Category Archives: Neuroscience

‘Dopamine Fasting’ Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Trend. Here’s What an Expert Has to Say – ScienceAlert

It's the latest fad in Silicon Valley. By reducing the brain's feel-good chemical known as dopamine cutting back on things like food, sex, alcohol, social media and technology followers believe that they can "reset" the brain to be more effective and appreciate simple things more easily.

Some even go so far as avoiding all social activities, and even eye contact.

The exercise, dubbed "dopamine fasting" by San Francisco psychologist Dr Cameron Sepah, is now getting increasing international attention. But what exactly is it? And does it work?

As someone who studies the brain's reward system, I'd like to share my knowledge with you.

Dopamine is a neurotransmitter a chemical messenger produced in the brain. It is sent around the brain conveying signals related to functions such as motor control, memory, arousal and reward processing.

For example, too little dopamine can result in disorders like Parkinson's Disease, involving symptoms of muscle rigidity, tremors and changes in speech and gait. One of the treatments for Parkinson's is the drug L-DOPA, which can cross the blood-brain barrier and be converted into dopamine to help ease the symptoms.

Dopamine is also important in the reward system in the brain. It is activated by primary rewards like food, sex and drugs.

Importantly, the brain's reward system can "learn" over time cues in our environment that we associate with potential rewards can increase the activity of dopamine even in the absence of an actual reward. So just being in a sweet shop and thinking about sweets can activate our brain's dopamine.

Dopamine transporter activity in the brains of a control and methamphetamine abuser. (National Institute on Drug Abuse)

This expectation and anticipation of rewards is called the "wanting" in neuroscience language. As one of the main symptoms of depression is "anhedonia" the lack of wanting, interest and pleasure in normally rewarding experiences dysfunctional dopamine regulation has also been linked to this disorder.

Some treatments for depression, such as the drug bupropion, are designed to increase dopamine levels in the brain.

So, given the important role of dopamine in vital functions in the human brain, why would we want to fast from it? The idea of dopamine fasting is based on the knowledge that dopamine is involved in unhealthy addictive behaviours.

As described, dopamine underpins wanting. For instance, a drug addict may say they no longer want to take drugs. But when in certain places where drug-related cues are present, the brain's wanting system kicks in and addicts are overcome with strong urges to take the drug.

Dopamine fasters believe that they can reduce desires and craving for unhealthy and even unwanted behaviours by reducing dopamine.

First we need to be clear, it is certainly not advisable, even if we could, to reduce the amount of dopamine in the brain as we need it for everyday normal functions.

Further, simply banning a particular reward, like social media, isn't going to reduce the levels of dopamine per se, but rather it can help reduce the stimulation of dopamine.

Therefore it is possible to reduce the amount of dopamine activity. But the key to doing this is to reduce our exposure to the triggers associated with the rewards that initiate the wanting for the rewards in the first place.

After all, it is these cues that initiate the craving and the desires to engage in behaviours that help us get the rewards. Thus just cutting out rewards doesn't necessarily stop the brain from making us crave them activating dopamine.

However, that this would "reset the brain" is not really correct there is no way of even knowing what the baseline is. So from a neuroscience perspective, this is nonsense for the time being.

If you find that you want to cut down on what you feel are unhealthy behaviours, such as spending too much time on social media or overeating, then you could start by reducing your exposure to the environmental cues that trigger the desires to carry out the unhealthy behaviours.

For example, if you go on your phone too much in the evenings when you are alone, try turning off the notifications sounds. This way dopamine is not being activated by the cues and therefore not signalling the urges to pick up the phone.

And if you think you drink too much alcohol ending up in bars with work colleagues most nights of the week try to go somewhere else in the evenings, such as the cinema.

The symptoms of unhealthy behaviours are similar to the signs of substance abuse. These might include spending the majority of the time engaging in the behaviour, continuing the behaviour despite physical and/or mental harm, having trouble cutting back despite wanting to stop and neglecting work, school or family.

You may even experience symptoms of withdrawal (for example, depression, irritability) when trying to stop.

In these instances, you may want to think about removing the cues that stimulate your dopamine neurons a sort of dopamine fasting.

Ciara McCabe, Associate Professor, University of Reading.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

See the article here:
'Dopamine Fasting' Is Silicon Valley's Latest Trend. Here's What an Expert Has to Say - ScienceAlert

Lisa Renzi-Hammond – University of Georgia

Lisa Renzi-Hammond, an assistant professor in the College of Public Health, conducts research that seeks to change how our society understands and supports people living with age-related neurodegenerative diseases.

