Category Archives: Neuroscience

University study shows faulty cell cleanup in the brain may lead to long lasting neurological issues – University of Virginia The Cavalier Daily

The process of neurodevelopment is responsible for creating neurological pathways in the brain that are responsible for controlling our movements, body functions and helping us retain memories. According to the Brighton Center for Pediatric Neurodevelopment, neurodevelopment sets a person up for the rest of their life and is a critical function. During this process, over half of the neurons die, a process called cell cleanup or dieback, in order to ensure the strongest neurological connections. A group of University neuroscientists and researchers discovered the importance of the AIM2 cell cleanup pathway as it relates to faulty cell cleanup and possible reactivation later in life.

Dr. John Lukens, assistant professor of medicine and principal investigator, notes the importance of neurodevelopment.

If there's any kind of perturbations or changes in the kinetics, it can have long lasting issues that lead to things like neurodevelopmental disorders like autism and schizophrenia, Lukens said.

There are a variety of issues that lead to too much or little cell cleanup. According to Lukens, early infections soon after birth, exposure to neurotoxic chemicals, oxygen levels in the brain and other infections such as Zika virus can all have negative impacts on the development.

If you have a neuron that has issues straight out of the gate, it has all these errors in the DNA that's basically going to have a result in a faulty neuronal connection being in the brain from a very early time point, Lukens said.

The John Lukens Lab, where the research project took place, is part of the neuroscience department at the University and focuses on immunological pathways and the development of neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental, mental and behavioral disorders.

The research team consisting of neuroscience graduate student Catherine Lammert, postdoctoral fellow Elizabeth Frost, undergraduate lab researcher Calli Bellinger, neuroscience graduate student Ashley Bolte, Washington University neuroscience graduate student Celia McKee, data science graduate student Mariah Hurt, cognitive sciences undergraduate student Matt Paysour, neuroscience graduate student Hannah Ennerfelt and Lukens discovered a pathway that helps to control DNA damage and ensure proper neurodevelopment. Their discovery was somewhat of a chance discovery stemming from unexpected results from their initial focus on traumatic brain injury.

Before moving forward with the initial trauma experiment, they tested mice to measure their motor coordination and discovered that mice and other animals lacking a specific cell cleanup pathway, AIM2 inflammasome, performed very poorly. The molecular pathway detects neurons that are faulty in order to ensure dangerous neurons do not get incorporated to the brain.

The team found that a lot of people with mutations or those that lack the AIM2 inflammasome have neurodevelopmental disorders amongst other diseases.

Manipulating this pathway to help the developing nervous system to eliminate those cells could potentially provide at least biomarkers or therapeutic targets to treat neurodevelopmental disorders like autism, Lukens said.

The use of the pathway could potentially be useful later in life as well as earlier in life.

As people grow older, the pathways that repair DNA become less effective. According to Lukens, it is thought that the acquisition of DNA damage overtime causes the degenerating of our organs, or atrophy.

As there are currently no treatments that treat the underlying causes of neurological diseases like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or Alzheimers, the possibility of reactivating the pathway later in life could potentially hold back neurodegeneration.

Lukens also emphasized the pathway can get inadvertently reactivated in old age due to DNA damage and if not controlled, can have negative consequences.

Lammert, who worked on the project for just under five years, thinks that treatments are far away but notes that many papers have shown inflammasomes to be important.

I think that the main really cool thing about this finding is that inflammasomes, which usually are activated in response to an infection or some kind of exogenous danger signal actually respond in the brain just at baseline and not responding to any disease or damage, Lammert said. In terms of treatment for things, it's just maybe shedding light on a new pathway that could be targeted.

The teams discovery is the tip of the iceberg in regard to possible neurological disease treatment and prevention. The pathway could be a possible target to combat neurological diseases such as ALS or alzheimers.

Visit link:
University study shows faulty cell cleanup in the brain may lead to long lasting neurological issues - University of Virginia The Cavalier Daily

WATCH: A Brigham and Women’s bedside nurse shares reality of patient care – Boston.com

Coronavirus is affecting everyday life even for those who have not been infected. We aresharing storiesof its impact on local people. To share your own, please submitthis formor email us atcommunity@boston.com.

This story was submitted by Melissa Coughlin, a registered nurse in the neuroscience unit at Brigham and Womens Hospital.

