Research Officer Addiction Neuroscience Job at The Florey Institute in Melbourne, Australia The Conversation AU
Read more here:
Research Officer Addiction Neuroscience Job at The Florey Institute in Melbourne, Australia - The Conversation AU
November 23, 2020
Koop Bills is an Arizona State University senior in neuroscience and psychology who wants to pursue a PhD in cognitive neuroscience after graduation. Bills was the first recipient of the brand-new Jenessa Shapiro Undergraduate Research Scholarship designed to support underrepresented students in their pursuits of research opportunities. He is a research assistant with the Perception, Ecological Action, Robotics, and Learning (PEARL) Lab.
The PEARL Lab aims to better understand perception and action by approaching perception from the perspective of sports, robotics and illusions. Recent project directions include studying subjective perception, time perception, color perception, sound symbolism and music.
Bills personal research interest centers on astrocytes glial cells in the brain and on human memory and behavior, such as walking in a pandemic and how you approach people. For example, there is a general trend when walking toward someone to shift to the right side when passing. This bias is consistent worldwide, even in countries that drive on the other side of the road.
Koop Bills has been working as a research assistant in the PEARL lab and attending lab meetings for over a year now, so I and graduate student supervisor Matt Langley have gotten to know him quite well. Like many others in this COVID-directed year, he was forced to change directions from a well-developed earlier project to one that could be run under social isolation conditions, but he has adapted well and come up with a nice, socially relevant study, saidMichael McBeath, professor of psychology and director of the PEARL Lab.
McBeath added, He is a bright, thoughtful, and insightful student and researcher. He has had to endure personal hardship and spend a lot of time working many hours to earn a living while attending ASU, which has slowed down his progress up until now. But he now has a renewed vigor and is making good headway due to receiving the Jenessa Shapiro Research Scholarship.
Bills was previously an engineering major, but after taking his first neuroscience course, he finished the semester and immediately changed his major.
When you are reading something and you get to the point of thinking that it is so cool, that is something you should be doing more of. I found that when I read about astrocytes and neuroscience. I had to have more of it, Bills said.
Video by ASU Department of Psychology
Bills has worked two jobs in the restaurant service industry for the past seven years to support his family while pursuing his undergraduate degree and serving as a research assistant in the PEARL Lab. He has had to make sacrifices that other students havent in order to pursue his passions and research.
Oftentimes Ive had to make the choice to go into work, when I know I need to write a paper Ive had to make the choice to work a double, when I needed to be the one to call out because I had real work that was important for me to do, Bills said.
This experience is representative of challenges that underrepresented students face regularly. Many students need to work multiple jobs in order to make ends meet while trying to study and achieve an undergraduate education.
When I found out I was receiving the scholarship, I lost it and danced around, said Bills, It took a few moments to really set in how much my life had just changed from receiving this scholarship.
The next day, Bills gave his two weeks notice at both jobs and refocused his schedule to be entirely research-centered.
One of the most gratifying parts of the experience for Bills was the support he received from his mentors, McBeath andMatthew Langley, a doctoral student in the Department of Psychology. He hadnt seen the application for the scholarship, and they pushed him to apply, encouraging him to work on the application a little bit every single day.
As Bills comments came through the shared document, they would edit in real time, even late into the night. They set up additional one-on-one meetings to make sure he was hitting his deadline to apply.
That was the most amazing thing, to see the support I was receiving from my professors and how much they wanted me to get this scholarship, Bills said. They didnt have to do this Im just an RA, Im just a student but they put in that extra effort, just because they care.
What really benefits the world is diversity. It is unique experiences getting to the highest level of education. It is the idea that we are better as a team, so if you are looking to donate to a fund, I think it is really important to give to scholarships like this one, Bills said. You just dont know who someone can be, until they are given an opportunity to grow.
The Jenessa Shapiro Scholarship, whichis dedicated to supporting annually one to two students with funding of up to $5,000,is part of theENERGIZE Initiativein the ASU Department of Psychology. The ENERGIZE initiative is designed to streamline the process of getting involved with research and working around requirements that would previously prevent underrepresented students from gaining the research experience they need.
Learn more or donate to the fund here.
