Category Archives: Human Behavior

Making global value chains sustainable and enhancing the position of LDCs: A shared responsibility – Trade for Development News

Company activities that incorporate products and services components spread throughout the world are called value chains. The value in the chain is added by certain elements of production processes in various countries, and, as a result, country economies are increasingly more connected to and dependent on each other.

Value here does not only have a financial and economic dimension, but also, and probably even more so, a social and climatic dimension. The social and climatic are important for making value chains sustainable, and joint responsibility and action by all stakeholders is required, acknowledging the interdependencies between all.

Moreover, value chains require that developed countries and companies originating in them increase their share of responsibility instead of focusing only on their own goals, as is currently happening in the distribution of vaccines against COVID-19. It seems the developed world is not realizing that the unequal distribution of vaccines is not only unfair, but due to economic interdependencies, there will also be significant damage that puts decades of economic progress at risk for developed and least developed countries (LDCs) alike.

The worldwide intertwining caused by value chains has its positives. For example, some of the world's population has risen above the poverty line, partly due to new connections to global value chains (GVCs), becoming producers and expanded roles in the playing field of international trade, versus being only consumers.

However, there are drawbacks. LDCs are still at the bottom of the ladder with activities that add the least value to the chain, and they are not benefitting sufficiently from their roles. For example, African countries participation in GVCs is largely through supplying inputs (often raw materials) to foreign firms for further processing. Another negative side effect of global interdependency is the fact that many developed countries are outsourcing their problems to LDCs, for example sending plastic waste abroad to achieve national sustainability goals.

Previously, multinationals put too much emphasis on cost savings when setting up value chains, avoiding the responsibility of providing employees with decent, safe working environments and respecting human rights, while demanding such from their suppliers.

This is a major barrier to making sustainable value chains work.

Both at the national and company level, there are policies in the developed world aimed at mitigating the risks of vulnerable GVCs. Company responses to overcoming value chain vulnerability include robotization and re-shoring of activities that were previously located in LDCs. For example, there are various initiatives to create local food systems. Although a noble goal, the impact on economies especially of LDCs needs to be considered, as those countries may see a decrease in their agricultural exports as a result. It is argued that further domestic support to agriculture in developed countries encourages overproduction, which in turn increases supplies in world markets and depresses prices. Low prices make it harder for producers in developing countries to compete in their home markets as well as international ones, thus reducing incentives for production and retarding the development of the agricultural sector.

The natural reaction of companies in developed countries is to invest more in the preservation and development of knowledge and production lines in their own countries. Investing in critical products and services should, however, be done based on solidarity and interconnectivity with the rest of the world.

The global interconnection and interdependence of value chains is such that when we take one domino from the chain, there is a chance that the entire structure will fall and that the poorest countries will suffer most. Global interconnectivity should be taken as a starting point when thinking about sustainable value chains, as opposed to the developed world focusing only on their own sustainability issues.

Multinationals are partly dependent on LDCs for their operations, from producing garments in Bangladesh to cocoa in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Given the competitive pressure these companies experience in international trade, their dominant position also puts more pressure on suppliers in LDCs, and most of these suppliers are micro-, small- and medium-sized companies. These businesses already operate in precarious conditions, and this is being exacerbated by the COVID-19 crisis. The pandemic shows even more the interdependence between companies and countries, and the need for cooperation for equitable access to medical supplies and equipment.

Where does a company's responsibility for the products and services provided by third parties in developing countries begin and where does it end?

Companies are increasingly expected to not only refrain from causing damage to the environment, but to rather make a proactively positive contribution to society, together with partners.

The ball is not only in the court of the business community. Solutions to the associated risks require public and private cooperation in which companies and governments must take responsibility, with citizens also playing a prominent role. If we want to face major challenges, such as sufficient clean water and CO2 emissions reductions, we must look at the entire value chain and its global interconnectedness.

In the everyday reality amplified by COVID-19, the world is confronted with the fact that human behavior is the cause of a lot of misery and can at the same time be the solution. With some good will, developed countries can leverage this crisis as an accelerator to change human behavior. This requires that countries must look beyond resolving their own national and local sustainability issues while ignoring the impact of those solutions in other parts of the world.

Developed countries and multinationals should focus more on dealing responsibly with scarce resources such as labor and the environment. Macro and micro, they must ask whether they are part of the solution or the problem, not only for themselves, but also for others. Developed countries must try to take even more responsibility when designing national policies, and commit themselves to making value chains truly sustainable, because we are all vulnerable, and Mother Earth does not care about the boundaries we have defined.

Read the rest here:
Making global value chains sustainable and enhancing the position of LDCs: A shared responsibility - Trade for Development News

Read of The Day author Emily Layden talks ‘All Girls’ Thursday – theday.com

It's very early in the rocket ride that will apparently be Emily Layden's career as a novelist, but she's already got the wholeinterview thing figured out. She's decided on the optimally comfortable chair for talking on the phone with reporters, and if the conversation takes place before noon, she drinks hot tea. If it happens after lunch, she shifts to sports drinks.

As for any wine and cheese receptions she might be missing out on as she undertakes her first author tour virtually, that's not a big deal.

"I actually find the idea of parties in my honor a nightmare scenario," she laughs. "I understand those receptions fit a lot of author profiles, and I'd probably get used to them. Right now, though, doing book events this way means I don't have to conquer some of the social anxiety."

Based on the advance reception for Layden's debut novel, "All Girls," the author had best get used to the attention. The book, a coming-of-age ensemble story set at Atwater, a fictitious and prestigious female prep school in Connecticut, centers around reactions to a late-breaking accusation by a long-ago student that she was raped by an unidentified faculty member a man supposedly still teaching at the institution.

Layden will discuss "All Girls" Thursday on the February episode of our virtual "Read of the Day" Book Club sponsored by The Day in partnership with Bank Square Books. Day reporter Julia Bergman will interview Layden for the event.

