Category Archives: Human Behavior

Bitcoin And The Great Filter – Bitcoin Magazine

This article originally appeared in Bitcoin Magazine's "Moon Issue." To get a copy, visit our store.

Energy money is the catalyst and tip of the spear for an intelligent sentient species transition from a Type 0 into a Type 1 civilization on the Kardashev scale, which measures the energy and technological mastery of a society.

ALL intelligent sentient species are on this path, whether consciously or unconsciously, and must reach this point before they are eliminated by:

This is known as the Great Filter. Energy money initiates a step change in how organic intelligence can operate and forms a critical step on the journey beyond the Great Filter.

Enrico Fermi was a mid-20th century physicist and Nobel laureate who, upon reflecting on the vastness of the cosmos, famously asked, Where are they?

With the practically infinite number of stars and planets in the universe, it seemed like there should be other intelligent species or civilizations capable of developing radio astronomy or interstellar travel, yet to this day, no evidence actually exists.

The Fermi paradox is the term used to describe this lack of evidence for extraterrestrial life in the face of a universe that should be, by the numbers, bursting with it.

While many have proposed solutions as to why this paradox exists, in the 1990s, Robin Hanson postulated a theory that has become known as the Great Filter.

The Great Filter theory suggests that intelligent sentient lifeforms must realize a series of critical steps on their way to becoming an interstellar race and at least one of them must be highly improbable, or their interrelated, path-dependent nature means that they must occur in a particular order and must all happen before a major cataclysm.

Hanson suggested some basic hurdles (or steps) paraphrased below:

But I believe that he was missing crucial elements. I believe that the discovery of energy money is the prerequisite for this grand goal. Energy money initiates a step change in how organic intelligence can operate, because the map truly represents the territory, in high fidelity.

Bitcoin is our energy money. It is our zero-to-one moment. An incorruptible scorecard in the grand game of life. A time and energy superconductor enhancing economic (human action) and behavioral feedback loops, enabling coordination across time and space in a way never before achieved.

It is our tool to get through the Great Filter and we need to remember that so we dont get lost in the minutia.

Ive taken the liberty of adapting Hansons work into what I believe is more accurate, with an emphasis on what Ive added to his general list.

I am convinced step 12 is not only the one most missing from any analysis by physicists all throughout history, but it is the most important and difficult to achieve in light of the technological advancements of an intelligent species and its propensity to want to control the uncontrollable.

Physicists have mastered the empirical study of matter and, through that success, have forgotten to account for the very real and very significant complex, random process of life; humanity perhaps being at the tip of this process.

As a result, they blindly believe that we can just fit reality into a series of models or equations, and as such, engineer our way through the Great Filter without accounting for the complex nature of human consciousness and intersubjective reality. Along this path, they sanitize the very life out of life.

In our dimension and in our timeline, weve had warnings from both sides of the academic spectrum, from Newton to Einstein, Huxley to Orwell, Nietzsche to Rand and Schopenhauer to Oppenheimer. Theyve all reminded us that false actions, arrogance and flying with wax wings can only lead to disaster.

Unfortunately, modernitys vanity and desire for comfort and control, all which stem from its collective fear, have conspired to drown out those voices of reason and replace them with a never-ending stream of meaningless noise designed to conform its constituents by numbing them into submission.

In a bid to control everything, fearful humans and the institutions they make up seek to sterilize the variance and randomness out of life so they can reduce it to a set of repeatable empirical processes. They abstract everything to the point that things are neither physical nor metaphysical, and everything is relative. Only then can they feel empty enough to be comfortable. Huxley explores this phenomenon in Brave New World Revisited, a series of essays written 27 years after his seminal novel by the same name.

The blind pursuit of sterile empirical ends at the expense of life, at the hands of collectivist megalomaniacs, is humanitys greatest threat and the only way to fix that is to reintroduce consequence to human action. To fix this, the map must accurately represent the territory so were all playing the same game, by the same rules.

When you finally become powerful enough to enslave, obsolete or blow yourself up, perhaps an asteroid is the universes way of pressing the cosmic reset button.

The discovery of energy money marks the point at which the science of matter is able to speak to the study of what matters. In this way, it enables, if not a unification, at least a direct relationship between physics and metaphysics.

I call it energy money not because its some literal battery thats storing energy in containers full of miners. I call it energy money because its the only form of scorecard (money) whose validity is priced in actual energy expenditure. The feedback loops between the cost of validation, the risk of fraud, and the demand in the market by humans seeking to cooperate on a functional standard all tie into work.

When resources, energy expenditure and the input of time are tethered to something that cannot be faked, co-opted or cheated, intersubjective value can be accurately measured and market signals, that is, prices become real. We begin to discover once again what things actually cost, and as such we as individuals and societies can make more accurate value judgements.

The behavior at the level of individual realigns toward natural order (arguably the definition of morality) and, at scale, results in functional, useful coordination among members of a society.

Without something like Bitcoin, intelligent sentient species cannot utilize their resources effectively or efficiently enough to become a meaningfully spacefaring species before wiping themselves out!

They cannot reach the point of energy mastery required to actually reach for the stars because 99% of what they do is wasted.

Reconciling physics and metaphysics means an intelligent, sentient species can make accurate value judgments and thus precisely measure and use the scarce resources it has toward maximizing energy output and minimizing time wastage.

Without such a high-fidelity transmission mechanism, the quantum wastage is not only too high but completely unknown. As a result, the road to serfdom via the incessant fear of loss and the knee-jerk reaction to control it all will prevail.

Bitcoin fixes this.

Many, including myself, have called Bitcoin the second Renaissance. As I wrote in a previous article for Bitcoin Magazine, "Bitcoin, Chaos and Order":

By tying the physical to the metaphysical, Bitcoin reunites matter to what matters. As such, it has the capacity to heal the world in the most deep and meaningful of ways.

This is both right and wrong.

Rightbecause Bitcoin will do this, and we will experience a renaissance of thinking, creativity, science, art, exploration, philosophy and more.

Wrongbecause it diminishes the magnitude of this discovery. It implies that it is another cyclical event similar to the Renaissance of yore. The reality is far more grandiose.

I would venture to say that every major enlightenment event along our timechain of human history was a pre-echo of sorts, culminating in Bitcoin.

Whether its the legends of Atlantis, the philosophy of the ancients, the gods of Egypt, the rise of Christianity, the Renaissance, the Age of Enlightenment or the Industrial Revolution, they all represent life reaching for this point of Aufklrung, through the vessel of humanity.

This may be the first or millionth attempt at crossing the Great Filter and I cannot but find myself in awe of the sheer gravity of this moment.

An incorruptible, fixed supply of money is as close to perfect not because of the number of transactions per second it enables, but because of how closely it resembles or embodies the physical laws of nature and the universe.

