Category Archives: Human Behavior

Will County colleges try to manage pandemic as new year begins – The Herald-News

The COVID-19 pandemic has pushed Will County-area colleges to make significant changes to keep students safe as classes begin.

Joliet Junior College, the University of St. Francis in Joliet and Lewis University in Romeoville all have plans on how they will continue to offer classes that lay out what measures theyre taking.

All three institutions have said they are requiring the use of face coverings for those on campus, maintaining regular cleaning of facilities and encouraging physical distancing according to public health guidance.

Colleges nationwide have been trying to reduce the number of people coming to campus on a regular basis.

Christopher Sindt, provost at Lewis University, said about 70% of classes for the semester will be delivered online. Another 20% will be given in a hybrid format, with the remaining 10% delivered in person.

Sindt said university officials tried to take a flexible approach to meet the needs of all of Lewis 6,400 students.

Weve tried to really pay attention to what students and families were telling us, he said, adding that he feels Lewis is in a comfortable place with its balance of remote and in-person instruction.

JJC has only about 10% of its students on campus for in-person labs every week. The junior college announced early in the spring that it would go nearly fully remote learning this semester and recently said it would continue with the format for next spring.

Our students have faced unprecedented stress, frustration and fear, JJC President Judy Mitchell said in a news release. But they havent given up on their education, and neither have we.

The schools also have implemented measures to screen and track those on campus in the event of a positive test.

JJC is requiring all individuals entering a campus building to go through a hands-free thermal temperature station. Those with a temperature of 100.4 degrees or higher will be required to leave and contact an appropriate college representative.

The college also is conducting its own contact tracing, said Judy Connelly, JJCs interim executive director of human resources. She said this does not replace the county health departments contact tracing program, which JJC also will be cooperating with, Connelly said.

JJC has been publicly reporting the number of positive COVID-19 cases among students and employees who have been on campus on its website. As of Thursday, JJC has reported nine positive cases among those who have been on campus since August.

Lewis University also is reporting the number of people whove been on campus and tested positive for COVID-19 on a weekly basis, which as of Aug. 28 stood at six.

The university said it is following contact tracing protocols as directed by the Will County Health Department. It also is using its LewisU smartphone app for students and staff to self-screen for symptoms daily before they come to campus.

This is a daily requirement for the 950 or so students who reside in on-campus housing. Anyone who tests positive is asked to contact the universitys COVID-19 hotline.

When on campus, students also use the app to check in via a QR code before they enter a classroom. This helps the university know who else might have been around someone who tests positive.

Sindt said he thinks students are very much engaged in complying with the safety protocols, a key to keeping the campus safe.

The most important part of our preparations is trying to communicate how important human behavior is, he said.

Read more from the original source:
Will County colleges try to manage pandemic as new year begins - The Herald-News

Finding Our Way Back: Examining the Geography of the Black Past – Appalachian State University

Finding Our Way Back: Examining the Geography of the Black PastMike Williams, Education Projects Manager for the National Humanities Center in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Thursday, October 22, 20203:30 p.m.Via Zoom: https://appstate.zoom.us/j/99440176140This talk is free and open to the public.

This talk will evaluate the role of geography in understanding the legacies of the transatlantic slave trade, the resilience of the enslaved, and its effect on continuing efforts to reclaim African cultural heritage.

Michael Mike Williams is the Education Projects Manager for the National Humanities Center (NHC) in Research Triangle Park, N.C. Williams earned a B.A. in English and African-American Studies from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a Masters of Education degree at North Carolina State University focusing on New Literacies and Global Learning, and a law degree from North Carolina Central University.

Prior to his position at the NHC, Williams served as chair of the history department at Warren New Tech High School in Warrenton, N.C. In that time, he was twice recognized as the Warren County Teacher of the Year (2014, 2017-18) and was named the 2017 Tachau National Teacher of the Year by the Organization of American Historians. Prior to this, he was a practicing attorney with the law offices of Williams & Clifton in Louisburg, N.C. Williams currently serves on the boards of the National Council for History Education and North Carolina Council for the Social Studies.

This event is brought to you by the Appalachian State University Department of Geography and Planning. To learn more about the Department of Geography and Planning, visit https://geo.appstate.edu.

###

About the Department of Geography and PlanningThe Department of Geography and Planning promotes the understanding of the spatial dimensions of human behavior within the physical and cultural systems of the earth, and the role of planning in achieving improvement in those systems. The department offers degrees in geography and in community and regional planning. Learn more at https://geo.appstate.edu.

Read more:
Finding Our Way Back: Examining the Geography of the Black Past - Appalachian State University

Versus Game Announces The Launch Of First-Ever Gaming Economy – PRNewswire

SAN FRANCISCO, Sept. 8, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --Versus Game, the world's leading consumer prediction marketplace, has announced the launch of its own gaming economy through a new exclusive feature that will give players the ability to host their own games. The first of its kind, the innovation will be a unique opportunity for users to earn money and grow their own social following.

