Category Archives: Genetics

Genetics put some older women at higher risk than men for Alzheimer’s – USC News

White women whose genetic makeup puts them at higher risk for Alzheimers disease are more likely than white men to develop the disease during a critical 10-year span in their lives, according to a study headed by Keck School of Medicine of USC researchers.

The findings from one of the worlds largest big-data studies on Alzheimers counter long-held beliefs about who is at greatest risk for the disease and when, suggesting new avenues for clinical trials.

Study results show genetically vulnerable 55- to 85-year-old white men and women have the same odds of developing the memory-erasing disease. One exception: From their mid-60s to mid-70s, these women still face significantly higher risk. That may provide clues to disease causes and potential interventions among these women.

Our discovery is important because it highlights how clinical trials could be weighted toward women a susceptible part of the population to help scientists more rapidly identify effective drug interventions to slow or cure Alzheimers, said Arthur Toga, director of the USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute at the Keck School of Medicine among the nations leaders in innovative scientific discovery.

The study was published Aug. 28 in the Journal of the American Medical Association Neurology. It included data from 57,979 North Americans and Europeans in the Global Alzheimers Association Interactive Network (GAAIN). This big-data project provides scientists around the world with shared data and sophisticated analysis tools to address a disease that makes up about 65 percent of the 47 million cases of dementia worldwide.

The results contradict a seminal 20-year-old study that found women with one copy of ApoE4, a gene variant linked to Alzheimers, were diagnosed with the disease 50 percent more often than men with the same genetic profile.

The findings presented in the USC-led study expand the number of participant data by ninefold and indicate the critical decade falls between 65 and 75, more than 10 years after the start of menopause. Previous studies in animals and humans have reported a relationship between ApoE4, menopause and cognitive decline.

So much work has been dependent on one 1997 finding, but with tools like GAAIN, we now have the ability to reinvestigate with increased statistical power, Toga said.

The new findings are significant because almost two-thirds of the more than 5 million Americans now with Alzheimers disease today are women.

The new findings are significant because almost two-thirds of the more than 5 million Americans now living with Alzheimers disease are women, according to the Alzheimers Association.

Many attribute the imbalance in disease risk to the fact that women, on average, live longer than men. However, a growing body of evidence suggests other reasons also contribute to the difference. For instance, men have higher rates of heart disease and stroke. So, men who live longer may be healthier than women of the same age and may face less risk of developing Alzheimers, according to the USC-led study.

In the future, doctors who want to prevent Alzheimers may intervene at different ages for men and women, said Judy Pa, co-author of the study and an assistant professor of neurology at the USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute.

Menopause and plummeting estrogen levels, which on average begins at 51, may account for the difference, Pa said. However, scientists still dont know what is responsible. Researchers need to study women 10, 15 or even 20 years before their most vulnerable period to see if there are any detectable signals to suggest increased risk for Alzheimers in 15 years.

Only some women are at increased risk of developing Alzheimers in their mid-60s to mid-70s compared to men. To find out, women could have their DNA analyzed. However, Pa cautions that genetic testing for the ApoE4 variant is no crystal ball.

There is controversy in terms of whether people should know their ApoE status because it is just a risk factor, Pa said. It doesnt mean youre going to get Alzheimers disease. Even if you carry two copies of ApoE4, your chances are greatly increased, but you could still live a long life and never have symptoms.

Even if some women discover they are at heightened risk, they can improve their odds by making life changes.

Get more exercise. Work out your mind, especially in old age.

Judy Pa

Get more exercise. Work out your mind, especially in old age, Pa said. Pick up hobbies that are cognitively or physically challenging. Reduce processed sugar intake because its linked to obesity, which is associated with many chronic diseases.

Alzheimers disease is the fifth-leading cause of death for Americans 65 and older, but it may one day outpace the nations top two killers heart disease and cancer. Alzheimers-related deaths increased by nearly 39 percent between 2000 and 2010 while heart disease-related deaths declined 31 percent and cancer deaths fell 32 percent, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Because Alzheimers disease has a huge impact on lifelong health, USC has more than 70 researchers dedicated to the prevention, treatment and potential cure of the memory-erasing disease. Big data projects like this require experts across disciplines computer science, biology, pathophysiology, imaging and genetics to coordinate.

For this study, the researchers examined data from 27 different studies that assessed participants ApoE gene variation, as well as characteristics such as sex, race, ethnicity, diagnosis (normal, mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimers disease) and age at diagnosis.

The records of nearly 58,000 people were scrutinized. Meta-analyses were performed on 31,340 whites who received clinical diagnoses sometime between ages 55 and 85.

The proportion of minorities was so small that analysts could not draw statistically significant conclusions about their disease risk. Because of this, the study focused on whites only.

Most of the archives around the world have insufficient numbers of underrepresented groups, Toga said. One of the take-home messages from our study is people of all races and ethnicities need to be involved in Alzheimers clinical trials because this disease is a problem that affects all of us.

The current findings need to be confirmed in more diverse study populations.

USC is working to build more diverse population studies related to Alzheimers. Established in 1984, the Alzheimer Disease Research Center at the Keck School of Medicine reaches out to communities in the greater Los Angeles area to educate the citys diverse population about Alzheimers and the clinical trials they might be interested in joining. Previous studies, for example, have focused on Latinos.

Historically, women have not been adequately represented in clinical trials, especially in studies on heart disease. Women need to be represented equally to men or even overrepresented, Pa said.

The bottom line is women are not little men, Pa said. A lot more research needs to target women because gender-specific variations can be so subtle that scientists often miss them when they control for gender or use models to rule out gender differences. Most research today is ignoring a big part of the equation.

The study was made possible because of lead author Scott Neu, a leader in the development of a federated approach to analyzing metadata and assistant professor of research at the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging at the Keck School of Medicine.

GAAIN the free resource we created in conjunction with the Alzheimers Association allows anyone to explore data sets around the world and conduct preliminary analyses to test scientific hypotheses, Neu said. Our goal is to connect scientists with those who have collected data to create new collaborations to further research and understanding of Alzheimers disease.