RELATED:Psychology researcher receives scholarship to explore stress, sleep
Top photo:ASU senior Koop Bills. Photo by Robert Ewing
Marketing and Communications Manager , Department of Psychology
480-727-5054 robert.ewing@asu.edu
Originally posted here:
ASU psychology student receives scholarship to research perception and neuroscience - ASU Now
The concept of neuroplasticity is one that hasn't been in the public vocabulary for very long, but it's already getting people to rethink big parts of medicine and therapy. Our ability to treat neurological issues has grown leaps and bounds in the last few years, allowing for previously prohibitive conditions to become significantly more manageable. This has become especially valuable in the world of sport's medicine, where its advantages are twofold: creating more effective treatments for injuries such as concussions while providing athletes with regimens that let them hone their motor reflexes.
Let's back up to discuss some basic vocabulary for a second. For starters, what is neuroplasticity?
To put it simply: neuroplasticity is our brain's ability to change over time by growing and reorganizing neural networks. Neural pathways that are used frequently are reinforced, while ones that go neglected will become less prominent over time. It's the process that's at work in your brain when you learn new skills. If you've ever noticed yourself developing reflexes for exercise that used to require a lot of conscious brainpower, you're seeing neuroplasticity at work!
While neuroplasticity is still a newer concept in the world of cognitive therapy and rehabilitation, it's opened some incredible doors.
Injuries and illnesses that cause neurological conditions are a serious matter. Head trauma from car accidents and career sports injuriesare two common forms of neurological problems, and both can mean a long, uphill battle in recovery. The integration of neuroplastic treatments into recovery seems to be making a huge difference!
One of the companies at the forefront of this medical frontier is NeuraPerformance Brain Center, an organization that's been using revolutionary neuroplasticity treatments to make a difference in people's lives. What makes them so unique is that the intersection they occupy is between sports medicine and cognitive therapy. Fans of Colorado sports will be excited to know that parts of NeuraPerformance can be traced to Denver's sports teams!
NeuraPerformanceClinic Director Shawn Caldwellhas over 20 years of experience working with professional sports teams to ensure player health. In fact, he's been the Colorado Rockies team chiropractor since 1999 and worked with the Denver Broncos for 13 years. He also consults with the Denver Nuggets!You can see some of Caldwell's expertise here:
NeuraPerformance employs a variety of different treatment options to accomplish a variety of outcomes. One of their most common treatments is Neurofeedback, a process that is used to treat migraines, concussions, and plenty of other conditions. This process has patients wear a brainwave-detecting helmet and interact with a special computer system that reads inputs from the user's brainwaves, allowing them to control objects on a screen by selectively focusing. By adjusting the contents of the screen and providing reaction prompts, neurofeedback helps condition patients to use their brains more actively and mindfully while reinforcing structures that can help in cognitive recovery.
Another treatment is GyroStim, which places patients in a chair that can move along multiple different axes and asking them to perform complex tasks. As patients will be rotating in directions that they probably aren't used to, this goes a long way in both developing new reflexes and forcing participants to engage their existing ones. What's interesting is that neither of these treatments are exclusive to patients undergoing rehabilitative therapy: they are also used by athletes looking to train their reflexes and improve their performance.
In addition to these things, NeuraPerformance has developed a variety of other treatments, such as the use of oxygen-rich hyperbaric chambers to boost the body's natural healing properties and Dynavision D2, which is used in concussion baseline testing and gaze/gait stabilization.
Companies like NeuraPerformance represent an exciting frontier in the medical world. Conditions that once used to require invasive (and expensive) treatments just to manage can now be addressed more effectively. From competitive sportsto traumatic accidents, to genetic conditions, the frontier of medicine is accomplishing some incredible things!
See the rest here:
Revolutionary Cognitive Therapy Combines Sports Medicine With Neuroscience - ourcommunitynow.com
Our earliest experiences with stories are with their oral forms, both on an individual level and as a society. Many of us developed our love for stories from listening to the stories and anecdotes that we were told by our elders in our childhood. Human beings have been spinning tales and passing them down to later generations orally since long before the first words were put to paper. The stories that our early ancestors told one another had a very important evolutionary role and played a major part in the creation and sustenance of the societal structures of today.
Through the advent of writing, and the wonderful world of books, stories have been transmitted, lived in and variously interpreted for centuries now. But the rising popularity of audiobooks has brought oral storytelling to the forefront once again. These modern, easily accessible descendants of the ancient story circles have much to offer in terms of convenience and entertainment. So, how does our brain react to an oral narrative? How do we process the stories that we listen to in the audio format?
Audiobooks Newsletter
Sign up for Audiobooks to receive the latest from the audiobooks world.
Thank you for signing up! Keep an eye on your inbox.
The theory of how human beings process language to extract meaning from it has been popular with researchers, and several models of language comprehension have been proposed. The process ultimately ends in the creation of a mental picture of what the text that is being listened to (or read) represents, including aspects like the space and time coordinates of the world that the text is trying to represent, causal relationships and inferences about the characters involved.
