Category Archives: Human Behavior

Next-Gen Speed And The Influence On User Experience – Forbes

As a society, we have come to expect instant gratification in almost every component of our lives so, why would we treat websites any differently? Why is there a need for things to be done at the snap of a finger?

The impulsivity and shortened attention span of today's consumer has become increasingly tricky in the grand scheme of the user experience. But it's not all our fault. This restlessness is in our DNA. There is psychological discomfort associated with self-denial. From an evolutionary perspective, resisting our instinct to seize the reward at hand is a difficult test, according to an article on Psychology Today.Human behavior tells us that we want things now, rather than later.

Instant Gratification

The desire to receive things as instantly as we request them has become more relevant over the years, and it's reflected every which way. From food delivery services to online shopping and even dating, consumers have become so invested in instant accessibility. Long gone are the days of waiting for services. Slogans like "Freaky Fast" (Jimmy John's) and "The World on Time" (FedEx), along with almost every fashion retailer's overnight delivery promises, are a microcosm of consumers' expectations in the purchasing cycle.

This sentiment remains the same when users interact with a website. There are standards that users uphold when considering speed, including how it impacts access to information and organization of specific conversion points. Instant gratification has become a theme of the consumer purchasing journey, and brands continue to compete over how to best position their speed services or discounted rates to satisfy needs.

User Retention Rates

More than 3.5 billion Google searches take place each day, indicating an unfathomable amount of people searching for answers, products and services on the internet. Implementing best practices for SEO (search engine optimization) is just one component to elevating website visibility. If a particular webpage delays loading after a user lands on the site, the user is likely to navigate away within a matter of seconds in favor of a competitors site.

According to research, 47% of consumers expect a page to load in two seconds or less. Analytics claim that 40% of consumers will abandon a website that takes more than three seconds to load. Thus, there's not much room for error as brands set their sights on seamless website usability. Fortunately, tools exist for improving website speed.

Popular Tools To Increase Speed

At my agency, we often use CDN services (content delivery networks) like Cloudflare and Amazon CloudFront that duplicate content in different geographic areas. So, when a user clicks on a link, the webpage loads quicker. CDN services work well with pretty much any website and can be implemented to improve the overall user experience.

Additionally, static website tools such as Hugo,Gatsby and Jekyll prepare content ahead of time into static files, increasing the speed of content that appears for the user because there's no need to run assembly code on the server. These tools work best for informational websites containing few call-to-actions, conversions or interactions (e.g., AldiandPepsi), but might not be the best fit for a picture-sharing platform or forum (e.g., PinterestorReddit).

Fast Might Not Always Be Best

With even more advanced technologies paving the way as we head into 2020 (like 5G internet speeds), the question remains: Is faster always better?

In theory, the better the code is, the faster a website will load. Companies like T-Mobile and AT&T are rolling out 5G more quickly and efficiently than ever before, but that comes at a price. Social economics factor into who will have faster internet accessibility, further increasing the digital divide.

At my agency, we feel it is essential that any website we develop can be accessed anywhere, regardless of internet speed. That is the primary goal of user experience to keep every kind of user in mind. It is critical to design for everyone and think about various types of users who will come in contact with websites. Otherwise, you are not designing for inclusivity. There is a balance between designing for the extreme user versus designing for the average user.

"In design, again and again, we see that looking to the average does not produce cutting-edge innovations," said inclusive design strategist and human rights advocate Elise Roy. "Instead, we should be looking to extremes. What gets forgotten is that people with disabilities are great examples of extreme users. We experience the world in such a different way. They are a gold mine for helping us to think differently."

Conclusion: 2020 Speed

As we approach 2020 and a new decade of speed, it is an exciting time for web design and development. It's imperative to innovate and experiment with a variety of strategies to engage users in an inclusive and elevated way that encourages conversion.

Whether or not speed is your primary focus in improving the user experience, it will certainly loom large in terms of how the average global consumer will perceive your brand.

The rest is here:
Next-Gen Speed And The Influence On User Experience - Forbes

The Tarrant Actors Regional Theatre Kicks Off The New Year With Noel Coward’s HAY FEVER – Broadway World

To kick off the 21st century's version of the Roaring Twenties this month, the Tarrant Actors Regional Theatre will present Noel Coward's classic 1920's British farce, Hay Fever, performed in the Sanders Theatre at the Fort Worth Community Arts Center, 1300 Gendy Street, Fort Worth TX 76107. The production is directed by TART Artistic Director Allen Walker.

In this fast-paced display of Coward's legendary verbal wit, retired British actress Judith Bliss and her author husband, David, long for a quiet weekend with some guests in their English country manor-but find quiet an impossible dream when their high-spirited children, Simon and Sorel, appear with guests of their own. As the weekend progresses, a houseful of drama waits to be ignited as tempers flare and misunderstandings abound. With Judith's new flame and David's newest literary inspiration keeping company as the children follow suit, the Bliss family lives up to its name as the quiet weekend comes to an exhausting and hilarious finale worth of Feydeau.

The cast features Laura M. Jones as Judith Bliss, Evan Faris as David Bliss, Karen Matheny as Sorel Bliss, Nicholas Zebrun as Simon Bliss, Jorge Martin Lara as Sandy Tyrell, Hannah Bell as Myra Arundel, Eric Dobbins as Richard Greatham, Laura Lester as Jackie Coryton, and Erika L. Durham as Clara. Olivia Dickerson serves as assistant director/stage manager, with technical direction by Bryan S. Douglas, scenic design by Ellen Mizener, lighting design by Branson White, costume design by Hannah Bell, properties design by Don Gwynne, and sound design by Allen Walker.

"Hay Fever has been delighting audiences for nearly a century," said Walker. "It is a wonderful romp through the foibles of human behavior, and is one of Noel Coward's most beloved scripts-largely due to his masterful use of verbal warfare and his subtle commentaries on societal norms and manners. I am incredibly honored to work with this outstanding cast and crew who have done an amazing job with this story, and have put together a production of which I feel Noel Coward would be proud."

Tickets are available now via TART's website, by calling the box office at (682) 231-0082 from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Monday through Friday, or by phone 24/7 with Brown Paper Tickets at (800) 838-3006. The play runs January 10-26, with performances Friday and Saturday evenings at 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday matinees at 2 p.m. There will be an opening night gala reception after the performance on Friday, Jan. 10, featuring complimentary hors d'oeuvres along with champagne, beer and wine for guests age 21 and older.

For more information, visit http://www.thetart.org, or call (682) 231-0082.

See the original post:
The Tarrant Actors Regional Theatre Kicks Off The New Year With Noel Coward's HAY FEVER - Broadway World

Big Data in Hollywood: The Brewing Antitrust Battle of the Streaming Era – Hollywood Reporter

Movie box office. TV ratings. Say what you will about the reliability of entertainment consumption metrics, but for decades, what people watched was hardly hush-hush. Then subscription video streamers came along. Now, massive data is collected about viewing habits but is disclosed only at the discretion of the companies sucking it up. Netflix says it will become more transparent in 2020. But will it? And who knows if the numbers it releases are inaccurate or misleading? How much should the rest of Hollywood care about transparency?

Well, consider that less than two years ago, Time Warner's then-CEO Jeff Bewkes took the witness stand during a trial where the U.S. government attempted to block his company's merger with AT&T. Bewkes pointed to Amazon, Netflix, YouTube and Facebook before explaining that these companies "know more about our consumers than we do." The merger was justified, he explained, because digital giants possessed something that one of Hollywood's biggest media companies sorely needed data. "The more you know about viewers, the more it informs your programming," he said. "It helps you understand how to optimize."

Hollywood is catching up. Disney has launched its data-sucking streaming service Disney+ while others including AT&T's HBO Max will be running soon enough. With a 21st century operation, though, comes a 21st century problem: the potential for regulation. Government intervention could drop a bomb on the so-called streaming wars.

Only in the past few years have academics begun discussing whether Big Data presents antitrust issues, and if so, what to do about it. Spurred by frustration at the might of companies like Google and Facebook, lawmakers and regulators on both sides of the political aisle have in recent months openly endorsed the scrutinizing of companies that are leveraging their inside knowledge about consumer habits to the disadvantage of third parties.

On Nov. 8, Department of Justice antitrust chief Makan Delrahim sounded his own alarm in a speech at Harvard. Delrahim said that the aggregation of data can create avenues for abuse especially for companies in the business of predicting human behavior (for advertising, yes, but perhaps also what entertainment programming you might want to see if you just watched The Irishman). He also responded to those who see such concerns as overstated because data collection has been happening for decades. (His example was grocery stores collecting information about consumer purchasing patterns through loyalty cards. Nielsen ratings would have worked just as well.) Something has changed, Delrahim warned.

"Antitrust enforcers must examine carefully whether greater competitive harms are threatened given today's market realities," he said. "For example, enforcers might consider whether the scale of the data collected has increased by several magnitudes; the type of data collected; and what it means when companies collect usage data, which cannot be easily replicated, in addition to user data. Most notably, enforcers must confront the reality that data insights in the digital economy are combined across the ecosystem of the internet sometimes in ways that transcend product improvement and impact consumer choice altogether."

It's happening slowly, but antitrust regulators like Delrahim are now being urged to look beyond Google and Facebook and review how data is being leveraged as a competitive weapon in the digital entertainment space. And the expressed openness by conservative legal thinkers (including Attorney General William Barr in a Dec. 10 speech) to analyze the non-price effects of competition is a remarkable development that bears watching.

While some privacy advocates have expressed concern about allowing data collection to happen in the first place, there are others who seem frustrated by the inequality presented by data collection and the potential for marketplace exclusion. For example, during the recent DOJ review of the Paramount Consent Decrees, the decades-old rules governing the relationship between movie studios and theater chains, Michigan State University law professor Adam Candeub submitted a comment critical of Netflix to the antitrust office. "Netflix does everything in its power to prevent third parties from learning its viewing data," he wrote. "Netflix encrypts its data to prevent ISPs and web browsers from tracking the use, and it does not share any data with third parties, even the studios whose material it licenses and who naturally want information on [their] own show[s]. While Netflix has a right to its own data Netflix goes a step too far by using its market power in the [online video] market to require that connected devices not use available data."

Similarly, in a July 31 letter from the Artist Rights Alliance to the DOJ and the House Judiciary Committee, the musicians' group laid out a number of concerns about specific tech companies, including Amazon. "The antitrust problems created by Amazon's role as both a distributor in its own right and a platform for other sellers and services are well understood," stated the letter. "The company's massive data stockpiles and ability to monitor its competitors from 'inside' their own transactions and operations threaten genuine competition in virtually every sector of the U.S. economy. Amazon's ongoing efforts to launch a streaming music service as part of its Prime family of products should be carefully scrutinized as part of your review. While more competition is always welcome and Amazon Music is a royalty-paying service, we are concerned about the dangers of predatory/sub-market pricing in a service that Amazon operates as a 'loss leader.' "

If regulators decide to crack down, a side squabble would erupt over how to remedy the competitive harms arising from data collection. Among the possibilities is that data aggregation could become a significant issue when companies seek approval for mergers. Reuters reported Dec. 10 that the DOJ is examining whether to block Google's proposed acquisition of Fitbit on the grounds that it would give Google too much data about American consumers. Regulators also could look to force data-sharing in some instances. A separate Reuters story reported that the Financial Stability Board, an international body that monitors the global financial system, would soon recommend that big tech firms be required to promote sharing of data.

