Worth Watching: ‘Will & Grace’ Loves ‘Lucy,’ ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Ends Its Season, ‘Good Fight’ Returns – TVInsider

A selective critical checklist of notable Thursday TV:

Will & Grace (9:30/8:30c, NBC): Who doesn't love I Love Lucy? Even so, this campy comedy is especially well equipped to pay homage to the sitcom classic in the high point of a mostly uneven final season. Naturally, gay/straight-man Will (Eric McCormack), up to his knees in dishwater suds, sees himself as Ricky, but the rest of the gang fancies themselves alter egos of Lucille Ball's wacky Lucy Ricardo, especially Grace (Debra Messing): "I'm the kooky redhead everyone loves and you're the guy who overreacts to every little things I do." Her recreation of the peerless "Vitameatavegamin" sketch is indeed uncanny. Later, she switches off with fellow Lucys Jack (Sean Hayes) and Karen (Megan Mullally) as Ethel and Fred in other sketches, including the grape-stomping incident featuring Leslie Jordan as Karen's nemesis in the grape tank and the chocolate factory, where Lucie Arnaz makes a strong cameo as the boss of the slapstick assembly line.

Grey's Anatomy (9/8c, ABC): It wasn't supposed to end this way. But like so many other shows this spring, the long-running hit medical drama had to halt production several episodes short of the finish line. So where we're left in the 21st episode (of a projected 25) is Link (Chris Carmack) trying to keep Amelia (Caterina Scorsone) calm in the final stage of her pregnancy, Owen (Kevin McKidd) making a "shocking discovery," and Dr. Hayes (Richard Flood) taking Meredith (Ellen Pompeo) by surprise. What happens next? We'll have to wait until fall if we're lucky once it's safe for filming to resume.

The Good Fight (streaming on CBS All Access): Always politically charged, the Good Wife spinoff opens its third season in a bizarro fantasy land with a satirically over-the-top episode that finds Diane (Christine Baranski) waking up to an alt-world reality where Hillary Clinton became president. As in all be-careful-what-you-wish-for scenarios, Diane soon discovers the dark side to what she might have imagined to be a liberal utopia. Just wait till you see who receives a Presidential Medal of Freedom. (It's possibly even more awful than the clown who got one this year.) Not to worry, next week the show returns to its regularly heightened version of normal. Can't wait.

Shaq Life (9/8c, TNT): With the NBA season currently suspended, TNT has moved up the premiere of this reality show focusing on the home life of basketball legend Shaquille O'Neal. Making it a "ShaqNight," TNT opens with Shaq screening Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (6/5c) with Rob Riggle. Then Snoop Dogg joins Shaq for the back-to-back series premiere, in which Shaq tries his hand as a DJ in Las Vegas and then hopes to revitalize the Papa John's pizza brand when made the brand's first African-American board member.

Inside Thursday TV: Amanda Fuller (Kristin) directs an episode of Fox's Last Man Standing (8/7c) in which Joe (Jay Leno) feels more underappreciated than usual by Mike (Tim Allen) after he's sidelined in an article about the guys' car-restoration business Getting high is an easy go-to place for comedians to get laughs, but few do it as hilariously and movingly as Pamela Adlon in another first-rate episode of FX's Better Things (10/9c). After visiting a weed dispensary to get relief for her aching hands, Sam overindulges just in time to be presented by a family emergency and an unexpected revelation by one of her daughters. Can it all be fixed with homemade peppermint ice cream? CBS's Tommy (10/9c) deals with cybercrime when an online "swatter" endangers the LAPD and first responders with fake 911 calls. Worse, the perp threatens to reveal private details about members of the LAPD which shouldn't affect police chief Tommy (Edie Falco), who has already publicly come out.

Link:
Worth Watching: 'Will & Grace' Loves 'Lucy,' 'Grey's Anatomy' Ends Its Season, 'Good Fight' Returns - TVInsider

Avengers Anatomy: The 5 Weirdest Things About Black Widow’s Body, Explained – CBR – Comic Book Resources

Natasha Romanoff' has been a lot of things in the Marvel Universe. From her time as an assassin, a spy, a villain and an Avenger, Black Widow has shown that she's one of Marvel's most skilled fighters, and she also has one of the biggest hearts, even if she doesn't show it.

Outside of her moral compass, wit and fighting ability, Natasha might seem like an average human. However, she still has some enhanced abilities that make her much more than simply human.

RELATED: Black Widow: What Differentiates Women Superheroes From the Men?

In everymedium she appears in -- comics, film, video games and animation -- the Black Widow is always one of Marvel's best hand-to-hand fighters. Trained in the Red Room since she was a child, Natasha Romanoff is an incredible acrobat, marksman, ballerina, assassin and martial artist. Ed Brubaker and Steve Epting's Captain America #27 confirms that she trained beside the Winter Soldier, another one of Marvel's deadliest characters, so it's no wonder shefights so well in the field.

Along with rigorous training, Natasha Romanoff also has a super-soldier serum pumping through her veins.This version of the serum does not grant her the same strength Captain America has, but it does allow Natasha to perform at peak human condition in regards to herstamina and strength. In Kelly Thompson and Annapaola Martello's Captain Marvel#7, Natasha proves how strong she is by single-handedly taking out an alligator without any assistance.

RELATED: Black Widow Addresses Natasha's Life Between Other MCU Films

Along with being incredibly strong, fast and flexible, the serum also makes Natasha physically more durable and gives her a stronger immune system. Injuries that would most likely kill someone or put them out of commission for an indefinite amount of time are not critical for Natasha. In writer Mark Waid and artist ChrisSamnee's2016 Black Widow run,Natashais brutally stabbed by a Black Widow trainee, but she is able to get back into action after some rest and the most minor medical treatment.

While Natasha can still be injured, it takes a lot to cause damage. Thanks to her healing factor, she recovers from these wounds in record time if they're too critical and do not result in severed body parts.

Black Widow is in a dangerous line of work, and Natasha is no stranger to jumping through glass windows, suffering physical blows from villains twice her size, enduring explosions and continuing the fight despite a few knife and bullet wounds. Would this would be fairly debilitating for most people, they're everyday occurrences for Natasha.