Where did you earn degrees and what are your current responsibilities at UGA?I am a proud Triple Dawg. I earned my B.S. in psychology with high honors from UGA, and my M.S. and Ph.D. in psychology, with a concentration in neuroscience and behavior, followed shortly after. I left UGA for my postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Texas at Austin Institute for Neuroscience and Center for Perceptual Systems after completing my Ph.D. I also served as a visiting scholar at the USDA Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, worked as a manager in global research and development in the industry world, and made it back to UGA as a faculty member in the College of Public Health in 2017. I am currently an assistant professor in the Institute of Gerontology and the department of health promotion and behavior. I am also the director of the Human Biofactors Laboratory and have recently joined UGAs Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Program faculty.

When did you come to UGA and what brought you here?I came to UGA in 1999 as a student. I have to be honest; I intended to go elsewhere. As a Georgia native, I wanted to leave my home state and explore. After touring UGA in high school, I fell completely in love, mailed in my acceptance and joined the UGA Honors Program.

I never anticipated returning as a faculty member, but UGA has excellent opportunities for interdisciplinary work and truly excellent students. It is a joy to mentor students who are where I was 20 years ago and to feel like I am doing for them what my mentors did for me so long ago.

What are your favorite courses and why?My background covers psychology/neuroscience, nutrition, sensory science and life-span development. As a member of the College of Public Health, I now have the opportunity to combine these disciplines and apply them all to big problems in our community. I have taught a number of courses at UGA in each of these individual areas, but my favorite course is a new course that I just added to UGAs online graduate and undergraduate course catalog called Cognition and the Aging Brain. This course has a little something from every one of these disciplines. More importantly, though, one of my goals is to change how our society understands and deals with people living with age-related neurodegenerative diseases. Despite the magnitude of the problem for health care, we can solve this problem, but the solution needs to include education of tomorrows health care providers. That goal is one that I hope to start to meet in this class, in this community.

What are some highlights of your career at UGA?I have been at UGA in multiple capacities and have experienced some wonderful things in each of them, but my most recent highlight has been watching my doctoral advisees each meet exciting milestones in their graduate careers. I could brag on them for hoursthey are really quite extraordinary. At the Institute of Gerontology, the faculty have worked hard to create a warm, collegial atmosphere, and student mentoring is a big deal for us. We are so proud of our advisees!

Another related highlight has been developing close working relationships with my fellow gerontology faculty members. We have big plans and big ideas for growing the institute into a world-class, interdisciplinary research, clinical and outreach hub for gerontology. Thanks to our clinical partners, our community partners and research collaborators from across campus, we believe that we can set a new standard for studying, diagnosing and caring for people who live with dementia and their care partners.

Lisa Renzi-Hammond (Photo by Peter Frey/UGA)

How do you describe the scope and impact of your research or scholarship to people outside of your field?We are all patients in a health care system. Most of us know someone who has been touched by an age-related neurodegenerative disease such as Alzheimers disease, age-related macular degeneration, Parkinsons disease, etc. There are gaps in communication between researchers and clinicians, and between clinicians and patients, and most patients certainly never hear from a researcher. Closing these gaps is essential. In our laboratory and our institute, we are not only studying the disease processes themselves, but we are also studying how people living with these diseases communicate with their health providers and act based on the information they receive. If you want to make a difference in the world of neurodegenerative disease, you have to see it all the way through to the patient experience.

How does your research or scholarship inspire your teaching, and vice versa?Many of my undergraduate students will leave the College of Public Health and go straight to medical school. My goal is that these students begin medical school with a view of their profession that is different from the typical model. Doctors should be health care providers, not disease managers. I try to help my students understand the difference. We collect data in local clinics and in our institute with patients who have a long history of health care consumption. Our students have the chance to really hear those patients and strategize how to communicate differently with them.

With respect to how my students have shaped me, I can actually picture one of my doctoral students reading this interview and laughing. My students very much set the research agenda in my laboratory. For example, our health communication initiative would never have happened without students who saw it as a problem and did the hard work to establish all the right relationships in the community.

What do you hope students gain from their classroom experience with you?Students come in to my classes expecting a traditional neuroscience or health psychology course. My hope is that they leave those classes with a different philosophy about behavioral medicine, with a belief that big problems in health care are actually solvable, with the conviction that behavior matters, and with an entrepreneurial spirit.

