Category Archives: Human Behavior

Get to Know the Faculty: Melody Lo – ASU News

09/16/2020

Its fitting that the inaugural Neil Griffin Endowed Dean of the Griffin College of Business is a precedent setter in her past academic career. Big things are ahead for Griffin College as Melody Lo is moving forward full gas and well caffeinated.

Melody Lo

Name?

Melody Lo

Place of birth?

Taipei, Taiwan

Family?

Husband David, Son Andrew, and dog Tubby

Why did you choose A-State?

I saw the potential impact of being the Neil Griffin Business Dean on the quality of education for students. The opportunity to change lives particularly for first generation college students is the reason that I choose to join A-State.

What is one thing you always have on you?

My Starbucks mobile card

What makes a good professor?

A good professor is the one who will have every students best interests in heart, and will guide all students to reach their next level regardless of their starting points.

My favorite motion picture is...

Braveheart

Who was your favorite teacher (and why)?

My favorite teacher was Dr. Pan-Long Tsai at National Tsing-Hua University. He was the Professor who made me see why economics makes sense for the very first time. His teaching continues to inspire me to be the best educator I can be in and out of a classroom.

Four people Id take to coffee...

Any three A-State colleagues and my son who shares my love for coffee

What makes for a good student?

Have a mindset to put in consistent effort to learn everything. Brave enough to question in any classrooms that helps stimulate others learning.

My passion is...

having positive impact on students education and future career path(s).

Whats the value of a university education?

There is no doubt that education has helped me become the person who I am today. To me personally, the value of a high-quality undergraduate education is that it provides a lifetime learning foundation leading to personal prosperity as well as meaningful contribution to our society.

Your philosophy on education in seven words:

Unleash every students greatest potential in life

If you could teach another field, which one and why?

Ethical (Entrepreneurial) Leadership. It is lacking in our society in almost everywhere and yet it greatly affects the health of work environment as well as the organizational efficiency.

What is your favorite podcast?

Any business news

The last book I read for fun was...

Wow... I have not found time to read a book just for fun for quite a while.

What is the one thing you wish you could teach everyone about your field?

Rational behavior (of everyone), a fundamental assumption used to explain the choices that people make to achieve satisfaction. Recognize the fact that everyone is born rational helps to explain all human behavior as it relates to decision-making.

What are you working on right now?

Meeting with NGCOB faculty and staff, members of the business community, donors, and alumni, evaluating existing degree programs, and expanding degree program offering.

Before you retire I want to...

I have not thought about retirement.

In college, I was known for...

the independence in my thought and my determination to pursue further education in the United States.

What music is playing in your car?

Hip-Hop

The television series I must DVR...

Sex and the City

My favorite trip was...

a cruise in Europe with my family in summer 2019.

If I could travel anywhere it would be...

Northern Europe in the summer.

I wish I could...

travel more with my son before he grows up.

The best advice I ever received was...

never give up.

What is the one thing Ive learned Id tell my college self...

always believe in yourself.

My hobby is...

cooking, decorating, and starting new businesses or projects.

My pro sports team is...

now it is Memphis Grizzlies

My pet peeve is...

people talking too much without substance.

My favorite meal is...

steak (and dessert).

A perfect day is...

Strolling around town without a time constraint or driving without a destination.

What I like about Jonesboro is...

how green and peaceful it is.

Cats or dogs?

Dogs

E-book or hardback?

Hardback

Beach or mountains?

Mountains with lakes

Dinner or supper?

Supper

The one thing Id take to a desert island (and a boat is not an answer)...

TV.

Only my friends know I...

am resilient and nothing can break my determination and ethics (Well, I am stubborn.)

My favorite saying is...

I know we (or you) can do this.

See the rest here:
Get to Know the Faculty: Melody Lo - ASU News

Good News on Climate Change: Most Americans Agree It’s Real, Even in the Midwest – Flatland

Share this story

Published September 16th, 2020 at 6:00 AM

Rising sea levels. An extraordinary inland hurricane ripping through the Corn Belt. Uncontrolled wildfires scorching the West Coast. Shrinking glaciers in the Arctic.

We are already seeing the effects of climate change.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has found that the average yearly temperatures in both Missouri and Kansas have been steadily increasing since 1950. Last year was the second hottest on record.

According to the United Nations Environment Programme, if global temperatures increase 2.7 degrees fahrenheit, (a number that scientists believe will be reached between 2030 and 2052 unless unprecedented action is taken) more than 70% of coral reefs will die, disrupting the food chain and livelihood of over 500 million people. Millions of people living on the coasts could be forced to flee inward due to rising sea levels. In the Midwest, flooding and extreme rain will impact infrastructure, and heat waves will affect agriculture.

All of this may be scary, but there is a silver lining. Most Americans agree its real.

According to the new 2020 Yale Climate Opinion Map, the majority of Americans (72%) believe global warming is happening. The study found that in Missouri and Kansas 67% of people now believe in global warming. The Kansas City area matched the national average at 72%.

The study surveyed more than 25,000 Americans, asking them several questions related to climate change. The questions ranged from belief in climate change, to whether human behavior influences climate outcomes, and support of climate-related public policies. The model has a margin of error of 7% at the state level, and 8% at the county level.

While the study did find that an overwhelming majority believe in climate change, a majority doesnt believe it will personally affect them.

There is essentially an optimism bias, said Jennifer Marlon, a Ph.D. Research Scientist at Yales School of Forestry and Environmental Studies. We tend to acknowledge that people in our community, or places farther away, or even in other countries are going to get impacted. But we tend to think that we personally are somehow protected, and so we often underestimate the risk.

In this region, 37% of Missourians and Kansans believe they will be harmed personally by global warming, 6 percentage points below the national average. In contrast, 69% of Missourians, and 67% of Kansans believe global warming will harm future generations.

That could be the symptom of a lack of understanding of how imminent the threat of climate change may be.

Its not taken seriously enough. Were not really understanding that were talking about a really severe threat, Marlon said. Were talking about the extreme weather were seeing just being the tip of the iceberg. The heat we are seeing this summer, dont think of this as the hottest year on record, think of this as the coolest summer you are going to have for the next 20 or 30 years.

When the Climate Disruption Index recently ranked the cities that would feel the effects of climate change the most, Kansas City was 5th on the list.