According to most accepted models of language comprehension, this is achieved through an active search for meaning on the part of the listener, as they corroborate their initial propositions about the words and sentences they listened to using information from the memory, from the rest of the text, and background knowledge.
Researchers have also tried to further dissect the process of language comprehension and its relationship with specific cognitive skills. A 2014 study showed through empirical analysis that three distinct cognitive skills have independent positive association with listening comprehension. The first, inhibitory control, is our brains ability to suppress a dominant response; it relates to our ability to eliminate distractions and focus our attention during listening. The next is theory of mindthe ability to put ourselves in the shoes of others, to make inferences about someone elses state of mind and to predict their behavior. Finally, the study found that comprehension monitoring, the brains ability to dynamically assess our understanding of a text, drives successful listening comprehension.
Once we have successfully extracted meaning from the text, how do we respond to it? In myriad different ways, it turns out. In a study sponsored by Audible UK, researchers found that audiobooks produced heightened physiological responses in participants. Participants showed higher heart rates, greater electrodermal activity (a commonly used measure of autonomic nervous system activity), and higher body temperatures. These responses were more intense when they listened to the audiobooks (popular titles across genres) compared to when they watched the corresponding movie adaptations, an observation that the researchers attributed to the greater level of active engagement in the case of audiobooks.
Another study has claimed that exposure to character-driven stories (though the story used in this case was in the video format) increases the concentration of oxytocin in the body, a neurochemical that has been associated with empathy and fellow feeling, and can even elicit direct behavioral responses like donating to a charity.
Recent research about the neuroscience of listening and reading has used functional MRI techniques to detect brain activity associated with these tasks. Research has shown that listening to an engaging story activates not only the areas of the brain known for linguistic processing but also areas associated with mental imagery, though the degree of involvement of mental imagery varies across individuals. Study of fMRI data has also let researchers explore how different individuals may elicit different meanings while listening to the same story.
Our brains are programmed to be empathetica study involving storytellers and listeners working with personal stories found extensive similarities in brain activity between the narrators and the audience. This might also explain how some of us can feel the excitement, joys, and sorrows of fictional characters almost as strongly as our own.
Another branch of research seeks to compare brain activity between listening and reading. A recent study found that there are no discernible differences. This, however, might not be a very accurate generalization for the book vs. audiobook debate, since the participants in this study only read one word at a time, displayed at a pre-determined speed. Another earlier study, on sentence comprehension by reading and listening, found subtle differences in brain activity.
There are many factors in the reading vs. listening debate, and there isnt a clear winner. Some experts argue that audiobooks are more stimulating, since listening is a more social activity. Others opine that as with reading the mind is continuously engaged in supplying a voice to the narrator and the characters and figuring out the tone of the text, our attention is less likely to wander, resulting in better comprehension and retention. Curious about other differences in how we process, and benefit from, the two media? Check out our detailed commentary on this debate.
Our brains are hardwired to enjoy stories, irrespective of the format we consume it in. So pick up those earphones, turn those pages, or hit play on Netflixchoose whatever floats your boat!
Read the original post:
The Neuroscience of Audiobooks - Book Riot
Fitzroy Pablo Wickham with his mother, Florence Wickham (on left) and sister, Kimberly Wickham (on right).
Fitzroy Pablo Wickham with his mother, Florence Wickham (on left) and sister, Kimberly Wickham (on right).
Photo: Contributed / Fitzroy Wickham /
Fitzroy Pablo Wickham with his mother, Florence Wickham (on left) and sister, Kimberly Wickham (on right).
Fitzroy Pablo Wickham with his mother, Florence Wickham (on left) and sister, Kimberly Wickham (on right).
Named a Rhodes Scholar, Wesleyan University senior wants to give other Jamaican youth opportunity to achieve
MIDDLETOWN Fitzroy Pablo Wickham said he laughed when when his pre-college adviser asked him to seriously consider applying for a Rhodes scholarship.
Now a senior at Wesleyan University Wickham was named the 2021 Rhodes Scholar for Jamaica. The prestigious award grants him a full scholarship to the University of Oxford for his postgraduate studies.
Wickham, a senior neuroscience and theater double major at Wesleyan , plans to pursue a masters and a doctorate in neuroscience at Oxford before attending medical school. He believes this prestigious scholarship is one piece of his long-term plan.
When he first learned hed been named a Rhodes Scholar, he physically choked trying to verbalize his overwhelming feeling of shock and gratitude, he said.
