Category Archives: Human Behavior

In Maine’s 200 years, man’s impact has altered the animal landscape – Press Herald

A look at the fate of just a few animal species during the 200 years that Maine has been a state tells the larger story of how humans impact wildlife. Whether these animals have vanished, returned, arrived or thrived all have direct or indirect links to human behavior.

Keep in mind, there is also a lot we dont know. Biologists dont have all the data, Noah Perlut, chair of University of New Englands Department of Environmental Studies, pointed out. To take just one example, the breeding bird survey now conducted annually across Maine wasnt even begun until the 1960s.

On the one hand, that is a really rich data set, Perlut said. On the other hand, its nothing compared to how long weve been here. Its not ecologically relevant data.

Here is a glimpse of the fortunes of a few species that roamed the forests, meadows and skies here at the time Maine became a state.

The Departed: Caribou

Since as far back as the 1700, several mammals have been extirpated from Maine or its waters, largely because of over-hunting. They include the gray whale, the eastern cougar (now extinct, although other subspecies of cougars survive in other parts of the country), the gray wolf, the wolverine and the woodland caribou.

In the 1800s, caribou were a source of food that was readily available, said Mark McCollough, the endangered species biologist in Maine with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. So much so, in fact, that they sustained the early settlers in northern Maine. But the last recorded caribou in Maine was shot on Mt. Katahdins Tablelands in 1908, he said.

More than 50 years later, in 1963, the state attempted to reintroduce them. Biologists brought 20 caribou from nearby Newfoundland to Baxter State Park. The project failed, though biologists at the time were not certain why, McCollough said. Portland businessmen funded a similar effort in 1986. Twenty caribou from Newfoundland were taken to Orono to breed. Later, 30 were released in Baxter, this time with radio collars affixed to their necks so scientists could track and study them more closely. Once again, not a single caribou survived. All fell prey to hungry bears or to brainworm, a parasite carried by, but not affecting, white-tailed deer.

It illustrated how difficult it is to try to right some of the wrongs that happened 100 or 200 years ago, McCollough said. If the environment has changed, there are factors that we may not even be aware of, like diseases that were not present 100 years ago.

The Survivor: White-Tailed Deer

Three commonly seen mammals have persisted in Maine at least since the early settlers arrived: moose, bear and white-tailed deer. But only the last has reached extraordinary numbers. In 2019, thestatewide population was estimated between 230,000 and 250,000, according to the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife.

They live in cities and in deep woods, McCollough said. They live alongside us and benefit from the changes we make to the environment, whether carving out backyards or forestry projects. They like a fragmented forest.

At the turn of the 1800s, when northern Maine was first settled, few deer lived there, McCollough said. Their numbers grew in the next 100 years with the advent of log drives and the arrival of forestry. Such timber practices created new tree growth, providing the deer with the low-lying branches they like to eat. Coupled with urbanization in southern Maine, which fragmented the forests, deer numbers exploded.

Whatever happens with climate change, I have no doubt that deer will still be here 200 years from now, McCollough said.

The Returnee: Peregrine Falcon

Some good news: some of the species that vanished from Maine over the last 200 years have since returned. Typically, humans played a role both in their disappearance and their revival. As hunting practices ended or were curtailed, and as pollutants and insecticides were cleaned up or banned, a few species that roamed Maine historically are repopulating the state.

The fastest bird in the world the peregrine falcon was once extirpated from Maine. The peregrine, which can fly more than 200 mph, nested in the eastern United States until the early 1960s when widespread use of the insecticide DDT pushed the birds to the brink of extinction. The federal government listed them as endangered in 1970. Although DDT was banned in 1972, the raptor is still considered endangered in Maine. Through reintroduction efforts, however, their numbers here have grown.

A total of 153 young peregrines were reintroduced in Maine between 1984 and 1997. Since 2009, Maine has been home to at least 25 nesting pairs, according to the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. Efforts by the state to create nesting platforms for the birds are ongoing.

In a lot of regions of the Northeast, peregrine falcons only nested on cliffs, Perlut said. Now they are nesting on bridges and quarries and buildings. That is adding more pairs than maybe were here historically.

The Newcomer: Turkey Vulture

Probably no animal better illustrates the resiliency of a newcomer in Maine than the coyote, which migrated across the country from the western United States in the 1940s. If it can survive in New York Citys Central Park, why not Maine? And it does.

A number of other non-native species have successfully moved here, too, including two species of vultures: the turkey vulture and the black vulture. The first documented breeding pair of turkey vultures arrived in 1970; they are now widespread across the state. In the past few years, there have been reports that black vultures are breeding here, too, Perlut said.

What drew them north? One theory credits urbanization, he said. Others believe birds follow highways, for the opportunity for road kill.

Invalid username/password.

Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

Previous

Continue reading here:
In Maine's 200 years, man's impact has altered the animal landscape - Press Herald

Prabal Gurung on Hope, Unity, and Innovation Amidst the Coronavirus Crisis – Vogue

The office is closed. All of the teams [at Prabal Gurung] are working from home, but staying in close communications. We are taking the safety of our team very seriously. The coronavirus is impacting us all, and its really got me thinking about how the industry does business, and how I want my brand to grow from this experience.

Around a year ago, I started to take a look at my business and see how I could make changes to operate at the most efficient level. Now, our spring and resort collections are 100% shipped and have been doing really well. As a matter of fact, this is the first time in our brand history where weve had three gowns with 100% sell-through. That said, the industry will continue to be rocked by the coronavirus, and to survive this particular moment we really, really need to look at how we do business. What needs to happen right now is the retailers, the designers, the vendorseveryone needs to work together in finding pragmatic solutions. How do we come together? This situation will not be fixed by a sale.