Now imagine if the DOJ ever dared to stop two streaming video companies from merging on grounds of having too much information about what Americans watched. Or picture a scenario in which Netflix and Disney+ were forced to share audited consumption data with the creative talents that produce and star in their shows.

Some observers, noting a lack of legal precedent and any empirical evidence about the competitive harms from data hoarding, are urging regulators to be cautious. A recent law review article by University of Florida professor D. Daniel Sokol addressed the debate over whether antitrust law has a role to play, with the conclusion that "antitrust intervention over market forces threatens consumer welfare, especially in fast-moving markets, and proposed remedies, such as limiting the collection and use of Big Data or forcing large firms to share with rivals, are likely to harm competition and innovation, and in fact may raise privacy concerns."

Truth be told, there's no indication yet that regulators are prepared to do anything more than conduct a review of data collection. Time will tell whether the talk about getting tough is really just frustration at not being able to do more to punish tech companies for other perceived sins (i.e., an indifference to privacy, ideological biases or sheer chutzpah).

But as Hollywood launches new digital platforms amid an appetite to police data collection, comments like those from Candeub and the Artist Rights Alliance may best be viewed as demonstrating the types of complaints that could become more commonplace in the years ahead for the streaming economy. As such, the industry is advised to think hard about the answer to these two questions: When it comes to measuring how individuals are consuming entertainment, would the data collection be less likely to occur if such data wasn't a secret and could be used by business partners and corporate rivals? If transparency presents a problem, why is that?

This story first appeared in the Jan. 3 issue of The Hollywood Reporter magazine. To receive the magazine, click here to subscribe.

View original post here:
Big Data in Hollywood: The Brewing Antitrust Battle of the Streaming Era - Hollywood Reporter

North Dakota ends 2019 with fewer than 100 reported traffic fatalities as Vision Zero safety effort expands – AM 1100 The Flag WZFG

Preliminary reports indicate that North Dakota had 98 motor vehicle fatalities in 2019 a total that, if it goes unchanged, would be the first time in 17 years the state has recorded fewer than 100 traffic fatalities. Gov. Doug Burgum thanked the agencies involved in theVision Zerotraffic safety initiative for making a difference and expanding their efforts during the past year.

Since the comprehensive Vision Zero initiative was launched in 2018 by the North Dakota Department of Transportation (NDDOT), Highway Patrol and Department of Health, traffic fatalities in the state have decreased from 116 in 2017 to 105 in 2018 to a preliminary total of 98 in 2019, which would be the lowest total since 97 traffic fatalities were recorded in 2002. It will take up to 30 days to finalize the 2019 total as crash reports and investigations are completed.

The only acceptable number of deaths on North Dakota roads is zero, and every year that we move closer to that goal represents important progress, because these arent just numbers theyre peoples lives, and every life matters, Burgum said. Were grateful to our Vision Zero partners for their dedication to keeping everyone safe and secure, and to the traveling public who have heeded the initiatives emphasison personal responsibility, including driving sober and distraction-free, buckling up and slowing down.

This past year, Vision Zero was expanded with additional safety measures including more highway safety engineering systems, law enforcement equipment and programs; the establishment of highway safety corridors; crash data improvements and dashboards; and Vision Zero Schools, a new peer-to-peer program in high schools.

We must keep in mind that lives lost on North Dakota roads are family, friends and community members, NDDOT Director Bill Panos said. Of the 98 fatalities, approximately 47% were not wearing their seat belt. Seat belts are the single most effective safety device to prevent death and injury in a motor vehicle crash. We are working to establish a culture of personal responsibility where motor vehicle fatalities are recognized as preventable and not tolerated, because when it comes to those we love, zero is the only acceptable number of lives to lose.

Of the 98 motor vehicle fatalities in 2019, 42% were alcohol-related and 25% were speed-related. Victims ranged in age from 3 years old to 93 years old, and 83% were North Dakota residents. By mode of transportation, 74 of the fatalities were in a passenger vehicle, 11 were motorcyclists, five were pedestrians, four were on all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and two were bicyclists. One fatality involved a train and 14 involved commercial motor vehicles.

Vision Zeros ongoing success requires strong partnerships and buy-in from the public, said Col. Brandon Solberg, superintendent of the Highway Patrol. If every driver and passenger chooses to buckle up, and every driver obeys speed limits and traffic laws and drives sober, the vast majority of traffic fatalities would be eliminated. Preventable human behavior contributes to 94% of motor vehicle crashes. Personal responsibility is the foundation of Vision Zero.

Vision Zero continues to educate through various mediums about the importance of passenger safety and dangers of speeding, distracted driving and impaired driving, including a new Not Funny campaign that stresses the importance of always driving sober or finding a sober ride.

Parents play a vital role in keeping their children safe on the road, no matter the age, State Health Officer Mylynn Tufte said. Parents should talk often with their young drivers about alcohol, lack of seat belt use, distracted driving, speeding, and driving with passengers. Young children should always be buckled in a car seat that is installed correctly and appropriate for their age and size.

For more information, visithttps://visionzero.nd.gov/.

Read more here:
North Dakota ends 2019 with fewer than 100 reported traffic fatalities as Vision Zero safety effort expands - AM 1100 The Flag WZFG

OK, Boomer, 5 things to get ready for in 2020 – Washington Times Herald

I am not a baby boomer. Not technically. All four of my older siblings are though, which I enjoy pointing out. I am just young enough to say OK Boomer to people who need to hear it, and am clearly old enough for people to say it to me.

Dont know what OK Boomer means? Then you probably are one. Because Im a good sport, Ill clarify it. OK Boomer is a catch phrase, sometimes a meme, that younger generations use to dismiss attitudes stereotypically attributed to the baby boomer generation. It is also an expression used toward an older person, say about my age, who just might not be as with it as he should be.

Michael Leppert is a public and governmental affairs consultant in Indianapolis and writes his thoughts about politics, government and anything else that strikes him at MichaelLeppert.com.

We used to call it the generation gap. Today, it is more often generically referred to as ageism. I dont care for todays whiny perspective much. I am, and always have been, a believer that older generations certainly have an obligation to teach, but they also have one to learn. And the ism part of this one is as snowflakey as just about anything.

2019 was the OK Boomer year. In 2020, it will likely continue.

Heres a short list of exactly how.

1. Climate change. For those of you claiming that it is a hoax, OK Boomer. Seriously, who under the age of 55 actually still needs convinced that our planets climate is changing and human behavior is the reason? If you are the one, contact me and I will give you a smidgen of the evidenceassuming you have a truck to haul it away. Let the fantasy of this being someone elses fault and responsibility to try and fix have its funeral in 2020, because trust me, this fantasy is dead.

2. Transit options are a waste. Indianapolis had a setback in the world of transit this week, when Blue Indy, the electric car rental service, announced it would discontinue service in the state capital. Resolving the use of its controversial parking spaces and charging stations will take a while to figure out. However, only a Boomer would use this failure to dissuade us from the next legitimate idea to find a more modern, efficient and sustainable way to move people. Our dependence on car ownership and driving our own cars everywhere we go is getting old. Sort of like fighting better transportation ideas is. Like it or not, Boomer, 2020 will only see growing support for new ideas here.

3. Your iPhones flashlight is on, Boomer. Admit it, nine out of 10 times a person is spotted obliviously walking around with their flashlight on, it is someone born before 1980. Now, that includes me and my much younger wife, but I almost never see a young person doing this. I spotted a teenage girl on the sidewalk committing this faux pas yesterday. Saying hey Boomer, your flashlight is on, to her was a holiday treat for me.

4. Gun rules and laws will get stricter. Thats right, Boomer, America is turning a corner on this one. The school shooting generation has grown in number and age, their patience has shrunk, and younger people simply disagree with the thought that more guns make anyone safer. The National Rifle Association ironically seems like a wounded duck, and 2020 will continue this trend. Congress passed a spending bill which will finally fund the study of gun violence, and science will find that a different course is necessary. Science trumps propaganda every time, eventually.

5. Religion is struggling. Data is bringing bad news to all kinds of churches, temples and mosques: fewer and fewer Americans are active there. While this is a troubling sign for the spiritual health of our nation, only those who lack faith would be overly pessimistic about the future of our individual souls. Boomer, we need you on this one. We need you to encourage your religion to set a better example for the youngsters. No religion I know condones cruelty. The rift caused by the Christianity Today editorial last week is not the greatest recruitment tool.

Baby boomers are most commonly referred to as Americans who were born between 1946 and 1965. Thankfully, it does not include me (barely). Even if it did, I would find the group difficult to defend, as a group. Boomers really need to show more of an interest in tomorrow than yesterday.

But this really isnt about that sharp definition though. It is more about the state of mind of older people who dont understand new perspectives on a much longer list than I give you today. OK Boomer, does any of that sound familiar?

Michael Leppert is a public and governmental affairs consultant in Indianapolis and writes his thoughts about politics, government and anything else that strikes him at MichaelLeppert.com.

Read more:
OK, Boomer, 5 things to get ready for in 2020 - Washington Times Herald

The Outlook for Stocks, Bonds, Commodities, and the Economy – Barron’s

Market Perspective by SunTrust Advisory Services Jan. 2: Global markets surpassed most investors expectations in 2019. The MSCI All Country World Index jumped 26.6%, while the S&P 500 rose 31.5% on a total return basis, its best gain in six years. With investor fears elevated and valuations depressed entering 2019, better-than-expected news went a long way toward bolstering stocks. Kicking off 2020, the backdrop has shifted dramatically:

The S&P 500 is up 37% on a price return basis since the December 2018 low, but is compounding at a more pedestrian annual growth rate of 6% since the January 2018 peak. Stocks have also tended to add to gains after big up years.

The price-to-earnings ratio for the S&P 500 is nearing a cycle high. However, the sharp decline in interest rates has left relative valuations at a level that has historically been associated with average 12-month forward stock gains of almost 13%.

Investor sentiment, used as a contrarian indicator at extremes, is at the polar opposite from late 2018. Many short-term measures show investor complacency and suggest stocks are vulnerable to unexpected bad news in the first quarter.

While shorter-term sentiment measures show a degree of complacency, equity fund outflowswhich reached the most negative extreme in more than 20 years during 2019still reflect nervousness from investors.

Global liquidity, a key market support, should remain abundant in 2020.

Technology was the only sector to meaningfully outperform the S&P 500 in 2019. This suggests a challenging environment for fund managers who were underweight the sector. In 2020, we expect leadership will broaden out and hold a positive outlook on financials and industrials.