Wickham said he believed the Rhodes scholarship was an impossibility for him and shared that he had laughed when the pre-college adviser asked about about applying.
I never thought a person like me, a rural boy from Jamaicas countryside could attain such an honor, he said.
Still, he thought why not, and applied.
Wickham noted that growing up in a single-mother household in Browns Town, Jamaica, he has always felt that youngsters from similar parts of the country have an untapped potential, but lack the resources to pursue their dreams.
Wickham said he intends to open his own practice and research lab in Jamaica after completing medical school, with this goal at the forefront of his mind. His achievements now are laying the foundation for him to invest in Jamaican youth, he said.
I want them to have the opportunity to achieve their wildest dreams because they have so much innate ability but they just lack the resources or the nudge from someone to say, yes you can do it and the belief in them to pursue, he said.
Wickham credits his mother with fostering his voracious appetite to read and learn. He recalls his mother handing him books whenever she could and providing him creative outlets to explore all the information he was absorbing. She told him to get a good education because that is something no one can steal from you.
Several scholars are looking forward to what Wickham will do in the future. Rashida Shaw McMahon, an associate English professor at Wesleyan, said she believes he is someone to look out for on the global stage.
She describes him as an infectious conduit of energy, who impressed her with his ability to think scientifically while remaining incredibly considerate of others viewpoints.
Wickham said he was 10 when he discovered Dr. Charles Drew and was fascinated by his contributions to modern-day blood transfusions and banks. He thought he would become a cardiologist then but after further exploring human anatomy his outlook changed. He decided the brain is, Gods most beautiful creation.
He is in awe of its intricate design, emotional stimulus and the checks and balances the organ provides. Wickham was compelled to continue with neuroscience even more after his grandmother was diagnosed with Alzheimers disease a couple years ago. Research of neurological disorders became his new calling.
Watching her forget things and slowly digress propelled Wickham toward neuroscience even more. He hopes to contribute to research for a cure that will end the diseases heartbreak for many.
The Neuroscience Market report is a valuable source of insightful data for business strategists. It provides the industry overview with growth analysis and historical & futuristic cost, revenue, demand and supply data (as applicable). Report explores the current outlook in global and key regions from the perspective of players, countries, product types and end industries. This Neuroscience Market study provides comprehensive data which enhances the understanding, scope and application of this report.
According to this study, over the next five years the Neuroscience market will register a 3.6% CAGR in terms of revenue, the global market size will reach $ 28600 million by 2025, from $ 24800 million in 2019.
(Special Offer: Get Flat 20% Discount on this report)
Inquire for Sample Copy of this Report:
Prominent Key Players of Global Neuroscience Market are GE Healthcare, NeuroNexus, Siemens Healthineers, Mightex Bioscience, Thomas RECORDING GmbH, Noldus Information Technology, Plexon, Blackrock Microsystems, Phoenix Technology Group, Tucker-Davis Technologies, Alpha Omega..
This report segments the Global Neuroscience Market on the basis of Types are:Whole Brain ImagingNeuro-MicroscopyElectrophysiology TechnologiesNeuro-Cellular ManipulationStereotaxic SurgeriesAnimal BehaviorOther
On the basis of Application, the Global Neuroscience Market are segmented into:HospitalsDiagnostic LaboratoriesResearch InstitutesOther
Regional Analysis for Neuroscience Market:North America (United States, Canada and Mexico)Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy)Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia)South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia etc.)Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)
Influence of the Neuroscience Market Report:-Comprehensive assessment of all opportunities and risk in the Neuroscience Market.-Neuroscience Market recent innovations and major events.-Detailed study of business strategies for growth of the Neuroscience Market leading players.-Conclusive study about the growth plot of Neuroscience Market for forthcoming years.-In-depth understanding of Neuroscience Market particular drivers, constraints and major micro markets.-Favourable impression inside vital technological and market latest trends striking the Neuroscience Market.
Browse the report description and TOC:https://www.marketintelligencedata.com/reports/132987/global-neuroscience-market-growth-status-and-outlook-2020-2025?Mode=108
What are the market factors that are explained in the report?-Key Strategic Developments: The study also includes the key strategic developments of the market, comprising R&D, new product launch, M&A, agreements, collaborations, partnerships, joint ventures, and regional growth of the leading competitors operating in the market on a global and regional scale.
-Key Market Features: The report evaluated key market features, including revenue, price, capacity, capacity utilization rate, gross, production, production rate, consumption, import/export, supply/demand, cost, market share, CAGR, and gross margin. In addition, the study offers a comprehensive study of the key market dynamics and their latest trends, along with pertinent market segments and sub-segments.
