Category Archives: Human Behavior

Pandemic has a Silver Lining – Newport This Week

By ohtadmin | on April 16, 2020

To the Editor:

While millions have been horribly affected by COVID-19, there is a silver lining to this pandemic. With the resulting global shutdown, the environments health is actually improving, and with that comes undeniable proof that humans are largely to blame for longstanding environmental degradation. In Indias Punjab region, the Himalayan Mountains are viewable with the naked eye for the first time in 30 years. In Venice, fish and dolphins are seen swimming in the canals, whose waters are now clear for the first time in decades. For now, Los Angeles is free of its perpetual smog blanket, and the Northeast corridors air is also clearer and cleaner.

Globally, 8.8 million people die prematurely due to air pollution. That happens mainly in areas near major highways and/or coal-burning facilities. Researchers are studying the probability that the higher number of COVID-19 deaths reported in industrial northern Italy stem from the added hazards of air pollution in that region. This is compared to fewer virus attributed deaths thanks to the less polluted skies in Italys more agricultural southern regions.

Humans arent alone in their suffering. All of natures creatures are plagued by the ecological devastation caused by complicit governments, together with corporate entities greedy desire to maximize profits at the ecosystems expense.

We must encourage and actively support the critical work of environmental and educational nonprofits with increasing pace. Individuals and governments must realize our newly emerging cleaner environment is a direct product of mankinds forced curtailment of polluting activities, due to COVID-19s heavy restrictions on transportation and industry. Proof that human behavior is guilty of degrading the worlds air, water, and soil is visible and undeniable now more than ever. That it took a pandemic to begin lifting the veil from skeptics eyes is discouraging and saddening, but truth is often more visible during a real, unexpected challenge.

Elizabeth Lisette PrinceNewport

See the original post here:
Pandemic has a Silver Lining - Newport This Week

How Devs Explores the Silicon Valley God Complex – The Ringer

At times Devs can seem utterly, obviously fake. From its opening shots of glossy, well-manicured grass below a bright, phony sun, to aerial shots of the Golden Gate Bridge that look computer-rendered, to the generic luxury homes, Devs can come off as though it purposely wants to convey how staged it is. Its as though the inhabitants are playing out a script, meant to fill a role in a life already constructed.

Its certainly the way Forestthe PTSD-suffering, megalomaniac tech genius at the center of Devs (played by Nick Offerman)sees the world. In the first episode, he remarks upon the deterministic nature of the universe, detailing how everything that unfolds has already been set in motion long before it happens. In the fourth episode, he fires an employee for daring to bring a multiverse theory into the titular Devs project, as it provides deviation from the apparent blueprint of our reality.

This universal order Forest obsesses over also doubles as a justification, a way to absolve his grief over the loss of his wife and child. It also exonerates him, in his own mind, of his role as a villain who murders or threatens employees, bends laws to his will, and thumbs his nose at government oversight. If the world is following a script, then he is no longer responsible for the evil hes perpetuated; hes merely a pawn in a game thats been played a million times before.

DevsAlex Garlands limited FX series about a mysterious tech firm that seems to have devised a way to know the futureportrays a highly nuanced version of the Silicon Valley God Complex archetype. Forest is the founder of Amaya, a mysterious tech firm named for his deceased daughter and complete with a giant statue of her haunting the premises. Within the company, he leads a small team of developers in an effort to realize his ambitious goal of seeing through time. Forest is uninterested in political gain or worldly affairs and, as he tells his head of security and general attack dog Kenton, he doesnt give a fuck about the environment. What motivates him is a selfish desire to resolve his unending grief through a secretive, controversial, and clearly irresponsible experiment of traveling through time and revealing free will to be imaginary. In news that would appeal to Rust Cohle, time indeed turns out to be a flat circle.

Forest is Garlands latest edition of technology-fueled madness inflicted on the world, following his breakthrough 2014 film Ex Machina, which featured Oscar Isaac as a secluded genius losing control through a combination of cabin fever and being overtaken by his own obsessions. Both characters reflect the extremes of a Silicon Valley culture that has elevated its leaders as geniuses and often scoffed when government oversight has tried to rein it in. You dont have to look further than Elon Musks Twitter page to see how the genius label can drive someone mad.

In Forest, obsessiveness is driven primarily by a deep, unflinching depression. Since he cant physically resurrect his family, he has dedicated his life to doing it in the abstract. This along with Forests flowing hair and unruly beard pushes for obvious comparisons to Jesus. (If the religious undertones are too subtle for you, the Devs team seems to spend much of their time watching the life of the actual Jesus or Joan of Arc being burned at the stake.) Creating objects and ideas that change humanity is the quest for technological gurus and scientists in both media and real life. Since we cant see God, becoming one is the next best thing.

Forest is dedicated fully to this project of understanding the universe and selfishly getting to revisit memories of his daughter, who died in a car accident an undisclosed number of years before the events of the series. In order to achieve it he is willing to murder, psychologically torture his staff, and literally bend this fictional San Francisco to his will. Because of his wealth and power, Forests pathology goes unchecked as he is given a comical level of free rein. But based on the rules of Devs universe, its hard to hate or hold Forest responsible for the destruction hes caused. If free will is a lie and the universe is deterministic, Forests behavior was inevitable, decided upon the moment he came to exist; to paraphrase a line he says to Sergei, a developer at Amaya, upon discovering hes a Russian spy in the first episode: He could only have done what he did.

With that in mind, Forest feels less like a threat than just another bystander watching his life happen. Offermans portrayal of the character is increasingly weighed down by that knowledge, as the Devs team perfects their system. This unfortunately carries the adverse side effect of making the secondary plot line involving Lilya programmer at Amaya and girlfriend of the murdered Sergeitrying to uncover the shady business happening in the Devs building somewhat of a chore. Not only is Lily constantly a step behind the audience, but as more information on the Devs system is revealed, the threats and questions it poses to the laws of the universe and the nature of human behavior render Lilys freelancing detective work ultimately meaningless.

So much of science fiction, from 2001: A Space Odyssey to the books of Octavia Butler to Blade Runner, posits that human progress cannot be divorced from human violence. The advancement of our world ultimately includes the advancement of our destruction. Whether its HAL 9000, humanoid robots or cyborgs, or the radioactive effect that technological advancement takes on the planet, societyif given the time and resourceswill create its own undoing. While its the tech itself in these stories that is meant to be unnerving, the people behind the invention should truly frighten. The kind of ego and audacity to challenge whats possible has led to a dearth of incredible progress, but that same hubris has gone on to fuel addictive behavior as well as challenge our privacy, the environment, and necessary regulations put in place by the state.

There is a reason the word techno-utopianism exists. Its an idea thats existed long before Silicon Valley and will likely persist after its gone. The internet, space travel, cell phones and tablets, robotsthese are objects meant to lead us closer to an idealized society. Even the ways in which these creators have changed work culture and the cities they live in are thought of as revolutionary. They are gods in their own playground, with their wide campuses, state-of-the-art offices, and private buses; they continue to lead by example with the sophisticated restructuring of work-life to make it a more ideal environment, and something aspirational. But most things that are aspirational often reveal how few people get to benefit from progress, ultimately left without a vote in the way the world grows around them. The tech mavens are agents of change, and change is typically deemed good. If utopia is achievable on earth, they are the ones who decide what it will look like.

The good intentions behind things like the internet cant erase how that same invention also led to an advancement in our worst impulses. The rise in misinformation, the loss of privacy, a more expedient method for committing crimes have all come along with our growing dependence on the internet. Society needs to advanceit has no choicebut human behavior wont necessarily grow with it. We are still bound by hubris and prone to giving in to our basest instincts.

Devs takes place in a world and time similar to ours. In it, San Francisco can look at a distance like the kind of utopia that Apple commercials are made of. And yet at the edges of the ambient lighting of the streets and luxurious homes, you see the homeless, particularly the guy who sleeps in front of Lilys apartment complex who turns out to be more than he seems. Itd be highly unlikely if this werent meant to play on the real San Francisco, which despite being one of the wealthiest cities in the country, has one of the largest homeless populations in the U.S. Its a subtle addition, but its an effective one considering how much the show questions the futility of life: If theres no free will, no fairness, does what has happened or yet to happen even matter? Being homeless is no more a happenstance than the car crash that took Forests family away. For as much as Devs dramatizes the psychological effect that loss, combined with egomania and wealth, can create, if you live in that world long enough, Forest and Katie, his no. 2 and lead developer, seem to be the only ones who make sense.

