Category Archives: Genetics

Unraveling the Impact of Lifestyle, Genetics on MS – AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

Obesity and metabolic syndrome

Adiposity obesity, particularly when it begins in childhood and late adolescence, was identified as leading to a 2-fold risk of developing MS in one study, according to Ruth Ann Marrie, MD, PhD, FRCPC, director of the Multiple Sclerosis Clinic at the University of Manitoba. Central obesity, or visceral adipose fatty deposits in the abdominal area, is a key component of metabolic syndrome, a cluster of abnormalities that includes hypertension, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance and is linked to a higher risk of cardiac disease and diabetes.

In the Nurses Health Study, which examined risk factors for chronic disease, women with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or more had a 2-fold increased risk of subsequently developing MS. And a study using data from the Copenhagen School Health Records Register found that children aged 7 to 13 years with a BMI equivalent to 30 in adults had an increased risk of developing MS later in life.

Obesity is more common even before MS diagnosis, Marrie said. In an effort to look at other aspects of metabolic syndrome, researchers used Canadian claims data of about 20,000 individuals with newly diagnosed MS and found that by the time of diagnosis, more than 15% had hypertension and nearly 10% had dyslipidemia.

There is also evidence that obesity and components of metabolic syndrome are associated with longer diagnostic delays, greater disability at diagnosis, as well as an increased relapse rate and accelerated disability progression. One key question she said, is whether treating metabolic syndrome might improve MS outcomes and multiple sclerosis.

In one small, nonrandomized cohort study of 50 individuals with MS, obesity, and metabolic syndrome, they were treated either with metformin or pioglitazone, or they declined treatment.

Before treatment, researchers measured the number of newer enlarging T2 lesions in the 24-month period before intervention as well as gadolinium-enhancing lesions; all 3 groups looked similar.

After treatment with either metformin or pioglitazone, the number of newer T2 lesions as well as gadolinium-enhancing lesions dropped over 24 months. Patients who declined treatment did not see a decrease.

I think the growing body of evidence suggests that clinical trials are needed to really test whether treating obesity and metabolic syndrome may improve outcomes in MS and to test whether we need to be using different strategies for managing disease-modifying therapy, including dosing in individuals who are obese or extremely obese with multiple sclerosis, Marrie said.

Smoking and genetics

Another presentation focused on the interactions between modifiable risk factorsnamely smokingand genetics.

People with a genetic susceptibility to the disease may be at a substantially increased risk of developing MS if youre exposed to certain environmental factors, said Anna Hedstrm, MD, PhD, from the Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden in the Department of Clinical Neuroscience.

Smoking and the chemicals from tobacco creates a cascade of problems, including systemic inflammation, local inflammation in the lungs, oxidative stress, damaged neural tissue, and epigenetic changes.

Smoking increases the risk of MS by about 50%, she said, with men more affected than women; in addition, there is also a dose response relationship between the accumulated dose of smoking and the risk of developing the disease.

In 2005, the Karolinska Institute began a study called the Epidemiological Investigation of Multiple Sclerosis, which uses the countrys national MS registry. As an ongoing study, it now includes 9000 cases and 12,000 matched controls.

In 2011, Hedstrm and colleagues published a study that found a significant interaction between 2 genetic risk factors and smoking: HL ADRB1*15, the key genetic risk factor for MS, and HLA A*02, the absence of which carries a reduced risk of MS. The research looked at the interaction of these genes in both smokers and non-smokes.

Smokers with both genes had an odds ratio (OR) of 13.5 (8.1-22.6) for MS, compared with nonsmokers with the same makeup.

Compared with non-smokers with neither of the genetic risk factors, the OR for smokers without genetic risk was 1.4 (0.9-2.1); the OR for non-smokers with both genetic risk factors was 4.9 (3.6-6.6).

Among those with both genetic risk factors, smoking increased the risk by a factor of 2.8 in comparison with a factor of 1.4 among those without the genetic risk factors.

Passive smoking (ie, never smokers exposed to second-hand smoke) also increases MS risk (OR 1.3-1.6) and the risk increases along with the length of exposure, she said.

Similarly, exposure to organic solvents, she said, also raises the rise of MS in people with the same genetic profile.

