Category Archives: Human Behavior

Top Virus Expert Warns Boosted People to Do This "As Soon as" They Can – Best Life

If you've felt like COVID's stronghold on the U.S. has loosened over the last few months, you're hardly alone. In fact, most Americans now say that their lives are looking more and more like they did pre-pandemic. According to a poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and the SCAN Foundation, 54 percent of adults feel their lives are somewhat the same as before and 12 percent feel that their lives are exactly the same today as they were before the pandemic hit. COVID cases are falling at the moment, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reporting a more than 5 percent decrease in new daily infections this week compared to last.

READ THIS NEXT: Dr. Fauci Just Said Virus Experts Are "Very Concerned" About This.

But the coronavirus is far from eradicated. Many virus experts have warned about a potential surge later this year, as the fall and winter seasons have already proved to be the most dangerous times for COVID's spread. Thomas Campbell, MD, an internal medicine physician who ran clinical trials for COVID vaccines, told UCHealth in Aurora, Colorado, that it's "important to plan for another wave in the fall and winter because there's a good probability that it will happen," as COVID will likely continue to spread due to a variety of factors.

"Both vaccine-induced immunity and immunity from natural infection wane over time. We have a virus that's still here along with waning immunity. And human behavior changes in the fall," Campbell explained. "Kids will go back to school. The weather will be colder. The daylight hours will be shorter, so people will be indoors more and having more contact with other people. Then, we'll have Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's, and travel associated with the holidays We have all the ingredients necessary to create a new wave."

The continued emergence of new Omicron subvariants is also likely to aid a future COVID surge, which is why vaccine manufacturers like Pfizer and Moderna have started to "create new, tailored versions of their booster shots that will better combat Omicron variants," according to UCHealth. On June 30, an advisory committee for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended approval for these new Omicron-specific booster vaccine formulas.

"The original vaccines and boosters did not specifically fight these Omicron variants because they hadn't developed yet," UCHealth further explained. "The vaccine makers have pledged to deliver the new doses by fall."

RELATED:For more up-to-date information, sign up for ourdaily newsletter.

But the likelihood of new booster shots has some people questioning when they should be getting their additional doses. Everyone over the age of 5 is eligible for a singular booster shot at least five months after their primary vaccine series, according to the CDC.A second booster is also available to adults who are 50 and older, as well as those 12 and older who are moderately or severely immunocompromised, once it has been at least four months since they received their first boost.

The CDC reports that nearly half of those fully vaccinated have gotten their first booster shot so far, but vaccination rates for the second booster are much lower. This may be partly because some people are unsure if they should be waiting for this additional dose, whether to better time it with the expected fall COVID surge or to get the new Omicron-specific booster formula. If you're holding out for one of these reasons, virus experts have a clear warning: Don't wait to get the second booster.ae0fcc31ae342fd3a1346ebb1f342fcb

"There is a high level of community transmission right now, so it's better to get it as soon as you are eligible to allow time to build up antibodies," Hannah Newman, MPH, the director of infection prevention at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, told WebMD. According toAmesh Adalja, MD, an assistant professor at the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University, it takes "probably seven days or so until you reach the peak protection for the immune system to have reacted."

Campbell also advised against waiting for a second booster, urging boosted individuals to get it as soon as possible as new variants continue to spread and vaccine-based immunity wanes further. "With the Omicron variant, after the first booster dose, the protection starts to really drop off by about six months," he said.

See more here:
Top Virus Expert Warns Boosted People to Do This "As Soon as" They Can - Best Life

The Hidden Governance in AI – The Regulatory Review

Measurement modeling could further the governments understanding of AI policymaking tools.

Governments are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) systems to support policymaking, deliver public services, and manage internal people and processes. AI systems in public-facing services range from predictive machine-learning systems used in fraud and benefit determinations to chatbots used to communicate with the public about their rights and obligations across a range of settings.

The integration of AI into agency decision-making processes that affect the publics rights poses unique challenges for agencies.

System design decisions about training data, model design, thresholds, and interface design can set policythereby affecting the publics rights. Yet today many agencies acquire AI systems through a procurement process that lacks opportunities for public input on system design choices that embed policy, limits agencies access to information necessary for meaningful assessment, and lacks validation and other processes for rooting out biases that may unfairly, and at times illegally, affect the public.

Even where agencies develop AI systems in house, it is unclear given the lack of publicly available documentation whether the policy relevant design choices are identified and subject to rigorous internal scrutiny, and there are only a few examples of such policy relevant design choices being subject to public vetting.

AI systems can be opaque, making it difficult to fully understand the logic and processes underlying an output, therefore making it difficult to meet obligations that attach to individual decisions. Furthermore, automation bias and the interfaces and policies that shape agency use of AI tools can turn systems intended as decision support into decision displacement.

Some governments have begun to grapple with the use of AI systems in public service delivery, providing guidance to agencies about how to approach the embedded policy choices within AI.

Canada, for example, adopted new regulations to ensure agency use of AI in service delivery is compatible with core administrative law principles including transparency, rationality, accountability, and procedural fairness. In April 2021, the European Commission unveiled a proposed Artificial Intelligence Act which is currently wending its way through the complex EU trilogue process. If adopted, the European law will, among other things, set standards and impose an assessment process on AI systems used by governments to allocate public benefits or affect fundamental rights.

These efforts are important. Nevertheless, building the capacity of administrative agencies to identify technical choices that are policyand therefore ought to be subject to the technocratic and democratic requirements of administrative law regardless of whether AI systems are built or boughtrequires tools and guidance to assist with assessments of data suitability, model design choices, validation and monitoring techniques, and additional agency expertise.

There is a growing set of tools and methods for AI system documentation. Used at appropriate times in the development or procurement of an AI system, these tools can support collaborative interrogation of AI systems by domain experts and system designers.

One such method is measurement modeling. Part of routine practice in the quantitative social sciences, measurement modeling is the process of developing a statistical model that links unobservable theoretical constructs (what we would like to model) to data about the world (what we are left with). We have argued elsewhere that measurement modeling provides a useful framework for understanding theoretical constructs such as fairness in computational systems, including AI systems.

Here, we explain how measurement modeling, which requires clarifying the theoretical constructs to be measured and their operationalization, can assist agencies to understand the implications of AI systems, design models that reflect domain specific knowledge, and identify discrete design choices that should be subject to public scrutiny.

The measurement modeling process makes the assumptions that are baked into models explicit. Too often, the assumptions behind models are not clearly stated, making it difficult to identify how and why systems do not work as intended.

But these assumptions describe what is being measured by the systemwhat the domain-specific understanding of the system is, versus what is actually being implemented. This approach provides a key opportunity for domain experts to inform technical experts about the reasonableness of assumptionsboth assumptions about which intended domain specific understanding of a concept should be used, and assumptions about how that concept is being implemented.

Careful attention to the operationalization of the selected concept offers an additional opportunity to surface mismatches between technical and domain experts assumptions about the meaning of observable attributes used by the model.

The specific tools used to test measurement modeling assumptions are reliability and construct validity. Broadly, this entails asking questions such as: What does an assumption mean? Does the assumption make sense? Does it work and in the way we expect?

An easily overlooked yet crucial aspect of validity is consequential validity, which captures the understanding that defining a measure changes its meaning. This phenomenon includes Goodharts Law, which holds that once a measure is a target, it ceases to be a good measure. In other words, does putting forward a measurement change how we understand the system?

As Ken Alder has written, measures are more than a creation of society, they create society. This means that any evaluation of a measurement model cannot occur in isolation. As with policymaking more broadly, effectiveness must be considered in the context of how a model will then be used.

AI systems used to allocate benefits and services assign scores for purposes such as predicting a teachers or schools quality, ranking the best nursing homes for clinical care, and determining eligibility for social support programs. Those assigned scores can be used as inputs into a broader decision-making process, such as to allocate resources or decide which teachers to fire.

Consider SASs Education Value-Added Assessment System (EVAAS), a standardized tool that claims to measure teacher quality and school district quality. Measurement modeling can help break down what EVAAS is doingthat is, what policies are being enforced, what values are being encoded, and what harms may come to pass as a result.

The EVAAS tool operationalizes the construct of teacher quality from a range of abstract ideals into a specific idea, a latent force that can be measured from differences in student test scores across years. To ensure that a measurement model is capturing what is intended, the designers of specific EVAAS tools need to consider the validity of the design choices involved.

For instance, does the operationalization of teacher quality fully capture the ideal (content validity) or match other agreed upon measures (convergent validity)? Cathy ONeil described examples where EVAAS scores were misaligned with teachers receiving teaching awards and support from the community.

We can further ask: Are the EVAAS teacher scores reliable across years? Again, ONeil has pointed to examples where a teacher could go from scoring six out of 100 to 96 out of 100 within one year. Teacher scores can further penalize students near the lower thresholds. Under-resourced school districts systematically result in lower teacher quality scores, which are much more likely a reflection of other social phenomena affecting the scores than teachers themselves (discriminant validity).

In addition, EVAAS tools literally encourage teaching to the testthat is, pedagogy that emphasizes test performanceat the expense of other educational priorities.

But even AI tools used for discovery are implicitly assigning scores, which are used to allocate agency attentionyet another decision.

