Category Archives: Embryology

Egg donors in the UK: What it’s actually like donating your eggs – Cosmopolitan UK

Over the past few months something strange has happened to my social media feeds. Rather than the relentless flow of ads for Shein, the all-mighty algorithm has decided that what I really need to see is endless posts telling me that I can be compensated 750 for donating my eggs.

Most of the adverts feature a happy couple (sometimes straight, sometimes gay) cooing over a baby. The captions are along the lines of Do an amazing thing and help others to start their family by donating your eggs! You will receive 750. Another ad features a grid of photos of a diverse range of women asking: Could this be you? as if theyre trying to recruit me to their gang of giving girls.

Typically, I scarcely pay attention to whats being pushed at me as I scroll, but this sudden overload of ads calling upon me to become an egg donor did have an impact. I stopped and questioned whether, actually, this indeed could be me.

And it turns out, thousands of women have wondered the same and decided that yes, it was the right choice for them. The UKs fertility regulator The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), is still collecting data for the past two years but in 2019, 4,433 IVF cycles were completed using donor eggs, with the figure doubling since 2009. The demand for eggs is high and social media posts are a quick and cheap way to reach potential donors, particularly from under-represented communities.

In one respect, the ads are spot on. Donating your eggs is an amazing thing to do and evidently helps thousands of people start a family. But, as with all ads, I was sure that the reality of donating was a little more complicated than a beautiful baby for a deserving couple, plus a 750 cheque for me. I wondered about the medical practicalities of donation, the long-term consequences, and costs. Most of all I wondered: have any donors came to regret this huge and irreversible decision? Is the 750 - which is by no means a huge sum - anywhere near worth it, or was it never about the money in the first place?

Three years ago, Izzie, 29 who works in admin, was also stopped in her tracks when she heard a friend of a friend discuss her experience of donating. Shed had a really positive experience and were very similar so I thought, maybe I could do this?

After reading blogs written by donors online, she quickly discovered that, as a mixed-race woman, her eggs would be in particular demand, due to a shortage of non-white donors. It was rare to see anyone who looked like me in the promotional material and I liked the idea of being able to help a family have a baby that looks like them, she explains to me over the phone.

Izzie says she had such a positive experience at her clinic (the Bristol Centre for Reproductive Medicine) that she donated again two years later. She especially appreciated the clear communication on offer and having to undergo what she called a fertility MOT.

This MOT is thorough and time consuming. After completing an online application form to see if they meet the eligibility criteria, donors forgo rigorous health checks testing their blood, urine, and ovarian reserve and an examination of their family medical history.

Donors also have a counselling appointment discussing the emotional and legal implications of donating. A range of topics are discussed, from the donors feelings around motherhood to whats motivating them to donate. She was shown leaflets written for children who were conceived through donation about how they came into the world.

It was very 'Mummy and Daddy wanted to have a baby but needed a bit of help', Izzie explained, laughing a little.

Florence OgramGetty Images

But according to Izzie the core point of the session was to explain that since 2005, donors have signed away their right to anonymity - meaning that once a child conceived through donation turns eighteen, they will be given access to their biological mothers name and contact details.

In her hour and a half counselling session Izzie was asked to consider challenging hypothetical questions: How would she feel if the child reached out in eighteen years time? What would she say if they wanted to be treated as a part of her family? How might she feel about this if she were to have her own children?

The crux of it was checking that Id actually thought about the implications of doing this and making sure I understood what I was signing up for and the possibility of being contacted down the line, she says.

Izzie found it interesting that the counsellor told her that at this stage, many women opt out after considering the real-life consequences of donating. That only goes to show how important this stage it, she adds.

At this point, Izzie also had the opportunity to write a message of goodwill to any potential child and a short profile of herself.

At first, I was quite stuck, but I put myself in the shoes of a child who might be curious about where they came from and that really helped. I told them how a looked, but also that I was a massive nerd at school and loved sci-fi and anime. I also made it clear that Id be very happy for them to approach me once they turn eighteen.