By enabling humans to effectively measure, manage and transact the product of their labor, it means value can be created, transformed and transmitted with minimal distortion, and it trends toward the elimination of waste and falsehoods.

One cannot celebrate fake facts in the face of an economic reality tied to the physical laws of thermodynamics.

Bitcoin permits maximum fidelity in human action to permeate society,and as a result, feedback loops are shortened so that trade-offs are more evident, consequences are inescapable, and risk can no longer be hidden and subsequent losses socialized (moral hazard). Everyones skin is now in the game, and we all play by the same rules.

This framework unifies matter and what matters because the lies necessary to separate the two can no longer exist.

The study of what matters, the pursuit of truth, of principles and of meaning can once again be anchored to reality, and vice versa. The study and evolution of matter can operate within the framework and toward the ends that matter.

This will have profound implications for humanity and marks what may be the most important fork in the road since Homo sapiens separated from other hominids.

Bitcoin fixes this means we fix the money, to fix human behavior, to fix the world in time to progress beyond the Great Filter.

On a sound foundation, we can know what things truly cost and we can make accurate value judgments in order to engineer and innovate our way forward.

With Bitcoin, the next chapter in humanitys timeline can truly commence.

As Scarface wouldve said, had he been a Bitcoiner: First we fix the money. Then we fix the world. Then we get the galaxy.

Go here to see the original:
Bitcoin And The Great Filter - Bitcoin Magazine

Making room for wildlife: 4 essential reads – The Conversation

Millions of Americans enjoy observing and photographing wildlife near their homes or on trips. But when people get too close to wild animals, they risk serious injury or even death. It happens regularly, despite the threat of jail time and thousands of dollars in fines.

These four articles from The Conversations archive offer insights into how wild animals view humans and how our presence affects nearby animals and birds plus a scientists perspective on whats wrong with wildlife selfies.

In some parts of North America, wild animals that once were hunted to near-extinction have rebounded in recent decades. Wild turkeys, white-tailed deer, beavers and black bears are examples of wild species that have returned to large swaths of their pre-settlement ranges. As human development expands, people and animals are finding themselves in close quarters.

How do the animals react? Conservation researcher Kathy Zeller and her colleagues radio-collared black bears in central and western Massachusetts and found that the bears avoided populated areas, except when their natural food sources were less abundant in spring and fall. During those lean seasons, the bears would visit food sources in developed areas, such as bird feeders and garbage cans but they foraged at night, contrary to their usual habits, to avoid contact with humans.

Wild animals are increasing their nocturnal activity in response to development and other human activities, such as hiking, biking and farming, Zeller reports. And people who are scared of bears may be comforted to know that most of the time, black bears are just as scared of them.

Read more: Black bears adapt to life near humans by burning the midnight oil

When a recovering species shows up on its old turf or in its former waters, humans arent always happy to make room for it. Ecologist Veronica Frans studied sea lions in New Zealand, a formerly endangered species that moves inland from the coast to breed, often showing up on local roads or in backyards.

Frans and her colleagues created a database that they used to find and map potential breeding grounds for sea lions all over the New Zealand mainland. They also identified potential challenges for the animals, such as roads and fences that could block their inland movement.

When wild species enter new areas, they inevitably will have to adapt, and often will have new kinds of interactions with humans, Frans writes. I believe that when communities understand the changes and are involved in planning for them, they can prepare for the unexpected, with coexistence in mind.

Read more: When endangered species recover, humans may need to make room for them and it's not always easy

How close to wildlife is too close? Guidelines vary, but as a starting point, the U.S. National Park Service recommends staying at least 25 yards (23 meters) away from wild animals, and 100 yards (91 meters) from predators such as bears or wolves.

In a review of hundreds of studies, conservation scholars Jeremy Dertien, Courtney Larson and Sarah Reed found that human presence may affect many wild species behavior at much longer distances.

Animals may flee from nearby people, decrease the time they feed and abandon nests or dens, they report. Other effects are harder to see, but can have serious consequences for animals health and survival. Wild animals that detect humans can experience physiological changes, such as increased heart rates and elevated levels of stress hormones.

The scholars review found that the distance at which human presence starts to affect wildlife varies by species, although large animals generally need more distance. Small mammals and birds may change their behavior when people come within 300 feet (91 meters), while large mammals like elk and moose can be affected by humans up to 3,300 feet (1,006 meters) away more than half a mile.

Read more: Don't hike so close to me: How the presence of humans can disturb wildlife up to half a mile away

There are stories from around the world of people dying in the act of taking selfies. Some involve wildlife, such as a traveler in India who was mauled by an injured bear in 2018 when he stopped to photograph himself with the animal.

Tourists are often the culprits, but theyre not alone. As ocean scientist Christine Ward-Paige explains, scientists who have special permission to handle wild animals as part of their field research sometimes use this opportunity to take personal photos with their subjects.

I have witnessed the making of many researcher-animal selfies, including photos with restrained animals during scientific study, Ward-Paige recounts. In most cases, the animal was only held for an extra fraction of a second while vigilant researchers simply glanced up and smiled for the camera already pointing in their direction.

But some incidents have been more intrusive. In one instance, researchers had tied a large shark to a boat with ropes across its tail and gills so that they could measure, biopsy and tag it. Then they kept it restrained for an extra 10 minutes while the scientists took turns hugging it for photos.

In Ward-Paiges view, legitimizing wildlife selfies in this way encourages people who dont have scientific training or understand animal behavior to think that taking them is OK. That undercuts warnings from agencies like the National Park Service and puts both people and animals in danger.

Instead, she urges fellow scientists to work to show the vulnerability of our animal subjects more clearly and help guide the public to observe wildlife safely and responsibly.

Read more: Even scientists take selfies with wild animals. Here's why they shouldn't.

Read the rest here:
Making room for wildlife: 4 essential reads - The Conversation

NOAA warns of ‘aggressive’ dolphin causing ‘concerns for human safety’ off Texas coast – Yahoo! Voices

AUSTIN, Texas Stay away from the too-friendly dolphin.

Officials have identified ananimal thathas gotten a bit pushy in the water off of North Padre Island,theNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said in a press release.

North Padre Island is about 20 miles east of Corpus Christi.

"Biologists report the animal is showing more aggressive behavior, separating children from their parents in the water, and isolating swimming pets from their owners," said the latest release issued on Thursday.

The problem is that people have been feeding, swimming and playingwith the dolphin for more than a year despite warnings from biologists, law enforcement and residents to stay away from it, according to the release.

Officials are warning that a dolphin has gotten too aggressive on North Padre Island and is separating adults from children in the water.