Keith Lerner

Mack Tracks by Mack Investment Securities January: Some comparisons, one year ago and today: CNN has an emotion-based measurement, the Fear & Greed Index. One year ago, on a scale of 1-100, the index was at 12, indicating intense fearand reduced risk. One year later, at the end of December, 2019, with stocks finishing with a great run, the index exhibited extreme greed at 94. Yesrisk is now elevated.

According to the American Association of Individual Investors, its subscribers average cash balance today is near 14%. This nearly matches the lowest amount of cash (13%) in 20 years and preceding the dot-com top of 2000. By the way, cash reached 45% at the market low in 2009. Yesrisk is now elevated.

[In December 2018, a majority of] stock-market newsletter writers] said sell (when stocks were at the lows) and risk was reduced. Historically, when this group is saying sell to the extreme, stocks rise. Conversely, in December 2019, a majority of newsletter writers [gave] buy recommendations. Historically, at these levels of recommendations, stocks have routinely fallen. Yesrisk is now elevated.

--Stephen W. Mack

Market Commentary by Gorilla Trades Dec. 30: Wildly bullish technicals predict a major rally following two years of consolidation, with a base-case target above 3,500 in the S&P 500.

The volatile pullbacks [in 2019], together with the widespread recessionary fears, provide a Wall of Worry for the rally to feed on

The global economy is sluggish, but U.S. growth remains stable, and election years in the U.S. are usually bullish.

Markets have the support of central banks, with the Fed and the majority of the global central banks already in easing cycles. Besides the monetary stimulus, further fiscal measures in the U.S. are expected ahead of the election, and Europe might also resort to massive stimulus.

While valuations are rich by historic measures, interest rates are lower than ever in modern history, and the cheap funding will continue to boost stocks through buybacks.

Corporate earnings remain resilient in the face of the global gloom. Further, since balance sheets are still healthy, even a small uptick in economic activity could result in significant earnings growth.

--Ken Berman

Martin Prings InterMarket Review by Pring Research January: Our [market] barometers remained unchanged in December, with bullish bond and equity models accompanying a negative commodity one.

That combination continues to signal a Stage II environment. The stellar equity performance in December certainly kept up with the Stage II reputation of being the best phase of the cycle for stocks. Not surprisingly, the Stock Barometer rallied to a 100% bullish reading. Other indicators also support characteristics typical of Stage II.

One example is the emergence of the economy from a recession or slowdown. Evidence in this direction is not yet conclusive, but housing starts, and new home sales are expanding.The 18-month slowdown is most probably in its terminal phase.

Stocks are clearly in the process of discounting the good news.

November saw the world stock exchange-traded fund, the iShares MSCI ACWI, break out from its approximate two-year consolidation. In December, Europe followed suit, as the DJ Stoxx 50 broke out from a 20-year consolidation pattern.

--Martin Pring

Weekly Technical Review by Macro Tides Dec. 30: The coming decade is the culmination of the 80-year cycle that has marked significant turning points in our nations history, i.e., 1781, 1861, 1941, and potentially 2021. Each of the prior turning-point decades included major changes and upheaval, so we should be prepared.

The S&P 500 has rallied since the low on Oct. 7 without taking a breath. Markets are a reflection of human behavior and the normal process is to inhale and then exhale, so the recent behavior is simply not normal.

The S&P 500 has become overbought, and sentiment is universally bullish. The S&P will be vulnerable to at least a modest correction in the first part of January. With bullish sentiment so widespread, and momentum strong, the initial pullback is likely to be shallow as investors buy the dip.

A better feel for how the S&P 500 will trade in the first quarter wont really be possible until we see how it rebounds after any setback.

Initial support should be the red trend near 3170. The more significant level of support is 3070. If and when 3070 is tested, how the S&P 500 responds will reveal much about what to expect in coming months.

--Jim Welsh

To be considered for this section, material, with the author's name and address, should be sent to MarketWatch@barrons.com.

Read more here:
The Outlook for Stocks, Bonds, Commodities, and the Economy - Barron's

The Week Ahead – Highlands Current

Submit listings to calendar@highlandscurrent.org.For a complete listing of events, see highlandscurrent.org/calendar.

COMMUNITY

SAT 4Audubon Christmas Bird CountPUTNAM COUNTYAll DayVarious locations | 845-270-2979Part of an international effort, the Putnam County count takes place for its 65th year. Any level of experience and interest is welcome. Contact organizer Charlie Roberto at chasrob26@gmail.com to participate. Donations are welcome.

WED 8Community Narcan TrainingCOLD SPRING7 8:30 p.m.Philipstown Behavioral Health Hub5 Stone St. | philipstownhub.orgLearn how to save a person from overdosing by giving a safe medication.

SAT 11Clearwater Sloop Open BoatBEACON3 6 p.m. Beacon Riverfront2 Red Flynn DriveTour the boat and learn about what happens to it in winter. Enjoy music, hot beverages and bring something to share for a potluck.

SUN 12Putnam Service Dogs Info SessionCOLD SPRINGNoon 1:30 p.m. Hudson Hils129 Main St. | putnamservicedogs.orgDuring this free informational lunch, learn about raising a puppy that will become a service dog for someone with physical and hearing disabilities.

KIDS & FAMILY

FRI 10Putnam County Talent NightPATTERSON6 p.m. Patterson Library1167 Route 311 | 845-878-6121butterfieldlibrary.orgAll Putnam County youth ages 8 and up are invited to participate. Younger children will perform first. Registration is required. Call or visit pattersonlibrary.org to register.

SAT 11Fei-FeiBEACONNoon. Howland Cultural Center477 Main St. | 845-763-3012howlandmusic.orgThe Classics for Kids series will feature the internationally recognized pianist in a family-friendly program. Cost: $10 adults (children free)

SAT 11Middle School Night with Lazer TagGARRISON7 10 p.m. Philipstown Recreation107 Glenclyffe Drive | 845-424-4618philipstownrecreation.com

TALKS & TOURS

FRI 10Full Moon WalkCORNWALL5:30 p.m. Outdoor Discovery CenterMuser Drive | 845-534-5506 | hnm.orgTake a guided hike through the fields and forest under the Wolf Moon. Dress appropriately for weather conditions. Register in advance. Cost: $10 adults/$8 children (members $8 and $6)

SAT 11Marketing Seminar for ArtistsBEACON10 a.m. Noon. Catalyst Gallery137 Main St. | 845-204-3844theresagooby.com/the-blank-project.htmlTheresa Gooby, an artist and career consultant, will teach artists how to get exposure for their work. Cost: $125

SAT 11Winter GardeningGARRISON10:30 a.m. 1:30 p.m. Desmond-Fish Library472 Route 403 | 845-278-6738desmondfishlibrary.orgMaster Gardeners will discuss seasonal projects like growing microgreens and pollinator-friendly plants from seeds, and how to support wildlife in your yard. Cost: $15 ($5 children with adult)

SAT 11Bird Identification WorkshopCOLD SPRING1 3 p.m. Butterfield Library10 Morris Ave. | 845-265-3040butterfieldlibrary.orgPete Salmansohn will teach families and beginners how to recognize the birds in their backyard. Best for ages 7 and up. Free

VISUAL ART

SAT 4The Sympathetic EyeBEACON2:30 4:30 p.m. Howland Cultural Center477 Main St. | 845-831-4988howlandculturalcenter.orgThe portrait photography of Jo Ann Chaus, Janet Holmes, Susan Rosenberg Jones and Paul Kessel will be displayed in this show curated by Susan Keiser.

SAT 11Donald AlterBEACON5 8 p.m. Hudson Beach Glass162 Main St. | 845-440-0068hudsonbeachglass.comCo-curators Harald Plochberger and Tony Moore have created this exhibit of the late artists work in memoriam, including more than 50 paintings, drawings and prints created in his final years.

SUN 12The Shape-ShiftersPEEKSKILL3 p.m. Hudson Valley MOCA1701 Main St. | 914-788-0100hudsonvalleymoca.orgArtist and art historian Marcy B. Freedman begins a three-part series, Art History with a Twist, that will explore how art confronts human behavior. Cost: $20 ($10 members)

STAGE & SCREEN

SAT 4Life is AmazingBEACON8 p.m. Howland Cultural Center477 Main St. | 845-831-4988brownpapertickets.com/event/4476264Abby Feldmans one-woman stand-up show includes original songs about her trials and failures. Cost: $15 ($20 door)

SAT 11Met in HD: WozzeckPOUGHKEEPSIE1 p.m. Bardavon | 35 Market St.845-473-2072 | bardavon.orgWatch the Metropolitan Opera Houses live broadcast of Bergs 20th century opera with baritone Peter Mattei in the title role. Cost: $28 (members $26, children $12)

SAT 11Artichoke Storytelling SeriesBEACON8 p.m. Howland Cultural Center477 Main St. | 845-831-4988howlandculturalcenter.orgStorytellers Elna Baker (This American Life), Micaela Blei (The Moth Radio Hour), Erin Barker (The Story Collider), Sandi Marx (Stories From the Stage), Mike Cho (Risk!) and Beacons own Mike Burdge (Story Screen) will perform. Cost: $17.50 ($20 door)

MUSIC

SUN 5Open Mic FinalsBEACON6 p.m. Towne Crier | 379 Main St.845-855-1300 | townecrier.comThis invitational round will bring together some of the best from the open-mic community. Cost: $8

FRI 10Molskys Mountain DriftersBEACON8:30 p.m. Towne Crier379 Main St. | 845-855-1300townecrier.comBruce Molsky (fiddle), Stash Wyslouch (guitar) and Allison de Groot (clawhammer banjo) will play roots music. Cost: $20 ($25 door)

SUN 12Fei-FeiBEACON4 p.m. Howland Cultural Center477 Main St. | 845-831-4988howlandmusic.orgThe Piano Festival begins with Fei-Fei performing a program that will include Beethovens Sonata in E-Flat Major, Op. 31, No. 3; Schumanns Kinderszenen Op.15; Debussys Joyeuse Isle, and Rachmaninoffs Moments Musicaux, Op. 16. Cost: $30 ($10 students)

CIVIC

MON 6City CouncilBEACON7 p.m. City Hall | 1 Municipal Plaza845-838-5011 | cityofbeacon.org

MON 6Special Meeting: Cell TowerNELSONVILLE7 p.m. Village Hall | 258 Main St.845-265-2500 | nelsonvilleny.govTo discuss potential settlement agreement for a cell tower at 15 Rockledge Road. Draft settlement and site plans are at bit.ly/34M13sI.