The author, 32, is a graduate of Stanford and, over the past six years, taught at three different female boarding schools providing experience and context for "All Girls." Layden majored in American studies at Stanford, studied creative writing, and comes from a family of writers; her father, Joe Layden, is a successful ghostwriter of celebrity biographies.

Quick success

Emily Layden, speaking by phone last week from her home in upstate New York in anticipation of her "Read of The Day" appearance, says she's known for years she wanted to write fiction.

She also knew the long odds facing anyone who wants a career as a novelist, and was prepared for the typical rough journey of rejection and setbacks as she hoped to find, first, an agent and then possibly a publisher.

What Layden didn't count on was quick success. But she'd barely submitted "All Girls" originally titled "Legacy" to agents when she was offered representation by literary agent Lisa Grubka of Fletcher & Co.In turn, St. Martin's Press offered a six-figure advance for the book less than 24 hours after receiving the manuscript.

"Certainly, the manner in which my book was sold not just the advance but the rapidity of the deal is not something any writer dares hope for," says Layden, who can now focus exclusively on writing. "I am extremely grateful for St. Martin's investment in me and my work, but it did create a different set of expectations than I'd expected. I'm more than happy to have the chance to spend my life writing, but it's sudden and different."

Ensemble cast

While the rape allegation and the identity of the accused faculty member certainly provide a "mystery" element to "All Girls," the novel is not structured like a conventional thriller. Covering one year at Atwater, the novel features an ensemble cast with each chapter taking the point of view of a different student. Against beautifully and wistfully detailed campus milestones from initiation and fall festivals to commencement and graduation the young women each must navigate the school year's academics and social interactions through the prisms of their own anxieties and desires. These developments are then skewed by the rumors about the faculty rapist and the administration's efforts to placate students and parents against the increasing belief that some sort of cover up is taking place.

If "All Girls" seems custom-crafted for our times, particularly with the #MeToo movement, Layden says the issues are important but coincidental.

"I actually did not set out to write about #MeToo," she says, "but rather the institutional mindset at a boarding school and the matter of transparency ... about the capacity of girls to speak their minds in circumstances that don't welcome that sort of initiative. And the mystery that drives the book is a lens through which we can see how all this happens at a place like Atwater."

Layden does amasterful job of establishing a cast of individuals whose experiences and day-to-day vignettes establish a broad and representative range of student types against which the plot and narrative tension develop. There's distance-running freshwoman Macy, who has major anxiety issues; Olivia, the universally adored all-everything senior, and her girlfriend, swimming star Emma. Chloe is plenty popular but hides an embarrassingsecret. And Louisa, the editor of the school newspaper, can't explain to the Head of School why a forbidden issue of the paper suddenly appeared online and triggeredtumultuous results.

Smooth assurance

If it seems risky to allot just one chapter to each character, rest assured Layden writeswith smooth assuranceand has selected her protagonists in a way that allows each one's interactions with others to continue the threads of the plot. In fact, the ensemble cast was precisely what Layden wanted to explore.

"The book really isn't about solving a mystery or the legacy of the school," she explains. "What it IS about are the ripples that spread out through the story and how each individual girl is processing them within developments in her own life. I never lost sight of wanting to write something that was about the girls."

Layden is asked if, in that writerly fashion, any of the characters surprised her developmentally as she worked through the drafts of the manuscript.

"Over the course of the book, these girls became as real to me as family members. In that sense just as with real friends or family sometimes they surprised me," Layden says. "At the same time, they do so in a way that would be consistent with human behavior from someone you know really well."

In that sense, the flow of the plot was never threatened when a character naturally evolved in a way the author didn't originally anticipate. "Fortunately, I was able to write the book I wanted, with a chorus of voices rather than just one protagonist. I will say that my favorite of the characters changed over the course of the book, but I love them all."

Oh, and as for the "whodunnit" aspect of the alleged rapist, Layden laughs and says, "I did know how it would turn out, but I'm laughing because that's been a pretty rare experience for me. This is my first novel, but all the stuff I wrote as an undergraduate, I started without knowing where the story was going. I'd just take off and see what happened. Because of the structure of 'All Girls,' I needed to have a sense of story and signposts along the way. So it worked out. I think that's probably the best way to do it."

Read this article:
Read of The Day author Emily Layden talks 'All Girls' Thursday - theday.com

How AI could spot your weaknesses and influence your choices – The Next Web

Artificial intelligence is learning more about how to work with (and on) humans. A recent study has shown how AI can learn to identify vulnerabilities in human habits and behaviors and use them to influence human decision-making.

It may seem cliched to say AI is transforming every aspect of the way we live and work, but its true. Various forms of AI are at work in fields as diverse as vaccine development, environmental management and office administration. And while AI does not possess human-like intelligence and emotions, its capabilities are powerful and rapidly developing.

Theres no need to worry about a machine takeover just yet, but this recent discovery highlights the power of AI and underscores the need for proper governance to prevent misuse.

A team of researchers at CSIROs Data61, the data and digital arm of Australias national science agency, devised a systematic method of finding and exploiting vulnerabilities in the ways people make choices, using a kind of AI system called a recurrent neural network and deep reinforcement-learning. To test their model they carried out three experiments in which human participants played games against a computer.

The first experiment involved participants clicking on red or blue colored boxes to win a fake currency, with the AI learning the participants choice patterns and guiding them towards a specific choice. The AI was successful about 70% of the time.

In the second experiment, participants were required to watch a screen and press a button when they are shown a particular symbol (such as an orange triangle) and not press it when they are shown another (say a blue circle). Here, the AI set out to arrange the sequence of symbols so the participants made more mistakes, and achieved an increase of almost 25%.

Read more:If machines can beat us at games, does it make them more intelligent than us?

