Category Archives: Human Behavior

Dr. John Torres: Heres how to make Olympics happen safely in 2021 – WETM – MyTwinTiers.com

COLUMBUS (WCMH) Tokyo 2020 in 2021? Thats still the plan from the International Olympic Committee. But there is still plenty to figure out, including whether it is safe enough to hold the Olympics as the world continues to go through the coronavirus pandemic.

The number of positive cases are growing each day. As of October, there have been more than 40 million cases globally and more than 8.2 million cases in the United States, according to Johns Hopkins University. And more than 1.1 million people have died globally.

NBC News Senior Medical Correspondent Dr. John Torres has been following the progress of the coronavirus from the beginning. As most medical experts, he is worried about the rise in cases weve seen both nationally and internationally.

Globally, weve taken a bit of a step back in the fight against coronavirus. Things looked like they were doing fairly well in certain parts of the world, especially in Europe, but once things started re-opening, once people started getting out and getting together again, those cases started to creep up and started to surge up, even right here in the United States, Torres said.

As we start to get into our cold weather months, youre going to see more cases of coronavirus. The difference is we have a better understanding of how to handle it and a better understanding of how to shut down things and what we need to shut down to keep it under control.

Much of the focus as it pertains to the coronavirus is the progression of a vaccine. Some countries have already started to distribute their vaccines while in the United States, the timeline is not as clear.

So what theyre talking about is probably having a vaccine here in the U.S. available sometime in the beginning of the year, maybe springtime, but remember, there are going to be phased-in distributions because you cant give 330 million people in the U.S. vaccines all on day one, Torres said.

Now switching to globally, theyre a little further ahead in the vaccine as far as getting it distributed and getting vaccines to people. Russia and China are doing that already. But using our safety measures, we would never do that at this stage. And so it seems they are ahead of where we are, were not exactly sure how safe and effective that vaccine they are using is and whether that is something we would use here at this point.

IOC chairman Thomas Bach has signaled that the Olympics could be staged successfully without a vaccine, pointing to other sporting events like the Tour de France that finished its competition during the pandemic. Dr. Torres agrees with Bach, pointing to other prevention measures to help contain any potential spread.

Its possible they could do the Olympics without a vaccine, but theyre going to have to be very, very careful and very stringent with athletes and the officials because one case there could ruin the whole Olympics for many, many athletes and officials. And it could essentially cancel the Olympics, said Torres.

The vaccine is not going to end the pandemic. Its one tool we have to ending the pandemic. And using that along with face masks, social distancing, hand-washing, those tools we know work are going to be the key to getting this under control so without the vaccine, you can still get it under control but you have to monitor that human behavior.

With more than 8 months until the rescheduled opening ceremony in Tokyo on July 23, 2021, optimism remains high among athletes that they will get a chance to compete. Same goes for the IOC and officials in Japan, who have said repeatedly that they will not postpone the Games again.

Torres thinks the example set by American sports leagues and those around the world also provide the IOC plenty of information they can use on what works and doesnt work as far as staging the Games. He also believes everything should be on the table, from mandatory testing, mask wearing, restricting fans and creating a bubble of sorts to keep everyone safe.

Im very confident that well be able to see the Olympics in July and August 2021 for a couple reasons. One, because theyve postponed them a year and weve learned a lot about the virus and how to handle it, said Torres. And two, its one of those symbols thats going to show us that yes, were getting through, were getting back to at least a new normal and its something that we can all look forward to and give the whole world confidence that together, we will get through the pandemic.

See the original post here:
Dr. John Torres: Heres how to make Olympics happen safely in 2021 - WETM - MyTwinTiers.com

Let’s Get the Party Started | Miami’s Community News – Miami’s Community Newspapers

Oh, woe is us!

Every 2020 compendium bemoans the worst year ever. Clearly, the enormous loss of life, the complete disruption of daily routines, and the ravages of massive job losses leading to widespread poverty and hunger are unlike anything seen since World War II. But, in the course of history, there have been many apocalyptic challenges confronting humanity

e.g. the Spanish flu pandemic, world wars, civil wars, disease and famine. During each of those calamitous events and, perhaps, for a short while after they ended, people thought that life was the worst it had ever been or could possibly ever be. And then, just as suddenly (in hindsight) the despair was gone. Life returned to the way it had been before calamity struck. Of course, new ways of living, learning and working discovered during the bad times and possibly a few lessons learned yielded change, adaptation and sometimes even progress.

This time will be no different. Within one year, most people will be proudly telling and re-telling their own pandemic stories about their ability to have endured. And, of course, the war stories will improve with age as millennials ultimately tell their grandchildren about the bad ol days of 2020 when every day was a struggle to survive their own personal challenges as a frontline hero. For a while, we will increase our stockpiles of PPE and otherwise enhance our national emergency preparedness. The return to the life we knew will bring enhanced focus on, and funding for, medical research, particularly related to knowledge derived from vaccine development. Human beings can finally rebound from their isolation and fear with a renewed sense of commonality and society.

This heightened awareness and sensitivity will produce policies and programs to promote diversity and to ameliorate and limit systemic racism. But it will be hard. Each person has their own unique makeup with each characteristic residing on a spectrum of opposites: those invulnerable to fear, hurt feelings and stress, and those with skin thinner than a micron; the Pope and the atheist; the workaholic and the lazybones; the coordinated athlete and someone who must sit to put pants on; the voices with perfect pitch and singers who sounds awful even in the shower; the introvert and the extrovert; the book nerd and the street- smart drop out. And everything in between. Thus, it is little wonder that people have trouble playing with others in the sandbox. Figuring out the right combination to promote healing among us takes time, interest and much thought.

Society is supposed to even the playing field by establishing acceptable norms to regulate human behavior and, to the limited extent possible, influence peoples thoughts. This is typically accomplished by governmental officials enacting laws, and civic, social and religious institutions setting the example for how we should live, work and play with others. In 2020, with the perfect storm of the pandemic, the war for social justice and well Trump, those legal and societal influences have been distorted, if not vitiated. If you add in the explosion of informational content where everyone can obtain validation for any conceivable belief or opinion it is no wonder that foreigners call us the Dis-United States of America.

And when leaders (of any stripe) demonize the opposition, much less condone or even encourage violence in pursuit of their purportedly just cause, then the haters thoughts become actions, putting the personal safety of people, perhaps many of them, at risk. The rule of law is the last barrier to anarchy. But in 2020, even the rule of law has been denigrated and ignored. The foundation of our democracy has been under siege. To their credit, the judicial branch of

government has stood strong against immense political pressure and we should be grateful to, and honor, our nations judges for so artfully and effectively securing our democracy.

The proverbial dark clouds should part in the next few weeks and months to once again reveal the sun, which can always be trusted to rise and shine after the darkness. And then, we will once again dance silly in the sun and our souls will feel reborn. Let us make hindsight truly 2020 and get the party started again!