I have a board at home where Ive outlined immediate issues, a middle section, and long-term problems. I then have a space for potential solutions. In these challenging times I think we must slow down, and think about innovation. How do we become more inventive and, for lack of better words, how do we hustle? I think about what consumers will want to wear once this is over. Are they going to be buying exuberant pieces, or are they going to be more understated and practical? Ive always believed in clothes to bring joy, but what does joy look like in this particular moment? These are the questions that are on my board and on my mind. I think about how we can evolve in this situation, and what the immediate needs of society and culture are, and how we can fill them.

Tackling an issue of this magnitude requires unity. We have to reach across departmental and industry lines to pull in help from a global braintrust of brilliant creatives and business leaders. Ive been doing live chats on Instagram with Kelly Rowland, Tina Craig from The Bag Snob, and Phillip Lim. We discuss the things that are really troubling us, whether it be about our businesses, or things that are more personal, emotional, or spiritual.

I find myself particularly consumed by the human issues surrounding the coronavirus outbreak. During crisis and stressful times, we get to see human behavior in its truest form: greed, compassion, altruism, empathy, fear, strength, and xenophobia. All the positive and negative sides come out, and they are two sides of the same coin. I am so distraught over the hateful acts of racism and xenophobia I have seen towards Asians during this time. From people feeding into racist tropes on Instagram, to the leader of this country, President Trump, dubbing this the Chinese virus I am disheartened to see these instances of fear and ignorance winning over compassion.

See the article here:
Prabal Gurung on Hope, Unity, and Innovation Amidst the Coronavirus Crisis - Vogue

Contrary to How it Seems, Humans Band Together During and After Disasters – tor.com

In November 2018, the largest and most deadly wildfire in California history destroyed entire towns and displaced thousands of people. In 2017, Hurricane Harvey drowned southeast Texas under punishing, endless rain. And in early 2020, Australia continues to grapple with bushfires that threatened to engulf the continent over its summer. Apocalyptic-scale disasters happen every day (and more often now, as climate change intensifies weather patterns all over the world.) Apocalyptic disaster isnt always the weather, either: its human-made, by war or by industrial accident; by system failure or simple individual error. Or its biological: the flu of 1918, the Ebola outbreaks in 2014, COVID-19 now.

In science fiction, apocalypse and what comes after is an enduring theme. Whether its pandemic (like in Emily St. John Mandels Station Eleven and Stephen Kings The Stand), nuclear (such as Theodore Sturgeons short story Thunder and Roses or the 1984 BBC drama Threads), or environmental (Octavia Butlers Parable of the Sower, Kim Stanley Robinsons New York 2140, and a slew of brilliant short fiction, including Tobias Buckells A World to Die For (Clarkesworld 2018) and Nnedi Okorafors Spider the Artist (Lightspeed 2011), disaster, apocalypse, and destruction fascinate the genre. If science fiction is, as sometimes described, a literature of ideas, then apocalyptic science fiction is the literature of how ideas go wrongan exploration of all of our bad possible futures, and what might happen after.

Most of apocalyptic literature focuses on all the terrible ways that society goes wrong after a society-disrupting disaster, though. This is especially prevalent in television and filmthink of The Walking Dead or 28 Days Later where, while the zombies might be the initial threat, most of the horrible violence is done by surviving humans to one another. This kind of focus on antisocial behaviorin fact, the belief that after a disaster humans will revert to some sort of base state of naturereflects very common myths that exist throughout Western culture. We think that disaster situations cause panic, looting, assaults, the breakdown of social structuresand we make policy decisions based on that belief, assuming that crime rises during a crisis and that anti-crime enforcement is needed along with humanitarian aid.

But absolutely none of this is true.

The myth that panic, looting, and antisocial behavior increases during the apocalypse (or apocalyptic-like scenarios) is in fact a mythand has been solidly disproved by multiple scientific studies. The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, a research group within the United States Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA), has produced research that shows over and over again that disaster victims are assisted first by others in the immediate vicinity and surrounding area and only later by official public safety personnel [] The spontaneous provision of assistance is facilitated by the fact that when crises occur, they take place in the context of ongoing community life and daily routinesthat is, they affect not isolated individuals but rather people who are embedded in networks of social relationships. (Facing Hazards and Disasters: Understanding Human Dimensions, National Academy of Sciences, 2006). Humans do not, under the pressure of an emergency, socially collapse. Rather, they seem to display higher levels of social cohesion, despite what media or government agents might expector portray on TV. Humans, after the apocalypse, band together in collectives to help one anotherand they do this spontaneously. Disaster response workers call it spontaneous prosocial helping behavior, and it saves lives.

Spontaneous mobilization to help during and immediately after an apocalyptic shock has a lot of forms. Sometimes its community-sourced rescue missions, like the volunteer boat rescue group who call themselves the Cajun Navy. During Hurricane Harvey, the Cajun Navyplus a lot of volunteer dispatchers, some thousands of miles away from the hurricaneused the walkie-talkie app Zello to crowdsource locations of people trapped by rising water and send rescuers to them. Sometimes it is the volunteering of special skills. In the aftermath of the 2017 Mexico City earthquake, Mexican seismologistswho just happened to be in town for a major conference on the last disastrous Mexico City earthquake!spent the next two weeks volunteering to inspect buildings for structural damage. And sometimes it is community-originated aidthis New Yorker article about 2018s prairie fires in Oklahoma focuses on the huge amount of post-disaster help which flowed in from all around the affected areas, often from people who had very little to spare themselves. In that article, the journalist Ian Frazier writes of the Oklahomans:

Trucks from Iowa and Michigan arrived with donated fenceposts, corner posts, and wire. Volunteer crews slept in the Ashland High School gymnasium and worked ten-hour days on fence lines. Kids from a college in Oregon spent their spring break pitching in. Cajun chefs from Louisiana arrived with food and mobile kitchens and served free meals. Another cook brought his own chuck wagon. Local residents old friends, retired folks with extra time, came in motor homes and lived in them while helping to rebuild. Donors sent so much bottled water it would have been enough to put out the fire all by itself, people said. A young man from Ohio raised four thousand dollars in cash and drove out and gave it to the Ashland Volunteer Fire Department, according to the Clark County Gazette. The young man said that God had told him to; the fireman who accepted the donation said that four thousand was exactly what it was going to cost to repair the transmission of a truck that had failed in the fire, and both he and the young man cried.