Thanks to the health benefits of the super-soldier serum, Natasha'spain toleranceis far beyond a normal human's threshold. It's also thanks to decades of torture, fighting and painful training that she's built up a superhuman endurance that allows her to power through the pain. One of the best examples of this is in Marjorie Liu and Daniel Acuna'sBlack Widow run,where she drags herself out of the hospital after being operated on while conscious,having felt every cut the doctorsmadeas well as their hands digging around her body.

Black Widow was first introduced as an adult in Stan Lee, Don Rico and Don Heck's Tales of Suspense #52, back in 1964, and Chris Claremont and Jim Lee'sUncanny X-Men #268 confirmed thatNatashawas a little girl in World War II prior to entering the Red Room. While she should at least bein her 80s, Natasha still appears to be in the physical prime of her life.

While Marvel has plenty of ways to explain away the age discrepancies of characters who've been adults for decades, Black Widow's aging was slowed by the same serum that gave her other abilities. This has allowed Natasha to age slower, feel younger and maintain her youthful appearance for decades.

RELATED: Endgame: Black Widow's Death Was Originally More Extreme

Prior to the events of Matthew Rosenberg and Travel Foreman'sTales of Suspense: Hawkeye& the Winter Soldier, the Black Widow was believed to be dead. However, those two Avengers discovered that Natasha had been revived through cloning while investigating a string of murders that appeared to be tied to her. Her body is a perfect replica of the original Black Widow, but this one is newer.

Her memories and her personality are also the same, but they were implanted by the Red Room, who conveniently withheld the information thatmakes Natasha an independent hero. However, she quickly realized what was going on and reprogramed her brain so that she could be her true, heroic self again.

KEEP READING: Marvel Artist Tutorial Includes Look at Black Widow's New Costume

Star Wars: Grievous Used Two IMPOSSIBLE Lightsabers in Revenge of the Sith

After moving to New York, Caitlin Sinclair Chappell got a job at Forbidden Planet, a science fiction and comic book mega store, working as a sales associate and a writer for their newsletter, the Weekly Planet. Prior to moving across country, Caitlin was a honors student at Lewis & Clark College, where she was an editorial intern at Dark Horse Comics, a director on several short films, and a writer for the Odyssey and the Piolog - her articles focusing on comics, film, and theatre. With several friends from Portland, Caitlin co-started the Comic Book Buds podcast, which she still co-hosts to this day. In her free time, Caitlin volunteers for festivals and conventions like NewFest, Screamfest, and Wizard World. Shes currently working on a handful of creative projects, including her first comic and a two act play.

More:
Avengers Anatomy: The 5 Weirdest Things About Black Widow's Body, Explained - CBR - Comic Book Resources

‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Season 16 Finale: Owen hears Teddy having sex with Tom and angry fans tear her apart – MEAWW

Ouch, ouch and double ouch. The worst way you can find out that your fiancee is cheating on you is to hear them having sex with someone else while they accidentally butt dial to your voicemail.

Owen Hunt (Kevin McKidd) discovered Teddy Altman's (Kim Raver) cheating and obviously did not make it to their wedding. Apparently this was goodbye sex with Tom Koracick (Greg Germann). So, Teddy thought she was done with all her flood of feelings and got dressed for her wedding, which some fans found rather gutsy. The Teddy-Tom-Owen triangle has taken up the latter half of the season, and it goes without saying that this was actually the most entertaining and thrilling part of that mess. However, you do feel sorry for Owen as he listens to the voicemail again in a dark room. The guy thought his whole life was sorted.

Fans are busy cursing Teddy on social media. "Teddy send voicemail of her and Tom sleeping together. Poor Owen I feel so bad for him," tweeted a fan. "So Teddy is complete piece of shit lol," another fan wrote.

Others can't stop laughing, "Owen listening to Teddy's accidental voicemail.. sksksksksksk I have to laugh," tweeted a fan."Teddy broke Owen's heart into a million pieces," another fan wrote.

A fan wrote that Owen and Teddy getting together was a bad idea in the first place. "Honestly, Owen & Teddy shouldnt have gotten back together cause its all just one big f**kery now. Owen deserves someone else & Teddy deserves Tom."

"Think I only want to see another episode of this horrible season to see Owen dump Teddy spectacularly. Damn it!" exulted another fan.

Some fans wrote that Teddy deserved to be stood up. "booo Teddy deserved to be stood up at the alter in public and embarrassed," a fan wrote. Others couldn't believe that she had the guts to wear a wedding dress after cheating on Owen. "Teddy had an affair on Owen and had the balls to put on her wedding dress??" a fan wrote.

"Really teddy still have the guts to get dress smh," a fan tweeted.

Some fans just hope that Owen finds his way back to Cristina Yang (Sandra Oh). "Well that's the end of teddy and owen. I heard cristina is coming back so hmmmm. Cristina and owen was always meant to be," another fan wrote.

Well, what will happen in Season 17?

Original post:
'Grey's Anatomy' Season 16 Finale: Owen hears Teddy having sex with Tom and angry fans tear her apart - MEAWW

15 Forgotten Facts About Isaiah Washington And Patrick Dempsey’s Grey’s Anatomy Feud – TheThings

Throughout sixteen seasons - and a whole lot of hospital beds -Grey's Anatomy has maintained its spot as one of the top medical dramas in television history. With a cast of characters that is difficult to rival,Grey's has provided viewers with some spectacular (and tear-inducing) moments over the years on the screen.

While the drama has always been hot and heavy at Seattle Grace (or Grey-Sloan) Memorial Hospital, the action behind the scenes has been just as intense. To journey back in time to the show's humble beginnings, two of their main actors began a feud. Patrick Dempsey and Isaiah Washington - who played Dr. Derek Shepherd and Dr. Preston Burke - started a rivalry that wound up sending shockwaves through theGrey's Anatomy universe that fans are still feeling the effects of today.

Here are15 Forgotten Facts About Isaiah Washington And Patrick Dempsey's Grey's Anatomy Feud:

Perhaps some of their fight was triggered due to some jealousy over the casting process forGrey's Anatomy. Current starEllen Pompeorevealed that Isaiah Washington was once in the running for the lead role of Dr. Derek Shepherd before Patrick Dempsey received it. While Washington did get three seasons in a high profile role at the height of the series' popularity, there is no doubt that he would have preferred to be in the starring role.