The only thing that seems to stir up any real emotion or passion in Forest is someone daring to validate the multiverse. That theory of the universe, the idea that our existence is just one of a vast, unending series of other versions, has existed for centuries in fiction and philosophy, and its especially familiar to those who read comic books or watch Marvel movies. The scientific basis for it is much more recent, and incredibly controversial, with some scientists admonishing it as God with another name. Forest is adamantly opposed, more than likely because it involves the capacity to make choices on some level. It would imply that Forest exists in the wrong reality, rather than one in which his daughter is alive. With one episode left, the multiverse is the potential wrench in the system that could upend everything.

Devs has been slowly building up to an earth-shattering event to be revealed in this Thursdays finale. Whatever it isas Katie tells Lily during their heart-to-heartwill lead to a total collapse in cause and effect. Its a monumental happening that both Katie and Forest have watched over and over. Its not really a question of acceptance so much as an understanding that whatever takes place is going to unfold exactly as expected; they are essentially just watching themselves do it at this point.

Everything about Forest, and the show itself, has been obsessively hurtling toward total destruction. Whether or not some sort of apocalypse is on the horizon, theres certainly going to be a collapse within time and space. The music at the forefront of the show has set the stage for it as much as anything else. The score, by Ben Salisbury, Geoff Barrow, and the group the Insects, continues their working relationship with Alex Garland: Salisbury and Barrow both worked on Ex Machina and Annihilation. Their music for Devs is truly their best yet, hauntingly capturing the sensation of a world collapsing in on itself. Their Hans Zimmeresque droning synths, hair-raising buzzes, and dystopic samples capture profound grief and an unstable universe breaking apart. Its a magnetic and discomforting atmosphere that elevates the show dramatically. The score, combined with the Kubrickian visual palette and the emotional vacancy of its lead performance, draws you in only to reveal an intense agony tearing the world at the seams.

There is an insatiable need in people to figure out the universe. Its an admirable ambition that has led to incredible scientific advancement and discovery, but inevitably and without fail, humanity hits a wall. There will always be something unknowable and inscrutable, which is obviously maddening. But the unknowable also can be humbling, for knowing too much can be just as tormenting. Forest has used his power and wealth to achieve a utopian dream of reliving moments with his daughter again, both symbolicallyin the form of a giant and disturbing shrine of herand through visualizing the universes timeline. In creating this personal heaven and space to act out his grief, he killed and destroyed others. While Devs is a vision of malevolent tech genius and power turned up to a preposterous degree, the sentiment is relevant. Human behavior can go as far as technological advance can take it, for better or worse. Forest is one in a long line of sci-fi egomaniacs with unchecked power, but hes also a chilling warning of the dangers posed by a certain kind of hubris that exists in our own world.

Israel Daramola is a writer based in Brooklyn. His work has appeared in Pitchfork, Spin, BuzzFeed, and Rolling Stone.

More:
How Devs Explores the Silicon Valley God Complex - The Ringer

CARES Act grants $10 billion to aid airports during pandemic – WJFW-TV

RHINELANDER - The recently signed CARES Act will grant $10 billion to airports across the country to help during the coronavirus pandemic.

"Most airports around the state are down about 95% when it comes to passengers," said Rhinelander-Oneida County airport director Matthew Leitner. "The Rhinelander-Oneida County Airport is set to receive $1,100,712. As the year progresses, the loss of revenue will become more prevalent, and we'll need to tap into these grant funds to make up for it."

The money must be used for capital improvement projects. Leitner said there are already a few in the works at the Rhinelander-Oneida County Airport.

"Those projects include rehabilitation on our passenger terminal, a new fuel farm over at Rhinelander Flying Service, a lot of pavement improvement projects, painting, and some design work for years to come," said Leitner.

Despite a decrease in travelers, the airport is still fully operational with extra safety measures in place.

"Safety is always paramount" said Leitner. "We would never compromise safety for the sake of a decrease in revenue. We would close the airport before we did anything like that."

Leitner hopes to see a rise in flights once stay-at-home orders are eventually lifted.

"Human behavior is hard to predict, especially at unprecedented times like this. We certainly hope that will be the case, and I think we are well prepared for it," said Leitner.

Link:
CARES Act grants $10 billion to aid airports during pandemic - WJFW-TV

Star Wars: Are droids property, pets or people in the galaxy? – Dork Side of the Force

The first character to appear in the entire Star Wars Saga was a droid. Then that droid was subjected to on-screen bullying for three movies (I can think of seven instances where C-3PO is told to shut up explicitly or physically restrained from speaking in the original trilogy.) Viewer relationship to C-3PO is typically separated into three camps Hate him, Love him, or hopelessly identify with him on a personal level.

These relationships with C-3PO only work for one reason his emotions and personality are clearly defined on-screen. Droids have a complex role in the Star Wars Universe, and its tough to pin down their social status in the galaxy.

Just about every droid on the hero side has defining qualities that make them original and almost human. Each of our droid characters tends to have highly personalized relationships with our living heroes. R2 was loyal to Anakin and Luke, K2-SO was close with Cassian Andor, and Lando had aum complicated relationship with L-3. Despite these qualities, they are frequently dismissed in-universe as by-products of programming and other alterations. They cant think, have a programmed purpose and their autonomy is viewed as a malfunction.

If droids could think, there would be none of us here would there Obi-Wan Kenobi

There is an expectation that droids are meant to behave exactly as they were designed. Obviously, with any artificial intelligence, things dont always go as planned. K-2S0 developed a seemingly self-aware personality with the ability to disobey orders, make jokes, and make decisions that he deemed productive to his mandate. Cassian Andor explained this behavior as a by-product of his reprogramming. But it feels more like evolution to become closer to his organic companions.

L3 follows a similar path to K2. She is opinionated, dreams of a crusade for droid liberation, and bitterly refers to her organic overlords. The origins of L3s personality are never explained beyond Lando saying he doesnt have her mind wiped because She has the best damn navigational database in the galaxy.

There is an acknowledged level of control over droids by our living characters throughout the Star Wars Universe meaning to reduce a droid to its essential functions. C-3PO had his mind wiped at the end of Revenge of the Sith, K-2SO is reprogrammed to serve Cassian, and restraining bolts play a major role in controlling a droids movement and behavior, emphasizing their need to fulfill their purpose.

In this case, droids are property. By the Jawas placing bolts on R2 and 3PO, the two droids were confined to being farmhands and tools for moisture farmers. The transaction between Owen Lars might be the perfect microcosm for the existence of droids in the Galaxy. They can be bought, controlled with restraining bolts, and repurposed to serve their owners. Its tough to give this more than a second thought. They are just non-living robots after all.

Droids are not good or bad. They are Neutral reflections of those who imprint them Kuiil

The Original trilogy struggles to convince viewers that our living characters care about our droids on a human level. And this might not be illogical. If droids are not living things, they cannot feel. And if they do not feel, it might be easy to disregard their capacity to experience life as living things (this concept is confusing if we consider this scene from ROTJ).

In the season finale of The Mandalorian, IG-11 sacrifices himself for the group, not out love for his friends, but to fulfill his purpose of protecting the Child. He cant get around his original source programming of self-destructing to avoid capture. Again, a droid is an instrument for a specific means and takes action to fulfill that means, instead of making a conscious decision. Battle Droids, for example, were built for pone purpose Destruction. They follow orders and were built in mass to overwhelm and eventually be destroyed. They were tools. Same for Probe Droids, Gonk Droids, and countless other units. Even C-3PO was programmed to understand human behavior and cant exceed his mandate on Endor despite motivation from his friends.

Donald Glover is Lando Calrissian and Phoebe Waller-Bridge is L3-37 in SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY.

However, it seems possible that droids have the capacity to learn behavior, either intentionally or unintentionally. Of any character in Star Wars, R2 had had the strongest relationship with Anakin. R2 was loyal and eventually brought his loyalty to the next generation with Luke and Leia.