Roeland Park Mayor Mike Kelly, a member of the executive board for Climate Action KC, says the effects of climate change are already showing in Kansas City.

Were going to see increased heating degree days, Kelly said. Weve seen increased extreme weather and flooding on the Kaw (Kansas River) thats affecting various communities.

Kelly also noted that vulnerable populations that live on low income, rely on government assistance, live in older housing, lack access to transportation or live in food deserts will feel the impacts worse than others.

Climate change is also currently affecting health issues. According to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, rising temperatures caused by climate change lead to a longer allergy season. They estimate rising temperatures have caused the pollen season to be 11 to 27 days longer.

The Yale study asked Americans whether they supported a number of climate change related policies.

Funding research into renewable energy sources, regulating CO2 as a pollutant, providing tax rebates for energy-efficient vehicles and solar panels and teaching about climate change in schools all have more than 70% approval in Missouri and Kansas.

Kelly said that Climate Action KC has seen an increase in support for green policies around the KC metro. Half a dozen cities are participating in Evergys Renewable Direct Program, which allows a city to acquire 100% of its metered electricity from renewable sources in this case, a wind farm.

When you look at these solutions for their own sake, you realize that a lot of them have a great fiscal impact outside of their emissions reduction, Kelly said. What were seeing is that weve shown people the long-term plan to the dollars and cents, and the improvement in quality of life for things like making your building more energy efficient, or providing walking and biking trails, or multimodal transportation options. People like those solutions.

Despite the large support for climate policies, there is less demand for elected officials to address the issue of climate change.

A narrower majority of 56% of Missourians and 54% of Kansans believe the president should be doing more to address climate change. Those numbers drop to 49% and 48%, respectively, when asked the same question about their states governor. And 44% in both states think global warming should be a high priority for the next president and Congress.

Its fascinating. So what this says (is) in theory people do support these policies, they do support action, but they somehow dont want the government to do it, Marlon said. That really gets at this anti-government sentiment that really runs deep.

Marlon said that while market-based policies, and buy-in from citizens and corporations will definitely help, the government must play a role in mitigating the effects of climate change.

Climate Action KCs executive board is made up of several elected officials in the area, including Kelly, Shawnee Councilwoman Lindsey Constance, Gladstone Mayor Carol Suter and Smithville Mayor Damien Boley. The organization is currently working on their 2020 Climate Action Playbook that will give officials and organization concrete steps they can take towards helping the environment. The playbook is slated to release in December of this year.

One of the findings of the Yale study is that less than 35% of Missourians and Kansans say they rarely or never talk about global warming. Even less see stories about climate change. Both states reported less than 25% of people hear about climate change in the media.

Yale Climate Connections is dedicated to increasing the accessibility to these stories by telling real, science-based stories about the effects of climate change throughout the country.

We have to be able to have a productive dialogue about the solutions, Marlon said. There are many things we can do (to fight climate change), but we need the public first to understand this threat, and then be willing to talk about these solutions and decide which ones to support.

Another big hurdle is convincing the human race to admit fault. While the study found that most people believe in climate change, it found far less people who believe humans are to blame (53% in Missouri, 52% in Kansas).

According to a study of scientific consensus on climate change, 97% of scientists believe that climate change is a result of human emissions such as the burning of fossil fuels and some agricultural practices.

Marlon says the problem is two-fold. One, the false balance of pitting climate scientists against climate change deniers in debate formats in the media. Two, the nature of science, and its inherent embrace of debate, and constant craving for progress.

I mean we get rewarded when we find something new, Marlon said. We have publications from the 1920s and 30s documenting how burning coal and oil and gas can warm the climate, so thats nothing new. We dont emphasize whats already solid and agreed upon.

Last year Climate Action KC held their 2019 Metro KC Climate Action Summit, where more than 750 people came together to talk about the issues facing our planet. They had more than 500 people sign up for their 2020 summit, which was cancelled due to COVID-19.

Both Kelly and Marlon agree public education is essential to saving the Earth.

Forty-three percent (of people) dont understand it (human impact on climate change), Marlon said. I mean if you dont understand that, then why would you think that we can actually fix it?

Jacob Douglas covers rural affairs for Kansas City PBS in cooperation with Report for America.

Discover more unheard stories about Kansas City, every Thursday.

Check your inbox, you should see something from us.

Excerpt from:
Good News on Climate Change: Most Americans Agree It's Real, Even in the Midwest - Flatland

Study links sun-seeking behavior to genes involved in addiction – Big Think

The mental and physical health benefits of sunlight have been heavily researched.

Photo by eldar nurkovic on Shutterstock

The benefits of sunlight have been widely discussed for many years. In fact, there are a number of physical and mental health benefits to sun exposure.

Sunshine (and the lack of) both impact your hormone levels.

Sunlight (and alternatively, the lack of sunlight) both trigger the release of certain hormones in your brain. Exposure to sunlight is thought to increase serotonin, which is associated with boosting your mood and helping you feel calm and focused.

Alternatively, dark lighting triggers melatonin, a hormone that is helpful in allowing you to rest and fall asleep. Without enough sunlight, your serotonin levels can lip - and low serotonin levels have been associated with a higher risk of major depression with seasonal pattern (formerly known as seasonal affective disorder).

Sunlight can build strong bones.

Exposure to the ultraviolet-B radiation in the sun's rays can interact with your skin, causing it to create vitamin D. According to NHS, vitamin D helps regulate the amount of calcium and phosphate in the body. A lack of vitamin D can lead to bone deformities or bone pain. A 2008 study has shown that even 30 minutes in sunlight (while wearing a bathing suit) can boost vitamin D levels.

Can sunlight actually prevent cancer?

Although heavy exposure to sunlight has been proven to contribute to certain skin cancers, a moderate amount of sunlight has actually been proved to have preventative benefits.

According to a 2008 study from the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, those who live in areas with fewer daylight hours are more likely to have some specific cancers (including, but not limited to, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, and prostate cancer) than those who live in areas with increased daylight hours.

Additionally, sunlight has been proven to help people with skin conditions such as psoriasis.

According to the World Health Organization, sun exposure may also be able to help treat skin conditions such as psoriasis, eczema, jaundice, and acne. Some research has also indicated the sun benefits people who struggle with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus, and inflammatory bowel disease.

