Category Archives: Genetics

Gene editing breakthroughs that cured genetic diseases in 2019 – The Star Online

IN the summer of 2019, a mother in Nashville, Tennessee in the United States, with a seemingly incurable genetic disorder finally found an end to her suffering by editing her genome.

Victoria Grays recovery from sickle cell disease, which had caused her painful seizures, came in a year of breakthroughs in one of the hottest areas of medical research gene therapy.

I have hoped for a cure since I was about 11, the 34-year-old said.

Since I received the new cells, I have been able to enjoy more time with my family without worrying about pain or an out-of-the-blue emergency.

Over several weeks, Grays blood was drawn so that doctors could get to the cause of her illness stem cells from her bone marrow that were making deformed red blood cells.

The stem cells were sent to a Scottish laboratory, where their DNA was modified using Crispr/Cas9 pronounced Crisper a new tool informally known as a molecular scissors.

The genetically-edited cells were transfused back into Grays veins and bone marrow. A month later, she was producing normal blood cells.

Medics warn that caution is necessary, but theoretically, she has been cured.

This is one patient. This is early results. We need to see how it works out in other patients, said her doctor, Haydar Frangoul, at the Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville.

But these results are really exciting.

In Germany, a 19-year-old woman was treated with a similar method for a different blood disease beta thalassemia.

She had previously needed 16 blood transfusions per year. Nine months later, she is completely free of that burden.

For decades, the DNA of living organisms such as corn and salmon has been modified. But Crispr, invented in 2012, made gene editing more widely accessible.

It is much simpler than preceding technology, cheaper and easy to use in small labs.

The technique has given new impetus to the perennial debate over the wisdom of humanity manipulating life itself.

Its all developing very quickly, said French geneticist Emmanuelle Charpentier, one of Crisprs inventors and the co-founder of Crispr Therapeutics, the biotech company conducting the clinical trials involving Gray and the German patient.

Gene cures

Crispr was the latest breakthrough in a year of great strides in gene therapy, a medical adventure that started three decades ago, when the first TV telethons were raising money for children with muscular dystrophy.

Scientists practising the technique insert a normal gene into cells containing a defective gene.

It does the work the original could not, such as making normal red blood cells in Grays case or making tumour-killing super white blood cells for a cancer patient.

Crispr goes even further: instead of adding a gene, the tool edits the genome itself.

After decades of research and clinical trials on a genetic fix to genetic disorders, 2019 saw a historic milestone: approval to bring to market the first gene therapies for a neuromuscular disease in the US and a blood disease in the European Union.

They join several other gene therapies bringing the total to eight approved in recent years to treat certain cancers and an inherited blindness.

Serge Braun, the scientific director of the French Muscular Dystrophy Association, sees 2019 as a turning point that will lead to a medical revolution.

Twenty-five, 30 years, thats the time it had to take, he said. It took a generation for gene therapy to become a reality. Now, its only going to go faster.

Just outside Washington, at the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), researchers are also celebrating a breakthrough period.

We have hit an inflection point, said US NIHs associate director for science policy Carrie Wolinetz.

These therapies are exorbitantly expensive, however, costing up to US$2 million (RM8.18 million) meaning patients face grueling negotiations with their insurance companies.

They also involve a complex regimen of procedures that are only available in wealthy countries.

Gray spent months in hospital getting blood drawn, undergoing chemotherapy, having edited stem cells reintroduced via transfusion and fighting a general infection.

You cannot do this in a community hospital close to home, said her doctor.

However, the number of approved gene therapies will increase to about 40 by 2022, according to Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) researchers.

They will mostly target cancers and diseases that affect muscles, the eyes and the nervous system.

In this Oct 10, 2018, photo, He speaks during an interview at his laboratory in Shenzhen, China. The scientist was recently sentenced to three years in prison for practicing medicine illegally and fined 3 million yuan (RM1.76 million). AP

Bioterrorism potential

Another problem with Crispr is that its relative simplicity has triggered the imaginations of rogue practitioners who dont necessarily share the medical ethics of Western medicine.

In 2018 in China, scientist He Jiankui triggered an international scandal and his excommunication from the scientific community when he used Crispr to create what he called the first gene-edited humans.

The biophysicist said he had altered the DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) of human embryos that became twin girls Lulu and Nana.

His goal was to create a mutation that would prevent the girls from contracting HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), even though there was no specific reason to put them through the process.