"I put myself in the shoes of a child who might be curious about where they came from"

The next stage of the treatment varies between clinics. Some artificially suppress the donors hormonal cycle, usually through a daily injection over a two-week period. Once the natural cycle is suppressed into an artificial menopause, donors are injected with hormones to boost the number of eggs produced, which lasts around 10 days. Then, a few days before collection, the donor will be given an injection of hCG which matures their eggs.

Other clinics work more within the donors natural cycle, skipping the two weeks of suppression injections. Then, instead of the hCG injection to mature their eggs, they use whats called a buserelin spike. This reduces the chance of ovarian hyperstimulation, a serious and potentially fatal reaction to fertility drugs, with symptoms including stomach pains, vomiting, and fainting. This method takes less time and has fewer medical risks so if you are considering donating, it is worth investigating which treatments are available

Finally, while under sedation (so, no eating that day!), the eggs are removed. The procedure takes about thirty minutes and donors feel discomfort or some pain for a few days afterwards, meaning things like sex can be difficult for a few weeks. The eggs will either be frozen, or if theyre used fresh (which increases the chance of conception) they will be mixed with a sperm sample that day usually from the intended father.

While the HFEA flags ovarian hyperstimulation as a potential risk, there is little research into the long-term health effects of donation. Although direct evidence is scant, some women have reported developing cancer or becoming infertile after donation, believing the treatment to have played a role.

A year on from her second donation, Izzie is still pleased with her decision; she knows a girl and a boy have so far been born using her eggs and although she is thrilled to have helped a family, Izzie doesnt feel any real connection to the children.

If you get very easily attached, I can see that might regret donating, she shares. You have to be not exactly cold, but detached and realistic about what it actually entails.

But what about those who didn't have as positive an experience as Izzie, or who aren't able to as easily separate themselves from the physical process?

Donating is a time consuming, invasive, and potentially dangerous process with relatively little compensation since it is illegal to sell your body parts in the UK. Here, donors are compensated up to 750 for their 'time', but the eggs themselves are given out of 'charity'. Meanwhile, in the US women can receive $50,000 per cycle. Naturally, this changes some of the factors motivating women to donate.

Liz, an American aged 43, went through three donation cycles in the mid noughties when her mother was facing eviction. I first thought of it after seeing an ad in a college magazine. I didnt respond to the flowery imagery telling me that donating my eggs would make me an 'angel'. I was purely motivated by the money as I was desperate, she tells me during a candid conversation.

Twenty years later Liz has come to regret her decision, not least since she believes it contributed to her developing an under-active thyroid. But crucially, another key difference between the UK and the States is that, according to Liz, donors are pressured to donate anonymously. Lizs donations may have resulted in birth of anything between zero and nine children, but she has no idea how many.

Ive struggled with this aspect of donating as I didnt know my father when I was growing up and Ive potentially put a group of children through the same thing, she adds.

Its an experience that Alicia, a 22-year-old opticians employee knows well. Born to an older, single mother, Alicia knew that she was donated through a sperm donation. But with her mother passing away when Alicia was seven, she was never told that she was also conceived using an egg donor. Then, last year she took a 23andme test and was connected to her biological mothers sister. After such a difficult childhood, Alicia has complicated feelings around her parentage.

I think when a lot of people donate, they consider the parents perspective, but they forget that theres going to be another human at the end of this who is going to have their own thoughts and feelings about it, she explains, adding that she now has a close relationship with both of her biological parents and even went to visit her biological father in the US.

Its bittersweet. We have a wonderful relationship but its hard that we were kept apart for so long. My biological mother and I are so similar, from the clothes we wear to the foods we hate. DNA goes so deep, and donors need to understand that, Alicia adds, remarking that on the other hand, she finds she has little in common with her aunt and uncle who raised her after her mothers death.