TUES 7School BoardCOLD SPRING7 p.m. Haldane High School (Room 211)15 Craigside Drive | 845-265-9254haldaneschool.org

TUES 7County LegislatureCARMEL7 p.m. Historic Courthouse44 Gleneida Ave. | 845-208-7800putnamcountyny.com

TUES 7Board of TrusteesCOLD SPRING7:30 p.m. Village Hall | 85 Main St.845-265-3611 | coldspringny.gov

WED 8School BoardGARRISON7 p.m. Garrison School | 1100 Route 9D845-424-3689 | gufs.org

THURS 9Philipstown Town BoardGARRISON7:30 p.m. Philipstown Community Center107 Glenclyffe Dr. | 845-265-5200philipstown.com

See the original post:
The Week Ahead - Highlands Current

Penn Badgley Says the Psychopath He Plays in ‘You’ Potentially Exists In All of Us – VICE

When You first premiered on Lifetime in September 2018, it stayed under the radar, and was even dubbed a "dud" for the network by The Hollywood Reporter. Its move to Netflix just three months later introduced the storyof a New York bookstore manager who becomes obsessed with and (spoiler alert) eventually kills a female customerto a wider, Very Online audience. On Twitter, fans of the thriller expressed their unabashed (and definitely concerning) attraction to Penn Badgley's character Joe Goldberg, the unhinged stalker/serial killer at the center of the series. Yes, the man we all grew to know and love as Dan Humphrey (or Woodchuck Todd) was now a cold-blooded killerand a fascinating one.

The extreme thirst for his admittedly hot but still very bad character even gave Badgley himself a slightly queasy feeling. "It was sort of like every one of my greatest fears and hopes for peoples engagement came to be fulfilled. There were the reactions of overlooking all of Joes faults, which is the whole point of the show, and just being really into him," Badgley told VICE. "That is, to say the least, problematic and disconcerting, but it is also part of the device, because were playing with that energy. We also want to encourage this reflection on why were so willing to watch a character like him. It was both gratifying and troubling."

With season 2 of You (out now) picking up after the murder of Joe's obsession and lover Guinevere Beck (Elizabeth Lail), the return of his mysterious and long-missing ex-girlfriend Candace, and a move to the land where a sociopathic murderer can get a decent base tanLA, baby!there are sure to be more questionable moments of viewers being horny on main, as well as continued controversy over how the series addresses toxic masculinity and violence toward women. We spoke to Penn Badgley about the thirst around Joe, being maybe too good at playing a sociopath, and how his character might even be an allegory for white supremacy.

VICE: Hi, Penn. Pop culture has historically hidden problematic or abusive behavior under the guise of romancelike in Twilight, for example. But You makes it pretty clear that your character, Joe, is not a great guy. Hes actually a very scary, terrible, horrible person. How does You address these issues differently? Was it troubling to see thefor lack of a better terma horny reaction to Joe after the first season? Penn Badgley: I think it helps us to see that we have some really strange and distorted ideas about love and relationships that seem more like lust and possession than actual love. But were inundated in pop culture with stories of love that have nothing to do with love. And we have been as long as theres been pop culture, so I think the fact that the show makes us think about these things is actually really great.

Another story about relationships, in a way, would be quite boring. Im excited to engage with any kind of media now that asks, Can we think about something other than romantic relationships? But if we are going to think about romantic relationships, can we see something new? Its definitely true that the show doesnt produce any constructive answers, but it at least lets us see how much we should be deconstructing the norms that do exist.

You hit the nail there, especially as someone whos done romantic comedies. (Badgley has previously acted in Easy A and John Tucker Must Die.)Its all Ive ever done! Are you kidding? Thats almost all there is! Theres one role since I was 14 or 15 where I havent been the object of somebodys affection or somebody whos desiring another as the object of their affection. And that movie was about the financial collapse, so there you go.

So this is a bit of a change-up! At least you get to be a psychopath.In a way, it is a more honest reflection of these norms. These "norms" are just fantasies. The idea of the way men and women should behave, weve completely constructed them. Were all understanding that at different levels and at different speeds. Theres a lot about culture that is arbitrary. Its been chosen by arbiters who are of a very small segment of a very small ruling class which has always been white men, at least in modern Western culture, and paraded around the world. Its really, really significant that this show makes so much sense in a way. Its interesting to watch it deconstruct these norms we have about male behavior, relationships, and female behavior, too.

The ideas of these all-powerful white men from years and years ago has infected everything. If anything, I feel like Joe is an allegory for white supremacy, and the way governments or anybody in power behaves in that construct. Not to get too headyits also just a showbut its definitely there.

The idea of This is mine. I want it, and I will have it.And that I deserve it, is the biggest assumption.

In terms of stepping into this role, what was the kind of research you did? Were there any figures you looked at or tried to emulate?A lot of it was quite intuitive. There were a lot of archetypes I was thinking about through the different seasons. To be honest, its hard to talk about because some of them are quite intense and I feel like in order to have a nuanced conversation about them, time and care needs to be taken. I wouldnt want to be taken the wrong way. I take this very seriously. I do struggle so much throughout the process because just trying to make these things real can often be super emotionally taxing. But recognizing that they resonate in this way sometimes is very surprising and very spontaneous. Im not trying to intellectualize them. It just kind of happens. And the way that Joe functions as an allegory of men in power throughout history is really consistent, so there are all kinds of people that I think of throughout.

Are there parts of Joe that are you, just in a more extreme way?Joe potentially exists in all of us. It might not manifest as Joe, but we all have a tyrant judge latent within us if we choose to awaken him. Thank god most of us dont do that, but at the same time, we dont completely abstain from it. Actually, we can be quite emotionally violent to one another; general discourse on Twitter is extremely emotionally violent even if it can be full of truths, you know? You can say something true in an emotionally violent way, and the funny thing about that is that it doesnt resonate as true, even if it was. So thats where I think were all compelled by Joe, and sometimes hes on to something. But hes violent, so it sort of doesnt matter [if he is]. Thats an interesting thing about human behavior; its not just what youre saying, but how youre saying itnot just what youre doing, but how youre doing it. Thats unfortunate, because it would be great if justice unadorned could reign.

I think with Joe, the allegorys pretty deep; anything that resonates on a cultural level with a show like this has to be understanding something true about people, whether its positive or negative. I feel like theres something to the allegory of Joe that [the book's author] Caroline Kepnes originally understood in conceiving the character, and that [show creators] Sarah Gamble and Greg Berlanti and the rest of the writers drew out. So something really is clearly working, and clearly they have their finger on the pulse. I feel like for me, I just try to be honest. I just try to believe everything he says, as much as possible.

Is there any point where you dont want to be too good at [playing Joe], because of what it could mean?To be honest, all the time, Im unsure of what to do. I think it ends up being an intuitive thing where I try to do everything like he believes it, because I think he does. And when people are that bad, I just dont think they can be that conscious of it. Doesnt mean that they cant be somewhat conscious of it, and actually do some really profoundly terrible things consciously, because obviously, thats what our world leaders are doing. But I still dont think its possible to be [totally] conscious while being that bad, because the whole reason youre that bad is because you are not that conscious. So he just believes it. You lack the thing youre seeking.

Thanks for speaking with us.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Read more:
Penn Badgley Says the Psychopath He Plays in 'You' Potentially Exists In All of Us - VICE

The genetic mechanism of selfishness and altruism in parent-offspring coadaptation – Science Advances

Abstract

The social bond between parents and offspring is characterized by coadaptation and balance between altruistic and selfish tendencies. However, its underlying genetic mechanism remains poorly understood. Using transcriptomic screens in the subsocial European earwig, Forficula auricularia, we found the expression of more than 1600 genes associated with experimentally manipulated parenting. We identified two genes, Th and PebIII, each showing evidence of differential coexpression between treatments in mothers and their offspring. In vivo RNAi experiments confirmed direct and indirect genetic effects of Th and PebIII on behavior and fitness, including maternal food provisioning and reproduction, and offspring development and survival. The direction of the effects consistently indicated a reciprocally altruistic function for Th and a reciprocally selfish function for PebIII. Further metabolic pathway analyses suggested roles for Th-restricted endogenous dopaminergic reward, PebIII-mediated chemical communication and a link to insulin signaling, juvenile hormone, and vitellogenin in parent-offspring coadaptation and social evolution.

Parents and offspring influence each others behavior and evolutionary fitness through reciprocal interactions (1). As an altruistic trait, parental care is beneficial to the survival and development of offspring but is costly for the parents, while selfish parents favor their lifetime fecundity at the expense of their offsprings fitness (1). Offspring are often tacitly regarded as passive recipients of parental care, but in reality, they actively demand care and influence their parents behavior and reproduction (1). Evolutionary theory predicts a tension between selfishness and altruism and genetic conflict between parents and offspring over parental investment due to their incomplete relatedness (1, 2). Theoretical models predicted that natural selection should favor resolved conflict and coadapted parent and offspring (3), a state characterized by (i) a compromise between the evolutionary interests of parent and offspring, (ii) balanced altruistic and selfish genetic tendencies, and (iii) well-coordinated behavioral interactions between them (1, 2). To date, studies on conflict resolution and coadaptation have focused on phenotypes rather than genes (3), and studies on the molecular basis of parenting focused on genes expressed merely in parents and lacked causal evidence (47).

To identify genes underlying parent-offspring coadaptation and to study their altruistic and selfish function during social interaction, a combination of these former approaches is required. In addition, offspring should be regarded as active players. Genes expressed in offspring and affecting parental care, for example, through effects on solicitation behaviors, should be studied.

In this study, we used the European earwig, Forficula auricularia, as an experimental system. F. auricularia is a nonmodel insect species with facultative posthatching maternal care, enabling behavioral manipulations with and without mother-offspring contact, without detrimental effects on offspring. Females produce one or two clutches over their lifetime and provide food (see movie S1) and protection to their young nymphs (8, 9). Mothers influence the behavior, development, and survival of their nymphs, and the nymphs, in turn, influence the behavior and future reproduction of their mothers, for instance, by chemical communication (2, 10, 11).

Our experimental approach was to first broadly quantify differential gene expression between manipulated treatments with or without parental care in both mother and offspring in an RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) experiment (Fig. 1A). We then identified candidate genes on the basis of these data and characterized their social function in an RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown experiment. As a criterion for selecting candidate genes, we used the differential coexpression of the same gene between experimental treatments in earwig mothers and nymphs in the RNA-seq data. Although coadaptation may occur between different sets of genes expressed in parents or offspring, it is of limited scope in the absence of physical linkage (3). The same genes affecting different traits in parents and offspring, a form of pleiotropy, provide scope for much tighter coadaptation (3). Mechanistically, this differential coexpression could be due to specific alleles in the cis-regulatory region of the pleiotropic gene reflecting a state of coadaptation.