Alan Rosenthal is a native Miamian and an attorney at Carlton Fields where he is a member of the firms National Trial Practice.

Connect To Your Customers & Grow Your Business

See original here:
Let's Get the Party Started | Miami's Community News - Miami's Community Newspapers

In Conversation with Crimefaces: The Definitive Interview – Bowery Boogie

Today, we chat with AC, the founder, and the voice of Crimefaces. You may recognize him from Instagram or his feature in Maxim magazine. He also co-sponsored our last Golden Gauntlet Graffiti Battle, and today is here to discuss the past, present, and future of Crimefaces.

I visited AC at Crimefaces HQ an undisclosed location in the heart of the city and was greeted at the door by Vin Major. He put a gun to my head. Fortunately, it was just to take my temperature. Vin gave me a Crimefaces face mask and then led me to meet AC, who was eating red grapes, then gave me an air hug.

BOWERY BOOGIE: Welcome, AC. Tell us how Crimefaces got started.

AC: Thank you! Well I saw what the internet was doing [and how] the creative world shifted to online content and I wanted to get involved. I started an Instagram page and started to do true crime. I am an avid reader of true crime books and watching true crime docs. I started to post for a month or two.

BB: What were you posting?

AC: I was posting daily crimedaily news and things that were on this news, and this and that. Hence, Crimefaces..

BB: But what were you posting about it?

AC: I documented the crime while analyzing the human behavior. One was this robbery and the guy ran in to rob a cell phone store and when he came out he was shooting at the cops and the cops shot him. I was reporting and assessing. Definitely not embracing it, but breaking it down as a deterrent to show some of this shit. I did that a month or two to learn the algorithm and the hashtags and it got extremely boring, but I was learning. I thought, let me learn everything first before I l blast it off. It got monotonous and then many of my peers were saying yo, the page is cool but youre the funniest dude I know, switch it up!

BB: Your friends already viewed you as the funny one in the group?

AC: Yeah, I get them out of character. I always had the toughest guys laughing and giggling. Its been like that since I was kid.

BB: Your friends were saying you could be a personality, an Instagrampersonality and here you are.

AC: Yeah, I said OK, but I want to be original, I dont want to do what everyone is else is doing. Originality is king in any field.

BB: What was the first video you did? Take us back.

AC: I found a video of central booking in Brooklyn from 2019. It was of a kid in the holding cell. They were bringing another prisoner in and when he got in the cell he told the kid to get up off the bench. They started to fight and the kid was slammed on his head.

BB: Oh, geez.

AC: Yeah, its not a good thing what happened, but its what happened. When I was putting together the content I strategically thought of comedy, but I wanted to do my own stance.

BB: What would you call your own stance?

AC: What I saw was WorldStar blowing up with fight videos. Theyve been doing the same thing since 2008, the formula works, but I asked myself, what else excites people? Fighting, sports, comedy. I know people are going to watch fight videos anyway so I jumped into the ring with my take.

BB: I never watched fight videos until Crimefaces.

AC: Oh, yeah? Thank you! What I thought of, which was kinda nuts, I turned the volume off on the video and I was focusing on human behaviors. I broke down what this guy was thinking, what that guy was thinking. I break the scenario down and spice it up with jokes. When I pick the video, the characters talk to me. Most of the time in fights, people are acting aggressive and belligerent. Chances are before, during and after the fight someone is acting wackadoo crazy.

BB: (laughter) How do you spell wackadoo?

AC: (laughter) w- a -c -k-a-d-o-o-

BB: Did you ever enter any spelling bees?

AC: I won!

BB: What? When?

AC: I think 2nd or 3rd grade? I have that title.

BB: Your parents must have been so proud.

AC: Yeah, it stopped there! Nah, Im joking.

BB: Speaking of family, where did you grow up?

AC: I grew up in Staten Island, and when I was about 15, I completely moved out on my own.

BB: At 15?

AC: Yeah, it was time to get moving, I had things to do! Laughter

BB: How did you afford that at 15!

AC: You see, its not like being 15 today when they cant even wipe their own ass. 15 in the 90s is like a 25-year-old today. I worked jobs, we did what boys do which was stupid decisions, but I actually had a job working at Shop-Rite. I did the carts, packing bags, I did the whole SHA-BANG! And the recycling, you know the bottles and the cans?

BB: Um, yes I know what recycling is. (laughter)

AC: (laughter)When I moved out, Im on my own, paying rent and working. Im exposed to things. I moved around.

BB: Why?

AC: Um. Different businesses, different girls. You know, youre a young man exploring. Hopefully, you dont completely fuck up because you have your values and dont go off the deep end.

BB: Did you go off the deep end?

AC: I was taking risks and, in hindsight, it was crazy. I made stupid decisions.

BB: Did you finish school?

AC: Yes, I did.

BB: Well, so not completely off the deep end!

AC: I went to multiple high schools. Night school here, day school there. I would get suspended nah, better than that kicked out. But I kept trying. A lot of my friends in high school were graffiti writers, I just wasnt one.

BB: Oh? Thats dope.

AC: My cousin is Logek. Shout out to 4Burnerz Crew in the BX! After High School, I majored in creative writing while briefly in New York City Technical College on Jay Street in Brooklyn.

BB: I have a BA in creative writing; is that cool?

AC: Actually, it is very cool. I should have stayed in college.

BB: It is never too late. So what was the next life marker for you? After college

AC: In my 20s, people around me started getting into trouble.

BB: Yet, in all the bad, you always maintained your sense of humor?

AC: Yeah, along the way was full of laughter and jokes. We snap on everybody! Thats what we call it. Everyone gets made fun of. If you had funky shoesIf your girl was uglyWe would get on you. Reb, I forget something important in high school: I always played sports.

BB: Okay, why is that important?

AC: Because I feel someone that participates in competition-level activities makes you more of well rounded person. Winning, losing, and camaraderie. I played baseball, basketball, martial arts and football.

BB: Gotcha. Flash forward to your mid-20s.

AC: I got a real jobit gives you stability and insurance, but it traps you in a way. Repetition kills creativity.

BB: How did you get unstuck?

AC: I always wanted to be a creator, so with the internet it gave me a chance to create a brand. That is the American dream, you dont want to be an employee. You want to be a boss. The internet gave an opportunity to build and be creative.

BB: Word. Was the Instagram page always called Crimefaces?

AC: Yeah.

BB: Okay, so obviously I have to talk about social media because that is your main platform right now. Was there one day that you just blew up?

AC: Yeah, Joe Budden and Bill Burr mentioned me in their podcasts in the same week. The first one was Bill Burr, my phone was sitting on the coffee table, and it started buzzing so much it fell off the coffee table. I had thousands of followers and I didnt know from where so I asked one of the new followers. They said Bill Burr mentioned your page.