All UK donors are now mandatorily registered and donate in the knowledge that they may be contact by the donor conceived child in eighteen years time. However, Clare Ettinghausen of the HFEA (The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority) emphasises that in the days of 23andme, anonymity is far from a given and donors may be contacted sooner than they think.

Its an amazing thing to do and a truly selfless act, she told me, But you must seriously consider the lifelong implications of being a donor. And, as with all medical procedures, there is a risk and donors must do their research.

"I felt like a chicken being harvested for its eggs"

Some donors, however, have found that that their experience was not what they thought they were signing up to, even in spite of pouring time into researching the process.

Niamh was a twenty-year old veterinary student when she decided to donate her eggs at a clinic in Nottingham in 2018. However, she was disappointed with how she was treated by the clinic. During one ultrasound scan, the technician was struggling to find one of her ovaries.

They were pushing on me incredibly hard to the point that I was almost in tears. They didnt stop when I asked either. I felt like a chicken being used for its eggs, she recalls.

Despite this, after undergoing the final procedure, Niamh was overwhelmed with the desire to donate again, but this time with another clinic. She had a better experience with a London-based one but still felt that the needs of the intended parents were always put before hers.

Everything was done according to their schedule. They cancelled on me at the last minute several times and asked me to travel at short notice, so I lost money on train tickets, she shares. I also didnt realise that any travel costs would be taken out of the 750 compensation, which meant I received very little despite giving up a lot of my time.

Despite donating twice, Niamh now wouldnt recommend the experience to other women. Care really varies between clinics, and I think its up to the intended parents to demand better care for the donors we are doing for them out of charity, after all.

She and Liz have joined the online community We Are Egg Donors to spread awareness of the medical, practical, and emotional complications of egg donation.

Doctor Alexandra Price of the Bristol Centre for Reproductive Medicine clinic was saddened when I referred to some of these incidents. We really take the time to investigate if donating the right decision for them, she told me. We put our donors on a pedestal since we know its such a gift theyre giving we even give them flowers afterwards to thank them.

The joy brought by starting a family can be compared to little else and to be the person to enable that is an incredible thing. With women starting families increasingly late in life, the demand for egg donors will surely only increase over time too. However, donating your eggs is a complex and irreversible procedure. And as one donor told me: Once a baby has been born, it cant be unborn.

Ironically, my research into donation has only fed the beast and increased the influx of fertility clinic adverts into my timeline. But now, rather than picturing what I might do with 750, I see a child who looks like me. Who maybe even behaves like me but who was a total stranger. I feel unnerved and, although I admire the selflessness of all donors, I knew with absolute certainty that it's not for me.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Continued here:
Egg donors in the UK: What it's actually like donating your eggs - Cosmopolitan UK

Elon Musks Babies Were Conceived Via IVF And Surrogacy – Is It The Future Of Reproduction? – Forbes

Vitro Fertilization. IVF and Human fetus with DNA strand. 3d illustration

Advances in science and technology, coupled with modern medicine, has impacted the way in which we look at life. Reproduction is not an exception. It is no secret that the most prolific innovator on the planet, Elon Musk, took an engineering approach to reproduction, and his first five boys came into this world via IVF, and the last girl was delivered using a surrogate mother. The Tesla mogul and his former wife, author Justine Wilson, welcomed son Nevada Alexander Musk in 2002. Nevada died of sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDS, at only 10 weeks. After losing their firstborn, Musk and Wilson turned to IVF to grow their family. She gave birth to twin sons Griffin and Xavier Musk in April 2004. The couple also used IVF to welcome triplet sons Kai, Saxon and Damian in January 2006. Later on, Musk began dating singer Grimes, who gave birth to their son X AE A-XII. Earlier in March, Grimes revealed that she and the SpaceX founder had welcomed their first daughter, Exa Dark Siderl Musk, via surrogate in December 2021. And there are claims that Elon and Amber Heard had a legal battle around the cryopreserved embryos. In recent weeks rumors surfaced that he had two more kids with the board member of OpenAI and executive at Neuralink. Sex of the babies was not disclosed. Considering how busy Elon is, business ethics of such a relationship, and the fact that there are two babies, there is a chance that he just served as a donor.