(A) The transcriptomic screen for candidate genes underlying parent-offspring coadaptation was based on experimental manipulation of the presence and absence of egg attendance and posthatching parental care: No care (NC), eggs were removed upon the completion of oviposition. No nymph sample was used because of insufficient hatching success of untended eggs (fig. S1 and table S1). Egg care (EC), mothers tended their eggs for 20 days and were then sampled shortly before eggs hatched (2). Nymphs were kept for 6 days without tending females before they were sampled. Full care (FC), mothers tended their eggs until hatching and cared for their nymphs until 6 days after hatching when both were sampled. Antennae, head, abdomen, and ovaries from mothers and the whole body of nymphs were sampled in each treatment. On the basis of this screen, the expression of candidate genes was manipulated using in vivo RNAi to assess their causal effects on behavior and components of evolutionary fitness. (B) Venn diagram illustrating that only two genes with confirmed insect origin were differentially coexpressed in mothers and offspring when they behaviorally interacted according to our selection criterion (see main text). (C to G) Heat maps of differentially expressed genes in different tissues from mothers and the nymphs (PFDR < 0.01). Rows are genes, columns are samples. Samples were clustered according to expression patterns. We color-coded each sample in the horizontal bar above each panel and the clustering trees according to its treatment. FC samples are in yellow; EC samples are in light green, and NC samples are in dark green.

We hypothesized that candidate genes underlying coadaptation should have the following signatures: (i) Gene expression changes in the parent or offspring when they behaviorally interact, with the strongest candidates showing differential coexpression of the same gene, irrespective of the direction of expression difference being parallel or antagonistic. (ii) For these candidate genes to be biologically relevant, an experimentally manipulated change in the expression level in the parent or offspring should influence behavior or fitness of self and the other via direct and indirect genetic effects (DGE and IGE), respectively (12, 13). (iii) When expressed, a gene with a selfish function should be beneficial to self and potentially harmful to the other, and a gene with an altruistic function, when expressed, should be beneficial to the other and costly to self. Here, we found two genes fulfilling these criteria in F. auricularia, and we discuss their potential roles in the evolution of parent-offspring interaction and social evolution.

To screen for candidate genes, we experimentally manipulated whether mothers attended their eggs and whether they cared for and socially interacted with their hatched nymphs. To this end, we established three treatments, no care (NC), egg care (EC), and full care (FC) (Fig. 1A). The FC treatment differed from the EC treatment in the occurrence of social interaction between mothers and nymphs, and the EC and NC treatments differed in egg attendance. Ninety females with their clutches were randomly assigned to the three treatments, with 30 per treatment. To detect tissue-specific expression, we separately sequenced the transcriptome of four maternal tissues including antennae, head, abdomen, and ovaries and the whole body of nymphs with RNA-seq. All nymphs were sampled on day 6 after hatching to avoid confounding variation caused by age or developmental stage.

A total of 138 gigabytes of Illumina HiSeq data were generated from 84 libraries and mapped to a previously published earwig transcriptome (14). Each maternal library was a pool of the same tissue from five individuals. Each nymph library was a pool of five clutches with three individuals each. NC nymphs were not used because of low hatching success (fig. S1 and table S1).

A total of 1547 genes in at least one maternal tissue and 114 genes in nymphs were differentially expressed between the FC and EC treatments (PFDR < 0.01) (data files S1 to S5). All of the FC samples were well clustered on the basis of the expression of these genes. Samples from NC and EC treatments were more similar to each other (Fig. 1, C to G). This pattern was true for all maternal tissues and nymphs, indicating consistently and broadly altered gene expression when mothers and their offspring behaviorally interacted.

Identification of candidate genes. As pointed out above, the most stringent condition for candidate genes underlying coadaptation in our transcriptomic data is the differential coexpression between FC and EC in mothers and nymphs during posthatching maternal care. The NC treatment was not used for candidate gene selection because its difference to the FC treatment could result from both posthatching maternal care and egg attendance, and no offspring data were available. Coadaptation theory predicts stronger coadaptation when the same genes alter their expression in parent and offspring during their social interaction, which may facilitate well-coordinated parenting by enhancing the phenotypic match between parent and offspring (3).

At the significance level corrected for false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01, we found no insect gene with differential coexpression between the FC and EC treatment in mothers and offspring. This was partly due to the fact that the transcriptome of nymphs was based on whole bodies, obscuring any potential tissue-specific expression. Thus, our measure of differential expression in nymphs was less precise, and our statistical power for their detection was lower. To expand the number of detected genes, we relaxed the significance threshold for nymphs to be less stringent with PFDR < 0.1. We found 13 genes differentially expressed between FC and EC treatments in mothers with PFDR < 0.01 and in offspring with PFDR < 0.1. We then used five insect genomes to filter out genes with insect origin. These genomes were previously used to annotate a published earwig transcriptome (14). They comprise two eusocial species, the honey bee (Apis mellifera) and the leaf-cutting ants (Acromyrmex echinatior), and three solitary species, the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum), and the jewel wasp (Nasonia vitripennis). Only two of the differentially coexpressed genes were present in at least one of the five insect genomes. We further checked the 11 remaining genes manually. Two had unknown origin and function, and nine were not from insects. Thus, the two genes, with confirmed insect origin and evidence of differential expression between the FC and EC treatment in both mothers and offspring during posthatching parental care, were selected as our candidates (Fig. 1B). One of them, Contig4258 in the published earwig transcriptome (14), is homologous to the D. melanogaster Th gene. The other, Contig29301, is homologous to the PebIII gene. Th encodes tyrosine hydroxylase, the first and rate-limiting enzyme in the dopamine synthesis pathway (15). PebIII encodes ejaculatory bulb protein III, an odorant-binding protein (OBP) (16).

Th and other genes related to dopamine. Compared with the EC treatment, Th expression was higher in the FC mothers head (PFDR < 0.0001; Fig. 2C) and in her nymphs (PFDR = 0.056; Fig. 2F). In addition, we found higher expression of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) decarboxylase [AADC (aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase); Contig5494; PFDR = 0.00018; Fig. 2H], the downstream enzyme of tyrosine hydroxylase that catalyzes the last step of dopamine synthesis (15), in the FC mothers head. Together, these results suggested enhanced dopamine activity in the head, where the central nervous system is located. Furthermore, Th showed a trend of reduced expression in the ovaries of FC mothers compared to EC mothers (PFDR = 0.053; Fig. 2E). This was in agreement with an elevated expression of dopamine N-acetyltransferase (DNAT; Contig14038; PFDR < 0.0001; Fig. 2M), an enzyme for dopamine degradation (17), in the ovaries of FC mothers compared to EC mothers. These results suggested decreased activity of dopamine in the ovaries during posthatching care. Dopamine is a well-studied neurohormone with a conserved function as neurotransmitter in the reward system and for associative learning from insects to mammals (18, 19). Dopamine also functions as gonadotropin to stimulate reproduction in various insect species including fruit flies, bees, and ants (2022). Thus, the fact that earwig mothers suppress their reproduction during parenting (2) may be partly regulated by the antagonistic expression of Th and dopamine in the head and ovaries. Conversely, the enhanced expression of Th in the mothers heads and in her nymphs during posthatching care suggested a role of a mutual dopaminergic reward in maintaining the social bond between them.

(A) Illustration of a known dopamine synthesis and degradation pathway catalyzed by tyrosine hydroxylase (Th) as the rate-limiting enzyme as well as DOPA decarboxylase (AADC) and DNAT (15, 17). (B to F) Differential expression of Th across treatments. (G to K) Differential expression of AADC. (L to P) Differential expression of DNAT. The y axes are normalized read counts. Treatments are color-coded, with NC in dark green, EC in light green, and FC in yellow. The box plots are shown with medians, interquartile range (box), and 1.5 interquartile range (whiskers). PFDR = 0.053 for Th differential expression between FC and EC in ovaries, *PFDR = 0.056 in offspring and ***PFDR < 0.001.

PebIII and other genes related to chemical communication. Compared with the EC treatment, PebIII expression in mothers was enhanced in the FC mothers head (PFDR < 0.0001; Fig. 3B) and in her nymphs (PFDR = 0.034; Fig. 3E). Given the putative function of PebIII as OBP, its involvement in parent-offspring communication and the perception of chemical cues such as cuticular hydrocarbons (CHC) (11) is conceivable. The increased expression of PebIII in the FC treatment may refer to enhanced olfactory sensitivities when mothers and nymphs interact. A link to chemical communication was further supported by the higher expression of a few genes homologous to acylcoenzyme A (CoA) desaturase previously shown to be involved in CHC synthesis (23) in FC mothers head, abdomen, and ovaries (Contig8369 and Contig10162, PFDR < 0.01 for all; Fig. 3, G, H, L, and N) and in FC nymphs than EC treatment (Contig3433, PFDR < 0.0001; Fig. 3T).

(A to E) Differential expression of PebIII. (F to T) Differential expression of acyl-CoA desaturase genes potentially for CHC synthesis and chemical communication. To distinguish multiple transcripts of desaturase genes, the corresponding contig ID is labeled next to each gene name. y axes are normalized read counts. Treatments are color-coded with NC in dark green, EC in light green, and FC in yellow. The box plots are shown with medians, interquartile range (box), and 1.5 interquartile range (whiskers). *PFDR = 0.034, **PFDR < 0.01, and ***PFDR < 0.001.

(A and B) Results for Th knockdown. (C) Pictures of an earwig mother tending hatched nymphs (top) (photo credit to J. Meunier) and tending her eggs (bottom). (D to F) Results for PebIII knockdown. In (E), the relative size of the second clutch was calculated on the basis of the first and second clutch egg numbers. In (A) and (B), frequencies are shown, Note that zero observed provisioning in the M+/O YFP treatment means that no instance of provisioning was observed during the observation sessions (see Materials and Methods). (D to F) Box plots with median, interquartile range (box), and 1.5 interquartile range (whiskers). Target genes were knocked down in three treatments: only in mothers (M/O+), only in offspring (M+/O), and in both (M/O). Three corresponding YFP treatments were used to control for the injection of exogenous double-stranded RNA. To test the specific effects of target gene knockdown over and above effects of injection of double-stranded RNA, we used a GLM for statistical analysis with the main effects gene, maternal treatment, and offspring treatment (table S2). Significant genebymaternal treatment interaction or genebyoffspring treatment interactions indicate a social function of a target gene, which are labeled with asterisks; *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

To characterize the social function of the two candidate genes in vivo, we knocked down the expression of Th or PebIII in mothers (M/O+), in the offspring (M+/O), or in both (M/O) using RNAi. Note that the refers to the injection of double-stranded RNA. To control for confounding side effects of exogenous double-stranded RNA injection, we also established three corresponding sham treatments of YFP (yellow fluorescent protein gene) with injection in mothers (M/O+), in the offspring (M+/O), or in both (M/O). Seventy earwig mothers with their overall 1363 nymphs were assigned randomly to these treatments. The specificity of knockdown was validated by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in the mothers head and the whole body of nymphs (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.05; fig. S2).