Versus Game is a mobile game dedicated to rewarding consumers for their knowledge and predictions on matchups related to celebrities, pop culture, food, business and more. The new gaming economy feature will be available exclusively in the game's Android app, and will enable players to create their own custom games using Versus Game's classic formula (i.e. Which show will be the most popular on Netflix this week?). Hosts can choose to keep the games exclusive to their inner circle or open them up for anyone in the world to play, and will earn a portion of the revenue generated from each game they create.

Currently sitting at over 3 million users, Versus Game launched last year and has given away over $8.5 million in cash prizes, with $4 million being during the current COVID era. The game has partnered with popular celebrities, brands and influencers, including Fat Joe, Foodgod and Remy Ma, and is dedicated to creating an exclusive environment for fans and talent to interact. This fall, Versus Game is planning to launch exciting collaborations with ESPN, Cumulus Media, Maxim, Lil Baby, Steve Aoki, Amanda Cerny and more.

To date, Versus Game has been a platform used by influencers and celebrities to earn money and engage with fans in a meaningful and entertaining way. With the launch of the new user-created game feature, Versus Game will open up that unique opportunity to the masses, giving anyone and everyone the chance to earn money, grow their following and build their personal brand.

"We created Versus Game because we firmly believe that knowledge should be rewarded, and with the launch of our very own gaming economy, players will have an even larger stake in their own brand," says John Vitti, Founder and CEO of Versus Game. "It's natural human behavior to make predictions surrounding culturally relevant moments, and Versus Game pays people for doing just that. The new feature will take it a step further, and give our users the ultimate opportunity to earn big, gain followers, and create compelling games. We can't wait to see what players come up with."

The new gaming economy feature will be available exclusively on Versus Game's new Android app, launching Tuesday, September 8. For more information, please visit http://www.versusgame.com.

ABOUT VERSUS GAMEVersus Game is a consumer prediction marketplace that presents timely and relevant interactive games, giving users the opportunity to get paid for being right. Players can predict the outcome of their favorite brands, celebrities, musicians, movies, athletes and more for cash prizes, with the platform being the first of its kind to bring power to the masses and allow consumers to capitalize on their knowledge of mainstream culture. To date, the platform has over 3 million users and has given away over $8.5 million in cash prizes. For more information, please visit http://www.versusgame.com.

SOURCE Versus Game

http://www.versusgame.com

Read the original here:
Versus Game Announces The Launch Of First-Ever Gaming Economy - PRNewswire

3 Things To Know About The Unabomber: Prophetic Warnings About Technology – Moguldom

Written by Dana Sanchez

Sep 08, 2020

A Harvard-educated math genius, Ted Kaczynski became one of the FBIs most wanted for planting 16 bombs between 1978 and 1995 targeting people involved with technology. Known as the Unabomber, he killed three people and injured 23 more in his desperation for attention.

Few people under the age of 60 would have known about the Unabomber if it hadnt been for the 2017 Netflix seriesManhunt: Unabomber, The National reported.

Hiding out in a Montana cabin off the grid, the Unabomber was caught in 1996 after theNew York TimesandWashington Postagreed to publish his 35,000-word manifesto Industrial Society and its Future. His brother recognized the ideas in the Sept. 19, 1995 publications and turned the Unabomber in.

Forty years later, it could be argued that the Unabomber was a visionary to whom we should all now be paying very close attention, Jonathan Gornall wrote in a February 2018 opinion piece in The National.

In his manifesto, Kaczynski wrote that he feared the technophiles are taking us all on an utterly reckless ride and that technology will eventually acquire something approaching complete control over human behavior. He was especially worried about artificial intelligence a concern shared by the late Stephen Hawking.

A super-intelligent AI, Professor Hawking warned, will be extremely good at accomplishing its goals and if those goals arent aligned with ours, were in trouble.

Twenty years earlier, Kaczynski predicted that computer scientists would develop intelligent machines that can do all things better than human beings. As society and the problems that face it become more and more complex and as machines become more and more intelligent, people will let machines make more and more of their decisions for them.

Eventually the decisions necessary to keep the system running will be so complex that human beings will be incapable of making them intelligently, at which stage the machines will be in effective control. People wont be able to turn off the machines because they will be so dependent on them that turning them off would amount to suicide.

Since then, Google, Facebook and Twitter have entered our digital lives, tracking and harvesting every facet of us. We willingly bring Amazons Echo and Googles Home into our living spaces, which listen, watch and learn about our preferences and habits.