While this approach raises many ethical questions including: Were his first babies selected to be male at the preimplantation stage?. While there are regular attempts to build moral and ethical framework for allowing sexing for non-medical reasons, sex selection is illegal in many countries. We recently observed one of the IVF boys taking matters into his own hands changing both name and gender and distancing herself from her father. A very brave move deserving recognition and support.

Elon Musk is not the only one opting for IVF instead of the traditional approach. Several people in my network recently told me that they chose IVF and surrogacy. Some decided to do this to improve the chances of having a healthy baby. One of my friends decided to reproduce via a surrogate to have undisputed legal rights and ensure that his plans to invest substantial resources into the upbringing and education of their offspring do not go down in flames due to the unexpected divorce. And some chose surrogacy for health reasons.

Also, there is a myriad of startups working on reproductive health and longevity including the two I recently covered, Dr. Dina Radenkovics Gameto, and Oviva, and several research groups and startups are working on artificial wombs.

Can this method of reproduction become mainstream? Are we going to see this trend accelerate as the artificial uterus technology matures and the natural reproduction declines? Lets take a closer look at this emerging and rapidly expanding field.

LONDON, ENGLAND - FEBRUARY 2003: A sperm fertilizes an egg under a microscope using ICSI (Intra ... [+] Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection) as part of IVF treatment at the private Lister Hospital. One needle holds the egg in position while the other needle injects a single sperm into the egg to fertilize it. The technique is used for male infertility. (Photo by Tina Stallard/Getty Images)

Louise Brown in 1978 became the worlds first baby to be born by in vitro fertilization, or IVF. Her birth revolutionized the field of reproductive medicine. Given that approximately one in eight heterosexual couple has difficulty in conceiving, and that homosexual couples and single parents need clinical help to make a baby, the demand for IVF has been growing. In fact, IVF is so common that over 5 million babies have been born through this technology. On a side note, critics of cryopreservation should note that these babies were cryopreserved before they were implanted...

COVID has also changed the way we view reproduction and IVF. Pew Research estimated there were close to 300,000 fewer births in the U.S. in 2021 as a result of the pandemic and low levels of sexual activity. Many women of reproductive age were perhaps worried about the vaccine, or were concerned about the vaccines effect on future fertility, current pregnancy, and breastfeeding, among other concerns. During the pandemic, there was a decline in the number of concluded assisted reproductive technology cycles as compared to the previous years. This decline can be attributed to many factors: the local restrictions and the fear about SARS-Cov-2 infection, being among the primary. However, a study published the same year by the National Center for Biotechnology Information reported that couples are actually prioritizing IVF treatment in the post-COVID era. No information exists in the literature regarding the effect of coronavirus on the IVF cycle attempt. In fact, a study titled Does COVID-19 infection influence patients' performance during IVF-ET cycle?: an observational study concluded that COVID did not affect patients' performance or ovarian reserve in their immediate subsequent IVF cycle. There needs to be more data available on IVF, both pre and post COVID.

In order to understand IVF, we first need to look at the natural process of reproduction. Believe it or not, it all starts in the brain. Roughly 15 days before fertilization can happen, the anterior pituitary gland secretes follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), which ripens a hand full of follicles of the ovary that then release estrogen. Each follicle contains one egg, and on average only one follicle becomes fully mature. As it grows and releases estrogen, this hormone not only helps coordinate growth and preparation of the uterus, it also communicates to the brain how well the follicle is developing. When the estrogen level is high enough, the anterior pituitary releases a surge of luteinizing hormone (LH), which trigger ovulation and causes the follicle to rupture and release the egg. Once the egg leaves the ovary, it is directed into the fallopian tube by the fimbriae. If the egg is not fertilized by the sperm within 24 hours, the unfertilized egg will die and the entire system will reset itself, preparing to create a new egg and uterine lining the following month.