The large-scale study examines the link between addiction and sunlight, with some surprising results...

Photo by KieferPix on Shutterstock

Addictions are multi-step conditions that, by definition, require exposure to the addictive agent. Due to the increase of serotonin (a chemical in the human body that has been proven to help reduce depression, regulate anxiety, and maintain bone health), it's natural that being exposed to prolonged periods of sunlight could become somewhat addictive to the human body and mind. We crave things that make us feel good, and sometimes those cravings become something we depend on. This is the very nature of addiction.

Countless people are exposed to addictive things (substances, medications, and yes, even the sun), but not all become addicted. This is because of the genetic component of addiction.

A large-scale study from King's College in London examines more than 260,000 people to better understand how sun-seeking behavior in humans can be linked to genes involving addiction, behavior traits, and brain function.

The study included two phases.

Phase one suggested genetics played a role in sun-seeking behaviors and phase 2 helped pinpoint what those genetic markers are.

Phase 1: the researchers studied the detailed health information of 2,500 twins, including their sun-seeking behavior and their genetics. Identical twins in a pair were more likely to have similar sun-seeking behavior than non-identical twins, indicating that genetics plays a role here.

Phase 2: the team of researchers then were able to identify 5 key gene markers involved in this sun-seeking behavior from further analysis of 260,000 participants.

Some of the genes indicated have been linked to behaviors traits that are associated with risk-taking and addiction (including smoking and alcohol consumption).

What does this study really prove?

Some may think it's natural to become addicted to something that makes you feel good. The physical and mental health benefits of the outdoors have been heavily studied...so what does this study really mean?

First and foremost, it means more research needs to be done to examine the link between human conditions and exposure to sunlight. Senior author Dr. Mario Falchi explains to the King's College London News Center: "Our results suggest that tackling excessive sun exposure or use of tanning beds might be more challenging than expected, as it is influenced by genetic factors. It is important for the public to be aware of this predisposition, as it could make people more mindful of their behavior and the potential harms of excessive sun exposure."

Additionally, it could mean alternative treatments, and further research needs to be conducted in terms of how we treat certain conditions that are caused or heavily influenced by human exposure to sunlight.

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Follow this link:
Study links sun-seeking behavior to genes involved in addiction - Big Think

California Doing Okay, Not Bad, on Walkability But It’s a Low Bar – Streetsblog California

In 2015, the U.S. Surgeon General issued a call to action to promote walking and walkable communities to encourage Americans to take up this simple physical activity to improve their health.

Safe Routes Partnership is using the five-year anniversary of this directive to call attention to what states are doing in response. This summer, the organization issued a report card grading each state on a range of metrics related to encouraging walkable communities.

Californias grade is: Not Terrible. The state earned the highest overall score of all fifty states: 163 points out of a total of 200. The scores are based on metrics like whether the states have policies or offer funding in support of walkability, whether they focus on high-need communities, and whether they do anything to support active schools and neighborhoods.

But its a low bar. Many states have no Complete Streets policy whatsoever, for example. Also, an increasing number of states are diverting federal money meant for active transportation to other purposes like highways. And 21 states offer no state funding at all for active transportation.

California, on the other hand, not only puts its own money into its Active Transportation Program, but it has not opted to use any federal active transportation money for other uses. Also, Caltrans first adopted a statewide Complete Streets policy in 2014. Although for many years that sat on the books as guidance largely ignored by its engineers, that is much less true today. That is, a strong push to seriously consider what it means to take into account all road users is taking shape. This is happening both as a result of pressure from advocates and elected leaders as well as within Caltrans itself, stemming from years of work setting up new programs and training employees as well as new leadership willing to focus on active transportation.

There is still work to be done, of course. The states Complete Streets policy only rates five of a total of ten possible points according to Safe Routes National Partnerships rubric, which is fair. Caltrans policy states, rather vaguely, that The Department provides for the needs of travelers of all ages and abilities in all planning, programming, design, construction, operations, and maintenance activities and products on the State Highway System. While travelers should include everybody no matter which mode they use, this leaves an awful lot of wiggle room.

Where California really gets dinged is in its lack of funding for Safe Routes to Schools. This is especially true for programming that encourages active transportation, whether it be through education, events, or other ways of getting people out walking or biking. This has been an ongoing issue with Californias Active Transportation Program, which has tended to reflect leadership preferences for building infrastructure rather than funding what they tend to see as amorphous, ambivalent, squishy strategies to change human behavior despite the fact that events like CicLAvia and bike education programs can have a profound influence on said behavior.

Appropriately, the Safe Route Partnerships rubric divides state scores into the general categories of Lacing Up, Warming Up, Making Strides, and Building Speed. That last, highest category has only been reached by two states, California and Massachusetts. It seems fitting: California cities are, with the exception of a few small areas, utterly car-dependent in a way that means walking for transportation still lies somewhere between difficult and dangerous in most places. California has started the work, and built a bit on its foundation, but the results so far are spotty.

So: Okay, California, not too bad. Keep up the good work.

Find Californias report here [PDF], and information about the scoring system, and other state scores, here.

Visit link:
California Doing Okay, Not Bad, on Walkability But It's a Low Bar - Streetsblog California

Reframing the Importance of Industry 4.0: Protect to promote – ITProPortal

The unprecedented pace at which businesses have been forced to adapt since the onset of Covid-19 has led to a revaluation of what is desired - and what is necessary - when it comes to future-proofing operations. In the case of manufacturing, the fallout from the pandemic has been twofold; the immediate need to protect workers through minimizing exposure to the virus and now, increasingly prevalent, the economic concerns in regard to reduced output.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) suggests that overall industrial production in the United States has experienced the sharpest decline since the country demobilized after World War Two. The dual concerns of health and long-term stability are not easily solved in tandem, with one often to the detriment of the other. New forms of lean manufacturing, however, do possess the potential to simultaneously protect and promote organizations. The WEF claims Industry 4.0 technologies are necessary for survival. While true, this statement does not paint the full picture. Innovation will become the lifeblood of manufacturing in the years to come; not just to get-by, but to fuel smarter rebuilding than weve ever seen previously.