Analysts excluded people with a history of stroke, cerebrovascular disease, abnormal proteins that contribute to Parkinsons disease and dementia, gene mutations leading to higher levels of toxic amyloid brain plaques and any known neurological diseases.

Scientists did not adjust for known Alzheimers risk factors such as education, family history of Alzheimers or dementia because that information was not provided in all data sets. They also were unable to adjust for sex-dependent differences such as cigarette smoking, hormonal changes with age and alcohol usage.

The study was supported by the Alzheimers Association through the Global Alzheimers Association Interactive Network initiative (GAAIN-14-244631) via a $5 million grant and a portion of two National Institutes of Health grants: $12 million from Big Data to Knowledge (U54-EB020406) and $5 million from neuroimaging and genetics (P41-EB015922).

More stories about: Alzheimer's Disease, Research

Go here to read the rest:
Genetics put some older women at higher risk than men for Alzheimer's - USC News

Hospital to boost genetic testing for newborn babies – Belfast Telegraph

Hospital to boost genetic testing for newborn babies

BelfastTelegraph.co.uk

One of the UK's largest women's hospitals is to increase its ability to genetically test newborn babies 12-fold.

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/hospital-to-boost-genetic-testing-for-newborn-babies-36079324.html

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/article36079323.ece/c3338/AUTOCROP/h342/PANews%20BT_P-013b5e7c-4e66-4b0a-b8d6-04b3c11abd37_I1.jpg

One of the UK's largest women's hospitals is to increase its ability to genetically test newborn babies 12-fold.

Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust will be able to screen all infants for inherited conditions or illnesses and plan for early treatment as part of a major new IT project.

It will also contribute to a major population health programme in Liverpool analysing genetic information by location, identifying and enabling work to prevent localised health issues.

IT firm Novosco will introduce the computing system.

Novosco managing director Patrick McAliskey said: "We are delighted to secure this contract which will enable the trust to take genetic testing to the next level and play an important role in the identification and prevention of conditions and illnesses in new-born babies and the wider population."

This role of genetics in healthcare is one of the most rapidly expanding areas of development for Liverpool Women's.

It provides a regional clinical genetics service based at Alder Hey Hospital, covering a population of around 2.8 million people from across Merseyside, Cheshire and the Isle of Man, chief executive Kathryn Thomson posted on the trust's website.

She added: "To discover that you or any child you have or plan to have may be at risk of a genetic disorder which could cause disability or a rare condition is traumatic.

"People are sometimes shocked and anxious and wonder what the future might hold.

"They need as much information and support as possible to help them cope.

"That is why the often unsung work of our clinical genetics team is so important, providing diagnosis and supporting families when they need it most."

Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust specialises in the health of women and their babies - both within the hospital and in the community. It is one of only two such specialist trusts in the UK - and the largest women's hospital of its kind.

Novosco is an IT infrastructure and managed cloud computing company and employs over 150 people. It has its headquarters in Belfast, with offices in Manchester, Dublin, and Cork.

See the original post here:
Hospital to boost genetic testing for newborn babies - Belfast Telegraph

New Genetics: The Gold Seal of Approval – Cannabis Now

Nightmare Cookies | Photos Ron Goldman via Stock Pot Images

While youve probably never encountered strains like Gorilla Grip or Nightmare Cookies, Goldman and a select group of other growers have been diligently laboring over trial gardens scanning them for anomalies and difficulties or possibly the next cannabis superstar like Northern Lights or Jack Herer.

I really like pushing the boundaries to get plants to reach their full genetic potential, he says.

Strain: Frozen Tangerines

A cannabis cultivator with overfour decades of experience, Goldmans initial farming experience began as a grower of greenhouse produce in the 1980s. More recently,his talents have been sought after by a number of marijuana seed breeders looking totest out new creations.

The same way that most manufacturers put their products through rigorous testing, says Goldman, cannabis seeds need to be tested toobefore theyre released to the world.

Because breeders are basically putting their reputations on the line every time they release a newly developed strain, testers like Goldman are absolutely essential to the process. The seed sellers that he consults for want to hear all the pros and cons of their new strains how they handle heat, synthetic versus organic fertilizers or small versus large habitats. They want a full picture of the plants inherent strengths, weaknesses and peculiarities to know whether its back to the drawing board or ready for consumer release.

Strain: Purple Frog

With every trial run, Goldman creates a detailed grow log from the time seeds germinate all the way through harvest. Being an avid photographer and a teacher of photography besides all of his very detailed scientific methodology is accompanied by close photo documentation week after week as the plants mature.

Ill document the structure of the plant and flowers. Looking at things like flower density and calyx to leaf ratio as well as yield and cannabinoid levels.

Some of Goldmans most recent work has been with Sin City Seeds, testing potential new releases such as Nightmare Cookies, a cross of White Nightmare and Platinum Girl Scout Cookies. He says its not only a beautiful plant with rich colors but at 26 percent THC, it packs a potent punch.

Strain: West Seattle

With Washington state now allowing medical and recreational cultivation, says Goldman, I can legally put together my passion for photography with my passion for growing.

The following photos were all taken from Goldmans medical cannabis test gardens and are strains we hope the public will soon have a chance to sample.

Originally published in Issue 18 of Cannabis Now. LEARN MORE

TELL US,does cannabis breeding interest you?

See the article here:
New Genetics: The Gold Seal of Approval - Cannabis Now

In Brief This Week: Qiagen, Clinical Genomics, Streck, Oxford Genetics, Isohelix – GenomeWeb

Qiagen and Clinical Genomics announced a partnership to use the PAXGene Blood ccfDNA Tube for collection and handling of blood samples in Clinical Genomics' Colvera colorectal cancer recurrence assay workflow. The PAXGene Blood ccfDNA system was developed by PreAnalytix, a Qiagen/Becton Dickinson joint venture. Colvera is a PCR-based assay that detects hypermethylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 DNA in the blood of patients.

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Already have an account?.