Consider a federal government-wide comment analysis tool that surfaces relevant regulatory comments, identifies novel information and suppresses duplicate comments. What are those tools doing? Sorting comments by relevancebut that requires finding an implicit ranking, based on some understanding and measurement of what relevance means.

A measurement of relevance depends on defining or operationalizing relevance. So any system that sorts by relevance depends on this measurements. And these measurements are used to guide users action about what comments should be followed up on, or safely ignored, with what urgency, and so on.

All this means that the definition and operationalization of relevanceor any other conceptis governance. Even though one persons understanding of what is relevant might differ from another persons, there is now one understanding of relevance embedded in the AI modelout of sight and upstream. Human decisions that once informed policy are now tasks defined through design in upstream processes, possibly by third-party vendors rather than expert agency staff.

Previously visible and contestable decisions are now masked, and administrators have given this decision-making away. Unless of course, they have tools that help them retain it. That is where measurement modeling comes in.

Although even skilled experts cannot fully understand complex AI systems through code review, measurement modeling provides a way to clarify design goals, concepts to be measured, and their operationalization. Measurement models can facilitate the collaboration between technical and domain experts necessary for AI systems that reflect agency knowledge and policy.

The rigor imposed by measurement modeling is essential given that important social and political values that must guide agency action, such as fairness, are often ambiguous and contested and therefore exceedingly complex to operationalize. Moreover, the data that systems train and run on is imbued with historical biases, which makes choices about mappings between concepts and observable facts about the world fraught with possibilities for entrenching undesirable aspects of the past.

When the measurement modeling process surfaces the need to formalize concepts that are under-specified in law, it alerts agencies to latent policy choices that must be subject not only to appropriate expert judgment but to the political visibility that is necessary for the legitimate adoption of algorithmic systems.

Whether an agency is developing the AI system or procuring it, there are a range of methods for bringing the knowledge of outside experts and the general public into the deliberation about system design. These include notice-and-comment processes, more consultative processes, staged processes of expert review and public feedback, and co-design exercises. Measurement modeling can be used within them all.

Issues warranting public participation can include decisions about the specific definition of a concept to be modeled as well as its operationalization. For example, fairness has multiple context-dependent, and sometimes even conflicting, theoretical definitions and each definition is capable of different operationalizations.

Existing jurisprudence on the setting of formulas and numerical cutoffs, and the choices underlying methodologies, provides useful guidance for identifying aspects of AI systems that warrant public input. Agency decisions that translate ambiguous concepts such as what is classified as appropriate into a fixed number or establish preferences for false negatives or positives are clear candidates.

The introduction of AI systems into processes that affect the rights of members of the public demands urgent attention. Agencies need new ways to ensure that policy choices embedded in AI systems are developed through processes that satisfy administrative laws technocratic demands that policy decisions be the product of reasoned justifications informed by expertise.

Agencies also need guidance about how to adhere to transparency, reason giving, and nondiscrimination requirements when individual determinations are informed by AI-driven systems. Agencies also need new experts and new tools to validate and monitor AI systems to protect against poor or even illegal outcomes produced by forces ranging from automation bias, model drift, and strategic human behavior.

Without new approaches, the introduction of AI systems will inappropriately deny and award benefits and services to the public, diminish confidence in governments ability to use technical tools appropriately, and ultimately undermine the legitimacy of agencies and the market for AI tools more broadly.

Measurement modeling offers agencies and the public an opportunity to collectively shape AI tools before they shape society. It can help agencies clarify and justify the assumptions behind models they choose, expose and vet them with the public, and ensure that they are appropriately validated.

Abigail Z. Jacobs is an assistant professor of information and of complex systems at the University of Michigan.

This essay is part of a nine-part series entitledArtificial Intelligence and Procurement.

View post:
The Hidden Governance in AI - The Regulatory Review

Public awareness campaigns appear to lessen human-caused fires in Utah – The Daily Universe – Universe.byu.edu

A human-caused wildfire burns on the mountains in Centerville on July 4. State officials hope to limit human-caused fires through public awareness campaigns. (Centerville Police Department via Facebook)

Utahns, it appears, are on fire in the sense theyre doing a great job making sure their state isnt.

Despite extreme drought, state fire officials are optimistic about how Utahs wildfire season is shaping up this summer and it may be thanks to public awareness campaigns.

After a record-breaking year of wildfires in 2020, the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands launched Fire Sense to combat human-caused fires, which accounted for most of the fires in 2020. In 2021 Utah had 922 fewer human-caused fires.

Karl Hunt from Forestry, Fire and State Lands said the organization has seen a 50% decrease in human-caused fires this year. Hunt credits Fire Sense, a public awareness campaign focused on preventing human-caused fires. Thanks to that public awareness, Hunt said this years wildfire numbers are still trending downward. Fire experts and professionals have a positive outlook to support these numbers.

It seems to me that its been working, said battalion chief at Provo fire station 21 Crag Olson about public awareness campaigns like Fire Sense. Ive seen less in the last year or two than in previous years, I think people are being more cautious.

State Fire Marshal Ted Black agreed. I think all in all the citizens of Utah have stepped up and are trying to be safe, he said.

This year to date, Hunt said Utah has had 384 wildfires which have burned 6,000 acres. Around 250 of those fires are human-caused. Thats a number that is always up there for the cause of wildfires, he said.

Campaigns such as Hot Rod, Hot Sparks, Happy Campers Douse Fires and Ready, Aim No Fire promote awareness for common culprits of wildfires: cars, campers and even guns.

Olson said the Fourth of July weekend proved public behavior is changing for the better. I was pleasantly surprised at how few fire calls we had, he said. People did a lot better job.

The state often uses fire as a land management tool but it can quickly become a problem when unplanned and unnatural fires start popping up.

We can use fire to increase the health of the forest, Black said. But if all of our resources are out on fires we cant do that.

Thanks to a significant reduction in the amount of human-caused fires, Black said the Forest Service and other divisions of the Department of Natural Resources are able to put resources toward fighting more natural fires this year.

The resource drain from fighting human-caused fires is a potential issue with most of Utah in an extreme drought. Black said so far, the drought has primarily affected how fast and how far fires burn but could become a bigger issue if water reserves start to run out.

Weve had plenty of water to fight fire, but if we start having lakes go dry then thats going to be an issue, he said.

In the weeks before July 24th, another holiday which usually involves fireworks, Olson said dry weather could make celebrations dangerous if people arent careful.

If we dont get any more rain between now and then well be a little worse off, he said.

As the summer continues to get hotter and drier, the responsibility for reducing human-caused fires falls to every Utahn camping, lighting fireworks and even driving.

We can make a significant difference in the health of our forest, in reducing loss, unnecessary loss due to fire, if we just be careful,Olson said.

Continued here:
Public awareness campaigns appear to lessen human-caused fires in Utah - The Daily Universe - Universe.byu.edu

CISO priorities for the second half of 2022 – Cybersecurity Dive

Sometimes sticking to the basics is the best approach. Thats what CISOs say they will focus on as their priorities in the second half of 2022.

Regardless of everything else happening in the world, and all the latest shiny baubles in security, it's important to maintain the basics, said Jon Davis, CISO at Oomnitza.

Those basics include single sign-on, endpoint protection, proper patching, security awareness and training, encryption, and multifactor authentication.

The reason for making standard security best practices a priority is simple: when you take the easy stuff for granted, Davis said, it opens the door for risks.

In companies with 50-1,000 employees, CISOs considered security hygiene the most critical security priority according to a study by Forgepoint Capital.

The priority is born of resource constraints. These organizations typically lack the budgets to build layers of backups or failovers, according to the report.

This differed from the smallest organizations, which emphasize talent development and social engineering awareness. Enterprise-scale organizations have prioritized incident response and digital transformation.

Humans in SMBs play a much more vital role in the organizations overall security posture than they do in the enterprise. Smaller companies dont have the budgets available for some of the more sophisticated security systems that large companies bring in.

That puts the onus on human behavior to keep the network secure. That includes putting more emphasis on security hygiene, such as cyber awareness education to avoid phishing attacks, or encouraging regular use of MFA and better password management.

Cybersecurity leaders, like all business leaders, want to tackle priorities with an eye toward cost-saving measures. Meanwhile the threat landscape is constantly changing.

Right now, my team and I are sticking to basics and working to advance security without having to make more significant investments or add tooling, said Ryan Davis, CISO at NS1.

As the year progresses, we look at our roadmap about where the business operates and what is achievable given the overall economic climate, Davis said.

As the world continues to adjust to life with COVID-19, more companies are requiring their employees to return to the office, at least part time.

The return dates for many of the largest organizations have been fluid, shifting as positive cases rise and fall. Securing the hybrid workforce is an issue that CISOs are prioritizing, especially as they see this as a long-term, if not permanent, work model.

While many companies are turning to zero trust as a way to offer security for a hybrid workforce, Jason Lee, CISO at Zoom, admitted there is no one-true definition of zero trust. So CISOs are charged with finding the zero trust solution that will work for them.

Lees approach is to protect the person and their devices, no matter where they are. Its an end user security strategy that I want to reinforce, said Lee.

In tandem, one of Lees priorities as a CISO is to come up with ways to better enable his business to work in this new environment.