I am a mother, wife, daughter, substitute school nurse, camp nurse, graduate advanced practice nurse (APN) student, member of my towns Board of Health, and a 20-year bedside nurse at the Brigham and Womens Hospitals neuroscience unit, but not a writer, never a writer.

I saw the opportunity to submit a personal account of our experience on the front lines and I must write. I must write to share what our patients cannot tell you. I must write to share what my colleagues have seen and are doing what you must know.

Almost twenty years ago, September 11, 2001, I biked to work from my apartment in Watertown knowing that this day would change my life forever. It was my first day as a nurse. Around 9 a.m. my life really did change forever; all our lives changed. The first tower came down. I watched from my first-ever patients room. Life as a nurse became real. So real. I learned most of it was not taught in the classroom. Empathy, compassion, handholding, getting to know my patients, who they are, who they were, what they need, how they feel, their fears, and dreams.

In the past twenty years, I have held hands with patients who are dying, who are getting news about new brain tumors, new strokes, new diagnoses of MS; the list is endless. I have held hands with family members while their loved ones are being diagnosed with horrible life-changing diseases.

This is different; worse, so much worse. We are scared. We are holding down the fort. We are gowned and gloved and covered. We cannot hold hands with the family members. We cannot hug them. We deny them the rights to be at their loved ones sides. We tell them, No. When we tell their wife, son, daughter, husband, mother, or father that their beloved relative will likely not make it through the weekend, we do it over FaceTime.

COVID-19 has stripped our humanity.

I do not work on a COVID-19 unit. I am not deployed. I am on our step-down unit and will stay to care for our population of extremely sick neuro patients. We have COVID-19 patients under investigation, we have recovering COVID-19 patients, and we have lots of enhanced respiratory precaution patients. We have sick patients. Patients who are alert enough to be scared, lonely and who know they are sick enough to have to be there.

Nurses are stretched beyond anything we have ever dreamed of. We are the family members, we are the eyes for the doctors, we are the therapists, we go into the room. When we have a critical event, we gown up and go into the room. We do not social distance. We cant.

Yet, despite the daily unknowns, we show up. We actually climb the stairs and show up. Yes, the elevators only allow four riders. So we walk up the stairs with masks on to get to work. My unit is on the tenth and twelfth floors. We climb literally and metaphorically to work every day.

We do not need praise. I promise you this is not why we do this. We do not consider ourselves heroes. We all just want this to be over. I assure you this is not media hype. This is very real. We want our patients to get the care and love they deserve. We want to feel safe.

We want our humanity back.

Sign up and receive coronavirus news and breakingupdates, from our newsroom to your inbox.

Sign up for Boston.com's e-mail alerts and receive coronavirus news and breaking updates, from our newsroom to your inbox.

Thanks for signing up!

More here:
WATCH: A Brigham and Women's bedside nurse shares reality of patient care - Boston.com

Stress physically alters communication in the brain – Medical News Today

Astrocytes, which are brain cells that regulate neuronal communication, show long-term degradation from stress.

The experience of traumatic events can lead to neuropsychiatric disorders, including anxiety, depression, and drug addiction, says Dr. Si-Qiong June Liu of LSU Health New Orleans School of Medicine.

Dr. Liu is the lead author of a new study on mice that reveals at least one way in which stress physiologically changes the way a brain operates

The journal for neuroscience JNeurosci has published the study.

In research with mice, Lius study finds that even a single stressful event can quickly cause long-lasting changes to an astrocyte.

When experiencing stress, the astrocytes shrink away from synapses resulting in disruption of neural communication. Synapses are structures that allow information to pass from one cell to another via neurotransmitters.

Researchers will need to carry out further studies to see whether the effect of stress on mice is the same as it is on humans. Liu notes, however, that there is a good chance that the molecular pathways involved in her research also exist in humans.

Stress alters brain function and produces lasting changes in human behavior and physiology. Investigation of the neurobiology of stress can reveal how stress affects neuronal connections and hence brain function. This knowledge is necessary for developing strategies to prevent or treat these common stress-related neurological disorders.

Si-Qiong June Liu

Not all the cells in the brain are neurons. Between 33% and 66% of them, are glial cells. The name comes from the Greek word gla, which means glue. Scientists gave them this name because they initially believed that glial cells simply held the brains neurons together.

Subsequent research suggests that they do far more than that. Scientists have identified four major types of glial cells: microglia, oligodendrocytes, NG2-glia, and astrocytes.