-Analytical Tools: The Global Neuroscience Market report includes the accurately studied and assessed data of the key industry players and their scope in the market by means of a number of analytical tools. The analytical tools such as Porters five forces analysis, SWOT analysis, feasibility study, and investment return analysis have been used to analyse the growth of the key players operating in the market.
Customization of the Report: This report can be customized as per your needs for additional data up to 3 companies or countries or 40 analyst hours.
Please connect with our sales team ([emailprotected]).
About Us:Market Intelligence Data provides syndicated market research on industry verticals including Healthcare, Information, and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc.,Market Intelligence Data provides global and regional market intelligence coverage, a 360-degree market view which includes statistical forecasts, competitive landscape, detailed segmentation, key trends, and strategic recommendations.
Contact Us:Irfan Tamboli (Head of Sales) Market Intelligence DataPhone: +1 (704) 266-3234[emailprotected]
Continue reading here:
Neuroscience Market Analysis,Overview,Applications,Key Players and Forecast 2020-2025 - The Market Feed
Neuroscience antibodies and assays Market is growing at a High CAGR during the forecast period 2020-2026. The increasing interest of the individuals in this industry is that the major reason for the expansion of this market.
The data presented in the global Neuroscience antibodies and assays market report is a compilation of data identified and collected from various sources. The scope of growth of the Neuroscience antibodies and assays market during the forecast period is identified after analyzing different data sources. The report is a valuable guidance tool that can be used to increase the market share or to develop new products that can revolutionize the market growth.
Get Sample Copy of This Report: https://www.premiummarketinsights.com/sample/BRC00017587
The analysis of the collected data also helps in providing an overview of the Neuroscience antibodies and assays industry which further helps people make an informed choice. Latent growth factors that can manifest themselves during the forecast period are identified as they are key to the Neuroscience antibodies and assays market growth. The Neuroscience antibodies and assays report presents the data from the year 2020 to the year 2027 during the base period while forecasting the same during the forecast period for the year 2020 to the year 2027.
Note In order to provide more accurate market forecast, all our reports will be updated before delivery by considering the impact of COVID-19.
Top Key Players Profiled in This Report:
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Abcam, Bio-Rad, Merck KGAA, Cell Signaling Technology, Genscript, Rockland Immunochemicals. Bio Legend, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Tecan, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Siemens.
To inquire about the discount available on this Report, visit @ https://www.premiummarketinsights.com/discount/BRC00017587
Global Neuroscience antibodies and assays Market by Geography:
Asia-Pacific (Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia)Europe (Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.)North America (the United States, Mexico, and Canada.)South America (Brazil etc.)The Middle East and Africa (GCC Countries and Egypt.)
This analysis provides evaluation for altering competitive dynamics:
This thorough Neuroscience antibodies and assays analysis of this shifting contest dynamics and keeps you in front of competitions; Six-year prediction assessment primarily based mostly on the way the sector is anticipated to development; Precisely which Neuroscience antibodies and assays application/end-user kind or Types can observe incremental increase prospects; Which trends, barriers, and challenges could impact the development and size of Neuroscience antibodies and assays economy; It helps to know that the vital product-type sections along with their growth;
Fundamentals of Table of Content:
1 Report Overview1.1 Study Scope1.2 Key Market Segments1.3 Players Covered1.4 Market Analysis by Type1.5 Market by Application1.6 Study Objectives1.7 Years Considered
2 Global Growth Trends2.1 Neuroscience antibodies and assays Market Size2.2 Neuroscience antibodies and assays Growth Trends by Regions2.3 Industry Trends
3 Market Share by Key Players3.1 Neuroscience antibodies and assays Market Size by Manufacturers3.2 Neuroscience antibodies and assays Key Players Head office and Area Served3.3 Key Players Neuroscience antibodies and assays Product/Solution/Service3.4 Date of Enter into Neuroscience antibodies and assays Market3.5 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Breakdown Data by Product4.1 Global Neuroscience antibodies and assays Sales by Product4.2 Global Neuroscience antibodies and assays Revenue by Product4.3 Neuroscience antibodies and assays Price by Product
5 Breakdown Data by End User5.1 Overview5.2 Global Neuroscience antibodies and assays Breakdown Data by End User
Read the original post:
Neuroscience antibodies and assays Market is Booming Worldwide to Show Significant Growth by 2020-2026 - The Market Feed
Strong emotions such as fear and anxiety tend to be accompanied and reinforced by measurable bodily changes including increased blood pressure, heart rate and respiration, and dilation of the eyes' pupils. These so-called "physiological arousal responses" are often abnormally high or low in psychiatric illnesses such as anxiety disorders and depression. Now scientists at the UNC School of Medicine have identified a population of brain cells whose activity appears to drive such arousal responses.