That technology is not safe, said Kiran Musunuru, a genetics professor at the University of Pennsylvania, explaining that the Crispr scissors often cut next to the targeted gene, causing unexpected mutations.

Its very easy to do if you dont care about the consequences, he added.

Despite the ethical pitfalls, restraint seems mainly to have prevailed so far.

The community is keeping a close eye on Russia, where biologist Denis Rebrikov has said he wants to use Crispr to help deaf parents have children without the disability.

There is also the temptation to genetically edit entire animal species, e.g. malaria-causing mosquitoes in Burkina Faso or mice hosting ticks that carry Lyme disease in the US.

The researchers in charge of those projects are advancing carefully however, fully aware of the unpredictability of chain reactions on the ecosystem.

Charpentier doesnt believe in the more dystopian scenarios predicted for gene therapy, including American biohackers injecting themselves with Crispr technology bought online.

Not everyone is a biologist or scientist, she said.

And the possibility of military hijacking to create soldier-killing viruses or bacteria that would ravage enemies crops?

Charpentier thinks that technology generally tends to be used for the better.

Im a bacteriologist -- weve been talking about bioterrorism for years, she said. Nothing has ever happened. AFP Relaxnews

More here:
Gene editing breakthroughs that cured genetic diseases in 2019 - The Star Online

Finding the right mix of genetics balancing and costs – High Plains Journal

In challenging times, beef producers are looking for an edge and genetics, nutrition and production are all part of the equation.

Finding the balance is the key for producers, according to Frank Goedeken, was one of the speakers at the first Cattle U and Trade Show, a High Plains Journal event July 29 to 30, at the United Wireless Arena in Dodge City, Kansas.

Goedeken has been a consulting nutritionist in the High Plains since 1989, including 15 years at Purina Mills and as an owner of Integrated Beef Consultants LLC. Priorities of his practice have been gain, conversion, cost of gain and out weight.

The challenge for producers continues to be to bring these advances together without compromising cattle health, properly growing and developing the cattle are required to reverse the trend of increased death loss and medicine costs.

As he visits with clients one of his goals is to not only look at the facility where the calves are located but also to help them envision the final product so the consumer has an enjoyable eating experience. He noted it all starts with the calves and all phases, from the cow-calf producer, to the backgrounder to the feeder all need to be on the same page.

If you talk to most feedyards and say, Youre going to bring in 100 calves that are being weaned on the truck? Hes not going to be very happy, Goedeken said. Why is that? Health is going to be an issue. So youre trying to improve the health of the cattle with good nutrition and good management.

At the same time producers need to keep tabs on feed costs and commodity prices, he said.

A cow-calf producer also needs to study the genetics of his herd and how the calves perform beyond the boundaries of the ranch, Goedeken said.

From his observations, Goedeken has noticed the comfort level of cattle is not always tied to feed. Good questions producers need to ask include do the cattle have the right pens and configurations? Should the producer do something different?

Sometimes the right environment for the cattle can make a big difference, too.

Have you ever noticed that cattle do not like to lay on bare dirt? You go out in your pasture, wheat stubble or whatever, he said. Very seldom would you see him or her lay on bare dirt. If you put some hay down or some straw out there theyd all be laying down. So thats kind of what we start with. Providing a comfortable environment is important.

Paying attention to nutrition is essential because of the life stages and physiological needs of the animal changes as they grow and mature and wrong decisions can even cause death to a young animal, he said.

Managing stress for the calf is also important, the consulting nutritionist said. A new environment can be a factor others may seem trite but are important, too, such as the water may taste different or the calfs mother is no longer with her calf. Goedeken said sometimes with all the stress, it can be wrongly assumed that all the calves are under stress. Then we run through, shoot, tag them and vaccinate.

He said, on the surface, it sounds like the right approach but it does not mean the situation was managed best for the cattle.

The more we stress the cattle the less likely they are to respond to challenges to their immune system, he said. They are less likely to respond to vaccines and the less likely they are to be healthy their entire life.

He also noted that timing of vaccines can make a difference and working with veterinarians is essential.

Nutritional stress occurs while trying to get those animals quickly up to speed to meet delivery needs but he says energy has to be balanced with health of the animals. In making a point he says distillers grain is an example in which feeders thought was a magic bullet but he says studies show the key remains balance in feeding nutrients.

A healthy animal means he is less likely to be stressed as a more stressed animal means more medication is needed, Goedeken said. Also, immune functions might become compromised and that can lead to unexpected death.