The loyal and opinionated astromech superseded his programming as a mechanic and became a message courier, swiss army knife, and regular savior of his companions, (until he is stored in the Resistance attic next to a box of Christmas decorations for who knows how long but whatever.) Ultimately, R2-D2 becomes more than his programming, likely the results of never having his memory erased.

Dave Filoni compared R2 to the family dog and Chopper to a cat when describing the moody astromech from Rebels. Despite both droids having the same utility and same role within their companions, they, like our own pets have different personalities and behavior. Your pet can be your companion and they can be trained for certain tasks, but you are ultimately held responsible for their well being and transgressions.

Comparing droid companions to pets might be selling droids short I mean C-3P0 knows over six million forms of communication, R2-D2 is elite hacker, and K-2SO can handle a blaster when given the opportunity. But if you consider their roles and relationships with other characters, it might not be a total stretch. They can be valued members of their families or teams, even loved, but its tough to place them in the same in-universe social standing their living counterparts.

Of course, L3 would have a serious problem being compared to a pet. And she might have a point.

If we take L3s point of view, the next logical question has to be asked are droids people too?In The Mandalorian, Kuiil points to an interesting argument in defense of the reprogramming and trusting IG-11. He tells Mando, Droids are not good or bad. They are neutral reflections of those who imprint them. There are parallels to the age-old philosophical questions of whether people are inherently good or bad. You can take a neutral approach and say people are neither good or bad, but products of their environment.

Thats similar to what Kuiil says in support of IG-11. They arent created in one way or another, but dependent on those around them. You can even teach them to be good, as Kuiil did, just as you can teach them to be bad.

IG-11 (Taika Waititi) in THE MANDALORIAN, exclusively on Disney+

Droids might be programmed to perform or behave in a certain capacity, but we already know that certain behaviors can be learned. L3 wasnt programmed to be a droid revolutionary and R2-D2s behavior surely surpassed that of a mechanic.

These behaviors make certain droids closer to living than not. Such characteristics inevitably generate responses from living characters. For instance, Mandos PTSD results in his distrust of all droids until IG-11 protects The Child and saves the group.

Perhaps one of the more belligerent examples is the bartender in the Mos Eisley Cantina. In a strange and offputting display of prejudice, the Bartender shouts to Luke that C-3PO and R2 must wait outside, since they dont serve their kind there. Generating such a horrible and emotional response seems strange for a non-living patron who wouldnt even be interested in their drink service anyway. The response is akin to any other prejudice against a race or species. It doesnt align with our typical notions of robots. So in some respects, droids must be viewed as a counterpart by living beings in the Star Wars Universe. Perhaps not all droids, but some.

Im not sure there is a proper way to categorize droids in a Star Wars social hierarchy. We know what L3 thinks, and we know Anakin valued R2 way more than property. R2 was a friend. Yet throughout the Saga, there is a limited amount of empathy and consideration in regards to droids, despite droid characters displayed varying levels of autonomy and capacity for relationships. So droids must be pets. Or people. Or maybe just property.

Who is the best droid in the Star Wars Saga? Let us know your opinions below.

Go here to read the rest:
Star Wars: Are droids property, pets or people in the galaxy? - Dork Side of the Force

Maybe the Coronavirus is the Hard Reset the Human Race Needed – BrownGirlMag

4 min read

On day one of my kids Corona-break from school, I noticed a take-out delivery guy wearing asurgical mask stepping out of the elevator in our building. He gave me a little nod before hecasually extended his arm towards the wall-mounted hand sanitizer dispenser that had magicallyappeared overnight. After that quick exchange, a thought ran through my head: We are all in thistogether.

Isnt it funny (well, maybe not funny, but ironic, tragic, and poignant) that a tiny virus that is invisible to the naked eye has affected everyone around the world? From the rich to the poor; the Easterner to the Westerner; the take-out delivery guy to the stay at home mom. COVID-19 doesnt care about who you are, what the color of your skin is, who you love, or who you pray to. It affects all of us because a virus is indiscriminate. It humbly reminds us that on the inside we are all blood, tissue, and bone.

When the virus first started to spread in China early this year there were warnings that it may reach pandemic status. But why did the United States and some other countries take the threat so lightly? As someone with a background in biology, I was taught that many infectious strains, whether bacterial, viral or fungal, follow a similar trajectory. It can exponentially travel from person to person, vector to vector, and may evolve to survive. Every year there are new strains that usually present in the general population with symptoms similar to the common cold. Some are more virulent than others, lingering for weeks, and though they typically arent life-threatening, they do become awkward annoyances. People will still go to work and find themselves saying to colleagues, I have no idea where this nasty bug came from!

As we now know, COVID-19 is highly transmissible and can become fatal if pneumonia develops, especially in those with pre-existing health conditions. Though deaths have occurred in a small percentage of younger patients, it has been touted as a disease more serious in the elderly.

Maybe thats how the novel coronavirus was able to slip with little fanfare and bring countries to a staggering halt and national economies to its knees. In a matter of days, it has altered our way of life in ways that our generation has never seen before. It has bound us together with the closings of businesses, public spaces, gyms, and schools. With social distancing, our lives have moved even more online than they were before. We are seeing celebrities give concerts on Instagram, and yogis stream their classes online. Teachers all around the world are testing out remote learning for the first time, which makes me wonder, will this become the norm? And will my kids grow up in a world without snow days?

The most remarkable thing to me is that the virus has revealed a side of humanity that we drastically needed. Its not an exaggeration to say that as of late the world and society, in general, has had a lot of problems. An example and one of the most pressing concerns is climate change. In a short time, the quarantines and the slowing down of human behavior have reduced the amount of pollution over China and cleared up the waters of Venice. With a reduction in travel, shopping, and traffic, what other changes await Mother Earth?

In a short time, many of us have altered our lives, proving that collectively changing our behavior is possible if our lives and the lives of our families depend on it. And we can do it relatively quickly. Not after years of public service announcements that tell us how bad smoking is or that seat belts save lives. It can happen rapidly, aided when governments can relay strong messaging and say, Theres a threat, and I know it sounds drastic, but its for the good of your parents, grandparents and your fellow man.

Maybe as people sit in their homes, socially distancing themselves from each other they may realize that we do need some government involvement to safeguard our health and welfare. That access to healthcare is a basic human right, and that a preexisting condition shouldnt be a death sentence. That education is important, teachers should be valued, and paid adequately. That the general public needs to understand that medicine is not an exact science and that there is rarely a magic bullet. A disease is not obligated to abide by a textbook scenario, though we naively expect it to. Of course, we also need to focus on education to nurture young minds to help us find cures for other viruses down the line.

Like with any tragedy, there will be unnecessary loss of life. Personal stories have already been shared, and its unfortunately just beginning. For me, it will be a trying time because I have a husband who works in the emergency room, a brother who works in an ICU, and another brother who is a primary care physician. On the flip side, there will be stories of kindness, happiness, and the ever-elusive hope.

But I am confident that one day soon we will emerge from our homes stronger than we were before. How will we be different? Will we go back to having every minute of our life scheduled? Or will we continue to check in on our neighbors and loved ones? Will we teach our children there is no app for empathy, and that more problems can be solved by looking out for one another rather than chasing materialism? Maybe we needed to be reminded that the elderly neighbor, the nurse working the night shift, or the immigrant who just arrived from a war-torn country needs to be taken care of too for all of us to be taken care of. That no one is immune to hard times and that compassion is at the heart of survival.

Here is the original post:
Maybe the Coronavirus is the Hard Reset the Human Race Needed - BrownGirlMag

Five Best Practices Security Leaders Should Implement Now To Fend Off Threat Actors – Forbes

Last week, Sequoia Capital penned an article about weathering a business downturn that went viral as fears around the global pandemic extended to every corner of the world. It talked about how, in some ways, business mirrors biology and quoted Darwin on who will survive as "not the strongest or the most intelligent, but the most adaptable to change."

This really resonated, as we fully subscribe to the notion that flexibility and adaptability are instrumental in our ability to thrive as individuals, as teams and as organizations. Today, this becomes more important than ever before particularly for security teams as businesses pivot toward all things digital in order to take recommended safety precautions in the face of crisis.