These behaviors match the roles and responsibilities that members of a society display before the apocalyptic disaster. Ex-military volunteers reassemble in groups resembling military organizations; women in more patriarchal societies gravitate towards logistics and medical jobs while men end up taking more physical risks; firefighters travel to fight fires far away from their homes. The chef Jos Andrs served more than three million meals over three months after Hurricane Maria devastated Puerto Rico. Humans all over the world display this behavior after disasters. They display it consistently, no matter what kind of disaster is happening or what culture they come from.

What really happens after an apocalypse? Society works better than it ever had, for a brief time.

The writer Rebecca Solnit wrote an entire book about this phenomenon, and she called it A Paradise Built in Hell. She points out that it is really the fear on the part of powerful people that powerless people will react to trauma with irrational violence that is preventing us from seeing how apocalypse really shapes our societies. Solnit calls this elite panic, and contrasts it with the idea of civic temperthe utopian potential of meaningful community.

Apocalyptic science fiction tells us so much about how the future is going to hurtor could. But it can also explore how the future will be full of spontaneous helping; societies that bloom for a night, a few weeks, a month, to repair what has been broken. The human capacity to give aid and succor seems to be universal, and triggered quite specifically by the disruption and horror of disaster. Science fiction might let us see that utopian potential more clearly, and imagine how we might help each other in ways we never knew we were capable of.

This article was originally published in November 2018. You can find the original version here.

Arkady Martine writes speculative fiction when she isnt writing Byzantine history. She is overly fond of borders, rhetoric, and liminal spaces. Her novel A Memory Called Empire is available from Tor Books. Find her on Twitter as @ArkadyMartine.

View post:
Contrary to How it Seems, Humans Band Together During and After Disasters - tor.com

Why Digital Transformation Is A Necessity For All SMBs – Forbes

Digital transformation happens to be one of the most talked-about terms among small and midsize businesses (SMBs) today. According to a Google-KPMG report, digitally engaged SMBs boost profits up to twice as fast compared to their offline counterparts. The induction of digital platforms allows SMBs to uncover new market opportunities, driving overall growth.

Figures Worth Noticing

The economic value of digital transformation is expected to reach $100 trillion by 2025.

Twenty-one percent of organizations believe their digital transformation efforts are complete.

According to Gartner,"Eighty-seven percent of senior business leaders say digitalization is a company priority, and 79% of corporate strategists say it is reinventing their business creating new revenue streams in new ways."

Nearly71% of leadersfirmly believe that the role of the workforce crucial in implementing digital transformation.

Digital Transformation

Those numbers should be convincing enough for SMBs to integrate technologies within their business workforce if they haven't done so already. However, of all the means available to disrupt almost any industry, data is at the forefront.

From analytics to AI, data never fails to amaze the scientists working on uncovering the potential of digital transformation. According toGartner, 90% of the organizational strategies will be based on relevant information by 2022, which means that data will have a value higher than ever.

However, the data received is raw, and to put this data to use, the data is first analyzed, segmented and studied. It helps business leaders to have a better view of market trends, customer expectations and future outcomes. Needless to state that the present face of business is highly competitive, and SMBs must take a step forward and take up measures that own the potential to better their overall operational efficiency.

Why Do SMBs Need Digital Transformation? (Traditional Vs. Digital)

Data has been a part of every industry since the beginning, and so it was just a matter of time before business professionals would eventually contemplate utilizing this data to enhance their organizational efficiency.

But how or why?

The top-scale organizations have already invested in digital technologies to better their everyday business functions and gain a cutting edge in the competitive market.

From robotics to automation, machine learning to predictive analytics, modern-day organizations are driven digitally, and it's time that SMBs get over their traditional form of operations.

The traditional form of business relied on word of mouth to promote brand visibility and managing multiple spreadsheets manually instead of using seamlessly integrated cloud solutions. However, the digital business economy mandates the usage of online marketing methods to enhance a brands value and connected cloud-based solutions to improve operational efficiencies.

And to top it all off, the traditional form of business focused on prioritizing profits, but the digital marketplace is focused on customers above all.

Getting Started

If you own an SMB and are looking to get started with digital transformation, start by discussing what digital transformation is with your team and how it will affect your business. A few questions to consider:

What are the different aspects of your business that lag behind your competitors?

Which elements in the existing business plan need to be replaced or technologically upgraded?

What operations consume a lot of time and can be automated?

Implementation

Once you have analyzed and examined the different areas that need to be improved, move ahead with the adoption of trends that promote digital transformation within your organization:

Digital presence with end user in mind: To be competitive, having a digital presence is a must. A website is not enough, but a thoughtful website that is built with your end users and customers in mind and helps push them deeper into your sales funnel is a must for your business, along with a presence on other digital platforms your customers regularly visit.Along with having a website,you also need to make sure that your website is optimized for mobile devices. As perGoogles 200 ranking factors, mobile-friendliness is one of the significant things to take into consideration, and there are now 3.5 billion smartphone users.

Predictive strategies: Whereas the traditional form of business worked on guesswork, the digital era relies on data to analyze and study human behavior. Based on the previous user interaction, companies drive data and then use this data to analyze how a user would react in a particular situation.

