Category Archives: Neuroscience

Pediatric Neuroscience Symposium – Texas Medical Center (press release)

=kr8S XIe9~5yTvT "!I6I^cI>J!e h4<yO X10gj =k&q4K}3.^kD@$H3` X>_;&$. i M=0:25"230%k4;3I&HgX2:,X yH>kSMj/!#dfPW x5Fm{97jt:MVNC|bMqXG+ V[S]vkj`*VU '7CsSw&i-?#DPFst+Vd #Q*ch'X}4<$-Qa^0/?"3%mNis[RpTw#Nt>G2icW&N,]Jxv-O}Uj_|3 ~DGf` x"JOiKkG U9GC-RRL'T Ut= BLY24_r3%^`jd@$j(:S`y1xs4Z:%F{o$6`, A} A @@AQe%PVdvT9Cm@# {m{YYYWz;[tOIQ=PU_V79`=J0W8JXGk4IGYat{UzW.mW{^*$@ 58(3 =HG%`^*2{fLGB!x9J%xvEmc'(VpmTgWp$D{>W|'elZ 'cG3*m{JV]*pAIaQ`J] | uuj7T4)-<"dh2t:N6o^=*VEI`HF.ZZSokz'1 xksGOzQ=`N9#n^vu!>k"W_S%jyzENPb}P4E 4%_sFqyO^Hh65vH=3>oO+Iv-i9h^]y`i`@?E !#o]' xX3?E4Hu"h!#5/ILD66Ye1"I0HFsZ#~_=@ 3U$w @T5;"E" <9f^*X 7Y_|Z+zF*XMc%/~_IsUt_*g3[7?94|l/ii?r@GxY"Ykc'#p8`0Xxs#F5}eN:attH_eN Wx4tHo]AvpAiiu ^sL :OWbQU(3f yU {gY-;*JMVJ]g| X[?7?(7l"6dI?4>=%(3dzxt }*UPaFr-TNo7z-|Nr~n^5r7V*+3n8_B<9(`%ATn1@_6:[G:Q}:N5;5 B>x?'r)!q' @#yV.3O'+-:tJu 'CBJ}C]0eBc 9 bmzt`irSnv." AC3 >Q^e!{[];/^P2auc$JgBCJ (~J<$vm[4|z{)!@wYq*boV7}]ix_n6 rHd.6~Z)YsEf&orm=mm(3$y!gj7,gZ^XR{r-z> @q;Gg{?rK$t<+CV/2sGi^DWfqY<8y$"f:5TpMo E@6h~=8[!2Y0zk%`UU3[kNaL1 f0+roxY2XY7v`bvLZt5NU jMi"WG%.-gJcUb9Zf&7kQ[M0:/Z*r}v ATM{Gfa'6iX#G*biSVzS7_~(d{G

Read this article:
Pediatric Neuroscience Symposium - Texas Medical Center (press release)

Neuroscience: The 1 Thing You Need to Achieve Any Goal (It’s Not What You Think) – Inc.com

We all struggle with maintaining motivation. How can you get excited about a goal and continue to pursue it? How do people convince themselves that the rewards outweigh the things they're giving up?

Turns out, according to science, the secret to maintaining your motivation might actually be more counterintuitive than we originally thought.

When we first embark on a task to achieve a goal--like losing weight, for example--we first focus on the positive outcomes. We'll be able to feel lighter, more confident, and maybe even get new clothes. Yet, what really pushes people to effective, consistent action isn't necessarily focusing on the potentially happy ending that could come from our actions. It's thinking about the potentially negative outcome--not being able to wear clothes that you barely fit into now, not being able to look good for a certain event on your mind--that get us thinking about concrete steps we can take to actually achieving our goals.

When people begin to experience the fear that accompanies a potential failure or disappointment, it actually encourages them to work harder to prevent that than if they were motivated by positive, promotional reasons. The desire not to let someone down--even if that person is yourself--is strong enough to get us on the path to success.

How can we actively prevent gaining weight? By cutting back on this meal, and that one. By working out this day, or more overall during the course of a week. The motivation we feel is derived from a necessity to avoid our own disappointment--our own feeling of having failed to achieve a goal we set for ourselves.