One security solution he is pursuing is getting rid of passwords. No one likes passwords, and they open up the company to too many risks. Lees favorite approach is to leverage a hard token combined with a biometric, which will offer a secure MFA option (and gives users no choice but to use a second authentication tool) no matter where the user is located.

More than 60% of security leaders dont believe their efforts are fully supported by their organizations board of directors, according to research by Encore. The same study also found that C-suite leadership doesnt like to talk about cybersecurity until a data breach occurs. Bringing this leadership on board with cybersecurity issues is a top priority for CISOs as 2022 continues.

The good news, said Davis, is that leadership is being very responsive to security findings and prioritizing them appropriately. They are investing wisely into security and security products.

The government might be pushing this relationship building higher on the priority list. An Executive Order from the Biden administration directs government agencies and all organizations to improve information sharing and take steps to become more cyber resilient. This will require better communication between leadership and CISOs.

At Zoom, Lee is already working on this priority. His company has formed a cyber committee within the board. Lee engages with this committee with a 90-minute meeting quarterly and has regular ad hoc meetings to discuss the latest threats and other security-related concerns.

Having security priority goals may help CISOs plan their strategies, but if everyone in the company doesnt buy in, they likely wont succeed. Thats why encouraging a proactive partnership for company-wide security is a top goal for Davis.

To achieve this goal, communication with staff may need to be reframed as security needs your help to succeed rather than security is here to stop you from making mistakes.

This kind of communication is critical to make sure everyone in the company understands their role in achieving our security goals, said Davis.

The goal of security priorities is to protect the business from risk. CISOs may set the priorities, but it is up to everyone, from the board of directors to the front-desk receptionist, to make sure those priorities are achieved to meet the No. 1 goal: a successful business.

See original here:
CISO priorities for the second half of 2022 - Cybersecurity Dive

When will COVID-19 become endemic? Possibly in about two years, Yale researchers say – Connecticut Public

Researchers at Yale have been working on an answer to one of the pandemics most lingering questions: When will COVID-19, and the coronavirus that causes it, become endemic?

We wanted to know when it would be over right from the start, said Caroline Zeiss, a professor of comparative medicine at the Yale School of Medicine.

Now Zeiss and her team think theyve landed on a fair estimate.

The median time was approximately 1,400 days from the start of the pandemic, she said, which leaves us at just under two years from now.

Two years thats when infection and transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2 could stabilize in the United States, according to the studys authors. It means the virus would continue to have a constant presence here, but it would be expected and have predictable patterns, much like influenza viruses and rhinoviruses that cause common colds.

Were not going to reach an endemic state until everybody has seen it [the virus], one way or another, Zeiss said, adding that vaccination is the safest method. And with vaccination and natural infection, and repeated natural infection, we just build this diverse immune repertoire that ultimately will protect us as a population.

But its still a moving target, she cautioned. The exact pathway to an endemic stage can be influenced by a number of factors.

The virus is so unpredictable and mutable, it could mutate somewhere, Zeiss said. It could mutate here, it could mutate in another country, and if its transmissible, it could create a version of what we saw earlier on [in the pandemic].

Joe Amon

/

Connecticut Public

The Yale study was funded by the National Science Foundation and published Tuesday in the journal PNAS Nexus.

Zeiss and her team found that the best way to predict the future course of the pandemic would be by modeling rates of infection and transmission among animals, since they, like humans, are susceptible to coronaviruses.

We havent seen pandemic-endemic transition of a coronavirus in our lifetimes, in humans, she said. Weve had other SARS [viruses], weve had MERS, but those did not spread globally like this virus.

Zeiss, who is also a veterinarian, said we have seen such transitions occur among animals.

Production animals, particularly pigs and chickens, are plagued with coronaviruses, she said, and a lot more is understood about them, because theyve been studied for decades.

In fact, Zeiss said studying coronavirus activity among animals can be useful not just for predicting an endemic stage, but to also help inform people of what to prepare for along the way. The poultry industry, for example, regularly vaccinates chickens for an endemic respiratory coronavirus that dates back to the 1930s.

What can we expect down the line once most of us are immune? Zeiss asked. What they do tell us is, periodically, the virus mutates and then you get a spike in pathogenicity the ability of a virus to cause disease or sometimes, the virus mutates and it becomes really, really apathogenic and it dies out. Thats happened, too.

However, its unlikely that the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 is going to die out anytime soon, if ever.

Yale researchers experimented with rats. They introduced the animals to a type of coronavirus that spreads very similarly to the coronavirus at the center of the COVID-19 pandemic but causes only mild disease in the rats.

Scientists then mimicked human behavior and created multiple scenarios in which the rats became exposed to the virus. Zeiss said her team also calculated in immunization to simulate COVID-19 vaccine uptake among the human population, and then continued to expose the rats to reinfection.

Sarah Mullin, a postdoctoral fellow in the Yale Center for Medical Informatics, took the experiment data and built a mathematical model to come up with a possible trajectory of the pandemics transition to an endemic stage in the U.S.

Tony Spinelli

/

Connecticut Public

For public health reasons, Zeiss said its important that people understand that endemic is not synonymous with safe.

Endemic just means that it has reached a fairly stable reproducible rate of recirculating amongst the population, she said. If youre susceptible, youre still going to get infected, and if you are prone to severe disease, you could still get severe disease.

The study found that an estimated 15% of the population will remain at risk of becoming infected with the virus, at any time, during an endemic phase.

The timeline also depends on what happens globally. Containing the virus and its variants in just certain regions or parts of the world leaves the global population vulnerable to a prolonged pandemic, Zeiss said.

I think nobody is safe until everybody is safe, she said. Until we have global endemicity, its not going to be stable here.

In the past 28 days, more than 17 million new confirmed and probable cases of COVID-19 have been identified worldwide, according to data from Johns Hopkins University. Of those, nearly 3 million have been in the United States.

Read more from the original source:
When will COVID-19 become endemic? Possibly in about two years, Yale researchers say - Connecticut Public

All There Is To Know About Matchmaker And Dating Coach Brandan Rader – Digital Journal

Meet Brandan Rader, the unmatched matchmaker and dating coach. With a success rate of about 90% and over 100 confirmed couples, he has hearts pounding and we are here for it! He works with an elite clientele including a-list celebrities, public figures, influencers, professional athletes, doctors, lawyers, etc.

What has contributed to Raders meteoric success?

He attributes it to his unique academic background and professional experience, which has provided him with insight into the deepest webbings of human nature. Rader graduated Cum Laude and a Distinguished Scholar with an advanced degree in psychology and professional certificates in Interpersonal Relationship Mediation, Matchmaking, Community and Behavioral Health, and Human Behavioral Research. He is an award-winning researcher who is the recipient of accolades from SACNAS and RaCAS for his research on habit formation

His passion for research into human behavior and interpersonal relationships helps reveal patterns on a societal and individual level. Rader transforms his empirical findings into techniques that he applies to his matchmaking and coaching services to help people discover healthy love. It is evident that Rader does not simply follow the trends and regurgitate information, he is on the vanguard.

His expertise has been commissioned by universities, government agencies, and private companies investigating interpersonal relationships and behavioral health. Rader has honed his matchmaking skills with industry leaders, such has Patti Stanger from The Millionaire Matchmaker on Bravo TV, and the largest matchmaking companies in the US, like Its Just Lunch. Brandan has helped other matchmaking companies refine their process, develop coaching programs, and generate millions in revenue. Rader has contributed his knowledge as a relationship and lifestyle expert on national talk shows and publications.

Working With Rader

To work with Brandan Rader, one has to get in line. He has an active waitlist that isnt getting any shorter! Hey, what can one expect when the artist has the highest success rate in the biz? Rader is dedicated to his mission to help as many singles as possible find happy, healthy long-term relationshipswhich is why he created masterclasses predicated on his award-winning research, original dating data, and proprietary techniques. The masterclasses received masterful reviews during the soft launch. They are designed to help quality singles eliminate their limiting dating and relationship patterns, find clarity on what they should be looking for to find their ideal partner, generate more romantic opportunities with high-caliber singles, and transform their romantic opportunities into a healthy relationship.

Rader will be releasing his new masterclasses in June 2022. For priority access, join his mailing list on brandanrader.com or connect with him on Instagram at @brandanraderoffcial

Media ContactCompany Name: Brandan Rader Consulting LLCContact Person: Brandan RaderEmail: Send EmailCity: DenverState: ColoradoCountry: United StatesWebsite: https://www.brandanrader.com/

See more here:
All There Is To Know About Matchmaker And Dating Coach Brandan Rader - Digital Journal

Nathan Fielder on ‘The Rehearsal’ – Vulture

This article was featured in One Great Story, New Yorks reading recommendation newsletter. Sign up here to get it nightly.

In 2009, when the comedian Nathan Fielder first moved to L.A., he learned to tell his managers not to send him to meetings. Why bother? If the point was to charm people into giving him a job, sitting down with them could only hurt his chances. Id always say, If people like the stuff Im making, Im not going to do anything to heighten that in person, he recalled. Im not going to be very funny in the room.