Describe your ideal student.For the past 16 years, I have asked students about what they hope to learn at UGA, and why they decided to come to college. Each day on the first day of class, students get asked this question in a questionnaire. Until recently, the answer was commonly, To figure out my passion, or To understand the world. Lately, it has been To get X job, or To get in to X graduate school. I think our students feel immense pressure to go to college to be able to do something, rather than to become something. To me, an ideal student can, for the duration of my class, be truly present. The time spent in the classroom is a time to get rid of social media, grade pressure, and preconceptions about health and society. The ideal student has a few hours a week to spare to find out who to become, instead of just what to do.

Favorite place to be/thing to do on campus is Health Sciences Campus is a pretty great place to be. I have spent most of my career on main campus, and now that I work primarily on health sciences, I wish I had started spending more time there as soon as we had access to it. The grounds are beautiful, the entire campus is walkable, were surrounded by good food, and the bike rental system is pretty amazing. I love using the campus rocking chairs in fall, with a nice, warm something to drink.

Beyond the UGA campus, I like to spend time with my animals! I travel a lot in my faculty role, representing UGA at conferences and educational events, so I have to confess that my favorite spot is actually home. My husband, who is also faculty here at UGA, and I have a mini-herd of goats and a dog who loves to chase them. Scratching goats is realits not digital, you cant scratch them on a screen, and they dont care if a journal review was unreasonable.

Lisa Renzi-Hammond (Photo by Peter Frey/UGA)

Community/civic involvement includes I am a proud volunteer for the Georgia Chapter of the Alzheimers Association, which is one of my favorite community partners. In the future, well be working with the Alzheimers Association to deliver support to persons living with dementia. Our institute also works closely with the Athens Community Council on Aging, and our students and faculty spend a lot of time delivering Meals on Wheels and working with the fantastic crew at the ACCA to deliver programming. I also volunteer on the Parent Council at the University Childcare Center.

Favorite book/movie (and why)?This is a really hard question for me, actually. I have favorites from each genre of book and movie, and its so hard to pick just one! I can say that one of my favorite movie moments of all time happens at the end of Charlie Chaplins City Lights. I was introduced to this film in graduate school, and I will never forget the watching the expressions on Charlie Chaplins and Virginia Cherrills faces in the last few moments of the film. There is a scene (spoiler alert!) when she realizes that the tramp on the street is really her benefactor. She has never seen him, but she recognizes him by the touch of his hand. I have never seen two people say more without words, and I think about that scene so often.

The one UGA experience I will always remember will be Over the now 20 years that I have spent off and on at UGA, I have had a lot of memorable experiences. One of my most recent memorable experiences was participating as part of Team Harmonized in the first cohort of the UGA site for the National Science Foundation Innovation Corps program, through Innovation Gateway. Because of that experience, I now see my research in terms of not only what we can learn, but in terms of what we can build. I see my work not just ending in research publications to share with my peers, but in products that can enter the marketplace and impact the public directly. The program changed my thinking completely about the value of our work for society.

Original post:
Lisa Renzi-Hammond - University of Georgia

Singapore announces its first brain bank – BSA bureau

The brain bank aims to be a research repository for brain and spinal cord tissues from donors who have passed away

Nanyang Technological University, Singapores (NTU Singapore) Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine), in partnership with National Healthcare Group (NHG) and National Neuroscience Institute (NNI), is launching Singapores first brain bank.

Hosted at LKCMedicine, the brain bank aims to be a research repository for brain and spinal cord tissues from donors who have passed away.

Setting up a national brain bank resource for Singapore is a vision shared by researchers and clinicians in the neuroscience community. Conceptualised by a joint team from LKCMedicine, NHG, and NNI, the brain bank will open up new research possibilities that will generate new knowledge of brain diseases.

NamedBrain Bank Singapore, the joint research centre is co-funded by the three partners.

Tissue donations from both healthy donors and from those with neurodegenerative conditions and neurological disorders will be stored and used for ethically approved research.

This research, which falls under one of LKCMedicines key research pillars Neuroscience and Mental Health will facilitate greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms and symptoms of brain-related illnesses so that more effective treatments and cures can be developed.

Brain Bank Singapore has recently begun brain donor recruitment after receiving approval from the SingHealth and NTU Institutional Review Boards. Over the next four years, the brain bank aims to recruit about 1,000 brain donors.

