THIS IS HAPPINESSBy Niall Williams

One of the unwritten tenets of the local poetics was that a story must never arrive at a point, or risk conclusion, says Noel Crowe, known as Noe, in the Irish writer Niall Williamss latest novel. And because in Faha time was the only thing people could afford, all stories were long, all storytellers took their, and your, and anyone elses, time, and all gave it up willingly, understanding that tales of anything as aberrant and contrary as human behavior had to be so long that they wouldnt, and in fact couldnt, be finished this side of the grave, and only for the fire going out and the birds of dawn singing might be continuing still.

While this passage is about Noes grandfathers oral storytelling practices, it also serves as an apt description of This Is Happiness. Williams has painted a lush, wandering portrait of Faha, a village back in time in County Clare, Ireland, a place also featured in his previous novel, History of the Rain, which was longlisted for the 2014 Man Booker Prize. History of the Rain is powerfully narrated by a young, bedridden woman who tells stories of her dead fathers life while devouring the books in his library. In this new work, the narrator, Noe, is a 78-year-old man looking back roughly 60 years to the spring of 1958, when he dropped out of the seminary after his mothers death and, full of fear and unprocessed grief, went to live with his grandparents in Faha, where hed spent time as a child. This Is Happiness is as full of detours and backward glances as it is of forward motion and as befits a novel narrated by an old man who comments that as you get toward the end, you revisit the beginning is centrally preoccupied with time itself.

Faha, as we encounter it in 1958, is a forgotten elsewhere, a place where everything has to be invented firsthand and all needs met locally. The tour Noe gives us of the town is full of pleasures: a digression on traveling encyclopedia salesmen; illuminating, often comic descriptions of the social intricacies of church and pub culture; the chemists shop with its once flood-swollen and now lifted-in-places linoleum. Even the cows get some gorgeous lines: In the fields the cattle, made slow-witted by the rain, lifted their rapt and empty faces, heavy loops of spittle hanging, as though they ate watery light.

At times, the novel reads almost like an ethnographic study of a village on the cusp of change, calling to mind John Bergers wonderful fictional trilogy Into Their Labors, set in the French Alps on the eve of industrialization. At the start of the novel, theres only one phone outside the village limits, and its in Noes grandparents home. His grandmother ritualistically prepares stationery and blotting paper to write letters to relations from County Kerry to America. The book is full of both cheerful and fatalistic waiting, whether in line at church or for a letter to arrive or for the rain to stop (or start again). As 21st-century readers, we are invited to lower ourselves into a slower kind of time; we regularly leave the central characters frozen in mid-speech to take a peek at something else.

What through-lines do emerge involve three intersecting plots: the Rural Electrification Schemes bringing of electricity to the town; the arrival of a stranger, Christy McMahon, who hopes to right a wrong from his past; and the awakening of Noes romantic desires, as played out through his hopeless crushes on all three daughters of the local doctor. We witness the brittle frailties and dogged strengths of Noe and Christy, men at very different stages of their lives who nevertheless have each others backs.

Where the books digressions sometimes bog down are in its more self-reflective moments: Noe the storyteller defending himself against charges (but whose?) of sentimentality and holding forth on the relationship between story and truth, the real and the imagined, and the enriching merits of the arts. Disarmingly, Noe is aware of his own flaws, telling us he was nicknamed Know-All as a child. Oh, just shut up and take me back to Faha, I wanted to interject at times. But I couldnt and wouldnt; hes too sweet a fellow, not to mention my elder (and a fictional character). Be kind, he admonishes the reader directly at one point, and its a testament to this bighearted novel that I felt duly chastened, almost like a member of the clan.

Read more:
Once Upon a Time in Ireland - The New York Times

Stable democracies have long been tied to the cultural values of citizens. But the stability of democracies worldwide could be vulnerable if certain cultural values decline,according to anew studypublished inNature Human Behavior.

The findings by researchers from the United States and New Zealand are based on an analysis of survey data from nearly 500,000 individuals from 109 countries.

Damian Ruck, lead author on the study and postdoctoral research fellow in UTs Department of Anthropology, worked withAlex Bentley, professor of anthropology, Luke Matthews from the policy research think tank RAND, and University of Auckland psychologists Quentin Atkinson and Thanos Kyritsis to examine historical changes in countries with varying political systems over 100 years.

It is often taken for granted that democratic culture will just follow once democratic institutions have been installed, said Ruck. But when looking at the data we see cultural values, such as openness and tolerance, precede both economic development and democratization.

Where confidence in institutions such as the government and the media is low, democracy tends to be unstable. In the study, some Western nations were among those with multi-decade declines in institutional confidence.

Despite the declines in institutional confidence and growing nationalism in some Western nations, the study found a global trend toward greater openness and tolerance.

During the last century, the world has become vastly more connected, Ruck said. More of us are exposed to people with different backgrounds and lifestyles, which encourages openness and tolerance, and is good news for the future of democracy.

__

CONTACT:

Brian Canever (865-974-0937,bcanever@utk.edu)

Read the original post:
Study: The Cultural Foundations of Modern Democracies - Tennessee Today

Soumya Balasubramanya and David Stifel

In an era of climate change, countries in the MENA region are increasingly prone to droughts facing 4c increase in future with 50% increase in the chance of drought. Moreover, in the absence of reduced green house gas emissions, droughts are expected to result in losses of 14% of regional GDP by 2050. To better understand the risk factors and the effects of drought in the region, IWMI conducted a survey of 400 commercial fruit farms in Jordan, one the most water-scarce countries in the world. Jordan is heavily dependent on groundwater, which is being rapidly depleted (~1 meter per year), and frequent droughts are increasing this dependence. The IWMI survey finds that of the almost 60% of the farms that faced severe water shortages in the last 10 years, 84% experienced production losses, 57% lost income, and 60% reduced the areas that they cultivated in order to cope with water shortages.

Farmers in the MENA region are being encouraged to adopt water-saving technologies such as drip systems, pressure-compensating pipes, and soil moisture sensors to not only adapt to drought conditions, but to also reduce groundwater depletion and improve its quality by reducing the need to extract water. These are important strategies that are necessary to reduce groundwater use, but they are unlikely to work on their own. IWMIs study in Jordan finds that 90% of farms already use drip systems, and that a majority of these are new. Yet, groundwater depletion continues apace. While the use of pressure-compensating pipes and soil sensors is low and can be increased, evidence suggest that the real problem is irrigation-related behaviors, practices and beliefs about groundwater.