And this kind of thinking can be applied to any goal possible. If we want to be selected for a promotion at year's end, we should work harder now. If we don't think we'll be able to finish a certain assignment on time, we'll be more greatly pressed to in order not to disappoint a supervisor than we would otherwise.

It's possible to achieve anything at all if we think in terms of things we want to avoid. So, allow yourself to be motivated by what you don't want to do, and see how much you accomplish as a result.

Here is the original post:
Neuroscience: The 1 Thing You Need to Achieve Any Goal (It's Not What You Think) - Inc.com

Laila Ali on hand for grand opening of HealthPartners’ new Neuroscience Center – KMSP-TV

ST. PAUL, Minn. (KMSP) - LailaAli grew up watching her father's Parkinson's Disease progress.

Her father, of course, was legendary boxer Muhammad Ali, who died less than a year ago.

Since then, she's become an advocate for those with neurological diseases, and was on hand Wednesday for the grand opening ofHealthPartner'sNeuroscience Center in St. Paul.

She says it's just the sort of place families dealing with neurological conditions deserve.

"You have so many questions that you need answers to," she said. "It takes a whole village really. I think it gives comfort in knowing this is a place right here in their home town they can go to."

From the track helping people walk across the room to the pool equipment with monitors for rehabilitation work, dozens of doctors are at work even now, treating various brain disorders--but being under the same roof as the lab conducting as many as 30 research studies at any given time is what makes the Center a destination.

The building cost more than 70 million dollars, warranting a fundraising campaign to assist the hospital. The goal is to reach 10.5 million by the end of 2017.

Read the original post:
Laila Ali on hand for grand opening of HealthPartners' new Neuroscience Center - KMSP-TV

What is the Neuroscience Engineering Collaboration building? – WSU Guardian

The Neuroscience Engineering Collaboration (NEC) building was constructed in 2012 and completed in 2016. The $37.5 million dollar building houses mostly researchers.

The goal is to create an environment that fosters cutting edge research, M.D. Ph.D Director, Mark Rich stated. By having such a research facility, the hope is that graduate and undergraduate students will have the opportunity to participate in clinically relevant research projects. The hope is that this will bring together engineers and neuroscientists, that will create such an environment.

Currently the building is occupied by the neuroscience, cell biology and physiology, engineering, psychology and biochemistry departments.

The building does not offer courses to students. There is an auditorium that holds different research seminars. The NEC building consists of 15 labs, along with approximately 35 offices. The labs are all used by graduate and undergraduate students.

According to the Boonshoft School of Medicine website, A full 55,000 square feet of the four-story building (including a basement) is assigned to research.

Rich stated, Faculty and graduate students use the building the most as it is primarily for research. Most of the graduate students are in masters degree or PhD programs, but there are 4-5 MD/PhD students as well. Some medical students and undergraduate students also do research projects in the building.

Read the original here:
What is the Neuroscience Engineering Collaboration building? - WSU Guardian

Pairing business and neuroscience – Penn Current

Led by Penn Integrates Knowledge Professor Michael Platt, the Wharton Neuroscience Initiative is a deliberate mash-up of neuroscience and business, with the intention of exploring every domain in which the two can inform each other.

At first, business and neuroscience might seem like animprobable pair. So when Penn launched its WhartonNeuroscience Initiative, WiN for short, its distinctivenessspurred particular attention: How exactly do thetwo fields coincide?

Its shocking and provocative, says Michael Platt,the programs founding director. But thats exactlywhat we aim to be. The Wharton Neuroscience Initiativeis a deliberate mash-up of neuroscience and business,and our intention is to explore every domain inwhich these two can inform each other.

WiN launched this past September, and opened itsbright, new space in Steinberg-Dietrich Hallrightnext to the Wharton Behavioral Labjust before winterbreak.

Its led by Platt, a Penn Integrates Knowledge professorwith appointments in the departments of Neuroscience,Psychology, and Marketing, and ElizabethJohnson, WiNs executive director and senior fellow.The duo worked for more than a decade together atDuke University before coming to Penn last year. KateMolt, who formerly worked in Whartons marketing department,serves as the programs coordinator.

Wharton is not your grandfathers school of financeanymore, Platt says. Just as it has put majorinvestments into analytics and innovation, Whartonknows neuroscience will be key to the practice in thenext decade.

The relationship often comes down to decisionmakingsomething the business community spends alot of time thinking about.