The scientists, whose study is published inCell Reports, found that artificially forcing the activity of these brain cells in mice produced an arousal response in the form of dilated pupils and faster heart rate, and worsened anxiety-like behaviors.
The finding helps illuminate the neural roots of emotions, and point to the possibility that the human-brain counterpart of the newly identified population of arousal-related neurons might be a target of future treatments for anxiety disorders and other illnesses involving abnormal arousal responses.
"Focusing on arousal responses might offer a new way to intervene in psychiatric disorders," said first author Jose Rodrguez-Romaguera, PhD, assistant professor in the UNC Department of Psychiatry and member of the UNC Neuroscience Center, and co-director of the Carolina Stress Initiative at the UNC School of Medicine.
Rodrguez-Romaguera and co-first author Randall Ung, PhD, an MD-PhD student and adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry, led this study when they were members of the UNC laboratory of Garret Stuber, PhD, who is now at the University of Washington.
"This work not only identifies a new population of neurons implicated in arousal and anxiety, but also opens the door for future experiments to systematically examine how molecularly defined cell types contribute to complex emotional and physiological states," Stuber said. "This will be critical going forward for developing new treatments for neuropsychiatric disorders."
Anxiety disorders, depression, and other disorders featuring abnormally high or low arousal responses affect a large fraction of the human population, including tens of millions of adults in the United States alone. Treatments may alleviate symptoms, but many have adverse side effects, and the root causes of these disorders generally remain obscure.
Untangling these roots amid the complexity of the brain has been an enormous challenge, one that laboratory technology has only recently begun to surmount.
Rodrguez-Romaguera, Ung, Stuber and colleagues examined a brain region within the amygdala called the BNST (bed nucleus of the stria terminalis), which has been linked in prior research to fear and anxiety-like behaviors in mice.
Increasingly, scientists view this region as a promising target for future psychiatric drugs. In this case, the researchers zeroed in on a set of BNST neurons that express a neurotransmitter gene, Pnoc, known to be linked to pain sensitivity and more recently to motivation.
The team used a relatively new technique called two-photon microscopy to directly image BNST Pnoc neurons in the brains of mice while the mice were presented with noxious or appealing odors - stimuli that reliably induce fear/anxiety and reward behaviors, respectively, along with the appropriate arousal responses. In this way, the scientists found that activity in these neurons tended to be accompanied by the rapid dilation of the pupils of the mice when the animals were presented with either of these odor stimuli.
The researchers then used another advanced technique called optogenetics - using light to control genetically engineered cells - to artificially drive the activity of the BNST Pnoc neurons. They found that spurring on BNST Pnoc activity triggered a pupillary response, as well as increased heart rate. Optogenetically driving the neurons while the mice underwent an anxiety-inducing maze test (traditionally used to assess anxiety drugs) increased the animals' signs of anxiety, while optogenetically quieting the neurons had the opposite effect.
"Essentially we found that activating these BNST Pnoc neurons drives arousal responses and worsens anxiety-like states," Rodrguez-Romaguera said.
The discovery is mainly a feat of basic neuroscience. But it also suggests that targeting arousal-driving neurons such as BNST Pnoc neurons with future drugs might be a good way to reduce abnormally strong responses to negative stimuli in anxiety disorders, for example, and to boost abnormally weak responses to positive stimuli in depression.
The study uncovered evidence that BNST Pnoc neurons are not all the same but differ in their responses to positive or negative stimuli, and the researchers are now cataloguing these BNST Pnoc neuron sub-groups.
"Even this small part of the amygdala is a complex system with different types of neurons," Ung said. Teasing this apart will help us understand better how this system works."
Reference: Rodriguez-Romaguera J, Ung RL, Nomura H, et al. Prepronociceptin-Expressing Neurons in the Extended Amygdala Encode and Promote Rapid Arousal Responses to Motivationally Salient Stimuli. Cell Reports. 2020;33(6). doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108362
This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.
Read the original:
Identified: The Brain Cells That Control The Body's Response to Fear - Technology Networks
The last five years have been a master class in gaslighting. For those of us who came into the Trump Era with some personal experience with narcissists, emotional abusers and flat out liars, it has been a jarringly familiar time.