In terms of behaviors, the IWMI study finds that a significant share of Jordanian farmers over-irrigate their crops. Similar to what is observed in other MENA countries, 25% of Jordanian farmers who faced severe water shortages irrigated their trees daily to reduce the risk of crop failure, compared to 14% of farms that had not faced such shortages. Moreover, a third of farmers reported that they irrigated when they felt the need to. Paradoxically, watering fruit trees every day or at improper times during the crop cycle reduces yields, and thus incomes. In order to address these behaviors, authorities need to design and deliver quality irrigation advisory services for farmers and seize the potential of the increased availability of water data and big data tools to catalyze change.

In terms of beliefs, farmers in the IWMI study, especially those who had yet to experience severe water shortages, are generally unaware of groundwater systems and how human behavior contributes to the depletion of groundwater. Farmers who had faced severe water shortages in the previous decade believe that there is only a 58% chance that groundwater levels will fall in the next five years, and a 61% chance that their farm incomes will be lower in the near future. Farmers who had yet to experience such shortages are even less aware. They believe that there is only a 35% chance that groundwater levels will rapidly fall, and a 37% chance that their farm incomes will be lower. These beliefs about groundwater are not particular to Jordan, and have been observed in other MENA countries. Authorities need to provide nudges to sensitize farmers to the links between groundwater use and depletion, and between groundwater use and pumping costs and incomes and shift from centralise to decentralise water management and governance

These results indicate that adopting water-saving technology is not enough on its own to stem groundwater depletion in the MENA region. Publicly-supported programs that provide irrigation advisory services and informational nudges that correct perceptions and beliefs are needed as well. Since farmers in the IWMI study rely on other farmers for agronomic information, and since farmers with large holdings (60+ hectares) who have faced severe water shortages view government agencies as trusted sources of information, these latter farmers may serve as a point of entry as lead-farmers who can share facts and information on improved practices to others in their networks.

Soumya Balasubramanya is Research Group Leader in Economics at the International Water Management InstituteCGIAR. David Stifel is Professor of Economics at Lafayette College, and currently a Sabbatical Research Fellow at the International Water Management InstituteCGIAR.

This publication was made possible partly through the support of the Office of Science and Technology, Bureau for the Middle East, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), under the terms of Award No. AID-ME-IO-15-003. Additional support came from Mercy Corps Jordan, through their USAID-funded program Water Innovations Technologies (Cooperative Agreement #AID-278-A-17-00002, CFDA # 98.001 between USAID and Mercy Corps Jordan).

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development, or of Mercy Corps Jordan.

Read this article:
Change in behaviour needed for improved drought management in Jordan and the MENA region - Jordan - ReliefWeb

The choice to have children is not just a prudential or pragmatic decision, nor can it be justified by appealing to what comes naturally.

By: Christine Overall

I suspect that most people eventually ask themselves the question Why have children? at least once or twice during their lives. In contemporary Western culture, it ironically appears that one needs to have reasons not to have children, but no reasons are required to have them. People who are childless are frequently and rudely criticized and called to account for their situation. One woman who wrote about her decision not to procreate was denounced as bitter, selfish, un-sisterly, unnatural, evil. It is assumed that if individuals do not have children, it is because they are infertile, they are too selfish, or they have just not yet gotten around to it. In any case, they owe their interlocutor an explanation. They cannot merely have decided not to procreate. In contrast, no one says to a newly pregnant woman or the proud father of a newborn, Why did you choose to have that child? What are your reasons? The choice to procreate is not regarded as needing any thought or justification.

Indeed, the philosopher Rosalind Hursthouse says, Just as a special context is needed to make sense of What do you want to have health (or knowledge, or pleasure or virtue) for? so is one needed to make sense of What do you want to have children for?. Unions are blessed not cursed with issue; those who have children are favoured by fortune; the childless are unfortunate; to be unable to have children is a lack, a privation, a misfortune. In other words, Hursthouse thinks it does not make sense, outside of special contexts, to inquire into the motives or reasons for having children. This view suggests that having children is the default position; not having children is what requires explanation and justification.

These implicit assumptions are the opposite of what they ought to be. The so-called burden of proof or what I would call the burden of justification should rest primarily on those who choose to have children. That is, the choice to have children calls for more careful justification and reasoning than the choice not to have children simply because in the former case a new and vulnerable human being is brought into existence whose future may be at risk.

The lack of acknowledgment that childbearing can be a moral choice may be due to its assimilation to other processes thought to be normal parts of human life like the phenomena of falling in love or being sexually attracted to another person. These aspects of human life are often regarded as the product of drives or instincts not amenable to ethical evaluation. For example, philosopher James Lenman claims that asking why we want children is foolish, for it is partly just because were programmed that way much as we are for sex. Some people, women in particular, believe that there is a biological clock inside them that generates a deep drive to have a child. It appears to be more than a simple desire to have a child; it is felt more like a biological force and is therefore very compelling. This drive is sometimes explained in evolutionary terms: Our very biological constitution determines that we bear children. The popular press likes to refer to the existence of a supposed mommy gene. Biologist Lonnie Aarssen writes about an apparently nongendered parenting drive, which he describes as an explicit desire to have children in the future and which involves an anticipated experience of contemporaneous pleasure derived directly from real-time parenthood per se.

There are many urges apparently arising from our biological nature that we nonetheless should choose not to act upon or at least be very careful about acting upon.

The questions we should ask are whether such a desire is either immune to or incapable of analysis and why this desire, unlike virtually all others, should not be subject to ethical assessment. There are many urges apparently arising from our biological nature that we nonetheless should choose not to act upon or at least be very careful about acting upon. Even if Aarssen is correct in postulating a parenting drive, such a drive would not be an adequate reason for the choice to have a child. Naturalness alone is not a justification for action, for it is still reasonable to ask whether human beings should give in to their supposed parenting drive or resist it. Besides, the alleged naturalness of the biological clock is belied by those growing numbers of women who apparently do not experience it or do not experience it strongly enough to act upon it. As psychologist Leta S. Hollingworth wisely noted almost a century ago, There could be no better proof of the insufficiency of maternal instinct as a guaranty of population than the drastic laws which we have against birth control, abortion, infanticide, and infant desertion.