Read this article:
In Conversation with Crimefaces: The Definitive Interview - Bowery Boogie

Researchers Examine Three Intrinsic Motivation Types To Stimulate Intrinsic Objectives Of Reinforcement Learning (RL) Agents – MarkTechPost

Reinforcement learning (RL) has enabled tools to make decisions and solve complex problems in unknown environments directly from high-dimensional image inputs, such as locomotion, robotic manipulation, and game playing. However, these successes are built upon in-depth supervision in manually crafted reward functions. The agents are rewarded and punished based on their performance and eventually learn a reward function maximizing rewards and minimizing punishment. But designing informative reward functions is costly, time-consuming, and likely to have an error. Also, these difficulties can increase with the complexity of the concerned task.

Unlike RL agents, natural agents learn through intrinsic objectives without externally provided assignments. For example, children are not assigned to crawl, but they naturally crawl and play around to explore their surroundings. This has motivated researchers to identify and provide RL agents with mathematical objectives that do not depend on a specific task and can be applied to any unknown environment.

Recently, researchers at the Vector Institute, University of Toronto, and Google Brain have examined three intrinsic motivation types to stimulate RL agents intrinsic objectives. It is observed that all three intrinsic goals correlate more strongly with a human behavior similarity metric than with any task reward.

The researchers have tested the following three common types of intrinsic motivation while evaluating agents without rewards:

Input entropy encourages encountering rare sensory inputs (measured by a learned density model) The agents are rewarded for learning the rule of their environment by Information gain. The agents are rewarded for maximizing their influence over their sensory inputs or environment by empowerment.

The team collected a diverse dataset of different environments and behaviors and retrospectively computing agent objectives for evaluation. They analyzed the correlations between intrinsic objectives and supervised objectives (such as task reward and human similarity) and established a relationship between different intrinsic objectives without training a new agent for each objective.

The researchers used 100 million frames from the three Atari game environments to train seven RL agents with and without a task reward. As the 3D game Minecraft environment simulation is slower than Atari, they applied 12 million frames per agent. Human behavior was taken as the ground truth for the human similarity objective, and the team estimated the similarity between agents and humans actions in the shared environment.

All examined intrinsic objectives across all environments correlate more strongly with human similarity than the task rewards do. It recommends inherent goals over task rewards when designing general agents that behave like humans. It is also noticed that the input entropy and information gain are similar objectives while empowerment may offer complementary benefits, and therefore they recommend future work on combining intrinsic goals.

The human dataset is currently comparatively small to identify human similarity values, and it is unclear what instructions the human players received. Using additional human data and control over players instructions can help this areas work. The team stated that to assign the agent observations to buckets, they have downscaled them. This is simple but does not account for the semantic similarity between images. Therefore they suggest learning the representations using deep neural networks for future work.

Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.11538.pdf

Codes: https://danijar.com/project/agenteval/

Suggested

See the rest here:
Researchers Examine Three Intrinsic Motivation Types To Stimulate Intrinsic Objectives Of Reinforcement Learning (RL) Agents - MarkTechPost

Here’s The Well’s "State of the World 2021" – Boing Boing

Every year Jon Lebkowsky and Bruce Sterling have an open discussion on the Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link about the state of the world. This year they are joined by Malka Older, a "writer, aid worker, and sociologist."

Older:

If a lot of Big Tech is starting to lose its conjuring power, thereis one technology that manages to be both hype and, to some, fakenews: the vaccine(s). Grateful as I am for the incredible effortthat went into accomplishing the vaccines so quickly, my concernfor the coming year and beyond is how the story is being rewritteninto a fable that our technological prowess omnia vincit. It mightbe hard to imagine now that the history of the pandemic could beturned into a triumphant narrative of human control over nature, butlost battles have been transformed into glorious conquest before.Already some are losing sight of the failures in organization, inhumanity, in preparedness that have made the vaccine glow like agrail.

This is unlikely to be the only challenge we see in the comingdecade, or the coming year, that can be solved more easily, quickly,and cheaply through changing human behavior and which we prefer toattack using money and technology. The climate crisis leaps to mind.I hope that we can engrave some of the lessons of this past yearinto our collective consciousness, but I have little confidence thatthey will function any better than the Japanese stones warning "DoNot Build Below This Point" that became so celebrated after thetsunami hit.

Read the original here:
Here's The Well's "State of the World 2021" - Boing Boing

Division for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions Iran – US Embassy in Georgia

A Chinese police officer takes his position by the road near what is officially called a vocational education centre in Yining in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region, China September 4, 2018. Picture taken September 4, 2018. To match Special Report MUSLIMS-( Thomas Peter/Reuters) RC1BB8158830

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is using big data and surveillance to target Uyghurs for detention based on behaviors that are allowed under the laws of the Peoples Republic of China, such as studying the Quran or calling family abroad.

Human Rights Watch says in a new report that the CCP uses itsIntegrated Joint Operations Platform (IJOP)to scan data from surveillance cameras, cell phones, police checkpoints and other sources to select Uyghurs for possible detention.

The report, China: Big Data Program Targets Xinjiangs Muslims, is based on HRWs analysis of a leaked list of more than 2,000 detainees from Aksu Prefecture, and found that the vast majority of detainees on the list were flagged for nonviolent behavior.

The Aksu List provides further insights into how Chinas brutal repression of Xinjiangs Turkic Muslims is being turbocharged by technology, HRW China researcher Maya Wang says in the report issued December 9.

The Chinese government should immediately shut down the IJOP, delete all the data it has collected, and release everyone arbitrarily detained in Xinjiang, Wang adds.

Since 2017, the CCP hasinterned more than 1 million Uyghursand members of other predominantly Muslim ethnic minority groups in camps in Xinjiang where they are forced to renounce their religious and ethnic identities and swear allegiance to the CCP.

The Aksu List identifies more than 2,000 detainees and provides the CCPs reasons for their detention. Reasons given include legal activities, ranging from traveling within Xinjiang or speaking with a relative abroad, to simply being born after 1980.

After the IJOP identifies someone for possible detention, HRW says, police or other administrative officials make detention decisions without involving prosecutors or the court a violation of Chinas constitution. Aksu Prefectures population is 80 percent Uyghur and all the detainees on the list are Uyghurs.

The mass surveillance and arbitrary detention of Xinjiangs Turkic Muslims violate fundamental rights under Chinas constitution and international human rights law, the report says.

The United States in Julysanctioned CCP officials and entitiesin connection with serious human rights abuses in Xinjiang, and it has restricted exports of certain technologies to companies that have contributed to mass surveillance programs linked to human rights abuses.

The world cannot stand idly by as the PRC government perpetrates horrific and systematic abuses against people in China, including violating the internationally recognized right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion or belief, Secretary of State Michael R.Pompeo said December 10.