This was not necessarily a case of false modesty. Fielder did not initially strike all of his friends and colleagues as the most engaging personality. Tim Heidecker, who met him in 2010, was bewildered when he heard Fielder was pitching his own show, Nathan for You, to Comedy Central. Who? That guy? the comedian remembered thinking. Hes deceptive, said Jimmy Kimmel, who has had Fielder on his show several times. Because you look at him and you go, Oh, this seems like a normal guy. Maybe even a boring normal guy. Maybe even a guy Id be bummed I had to sit next to on a plane.

On Nathan for You, Fielder used his faade of bland charmlessness to get people to do and say astonishing things. The cult hit, which ran on Comedy Central from 2013 to 2017, was a kind of parody of business-improvement shows like Kitchen Nightmares. In a typical segment, Fielder would visit a real small business, usually somewhere in the Greater Los Angeles area, and pitch the owner on an absurd idea poo-flavored frozen yogurt, a special soundproof box in which vacationing parents could confine their children while having sex in a hotel room. His manner, an unusual combination of gentle and pushy, arrogant and insecure, suggested both a desperate desire to be liked and a pathological inability to understand why he wasnt. He asked intrusive questions, stood too close to people, and leaned in even closer when they tried to pull away. What made the show outrageously funny, and arguably kind of mean, was his relentless commitment to the role. Even as his subjects squirmed in discomfort, he delivered his pitches with such conviction that people nearly always agreed to try whatever scheme he proposed, no matter how ridiculous it made them both look.

The show positioned Fielder, now 39, at the forefront of what the New York Times recently hailed as a quiet revolution in comedy. Along with Sacha Baron Cohen and John Wilson, both of whom have collaborated with him, he belongs to a contingent of comedians who specialize in exposing the sorts of behavioral quirks, the unsightly warts of the self, that we are forever trying to hide. In an age of fake news and filtered pics and Big Lies, his genre some call it reality comedy has become an improbable source of precious truth. Unlike, say, Baron Cohen, scourge of NRA shills and Rudy Giuliani, Fielder isnt especially interested in politics. What distinguishes him, along with the diabolical intricacy of his pranks, is the depth of his interest in the human psyche. I occasionally was able to draw out some things the interviewee wouldnt normally reveal on a television show, but hes able to draw out more, said Baron Cohen, one of the pioneers of the form. He took the genre I stumbled into and moved it forward. Hes about to move it even further. The Rehearsal, on HBO, marks Fielders return to acting and directing for the first time in five years, and it is his most ambitious, thrilling, and personal work yet.

On the Cover

Nathan Fielder. Photo: Zachary Scott for New York Magazine. Production by Megan Sluiter; Set Design by Laura Sian Morris; Styling by Megan Parsons for The Rex Agency; Grooming by Gabrielle Alvarez.

Nathan for You was set in an L.A. devoid of Hollywood glamour or Silver Lake chic, a world of electronics chains and mall Santas and business-casual khakis. Fielder lives in Silver Lake, but he seems to belong to that world, too. When I met him at his door, he was dressed in a nondescript outfit of black chinos, white T-shirt, and gray New Balances. In his living room, there was a beige couch, some fluffy white pillows the kind of neutral dcor you might find at a perfectly nice Airbnb. There are multiple streams of internet discourse devoted to identifying the source of his inexplicable attractiveness. Perhaps its not so inexplicable. Out in the world, he is witty, self-deprecating, and successful. He has a slim build, a still-boyish face, and the thick, slightly unruly salt-and-pepper hair of a grad student who just spent a month in the lab pulling consecutive all-nighters. Fielder speaks in the same flat, stilted voice he uses on the show, but in person, its infused with a tone of perpetual, bone-dry amusement. Heidecker, who eventually came to appreciate his subtle charms, described him as the consummate straight man. Hes a really fun person to be an idiot around, he said. I might say, We should start eating dog food, and hed be like, Why would I do that?

At his house, Fielder introduced me to his cats, Jackie and Rocket, who trailed us into the kitchen and jumped onto the table. When I got them, they were kittens, he said. There were like ten brothers and sisters grouped together, all cuddling, and then one off to the side. Jackie was the outcast. I was like, I want her, Fielder said. She maybe has some behavioral issues, he added uncertainly. A cat, of course, is a creature that doesnt cooperate with anyones agenda but its own. Fielder can be the same way. Before I had a chance to ask my first question, he had asked me several: Did I get my reporters notebook on Amazon? Wasnt it a shame that when I opened it to take notes, my interview subjects couldnt see the word NEWS printed in large block letters on the cover? We sat at the kitchen table, and I finally asked how he was doing. Well, I hate talking about myself, he said. He claimed this had something to do with a lifelong struggle to articulate his thoughts. When he was in elementary school, a speech therapist told him he knew fewer than 500 words, which bothered him so much his mother gave him a book of advanced words like abreast. (Not a breast, he clarified.) I still, to this day, feel like I dont know a lot of words. Maybe its that. He shook his head. I dont know.

He hopped up from the table and began pacing around the kitchen island, searching for a pair of claw clippers. Did he claw you? he asked, looking at Rocket, who had planted himself on top of my recorder and had not clawed me. He saw me writing something in my notebook. Are you writing Cat clawing Nathan? He laughed. Cat does not like Nathan, he continued. Nathans own cat does not like him. As we left the house, he asked if I would ever abandon a story after it had been assigned. What would I have to do to make you bail?

The Rehearsal, like all of Fielders work, is not quite what it seems at first. The shows sparse marketing materials describe it as a series about the lengths one man will go to reduce the uncertainties of everyday life. In the opening scene of episode one, Fielder walks into the apartment of a middle-aged teacher who has responded to a vague Craigslist ad. In a video submission, the teacher has confessed to Fielder that he has spent years agonizing over a lie he told a friend on his trivia team about his educational background. The Fielder who greets him isnt exactly like the one we have seen before. He is warmer, more inclined to smile. In the voice-over, he notes hes been told his personality can make people uncomfortable, so he tries a few jokes. He notices a lot of doors in the apartment. Door city over here! he exclaims with a shy grin. The teacher laughs awkwardly.

Fielder has come to this apartment to offer what may sound like an extraordinary gift. Enlisting a construction crew and a small army of actors, Fielder will build a set and direct a series of rehearsals that will allow the teacher to practice confessing his secret to his friend, over and over. What if, the show asks, we could know what will happen in our lives before it happens, could prepare for every way it might unfold? What if we could take control of our futures? There is something poignant, and kind of wonderful, about what Fielder appears to be proposing, but anyone whos watched Nathan for You knows his objective is never straightforward. Theres a real Milgram quality to Nathan, said the actor and comedian H. Jon Benjamin, referring to Stanley Milgram, the eccentric and visionary psychologist known for a notorious study of obedience, begun in 1961, in which he lured subjects into administering what they believed were electric shocks to other participants. It always seemed like he was from another planet learning how to do human customs, Benjamin told me, or AI collecting information on human behavior.

At his cluttered office in a rental house in Echo Park, Fielder flipped open his laptop and zoomed into the writers room for How To With John Wilson, an HBO show for which he serves as an executive producer. Fielder met Wilson by chance in January 2018 at a restaurant in New York with a group of mutual friends. He had recently wrapped the final season of Nathan for You and was trying to figure out what to do next. Fielder says Comedy Central wanted more seasons of the show, but he was ready to move on. He happened to see one of Wilsons documentary shorts about his experience as a plaintiff on a court TV show, where he had appeared after deliberately filing a bogus lawsuit. That night at dinner, Fielder suggested they make a show together. He wanted to pour his energy into something, Wilson told me. And he completely changed my life.

If Fielder is like Milgram, designing experiments to study how people behave, Wilson is more of an anthropologist, obsessively observing humans in their natural environments. He strolls around New York with a camera, recording interviews with New Yorkers and surreptitiously documenting their strange customs (a woman placing a pigeon into a shopping bag, a man dragging an air conditioner down the street on a leash). The episodes take inspiration from the most basic genre of internet content: the instructional video. Each tackles a different topic: how to make risotto, how to throw out batteries, how to make small talk. But Wilson is not actually interested in teaching anyone how to make risotto. Hes interested in exploring his struggles with making risotto and with discarding batteries and chatting with people at parties and all the other confounding aspects of existence that seem to make the life of John Wilson a perilous adventure. Fielders role in the writers room is to broaden the scope of these investigations, to lead Wilson down alleys of inquiry he might not have otherwise thought to pursue.

Today, they were trying to hammer together a provisional script for an episode of the shows third season. The topic filled Wilsons heart with trepidation. Is there anything new, Fielder asked, on the public-bathroom front? Wilson and the two other writers in the room Michael Koman, an EP on How To and the co-creator of Nathan for You, and Alice Gregory, a journalist stared back at him. They had already spent days talking about how hard it can be to find and use a public toilet, analyzing the problem from every angle, but they were still struggling to answer a basic question: Why does this mundane fixture of modern life make people so anxious? Its all relative to the sound other people make, Fielder proposed. If other people are farting a lot, youll never feel self-conscious.

Koman disagreed: I think all it takes is a pair of shoes to just completely seize up.

Wilson, peering through thick glasses, nodded. I feel like some people might wear different shoes in the bathroom just so that when you look under, you dont know its them.

Fielder clasped his hands together professorially. Obviously, its terrifying to make any noise in a bathroom with other people, he conceded. One strategy, if you had to make a sound with your bum, is to spread your cheeks wider to avoid the fart noise.