With much of the world's workforce mandated to work from home, it is imperative that security leaders take a step back from ordinary operations and focus their time and attention on taking the appropriate steps to guard against malicious or thrill-seeking threat actors, such as the fake coronavirus maps used to spread malware or fake text message "alerts" claiming to sell CDC-approved remedies to symptoms.

Here are five best practices our own team and some of our customers are implementing today that can help keep your organization as safe as possible during a time in which everyone is more susceptible to hackers.

1. Ruthlessly prioritize real security measures, and ditch security theater.

Security leaders have several competing priorities, from meeting existing regulations to moving your IT stack to the cloud to finding the right talent amid the most acute cybersecurity skills shortage we've ever faced. Use this as an opportunity to be brutally honest about which programs will have the highest impact and which ones can be classified as security theater countermeasures that provide a feeling of improved security and "check the box" but in reality do very little (if anything) to increase security. Focus on initiatives to form a solid foundation, such as creating a bulletproof incident response plan. Cut or table projects that aren't absolutely necessary to your security operations right now.

2. Brace for insider threats.

When it comes to cybersecurity, our minds are quick to jump to external threats we might be prone to. However, threats exist internally as well. If your company is in an industry where layoffs are either anticipated or inevitable, prepare to mobilize against internal threat actors who might act out. Implement data loss prevention solutions, and ensure you have relevant guardrails in place, such as logging and monitoring. Focus on a few specific use cases where you can intercept known risk, and amp up your security monitoring and incident response accordingly.

3. Bring social engineering to the forefront of internal conversation.

Social engineering uses fear and urgency to deceive victims into taking action. While some cybersecurity attacks exploit technical vulnerabilities in software, others exploit psychological vulnerabilities in human behavior, which is particularly relevant as people cope with higher-than-usual levels of mental stress.

Increase awareness around social engineering simply by starting the conversation and underscoring the importance of adhering to safe practices at home. For those who have not kept security top of mind, now is the time for them to start. It's your role to engage as many members of your workforce as possible to reduce overall risk. Warn of malicious links and provide validated resources for employees to check for updates. When in doubt, make sure your customers and employees know that if they see something suspicious, they can (and should) ask you about it, and provide a process and forum for communicating these concerns.

4. Develop contingency plans for mission-critical, third-party services.

You can only control what goes on in your own organization (to an extent). So what happens if the vendors you rely on get hacked, experience a breach or become unavailable? Take inventory of the services that your business operations would be severely impacted by losing access to. Reach out to vendors on that list, and, in partnership with those teams, create contingency plans that you can quickly adopt to minimize the impact internally.

5. Cement your seat at the table.

CISOs have been edging their way toward having a seat next to the CEO and CFO, but it's still not standard across organizations. As a security leader, you must be privy to what is happening at the highest level because business operations are changing daily if not hourly in the midst of this pandemic. Without staying abreast of how things are evolving at the organizational level, it becomes difficult at best and impossible at worst to align your security strategy with the overall business strategy. Now is the time to educate the C-suite around the changes to the threat landscape, the value of cybersecurity in identifying and mitigating risk, and short-term to midterm plans to weather the storm.

As security leaders, managing risk and operating under uncertainty is core to our roles. This is our opportunity to lead the way for others who are trying to figure out how to do the same right now. None of us can be sure how long this situation will last, but one thing is certain: We must do everything in our power to mitigate the risks that internal and external threat actors pose in order to protect our organizations.

See the rest here:
Five Best Practices Security Leaders Should Implement Now To Fend Off Threat Actors - Forbes

Tell us your favorite NBA team and well give you a book to read – SB Nation

You, me, and everyone we both know have more spare time indoors than ever before. Isolation (hopefully) equals safety, but its also stressful, monotonous, and, when endured without any outlet to temporarily slink away from long days that feel like bad dreams, alarmingly passive.

The NBA would be said outlet for millions of people during a time as difficult as the one were in, however its currently out of commission. But books escapisms undefeated No. 1 draft pick remain as accessible and welcome as ever. As a way to connect the two, Ive decided to recommend one (that Ive read in the last 18 months) to every fanbase in the league.

Several of these selections were obvious and explicit, tied to geography or stereotypes. Some remind me of a team owner or playing style or current trajectory. Some remind me of a mood or vibe I associate with the team for reasons that are impossible to articulate. If that sounds ridiculous, well, it is! Never forget how unscientific this exercise is.

Recommending literally anything to an amorphous collection of individuals who happen to root for the same NBA team is not possible. People have different tastes. The books listed here cross genres, from science fiction short stories to self-help memoirs. All wont be for everybody, but I dont regret the time I spent with any of them.

Im ashamed to admit I didnt know this book existed until I semi-recently saw it tucked in the back of a used bookstore. I grabbed it off the shelf and noticed Whiteheads signature on the inside jacket. Despite several dog ears and fading cover art, it cost $45. A smidge too expensive for my blood, even if the authors prose makes almost any other look like a condo compared to the Taj Mahal. A few days later I walked to the Carroll Gardens public library and checked it out.

Within the first three pages I realized this book was not for me. I dont get poker, which is not what Noble Hustle is necessarily about, even if besides Whiteheads overt antipathy for everything he chooses to meditate on (most notably self-doubt) its the closest thing it has to a backbone. Theres no structure, which is fine. Instead, it rambles from depressing Atlantic City bus rides to depressing Las Vegas casino floors to the mind of a man who might be depressed.

I couldnt help but feel pessimistic navigating a world that is literally one endless crap shoot, but 1) the book is not without fits of piercing insight (I have a good poker face because I am half dead inside), and 2) depending on what type of mood youre in (i.e. maybe after 200 straight days without seeing the sun) reading it can actually be kind of soothing?

Absolutely nothing written above or in the book has anything to do with the Atlanta Hawks. But someday someone will appreciate that $45 price tag. Which is to say: beauty is in the eye of the beholder, whether its a morose memoir about gambling or Travis Schlenks polarizing ground-floor rebuild of a basketball team.

Put in different, simpler terms, this book suits anyone whose favorite team regularly makes them want to cry, which doesnt not apply to anyone who is emotionally invested in Trae Youngs defensive ceiling.

For whatever reason I tend to struggle with essay collections. Maybe its my shrinking attention span, and how if I dont let one narrative carry me from beginning to end the reading process tends to feel like a crawl through rush-hour traffic.

Trick Mirror the most satisfying and relatable collection of essays Ive ever read was like that but for the exact opposite reason. After I finished each chapter, my brain played tug of war: Should I continue on or save the rest for as long as I possibly can? Sometimes she crawled into my head and untangled a knotty thought I had never been able to clearly make sense of: Where we had once been free to be ourselves online, we were now chained to ourselves online, and this made us self-conscious. Platforms that promised connection began inducing mass alienation.

Before Trick Mirror, Tolentino was already my favorite writer on the internet meaning what she mostly covers and the primary home for her work and, to make a ludicrous analogy for the purpose of this column, in terms of age, promise, and sheer talent, she is to American literature what Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown (combined) are to the NBA.

Not everyone can identify with this books unnamed protagonist a nihilistic orphan who muffles her misery with dubiously-prescribed medication but many would be consoled by her lifestyle. (Money isnt an issue, day-to-day responsibilities dont exist, and VHS tapes of old movies are her best friend. Things could be worse!)

The stakes in this novel which is very funny despite everything written about it here are pretty much non-existent because the present is communicated from the perspective of a wannabe coma patient. One day bleeds into the next, which bleeds into the next, which bleeds into the next. Her life is one rolling blackout.

This stasis is obviously unhealthy, but someone whose favorite basketball team recently signed one of the 15 best players who ever lived just a few months after he tore his Achilles tendon might not mind it.

I was reading this on a plane when the flight attendant stopped to take drink orders for my row. She recognized the colorful book jacket, crinkled her nose, then asked how I liked it. I tilted my head and shrugged. She chuckled and passed me a ginger ale. That one lost me.

The confidence game the con is an exercise in soft skills. Trust, sympathy, persuasion. The true con artist doesnt force us to do anything; he makes us complicit in our own undoing. He doesnt steal. We give We believe because we want to, not because anyone made us. And so we offer up whatever they want money, reputation, trust, fame, legitimacy, support and we dont realize what is happening until it is too late.