By U.S. Embassy Tbilisi | 5 January, 2021 | Topics: History, Human Rights, Key Officials, News | Tags: China, cultural preservation, freedom of religion, technology, Uyghurs

See the article here:
Division for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions Iran - US Embassy in Georgia

Starting Line On Hiatus As We Consider Future – iowastartingline.com

As youve probably noticed, Iowa Starting Line has been rather quiet lately. Ive decided to stop publishing for the time being as I consider significant changes to our operation or whether to continue on at all.

In reality, this hiatus began at the start of December, its just taken me this long to finally write the official post about it. I had intended to only take a personal break for a couple of days, but ended up crashing so hard that Ive barely been able to string together a few sentences for weeks. Working 60 to 80-hour weeks for the past six years straight with practically no breaks probably contributed to that.

This decision is for two reasons, both related to the 2020 election.

The first is financial. While weve had considerable success in building up a news outlet from scratch and expanding it significantly in the past two years, our funding situation is always fluid and comes from different sources each year.

With Democrats getting blown out in Iowa yet again this November, Im concerned about how much left-leaning money will be coming into Iowa in the immediate future. Starting Line was able to expand how it did in part thanks to interest in the Iowa Caucus race and competitive 2020 general election campaigns, along with the advertising revenue that came with those.

If the general mood is that people believe Iowa to be a red-leaning, non-competitive state, getting investments here for the broader progressive infrastructure gets more difficult. I actually think that our race for governor will be very close, but it will probably be early to mid-2022 when some polls come out showing that, and national folks will then engage here in a big way again. My concern for Starting Line is getting through 2021.

As such, if we do continue publishing at Starting Line, the staff will unfortunately be reduced to just myself going forward, though I hope to add back on as things improve. Still, its a very frustrating decision to make, as I very much wanted to keep longterm, permanent positions intact after expanding.

The second reason is with the disappointment in how those November elections turned out not so much that Republicans swept nearly every contested race, but how and why it happened.

Theres three major issues that made this election so particularly demoralizing.

Since 2010, Iowa has experienced four Republican wave years (2010, 2014, 2016 and 2020), one good Democratic year (2018) and one relatively neutral year (2012). This has become an exhausting phenomenon to live through, where it seems that everything gets decided by the national mood or larger factors far outside the control of any person or campaign or issue. So you end up with good public servants that just get wiped out regardless (thats not to say there havent been many bad campaigns run in Iowa there most certainly have its just that the good ones lose too). And then you have total idiots unfit for office elevated by blind party voting.

These wave years have essentially made everything that happens on the ground seem that much less important, including good journalism, which is my next point.

Iowa handled the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 worse than nearly any other government in the entire world, resulting in thousands of unnecessary deaths. And at every step along the way, Iowas press corp held Gov. Kim Reynolds and other leaders feet to the fire, asking tough questions and exposing ways in which the state was covering up the extent of the outbreak and failing to contain it.

And it feels like none of it mattered. Iowans continued to engage in reckless behavior that resulted in killing their neighbors or themselves. And Reynolds and her fellow Republicans were rewarded for their ineptitude we found and heard stories of many first-time voters who came out to support the GOP ticket as a backlash to how they felt COVID changed their lives (despite living in a state with some of the weakest restrictions).

I do want to be clear: I dont think the worth of a Brianne Pfannenstiel or Dave Price or Tony Leys or Kate Payne article rests on whether it costs Republicans votes. Nor does a good piece of journalisms impact need to have anything to do with an election good policy decisions or consequences from reporting can happen regardless of whos in power.

But good lord, youd think Iowas disastrous experience with COVID (or, you know, everything else) would have at least given Iowa voters second thoughts about delivering a massive political win to the party in charge of this mess. It would have been one thing if Joni Ernst and Iowa House Republicans had just barely hung on, where you could attribute the narrow victory to other issues. But Ernsts comfortable victory and Republicans upsets to improve their House majority were striking given the environment they ran in.

There are many, many reasons as to why journalisms impact was limited, all of which we wont even begin to get into here, but the bottom line is this: good journalism should hold the powerful accountable, but it should do so in reality, not just theory. And if voters arent listening to it, then what are we doing here?

When Reynolds held her first press conference after the election, I sat down ready to type up something on it. But as I looked around on Twitter, I noticed how everyone was reporting on her latest COVID briefing in the exact same manner they had before the election. There were the same righteous outrage takes, the same in-depth informative posts on the numbers. We just had an election where voters said resoundingly we dont care to Iowas COVID disaster, and no one was trying to present that information in a different way.

In fairness, there hadnt been much time for reflection yet, but as the weeks drew on, I mostly saw a similar lack of introspection on the political front.

The way Democratic campaigns are run in this state is not working. The longterm infrastructure here is lacking. And many of the suggestions of how to do things differently are the same things Ive heard after 2010, 2014, 2016

So many of the post-2020 takes boiled down to this simply proves what Ive said all along. Others are in denial that anything needs to change (in part because it would mean theyd need to) and are dismissing the election results as solely due to it being a bad year.

I am deeply skeptical that the Democratic campaigns run in 2022 (or the broader party/progressive infrastructure) will look much different from 2020.

So, what to do? I see a couple of different options of what Starting Line and I could do in the future and would be happy to hear your feedback on it. It may be another month or two until we get started back up, as if we do keep going, I would actually like to put deep thought into how we can do things better.

Heres some possibilities:

In some ways, I just want to be done with politics. Ive been involved here in Iowa for nearly 18 years, and I feel like Ive more than done my part. Starting Line has been exhausting, sometimes unrewarding work, and the amount of toxicity you have to put up with in Iowa politics increases every year. It might be nice to have a job with normal hours and reasonable pay for once.

Meanwhile, everything in the U.S. feels like its on a continual downward slide that nothing is going to reverse. And if were really in a lol nothing mattes world, then whats the point of spending all this energy in a broken political system when facts simply dont matter?

And the most depressing aspect is this: if youve followed my work over the years, you know I like to highlight younger political leaders. Regardless of their backgrounds or ideological stances, its good to have fresh eyes and new ways of thinking in politics. But lately, I see some of Iowas up-and-coming leaders making the exact same mistakes their older predecessors did.

Of course, we have built up something important and rather influential here at Starting Line. Making a complete break with it might be good for the mental health, but theres a lot of potential still here. And I unfortunately think that operations like Starting Line could be a big part of the solution to todays news/disinformation problem in politics.

We have quite the property here with Starting Line. I try (and often fail) to explain this to Iowa donors, but Starting Lines influence and national reach with our social media feeds and behind-the-scenes relationships is immense. Nearly every national political reporter follows us. Any time I see an interesting tweet from a national policy leader, elected official, well-known activist or opinion writer, I find that theyre already following us.

For any national news outlet or organization who wanted to make a big jump into Iowa political reporting, purchasing the Starting Line outlet or doing a partnership with us could make a lot of sense.