Omnichannel presence and interconnected systems: Digitization has a ubiquitous presence, and there is now a whole generation of users who are not platform-specific. So, in order to reach out to most of them, you need to work on creating an omnichannel presence to promote your products and services. You also need a robust integration strategy for all these channels to get a 360-view of operations.

Future

This is just the start. The gamut of digital transformation is huge, and there is more to this than meets the eye. According to research,85% of decision-makers believe that they need to integrate digital methods within their operations in two years or less.

With such huge investments, the future of digital transformation will see technology at the core of every business operation and customers as king. However, there will be dramatic scarcity in the available skills and resources, and top leaders need to focus on that and work toward curbing its impact.

What you can do is stop anticipating and start working. Are you ready for change?

Read the original:
Why Digital Transformation Is A Necessity For All SMBs - Forbes

[OPINION] The Pope and single-use plastics – Rappler

What is more urgent and effective: go big or start small?

This is one of the fundamental questions I encounter when addressing the climate crisis. Some would argue that given the need to drastically reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within the next decade, the focus should be on pressuring authorities to implement large-scale solutions. Governments must enact policies for phasing out fossil fuels, especially coal, while corporations need to either stop funding environmentally-destructive projects or implement a just transition towards renewable energy development.

While these measures are obviously effective in mitigating and adapting to climate change, the value of the small-scale actions can never be discredited. These actions help create a precautionary culture wherein caring for the planet becomes a habit instead of an incentive, an initiative rather than a reaction. An educated, enabled, and empowered citizenry is also vital for exerting pressure on governments and corporations to instigate shifts in political and socioeconomic models to deal with the climate crisis.

The importance of behavioral change to stop climate change is evident, whether you look at it through a scientific or religious lens.

The religious lens

Pope Franciss encyclical "Laudato Si" is known as a landmark document of the Roman Catholic Church for directly addressing the climate crisis and environmental degradation. Yet at its core, it points to one undeniable fact: that human behavior is at the root of the ecological crisis, and therefore at the heart of solving it.

The Laudato Si calls for the creation of an ecological citizenship, where people are adequately motivated to respond to the call on caring for our common home. This would be brought about by environmental education with a renewed focus on ecological ethics.

Given the challenges of today, education centered on scientific information, raising awareness, and avoiding environmental risks is no longer enough. It also needs a focus on critiquing and shattering the myths we consider as norms of the current modern life, from infinite growth to consumerism. It ultimately points for us to conduct ourselves in a way that is indicative of a lifestyle in harmony within ourselves and with others on Earth.

Activities such as avoiding the use of single-use plastics, minimizing wasteful consumption of food, water, and electricity, using public transportation, and tree-planting and growing have positive impacts in our struggle for protecting our planet. Doing these actions do not just benefit our environment; they also provide personal co-benefits in aspects such as financial savings and better health. (READ: Philippine survey shows 'shocking' plastic waste)

While these acts are done on an individual level, that does not mean they should be misconstrued as modes exclusively for self-improvement. A dilemma with the complexity of the climate crisis requires a societal approach to properly address them. Given their potential positive impacts on the individual and communal levels, such activities are likely to spread and be adopted by different communities.

As Pope Francis states, when done for the right reasons, each of these solutions can be considered as an act of love that reflects our societal responsibility for others and expresses our individual dignity.

The scientific lens

Several scientific reports have also proven the effectiveness of small-scale solutions for mitigating and adapting to the impacts of climate change. A 2018 study by the Center for Behavior and the Environment showed that almost two-thirds of global GHG emissions are associated with both direct and indirect means of human consumption.

It is noteworthy that almost every item we consume is made using resources such as fossil fuels. Therefore, if we start minimizing unnecessary consumption and actively look for alternatives, we are pressuring manufacturers to switch to more environment-friendly production and distribution systems, which in turn reduces consumption of pollutive fossil fuels and other resources. (READ: Single-use plastics, still the environment's number 1 enemy)

Furthermore, implementing small-scale behavioral solutions can reduce GHG emissions by as much as 37% from 2020 to 2050. These solutions involve modifications to activities involving food, agriculture and land management, transportation, and energy and materials.

This is supported by a report by Project Drawdown, a nonprofit organization dedicated to urgently reducing global GHG emissions. It claims that while the solutions to the climate crisis already exist, some of them receive relatively little attention compared to large-scale solutions such as developing more renewable energy resources, especially wind and solar.

This report identified the following as seven of the 10 most effective individual solutions: reduced food waste, health and education, plant-rich diets, refrigerant management, tropical forest restoration (including tree-planting), alternative refrigerants, and improved clean cookstoves. (READ: Sachet away: What's lacking in our plastic laws?)

The expression great things from small beginnings is almost a clich nowadays, but it still applies when it comes to climate and environment action. Everyone needs to be involved in preventing further climate change and environmental degradation. And despite what some people might tell you, accessible and affordable solutions do exist. An act of love could truly go a long way. Rappler.com

John Leo Algo is the Program Manager of Living Laudato Si Philippines and Climate Action for Sustainability Initiative (KASALI). He has been a citizen journalist and feature writer since 2016, focusing on the climate and environment beat. He earned his MS Atmospheric Science degree from the Ateneo de Manila University in December 2018.

See the article here:
[OPINION] The Pope and single-use plastics - Rappler

In Maine’s 200 years, man’s impact has altered the animal landscape – Lewiston Sun Journal

A look at the fate of just a few animal species during the 200 years that Maine has been a state tells the larger story of how humans impact wildlife. Whether these animals have vanished, returned, arrived or thrived all have direct or indirect links to human behavior.

Keep in mind, there is also a lot we dont know. Biologists dont have all the data, Noah Perlut, chair of University of New Englands Department of Environmental Studies, pointed out. To take just one example, the breeding bird survey now conducted annually across Maine wasnt even begun until the 1960s.