After all, human beings are thoroughly social entities. Our sheer survival means we have been socialized; we live not as individual islands, entire of ourselves, in John Donnes words, but as a part of the main, an acculturated segment of the whole that is humanity. Because we are social beings, we do not just see the world; we instead see the world as we have learned to see it and as we sometimes choose to see it. All human behavior (except perhaps simple reflex actions, such as the movement of the leg in response to a hammer tap on the knee) is a reaction to the world as perceived. Once past the age of early infancy, we do not just respond like automatons to inner promptings. Instead, what and how we perceive and feel are at least in part a function of our experience and our learning. In seeing, hearing, tasting, feeling, or smelling something, we are engaged in a process of interpretation, a process that we have gradually learned as part of our socialization into our particular culture.

The inevitability of interpretation applies to our inner as well as our external environment. For example, if I experience a certain fluttering in my midsection, I may variously interpret it as anxiety, fear, anticipation, happiness, or just the need for a snack. Whatever inner promptings we may experience, they always already contain a social message, and they are always already open to reinterpretation. This description applies to the desire to have a child. Because of the inevitability of interpretation, it does not make sense to blame or credit instinct as the source of behaviors such as having children.

If we fail to acknowledge that the decision whether to have children is a real choice that has ethical import, then we are treating childbearing as an unavoidable fate and a mere expression of biological destiny. Instead of seeing having children as something that women do, we will continue to see it as something that simply happens to women or as something that is merely natural. But whatever our biological inclinations may be, we do have some control over our fertility, and the rapidly declining birthrate in most parts of the world is evidence of that fact.

If we fail to acknowledge that the decision whether to have children is a real choice that has ethical import, then we are treating childbearing as an unavoidable fate and a mere expression of biological destiny.

But there are many things about having children that one cannot know until one actually has them. It might therefore be argued that one cannot know what a childless life will be like until one commits to living it. Given the unknowability of the outcomes of a decision to have a child or not have a child, it may seem unfair to elevate the decision to the level of ethics.

However, many significant ethical decisions are similar to this particular decision: We cannot know or know well all the possible outcomes of the choices we consider. Some things do just have to be experienced. Nonetheless, the indeterminate results of human freedom do not relieve us of the responsibility to consider carefully the moral aspects of our decisions. Moreover, although our own experiences of and reactions to having a child or remaining childless may be difficult to predict, it is possible to observe the effects on other people who have made those decisions. We are surrounded by people who have had children or have chosen not to. As with many important life decisions, we can learn something about the nature of the choices by observing others who have already made them. So the difficulty of making the choice whether to have a child or not and the unknowability of the outcome in ones own case do not preclude seeing procreation as an ethical decision.

Nevertheless, it might be objected that the question whether to reproduce or not is merely prudential, not ethical that it is like other major life decisions, such as whom to marry (or whether to marry), where to live, what career to choose, and so on. These decisions affect primarily the choosers welfare; hence, they are not inherently ethical issues.

But virtually every area of human life has ethical dimensions, including seemingly pragmatic choices of what to eat, what form of transportation to use, how to heat or cool ones home, and so on. We can no longer assume that so-called private life is only personal and therefore in principle immune to ethical examination. Questions about choosing whether to have children are of course prudential in part; that is, they are in part practical in nature, and they are concerned about what is or is not in ones own interests. But they are also ethical questions, for they are about whether to bring a person (in some cases more than one person) into existence and that person cannot, by the very nature of the situation, give consent to being brought into existence. Such questions therefore profoundly affect the well-being both of existing persons (the potential parents, siblings, grandparents, and all the other people with whom the future child may interact) and of potential persons.

Children are both vulnerable and dependent; they will have a lifelong emotional interdependence with their parents. Procreation decisions are about whether to take on responsibility for a new life or new lives. Questions about choosing to procreate are also closely tied to how we define our own lives and how we interact with our social and physical environments.

These decisions also have profound implications for the community or communities in which we live. Philosopher Mianna Lotz argues, There exists a (generally unacknowledged) distinctly collective interest in procreation being undertaken with a seriousness, intent and purposiveness that reflects and expresses concern or regard for the moral community itself, understood at its broadest level as comprising both moral agents and moral subjects. This collective interest requires us to relinquish our relatively recent yet now widespread preoccupation with procreation as principally, even exclusively, a private and individual matter. Questions of procreative morality are not posed exclusively within the sphere of private individual morality or the procreatorchild relationship, but always fall also within the scope of collective morality.

When it comes to choosing whether to have children or not, there is a moral right and wrong to the choice, or at least a moral better and worse.

Lotz suggests several possible explanations of why our specific reasons for procreating matter morally. One possibility is that our reasons are predictive of the quality of parenting, and derivatively of the quality of life or welfare of the future child. However, Lotz says, the empirical information available does not suggest much of a connection between procreative motivations and parenting capacity. Instead, factors such as parental mental ill health, domestic violence, alcohol and drug misuse, and socioeconomic deprivation better predict bad parenting, including the abuse and neglect of children.

But notice that some of these factors might in certain cases also affect parental motivations. For example, a woman who is the target of domestic violence might want to have a child because of the illusion that doing so will eliminate the abuse. Or a woman who is addicted to alcohol might think that having a child will somehow help her to stop drinking. Because children generally do not solve their parents problems, the implausibility of these reasons suggests that a motive for procreation might in some cases predict potential problems in how the child is treated. That is, some parental motivations might be indirect predictors of bad parenting. (In my book, I argue that at least one motivation for parenting the quest for a savior sibling for an existing child who is ill does have a substantial effect on how the new baby will be treated.) More generally, we cannot be indifferent to the potential implications of procreative motives for parenting behavior.

A more plausible explanation, Lotz says, for why our reasons for having children matter lies in what children express: the meaning or message (whether it is intended or not) that is conveyed by ones procreative motivation, whether it is conveyed to family members, to people outside the family, or even to the child herself. I agree that our procreative motivations may have this signaling effect. And even if this particular effect is small, our motives for procreating (or not) remain morally significant for the other reasons I have suggested. When it comes to choosing whether to have children or not, there is a moral right and wrong to the choice, or at least a moral better and worse.

Although choosing to have children or not to have children may involve many feelings, motives, impulses, memories, and emotions, it can and should also be a subject for careful reflection. Whereas in the past procreation was not a matter to which womens will or ideas or decisional capacity had much application, now it is something that women can potentially control, that they can make truly their own. As Lori Leibovich points out in her book Maybe Baby, Couples can opt out of parenthood, women can have children into their fifties, single women can procreate on their own, and gays and lesbians can start families or not. All of the old rules about childbearing no longer apply. Moreover, the decision whether to have a biologically related child or not is one that may be made repeatedly over a period of years. Many women (and men) do not simply choose once and for all whether to become parents; rather, they make decisions about their life goals and parenting plans on several occasions, including during pregnancy itself.