Technology may be initially introduced as optional, but it changes society in such a way that it becomes impossible to function without using that technology, Kaczynski said. When you consider the United Nations assertion that access to the internet is a human right, up there with food, shelter and education, Kaczynski may be right.

Some technologists are starting to wonder if scale of tech intrusion in our lives is so extensive and complex that its getting out of hand. In the process, they are beginning to sound like Kaczynski, Gornall wrote.

Kaczynski cited cars, which gave everyone freedom to travel farther until they became a necessity, requiring more money, regulations and roads. Cities were designed for the convenience of drivers, not pedestrians, the Unabomber wrote. For many people, driving is no longer an option.

TheiPhone X shows that the Unabomber had a point, Steve Chapman wrote in a 2017 Chicago Tribune report. When cellphones first appeared, they offered one more way of connecting that could be accepted or rejected. Now we all panic when we leave home without a cell phone. We went from you can have a portable communication device to you must have a portable communication device practically overnight, Chapman wrote.

A domestic terrorist, Kaczynskiwas imprisoned for life, however, his ideas cannot be dismissed and are increasingly important, according to a 2013 Fox News opinion piece.

Listen to GHOGH with Jamarlin Martin | Episode 73: Jamarlin Martin Jamarlin makes the case for why this is a multi-factor rebellion vs. just protests about George Floyd. He discusses the Democratic Partys sneaky relationship with the police in cities and states under Dem control, and why Joe Biden is a cop and the Steve Jobs of mass incarceration.

Kaczynski wrote that increasing reliance on technology would end up short-circuiting the ability of humans to think for themselves and act on their own ideas and abilities.

The Unabomber saw the political left as particular villains in embracing these technologies, because they were in keeping with the leftist ideology that centralized power was the way to govern men, according to the Fox News opinion piece:

He saw these leftists as psychologically disorderedseeking to compensate for deep feelings of personal disempowerment by banding together and seeking extraordinary means of control in society, Fox opined. Well, Kaczynski,while reprehensible for murdering and maiming people, was precisely correct in many of his ideas.

Having seen Barack Obama elected, in part, by mastering the use of the Internet as a campaign tool, then watching his administration preside over eavesdropping on the American public, monitoring their emails and tapping their phones, denying them their due process and privacy, and making a play to disarm them, Kaczynski, must wonder what it will take for Americans to wake up to the fact that their individuality and autonomyindeed, what constitutes the core of a human lifeis under siege (by the very forces he predictedtechnology and leftist political leaders).

Read more: What Is The Algorithmic Colonization of Africa? Researcher Explains

Excerpt from:
3 Things To Know About The Unabomber: Prophetic Warnings About Technology - Moguldom

Heading to the beach, pool or park for Labor Day weekend? Doctors give COVID-19 safety tips – KHOU.com

Public health officials are concerned about "COVID fatigue" and people letting their guards down during the holiday that could lead to a rise in cases.

HOUSTON As Texas shows improvement in new COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations, public health officials are urging people to keep up their healthy habits, especially when celebrating the holiday weekend with friends or family.

After Memorial Day weekend, Texas saw a spike in new coronavirus cases, and Houston mayor Sylvester Turner warned people that in order to return to school in-person and re-open the economy fully, people would need to avoid creating a new rise in cases.

Human behavior largely determines the spread of the virus, according to UTHealth's Luis Ostrosky, MD, an infectious disease doctor.

Dr. Ostrosky said people should limit the size of any parties or gatherings. Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo put a ban on gatherings of more than 10 people.

The more people, the higher risk," Dr. Ostrosky said.

Objects like sports balls, toys or cooking utensils getting passed from one person to another can potentially transmit the virus if people do not sanitize the objects and wash their own hands after each contact with the item.

He also urged people should treat family and friends the same as strangers when it comes to healthy habits: practice social distancing, wash your hands, and wear a mask, even if it gets hot or socially awkward.

We have a lot of people dying from this. We have families destroyed. We have situations where a family member cant say goodbye to their loved ones because theyre in an isolation environment. Its sad. Its really powerful," Dr. Ostrosky said.

Read more from the original source:
Heading to the beach, pool or park for Labor Day weekend? Doctors give COVID-19 safety tips - KHOU.com

Commentary: Trump’s ban on diversity training is misguided. The training is neither divisive nor un-American. – The San Diego Union-Tribune

Anti-racism work has been happening for decades. However, it reached a critical mass in the late spring with the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and too many more. As people worldwide hunkered down at home due to the pandemic, they were forced to witness, contemplate and reconcile our individual and collective responsibility to create systemic change. Anti-racism work can now be found anywhere from the corporate world to grass-roots community organizing.