The truth is that our finest moments are most likely to occur when we are feeling deeply uncomfortable. -M. Scott Peck

Although a reference to human behavior at an individual level, psychiatrist M. Scott Pecks assessment of discovering a better way through discomfort can also be applied to businesses and industries in todays world. The current challenge - one that could have been foreseen in a general sense but is nigh on impossible to prepare for - has forced manufacturers to question the very foundations of their operations.

According to the latest research from McKinsey, 39 percent of manufacturers have already implemented a nerve-center or control-tower approach, to increase end-to-end transparency across the whole of the supply chain. In addition, almost a quarter want to fast-track automation programs, in a bid to help stem worker shortages following Covid-19. Granted, much of this would have been implemented at some point in the near future, but the shock of removing workers from factory floors almost overnight, along with a reduced capacity for production, has forced the hand of manufacturing leadership and resulted in a re-prioritization of certain technologies.

The silver lining for manufacturing is that, as an industry, it was already primed for evolution. Around 80 percent of process lines included some form of automation before the pandemic hit, so the groundwork was already there. The removal of the human 20 percent naturally brought things to a halt - as a business, you cannot deliver 80 percent of a project or only build 80 percent of a product - but the distance needed to travel to fill the gap does not represent a particularly big leap of faith. Especially because the shift to adopting robots is not technological; it is purely socio-psychological.

Technology has always been leaps and bounds ahead of public perception. When it comes to robots, however, there has been a whole generation that grew up with the Terminators and the iRobots of this world. It means the existing narrative around robots is predominately one of threat, which then trickles down within industry to manifest in the idea that robots will take jobs. This is far from the truth. In fact, manufacturing can become synonymous with early-adoption, full-scale robotics, that allows for businesses to redefine where real value from both person and machine is added.

Greater automation is supported by the availability of predictive analytics on factory floors and within supply chains, which many manufacturers have already embraced. Achieved through a web of connected sensors and nodes, this technology can help businesses extend the life cycles of the industrial devices on their roster by knowing the exact state of each machine. These techniques also provide the infrastructure for other Industry 4.0 technologies, including robots, as the sensors can track performance in near real-time and identify where additional opportunities can be incorporated into the manufacturing proposition. In other words, it is the existence of data-driven, smart machinery that can boost confidence in an automation uptake.

The introduction of advanced robotics alongside this IoT machinery, therefore, is the next logical step, and will allow businesses to physically protect employees, retrain workers, and learn from current pitfalls induced by Covid-19. A largely roboticized supply chain would change the role of human beings as those boots on the ground workers. Moving into supervisory roles or freshly created ones, a lot of which can be done remotely, would allow more people to contribute to the discovery of new innovations within manufacturing, and ensure talent is retained within the industry.

Greater innovation and output, however, is not simply realized through individual pieces of robotics hardware. Software has a vital role to play and will, in fact, be the aspect that allows manufacturers to not only survive but actually thrive.

Manufacturer owned robotics app stores, where businesses can tap into software to increase the purpose of their robotics hardware, will allow manufacturers to modify what their hardware can produce or the services they provide. This will enable all companies to prepare for the highest and lowest levels of demand, to fully optimize their robotic workforce and be ready for any unforeseen developments. In other words, downtime at a minimum at the worst of times and streamlined activity at the best. It is the modular capabilities of robots, via an app store, that will allow the manufacturing industry to be more flexible when unpredicted challenges present themselves.

Over time, software will replace hardware as the fundamental element in a robots value. Security and reliability will remain the building blocks, with collaboration opening the doors to smarter robots, able to extend their lifespans through a range of third-party apps. To address this need, containerized software packages - easy to create, safe to run, and able to update automatically and transactionally - have begun to emerge. Once a manufacturer opens up a robots APIs, 3rd party developers can create their own programs and evolve the use cases of a machine. The real value of a robot, therefore, will soon arrive alongside a comprehensive app store, which continually adds value to the hardware by extending its functionality.

The fact that Industry 4.0 is a collection of technologies means that it is often regarded as a form of high-level thinking and not entirely practical to implement, especially when industries like manufacturing are experiencing issues. But as individuals and organizations adapt to a culture of new priorities - the dual concerns of health and economic stability - intelligent infrastructure and roboticized workforces can help alleviate some of the strain. Together they represent the building blocks of manufacturings path out of the current landscape, and can position businesses to subsequently thrive.

Industry 4.0 will not only identify issues within a manufacturers supply chain preemptively, but contribute to more intuitive processes: better results, less downtime, and the removal of unexpected costs. Overlaying every device with IoT intelligence can be the answer to the pressures the manufacturing industry currently faces.

Tom Canning, Vice President of IoT and Devices, Canonical - The company behind Ubuntu

View original post here:
Reframing the Importance of Industry 4.0: Protect to promote - ITProPortal

She Lost Her Son to Suicide, Then Created a Foundation to Help Others – Healthline

Lee Thompson Young was a bright light and accomplished actor. At 13 years old, he appeared in the Disney Channels original series The Famous Jett Jackson.

A few years later, he went on to star in a McDonalds commercial with Michael Jordan.

From there, he landed roles in various prime-time television shows, such as Friday Night Lights, Smallville, and Scrubs, as well as films, including The Hills Have Eyes 2.

While his career was flourishing, Young began struggling with mental health issues.

In his late teens, he was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, a mental health condition that is associated with episodes of mood changes ranging from depressive lows to manic highs.

He managed his illness with medication and therapy for several years, all while continuing to build a successful acting career and being a loving brother and son.

However, in 2013, Young died by suicide at 29 years old.

At the time, I didnt live near Lee. I lived across the country. When Id talk to him on the phone, I couldnt tell he was in crisis. He was a very good actor, his mother, Velma Love, told Healthline.

Love remembers her son as a caring, kind person who was deeply aware of social issues and sought out creative ways to impact society. To memorialize his life, Love and her daughter, Tamu Lewis, established the Lee Thompson Young Foundation in 2014.

Losing Lee was a tremendous shock, and immediately it brought to my mind the need for more education about mental illness, especially the stigma associated with it. We [wanted] to do something to help other people and prevent other families from losing someone by suicide, said Love.

The Lee Thompson Young Foundation focuses on erasing the stigma associated with mental illness through various awareness efforts, including its Mind program.

The Mind program is for administrators and school personnel working with children K-12 so they can learn the broad spectrum of mental health trends, what to look for in children, when to recognize help is needed, and how to create bridges to resources in their communities, Stephanie E. Johnson, owner of NaviPsych and executive director of the Lee Thompson Young Foundation, told Healthline.