On the one hand, that is a really rich data set, Perlut said. On the other hand, its nothing compared to how long weve been here. Its not ecologically relevant data.

Here is a glimpse of the fortunes of a few species that roamed the forests, meadows and skies here at the time Maine became a state.

The Departed: Caribou

Since as far back as the 1700, several mammals have been extirpated from Maine or its waters, largely because of over-hunting. They include the gray whale, the eastern cougar (now extinct, although other subspecies of cougars survive in other parts of the country), the gray wolf, the wolverine and the woodland caribou.

In the 1800s, caribou were a source of food that was readily available, said Mark McCollough, the endangered species biologist in Maine with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. So much so, in fact, that they sustained the early settlers in northern Maine. But the last recorded caribou in Maine was shot on Mt. Katahdins Tablelands in 1908, he said.

More than 50 years later, in 1963, the state attempted to reintroduce them. Biologists brought 20 caribou from nearby Newfoundland to Baxter State Park. The project failed, though biologists at the time were not certain why, McCollough said. Portland businessmen funded a similar effort in 1986. Twenty caribou from Newfoundland were taken to Orono to breed. Later, 30 were released in Baxter, this time with radio collars affixed to their necks so scientists could track and study them more closely. Once again, not a single caribou survived. All fell prey to hungry bears or to brainworm, a parasite carried by, but not affecting, white-tailed deer.

It illustrated how difficult it is to try to right some of the wrongs that happened 100 or 200 years ago, McCollough said. If the environment has changed, there are factors that we may not even be aware of, like diseases that were not present 100 years ago.

The Survivor: White-Tailed Deer

Three commonly seen mammals have persisted in Maine at least since the early settlers arrived: moose, bear and white-tailed deer. But only the last has reached extraordinary numbers. In 2019, thestatewide population was estimated between 230,000 and 250,000, according to the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife.

They live in cities and in deep woods, McCollough said. They live alongside us and benefit from the changes we make to the environment, whether carving out backyards or forestry projects. They like a fragmented forest.

At the turn of the 1800s, when northern Maine was first settled, few deer lived there, McCollough said. Their numbers grew in the next 100 years with the advent of log drives and the arrival of forestry. Such timber practices created new tree growth, providing the deer with the low-lying branches they like to eat. Coupled with urbanization in southern Maine, which fragmented the forests, deer numbers exploded.

Whatever happens with climate change, I have no doubt that deer will still be here 200 years from now, McCollough said.

The Returnee: Peregrine Falcon

Some good news: some of the species that vanished from Maine over the last 200 years have since returned. Typically, humans played a role both in their disappearance and their revival. As hunting practices ended or were curtailed, and as pollutants and insecticides were cleaned up or banned, a few species that roamed Maine historically are repopulating the state.

The fastest bird in the world the peregrine falcon was once extirpated from Maine. The peregrine, which can fly more than 200 mph, nested in the eastern United States until the early 1960s when widespread use of the insecticide DDT pushed the birds to the brink of extinction. The federal government listed them as endangered in 1970. Although DDT was banned in 1972, the raptor is still considered endangered in Maine. Through reintroduction efforts, however, their numbers here have grown.

A total of 153 young peregrines were reintroduced in Maine between 1984 and 1997. Since 2009, Maine has been home to at least 25 nesting pairs, according to the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. Efforts by the state to create nesting platforms for the birds are ongoing.

In a lot of regions of the Northeast, peregrine falcons only nested on cliffs, Perlut said. Now they are nesting on bridges and quarries and buildings. That is adding more pairs than maybe were here historically.

The Newcomer: Turkey Vulture

Probably no animal better illustrates the resiliency of a newcomer in Maine than the coyote, which migrated across the country from the western United States in the 1940s. If it can survive in New York Citys Central Park, why not Maine? And it does.

A number of other non-native species have successfully moved here, too, including two species of vultures: the turkey vulture and the black vulture. The first documented breeding pair of turkey vultures arrived in 1970; they are now widespread across the state. In the past few years, there have been reports that black vultures are breeding here, too, Perlut said.

What drew them north? One theory credits urbanization, he said. Others believe birds follow highways, for the opportunity for road kill.

Invalid username/password.

Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

Previous

Next

Go here to read the rest:
In Maine's 200 years, man's impact has altered the animal landscape - Lewiston Sun Journal

Healthier and Happier Without Facebook Reduce Usage to Feel Better All Round – SciTechDaily

People who reduce the time they spend on Facebook smoke less, are more active and feel better all round.

Two weeks of 20 minutes less time per day on Facebook: a team of psychologists from Ruhr-Universitt Bochum (RUB) invited 140 test persons to participate in this experiment. Lucky those who took part: afterward they were more physically active, smoked less and were more satisfied. Symptoms of addiction regarding Facebook usage decreased. These effects continued also three months after the end of the experiment. The group headed by Dr. Julia Brailovskaia published their results in the journal Computers in Human Behavior on March 6, 2020.

The research team recruited 286 people for the study who were on Facebook for an average of at least 25 minutes a day. The average usage time per day was a good hour. The researchers subdivided the test persons into two groups: the control group comprised of 146 people used Facebook as usual. The other 140 people reduced their Facebook usage by 20 minutes a day for two weeks, which is about one third of the average usage time.

Julia Brailovskaia heads the research group at Ruhr-University Bochum. Credit: RUB, Marquard

All participants were tested prior to the study, one week into it, at the end of the two-week experiment, and finally one month and three months later. Using online questionnaires, the research team surveyed the way they used Facebook, their well-being and their lifestyle.