MS and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection

No virus has been discovered as a cause of MS, but the hypothesis that a virus may be involved in MS has been around for some time, said Kassandra Munger, ScD, of the Department of Nutrition in the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health. Current knowledge, she said, points to Epstein-Barr.

From environmental risk factor perspective, MS is likely a rare complication of Epstein-Barr virus infection, with risk further modified by inadequate vitamin D levels, being overweight or obese in early life and cigarette smoking, she said.

Early studies attempting to look at the issue through antibody testing could not determine if EBV infection proceeded MS or if it was a complication.

Using blood samples collected by the Department of Defense of US military members, Munger and colleagues found preliminary evidence that EBV infection does happen before MS. They identified 305 MS cases and 610 matched controls. In cases where serum samples were collected before the onset of MS symptoms and measured EBV titers, they found that 38 were EBV negative at the time they went on active duty. During follow up, up until MS onset, 20 of the 38 became EBV positive. Eighteen remained EBV negative and did not develop MS.

This is a preliminary finding that needs to be replicated in a larger study, she said.

References

Hedstrm AK, Sundqvist E,Brnhielm M,et al. Smoking and two human leukocyte antigen genes interact to increase the risk for multiple sclerosis. Brain.2011;134(3):653-64.doi:10.1093/brain/awq371

Here is the original post:
Unraveling the Impact of Lifestyle, Genetics on MS - AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

When ‘bones and stones’ are not enough: Genetics fills in the blanks in the story of human evolution – Genetic Literacy Project

In recent years, a field that has traditionally relied on fossil discoveries has acquired helpful new tools: genomics and ancient DNA techniques. Armed with this combination of approaches, researchers have begun to excavate our species early evolution, hinting at a far more complex past than was previously appreciatedone rich in diversity, migration, and possibly even interbreeding with other hominin species in Africa.

To piece together that story, we need information from multiple different fields of study, remarks Eleanor Scerri, an archaeologist at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany. No single one is really going to have all the answersnot genetics, not archaeology, not the fossils, because all of these areas have challenges and limitations.

[I]t was the advent of genetic research that showed unequivocally that populations outside of Africa descended from a single population in Africa. But the story had a twist: intwogroundbreakingstudiespublished in 2014, researchers compared ancient DNA extracted from Neanderthal bones and compared it with modern-day people, and found that 2 percent of the average European genome is Neanderthal in origin. Our species originated in Africa, but interbred with hominins outside of it.

These findings, and many since, have highlighted the power of genetics in resolving questions about human ancestry that fossils alone cannot.

Read the original post

Read more from the original source:
When 'bones and stones' are not enough: Genetics fills in the blanks in the story of human evolution - Genetic Literacy Project

Viewpoint: Genetics is revolutionizing baby making and what it means to be a family – Genetic Literacy Project

Humans are reproducing in ways that would have been truly unimaginable just several decades ago: Two men and a surrogate. Two women and a sperm donor. An older woman using genetic material from a much younger egg.

Each turn of the technological screw has been generated by the same profound impulse to allow people to conceive babies they desperately want and to build families with those they love. Each development has, in many ways, been deeply conservative, intended to extend or re-create lifes most basic process of production. But as these technologies have expanded and evolved, their impact has become far more revolutionary; theyve forced us to reconceptualize just what a family means.

If the techniques of [in vitro gametogenesis] prove feasible, therefore, would-be families could theoretically begin by creating their own gametes. A single woman, for example, might mix her egg with sperm fashioned from the genetic material of her two best male friends; the resulting child would have three genetic parents. Or she might mate her egg with a carefully selected donor sperm, using genetic testing to eliminate any risk of the cystic fibrosis that runs in her own family. Stem cells derived from the resulting embryo could then yield a next-generation egg to be paired with her best friends similarly well-conceived sperm, yielding a child with four parents. And so on. The implications are enormous.

Read the original post

Read the original:
Viewpoint: Genetics is revolutionizing baby making and what it means to be a family - Genetic Literacy Project

Fulgent Genetics to Provide COVID-19 Testing Solutions for the State of Utah – GlobeNewswire

TEMPLE CITY, Calif., Sept. 15, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLGT) (Fulgent Genetics or the company), a technology company providing comprehensive testing solutions through its scalable technology platform, today announced a new partnership with the State of Utah for COVID-19 testing.