But we know relatively little about the biologicalmechanisms that underlie decision-making, says Johnson,a neuroscientist by training. Although there havebeen great strides made in the last 15 years in that capacity,it hasnt moved into the realm of applicationyet.

Platt continues, We are finally in a position to applythat knowledge in a much more real-world environment,to real-world questions that have impact. Whatwas a dream 20 years ago can now be achieved.

WiNs goal isnt to turn Wharton students into neuroscientists.Its more about developing a common language.

You have to have a lingua franca in order to evenbegin to have creative applications emerging out of thiscommunity, Johnson says. You have to have a sense ofopen communication between disciplines, which thisforum provides.

Some early faculty affiliates include the AnnenbergSchool for Communications Emily Falk, whose workpredicts behavior change after exposure to persuasivemessages; the Wharton Schools Gideon Nave, whostudies the biological basis for how humans make decisions;the School of Engineering and Applied SciencesDanielle Bassett, who uses tools from network scienceand complex systems theory to enhance understandingof connectivity in the brain; and the School of Arts &Sciences Coren Apicella, who analyzes the evolutionaryorigins of social behaviors.

The Initiative hopes to amplify the academichomes of its faculty members, as well as students, Johnsonsays.

I think situating this kind of initiative at a universitywhere its a walking campus in an urban landscape,where the schools of medicine, law, business, arts andsciences, even vet, are all right here, is an incredibleasset, she says. It encourages movement into an intellectualspace like Wharton, where they may not havefelt was their home before.

As WiN continues to develop its presence on campus,it hopes to be a place for related educationitsalready spearheading new coursesand abundant researchopportunities.

We hope to bolster the educational andresearch platform to make it possible to dointegrative research thats both vertical andhorizontal, Johnson explains. By vertical Imean undergraduates all the way throughfaculty, but even more vertical to includeoutside partners from industry and thecorporate world, and by horizontal I meanfrom across many different disciplines.

A big part of WiNs plans is also to sponsorregular, open-to-the-public events. Itsalready coordinated a half-day conferencethis past December, focused on the interactionsbetween brain science and marketing.

Philadelphia is such a hub of activityfor us, and we want to engage with the communityat large, Johnson says. It will onlyincrease what we are capable of doing.

Originally published on Thursday, May 11, 2017.

Read the original:
Pairing business and neuroscience - Penn Current

Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Center opens at St. Rita’s – Lima Ohio

LIMA A Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Center that opened Tuesday at St. Ritas Medical Center will provide comprehensive care to patients with neurological impairments, hospital officials said.

Located at 770 W. High St. in Lima, the NRC features a team of physicians, nurse practitioners and medical assistants who will administer a variety of services. The newly renovated facility will provide neurology, pain management, physical medicine and rehabilitation services, all under one roof.

Adjacent to the NRC is St. Ritas Ambulatory Surgery Center, where procedures to reduce pain are performed. Outpatient physical, occupational, and speech therapy services are also in close proximity.

I think the collaboration of providers all working together to deliver services is an enormous benefit to patients, said Dr. Matthew Owens, medical director of St. Ritas Neuroscience Institute.

Dr. Michael Rivera, pain management specialist at St. Ritas, added that the NRC provides a unique opportunity for patients to use multiple specialties in one location.

Its all in one place, so the patients dont have to go out of town or even around the corner, Rivera said. That way, the patient can get the best care possible.

The NRC houses 18 exam rooms and one massage therapy room, and is staffed with three physicians and four nurse practitioners. Owens said two medical assistants will also be added within the next several weeks.

For Owens, the NRC is part of a larger movement to ensure providers from multiple specialties are working closely together to administer the best outcome for patients.

What we want to accomplish is the idea of a patient being able to come to one location to start their journey of taking care of whatever condition they may be suffering from, he said. We want them to feel like we can help navigate and guide them through all these levels of care. That way, they can sit back and only have to worry about getting better.

Dr. Michael Rivera, a pain management specialist at St. Ritas Medical Center, speaks at a ribbon-cutting ceremony Tuesday for the hospitals Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Center.

http://limaohio.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/web1_neuroscience-center.jpgDr. Michael Rivera, a pain management specialist at St. Ritas Medical Center, speaks at a ribbon-cutting ceremony Tuesday for the hospitals Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Center. John Bush | The Lima News

Reach John Bush at 567-242-0456 or on Twitter @Bush_Lima.