The results showed: participants in the group that had reduced their Facebook usage time used the platform less, both actively and passively. This is significant, because passive use in particular leads to people comparing themselves with others and thus experiencing envy and a reduction in psychological well-being, says Julia Brailovskaia. Participants who reduced their Facebook usage time, moreover, smoked fewer cigarettes than before, were more active physically and showed fewer depressive symptoms than the control group. Their life satisfaction increased. After the two-week period of Facebook detox, these effects, i.e. the improvement of well-being and a healthier lifestyle, lasted until the final checks three months after the experiment, points out Julia Brailovskaia.

According to the researchers this is an indication that simply reducing the amount of time spent on Facebook every day could be enough to prevent addictive behavior, increase well-being and support a healthier lifestyle. Its not necessary to give up the platform altogether, concludes Julia Brailovskaia.

Reference: Less Facebook use More well-being and a healthier lifestyle? An experimental intervention study by Julia Brailovskaia, Fabienne Strse, Holger Schillack and Jrgen Margraf, 6 March 2020, Computers in Human Behavior.DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106332

Read the original:
Healthier and Happier Without Facebook Reduce Usage to Feel Better All Round - SciTechDaily

We’ve Been Transforming the Earth for at Least 10000 Years – The Good Men Project

By KEITH RANDALL-TEXAS A&M

The study synthesizes data from 255 archaeologists to provide the first global survey of the Earths transformation through human land use over the past 10,000 years. The findings challenge the commonly held view that large-scale, human-caused environmental change is a relatively recent phenomenon. It also shows how the overall impact of human behavior has been growing exponentially since the end of the last Ice Age.

Our team synthesized archaeological data provided by experts from around the world to establish a timeline for when people in different parts of the world began to intensify land use in different ways, says Heather Thakar, assistant professor in the anthropology department at Texas A&M University.

This time-lapse map shows how extensive agriculture (noncontinuous cultivation, or the beginnings of farming) spread as a percentage of land use. To highlight land use in Oceania, four groups of islands are represented by icons. (Credit: Nicolas Gauthier/Arizona State)

The ArchaeoGLOBE project analyzed land use from roughly 10,000 years ago, the time of hunters and gatherers, to the year 1850, after the Industrial Revolution.

I BELIEVE THAT WE WILL ALSO FIND A WAY TO ENSURE THAT OUR HOME REMAINS HABITABLE FOR OUR SPECIES.

The new study adds an archaeological perspective to existing models of historical land use. Based on researchers expertise of land use on six continents, the crowdsourced map shows that agriculturean extraction of environmental resources that leaves a complex mark on the landscapebegan earlier, and in more parts of the world, than more recent studies have reported.

There are archaeologists working all over the world, but they aggregate data differently, and it can be difficult to find larger patterns, says coauthor Ben Marwick, an associate professor of anthropology at the University of Washington. By asking archaeologists a series of questions rather than combining datasets, weve created a brilliant workaroundessentially, what were people doing, and how much, in different parts of the world?

The researchers looked at how human global land use has transformed the surface of the Earth, especially in the last 10,000 years. They divided Earth into 146 regions and used 10 time periods, from 10,000 years ago to 1850.

They found that about 42% of the regions examined had some form of agriculture by about 6,000 years ago, and that the beginnings of agriculture occurred earlier than previously believed.

The researchers conclude that foragers, farmers, and herders had transformed the planet by 3,000 years agomuch earlier than the timeframe derived from the most common land-use reconstructions used by earth scientists. In some regions, the survey showed effects of intensive land-use more than 1,000 earlier than previous estimates.

The industrial revolution and large-scale agriculture often spring to mind when people think about human impact on the environment, but these findings show that humans have been transforming the landscape going back at least 10,000 years, says coauthor Jessica Thompson, an anthropologist at Yale University. The line that separates the pristine natural world from one transformed by people is blurrier and goes further back in time than what is commonly believed.

The map is covered in dark green at the beginning of the time span (10,000 years ago) but the green gets lighter across the map as foraging becomes rarer

The survey found that foraging, which includes hunting, gathering, and fishing, was commonplace 10,000 years ago in 120, or 82%, of the 145 regions. However, foragers were not passive occupants; they also drastically changed landscapes, such as through extensive burning, to improve conditions for hunting and gathering, according to the study.

WE ARE AT A CRITICAL TURNING POINT.

Certainly foragers had significant impacts on the plant and animal communities where they lived, Thompson says. They manipulated the landscape to enhance their chances of survival. They might burn land to increase its productivity or influence how vegetation grows to attract animals to hunt.

We need to start thinking more seriously about that activity when we consider what constitutes an environment or landscape transformed by people. And that requires archaeologists to be a part of the conversation about modern-day human impacts.

Think of it this way: when humans began to intensify land use in different ways, often times associated with increased food production, they also began to alter the local landscape and ecology in significant and lasting ways, such as human driven extinctions and deforestation, Thakar says.

We have established that intensive human impacts on local environments begin much earlier than many researchers had previously assumed. This work provides important historical context for our rapidly accelerating impacts on the Earth.

The teams research also examines the origins of the Anthropocene, which is a term used to mark how people shaped the world and continue to shape it through their actions. The word combines anthropo, meaning human, and cene, meaning an epoch of geologic time.

I would say the Anthropocene Era is already widely accepted by the scientific community, Thakar says. The idea that human activity has become a dominant influence on the global environment during recorded history is well-established. What is debated, across disciplines, is not whether the Anthropocene exists, but the point at which our actions as a species became a climatic-driving force on par with that of major geologic processes.

Thakar notes that the project contributes a global assessment of how far we can push scientific evidence of human-induced landscape transformations.

The Anthropocene includes major milestones in human history, among them the invention of the wheel 3,500 years ago; the printing revolution that began in 1439; the scientific revolution from 1543 to 1687; the invention of the steam engine in 1712; the worlds population reaching 1 billion in 1804; the first electric motor in 1822; the first modern oil well built in 1859; World War I and World War II; the atomic age in 1945; the Great Accleration of knowledge that began in 1950 and continued for the next 60 years with unprecedented discoveries; and to 2011 when the world population hit 7 billion.