The more widely reported reason as to why these two stars came to blows was over McDreamy's tardiness when arriving on set. Instead of arriving on time, Dempsey had a tendency to arrive late which upset his fellow cast members. As a way of standing up to Dempsey, Washington confronted him which led to the fight breaking out.

While McDreamy was always pleasant around Seattle Grace, he did have an unfortunate reputation on set for being less than cheery to deal with. According to Washington, he had heard that Dempsey was difficult to deal with as an acting partner and had a reputation as a bully. While it ultimately did not work out for Washington, it seems like he was trying to stand up for everyone else.

RELATED:20 Surprising Facts About Grey's Anatomy Star, Patrick Dempsey

While T.R. Knight was not involved in the physical altercation, his presence does mean a lot the story. Instead of being hit with a punch, the words that were exchanged during the fight between Washington and Dempsey hurt him emotionally. During the fight, Washington said some insulting remarks regarding sexual orientation, which personally insulted Knight who identifies as gay.

Considering how much time each man spends on their figure and facial features, it is surprising that they would engage in such a physical brawl. However, for those that were on set at the time of their altercation and called it a "violent brawl" complete with throat grabbing and hard punches. Scary stuff!

When entering a professional fight setting, the athletes normally receive a "tale of the tape" to show how they match up against each other. While neither man is a professional cage fighter, it is entertaining to think of them that way. Despite being three years older than Dempsey, Washington has both a weight and height advantage over McDreamy.

Despite the fight being called "violent", Washington was quick to say that everyone involved has completely moved on from the situation. When discussing the fight to ABCNews afterwards Washington said, "We apologized after we went in the room and we cleared up what I implied or whatever".

RELATED:15 Questions We Need Grey's Anatomy To Answer Before The Finale

The fight between these two actors made national headlines, and was very frightening for all the people on set. However, Washington was quick to begin making jokes about the ordeal soon after it occurred. When asked about the fight, Washington said he had never been so close to Dempsey's "pretty blue eyes" before.

There is no denying that the comments which Washington made during the argument were uncouth. In fact, that is what cost him his coveted role onGrey's Anatomy. However, Washington maintains that there was no ill will meant by his comments, and that they were all directed towards Dempsey.

When Washington says that his comments were directed towards Dempsey only, he is referring to the orientation slurs which upset T.R. Knight during the confrontation. Washington maintains that since Knight was not involved in the scuffle directly, that none of the slurs were directed towards him.

Not only does Washington maintain that he meant no mark to Knight, but that Knight used the fight as a platform to help his own agenda. According to an article in the Houston Chronicle, Washington said "I'm saying to you has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that he's gay. He came out October 19 as purely a tactical move to do exactly what he did, get public opinion in an outrage to lead him to believe that he is being picked on because he is gay".

While many of the cast members ofGrey's Anatomy agreed with Washington's eventual exit from the show, is close co-star Sandra Oh stayed close with him. While the details of their conversation have not been revealed to the public, Washington revealed that afterwards he got a "wonderful e-mail from Sandra Oh" following the incident.

RELATED:15 Times Cristina Yang Proved She's The Best Grey's Anatomy Character Ever

In the aftermath of the incident, show runner Sondra Rhimes felt it best to remove Isaiah Washington from the cast, and his contract was not renewed following season three. Despite Dr. Burke having plenty of story left to tell - including the fall out from leaving his wedding to Cristina Yang - he left the show abruptly, and has hardly been mentioned since. Except until...

Burke returned toGrey's Anatomy after a seven season absence for a two-episode arc in season 10. While there was plenty of interaction (and closure) between Burke and Yang that audiences had been waiting for, there was no interaction between Washington and Dempsey's characters through either of the episodes. Despite their characters being very close previously, it was best that these two actors did not cross paths.

There were many things that could have been on the show while Dr. Burke was present, but the circumstances of his exit assured that they would never happen. In fact, there were original plans for Meredith Grey and Dr. Burke to be the main couple of the show, but that was stopped during the original writing phases. Considering how things all played out, it could have meant a quick end to the series if this had been followed through.

NEXT:Grey's Anatomy: Interns Ranked From Useless To Valuable

Next14 Things Lady Gagas Employees Have Said About Working For Her

Read the original here:
15 Forgotten Facts About Isaiah Washington And Patrick Dempsey's Grey's Anatomy Feud - TheThings

Funding roundup: At-home medical exams and a Parkinson’s treatment – MedCity News

Tyto Cares kit includes a connected otoscope among other things

Numerous startups offering telehealth or remote monitoring solutions closed funding rounds this week, despite slowing activity due to the Covid-19 pandemic. One of them is Tyto Care, a startup with a platform for at-home medical exams. It actually includes a kit with several tools that can allow physicians to remotely listen to a patients heart, measure their temperature, and image their throat and ears. Several hospitals in Israel, including Sheba Medical Center, deployed its technology to care for patients remotely.

On the biotech side, there were some notable rounds, too, including $70 million for Aspen Neuroscience, which is developing a new treatment for Parkinsons disease. The company was founded by Scripps Research Professor Emeritus Jeanne Loring, who developed a way to turn pluripotent skin cells derived from skin cells or other adult cells into neurons that produce dopamine.

Read more about the companies that recently raised funding:

Tyto Care

Funding amount: $50 million

Headquarters: New York, Israel

Tyto Care, a company that lets people conduct at-home medical exams, already saw rising demand before the Covid-19 pandemic. The company said it saw threefold growth in sales last year and has continued to see its users increase during the pandemic. Its at-home telehealth kit includes a handheld device with attachments that allow physicians to remotely listen to the heart and lungs, measure temperature, and look at the throat and ears during an exam.

The company closed an oversubscribed $50 million round, co-led by Insight Partners, Olive Tree Ventures and Qualcomm Ventures. Tyto Care plans to use the additional funds to further expand its footprint in the U.S., Europe and Asia, and add new features to its platform, such as home diagnostics.

Aspen Neuroscience

Funding amount: $70 million

Headquarters: San Diego, California

Aspen Neuroscience is developing a treatment for Parkinsons disease using a patients own cells. The company uses induced pluripotent stem cells to make dopamine-producing neurons, which are affected by the disease.

The company closed a $70 million series A round, led by New York-based healthcare investor OrbiMed, with participation from ARCH Venture Partners, Frazier Healthcare Partners, Domain Associates, Section 32 and Sam Altman.