At Fielders prompting, they considered the amazing variety of public toilets throughout the city. Koman reflected on the comfort and dignity he felt upon taking a dump in Japan, where the toilet seats are sometimes heated, which got Fielder thinking about whether there are people who, because of what they do for a living, dont care if a bathroom is clean and comfortable. Fielder proposed sending Wilson to a morgue to interview its employees about the bathroom politics of the place. If even people who are comfortable with corpses feel anxious about using public toilets, that would be a no hope moment for the rest of us, Fielder said.

The challenge would be getting those people to respond honestly. Fielder understands that when people go on reality TV, they have certain expectations for how theyre supposed to act. In his own shows, he uses a variety of tactics to throw his subjects off-balance needling or misdirecting them, sitting in excruciating silence until they crack. In one episode of Nathan for You, a Realtor reveals she was once choked by a ghost in Switzerland; in another, a gas-station owner nonchalantly says he drinks his grandsons pee when hes scared. As Fielder sees it, uncomfortable situations can prompt people to expose parts of themselves they usually try to conceal qualities that make them unique and often endearing. On the Zoom, he suggested that Wilson interview the workers without telling them the episode was about bathrooms. If the subjects knew the topic was toilets, they would surely clam up or, worse, try to be funny.

In the growing subgenre of reality comedy, comedians play off the reactions of real people. Some of these shows cause mild discomfort; the most extreme will make you want to curl up and die.

Photo: Michael Underwood/Everett Collection (Fielder); PictureLux/Alamy (Glick); Courtesy of WarnerMedia (Andre); VH1/Courtesy Everett Collection (Ritchie); GM/Alamy (Galifianakis);Everett Collection/Alamy (Knoxville, Benjamin); Cindy Ord/Getty Images (Triumph); Alli Harvey/Getty Images (Lee); Courtesy of HBO (Wilson); Universal/Everett Collection(Cohen); Jeremy Chan/Getty Images (Chatman)

When Fielder was 13, he had a friend whose father and grandfather were both magicians. One day, the friend showed him a simple card trick. Fielder begged him to teach him how to do it. He and the friend joined the Vancouver Magic Circle, the only kids in a sea of old men. He got a job at a magic store in the mall, carried a deck of cards around with him at all times, and started performing at childrens birthday parties. One night at dinner, he agreed to show me the feat of deception that short-circuited his brain all those years ago. Its not that impressive, he warned, slipping a worn business card from his wallet. See the card? With a flick of his wrist, the card disappeared. I asked him to do it again. Fielder smiled. No, Im not going to do it again.

Our table was illuminated by the ambient glow of an enormous sign affixed to an ITSUGAR across the street. We were at a Japanese restaurant in an outdoor mall at the Universal Studios theme park, a sprawling monument to crass consumerism, seductive storytelling, and the allure of animatronic dinosaurs. I asked Fielder what drew him to magic as a kid. His hesitation to answer this sort of question did not come as a surprise. Fielders colleagues have described him as a genius in the edit room, a master at pulling narratives out of countless hours of incoherent footage, but hes less confident when it comes to telling his own story. I had already heard the following speech several times with slight variations: I think you can build a story for yourself and retroactively say, Well, that probably was this. Youre looking for the logical connections. Its nice to tell a story that way, but I dont know if thats always whats happening. He fiddled with his chopsticks, rolling them in his fingers. I dont know. Maybe.

Fielder grew up in Vancouver, the child of two social workers, civil servants who helped people injured on the job. The family had no cable, only a handful of VHS tapes his grandfather had recorded, including a Peter Pan musical that still aired on public television in the 80s. On Halloween, Fielders parents would take away his candy and replace it with healthier snacks. They sent him to a Jewish elementary school that he remembers mostly for its emphasis on Holocaust education. They were showing us dead bodies at a very young age, he said. At 13, he transferred to a large public school, a bewildering experience. I didnt understand how people made friends, he said. Performing magic, he soon discovered, was easier than conjuring small talk. Youre saying, Heres what were going to engage about.And then when the trick is done, the interaction ends, he said with a laugh. Around that time, he joined the high-school improv team. One of his partners, who happened to be Seth Rogen, recalled how Nathan was always doing his own thing during warmup exercises. It was not even on the table that he would act like he was burning in lava, he said.

After studying business at the University of Victoria, Fielder got a job, briefly, at a brokerage, which he found depressing. He decided to give himself a year to see if he could succeed as a comedian, so in 2005 he moved to Toronto for Humber Colleges comedy program and joined a collective called Laugh Sabbath. He bought a video camera and made hundreds of experimental shorts. Katie Crown, a frequent collaborator, recalled that Fielder had a particular idea of fun. Sometimes he would dare her to do something absurd, like draw a goatee on her face in chocolate sauce, then turn to a waiter and pretend everything was normal. When he presented his videos at the Laugh Sabbath weekly show, he noticed that people often laughed at aspects of the work he hadnt intended to be funny his voice, his facial expressions. It felt freeing. There was a transition where I went from trying to hide the embarrassing parts to appreciating the things about myself that I hated before, he said.

Fielders videos caught the eye of a producer on This Hour Has 22 Minutes, Canadas equivalent of The Daily Show. In 2007, he developed an interview segment for the show called Nathan on Your Side. He went around the country in a shirt and tie confronting real people with questions no local correspondent would ever ask. In one, he sits down with a professional matchmaker and inquires when they will get to the kiss. Is this a hypothetical question, or does he really expect her to kiss him? All the essential elements of the Nathan for You persona are already in place the inscrutable affect, the disturbing man-childs gaze, the talent for responding to an awkward moment by making it ten times worse. Whenever both people are feeling like theyre ready, the matchmaker replies, looking a little concerned about where this is headed. Okay, he presses on. Are you feeling like youre ready? She tries to break the tension with a joke. Sure, she says, laughing, We just wont tell my husband. Okay, he replies. The camera lingers on her panicked expression as her laughter slowly grows brittle and dies. By the end of the segment, he is holding his face inches from hers.

When Fielder was in his mid-20s, Koman, then working as the head writer of the Comedy Central sketch show Important Things With Demetri Martin, hired him as a writer. One of his colleagues on the show, H. Jon Benjamin, found him to be endearing, and odd. Wed go out to eat, and everyone would order, and then the waiter would come to him and he would stall, he recalled. He would ask about every dish. He would ask what the ingredients were. I remember him asking about chicken teriyaki for, like, three minutes Whats in it? Whats in the sauce? Do you like it? to the point where the server was like, I dont have time for this. The assumption, I think, was that it was a joke, and it was the most entertaining thing to watch. But he was not joking he could not order. It was like hed spent six years alone in his room doing magic and was now wandering around like a foreigner in this world. Benjamin offered Fielder a job acting and writing on his Comedy Central series Jon Benjamin Has a Van. During Fielders tenure on the show, he and Koman pitched Nathan for You to Comedy Central. When Benjamin first watched it, he was struck by how much of Fielder he saw in the work. He was kind of exposing his own obsessive personality disorder, he said.

Some of Nathan for Yous Best Stunts: The Hero: Nathan becomes another man in order to turn him into a hero. Dumb Starbucks: A local coffee shop is made over into a Starbucks parody. Photo: Comedy Central; Nick Ut/AP/Shutterstock.

Some of Nathan for Yous Best Stunts: The Hero: Nathan becomes another man in order to turn him into a hero. Dumb Starbucks: A local coffee shop i... more Some of Nathan for Yous Best Stunts: The Hero: Nathan becomes another man in order to turn him into a hero. Dumb Starbucks: A local coffee shop is made over into a Starbucks parody. Photo: Comedy Central; Nick Ut/AP/Shutterstock.

Gas-Station Rebate: An independent gas station gets a ludicrous rebate scheme. Claw of Shame: Nathan vs. a claw that threatens to make him a sex offender. Photo: Comedy Central.

Gas-Station Rebate: An independent gas station gets a ludicrous rebate scheme. Claw of Shame: Nathan vs. a claw that threatens to make him a sex o... more Gas-Station Rebate: An independent gas station gets a ludicrous rebate scheme. Claw of Shame: Nathan vs. a claw that threatens to make him a sex offender. Photo: Comedy Central.

It was 2011, an ideal time for Fielder to sell a show as strange as Nathan for You to a television network. Jackass and Baron Cohen had proved that America had an appetite for absurdist stunts, and The Office had revealed our desire for scenes of excruciating awkwardness set in the drab confines of a suburban business environment. But Fielders interests had always been more obscure. One of the artists he admires is the British mentalist and illusionist Derren Brown. In one of Browns television specials, which Fielder suggested I watch, Brown brainwashes businesspeople who have never been in trouble with the law into committing what they believe to be a genuine armed robbery. Hes a guy who made something where you cant figure out how its done and how its so good, Koman said. If I had to guess what drove Nathan, it would be to feel like he made something that had those qualities.

In its best moments, Nathan for You didnt just make you laugh. It provoked feelings of awe, affection, and, not infrequently, a desire for a vortex to open up in the center of your couch and swallow you whole. In the 2015 season-three finale, which deviates from the shows business theme, Fielder sets out to help Corey, a hopeless man with a dead-end job, get a girlfriend and become a national hero. In a typical reality show, this would have involved a fitness program, a makeover, a session or two with a lifestyle guru. Fielder, instead, yanks back the curtain on the American obsession with personal transformation, the belief in the quick fix, the overnight success, that stretches back to Dale Carnegie and beyond, revealing the emptiness at its core.