See the original post here:
Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Center opens at St. Rita's - Lima Ohio

Peabody Essex Museum appoints neuroscience researcher to guide enrichment of visitor experience – Blooloop

The move is a first for an art museum.

Dr. Tedi Asher has been tasked with synthesising neuroscience research findings and making recommendations to help PEM enrich and enhance its offering.

We are very excited by the opportunity to be the first art museum to employ a full-time neuroscientist as a means to help develop new ways of designing experiences that are highly meaningful and relevant to visitors, reports Dan Monroe, PEMs Rose-Marie and Eijk van Otterloo Director and CEO.

Dr. Ashers unique perspective and deep insight will enable us to make the process of art exploration and discovery especially rewarding, stimulating, and fun.

Monroe added that the pioneering collaboration could well benefit the art museum community at large.

PEM began its neuroscience initiative over two years ago. Research suggests that the established methods of presenting and interpreting art are not always a good fit with the ways our brains work.

PEMs cross-disciplinary approach is exciting and comes at a time when neuroscience findings are beginning to be more widely embraced outside of the scientific community, comments Asher.

Neuroscience has the potential to deepen our fundamental understanding of human nature and reveal the mechanisms behind our human experiences. I am thrilled to have such a unique opportunity to collaborate with an organisation that embraces such a spirit of curiosity, ingenuity and experimentation.

Ashers appointment has been funded by a grant from Bostons Barr Foundation. PEM was founded in 1799 and is the USs oldest continuously operating museum. Its collections encompass American art and architecture, Asian export art, photography, maritime art and history, Native American, Oceanic and African art. Among the many historic structures on the campus is Yin Yu Tang, a 200-year-old Chinese house.

Other research into the science of sensation at museums and theme parks includes the work of Professor Brendan Walker.

Images courtesy PEM

See the article here:
Peabody Essex Museum appoints neuroscience researcher to guide enrichment of visitor experience - Blooloop

Q&A with Greg Dunn, neuroscientist turned artist – PLoS Blogs (blog)

For most neuroscientists, long days in the lab pipetting or recording from cellsdoesnt inspire one to pick up a paintbrush or sketchpad. But for others,the still-mysteriousand often breathtakingly beautifulworkings of the brain are a source of awe. One such individual is neuroscientist-turned-artist Greg Dunn. As a graduate student at the University of Pennsylvania, his own researchmerged withexperimental forays into painting, adapting neural forms to the principles of Asian art. Greg joins us to discuss his personal journey to becominga science artist, his visionsfor the burgeoning field of science-inspired art, and his advice for aspiringbrain-loving artists.

You followed a unique career path compared to most scientists. Could you share a bit about your transition from scientist to artist and what inspired you to pursue this path?

GD: I had always needed an artistic outlet in my life, and that became more true than ever when working on very complex biological systems in the lab. When experiments dont work after a massive expenditure in your efforts, its nice to have something going in parallel that produces something tangible, such as art. Ive always loved Asian art and the neuroscience images I saw every day in grad school began to merge with that interest, and over the course of several months in my first year of grad school I began to develop my aesthetic in earnest.

I never felt that I was doing anything at the lab bench that others couldnt have, but I do feel like I have a useful voice in combining science and art. I hope that my career trajectory serves as an example that specialized scientific knowledge can be applied to many different fields and can help to refine a persons individual voice.

Art based on science (including neuroscience) is becoming increasingly popular. Why do you suspect this field is so appealing, even to non-scientists?

GD: The brain is the ultimate frontier, it is more fundamentally US than anything else we possess. It is at the fundamental root of everything we could possibly be interested in or do with our lives. It is similar to why astronomy is popular to the lay public in this sense, it holds such great philosophical mysteries to explore. And on top of its conceptual and metaphorical meaning, it is aesthetically beautiful. It is so rich in possibility that it is the sort of thing a person can comfortably spend their whole life exploring.

How, if at all, do you believe that neuroscience-inspired art can serve as an effective outreach tool? Have you witnessed this with your own work?

GD: Yes. Art harnesses the power of emotions and direct perceptions in a way that hard data and dry explanations cant. I deliberately use the power of composition and design to try and make my works appealing on an instinctive level. With the world at our fingertips, people need to be given a reason to care about what they are looking at. Making compelling paintings is about drawing the viewer in initially and then giving them something to chew on in the long term, in this case pondering the nature of the brain and mind.