Go here to see the original:
In Brief This Week: Qiagen, Clinical Genomics, Streck, Oxford Genetics, Isohelix - GenomeWeb

Genetics research gives farmers larger tomatoes – The Albany Herald

ATHENS Ever wonder how that slice of tomato on your summer BLT got to be so perfectly bread-sized?

kAmv6?6E:4:DED 2E E96 &?:G6CD:EJ @7 v6@C8:2 92G6 7@F?5 E96 86?6 G2C:2?ED E92E 4@?EC@= 2 E@>2E@D D:K6] %96J AF3=:D965 E96:C 7:?5:?8D C646?E=J 😕 E96 @A6?2446DD ;@FC?2= !{~$ v6?6E:4D]k^Am

kAm!C@76DD@C tDE96C G2? 56C z?22A H9@ 92D DA6?E >F49 @7 96C 42C66C H@C<:?8 E@ F?56CDE2?5 E96 86?6E:4 D9:7ED E92E 92G6 @44FCC65 36EH66? 2?46DEC2=[ H:=5 E@>2E@ G2C:6E:6D 2?5 >@56C?[ 4F=E:G2E65 E@>2E@6D 92D 96=A65 E@ A:?A@:?E 2?@E96C 86?6 E92E C68F=2E6D E96 D:K6 @7 E96 E@>2E@D :?5:G:5F2= 46==D[ H9:49 😕 EFC? 96=AD E@ C68F=2E6 E96 D:K6 @7 E96 @G6C2== 7CF:E]k^Am

kAm%96 A24E:?8 @E96C :>A@CE2?E BF2=:E:6D DF49 2D 5:D62D6 C6D:DE2?46 2?5 7=2G@C[ D2:5 G2? 56C z?22A[ 2 AC@76DD@C 😕 E96 56A2CE>6?E @7 9@CE:4F=EFC6 2?5 E96 x?DE:EFE6 @7 !=2?E qC665:?8[ v6?6E:4D 2?5 v6?@>:4D 2E &vp]k^Am

kAm(96? 9F>2?D 7:CDE 3682? 4F=E:G2E:?8 E96 H:=5 E@>2E@ 😕 E96 p?562? >@F?E2:? C68:@?D @7 t4F25@C 2?5 }@CE96C? !6CF[ E96J 4@?E:?F2==J D6=64E65 A=2?ED E92E AC@5F465 =2C86C 7CF:ED]k^Am

kAm}@H[ E9@FD2?5D @7 J62CD =2E6C[ E@>2E@6D @? E96 >2C<6E 42? H6:89 `[___ E:>6D >@C6 E92? E96 7CF:ED @7 E96:C 2?46DE@CD] '2? 56C z?22A 2?5 96C C6D62C49 E62> :?G6DE:82E65 2 86?6 E96J ?2>65 r6== $:K6 #68F=2E@C[ @C r$#[ E92E 3@@DED 7CF:E H6:89E 3J :?4C62D:?8 E96 D:K6 @7 E96 :?5:G:5F2= 46==D 😕 E96 7=6D9J A2CE @7 E96 E@>2E@]k^Am

kAmr@>A2C65 E@ H:=5 E@>2E@6D[ 5@>6DE:42E65 G2C:6E:6D 42CCJ 2 >FE2E:@? 😕 E96 r$# 86?6 E92E 27764ED E96 H2J E@>2E@ 46==D 56G6=@A 367@C6 E96J C:A6? 2?5 72== @77 E96 A=2?E] %96 G2C:2E:@? @C:8:?2E65 😕 E96 496CCJ E@>2E@ 3FE ?@H 2AA62CD 😕 2== =2C86 4F=E:G2E65 E@>2E@ G2C:6E:6D]k^Am

kAm%96 ?6H DEF5J 6IA2?5D @? AC6G:@FD C6D62C49 E92E 925 :56?E:7:65 E96 =@42E:@? @7 r$# 2E E96 3@EE@> @7 49C@>@D@>6 `` 2D @?=J 2 D>2== 86?6E:4 4@?EC:3FE@C E@ E@>2E@ H6:89E]k^Am

kAm%96 EC2?D7@C>2E:@? @7 E96 E:?J[ 36CCJ=:<6 7CF:E @7 H:=5 E@>2E@6D :?E@ E96 3667DE622 E@>2E@6D 8C@H? 3J 72C>6CD E@52J :?G@=G65 E96 56G6=@A>6?E @7 2 ?6H >FE2E:@? E@ DFAA@CE E96 492?86 😕 7F?4E:@? @7 E96 r$# 86?6] {2C86 7CF:E C6BF:C65 >2?J >@C6 >FE2E:@?D 😕 @E96C 86?6D E@ 2==@H E96 A=2?E E@ 42CCJ 2?5 DFAA@CE :ED ?6H 3@F?EJ]k^Am

kAm%96C6 H2D D=@H D6=64E:@? 7@C =2C86 7CF:E 3J A6@A=6 3642FD6[ @7 4@FCD6[ :7 E96 E@>2E@ 7CF:E 8C6H E@@ 3:8 7@C E96 A=2?E[ :E H@F=5 4@==2AD6 E96 A=2?E 2?5 E92E H@F=5 36 2 56256?5 A=2?E[ D2:5 G2? 56C z?22A] x7 E96 7CF:E 😀 E@@ =2C86 7@C E96 A=2?E E96? :E 42? @?=J >2<6 E92E @?6 7CF:E 367@C6 :E 4@==2AD6D] p?J 72C>6C H@F=5 D2J[ %92ED ?@ 8@@5[ 2?5 E@DD :E @FE]k^Am

kAmxE E@@< E9@FD2?5D @7 J62CD 7@C 72C>6CD E@ 3C665 E@>2E@ A=2?ED E@ AC@5F46 E96 7CF:E H6 FE2E:@?D E92E =65 E@ A=2?ED E92E 4@F=5 DFAA@CE =2C86C E@>2E@6D]k^Am