The egg is protected by a thick extra cellular shell of sugar and protein called the zona pellucida. The zona thwarts the entry and fusion of more than one sperm. Each ejaculation during sexual intercourse releases more than a 100 million sperm. But only a 100 or so will make it to the proximity of the egg, and only one will successfully penetrate through the armor of the zona pellucida. Upon successful fertilization, the zygote immediately begins developing into an embryo and takes about three days to reach the uterus. There it requires a couple of days to implant firmly into the endometrium, the inner lining of the uterus. Once implanted, the cells that are to become the placenta, secrete a hormone that signals to the ovulated follicle that there is a pregnancy in the uterus. This helps rescue that follicle, now called the corpus luteum, from degenerating, as it normally would do in that stage of the menstrual cycle. The corpus luteum is responsible for producing the progesterone required to maintain the pregnancy until six to seven weeks of gestation when the placenta develops and takes over until the baby is born approximately 40 weeks later.

In patients undergoing IVF, FSH is administered in levels that are higher than naturally occurring, to cause a controlled over-stimulation of the ovaries so that they ultimately produce multiple eggs. The eggs are then retrieved before ovulation would occur, while the woman is under anesthesia, through an aspirating needle guided by ultra-sound. Most sperm samples are produced by masturbation. In a laboratory, the identified eggs are stripped of surrounding cells, and prepared for fertilization in a petri dish.

Fertilization can occur by one of two techniques. In the first, the eggs are incubated by thousands of sperm and fertilization occurs naturally over a few hours. The second technique maximizes certainty of fertilization by using a needle to place a single sperm inside the egg. This is particularly useful when there is a problem with the quality of the sperm. After fertilization, embryos can be further screened for genetic suitability, delivered into the womans uterus via catheter, or frozen for later attempt at pregnancies. This last process is also called embryo cryopreservation. It involves freezing of the embryos. You may choose to freeze extra embryos and use them later if you: postpone or cancel implantation into your uterus after an egg is already fertilized; want to delay IVF to a later date; want an option in case early attempts at fertility treatment fail; or choose to donate unused embryos to other people trying to get pregnant or to researchers rather than destroy them; or for other reasons.

If the womans eggs are of poor quality due to age or toxic exposures or have been removed due to cancer, donor eggs may be used. In the case that the intended woman has a problematic uterus or lacks one, another woman, called the gestational carrier, or surrogate, can use her uterus to carry the pregnancy. To increase the odds of success, which are as high as 40% for women younger than 35, doctors sometimes transfer multiple embryos at once. Which is why IVF results in twins and triplets more often than natural pregnancies. However, many clinics seek to minimize the chances of multiple pregnancies, as they are riskier for mothers and babies.

Millions of babies like Louise Brown have been born from IVF and have had normal, healthy lives. The long-term health consequences of ovarian stimulation with IVF medicines are less clear. In fact, it is possible to avoid the many genetic abnormalities with preimplantation diagnosis. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority of the U.K. published a blog in which they declared that IVF is generally safe, adding that most people who have it experience no problems with their health or pregnancy. They do mention some risks that people should be aware of, including: ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, having a multiple pregnancy or birth, and having an ectopic pregnancy. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine also notes that although serious complications from IVF medicines and procedures are rare, there are still some risks from injectable fertility medications. Though so far, IVF seems safe for women. Because of better genetic testing, delayed child-bearing, increased accessibility, and diminishing costs, it is not inconceivable that artificial baby-making via IVF and related techniques could outpace natural reproduction in years to come.