The episode took more than six months to make. Fielder begins his quest by hiring a fourth-generation circus performer to teach him how to walk on a wire. Then he disposes of Corey, hiding him for two weeks in a trailer in the Mojave Desert. With the ostensible protagonist safely out of the way, Fielder puts on a padded bodysuit and a prosthetic mask of Coreys face and becomes him. He meets a woman named Jasmine while posing as Corey online, goes on a date with her, and spends the whole night dancing. It was nice, for once, to have a night away from all my insecurities, he drones in a voice-over.

In reality, this performance was a grueling test of stamina. Eric Notarnicola, a writer and editor on the show, recalled Fielder sitting in the makeup chair for some four hours each day for two weeks while technicians painstakingly affixed the Corey prosthetic to his face. It would look like he was crying, but it was just sweat that was pouring out of the holes between his eyes and the mask, Notarnicola said. Hed torture himself to get a good scene.

The climax of the episode is one of the most troubling, profound, and funny sequences in all four seasons. Wearing Coreys face, Fielder walks back and forth across a wire strung between two seven-story office buildings while a crowd of spectators, reporters, and Coreys grandparents cheer him on. At last, hidden from the crowd in a tent on the roof, he switches places with Corey, instructing him to walk out into the waiting arms of Jasmine, a woman he has never met. Corey tells Fielder hes confused by whats happening, but once he leaves the tent and hears the roar of the crowd and sees the girl beaming at him, he meets the moment. Following Fielders directions, he asks if she wants to kiss. She consents, if you can call it that given all the false information shes been fed. Corey looks out at the crowd and the news cameras below and delivers a speech Fielder wrote for him, glowing with unearned pride. Coreys response to Fielders scheme, and the crowds response to Corey, captures so much of what Nathan for You reveals about human nature our willingness to do what were told no matter how wrong it seems, our credulous belief in heroes and tidy narratives. As the episode winds down, the camera dwells on a close-up of the lonely magician, the sad clown behind it all. Makeup artists peel away the prosthetic face, revealing Fielders dead eyes, his empty expression, like something from a horror movie about the death of the American Dream.

Fielder said his mother thinks of what he does as ethnomethodology, an obscure discipline of sociocultural analysis. Ethnomethodologists attempt to examine society through the study of ordinary people and everyday affairs, in part by designing experiments aimed at disrupting the rules that govern human behavior. In one classic experiment, the disciplines founder, Harold Garfinkel, instructed his students to pretend to be lodgers in their own homes without revealing to their parents and siblings what they were doing. For the most part, family members were not amused, Garfinkel later noted in his 1967 book Studies in Ethnomethodology, the defining text of the field. Even after the students explained their assignments, the unwilling subjects felt manipulated and used. Please, no more of these experiments, the sister of one student begged. Were not rats, you know.

When Nathan for You first aired, many critics hailed it as brilliant, but some wondered if it wasnt also cruel. On a Slate culture podcast in 2014, Dan Kois said there were moments when the concepts really hit and other times that made him deeply unhappy with himself and the world. Watching the show, it was sometimes hard not to worry for the people who were in it. Did they know what they were getting into?

The answer is not usually, at least not at first. Fielders producers would typically tell business owners he was making a show about small businesses for MTV Networks (Comedy Centrals parent company). Fielder tended to appear after the contracts were signed and the cameras were rolling. Some realized the joke early on and were happy to play along. Joy Lazarus, then the owner of a ranch that offered horseback rides, didnt mind Fielders tendency to ask so many unusual questions. He was really intrigued by the horses, she said fondly. The widow of the late Judge Filosa, a recurring character, said Fielder and his crew showed up to his funeral. That show was the best thing that could have happened to him, she said. He loved it.

Others were upset by the experience. In season three, Eric Belland was working as the manager of an outdoor-clothing store where Fielder set up a display for a windbreaker hed designed to raise awareness of the Holocaust. Belland was offended by the display itself bodies in ovens at the service of humor and felt Fielder had cast him as the rube. He didnt feel any better when he saw the episode and realized it was all a joke. He looks like an idiot within the confines of the show, he said, but he looks like a nasty trickster outside the confines of what the show is supposed to be. Mark Rappaport, the inventor of a toy called the Doinkit, said he knew Fielder was doing a bit after just a couple of minutes with him but disliked him anyway. He was trying to get me to say things that would be harmful to my business, he said, and to show how funny he was.

It can be hard to tell just by watching the show how a given subject will feel about it. When fans debate its cringiest moments on Reddit, they sometimes cite a scene with an actress named Victoria Lynn. In that episode, Fielder stages a play at a bar in a highly impractical attempt to circumvent Californias ban on indoor smoking. Lynn was cast in one of the roles. At one point, Fielder proposes an acting exercise. He gazes into her eyes and instructs her to say I love you. One of the running jokes of the series is that Fielder is desperate to connect with someone, anyone, and will use his power as a television host to wheedle affirmation out of everyone he meets. Im not believing that at this point, Fielder says in the episode. Say it again. She does. Again, he says. This happens 11 times, ending only when Lynn points out Fielder has tears in his eyes. Viewers have wondered whether she felt harassed or threatened, but as it turns out, she had a great experience. He just seemed like he needed to hear I love you, she told me, and I felt really comfortable giving him that.

Fans have often said Nathan for You exposes the cruelty of capitalism, depicting America as a place where people will do nearly anything to survive. But that is also a large part of what can make the show itself unsettling to watch. By focusing on small businesses, it depends on the participation of people who are struggling, many of them immigrants and people of color. In one of the more unpleasant segments, Fielder pitches the owner of the Help Cleaning Service on an idea he says would allow her to offer the fastest clean in the country. At his suggestion, the owner dispatches 40 of her employees to a small apartment. Crammed into the place like clowns in a clown car, they manage to clean it in just over eight minutes. After they finish, Fielder lines them up in front of the man who lives there, a middle-aged white guy, and tells them hes single. When the guy compliments the women on their hard work, Fielder turns to them and jokes, If youre lucky, he could do some hard work on you. The women look unamused.

The owner of the housecleaning service, Kandiie Tapia, is a Mexican immigrant. She was 22 when Fielders producers told her they wanted to interview her about how she had built her business. She felt honored that someone wanted to share her story and called her family to tell them the good news. But after the producers rushed her through the process of signing a contract, they flipped a switch, she said. During the taping, she found Fielder to be rude. He was in character, but she didnt know that, or that his technique sometimes involved getting a rise out of a subject. At one point, Tapia said, he blew his nose in a tissue and then asked her if she would throw it out for him. Youre the Help, right? she recalled him asking her. (No such exchange made it into the episode.) It was a power move, she told me. Like hes white and Im a minority and Im young. She talked to her husband about dropping out, but he still thought the show could benefit the business. When the episode aired and Tapia realized it was a comedy, she was so embarrassed she told her family not to watch it. If Id known what it really was, I would have said no, she said. Im not gonna go on a show voluntarily to be made fun of.

Fielder said he was surprised and upset to learn how Tapia felt. It kills me any time I hear people didnt like their experience, he said. I remember her being very excited about it. He didnt recall asking her to throw out a tissue or calling her the Help and couldnt imagine having done that. I dont want to invalidate anyones experience, he said, but I know the types of jokes I might make. He pointed out that he is the one who is meant to look like a fool in the episode. I definitely feel Im the most pathetic person in everything I do.

Still, he wondered if the core idea of Nathan for You might explain why Tapia would feel upset and he would never know. One of the shows central jokes is that the business owners think his ideas are dumb but do them anyway. Sometimes they just want the promotion and theyre making the calculation, he said. Sometimes they dont want to hurt my feelings because they can tell Im excited about it. And sometimes what might be at play is a power dynamic where the presence of cameras and the pressure of the moment is making them say yes. When the cameras arent rolling, Fielder said, he and his team regularly check in to make sure people want to keep going. His goal was to give ordinary people an experience outside their day-to-day lives. And generally people have an assumption of reality TV being a fairly absurd thing. He said only one subject ever quit. But maybe more people hadnt dropped out because of the very dynamic the show critiques. You can be checking in with someone and theyre constantly saying, Yes, this is great, lets do it. But it might not be completely true, or later they might change their mind. Its a weird paradox, he said. The thing where were satirizing these power dynamics is also a challenge in making the show. And we do get it wrong.

Nathan Fielder in The Rehearsal. Photo: Allyson Riggs/HBO

At Universal Studios, Fielder suggested we take in some culture: a live stunt show based on Waterworld, the 1995 postapocalyptic epic starring Kevin Costner. The movie was a flop of historic proportions, and yet the show, improbably, is still going strong. On a Wednesday afternoon, the stadium was packed and the crowd was shrieking. What percentage of people here even know Waterworld is a movie? Fielder wondered.

Life, as Fielder is acutely aware, is unpredictable. The Rehearsal grew out of his exhaustive efforts to anticipate how each episode of Nathan for You would unfold. To prepare for every scene, Fielder and his team had tried to imagine how a reasonable person might react to his unreasonable suggestions, role-playing all the ways an exchange might go down. Even so, people would invariably say and do things Fielder had failed to see coming. After Nathan for You ended, it struck him that it would be interesting to make a show about the futility of trying to predict the future. Its sort of universal that people want to have control over their lives, he said. Theres something really funny to that compulsion.