kAmu@C 7CF:E H6:89E[ x E9:?< H6 92G6 ;FDE D4C2E4965 E96 DFC7246 E96C6D DE:== 2 =@E E92E H6 5@?E

kAm'2? 56C z?22AD E62>D ;@FC?2= 2CE:4=6 😕 !{~$ v6?6E:4D 😀 2G2:=23=6 2E 9EEAi^^;@FC?2=D]A=@D]@C8^A=@D86?6E:4D^2CE:4=6n:5l`_]`bf`^;@FC?2=]A86?]`__ehb_] ~E96C 4@==23@C2E@CD 2C6 8C25F2E6 DEF56?E ": |Fj A@DE5@4E@C2= D49@=2CD +6;F? wF2?8[ |2?@92C r92@D]k^Am

kAmW%96 DE277 @7 !{~$ v6?6E:4D 4@?EC:3FE65 E@ E9:D C6=62D6]Xk^Am

kAmk6>m|6CC:EE |6=2?4@? 😀 2 ?6HD 65:E@C H:E9 E96 &?:G6CD:EJ @7 v6@C8:2 r@==686 @7 p8C:4F=EFC2= 2?5 t?G:C@?>6?E2= $4:6?46D]k^6>mk^Am

Success! An email has been sent with a link to confirm list signup.

Error! There was an error processing your request.

Get Breaking News alerts from the Albany Herald delivered to your email.

Get the Local News headlines from the Albany Herald delivered daily to your email.

Get the Sports headlines from the Albany Herald delivered daily to your email.

Here is the original post:
Genetics research gives farmers larger tomatoes - The Albany Herald

Genetics for everyone – The Boston Globe

Illustration by cristina span/for the boston globe

The Greeks asked their oracles to predict future fortunes and future losses. The Romans studied the entrails of sacrificed animals for similar reasons. In modern-day medicine, though, soothsayers come in the form of genetic tests.

Ever since the human genome was sequenced almost 15 years ago, tens of thousands of genetic tests have flooded the marketplace. By analyzing someones DNA, often through a blood sample or cheek swab, these tests promise to foretell whether a patient is prone to certain cancers, blessed with the potential to become a star soccer player, or at an elevated risk of having an opioid addiction.

Advertisement

These types of genetic tests are finding an eager audience. The North American genetic testing market, already the largest in the world, was worth $11.9 billion in 2016, by one estimate, and is expected to grow at more than 15 percent a year for the foreseeable future. Companies such as LabCorp, which offer genetic tests via doctor recommendations, and the healthcare giant Roche have moved aggressively into the field. The company 23andMe, a household name because of its ancestry tests, sells health-related tests directly to consumers.

But for a source of medical information to be legally sold in the United States, just how accurate does it need to be?

Like a prediction from a crystal ball, genetic test results are sometimes wrong. Some tests that predict the likelihood a young pregnant woman will have a child with a genetic condition such as Down syndrome may only be correct only 60 percent of the time. Most genetic tests, and many other lab tests, go unvetted by the Food and Drug Administration. That means these tests may not undergo any independent review to make sure they accurately pick up the disease or genetic conditions they claim to be seeking.

Using the worlds first portable DNA lab to sequence beer is a cool thing to do.

The FDA has been wrestling for years with whether and how to do more. During the Obama administration, the agency proposed a new set of draft limits on a whole class of tests, and then put them on hold immediately after Donald Trumps election. This spring, the FDA gave 23andMe permission to market genetic screenings for susceptibility to Alzheimers, Parkinsons, and other conditions. It was the first time the agency blessed direct-to-consumer tests for genetic health risks.

While the debate over genetic testing often follows a pattern familiar from countless other industries business groups want less regulation, and consumer advocates favor more it also raises more cosmic questions: Is a medical test just a piece of information? Or is it something more, if its result leads to dramatic or irreversible action such as chemotherapy or an abortion? And if a data point is factually suspect, or ripe for misinterpretation, when and how should it be offered to consumers?

Advertisement

Especially if regulators stand aside, Americans may soon be swimming in even more tests that vary greatly in their reliability. Yet for some people contemplating a current ailment or their future well-being, getting an answer even an unreliable one may be better than no answer at all.

Especially for people expecting a baby, genetic tests can be hard to resist. I think we all are wanting to know our child doesnt have something... we want them to be healthy, said Mischa Livingstone, a filmmaker and professor who lives in California. Without asking for it, his pregnant wife, Jessica, was given a genetic test that predicted a 99 percent chance their child would have Turner syndrome, a genetic condition that can lead to short stature, heart defects, and other symptoms. But genetic tests for Turner are more often wrong than right a fact the couple didnt know at the time.

They were devastated, and immediately went for more invasive testing, which showed the fetus was fine. But their sense of dread didnt lift until their daughter, now 2 1/2, was born perfectly healthy.

Despite the heartache a faulty genetic test result caused, Livingstone says hed consider asking for one again. I think it feeds into that need for certainty, he said.

Both individuals and society as a whole are intolerant of the unknown, medical sociologists say.

Long before genetic screenings, there was a critical relationship between lab tests and medical treatment. Doctors often wont prescribe drugs or treatment without a positive test result. Insurance payments are rarely processed without diagnostic codes. The rise of genetic testing wont change, and may even amplify, that dynamic.

While some diagnoses may still carry social stigma think schizophrenia, for example they more often may confer legitimacy. Having a gene for alcoholism, for example, can make people view the problem as biological, as opposed to a character flaw. For patients, genetic tests promote a therapeutic optimism a hope that they can be treated and cured for an immediate problem or a future one, according to Michael Bury, professor emeritus at Royal Holloway, University of London, who studies society and illness.

A test alone can feel like a step forward. Undergoing a screening, said Natalie Armstrong, professor of healthcare improvement research at the University of Leicester, can make people feel that at least they are doing something proactive.

Interestingly, one study indicated that certain direct-to-consumer genetic tests dont affect users behavior or anxiety levels, bolstering the argument that people may use the information as data points, not a surefire prediction of their own fate.