Like it or not, Iowa always finds its way into the middle of national politics. The Republican presidential primary will likely still start here regardless of what happens with Democrats caucus. The campaigns for the Senate seat and governorship here in 2022 will be important. Starting Line could retain its left-leaning bent or just go straight analytical as it covers all of this for a larger organization.

While Im extremely frustrated by 2020 and the lack of change afterwards in everything, Im also hesitant to just throw out our current model. Ive always tried to keep our focus narrow with Starting Line so that we could be really good at one thing this wasnt ever supposed to revolutionize journalism as we know it or single-handedly change Iowa politics. And we have really excelled at what we do go back and check our accomplishments post in case you missed it.

But if were only playing a role in a larger broken political system, how effective is it? A big part of our success is in influencing the broader Iowa politics conversation and how the media covers certain topics, but if voters arent paying attention to those outlets, what can we accomplish?

Still, I also wonder if this could end up as a situation of you dont know what youve got til its gone if we move away from this model. This past year, Republicans did a far better job at pushing their oppo research on Democrats out to friendly outlets like the Free Beacon, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox News and even the Epoch Times. They produced countless stories damaging to Iowa candidates, but it had a limited effect coming from national outlets.

If that continues unchecked, however, we could end up in a situation where right-wing outlets funded by billionaires produce the majority of content on key Iowa races, and that could have a big impact over time.

I also know how to fund this kind of operation, which is extremely cost-efficient for what it produces and accomplishes. If Im feeling more optimistic of where Iowa politics is going in the future, sticking with what were good at (while still constantly working on what we can improve, obviously), might be the smarter thing to do.

One other quick note: if were to continue this, I hope people actually take better advantage of what were producing. Weve written countless stories that you would think campaigns would want to get in front of an audience with digital ads. There are many legislative candidates who weve written up profiles of that would seem to benefit from voters reading them, but instead their Facebook ads are all just replaying their TV ads. I truly dont understand what some Democrats digital teams are thinking if a problem is that there isnt enough news about your candidate, then maybe you should boost the news that is there into peoples social media feeds.

The biggest problem we have right now in American democracy is the spread of misinformation and voters getting trapped in media echo chambers where not only are their views reinforced, they also plain dont hear about a lot of actual news that happens. How many Donald Trump voters will literally never hear of his impeachable phone call to the Georgia Secretary of State from yesterday?

Many in politics do not fully understand the role of what you could call outsider voters, people who are deeply distrustful of the system, dont listen to mainstream news, and who respond strongly to any kind of anti-establishment or anti-expert messaging. Their news comes up in YouTube ads, online forums, and in their social media feed. Those are the kind of people who voted for the first time for Trump and who political ads and factual news articles simply arent getting to.

And its getting easier for people to tune out mainstream news as that news gets harder to access. Newspapers increasingly strict paywalls are dramatically reducing their influence in the world. If the Register has a big investigative report thats a subscriber exclusive that only several tens of thousands of people will read at best, whats its real impact? We know that Reynolds and other Republicans can simply ignore these things when their political base doesnt even know about it or doesnt believe it.

Starting Line does have a very large and rather influential audience, but its largely made up of people already engaged in politics. The most impactful mission we could focus on might be figuring out how to present factual information that is more engaging and trusted by people who are outside the normal political process.

ACRONYM attempted this by establishing local online progressive news outlets and pushing their and others content out through social media ads, which had some fascinating successes and setbacks.

I also have a theory that might be fun to test out: if you make regular news items sound mysterious, they might resonate more with those who distrust the system. I mean, there are legit, real-life, true conspiracies being perpetrated on Iowans all the damn time powerful, wealthy interests working with corrupt or complicit politicians to enrich themselves and screw over working-class people. And yet, the way the news and political campaigns present these facts somehow get dismissed by voters who at the same time believe wild Q-Anon theories about every elected official being involved in a child sex trafficking ring.

Anyway, this approach would require a significant retooling of how we write and who our audience is, which would abandon some of the advantages weve built up over six years. And this idea also veers very close to my concern of trying to do too much can one news outlet with a small or one-person staff fundamentally change how a significant number of Iowans get their news? Im not so sure, but it might be worth it to try.

5. Investigative News

Perhaps what I would personally enjoy most is doing a one-man investigative site, spending days and weeks at a time digging into stories no one else is and uncovering what I can discover. Dont worry about website traffic, just break stories that people cant ignore. Theres many little unsolved threads from Iowas COVID pandemic that we didnt have enough time to chase down even with a full staff.

But, as discussed above, how much impact would it have if so many people can just ignore it or would never see it through our site or even mainstream news outlets? Im also less sure how to fund this approach.

6. YOLO It

I am not happy with how Democratic campaigns are run in this state. I am not happy with how nothing ever changes cycle to cycle.

Throughout this past year, I expressed my concerns and suggestions to friends who work on campaigns privately. Sometimes it has an effect, sometimes it doesnt. My own personal preference is to not put people on public blast on decisions that have already been made, where your criticism isnt going to change anything I personally see that as performative, but to each their own. People also simply cannot handle public constructive criticism in any manner, and I cannot single-handedly change human behavior on that front.

However, the number of bad strategies that get repeated year in and year out is just ridiculous, and I may have finally hit my breaking point. There are many individual bad actors in Iowa politics that need to get called out and see their influence reduced or removed, and I certainly know who those people are.

The problem is, would it actually change anything? The power of self-interest in literally everything is strong, and doing a one-man crusade against it, as good as it may feel to do, could go nowhere. And I certainly dont see other folks making sacrifices, so why should I?

As always, Ill end with a very big thank you to our readers and supporters over the year. Continuing to write and operate just for our many loyal fans is very nearly worth it alone. But we do have some decisions to make.

While we likely wont get back to regular publishing for a month or two (if we do at all), Ill probably write stories every now and then or post some guest pieces. With this overly-long piece out of the way, it may be easier to write up some of the many, many ideas Ive had since the election that I simply havent had the energy to do.

by Pat RynardPosted 1/4/21

Iowa Starting Line is an independently owned progressive news outlet devoted to providing unique, insightful coverage on Iowa news and politics. We need reader support to continue operating please donate here. Follow us onTwitterandFacebookfor more coverage.

Link:
Starting Line On Hiatus As We Consider Future - iowastartingline.com

FDA Statement on Following the Authorized Dosing Schedules for COVID-19 Vaccines – FDA.gov

For Immediate Release: January 04, 2021 Statement From:

Statement Author

Leadership Role

Commissioner of Food and Drugs - Food and Drug Administration

Leadership Role

Director - Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)

Two different mRNA vaccines have now shown remarkable effectiveness of about 95% in preventing COVID-19 disease in adults. As the first round of vaccine recipients become eligible to receive their second dose, we want to remind the public about the importance of receiving COVID-19 vaccines according to how theyve been authorized by the FDA in order to safely receive the level of protection observed in the large randomized trials supporting their effectiveness.