Astrocytes are the most abundant type of glial cell and are critical for the formation and maintenance of synaptic connections. These star-shaped cells have limbs, or fine processes, that extend outward from the cells center.

A brains neurons form connections, or synapses, through which they chemically exchange information. The upstream, or presynaptic, neuron releases neurotransmitters that bind with receptors on a downstream, or postsynaptic, second neuron.

However, astrocytes are the third partner in the process. Research shows that when astrocytes are unavailable to neurons, the neurons degrade and eventually die.

The astrocytes involvement in communication between two neurons is so important, scientists describe the connection as a tripartite synapse.

Scientists are still investigating the full role of astrocytes in synaptic connections, though they are aware of some of their contributions.

When astrocytes extend their fine processes outward to touch their synaptic neuron partners, they regulate synaptic transmission by interacting with neurons excitatory and inhibitory chemicals.

They also clear away buildup of no-longer-needed neurotransmitters after they have delivered their message.

Astrocytes also provide nutrients to neurons and help them retain plasticity, as well as helping maintain the blood-brain barrier.

Lius team saw that when they exposed the mice to the odor of a predator even one time, the stress produced a long-lasting change to their astrocytes.

In response to the stress, the mice secreted the stress hormone norepinephrine, which, in turn, suppressed a molecular pathway that produces a protein called GluA1. GluA1 controls the shaping and plasticity of the astrocytes. In particular, it controls the extension of the astrocytes fine process.

Lius team observed that the astrocytes fine processes retracted in response to stress and pulled away from contact and communication with neurons and synapses. This made synaptic connections more difficult or impossible.

Stress affects the structure and function of both neurons and astrocytes, Liu says.

Because astrocytes can directly modulate synaptic transmission and are critically involved in stress-related behavior, preventing or reversing the stress-induced change in astrocytes is a potential way to treat stress-related neurological disorders. We identified a molecular pathway that controls GluA1 synthesis and thereby astrocyte remodeling during stress.

Liu is hopeful that her teams identification of the interplay between stress, norepinephrine, and GluA1 can provide a new therapeutic avenue to explore, saying, This suggests new pharmacological targets for possible prevention or reversal of stress-induced changes.

Visit link:
Stress physically alters communication in the brain - Medical News Today

3 things you can do today to beat work stress, according to neuroscience – CNBC

Nearly every aspect of living and working has been upended by the coronavirus pandemic.

Running essential errands, checking on friends and family, caring for kids while school is shut down andstaying healthy have all become harder. On top of all that, workers are simultaneously worried about job security and may be logginglonger, more distracted hoursin their new work-from-home arrangements.

"In the brain, it's like we woke up one day in a war zone with no training or skills, and our brains are not dealing well with it," says David Rock, founder and CEO of NeuroLeadership Institute, a science-based leadership development company.

While it may feel like stress is coming at you from every direction, Rock tells CNBC Make It that it's important to boil down the root causes of stress to three main points: feelings of uncertainty, a lack of autonomy and a decrease in positive social interaction.

"Those three things combined make this the most stressful experience of most people's lives by many multiples," Rock adds.

The good news is that knowing these three root causes of stress is the first step to overcoming it at work and at home. Of course, if you're feeling particularly overwhelmed, you may want to talk to a mental health professional.Your workplace may offer teletherapy and counseling services through an employee assistance program, and some states have made free mental health hotlines available to residents.

Here are Rock's suggestions for simple ways to start combating stress today.

"You might feel like the news is making you more certain," Rock says, "but it's actually making you more anxious."

To that end,you may want tolimit the amount of time and energy you focus on the news, other than essential details of how to keep you and your family safe.

First, try to limit the number of times you scroll through your news feed or turn on the TV news channel for example, in the morning before work and in the evening before dinner. When you do check the news, set an alarm for when you have to stop.

"It can be good for mental health to be productive and not focus on the news too much," Rock adds. Be intentional with how you spend your time consuming news, doing work and pursuing personal interests and hobbies.

For a lot of people, working from home means working with a host of new distractionshousemates, partners, kids, errands all of which can make you feel like your days are slipping away from you.

To that end,"it's important for your sense of certainty and autonomy to build a schedule and stick to it," Rock says.