So it came as a surprise when buried at the bottom of the page in Saturdays The San Diego Union-Tribune, ironically in the Racial Justice in America section, was an article reporting President Donald Trumps ban on diversity training that discusses White supremacy or critical race theory. The rationale given was that these trainings were divisive and un-American.

Divisive? Not at all. When we study the Jewish Holocaust and the systems created to terminate an entire group of people based on race, is this divisive or is it critical knowledge to ensure history does not repeat itself? When we study how the German people were susceptible to a tyrant like Adolf Hitler and why so many were able to overlook these atrocities, is this divisive or is it a critical study of human behavior so that we as a people are never again complicit with the disregard of any human life?

Un-American? Not at all. The United States was birthed as a nation by White, Protestant Christian men running from religious persecution. It is a nation birthed from the womb of revolution against a religious system of oppression. Did our founding fathers falter in creating a country that was truly equitable for all? Yes. This is widely known and undebatable. We have learned how our nation was built, from the onset, on the backs of enslaved Africans on land stolen from Indigenous people who were here long before our founding fathers.

To be unwilling to acknowledge the historic truths about our country sends the message that only some are valued while other peoples lived experiences, family histories and day-to-day realities are of no consequence and are deeply unappreciated in todays United States.

Could it be that the president has conflated divisive and un-American with uncomfortable? The idea that we should be made to feel comfortable by others is in itself a concept born out of White supremacy and is a luxury that has only been afforded to some. On the contrary, the discomfort that the memorandum is encouraging be avoided is not something that we need to shy away from; rather it presents an opportunity to realize that our learning our growth often happens inside of this very discomfort.

Through discomfort we have learned to adopt a common vocabulary, and now normalized vernacular that includes terms like anti-racist, White supremacy, anti-Blackness, systemic oppression and racism as regular parts of conversations across the United States. Every person plays a role in perpetuating or dismantling systems of oppression and White supremacy. We are unable to be effective in our roles without a clear understanding of the complexity and pervasiveness of this issue.

Understanding the impact of systemic oppression and racism through the voices and experiences of those who are direct targets of it is the cornerstone of critical race theory. The theory is based on the belief that racism is embedded in the fabric of the country and its institutions, and impacts social structures, policies, practices and exchanges. In other words, it examines the systems that were created centuries ago and recognizes that these systems were created by those in power, White people, to preserve that power structure White supremacy and continue to effect the opportunities, relationships and resources for people today. This does not mean that all the White people who continue to benefit from these systems are bad people, but instead provides us with an understanding that can help forge better realities for ourselves and future generations.

With this knowledge, Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) and White people have come together to begin deconstructing and reconstructing these systems to better represent the culturally, racially diverse people of today. The work is uncomfortable, and at times painful, and it comes at a personal cost for all involved. It forces us to open our eyes to our own biases and behaviors that contribute to the sustaining of racist and oppressive systems.

Acknowledging our imperfection is not a flaw in the human condition. Regardless of discomfort, anti-racist work is the necessary action we must take to build a nation that lives up to its potential.

Salde Encarnacion is a Community Voices Project contributor. Melendrez is executive officer of equity and engagement at Southwestern College and a co-founder and co-president of an equity and inclusion firm.

See original here:
Commentary: Trump's ban on diversity training is misguided. The training is neither divisive nor un-American. - The San Diego Union-Tribune

Development and initial psychometric properties of a panic buying scale during COVID-19 pandemic – DocWire News

This article was originally published here

Heliyon. 2020 Sep;6(9):e04746. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04746. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

ABSTRACT

Fear is a powerful driver of human behavior, even more during times of crisis. Panic buying occurs when fear and panic influence behavior leading people to buy more things than usual. So far, no specific scale on this has been found in the major databases, thus the aim of this exploratory study is to develop a Panic Buying Scale (PBS) during COVID-19 pandemic. 393 Brazilians took part in this study (251 women and 142 men), answering a sociodemographic questionnaire and instruments of these variables: (1)panic buying, (2)impulse buying, (3)temporal focus, (4)optimism, (5)risk perception, (6)need for cognition. Data collection was conducted through an online questionnaire which was shared through social media networks, from April 10th to May 4th, 2020. Factorial exploratory and confirmatory analysis indicated that PBS has a unidimensional solution and showed satisfactory reliability indexes. Results revealed that men buy more by panic than women. PBS also was positively correlated with impulse buying, past and future temporal focus, and risk perception; as well as negatively correlated with optimism and age. Findings suggest that PBS is psychometrically acceptable in the Brazilian context. This new instrument can be useful to understand the psychosocial phenomena associated with consumer behavior. Future investigations could provide more evidences of validity in other contexts.

PMID:32895636 | PMC:PMC7467094 | DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04746

View original post here:
Development and initial psychometric properties of a panic buying scale during COVID-19 pandemic - DocWire News

Cat owners fall in one of five categories, researchers say. Which one are you? – CNN

Domestic cats fall on a spectrum based on their proclivity to hunting and roaming and the supervision levels of their owners can affect how the feline pets interact with their surrounding environments.