Clearly, IVF is gaining popularity every year. According to a 2015 report by the U.S. Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (published in 2017), one million babies born in the U.S. between 1987 and 2015 were born through the use of IVF or other assisted reproductive technologies. There are many agencies and centers worldwide that provide these services. Some examples of these agencies are: Circle Surrogacy & Egg Donation, Brilliant Beginnings, The Center For Surrogacy & Egg Donation, ConceiveAbilities, Hatch Egg Donation & Surrogacy, and Growing Families. Others include Ambroise Par Group, AMP Center St Roch, AVA Clinic Scanfert, Bangkok IVF center, Betamedics, Bloom Fertility and Healthcare, Bourn Hall Fertility Center, and Biofertility Center and Chelsea and Westminster Hospital.

Like IVF, surrogacy too is becoming a very popular way to have children, particularly for wealthy couples in the West. According to a 2019 WebMD blog post, about 750 babies are born each year using gestational surrogacy. Similarly, PBS reported that in 2018 over 100 children were born in Boise, Idaho, through surrogacy. In Canada, surrogate births have increased by 400% in the last decade. Even celebrities are doing it! News anchor Anderson Cooper used a surrogate for the birth of his son, as did Sir Elton John, who used a surrogate for the birth of his two sons. Other celebrities like Kim Kardashian, Robert De Niro, George Lucas, and Neil Patrick Harris used surrogates too.

Three generations of women and a robot jumping for joy

There are several reasons why IVF and surrogacy are fast becoming a new way of family planning. Infertility is one of the main reasons why prospective parents opt for surrogacy. Another reason why would-be parents opt for surrogacy is the age factor because age plays a big role in a persons ability to conceive and carry a baby. Likewise, same-sex couples and single individuals who are unable to conceive a child naturally may choose to turn to a surrogate. Some people may also have medical or physical problems that dissuade them from pregnancy or make birth impossible. At the end of the day, it is a personal and private decision.

Interestingly, many in the generation X and Y are reproducing via IVF after going through a divorce. Recently I spoke with one of my friends in the venture capital world who is looking at IVF via a surrogate as a way to avoid the possible legal problems in the case of a future divorce. "I am planning to go to buy a few egg cells from a very accomplished young scientist and use a service in Georgia (country) to get a surrogate. I want to have a very smart kid that I will invest a lot of resources, time and energy in and I won't need to share custody over the kid in the case I break up with my girlfriend," said an accomplished man in his mid-forties who refused to be named in the article. "I went through a very painful breakup once and how I have to share custody of a child and don't have full control over the upbringing. But children are our legacy and I want to ensure that I can raise the child to be a great person, give great education, and provide amazing care without being pulled into a difficult relationship with the mother. I am sure that my girlfriend will invest a lot of energy into this child or I will find another girlfriend."

This statement shocked and puzzled me.

Recently, I covered a startup called Gameto, run by Dr. Dina Radenkovic, a wonderful physician turned VC turned CEO. "The reproductive industry is up for disruption. We are going to help millions of women get the freedom to have babies without the time pressure. And postpone menopause. But I am also investing in a company developing artificial uterus technology. In the future, painful childbirth may be optional and without the need of a surrogate, she told me.

And females also get a lot of freedom to choose the genetic background of their children. Many are choosing to reproduce using the sperm from the validated, healthy, intelligent, and accomplished individuals.

Same week I met a wonderful scientist, a recent PhD from Harvard who also works in the field of reproductive health. "You know, I am an open ID sperm donor. It helped pay my bills during the school years and now I have over 35 confirmed kids worldwide, he said.

A sperm bank is a facility or enterprise that collects and stores human sperm from sperm donors for ... [+] use by women who need donor-provided sperm to achieve pregnancy. (Photo by Evan Hurd/Corbis via Getty Images)

There are few reliable figures on the sperm banking industry and the percentage of donations that are made anonymously. Researchers find it difficult to track how many men have donated sperm, and how many children have resulted from each individuals donation. Approximately, there are about two dozen sperm banks in the United States; each operates independently and with minimal government oversight. Some of the famous ones include Cryos International and California Cryobank. There are others also.