Johnson also developed a 5-week resilience and training program on behalf of the foundation based on psychological principles and techniques of Abraham Maslows Hierarchy of Needs, Daniel Golemans Emotional Intelligence, and the Needs, Emotional Intelligence, Cognitive Behavior (NEICB) model.

The program teaches participants (both students and school personnel) to nurture their overall mental wellness by:

We ask teachers to be moved to do their own training and experience it for themselves, so they can relate to kids and engage with them firsthand, Johnson said.

She is working to expand the foundations efforts with new offerings, such as online mindfulness sessions, in which a therapist teaches young adults how to cope with anxiety and depression.

This is geared toward college students because there is not enough support for them as they transition out of high school and go to college. They are a vulnerable group right now. We want to provide something easy to access that will help them self-regulate and self-empower, said Johnson.

The foundation also recently partnered with The Gottman Institute, which aims to help families create and maintain healthy relationships.

We will be working together to provide an emotion coaching program for parents because being home working and managing children all day long is a huge challenge right now, said Johnson.

The organizations latest endeavor is partnering with the AAKOMA Project, which offers teletherapy.

We are paying for 20 sessions for individuals who are looking to get help right away. When people are in crisis, its about surviving and meeting the basic needs of food, shelter, and safety. This program allows people to get mental health support without them having to think about it or stress about it and create more anxiety around it, Johnson said.

When Young was first diagnosed with bipolar disorder, his mom wasnt familiar with the condition.

I had a friend who was a mental health counselor who I spoke with because I didnt know anything about the condition. She told me about suicide and how prevalent it was, but it was something I didnt even register at the time, said Love.

According to the National Alliance on Mental Illness, 46% of people who die by suicide have a diagnosed mental health condition, and 90% of people who die by suicide have experienced symptoms of a mental health condition.

While people with severe mental illness, such as depression and bipolar disorder, are at increased risk for suicide, Julie Cerel, PhD, licensed psychologist and past president of the American Association of Suicidology (AAS), says not everyone who has these illnesses will die by suicide.

In fact, a greater percentage of people with schizophrenia and eating disorders die by suicide than those with depression and bipolar disorder. Depression is quite common and, fortunately, a small percentage of people with depression die by suicide even though popularly, people think of depression being the only cause of suicide, Cerel told Healthline.

She adds that while mental health conditions play a role in suicide, not all suicide is the result of mental health issues.

Many people who die by suicide do not have diagnosable mental health problems, but also have relationship problems, physical health problems, job- or money-related stress, legal or housing problems. It is important for people to know that mental health issues are common and treatable and to reduce the stigma of getting help, said Cerel.

The stigma to get help is especially present in the African American community, says Love.

In African American communities, there is such a stigma that people dont want to talk about it or get treatment. Whenever I give public presentations, there are people who will come up to me and speak in their hushed tones about a family member who needs help, but they do not openly talk about it. With suicide there are all kinds of judgment placed on families, Love said.

Part of the stigma is due to mental health disparities experienced by Black, Indigenous, and People of Color. Cerel says these disparities are also an issue in suicide prevention.

Following the death of George Floyd in May, the AAS issued a statement pledging to become anti-racist.

Other leaders in the field of suicide prevention pledged to make change too.

The American Foundation for Suicide Prevention set out to make diversity a priority for grants. Vibrant Emotional Health, which operates the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, distributed tip sheets to mental health professionals that give guidance on how to talk about racism and civil unrest.

Love believes more efforts like these are needed.

The larger scope of the problem beyond the therapeutic needs and clinical practices and programs is the stress factors of being Black in America, she said.

We live in a highly racially charged environment, and the day-to-day life and microaggressions that happen, the fear that is exacerbated whenever a child watches a shooting on TV all those factors contribute to the need for mental health professionals and well-being counselors and therapies and modalities.

Love added, As a cultural worker and educator, I see the systemic issues that are so imbedded in this society, and these are issues Lee was concerned about.

The foundation in her sons memory plans to address these issues.

Its a matter of having more conversations and addressing things in gentle ways. For the Black community, and African men, boys, and teenagers, we are present, said Johnson.

The reasons people become suicidal are complex, and Cerel says that there isnt one type of person who attempts or dies by suicide. In fact, people of all races, ages, and walks of life can be suicidal.

The biggest warning sign that someone may be suicidal is if they talk about suicide, says Cerel.

It is really OK to ask someone if they are thinking of suicide if you are worried about them. You wont put any ideas in their head that arent there already. Having the means to end their lives can be fatal, so someone who is suicidal with a firearm is at risk. It is best to figure out how to separate people who are suicidal from the means they could use, she said.

The most common misconception she wants to debunk is that people who are suicidal are selfish.

In fact, their brain is telling them that the people they love would be better off without them. This is one of the great tragedies of suicide, as each suicide touches about 135 people we found in our work, and those left behind often have their lives permanently changed, Cerel said.

If you are in need of help or know someone who is, contact:

Cathy Cassata is a freelance writer who specializes in stories around health, mental health, and human behavior. She has a knack for writing with emotion and connecting with readers in an insightful and engaging way. Read more of her work here.

Read this article:
She Lost Her Son to Suicide, Then Created a Foundation to Help Others - Healthline

"Enemies of the State" director on the twisty new doc with "too many secrets still in the story" – Salon

The legal cases against Matthew DeHart are the subject of the fascinating documentary "Enemies of the State," which received its world premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival last week.

Directed by Sonia Kennebeck, and executive produced by Errol Morris, the film chronicles what happened after DeHart,who is described as "a pioneer with Anonymous and Wikileaks,"is investigated for allegedly possessing child pornography. The accused, along with his parents, Paul and Leann, insist that these are trumped-up charges. DeHart claims he possessed sensitive information he received over the dark web that the government wants, and they are using the legal caseto target him and get access to his computer files.

But, as someone in the film asks, "Where do you go if the U.S. government has you on National Security offenses?" Matt and his parents are a patriotic military family, however, given this situation, they pack up in the middle of the night and seek asylum in Canada. DeHart was eventually jailed; moreover, he claims he was tortured in prison.