Dolphin attack:$20,000 reward for information about stranded dolphin 'harassed' to death on Texas beach

Watch:Curious dolphin makes a surprise appearance at a Florida beach

It saidthat the dolphin "has become so used to humans that it now seeks out people, boats, and any form of interaction."

The mammal also has wounds caused by boats and there are concerns about its safety, officials said.

People are being asked to leave the dolphin alone. Boaters are asked to avoid stopping if the dolphin comes to close and to slowly move away.

Swimmers are being asked to leave the water if they see the dolphin, the release said.

"While the dolphin may seem friendly, this is a wild animal with unpredictable behavior," according to NOAA. It is showing behaviors similar to other lone, sociable dolphins worldwide, officials said.

What's everyone talking about?: Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day

Those behaviors, according to the release, include following boats and people, losing its natural wariness and starting to play with and swim with people,

The dolphin in now in thelast stage of these behaviors which include showing dominant and aggressive behavior toward people, according to NOAA.

Story continues

NOAA and biologists are working to determine how to protect the dolphin.

Any interaction with the dolphin that may injure or change its behaviors is considered to be harassment and is illegal under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Feeding or attempting to feed wild dolphins is also illegal.

Violations can be reportedto NOAAs Enforcement Hotline at (800) 853-1964. Violationsare punishable by a fine up to $100,000up to 1 year in jail.

This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: NOAA warns of 'aggressive' dolphin looking for people off Texas coast

See more here:
NOAA warns of 'aggressive' dolphin causing 'concerns for human safety' off Texas coast - Yahoo! Voices

PAU Launches the Technology and Mental Health Concentration within its MS in Psychology Degree – PR Web

PALO ALTO, Calif. (PRWEB) June 03, 2022

Starting in the fall of 2022, the Master of Science in Psychology program at Palo Alto University (PAU) will offer a Technology and Mental Health Concentration. This concentration will explore the important role technology plays in todays society, the negative and positive effects of technology on mental health, and the complexity of the interaction between technology and human behavior.

Utilizing technology to enhance mental health is an emerging area of study, and PAU is at the forefront of this burgeoning field. Students will learn to identify the impact of technology on human psychology, which digital tools contribute to mental health, and how to develop these digital tools.

Students in this concentration will pair traditional training in graduate psychological science with cutting-edge courses about how technology affects mental health and how we can use technology to develop new treatments and improve mental health in the future.

Tech and Mental Health Coursework

The Technology and Mental Health Concentration covers current trends in mental health and wellness and includes these courses:

1) Technology and Mental Health for Children and Adolescents: Screen Time, Digital Interventions, and Teletherapy. This course explores the effects of technology on children and adolescents.

2) Evidence-based Digital Internet Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities. This course discusses the development and efficacy of technological innovations in healthcare.

3) Using Evidence-based Principles of Multimedia Learning for Product Design. Students will learn how people learn and process information and apply this framework to multimedia content design.

4) Mental Health and Design in the Digital World (User Experience). Students will learn how the development of technology has positively affected our wellness, learn the skills and strategies for UX product design, and become leaders of these future trends in mental health.

Careers in Technology and Mental Health

Students who graduate with this concentration become experts in the application of technologysuch as smartphone apps, virtual reality, and video gamesto enhance mental health in various industries. This concentration prepares students for technology-related employment in the fields of:

Graduates will understand the changing demands of mental health and tech in the workforce, the expansion of mental health and technology in the corporate sector, and the ways in which an understanding of psychology can benefit those who want to work in technology.

Click here to apply or learn more about PAUs MS in Psychology program, Technology and Mental Health Concentration. Applications are due August 5, 2022.

Share article on social media or email:

Continued here:
PAU Launches the Technology and Mental Health Concentration within its MS in Psychology Degree - PR Web

The Puerto Rican Island Where 1,500 Monkeys Rule | Travel – Smithsonian Magazine

Jennifer Nalewicki

Travel Correspondent

On the morning of September 20, 2017, Hurricane Maria made landfall in Puerto Rico, pummeling the island with 170 mile per hour wind gusts and flooding rain. It would be the first category 4 hurricane to strike the island in nearly 85 years, leaving many citizens without basic necessities like electricity, food, running water and shelter. However, in the storms aftermath, one community of residents emerged largely unscathed: some 1,500 rhesus macaques living a mile off the eastern shore of Puerto Rico on Cayo Santiago.

The island, known locally as Monkey Island, first became home to these unlikely inhabitants in the late 1930s, when primatologist Clarence Carpenter brought about 450 of the monkeys by ship from India to the 38-acre island to study their social and sexual behaviors. Through that initial pioneering research, the tree-studded enclave eventually became home to the Caribbean Primate Research Center, an educational and research facility thats part of the University of Puerto Rico. Over the years, generations of monkeys have descended from that original colony, and today those descendants roam freely around the island, playing on its sandy beaches and exploring its endless canopy of trees. The rhesus macaqueseach weighing about 20 pounds and known for their long, fluffy tails and straw-colored furlive largely independent from human intervention (minus feedings).

After the hurricane ravaged Puerto Rico, researchers from the center feared the worst for the monkeys, unsure if they would even survive the storm. (Initial news reports were saying that the human death toll was hovering at 65 casualties.) However, once it was safe to return to the island, the scientists were surprised to find that the furry inhabitants had persevered.

Two days after the storm, members of our staff took a boat to the island to feed them, says Alyssa Arre, the centers scientific director. Everyone worried that the monkeys had died, but that wasnt the case.

Arre says its impossible to say for sure if any of the monkeys succumbed to the storm, however the workers tasked with taking daily census counts of the population didnt find any irregularities.

While no cameras exist on the island to capture exactly how the macaques faired during the storm, Arre suspects that they sought shelter by climbing onto one of the islands two hills and staying low to the ground. The only buildings on the island are used by staff for storage and research purposes.

The hurricane destroyed all of the vegetation that the monkeys use to supplement their diets, Arre says. The wind was so strong [it knocked off twigs and branches], so we dont think that they climbed into trees.

The only daily human intervention that the monkeys receive are feedings, which came about as the result of the monkeys destroying much of the vegetation early on in their arrival to the island.

Originally, [Carpenter and his team] thought the monkeys would just live on the island without any human intervention, but the monkeys quickly destroyed all of the vegetation on the island and ate everything, Arre says. So, they realized they would have to start sustaining the population with food provisions, and its been that way since the beginning.

Currently, their diet includes coconuts, corn, seeds, apples, papaya and Purina Monkey Chow (yes, its a real thing!), which are yellow egg-shaped dry biscuits. Arre confirms that the monkeys are not fans of bananas despite what movies and media may depict.

They like to take the monkey chow and put it in a puddle and roll it around [so it softens] before they eat it, she says.