As philosopher Diana Tietjens Meyers observes, When asked why they want or dont want to have children, most people are flummoxed. Highly articulate individuals lose their fluency, grope for words, and stumble around, seizing on incompatible explanations and multiplying justifications. On its face, choosing whether to have children may not seem like the sort of decision that is deserving or even capable of analysis. That doesnt mean it isnt.

Christine Overall is Professor Emerita of Philosophy and University Research Chair in the Department of Philosophy at Queens University, Kingston, Ontario. She is the author of, among other books, Why Have Children?, from which this article is adapted.

Read the rest here:
Why Choosing to Have Children Is an Ethical Issue - The MIT Press Reader

This color-coded map shows global surface temperature anomalies. Higher-than-normal temperatures are shown in red, and lower-than-normal temperatures are shown in blue.

The computer models used over the past five decades to predict the impact of future global warming have turned out to be very accurate so far, a new study has found.

Climate scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and NASA evaluated climate models from the early 1970s into the late 2000s to see how well they predicted the actual global mean surface temperature, based on levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

They also looked at how well the models matched the relationship between warming and changes in levels of greenhouse gases.

Of the 17 climate projections examined, 14 effectively matched observations after they were published, according to the study published Wednesday in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

(MORE: Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Projected to Set Another Record This Year)

Estimating how much greenhouse gas will be emitted in the future is difficult because it involves human behavior, how well the economy is doing and government policy. Rolling back emission regulations on new cars, for example, adds more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.

"We did not focus on how well their crystal ball predicted future emissions of greenhouse gases, because that is a question for economists and energy modelers, not climate scientists," Zeke Hausfather, a UC Berkeley doctoral student and lead author of the study, said in a news release. "It is impossible to know exactly what human emissions will be in the future. Physics we can understand, it is a deterministic system; Future emissions depend on human systems, which are not necessarily deterministic."

So, according to Gizmodo's Earther blog, the researchers put the actual amount of global greenhouse emissions into the models to see if they would accurately predict global temperature rise since the models were created.

That found the models were quite accurate.

"The earliest models were so skillful because the fundamental science behind the greenhouse effect and global warming is well established and fairly straightforward," Henri Drake, a co-author of the study and an MIT doctoral student, told Mashable.

"The real message is that the warming we have experienced is pretty much exactly what climate models predicted it would be as much as 30 years ago," Hausfather said. "This really gives us more confidence that today's models are getting things largely right as well."

The Weather Companys primary journalistic mission is to report on breaking weather news, the environment and the importance of science to our lives. This story does not necessarily represent the position of our parent company, IBM.

See the article here:
Nailed It: Early Climate Models Have Accurately Predicted Effects of Global Warming, Study Finds - The Weather Channel

Two productions of The Nutcracker abridged for children will take the stage Saturday at the Newport Beach Central Library, 1000 Avocado Ave.

The performances, from the Fountain Valley-based Festival Ballet Theatre, will start at 2 and 3:30 p.m.

Admission is free and seating is available on a first-come, first-served basis.

Ticket distribution for both shows will start at 1 p.m.

Participants will toe-toe-toe the line Saturday during the sixth annual Run for a Claus at UC Irvine.

Registration starts at 6:30 a.m. Along with 5K and 1-mile courses for runners and walkers, the event will include festive activities such as a holiday expo, seasonal costumes and an appearance by Santa Claus.

For more information, or to register, visit runforaclaus.com.

Santa Claus will make his grand entrance to Lido Marina Village in Newport Beach by boat on Saturday.

The event at 3434 Via Lido starts at 10 a.m. and also will include a petting zoo, face painting and holiday music. For more information, visit bit.ly/2rSKcqu.

Hundreds gathered for last years holiday tree-lighting ceremony at Crystal Cove State Park.

(File Photo)

Crystal Cove State Parks tree-lighting ceremony and holiday bazaar will take place Saturday from 10 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

The 23rd annual event will take place near Pacific Coast Highway and Los Trancos and include an appearance from Santa Claus, performances from carolers and free hot chocolate. Santa is scheduled to arrive at the beach at 4 p.m., with the tree-lighting ceremony following at 5:15.

Parking is $5 an hour, though shuttles will be available at the lots north of the historic district at Pelican Point.

Furnishing Hopes Home Store in Newport Beach will host a pop-up holiday market Saturday from noon to 6 p.m.

The event will include raffles, prizes and childrens activities.

The store is in the Westcliff Plaza, 1100 Irvine Ave. For more information, visit FurnishingHope.org.

Fountain Valleys tree-lighting ceremony is scheduled Saturday from 4:30 to 8 p.m. at the city Recreation Center, 16400 Brookhurst St.

The lighting will take place between 5 and 5:45 p.m., and fireworks will follow immediately afterward.

The event also will include an appearance from Santa Claus, food and live entertainment.

For more information, call (714) 839-8611.

The 12th annual Polar Express event presented by L3 Real Estate is set for 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. Saturday at Costa Mesas Estancia Park, 1900 Adams Ave.

Free activities will include small-train rides, pictures with Santa Claus, letter writing to Santa, face painting, cookie decorating, ornament making and firetruck viewing.

L3 Real Estate has joined with the Costa Mesa Fire Departments annual Operation Give Back toy drive to raise awareness of the need for toys this holiday season. Visitors to the Polar Express are asked to bring an unwrapped gift or a gift card valued at $10.

The Fire Department is collecting donated toys through Dec. 20 at all its fire stations.

For questions about the Polar Express, call (714) 444-4663, ext. 101, or visit thel3.com/polar-express.php.

The Resort at Pelican Hill in Newport Coast will school children ages 5 and older on how to decorate a gingerbread house Saturday and Dec. 15 at 10 a.m.

The classes cost $95, plus tax and a service charge. Parental supervision is required for children 10 years old and younger. For more information, visit pelicanhill.com/family-fun.

The resort is at 22701 Pelican Hill Road South.

The Fountain Valley-based Festival Ballet Theatre will stage performances of The Nutcracker starting Saturday through Dec. 24 at the Irvine Barclay Theatre, 4242 Campus Drive.

For more information, or to buy tickets, visit festivalballet.org.