Whereas some owners embrace the more wild tendencies of their cats and allow them the space to roam outdoors, others prefer raising house cats, keeping their furry friends inside and under supervision. Depending on where in this spectrum, you may be a "conscientious caretakers" or a "freedom defender."

"I think normally it's framed as a debate between cat owners or cat advocates and conservationists, particularly bird conservationists," says Sarah Crowley, an anthrozoologist based in Exeter's Centre for Geography and Environmental Science (CGES). Anthrozoologists study the interactions between humans and other animals.

Crowley and her colleagues at the University of Exeter have been seeking the middle ground in this conflict by considering the perspectives of cat owners. The ultimate goal of their work is to identify the best practices in sustainably managing cats' behavior, ideally in a way that keeps all parties satisfied.

The five types of owners

They have since identified five distinctive cat owner perspectives:

Outdoor cats don't only endanger birds and rodents; without human supervision they may also be at risk themselves.

"Cats roaming outdoors are more at risk for traffic accidents. They're also more at risk for disease," Crowley said.

"People don't tend to worry so much about rats and mice, but people are definitely concerned about birds and, in some countries, other vulnerable animals like small reptiles," she said.

Crowley notes that not all cats hunt or roam equally and variations increase even more between a city cat, for example, versus a farm cat. It was important to the Exeter research team to speak to cat owners directly due to the range in cat behavioral types. Going to the source means surveying various humans who care for these animals.

A "freedom defender" would be more likely to embrace their pet's natural instincts and accept the risks of a free-roaming cat in comparison to "conscientious caretaker" who is more likely to keep their cat indoor at least some of the time.

No matter where you or the cat lover in your life falls on this spectrum, researchers agree that simply being mindful goes a long way.

"We hope this research inspires people to think about what type they are and to have conversations with their friends and family about the responsibilities that cat owners might have, both to themselves and to other wildlife," Crowley said. "We think this can happen without a conflict between cat lovers and bird projects."

Quiz time

Continued here:
Cat owners fall in one of five categories, researchers say. Which one are you? - CNN

Heading to the beach or pool for Labor Day weekend? Doctors give COVID-19 safety tips – KENS5.com

Public health officials are concerned about "COVID fatigue" and people letting their guards down during the holiday that could lead to a rise in cases.

HOUSTON As Texas shows improvement in new COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations, public health officials are urging people to keep up their healthy habits, especially when celebrating the holiday weekend with friends or family.

After Memorial Day weekend, Texas saw a spike in new coronavirus cases, and Houston mayor Sylvester Turner warned people that in order to return to school in-person and re-open the economy fully, people would need to avoid creating a new rise in cases.

Human behavior largely determines the spread of the virus, according to UTHealth's Luis Ostrosky, MD, an infectious disease doctor.

Dr. Ostrosky said people should limit the size of any parties or gatherings. Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo put a ban on gatherings of more than 10 people.

The more people, the higher risk," Dr. Ostrosky said.

Objects like sports balls, toys or cooking utensils getting passed from one person to another can potentially transmit the virus if people do not sanitize the objects and wash their own hands after each contact with the item.

He also urged people should treat family and friends the same as strangers when it comes to healthy habits: practice social distancing, wash your hands, and wear a mask, even if it gets hot or socially awkward.

We have a lot of people dying from this. We have families destroyed. We have situations where a family member cant say goodbye to their loved ones because theyre in an isolation environment. Its sad. Its really powerful," Dr. Ostrosky said.

Continued here:
Heading to the beach or pool for Labor Day weekend? Doctors give COVID-19 safety tips - KENS5.com

The world of Artificial… – The American Bazaar

Sophia. Source: https://www.hansonrobotics.com/press/

Humans are the most advanced form of Artificial Intelligence (AI), with an ability to reproduce.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer a theory but is part of our everyday life. Services like TikTok, Netflix, YouTube, Uber, Google Home Mini, and Amazon Echo are just a few instances of AI in our daily life.

This field of knowledge always attracted me in strange ways. I have been an avid reader and I read a variety of subjects of non-fiction nature. I love to watch movies not particularly sci-fi, but I liked Innerspace, Flubber, Robocop, Terminator, Avatar, Ex Machina, and Chappie.

When I think of Artificial Intelligence, I see it from a lay perspective. I do not have an IT background. I am a researcher and a communicator; and, I consider myself a happy person who loves to learn and solve problems through simple and creative ideas. My thoughts on AI may sound different, but Im happy to discuss them.