Many bioethicists are unpersuaded. On an individual basis, it is tempting to discount the pitfalls of a little extra information, says Beth Peshkin, an oncology professor and genetic counselor at Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center in Washington, D.C. But on a population level the implications of inaccurate results can be costly and, sometimes, deadly.

One of the most cited examples of this harm is from a 2008 genetic test for ovarian cancer that misdiagnosed women, some of whom had their ovaries removed unnecessarily before the test was pulled from the market. Because test makers do not have to report when a test turns out to be wrong in fact many people may never know when a test result is a false positive or negative FDA officials have said it has been almost impossible to assess the overall harm from all unregulated tests.

Cost is another concern that may arise from the overuse of genetic tests that proliferate without meaningful oversight. Tests often beget more tests that cost an ever-escalating amount of money. Enough testing, will invariably pick up something abnormal in a patient, even though it may not harm them, some experts believe.

In some ways its easy for us to try and find something definitive and act on that even though it has nothing to do with what is wrong with the patient, said H. Gilbert Welch, a cancer research at Dartmouth College who has written extensively on the dangers of overtesting. Genetics is an amazing tool... but to what extent does that data predict something that you care about? Is it useful knowledge?

Get This Week in Opinion in your inbox:

Globe Opinion's must-reads, delivered to you every Sunday.

The American Clinical Laboratory Association, the key trade group for genetic test makers, and other advocates of lighter regulation argue that bad tests are rare, and that its more important for the free market to allow innovation. With more tests in place to identify disease, cures come next, they say.

So far, the public has shown little concern about the fallout of genetic testing. While a 2016 poll showed only 6 percent of American adults have undergone genetic testing, 56 percent of them said they would want to if it could predict cancer or a disease like Alzheimers. Most Americans, the poll found, believe genetic tests for predicting disease are mostly accurate and reliable.

Safety advocates best chance to tighten regulation may have already passed. The world of genetic testing becomes more free-wheeling and consumer-driven all the time. By one industry estimate, 10 new genetic testing products enter the market each day. Despite considerable skepticism from medical experts, new apps purport to use data from gene sequencing to develop personalized diet plans and fitness routines.

The FDAs now-shelved rules would have classified genetic and other tests according to how much harm they could cause if their result was wrong. For example, a new genetic test for colon cancer, which requires intrusive and costly treatment, likely would have been subject to full FDA review; the maker of a test that predicts mere baldness might only have had to register it with the agency and report any known problems with it. Under the Trump administration, the agency appears less likely to draw such distinctions or impose new restrictions at all.

People want answers soon, and their inclination is to believe what appears to be solid, unassailable medicine, said Robert Klitzman, a Columbia University bioethicist. Individuals will need to evaluate these tests carefully. The notion of being able to tell your fortune has great lure. But its a little bit of hubris. We still dont know so much.

Genetic testing, still in its infancy, promises a measure of clarity about the future of our bodies. But as genetic science rapidly evolves, that modern-day crystal ball raises vexing new questions and creates its own kind of uncertainty.

View post:
Genetics for everyone - The Boston Globe

Drilling Down Into Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN) – StockNewsJournal

Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN) is an interesting player in the Services space, with a focus on Research Services. The stock has been active on the tape, currently trading at $29.52, up from yesterdays close by 0.92%. Given the stocks recent action, it seemed like a good time to take a closer look at the companys recent data.

Fundamental Analysis

This company has been competing with others in the Services space and offers its own combination of interesting factors Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN) currently trades with a market capitalization of $2.03 Billion. That value represents a market adjusting for revenues that have been growing by 7.56 % on a quarterly year/year basis as of the companys last quarterly report.

The balance sheet health of any company plays a key role in its ability to meet its obligations and maintain the faith of its investment base. For MYGN, the company currently has $102.4 Million of cash on the books. You can get a sense of how sustainable that is by a levered free cash flow of $100.1 Million over the past twelve months. Generally speaking, earnings are expected to grow in coming quarters. Analysts are forecasting earnings of $0.21 on a per share basis this quarter. Perhaps, that suggests something about why 96.67% of the outstanding share supply is held by institutional investors.

Technical Analysis

Sometimes, we can understand most about a stock by simply looking at how it has been trading. Looking at the stocks movement on the chart, Myriad Genetics, Inc. recorded a 52-week high of $29.52. It is now trading 0% off that level. The stock is trading $25.76 its 50-day moving average by -3.76%. The stock carved out a 52-week low down at $15.15.

In recent action, Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN) has made a move of +25.83% over the past month, which has come on weak relative transaction volume. Over the trailing year, the stock is outperforming the S&P 500 by 27.56, and its gotten there by action that has been less volatile on a day-to-day basis than most other stocks on the exchange. In terms of the mechanics underlying that movement, traders will want to note that the stock is trading on a float of 31.15% with $67.78 Million sitting short, betting on future declines. That suggests something of the likelihood of a short squeeze in shares of MYGN.

Read the original post:
Drilling Down Into Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN) - StockNewsJournal

Hendrix Genetics expand layer distribution in the US – Poultry World (subscription)

Eggs

News Aug 25, 2017259views

Hendrix Genetics has officially opened a new $18.5m hatchery in Nebraska, creating 45 jobs, as it aims to expand its share of the market.

The new layer hatchery has a capacity to produce 24m female chicks per year.

Key contract growers located near the new hatchery will rear and house the birds during production. The company is already working with 8 contract growers in the Grand Island area who have invested in new barns with a capacity of 40,000 birds per barn.

The Grand Island contract growers will complete the new national production hub for Hendrix Genetics in the US, enabling the firm to meet another 10% of the total US layer market needs.

Ron Joerissen, Hendrix Genetics production director layers, said: The new hatchery signifies a major step in supplying the US layer market with top quality laying hens. We are dedicated to breed for the egg producing industry of today and tomorrow.

Nebraskas Governor Pete Ricketts described the plant as a great example of value-added agriculture.

It is not only a $20m investment here that will create between 40 to 50 jobs but it is going to allow area farmers to put up these barns for the eggs that will supply this hatchery and a diversified revenue stream for those farmers who are participating, he said.