In looking at nutritional matters, he said striving to get to the right level of energy, protein and other nutrients in the diet does pay. Supplementing the diet with zinc can help producers because zinc is tied to muscle development and immune functions.

Stress negatively affects health and performance. As an industry, we need to pay more attention to that. When I grew up in the business I thought, Man, lets get all that stress over with, lets process them and lets get them into their pens? But it may not have been the right time to process those cattle based on what we talked about.

Healthier cattle perform better, he said, and that dynamic has not changed and much more information is available with studies to back it up.

Continue reading here:
Finding the right mix of genetics balancing and costs - High Plains Journal

‘Counting On’: Amy Duggar Just Started A Debate About Genetics On Her Instagram Page and It’s Hilarious – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Well, its official, AmyDuggar doesnt want to be associated with the Duggar family any longer. Fanshave long suspected that cousin Amy has been slowly removing herself from theinner workings of the Duggar clan ever since MaryDuggar, the famed grandmother of 20 children, passed away unexpectedly inJune 2019. Now, Amy wants to make sure people know that her son, DaxtonRyan, isnt a Duggar, and its created quite the debate on Instagram.

Amy recently took to Instagram to share a photo of her youngson. The themed photo was all about ringing in the New Year, but followersseemed to want to discuss genetics and the Duggar name. One commentercomplimented Amy, claiming her son was beautiful because he was a Duggar. Apparently,Amy couldnt let that one go and reminded the commenter that while sheappreciated the sentiment her son, Daxton, was a King.

Amy married DillonKing in September 2015. Amy promptly changed her name to her husbands lastname. Their first child, Daxton Ryan, was born on Oct. 9, according to People.Since his birth, Amy has been postingalmost nonstop snapshots of the chubby baby, and while fans are absolutelyloving her pictures, they all seem to insist hes a Duggar. Amy wants everyoneto know he is not. Her most recent reminder kicked off a debate about geneticsand lineage.

The second Amy suggested her son was not a Duggar, thefamilys most prominent supporters came crawling out to comment. While manyinsist that he is a Duggar because Amy is a Duggar, their understanding of geneticsseems a little elementary. Yes, technically, Daxton is 25% Duggar because hismother, Amy, is 50% Duggar. Remember, Amy has a father, too. Daxton also shareshalf of his genetics with his father, Dillion. That means this child is not justa Duggar and not only a King.

While fans might be correct that he has Duggar blood, he carrieshis fathers surname, which appears to be what Amy was really trying to pointout. While several fans took it as a sign of disrespect, when you think about it,Duggar fans are actually the ones being disrespectful. Since Amy and Dillon havechosen to give their child the King name, fans should probably respect him aspart of that family.

Amy might be related to the Duggar clan through her mother,Deanna Duggar, but that doesnt mean she wants to be associated with their values.It has been clear, for years, that Amy was raised markedly different from her19 cousins. She was allowed to date, didnt need a chaperone, and while still aChristian, isnt a part of the ultra-conservative Christian ministry the Duggarfamily belongs to. She also was not homeschooled.

While Amy remains friendly with some of her cousins, shedoesnt seem to be particularly interested in being a part of the largerfamily. Back in November 2019, Amyinsisted she knew nothing about the rumored raids on the Duggar property,stating that she had no idea why people would think her aunt and uncle would tellher anything. Fans took the statement to mean that Amy isnt particularly closeto the supersized family.

Likely, shes not, to be honest. Her values dont jive withthe Duggars, and her husband recently investedin a whiskey lounge, a business that is undoubtedly not Duggar approved.Amy is also a business owner herself, meaning she works outside the home,another decision that is verboten in the Duggars social circle. Likely, Amyhas quietly been distancing herself from the large family for years, but a bombshellreason for the rift probably doesnt exist.

Go here to read the rest:
'Counting On': Amy Duggar Just Started A Debate About Genetics On Her Instagram Page and It's Hilarious - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

The supercells’ that cured an infants genetic illness – Jamaica Observer

'); } else { $(".fotorama-caption").addClass("remove_caption"); } }) .fotorama();

MCLEAN, United States (AFP) When a person's immune system is impaired by a genetic disease a bone marrow transplant can be a powerful therapeutic tool, but with a major downside during the first few months the recipient's defences against viruses are severely weakened. The slightest infection can lead to a hospital trip.

A still-experimental type of treatment known as T-cell therapy aims to assist during this vulnerable period the months during which the body is rebuilding its natural defences. After two decades of clinical trials, the technology has been refined and is being used to treat more and more patients, many of them children.