In the case of Self Reflected, my latest work done in collaboration with Dr. Brian Edwards, the point was to demonstrate directly what complexity looks like. Telling somebody that the brain has 86 billion neurons is essentially meaningless because we have no ability to grasp what that number means. Showing somebody directly what the activity of 500,000 neurons looks like at once in a huge, wall sized microetching gives a person a stepping stone to begin to comprehend this astonishing fact. When you then tell them that the brain is actually hundreds of millions of times MORE complicated than that, thats when a light goes on.

How do you select the subject matter for your work? Do you have any favorite pieces that were particularly meaningful, or that youre especially proud of?

GD:Im attracted by a variety of compelling images and subjects in neuroscience and meditation. I try to choose subjects that are of interest to different categories of people- some are more specialized neuro, others more general, some more abstract, etc. Id say that some of my favorites are Basket and Pyramidals as I think it is a clear statement about how neurons fit in the fractal like organization of nature and how they are similar in form to trees, branches, etc that have been painted in gold leaf in Asia for centuries. Cortex in Metallic Pastels also turned out very well and is one of the first examples of my deep reflective gold leaf technique. And, of course, Self Reflected is the most ambitious project of any kind Id ever attempted. Its scope and attention to detail I think will make it a useful visualization of the brain for a very long time.

The overlapping fields of art and neuroscience are evolving rapidly. How to do you see the field changing over the next decade?

GD: Representing brain aesthetics is only one part of it. There is a lot of art/sci work going on in using EEG signals or other neurofeedback devices to direct tasks of various sorts. I am looking forward to seeing some of the work that will come out of collecting unconscious brain activity data that will direct image generation software. I personally plan to try to elucidate states of consciousness that arise in deeper states of meditation through art, as this is more of a subjectively and experientially directed bit of neuroscience art. I think that it is important that art poke our brains into different types of perceptions to teach us a bit more about how it works.

Do you have any advice for others hoping to pursue a career in science-inspired art?

GD: Find your own unique voice! Make a Venn diagram of what your passions are and think hard about how and where they intersect. That is where you will be more effective, motivated, and unique. Really strive to make something categorically new. Dont always trust your first idea on how to do something, give yourself the time to really iterate an idea in your mind before you realize it. If you are trying to make a living at it, be smart about how to balance your passion with financial realities. Overall, work to convince the world that the barriers between science and art are indistinct at best, and that multifaceted approaches to problems are the most effective solutions.

You can learn more about Greg Dunns work atgregadunn.com

Feature image:Basket and Pyramidals, ink on 22K gold leaf, 18 X 24, 2013

Any views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect those of PLOS.Emilie Reas received her PhD in Neuroscience from UC San Diego, where she used fMRI to study memory. As a postdoc at UCSD, she currently studies how the brain changes with aging and disease. In addition to her tweets for@PLOSNeuroshe is@etreas.

Excerpt from:
Q&A with Greg Dunn, neuroscientist turned artist - PLoS Blogs (blog)

Doomtree’s Dessa has neuroscience on the brain at NYC residency – amNY

The songwriter, rapper, essayist and whiskey enthusiast Dessa was a part of a chart-topping album last fall, performing the previously-unreleased Congratulations on The Hamilton Mixtape. That record made it to the top of the Billboard 200, so the obvious follow-up is a four-week performance residency involving neuroscience.

Part of the last six months of my life has been spent lying on my back, in a 7 Tesla MRI scanner, to see if I could find the love in my own brain, she says, as an introduction to her Heartbreakers series at The Greene Space. And if I could, then how to get rid of it.

Mixing song with science, Dessa has put together lineups for each evening that look as much like a fascinating dinner party as a performance. Paper Tiger, her cohort from the Minneapolis hip-hop collective Doomtree, will be joining Dessa on the same night as Columbia University professor of psychology Geraldine Downey, for instance, and also taking the stage will be rappers, singers and cognitive neuroscientists.

amNewYork caught up with Dessa in advance of the first night of her residency to talk breakups, connections and the passion shared by both artists and researchers.

What was the spark for this?