Many remote-work experts agree it's crucial to establish some sort of routine so the confines of work and home don't bleed into each other, which can cause burnout. Establish a clear morning, work and evening schedule, and coordinate with people in your household. Communicate some of these boundaries with work colleagues, too.

Remember that during times of stress, you'll probably become more irritable toward others. "When things feel completely out of control, even small stressors become big stressors," Rock says.

Be open with others, whether members of your household or colleagues during the workday, about what you need from each other to avoid small conflicts from getting out of hand. Practicing empathy when you're on the receiving end of feedback can also go a long way to help you feel more in control.

One thing that might feel completely out your grasp is job security. Roughly 22 million Americans filed for unemployment in the first month since the pandemic upended the U.S. economy. And according to a recent Gallup poll, 25% of American workers are worried they could lose their job in the next year, compared to 8% of workers who felt that way last year.

Rock says even in the event of losing your job, you can find a way to exercise autonomy, such as controlling your spending or preparing your job-search plan. In today's situation, that might mean acknowledging you won't be able to find a new job for the next six months, and creating a plan about how you'll use your time until that point.

"It might sound glib, but it's actually quite powerful to be proactively making choices in a situation that feels like it's been done to you," Rock says. "It can be helpful to use the opportunity of a downturn to take time to reevaluate your career interests, reconnect with loved ones and get yourself in better physical and emotional shape."

Connecting with others during the pandemic is both harder to do and more crucial than ever to combat stress.

And just like you structure time for news and work, Rock says it can make a big difference to schedule time to socialize: "If we don't put those things in the calendar first, work will expand to fill the available time," he says.

That might include having a virtual coffee break with colleagues in the morning, or setting aside an hour every week to have lunch with your partner at home. To stay accountable for your log-off time, you may commit to a phone call with a friend or family member while taking an after-work walk around the neighborhood.

The key is to make these quality and positive interactions. "We need those interactions with people every day to calm our nervous systems," Rock says.

Correction: This story has been revised to reflect David Rock's role as founder and CEO of a leadership company.

Check out: The best credit cards of 2020 could earn you over $1,000 in 5 years

Don't miss:

Read the original here:
3 things you can do today to beat work stress, according to neuroscience - CNBC

New Neuroscience Research Calls Where You Study Key to Faster Learning – Inc.

So what can you doif you need remember,or better yet memorize,something important?

According tonew research published earlier this month in the scientificjournalNeuron, stopstudying in your office. Or in your home. Or anywhere you're familiar. Study in a place that's new to you.

While that might seem odd, sincestudying in an unfamiliar setting sounds distractingrather thanconducive to learning, the opposite turns out to be true.

A fresh environment activatesthe dopamine system in your brain, and dopamine promotes associative learning, triggering feelings of reward that increase your brain's ability to absorb and retain information. (Associative learning is connecting a stimulus or action with a positive or negative outcome; think connecting the dots.)

In short, the naturalbuzzyou get from being somewhere new--or as the researchers call it, experiencing "inconsequential novel stimulus"--helps you learn more quickly.

"From avery practical perspective," the researchers write,"the results remind us to break our routine more often and seek out novel experiences to be better learners."

Need to nail a new sales demo? Need to nail a presentation? Need to remember a variety of facts and figures to support an idea?Study and rehearse somewhere new.

Just keep in mind that "new" really does mean new.

"Strictly speaking," the researchers write, "anything is only new the first time we perceive it."

Which means you'll constantly have to find new places to study.

Butsince new can be "inconsequential," where you go doesn't need to have a great view.Orspecial ambience.Or social cachet.

To learn better and faster, where you go justhas to be different.

Published on: Apr 23, 2020

The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

See more here:
New Neuroscience Research Calls Where You Study Key to Faster Learning - Inc.

New Hinton Nature Paper Revisits Backpropagation, Offers Insights for Understanding Learning in the Cortex – Synced

Although Turing awardee and backpropagation pioneer Geoffrey Hintons interests have largely shifted to unsupervised learning, he recently co-authored a paper that takes a look back at backpropagation and explores its potential to contribute to understanding how the human cortex learns.

Hinton and a team of researchers from DeepMind, University College London, and University of Oxford published the paper last Friday on Nature Reviews Neuroscience. Their main idea is that biological brains could compute effective synaptic updates by using feedback connections to induce neuron activities whose locally computed differences encode backpropagation-like error signals.