To comment, login here Or register to be able to comment.

See the rest here:
Hendrix Genetics expand layer distribution in the US - Poultry World (subscription)

Trying to Find a Healthy Diet? Look to Your Genes – NBCNews.com

The latest trend in nutrition isn't a fad diet or newly discovered supplement; it's your DNA.

Unlocking the secrets of one's genetic code used to be confined to the laboratory, but increasingly, the big business of DNA is now going after your eating habits. Thanks to new research in a field of study called nutrigenomics, scientists are learning how variations in our genes determine how well our bodies metabolize certain foods and nutrients.

For example, people with a variation of the CYP1A2 gene metabolize caffeine more slowly, and are at an increased risk of heart attack and hypertension if they drink more than a couple of cups of coffee a day.

Companies like the genetic testing service 23andMe helped pave the way for genotyping the process of determining variations in a person's genes to go mainstream. The California-based company has genotyped more than 2 million customers, though their testing focuses on genetic health risks and ancestry reports.

Now, more and more genetics startups are getting into nutrition: looking at how information in your genes could help people decide the best food to eat to feel good and even lose weight.

Scientists from the University of Toronto launched biotechnology company Nutrigenomix in 2012. The company offers genotyping test kits that look at 45 genetic markers related to genes for issues like weight loss, heart health, and food intolerances. The test is designed to help medical professionals make recommendations for a person's intake of sodium, omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin C, and yes, caffeine.

Ahmed El-Sohemy, a professor of nutritional sciences at the University of Toronto and the founder of Nutrigenomix, points to research that shows the "one-size-fits-all model of nutritional guidance" is not the most effective way for people to eat healthily or lose weight.

"There's research now showing that people who get DNA-based dietary advice are more likely to follow recommendations. So not only are people getting more accurate dietary advice, but they are more likely to follow it," said El-Sohemy.

Nutrigenomix uses a saliva test ordered through healthcare professionals, and is available from more than 5,000 healthcare providers in 35 countries.

Now, there's a new kid on the block: Oakland-based personalized nutrition company Habit.

"We think we're going to disrupt the diet industry," Habit founder and CEO Neil Grimmer told NBC News. "When you think about moving from a one-size-fits-all approach to food to something that's highly personalized, it changes everything. It changes the way you shop. It changes the way you eat. And quite frankly, it even changes the way you think about your own health and well-being."

Habit's home testing kit containing DNA cheek swabs, three finger-prick blood tests, and a special shake. The bloodwork is designed to show how your body metabolizes the huge amounts of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins in the shake. Chiara Sottile

At Habit, it's not just DNA data they're using to make diet recommendations. For $299, Habit sends customers an at-home test kit containing DNA cheek swabs, three finger-prick blood tests, and a "metabolic challenge shake loaded with 950 calories. Users take one blood test prior to drinking the shake, and two more timed blood pricks afterwards. The bloodwork is designed to show how your body metabolizes the huge amounts of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins in the shake.

"You layer in your blood work, your fasting blood work, and you layer in your metabolism, and all of a sudden you have a really clear picture of what's going on inside yourself," said Grimmer.

The Habit test kit also asks you to measure your waist circumference and provide information about your weight and activity level. Users send in the DNA swabs and blood sample testing cards sealed in a pre-paid envelope, and then get their results back a couple weeks later.

Health-conscious San Francisco resident Michelle Hillier was introduced to Habit through a friend. When she received her test results, she was surprised to learn she is a diet type Habit calls a "Range Seeker" meaning she should eat about 50 percent of her daily calories in carbohydrates, about 30 percent from fat, and 20 percent from protein.

"You hear so much about how you need so much protein, and I'm a pretty active person so I had been really upping my protein. And to find out that I'm supposed to have more carbs than anything else was really surprising to me," said Hillier, who is not affiliated with the company.

She also learned that she has genes that are impactful for lactose and caffeine sensitivity, something she had suspected. Like all Habit users get for the $299, after she received her test results, Hillier had a 25-minute phone consultation with a registered dietitian from the Habit team.

Michelle Hillier, pictured, learned she is a "Range Seeker," which means she should eat about 50 percent of her daily calories in carbohydrates, about 30 percent from fat, and 20 percent from protein. Chiara Sottile

The Habit test kit is now available nationally (except in New York, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, because of regulatory restrictions). In the San Francisco Bay Area, Habit users get an added perk: the company will cook you fresh meals in their Oakland kitchen based on your diet recommendations and deliver them to your door weekly.

Hillier receives about three dinners a week costing between $10 and $15 a meal and she can choose her meals with Habit's online dashboard.

For Hillier, the Habit meals have been a positive addition to her already healthy lifestyle, though she admits: "The shake was awful," referring to the metabolic challenge shake. "It was like drinking seven coffees, four avocados, and a scoop of ice cream," said Hillier with a laugh.

Blood pricks and a "Challenge Shake" that lives up to its name could be barriers for some people but, Hillier says, it was well worth it for her.

"I've noticed that my clothes are looser on my body, I feel better. I noticed that I have more energy, honestly, since I started doing the meal plans," said Hillier in an interview, noting she's lost about seven pounds since she started receiving the Habit meal plans in May.

Kristin Kirkpatrick is a registered dietitian at the Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute, where they offer DNA testing kits from Nutrigenomix.

"Many of my patients have mentioned to me that it [nutrigenomics] has truly changed the way that they eat. But I don't think it's the first step. I think seeing a professional and going over what those important goals and barriers are is definitely what you want to do first, said Kirkpatrick in an interview with NBCs Jo Ling Kent.

As some urge potential consumers to do their homework and speak with their own healthcare professional before they take the plunge into their genetics, the market for DNA-based products is racing ahead. Just last month, Helix, a personal genomics company, launched the first online "marketplace."

Customers who have their genome sequenced with Helix get access to a slew of services from other emerging genomics companies ranging from Vinome,which aims to pick wine for you based on your genes, to EverlyWell, which offers food sensitivity and metabolism tests.