"Enemies of the State" unpacks this twisty story, which was also covered by journalist Adrian Humphreys, who is interviewed in the film. Kennebeck uses recreations of events, original audio recordings, and testimonies from police, lawyersand others involved in the case, along with the interviews with the DeHart family, to ferret out the truth. What is revealed is both surprising and perhaps not. It all depends on who or what viewers believe: Is DeHart a criminal or a scapegoat? What happened to the USB drive with the sensitive files?

Salon spoke with Kennebeck about the DeHart case and her intriguing new film.

Perhaps one of the most revealing anecdotes in the film is one that his high school buddy Josh Weinstein provides about Matt running for student body president. I am curious what your impression of Matt is?

I think he is an enigma. I spent so many years digging into the story, and it was a challenging investigation. I think what's important to know is that we went into the story with an open mind. We didn't know the outcome when we embarked on this investigation and journey. As time went along, we interviewed the parents and people who knew [Matt] as well as prosecutors and detectives. [We were curious] to hear from Matt himself and not just through an interview on a prison phone line, where everything was recorded.

As Adrian Humphreys says about some of the questions we have in his case, Matt might be the only one to answer them in the absence of a number of documents and parts of the investigation.

What attracted you to tell this story which involves untangling the truth and lies? The real issue of "Enemies of the State" may be deciding who or what to believe. Someone is an unreliable narrator here.

I gravitate towards these types of stories. I'm interested in stories that have a lot of secrecy. I love researching and investigating. I first heard about Matt during production of "National Bird." When I heard it involves Anonymous, Wikileaks, the FBI, child pornography, and torture there are so many strange elements, I wanted to get to the bottom of it. My production team and I wanted to make a film about alleged U.S. government torture, so that connected us to the Matt DeHart story. But we realized very quickly there is another side to it, and we found different perspectives. As we went along, it was clearer to me that it was a film and a story about the truth. Through trying to find truth in the world we live in now, where so many strange stories exist on the internet, this film became a timely piece and a commentary on the times. We have trouble figuring out what to believe and how to get to the bottom of things.

You use interviews and reenactments as well as audio recordings to tell this story which practically folds in on itself. I admire the high-wire balancing act. Can you talk about access to the subjects and how you constructed the narrative?

What I tried to do is take the audience on the investigation we went on. We disclosed the steps and timeline as we received information, so the viewer could experience what we experienced, because that is the most accurate approach to a complicated story like this. When we started interviewing people it was clear how much was "he said/she said," and how contradictory their statements were.

My editor did an excellent job. We gathered all the evidence and went through the story and timeline and used as many documents as we could to show as much reliable information and present that to the audience so they could piece together the story and form their own opinion. Human behavior is complicated.

That's the beauty of the film too; you have the voices, and sound is important because there is so much original audio, but then the visuals and the music and what you see in people's eyes the film presents all these dimensions.

There is a discussion in the film by journalist Adrian Humphreys who talks about an image of DeHart. A photo of him looking bleary-eyed in an orange prison jumpsuit was sent for publication. DeHart, of course, preferred a smiling photo of him in a Canadian hockey shirt. There is a manipulation of representation. Can you talk about that and how you, as a filmmaker, confront the image that best reflects the story versus one that might show bias?

That soundbite has so much depth it represents how on one hand, the journalist has to be fair, and should try to listen to and ask questions of both sides, whenever possible. The government too, often blocks interview requests, and has too much secrecy. As journalists and investigative reporters, we try to get to the bottom of things. But we must acknowledge that there are opposing viewpoints that people try to present their story in the best possible way and in the best light. Humphreys understands this and tells us to pay attention and be critical about what you are being presented.

What we are doing, and the images in the film, are very important and the credit goes to my cinematographer. The images in the film often carry multiple messages. We have a shot of Matt sitting in his room reflected in multiple mirrors. That image represents the [multiple] sides of the story, and we tried to use film as a medium to its fullest.

The documentary has footage and recreations that were done with accuracy and thought. A lot of the film is what you believe and want to believe but also how the surveillance state induces paranoia. When we investigate stories like this, what we know is that the U.S. government has been doing terrible things: torture, the drone program, mass data collection, surveillance. etc. That is the world we live in. There is a history of government misconduct in this country.

I don't want to spoil anything, but the film team makes a startling discovery. And someone does state what may have been on the USB drive, which would be pretty shocking iftrue. What surprised you about the DeHart case in making this film?

There were a lot of things that we didn't see coming. What is on the USB drive, and when it was revealed to us of course, you need to see the evidence as a journalist. All the attorneys were speculating where these drives could be.

One of the questions the film asks is how do people take a stance when there is incomplete information? I love the point that people need to think critically; it's just not done enough. What are your observations on that?

What I take away is that you really have to go into a true investigation with an open mind and be open to different opinions and perspectives. I want people to probe and investigate, listen and question, and think critically. The story isn't entirely over.

Where do your sympathies lie?

There is a reason I'm not including my voice in the film. I think there are too many secrets still in the story, and I think part of it is the responsibility of the government classifying too many documents. I have a lot more questions. I gave everyone who wanted to speak with us an opportunity to present their perspective. We presented all the evidence we could find. I'm not a judge or jury, but it is important for people to think for themselves and come to their own conclusion.

View original post here:
"Enemies of the State" director on the twisty new doc with "too many secrets still in the story" - Salon

How Do I Know I’m Not the Only Conscious Being in the Universe? – Scientific American

It is a central dilemma of human lifemore urgent, arguably, than the inevitability of suffering and death. I have been brooding and ranting to my students about it for years. It surely troubles us more than ever during this plague-ridden era. Philosophers call it the problem of other minds. I prefer to call it the solipsism problem.

Solipsism, technically, is an extreme form of skepticism, at once utterly nuts and irrefutable. It holds that you are the only conscious being in existence. The cosmos sprang into existence when you became sentient, and it will vanish when you die. As crazy as this proposition seems, it rests on a brute fact: each of us is sealed in an impermeable prison cell of subjective awareness. Even our most intimate exchanges might as well be carried out via Zoom.

You experience your own mind every waking second, but you can only infer the existence of other minds through indirect means. Other people seem to possess conscious perceptions, emotions, memories, intentions, just as you do, but you cant be sure they do. You can guess how the world looks to me, based on my behavior and utterances, including these words you are reading, but you have no first-hand access to my inner life. For all you know, I might be a mindless bot.