A boy named Johan is one of them.

Today he is a mischievous, smiling toddler, with a thick shock of light-brown hair, who never tires, playfully tormenting the family's puppy, Henry.

There is no sign of the three-year-long medical and emotional roller coaster ride he and his family, who live in an affluent Washington suburb, have been on.

The first traumatic surprise came with the results of a pregnancy test Johan was not planned.

That was a huge shock. I cried, said his mother, 39-year-old Maren Chamorro.

Risky procedure

She had known since childhood that she carried a gene that can be fatal in a child's first 10 years, chronic granulomatous disease (CGD).

Her brother died of it at the age of seven. The inexorable laws of genetics meant that Maren had a one in four chance of transmitting it to her child.

For their first children, she and her husband Ricardo had chosen invitro fertilisation, allowing the embryos to be genetically tested before implantation.

Their twins Thomas and Joanna were born both disease-free seven and a half years ago.

But in Johan's case, a post-birth genetic test quickly confirmed the worst: He had CGD.

After conferring with experts at Children's National Hospital in Washington, the couple took one of the most important decisions of their lives, Johan would receive a bone marrow transplant a risky procedure but one that would give him a chance of a cure.

Obviously, the fact that Maren had lost a sibling at a young age from the disease played a big role, Ricardo confided.

Bone marrow, the spongy tissue inside bones, serves as the body's factory for the production of blood cells both red and white.

His brother's immune system

Johan's white blood cells were incapable of fighting off bacteria and fungal infections. A simple bacterial infection, of negligible concern in a healthy child, could spread out of control in his young body.

Luckily, Johan's brother Thomas, six years old at the time, was a perfect match. In April 2018, doctors first cleansed Johan's marrow using chemotherapy. They then took a small amount of marrow from Thomas's hip bones using a long, thin needle.

From that sample they extracted supercells, as Thomas calls them stem cells, which they reinjected into Johan's veins. Those cells would eventually settle in his bone marrow and begin producing normal white blood cells.

The second step was preventive cell therapy, under an experimental programme led by immunologist Michael Keller at Children's National Hospital.

The part of the immune system that protects against bacteria can be rebuilt in only a matter of weeks; but for viruses, the natural process takes at least three months.

Hurdles remain

From Thomas's blood, doctors extracted specialised white blood cells T-cells that had already encountered six viruses.

Keller grew them for 10 days in an incubator, creating an army of hundreds of millions of those specialised T-cells. The result: A fluffy white substance contained in a small glass vial.

Those T-cells were then injected into Johan's veins, immediately conferring protection against the six viruses.

He has his brother's immune system, said Keller, an assistant professor at Children's National.

Johan's mother confirmed as much: Today, when Thomas and Johan catch a cold they have the same symptoms, and for nearly the same amount of time.

I think it's pretty cool to have immunity from your big brother, Maren Chamorro said.

This therapeutic approach boosting the body's immune system using cells from a donor or one's own genetically modified cells is known as immunotherapy.

Its main use so far has been against cancer, but Keller hopes it will soon become available against viruses for patients, like Johan, who suffer from depressed immune systems.

The chief obstacles to that happening are the complexity of the process and the costs, which can run to many thousands of dollars. These factors currently restrict the procedure to some 30 medical centres in the United States.

For Johan, a year and a half after his bone marrow transplant, everything points to a complete success.

It's neat to see him processing things, and especially play outside in the mud, his mother said.

You know, what a gift!

Her only concern now is the same as any mother would have that when her son does fall ill, others in the family might catch the same bug.

Now you can read the Jamaica Observer ePaper anytime, anywhere. The Jamaica Observer ePaper is available to you at home or at work, and is the same edition as the printed copy available at http://bit.ly/epaperlive

Read the rest here:
The supercells' that cured an infants genetic illness - Jamaica Observer

The Face of Science – Clemson World magazine

That next day, Drake preferred sleeping over eating. But then, thats common with newborns. Tarah and Eric would wake him for feeding, careful to make sure he got plenty of nourishment.

By Saturday, these experienced parents became uneasy. Drake was just too lethargic. It was harder to wake him for feedings. The OSullivans called Drakes doctor and were assured there was nothing to be concerned about; Drake had been healthy when he left the hospital two days ago. And, the doctors office assured them, they would be checking him again on Monday at a scheduled office visit.