Few books will teach you more about human behavior. So long, GarPax, and shout out to every Bulls fan who is finally out from under their thumb.

You know when you feel terrible about something but cant cry? Instead, your stomach ties itself in a loop and your face clenches into the shape of emotional exhaustion? That was me during the last 50 pages of this novel, a soul-shattering foredoomed journey about the impossible choices made with our heart instead of our brain (and vice versa). To every Cavaliers fan floating through an ocean of basketball misery, it made me think of you.

I did not write these recommendations in order, and also could not for the life of me link any books Id recently read with the Mavericks. The closest was Judas, a candid jaw-dropper that turned the volume of my own heartbeat up to 1000. I bought it in Amsterdam earlier this year, then carried it around the city, stealing pages on department store couches and in hotel lobbies while my wife shopped with her sister.

If youre wondering why Ive connected the story of a woman who testifies against her homicidal brother to Dallas, a few months ago, as the national anthem played before Kristaps Porzingis very first game back at Madison Square Garden, a couple fans near press row shouted Judas! and Traitor! multiple times. (I realize that this says more about the Knicks than the Mavs, but lets jus go with it.)

I adore this story, even if its almost impossible to describe. Its a 300-plus page series of hilarious jump cuts that, by the end, are nothing short of a miracle. You know what else is a miracle? Nikola Jokic: franchise tentpole, top 10 player, and wholly unique NBA superstar. So little about the Nuggets and Frankissstein makes sense, but both work for that very reason.

For a fanbase thats living through prolonged dark days with a past to be proud of, heres a book about memory as in: cherish the good ones, because zero lie in the pipeline.

Does this queasy insider account of an ostensibly progressive utopia run by an endless stream of megalomaniacs have anything to do with the revolutionary basketball dynasty that happened to ascend right across the bay?

Not quite, even if one could argue that the Warriors eventually collapsed under the weight of their own hubris. Weiners first-person account of life in Silicon Valley hones in on morally-suspect data collection, oblivious misogyny, and unchecked ego. We talked about our IPO like it was dues ex machina coming down from high to save us.

To associate that mindset with the Warriors borders on parody. Unless Golden States strength-in-numbers rallying cry ever made you scream into a pillow.

If theres one continuous temperament that runs through the Rockets, from diehard fan to franchise player, its unappreciation. Much of it is valid. Most who dont root for Houston either begrudgingly accept James Hardens offensive virtuosity or aggressively shine light on his blind spots. Same deal for Daryl Moreys approach to team building or Mike DAntonis coaching style.

Now, Scorsese is not the perfect analog here partly thanks to the different scales on which a director and members of a basketball team can be weighed but he has been overlooked by critics and paying customers just the same. (In her review of Goodfellas, legendary New Yorker film critic Pauline Karl wrote: Is it a great movie? I dont think so.)

This isnt to suggest both Scorsese and the Rockets wont be celebrated until theyre gone. The former is widely recognized as one of the greatest and most influential directors alive, while Harden has an MVP, DAntoni has two Coach of the Year awards, and no single human being receives more credit for the NBAs analytical revolution than Morey. But all will be revered differently after their collective bodies of work are complete and in the case of Scorsese, hes already lived long enough to appreciate the bend in his own narrative arc.

The career of a player, coach, or general manager is never long enough to evolve the same way, but the perception of their impact can, and almost definitely will.

This slim, intense novel begs to be consumed in one sitting. The only break I took after I started it was getting off the couch to tip a pizza delivery person. There might not be a more efficient way to kill three hours. My Sister, the Serial Killer knows exactly what it is; no words are wasted or in the wrong order.

This is how I feel whenever I watch the Pacers. Theyre confident with their own structure and how they play, even if its so different from almost every other team. There are no excuses. They hunt for the shots they want, defend the post how they want, and play the lineups they want. I personally dont agree with most of their choices, but theres no arguing with the consistent results that come from them.

Every sports fan, athlete, and human being who exists inside a physical body should consider reading this. Success for any team requires luck in the health department, but arguably none of them need it quite like the Clippers. Their long-term future was recently exchanged for Kawhi Leonard and Paul George, two injury-prone superstars who will be 29 and 30 years old, respectively, the next time they play in an NBA game. They can also opt out of their contracts next summer. In other words: Let that Epsom salt flow.

When I alluded in the intro to some of these choices maybe being a bit on the nose, this is what I was referring to. The Lakers are Hollywood; Hollywood is movies. But even more important than that: When I first noticed an entire chapter in this book called Do you wanna read an essay about Friday? I knew it was my new bible. Go buy Sheas book if for whatever reason you have not already.

This book piqued my interest for two reasons: 1) Arrival was a beautiful movie, and 2) Barack Obama blurbed it. In her review, Voxs Constance Grady described Chiangs writing as a particularly utopian episode of Black Mirror. Sold!

Its specifically right here because everything thats happened to the Grizzlies over the past 18 months equals science fiction. For them to zoom straight from the Grit N Grind era a lovable, grimy, anachronistic stretch of underdog prestige that perennially came up a few inches below championship contention to Ja Morant and Jaren Jackson Jr. is not real life. No rebuild is perfect, but Memphis goes beyond their most optimistic fans imagination.

The core Memphis recently aged out of always had one or two stylistic flaws that lowered its ceiling. Morant and Jackson are two budding cornerstones who have no ceiling to speak of; the organization spent approximately 15 seconds in the wilderness before they landed back on track.

I dont know if theres any revelation or moral to this story, but those fans are living in a complete dream world and I salute them all to the maximum degree.

Its cheesy to connect these two on the basis of their shared unapologetic desire to push boundaries until they break, but thats exactly what I did here. American Spy takes no prisoners. Neither does Pat Riley.

Wilkinson also just used a bunch of lines that are easy to envision on a giant poster board in Rileys office. Live with your head in the lions mouth,or The first few moments after you meet someone are precious, because the data on them is plentiful and your own subjectivity has yet to interfere. I mean, come on. If Riley hasnt read this yet someone should give it to him immediately. (Also, Im a sucker for book covers that pop. American Spy is the Miami Vice jersey of cover art.)

At this point, Bucks fans might as well swerve into the skid and bury their heads inside this expansively claustrophobic horror story thats one part simmering identity crisis, two parts work-life paranoia, and 18 parts zombie apocalypse. No fanbase deserves more empathy right now.

As the narrative jumps from present day to the main characters recent past, a global pandemic even scarier than our real one paralyzes the human race. I wouldnt call it comforting, but this novel dimly illuminates an even darker tunnel than the one were currently inching through.

A while ago I told my wife, who is from Michigan, that shed like this. Right around the time she was nearly finished, I let her know about this very article and asked which NBA fanbase shed recommend it to. Her response, without hesitation, was Minnesota. I asked why. Because Midwesterners enjoy racy material that they cant talk about in person. Case closed!

If I were to compile a list of non-science-or-health-related public figures who must be protected at all costs, Samantha Irby and Zion Williamson would both be on it. Earlier this year someone who doesnt know anything about the NBA asked me which one player should he watch to hook himself in. I exhaled Zion without thinking.

This is kinda how I feel about Irbys latest essay collection. If theres one book/movie/TV show/anything Id recommend to anyone right now, its that, a body-shaking funny gem that Ive already devoured more than once. I wish Irby and Williamson couldve somehow entered my life 10 years ago. Better late than never, though.

In his prime, Ovitz was an omnipotent Hollywood deal-maker and relentless bully who inevitably helped shift parts of how the movie industry does business. A co-founder of CAA and one of the most powerful talent agents who ever lived, Ovitzs memoir is sincere yet steeped in delusion, with words that often come across as a fantastical misrepresentation of reality. Lying to me is a point-blank misstatement with no purpose in mind, Ovitz, a notorious liar, wrote.

Taken at face value, its little more than a brick of narcissism. Some statements are from a man staring at a mirror, talking to his own reflection. I had two hundred magazine subscriptions, and Id skim the magazines. What?

Ovitz was also petty, power hungry, and quick to point a finger. In that vein, the gossip makes this book entertaining, if nothing else. But its most revealing moments are overshadowed by a massive ego thats protected by egg shells.