The third experiment consisted of several rounds in which a participant would pretend to be an investor giving money to a trustee (the AI). The AI would then return an amount of money to the participant, who would then decide how much to invest in the next round. This game was played in two different modes: in one the AI was out to maximize how much money it ended up with, and in the other the AI aimed for a fair distribution of money between itself and the human investor. The AI was highly successful in each mode.

In each experiment, the machine learned from participants responses and identified and targeted vulnerabilities in peoples decision-making. The end result was the machine learned to steer participants towards particular actions.

These findings are still quite abstract and involved limited and unrealistic situations. More research is needed to determine how this approach can be put into action and used to benefit society.

But the research does advance our understanding not only of what AI can do but also of how people make choices. It shows machines can learn to steer human choice-making through their interactions with us.

Read more:Australians have low trust in artificial intelligence and want it to be better regulated

The research has an enormous range of possible applications, from enhancing behavioral sciences and public policy to improve social welfare, to understanding and influencing how people adopt healthy eating habits or renewable energy. AI and machine learning could be used to recognize peoples vulnerabilities in certain situations and help them to steer away from poor choices.

The method can also be used to defend against influence attacks. Machines could be taught to alert us when we are being influenced online, for example, and help us shape a behavior to disguise our vulnerability (for example, by not clicking on some pages, or clicking on others to lay a false trail).

Like any technology, AI can be used for good or bad, and proper governance is crucial to ensure it is implemented in a responsible way. Last year CSIRO developed an AI Ethics Framework for the Australian government as an early step in this journey.

AI and machine learning are typically very hungry for data, which means it is crucial to ensure we have effective systems in place for data governance and access. Implementing adequate consent processes and privacy protection when gathering data is essential.

Organisations using and developing AI need to ensure they know what these technologies can and cannot do, and be aware of potential risks as well as benefits.

This article by Jon Whittle, Director, Data61, is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Published February 15, 2021 13:30 UTC

More:
How AI could spot your weaknesses and influence your choices - The Next Web

Participants Needed for Nutrition and Health Behavior Study – University of Arkansas Newswire

Are you interested in learning more about how behavior impacts your health?

The Center for Human Nutrition and the Exercise is Medicine program at the University of Arkansas are recruiting adults over the age of 18 years to participate in research related to health and behavior.

The DFEND (Diet, Food, Exercise, and Nutrition During social distancing) research study is a 20-week education program which involves 30-minute educational meetings once per week, weekly health and behavior challenges, and the opportunity to meet weekly with personalized coaches.

Compensation for full participation for the first 75 people to sign up.

Anyone can join the DFEND educational sessions for free without signing up for the research study.

For more information, please contact us atbaum@uark.eduordfend@uada.eduor go to our websiteaaes.uark.edu/dfend3.

Go here to see the original:
Participants Needed for Nutrition and Health Behavior Study - University of Arkansas Newswire

Preparation and prevention vs insider threats The Manila Times – The Manila Times

Insider threats may have been looming even before the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, but the crisis further put a corporations security in distress.

Because of the drastic changes caused by the pandemic, the various factors that could motivate employees and other insiders to put their organizations computer network in danger intensified. These include fear, anxiety, anger, depression and financial troubles.

Working remotely also cultivated an environment that offers malicious insidersopportunities to execute security breaches. And employee negligence can result in the unauthorized access to or sharing of information from laptops, mobile phones, cloud storage and other technologies.

Organizations must increase their vigilance and diligence to reduce insider threats during this time. These can be done by applying a proactive approach in balancing security and privacy.

The rise of insider threats

The dramatic increase in security breaches requires organizations to take a more comprehensive approach in combating insider threats. A study by the Ponemon Institute, a leading security research organization, showed that insider threats have jumped by 47 percent over the past two years. Reasons cited for this increase include the growing number of emboldened insiders who are determined to commit theft, fraud and espionage; negligent employees who unintentionally made disclosures by using weak passwords or divulging sensitive information by falling prey to phishing; and using compromised devices for work. These have been especially amplified by the work-from-home arrangements that many firms have adopted.

As the term indicates, insider threats are mostly caused by complacent employees, contractors and third parties, rather than malicious external threats. To provide some perspective, 62 percent of insider-threat incidents are caused by negligent, hasty or unaware employees; 23 percent resulted from compromise, with stolen and sold insider credentials leading to identify theft and sabotage; and 14 percent are linked to insiders with intent to commit theft, fraud or espionage.

Insider threats are aided by different tools, such as encryption, cryptocurrencies and dark web trading sites, and working remotely can significantly contribute to them.

Furthermore, when information is stored in the cloud, it can be accessed anywhere, thus making it easier for hackers to steal it. Understanding the signs that indicate insider threats can help organizations trace potential issues and prevent breaches from happening.

As digital transformation is currently trending, the internet has made it easy for cyberattackers to steal private data from organizations. Platforms such as dark websites and the onion router allow buyers and sellers to trade data online. Cybercriminals are exerting great effort to search for vulnerable insiders who are willing to give them the data they need while looking for ways to hack systems.

Human error

While we know that human behavior is the ultimate cause of insider threats, most organizations still rely on technology to detect and prevent attacks. This approach has led to organizations only reacting after an attack has occurred.

It is suggested that an organization must have a human-centric insider threat program from the beginning. Employees should be engaged through training, transparency and communication. The program must also make use of human behavior and analytics tools to determine possible human vulnerabilities and prevent a potential breach. Employee involvement should be a big part of any organizations cybersecurity program.

Engaging employees to identify and help prevent insider threats makes them an organizations top ally in cybersecurity. By using technology and analytics to identify and predict potential human vulnerabilities, an organization would have a more robust insider-threat program. But with all these said, it would still need to balance employee participation and behavior. This makes training, awareness, communication and assessment of privacy risk very important.