Pooches will put on a show at the OC Fair & Event Center this weekend.

The Holiday Classic Dog Show, presented by the Shoreline Dog Fanciers Assn. of Orange County, will run Saturday and Sunday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Admission is free. Parking is $9.

For more information, visit ocfair.com/events.

The Orange County Fair Super Pass for all 23 days of the 2020 season in Costa Mesa went on sale Wednesday. The general admission pass is being offered for $25 until Feb. 27. After that, the price will go up to $30 through May 28 and to $35 from May 29 to Aug. 14.

The OC Fair & Event Center also announced that tickets for two performances in the 2020 Toyota Summer Concert Series at the Pacific Amphitheatre will go on sale at 10 a.m. Saturday via Ticketmaster.

The Happy Together Tour returns at 8 p.m. July 19 with the Turtles, Chuck Negron (formerly of Three Dog Night), the Association, Mark Lindsay (formerly of Paul Revere & the Raiders), the Vogues and the Cowsills.

Viva El Mariachi will return at 6 p.m. Aug. 9 with Mariachi Sol de Mexico de Jose Hernandez, Shaila Durcal, Mariachi Reyna de Los Angeles and more.

For more information, visit ocfair.com.

Morgan Halverson of the band Circus Joy walks on stilts during the 2013 Corona del Mar Christmas Walk.

(File Photo)

The 41st annual Corona del Mar Christmas Walk will take place Sunday from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Admission is free for the community-wide event, which will include live entertainment, food, games and prizes.

The Christmas Walk is organized by the Corona del Mar Chamber of Commerce. For more information, visit bit.ly/2ORHuuc.

Orange Coast College music instructor Adam Pettit will direct a performance of the schools guitar ensemble at 3 p.m. Sunday in the on-campus Robert B. Moore Theatre.

The event will include soloists, small ensembles and a guitar orchestra. Bokyung Byun, a South Korean guitarist, also will perform.

Tickets are available for $10 at the door or by calling (714) 432-5880 or visiting occtickets.com.

OCC is at 2701 Fairview Road.

The Port Theater will celebrate its 70th anniversary Sunday during the Christmas Walk After Party.

The event will include a live performance by Flashback Heart Attack, an 80s cover band.

Tickets are $5 in advance or $10 at the door. Guests must be at least 21 years old to attend.

For more information, or to buy tickets, visit portnewport.com or call (949) 723-6333. The theater is at 2905 E. Coast Hwy. in Corona del Mar.

The annual Light a Light of Love celebration will return to Huntington Beach Sunday from 3:30 to 7 p.m.

The event at Pier Plaza, at the corner of Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway, will include live entertainment, a childrens holiday parade, a visit from Santa Claus and a snowflake lighting at 6 p.m.

Proceeds benefit Waymakers, a nonprofit that runs an emergency youth shelter and intervention programs.

For more information and an event schedule, visit waymakersoc.org.

The Laguna Playhouse will present performances of Sisters Christmas Catechism, a holiday murder mystery, at 7:30 p.m. on Monday and Tuesday.

TIckets are $46 and available at lagunaplayhouse.com.

The playhouse is located at 606 Laguna Canyon Road.

Newport Beach Mayor Diane Dixon speaks during an event this year.

(File Photo)

Newport Beach will honor outgoing Mayor Diane Dixon, as well as the citys new mayor and mayor pro tem, during an event Tuesday.

The 2019 Mayors Reception and Chamber Volunteer Award Ceremony will start at 6:30 p.m. at Back Bay Bistro, located in the Newport Dunes Waterfront Resort & Marina at 1131 Back Bay Drive.

Tickets are $45 a person. Reservations are required and can be made by calling (949) 729-4411 or visiting newportbeach.com.

The Placemaking Roadshow which celebrates Orange Countys diversity will take place Tuesday at Centennial Farm in Costa Mesa.

Admission is free for the event, which runs from 6 to 8 p.m. For more information, visit heritagefuture.org/placemaking-roadshow.

Centennial Farm is located within the OC Fair & Event Center, 88 Fair Drive.

The Huntington Beach Academy for the Performing Arts will present its annual holiday concert on Dec. 12 and 13.

Shows start at 7 p.m. in the Huntington Beach High School Theatre, 1905 Main St.

Tickets are available at hbapa.org/see and cost $22 for adults and $16 for students and seniors. For more information, call (714) 822-1151.

Patrons also are asked to bring new, unwrapped toys to donate to Toys for Tots.

Families check out the Snoopy House holiday display at Costa Mesa City Hall in 2016.

(File Photo )

Snoopy and the rest of the Peanuts gang will take up their seasonal residence at Costa Mesa City Hall next week.

The Snoopy House holiday display will be at City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, from Dec. 13 to 22.

The themed display has been a city tradition since 1966. It includes free train rides, cider, photos with Santa Claus and live performances.

For more information, visit costamesaca.gov/snoopyhouse.

Pacific City in Huntington Beach will be the venue for this years State of the County.

The Dec. 13 event will run from 8 to 11 a.m. and include remarks by local legislators and business organizations about challenges facing Orange County such as homelessness, affordable housing, workforce development and education.

State of the County will take place in Pacific Citys Level 2 Ocean Front Suite, 21010 Pacific Coast Hwy.

Fairview Commons, a senior-living community in Costa Mesa, has been renamed Coastal Heights Senior Living. The property at 2283 Fairview Road is now operated by Carlsbad-based Integral Senior Living.

Amenities at the community include a beauty salon, fitness center and crafts center. For more information, visit coastalheightsseniorliving.com.

Xperience Restaurant Group, the Cypress-based parent company of El Torito, has acquired Sol Cocina in Newport Beach and Solita Tacos & Margaritas in Huntington Beach.

Our goal from day one has been to optimize our existing brands while simultaneously identifying attractive opportunities for growth, said XRG Chief Executive Randy Sharpe, in a statement. With the rapid transformation of the casual dining sector in recent years, it is more important than ever for brands to provide a unique experience for customers, which has long been a hallmark of both Sol and Solita. These brands are a natural fit for our portfolio as we grow the XRG platform.

The city of Newport Beach and the Irvine Ranch Conservancy have converted the Buck Gully and Bobcat trails in Buck Gully Reserve into one-way directional trails for bicycles.

Cyclists can now only travel northeast toward the San Joaquin exit on the Buck Gully Trail and travel uphill on the Bobcat Trail to Harbor Watch Park.