We are impressed by the progress Aspen has made to date against its goals to develop innovative therapies to treat Parkinson disease and encouraged by the broader investment communitys support of the company, OrbiMed Managing Partner Jonathan Silverstein said in a news release.

The company plans to use the capital to fund the development of its lead candidate, including completing studies needed to submit an investigational new drug application to the FDA, and recruiting for clinical trials.

Tango Therapeutics

Funding amount: $60 million

Headquarters: Cambridge, Massachusetts

Tango Therapeutics, a biotechnology company focusing on developing cancer therapies, closed a $60 million series B round. The company is working on developing treatments to counteract the loss of tumor suppressor genes, reverse cancer cells ability to evade the immune system, and identify new combinations that are more effective than single-agent therapies. The oversubscribed financing was led by Boxer Capital, with additional new investors in Cormorant Asset Management and Casdin Capital.

SonderMind

Funding amount: $27 million

Headquarters: Denver, Colorado

SonderMind, a startup that matches users with in-network therapists, raised $27 million in funding. The series B round was led by prominent VC General Catalyst and F-Prime Capital. Existing investors include the Kickstart Seed Fund, Di?ko Ventures and Jonathan Bush.

The company has a large network of behavioral providers in Colorado, and is expanding in Texas and Arizona. It plans to use the proceeds of the funding round to expand its partnership with payors, employers and health systems.

SilverCloud

Funding amount: $16 million

Headquarters: Boston, Massachusetts

SilverCloud has seen an uptick in users tapping into its mental health programs for depression, anxiety and other conditions. The company raised a $30 million series B round, led by MemorialCare Innovation Fund, the VC arm of MemorialCare Health System. Other participating investors included LRVHealth, OSF Ventures and UnityPoint Health Ventures.

So far, the company had drummed up partnerships with more than 300 companies. Notably, it was also one of the products selected for Express Scripts first digital health formulary. SilverCloud said it would use the additional funds to expand access to mental health support services for healthcare professionals, as well as their families and their patients.

CyberMDX

Funding: $20 million

Headquarters: New York

Healthcare security startup CyberMDX closed a $20 million funding round. Sham, a French risk management and insurance provider, led the funding round, with participation from Pitango Venture Capital and Oure Ventures.

CyberMDX monitors a providers network for threats to its IT systems, connected medical devices, and other IoT devices. The company said it will use the $20 million to expand its platform to new markets.

Photo credit: Tyto Care

Read more:
Funding roundup: At-home medical exams and a Parkinson's treatment - MedCity News

This Is How We Can Train Ourselves to Become More Compassionate – Thrive Global

Richard Davidson studies the science behind meditation and positive emotions including kindness and compassion. A neuroscience professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a meditation practitioner himself, Davidson puts meditators into brain scanners and looks at how the practice changes their neural connections. We discuss his belief that humans are hard-wired for compassion and love, the use and potential misuse of meditation and how our wellbeing requires committed practices, much like going to the gym or exercising our physical health. (Our conversation has been condensed and edited for clarity.)

**

1. What does neuroscience tell us about kindness and compassion?

One of the things that weve learned is that there is a really important distinction between empathy and compassion. They look totally different in the brain. Empathy is taking on the emotions of another. If someone else with whom youre empathizing is in pain or is anxious, the empathizer activates networks in the brain associated with pain and anxiety. It may be helpful to do that just a little bit to get a taste of what theyre experiencing. But if you envision experiencing that in a more enduring way, it really could be toxic. A lot of health care providers and other people on the front line often talk about compassion fatigue. Its not compassion fatigue, its empathy fatigue. They are taking on the anxiety, the pain, the fear, the suffering of others and over time that can really be toxic. Compassion is different it is the disposition to relieve another persons suffering and it involves activating networks in the brain that are important in positive emotion and in caring and these are totally different networks than the networks that are activated in empathy.

2. Are people predisposed to either compassion or empathy?

There are large individual differences in how a person expresses their empathy and the extent to which they show empathy versus compassion. Weve studied this in young children, for example by having an adult simulate getting fingers stuck in a clipboard and showing a facial expression of pain. If a three-year-old toddler sees an adult injure herself, there are some toddlers that wince in pain, some begin to cry, others go and kiss the finger of the experimenter and really try to relieve the distress. Theres tremendous variation probably due to both early learning and to genetic factors. We really dont know in detail what theyre due to but we do know that these qualities of compassion can be learned, cultivated and developed.

3. If meditation practices make people more present, how do compassion and kindness fit into the equation? Is mindfulness a morally neutral practice?

Well, in some sense its neutral. Although all meditation practices come from different contemplative traditions and are embedded within an ethical framework, which is often part of the religious context from which those practices are derived. But I also believe that there is a universal ethics that is not explicitly religious and that can be conveyed in a secular form, like the ethics of non-harm. Its important to recognize that meditation is kind of like sports. There are literally hundreds of varieties and they are meant to accomplish different sorts of goals. In order to promote optimal human flourishing, there are many different components that need to be nourished. Mindfulness is one component. But if you just nurture mindfulness, it would be equivalent to going to the gym and just working out on your upper body. Its only activating and exercising one piece of the overall puzzle.

4. Youve advocated for calling some meditations attention training instead. Would that help to reach more people, or by secularising the practises do you remove some part of their essence?

Youre asking a very important question and there arent simple answers. I believe that it is important to place these practices within an ethical framework. It doesnt need to be a religious framework. If all you did is attention training, with a form of mindfulness thats completely stripped from the ethical framework, you can become a more mindful killer. But if its embedded within the proper ethical framework, we think that will decrease the likelihood that these practices will be abused.

5. Youve spoken before about how the same mechanisms in the brain that facilitate adversity can also allow our awakening. Can you talk more about that?

Well, the simple answer is its the mechanism of plasticity. Our brains are changing wittingly or unwittingly, constantly. And when we are subjected to adversity, our brains are being changed by the adversity unwittingly. We dont choose to become captives of adversity, it just happens. But the very same mechanisms in our brain that change in response to adversity can be harnessed so that we can actually engage them to promote human flourishing.