But the OSullivans disquiet grew by the hour. By Sunday evening, Drake would not open his eyes or respond to them. He was growing limp and struggling to breathe. The OSullivans rushed Drake to the hospital where the staff flew into emergency mode. Too sick for care at the local hospital, Drake was stabilized for transport to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at Greenville Memorial Hospital. Just 72 hours after birth, Drake lapsed into a coma. And no one knew why.

That unforgettable night was the beginning of a long journey of test after test and a diagnosis by elimination.

Drake continued to decline as each negative test pushed aside another horrible possibility. You would think that eliminating terrible diseases would be a good thing, says Eric. But that just meant we were looking at something very rare.

Finally, blood tests revealed an ever-elevating level of glycine in Drakes blood, a symptom of an extremely rare, genetic metabolic disease called nonketotic hyperglycinemia or NKH.

The words nonketotic hyperglycinemia meant nothing to Tarah and Eric. But the next words were clear: Drake had a less than 10 percent chance of survival.

The diagnosis was like a starters pistol for the OSullivans. From that moment, everything would be a race against time to save Drake.

After 28 days of tests, monitors, tubes and wires, Drake was released to go home. There, as Tarah explains, Our house became a sort of lab. There were blood tests, feedings, medications and monitoring day and night, 24/7. Glycine became the OSullivans obsession as they tried desperately through medication and diet to moderate Drakes levels. They began to search for information, research, treatment, medical advice anything to save his life.

The OSullivans contacted anyone who might know about NKH, have a related research project or could tell them more. They learned that NKH affects fewer than 500 people worldwide and has no cure. There was no research underway, and no funding for research. And because there is no medically recognized cure for NKH, all treatments are considered experimental and not covered by medical insurance. Period.

So Tarah became a lay scientist. She read everything, called and emailed medical researchers and established the Drake Rayden Foundation to raise awareness for NKH, fight for better treatment and support research. She entered a world of genetics and vectors, glycine and metabolic pathways. Tarah had quit college just shy of completing her business degree. Now she desperately needed the scientific expertise that would help her understand the disease and find the cure.

Tarah decided to return to college.

Go here to see the original:
The Face of Science - Clemson World magazine

A Note On Genetics Generation Advancement Corp.s (GTSM:4160) ROE and Debt To Equity – Simply Wall St

While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. Well use ROE to examine Genetics Generation Advancement Corp. (GTSM:4160), by way of a worked example.

Our data shows Genetics Generation Advancement has a return on equity of 5.7% for the last year. One way to conceptualize this, is that for each NT$1 of shareholders equity it has, the company made NT$0.06 in profit.

Check out our latest analysis for Genetics Generation Advancement

The formula for return on equity is:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) Shareholders Equity

Or for Genetics Generation Advancement:

5.7% = NT$20m NT$352m (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2019.)

Its easy to understand the net profit part of that equation, but shareholders equity requires further explanation. It is all earnings retained by the company, plus any capital paid in by shareholders. You can calculate shareholders equity by subtracting the companys total liabilities from its total assets.

ROE looks at the amount a company earns relative to the money it has kept within the business. The return is the profit over the last twelve months. That means that the higher the ROE, the more profitable the company is. So, all else being equal, a high ROE is better than a low one. Clearly, then, one can use ROE to compare different companies.

One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. The image below shows that Genetics Generation Advancement has an ROE that is roughly in line with the Biotechs industry average (5.7%).

That isnt amazing, but it is respectable. ROE doesnt tell us if the share price is low, but it can inform us to the nature of the business. For those looking for a bargain, other factors may be more important. If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: insiders have been buying them).

Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.

Shareholders will be pleased to learn that Genetics Generation Advancement has not one iota of net debt! So although its ROE isnt that impressive, we shouldnt judge it harshly on that metric, because it didnt use debt. After all, with cash on the balance sheet, a company has a lot more optionality in good times and bad.

Return on equity is one way we can compare the business quality of different companies. In my book the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, Id generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. Check the past profit growth by Genetics Generation Advancement by looking at this visualization of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

Of course Genetics Generation Advancement may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have high ROE and low debt.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

Read more:
A Note On Genetics Generation Advancement Corp.s (GTSM:4160) ROE and Debt To Equity - Simply Wall St

Our 10 most read stories of 2019: genetics, TV, ‘Barbie Death Camp’ and more – The Jewish News of Northern California

It was quite a year for the Jews of the Bay Area. From TV shows to Barbie Death Camp to white supremacists to racial diversity in the Jewish community, here are the 10 stories our online readers clicked on the most in 2019.