"People are very interested to go beyond the generalities that they've seen and get more specific to what's actually impacting their genes," said Kirkpatrick, though she warns this kind of testing "may not be ready for primetime."

The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics agrees, writing in a 2014 opinion paper that, "...the use of nutrigenetic testing to provide dietary advice is not ready for routine dietetics practice." In the same paper, the Academy did also characterize nutritional genomics as insightful into how diet and genes impact our phenotypes.

"I don't think it's going to answer every single question that you may have about your health and it's definitely not going to answer things that are very specific to health ailments that you may have," Kirkpatrick told NBC News.

"Will it put you in the right direction towards knowing what foods you need to increase? What foods perhaps you should have less of and what's the best source of protein or fat related to weight loss? Absolutely," Kirkpatrick continued.

By 2020, the genomics market is expected to generate a staggering $50 billion globally, and diagnostic tools, health tech, and wireless wearables are expected to boom from $2 billion to $150 billion globally, according to one analysis.

"I think this is the start of a highly personalized future," said Habit CEO Neil Grimmer. "What we really hope to do is actually dispel a lot of the myths, get rid of the fad diets and actually get something that's personal to you."

Michelle Hillier says her Habit "nutrition coach," a registered dietitian, also advised her that she should consider factors beyond just her test results.

"She said take the results with a grain of salt, because you have to first see how you feel when you eat this way. It's not meant to be the 'end all be all,' but it is a guide like anything else," said Hillier.

Read the original:
Trying to Find a Healthy Diet? Look to Your Genes - NBCNews.com

How white supremacists respond when their DNA says they’re not … – PBS NewsHour

A white supremacist wears a shirt with the slogan European Brotherhood at a rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S., August 12, 2017. Photo by Joshua Roberts/Reuters

Whether youre a white supremacist, a white nationalist or a member of the alt-right, much of your ideology centers around a simple principle: being white. The creation of a white ethnostate, populated and controlled by pure descendants of white Europeans, ranks high on your priority list.

Yet, when confronted with genetic evidence suggesting someone isnt pure blood, as white supremacists put it, they do not cast the person out of online communities. They bargain.

A new study from UCLA found when genetic ancestry tests like 23andMe spot mixed ancestry among white supremacists, most respond in three ways to discount the results and keep members with impure genealogy in their clan. Their reactions range from challenging the basic math behind the tests to accusing Jewish conspirators of sabotage.

Some argued their family history was all the proof they needed. Or they looked in the mirror and clung to the notion that race and ethnicity are directly visible, which is false.

But the real takeaway centers on a new, nuanced pattern within white supremacist groups to redefine and solidify their ranks through genetic ancestry testing, said Aaron Panofsky, a UCLA sociologist who co-led the study presented Monday at the American Sociological Associations 112th annual meeting in Montreal.

Once they start to see that a lot of members of their community are not going to fit the all-white criteria, they start to say, Well, do we have to think about what percentage [of white European genealogy] could define membership? said Aaron Panofsky, a UCLA sociologist who co-led the study presented Monday at the American Sociological Associations 112th annual meeting in Montreal.

And this co-opting of science raises an important reminder: The best way to counter white supremacists may not be to fight their alternative facts with logical ones, according to people who rehabilitate far-right extremists.

To catalog white supremacists reactions to genetic ancestry results, this study logged onto the website Stormfront. Launched in 1995, Stormfront was an original forum of white supremacy views on the internet. The website resembles a Reddit-style social network, filled with chat forums and users posting under anonymous nicknames. By housing nearly one million archived threads and over twelve million posts by 325,000 or more members, Stormfront serves as a living history of the white nationalist movement.

Over the course of two years, Panofsky and fellow UCLA sociologist Joan Donovan combed through this online community and found 153 posts where users volunteered the results of genetic ancestry tests. They then read through the subsequent discussion threads 2,341 posts wherein the community faced their collective identities.

No surprise, but white supremacists celebrate the test results that suggest full European ancestry. One example:

67% British isles18% Balkan15% Scandinavian100% white! HURRAY!

On the flip side, Panofsky and Donovan found that bad news was rarely met with expulsion from the group.

So sometimes, someone says, Yeah, this makes you not white. Go kill yourself,' Panofsky said. Much more of the responses are what we call repair responses where theyre saying, OK, this is bad news. Lets think about how you should interpret this news to make it to make it right.'

These repair responses fell into two categories.

Reject! One coping mechanism involved the outright rejection of genetic tests validity. Some argued their family history was all the proof they needed. Or they looked in the mirror and clung to the notion that race and ethnicity are directly visible, which is false, University of Chicago population geneticist John Novembre told NewsHour.

Genetically, the idea of white European as a single homogenous group does not hold up.

Though the genetics of whiteness are not completely understood, the gene variants known to influence skin color are more diluted across the globe than any random spot in the human genome. That is to say, humans appear, based on our skin pigmentation, to be much more different from each other than we actually are on a genomic level, Novembre said.

Others accused the ancestry companies of being run and manipulated by Jews, in an attempt to thwart white nationalism, but even other Stormfront users pointed out the inaccuracy of this idea.

Reinterpret:The biggest proportion of responses 1,260 posts tried to rationalize the result by offering an educational or scientific explanation for the genetic ancestry results. Many in the online community played a numbers game. If a genetic ancestry test stated someone was 95 percent white European, they would merely count the remaining 5 percent as a statistical error.

Many adapted this line of thinking to make exceptions for those with mixed ancestry. Nearly 500 posts made appeals by misapplying theories of genetics or by saying whiteness is a culture, not just biology an apparent contradiction to the mission of forming a pure ethnostate. This trend led some white supremacists to debate the boundaries of their ethnostate, Panofsky said.

They start to think about the genetic signs and markers of white nationalism that might be useful for our community, Panofsky said. [They say] maybe there are going to be lots of different white nations, each with slightly different rules for nationalism? Or an overlapping set of nations, that are genetically defined in their own ways?

But these arguments are moot, because these genetic ancestry boundaries are inherently built on shaky ground.