6. How does your brain imaging work relate to this?

Most importantly, the imaging work shows us that the brain can change with very little intervention. It doesnt take much to begin to see objective changes in the brain. It doesnt mean that those changes will stick. It simply means that theyre accessible. And just like physical exercise: we know if we go to the gym and work out for two weeks and then stop exercising, we will eventually revert back to our base. So too with the mind, we need to keep practicing. But the data show us that it doesnt take much to get these changes going in the first place.

7. Why do you think were hardwired to be compassionate? That would come as a surprise to many people, especially in this political moment.

The evidence comes from a study of very young infants. If you take a three to six month old infant and expose them to, for example, puppets that are playing altruistically, where one puppet is helping another puppet versus another scenario with the same puppets, where theyre playing aggressively and selfishly, the infants prefer the altruistic encounter. There are many behavioural ways of assessing the preference of a young infant. We can see which puppet it reaches for, we can see where it smiles more, we can track the eye movements of an infant. All of those measures show that 95% of young babies prefer the altruistic encounters. These kinds of data show us that pro sociality is built in to us, kind of like how language is built in. But in order for us to cultivate language we need to be raised in a normal linguistic immunity community. So we think of compassion in the same way that other scientists might think of language.

Follow ushereand subscribeherefor all the latest news on how you can keep Thriving.

Stay up to date or catch-up on all our podcasts with Arianna Huffingtonhere.

The rest is here:
This Is How We Can Train Ourselves to Become More Compassionate - Thrive Global

Commentary: Why teenagers may be the downfall of preventing the spread of the coronavirus – CALmatters

As the rest of us hunker down in place or, donning our masks and gloves, venture tentatively outdoors, there is a subset of individuals particularly maladapted to this coronavirus pandemic lifestyle.

No doubt youve seen some of them mingling in public spaces, socializing in large groups laughing, talking, kissing. You may even be one of the 42 million unfortunate adults to have one in your home during this era of COVID-19.

What is it about teenagers?

As an epidemiologist and behavioral researcher in Los Angeles, I develop strategies to promote healthier decisions among adolescents, particularly for the prevention of HIV. Through this work, I often draw from research in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics to better understand why humans in general, and adolescents in particular, make decisions that are not in their best interest.

Of no surprise to parents and educators anywhere, teenagers are particularly susceptible to errors in judgement that lead to risk-taking. Recent studies of the adolescent brain provide evidence that the unique development of neural networks during adolescence can make these individuals hypersensitive to immediate rewards and less equipped to regulate their impulses. It also suggests that adolescents may be less able to resist social pressure, especially when they are aroused or excited.

This predisposition toward impulsivity could explain in part why individuals in this age group drive recklessly with friends, participate in binge drinking, or even gather in groups amid a worldwide pandemic. Behaviors which seem to reflect a decayed moral sensibility perhaps have more to do with the state of their brains than the state of their souls.

Teenage risk-taking could also be linked to the unique ways in which younger individuals evaluate new information. Humans undergo a process of belief updating, in which we adjust our prior beliefs based on new facts. A persons nave belief that the earth is flat, for instance, might be updated upon learning that one can circumnavigate the world.

The extent to which new information can shift beliefs can depend on whether it is good or bad; we are, in general, more apt to incorporate good news into our beliefs and discount the bad. And, while all are susceptible to this bias, adolescents are particularly inclined to demonstrations of irrational optimism.

So, in the not-so-hypothetical event of a pandemic, adolescents may be more likely to discount news about the severity of the novel coronavirus, focusing instead on the fact that they are unlikely to die from COVID-19.

Adolescents are not to be released from all personal responsibility. While their brains are still developing, they nonetheless have brains. Still, their susceptibility to social pressure and tendency toward optimism could inform how we, as public health practitioners, family members, friends and the general public, can encourage safer behaviors.

First, we must acknowledge that communicating the threat of disease may have limited impact. Reality is a bitter pill to swallow right now, and one that teenagers are likely to spit out. Second, we should find ways to make social distancing immediately rewarding.

Research suggests that social approval and acceptance are massively gratifying and strong motivators for behavior change, and so young people may be more inclined to engage in social distancing if they are publicly lauded as paragons on social media. Along these lines, as teenagers are particularly apt to respond to social pressure, we should seek to communicate information about social norms (i.e., informal standards of behavior). If teenagers learn that majority of their peers engage in social distancing, they are likely to follow suit.

In this crucial moment in history, the welfare of our society depends on mutual collaboration from every member. Our actions, and their consequences, are not our own. And yet we often cannot force people to behave the way we want, especially teenagers. We must find better ways to persuade these individuals to take greater care, for their safety as well as our own.

_____

Jessica Londeree Saleska is a post-doctoral fellow at UCLAs Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, [emailprotected] Her current research centers on the use of behavioral economic principles to encourage health behaviors to prevent HIV transmission.

The rest is here:
Commentary: Why teenagers may be the downfall of preventing the spread of the coronavirus - CALmatters

Psychological Facts about Human Behavior – Psych Lens

The psychological facts about human behavior that you might not know.

Human behavior is more complicated than you think. It is shaped by many instrumental factors that you may not aware of.

If you wonder how and why a person acts as he/she does, today youll learn the different factors that affect behavior. Here are the psychological facts about human behavior that you might not know.

High testosterone level could lead an individual to find pleasure in others irritation. Those who have a high level of this hormone tend to enjoy others agitation.

People who have the lower level of self-esteem engage in a stereotyping act or discrimination. Most of their victims are those who are better than them in a certain aspect of life. Humiliation boosts their self-esteem.

Someones making decision considers the presence of others. In fact, an individual may make favorable or good decision in a group than when no one is around. People being watched tend to behave accordingly.

People who committed undesirable acts tend to reshape moral standards. A robber, for instance, may perceive that stealing is good.

In most cases, we perceive someone who looks attractive and honest as trustworthy and sincere. While in fact, in some instances, the contrary is true. Appearance plays an important role in behavior.

Successful people are mostly considered as intelligent.

Most people who face hard challenges tend to do nothing. This may be the reason why most people are not successful.

These psychological facts about human behavior affect almost all of us. These concepts may have no significant effect on your life. But in extreme cases, they shape your attitude and behavior.

The rest is here:
Psychological Facts about Human Behavior - Psych Lens

Psychology: An introduction to the science of human behavior

by Chris Woodford. Last updated: January 13, 2020.