The city says the change was meant to improve safety on the popular, multi-use trails narrow sections and blind corners.

The UC Irvine Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders recently recruited Alzheimers disease researcher Dr. David Sultzer to oversee its clinical research operations, according to a news release.

Sultzer is a clinical professor of psychiatry and human behavior. The university said he plans to incorporate his understanding of the human struggles with these behavioral changes into the fabric of clinical trials, which he also did while at UCLA.

The Vans logo adorns the companys headquarters in Costa Mesa.

(File Photo)

Vans recently donated more than $1 million to Imagination.org, a Los Angeles-based nonprofit that works to foster creativity in children around the world.

The donation from the Costa Mesa-based company will form new chapters of the group, strengthen current chapters and help more than 10,000 children, according to a news release.

The Fountain Valley Police Department is recruiting new members for its Retired Senior Volunteer Program, according to a news release.

Members patrol streets in marked cars, remove illegal signs and perform other tasks. For more information, call Joanne Minney at (714) 593-4526.

Support our coverage by becoming a digital subscriber.

Read the original:
Around Town: Free productions of 'The Nutcracker' for kids coming to N.B. - Los Angeles Times

Within the next 30 years, the number of Americans living with Alzheimers Disease will likely grow by an estimated 240 percent. By the end of that 30-year mark, the disease and other dementias will cost the United States nearly $1.1 trillion. In seniors, it kills more patients than breast cancer and prostate cancer combined. Every 65 seconds, a person in the U.S. develops Alzheimers, according to the Alzheimers Association. But how has research into this disease changed over the years, how has the University shaped this research and where is it leading to now?

Over the past ten years, there have been significant advances made in the understanding of and approach to a disease that currently has no cure. This past September, the University received the largest federal grant in its history to research care for Alzheimers disease as part of this effort.

Alzheimers disease, or what may be more accurately referred to as a syndrome because its cause is unknown, is a form of dementia a mental condition characterized by issues in cognitive functioning and difficulties with daily activities.

Early treatments for Alzheimers Disease

There are at least two distinctions of AD: clinical and pathological. Clinical syndrome AD specifically refers to individuals with symptoms of dementia. In contrast, pathological Alzheimers refers to the phenomena of amyloid plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles in the brain, both characterized by buildups of their respective proteins. Traditionally, pathological AD is identified post-mortem, or after death; but over the past ten years, two newer techniques that can identify pathological AD in living people have been created: PET scans and lumbar punctures. In recent years, researchers have begun exploring a third and more accessible test a blood screen.

More recently, people have also associated mutations in three specific genes as predictors of AD. But in an article published this year in Nature, Assistant Professor of Opthalmology Joseph Arboleda-Velasquez at Harvard Medical School and his group showed that there may be a mutation that can delay the progression of AD.

Over the years, the way people have thought about the underlying pathology of AD has evolved. In the 1990s, people believed that it was caused by a deficiency in neurotransmission how nerves communicate in the brain. Then, researchers began thinking that it was amyloid plaques that caused the disease, and that these plaques would build up for years before an individual was finally diagnosed. In a clinical trial known as the A4 study, coordinated at the University of Southern California, researchers tested an anti-amyloid therapy, but it failed clinically. Scientists have theorized that perhaps this failure was caused because the patients were treated too late to counteract the disease.

The last decade in research at Brown and the greater University community

Brian Ott, professor of neurology at the University and director of the Alzheimers Disease and Memory Disorders Center, managed a clinical site used for the testing of Tacran, the first drug to clinically succeed for Alzheimers treatment. Tacran targeted the deficiencies in neurotransmission, one of the early hypothesized causes of AD. All of a sudden, people saw Alzheimers as something that was treatable, Ott said. Unfortunately, Tacran has since been found to be toxic to the liver.

Ott also conducted clinical trials for Memantine, which is the last Alzheimers drug to have been approved by the FDA in the last 16 years. Memantine blocks NMDA, a receptor found in nerve cells. While Memantine appears to be safe for human use, it only targets explicit symptoms of dementia and does not actually prevent the diseases progression. Memantine is one of only two types of currently approved treatments.

Earlier this year, Ott and his team collaborated with the lab run by William Heindel, professor of cognitive, linguistic and psychological sciences at the University, in a large, controlled clinical trial. Their research showed that transcranial magnetic stimulation, which uses magnetic fields to stimulate neurons and is often used to treat depression, could potentially also treat dementia.

Currently, TMS is approved for the treatment of Alzheimers disease in various countries in Europe and Asia but not the U.S., Ott said.

In 2013, University researchers began clinical trials for the drug Aducanumab at the Rhode Island and Butler Hospitals in coordination with biotechnology company Biogen. Named the EMERGE clinical trials, these tests administered high doses of anti-amyloid treatment, similar to the A4 trials. Aducanumab is being submitted to the FDA in 2020 for approval for what may be the first disease-modifying Alzheimers treatment since 2003. But scientists remain wary, given that only one of their two clinical trials showed success.

Recent advances in improving Alzheimers care

Stephen Salloway, professor of neurology and psychiatry and human behavior at Alpert Medical School and director and establisher of the Memory and Aging program at Butler Hospital, has conducted more than 100 clinical trials on AD and related disorders. The cost of care for Alzheimers is already greater than that of cancer and heart diseases, taking to account formal and informal costs, Salloway said.

About four years ago, Salloways program became the first to perform an infusion using an antibody that targeted beta amyloid to try to prevent AD. Unfortunately, the clinical trial was not successful, but it does have implications for future research.

At the community level, Salloway and his program are organizing prevention swab parties all around the state. These swab parties allow people to swab their cheeks; the research team can then use genetic tests to identify Alzheimers risk genes. If someone tests positive for any of the risk genes, they become eligible to participate in research studies.

In 2011, Ott received a grant from the National Institutes of Health to start the Rhode Island Alzheimers Prevention Registry. Families can sign up for these registries, and they are sent monthly newsletters and announcements for recruitment to prevention-related studies. Butler Hospital also has a prevention registry run by Salloway that allows people to sign up for studies and receive updates on current research. These registries are important venues to reach out to the public, Salloway said.

More recently, the Carney Institute of Brain Science has made it a greater priority for the University to study diseases like Alzheimers. With increased funding, the Institute has been able to recruit more faculty, including Yu-Wen Alvin Huang, assistant professor of molecular biology, cell biology and biochemistry. Huang came from a Stanford Nobel Laureate lab and is developing a chip brain model to study AD signaling pathways. This year, the University also opened the Institute for Translational Neuroscience, which aims for scientists who work in clinical and lab settings to work together on brain disease-oriented research.

