls looking to be attached to a corporeal body in the physical world. The supernatural conceit is largely limited to verbal description in Odas drama, which imagines the privilege of life as as a job that requires an interview, and over the course of nine days, Will narrows down potential prospects to one hell send to terra firma, a place hes been himself and was enormously disappointed by.

The wooden frame is being prepared for the first to be dismissed in Nine Days, made to simulate a scene from someone elses life that they were most taken by on the many screens Will has set up in the house to keep tabs on all those hes sent onto the next level, and while this marks the end of the road for someone who wont get the chance to really live, it is the starting block for Odas architectural marvel in terms of opening up the mind as the writer/director has made something strong enough to let the films considerable artifice to fall away to begin to ponder questions about the meaning of life and how much human behavior can ever be accounted for and predicted by someone living outside of anothers experience. Although Dukes Will is the sturdy center of Nine Days, the wonderfully curious Beetz proves to be an ideal avatar for an audience in a film that continually raises so many big ideas playing Emma, the most difficult of the candidates for Will to get a sense of before making his choice. Shes joined in the house by Maria (Arianna Ortiz), Mike (David Rhysdahl), Alex (Tony Hale) and Cain (Bill Skarsgard), all unsure of how to respond to Will, who never articulates what hes looking for, though a sense of toughness seems to be a necessity, especially as its gradually revealed that he may have been assigned his own job by not having enough of it.

Besides the philosophical questions raised by the premise, Nine Days also begs for a few about Wills literal place in the grander scheme of things, but Oda constructs an alternate universe cohesive and awesome enough to keep those at bay until well after the film has ended, if at all, and never shrinks from the boldness from the ideas hes putting forth. The airy cinematography of Wyatt Garfield and Antonio Pintos heavenly score open the film up to the heights that few ever even attempt to reach, and while Oda explores the increasingly weighty decisions Will makes as he becomes aware of choices hes made that havent worked out as he expected, the film manages the exact right lightness of touch to take hold. Nine Days may tell a story of those awaiting their time to live, but as an experience, it is alive with possibility and wonderment.

Related

See more here:
Sundance 2020 Review: Edson Oda's Nine Days Offers a Rare and Special Time to Reflect - The Moveable Fest

The Human Screenome project wants you to share the use of your smartphone – Mash Viral

Vadymvdrobot / 123RF

You almost certainly saw her on YouTube. Noah takes a picture of himself every day for 20 years (5 million views) Portrait of Lotte, 0 to 20 years (10.9 million views) Married at 12 I took a picture every day (To an astonishing 110 million views.) Even Homer Simpson and Peter Griffin from Family Guy parodyed the format. In times of selfies and ubiquitous smartphone cameras, this increasingly popular genre of time-lapse videos depicting the aging process allows people to document their experiences in a typically modern way that was almost impossible a few decades ago would.

But what if the bigger story wasnt the changing facial features of a YouTube star, but the fact that millions of us would spend minutes of our day watching it? Maybe afterwards we tweeted a link to the video we just saw. Or sent it to a friend on WhatsApp. Or we started the camera app on our own smartphone and started creating our own version. Or we just forgot what we just saw and played a quick game on Mario Kart Tour.

In a world where we live digitally, the way we consume media on our screens (and especially on our smartphones) could turn out to be the most profound way to document life in 2020. At least this is the idea of an ambitious new initiative called the Human Screenome Project. The new mass data collection, created by researchers at Stanford and Penn State University, prompts users to share information about everything they do on their smartphones.

Special software developed by the project creators takes screenshots of these mobile devices every five seconds they are active, encrypts them, sends them to a research server, and then uses artificial intelligence algorithms to analyze exactly what is important , The researchers want to create a multi-dimensional map of the changing digital life of people in the 21st century. They give a brief overview of the changes over the course of days, weeks, months and possibly even years and decades.

The digital media environment has made so much progress in recent years, Nilam Ram, professor of human development and psychology at Penn State University, told Digital Trends. We dont have a good idea of how people use their devices and who theyre exposed to. Usually, screen time research studies are based on self-reports of how long people have been using social media for the past week. Its a really complicated question that people have to answer. The evidence suggests that people underestimate or underestimate their own engagement by a few hours.

According to Ram, the project stems from a seven-year chance meeting between him and Byron Reeves, a professor of communication in Stanford. Reeves was interested in the media and its effects on people. Ram was interested in time series data for the behavior. A type of behavior analysis that works with regular data points that are collected in chronological order. This can be used to study and predict things about individual behavior.

First, the two set out to research multitasking. They developed software that enabled them to determine how quickly students switched between tasks while working. They found that they would change windows about every 20 seconds. It was faster than anyone thought at the time that someone was going from task to task, said Ram. From there, we developed software that made this possible on a smartphone.