For the one fanbase thats had to cope with divorce more than any other, heres a pseudo-therapeutic bestseller that nosedives into one of the most painful experiences a person can go through. Its unpredictable, told from a few different points of view, and slightly confusing. But this will make you feel something. Especially if you watch the Rockets and wish their two best players were in blue.

I didnt include Tanking to the Top because Yaron is a friend who threatened/offered to pay me when I first told him about this column. Its insightful and packed with fresh anecdotes about how a bold experiment generated a fascinating inflection point. Go buy it.

Why isnt it recommended to Sixers fans? 1) They should already have it, 2) It somehow felt more appropriate connecting this to a fanbase that deserves to know what a good, arduous tank job looks like. Few franchises are more in need than Orlando.

My original answer here was Sprawlball: A Visual Tour of the New Era of the NBA by Kirk Goldsberry, but proposing that informative examination of modern strategy to segments of a fanbase that still believe in their own craggy infrastructure made me feel too much like Skip Bayless. (By all means, dont let that stop you from buying Sprawlball, reading it, and then venting to Josh Harris with a 7,000-word email.)

Instead heres a relishable murder mystery that felt like a more appropriate way to acknowledge one of the most bizarre seven-year runs any relevant NBA organization has ever had.

The Sixers are stranger than fiction, and every time they come up in conversations had with friends, people who work in the NBA, other writers, etc. the same questions are asked:

Do the Sixers trust Joel Embiids body?

Will Simmons ever develop a reliable jump shot?

Was the Markelle Fultz situation ever repairable?

Why didnt they keep Jimmy Butler?

Did Sam Hinkie actually have to die for our sins?

Tea leaves can answer the aforementioned questions well enough (nope, leaning towards no, probably not, still unclear, sir this is a Wendys). But thats not the same as hard evidence. The Sixers are all conjecture.

For any fan whos fed up with their favorite teams need to obfuscate the truth, either deliberately or through their own bumbling incompetence, let Witch Elm be your medicine. At the very least, by the end youll finally have some answers.

Imagine being forced into a one-way, emotionally abusive relationship with an obscenely wealthy white man who knows he can directly impact your happiness but never never makes an effort to change his behavior. Your feelings are at the bottom of the totem pole to this person. There are some things he can use you for but far more often than its you who needs him.

Suns fans have no idea what Im talking about, but they can learn more by reading this memoir.

Apologies to every Blazers fan who saw this and immediately rolled their eyes. Last month I saw it in the front window of a new bookstore in Brooklyn and it felt like a sign. My original copy was lost somewhere down the line, so I walked in and bought this one, with a grimacing Bill Walton and his scraggly red hair on the cover.

Aside from some dated language and how it was obviously written long before analytics transformed the scouting process, so many of its ideas are timeless, if not prescient. (The delicate balance between chemistry and talent, the exhausting regular season being too long, and the swelling power struggle between owners and players to name a few themes sprinkled throughout.)

One part I forgot that for sure solidifies Portland as the most cursed team in NBA history (sorry again, Blazers fans!) is how they had Moses Malone as Waltons backup, then traded him for a draft pick. Two years later, Malone was the NBAs MVP and Walton was in San Diego. Woof. (Also forgotten but equally important: Walton once had two shower heads in his home. The higher one for himself, and the lower one, as he put it to wash the soap off my balls. This book really has it all.)

No one is suggesting you snort DMT just because your mood is irrationally affected by Vlade Divacs whimsical understanding of the NBAs collective bargaining agreement, but if that is in fact ever something youve considered doing then sink into this exploration of the tantalizing hidden benefits held by various psychedelic drugs before you do.

Does anyone out there honestly believe that San Antonios demise just happened to coincide with the NBA season being put on hiatus? Theres no such thing as a coincidence. The Spurs will never die. By the time basketball is back in full swing, Dejounte Murray will be one of the five best players in the league and LaMarcus Aldridge will move like hes 26. This is just the way of the world.

My favorite genre is any behind-the-scenes come-up story where a professional writer illustrates their life as a professional writer. I ingested most of it during a weekend trip to Greenwich, where my wife was a bridesmaid in her college friends wedding.

Now, theres really no reason why a book about Hillary Clintons failed 2016 presidential campaign would be super interesting to your average Canadian, but your average Raptors fan might be able to compare Chozicks pursuit of Clinton to the tension they felt watching Kawhi Leonard throughout the playoffs, unsure if hed re-sign or leave for Los Angeles. If that sounds like a stretch, it totally is! I just really wanted to include this book because it belongs in a time capsule.

The few self-help books Ive ever read were approached with the following expectations: If this does not 100 percent cure all my problems overnight then whoever wrote it belongs in prison, which is an extremely healthy way to be.

A few years ago when I was living in Los Angeles, this sentence was more or less uttered verbatim in my therapists office and she responded by endorsing 10% Happier. So I ordered it the same day. Then I watched it collect dust on a shelf in my bedroom room.

A short time ago, after lugging it on moves to Boston and Brooklyn, I gave the book a try, more out of curiosity than anything else. It didnt rectify my own anxiety (I still use fancy-sounding words I dont technically know the definition of The Invisible Man was bad but the uncouth scenes almost held it together in conversations with people I dont know very well/my wife in the hope theyll think Im smart, which is never embarrassing) or convince me to pick up meditation. But I couldnt help but admire how it was packaged useful life advice thats Trojan-horsed inside the authors re-telling of his professional nadir.

This has literally nothing to do with the Jazz or their fans, other than the fact they are human beings and Harris story is nearly universal. Were all anxious. We all have self-doubt. This book might not be meant to solve those problems, but if youre looking for a way to pass the time before basketball comes back, giving it a try cant hurt.

We end with one of the most tortured fan bases in professional sports. This book a bleak exploration of masculinity, addiction, and hopelessness will lock you into an emotional death spiral, which is how I imagine being a fan of the Wizards has felt for the past 20 years.

Here is the original post:
Tell us your favorite NBA team and well give you a book to read - SB Nation

Poets&Quants | Why This Dean Is Optimistic About An On-Campus Start In The Fall – Poets&Quants

Duke Fuqua Dean Bill Boulding. File photo

When the fall term begins at business schools in late August and early September, the dean of Duke Universitys Fuqua School of Business is optimistic that instruction will return to the physical classroom and the campus. Dean William Boulding believes that once the country gets beyond the surge in COVID-19 cases and deaths, a confluence of changes will emerge to make people feel safe enough to reengage in society.

Im optimistic about physically opening for three reasons, says Boulding. Number one, we are going to see better treatments.We will have solved the testing issues which have continued to plague this country. The key to really successful management and engagement is whether you have access to really easy testing. My belief is by the time we get into the summer, I believe we will have a home test kit. With better treatment and best practices, the level of panic will go down.

He doesnt rule out a second wave of the pandemic in the late fall, however.Like the rest of the world, he says, we are making a guess that the optimal time to open is the beginning of September. The best guess is that when we reopen things we will probably have another wave of COVID-19 which will happen in the fall. So it wouldnt be surprising if things shut down again until we get to the vaccine in the spring.

WHY APPLICATIONS TO FULL-TIME MBA PROGRAMS WONT EXPERIENCE A BOOM IN THE NEXT CYCLE

In a wide-ranging and highly revealing interview with Poets&Quants, Dean Boulding also explains why he believes business schools will not experience a boom in MBA applications in the next admissions cycle, why the current admissions season is the craziest in the history of business schools, how he is dealing with the challenges in finding this years graduates jobs in a severe recession, and what he believes will be the long-lasting impacts of the coronavirus on business education. He also addresses the current controversy over tuition refunds for MBA students who are now in Zoom classes.

His views are as sobering as they are optimistic. He believes that many business schools and universities will go out of business, especially those that have weak balance sheets and are heavily dependent on tuition revenue. Boulding believes the most vulnerable MBA graduates this year are those who are in the midst of self-directed searches for jobs. All of that has been thrown up in the air, he says. Who (among employers) is ready to make decisions right now? They are just trying to hold on until the storm passes. So I worry quite a bit about people in that position who need something to get through the storm until companies are open for business and are hiring like gangbusters. I think that will happen when the vaccine is finally out there in the spring of next year.