If it seems white supremacists are making arbitrary decisions about their ancestry tests, its hard to blame them. Direct-to-consumer ancestry testing is a slippery, secretive industry, built largely upon arbitrary scientific definitions.

Its black box because its corporate, said Jonathan Marks, biological anthropologist at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. The way these answers are generated depends strongly on the sampling, the laboratory work that you do and the algorithm that you use to analyze the information. All of this stuff is intellectual property. We cant really evaluate it.

White nationalists carry torches on the grounds of the University of Virginia, on the eve of a planned Unite The Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S. August 11, 2017. Picture taken August 11, 2017. Photo by Alejandro Alvarez/News2Share via REUTERS

Genetic ancestry companies assess a persons geographic heritage by analyzing DNA markers in their autosomal DNA (for individual variation), mitochondrial DNA (for maternal history) or their Y chromosome (for paternal history). The latter two sources of DNA remain unchanged from parent to child to grandchild, aside from a relatively small number of mutations that occur naturally during life. These mutations can serve as branch points in the trees of human ancestry, Panofsky and Donovan wrote, and as DNA markers specific to different regions around the world.

When genetic anthropologists examine the full scope of humans, they find that historical patterns in DNA markers make the case that everyone in the world came from a common ancestor who was born in East Africa within the last 100,000 to 200,000 years. Plus, groups intermingled so much over the course of history that genetic diversity is a continuum both within American and Europe, through to Asia and Africa, Novembre of the University of Chicago said.

WATCH: Years after transatlantic slavery, DNA tests give clarity

Genetically, the idea of white European as a single homogenous group does not hold up. The classic geographic boundaries of the Mediterranean, Caucasus, and Urals that have shaped human movement and contact are all permeable barriers, said Novembre. Most of the genetic variants you or I carry, we share with other people all across the globeIf you are in some ethnic group, there are not single genetic variants that you definitely have and everyone outside the group does not.

Commercial ancestry companies know these truths, but bend them to draw arbitrary conclusions about peoples ancestry, researchers say. They compare DNA from a customer to the genomes of people or reference groups whose ancestries they claim to already know.

23andMe, for instance, uses reference dataset that include genomes from 10,418 people who were carefully chosen to reflect populations that existed before transcontinental travel and migration were common (at least 500 years ago). To build these geographic groups, they select individuals who say all four of their grandparents were born in the same country, and then remove outliers whose DNA markers do not match well within the group.

These choices willfully bias the genetic definitions for both geography and time. They claim that a relatively small group of modern people can reveal the past makeup of Europe, Africa and Asia and the ancestral histories for millions of customers. But their reference groups skew toward the present and overpromise on the details of where people came from.

While 23andMe denounces the use of their services to justify hateful ideologies, they do not actively ban known white supremacists from their DNA testing.

A study by 23andMe reported that with their definition of European ancestry, there is an average of 98.6 percent European ancestry among self-reported European-Americans. But given all Ive said, we should digest this with caution, Novembre said. An individual with 100 percent European ancestry tests is simply someone who looks very much like the European reference samples being used.

Though ancestry companies cite research that claims genetic tests can pinpoint someone within 100 miles of their European ancestral home, thats not always the case. Marks offered the recent example of three blond triplets who took an ancestry test for the TV show The Doctors. The test said the triplets were 99 percent European. But one sister had more English and Irish ancestry, while another had more French and German. Did we mention they are identical triplets?

That shows you just how much slop there is in these kinds of of ancestry estimates, Marks said.

Marks described commercial ancestry testing as recreational science because its proprietary nature lacks public, academic oversight, but uses scientific practices to validate stereotypical notions of race and ethnicity.

While 23andMe denounces the use of their services to justify hateful ideologies, they do not actively ban known white supremacists from their DNA testing, BuzzFeed reported.

But white supremacists arent the only ones to buy into these wayward notions when genetic ancestry tests support their self-prescribed identities or reject the science when things dont pan out as expected. African-Americans do it too, as Columbia University sociologist Alondra Nelson found in 2008.

Consumers have what I call genealogical aspiration, Nelson told NewsHour. They often make choices among dozens of companies based on the kind of information theyre seeking. If youre interested in finding whether or not youre a member of the small group that has, for example, some trace of Neanderthal DNA, then youre going to go to a company that focuses on that.

She said Panofsky and Donovans study shows that white nationalists will engage in a process of psychic and symbolic negotiation when genetic ancestry results fail to satisfy their impossible idea for racial purity.

But Panofsky, who doesnt support or sympathize with white nationalists, believes these negotiations are not a reason to dismiss white nationalists as ignorant and stupid.

I think that is actually a dangerous view, Panofsky said. Our study reveals that these white nationalists are often engaging with genetic information in extraordinarily sophisticated ways.

Many white supremacists are dealing with toxic shame, a perpetual subconscious belief system where their sense of identity is negative.

White supremacists are trying to deal with the issue of identity as an intellectual problem, said Tony McAleer, the co-founder and board chair of Life After Hate, a counseling organization that rehabs white supremacists. But he said the rehab of white nationalist views doesnt start with challenging their mental gymnastics with data.

We need to deal with the emotional drivers first, McAleer said. University of Maryland did a study of violent extremists and what they found was the number one correlated factor with someone joining a violent extremist group was childhood trauma.

But McAleer continued that the emotional trauma fueling white supremacy extends past physical and sexual abuse. Many white supremacists are dealing with toxic shame, a perpetual subconscious belief system where their sense of identity is negative.

The person feels at a subconscious level theyre not good enough, McAleer said. One way to react to that is to perpetually spend all of your efforts to prove to the world that you are a winner.

So, Life After Hates antidote to this shame is compassion and empathy, he said. Rather than toss statistics about how Muslims arent flooding the country and do not lead to spikes in crime, they will take a white supremacist to an Islamic center and have them sit down and spend time there.

A personal connection is a much more powerful way to change the dynamics within a person, than it is to re-educate the dataset thats in their head, McAleer said.

Visit link:
How white supremacists respond when their DNA says they're not ... - PBS NewsHour