As a research institution that has been studying these mammals for decades, it only made sense to take a closer look into how trauma, in this case a natural disaster, affected their behavior and relationships. Researchers were surprised by their findings.

After Hurricane Maria, the monkeys had more affiliative interactions in their social networks, and their social networks expanded, so they were interacting with more individuals Arre says. Researchers also studied how trauma, especially early-life adversity like a hurricane, can affect a monkeys behavior and health.

That research would eventually become part of a study published early last year in Current Biology, concluding that the macaques became more social and monkeys that were more isolated prior to the hurricane increased social connections most after it.

Another study found that females were reproducing less frequently after the hurricane.

Since its official establishment in 1970, the center has built a reputation as a pioneer in the field of primate research and has made many important contributions to our understanding of both primate and human behavior. The late William Windle, who oversaw the perinatal physiology lab at the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness (NINDB) in San Juan, worked closely with the island as it provided resources for behavioral and reproductive studies under naturalistic conditions. Windle studied the effects that asphyxia (oxygen deprivation) can have on a monkeys brain during birth, and the permanent damage of the brain those effects can engender. His work not only changed delivery procedures in human infants, but he also went on to be awarded the Lasker Prize in 1968 for his work. More recently, the institute has been shedding light onto Covid-19 and its effects on monkeys.

A 1939 article published in Life magazine and photographed by German photojournalist Hansel Mieth also put Monkey Island on the map. One of Mieths images, known for being one of the most iconic animal photos in history, features a rhesus macaque sitting in the water soaking wet.

In a later interview, Mieth explained how she captured it, saying, One afternoon all the doctors were away and a little kid came running to me and said, A monkeys in the water I dont think [the monkey] liked me, but he sat on that coral reef, and I took about a dozen shots.

Today, the island isnt open to the general public, in order to prevent unnecessary human contact with the monkeys. Yet, each year, visiting researchers come to the island to study the monkeys and tap into the islands expansive database that contains more than 60 years worth of data, from basic demographic information (age, social groupings and maternity rates) on more than 11,000 monkeys to genetic information and a collection of more than 3,300 monkey skeletons. Their studies continue to push the needle forward in our understanding of primate behavior and how it translates to our own behavior as humans.

"Rhesus macaques make a good model for humans, as we share many characteristics of our biology and similarly live highly social lives," Arre says. "Taken together, the projects with the rhesus macaques conducted at Caya Santiago help us better understand human sociality and health, and recently, how adversity and trauma might affect the life of an individual."

Recommended Videos

Read more:
The Puerto Rican Island Where 1,500 Monkeys Rule | Travel - Smithsonian Magazine

Astonished by How Much There Still Is to Learn and Do – Psychiatric Times

How can wepsychiatrists and psychiatric nurse practitionerswork together to move the psychiatric field forward?

COMMENTARY

Mark Twain fully grasped the folly of youth. He contrasted it with the humility that comes with experience in this memorable observation: When I was a boy of 14, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be 21, I was astonished at how much he had learned in 7 years. Tongue firmly in cheek, Twain is commenting that the aging process teaches us how little we really know.

Since I started medical school in 1977, we have witnessed dramatic advances in our understanding of neuroscience, psychopathology, and numerous psychiatric and psychotherapeutic treatment modalities. As the knowledge base of biological psychiatry has become more robust, a growing body of psychotherapy outcomes research has had a dramatic impact on the work lives of most American psychiatrists. Time-limited therapies were shown to be as effective as open-ended, longer-term psychotherapies. We also learned that mental health professionals who had not attended medical school were able to assist emotionally distressed patients as effectively as, and sometimes more effectively than, psychiatrists. As we became more biological in our orientation, episodes of care got shorter and shorter. At times, the assembly line moves too quickly and the flames and smoke of burnout may singe and choke us if we do not effectively balance caring for ourselves with caring for others.

With 1 eye on the patients and another on ourselves, we are also paying more attention, as we must, to the larger social picture. As I watched addiction psychiatry come together as a central psychiatric subspecialty that exemplifies the wisdom and intellectual vigor of our biopsychosocial orientation, we have all witnessed the limitations of a 1 patient at a time approach that ignores the socioeconomic determinants of mental health. Alas, the opioid epidemic rages on. Mental health parity is incomplete. Universal access to adequate care is not a reality. Far too many Americans with chronic psychiatric conditions are receiving care in the criminal justice system.

As section editor-at-large here at Psychiatric Times, I hope to partner with youpsychiatrists and psychiatric nurse practitioners in different practice settingsto move the field forward. How do we leverage our knowledge and skills to optimize the biopsychosocial well-being of our patients and their families? How do we partner most effectively with our colleagues in other medical and mental health specialties? As stakeholders in a needlessly complex patchwork quilt of orthogonal health plans and reimbursement systems, what can we do about the vexing administrative complexities that interfere with patient outcomes and effective care coordination?

Although our field is atomized into many subspecialty areas, most of our patients experience challenges that cut across our categorical approach to psychopathology. Personally, I like nothing more than leaning into the complexity of patients with complicated presentations. I am currently treating 2 individuals with significant cooccurring anxiety, substance use, and personality disorders. In 1 case, I function as an integrative psychiatrist delivering all necessary care. In the other case, I am one of 3 mental health professionals working with the patient on a weekly basis, but the only psychiatrist. It is not simple figuring out how and when to flex ourselvessometimes as a 1-person band, other times as a member, or conductor, of a small interdisciplinary collaborative group.

Thankfully, my career experiences have been rich and varied. I invite you to reach out to me through Psychiatric Times with questions or concerns regarding the following subject areas:

Burnout: What are the best protective strategies for us and our colleagues? How can we sort out the overlap between burnout and depressive disorders?

Career development: What are the pros and cons of (1) different institutional practice settings, (2) subspecialty training and practice, and (3) private practice? What is the role of mentorship in developing your career?

Coaching and coaching psychiatry: Is coaching the new psychotherapy? Should psychiatry embrace coaching or shun this nonspecific discipline that has been defined as partnering with clients in a thought-provoking and creative process that inspires them to maximize their personal and professional potential (International Coaching Federation)?

Health professional health and well-being: How does the psychiatric treatment of independently licensed health care providers and other safety-sensitive professionals (eg, aviation, transportation) differ from the usual and customary care we provide to other patients? How do we respect patient confidentiality while ensuring the safety of the public?

Integrating medical and mental health care: What practice settings are most amenable to integrated and colocated mental health care? What are our options when patients constrain us from communicating with clinicians from other specialties?

Integrating pharmacotherapy with psychotherapy: What are the pros and cons of integrated care versus split treatmentfrom the perspective of the patient, the organization, the bottom line, and the job satisfaction of different professional disciplines?