Boulding is an especially authoritative voice in these uncertain times. Besides leading Fuqua as dean for the past eight-plus years,he chairs the board of the Graduate Management Admission Council, the organization that administers the GMAT exam. A professor whose teaching interests spanthe areas of management, marketing, and strategy, he also serves as a member of the World Economic Forums Council on Values.

The health crisis has also hit home. By mid-March, at least 15 Duke MBA students who traveled to Israel over spring break tested positive for COVID-19 and had been isolated at their homes off-campus. An additional 11 individuals in the Duke community tested positive after traveling internationally as well, according to news reports.

The conversation with Poets&Quants Founder John A. Byrne occurred remotely via Zoon, as everything does these days, with Dean Boulding in his home office in Durham, N.C., and Byrne in his man cave in the Bay Area just outside San Francisco. In common with other schools, Fuqua has moved all of its 101 current courses out of the physical classroom and online. It was a move involving 45 faculty members at the school and 80 of those courses were transitioned over a two-day period for the schools full-time residential programs.

An edited transcript of our conversation follows:

So this is clearly a crazy time. How are you and how have you been dealing with the crisis?

This is a time that is unprecedented in our lifetimes. This is something that we have never experienced so it has been interesting and challenging. What I feel really good about is what people often say, that in a crisis you can see both the best and the worst of human behavior and we are really lucky that we get to see the best.

Despite all these challenges, I feel extremely grateful to the community I am part of to help us get through this. Some of the things we are doing now because we have to we will continue to do. So this is not without upside in terms of identifying ways to connect our community in ways that we werent using before. So there definitely are positive aspects despite the onslaught of really scary, damaging events that are happening.

Bill, can you give us a few examples of the upside?

What this helps faculty and students understand is what works well online and why do you need face-to-face. I think there is a generation with a belief that by definition everything face to face has to dominate. And yet I believe that faculty and students are discovering that there are examples where they can change up the material in interesting ways to put some content online that actually enhances the face-to-face component. There is this massive forced experiment, and out of it you are going to have some failures and some discoveries around better practices than what we know-how.

If you choose a face-to-face program, so much of that experience happens outside the classroom. So we need to be very much aware of not only how we teach but how we facilitate that interaction. I just came out of a meeting where the insight was, Wow. These interactions online are attracting much bigger audiences because people dont have the barriers of having to get out of their homes and into a particular location. Whether its physical or psychological barriers, it is opening up access to programming at a scale that you dont get in a face to face environment. Those are things that will be sticky for us.

A ritual for all schools is Admit Weekend to help admissions seal the deal with admits. Did you have your big admissions event online this year?

A month or two ago, we had a Blue Devils Weekend on campus but that feels like centuries ago. Now our second one will be virtual. Well learn what works well in a virtual environment and then on an ongoing basis we will create an online alternative for someone who cant get to campus for the actual event. At the same time, were creating opportunities for programming, including interviews with on-campus guests who you may have to work with for weeks to figure out a time in their schedule to come. Now weve been able to put together a series of events more easily because the barriers to participation have been lowered. There are definitely positive things that will come out of this crisis but lets not kid ourselves this is a humanitarian crisis of enormous consequences, both in terms of health and economics. This is serious stuff.

How difficult was it for Fuqua to make the transition from the physical classroom to remote instruction?

We were on spring break with two days to go when the university announced that we would be closing down the campus. Because the announcement was so precipitous, the university said it would extend the spring break by another week to give faculty time to stand up on line. We did not take the extra week. We felt why not go the next Monday as planned on the schedule. Weve been through this drill before having to close down our campus in China. We had very little notice and we stood up the online version of our program there for students overnight. So we knew what to do and made the decision to take no more than two days over spring break. Luckily, we also have several programs that either have 100% online delivery or a fraction is online. So we have a faculty that is very experienced in using the online modality of teaching. So we actually have several years of investment in building up our online capabilities so when the moment came we were ready.

View post:
Poets&Quants | Why This Dean Is Optimistic About An On-Campus Start In The Fall - Poets&Quants

What Is Human Behavior? Theories, Definition, And Types …

By Gabrielle Benitez

Updated September 27, 2019

Reviewer Lauren Guilbeault

Humanbehaviorisaninherentlycomplexsubjectmatterwhichpertainstothemannerandreasonsbehindpeople'sactions.Ofcourse,therearecountlesstheoriesassociatedwithhumanbehaviorandvarioustypesofconduct.Understandinghumanbehaviorisveryimportantinsociety;theknowledgeshedslightonpatterns,thereasonspeoplemakecertaindecisions,andmuchmore.Ofcourse,themoreoneunderstandsabouthumanbehavior,thebettertheycanpositionthemselvesandcomprehendhowotherssee,interpret,andadapttotheirvariousenvironments.

Source:pixabay

Oftheoriesabouthumanbehavior,oneofthemostprevalentonesofallisthatofconditioning.Conditioningoccurswhensomeoneisgroomedintobehavinginacertainmanner.Therearetwomaintypesofconditioning,anddifferentpeoplemaybemoreimpactedbyoneformovertheother.Ofcourse,conditioninghumanbeingstobehaveinacertainwaycanhavepromptethicalormoraldebates,especiallywhensomeoneisconditionedtoactinamannerwhichfailstosuittheirbestinterests.Then,othersmaintainthathumanbeingsareallinherentlyprogrammedtobehaveinonewayoranother.

ClassicalConditioning

Classicalconditioningoccurswhensomeonecomestoassociatespecificstimuliwithvariousoutcomes.Inturn,thismannerofconditioningoftenencouragespeopletobehaveinwayswhichwillbringthemjoyandpleasure.Forinstance,ifsomeonefindsthattheytendtodowellwhentheyfollowtheirinstinctsasopposedtofollowingtherules,theyarelikeliertobeanonconformistandtakerisks.Classicalconditioningdoesnotalwayshavetooccurfromtheactionsormanipulationsofaspecificindividual.Sometimes,thistypeofconditioninghappensfromsocietyorfromtheenvironmentinwhichsomeoneisroutinelyexposedto.

OperantConditioning

Quitesimply,operantconditioningcontrolshumanbehaviorviapositiveandnegativereinforcement.Apersonwhofindsthemselvesconstantlyintroublewiththelawwhentheybreakcertainrulestypicallylearnstoassociaterule-breakingwithlegalissues.Likewise,anindividualwhoregularlystudiesforexamsandacesthemcomestoassociatestudyingwithpositivegrades.Whenitcomestohumanbehavior,peopletendtosteerclearofwhatcausesthempainandgravitatetowardspleasureandpersonalsatisfaction.Thesearesomeofhowconditioning,bothclassicalandoperant,istheorizedtoimpacthumanbehavior.

Cognition

Intherealmofhumanbehavior,cognitionisaveryprevalenttheorywhichmaintainsthathumanbehaviorisdeterminedbyanindividual'sthoughts,innerjudgment,personalmotivations,etc.Thisparticulartheoryplacesgreatemphasisonpeople'sinternalstatesandmaintainsthatwhatapersonisfeeling,thinking,orbattlingwilleventuallyimpactthebehaviorwhichtheworldsees.Ofcourse,cognitivetheorieswhichpertaintohumanbehaviorareheavilysupportedbymentalhealthstudies,psychologicalstudies,andmore.Muchofwhatexistswithinthetangible,externalworldtodayoriginallyexistedwithinanindividual'smind.

Manytheoriesofhumanbehaviorarewidelyusedandacceptedintoday'sworld.Understandingthesetheoriesmakesadifference,butsodoesunderstandingthetypesofhumanbehaviorandthefactorswhichdrivethem.Asauniquespecies,humanbeingswillcollectivelyandindividuallyfallintodifferentorevenmultiplecategories.Certainpeoplemaybeinclinedinonedirection,whereasothersaredrivenbysomethingelseentirely.Nevertheless,thefollowinginformationisrequiredtounderstandwhathumanbehavioristrue.

Personality-Based

Source:pixabay

Howpeoplebehaveislargelyimpactedbytheirpersonality.Someindividualsmaybepatientandeasygoing,whileothersareimpatientandhot-headed.Inmostcases,youcannottellsomeone'spersonalityrightoffthebat.Usually,ittakestimetogettoknowthem,interactwiththem,andtrulygetafeelforwhatyou'redealingwith.Somepersonalitiesarefriendlierthanothers,andthereareaseriesoffactorswhichcanshapeoraltersomeone'spersonality.Culture,environment,thepeercaninfluenceanindividual'spersonality,andsomuchmore.