It was a big year for Israeli TV in America. One show in particular, Shtisel, became an unlikely crossover hit among American viewers when the 2013-2016 series about the travails of a haredi family in Jerusalem hit Netflix late last year. As our TV reviewer Esther D. Kustanowitz wrote in January, there are some universal themes about family, community and change that kept mainstream audiences fascinated by the show:

In September, we brought you perhaps the strangest piece of news we covered this year: the curious case of Burning Mans Barbie Death Camp display. Heres how reporter Gabe Stutman described it: A sea of nude Barbies is seen moving toward three full-size kitchen ovens. Some are crucified on bright pink crosses. Other photos show toy soldiers with semi-automatic rifles marching the Barbies from the rear. A banner strapped to an RV proclaims the Barbie Death Camp the friendliest concentration camp at Burning Man. Another reads arbeit macht plastik frei, a reference to the message over the Auschwitz gate meaning work makes you free.

Some might say its the least Jewish story we wrote this year, but I beg to differ. My visit to the recently remodeled Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Temple in Oakland was a personal highlight of the year. It was the first time it had been open to the public in over 50 years, and the visit did not disappoint. As I wrote at the time: I was there out of my love of religious architecture and because Id heard that [Mormon temples] include architectural references to the Mishkan (the portable sanctuary used by the Israelites as they wandered in the desert), as well as the ancient Temples that stood on Jerusalems Temple Mount.

No one article about him truly topped the list, but weve been covering the story since the 24-year-old Concord man was arrested in June and accused of plotting online to shoot Jews. Police found a weapons cache and Nazi literature in his home. He has been in and out of court and jail since then. Last month, a federal charge was added: In 2017, he falsified an application to join the Army by lying about his mental health history, according to the FBI. His bail has been revoked and he remains in custody as his case progresses.

This profile of iconoclastic billionaire Craig Newmark, founder of Craigslist, was the first in-depth interview he has given about his Jewish upbringing and values. More and more Im conscious of the notion of treating people like I want to be treated, and more and more Im conscious of the notion that I got lucky financially and I should share that in ways that mean something, he told our late colleague Rob Gloster in April.

The 2018 Portrait of Bay Area Jewish Life and Communities revealed that one-quarter of local Jewish households include at least one person of color. In our Jan. 25 editorial, we wrote: Its time we acknowledge not only the tendency to make Jews the other in broader society, but the equally pernicious tendency to other Jews of color right here within our own community. Our cover story is replete with stories from Jews of color being stared at or questioned when they show up in synagogue, and being passed over for leadership positions. But we also highlighted ways in which the situation is changing for the better.

Remember this years middling Netflix film The Red Sea Diving Resort, based on the secret Israeli plan to extract Ethiopian Jews through Sudan in the early 80s? Yeah, theres no reason you should. Much more interesting is the real-life story of one of the Israeli naval commandos who took part in the operation. Nir Merry lives in Mountain View today, and as he told editorial assistant Gabriel Greschler, during the operation he spent nights picking up Ethiopian Jews who had hiked for days, sometimes weeks, to reach the rendezvous point. He recalled avoiding armed Sudanese patrols on the coastline and ferrying the refugees to a disguised Israeli Navy ship in the Red Sea. We were tired but really excited, Merry said. I remember picking [up] an [Ethiopian] lady and you could hear little squeaks. And I realized it was a baby tucked in her dress close to her body.

Just last week, Adam Eilath, head of school at Ronald C. Wornick Jewish Day School in Foster City, registered his dismay at the Hanukkah-themed episode of the Disney series Elena of Avalor. In his opinion piece he wrote, As a Sephardic Jew raising two small daughters in an American Jewish community whose default is almost always Ashkenazi. I was excited that the episode would feature Princess Rebekah from a Latino (Ladino) Jewish kingdom. But, he continued, As usual, the only way that Sephardic culture gets represented in this episode is by incorporating Sephardic food.

This story was part of a three-part series on the rise of home genetic testing and the ease of doing genealogical research from the comfort of your home computer. One woman we spoke with grew up Catholic, but found out that she was 50% Asheknazi Jewish from a 23andMe home genetic test. But, as reporter Maya Mirsky asks, what does that really mean? The question itself is a new wrinkle in the age-old debate of just what it means to be Jewish, which has been given a kick in the pants from the commercialization of a field of science that says it can tell you something new: For a price, you can now choose from one of seven commercial genetic tests to find out just how Jewish you are.