Humans are the most advanced form of AI that we may know to exit. My understanding is that the only thing that differentiates humans and Artificial Intelligence is the capability to reproduce. While humans have this ability to multiply through male and female union and transfer their abilities through tiny cells, machines lack that function. Transfer of cells to a newborn is no different from the transfer of data to a machine. Its breathtaking that how a tiny cell in a human body has all the necessary information of not only that particular individual but also their ancestry.

Allow me to give an introduction to the recorded history of AI. Before that, I would like to take a moment to share with you my recent achievement that I feel proud to have accomplished. I finished a course in AI from Algebra University in Croatia in July. I could attend this course through a generous initiative and bursary from Humber College (Toronto). Such initiatives help intellectually curious minds like me to learn. I would also like to express that the views expressed are my own understanding and judgment.

What is AI?

AI is a branch of computer science that is based on computer programming like several other coding programs. What differentiates Artificial Intelligence, however, is its aim that is to mimic human behavior. And this is where things become fascinating as we develop artificial beings.

Origins

I have divided the origins of AI into three phases so that I can explain it better and you dont miss on the sequence of incidents that led to the step by step development of AI.

Phase 1

AI is not a recent concept. Scientists were already brainstorming about it and discussing the thinking capabilities of machines even before the term Artificial Intelligence was coined.

I would like to start from 1950 with Alan Turing, a British intellectual who brought WW II to an end by decoding German messages. Turing released a paper in the October of 1950 Computing Machinery and Intelligence that can be considered as among the first hints to thinking machines. Turing starts the paper thus: I propose to consider the question, Can machines think?. Turings work was also the beginning of Natural Language Processing (NLP). The 21st-century mortals can relate it with the invention of Apples Siri. The A.M. Turing Award is considered the Nobel of computing. The life and death of Turing are unusual in their own way. I will leave it at that but if you are interested in delving deeper, here is one article by The New York Times.

Five years later, in 1955, John McCarthy, an Assistant Professor of Mathematics at Dartmouth College, and his team proposed a research project in which they used the term Artificial Intelligence, for the first time.

McCarthy explained the proposal saying, The study is to proceed on the basis of the conjecture that every aspect of learning or any other feature of intelligence can in principle be so precisely described that a machine can be made to simulate it. He continued, An attempt will be made to find how to make machines use language, form abstractions and concepts, solve kinds of problems now reserved for humans, and improve themselves.

It started with a few simple logical thoughts that germinated into a whole new branch of computer science in the coming decades. AI can also be related to the concept of Associationism that is traced back to Aristotle from 300 BC. But, discussing that in detail will be outside the scope of this article.

It was in 1958 that we saw the first model replicating the brains neuron system. This was the year when psychologist Frank Rosenblatt developed a program called Perceptron. Rosenblatt wrote in his article, Stories about the creation of machines having human qualities have long been fascinating province in the realm of science fiction. Yet we are now about to witness the birth of such a machine a machine capable of perceiving, recognizing, and identifying its surroundings without any human training or control.

A New York Times article published in 1958 introduced the invention to the general public saying, The Navy revealed the embryo of an electronic computer today that it expects will be able to walk, talk, see, write, reproduce itself and be conscious of its existence.

My investigation in one of the papers of Rosenblatt hints that even in the 1940s scientists talked about artificial neurons. Notice in the Reference section of Rosenblatts paper published in 1958. It lists Warren S. McCulloch and Walter H. Pitts paper of 1943. If you are interested in more details, I would suggest an article published in Medium.

The first AI conference took place in 1959. However, by this time, the leads in Artificial Intelligence had already exhausted the computing capabilities of the time. It is, therefore, no surprise that not much could be achieved in AI in the next decade.

Thankfully, the IT industry was catching up quickly and preparing the ground for stronger computers. Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Intel, made a few predictions in his article in 1965. Moore predicted a huge growth of integrated circuits, more components per chip, and reduced costs. Integrated circuits will lead to such wonders as home computers or at least terminals connected to a central computerautomatic controls for automobiles, and personal portable communications equipment, Moore predicted. Although scientists had been toiling hard to launch the Internet, it was not until the late 1960s that the invention started showing some promises. On October 29, 1969, ARPAnet delivered its first message: a node-to-node communication from one computer to another, notes History.com.

With the Internet in the public domain, computer companies had a reason to accelerate their own developments. In 1971, Intel introduced its first chip. It was a huge breakthrough. Intel impressively compared the size and computing abilities of the new hardware saying, This revolutionary microprocessor, the size of a little fingernail, delivered the same computing power as the first electronic computer built in 1946, which filled an entire room.

Around the 1970s more popular versions of languages came in use, for instance, C and SQL. I mention these two as I remember when I did my Diploma in Network-Centered Computing in 2002, the advanced versions of these languages were still alive and kicking. Britannica has a list of computer programming languages if you care to read more on when the different languages came into being.