As we waited for the show to begin, a performer hyped up the crowd, blasting a hose directly at a guy in the front row. We have zero control over where this water goes! he shouted. Fielder gestured toward a green line a few feet in front of us, the outer boundary of the splash zone. Its kind of good because we have a little risk of getting splashed, he said. With the faintest suggestion of wistfulness, he added that sitting in the splash zone would be, I guess, the more thrilling experience. Once the action began, he sat very still, watching closely, his hands tucked beneath his legs. Plumes of smoke billowed out of a seaplane, and a stuntman dove off a 45-foot-high platform while engulfed in flames. Do you think they dye the water blue to make it look more like water? Fielder asked. Looks a little too blue.

Like the Waterworld show, The Rehearsal involved the construction of an artificial reality. To help the teacher in the pilot episode prepare for his difficult conversation with a friend, Fielders team built an exact replica of the Alligator Lounge, the bar in Brooklyn where the two friends planned to meet, down to the rips in the stool cushions. It was a very expensive pilot, Fielder said. One of the crew members told me the cost to replicate that bar was probably more than it cost to build the real bar. The shows main story line features a woman who doesnt know whether she wants to have kids. To simulate the experience of raising a child from birth to 18 years old, Fielder moves her into a house in the countryside and hires dozens of child actors to play her son. From the outset, its clear this is an insane idea, but both Fielder and the woman are intent on pretending otherwise, each for their own murky reasons. Despite all the effort that has gone into creating a simulacrum of domestic life, something is off, and the glitches become only more obvious over time. In one scene, the woman dutifully pulls store-bought vegetables out of the dirt behind the house, acting as if she were picking them from a real garden. Later, in the kitchen, as she washes the eggplants, Fielder spots a sticker on a pepper on the counter, then carefully flips the pepper over, concealing the flaw. If Nathan for You showed how easily we could be deceived, The Rehearsal explores our eagerness to deceive ourselves. I often feel envious of others, Fielder says in the voice-over. The way they can just believe.

As the series progresses, the line between Fielders life and work blurs, until he finds himself at the center of his own experiment. At times, he seems to question the wisdom of manipulating people the way he does. When the teacher likens him to Willy Wonka, he looks disturbed. Isnt he the bad guy? he asks. As the credits roll, we hear the eerie tinkling of a celesta, the swell of strings, and then Gene Wilders voice, soft as cotton candy. To engineer a moment of intimacy with the teacher, he takes him to a heated pool. Hoping to get the guy to open up, he says he was once married. The teacher begins talking about the pain of his own divorce, but a moment later, the conversation ends. I didnt want to go too deep into my private life, Fielder explains in voice-over, so I had preplanned for an elderly swimmer to interrupt us. The Fielder who appears in these scenes is not unlike the real Fielder. Youre seeing me control and not wanting to share, he told me. Im aware that Im like that, and so its in the show.

At lunch the day before the Waterworld show, he was reluctant to say much about The Rehearsal. I dont want any extra context, he said. The thing is the thing. When I asked if there was anything going on in his personal life that contributed to his desire to make it, he said he wasnt sure. You could try to make a story and connect it for yourself, but I dont know. Its hard to know where ideas come from or why you feel something at a certain time. After a pause, he added, I did go through a divorce. He looked down at the table, folding up his paper plate and stuffing it into the little plastic cup.

After relaxing in the splash-free zone, he seemed a little more open to talking about what had happened. He drove me back to my hotel and we lingered in his car in the dark, the engine off but his hands still on the wheel. Fielder had gotten married in 2011 to a childrens librarian he had met at a friends comedy show in Halifax. Three years later, in the midst of making the second season of Nathan for You, the marriage fell apart. Everything suddenly felt uncertain. I was like, Wow, Im so bad at life, he said. He wondered whether he could have done something, anything, differently. One day, he broke down in the middle of a big meeting. Losing control of his emotions, he said, was a very jarring experience.

He began seeing a therapist just before his marriage ended and discovered it was physically difficult for him to talk about his feelings. I had a pain in my chest, he said. I still get that, but not as much. He was dating someone now, and theyd recently moved in together. Its not always easy to let a person in like that, he said. Its been really nice. He was silent for a long moment. Im, like, really happy. Saying things out loud to his therapist that hed never said before had helped. Ive shared everything with her, he said, and its been fine.

I asked if he had talked about our interview with his therapist. He hesitated. Ummm fuck. His voice dropped to a low murmur. I wanted to just lie right now. He began to explain himself: He did not specifically schedule a session with her after speaking with me. He just happened to have one scheduled. Why am I telling you this shit? he said, laughing in disbelief. He was growing uncharacteristically animated. I should have just lied to you just now! he said. But I know if I lied in that moment, I would have been caught.

Would he tell me what hed told her?

No! he said. No, no, no!

I pointed out that this is what he does all the time probe for peoples hidden soft spots. Of course, he said, but youre going for something different than I might be interested in. He wanted to get authentic moments out of people, moments you never see on TV. He wasnt asking them to explain and interpret their lives, to sort their experiences into a narrative, to impart them with meaning. On The Rehearsal, he hires actors to portray real people and then instructs them to follow those people around, engaging them in conversation without ever revealing their intentions. If the person knows youre trying to find out about them, he said, then theyre not going to present a real version. Narrative was just another magic trick, an illusion conjured in the edit room.

Thank you for subscribing and supporting our journalism. If you prefer to read in print, you can also find this article in the July 4, 2022, issue of New YorkMagazine.

Want more stories like this one? Subscribe now to support our journalism and get unlimited access to our coverage. If you prefer to read in print, you can also find this article in the July 4, 2022, issue of New York Magazine.

The one story you shouldnt miss today, selected byNew Yorks editors.

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice and to receive email correspondence from us.

Read the rest here:
Nathan Fielder on 'The Rehearsal' - Vulture

"There’s Often No Right Answer": A Famous Economist Explains the Smartest Way to Tackle Life’s "Wild Problems" – Entrepreneur

Russ Roberts was trained to solve problems. But he has found a kind of problem he cannot solve at least, not with the tools he was trained with.

Roberts is one of the most recognizable names in economics, thanks to his popular podcast "EconTalk." He's currently president of Shalem College in Jerusalem and a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. This means he often thinks in numbers and systems, and to solve problems with cold logic. But when a friend asked for advice on whether to have children or not, Roberts realized that humans often grapple with what he calls "wild problems" the big, life-changing decisions we all must make, where there is no single right answer and where outcomes are unpredictable.

So how do you solve those problems? That's what he set out to learn, and it is the subject of his new book, Wild Problems, which draws lessons from Charles Darwin, Bill Belichick, and basically everyone in between.

Related: These Decision-Making Tactics Can Help You Formalize Your Process and Make Better Choices

You have been taught to solve problems with economic logic. But as you write in the book, "I have come to believe that when it comes to the big decisions of life, those principles can lead us astray." How did you come to realize that?

Economics is about trade-offs. We don't have enough money to have everything we want. We don't have enough time to enjoy everything we want. And so the essence of the economics view of human behavior is that we try to be as happy as possible, facing that reality of finite money and finite time.

That's really useful in lots and lots of areas. But I would suggest it's not so useful in this area, partly because the pleasure and pain that we're going to experience from our choices is really difficult to anticipate, and because we care about more than just the day-to-day pleasures and pains that result from our choices. To think like an economist is to think like a maximizer. What I argue in the book is that optimizing in the context of big life decisions is probably not possible.

Too bad. Had you come out with a book that said, "The tools of economics can solve your life problems," I think people would've said, "Oh, good. Tell me about that." Because they want some way to outsource the problem.

There are so many apps and algorithms that help us do all kinds of things. And I love them. Google Maps is fantastic at telling you how to get somewhere as quickly as possible. But it doesn't tell you whether that's where you should go.

You have to embrace a different mindset. First of all, there's often no right answer. I think a lot of times we think, I gotta find the best romantic partner. I gotta find the best headphones. I gotta find the best, best, best. In life, you can't find the best partner. It's a multidimensional problem a matrix. It's not a single number, like a seven out of 10. It's a seven on this, a three on that, and a nine on this, et cetera, et cetera. So how do I add 'em all up? There's no rule for that.

So then what should you do? You should recognize that in a lot of these cases, these decisions define who we are. They create an overarching sense of ourselves that we want to respect. So the self-respect and dignity that comes from making good choices that take you to who you can be, and not just who you are those are very important. They go way beyond the day-to-day pleasure and pain.

Related: Entrepreneurs Solve Problems Differently Than Other Professionals. Really! Here Are the 6 Ways.

In the book, you share a simple but surprising decision-making technique. Can you explain the coin flip?

Piet Hein says in a poem: You should flip a coin when you're trying to make a big yes/no decision: marry or not marry, move or not move, accept the job or turn it down. Flip a coin and when it's in the air, you'll find yourself, subconsciously, intuitively, hoping it comes up one way or the other. I wanna take the job. So the coin flip isn't to make the decision. It's to activate your gut your instinct.