Read more here:
Singapore announces its first brain bank - BSA bureau

CVL Team Awarded $2.9 Million To Study Socioeconomics of Alzheimer’s – University of Texas at Dallas

Text size: research

Dec. 2, 2019

Researchers at The University of Texas at Dallas Center for Vital Longevity (CVL) have received a $2.9 million grant to continue their investigation into links between socioeconomic disadvantage and susceptibility to cognitive decline.

The National Institute on Aging, part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), provided funding for the project, led by Dr. Gagan Wig, associate professor of cognition and neuroscience in theSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Focusing on middle-aged adults from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, researchers hope to pinpoint structural features of the adult brain that could predict later symptoms of degenerative conditions such as Alzheimers disease.

This initiative builds upon Wigs previous work published in 2018 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences linking a persons environment to the way their brain is organized.

Last year, we found that lower socioeconomic status is associated with less-organized brain networks, which we know relates to poor memory, and that there is individual variation in this risk, Wig said. In the new study, we will examine this variation by tracking individual brain networks and Alzheimers disease genetic risk, along with changes in measures of health, environment and lifestyles.

Dr. Denise Park, director of research for the CVL, UTRegents Research Scholar and Distinguished University Chair in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, is a co-investigator on the study. Also joining the team as co-investigators are Dr. Sherwood Brown, vice chairman of clinical research and chief of clinical neuroscience in the Department of Psychiatry at UTSouthwestern Medical Center; and Dr. Jennifer Gonzalez, senior director of population health at the Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute in Dallas.

Our earlier work allows us to say that there is a correlation between socioeconomic status and brain function and anatomy. Now, we plan to examine some of the specific features which characterize aspects of an individuals health, lifestyle and environment to learn which have the largest impact on brain and cognitive aging.

Dr. Gagan Wig, associate professor of cognition and neuroscience in the School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Members of Wigs lab involved in the current study include postdoctoral researcher Micaela Chan MS12, PhD16, lead author of the 2018 PNAS study; cognition and neuroscience doctoral student Phillip Agres MS16, who was also an author on the earlier study; and lab manager Claudia Carreno MS17.

Even with what our previous study revealed, it was unclear which of the many factors that vary with socioeconomic status are driving the observed relationships with the brain, Chan said. The new studys approach will allow us to determine whether certain biological or lifestyle factors such as stress, sleep, diet, socialization, mental stimulation or physical activity are driving how brain network organization and cognition differ across individuals.

The study will track approximately 150 participants of low-to-middle socioeconomic status (SES) between 40 and 65 years old for four years.

This segment of the population is at higher risk for cognitive decline and Alzheimers disease compared to higher SES individuals, Wig said. Yet they have been largely understudied in brain research.

The researchers hope to identify which features of an individuals environment are most influential in cognitive decline.

Doing so could also help us understand why some people age relatively gracefully while others are more vulnerable to cognitive decline, Wig said. Our earlier work allows us to say that, across a broad range of middle-aged adults, there is a correlation between socioeconomic status and brain function and anatomy. Now, we plan to examine some of the specific features which characterize aspects of an individuals health, lifestyle and environment to learn which have the largest impact on brain and cognitive aging.

The team plans to begin enrolling participants next spring.

Media Contact: Stephen Fontenot, UT Dallas, (972) 883-4405,[emailprotected]or the Office of Media Relations, UT Dallas, (972) 883-2155, [emailprotected]

See more here:
CVL Team Awarded $2.9 Million To Study Socioeconomics of Alzheimer's - University of Texas at Dallas

Why neuroscience research will be critical to designing future cities – Inverse

Most of us will get lost from time to time. But, nevertheless, our brains are actually pretty amazing at navigating. Even when you zone out on your daily commute, your brain is still able to get you there safely. This is thanks in part to your place cells.

Place cells are brain cells that respond to a particular location in the environment and become active when you are in that location. Researchers discovered them by putting rats in a square chamber and watching them run around. They monitoredwhen and where the rats place cellswere active. By doing this, they could determine what location each place cell was responding to, called the cells place field. These place fields are usually circles of 15-25 inches in diameter for rats and mice.

This story originally appeared on Massive Science, an editorial partner site that publishes science stories by scientists. Subscribe to their newsletter to get even more science sent straight to you.