Implementing insider-threat programs

Insider threats have been established as notable cybersecurity risks that can result in heavy financial and reputational damages. To ensure consistency and compliance, organizations must carefully design insider-threat programs to cater to long-term use and sustainability.

According to Grant Thornton, the effective implementation of this program is marked by three pillars: Assess, Build and Run. Assess makes sure organizations evaluate regulatory requirements, industry standards and best practices that apply to high-value data. This includes evaluating data protection tools, solutions, risks and employee preparedness.

Under Build, organizations should implement the changes identified during Assess, and must make up of policies, procedures, governance, teams, training and tools. They must also implement and integrate technology to identify and track insider-threat indicators.

Under Run, effective programs should be managed and monitored. Among those factors monitored are employee sentiment, awareness, compliance and training, and reporting on performance and risk metrics. Programs must also be adjusted based on feedback and regular independent audits.

Overcoming the challenges of remote working

Of course, there will be challenges in implementing an insider-threat program amid the pandemic, given that many employees still work from home. Trying to maintain a secure online work environment is already difficult, and introducing such a program may even be more so. But one must remember that with employees working remotely using laptops, mobile devices and independent internet connections, the risk of security breaches increases.

As dated cybersecurity methods involving traditional firewalls are becoming obsolete, it becomes necessary for organizations to take the initiative in addressing insider threats where the line between trust and human behaviors are ever changing. Investing in cybersecurity at this time will reap great benefits as cybercriminals are still looking out for vulnerable links. Prioritizing cybersecurity is undoubtedly one of the decisions that would make or break any organizations future.

Mark Bajar is the lead consultant of the Advisory Services Division of P&A Grant Thornton. P&A Grant Thornton is one of the leading audit, tax, advisory, and outsourcing firms in the Philippines with 22 partners and more than 900 staff members. Wed like to hear from you! Tweet us with @GrantThorntonPH; like us on Facebook at P&A Grant Thornton; and email your comments to pagrantthornton@ph.gt.com. For more information, visit http://www.grantthornton.com.ph.

More here:
Preparation and prevention vs insider threats The Manila Times - The Manila Times

The secret startup weapon no one talks about: Befriending competitors – The Next Web

As an entrepreneur, you probably already know that its important to keep an eye on the competition. You want to continually analyze what theyre doing in order to learn from their approach and understand where you can stand out.

But over my 15 years of building startups, my co-founder and I have found a better strategy is to cozy up to the competition even befriend them.

I know this approach can seem counterintuitive, but it was critical to the success of our last business, Imagine Easy, and is the same playbook were following with our current one, classic games, and brain training app Solitaired.

Not convinced? Well, let me walk you through the short-, medium- and long-term benefits weve seen from this strategy and how easy it is to put into action.

A major goal of befriending the competition is to set up a future opportunity to acquire them.

Time and time again in scaling companies, Ive found that acquisition is an effective tool to build market share, gain new technologies, and grow a customer base. Moreover, youre no longer allocating resources to fend off the competition, and instead, their success becomes yours.

While you may see competition as someone you need to beat at all costs, if one of your goals is to be acquisitive, it doesnt make sense to have an acrimonious relationship.

We dont go into a relationship or conversation with an agenda to be duplicitous or to get a competitive leg up. Instead, by building good relationships over time, our company becomes the first they reach out to when theyre ready to sell.

On top of that, were able to negotiate very friendly terms, often accretive to our business, because they already know and trust us.

In the interim, befriending your competitors can provide you a lot of opportunities to collaborate. If you both have common goals, could you achieve them better together? To expand your footprint, you need to either find ways to take traffic away from competitors, target new customers, or as an alternative, partner with to expand the pie together.

Your competitors may look at your outreach and the ideas you bring forward incredulously. Instinctually, they might think you have alternative goals.

For instance, at Imagine Easy, we had one competitor who was very skeptical when we reached out to him, and it seemed unlikely we would ever be able to acquire that company.

However, we noticed a way he could be making a lot more money using some proprietary ad technology we had built, so we approached him about a partnership in which we would help him monetize his site and he would give us a cut.

We started with a one-month trial where we increased his revenue 5x and over a 5 year period we turned this into meaningful cash flow that we were able to reinvest in our main business.

In the end, it helped that founder make enough money to retire. And when he was ready to sell, we were able to buy on friendly terms because he was so thrilled with the work we had done.

Even if there isnt a clear opportunity to work with a competitor, I always tell people that its still good to build the relationship because, in doing so, your competition might become a little less competitive.

Its a very core human behavior: just by viewing each other as people instead of as a faceless enemy, you have more goodwill towards one another.

This isnt to say youll completely lose your competitive edge, but maybe instead of copying strategies or stealing features, youll both look for other ways to differentiate yourself without undercutting each other.

Additionally, you can even share information that would help you both (without hurting your business). For instance, when we noticed that Solitaired was seeing a dip in traffic, we were able to check with a friendly competitor to confirm that it was a seasonal trend they were also experiencing. As result, we were able to avoid deep-diving into site performance to understand if there may be an issue with our platform.

Opening positive communication channels with competitors is more beneficial than most realize. In one instance, a competitor told us about a technology to monetize ad-block users which increased our revenue by more than 5%.

More importantly, though, a good relationship with a competitor has the unintended side effect of pushing you to think outside the box.

So how do you actually become friends with your biggest competitors? I start by reaching out and being complimentary, sharing that I like what theyre doing, and offering to be of help in any way I can.

I find often in building these relationships, I have to give a little before a competitor will open up. So Ill often share basic things that might help them general industry insight, high-level strategies that have been working well, or new technologies Ive noticed in the space.

In one instance, I shared insights from a successful conversion rate optimization test, which I knew could be helpful to them but not harm us at the same time.

Finally, I always frame these conversations around our common goals. Could we do more or accelerate our missions together? That type of aspirational messaging always builds towards a strong long-term relationship.