Why do we do the things we do? Why do some people like hot chocolate while others prefer coffee? Why do some live to surf while others would rather stay home and read a book? How can some of us puta name to every single person we've ever met while others struggleeven to remember our own telephone number? Why do some peoplealways seem happy and successful while others see no choice but toend their painful lives in suicide? These are the sorts of questionswe can try to answer through psychology: the science of humanbehavior. In this short article, we'll briefly explore the differentbranches of psychology and get a quick overview of the kinds ofthings psychologists do.

Photo: Everything you do, think, and feel involves your brain, shownhere as a 3D-printed model. Understanding how the brain works, how it gives rise to the mind, and why it makes us do the things we do is the prime goal of psychology. Photo courtesy of Nevit Dilmen, NIH 3D Print Exchange, National Institutes of Health, published on Flickr under a Creative Commons Licence.

We can divide psychology into two big areas called experimental psychology and social psychology.

Of course, we can study social psychology in a lab using rigorousexperiments, just as we can carry out meticulous experiments in the real world; the division I've drawn between experimental and socialpsychology is arbitrary and artificial, but it reflects the waypsychology is often taught in schools and colleges, and how it'swritten up in textbooks and scientific papers. The reason for that islargely historical: in the late 19th-century, when psychology wasstill a very new field, psychologists were keen to be taken seriouslyas scientists, so they tried to adopt scientific methods to cloak thethings they studied in respectability. To this day, there's a certainstigma attached to social psychology and sociology (the study of howindividuals and groups behave in society); whether fairly or not,some people see them as soft sciences lacking academic rigor. AtCambridge University in England, for example, the psychologydepartment still calls itself the "Department of ExperimentalPsychology" and its curriculum includes relatively little socialpsychology.

Humans are the most complex of all the animals, which explains whypsychology is such a vast subject. Within the psychology departmentof a typical university, you'll find people working in a huge rangeof different areas. There are people who study perception (such ashow our eyes and ears work), learning (how we develop as children andhow we make sense of the world as adults), memory (why we rememberand how we forget), language, thinking, and reasoning. While somepsychologists study "normal" human behavior, others specialize in"abnormal" psychology, which includes how people behave whentheir brains are damaged or degenerate over time and what causespsychiatric disorders. Social psychologists study everything from thebest way to design a computer mouse to whether we can really trustthe evidence we get from people who witness crimes. Let's look at thevarious branches of psychology in turn, in a bit more detail.

You can think of people as living machines who receive information fromthe world, process it in various ways, and then act on it. In themid-20 century, it was fashionable to talk about animals (includingpeople) receiving a stimulus through their senses (maybe seeing achocolate-chip cookie appearing in front of you), which then led tosome kind of response (salivating and reaching out); according to aschool of thought known as behaviorism, human behavior was allabout the way a certain stimulus produced an appropriate response(and exactly what went on inside the brain to make the connectionwasn't thought to be especially important: behaviorism was literally"mindless"). Since the 1960s and 1970s, psychologists have tendedto view the human brain as a kind of computer, taking in informationas "input," processing and storing it in various ways, and thenproducing "output" (some kind of visible behavior); this approachis known as cognitive psychology and we'll consider it again alittle later. However you react to the world, your behavior usuallystarts with sensory perception: the way your five main senses(vision, hearing, smell, touch, and taste), plus other, lesser-knownsensory abilities such as proprioception (your sense of where yourlimbs are and how your body is moving), feed information into yourbrain.

Photo: A huge part of your brain is devoted to processing information gathered by your eyes.

For most people, vision is easily the most important sense, closelyfollowed by hearing; that also explains why perceptual psychologistshave traditionally devoted most effort to studying vision, closelyfollowed by hearing (comparatively speaking, the other senses havebarely been explored at all). Most of us assume that we see with oureyes, but it's far more accurate to say that we see with our eyes andour brains. While we can't see without our eyes, it's also true thatour brains carry out a huge amount of processing on the sensoryimpressions they receiveand in all kinds of interesting ways. Onevery obvious example is that we see things in three dimensions usingseparate, two-dimensional images that our brain fuses together fromour two eyes. But we also see things based on what we expect to see,which is what causes most of the things we call optical illusions;for example, we see faces in clouds because our brains try to makesense of the world very quickly based on the things we've seen in thepast (an awful lot of faces), the things we expect to see in thefuture (an awful lot more faces), and the things that matter most tous (the faces of people we love, work with, and have to interactwith). We can get some idea of just how complex the human visualsystem is by considering how little progress computer scientists androbot engineers have made designing machines that can "see" inanything like the same way. Why are our own brains so good at seeing?It's estimated that something like 30 percent of the cortex (the outer and,in evolutionary terms, "newest" part of the human brain) is devoted to vision. That's a veryimpressive illustration of the sheer complexity of making sense ofthe world entirely by studying light rays that enter two big holes inyour head.

One of the things that marks out humans from "lesser" creatures is ourability to make sense of our environment and learn from it. It'sobviously untrue to suggest that humans are the only creatures thatlearn things: you can teach a chimpanzee to use a symbolic language,you can train a dog not to defecate on your carpet, a rat willquickly learn to run through a maze to reach a food reward, and evena simple sea-slug can learna couple of basic tricks.

Learning goes hand-in-hand with survival, but it's a surprisingly large andcomplex subject. At one end of the spectrum, psychologists study theprocess of conditioning, which is how animals come toassociate a particular stimulus with a certain response. One ofthe first people to look into this was Russian scientistIvan Pavlov(18491936), who famously rang a bell when he delivered food to his dogs; eventually,he found the dogs would salivate simply when he rang the bell, evenwhen there was no food around, because they'd been conditionedto associate salivating with the sound of the bell. When behaviorismwas fashionable, some psychologists thought all kinds of complexhuman behavior might be broken down into patterns of stimulusand response. That's why, for example, you often see attempts toblame violence on TV and in the movies for wider violence in society.Now we know complex human behavior is much more than a simpleknee-jerk reflex from stimulus to response.