Leadership in medicine and psychiatry: How can frontline mental health professionals develop their leadership skills and gain experience in mid-level and high-level leadership roles? How can we best leverage our understanding of human behavior as emerging leaders?

Motivational interviewing: How can we use motivational interviewing to assist chronically mentally ill individuals who struggle with acceptance and compliance? What are the limitations of motivational interviewing in working with some communities and populations?

Problematic workplace behavior in medical and mental health settings: What is the role of psychiatry in assessing and treating health professionals who show up at work with rough edges? How can we effectively address a colleagues problematic behavior in a mental health setting?

Psychiatric supervision of nonphysicians, residents, and colleagues: When it comes to supervision, what best practices and pitfalls should we keep in mind?

Spirituality and psychiatry: What do spirituality-informed psychiatric assessment and treatment look like? How do our own spiritual/religious histories and practices enhance or interfere with our care of patients?

Substance use in psychiatric patients; addiction medicine; and addiction psychiatry: What advice should we be giving patients without substance use disorders about their use of legal and illicit psychoactive substances? As the general subspecialty of addiction medicine grows, what is happening to the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology subspecialty of addiction psychiatry, and where do we go from here?

Traditional psychotherapy and psychiatry: Should all psychiatrists possess knowledge, skills, and experience in psychodynamic psychotherapy? What training and skills in nonpsychodynamic psychotherapies are essential for the practicing psychiatrist?

I look forward to contributing pieces on these and other matters in forthcoming issues of Psychiatric Times. Just as I endeavor to be patient centered and client centered as a physician and coach, my goal here at Psychiatric Times is to be reader centered and learner centered. I look forward to hearing from you.

Dr Adelman is a coaching and consulting psychiatrist, and is board-certified in psychiatry, addiction medicine, and coaching (BCC). He launchedwww.AdelMED.com after 8 years directing Physician Health Services, Inc. Dr Adelman is onthe faculty of the University of Massachusetts Medical School and serves aconsultant in psychiatry in the Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse of McLean Hospital, an affiliate of Harvard Medical School. He serves as Psychiatric Times section editor-at-large.

See original here:
Astonished by How Much There Still Is to Learn and Do - Psychiatric Times

Evolution of anxiety: Humans may show signs of stress to gather support – Study Finds

PORTSMOUTH, United Kingdom Science has finally uncovered the evolutionary reason why we tend to bite our nails, touch our face, or fidget when under stress. To evoke support! Scientists from the University of Portsmouth and Nottingham Trent University report that showing signs of stress may make people more likable and subtly encourage others to act more positively towards them.

Monkeys and apes display similar restless behavior when stressed out as well. So, the research team set out to investigate this instinctive paradox. According to the study, actions like scratching, nail-biting, fidgeting, and touching ones face or hair all tell onlookers that you are in a weakened state. Advertising vulnerability isnt exactly conducive to surviving out in the wild.

We wanted to find out what advantages there might be in signaling stress to others, to help explain why stress behaviors have evolved in humans, says Dr. Jamie Whitehouse, a research fellow at NTUs School of Social Sciences, in a university release.

If producing these behaviors leads to positive social interactions from others who want to help, rather than negative social interactions from those who want to compete with you, then these behaviors are likely to be selected in the evolutionary process. We are a highly cooperative species compared to many other animals, and this could be why behaviors which communicate weakness were able to evolve, he continues.

The investigation found that people are indeed quite capable of accurately noticing when someone around them is experiencing stress. Additionally, those noticing that something was off reacted more positively towards the anxious individuals.

The team recorded each person in their experiment while they participated in a mock presentation and interview session. Importantly, they told each person to prepare these presentations on very short notice. Researchers then showed the interviews to a different group of people they called raters. These raters had to assess the stress level of the people in the recordings.

Sure enough, participants who admitted to feeling stress during the presentation were perceived as being more stressed out by the raters. Those who displayed more stressful behaviors like nail-biting were also rated as being more stressed.

Critically, participants who were perceived as more stressed were also considered more likable by other people. Study authors theorize this may partially explain why primates evolved to outwardly display signs of stress.

If the individuals are inducing an empathetic-like response in the raters, they may appear more likable because of this, or it could be that an honest signal of weakness may represent an example of benign intent and/or a willingness to engage in a cooperative rather than competitive interaction, something which could be a likable or preferred trait in a social partner, explains study co-author Professor Bridget Waller.

This fits with current understanding of expressivity, which tends to suggest that people who are more emotionally expressive are more well-liked by others and have more positive social interactions, she adds.

All in all, these results strongly suggest the average person can accurately detect when someone else is feeling anxious based on their physical behaviors.

Our team is currently investigating whether young children also show this sensitivity to stress states. By looking at childhood we can understand how difficult it is to detect stress, as well as identifying how exposure to adults stress might impact young children, concludes study co-author Dr. Sophie Milward from the University of Portsmouth.

The study is published the journal Evolution and Human Behavior.

Go here to read the rest:
Evolution of anxiety: Humans may show signs of stress to gather support - Study Finds

Tedcore: the self-help books that have changed the way we live, speak and think – The Guardian

You are a victim. A person of anxious experience, navigating a minefield of shame triggers. Research suggests that people with your attachment style are predisposed to dissociating. Some experts believe this very sentence could re-traumatize you. Its not your fault, of course. You just need to reframe your narrative.

This is the language of a coalescing sub-genre of self-help books that combine the comforting yet impenetrable language of modern therapy with pseudoscientific grand theories on human behavior. Youll recognize it from titles like Atlas of the Heart, Atomic Habits, The Body Keeps The Score, Attached, Mating in Captivity, even The Artists Way. None were bestsellers upon release, but all have slow-burned their way to the tops of bestseller lists and the bookshelves of People Who Go To Therapy. These are the new bourgeois bibles foundational texts for a generation of yuppies adrift.

These books peddle feel-good Marvel movie versions of philosophy that dont challenge our conceptions, but validate our feelings, often backing up their circular logic with dubious research and experts. They cajole and condescend, opening neural pathways that lead directly to the authors paywalled Substack.

I call this genre Tedcore. Most of these authors have given Ted talks, and much like the popular conference series, these books are accessible yet vaguely highbrow, prone to presenting the mundane as revelatory. With every new trite slogan she drops, the Ted speaker doesnt just imply, Arent I amazing? she says, Arent we amazing?! Everyone gets to leave feeling smarter and more special. Unlike its pluckier predecessors (Men are From Mars, Women are Venus or How to Win Friends and Influence People), Tedcore doesnt attempt to decode what others are thinking, instead turning the gaze to our navels, pathologizing our every thought.