In October we reported on a Nazi flag seen hanging inside a state parole office in Sacramento. How did it get there? And why was it hanging in a government building? The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation told us in an email that they have a zero tolerance policy for the display of objects that are derogatory in nature, but they pointed out that their officers deal with gang members and high-risk sex offenders, [so] we will come into contact with items that may be considered objectionable. However, the email continued, We take this issue seriously and have removed the item and are looking into the circumstances for why the flag was displayed in potential view of the public. No word yet on what they found out.

Read this article:
Our 10 most read stories of 2019: genetics, TV, 'Barbie Death Camp' and more - The Jewish News of Northern California

Mutants among us: "Natural short sleepers" reveal the genetics of sleep – Inverse

Humans spend about one-third of our lives asleep, but scientists still dont fully understand how sleep works and why some people have different sleep habits than others. Natural short sleepers are a perfect example: The average person requires seven hours a night, but these folks only need about four to six hours of snooze time.

In August 2019, scientists discovered that these natural short sleepers have something unusual a mutation in the gene ADRB1. The finding suggests genetics may at least in part underlie natural short sleepers tendencies. Understanding why they need different doses of daily rest than the average Joe could help scientists finally pinpoint just how much sleep humans really need to be well-rested.

This is #2 on Inverses 25 most WTF science stories of 2019

Lead study author Ying-Hu Fu, a neurology professor at UC San Francisco, told Inverse at the time she hoped the finding would not only bring relief to those who suffer from sleep problems, but increase sleep efficiency for everyone to ensure healthy aging.

Fu and her team analyzed a family of short sleepers genes and found that they all carried mutations in ADRB1. The gene is involved in neurons in a brain region called the dorsal pons which play a role in regulating sleep-wake behavior.

From there, they compared the mutated ADRB1 genes protein to that of a non-mutated version, and found that the mutant version of the protein was less stable. This suggests that the mutation doesnt interact with the neurons as expected that may explain why carriers of the genetic variant have an atypical sleep-wake cycle.

To confirm their results, the researchers bred mice with the mutated ADRB1 gene and compared them to controls. The mutant mice woke up 55 minutes earlier than the control mice on average. They also saw that the gene was expressed at high levels in the mutant mices brains dorsal pons region.

Untangling the genetics underlying sleep could one day help people get better at sleeping, said Fu. Her team has also found that natural short sleepers may carry a different mutation in the DEC2 gene, which helps regulate circadian rhythms. And there are likely more discoveries to come as scientists get to grips with the biology of this universal human activity.

As 2019 draws to a close, Inverse is counting down the 25 science stories from this year that made us say WTF. Some are incredible, some are icky, and some are just plain strange. This has been #2. Read the original article here.

Read the original post:
Mutants among us: "Natural short sleepers" reveal the genetics of sleep - Inverse

What to Know Before You Buy an At-Home Genetic Cancer Risk Test – Everyday Health

What Can Genes Tell Me About My Cancer Risk?

Before pursuing any kind of genetic testing, it is important to understand that the majority of cancers are not the direct result of genes passed down from your parents. Inherited gene changes sometimes called mutations or variants contribute to somewhere between 5 and 10 percent of all cancers. For that reason, genetic testing and counseling is typically recommended only for people who have had certain types of inherited cancer or who have histories of cancer within their family.

Genetic testing allows healthcare providers to look for inherited gene mutations associated with increased cancer risk, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene changes that have a clear tie to breast and ovarian cancer. For example, women in the general population have roughly a 12 percent chance of developing breast cancer in their lifetime; for women with BRCA mutations, it is closer to 70 percent, according to the NCI. Understanding that risk can help a woman and her healthcare providers plan prevention strategies.

RELATED: My Genetic Test Came Back BRCA Positive. Now What?

Medical-grade genetic cancer testing is typically ordered by your doctor or a specialist, such as a genetic counselor. The tests are noninvasive and typically use a blood or saliva sample.

"Medical-grade testing is developed and approved to answer medical questions [such as]: 'Do I carry a mutation in one of these hereditary cancer genes?'" says Ellen Matloff, the president and CEO of My Gene Counsel, a company that helps clients better understand their genetic testing results, and the former director of the cancer genetic counseling program at Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut. "At-home testing kits are for entertainment and are not developed, or approved, to answer medical questions."