We have been following the discussions and news reports about reducing the number of doses, extending the length of time between doses, changing the dose (half-dose), or mixing and matching vaccines in order to immunize more people against COVID-19. These are all reasonable questions to consider and evaluate in clinical trials. However, at this time, suggesting changes to the FDA-authorized dosing or schedules of these vaccines is premature and not rooted solidly in the available evidence. Without appropriate data supporting such changes in vaccine administration, we run a significant risk of placing public health at risk, undermining the historic vaccination efforts to protect the population from COVID-19.

The available data continue to support the use of two specified doses of each authorized vaccine at specified intervals. For the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, the interval is 21 days between the first and second dose. And for the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, the interval is 28 days between the first and second dose.

What we have seen is that the data in the firms submissions regarding the first dose is commonly being misinterpreted. In the phase 3 trials, 98% of participants in the Pfizer-BioNTech trial and 92% of participants in the Moderna trial received two doses of the vaccine at either a three- or four-week interval, respectively. Those participants who did not receive two vaccine doses at either a three-or four-week interval were generally only followed for a short period of time, such that we cannot conclude anything definitive about the depth or duration of protection after a single dose of vaccine from the single dose percentages reported by the companies.

Using a single dose regimen and/or administering less than the dose studied in the clinical trials without understanding the nature of the depth and duration of protection that it provides is concerning, as there is some indication that the depth of the immune response is associated with the duration of protection provided. If people do not truly know how protective a vaccine is, there is the potential for harm because they may assume that they are fully protected when they are not, and accordingly, alter their behavior to take unnecessary risks.

We know that some of these discussions about changing the dosing schedule or dose are based on a belief that changing the dose or dosing schedule can help get more vaccine to the public faster. However, making such changes that are not supported by adequate scientific evidence may ultimately be counterproductive to public health.

We have committed time and time again to make decisions based on data and science. Until vaccine manufacturers have data and science supporting a change, we continue to strongly recommend that health care providers follow the FDA-authorized dosing schedule for each COVID-19 vaccine.

The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nations food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.

###

01/04/2021

Originally posted here:
FDA Statement on Following the Authorized Dosing Schedules for COVID-19 Vaccines - FDA.gov

Bridge Over Troubled Water: The Evolution of Transitional Lending – Commercial Observer

Like a bridge over troubled water, I will lay me down.

Paul Simon

Troubled water would be a generous way of describing market conditions in 2020.

As the clock struck midnight on New Years Eve 2019, we all raised a glass to what looked like a great year ahead. The bull market stampeded on, and nobody could quite pinpoint the red flag that would eventually make it veer off course, or as we soon learned impale us.

But, by late March, the coronavirus had brought the commercial real estate industry to a screeching halt, and the bridge lending sector went from a crowded party that would never fly under social distancing rules to a scene fit for blowing tumbleweeds. After all, lending on stabilized, cash-flowing assets was scary enough, let alone properties that were in transition and had a distinct element of hairiness to them.

The shutdown arrived swiftly. I thought it was too quick at the time, but I was wrong, Seth Grossman, a senior managing director at Meridian Capital Group, said. I wasnt a believer that the whole world would shut down drastically, but a lot of lenders rightfully hit the brakes.

For some who retrenched, their sources of secondary financing (or leverage) had become volatile overnight, or dried up completely. The collateralized loan obligation (CLO) market which several bridge lenders funneled loans into had dissipated, and warehouse lines were abruptly cut off. Margin calls rang out, some more publicly than others.

Beyond the fact that some [lenders] were too levered and with the wrong leverage was the fact that they had huge hotel exposure, Josh Zegen, a co-founder of Madison Realty Capital, said. The average debt fund or mortgage REIT probably had 15 to 30 percent of exposure to hotel lending. I think thats one of the things that really hurt a number of the marquee names that were very active a year ago.

Now that were 10 months into the pandemic, a combination of factors is affecting lenders activity on any given day, Grossman said: You can have a ripple of good or bad news in the secondary markets, and that can cause lenders to tighten or widen based on where they think theyre going to get their leverage from, or the CLO execution. You can also have a scenario where nothing changes in the secondary markets, but a lender has a handful of loans with more tenant defaults for the underlying assets, so they tighten the credit screws.

The current ebbing and flowing of willing financiers in the bridge lending space marks a period of choppy waters to be navigated before a return to smoother sailing, poetically mirroring the participants lending niche.

In the meantime, COVID-19 has altered the very nature of bridge lending as we know it.

Its going to be a lot more complex going forward, Jonathan Roth, co-founder of 3650 REIT, said. Over the past 10 years, you could buy a building as an operator, sandblast the wood beams and, all of a sudden, youve created creative office space and can increase the rents. Thats over for a while. Now, youre going to have to take that shuttered JCPenney box and turn it into something completely different.

Roth noted that the essence of bridge lending has always been taking a, say, 60 percent leased asset, doing a short-term loan, and getting its occupancy up to 85 or 90 percent. Post-COVID,that property is empty and a borrower has to figure out the higher and better use for it, he said. The lender to that situation is somebody who understands every moving part. Its a firm that understands construction and really technical lease negotiations. Its not for everybody, and I think the pool of lenders will get smaller and smaller.

Building a Bigger Bridge

A full cycle of evolution has occurred within the bridge space since the global financial crisis (GFC), and its once again figuring out its next iteration.

For Mark Fogel, co-founder of ACRES Capital, this period is reminiscent of when he started bridge lending 20 years ago. People are trying to figure out their way, he said. In 2000, we were also feeling our way around how bridge programs were going to work on a go-forward basis. It felt the same way in 2010. So, it seems like every 10 years we go through this to figure out how the space works, and reinvent it in a way that makes better sense.

While bridge loans existed prior to the GFC, their evolution proved especially important in the years following it, as regulators tightened the reins on banks lending activities and a new breed of lenders alternative lenders or debt funds found their footing in filling the void.

Other lenders with a taste for risk, and yield, soon caught on and the draw to the bridge space continued to build to a crescendo point. Just prior to the coronavirus hitting the reset button, new entrants piled into the space seemingly every week, and the reward for the risk associated with transitional lending was diminished.

Since [the pandemic hit], youve seen many groups that were in the market take a step back and groups that had taken steps back coming forward, and now, new groups entering, Grossman said. Were in a very interesting time that I think is going to be the next phase of the alternative lending market.

ACORE Capital is one firm thats continued to lend on bridge opportunities consistently throughout the pandemic.

The exodus of other bridge lenders leaves a hole for the likes of us who really dont have any material problems in our portfolio of roughly 200 loans totaling approximately $16 billion, Boyd Fellows, a founder and managing partner of ACORE, said. It leaves us in a pretty unique spot right now, because we have plenty of dry powder to selectively deploy with materially reduced competiion. Were not overwhelmed with problems, and we have a large asset management team in place already.