Largest federal grant in University history

This past September, the University was awarded a $53 million grant for Alzheimers research, which will be co-led by Vincent Mor, professor of health services, policy and practice. Mor conducts his public health research in nursing homes where 70 percent of his research population has dementia. Over the past ten years, he has seen dementia research generally move from observational work to more intervention-based studies.

In an early project, Mor examined whether there was a relationship between the amount of money spent to fund nursing homes and the self-reported experiences of their residents. The study showed that more money correlated to a decrease in self-reported negative experiences.

In an ongoing project, Mor has been studying music and memory in an effort to create personalized music for people with advanced stages of Alzheimers. He hopes these programs can be implemented in nursing home settings to reduce treating patients with antipsychotic drugs. As a public health professional, Mor explains that just as public health focuses on the population, we focus on the population of people with dementia. When we have that information, we can identify things that work for the (entire) population, not just a handful of subjects.

The $53 million grant will fund projects across the country like the one completed by Mor and his team in nursing homes.

The notion that you can take existing, large administrative data collected by providers and turn it into a data system to test outcomes in a large population base is being used more in the field, Mor said.

Read more:
The last 10 years in Alzheimer's research: No cure, but care improves - The Brown Daily Herald

By James Preston Allen, Publisher

The era that we have come to know as the 60s actually started much earlier 1955 to be exact. It began with simple act of defiance by a woman of color refusing to give up her seat on a segregated bus in Montgomery, Alabama. Rosa Parks would eventually become a national symbol for the civil rights movement and Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. would become a Nobel Prize recipient before he was assassinated and martyred just as he began to speak out against the war in Vietnam and fight for economic justice for the working class.

In November 1963, I was just a month shy of turning 13 when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas. It was a devastating shock to this nation. Im not sure we have ever quite recovered from nor come to a full understanding of its significance. Yet, from that time through all of the riots, demonstrations and subsequent murders of political leaders that followed, it formed a national consciousness that remains to this day. It even influences those who were not yet born then. The end of the Vietnam War, the Watergate scandal and the impeachment of a sitting president Richard M. Nixon punctuated this era of the 1960s. The echos of that impeachment is whats resonating in the current congressional proceedings.

Recently, I was invited to lecture to a class at Los Angeles Harbor College to a class of students recently. Most of the students werent even born in the past century. I was asked to frame the history of the 60s in something other than a textbook version, something more personal. It could have been a lecture on the influence of rock n roll, The Beatles, The Rolling Stones and The Who, but this was a history class.

So I started telling them about high school in 1964 about how some of my friends and I started the first off campus newspaper, which had to be published anonymously because it was not sanctioned by the school administration. In those days, student free speech was not protected and we all would have been expelled from school if we had been caught.

I recounted how one clever teacher, Mr. Wooten, figured out the identity of the main culprit behind the unsanctioned newspaper and convinced the school counselor to put me in his honors social studies class. It was an honor my grades at that time didnt support. I was the kind of student he wanted in his class who would ask questions that others would not. Looking back, much of what I read and discussed in that one class has informed me ever since.

It was during this same time that my father paid for me to take a trip to the United Nations in New York and Washington D.C., ostensibly to see how government worked. At the U.N. we saw the famous painting of Guernica by Pablo Picasso and the huge room of the general assembly. And then, it was off to the nations capital.

We arrived on April 3, 1968 and our chaperones had planned for us mostly white suburban kids to have an interracial dance party with some of the inner city kids from the District of Columbia. Just as the music started to kick up, the party was stopped by the news of Dr. Martin Luther King Jrs assassination that day in Memphis, Tenn. The women began to cry, the men shook their heads and the teenagers all stopped and held their breath. Its the saddest dance party that Ive ever attended.

The outrage in the neighborhoods surrounding the National Mall exploded that evening and our adult handlers evacuated us back to our hotel rooms with orders not to leave. By nightfall, the grief and the outrage escalated into riots and fires. The National Guard was called in to occupy the Mall and protect the national monuments. I didnt sleep much that night. By the next morning, we were still under orders not to go outside, but in my usual sense of curiosity I snuck out, anyway, onto the National Mall. There, to my amazement, were rows of concertina wire and machine guns guarding the Supreme Court and the steps to the U.S. Congress. The smell of tear gas and smoke lingered in the air. There was a pregnant silence like a battlefield after the shooting stops and I thought to myself, If my father wanted me to see how government actually worked, he really got his moneys worth! This was history in the making and I took pictures with my square Kodak camera and never forgot this.

Back in Los Angeles, on June 4 of the same year, on the night of the California Democratic primary Robert Kennedy, the leading contender for nomination to run against Richard Nixon, was assassinated at the Ambassador Hotel. Again the nation was in mourning and the question of where this nation would have gone if he, his brother, John, and Dr. King had lived still haunts us like a giant question mark.

My question to these mostly young people the other day (if not to ourselves generally) is whether our history is just circling back on us with issues unresolved from before? Racism and seemingly endless foreign wars and now a corrupt president who, very much like Nixon before him, is willing to flaunt the U.S. Constitution in order to maintain power.

My answer is that it is up to each generation to protect the liberties enshrined in our Constitution and the Bill of Rights. For even as technology has changed, human behavior has barely evolved. The ghosts of our past are very much with us today, even as they place a statue of Rosa Parks near the Montgomery, Ala. bus stop this week, where she was once arrested.

See more here:
Ghosts of Vietnam and Memphis - Random Lengths

Its been a tough year for the trucking business. And the outlook for next year isnt looking any rosier.

Despite a growing economy, many truckers continued to struggle with lower than desired shipping rates and shipment levels. Tariffs took their toll, manufacturing continued to contract and the closely watched Cass Freight Index which measures North American freight volumes and expenditures logged yet another decline, its eleventh in a row, this October. Not only that but trucking companies in California are now fighting a new law that will require them to reclassify how they treat their independent drivers.

The evidence overwhelmingly suggests 2020 is going to be a very, very tough year, industry analyst Kenny Vieth said at a recent conference. Freight recovery is dependent on the speed at which equipment supply and freight demand are brought back into line.