Backpropagation of errors, or backprop, is a widely used algorithm in training artificial neural networks using gradient descent for supervised learning. The basics of continuous backpropagation were proposed in the 1960s, and in 1986 a Nature paper co-authored by Hinton showed experimentally that backprop can generate useful internal representations for neural networks.

The introduction of backpropagation also generated excitement in the neuroscience community, where it was viewed as a possible source of insight on understanding the learning process in the cortex. How the cortex modifies synapses to improve the performance of multistage networks remains one of the biggest mysteries in neuroscience.

Although we know that human brains learn by modifying the synaptic connections between neurons, synapses in the cortex are embedded within multi-layered networks, making it difficult to determine the effect of an individual synaptic modification on the behaviour of the system. In artificial neural networks, backprop tries to solve this problem by computing how slight changes in each synapses strength change the networks error rate using the chain rule of calculus.

The relevance of backpropagation to the cortex however had been in doubt for some time. The method was viewed as biologically problematic, as it was classically described in the supervised learning setting while the brain is thought to learn mainly in an unsupervised fashion and appears to use its feedback connections for different purposes. Moreover, decades after it was first proposed, backpropagation had still failed to produce truly impressive performance in artificial systems.

Backprop made its comeback in the 2010s, contributing to the rapid progress in unsupervised learning problems such as image and speech generation, language modelling, and other prediction tasks. Combining backprop with reinforcement learning also enabled significant advances in solving control problems such as mastering Atari games and beating top human professionals in games like Go and poker.

The successes of artificial neural networks over the past decade along with developments in neuroscience have reinvigorated interest in whether backpropagation can offer insights for understanding learning in the cortex. The new paper proposes that the brain has the capacity to implement the core principles underlying backprop, despite the apparent differences between brains and artificial neural nets.

The researchers introduced neural gradient representation by activity differences (NGRAD), which they define as learning mechanisms that use differences in activity states to drive synaptic changes.

To function in neural circuits, NGRADs need to be able to coordinate interactions between feedforward and feedback pathways, compute differences between patterns of neural activities, and use these differences to make appropriate synaptic updates. Although it is not yet clear how biological circuits could support these operations, the researchers say that recent empirical studies present an expanding set of potential solutions to these implementation requirements.

The NGRAD framework demonstrates that it is possible to embrace the core principles of backpropagation while sidestepping many of its problematic implementation requirements. And although the researchers focused on the cortex because many of its architectural features resemble that of deep networks, they believe NGRADs may be relevant to any brain circuit that incorporates both feedforward and feedback connectivity.

Many pieces are still missing that would firmly connect backprop with learning in the brain. Nonetheless, the situation now is very much reversed from decades ago, when neuroscience was thought to have little to learn from backprop. Now, the researchers believe, learning by following the gradient of a performance measure can work very well in deep neural networks: It therefore seems likely that a slow evolution of the thousands of genes that control the brain would favour getting as close as possible to computing the gradients that are needed for efficient learning of the trillions of synapses it contains.

The paper Backpropagation and the Brain is available on Nature Reviews Neuroscience. The first author is Timothy P. Lillicrap, and the research team also includes Adam Santoro, Luke Marris and Colin J. Akerman.

Journalist: Yuan Yuan | Editor: Michael Sarazen

Like Loading...

Read the original post:
New Hinton Nature Paper Revisits Backpropagation, Offers Insights for Understanding Learning in the Cortex - Synced

New Breakthrough Work Involving AI and Neuroscience – Can Spinal Cord Injury Be Treated? – Communal News

Breakthrough new research became available on April 20 discussing how neuroscientists created artificial neurons from protein strands to behave like live ones. Neurons are the nerve cells and nerve fibers that are electrically excitable cells in the nervous system that function to process and transmit information. In vertebrate animals, neurons are the core components of the brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerves.

The full research paper is titled Bioinspired bio-voltage memristors.

A memristor is a non-linear two-terminal electrical component relating electric charge and magnetic flux linkage. It was described and named in 1971 by Leon Chua, completing a theoretical quartet of fundamental electrical components which comprises the resistor, capacitor and inductor.

This advance could mean it would be possible to use artificial neurons and fuse them with live ones in the future, allowing science to easily treat spinal cord injuries and paralyzed people. Progress in artificial intelligence could also lead to energy efficient machines powered by AI in the future.

Scientists may also be able to achieve full stability in biological fluids, which would be an important feature for the medical community.