For those who previously had the luxury of expecting honesty of others, this has been a sharp learning curve. We all now know exactly what it feels like to be on the receiving end of untruth so blatant and shameless it makes us question ourselves. We know what it's like to hear a falsehood repeated so insistently it almost becomes convincing. We get it from the highest levels of government, from cable news networks, from our radicalized relatives and neighbors. And we know the confusion, self-doubt and fear that come with long term exposure to what liars like to call "alternative facts."
It feels pretty crappy. But what does it feel like for the liars? How can they keep spinning their BS with such shocking ease and conviction?
As with all things, it's a matter of practice. We all bend the truth with some regularity a 2003 University of California study found that participants reported lying on average twice a day. If "I'm fine" counts, the number must surely be higher. White lies are a social lubricant and a "get out complicated explanations" card. Dinner was delicious. I'm five minutes away. I wish I could help.
But toxic people, people with antisocial personality disorder, people with pseudologia fantastica (a.k.a. pathological liars) lie for other reasons, and they do it a lot. They lie to gain control in their relationships. They lie to self exonerate and to justify their behavior. And the more they do it, the better they get at it, and the bigger their lies can become.
A 2016 study published in Nature Neuroscience found that "Signal reduction in the amygdala," the part of the brain associated with emotion, "is sensitive to the history of dishonest behavior, consistent with adaptation. . . . the extent of reduced amygdala sensitivity to dishonesty on a present decision relative to the previous one predicts the magnitude of escalation of self-serving dishonesty on the next decision."
In other words, "What begins as small deviations from a moral code could escalate to large deviations with potentially harmful consequences." Hence, you can seemingly desensitize yourself to your own dishonesty.
This is especially handy for a narcissist, who, as psychiatrist Dr. Bandy X. Lee explained to Salon recently, perpetually "must overcompensate, creating for himself a self-image where he is the best at everything, never wrong, better than all the experts, and a 'stable genius.'"
It's not just the amygdala that gets a workout from lying: other parts of the brain get in on the act as well. A 2009 Harvard University study of volunteers some of whom cheated on a simple coin toss game and some who didn't found that while the honest players had "no increased activity in certain areas of the prefrontal cortex known to be involved in self-control those control regions did become perfused with blood when the cheaters responded." And it happened even when the cheaters were telling the truth. Keeping your story straight takes work.
If you're capable of knowing right from wrong, lying and cheating make you feel bad. And even if you don't puke like Marta in "Knives Out," you may have a "tell" fidgeting, averting your gaze that communicates that. But habitual liars don't feel bad. This is why lie detector tests are such unreliable tools. The autonomic nervous system of a somewhat average person, with an average person's anxiety about being caught in wrongdoing, will respond differently when telling the truth and when not. Their breath, blood pressure and heart rate may change. They may get sweaty. If you're someone like Gary Ridgway or Ted Bundy, two of the most prolific and vicious serial killers in American history, you can pass a polygraph with ease.
The other key component of chronic lying is that it often resides in the same neighborhood as delusion. Individuals with delusional disorders have "fixed beliefs that do not change, even when presented with conflicting evidence," and oh boy, there is no shortage of a spectrum of unchanging fixed beliefs here in our country right now. This is why gaslighting is so persuasive. It's the blatant, brazen confidence that only people who really put in their ten thousand hours of bald faced lying and genuine dissociation from reality can deliver that sells it.
Can habitual liars change? Dr. Robert Feldman, who wrote "The Liar in Your Life: The Way to Truthful Relationships," told Everyday Health in 2016 not to hold your breath, because they usually don't want to. The only path forward is escaping their grip and keeping our own amygdalas honest.
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Bridging the gap: SYNGAP1 protein is located mostly at synapses, the junctions between neurons (green). Editors Note
This article was originally published on 24 November, based on preliminary data presented at a conference. We have updated the article to provide additional context.
Spectrum is covering the 2020 International SYNGAP1 Scientific Conference, which took place virtually because of the coronavirus pandemic. Here were highlighting researchers reactions to noteworthy presentations.
Drug test: A new assay allows researchers to test thousands of candidate drugs for their ability to boost expression of the autism gene SYNGAP1. The tool may help researchers identify and screen potential treatments for people with mutations that silence the gene. Gavin Rumbaugh, professor of neuroscience at Scripps Research in Jupiter, Florida, presented the unpublished results on 18 November.