This approach might seem counterintuitive at first, and its not going to lead to results overnight. Its a long-game strategy but its one I continue to pursue because the benefits can be game-changing.

Published February 15, 2021 09:42 UTC

See the original post:
The secret startup weapon no one talks about: Befriending competitors - The Next Web

Three Behaviors That Isolate Philanthropists (And Make Them Less Effective) – Forbes

We need to be honest with ourselves about exactly where and how we are falling short

When nobody is offering you constructive criticism, take an honest look in the mirror.

I'd hazard a guess that in philanthropy circles, people arent often calling each other out for being delusional. That's why I wrote a book on it. Its called Delusional Altruism. In a nutshell, its about human behaviors were not even aware of that get in the way of transformational change. Its also about how to replace those behaviors with ways of working that are much more effective.

At a time of deep social anxiety as we grapple with a pandemic, police brutality and systemic racial inequalities brought into even starker relief because of COVID-19, we need to be honest with ourselves about exactly where and how we are falling short. We dont have the time or luxury to live in our own alternate reality.

While most philanthropists are eager to do the right thing, the hard part is changing something that you dont even know youre doing. So, here are three very common blind spots to recognize, and what to do instead. These changes will lead you to greater opportunities, more powerful networks, and increased resources and support. In other words, by doing these things youll pivot away from too much isolation, privilege and power, and create more inclusion and equitable impact.

1. You have a scarcity mentality. Instead, embrace abundance.

If you routinely do everything on the cheap, without investing in the infrastructure or long-term health of your organization and its people, you're limiting yourself with restrictions instead of building yourself up with opportunities. Although your heart might be in the right place thinking more money will go to the cause, you are doing more harm than good.

This mentality often gets extended to grantees, with little to no funding offered for things that can help them grow in impact and effectiveness like operating expenses, leadership development or technology. Having a stranglehold on opportunity creates a massive imbalance of power and leaves those on the ground spending their time grasping for limited resources.

An alternative to this reality is an abundance mindset. It's not about throwing money around, but instead focusing on becoming stronger. Being proactively generous with things like your leadership, reputation, experience and connections positions you and your collaborators to succeed in new ways. Taking risks, thinking big and investing in your capacity and talent and that of your grantees are other ways to unleash opportunity and the almost limitless human capacity to create and implement solutions.

2. Youre extraordinarily busy with little to show for it. Instead, quickly find your North Star.

Even if you have means, trying to figure out which way to go is one of life and philanthropy's significant challenges, especially when you want to make a substantial difference. So, absent a clear X-marks-the-spot, many organizations churn in relative solitude, putting out a mountain of good intentions and effort but without the corresponding impact. While many philanthropies are trying to rectify this with strategy focused on long-term systemic change, progress still remains elusive.

So how do you find your way? Instead of spending an outsized amount of time deliberating in the board room to create a three-to-five-year strategic plan, make strategy a vital but more short-term tool. In addition to being more helpful for galvanizing your team and collaborators toward a common goal, when a crisis hits, your plan won't become immediately obsolete. And you'll have the ability and experience to quickly adjust your strategy when new circumstances arise.

Creating a clear strategy for the next year requires having a clear mission (your reason for being), organizational values (your guiding beliefs that define your culture and behavior), and a vision (the future you want to help realize). Once you have these in place, you can determine the short-term sprints that get you closer to specific and progressive waypoints along your journey. Then comes implementationclearing out the things that are no longer a priority, assigning tasks, holding the team accountable, celebrating successes, learning, and adjusting your course.

3. You wield too much power. Instead, cede control and build trust.

You hold the resources that other people need. You are the Grantor and they are the grantee. Ultimately, it's a set-up for limiting honesty and trusting relationships. In addition to a more isolating, stressful and less fun environment for everyone, this power differential also sets philanthropies up for failure because they don't have enough feedback loops to understand how efforts may be falling short. If you are trying to reduce racial inequities, its another way to perpetuate the status quo because youre existing within a privileged and ignorant bubble. But you hold the power to remove these barriers.

You can do that by consciously working harder to build trusting relationships with your community, your grantees, essentially anyone who is a potential partner and collaborator in this work. Start by being your most authentic self. Own who you are and what you are good at and appreciate that same honesty in others. Say what you'll do and do what you say. Establish expectations from engagement to dollars and then follow through. And admit mistakes. When we make ourselves vulnerable, people lean in with recognition and understanding. Saying you don't know or figuring things out with your grantees as collaborators will change your relationships and what you can accomplish as a collective.

One key thing to remember is that relationship building takes time. Be patient. Find shared values and goals. Recognize power dynamics. And listen long and hard.

As Mahatma Gandhi said, "If you want to change the world, start with yourself." By seeing clearly the ways we hold ourselves and our collaborators back and then consciously changing, we create new and better realities for ourselves and the people around us. In times like these, it's this kind of momentum that will remake civil society into the inclusive engine for change we all know it has the potential to be.

Continued here:
Three Behaviors That Isolate Philanthropists (And Make Them Less Effective) - Forbes

Menstrual cycles and lunar cycles: Is there a link? – Medical News Today

For centuries, scholars and writers have speculated about the possibility of a link between lunar cycles and menses. And in 2021, it seems that the potential synchronicity between the two continues to fascinate.

Menstruation is a cyclical process, as are the phases of the Moon from new moon to waning crescent. Little wonder, then, that poets, philosophers, and scholars have, over the centuries, drawn parallels between the two, suggesting that they might be connected.

The mystique of the Moon and that of female bodies at a time when medicine was in its infancy led Greek philosopher Aristotle to claim, in the 4th century before the common era, that:

[T]he menses tend to occur naturally during the waning moon []. For this time of the month is colder and more humid because of the wasting and disappearance of the Moon.