Through a competitive bidding process, the Utah Department of Health selected Fulgent Genetics to utilize the companys FDA EUA-approved RT-PCR test for its Test Utah COVID-19 testing initiative. This initiative was developed to increase availability of COVID-19 testing solutions for residents across the state of Utah to help stem the spread of COVID-19. Fulgents RT-PCR test is being administered at a number of fixed sites and mobile units in select counties across the state, with the potential to expand as the program grows. Samples are collected on-site and processed at Fulgents lab in Temple City, California and results are delivered to patients within an average of 24 hours of sample receipt.

We are pleased to be selected as a partner by the Utah Department of Health for their Test Utah initiative, which is making COVID-19 testing more readily available for residents of Utah, commented Brandon Perthuis, Chief Commercial Officer of Fulgent Genetics. The State of Utah joins the growing list of municipalities, healthcare providers and organizations that have selected Fulgents RT-PCR test for their COVID-19 testing needs. Our rapid turnaround time, reliable testing solutions combined with our user-friendly platforms and applications continue to be reasons why Fulgent is selected as a testing partner in these competitive situations.

As we look to stop the spread of COVID-19 and save lives across the state of Utah, we are pleased to be working with Fulgent Genetics as part of our Test Utah initiative to offer our residents a convenient and reliable testing solution for COVID-19, said Utah Governor Gary Herbert. The goal of our Test Utah initiative is to dramatically increase the rate of COVID-19 testing in the state so residents can have better access to testing and help stem the spread of COVID-19, so we can get back to normal as quickly as possible. We are thankful to have Fulgent as a partner to offer reliable and timely COVID-19 testing solutions.

For more information on the State of Utahs Test Utah program, please visit http://www.testutah.com.

About Fulgent Genetics

Fulgent Genetics proprietary technology platform has created a broad, flexible test menu and the ability to continually expand and improve its proprietary genetic reference library while maintaining accessible pricing, high accuracy and competitive turnaround times. Combining next generation sequencing (NGS) with its technology platform, the company performs full-gene sequencing with deletion/duplication analysis in an array of panels that can be tailored to meet specific customer needs. In 2019, the company launched its first patient-initiated product, Picture Genetics, a new line of at-home screening tests that combines the companys advanced NGS solutions with actionable results and genetic counseling options for individuals. Since March 2020, the company has commercially launched several tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), including NGS and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) - based tests. The company has received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the RT-PCR-based tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using upper respiratory specimens (nasal, nasopharyngeal, and oropharyngeal swabs) and for the at-home testing service through Picture Genetics. A cornerstone of the companys business is its ability to provide expansive options and flexibility for all clients unique testing needs through a comprehensive technology offering including cloud computing, pipeline services, record management, web portal services, clinical workflow, sequencing as a service and automated lab services.

About Picture Genetics

Through its Picture Genetics platform launched in 2019, Fulgent Genetics offers consumers direct access to its advanced genetic testing and analytics capabilities from the ease and comfort of home, at an affordable price point. The Picture Genetics platform provides a holistic approach to at-home genetic screening by including oversight from independent physicians as well as genetic counseling options to complement Fulgent Genetics comprehensive genetic testing analysis. The Picture Genetics platform currently offers multiple tests, providing medically actionable, clinical-level results with professional medical follow-up in one easy process. Visit http://www.picturegenetics.com for more information.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements in this press release include statements about, among other things: managements beliefs, judgments and estimates regarding Fulgents testing solutions, including its technology platforms and RT-PCR testing solution; the companys identification and evaluation of opportunities and its ability to capitalize on opportunities to grow its business; and its expected lab capacity and results turnaround times.

Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical facts and relate to future events or circumstances or the companys future performance, and they are based on managements current assumptions, expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect on the companys business. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, which may cause the forward-looking events and circumstances described in this press release to not occur, and actual results to differ materially and adversely from those described in or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others: the ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the preventive public health measures that may continue to impact demand for its tests and the pandemics effects on the global supply chain; the market potential for, and the rate and degree of market adoption of, the companys tests, including its newly-developed tests for COVID-19 and genetic testing generally; the companys ability to capture a sizable share of the developing market for genetic and COVID-19 testing and to compete successfully in these markets, including its ability to continue to develop new tests that are attractive to its various customer markets, its ability to maintain turnaround times and otherwise keep pace with rapidly changing technology; the companys ability to maintain the low internal costs of its business model, particularly as the company makes investments across its business; the companys ability to maintain an acceptable margin on sales of its tests, particularly in light of increasing competitive pressures and other factors that may continue to reduce the companys sale prices for and margins on its tests; risks related to volatility in the companys results, which can fluctuate significantly from period to period; risks associated with the composition of the companys customer base, which can fluctuate from period to period and can be comprised of a small number of customers that account for a significant portion of the companys revenue; the companys ability to grow and diversify its customer base and increase demand from existing and new customers; the companys investments in its infrastructure, including its sales organization and operational capabilities, and the extent to which these investments impact the companys business and performance and enable it to manage any growth it may experience in future periods; the companys level of success in obtaining coverage and adequate reimbursement and collectability levels from third-party payors for its tests; the companys level of success in establishing and obtaining the intended benefits from partnerships, joint ventures or other relationships; the companys compliance with the various evolving and complex laws and regulations applicable to its business and its industry; risks associated with the companys international operations; the companys ability to protect its proprietary technology platform; and general industry, economic, political and market conditions. As a result of these risks and uncertainties, forward-looking statements should not be relied on or viewed as predictions of future events.

The forward-looking statements made in this press release speak only as of the date of this press release, and the company assumes no obligation to update publicly any such forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or to changes in expectations, except as otherwise required by law.

The companys reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 filed with the SEC on March 13, 2020 and the other reports it files from time to time, including subsequently filed quarterly and current reports, are made available on the companys website upon their filing with the SEC. These reports contain more information about the company, its business and the risks affecting its business.

Investor Relations Contact:The Blueshirt GroupNicole Borsje, 415-217-2633; nborsje@blueshirtgroup.com

Media Contact:The Blueshirt GroupJeff Fox, 415-828-8298, jeff@blueshirtgroup.com

See the original post here:
Fulgent Genetics to Provide COVID-19 Testing Solutions for the State of Utah - GlobeNewswire

Craving the Sun? Twin Study Finds It May Be Genetic – MedicalResearch.com

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Dr Mario FalchiHead of Bioinformatics for the School of Life Course SciencesDepartment of Twin Research & Genetic EpidemiologyKings College London

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?

Response: The relationship between sun exposure and health is a double-edged sword, on one side there is the beneficial effect of vitamin D production and on the other the increased risk of skin cancer, depending on length and frequency of exposure, and on the individual skin type.

Despite public health campaigns, changing sun-seeking behaviour seems to be challenging for some people, even for those with a familial or personal history of skin cancer. Previous investigations have suggested that exposure to UV could be addictive.

MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?

Response: We investigated the sun seeking behaviour of 2,500 twins from the TwinsUK cohort, finding that identical twins tend to share a more similar attitude towards sun exposure compared to fraternal twins. Sun seeking seems to be heritable and significantly influenced by genetics. To identify the genes involved, we performed a genome-wide association study of sun seeking behaviour in 260,000 volunteers from the UK Biobank and the US Nurses Health Studies and Health Professionals Follow-up Study, which highlighted five significantly-associated genetic loci. These loci are enriched for genes expressed in the central nervous system, and that have been previously associated with behavioural traits, cognitive function, and addiction. Interestingly, one of these genes has also recently been associated with vitamin D levels

MedicalResearch.com: What should readers take away from your report?

Response: Sun seeking behaviour is influenced by genes involved in neuropsychological traits and addiction. This should be taken into account to improve the efficiency of public health campaigns aimed at reducing sun exposure and incidence of skin cancer.

MedicalResearch.com: What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this work?

Response: Further investigations aimed at understanding the mechanisms of addiction more generally, and the biological pathways involved will help in identifying potential drug targets to tackle and help controlling a number of risky behaviours that have a negative impact on public health.

Citation:

Sanna Marianna, Li Xin, Visconti Alessia, Freidin Maxim B, Sacco Chiara, Ribero Simone, Hysi Pirro, Bataille Veronique, Han Jiali, Falchi Mario.Looking for Sunshine: Genetic Predisposition to Sun-Seeking in 265,000 Individuals of European Ancestry.Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 2020; DOI:10.1016/j.jid.2020.08.014

We respect your privacy and will never share your details.