On top of all that, trucking companies across the country are now approaching a national compliance deadline that while it will certainly contribute to improved measurement and safety is also just as certainly to add more costs. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrations rule, which goes into effect on 16 December, will require all trucks on American roads to be outfitted with an electronic logging device (ELD). The purpose of the new technology, according to the FMCSA is to help create a safer work environment for drivers, and make it easier and faster to accurately track, manage, and share records of duty status.

Unfortunately, many trucking companies have put things off until the last minute and some experts are concerned that these companies are underestimating the time and costs to make this technology transition. Besides potential problems with connectivity or software bugs, fleets might (also) have problems with hardware, Ken Evans, the founder and CEO of Konexial, an ELD solutions company told Freight Waves. Evans also noted that human behavior shouldnt be taken for granted. Learning a new piece of software and working around with the hours of service rules is a big change for people, he said.

There is one bit of good news, however. According to industry reports like this one, another rule that was about to go into effect in December a rule which would require truckers to provided mandated training to entry level drivers will likely be delayed for two years. Of course, more and better training particularly for new drivers seems like a pretty darn good idea. But unfortunately the states and federal people still need more time to get themselves aligned. Im sure many trucking company executives welcome the breather.

You would think that running a trucking company in 2020 would be a profitable affair, given a strong environment for consumer sales and online shopping. But shippers particularly smaller shippers continue to face driver shortages, significant competition, trade uncertainty, manufacturing declines and government regulations that present many challenges. Yes, as I wrote here previously, some managers could do a better job at forecasting their demand and managing their cash flow during these challenging times.

But Im betting that even the best managers in the trucking business are struggling to navigate their companies through the coming year and wondering when things will get better.

See the original post here:
2020 looks set to be a tough year for the American trucking industry - The Guardian

Person having feet up under blanket and watching TV

Despite decades of predictions that different types of internet usage would usurp TV viewing, how much TV and video Americans watch has actually gone up in the last 25 years. And now that weve entered the holiday season, screen time is about to reach another peak for most people in the western world. The days will be at their shortest, the weather cold, children will be out of school, and both broadcasters and online TV companies will be promoting and screening some of their best new shows as well as favorite old holiday movies. But why, when there are now so many other potential distractions in our fast-paced world, do people continue to watch so much TV and video?

According to new research byLondon Business School professorPatrick Barwiseand senior researchersSteven BellmanandVirginia Bealat the University of South Australia, its because TV viewing still meetsour psychological needs to relax and escape, as well as being a much cheaper time filler than other activities, and is now more available than ever.

The new study, along withNielsen Media Research, shows that offline viewing of TV has remained constant for the past 25 years, but the growth of online viewing has led to a 15% bump in the overall consumption of television and video. In fact, we now, on average, spend about a quarter of our lives watching moving pictures on a screen and most of this is still live or time-shifted TV on a TV set.

On one hand, the increase in sedentary activities has been shown to lead to a plethora ofnegative mental and physical health effects. But on the other hand, previous media research (including Professor Barwises own earlier studies of viewing behavior) has suggested that watching television helps people relax and allows them, at least temporarily, to escape from their day-to-day worries.

The new study confirms this interpretation by drawing together the results of recent lab-based research using electroencephalography (EEG) and reaction-time measures. More specifically, the authors found that watching TV and video generated brainwaves associated with pleasant, wakeful relaxation and absorbed cognitive capacity, taking viewers minds off other things. They conclude that viewing has increased because it still meets the same basic psychological needs as in the past but we now have many more opportunities to meet those needs throughout the day and, increasingly, wherever we are.

Evolution Not Revolution

The average U.S. adult (18 and older) now watches almost six hours of television and video per day. That's around 30% of waking hours. And, despite all the hype, theres been less change in the patterns underlying this viewing than you might think.

The explosion in television and video distribution technologies since the 1970s has led to more complex viewing patterns, but the changes so far have been evolutionary, not revolutionary, according to the research, published in theJournal of Advertising Research. The authors say that when, where and how people watch as well as why has changed little, with the new patterns of viewing being mostly additional to the old ones, rather than replacing them.

Forget Your Bad Boss, Bills, and Break Up

One of the studys most intriguing results relates to why TV viewing is so good at helping people at least, while they are watching escape from their worries. Referring to the limited capacity media consumption model ofProfessor Annie Langat the University of Indiana, who led many of the lab-based studies they cite, the authors say thatwatching a moving picture on a screen automatically absorbs a significant amount of cognitive capacity, reflected in slower reaction times on a secondary task such as pressing a button in response to a stimulus. In other words, watching TV literally takes our minds off other things meaning it helps us stop thinking about problems we dont want to think about - like our horrible boss, unpaid bills and personal problems.

Despite younger people watching TV in many different ways (including online),more than 50% of millennials viewing is still on a traditional television set. At the same time, our aging population is not the main driving force behind increased overall television consumption. As people get older, their TV watching does increase, but this new research contends that demographic changes account for very little of the long-term increase in viewing. Its really about what we, as humans, are looking for when we view, and the increasing number of opportunities to look at moving pictures on a screen.

Per the new research, the key is Psychophysiological patterns suggesting that television and video may help viewers relax by automatically inducing a pleasant, comfortable mental state, reflected in a relatively high incidence of alpha waves, and escape, by literally taking their mind off other things, reflected in longer secondary task reaction times.

The researchers also draw an interesting contrast between TV viewingand radio listening. Most radio consumption is a secondary activity. Where, when and how it happens are quite different from TV viewing. Because it does not involve visual processing,radio listening is mentally less taxingthan watching television and seems to haveno significant impact on primary task reaction times. Thus, television and radio appear to be meeting complementary needs. Radio is reserved for background while doing boring, repetitive work like laundry, driving or eating, and it does not automatically absorb so much mental capacity that it reduces performance on the primary task. (In contrast, talking on even a hands-free phone while driving does slow down reaction time, with potentially fatal results). Think of radio as taking your mind off of what you are doing at that moment - something boring. Television watching, on the other hand, is usually a primary activity to help you unwind and take your mind off things you don't want to think about then because theyre unpleasant.

While debate will continue over how good, bad, healthy, and unhealthy television and screen time are for people of all ages, one thing is clear: it isnt going anywhere. TV and video tap into basic human needs and are a cheap, familiar, reliable, easy to use, and increasingly ubiquitous means of entertainment. And if theres anything weve come to understand about human behavior, it would be that its very difficult to change established habits and patterns.

See the rest here:
Psychological Research Explains Why TV Viewing Is Higher than Ever - Forbes