Age-old parallels between the menstrual cycle and the phases of the moon have likely also led to some females referring to their periods as moon cycles to this day.

Is there really a link between lunar cycles and menstrual cycles? In this Special Feature, we investigate.

Popular belief and many works of literature suggest that there may be some synchronicity between menses and the phases of the Moon.

That may be based on the similarity of duration between menstrual cycles and lunar cycles.

One full revolution of the Moon around the Earth takes 27 days, 7 hours, and 43 minutes. A moon phase cycle, during which the amount of Moon surface that we are able to see from Earth waxes and wanes, takes 29.5 days.

The length of menstrual cycles can be in the range of 2530 days, with the median duration of a menstrual cycle being 28 days.

One 1986 study which Sung Ping Law, from the Department of Gynecology at the Canton Traditional Chinese Medical College in Guangzhou, conducted did seem to find a link between menstrual and lunar cycles.

The research, which appears in the journal Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, studied the cycles of 826 female participants, aged 1625 years, over 4 lunar months in different seasons.

The study concept, the author writes, was based on the concept of traditional Chinese medicine that human physiological rhythms display synergism with other natural rhythms.

Law found that, in the study cohort, a large proportion of menstruations occurred around the new moon. This led the researcher to deduce that ovulation periods tended to coincide with the full moon.

However, more recent research contradicts the notion that menstrual cycles often synch with moon phases.

For example, a year-long retrospective study from 2013 which appears in the journal Endocrine Regulations found no synchrony of lunar phases with the menstrual cycle.

This study monitored 980 menstrual cycles in 74 females of reproductive age over a calendar year. The authors say that the findings came in defiance of traditional beliefs.

A more recent study, which the company who program the period tracking app Clue commissioned in 2016, also concludes that synchrony between menstrual and moon cycles is a myth.

This research, which analyzed over 7.5 million menstrual cycles, suggests that periods most likely do not sync with the lunar cycle.

The researchers collected data on menstrual patterns from 1.5 million Clue users. Clue data scientist Dr. Marija Vlajic Wheeler analyzed them.

Looking at the data, we saw that period start dates fall randomly throughout the month, regardless of the lunar phase, says Dr. Wheeler.

Clues raw data and subsequent analysis are not available to the public.

A new study in the journal Science Advances, however, suggests that there may be more to the idea of synchrony between lunar phases and menstrual cycles than previous research may have indicated.

This small-scale study analyzed the menstrual patterns of 22 participants who had kept track of their period onset for up to 32 years.

Together, we had recordings of 15 women aged [35 years and younger] and of 17 women aged [over] 35 years, the researchers write.

Their study found that those whose menstrual cycles were longer than 27 days had intermittent synchrony with two of the Moons cycles: the luminance cycle and the gravimetric cycle.

The luminance cycle refers to the Moons different light intensity as its position in relation to the Sun changes and it passes through its different phases, from new moon to full moon.

The gravimetric cycle refers to the cyclical difference of the Moons pull on the Earth as it orbits around our planet. Since the Moons orbit is elliptical, sometimes it is more distant from the Earth, and sometimes it comes closer.

Its cycle from perigee (when it is closest to the Earth) to apogee (when it is farthest from the Earth) lasts 27.5 days. Depending on where it is in its orbit, the Moon exerts a different gravitational pull on different parts of the Earth.

A third lunar cycle the tropical month, or the mean time of the Moons revolution from any one point in its orbit back to that same point also seemed to be linked to period onset, though to a lesser degree, according to the study authors.

The team also notes that, while menstrual cycles intermittently synched with the Moon cycles, the likelihood of synchrony faded as the participants got older.

Overall, the researchers observed that the Moons light intensity cycle seemed to be the most influential lunar cycle in terms of its effect on menses onset.

We hypothesize that in ancient times, human reproductive behavior was synchronous with the Moon but that our modern lifestyle, notably our increasing exposure to artificial light, has changed this relation, they explain.

Medical News Today spoke to first study author Prof. Charlotte Frster, from the Neurobiology and Genetics Biocenter at the Julius-Maximilians University of Wrzburg in Germany.

We asked her what spurred her research interest in the possible synchrony between moon cycles and the menses.

As a chronobiologist, I am interested in all kind[s] of rhythms, and I was always fascinated by the coincidence of the lunar cycle length and the menstruation cycle length, she told us.

At the same time, she went on, it was very clear that most women appear not to be in synchrony with the moon at least not permanently. This brought me to the idea to investigate whether menses onset couples intermittently to the moon, and I started to ask women about long-term records of their menses onset.

Although her and her colleagues study may be small-scale, sourcing the necessary data to conduct it was no mean feat.

It took more than 10 years until I had collected the data from these 22 women, Prof. Frster explained.

Their study taps into much debated questions regarding how and to what extent human circadian rhythms or our body clocks, which regulate our biological patterns relate to cycles from our natural environment.

Previous studies, including a recent one in the Journal of the Endocrine Society, have looked at fluctuations in melatonin levels in the blood throughout the menstrual cycle.

These have shown that levels of melatonin which is a hormone key to regulating circadian rhythms, and especially the sleep-wake cycle peak just before the onset of menses and decline, overall, the closer a female gets to menopause.

There is also some evidence to suggest that a full moon influences sleep, essentially disrupting sleep duration and quality. One 2013 study in the journal Current Biology suggests that participants slept less on a full moon night, and their melatonin levels also decreased.

Furthermore, there is some evidence to suggest that artificial light can disrupt sleep-wake cycles and have a negative impact on sleep duration and quality.

However, is there any evidence in support of Prof. Frster and colleagues hypothesis that exposure to artificial light has affected females natural synchronicity with lunar cycles over time?

Why and how might exposure to artificial light affect menstrual cycles? MNT asked Prof. Frster. This is a difficult question, and I cannot answer it yet, she replied.