Indeed, ACORE has roughly 30 people focused on asset management today. Before the pandemic, we used to think, Wow, weve really built out one hell of a big asset management team, Fellows said. Now were saying, It was really smart we built out this very large asset management team.

And until the bridge lending sector figures out how the leading indicators relate to changes in human behavior and the impact on commercial real estate, tempered liquidity is to be expected, Warren de Haan, also a managing partner and co-founder of ACORE Capital, said.

If youve got an office building thats in West Hollywood and its fully leased to Netflix, its going to get bid extremely strongly by a handful of bridge lenders at very tight pricing, and its going to feel like pre-COVID, de Haan said. But, as you drift further out into deeper renovations and so on, theres a much thinner bidding list.

The OGs

While even some of the most well-established lenders pulled back on credit metrics and dipped out for periods during the pandemic, many have been a steady hand throughout it, Meridian Capitals Grossman said. Its been more difficult for some of the public vehicles because theyre at the whim of the stock market. But, generally speaking, several of the stronger, established lenders have been the most consistent.

Prior to the pandemic hitting, you just had so many different names out there, Zegen said. And unfortunately, brokers or borrowers were willing to take a chance on the new kid in town. But the question is, can that new kid provide what the people that have been in the business a long time provide? And do they have the experience, the track record through up- and down-cycles and the ability to fund construction loans without using leverage? One trend Im seeing in this cycle is a lot of lenders not meeting their commitments.

Emerald Creek Capital not a new kid has been bridge lending since its formation in 2009. Banks were pulling back massively in 2008 through 2010, Mark Bahiri, Emerald Creek co-founder and managing partner, said of his initial draw to the bridge space. My partner and I thought it was a great idea to start a business at the bottom [of the market], as theres only up from there. We were looking to capitalize on the pullback and fill that void.

As the cycle progressed, Bahiri watched the influx of competition and capital into the bridge space. But since COVID hit, much of that competition has dispersed.

Mainly, the less-established lenders; the pass-the-hat, participant-type lenders, whose investors decided to stay on the sidelines while the pandemic played out, Bahiri said. The more-established institutional lenders have continued their presence in the space. Having committed discretionary capital through a global crisis is certainly a benefit.

The weeding out of weaker firms is a healthy thing for the market, Bahiri said. After all, the cutthroat bridge lending environment pre-pandemic was the reason some established lenders chose to step back.

In the pre-COVID times, we were only lending on situations with existing customers that had familiarity with us, Jason Baker, an executive vice president at Pacific Western Bank, said. If there was a situation where it was just a broadly-marketed deal via brokers, and they were going to get 15 quotes from various lenders, we were never going to be the most-attractive quote in that matrix, from a pure cost-of-capital perspective.

Baker made his first bridge loan in 2005, while at Fremont Investment & Loan.

The real difference is there were fewer participants in the space and higher leverage then, so you could do a bridge loan at, say, 80 percent of cost, whereas today, a bridge loan that we might consider doing is going to be 60, 65 or maybe 70 percent in some situations. Theres a more appropriate level of leverage today.

While Pacific Western remains an active bridge lender today, its turned its attention to construction lending, an area in which it has significant expertise and where the competition has truly thinned post-COVID.

Because of mortgage REITs obligations to fund and capitalize forward commitments, theyre staying away from construction, ACOREs de Haan said. We are running towards it. And because were a true one-stop-shop, weve been very successful at doing a lot of what we view as great risk-adjusted-return construction transactions, because the field is very thin.

Roth said 3650 is experiencing a similar trend. Our life got a little easier, by virtue of the fact that, a number of our competitors, most of whom use leverage, are having a much more difficult time getting inexpensive leverage today, he said.

Construction bridge lending is part of the sectors evolution. ACRES Capitals Fogel started making bridge loans when he was with Arbor Realty Trust: short-term, value-add loans that would go into Fannie Mae permanent financing within a year. It wasnt stretching into what we do here at ACRES, where its ground-up construction, or renovation or adaptive reuse. It was a much simpler bridge lending program, Fogel recalled.

Theres another paradigm shift underway currently, and bridge lending will likely come out of the pandemic looking quite different again, Grossman said: My guess is, its all for the better. The smart lenders are going to survive, and grow, and figure out ways to make more money. The groups that probably shouldnt be playing in the sandbox may realize this when things dont go as planned.

Crossing the Bridge

With vaccines in circulation, and a light at the end of the tunnel that doesnt appear to be a high-speed train, lenders are returning to the market, slowly but not consistently.

As a result, it no longer makes sense to only go to three of four prospective lenders when seeking financing, Grossman said: You now have to go pretty wide, not collecting 50 bids, but going wide enough to make sure you know whos lending and on what. A lender that may have been interested in a deal literally two months ago may have hit pause again. And conversely, lenders that were out of the market for two, six or nine months on any given date can be back in the market.

Consequently, the time to get a loan signed up and to receive quotes is significantly longer than its ever been in Grossmans 15-plus years in the business.

And, a few new faces are stepping in.

Theres an opportunity to enter now that probably didnt exist pre-pandemic, Grossman said. And theres been a greater influx of 7 to 12 percent lenders, than 4 to 6 percent lenders.

Youre seeing more new entrants proportionally in the quote-unquote hard money space, because theres more yield there, theres more opportunity there, and theres more investors scrambling to get tougher deals done, Grossman said. Lenders want to get paid for it.

But, new players shouldnt take an overly simplistic view of transitional lending, Pacific Westerns Baker said: They may think, Ground-up construction is very complicated, and I, as a new lender, dont have the expertise to figure that out. But, I can wrap my mind around taking an existing office building and repurposing it for multifamily, because Im using the existing structure, and so, theres a lot less risk. But, the reality is there are a lot of risks and pitfalls that lenders can quickly find themselves in.

Plus, new firms tackling complex loans during a global pandemic may not exactly be a match made in heaven. As such, Grossman is avoiding groups he doesnt think are able to see deals through to the finish line.

You never want to deal with somebody whos loan-to-own, and you never want to deal with somebody whos not equipped to deal with potential changes in a transaction or structural issues that come up down the road, he said. There are definitely some groups out there that see this [market dislocation] simply as a yield arbitrage and want to take advantage of high rates. Those are probably the groups that are going to shake out and have some trouble.

Bridge Ahead

For now, lenders are approaching new opportunities with caution. ACRES is taking on top sponsors with the best of business plans in the best of locations. Whereas, pre-COVID, we were probably stretching a little bit into markets and with sponsors that we didnt necessarily feel great about, Fogel said.

ACORE has made tweaks, too.

The deals that were doing now are probably 5 to 10 percentage points lower LTV than what they were pre-COVID, and pricing is probably, from a spread perspective, out 100 to 150 basis points, de Haan said.