One of the great things about psychology, which differentiates it from oldersciences such as physics and chemistry, is that its relevance toeveryday life is often more immediate and apparent. One branch of thepsychology of learning is called developmental psychology andit concerns how babies develop into children and adults: for example,how they learn language, how they turn specific, concrete examples ofthings they see around them into much more general, abstractprinciples (the rules by which we have to live to survive), and therelative importance of "nature" (genetic factorsthings we'reborn with) and "nurture" (environmental factorsthings we'retaught and learn). Developmental psychology has played a huge role inpedagogy and the scientific, theoretical approach to education; it's also afascinating subject to study if you're a parent.

Photo: Mirror neurons? Sometimes we mimic one another's behavioral unconsciously, such as when two friends stand next to one another and, quite unawares, adopt exactly the same posture. Psychologists think our brains contain "mirror neurons," which are activated both when we do things and when we see other people doing those things. That encourages us to copy other people's behavior, and possibly explains how we feel empathy with others. Photo by Kasey Close courtesy of US Navy.

Thousands of years ago, before humans started to create fixed settlements anddeveloped agriculture, we lived much like other animals andday-to-day survival was our only preoccupation. How different thingsare now. Although the world's poorest people still experience life asa horrible daily battle to survive, most of us, thankfully, get tolead lives that alternate between (reasonably tolerable) work and(extremely tolerable) pleasure. Both of these things involve usingour brains as much as or more than our bodies; both see us functioningas living computers"human information processors"that take ininformation, process or store it in our brains, and then outputresults. The way we process and store information is what cognitivepsychologists study. How do we understand a simple sentence whisperedinto our ears? How can we remember everything from how to ride abicycle to the names, in order, of all the American presidents? And isthere any fundamental difference between these two types of memory(knowing how to do something, which is called procedural memory, andknowing facts about the world, which is declarative memory)?

Where behaviorists liked to pretend that "internal mental processes"didn't matter, didn't exist, or probably both, cognitive psychologists spendtheir time teasing out the precise nature of those processes,typically coming up with flowchart models that break such things asmemory and language processing (a field of its known, often known aspsycholinguistics) into sequences of discrete components.Applying this to the study of memory, for example, has given usmodels of mind that suggest memory breaks into separate long-term andshort-term stores, with the short-term or "working" memory itselfdivided into distinct areas that process visual impressions, snippetsof spoken language, and so on.

Artwork: Ulric Neisser's famous caricature of cognitive psychology from his 1976 book Cognition andReality.

Cognitive psychology is not limited to how we process the structure ofinformation, but also what information means. The word cognition is asynonym for thinking and reasoning, two areas that cognitivepsychologists have also studied using computational models. How do wemake informed judgements about things, such as whether one car is abetter buy than another? Why do we live in absolute fear of thingslike terrorist attacks but happily cross roads, drive cars, ridebicycles, drink alcohol, or smoke cigarettes (all of which pose fargreater risk to our safety and health)? Why do we play lotteries whenthe chances of winning are so much less than the odds of being struckby lightning? These are the sorts of questions cognitivepsychologists consider under the broad umbrella of thinking and reasoning.

Photo: The psychology of typography: Thanks to things you've read and seen previously, you read words printed in different fonts (typefaces) with a slightly different meaning and emotion: elegant, relaxed, friendly, imperative, hostile, or whatever it might be. You can emphasize a message you want to get across by choosing the most appropriate font. That's one of the key principles of graphic designand it happens in your mind, not on the page.

Though related to cognition, intelligence, which we might define as ageneral ability to solve problems, is a separate area of study, andit's much less fashionable than it used to be several decades ago.There are several reasons for this. FromSir Cyril Burt (a prominentBritish psychologist who allegedly faked research data about hisstudies of intelligence) toWilliam Shockley (the co-inventor of thetransistor who, predictably, became embroiled in controversy when hedared to suggest that there was a link betweenrace and intelligencethat made white people intellectually superior to blacks), the studyof intelligence has often proved intensely controversial. Thecontroversies, though important, distract from a much more fundamentaldifficulty: how should we define intelligence and is it even a meaningfulconcept? Some cynics have defined intelligence as the mere ability topass intelligence tests, but although psychometric testing isas popular as ever in recruitment for jobs, intelligence tests arenot, and never have been, a predictor of people's ability to livehappy, worthwhile, successful lives.

When you study psychology, it's remarkably easy to forget that most of thecool and fascinating things you discover happen inside the brainanapparently unremarkable organ often compared to "two fistfuls ofporridge." Neuropsychology is all about figuring out how the brainis structured and how different parts of it have different functions.One extreme, early example of neuropsychology, known as phrenology,famously involved quack doctors claiming they could tell interestingthings about someone's personality by feeling their skull for bumps.Although the idea seems risible today, the central idea ofphrenologythat the brain is modular, with discrete regions havingspecialized functionsis now known to be essentially correct.However, it's an unhelpful oversimplification to suggest, forexample, that the right half of the brain is dreamily creative whilethe left half is clinically rational; for most of the things we do,many different parts of the brain are involved, either working inparallel or in complex serial circuits.

Photo: Brain scanners have revolutionized psychology. By showing up the activity inside ourbrains when we think certain thoughts or do certain things, they can help to reveal which areas of the brain do what. Photo by courtesy ofWarren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center (CC) and USNational Institutes of Health (NIH) Image Gallery.

If cognitive psychology can break things like memory or language intoseparate areas or processes, is it possible to locate parts of thebrain where those things happen? That's the basic thinking behind ahugely successful field called cognitive neuropsychology,which involves trying to map abstract processes and functionsdiscovered through cognitive psychology onto very concrete areas ofthe brain that neuropsychologists have discovered (and vice-versa).Some psychologistsmodern-day mentalMercatorsget carried away in a frenzy to map the brain,forgetting that the ultimate goal is not to draw a tourist's guide to the insideof your head but to produce a scientific explanation of the mind: who we are andwhy we do the things we do.

While neuropsychologists do study healthy, functioning brains, they alsodevote a lot of their time to researching people whose brains havebecome damaged through such things as head injuries, strokes, ordegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's. We can discover much abouthow things like memory and language processing work by studying whatpeople can no longer do when specific areas of their brain aredamaged or destroyed. In the most spectacular cases, it's possible tofind people with very localized brain damage who can no longer dovery specific things (for example, recognizing faces or readingwords); we can infer from this that the damaged brain areas play akey role in whatever function has been lostand that helps us buildup a map of which parts of the brain do what.