A breakup. Id had a really lousy breakup with a really awesome dude. I found that I was healing really slowly. You expect that youre going to eat ice cream and sulk around for a while, but eventually youre going to perk back up. I was just blue for a really long time. So partly out of vested interest in my own well-being and partly out of scholarly interest I started reading some of the research on what happens to the brain and the body during and after love. I got really into the work of Dr. Helen Fisher, an anthropologist who uses fMRI technology to investigate what the human brain looks like in love, when its a reciprocal love and when its not a reciprocal love. And I was hooked. Every one of my interests seemed to coalesce there; Ive been long interested in science, human connection, better understanding the human condition I studied philosophy in college and it all came wrapped up in a neat bow. And I thought, Id love to put out an event that investigates heartbreak both from an artistic and from a really robust scientific viewpoint.

You debuted some of this in Minneapolis, right?

I had this orchestral debut a couple of months ago with the Minneapolis Orchestra. And part of that concert included a mini-TED talk that investigated some of these ideas. But on that stage there were only a few minutes to talk about some of the work Id been researching. The events at The Greene Space are going to have some music and a lot of conversation, and opportunity to ask questions of the researchers present.

From the outside, combining songwriters and researchers seems like an odd match.

Both fields, music and science, are very often driven by the spirit of inquiry and lifelong driving passion and curiosity. Very few researchers and very few musicians at a dinner party would say, I did it for the money. Its a passion-driven field, and in the particular artists and scientists Ive invited to participate in the residency, Ive asked those people who have really been driven to try and understand interpersonal relations, to try and understand why and how people connect, why we fall in love, out of love and what to do if were left holding one end of a love that someone else released. Theyre approaching the same phenomenon, but from different vantage points.

Link:
Doomtree's Dessa has neuroscience on the brain at NYC residency - amNY

Being on the same wavelength isn’t just a figure of speech. It’s proven neuroscience. – Quartz

You know when someones on your wavelength. Conversations go great. You get them, and they get you. Its groovy. Now science is proving this concepts more than metaphorical.

A study on brain-to-brain synchrony, published in Current Biology on April 27, examined the neuroscience of classroom interaction and found that shared attentionspurred by certain stimuli, like eye contact and face-to-face exchangegenerated similar brain wave patterns in students. The research, led by psychologist Suzanne Dikker at New York University, indicates engaged groups are literally in sync on a brain-to-brain basis.

The human brain has evolved for group living, yet we know so little about how it supports dynamic group interactions, the study notes. Real-world social exchanges are a mystery and much previous research has been limited to artificial environments and simple tests. This effort, however, measured brainwave activity during face-to-face interaction in a natural rather than constructed environment, investigating social dynamics across time.

Classrooms make a particularly good place for neuro-scientific exploration because theyre livelywith lots of actors and factors at playbut also semi-controlled environments with limited influences and all activities led by a single teacher. This allowed us to measure brain activity and behavior in a systematic fashion over the course of a full semester as students engaged, the researchers explain.

The brainwaves of 12 teenage students brainwaves were recorded during 11 different classes throughout the semester; each session was 50 minutes long. The students followed live lectures, watched instructional videos, and participated in group discussions. Researchers tracked students brainwaves throughout using portable electroencephalogram (EEG) systems.

The study tested the hypothesis that group members think similarly, and that the more engaged they are, the more similarly the thinkand that this could be seen in shared brainwave patterns. The researchers believed that engagement predicts, and possibly underpins, classroom learning specifically and group dynamics generally. Indeed, they found that when students were more engaged in a teaching stylelistening to a lecture versus watching a video, saythey were also more likely to show similar brainwaves.

That brainwave synchronicity seems to be generated from a number of small, individual interactions. Particular types of exchanges seemed to especially influence the meeting of the minds in the study, say the researchers. For example, eye contact was linked to shared intentions, which sets up a scaffold for social cognition and more engagement. These individual interactions seemed to lead to a shared sense of purpose across the groupwhich manifested in specific brainwave patterns, likewise shared across the group.

The researchers believe their work with teens in the classroomwhich wasnt easy given the students energy levels and EEGs attached to their boisterous young brainsshows it is possible to investigate the neuroscience of group interactions under ecologically natural circumstances. They hope it leads to more exploration of brainwaves out in the wilderness that is civilization.

Go here to read the rest:
Being on the same wavelength isn't just a figure of speech. It's proven neuroscience. - Quartz