These advancements created a perfect amalgamation of resources to trigger the next phase in AI.

Phase 2

In the late 1970s, we see another AI enthusiast coming in the scene with several research papers on AI. Geoffrey Hinton, a Canadian researcher, had confidence in Rosenblatts work on Perceptron. He resolved an inherent problem with Rosenblatts model that was made up of a single layer perceptron. To be fair to Rosenblatt, he was well aware of the limitations of this approach he just didnt know how to learn multiple layers of features efficiently, Hinton noted in his paper in 2006.

This multi-layer approach can be referred to as a Deep Neural Network.

Another scientist, Yann LeCun, who studied under Hinton and worked with him, was making strides in AI, especially Deep Learning (DL, explained later in the article) and Backpropagation Learning (BL). BL can be referred to as machines learning from their mistakes or learning from trial and error.

Similar to Phase 1, the developments of Phase 2 end here due to very limited computing power and insufficient data. This was around the late 1990s. As the Internet was fairly recent, there was not much data available to feed the machines.

Phase 3

In the early 21st-century, the computer processing speed entered a new level. In 2011, IBMs Watson defeated its human competitors in the game of Jeopardy. Watson was quite impressive in its performance. On September 30, 2012, Hinton and his team released the object recognition program called Alexnet and tested it on Imagenet. The success rate was above 75 percent, which was not achieved by any such machine before. This object recognition sent ripples across the industry. By 2018, image recognition programming became 97% accurate! In other words, computers were recognizing objects more accurately than humans.

In 2015, Tesla introduced its self-driving AI car. The company boasts its autopilot technology on its web site saying, All new Tesla cars come standard with advanced hardware capable of providing Autopilot features today, and full self-driving capabilities in the futurethrough software updates designed to improve functionality over time.

Go enthusiasts will also remember the 2016 incident when Google-owned DeepMinds AlphaGo defeated the human Go world-champion Lee Se-dol. This incident came at least a decade too soon. We know that Go is considered one of the most complex games in human history. And, AI could learn it in just 3 days, to a level to beat a world champion who, I would assume must have spent decades to achieve that proficiency!

The next phase shall be to work on Singularity. Singularity can be understood as machines building better machines, all by themselves. In 1993, scientist Vernor Vinge published an essay in which he wrote, Within thirty years, we will have the technological means to create superhuman intelligence. Shortly after, the human era will be ended. Scientists are already working on the concept of technological singularity. If these achievements can be used in a controlled way, these can help several industries, for instance, healthcare, automobile, and oil exploration.

I would also like to add here that Canadian universities are contributing significantly to developments in Artificial Intelligence. Along with Hinton and LeCun, I would like to mention Richard Sutton. Sutton, Professor at the University of Alberta, is of the view that advancements in the singularity can be expected around 2040. This makes me feel that when AI will no longer need human help, it will be a kind of specie in and of itself.

To get to the next phase, however, we would need more computer power to achieve the goals of tomorrow.

Now that we have some background on the genesis of AI and some information on the experts who nourished this advancement all these years, it is time to understand a few key terms of AI. By the way, if you ask me, every scientist who is behind these developments is a new topic in themselves. I have tried to put a good number of researched sources in the article to generate your interest and support your knowledge in AI.

Big Data

With the Internet of Things (IoT), we are saving tons of data every second from every corner of the world. Consider, for instance, Google. It seems that it starts tracking our intentions as soon as we type the first alphabet on our keyboard. Now think for a second how much data is generated from all the internet users from all over the World. Its already making predictions of our likes, dislikes, actionseverything.

The concept of big data is important as that makes the memory of Artificial Intelligence. Its like a parent sharing their experience with their child. If the child can learn from that experience, they develop cognizant abilities and venture into making their own judgments and decisions. Similarly, big data is the human experience that is shared with machines and they develop on that experience. This can be supervised as well as unsupervised learning.

Symbolic Reasoning and Machine Learning

The basics of all processes are some mathematical patterns. I think that this is because math is something that is certain and easy to understand for all humans. 2 + 2 will always be 4 unless there is something we havent figured out in the equation.

Symbolic reasoning is the traditional method of getting work done through machines. According to Pathmind, to build a symbolic reasoning system, first humans must learn the rules by which two phenomena relate, and then hard-code those relationships into a static program. Symbolic reasoning in AI is also known as the Good Old Fashioned AI (GOFAI).

Machine Learning (ML) refers to the activity where we feed big data to machines and they identify patterns and understand the data by themselves. The outcomes are not as predicted as here machines are not programmed to specific outcomes. Its like a human brain where we are free to develop our own thoughts. A video by ColdFusion explains ML thus: ML systems analyze vast amounts of data and learn from their past mistakes. The result is an algorithm that completes its task effectively. ML works well with supervised learning.