It raises the question: what do the next thousand years hold for humankind?

I think that we need to be concerned, not just about some distant future (1000 years), but the very near future (10-100 years) which offers our greatest opportunity to consciously, critically, and deliberately influence the Earths climate, Thakar says. Our past does help predict our future, and our past documents humanitys incredible capacity for innovation and collective action. Once we accept the truth of our role as climate-drivers, I believe that we will also find a way to ensure that our home remains habitable for our species.

She adds that archaeological data demonstrates humans ability to adapt to changing conditions, giving hope that we can find ways to adapt to global climatic changes in our future.

But, what we face today is unprecedented in both pace and scope, Thakar says. We are at a critical turning point. In order to land safely in the future, we must change outdated and destructive habits and replace them with new, future-oriented solutions.

The research appears in Science.

The National Science Foundation funded the work.

Source: Texas A&M University, University of Washington, Yale University

Original Study DOI: 10.1126/science.aax1192

Previously published on futurity.org.

Have you read the original anthology that was the catalyst for The Good Men Project? Buy here: The Good Men Project: Real Stories from the Front Lines of Modern Manhood

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

Photo credit: istockphoto

Read the original:
We've Been Transforming the Earth for at Least 10000 Years - The Good Men Project

Robots that admit mistakes foster better conversation in humans – Yale News

Three people and a robot form a team playing a game. The robot makes a mistake, costing the team a round. Like any good teammate, it acknowledges the error.

Sorry, guys, I made the mistake this round, it says. I know it may be hard to believe, but robots make mistakes too.

This scenario occurred multiple times during a Yale-led study of robots effects on human-to-human interactions.

The study, which published on March 9 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, showed that the humans on teams that included a robot expressing vulnerability communicated more with each other and later reported having a more positive group experience than people teamed with silent robots or with robots that made neutral statements, like reciting the games score.

We know that robots can influence the behavior of humans they interact with directly, but how robots affect the way humans engage with each other is less well understood, said Margaret L. Traeger, a Ph.D. candidate in sociology at the Yale Institute for Network Science (YINS) and the studys lead author. Our study shows that robots can affect human-to-human interactions.

Because social robots are becoming increasingly prevalent in human society, she said, people are encountering them in stores, hospitals and other everyday places. This makes understanding how they shape human behavior important.

In this case, Traeger said, we show that robots can help people communicate more effectively as a team.

As we create hybrid social systems of humans and machines, we need to evaluate how to program the robotic agents so that they do not corrode how we treat each other.

Nicholas A. Christakis

The researchers conducted an experiment in which 153 people were divided into 51 groups composed of three humans and a robot. Each group played a tablet-based game in which members worked together to build the most efficient railroad routes over 30 rounds. Groups were assigned to one of three conditions characterized by different types of robot behavior. At the end of each round, robots either remained silent, uttered a neutral, task-related statement (such as the score or number of rounds completed), or expressed vulnerability through a joke, personal story, or by acknowledging a mistake; all of the robots occasionally lost a round.

People teamed with robots that made vulnerable statements spent about twice as much time talking to each other during the game, and they reported enjoying the experience more compared to people in the other two kinds of groups, the study found.

Conversation among the humans increased more during the game when robots made vulnerable statements than when they made neutral statements. Conversation among the humans was more evenly distributed when the robot was vulnerable instead of silent.

The experiment also showed more equal verbal participation among team members in groups with the vulnerable and neutral robots than among members in groups with silent robots, suggesting that the presence of a speaking robot encourages people to talk to each other in a more even-handed way.

We are interested in how society will change as we add forms of artificial intelligence to our midst, said Nicholas A. Christakis, Sterling Professor of Social and Natural Science. As we create hybrid social systems of humans and machines, we need to evaluate how to program the robotic agents so that they do not corrode how we treat each other.

Understanding the social influence of robots in human spaces is important even when the robots do not serve an intentionally social function, said Sarah Strohkorb Sebo, a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Computer Science and a co-author of the study.

Imagine a robot in a factory whose task is to distribute parts to workers on an assembly line, she said. If it hands all the pieces to one person, it can create an awkward social environment in which the other workers question whether the robot believes theyre inferior at the task. Our findings can inform the design of robots that promote social engagement, balanced participation, and positive experiences for people working in teams.

Other co-authors on the study are Yales Brian Scassellati, professor of computer science, cognitive science, and mechanical engineering; and Cornells Malte Jung, assistant professor in information science.

The research was supported by grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the National Science Foundation.

See the article here:
Robots that admit mistakes foster better conversation in humans - Yale News

Because of coronavirus were doing things differently. How long will that last? – San Francisco Chronicle

It isnt easy to change habits, as those who have tried to go a day without touching their face have found, but the coronavirus outbreak is threatening to modify human behavior, culture, business and yes habits in ways that could permanently alter our way of life.

The COVID-19 pandemic has already disrupted American society, causing the stock market to plummet, and workplaces, theaters and sports leagues to close down as people across the country stockpile food and hole up at home.

Locally, ridership on BART and other mass transit has declined, and movie theaters, bars and restaurants are virtually empty. Handshakes, hugs, high-fives and kisses on the cheek have become almost taboo. Even the untidy among us have become germophobes, incessantly washing our hands and wiping down surfaces.

The impacts of the growing pandemic are far reaching, but the biggest changes are in the business realm, where experts say increased teleconferencing, automation and e-commerce could become standard even after the virus threat is gone.

Companies will put in infrastructure to enable remote working, to make sure people can operate seamlessly and communicate well regardless of where they are on the planet, said Darren Murph, head of remote for GitLab, a software company whose 1,150-plus employees all work remotely.