People are hugely diverse and differentthat's one of the things that makeslife interesting. While it's difficult to define "normal"behavior, it's somewhat easier to point to examples of abnormalbehavior, which is harmful to people and those around them.Neuropsychological problems following brain injuries are one example,but behavior can also become abnormal for a wide variety of otherreasons, which we might broadly divide into behavioral, cognitive,and neurochemical/biological. Eating disorders such as anorexia andbulimia are believed to be largely behavioral and cognitive, forexample: you might develop an eating disorder if you convinceyourself you're fat, after becoming obsessed with skinny catwalkmodels. Illnesses such as Parkinson's disease are more to do withneurochemistry and biology: Parkinson's is believed to occur when nerve cells in the brainstop producing dopamine, an essential chemical neurotransmitter that sends messages around the brain.

Psychiatric disorders such as depression and schizophrenia are hugely complex andstill imperfectly understood. Depression can occur for many differentreasons, which might be behavioral (you feel nothing you do makes anydifference and become miserable through "learned helplessness"),cognitive (you analyze the world around you in a way thatpersistently makes you unhappy), neurochemical/biological (for onereason or another, the chemicals or the basic structure of your brainare geared to unhappiness), or some combination of these things. Thestudy of schizophrenia has a fascinating history, with attempts toexplain it shifting from anatomical/biological causes, through cognitive and behavioral ones, and back again. Originallydescribed as a kind of premature dementia ("dementia praecox"),by the 1960s it was being painted (by such figures as R.D.Laing) as akind of sane reaction to an insane world, and now it's much more likely tobe considered a consequence of a person's particular brain chemistry.

You'd think understanding the cause of a psychiatric problem would be thefirst step toward treating it but, remarkably, psychiatry has oftenworked in willful ignorance of what was happening in the mind, partlythrough the influence of behaviorism, partly through the challenge of anti-psychiatristswho refused to believe in what they called the"myth of mental illness," and also because the underlyingcauses of psychiatric problems were genuinely not known. Treatmentsfor psychiatric disorders were largely doled out on the basis of whatseemed to work and what didn't; if clinical trials found that drugscured more depressive patients than, say, group therapy (talkingabout your problems with other patients), drugs became the treatmentof choice. It didn't necessarily matter why they worked or how,providing the patients showed an improvement. That's how hugelycontroversial psychiatric treatments such aslobotomy (surgicalremoval or destruction of parts of the brain, also called leukotomy) andelectroconvulsive therapy(electrical shocks to the brain) became popular in the mid-20thcentury. Just as psychology tried to cloak itself in experimental andscientific rigor, so 20th-century psychiatry latched onto therespectability of medicine, often masking a substantial ignorance ofhow and why disorders actually occurred. Today, thanks to advances inneurology, neuropsychology, and neurobiology, we have a much clearerunderstanding of how the brain works and why it can malfunctionbutmany questions remain.

Photo: Psychologists are helping computer scientists to develop emotional robots like this one, pictured at Think Tank, the science museum in Birmingham, England.

In the 150 years or so since psychology became a science, hugeamounts have been discovered about why people behave as they do andhow we can relate different aspects of human behavior to what goes oninside our heads. Even so, teasing out the many, remaining mysteriesof the brain remains one of the last great challenges of science.Apart from being hugely interesting in its own right, anotherimportant prospect is the discovery of effective treatments forterrible degenerative diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's. Afurther interesting direction is the development of artificialintelligence, including computers and robots that can "think" andact in more humanlike ways. Will probing the mysteries of the mindhelp us perfect electro-mechanical rivals who make us obsolete? Orwill the act of developing intelligent machines sharpen our sense ofwhat it means to be human, making us happier and more fulfilled?Psychologists, you can be sure, will find the answer!

Read more from the original source:
Psychology: An introduction to the science of human behavior

Similar behaviors influenced the 1918 pandemic and now COVID-19 in Missouri – KOMU 8

Beds with patients in an emergency hospital in Camp Funston, Kansas, in the midst of the influenza epidemic.

COLUMBIA Before COVID-19 was even on the worlds radar, MU School of Health Professions associate professor Carolyn Orbann had been studying how human behavior played a role in the 1918 pandemic.

Im very interested in humans and their culture and how their culture influences the way they interact with each other," Orbann said. I started working with someone in the department of anthropology who was studying the 1918 flu pretty extensively.

When COVID-19 emerged as a global pandemic on the same scale as the 1918 pandemic, Orbann started to notice some similarities.

Massive movements of population really played a role, she said.

For COVID-19, things like cars and commercial air travel are major factors for transporting the virus to new places. But in 1918, those things were in their infancy, yet the flu was able to spread around the world in the same fashion. Theres one big reason for that.

In the 1918 pandemic, you had this big global stage of World War I, she said. The circulation that was happening as the war was winding down, you had all these multinational people who and been in Europe fighting, who were now going home.

In her study of the 1918 pandemics effects in Missouri, Orbann found it spread across the state in a similar pattern as COVID-19 is spreading now.

The cities at the time seemed to have it earlier whereas some of the rural places at the time seemed to have it later, even up to years later.

While it hit rural areas later, it also hit them harder.

One of the things that happened in rural Missouri is that a lot of the medical professionals actually left to help with the war effort, she said.

Orbann said her study found people in rural areas in 1918 often felt more of a sense of patriotism and duty to serve their country as compared to people living in bigger cities like Kansas City and St. Louis.

Soon, Orbann will put her knowledge of the 1918 pandemics spread in Missouri to use in the COVID-19 fight.

Well start to look at state data and see if we have any similar patterns, Orbann said. There are reasons to think its possible we could see a similar pattern and reasons to think that it might not follow the same trajectory.

Even though a global war didnt bring on COVID-19, the virus didnt need one in order to spread as quick as at has.

Its the same patternin our time now its just so sped up that you have to really jump on the mitigation much faster, Orbann said. You just dont have as much time to plan because everything happens so much more quickly.

She said her knowledge of the 1918 pandemic may have played a role in her preparedness for COVID-19.

Having read some of the manuscripts and letters and all the historical stuff from the flu here, maybe I was a little more mentally prepared for these weeks and weeks of home quarantine, Orbann said.

Read more from the original source:
Similar behaviors influenced the 1918 pandemic and now COVID-19 in Missouri - KOMU 8