Here I would like to make a quick tangent for all those creative individuals who need some motivation. I feel that all inventions were born out of creativity. Of course, creativity comes with some basic understanding and knowledge. Out of more than 7 billion brains, somewhere someone is thinking out of the box, verifying their thoughts, and trying to communicate their ideas. Creativity is vital for success. This may also explain why some of the most important inventions took place in a garage (Google and Microsoft). Take, for instance, a small creative tool like a pizza cutter. Someone must have thought about it. Every time I use it, I marvel how convenient and efficient it is to slice a pizza without disturbing the toppings with that running cutter. Always stay creative and avoid preconceived ideas and stereotypes.

Alright, back to the topic!

Deep Learning

Deep Learning (DL) is a subset of ML. This technology attempts to mimic the activity of neurons in our brain using matrix mathematics, explains ColdFusion. I found this article that describes DL well. With better computers and big data, it is now possible to venture into DL. Better computers provide the muscle and the big data provides the experience to a neuron network. Together, they help a machine think and execute tasks just like a human would do. I would suggest reading this paper titled Deep Leaning by LeCun, Bengio, and Hinton (2015) for a deeper perspective on DL.

The ability of DL makes it a perfect companion for unsupervised learning. As big data is mostly unlabelled, DL processes it to identify patterns and make predictions. This not only saves a lot of time but also generates results that are completely new to a human brain. DL offers another benefit it can work offline; meaning, for instance, a self-driving car. It can take instantaneous decisions while on the road.

What next?

I think that the most important future development will be AI coding AI to perfection, all by itself.

Neural nets designing neural nets have already started. Early signs of self-production are in vision. Google has already created programs that can produce its own codes. This is called Automatic Machine Learning or AutoML. Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and Alphabet, shared the experiment in his blog. Today, designing neural nets is extremely time intensive, and requires an expertise that limits its use to a smaller community of scientists and engineers. Thats why weve created an approach called AutoML, showing that its possible for neural nets to design neural nets, said Pichai (2017).

Full AI capabilities will also trigger several other programs like fully-automated self-driving cars, full-service assistance in sectors like health care and hospitality.

Among the several useful programs of AI, ColdFusion has identified the five most impressive ones in terms of image outputs. These are AI generating an image from a text (Plug and Play Generative Networks: Conditional Iterative Generation of Images in Latent Space), AI reading lip movements from a video with 95% accuracy (LipNet), Artificial Intelligence creating new images from just a few inputs (Pix2Pix), AI improving the pixels of an image (Google Brains Pixel Recursive Super Resolution), and AI adding color to b/w photos and videos (Let There Be Color). In the future, these technologies can be used for more advanced functions like law enforcement et cetera.

AI can already generate images of non-existing humans and add sound and body movements to the videos of individuals! In the coming years, these tools can be used for gaming purposes, or maybe fully capable multi-dimensional assistance like the one we see in the movie Iron Man. Of course, all these developments would require new AI laws to avoid misuse; however, that is a topic for another discussion.

Humans are advanced AI

Artificial Intelligence is getting so good at mimicking humans that it seems that humans themselves are some sort of AI. The way Artificial Intelligence learns from data, retains information, and then develops analytical, problem solving, and judgment capabilities are no different from a parent nurturing their child with their experience (data) and then the child remembering the knowledge and using their own judgments to make decisions.

We may want to remember here that there are a lot of things that even humans have not figured out with all their technology. A lot of things are still hidden from us in plain sight. For instance, we still dont know about all the living species in the Amazon rain forest. Astrology and astronomy are two other fields where, I think, very little is known. Air, water, land, and celestial bodies control human behavior, and science has evidence for this. All this hints that we as humans are not in total control of ourselves. This feels similar to AI, which so far requires external intervention, like from humans, to develop it.

I think that our past has answers to a lot of questions that may unravel our future. Take for example the Great Pyramid at Giza, Egypt, which we still marvel for its mathematical accuracy and alignment with the earths equator as well as the movements of celestial bodies. By the way, we could compare the measurements only because we have already reached a level to know the numbers relating to the equator.

Also, think of Indias knowledge of astrology. It has so many diagrams of planetary movements that are believed to impact human behavior. These sketches have survived several thousand years. One of Indias languages, Vedic, is considered more than 4,000 years old, perhaps one of the oldest in human history. This was actually a question asked from IBM Watson during the 2011 Jeopardy competition. Understanding the literature in this language might unlock a wealth of information.

I feel that with the kind of technology we have in AI, we should put some of it at work to unearth our wisdom from the past. It is a possibility that if we overlook it, we may waste resources by reinventing the wheel.

View post:
The world of Artificial... - The American Bazaar