Last Modified: Sep 14, 2020 @ 11:12 am

The information on MedicalResearch.com is provided for educational purposes only, and is in no way intended to diagnose, cure, or treat any medical or other condition. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health and ask your doctor any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. In addition to all other limitations and disclaimers in this agreement, service provider and its third party providers disclaim any liability or loss in connection with the content provided on this website.

1

Visit link:
Craving the Sun? Twin Study Finds It May Be Genetic - MedicalResearch.com

Viking genetics and robots working together at Alderston Mains – The Scottish Farmer

Owning a Jersey herd that produces 8100 litres at 5.75%BF and 4.01%P (780kg fat plus protein), can prove problematic knowing where to turn to continue improving performance. But for Andrew Hastie and his family at Alderston Mains near Haddington in East Lothian, the answer has come through a marriage of focussed management, high quality genetics and up-to-date milking technology.

Having experienced success through a combination of the Viking Jersey and robotic milking during a gradual switch over the last three years, the Hasties have decided to follow this process to its logical end. This year, they will add their final two Lely Astronaut A5 robots, bringing their total to six (2 x A4 and 4 x A5), and theyll complete the switch to using genetics exclusively from the Viking countries (Sweden, Finland and Denmark).

With a modest acceptance that the herds production is nearer the top than the bottom, Mr Hastie remarks: Were not really far ahead of the average when you go to Denmark.

And therein lies the overriding reason for the familys choice of genetics, which sees the Vikings gradually take over from all other bloodlines.

The farms foundations were laid in the 1950s when grandfather, David Hastie, started the herd with native UK Jerseys. Since that time, Andrew and his parents, Gordon and Vivian, and brother, David, have fine-tuned both the farm and the herd, to reach the exceptional performance of today.

Over that period, the farm has switched from a mixed enterprise to one thats purely focussed on dairy, with all grass and arable crops across its 400 acres now grown exclusively for the 360-head herd. With a target of increasing the herd to 430 head, the plan is to consolidate numbers at this level.

Weve always enjoyed the Jersey and found her to have robustness and some health benefits over the Holstein, says Mr Hastie. We operate a sort of hybrid system where we want high yields but like the cows to go outside for exercise and grazing even with the robots as we feel its good for their health and keeps our feed costs down in summer.

Close attention has always been paid to the type of genetics that will best meet the farms targets, which began in the earliest days of the herd.

My grandfather was an early adopter of artificial insemination; hed use the best bulls he could get from the USA, New Zealand and Denmark and we continued breeding this mixture for a long time, he said.

Around 15 years ago we dropped the New Zealand bulls, largely because their genetics is driven by milk solids weight-based contracts, which are not quite like our own.

The USA we felt was at the other extreme, and our experience was that the taller, leaner and more angular animals didnt live so long.

We feel the Viking breeding programme has the balance just right, with cows which look long-lasting and producing high quality milk. They are particularly suited to our contract with Grahams Family Dairy, where we need to produce at least 5% fat for the Gold Top range.

In some past summers we had been slightly short of butterfat but find the VikingGenetics bulls are helpful in boosting that.

Around 18 months ago the farm also switched to sexed dairy semen which is now used alongside Aberdeen Angus beef.

Also opting to introduce genomic testing for heifers, Mr Hastie says this is giving an early indication of genetic potential across a range of traits.

When you have a cow on the ground you have a good idea of how she should breed, he says. But with a heifer, all you have is the animals pedigree, so a genomic test adds accuracy for many different traits.

There are also traits on the VikingGenetics bar chart which you dont normally have, he adds. This includes hoof health and saved feed index, which are helping us to breed cows with better feet and more efficiency.

We only started genomic testing recently but plan to test all 200 of our heifer calves born each year, he says. This supplies a linear bar chart, just like youd have for a bull, and you can see straight away what you need to improve.

It also ranks the heifers on the Nordic Total Merit [NTM] index, which is not unlike the UKs PLI [Profitable Lifetime Index].

Also using VikMate, the VikingGenetics mating program, Mr Hastie is able to set his own targets and receive a best-choice mating for each animal in the herd.

He says: If I want to focus on a particular trait, I can change that myself when running the program. This could be for hoof health, stature, milk quality or any other trait.

In fact, were already seeing big improvements in feet and legs through corrective breeding and starting to see changes in other areas.