He thinks the coronavirus will make telecommuting the norm for people who now only occasionally work from home when they are waiting for a repair person or attending a childs school event.

This is like a get-out-of-jail-free card that every major city in the world never saw coming but will be so grateful for, Murph said. Were already way oversubscribed with people on public transit and in cars on the road. This will reduce strain on the infrastructure without spending any money.

The changes will be necessary, given that it could take 12 months or longer before a vaccine is developed. And restrictions could get more draconian as the number of infections grow, including mandatory home quarantines.

It is unlikely that many cities and regions could be isolated, like has happened in China and New Rochelle, N.Y. But the fast-spreading disease has forced Italy into a lockdown and the United States is, by all accounts, still in the beginning stages of infection.

Experts say the disease is likely to have long-term implications on how much people fly or take mass transit and even whether they greet people with a handshake or the newly fashionable elbow bump.

But major changes in our personal habits are unlikely, said Russell Poldrack, a neuroscientist at Stanford University and an expert on habit-forming behavior. Once the threat is over, he said, people will probably go back to touching their faces, shaking hands, hugging, kissing and failing to wash their hands frequently.

Whether (new behaviors) become permanent depends on how long this lasts and how bad it gets, Poldrack said. Take handshakes. They are so deeply ingrained in our fabric, but it could well be that the virus drives people to worry enough about disease transmission that they change to some other greeting.

New technologies, if not new habits, are more likely to catch on and become permanent as the virus spreads, said Ken Goldberg, a professor of engineering and robotics at UC Berkeley.

I think it will accelerate that tendency to order things online, especially things like food and groceries, Goldberg said. That, in turn, will increase a demand for robots to fulfill these orders.

An example of a technology that could boom during the crisis, he said, are robots that collect items in warehouses and package them for online shoppers, an industry that is now booming in China as a result of the new coronavirus.

Fear of infection among health care workers could also drive innovations in telemedicine, including remote-control robots that can help doctors examine patients without having to be there in person, he said. An Israeli startup, TytoCare, has developed such a system, allowing doctors to guide patients from afar as they perform medical tests on themselves using a handheld exam kit.

Similarly, the reluctance of people to go to large meetings and conferences will likely increase demand for tele-robots, with video screens and microphones, that could attend a conference in a persons place, allowing virtual delegates to network while lounging at home in their pajamas. Such robots are available now, but they are rare.

I think its a game changer in that (telecommuting) may be our new normal, said Bernard Coleman, head of employee engagement at Gusto, a payroll, benefits and human resources platform for small businesses.

One offshoot could be rethinking work hours.

Do the hours of 9 to 5 even make sense anymore? Coleman said. What if people are more productive from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m.?

A reduction of in-person conferences could force many professional societies to develop new business models, since the income from annual meetings helps fund their advocacy, training, research and other activities. But replacing large annual meetings with virtual conferences isnt all bad, said Dr. Dan Diekema, director of the infectious disease division at the University of Iowa.

There has been pressure building on this from an environmental standpoint because of the emissions produced by travel, Diekema said in an email. Now perhaps a tipping point will be reached.

Another example of a potentially permanent change is happening at UC Berkeley, Stanford and many other major universities around the country, where classes are being taught exclusively online as a result of the COVID-19 scare.

The technology obviously is never going to be as good as being there, but as people get used to going to classes, religious services and other places remotely, it could catch on, Goldberg said. Maybe we will adapt and in 20 years, it will be normal for people to have remote meetings.

A range of domino effects could occur if working from home becomes more commonplace. Some would benefit society: less traffic and thus fewer emissions. But the flip side would be fewer people on public transit, hurting agencies that depend on fare revenues. There would also be fewer patrons at restaurants that depend on workers for lunchtime business, and fewer customers in stores.

Businesses also might need less office space if there is a permanent increase in telecommuting, causing building vacancies and reducing rents. That could actually help San Francisco, which has a serious office space shortage, said Jay Cheng, public policy director of the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce.

Paid sick leave could be a long-lasting legacy of the coronavirus pandemic. Currently, the U.S. has no mandate for employers to offer paid sick leave, or paid family medical leave, which typically is longer. As a result, one quarter of workers about 30 million people who lack the benefit must decide whether to forgo a paycheck or risk going to work and transmitting or contracting disease.

The crisis has ignited debate on Capitol Hill and elsewhere, with proponents highlighting studies that mandatory paid leave decreases flu rates. Historically, Democrats have pushed for paid sick leave, while Republicans have opposed it as hurting businesses.

Now, folks on both sides of the aisle are talking about the need to do something, said Ruth Martin, chief workplace justice officer for MomsRising, a nationwide advocacy group pushing the Healthy Families Act, which would require businesses with at least 15 employees to provide seven days a year of paid sick leave.

In fact, the emergency relief plan that Congress passed early Saturday with broad bipartisan support includes two weeks of paid sick leave and up to three months of paid family and medical leave, as well as expanded unemployment insurance. While they are temporary and only for people affected by the coronavirus, those benefits lay the groundwork for similar future legislative action.

David Levine, a professor at the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley, said change usually happens slowly, and even in this situation probably needs a push.

This (disease) is forcing many places and schools to try something new, and once the fixed cost of learning new software, new routines and changing the norm is over, some of them are going to say, Hey, this is a better way, Levine said. But the way to make necessary changes systematic is not to rely on individuals. To the extent that organizations institute safe routines there can be lasting change. When you walk into a doctors office, they should ask you to wash your hands.

Peter Fimrite and Carolyn Said are San Francisco Chronicle staff writers. Email: pfimrite@sfchronicle.com, csaid@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @pfimrite, @CSaid

More:
Because of coronavirus were doing things differently. How long will that last? - San Francisco Chronicle