Image Credit: Patrick Beaudouin | Hoover Institution

In other words, we know the answer but won't listen to it. That reminds me of an old philosopher: He wrote that when someone seeks advice, they select who to ask based on what they know that person will say. They're looking for confirmation of something they cannot just self-motivate themselves to do.

Instead, they should ask what Adam Smith called an impartial spectator: Someone who cares enough about you to take it seriously but doesn't have a stake in the outcome of the decision. Then you can get some insight.

What you're worried about often in that situation is a fear of regret that you'll make a decision that you'll regret later. But regret is a strange emotion in a world of uncertainty. When you can't anticipate how your decisions will play out, the whole idea of a mistake is not well-defined. I don't know if it's humanly possible, but I argue that if we could be less worried about mistakes sometimes by knowing we can reverse our decisions then we would take more chances.

Speaking of taking more chances, let's talk about how New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick solves a wild problem which in his case is: Which players does he draft out of college?

He likes to take a high draft pick and then trade it for multiple lower draft picks. And why would he do that? He's very aware that, as smart as he is, he can't anticipate [which player would be the best to draft]. So he brings a bunch of them in, hoping that some will pan out.

It's kind of an obvious idea, but I think we struggle to do that in our actual life. We're very worried you know, this vacation has to be perfect. You might be better off taking a bunch of small vacations, learning what you like, and then you can be a better chooser later on.

Related: The CEO of GoDaddy's Secret to Creating a Culture of Experimentation

It makes me think: When you try to decide if something is right, you're putting a lot of onus on the thing itself. It's like, "This better be good!" But really, the onus is always upon us to make the decision work. That's what Belichick does: Instead of expecting a player to be good, he's putting the onus on himself to identify and shape the best player.

If we can trust that we are the ones who can make something work, then we can widen our options, select one, and make it work. What do you think?

That's fantastic. If you say, "I'm going on vacation to Paris, and boy, I better be wowed by the Mona Lisa," you're in for a shock. It's a tiny, little picture. So as a result, your whole attitude toward Paris is going to be wrong. What you should be thinking about instead is: How might this turn out? What might I explore? What will I discover? Then you'll discover how you can make lemonade out of lemons, and how you can be faced with a crisis and rise above it.

Read this article:
"There's Often No Right Answer": A Famous Economist Explains the Smartest Way to Tackle Life's "Wild Problems" - Entrepreneur

The Iconic Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdom Travels Throughout U.S. to Film New Series "Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdom Protecting the Wild" -…

Conservationist and legendary TV host, Peter Gros, showcases Floridas wildlife this summer for new series set to air in January 2023

OMAHA, Neb., July 06, 2022--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdom is back in action and traveling across the U.S. this summer to film a brand new television series, "Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdom Protecting the Wild." The series, which will debut in January 2023 on RFD-TV and digital channels, will showcase conservation success stories, aiming to inspire the next generation of conservationists.

Starting this week, the Wild Kingdom team, including Peter Gros, host of the original show, and local conservation experts, will be making their way across Florida to showcase animal success stories.

"We are in the beautiful state of Florida for the month of July filming multiple episodes for Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdoms new series, Protecting the Wild," said Peter Gros, Licensed Exhibition & Animal Educator, Conservationist, Television and Digital Content Host. "This series will celebrate the incredible work being done by many compassionate conservationists and will hopefully encourage a new generation of people who are committed to making a positive impact on the Wild Kingdom."

Peter Gros has nearly 30 years of field experience with resident wildlife and has traveled coast to coast filming the new series this year. Following its filming throughout the summer, the debut of the new series will coincide with the 60th anniversary of the iconic, beloved "Wild Kingdom" program.

Protecting the Wild in Florida

The Florida filming is in collaboration with many organizations, including Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) accredited facilities Mote Marine Laboratory & Aquarium in Sarasota, Jacksonville Zoo and Gardens, and The Florida Aquarium in Tampa. Other stops include the Florida Coral Rescue Center , and the Florida Power & Light Companys Turkey Point Clean Energy Center. Animals featured in the Florida filming include:

Story continues

American Crocodiles The once-endangered American crocodile is making a comeback thanks in large part to the successful breeding program at Turkey Point Nuclear Clean Energy Center, a clean energy center in South Florida. This episode will showcase how the 11,000 acres of protected land provides an ideal habitat for the crocodiles to thrive and nest without the risk of flooding. Last years program saw great success, with more hatchlings being produced than in its 40-year history.

Coral Reefs Believe it or not, corals are animals! Coral reefs cover less than 1% of the ocean floor but support about 25% of marine life. Unfortunately, coral reefs around the world are declining due to many factors, including increasing water temperatures and ocean acidification caused by climate change and disease. This episode will highlight how local organizations work to fight reef loss along the Florida coast and how AZA-accredited zoos and aquariums across the country are helping conservation efforts by becoming repositories for coral.

Sea Turtles and Manatees Human behavior can have both a positive and negative impact on animals in the wild, especially when it comes to sea turtles and manatees. This episode will highlight how citizen patrols of sea turtle nesting areas in Florida and community education have positively impacted turtle populations in southwest Florida. It will also educate on the severe habitat impact red tide has on depleting the manatee food supply, which is contributing to the species ongoing unusual mortality event.

For additional information about Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdom Protecting the Wild, including the shows filming schedule and adventures, visit http://www.wildkingdom.com or follow us on Facebook.

About Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdom

Since its network television premiere in 1963, Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdom has been one of the most loved and respected wildlife programs in television history. Now, launching in January 2023, "Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdom Protecting the Wild," will celebrate stories of conservation success, including the great work of caring, compassionate experts and how they are making a positive impact on the Wild Kingdom. The new launch also coincides with the 60th anniversary of the iconic, beloved "Wild Kingdom" program. For more information about Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdom, visit wildkingdom.com.

About Mutual of Omaha

Founded in 1909, Mutual of Omaha is a highly rated, Fortune 300 organization offering a variety of insurance and financial products for individuals, businesses and groups throughout the United States. As a mutual company, Mutual of Omaha is owned by its policyholders and committed to providing outstanding service to its customers. For more information about Mutual of Omaha, visit http://www.mutualofomaha.com.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220705005027/en/

Contacts

Alana HallettZeno Groupalana.hallett@zenogroup.com

Emily PoeschlMutual of Omahaemily.poeschl@mutualofomaha.com

Read more:
The Iconic Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdom Travels Throughout U.S. to Film New Series "Mutual of Omahas Wild Kingdom Protecting the Wild" -...

UN Urges Ambitious Action to Protect Oceans – Voice of America – VOA News

lisbon, portugal

World leaders must do more to protect the oceans, a major U.N. conference concluded Friday, setting its sights on a new treaty to protect the high seas.

"Greater ambition is required at all levels to address the dire state of the ocean," the U.N. Ocean Conference in Lisbon said in its final declaration.

The meeting in the Portuguese capital attended by government officials, experts and advocates from 140 countries is not a negotiating forum. But it sets the agenda for final international negotiations in August on a treaty to protect the high seas those international waters beyond national jurisdiction.

"Biodiversity loss, the decline of the ocean's health, the way the climate crisis is going ... it all has one common reason, which is ... human behavior, our addiction to oil and gas, and all of them have to be addressed," Peter Thomson, U.N. special envoy for the ocean, told AFP.

Oceans produce half the oxygen we breathe, regulate the weather and provide humanity's single largest source of protein.

They also absorb a quarter of CO2 pollution and 90% of excess heat from global warming, thus playing a key role in protecting life on Earth.

But they are being pushed to the brink by human activities.

Sea water has turned acidic, threatening aquatic food chains and the ocean's capacity to absorb carbon. Global warming has spawned massive marine heat waves that are killing off coral reefs and expanding dead zones bereft of oxygen.

Humans have fished some marine species to the edge of extinction and used the world's waters as a rubbish dump.

Patchwork of agreements

Today, a patchwork of agreements and regulatory bodies govern shipping, fishing and mineral extraction from the seabed.

Thomson said he was "very confident" national governments could agree on a "robust but operable" high seas treaty in August.

Tiago Pitta e Cunha, head of Portuguese foundation Oceano Azul (Blue Ocean), said: "Pressure has increased a lot on less interested countries to create an effective mechanism to protect the high seas."

Laura Meller of Greenpeace called for more action.

"We know that if words could save the oceans, then they wouldn't be on the brink of collapse," she told AFP. "So in August when governments meet at the United Nations, they really need to finalize a strong global ocean treaty."

Efforts to protect the oceans will then continue at two key summits later this year: U.N. climate talks in November and U.N. biodiversity negotiations in December.

Overfishing, mining, plastic

At the heart of the draft U.N. biodiversity treaty is a plan to designate 30% of Earth's land and oceans as protected zones by 2030.

Currently, under 8% of oceans are protected.

A number of new, protected marine areas could be declared off-limits to fishing, mining, drilling or other extractive activities that scientists say disrupt fragile seabed ecosystems.

Making things worse is an unending torrent of pollution, including a rubbish truck's worth of plastic every minute, the United Nations says.

"The ocean is not a rubbish dump," U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned on Monday. "It is not a source of infinite plunder. It is a fragile system on which we all depend."

Continued here:
UN Urges Ambitious Action to Protect Oceans - Voice of America - VOA News