These experiments taught us a lot about how place cells work, but they are not a great representation of the real world. A barren, square, white box is an unlikely environment for a rat, let alone a human, to encounter in the wild. How do your place cells represent locations in a real-life 3D world?

Roddy M. Grieves, a neuroscientist at University College London, has designed a new rat navigation experiment to answer this question. Hebuilt a cubic lattice, a 3D grid that the rats could climb in any direction they pleased. They couldnt just move along the floor, but also vertically up and down.

Grieves and his colleagues wondered what the place fields of place cells would look like in such an environment. They posed two hypotheses. The first was that the place field might now look like cylinders, so one place cell would respond to a location parallel to the ground, regardless of how high in the lattice the rate had climbed. The second was that the place fields would become spheres, so the place cell would take height into account and only respond when the rat was at a particular location along the ground and at a particular height. This hypothesis comes from research in Egyptian fruit bats, whose place cells have such spherical place fields.

The researchers discovered that place cells in rats roughly followed the second hypothesis: their place fields took the shape of elongated spheres, like rugby balls. The elongation was always along one of the three directions the rat could run in the wire frame lattice. Generally speaking, the place fields were more stretched in the vertical direction than they were horizontally. This is important, because it means that the cells are less accurate in this direction. In other words, the place cells were less precise in knowing how far up the rat was in space than where it was within the lattice on the ground.

This may be because rats are more inclined to move horizontally than vertically. Of course they can climb, but they tend to spend most of their time walking along the floor. Their place cells may just not be optimized for vertical movement. Another reason the place cells may be worse in the vertical direction is that it is physically harder for the rats to run in this direction. This makes it more difficult for them to gauge how far theyve traveled.

This research may give us an insight into how the human brain performs navigation, because the human hippocampus, which is critical to navigation, is similar to that of rats. And like rats, we are mammals who generally navigate predominantly in a 2D environment. However, our environment is becoming more and more 3D, with tall buildings, bridges, and underground structures.

These findings in rats suggest that our brains are mainly tuned to the direction were used to navigating: parallel to the ground. Since most of our world is laid out flat in front of us, like the floors in buildings, this makes sense. Even if we fly a plane or drive a submarine, we are often still moving parallel to the ground. But this might not always be the case.

One possible future scenario where humans would be truly navigating in 3D would be in outer space. Without gravity there would not be a single direction that would be relatively easier or harder to move along, such as the vertical axes for the rats. As of now, we dont know what our place cells might do in such a situation and, more importantly, whether we would be able to navigate around as efficiently as we do in our 2D world.

Both on Earth and in space, the design of the environment ultimately has a big impact on our ability to navigate. We are better able to navigate if there are plenty of landmarks around to tell us where we are. We can orient ourselves more easily if a space is not symmetrical. We also navigate better through an environment if we have experienced it from different angles.

Knowing how we find our way around, especially in complex environments, has major implications for the fields of architecture and urban design. It should also be taken into account by engineers and anyone who designs the spaces around us. The goal of research into navigation is not just to understand how our brain works, but also to use this information to make the world around us more suitable for navigation.

This collaboration between neuroscience and urban design is combined in the burgeoning idea of conscious cities: environments built to take the needs and behaviors of humans into account. As our cities are getting larger and more complex, neuroscience research will become increasingly important in guiding their design.

Read the original:
Why neuroscience research will be critical to designing future cities - Inverse

The next phase of recovery: using neuroscience to help heal chronic pain – YakTriNews KAPP-KVEW

";return o};var h=function(o){var p=function(q){var r=this.owl.currentItem+1;q.siblings(".carousel-counter").find(".page-current").text(r)};var n={navigation:true,singleItem:true,autoHeight:true,afterAction:p};c.use("owl",function(){o.owlCarousel(n)})};var m=function(){var r,q="",t='',n=j(''),p=j(''),s=j('').css("background-color",f.color);if(k.totalCount>1){r='

';r+='1/';r+=''+k.totalCount+"";r+="

Read more from the original source:
The next phase of recovery: using neuroscience to help heal chronic pain - YakTriNews KAPP-KVEW

Identifying Internal States of the Brain – Technology Networks

Imagine an attractive person walking toward you. Do you look up and smile? Turn away? Approach but avoid eye contact? The setup is the same, but the outcomes depend entirely on your internal state, which includes your mood, your past experiences, and countless other variables that are invisible to someone watching the scene.