These books still sing with American optimism yes, you can be happier! but it arrives in the numbing straitjacket of an analyst who swaps Freud for Myers-Briggs. Psychoanalytic concepts desire, sexuality, family dynamics are sanded down until they can be comfortably applied to not getting a promotion at work. Your anxieties are your identity now. You dont need to be fixed. Just discussed. And possibly medicated. For ever.

Few embody the genre more than Bren Brown, who boasts two podcasts; multiple Ted talks; a paid certification course for budding business consultants called Dare to Lead; eight books, including Atlas of the Heart (No 3 on Amazons nonfiction list as of Tuesday); and a new HBOMax series of the same name, where her audience nods approvingly to facile profundities like language is the greatest human portal that we have.

Her book is organized as a dictionary of emotional terms, where, in large font on glossy pages, she demystifies apparently inscrutable emotions like joy or despair by consulting Merriam-Webster then reporting back: Vulnerability is the emotion we experience during times of uncertainty, crisis and emotional exposure. On regret: Both disappointment and regret arise when an outcome was not what we wanted. Curiously, there are no entries for self-pity or narcissism.

Research and studies surface with alarming frequency and vagueness in Browns work, often burnishing her Grand Theory that different words exist: Are curiosity and interest the same thing? Researchers dont agree.

Taking the top spot on Amazon is Atomic Habits: An Easy & Proven Way to Build Good Habits & Break Bad Ones, where the motivational speaker James Clear explains how to lose weight, quit smoking or finally write that screenplay, mostly by renaming things that already exist: stacking is doing something after you do another thing, such as doing yoga after you finish your morning pages. Temptation bundling is offering yourself a little treat for doing your stacked habits. All habits consist of a cue, craving, response, and reward, which he helps illustrate by explaining that when I walk into a dark room and instinctively reach for a light switch, I am satisfying my craving to see. Ah yes, my insatiable lust for vision. Presumably when I blow my nose I am satisfying my nostrils craving to feel empty.

Clear is also fond of the pseudo-fact: People who are high in agreeableness tend to have higher natural oxytocin levels. You can easily imagine how someone with more oxytocin might be inclined to build habits like writing thank-you notes. Soft qualifiers like tend to and easily imagine keep us firmly in the realm of feel-good conjecture. I did not sign up for his online Habits Academy for $299, but I imagine your time might be better spent stacking yoga on top of your morning pages.

In The Subtle Art of Not Giving A F*ck (which apparently gives enough of one to censor its own title), the author Mark Manson leans on Bukowski and other high school male heroes to guide his simplistic mantras, mostly benign euphemisms for getting over yourself, like a Jordan Peterson podcast, or perhaps a cool pastors motivational desk calendar. He offers mild coddling with a Seth-Rogen level of naughtiness: Even if you get run over by a clown car and pissed on by a busload of schoolchildren, its still your responsibility to interpret the meaning of the event and choose a response. Here, too, is a Grand Theory: when something bad happens, its not your fault. But its still your responsibility. I imagine it would also not be your fault if you signed up his online Subtle Art School (More life lived, fewer fucks given) at $149.99 a year, but that, too, would be your responsibility.

Is anything your fault? Probably not, according to The Body Keeps The Score. Released in 2014, it has been on Amazons nonfiction list for 48 weeks now. It is perhaps more responsible than any other text for centering the word trauma in our discourse. This hefty book, by the Dutch psychiatrist Bessel van der Kolk, might seem at odds with Tedcore: it is highly technical, rather academic. The font size is very small. Van der Kolk is a real doctor, who spent decades working with victims of very real trauma the Vietnam war, childhood rape and was treating PTSD before we even called it that.

He argues our bodies remember traumatic events and will chemically induce anxious responses when triggered, even if we know our tragedy is behind us. We meet a woman who binge-eats on dates because of her sexual abuse as a child; a couple who cant sleep after a car accident. Van der Kolk offers evidence that with a combination of pharmaceuticals, specialized forms of CBT and other physical interventions, we might convince our brain to stop reliving trauma in a way that simple talk therapy cant accomplish.

The Body Keeps The Score is convincing enough. But I cant imagine that all the people who keep buying it are solely interested in its science, or have experienced the same level of trauma of its subjects. With its empathetic tone and medical seriousness, The Body Keeps The Score is deeply validating. It confirms a persistent worldview that the way forward is not looking outward, but looking in. Not seeing, but feeling seen. So when the reader is shown images of brain scans of people whove been in a car accident, they internalize this as evidence they are not crazy, that the brain hurts when we are sad: my anxieties are permanent.

Unsurprisingly, the few criticisms of the book I could find online were readers upset that its focus on people who had watched their friends die in Vietnam was not expansive enough a definition of trauma. That as a reader, merely extrapolating these horrors to your own difficulties wasnt validating enough. They want to see themselves in writing.

Those looking for a mirror will surely find it in the aggressively useless Attached, which peddles attachment theory, dividing all people on Earth into three attachment styles secure, anxious and avoidant. Thats it. The book finds endless ways to describe someone (almost always an anxious woman) who dates someone else (an avoidant man) who is simply not that into her.

From its credentialed authors, Amir Levine MD and Rachel Heller MA, we learn that attachment security directs us to the comfort zone while deactivating strategies lead us to the danger zone where our signals are viewed as threats. Translation? Being desperate is off putting. Again, pseudoscience: It is believed that each attachment style evolved in order to increase the survival chances of humans in a particular environment. Who exactly believes this goes unmentioned, as do the psychological professionals who have concluded if people do have certain attachment styles they are subject to change depending on the relationship, rendering the theory somewhat pointless.

One of the few instances of compelling writing in this genre comes from Esther Perel, a Belgian couples therapist and author of Mating in Captivity: Unlocking Erotic Intelligence. A sex-positive European, she name-checks Simone de Beauvoir and looks down on American puritanism. Unlike most of her contemporaries, she is more polemic in her worldview: good sex needs mystery. Distance breeds eroticism. She says things like sexual alchemy and the primal bog of his erotic self. What fun! Writing about sex should feel sexual. It should reference freaky swamps. This is good.

Yet while she is brave enough to speak about the bottoms desire for submission, she still studiously avoids Freud, or truly plumbing the depths of human desire. She has a mission: to get her heterosexual readers in frustrated marriages to have more sex. She doesnt want to scare them off by talking about the Oedipus complex.

It is tempting to locate the desire for the broader, 30,000-foot analyses these books offer to the collective trauma of the pandemic. But times have always been tough. Weve always wanted answers. Lifestyle gurus from Jesus to Gwyneth have always held the attention of the town square, hawking their vision for a better world. I would argue it has more to do with the embrace of therapy as a moral imperative. Tedcore is a product that falls under self-care and affirms our identity. It operates through a modality of wellness: processing your trauma is green juice (and should be just as overpriced). What it ignores is all the things that actually produce anxiety in our society: precarious economies, war, mass migration and the climate crisis, rupturing social fabric. Our families. And perhaps most of all: sex.