This includes reducing udder depth and strengthening udder support we think theyll remain higher for longer and making other changes to help robotic milking.

This has involved a change of mindset and were now looking to widen rear teat placement as well as lengthen teats something we didnt do in the past.

We have also moved away from selection for production, now keeping our focus on health and functional traits. We have found that the milk is there, even without looking for it, which allows us to focus improvement on other areas.

Also aiming to improve the herds management and efficiency, the next robots to be installed will help in this endeavour.

He says: Our sixth robot will be a grazing robot, which will be used exclusively by our late lactation cows. Theyll be in strawed yards in winter and graze in summer, only receiving concentrates while at grass, when theyre having no total mixed ration.

Im confident well maintain their yields and should manage body condition score better. I think it will save 1-2 per head each day in feed costs for the last 30-40 days of lactation.

Asked how the Viking-bred cattle have impacted profitability, he believes its too early to say with any precision.

In a few years, when nearly all the herd is Danish, Ill be able to tell you but all I can say now is that we are very pleased.

FARM facts

360 milking Jerseys rising to 430 in year-round calving system

Production at 8100 litres at 5.75%BF and 4.01%P (780kg fat plus ptn)

All breeding switched to VikingGenetics for longevity and milk quality

Four A4/A5 Lely robots, increasing to six, including one grazing robot

Sexed semen produces 200 Jersey heifers/year for replacements and sale

Genomic testing introduced for all Jersey heifer calves this year

TMR fed to all milking groups except late lactation, plus concentrates to yield

Follow this link:
Viking genetics and robots working together at Alderston Mains - The Scottish Farmer

Biotechnology timeline: Humans have manipulated genes since the ‘dawn of civilization’ – Genetic Literacy Project

Historically, biotech has been primarily associated with food, addressing such issues as malnutrition and famine.

Today, biotechnology is most often associated with the development of drugs. But drugs are hardly the future of biotech. Weve entered the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and genetics are on a new level. Biotech is paving a way for a future open to imagination, and thats kind of scary.

The next ten years will surely prove exciting as artificial intelligence and biotechnology merge man and machine

Most of the biotech developments before the year 1800 can be termed as discoveries or developments. If we study all these developments, we can conclude that these inventions were based on common observations about nature.

The Second World War became a major impediment in scientific discoveries. After the end of the second world war some, very crucial discoveries were reported, which paved the path for modern biotechnology.

The origins of biotechnology culminate with the birth of genetic engineering.There were two key events that have come to be seen as scientific breakthroughs beginning the era that would unite genetics with biotechnology:One was the 1953 discovery of the structure of DNA, by Watson and Crick, and the other was the 1973 discovery by Cohen and Boyer of a recombinant DNA technique by which a section of DNA was cut from the plasmid of an E. coli bacterium and transferred into the DNA of another. Popularly referred to as genetic engineering, it came to be defined as the basis of new biotechnology.

A version of this article was originally published on Brian Colwells website as A Giant-Sized History of Biotechnology and has been republished here with permission from theauthor.

Brian Colwell is a technology futuristwith an investment thesis focused on disruptions in this next Industrial revolution. His research areas includeagricultural,biotechnology and artificial intelligence. Follow @BrianDColwellon Twitterand at his website.

Excerpt from:
Biotechnology timeline: Humans have manipulated genes since the 'dawn of civilization' - Genetic Literacy Project

Podcast: Where do babies come from? How developmental genetics revealed the secrets of life’s earliest stages – Genetic Literacy Project

The GLP Needs Your Help

It is easier than ever for advocacy groups to spread disinformation on pressing science issues, such as the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. No, vaccines are not harmful. Yes, the use of biotechnology, GMOs or gene editing to develop antigens for treatments including vaccines are part of the solution. To inform the public about whats really going on, we present the facts and challenge those who don't. We cant do this work without your help. Please support us a donation of as little as $10 a month helps support our vital myth-busting efforts.

Originally posted here:
Podcast: Where do babies come from? How developmental genetics revealed the secrets of life's earliest stages - Genetic Literacy Project

Brighton researchers lead study on genetics and asthma – The Argus

A STUDY has shown for the first time that genetics may play a part in how well children respond to treatment for asthma.