Sham treatments injecting double-stranded RNA of an exogenous gene such as YFP were a necessary control because we expected that the injection of RNA per se would influence survival, behavior, development, or reproduction. To statistically control for these confounding effects and demonstrate the specific effects of knockdown of the target gene, we compared target gene injection treatments with the corresponding YFP sham treatments using generalized linear models (GLMs). In the GLMs, we defined the fixed main effects gene for the overall difference between target gene and YFP injection, maternal treatment for the overall difference between injected and untreated females, and offspring-treatment for the overall difference between injected and untreated nymphs on the basis of our experimental design. To determine the function of a target gene, the effects of maternal or offspring injection should depend on whether it was due to the injection of double-stranded RNA of target gene or YFP. In other words, only the interaction between gene and maternal treatment or the interaction between gene and offspring treatment resulted from the GLM analysis tested the specific function of a target gene on a dependent trait. Whether the gene operated via a DGE or an IGE depended on whether the effect was in the focal individual or in its social partner.

Th: A gene reciprocally promoting altruism. Th knockdown in mothers affected food provisioning (Fig. 4A and table S2, genebymaternal treatment interaction, P = 0.0043, GLM). This effect arose from less observed food provisioning in Th-knockdown mothers than in YFP-injected mothers in the M/O treatment and more observed food provisioning in Th-untreated mothers than YFP-untreated mothers in the M+/O treatment. M/O and M+/O differ in maternal injections, but the offspring were injected in both treatments. Thus, comparing M/O to M+/O, Th knockdown in mothers resulted in a relative reduction of food provisioning. Put differently, Th expression in mothers enhanced food provisioning via a DGE, over and above any effect due to the injection of exogenous double-stranded RNA.

Moreover, Th knockdown in nymphs affected their mothers likelihood to produce a second clutch (Fig. 4B and table S2, genebyoffspring treatment interaction, P = 0.037, GLM). The mothers of Th-knockdown offspring tended to be less likely to produce a second clutch than the mothers of YFP-injected offspring in the M/O treatment, and the mothers of Th-untreated offspring tended to be more likely to lay a second clutch than the mothers of YFP-untreated offspring in the M/O+ treatment. Thus, comparing M/O to M/O+, Th knockdown in offspring reduced the likelihood of maternal future reproduction, or in other words, Th expression in offspring enhanced the likelihood of maternal future reproduction through an IGE.

Enhanced food provisioning is a typical parental behavior that elevates the fitness of offspring at a cost to mothers (1, 8). Thus, elevated expression of Th in mothers induced a maternal behavior that is beneficial to offspring and costly for themselves. Increased maternal future reproduction enhances maternal lifetime fecundity, but from the perspective of the current nymphs inducing this effect, it is at the cost of reduced received care, as formerly demonstrated in experimental evolution experiments in this species (2). Hence, in both mothers and nymphs, higher expression of Th enhanced the fitness of the other at a potential expense of self, which is consistent with our prediction of an altruistic gene.

PebIII: A gene reciprocally promoting selfishness. PebIII knockdown affected offspring developmental rate (Fig. 4D and table S2, genebymaternal treatment effect, P = 0.0013, GLM). The offspring of PebIII-knockdown mothers reached the second instar in fewer days than the offspring of YFP-injected mothers in the M/O treatment, while the offspring of PebIII-untreated mothers took more days to reach the second instar than the offspring of YFP-untreated mothers in the M+/O treatment. Therefore, comparing M/O to M+/O, PebIII knockdown in mothers caused faster offspring development, or in other words, PebIII expression in mothers delayed offspring development through an IGE.

Furthermore, PebIII knockdown in mothers affected the size of their second clutch (Fig. 4E and table S2, genebymaternal treatment interaction, P = 0.017, GLM). The PebIII knockdown mothers tended to have smaller relative size of their second clutch than the YFP-injected mothers in the M/O treatment, but the PebIII-untreated mothers had larger relative size of second clutch than the YFP-untreated mothers in the M+/O treatment. Thus, comparing M/O to M+/O, PebIII knockdown in mothers had the effect to reduce the size of the second clutch. In other words, PebIII expression in mothers increased their own investment in future reproduction through a DGE.

Last, PebIII knockdown in nymphs influenced their own survival (Fig. 4F and table S2, genebyoffspring treatment, P = 0.037, GLM). The PebIII knockdown offspring showed no difference of survival compared to the YFP-injected offspring in the M/O treatment, but the PebIII-untreated offspring survived better than the YFP-untreated offspring in M/O+ treatment. Hence, comparing M/O to M/O+, it was PebIII knockdown in offspring that led to relatively stronger reduction of survival than YFP injection. In other words, PebIII expression in offspring enhanced their own survival through a DGE.

In all three cases, individuals that expressed PebIII gained benefits for themselves but partially harmed the fitness of the other. For instance, the enhanced future reproduction of mothers and the better survival of offspring were both influenced by their own expression of this gene, but the delayed offspring development, potentially having negative consequences, was influenced by maternal expression through an IGE. These results are consistent with our prediction for a selfish gene.

That Th influenced the mothers likelihood of producing a second clutch might be partially explained by the Th-restricted dopamine because dopamine functions not only as a neurotransmitter but also as gonadotrophin in insects (1822), but how PebIII influenced reproduction in mothers through a DGE is less straightforward. PebIII is indirectly linked to the yolk protein vitellogenin (Vg) and juvenile hormone (JH) via apolipophorin and lipophorin (24, 25). Vg and JH are well known to regulate female reproduction and interact with insulin signaling in many insects (2630). We thus further explored the expression of genes related to this pathway in earwig mothers using our RNA-seq data.

Compared to EC mothers, we found evidence for reduced insulin signaling and JH but elevated Vg in FC mothers providing posthatching care. With regard to JH, the expression of JH epoxide hydrolase (JHEH), an enzyme degrading JH (31), was enhanced in their head (Contig8080, PFDR < 0.0001; Contig6965, PFDR = 0.00019; Fig. 5) and antennae (Contig20452, PFDR = 0.00041; Fig. 5). Conversely, the expression of JH acid O-methyltransferase (JHAMT), a key enzyme converting inactive precursors of JH to active JH in insects (32), was reduced in their head (Contig11595, PFDR = 0.00064; Contig8442, PFDR < 0.0001; Fig. 5). Last, JH-inducible proteins were down-regulated in their head (Contig5526, Contig14685, and Contig11575, PFDR < 0.0001 for all; Fig. 5). These results are consistent with a previous earwig study showing that a low JH titer was associated with maternal care for nymphs in mothers (33). With regard to Vg, five contigs of Vg genes were up-regulated in the head, abdomen, and ovaries of FC mothers (Contig39462, Contig75606, Contig384, Contig267, and Contig4671, PFDR < 0.0001 for all; Fig. 5), but the Vg receptor was down-regulated (Contig1851, PFDR < 0.0001 in the head and PFDR = 0.0012 in the abdomen; Fig. 5). Gonadotropic functions of JH and Vg are well known in insects (26, 27, 29, 30) and are related to caste determination and division of labor in eusocial species such as the honey bee (A. mellifera) (27). Vg is also related to brood care in the burying beetle (Nicrophorus vespilloides), honey bee, and the ant (Temnothorax longispinosus) (26, 3436). The antagonistic regulation between JH and Vg previously thought to be unique in honey bee (27) is comparable to our findings in the subsocial European earwigs and the burying beetles (26), suggesting the role of antagonistic JH-Vg regulation in posthatching parental care and social evolution.

Bars above zero indicate enhanced expression in FC mothers compared to EC mothers in the RNA-seq experiment, while bars below zero indicate reduced expression. Dotted lines indicate thresholds for 2 and 2 log2 fold changes. ILP, insulin-like peptide; IRS, insulin receptor substrate; InR, insulin receptor; FOXO, forkhead domain transcription factor; JHIP, JH ineducable protein; VgR, Vg receptor. To distinguish multiple transcripts of the same gene, the contig ID is labeled next to the corresponding gene name. # ILP showed a trend of differential expression with PFDR = 0.065 in the mothers head and PFDR = 0.058 in the ovaries, but there was no expression difference found for IRS or InR. PFDR < 0.01 for all the other genes.

With regard to insulin signaling, an association with reproductive asymmetries between castes was described in eusocial ants (28). In the present study, we found a trend of decreased expression of the insulin-like peptide gene ILP in FC compared to EC mothers (Contig13532, PFDR = 0.065 in the head and PFDR = 0.058 in the ovaries; Fig. 5). In addition, the FOXO transcription factor, which is known to suppress insulin signaling (37), was significantly higher in FC than EC mothers ovaries (Contig8355, PFDR = 0.00091; Fig. 5). These results suggested a role for insulin signaling in mediating posthatching care in the subsocial earwigs.

Last, oxytocin and vasopressin are neuropeptides that were previously shown to be associated with parental care in mammals (7, 38). We found an earwig homolog (Contig9205) of the Tribolium gene, according to their translated protein sequence comparison, for the receptor for the insect vasopressin/oxytocin-like peptide (39). However, in our experiment, no differential expression was found between FC and EC mothers (PFDR = 0.50), confirming previous findings that vasopressin/oxytocin-like peptide may function differently in insects and mammals (39).

In this study, we found more than 1600 genes in earwig mothers and offspring that were differentially expressed in association with posthatching maternal care. Among these, Th and PebIII showed the hypothesized signatures of coadaptation, with differential coexpression between treatments in both mothers and offspring during posthatching care when they socially interact, and causal effects on behavior and measured fitness that indicated altruistic and selfish tendencies, respectively. Our results demonstrate that genes expressed in offspring are active players shaping maternal behavior and reproduction. Whether other differentially expressed genes are related to mother and nymph behavior and whether they may be shaped by coadaptation require further study.

Our findings are also of direct interest to better understand the molecular link between maternal care and worker care in insects and, hence, the evolutionary transition from parenting to eusociality (40). Specifically, a recent transcriptomic study in the pharaoh ant, Monomorium pharaonis, reported a large suite of differentially expressed genes in larvae and caregiving nurses across larval development (41). The authors refer to this phenomenon as the social interactome of this species, a molecular signature of social interactions between larvae and nurses. In the context of our study, note that dopamine-related genes and PebIII were also among the differentially expressed genes in larvae and nurses in M. pharaonis [see the S1 dataset of (41)].

We went a step beyond the correlational description of the social interactome (41) in earwigs and also controlled for confounding developmental effects for the genes in offspring. We experimentally manipulated the presence and absence of posthatching parent-offspring interactions and characterized the social functions of the two genes showing the most convincing signature of differential coexpression using RNAi knockdown experiments. On the basis of this strictly experimental and result-driven approach, we could test the DGE and IGE of the two candidate genes Th and PebIII on behavior and fitness and assign selfish versus altruistic function to their expression. Only together with these functional results were we able to interpret the differential coexpression in mothers and nymphs as at least partly shaped by coadaptation.