The specter of Freud and his greatest obsession haunts these books like a wealthy conservative dad paying for his liberal daughters wedding to a Sarah Lawrence grad; everyones partying on his dime, but no one wants to admit it. All these pathologizing theories are indebted to psychoanalysis, yet he is mentioned rarely, and only in passing. How can we ignore the anxiety of our sexual hangups? Not just does this person like me but why do I want to be slapped during sex? And in 2022 no less? Even Urban Outfitters sells hats that say Daddy. Trends in gender are rapidly evolving, culture wars are still raging, and Gen Z is having less sex than ever. Masculinity is in crisis and we cant even mention dick size? Perhaps because theres nothing pseudo about that science. Its a little too measurable.

As I scoured these pages for evidence that Tedcore was turning us all into narcissists, my own pseudoscientific Grand Theory, I found their call to self-pity increasingly infectious. I began looking for myself. Highlighting passages that could validate me, and my pain: six months ago, my ex-boyfriend left me for his co-worker. Yes, Im still processing the trauma. None of these books were particularly helpful in affirming my victimhood. I wasnt compelled by comparing our attachment styles, nor Bren Browns definition of betrayal: It can cause anger, sadness, jealousy, decreased self-worth, embarrassment, humiliation, shame and even trauma symptoms. How enlightening.

But in Mating in Captivity, I found a kernel of hope: a patient who had been having an affair for years, then finally thought to ask his wife if she ever thought about other men. She responded, Maybe I do. Maybe I dont. Her answer shocked him. Perel offers: Its easy to imagine that youre the mysterious one, the rebel, and shes Penelope sitting at her loom, waiting for you to come home. Maybe she has a few secrets of her own, fantasies of men who can give her what you cant. I realized I had cast my ex-boyfriend as Penelope, incapable of straying. Perels reframing let me take more responsibility! Not that it was my fault, of course. Yet my path to this revelation was one of fixation. I had not replaced my trauma with anything other than navel gazing.

The solutions these books offer invariably encourage us to look outward, take yoga, learn a language, get over our exes, process our trauma by directing our energy towards something new. Mason describes the value of suffering. That happiness requires struggle and something great awaits you on the other side of feeling sorry for yourself. Yet there you sit, alone in your apartment, or next to your sleeping partner, or neck-pillowed in the Delta Sky Lounge, desperately scanning the pages of a self-help book for mentions of the only thing you really care about: you.

More here:
Tedcore: the self-help books that have changed the way we live, speak and think - The Guardian

Relevance of sleep and associated structural changes in GBA1 mouse to human rapid eye movement behavior disorder | Scientific Reports – Nature.com

Haba-Rubio, J. et al. Prevalence and determinants of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder in the general population. Sleep 41, zsx197 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Sasai-Sakuma, T., Takeuchi, N., Asai, Y., Inoue, Y. & Inoue, Y. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of REM sleep behavior disorder in Japanese elderly people. Sleep 43, zsaa024 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Hogl, B., Stefani, A. & Videnovic, A. Idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder and neurodegenerationAn update. Nat Rev Neurol 14, 4055 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Postuma, R. B. Prodromal Parkinsons diseaseUsing REM sleep behavior disorder as a window. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 20, S1S4 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Galbiati, A., Verga, L., Giora, E., Zucconi, M. & Ferini-Strambi, L. The risk of neurodegeneration in REM sleep behavior disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Sleep Med. Rev. 43, 3746 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Krohn, L. et al. GBA variants in REM sleep behavior disorder: A multicenter study. Neurology 95 (8), e1008e1016. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010042 (2020).

CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gan-Or, Z. et al. GBA mutations are associated with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2, 941945 (2015).

CAS Article Google Scholar

Wasserman, D. et al. Restricted truncal sagittal movements of rapid eye movement behaviour disorder. npj Parkinsons Dis. 8, 26 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Ferri, R. et al. REM sleep EEG instability in REM sleep behavior disorder and clonazepam effects. Sleep 40, zsx080 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Inoue, Y., Sasai, T. & Hirata, K. Electroencephalographic finding in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. Neuropsychobiology 71, 2533 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Christensen, J. A. E. et al. Sleep stability and transitions in patients with idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder and patients with Parkinsons disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. 127, 537543 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Valomon, A. et al. A high-density electroencephalography study reveals abnormal sleep homeostasis in patients with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Sci. Rep. 11, 4758 (2021).

ADS CAS Article Google Scholar

Yousaf, T., Kershaw, M., Suarez Contreras, V., Vickers, P., Pagano, G. & Politis, M. Structural changes in non-manifesting GBA mutation carriers and GBA mutation carriers with Parkinsons disease. Mov. Disord. 34. https://movementdisorders.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mds.27795 (2019).

Baker, K. G., Tork, I., Hornung, J. P. & Halasz, P. The human locus coeruleus complex: An immunohistochemical and three dimensional reconstruction study. Exp. Brain Res. 77, 257270 (1989).

CAS Article Google Scholar

Peever, J., Luppi, P. H. & Montplaisir, J. Breakdown in REM sleep circuitry underlies REM sleep behavior disorder. Trends Neurosci. 37, 279288 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Ramaligam, V., Chen, M. C., Saper, C. B. & Lu, J. Perspectives on the rapid eye movement sleep switch in rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Sleep Med. 14, 707713 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Ehrminger, M. et al. The coeruleus/subcoeruleus complex in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder. Brain 139, 11801188 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Clarke, E. et al. Age-related neurochemical and behavioural changes in D409V/WT GBA1 mouse: Relevance to lewy body dementia. Neurochem. Int. 129, 104502 (2019).

CAS Article Google Scholar

Sardi, S. P. et al. CNS expression of glucocerebrosidase corrects alpha-synuclein pathology and memory in a mouse model of Gaucher-related synucleinopathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 1210112106 (2011).

ADS CAS Article Google Scholar

Kim, B. et al. Differential modulation of global and local neural oscillations in REM sleep by homeostatic sleep regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114, E1727E1736 (2017).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Van Gelder, R. N., Edgar, D. M. & Dement, W. C. Real-time automated sleep scoring: Validation of a microcomputer-based system for mice. Sleep 14, 4855 (1991).

Article Google Scholar

Torrence, C. & Compo, G. P. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 79, 6178 (1997).

ADS Article Google Scholar

Zhivomirov, H. On the development of STFT-analysis and ISTFT-synthesis routines and their practical implementation. TEM Journal 8, 5664 (2019).