So how can an observer decode internal states by watching outward behaviors? That was the challenge facing a team of Princeton neuroscientists. Rather than tackling the intricacies of human brains, they investigated fruit flies with fewer behaviors and, one imagines, fewer internal states. They built on prior work studying the songs and movements of amorous Drosophila melanogaster males.

Our previous work was able to predict a portion of singing behaviors, but by estimating the flys internal state, we can accurately predict what the male will sing over time as he courts a female, said Mala Murthy, a professor of neuroscience and the senior author on a paper appearing in todays issue of Nature Neuroscience with co-authors Jonathan Pillow, a professor of psychology and neuroscience, and PNI postdoctoral research fellow Adam Calhoun.

Their models use observable variables like the speed of the male or his distance to the female. The researchers identified three separate types of songs, generated by wing vibration, plus the choice not to sing. They then linked the song decisions to the observable variables.

The key was building a machine learning model with a new expectation: animals dont change their behaviors at random, but based on a combination of feedback that they are getting from the female and the state of their own nervous system. Using their new method, they discovered that males pattern their songs in three distinct ways, each lasting tens to hundreds of milliseconds. They named each of the three states: Close, when a male is closer than average to a female and approaching her slowly; Chasing, when he is approaching quickly; and Whatever, when he is facing away from her and moving slowly. The researchers showed that these states correspond to distinct strategies, and then they identified neurons that can control how the males switch between strategies.

This is an important breakthrough, said Murthy. We anticipate that this modeling framework will be widely used for connecting neural activity with natural behavior.

Reference: Calhoun, A.J., Pillow, J.W. & Murthy, M. Unsupervised identification of the internal states that shape natural behavior. Nat Neurosci (2019) doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0533-x

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Read the original here:
Identifying Internal States of the Brain - Technology Networks

Neuroscience Market to Perceive Substantial Growth by the End 2026 – News Description

The global neuroscience market is expected to witness a promising growth in the next few years. The rising level of competition among the leading players and the rising focus on the development of new products are likely to offer promising growth opportunities throughout the forecast period. The research study on the global neuroscience market offers a detailed overview, highlighting the key aspects that are expected to enhance the growth of the market in the near future. The key segmentation and the competitive landscape of the market have also been mentioned at length in the research study.

Global Neuroscience Market: Key Trends

The rising trade of neuroscience consumables and devices for the diagnostics and imaging purpose of nervous system and brain is projected to encourage the growth of the global neuroscience market in the next few years. The function and structure of the nervous system and neurological disorders in several countries such as Russia and Poland is likely to enhance the growth of the overall market in the coming few years.

Moreover, the rising awareness among consumers regarding to the benefits of advanced neuroscience devices, including combination of other imaging devices is projected to accelerate the growth of the global neuroscience market in the next few years.

Request a Brochure of Neuroscience Market Report

https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=49641

Global Neuroscience Market: Market Potential

The rising government spending on the healthcare infrastructure, especially in developed regions is one of the major factors estimated to encourage the growth of the global neuroscience market in the next few years. The rising health spending in the U.S. is predicted to rise substantially, which is another key factor that is likely to enhance the market growth in the near future.

In addition to this, the high adoption of new technologies and the rising spending on the research and development activities are expected to generate potential growth opportunities for the market players in the next few years.

Global Neuroscience Market: Regional Outlook

Among the key regional segments, the Middle East and Africa is expected to hold a large share of the global neuroscience market in the next few years. The rapid development of the medical sector is predicted to enhance the growth of the Middle East and Africa market for neuroscience in the coming few years.

Furthermore, Asia Pacific is estimated to witness a healthy growth in the coming years. The rising geriatric population and the rising incidences of CNS disorders are predicted to encourage the growth of the market in the near future. Europe and North America are estimated to observe a promising growth in the next few years.

Global Neuroscience Market: Competitive Analysis

The global market for neuroscience is competitive in nature and is projected to witness a high level of competition among the key players in the next few years. The growing focus on the research and development activities and innovations is projected to support the growth of the overall market in the next few years. Moreover, the rising mergers and acquisitions and collaborations is likely to enhance the growth of the market in the near future.

Request for a Discount on Neuroscience Market Report

https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=D&rep_id=49641

Some of the key players operating in the neuroscience market across the globe are Plexon Inc., Alpha Omega, Femtonics Ltd., Kendall Research Systems LLC, Doric Lenses Inc., Siemens Healthineers, GE Healthcare, Laserglow Technologies, Neuralynx, Thomas RECORDING GmbH, Mediso Ltd., TRIFOIL IMAGING, Prizmatix, and Neurotar.