Interest-Based

Aperson'slevelofinterestsignificantlyplaysaroleintheirhumanbehavior.Interestcandeterminewhetherornotsomeonebehavesinawaywhichisnotconsistentwithwhotheyare.Furthermore,interestoftendetermineswhetherornotsomeonetakesrisksorpursuesagoal.Moreoftenthannot,whensomeoneisinterestedinapersonorsubject,theyaremorelikelytodevoteattentionthaniftheywerenotinterested.Gaugingaperson'sinterestinsomethingcanbeaverygreatwayofpredictingortheorizingforthcominghumanbehavior.

Attitude-Based

Likepersonalityandinterest,individualattitudealsodeeplyaffectshumanbehavior.Attitudescanberightorwrong,byone'sdevelopmentorbyoutsideinfluence.Nevertheless,thereisnodenyingthataperson'sattitudedeterminesthechoicestheymake,thewaytheyinteractwithothers,andtheirgeneralhumanbehaviorinanutshell.Apositiveattitudecanmakesomeonemoreopenandreceptivetoacertainpersonorsituation.Likewise,anegativeattitudetendstocauseindividualstoavoidorshutoutwhattheyviewdisfavorably.

Emotion-Based

Emotionsaredeeplyrelevantwhenitpertainstohumanbehavior.Somanyactionsanddecisionsinlifeareemotionallycharged,evenwhenpeopledon'trealizethisonthesurface.Apositiveemotionalstatecancausesomeonetobeopen-minded,morelikelytotakerisks,andotherwiseengageincertainbehaviors.Likewise,anegativeemotionalstatecanleadtodestruction,isolation,oraperson'sdecisiontowithdraw.Virtuallyallmannersofhumanbehaviorcanbetracedbacktoemotionsofsomesort,evenifadditionalfactorsareinvolved.

Amorethoroughcomprehensionofhumanbehaviorhaspositivelycontributedtosocietyonsomanylevels.Thisisanundeniablefact,andyet,inspiteofthedefinition,theories,andtypesofhumanbehavior,self-controlisstillverymuchrelevant.Howyoubehavealwaysmakesadifferencebecausewhenit'sallsaidanddone,youareaccountableforyouractions.Behavingwellandcontrollingyourselfisveryeasywheneverythingisgoingwell,andyourbackisn'tagainstthewall.However,behaviorinthefaceofstress,worries,andchallengesisoftenwhatturnsouttobethemostdefining.

Source:pixabay

Self-controlmattersbecauseitdetermineswhetherornotyoustaygroundedeveninthefaceofadversityortoughtimes.Someonewholacksself-controlwillhaveasignificantlyhardertimestayingoutoftroublethansomeonewhoknowshowtomanagethemselves.Exercisingself-controldoesn'tmeanthatyouwillneverfeelangry.Itdoesn'tmeanthatyourpersonality,interestlevels,andattitudeswon'tcomeintoplay;however,whenyouhaveself-control,youcanmanagethesefactorsinsteadofallowingthemtomanageyou.

Consequences,whetherpositiveornegative,areinevitablefactorswhenitcomestohumanbehavior.Thechoicesyoumakeandhowyouchoosetobehavedeterminewhetherornotyouexperiencedesirableorundesirableoutcomes.Self-controliswhatallowsyoutomanageyourbehaviorandavoidnegativeconsequenceswhichyoudon'twanttobeexposedto.Therearecountlesssituationswherepeoplehavelookedbackandeitherwishedthey'dexercisedbetterself-controlorfeltthankfulthattheydidexerciseself-control.

Ifyoufindyourselfstrugglingwithmanagingyourbehavior,thenthiscouldverywellbeasignofadeeperissuewhichneedstobeaddressed.Evenwhensomeoneisfeelingfrustratedorundertheweather,therestilltendstobeadegreeofself-control,whichallowsthemtomanagethechoicestheymakeandhowtheyinteractwithothers.

Issueswithpersonalhumanbehaviorcouldbeindicativeofunresolvedissuesorpasttrauma.Sometimes,peoplefindthemselvesonnegativedownwardsspiralswhentheyhaven'tdealtwithveryimportantissueswhichhavethepowertoimpacttheirlife.Unresolvedtraumacanimpactsomeone'spersonality,levelsofinterest,attitude,emotionalstate,andsomuchmore.It'snothingtomessaroundwith,andtheworstpartisthatmanyindividualsarenotconsciouslyawarewhentheseadverseimpactsarehappening.Alltheycanseeisthesymptomsoftheproblem,hencetheinabilitytomanagetheirbehavior.

Ifthisissomethingwhichresonateswithyou,thensigningupforonlinetherapywithBetterHelpcantrulychangeyourlifeforthebetter.Onlinetherapycomeswithmultiplebenefits;firstandforemost,you'llhaveaccesstoatherapistregardlessofwhoyouareorwhereyoulive.Secondly,you'llhavethesupportsystemandprofessionalguidance,whichcanprovideinsightintoyoursituation.Finally,byworkingwithatherapist,youopenyourselfuptonotonlylearningmoreaboutyourselfasanindividualbutalsounderstandingimportantdetailswhichimpactthequalityofyourlife.

Source:pixabay

Regardlessofwhoyouareorwhatyoumaybegoingthrough,youdeserveaccesstothebestcarepossible,andyoudeservetheopportunitytomaketherestofyourlifethebestofyourlife.

Follow this link:
What Is Human Behavior? Theories, Definition, And Types ...

In Predicting COVID-19’s Behavior, We Forgot To Consider Our Own – American Council on Science and Health

The other day, Tyler Cowen, an economist, was discussing the differences in economic and epidemiologic models. One factor that economists frequently consider is termed elasticity. A simple example, the fundamental economic belief that supply and demand (as measured by price) are inversely related - as supply increases, the price diminishes, and as the supply decreases, the price increases. We need to look no further than price-gouging for N95 masks or toilet paper during the days of COVID-19 as an example. But economists take this fundamental relationship one step further recognizing that for some, the price of toilet paper is more elastic, they are willing to spend more than others, or they may be less elastic, unwilling to pay a cent more. (Perhaps they have a bidet.)

Epidemiologic models do not take elasticity, and we can call it by its more common name, human behavior, into account. The math of epidemics, for the most part, involves variables that act upon one another, but not with one another. That may well explain some of the discrepancies in the pandemic models. For example, based on the biologic behavior of infections, higher population density increases the opportunity and, therefore, the propensity for the disease to spread for any given R0.

Consider the outbreak of COVID-19 in Westchester County, just north of NYC. It was one of the first hotspots identified. Track and trace concluded that one or two individuals meeting in population-dense gatherings were responsible for the subsequent outbreak. You can blame that on culture or lack of knowledge, but it was our behavior that impacted the rate of infectivity.

In the real world, population density is impacted by the elasticity of human behavior in this instance, the rapid adoption of social distancing. If you look at the behavioral response of countries acknowledged for quickly flattening the curve with social distancing and track and trace, Hong Kong, and Singapore are the usual suspects, their response was different than ours. In part, because they had already been primed by a close call experience with SARS. It is not that the virus had different infectivity or biologic behavior in those countries; it is because of their human response, unaccounted for in the epidemiologic models, altered the outcome significantly.

A return to social mingling

Given this understanding, it is a logical conclusion that human behavior will be the unmeasured variable in the models constructed for a return to normal. The most straightforward example offered by the media, are the cultural memes among Western countries, emphasizing the individual over the collective concerning societal good and privacy concerns. Singapore is believed, in some monotonic way, to be all in on digital track and trace. But the data shows that Singapores human response is varied, withonly 20%of a reasonably regimented population downloading the necessary app.

More to the point. Ask yourself these questions.

No matter what model policymakers use in finding a way to end social distancing, our behavior will be difficult to predict and will make the assumptions and predictions of those models inaccurate and unreliable. Models contain simplifying assumptions that rarely hold in the real world; our human response is probably the least predictable and makes all models useful, but all models wrong.

Original post:
In Predicting COVID-19's Behavior, We Forgot To Consider Our Own - American Council on Science and Health