Despite existing evidence that suggests that artificial light affects various aspects of circadian rhythms, research into how it might interfere with menstrual cycles is lacking, she explained.

What we know from circadian rhythms is that their period is strongly affected by light. Depending on the species, [this] period becomes shorter or longer with increasing light intensity. Obviously, this also applies to monthly rhythms, such as the menstruation cycle. In circadian rhythms, light interferes with the molecular mechanisms that generate them. For monthly rhythms, the molecular mechanisms are not yet known. Therefore, I also dont know the mechanisms [underlying] how light affects them.

Prof. Charlotte Frster

The intermittent synchrony between menstrual cycles and lunar cycles is not coincidental, though, the researcher maintains. We performed sophisticated statistical tests that revealed that the intermittent synchrony does not occur by chance, she told us.

Although this new study may have opened up new avenues for research into menstrual patterns, much more work is necessary to confirm whether or not there is a synchrony with moon cycles and, if so, what biological mechanisms might be at play.

Further research should include a larger and more inclusive cohort, the investigators note in their study paper. Aside from the limited number of participants in the recent study, there was also a dearth of variance in participant diversity.

This cohort is not at all representative of the global female population, because the majority of women are white and stem from Europe, Prof. Frster told MNT.

Using a more diverse cohort is important, as previous research has suggested that menstrual cycle length may vary by race or ethnicity.

Prof. Frster believes that learning more about the environmental factors that may influence menstrual cycles could come in handy under certain circumstances.

What applications might this and further studies on this topic have, in the context of womens health? we asked her.

I think that it is still too early to [draw] conclusions. There are so many factors that influence health, and the absence of a synchronization with the moon is for sure a minor contributor to health problems, she told us.

Nevertheless, women who have difficulties [in getting] pregnant and could exclude all other medical reasons might wish to consider a more natural life without too much artificial light at night, she suggested.

See the article here:
Menstrual cycles and lunar cycles: Is there a link? - Medical News Today

Hundreds of Fish Species, Including Many That Humans Eat, Are Consuming Plastic – EcoWatch

By Alexandra McInturf and Matthew Savoca

Trillions of barely visible pieces of plastic are floating in the world's oceans, from surface waters to the deep seas. These particles, known as microplastics, typically form when larger plastic objects such as shopping bags and food containers break down.

Researchers are concerned about microplastics because they are minuscule, widely distributed and easy for wildlife to consume, accidentally or intentionally. We study marine science and animal behavior, and wanted to understand the scale of this problem. In a newly published study that we conducted with ecologist Elliott Hazen, we examined how marine fish including species consumed by humans are ingesting synthetic particles of all sizes.

In the broadest review on this topic that has been carried out to date, we found that, so far, 386 marine fish species are known to have ingested plastic debris, including 210 species that are commercially important. But findings of fish consuming plastic are on the rise. We speculate that this could be happening both because detection methods for microplastics are improving and because ocean plastic pollution continues to increase.

It's not news that wild creatures ingest plastic. The first scientific observation of this problem came from the stomach of a seabird in 1969. Three years later, scientists reported that fish off the coast of southern New England were consuming tiny plastic particles.

Since then, well over 100 scientific papers have described plastic ingestion in numerous species of fish. But each study has only contributed a small piece of a very important puzzle. To see the problem more clearly, we had to put those pieces together.

We did this by creating the largest existing database on plastic ingestion by marine fish, drawing on every scientific study of the problem published from 1972 to 2019. We collected a range of information from each study, including what fish species it examined, the number of fish that had eaten plastic and when those fish were caught. Because some regions of the ocean have more plastic pollution than others, we also examined where the fish were found.

For each species in our database, we identified its diet, habitat and feeding behaviors for example, whether it preyed on other fish or grazed on algae. By analyzing this data as a whole, we wanted to understand not only how many fish were eating plastic, but also what factors might cause them to do so. The trends that we found were surprising and concerning.

Leopard sharks swim past plastic debris in shallow water off southern California. Ralph Pace / CC BY-ND

Our research revealed that marine fish are ingesting plastic around the globe. According to the 129 scientific papers in our database, researchers have studied this problem in 555 fish species worldwide. We were alarmed to find that more than two-thirds of those species had ingested plastic.

One important caveat is that not all of these studies looked for microplastics. This is likely because finding microplastics requires specialized equipment, like microscopes, or use of more complex techniques. But when researchers did look for microplastics, they found five times more plastic per individual fish than when they only looked for larger pieces. Studies that were able to detect this previously invisible threat revealed that plastic ingestion was higher than we had originally anticipated.

Our review of four decades of research indicates that fish consumption of plastic is increasing. Just since an international assessment conducted for the United Nations in 2016, the number of marine fish species found with plastic has quadrupled.

Similarly, in the last decade alone, the proportion of fish consuming plastic has doubled across all species. Studies published from 2010-2013 found that an average of 15% of the fish sampled contained plastic; in studies published from 2017-2019, that share rose to 33%.

We think there are two reasons for this trend. First, scientific techniques for detecting microplastics have improved substantially in the past five years. Many of the earlier studies we examined may not have found microplastics because researchers couldn't see them.

Second, it is also likely that fish are actually consuming more plastic over time as ocean plastic pollution increases globally. If this is true, we expect the situation to worsen. Multiple studies that have sought to quantify plastic waste project that the amount of plastic pollution in the ocean will continue to increase over the next several decades.

While our findings may make it seem as though fish in the ocean are stuffed to the gills with plastic, the situation is more complex. In our review, almost one-third of the species studied were not found to have consumed plastic. And even in studies that did report plastic ingestion, researchers did not find plastic in every individual fish. Across studies and species, about one in four fish contained plastics a fraction that seems to be growing with time. Fish that did consume plastic typically had only one or two pieces in their stomachs.