The assay uses neurons from mice with one intact and one mutated copy of SYNGAP1. The researchers genetically engineer the mice so that SYNGAP1 protein made from the intact copy is tagged with luciferase the enzyme that gives fireflies their glow.
They then grow these neurons in tiny wells and add a different candidate drug to each well. The amount of SYNGAP1 protein in the dish gives a proportionate amount of light in your well, Rumbaugh says.
Rumbaugh and his team plan to use the platform to run through more than 100,000 different experimental compounds in 2021, he says.
Thats going to be really exciting for drug discovery efforts for SYNGAP1. I think thats going to be a game changer, says Karun Singh, senior scientist at the University Health Network in Toronto, Canada, who was not involved in the work.
It will be very exciting to see if they are able to uncover any useful hits with their novel approach, says Helen Bateup, associate professor of neurobiology at the University of California, Berkeley, who was not involved in the work.
Treatment across ages: A leading theory of autism is that the condition is characterized by a signaling imbalance: too much excitation or too little inhibition in the brain. One of the key players in creating this imbalance is thought to be inhibitory interneurons, which employ the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). And mutations to SYNGAP1 may disrupt GABAs function, said James Clement, assistant professor of neuroscience at the Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research in Bangalore, India, in a presentation on 18 November.
GABA is excitatory early on in brain development and inhibitory later on a switch that seems to be impaired in mice with SYNGAP1 mutations, he says. He and his team have tested a new compound that restores the GABA switch in mice and eases almost all SYNGAP1-related traits including seizures, learning issues and motor impairment in the mice. It works in newborn and adolescent mice. Due to a pending patent application, Clement and his lab are not revealing the compounds name.
I think its important to test efficacy at multiple ages, as they have done, to understand which phenotypes or problems can be improved with early treatment and which might still be responsive to treatment even if its administered later in life, says Bateup, who was not involved in the work. The idea that GABA may remain depolarizing for longer in SYNGAP1 mutant mice is quite interesting.
Clements lab was the only other lab that was presenting at this meeting that presented data from a very early age, says Shilpa Kadam, associate professor of neurology at the Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore, Maryland, who was not involved in the work. Kadam also presented results on mice with SYNGAP1 mutations, showing that from an early age, theseanimalshave seizures thatcan be treated by blocking one type of GABA receptor.
Motor coordination: For mice, the loss of SYNGAP1 function in the striatum impairs their goal-directed learning and seems to lead to inflexible behavior, Bateup said in a presentation on 18 November.
Helen Bateups work looking at striatal function as it relates to motor coordination and motor learning is also pretty exciting and may shed light not only on the motor-coordination difficulties but also the repetitive or habitual motor behaviors, says Constance Smith-Hicks, child neurologist and research scientist at the Kennedy Krieger Institute, who was not involved in the work.
Bateups presentation also demonstrated that SYNGAP1 deletion seems to affect neurons differently depending on which type of dopamine receptor they express.
We know SYNGAP1 is at most excitatory synapses, so why shes seeing some functional effects in one type of cell and not the other, I find that interesting, says Richard Huganir, professor of neuroscience and psychological and brain sciences at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, who was not involved in the work.
Its exciting to be able to kind of pinpoint which pathway might be involved and get a better understanding of the circuits that are disrupted, says Singh, who was not involved in the work.
Protein levels: People with a nonfunctional copy of SYNGAP1 have about half the typical amount of SYNGAP1 protein. Increasing the activity of the intact copy of the gene could help restore typical functioning, Huganir said in a presentation on 18 November.
He and his team tested this idea on two unique mouse models in unpublished work. Instead ofhaving one intact and one missing copyof the SYNGAP1 gene, as is typical for SYNGAP1 mouse models, each mouse model carriesone intact copy of the gene and one with a mutation seen in people. Both mice produce about half the typical amount of SYNGAP1 protein and show the same behaviors as the classical knockout mouse, despite having different types of mutations.
These new mouse models are crucial because they can directly correlate to what is happening in the humans, says Clement, who was not involved in the work.
Huganir and his team are testing different types of gene therapies to increase SYNGAP1 protein up to the typical levels, and have found that there are two SYNGAP1 protein isoforms, or slight variations of the protein.
One of the isoforms can restore synaptic plasticity in the animal model for SYNGAP1, so I think thats really exciting because even though theres multiple isoforms, it seems that one might be more important from a gene therapy point of view, says Singh, who was not involved in the work. Its pretty exciting to have a specific target now.
Read more reports from the2020 International SYNGAP1 Scientific Conference.
Read more:
Reactions from the 2020 SYNGAP1 Scientific Conference - Spectrum