Researchers at Brighton and Sussex Medical School (BSMS) say their findings indicate that childrens asthma symptoms could be better controlled with personalised treatments.

Dr Tom Ruffles, honorary consultant in paediatric respiratory medicine, worked with a study team led by Professor Somnath Mukhopadhyay, chairman in paediatrics at the Royal Alexandra Childrens Hospital and BSMS.

Dr Ruffles and Professor Mukhopadhyay presented the results from their trial at the virtual European Respiratory Society International Congress.

According to Dr Ruffles, asthma affects one in 11 children in the UK and a child is admitted to hospital because of their asthma every 18 minutes.

He told the conference: Asthma is a common condition in children that causes coughing, wheezing and difficulty breathing.

We have a number of medicines that are generally effective in treating children with asthma, but they dont work equally well for all children.

We think that genetic differences could have an effect on whether these medicines work and thats what we wanted to examine in this study.

Previous research suggests the majority of children with asthma will benefit from standard treatment with a medicine called salmeterol and their regular steroid inhaler.

However about one in seven children have a small genetic difference which means using this medication could actually result in them having more asthma symptoms.

The BSMS study involved 241 young people aged between 12 and 18 who were all being treated for asthma.

Participants were randomly assigned either to receive treatment according to existing guidelines, or treatment according to particular genetic differences their genotype an approach known as personalised medicine.

Children in the personalised medicine group were treated with an alternative asthma medicine called montelukast.

Researchers followed the children for a year to monitor their quality of life, with a score between one and seven according to how their symptoms were and whether their normal activities were limited by their asthma.

They found that for children with a particular gene who were given personalised treatment, they experienced an improvement in their quality of life score.

Professor Mukhopadhyay said: These results are very promising because they show for the first time, that it could be beneficial to test for certain genetic differences in children with asthma and select medication according to those differences. In this study we saw only a modest effect, but this may be partly because the childrens asthma was generally very well controlled and only a few children experienced any serious symptoms during the 12-month period.

Larger trials, with a focus on those with poorer asthma control, may help us determine the true benefit for children of prescribing in this way.

Read more:
Brighton researchers lead study on genetics and asthma - The Argus

Can we stand together and overcome adversity and genetics? – Laurel Outlook

I would like to refer to the excellent article by Barbara Karst in the Outlook September 3rd edition. I take exception to one statement.

Racism is not an inherent attitude. It has to be taught by someone - parents, grandparents, and others who are racist/ bigoted. This statement brings into play the continuing discussion; does man learn through nurture or nature? Do we only learn from the experiences encountered from the time of conception on, or is there residual knowledge passed on to us via genetics?

I would like to refer you to the works of Dr. E. O. Wilson, major proponent of sociobiology, Robert Ardrey and his four book series, The Nature of Man, and to the work of Dr Raymond Dart after his 1924 discovery of the Australopithecus Africanus. Their assertion is we learn by both nurture AND nature. Dr. Darts bold, blunt and controversial statement is both man and animals retain knowledge through instinct. The strongest instinct being the instinct to survive.

There are many facets to the act of survival. Currently most common is the discussion of the herd instinct, or the social need for community. This need for community is so strong, we use the deprivation of community as a form of punishment. We imprison, or remove from society our criminals. Solitary confinement is not only considered a punishment but has proven to be a form of torture. Religions shun or excommunicate controversial individuals. We instinctually repel or fear that which is new or not understood for it may threaten our survival.

To be succinct, we are all bigots. Strength in numbers, or the herd can provide security. We look alike. We talk alike. We think alike. I will be safe. I will survive and in times of stress, we revert to that which we presume will again protect us.

Ironically, the study of genetics has shown us the necessity for diversity. We have learned the inbreeding of animals and humans can cause numerous physical and mental deficiencies. We can also inbreed our society intellectually. The art of learning is augmented through the nurturing of our young and the continued exploration of creation throughout our lives.

In this time of social and economic uncertainty, will we revert to the herd? Retreat to our embattlements and separate into isolated communities fearful of the unknown? Or do we have the courage and strength of character to stand together in an ever expanding herd and face the unknown? Strength of numbers, nature, expansion of knowledge, nurture, they can work together.

Jim Tikalsky of Laurel

See original here:
Can we stand together and overcome adversity and genetics? - Laurel Outlook