Our study adds to the view that the dopaminergic pathway may be evolutionarily conserved in the context of parent-offspring interaction from insects to mammals, including primates and humans. Regarding the Th gene for which we showed evidence of reciprocally altruistic effects in earwigs, it was expressed more in the FC treatment in both mothers and offspring. In addition to Th per se, we also found higher expression of other genes related to dopamine synthesis and degradation pathways in caring mothers, suggesting enhanced dopamine activity in the central nervous system of earwigs (18, 19) but suppressed dopamine activity in the reproductive system (2022). The dopaminergic pathway was formerly associated with parenting: In rat mothers, dopamine levels were associated with pup licking and grooming behavior (42); in vervet monkeys and humans, variable number tandem repeats in exon III of the dopamine receptor DRD4 gene were associated with parent-offspring interactions (4346). It is likely that the behavioral difference in vervet monkey and human mothers and offspring was due to differential expression of various alleles or different receptor sensitivity to dopamine resulting from the allelic polymorphism of DRD4. This pathway also appears to be crucial to the simpler and nonobligate mother-offspring interaction in earwigs, which suggests an ancestral or convergent function of dopamine in the evolution of the social bond between parents and offspring.

Unlike the conserved dopamine, the PebIII gene, for which we showed evidence of reciprocally selfish effects, may be functionally co-opted along the trajectory of social evolution from solitary to subsocial and to eusociality. Its expression effects vary from direct control of offspring development to social regulation of development and additional control of maternal reproduction and to reproductive caste differentiation: In the solitary Drosophila, larval development was associated with PebIII expression in larvae through a DGE (47); in earwigs, we found that nymph development was influenced by PebIII expression in mothers through an IGE, and maternal expression of PebIII governs female reproduction in earwigs via a DGE. In the eusocial termite Reticulitermes flavipes, two transcripts of this gene are expressed caste specifically between sterile soldiers and reproductive alate (48). Although PebIII consistently influences offspring development in solitary Drosophila and subsocial earwigs, the regulation seemingly shifted from direct control by the offspring to indirect control by the parent. The function on female reproduction is similar in subsocial earwigs and eusocial termites but diverged from single-gene determination to two transcripts of the same gene with potential neofunctionalization or subfunctionalization between castes. Thus, our results on PebIII might have captured an intermediate functional state of this gene between solitary and eusocial species.

A long-standing different question in the literature on parent-offspring conflict is whether genes expressed in parents or offspring control reproductive investment (49). Our results in earwigs provide direct evidence for a compromise with partial control by genes expressed in both parent and offspring. Whether or not a female produced a second clutch was under offspring control and was modulated by Th expression in nymphs. However, how much the females invested in their future clutch relative to their current clutch was under maternal control and was influenced by PebIII expression in females.

To elucidate how PebIII expression may influence maternal reproduction through a DGE in the subsocial earwigs, we found differential expression of genes related to insulin signaling, JH, and Vg, which consistently suggested suppressed insulin signaling and JH but elevated Vg in the FC treatment. These results are in line with previous results on caregiving in other insect systems such as burying beetles, ants, and bees (26, 27, 30, 34, 35) and provide indirect evidence for an evolutionary link between parenting genes and genes shaping eusociality (50). A graphical summary for this potential link between PebIII, insulin signaling, JH, and Vg is shown in Fig. 6.

PebIII, an OBP, may play a role in chemical communication between mothers and offspring. PebIII indirectly interact with Vg and JH via apolipophorin and lipophorin (25). Insulin signaling, JH, and Vg interplay with each other and regulate maternal reproduction (26, 27, 29).

In conclusion, it is a general expectation that the social bond between parents and their offspring is shaped by both altruistic and selfish behavior reflecting a compromise of their respective evolutionary interests (1). However, evolutionary theory ultimately relies on genetic or genomic support to demonstrate these tendencies. We used predictions of coadaptation theory and identified two genes that were differentially coexpressed in mothers and nymphs between treatments with or without posthatching parental care and mother-nymph interactions, Th and PebIII, with such distinct social functions. Neither Th nor PebIII was altruistic or selfish in a classical sense because both genes had a comparable function when expressed in mothers and offspring. These reciprocally altruistic and reciprocally selfish gene functions are peculiar because the genes fitness loss or gain during one life stage may at least partly be offset by its gain or loss during the other life stage. We envision that differential coexpression and reciprocally altruistic or selfish function are signatures of genes underlying parent-offspring coadaptation and may reflect a mechanism of co-regulation potentially through allelic variation in their cis-regulatory region. We predict that genes with differential coexpression and reciprocally altruistic or selfish function may be typical among genes underlying the social bond between parents and offspring and possibly also among caregivers and care recipients in other social systems.

Experimental design and behavioral manipulation. The earwigs were maintained in the laboratory as previously described (2). A total of 90 randomly picked mated females from the breeding stocks were randomly assigned to three experimental treatments with 30 females per treatment. Females assigned to the NC treatment were isolated from their first clutch 1 day after oviposition, which is typically the time when the clutch is complete. These females were then kept in a new petri dish for 6 days without food, as is natural during the period of EC, and then euthanized for RNA extraction. Females assigned to the EC treatment tended their eggs for 20 days to ensure maximal duration of EC while avoiding any interaction with hatched nymphs. Hatching typically occurs after 21 to 30 days (2). The eggs were allowed to hatch, and the nymphs were kept with food for 6 days. On day 6 after hatching, three nymphs per clutch were sampled for RNA extraction. Females in the FC treatment tended their eggs until the eggs hatched and then fully interacted with the nymphs for 6 days. On day 6 after hatching, the females and three nymphs per clutch were sampled. Six days was chosen because mother-offspring interactions reach a peak at this time (51).

NC females were in a state where no maternal care could be expressed except for a maximum 1-day contact with eggs during oviposition. EC females could express care exclusively toward eggs, and only FC females could behaviorally interact with hatched offspring. With regard to offspring, the EC nymphs experienced no interactions with their mother, while the FC nymphs had such interactions for 6 days. Thus, differential gene expression between the FC and EC treatments in females and nymphs was assumed to be largely due to parent-offspring interactions. Differential expression between the EC and NC treatment in females was assumed to be largely due to egg attendance.

Sequencing. The insects were euthanized by exposure to high concentrations of petroleum ether before dissection. From females, the antennae, head, abdomen (without gut to avoid microbial contamination), and ovaries were sampled separately for RNA extraction to investigate tissue-specific variation in gene expression. Each maternal sample was a pool of the same tissue from five individuals to obtain sufficient RNA quantities. For nymphs, RNA was extracted from the whole body without dissection. Each nymph sample was a pool of five clutches with three nymphs per clutch to obtain sufficient RNA quantities. All samples were stored in RNAlater (QIAGEN) at 80C.

A total of 84 samples were processed for RNA-seq, including six replicates of four female tissues across three treatments and nymph samples from two treatments: 6 (4 3 + 2) = 84. NC nymphs were not used for sequencing because the hatching success of eggs without maternal care was too low (fig. S1 and table S1).

The RNA of each sample was extracted using the TRIzol protocol (Invitrogen), resulting in six replicates per tissue per treatment. The cDNA library was prepared and sequenced with paired-end 100-nucleotide reads on Illumina HiSeq. Each sample was indexed using an Illumina TruSeq kit. Samples from different treatments and tissues were evenly distributed among four multiplex lanes.

Bioinformatic and statistical analysis. An average of 18 million RNA-seq reads per sample was generated. The reads of each sample were mapped to a previously published earwig transcriptome (14) using the BWA-MEM algorithm in BWA version 0.7.8-r455 (52). SAMtools version 0.1.18 (53) was used to process sam files to bam format and to count mapped reads for each contig. Mapped reads with a mapping quality higher than MQ40 were processed for further analysis.

The initial statistical analysis of gene expression differences between experimental treatments was carried out using the edgeR package (54) in R. The RNA-seq data were TMM-normalized. Pairwise comparisons of each gene between the FC and EC treatment were performed for each female tissue and the nymph samples using exact negative binomial tests. To take into account multiple testing, we used an FDR correction as implemented in edgeR. Corresponding P values are denoted as PFDR.

Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis were performed for differentially expressed genes with Blast2GO version 2.7.2 (55). A cutoff value was set at 106 for the BLASTX search against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant nucleotide database and the SWISS-PROT database using the NCBI BLAST service.

Experimental design. To test the effects of expression of the two candidate genes on females and nymphs, we carried out an RNAi experiment. To date, this is the first documented RNAi experiment performed on this nonmodel insect species. Th or PebIII was knocked down in separate treatments: knockdown in mothers (M/O+), nymphs (M+/O), and both (M/O). Three corresponding YFP treatments were used to control for the injection of exogenous double-stranded RNA. A total of 70 randomly mated female earwigs and their 1363 nymphs were randomly assigned to the experimental groups for behavioral and fitness assay. Clutch size was standardized to 20 nymphs in each family 1 day after hatching, except clutches that had less than 20 hatched nymphs. The sample size of each measured behavior and fitness trait was shown in table S5.

Synthesis of double-stranded RNA. The amplified sequences of each gene with a T7 promoter overhang at 5 and 3, respectively, were cloned from earwig cDNA to plasmids for storage and large-scale yields (table S3). Cloning was confirmed by sequencing the PCR product of each target gene from the plasmids. Double-stranded RNA was synthesized using RiboMAX large-scale RNA synthesis system T7 (Promega). The final concentration of double-stranded RNA used for injection was 6 g/l for each gene. The mothers were injected with 2 l, and 20 nymphs from each family were injected with a total of 2 l of double-stranded RNA on day 4 after the nymphs hatched. For RNAi injection, we used a CellTram air microinjector (Eppendorf) and borosilicate capillaries (Harvard) processed with a P-1000 Micropipette Puller (Sutter Instruments). Before injection, the earwigs were exposed to low concentrations of petroleum ether (Sigma-Aldrich, #77379) vapor for sedation.

Validation of knockdown. The double-stranded RNA was injected in the abdomen of mothers and offspring on day 4 after the nymphs hatched. The knockdown effects were initially validated with RT-qPCR after injection using three technical replicates per gene per sample. Each maternal sample was the head of a female. Each nymph sample was a pool of the whole body of three nymphs from the same clutch. Maternal samples included three Th-injected mothers, four PebIII-injected mothers, and two YFP-injected mothers. Offspring samples include three Th-injected nymphs, three PebIII-injected nymphs, and four YFP-injected nymphs. Both maternal and nymph samples were collected 3 days after injection. RNA was extracted using the TRIzol-LS reagent (Ambion). The cDNA libraries were synthesized using the GoScript Reverse Transcriptase system (Promega). The qPCR was run in triplicates on the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast platform using an EvaGreen 2X qPCR Master Mix reagent (Biotium). Expression levels were calculated using Ct. The calibration was done separately for mothers and offspring. Results are shown in fig. S2.

Behavior and fitness assays. The developmental and reproductive variables were quantified following the standard protocol used in a previous study in this species (2). The rate of offspring development was quantified as the number of days from hatching until the first nymph of a family reached the second juvenile instar and nymph survival as the proportion of surviving nymphs 3 days after injection divided by the number of nymphs hatched.