Natural selection instilled in us the capacity for a so-called theory of minda talent for intuiting others emotions and intentions. But we have a countertendency to deceive each other, and to fear we are being deceived. The ultimate deception would be pretending youre conscious when youre not.

The solipsism problem thwarts efforts to explain consciousness. Scientists and philosophers have proposed countless contradictory hypotheses about what consciousness is and how it arises. Panpsychists contend that all creatures and even inanimate mattereven a single proton!possess consciousness. Hard-core materialists insist, conversely (and perversely), that not even humans are all that conscious.

The solipsism problem prevents us from verifying or falsifying these and other claims. I cant be certain that you are conscious, let alone a jellyfish, sexbot or doorknob. As long as we lack what neuroscientist Christof Koch calls a consciousness metera device that can measure consciousness in the same way that a thermometer measures temperaturetheories of consciousness will remain in the realm of pure speculation.

But the solipsism problem is far more than a technical philosophical matter. It is a paranoid but understandable response to the feelings of solitude that lurk within us all. Even if you reject solipsism as an intellectual position, you sense it, emotionally, whenever you feel estranged from others, whenever you confront the awful truth that you can never know, really know another person, and no one can really know you.

Religion is one response to the solipsism problem. Our ancestors dreamed up a supernatural entity who bears witness to our innermost fears and desires. No matter how lonesome we feel, how alienated from our fellow humans, God is always there watching over us. He sees our souls, our most secret selves, and He loves us anyway. Wouldnt it be nice to think so.

The arts, too, can be seen as attempts to overcome the solipsism problem. The artist, musician, poet, novelist says, This is how my life feels or This is how life might feel for another person. She helps us imagine what its like to be a Black woman trying to save her children from slavery, or a Jewish ad salesman wandering through Dublin, wondering whether his wife is cheating on him. But to imagine is not to know.

Some of my favorite works of art dwell on the solipsism problem. InIm thinking of ending thingsand earlier films, as well as his new novelAntkind, Charlie Kaufman depicts other people as projections of a disturbed protagonist. Kaufman no doubt hopes to help us, and himself, overcome the solipsism problem by venting his anxiety about it, but I find his dramatizations almost too evocative.

Love, ideally, give us the illusion of transcending the solipsism problem. You feel you really know someone, from the inside out, and she knows you. In moments of ecstatic sexual communion or mundane togethernesswhile youre eating pizza and watching The Alienist, sayyou fuse with your beloved. The barrier between you seems to vanish.

Inevitably, however, your lover disappoints, deceives, betrays you. Or, less dramatically, some subtle bio-cognitive shift occurs. You look at her as she nibbles her pizza and think, Who, what, is this odd creature? The solipsism problem has reemerged, more painful and suffocating than ever.

It gets worse. In addition to the problem of other minds, there is the problem of our own. As evolutionary psychologist Robert Trivers points out, we deceive ourselves at least as effectively as we deceive others. A corollary of this dark truth is that we know ourselves even less than we know others.

If a lion could talk, Wittgenstein said, we couldnt understand it. The same is true, I suspect, of our own deepest selves. If you could eavesdrop on your subconscious, youd hear nothing but grunts, growls and moansor perhaps the high-pitched squeaks of raw machine-code data coursing through a channel.

For the mentally ill, solipsism can become terrifyingly vivid. Victims of Capgras syndrome think that identical imposters have replaced their loved ones.If you have Cotards delusion, also known as walking corpse syndrome, you become convinced that you are dead.A much more common disorder is derealization, which makes everything--you, others, reality as whole--feel strange, phony, simulated

Derealization plagued me throughout my youth. One episode was self-induced. Hanging out with friends in high school, I thought it would be fun to hyperventilate, hold my breath and let someone squeeze my chest until I passed out. When I woke up, I didnt recognize my buddies. They were demons, jeering at me. For weeks after that horrifying sensation faded, everything still felt unreal, as if I were in a dreadful movie.

What if those afflicted with these alleged delusions actually see reality clearly? According to the Buddhist doctrine of anatta, the self does not really exist. When you try to pin down your own essence, to grasp it, it slips through your fingers.

We have devised methods for cultivating self-knowledge and quelling our anxieties, such as meditation and psychotherapy. But these practices strike me as forms of self-brainwashing. When we meditate or see a therapist, we are not solving the solipsism problem. We are merely training ourselves to ignore it, to suppress the horror and despair that it triggers.

We have also invented mythical places in which the solipsism problem vanishes. We transcend our solitude and merge with others into a unified whole. We call these places heaven, nirvana, the Singularity. But solipsism is a cave from which we cannot escapeexcept, perhaps, by pretending it doesnt exist. Or, paradoxically, by confronting it, the way Charlie Kaufman does. Knowing we are in the cave may be as close as we can get to escaping it.

Conceivably, technology could deliver us from the solipsism problem. Christof Koch proposes that we all get brain implants with wi-fi, so we can meld minds through a kind of high-tech telepathy. Philosopher Colin McGinn suggests a technique that involves brain-splicing, transferring bits of your brain into mine, and vice versa.

But do we really want to escape the prison of our subjective selves? The archnemesis of Star Trek: The Next Generation is the Borg, a legion of tech-enhanced humanoids who have fused into one big meta-entity. Borg members have lost their separation from each other and hence their individuality. When they meet ordinary humans, they mutter in a scary monotone, You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.

As hard as solitude can be for me to bear, I dont want to be assimilated. If solipsism haunts me, so does oneness, a unification so complete that it extinguishes my puny mortal self. Perhaps the best way to cope with the solipsism problem in this weird, lonely time is to imagine a world in which it has vanished.

Further Reading:

Jellyfish, Sexbots and the Solipsism Problem

Do Fish Suffer?

Can Integrated Information Theory Explain Consciousness?

Dont Make Me One with Everything

Do We Need Brain Implants to Keep Up with Robots?

Rational Mysticism

See also my free, online book Mind-Body Problems: Science, Subjectivity & Who We Really Are and my upcoming book Pay Attention: Sex, Death, and Science, which describes what its like to be a neurotic science writer.

View original post here:
How Do I Know I'm Not the Only Conscious Being in the Universe? - Scientific American

Sharp attention explains why the early bird gets the worm – UB News Center

BUFFALO, N.Y. Many of the characteristics related to auditory attention in birds match those of humans, according to a study from the University at Buffalo.