For 3650 REIT, every asset stands on its own, Roth said. Whether were in an up cycle or down cycle, our first level of inquiry is on the sponsor; are they credible, do they know what theyre doing, do they have the capital? If we check that box, then we look at the real estate. As a lender, our job is to identify, quantify, and mitigate risk. We go through the same level of inquiry and due diligence that we always have.

Madison Realty Capital continues to invest in all real estate asset classes, but is more skewed towards multifamily and industrial. The firm is also taking on some higher value-add construction completion financing.

A lot of lenders are purely originators of loans, Zegen said. Weve been able to make loans, buy loans and re-work loans [during COVID]. You need as many tools as possible, because in times like these, nothing is as straightforward as when things are rosy. Our experience in going through a financial crisis like 2008 has given us an advantage.

One silver lining of the crisis, Fogel said, is that bridge deals that traditionally would go to bank lenders are funneling through to the active debt funds. Declining to name the property, he spoke of a financing opportunity on an iconic Manhattan building, where the sponsor is looking to do a gut renovation.

Its the kind of deal that never, ever would have come our way, or the way of any other lenders like us. It would have gone right to a bank, Fogel said. But the banks, especially when it comes to Manhattan, are sitting on the sidelines, not doing anything especially when it comes to office.

Fogel expects a leveling of the playing field when normalcy returns. I think its going to come back faster than it did in 2010, he said. There was a lot more at issue back then, and the real estate fundamentals werent great. The fundamentals in real estate were very good pre-COVID and I think will bounce back to what they were very quickly.

Until then, Roth will continue on.

Ive always done well as an investor and as a lender in going into areas where people are running the other way, he said. But, Im a big believer in fundamentals. If something fundamentally works, you can find that value proposition, regardless of whats going on in the rest of the world. Somebody much smarter than me once said, There are no bad assets, just bad pricing. And its really true.

See original here:
Bridge Over Troubled Water: The Evolution of Transitional Lending - Commercial Observer

Richard Foley, a GOP chief who taunted the FBI, dies at 71 – The CT Mirror

Marty Heiser Show

From left, J.R. Romano, Dave Mathus, Matt OBrien and Richard Foley during the 2019 campaign for GOP chair.

On his way to prison in January 1994, the 44-year Richard Foley said he knew how his obituary would begin: There would be a mention of his service as a state lawmaker and Republican state chairman, followed by the fact he was convicted of taking a bribe.

Dick Foley wasnt known for flinching. He was the blue-collar guy who led the state GOP from 1989 to 1992, when Connecticut was a presidential swing state and the party struggled to decide if its future was in Fairfield County or the post-industrial Naugatuck Valley.

When it became clear in late 1992 that he was in the crosshairs of the FBI, Foley called a press conference to call the feds bumblers and bureaucrats. Were going on offense. Put up or shut up, Foley said. They picked on the wrong mick.

The quote ended up on the wall of a semi-secret office the FBI kept for a time in Waterbury, a corruption target. Foley was convicted of four felonies in connection with $25,000 he accepted from two corrupt businessmen, a developer and a banker.

When asked for an interview before he left for prison, Foley said, Yeah, why not?

Foley, 71, was found dead at his condominium in Danbury on Saturday. His friend, Ben F. Proto, said Foleys daughter called with news of his death. No cause was immediately evident.

He came head-on at pretty much everything, from politics to prison. He had an Irish memory, forever remembering friends and foes. He was a state representative, a salesman and a student of human behavior.

His conviction was overturned on appeal, and Foley managed a second act in political life as a lobbyist and campaign consultant. He attempted a comeback last year, challenging J.R. Romano for state chair of the GOP.

He won and lost plenty of political bets. In 1991, he was convinced that passage of the income tax by a Democratic legislature and an independent governor, Lowell P. Weicker Jr., would be the GOPs ticket to the majority. It wasnt.

I talked with him earlier in the week, said Proto, who joined Foley in the 2018 floor fight at the GOP state convention that led to Steve Obsitnik of Westport obtaining enough delegate support to join the party primary for governor. We were going to have lunch next week. He was a dear friend. He was the kind of guy you wanted to have as a friend.

Proto said that Foley was steeped in Connecticuts political history and was among the very young Republicans who, in the early 1970s, made up Gov. Thomas Meskills kiddie corps.

Chris Healy, a former GOP state chairman, said Foley prized and exuded loyalty.

He was the most-loyal, steadfast person you could find, Healy said Saturday. I am grief-stricken because I lost one of my best friends. You either loved him or hated him, and those of us who loved him, we would have done anything for him. He loved to have fun, and he loved to laugh at the absurdity of things. You always ended up laughing during a conversation with Dick Foley, at some point.

MSNBC

Richard Foley

Foley was blunt, often coarse. He had no patience for the timid or cautious. To them, he would say, If you want a guarantee, then buy a f refrigerator.

He could be flippant, but his advice to candidates seeking counsel on issues of morality was not: figure out where you stand; dont be cute; your constituents will tolerate a principled difference.

He offered himself as an example. For 10 years, he represented a conservative and largely Catholic district, but he was more pro-choice than pro-life in his voting.

His legal troubles came from an association with Richard D. Barbieri Sr. and John A. Corpaci, key figures in a Waterbury corruption scandal. They told the FBI they had built a favor bank with politicians as they established a real estate and banking business.

To curry favor with a bigger banking chain, they said they paid Foley $25,000 to help pass a bill liberalizing state banking laws. The story had some holes: Foley, for one, was in the minority. Second, he voted against the bill and urged its defeat.

Foley never denied accepting ten $2,500 payments, but he insisted they were a consulting fee in return for seeking tenants for a commercial property. He was convicted and sentenced to 40 months in prison.

He went to prison uncertain about winning his appeal.

Over coffee at an Abdows Big Boy on the Silas Deane Highway in Wethersfield, Foley talked for three hours about prison and his expectation he might have to serve three years before qualifying for a good-behavior release.

He smoked a cigar, one that he promised would be among his last. He was loud. An elderly woman in the next booth gave him a long sideward glance, mouth agape.

Foley talked about quitting tobacco, losing weight. If he was going to lose three years going in, perhaps he could gain five more on the back end by clean living.

But he had no illusions about how he would be remembered, even if he won his appeal.

In most situations, death pays the debt. Not in this one, he said. This one you pay after you die. Thats hard. Thats hard. But thats one you gotta accept. Thats the way its going to be.

A federal appeals court voted 2-1 in January 1996 to overturn his conviction, concluding he had been improperly charged under statutes that covered the illegal acceptance of federal funds.

Foley served four months in prison, then was freed on bond during his appeal.

Ken Dixon of Hearst Media contributed to this report.

See more here:
Richard Foley, a GOP chief who taunted the FBI, dies at 71 - The CT Mirror