Food provisioning was recorded during observation sessions under red light (earwigs are nocturnal) of 1 hour each across three consecutive days after injection, which was on days 5, 6, and 7 after the nymphs hatched. Observations were started 15 min after setup to calm down the animals. The occurrence of mouth-to-mouth contact between the female and one of her nymphs was treated as a binomial trait (yes/no). The observer was blind to experimental treatments. For quantitative traits, the average values across the three consecutive observation sessions were used in the analysis. For binary traits, at least one event across the three sessions counted as yes. The future reproduction of females was assessed by (i) noting whether a second clutch was produced within 60 days of hatching of the first clutch and by (ii) counting the relative size of second clutches as the proportion of eggs in the second clutch over the sum of eggs in the first and second clutch.

The survival of 70 mothers and their 1363 offspring was quantified 3 days after injection (table S6). It was difficult to tell whether they died immediately after injection because both mothers and nymphs were sedated before injection. Seven females died during the 3 days and had to be excluded from the analysis because no behavior or future reproduction was measurable. Nymphs from all 70 families were used for the quantification of survival because the mortality due to injection of double-stranded RNA was captured in our YFP sham treatments to which target gene treatments were compared.

Statistical analysis for behavior and fitness assay. The effects of the RNAi treatments on measured traits were tested using GLMs (tables S1 and S2). In the GLMs, main effects consist of fixed factors [maternal treatment effect, offspring treatment effect, and gene effect (target gene versus YFP)] and covariate (oviposition date). Interactive effects comprise the maternal treatmentbygene interaction and offspring treatmentbygene interaction. We used a backward model simplification procedure, eliminating effects sequentially according to their P value when P > 0.1, starting with the interaction terms and largest P values. When no interactive effect could be further removed, we continued with nonsignificant main effects, starting from the largest P value, provided that it was not part of an interactive effect still in the model. Continuous dependent variables were modeled using a Gaussian error distribution. Discrete or proportional dependent variables [food provisioning (yes/no), second clutch (yes/no), and relative size of second clutch and survival] were analyzed using a binomial error distribution and a logit link. Effects of the candidate gene are detectable as deviation from the YFP side effects as significant interactions between the factor gene and one of the treatment factors. Statistical analyses were carried out using R version 3.1.1; tests were two-tailed with a significance threshold of = 0.05.

Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/6/1/eaaw0070/DC1

Fig. S1. Hatching success of 5073 total eggs in RNA-seq experiment.

Fig. S2. RT-qPCR validation for Th and PebIII knockdown.

Fig. S3. Nonsignificant behavior and fitness results for Th and PebIII knockdown.

Table S1. Hatching success of 5073 total eggs in RNA-seq experiment.

Table S2. GLM results on behavior and fitness for Th and PebIII knockdown.

Table S3. Nonsignificant GLM results of behavior and fitness assay for Th and PebIII knockdown.

Table S4. Primers for double-stranded RNA synthesis.

Table S5. Sample sizes in the behavioral and fitness assay of the RNAi experiment.

Table S6. Mortality of mothers and offspring in RNAi experiment.

Movie S1. Food provisioning in earwigs.

Data file S1. List of genes responsive to parent-offspring interaction in earwig mothers antennae.

Data file S2. List of genes responsive to parent-offspring interaction in earwig mothers head.

Data file S3. List of genes responsive to parent-offspring interaction in earwig mothers abdomen.

Data file S4. List of genes responsive to parent-offspring interaction in earwig mothers ovaries.

Data file S5. List of genes responsive to parent-offspring interaction in earwig offspring.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

N. J. Royle, P. T. Smiseth, M. Klliker, The Evolution of Parental Care (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).

M. Klliker, N. J. Royle, P. T. Smiseth, in The Evolution of Parental Care, N. J. Royle, P. T. Smiseth, M. Klliker, Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, ed. 1, 2012), pp. 285303.

J. Costa, The Other Insect Societies (Harvard Univ. Press, 2006).

G. J. Blomquist, A.-G. Bagnres, Insect Hydrocarbons: Biology, Biochemistry, and Chemical Ecology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

Acknowledgments: We thank S. Boos, L. Rllin, L. Sandrin, P. Suess, and X. Tang for technical support in the animal laboratory; R. Arbore, A. C. Roulin, L. Du Pasquier, G. Bento Neves, J. He, and C. Grozinger for technical advice; D. Ebert, J. Hottinger, and U. Stiefel for support during the RNAi experiments; the Quantitative Genomics Facility, Basel for Illumina HiSeq sequencing; and K. Sullam, J. Meunier, and M. Chapuisat for comments on the manuscript. All molecular work and bioinformatic analyses were carried out at the Genetic Diversity Centre (GDC) ETH Zrich. Funding: This project was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. PDFMP3_141788 to M.K. and J.-C.W). Author contributions: M.K. and J.-C.W. conceived the study. M.W., M.K., and J.-C.W. designed the experiments. M.W. and L.S. performed the experiments. M.W., M.K., and J.-C.W. analyzed the data. M.W., M.K., J.-C.W., and L.S. wrote the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors. Raw transcriptomic data are deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (PRJEB21539).

Visit link:
The genetic mechanism of selfishness and altruism in parent-offspring coadaptation - Science Advances

How does cruelty to animals influence behaviour in children? – The Statesman

All of us want peace on earth but, as we grow in size, we humans have become more distressed and more apart from each other. While we live together like lemmings, unfortunately we do not behave like lemmings who live in harmony. We have split the world into small pools of hatred and not only do we attack each other ceaselessly, we attack our own planet and everyone on it without thinking.

Do we want our children to grow up like us? No. We want our children to be happy but happiness has its own disciplines: gentleness, mindfulness, respect, a desire for peace, a love for nature. But do we raise them like this? Or do we teach them to be vicious and fearful from the day we think they can learn.

We teach them to be scared of all creatures, and fear breeds violence. By laughing when they pull up grass, or squash snails and ants, or by making them watch animal based cartoons like Bugs Bunny and Tom and Jerry where guns are fun, is sending your children on the path to destruction.

How does watching, or taking part in, cruelty to animals influence behaviour in children?

Sigmund Freud, the Austrian neurologist and psychoanalyst, believed that the human psyche (personality) is structured into three parts the id, ego, and superego. Children develop the id which deals with the instinctive side of human behaviour quickly. But it takes time for them to develop their superego the one that deals with moral conscience, which is why in their early years from 5-10, children are unaware of the moral right or wrong and usually act on their instincts and rely on imitation. If we show them cartoons, and these glorify violent games against animals, acting on their instincts they will develop moral leanings that they see in such animation. All violence, posing as fun, is going to bias their mental development and emotional understanding. From there they go on to video games: 90% of those are about violent supremacy, crashing, killing, shooting.

In the Little Albert experiment, Researchers John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner worked on stimulus generalization. If a child has been taught to fear one thing, what else will he fear in general ? A little boy Albert was conditioned to fear a white rat. They observed that Albert showed fear in response to similar stimuli he started fearing everything that was white a white dog, a rabbit and even white hair.

This study proved that its difficult for children to distinguish between conditioned stimuli and generally similar stimuli. Meaning: if children are conditioned to believe that animal violence is justified, there is a high chance that they will start believing that all violence is justified.

The Society for Neuroscience conference in San Diego showed that the prefrontal cortex grew smaller, and less active, in a group of people who had shown aggressive/violent tendencies as children. This validates the graduation hypothesis, which suggests that the presence of cruelty to animals at one developmental period predicts interpersonal violence at a later age. Animal abusers will always work their way up from harming animals to harming people. Their brain development actually predicts it.

Early experiences of violence may confer lasting damage at the basic levels of nervous, endocrine, and immune systems, and can even influence the genetic alteration of DNA. (Building a framework for global surveillance of the public health implications of adverse childhood experiences, Atlanta University, 2010.) What does that mean? It means that you are not just producing a violent child/ person, you are changing the brain and DNA so that his children will be inclined towards violence from the day they are born. Is that the world you want ?

One of the saddest things I have ever seen is a tied dog being beaten to death by a woman with her high heels. A child being strangled slowly. Both films are part of an industry called Crush and Snuff. Crush videos typically depict humans, usually women, crushing, stomping on, or impaling small, helpless animals to satisfy the bizarre sexual fetishes of their viewers. Snuff kill young children actually. The same people produce both types of films.

Jeff Vilencia, the person who introduced Crush films, recalls with pride that even as a child he was fascinated by seeing insects and animals being stepped upon, and was encouraged in his violence. Is he better than any serial murderer?

Cruelty to animals is a hallmark background for serial murderers. Eleonora Gullone, writing for Journal of Animal Ethics, states that Ted Bundy or Jeffery Dahmer, world famous serial killers, were also known for their animal abuse tendencies. During the trial of convicted sniper Lee Boyd Malvo, a psychology professor testified that the teenager, who killed 10 people with a rifle, had pelted-and probably killed-numerous cats with marbles from a slingshot when he was about 14.

Another study by Bill Henry and Cheryl Sanders, State College of Denver, found that nearly all homicidal sex offenders in the study engaged in significantly more animal cruelty when young.

The Violence Graduation Hypothesis suggests that animal cruelty in childhood is predictive of violence towards humans in adulthood. Of the number of serial murderers in a study, published in Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 36% engaged in animal cruelty as children, 46% engaged in animal cruelty as adolescent, and 36% engaged in animal cruelty as adults. This theory suggests that children practice animal cruelty, and are desensitised to the consequences of violent behaviour, before they graduate to violence against humans.

According to the paper, The Relationship of Animal Abuse to violence and other forms of Antisocial Behavior by Arluke, Levin, Luke and Ascione, the presence of cruelty to animals at one developmental period predicts interpersonal violence at a later developmental period. The study showed that animal abuse is uniquely related to violence towards humans, as opposed to other forms of violence. The results obtained by the study indicate that animal abusers were significantly more likely to be involved in some form of criminal behaviour, including violent crimes.

On January 1st, 2019 Americas FBI included acts of cruelty against animals alongside felony crimes like arson, burglary, assault, and homicide in the FBIs criminal database NIBRS, and began collecting data from 18,000 law enforcement agencies on acts of animal cruelty, including gross neglect, torture, organized abuse, and sexual abuse. Studies say that cruelty to animals is a precursor to larger crime, said Nelson Ferry, of the Bureaus Criminal Statistics Management Unit, which manages NIBRS. Thats one of the items that were looking at.

The National Sheriffs Association was a leading advocate for adding animal cruelty to the Bureaus collection of crime statistics. The Association for years has cited studies linking animal abuse and other types of crimes, domestic violence and child abuse. The National Sheriffs Association urged people to shed the mindset that animal cruelty is a crime only against animals. Its a crime against society. By paying attention to these crimes, we are benefiting all of society.

When police in India underplay, and try to avoid registering animal abuse crimes, this is what they should read or be taught in police training academies. The report titled Animal Cruelty as a gateway of Crime, released by the U.S. Department of Justice, estimated that animal abusers are five times more likely than non-animal abusers to commit violent crimes against people, four times more likely to commit property crimes, and three times more likely to have a record for drug or disorderly conduct offenses.

See the article here:
How does cruelty to animals influence behaviour in children? - The Statesman