The findings published in the journal PLOS ONE provide novel insights into evolutionary survival mechanisms, and are the first to behaviorally measure the cognitive process responsible for a non-human animals ability to segregate and respond to meaningful targets heard in simultaneous sound streams.

Though previous research had explored auditory attention in animals, the experiments were clouded by anthropomorphism, which essentially put the cart before the horse, according to Micheal Dent, a professor of psychology in UBs College of Arts and Sciences, and lead author of the paper co-written with then-UB graduate student Huaizhen Cai, currently a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Pennsylvania.

People have been doing physiological experiments to find neural correlates to attention capture, but I always thought they did it backwards since at the time there was no evidence that animals have the same attention characteristics and limits that humans possess, says Dent. When you look for physiological correlates to something, you need to know first that the behavior exists.

We didnt know it existed then, but now we do.

Auditory attention is the ability to focus on specific sounds. Attention capture is the involuntary response to sound targets in the environment. For humans, auditory attention can mean having a conversation in a noisy room, but still recognizing and responding (attention capture) to hearing a name being called from a distance.

But what amounts largely to social utility for humans becomes a matter of survival for birds.

For animals trying to hone in on something in the environment, its critical that they respond to something like a big crash in a bush, which could signal the presence of a predator, but not a little one, which can likely be ignored, explains Dent. No one had ever measured this before in the auditory domain. They had measured it in the visual system, but never with sound.

As it turns out, auditory attention in birds is nearly as keen as it is in humans.

But testing auditory attention in animals is challenging given the difficulty of building a paradigm where animals have to ignore specific elements. For humans, the research method is straightforward: tell participants to pay attention to changes in one sound stream, but ignore changes in a different stream.

So to conduct their experiments, Dent and Cai trained seven adult budgerigars to peck a key that started a stream of tones, AAAA, for example. When one tones pitch in the sequence changed (AABA) the birds would peck another key.

The researchers then slowly introduced a background stream of tones the birds were supposed to ignore (CCCC), which they did, just as humans would ignore surrounding chatter and noise happening during a phone conversation.

What the birds had trouble ignoring was a frequency change to the background tones (CDCC), similar to the loud crash in the bush, a task also challenging to humans, according to Dent, an expert in the perception of complex auditory stimuli in birds and mammals.

Other factors that affected the birds attention were the saliency of the changes in the distractor. Bigger frequency changes in the background disrupted attention to the targets more so than smaller frequency changes. Also, the longer the birds listened to the background they were supposed to be ignoring, the easier it was for them to notice changes in the target streams.

Just like humans trying to pay attention to something, the longer they hone in on those sounds, the easier it is to ignore the background, says Dent.

Dent says shes currently involved in research to test her hypothesis with more ecologically relevant sounds.

We have results that demonstrate how the birds respond to pure tones, but are they equally proficient with bird calls? Dent asks. Thats what were testing next.

Read more:
Sharp attention explains why the early bird gets the worm - UB News Center

How One Pacific Islander Community Is Responding To The Pandemic – Honolulu Civil Beat

This COVID-19 pandemic has uncovered underlying health and socioeconomic disparities, the brunt of which is borne by the Pacific Islander communities. Due to pre-existing chronic health conditions, lack of access to quality health care coupled with socioeconomic factors, its predictable that PI communities are at high risk of contracting the coronavirus disease.

Thus, in order to reduce the risk and narrow the disparity gap, it will take systemic policy changes as well as political will at both the federal and state levels. However, it will take time for such actions, a scarce commodity during this pandemic. This unprecedented pandemic crisis demands urgent and immediate solutions.

Rather than waiting for the government, various PI communities have rallied and mobilized by forming their own COVID-19 task forces in order to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus into their communities. In spite of lack of resources, they have resolved to take matters into their own hands to ensure their communities are safe.

A Marshallese interpreter at the Towers at Kuhio Park in Kalihi during COVID-19 testing on Sept. 3.

Anita Hofschneider/Civil Beat

In the Marshallese community, a COVID-19 task force team was formed in early March 2020, with volunteer members representing all the Marshallese communities across the islands, organized by the Republic of the Marshall Islands Consulate in Honolulu.

It has closely engaged the faith-based community and leaders, collaborated with both local and U.S. mainland COVID-19 task force team counterparts and other Pacific Islander and Native Hawaiian COVID-19 outreach efforts. It has held community outreach mass drives providing face masks, care packs and foods.

Additionally, it has worked with the Republic of the Marshall Island government in its efforts to mitigate the COVID-19 spread and repatriate its stranded citizens. It has been active in its community outreach efforts in ensuring the community is fully engaged in mitigating and containing the COVID-19 infection. It has served as a COVID-19 community resource and command center for the Marshallese community in Hawaii.

As a result, the Marshallese community COVID-19 infection rate has remained relatively contained under the current circumstances. It has demonstrated that such a model of community engagement which is based on cultural competency and engagement can work and should be considered as a reasonable and effective intervention strategy.

Proven intervention strategy of COVID-19 is due primarily to non-pharmaceutical interventions (i.e., face covering, social distancing, hygiene, etc.). To implement such a strategy, which is directly related to human behavior and customs, its essential to recognize the significance of active community engagement and participation to help inform best practices. COVID-19 has been shown to impact communities differently with the ethnic minority groups experiencing more devastation.

The Marshallese communitys infection rate has remained relatively contained.

The Marshallese COVID-19 task force has shown that a more reasonable and efficacious intervention approach recognizes the significance of underpinning cultural nuances and practices, as well as language challenges, as an integral part of its strategy. It has implemented a strategy that is culturally competent and sensitive to ensure full community engagement and adherence.

By partnering with the various PI community task forces, the state can form formidable alliances to effectively defeat this COVID-19 pandemic. The government should consider directly engaging and leveraging community assets as one unified island community in its efforts to end this unprecedented pandemic.

It speaks to equity, inclusion, and diversity. After all, were all in this together.

Sign Up

Sorry. That's an invalid e-mail.

Thanks! We'll send you a confirmation e-mail shortly.

Continue reading here:
How One Pacific Islander Community Is Responding To The Pandemic - Honolulu Civil Beat