Some of these operations are pretty cryptic and shady. Many clinics have revised their policies not to eliminate anonymous donations, but to make clear that the term only means they will not share donor information. Others are moving toward open ID donor systems, in which donors are told that offspring could connect with them when they turn 18 or sooner if both parties agree to it.

As debates about womens bodies and their right to choose continue to rage throughout the world, surrogacy laws remain in infancy. The laws also change as reproductive technology and the very meaning of a parent changes. In the U.S., there isn't a federal law on surrogacy and state laws vary. Some states have written legislation, while others have common law regimes to deal with surrogacy issues. Surrogacy friendly states facilitate surrogacy and surrogacy contracts while others simply refuse to enforce them. Some states only facilitate married heterosexual couples. States that are considered to be surrogacy friendly include California, Illinois, Arkansas, Maryland, Oregon and New Hampshire.

Surrogacy has become so popular that it has given birth to a new form of tourism called reproductive tourism or cross-border reproductive care. This multibillion-dollar global industry is perfect for price-sensitive, middle-income would-be parents. The surrogates in this case are usually those who are thought to be of low socioeconomic status in countries like India and Nepal. In India, surrogacy may be worth about $400 million each year, driven by the countrys nearly 3,000 specialty clinics. Thailand, Ukraine and Russia are other popular sources of surrogates for international clientele. Thus, surrogacy is the route to escape poverty for many women in these developing states.

Research on the development of IVF and reproductive technology is still in infancy. However, as it becomes more advanced, we are likely to see more non-traditional families and the reality is probably closer than we think. And with the changing trends in family planning, there is no doubt that science and technology will continue to progress and change the way we live and think. Before we know it, this new trend and demand for babies is likely to further advance science and the procedures. Perhaps in the future, women will not need to go through the painful process of childbirth.

Go ahead and continuously improvement concept, silhouette man jump on a cliff from past to future ... [+] with cloud sky background.

Follow this link:
Elon Musks Babies Were Conceived Via IVF And Surrogacy - Is It The Future Of Reproduction? - Forbes

Handful of Tories declare themselves as candidates to replace Johnson – Morning Star Online

THEresignation of Boris Johnson as prime minister has seenattention turntowho will replace him.

Only a handful of Tories have so far declared themselves candidates, although a number of others are thought to be set to do so.

Attorney GeneralSuella Braverman and Commons foreign affairs committee chairman Tom Tugendhat have confirmed their intention to stand while Steve Baker has said he is seriously considering standing.

Ms Bravermantook the unusual step this week of calling on Mr Johnson to resign, saying that she would not be stepping down but at the same time throwing her hat into the ring as his potential successor.

Mr Tugendhatlaunched his leadership bid with an article in the Daily Telegraph today, promising tax cuts and new energy and ideas for government.

"I have served before in the military and now in Parliament. Now I hope to answer the call once again as prime minister, said the former soldier, who has been a prominent critic of Mr Johnson and an advocate of a more aggressive foreign policy.

Former chancellorRishi Sunak also unveiled his candidacy today, the most high-profile figure so far to do so.

Foreign Secretary Liz Truss, former health secretarySajid Javid, ChancellorNadhim Zahawi, health and social care select committee chairmanJeremy Hunt and Transport SecretaryGrant Shapps are all expected to enter an increasingly crowded field.

More declarations are expected in the coming days, but some senior Tories have already said that they will not be standing, including former levelling up secretary Michael Gove, Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab and disgraced former health secretary Matt Hancock.

Another candidate yet to confirm, but already installed as the bookies favourites, is Defence Secretary Ben Wallace.

Polling of Tory Party members by YouGov also puts Mr Wallace in pole position, where he beats all of the main presumed contenders.

Mr Wallace, who served in the Scots Guards, has had a prominent role in Britains response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

However, he has one of the worst voting records on LGBT rights in Parliament.

He has opposed every piece of LGBT legislation put in front of him, including same-sex marriage and the Equality Act.