Google Scholar

Gelegen, C. et al. Excitatory pathways from the lateral habenula enable propofol-induced sedation. Curr Biol 28, 580587 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar

Gelegen, C. et al. Staying awakeA genetic region that hinders alpha2 adrenergic receptor agonist-induced sleep. Eur. J. Neurosci. 40, 23112319 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Wood, T. C. et al. Whole-brain ex-vivo quantitative MRI of the cuprizone mouse model. PeerJ 4, e2632 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M. & Altman, D. G. Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 8, e1000412 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Ramirez-Villegas, J. F. et al. Coupling of hippocampal theta and ripples with pontogeniculooccipital waves. Nature 589, 96102 (2021).

ADS CAS Article Google Scholar

Wasserman, D. et al. Striatal dopaminergic deficit and sleep in idiopathic rapid eye movement behaviour disorder: An explorative study. Nat. Sci. Sleep 13, 19 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Sasai, T., Matsuura, M. & Inoue, Y. Electroencephalographic findings related with mild cognitive impairment in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Sleep 36, 18931899 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Iranzo, A. et al. Electroencephalographic slowing heralds mild cognitive impairment in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. Sleep Med. 11, 534539 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

OReilly, C., Godin, I., Montplaisir, J. & Nielsen, T. REM sleep behaviour disorder is associated with lower fast and higher slow sleep spindle densities. J. Sleep Res. 24, 593601 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Oksenberg, A., Radwan, H., Arons, E., Hoffenbach, D. & Behroozi, B. Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder: A sleep disturbance affecting mainly older men. Isr. J. Psychiatry Relat. Sci. 39, 2835 (2002).

PubMed Google Scholar

Olson, E. J., Boeve, B. F. & Silber, M. H. Rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder: Demographic, clinical and laboratory findings in 93 cases. Brain 123(Pt 2), 331339 (2000).

Article Google Scholar

Massicotte-Marquez, J. et al. Slow-wave sleep and delta power in rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Ann. Neurol. 57, 277282 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Latreille, V., Carrier, J., Montplaisir, J., Lafortune, M. & Gagnon, J. F. Non-rapid eye movement sleep characteristics in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. J. Neurol. Sci. 310, 159162 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Stojkovska, I., Krainc, D. & Mazzulli, J. R. Molecular mechanisms of alpha-synuclein and GBA1 in Parkinsons disease. Cell Tissue Res. 373, 5160 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar

Clarke, E. The unfolded protein response: A potential link between heterozygous mutations in GBA1 and Lewy body dementia? In Wolfson Centre for Age Related Diseases (Kings College London, 2018).

Chan, P. C., Lee, H. H., Hong, C. T., Hu, C. J. & Wu, D. REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Behav. Neurol. 2018, 9421098 (2018).

PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Read more:
Relevance of sleep and associated structural changes in GBA1 mouse to human rapid eye movement behavior disorder | Scientific Reports - Nature.com

Governor Newsom Announces Appointments 5.12.22 | California Governor – Office of Governor Gavin Newsom

SACRAMENTO Governor GavinNewsom today announcedthe following appointments:

Katherine Litzky, 40, of Sacramento, has been appointed Assistant Director of Legislation at the California Department of Conservation, where she has been Legislative Manager since 2021. Litzky was Senior Policy Manager at the California State Parks Foundation from 2015 to 2021, where she was a Policy and Research Specialist from 2007 to 2015. She was an Intern for the Office of California State Assemblymember Lois Wolk in 2006. Litzky is a Board Member of Tree Top Kids, Inc. She earned a Master of Arts degree in Public Policy Administration from California State University, Sacramento. This position does not require Senate confirmation and the compensation is $131,484. Litzky is registered without party preference.

Michelle Baass, 48, of Sacramento, has been appointed to the State Council on Developmental Disabilities. Baass has served as Director at the California Department of Health Care Services since 2021. She held several positions at the California Health and Human Services Agency from 2017 to 2021, including Undersecretary and Deputy Secretary. Baass was Deputy Director and Principal Consultant to the California Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee from 2012 to 2017. She was Deputy Director and Principal Consultant to the California State Senate Office of Research from 2008 to 2012. Baass was Senior Fiscal and Policy Analyst at the California Legislative Analysts Office from 2004 to 2008. She was Manager and Consultant at Accenture from 1996 to 2004. Baass earned a Master of Public Policy and Administration degree from California State University, Sacramento. This position does not require Senate confirmation and there is no compensation. Baass is a Democrat.

Susan DeMarois, 57, of Sacramento, has been appointed to the State Council on Developmental Disabilities. DeMarois has been Director of the California Department of Aging since 2021. She was a Member of the Master Plan for Aging Stakeholder Advisory Committee from 2019 to 2020. DeMarois held several positions at the Alzheimers Association between 1999 and 2021, including Director of Public Policy and Advocacy, California Government Affairs Director and California State Policy Director. She was Assistant Director of Government and Community Relations at the University of California, Davis Health System from 2002 to 2009. DeMarois was Associate Director of Public Policy at LeadingAge California from 1993 to 1999. This position does not require Senate confirmation and there is no compensation. DeMarois is a Democrat.

Elizabeth Liz Laugeson, 50, of Los Angeles, has been appointed to the State Council on Developmental Disabilities. Laugeson has held multiple positions at the UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, including Interim Director at the Tarjan Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities since 2021, where she was Training Director from 2014 to 2021; Program Director of the Autism Center of Excellence Dissemination, Outreach and Education Core since 2017; and Program Director of the Autism and Neurodevelopmental Disabilities Pre-Doctoral Psychology Internship Track since 2016. She has held multiple positions at the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA including Associate Clinical Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences since 2017 and Founder and Director of the UCLA PEERS Clinic in the Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences since 2010. Laugeson was Director of the Help Group UCLA Autism Research Alliance in the Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA from 2007 to 2017, where she was Associate Director of the UCLA Parenting and Childrens Friendship Program from 2007 to 2010. Laugeson is a member of the International Society for Autism Research and the American Psychological Association. She earned a Master of Arts degree in clinical psychology and a Doctor of Psychology degree from Pepperdine University. This position does not require Senate confirmation and there is no compensation. Laugeson is a Democrat.

Aubyn Stahmer, 54, of Sacramento, has been appointed to the State Council on Developmental Disabilities. Stahmer has been a Professor at the University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities at the University of California, Davis MIND Institute since 2015. She was Associate Professor at the University of California, San Diego from 2013 to 2014. Stahmer was Director and Psychologist at the Autism Discovery Institute at Rady Childrens Hospital from 1996 to 2013. She earned a Doctor of Philosophy degree in Psychology from the University of California, San Diego. This position does not require Senate confirmation and there is no compensation. Stahmer is registered without party preference.

###

Continue reading here:
Governor Newsom Announces Appointments 5.12.22 | California Governor - Office of Governor Gavin Newsom