There is previous work that was published in March connecting live cells with artificial ones. The Internet aided in the creation of a virtual brain using actual live nerve cells. This breakthrough and novel project was created with collaboration from Italian, Swiss and British scientists. The artificial neurons came from Switzerland, electronic interneuron connection from the UK and the live nerve cells from Italy. All these were amalgamated into one functioning system. It means that a live nervous system can be collaborated with the technology into one.

The neural networks will be controlled via a regular laptop and can be used, in specially designed devices tailored to the patients and their needs, to compensate for the non functioning live neurons. It is highly plausible artificial neurons will be manufactured for wide use in neurological cases.

The researchers assembled a memristor from protein nanofibers and a thin silver wire. Electrical impulses were passed through the latter. As a result, the device created new branches and fiber connections that are hundreds of times thinner than a human contains. According to the diagram (available open source), the specifics of the work include the ability of the Geobacter sulfurreducens proteins to chemically reduce metals, hence the microbes get energy.

Authors of the work emphasize that the device they created does not have a software application, but the system operates at z 0.04-0.1 volts. This is very close to the voltage that a live neuron utilizes for energy.

The next step is to start testing these artificial neurons to connect with live ones. Obviously, there is a lot of work ahead before the research can enter trials and even be approved.

See the original post here:
New Breakthrough Work Involving AI and Neuroscience - Can Spinal Cord Injury Be Treated? - Communal News

Five New Bass Professors Named for Excellence in Teaching and Research – Duke Today

Five Duke professors with demonstrated excellence in research and undergraduate instruction have been selected as the 2020 Bass Fellows.

This moment of crisis has highlighted the importance of having faculty who excel, both in teaching and in research, said Gary Bennett, vice provost for undergraduate education. Bass Fellows represent the best that Duke offers -- faculty with a commitment to discovery and delivering a transformational undergraduate education, one that changes lives and strengthens our global communities.

The chairs were created in 1996 when Anne T. and Robert Bass gave $10 million as a matching gift to encourage Duke alumni, parents and friends to endow the positions. Candidates are nominated by faculty and evaluated by a faculty committee for having achieved true excellence in both research and teaching and being good university citizens. Bass professors hold their named chairs for five-year terms and then become lifetime members of the Bass Society of Fellows, which now numbers 106.

Thomas Robisheaux, the Fred W. Shaffer Professor of History whose research focuses on early modern Europe, was elected this month to serve as the new faculty director of the Bass Society of Fellows. He succeeds Lisa Keister, a professor of sociology who holds a joint appointment in the Sanford School of Public Policy.

The newly appointed Bass Fellows are:

Brenton Hoffman, James L. and Elizabeth M. Vincent Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering. The primary goal of Hoffmans research program is to use an interdisciplinary approach to first advance the basic understanding of mechanotransduction and then use this knowledge to guide the development of new treatments for mechanosensitive diseases. He has developed and taught two major courses -- Cell Mechanics and Mechanotransduction, and Biomaterials and Biomechanics, a required course for juniors who choose to focus on cell and tissue engineering, biomaterials or biomechanics. Hoffman has mentored more than 20 undergraduate researchers.

Sheila Patek, Mrs. Alexander Heymeyer Professor of Biology. Patek studies the unifying principles that guide, limit, and promote the evolutionary diversity of biomechanical systems. Her research has yielded discoveries of new biological phenomena, original tests of macroevolutionary hypotheses, and new frameworks for understanding the mechanical foundations of biological diversity. Her classes receive very positive student evaluations. She also created the Muser website, which connects undergraduates to mentored research opportunities across campus.

Christine Payne, Mary Milus Yoh and Harold L. Yoh, Jr. Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science. Payne came to Duke from Georgia Tech in 2018. Her research focuses on cellular interactions with nanoparticles, which increasingly are being used as sources for heating in cancer therapy or as drug delivery vehicles. She has already made an impact on teaching through her new course on the Materials Science of Science Fiction.

Gregory Samenez-Larkin, Jack H. Neely Associate Professor of Psychology & Neuroscience. Samenez-Larkins research lies at the intersection of human development, affective science, health psychology, cognitive neuroscience, behavioral economics and experimental finance. His four undergraduate courses, including an upper-level seminar and a foundational statistics/data-analysis class, have earned him exceptional student evaluations.