In our view, this indicates that plastic ingestion by fish may be widespread, but it does not seem to be universal. Nor does it appear random. On the contrary, we were able to predict which species were more likely to eat plastic based on their environment, habitat and feeding behavior.

For example, fishes such as sharks, grouper and tuna that hunt other fishes or marine organisms as food were more likely to ingest plastic. Consequently, species higher on the food chain were at greater risk.

We were not surprised that the amount of plastic that fish consumed also seemed to depend on how much plastic was in their environment. Species that live in ocean regions known to have a lot of plastic pollution, such as the Mediterranean Sea and the coasts of East Asia, were found with more plastic in their stomachs.

This is not just a wildlife conservation issue. Researchers don't know very much about the effects of ingesting plastic on fish or humans. However, there is evidence that that microplastics and even smaller particles called nanoplastics can move from a fish's stomach to its muscle tissue, which is the part that humans typically eat. Our findings highlight the need for studies analyzing how frequently plastics transfer from fish to humans, and their potential effects on the human body.

Our review is a step toward understanding the global problem of ocean plastic pollution. Of more than 20,000 marine fish species, only roughly 2% have been tested for plastic consumption. And many reaches of the ocean remain to be examined. Nonetheless, what's now clear to us is that "out of sight, out of mind" is not an effective response to ocean pollution especially when it may end up on our plates.

Alexandra McInturf is a PhD Candidate in Animal Behavior at the University of California, Davis. Matthew Savoca is a Postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University.

Disclosure statement: Alexandra McInturf is affiliated with The Ethogram. Matthew Savoca receives funding from The National Geographic Society and the National Science Foundation.

Reposted with permission from The Conversation.

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Follow this link:
Hundreds of Fish Species, Including Many That Humans Eat, Are Consuming Plastic - EcoWatch

For a writer, patience is a pre-requisite: Jayant Swamy – The Sunday Guardian Live – The Sunday Guardian

In an interview with G20, author Jayant Swamy talks about the rituals of writing, and his recent novel Family Secrets, which is a fictional story of two half-brothers who face-off under contrasting circumstances. Excerpts:Q. Why do you write novels?A. Writing has always been part of my life. I always have several stories swirling in my head. I constantly inhabit the world of imagination and intuition filled with what-ifs and why-nots. Writing novels offers me the opportunity to harvest this gift, factualise fantasy and fictionalise fact.I am a keen observer and interpreter of human behavior and a soft skills trainer. I like to channelise my passion for behavioural sciences into creating characters that are memorable and writing emotional scenes brimming with human drama.Q. Tell us something about your latest novel. What is your dream star cast for Family Secrets?A. My second novel Family Secrets, a corporate thriller and a dynastic drama is the story of two warring half-brothers and their relationships. It was released in October 2020. Published by Vishwakarma Publications, the cover is designed by my literary agency, The Book Bakers.Siddhartha, the English teacher-turned-conman seeks justice for a missed inheritance. The powerful business tycoon Abhimanyu, the illegitimate son of lawyer Vikramaditya, is the solitary owner of the family fortune. A series of face-offs between them, the cleverly-planned cons of the one, thwarted by the boardroom-like moves of the other make the book a corporate thriller.Siddharthas loving relationship with his theater-artiste wife Sadhana, Abhimanyus reverence for his blue-blooded mother Rani Maa, and the emotional tussle he faces in accepting his newfound son Rahul, provide the elements of human drama.I would love to see Akshay Kumar as the easygoing Siddhartha and Ajay Devgn as the cold and calculating Abhimanyu. Dimple Kapadia as the majestic Rani Maa, Anushka Sharma as the versatile Sadhana and upcoming actor Vikrant Massey as the emotion-filled Rahul would make for a dream cast. Lawyer Vikramaditya the father of both Siddhartha and Abhimanyu appears in a flashback Manoj Bajpai in a Special Appearance would be the icing on the cake.Q. Describe your writing process. What are your writing rituals? A. My home office is my writing haven. A confirmed owl in my circadian rhythm, I prefer to write late into the night. I listen to music when I write I cannot work in silence. I clearly know my endgame, start with an outline, and keep writing accordingly until my characters reach a critical velocity my characters then take over from me, writing their own stories. I often have stretches of time when the creativity does not flow. I have learnt to use them to edit and reorganise what I have written previously.Q. Your biggest learnings as a writer?A. Patience, patience, patience. That is my biggest learning from the umpteen rejections I had received for my debut novel. Not to take rejection personally and continue doing what I believe in, that is an attitude I quickly learnt to cultivate.When opportunity meets preparation, success happens, that is the other learning. Marketing my book is in my control. A readers decision to spend their money and buy my book, is not! Marketing efforts can definitely influence that decision but cannot guarantee the sale, right?Q. Describe some of your high points and low points as a writer. A. When my first novel Colours in the Spectrum was published, my heart sang This is what I am born to do. That was a memorable moment. I got to relive it when my second novel Family Secrets was published. Higher points as a writer are yet to come! There are several low points I have faced, continue facing. They teach me valuable lessons, make me more compassionate.Q. What is your advice to budding writers?A. You are the CEO of your own life. Exercise the power of individual choice.Write from the heart. Never sell your soul. If you dont enjoy writing, dont become a writer. Be authentic. Dont write what you consider to be hurtful or harmful. Be innovative. Develop your own signature style.Q. What message would you like to send to your readers?A. I write to express myself, and share my perspectives with a larger audience. You may like it or you may hate it. After all its only a story. You may or may not agree with what I have written. In fact, I wouldnt want everybody to agree with everything I write. Sit back, relax, read and enjoy. Pen me a heartfelt review if you can. That will be precious. Family Secrets is as much a corporate thriller as it is a family drama.

See more here:
For a writer, patience is a pre-requisite: Jayant Swamy - The Sunday Guardian Live - The Sunday Guardian