The report offers a comprehensive evaluation of the market. It does so via in-depth qualitative insights, historical data, and verifiable projections about market size. The projections featured in the report have been derived using proven research methodologies and assumptions. By doing so, the research report serves as a repository of analysis and information for every facet of the market, including but not limited to: Regional markets, technology, types, and applications.

Original post:
Neuroscience Market to Perceive Substantial Growth by the End 2026 - News Description

NEUROSCIENCE ANTIBODIES AND ASSAYS Market is Expected to Reach at USD 5.1 billion by 2026 – Statsflash

Statsflash is a news portal created to deliver Real and worthy news related to Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Bitcoin and other altcoins. The website is managed by Team of writers and co-workers situated in several regions across the Globe. Our main goal is to deliver Read-worthy content to our users. At Statsflash, We provide the latest news, prices, and detailed analysis and current market statistics in the digital currency community.

See original here:
NEUROSCIENCE ANTIBODIES AND ASSAYS Market is Expected to Reach at USD 5.1 billion by 2026 - Statsflash

The 2019 "Transforming Education Through the Science of Learning" Award Was Presented on Saturday at the Learning & the Brain…

Dr. David H. Rose from CAST was presented with the "2019 Transforming Education Through the Science of Learning" Award for his contributions to the field of Mind, Brain, and Education during the Learning & the Brain educational conference in Boston, MA.

BOSTON (PRWEB) November 27, 2019

A groundbreaking researcher whose work lies at the intersection of education and cognitive neuroscience was awarded the twelfth annual prize for "Transforming Education Through the Science of Learning." The award was established to honor individuals who represent excellence in connecting educators to the latest in the science of learning and is funded by the Learning & the Brain Foundation. The award comes with a $2,500 prize.

David Rose is being honored for his work as a developmental neuropsychologist and educator whose primary focus is on the development of new technologies for learning. In 1984, he co-founded CAST, a not-for-profit research and development organization whose mission is to improve education, for all learners, by combining an inclusive perspective and findings from the cognitive neurosciences, technology, and design. That work has grown into a new field called Universal Design for Learning which now influences educational policy and practice throughout the United States and many other countries.

Dr. Rose is a prolific author of academic articles as well as books for the general educational audience including Universal Design for Learning: Theory & Practice (2014) and Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning (2002). Dr. Rose has also taught at the Harvard Graduate School of Education for over three decades and continues to work with CAST in an emeritus roll.

David Rose has received praise from many of his colleagues in the field. David B. Daniel, PhD, Professor of Psychology at James Madison University and the 2013 winner of the award, said about the new recipient, "One cannot understate the impact of David Rose's work and vision in American education, and beyond. He courageously leveraged his innovative thinking and passion into a movement to ensure that ALL students are given the materials and scaffolds to learn in a way that is most productive for the way they can learn best. David Rose's kindness, coupled with his keen intellectual power, are appreciated by everyone with whom he interacts. He is also an innovative teacher who continually redesigns his pedagogy to adapt to the students he teaches."

According to Mary Helen Immordino-Yang, EdD, a Professor of Education at the Rossier School of Education, a Professor of Psychology at the Brain and Creativity Institute, a member of the Neuroscience Graduate Program Faculty at the University of Southern California, and the inaugural winner of this award, "David Rose's pathbreaking work on Universal Design for Learning is a seminal contribution to education policy and practice, and a major force for good in children's lives. At the launch of the digital era in schools, David showed educators how digital media could be leveraged to provide the flexibility that would enable access to all learners. His brilliance provided a lifeline for learners with disabilities, and made material better and more accommodating for all."

Dr. Daniel presented the prize to Dr. Rose in front of an audience of 1,200 educators at the Learning & the Brain educational conference in Boston, MA on Saturday, November 23, held at the Westin Copley Hotel. The Learning & the Brain Foundation wishes Dr. Rose our heartiest congratulations.

For the original version on PRWeb visit: https://www.prweb.com/releases/the_2019_transforming_education_through_the_science_of_learning_award_was_presented_on_saturday_at_the_learning_the_brain_educational_conference_in_boston/prweb16752774.htm

Here is the original post:
The 2019 "Transforming Education Through the Science of Learning" Award Was Presented on Saturday at the Learning & the Brain...