Jun Yang, Bishop-MacDermott Family Professor of Computer Science. As the co-director of the Duke Database Research Group, Yangs primary research interest lies in the area of database and data-intensive computing, which includes computational journalism, using computing to help to preserve public interest journalism. Before his arrival at Duke, the computer science department did not offer any courses in databases. Yang developed a coherent curriculum from scratch. His highly popular Introduction to Database Systems, usually attracts about 150 students.

For more information, visit the Bass Fellows website.

More here:
Five New Bass Professors Named for Excellence in Teaching and Research - Duke Today

Broncos Win Fulbrights and Goldwater Scholarship Awards – Business Wire

SANTA CLARA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Santa Clara University is proud to announce that five Santa Clara University students or alumni have won prestigious Fulbright and Goldwater awards, enabling them to pursue research in fields such as urban environmental mitigation, disability rights, agricultural innovation, or neuroscience.

We are very proud of our students who have worked so hard inside and outside of class to earn these very competitive fellowships. We also commend their professors and mentors who encouraged them throughout the process, said University President Kevin OBrien, S.J. The University is honored to count these young scholars as Santa Clara students and alumni, particularly as they put their Jesuit education into practice for service of others.

Recent alumna Erin Ronald 19 and seniors Griffin Garner 20, Mariana Perera 20, and Bridget Woody 20 each won Fulbright Scholarships, to study in Sweden, Uganda, Brazil, and Jamaica, respectively, while junior Max Bjorni 21 won the Goldwater Scholarship for outstanding science, engineering or math students. Two other SCU seniors, Ali Deambrosio 20 and Graeme Hugo 20 are Fulbright alternates, and will study in Uruguay and Chile, respectively, if other awardees are unable to participate.

Ronald will study urban climate mitigation policy in several cities in Sweden. Garner will work in Uganda to help smallholder coffee farmers incorporate best practices to thrive and grow amid climate change. Perera will study disability rights policy in Brazil. Woody proposed traveling to Kingston, Jamaica, to conduct research into how past technological innovations historically affected the colonized slave populations there, as a way to inform modern-day, ethical engineering innovation.

Bjorni, a double major in neuroscience and biology, was awarded a Barry Goldwater Scholarship, which recognizes the nations top college sophomores and juniors who intend to pursue research careers in the natural sciences, engineering, and mathematics.

About Santa Clara UniversityFounded in 1851, Santa Clara University sits in the heart of Silicon Valleythe worlds most innovative and entrepreneurial region. The Universitys stunningly landscaped 106-acre campus is home to the historic Mission Santa Clara de Ass. Ranked among the top 15 percent of national universities by U.S. News & World Report, SCU has among the best four-year graduation rates in the nation and is rated by PayScale in the top 1 percent of universities with the highest-paid graduates. SCU has produced elite levels of Fulbright Scholars as well as four Rhodes Scholars. With undergraduate programs in arts and sciences, business, and engineering, and graduate programs in six disciplines, the curriculum blends high-tech innovation with social consciousness grounded in the tradition of Jesuit, Catholic education. For more information see http://www.scu.edu.

View original post here:
Broncos Win Fulbrights and Goldwater Scholarship Awards - Business Wire

Opinionated Science Episode 3: The Microbiome: Gut-Brain Connections and Poo Pills – Technology Networks

Opinionated Science is Technology Networks homemade podcast, where our team of scientists-turned-journalists cut out the chewy jargon and serve up slices of the most fascinating stories from the world of science. Expect a new Opinionated Science every other Friday.

In this episode, the Technology Networks team discuss the the community of bacteria that have made our bodies their home: the microbiome. We explore how these bugs can influence our behavior and help us fight disease and whether microbiota-modifying poo pills could become a part of precision medicine in the near future.

Read more from this podcast:https://www.technologynetworks.com/cancer-research/infographics/the-microbiome-and-cancer-319758

https://www.technologynetworks.com/genomics/infographics/sequencing-the-microbiome-327727

https://www.technologynetworks.com/neuroscience/articles/mouse-moms-microbiota-leads-to-altered-behavior-326252

https://www.technologynetworks.com/tn/articles/microbiome-medicine-takes-center-stage-308055

Listen to moreTechnology Networkspodcastshere.

See the article here:
Opinionated Science Episode 3: The Microbiome: Gut-Brain Connections and Poo Pills - Technology Networks