There are several reasons for that. Medical-grade testing is far more thorough, Matloff says. For example, medical-grade testing for BRCA gene mutations analyzes thousands of gene variant options, whereas one leading at-home kit considers just three.

There are also differences in accuracy. A study published in March 2018 in the journal Genetics in Medicine found that 40 percent of gene variants reported in direct-to-consumer tests were false positives and that some of the variants companies told users meant they were at increased risk for certain health conditions are actually considered common gene variants by clinical labs.

An unpublishedstudy presented in October 2019 by Invitae, a medical-grade genetic testing company, found that an individual's ethnicity may have a significant impact on whether their at-home test results are accurate. MUTYH gene mutations, for example, would have been missed in 100 percent of Asian and 75 percent of African American test takers, but only 33 percent of Caucasian individuals.

"Medical-grade testing uses laboratory techniques and validation methods not used by most at-home testing kits," Matloff explains. "So those results are generally more accurate."

Health insurance plans will often cover genetic testing which can cost thousands of dollars but not always, according to the U.S. National Library of Medicine and Breastcancer.org. Direct-to-consumer genetic cancer risk tests tend to be less expensive, so they can be a good starting point for people who are worried about their family history and who do not want to spend too much.

"There are some at-home genetic cancer testing kits that are good, reasonably priced, and convenient for people who do not meet insurance criteria for coverage of traditional medical-grade testing and prefer to pay out of pocket and have the test delivered to their house," Matloff says.

But it is important to remember that everyone from the American Cancer Society to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) caution that the tests may provide incomplete or inaccurate information, and urge individuals to talk to their doctors before making any health-related decisions on the basis of those tests.

Read the rest here:
What to Know Before You Buy an At-Home Genetic Cancer Risk Test - Everyday Health

Resolving for a healthy 2020? Talking to your family is a great way to start – Mountain Grove News Journal

(BPT) - An estimated 130 million Americans make resolutions for 2020 with more than half of them focused on health. However, most resolutions are broken by February.

Marjan Champine, a board-certified and licensed genetic counselor at Ancestry, the global leader in family history and consumer genomics, shares tips for thinking about your health in 2020:

1. Small choices matter for a healthier you in the New Year.

Day in and day out, the small choices we make can end up making a big difference in how we feel and our overall health. The journey to better health can be as simple as to:

2. Talking to your family can unlock valuable insights into your health.

Understanding your familys health history and screening for common genetic conditions can provide information about some potential health risks. Armed with this information, there are powerful choices and actions you can take to improve your health, and your familys health, now and in the future.

You dont need to be alone in trying to make sense out of all of this. Genetic counselors can help you connect the dots of your family health history and the results of genetic health screening tests. Services like those offered by Ancestry, which recently launched AncestryHealth, can also empower you with genetic insights to put you on the path to a better, healthier you. When you and your health care provider know more about your risks for certain conditions, thats the start on the path toward better health.

3. Your genes dont need to be your destiny.

While genetics plays an important role in our health, the daily choices we make about our activity, sleep, nutrition and how we handle stress can also play a role in our quest for better health.

Because families share genetics as well as other health-related risk factors such as diet, lifestyle and environment family history is again important in this regard. Most people understand the health benefits of a good diet and exercise. But whats often overlooked is the importance of knowing your familys health history. By sharing your family health history in addition to any genetic health test results with your health care provider, you can work together to create a personalized plan of action to treat, manage and, in some cases, even prevent certain diseases.

4. Specific, achievable, actionable and enjoyable.

I am always looking for fun ways to improve my health. As part of that goal, my resolution this year is to spend more quality time with my family, share stories about our history and keep a record of our health history all in one place using AncestryHealths family health history tool.

If you havent made a New Years health resolution yet, think of a goal thats specific, actionable and achievable. Also think of goals that can be achieved in ways you enjoy.

5. The time is now.

Now is the perfect time to jump in and begin tackling your 2020 New Years health resolutions. Your family health history and genetic screening results could unlock important information that will allow you to manage your health.

The more you know about your genetic risk factors, including your family health history, the more you can take proactive steps, in collaboration with your health care provider. Taking this information and sharing it with your health care provider is important so that, together, you can create a personalized plan of action for a healthier 2020.

Marjan Champine is a board-certified and licensed genetic counselor at Ancestry with a passion for family, health and helping others.

See original here:
Resolving for a healthy 2020? Talking to your family is a great way to start - Mountain Grove News Journal