(embed) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeJAkkXYIV8 (/ embed)

They thought that this would be a natural extension of their multitasking work. However, when a small group of students first came into data flow, they found that they had drilled a much deeper well than they thought. When we started looking at time-lapse footage of what people were actually doing on their phones, we found that there are so many different types of human behavior that are expressed here, said Ram. That could be a commitment to politics, mental health, social media, interpersonal relationships and climate change. We can see things like the gender distribution of faces that people look at on their cell phones, the racist distribution of these faces there is so much wealth in it.

If this sounds like it is too much for a couple of researchers to look at, you are absolutely right. The hope is that the Human Screenome project the name of which alludes to the previous Human Genome project will create an extensive shared database of information that is also available to other researchers. This will be a partially ongoing user survey (though without users having to actively answer questions) and a partially historical artifact, such as a digital mass observation project. The potential value of such an archive could be immense. Some researchers could use it to track the rise and fall of memes as they appear, flourish, and disappear in the cybernetic ether. Design students could use it to investigate how changing user interfaces of apps affect transitions in this particular area. Others may use it with referenced information to investigate the potential health effects of social media. Or how the screen time affects the concentration.

The idea of the human genome project was that if we could map the human genome, the way we deal with and treat diseases would change, said Ram. I think it did. In a way, were trying to make the same theoretical leap by saying that the human screenome changes the way we think about digital media and how it affects people if we can map it.

But is such a project feasible? The same thing that makes it so exciting from a research perspective also poses challenges. In short, as Apple co-founder and former CEO Steve Jobs predicted back in 2007, the smartphone has become a consolidation of all the devices that we once carried around. Its our laptop, our personal organizer, our portable music player, our GPS system and much more.

Because a smartphone requires physical user interaction and millions of apps available, it is a much more dynamic media environment than its predecessors: living room television with a choice of channels. Smartphones are the epitome of what media theorist Marshall The medium is the message, which McLuhan would have described as expanding ourselves. However, this makes them as personal as few other devices do. Allowing researchers to see everything you do on your smartphone is just a step too far for some users.

Still, Ram is confident that this wont apply to everyone. In general, when we talk to attendees, we find that they know that their data is regularly collected by big data companies, he said. It is used in a way that they have no control over. They seem to be aware of this and are enthusiastic about the possibility that this data can be used instead for research purposes to understand human behavior.

The Stanford Screenomics Lab has currently collected over 30 million data points from more than 600 participants. Although it has not yet opened its platform to those who want to get involved, Ram hopes that the number of users will eventually be able to scale that number to far more epic proportions with multi-year user contributions.

And what if smartphones are finally giving way to another dominant technology? (This is something that could) go on forever, said Ram. (This means that it has to look different) when screens change from separate devices to devices that are somehow embedded, whether its a chip or a Google Glass-style advancement. We want to share our data collection paradigm with evolving the advent of these technologies.

Editors recommendations

Go here to see the original:
The Human Screenome project wants you to share the use of your smartphone - Mash Viral

Letter to the Editor: Crashes Are No Accident – Bay Net

Dear Editor, January 1, 2020 marked the beginning of a new year, and while it often signals a fresh start for many, it also brought about the same heart-wrenching headlines we have all become too familiar with.

Within the first week of the year, seven pedestrians were hit in three separate incidents in Essex, Columbia and Aspen Hill. Four of the victims were children, three of which were killed and the other critically injured. Days later, a Waldorf man was killed in a crash in Prince Georges County and a woman died after a two-vehicle crash in Frederick County. These are just a few of the multiple tragedies that have already happened on Maryland roads this year. Over the last decade, Maryland has averaged more than 500 fatalities, including more than 100 pedestrians, and thousands of injuries, each year as the result of motor vehicle crashes. But those figures are more than just numbers theyre mothers, fathers, children, siblings, friends, and coworkers.

We often hear the word accident when referring to a motor vehicle crash. Using that word suggests that the incident was unavoidable and no one is to blame, but in reality, 94 percent of roadway fatalities and injuries can be attributed to human behavior. The most common contributing factors to a fatality or injury in a motor vehicle crash are driving while impaired, speeding, driving distracted or failure to wear a seat belt all behaviors that can be changed.

Last year, the Maryland legislature enacted a bill that set a goal of zero motor vehicle fatalities in the state by 2030. That goal can only be attained by all of us realizing that we each have a responsibility to make the safest choices we can.

As drivers, park the phone, slow down, never driver impaired, look out for bicyclists and pedestrians and buckle up in every seat, every time. Look out for our first responders and fellow drivers who may be pulled over on the side of the roadway.

As pedestrians, be visible to drivers, look both ways before crossing, and cross the street at crosswalks and intersections.

As bicyclists, obey traffic signs and signals, wear a helmet and use lights at night when visibility is poor.

Lets change the conversation: motor vehicle crashes are no accident. They can be prevented, and we all have a responsibility to each other to make sure we make it home safely throughout 2020.

-Sincerely, Chrissy Nizer MDOT MVA Administrator

Visit link:
Letter to the Editor: Crashes Are No Accident - Bay Net