Mr Wallace also voted in favour of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, which, had it passed, would have made it harder for lesbian couples to conceive children through IVF.

Hehas also repeatedly opposed raising welfare benefits and has always backed more hard-line immigration and asylum laws.

See the original post here:
Handful of Tories declare themselves as candidates to replace Johnson - Morning Star Online

Y Combinator-Backed Lilia Launches A More Convenient And Affordable Egg Freezing Offering Built For The Millennial Women – Forbes

While a womans age at thaw has relatively little impact on a womans chances of success, the age at ... [+] freeze does, according to the U.K.'s Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority

Lilia, a full-service egg freezing concierge, today announced they are now offering egg freezing directly for their clients at nearly half the price of an average IVF procedure and in half the time, and coordinated to make the experience less isolating. With this new breakthrough offering, women have access to the leading, most progressive doctors in the country dedicated to Lilias mission of giving every woman the freedom to make her own decisions on her own timeline.

According to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, the U.K.'s independent fertility regulator, the data shows that while a womans age at thaw has relatively little impact on a womans chances of success, the age at freeze does, with evidence showing that if eggs are frozen below the age of 35, the chances of success will be higher than the natural conception rate as the woman gets older.

Alyssa Atkins, founder and CEO of Lilia

As a Y Combinator graduate, and having raised roughly $1.5 million to date, Lilia is revolutionizing how women plan their futures. Founded in 2019 by Alyssa Atkins, who froze her eggs at the age of 29, the idea for Lilia was conceived when she founder realized the whole experience was built for an IVF couple, not young women focused on their futures. The company is currently operating with doctors in New York City, Chicago, and San Francisco, with plans to go national by the end of 2023. As explained by Atkins, Lilia is now a single point of contact for women - no more waiting on hold for doctors offices or fielding a million emails from the clinics different departments.

The convenience of Lilias offerings is reflected in the fact that they coordinate everything for the patient from contracts, to appointments, meds, and virtual consulting and prep work. The whole process, Atkins highlights, takes less than a month. And lets be honest until now, no one has focused specifically on serving the millions of women aged 24 35 for whom egg freezing works best.

Most women have considered freezing their eggs at some point and many have been thinking about it for years. But when they turn to Google, they are bounced out by the complexity of how to start, where to go, or what to do. Egg freezing, when done early, is the best way to relieve reproductive pressure and give women more optionality. Optionality is freedom and freedom is everything for women who dont want to be pressured into having a child before they are ready.

Lilia is changing a stale narrative about what a womans life ought to look like. Society is pretty prescriptive about its expectations of women college, career, marriage, baby in that order and ideally by 30, which leaves most women feeling behind no matter what theyve accomplished or what their personal goals are, explains Atkins.

Its 2022 (in case you havent noticed) and its time we usher in a new normal. One where egg freezing isnt perceived as something you do in your late 30s as a last resort, but something you can do early, in your 20s, because you have the right to reproductive freedom, autonomy, and choice. Its not just something to be done for your future self; it has real and direct impacts on the present you by taking the pressure off, especially in dating. With eggs secured early, women dont have to rush; every first date isnt an evaluation of whether the person in front of you is the future father of your children.

Atkins admits she sees so many women in their late 30s saying they wish someone had told them to freeze their eggs earlier. So, she and her team are working on showing women how common and normal this process is and educating them along the way. People think egg freezing is about the future you, but really its about taking the pressure off of you today because it lets you date differently, make different career moves, and live with more freedom, she adds.

It is more important now than ever that women have the power of choice and freedom. Choice over whether they take certain jobs, and when or whether to have kids at all. They deserve the freedom not to settle, to stop doing the dating math, and not to be rushed in making important decisions about their careers or matters of the heart. Every woman deserves the feeling of freedom and inner peace that comes from knowing all doors to her future are open, continues Atkins.

So who are Lilia's users and target audience? Obviously, someone for whom being a biological mom is incredibly important, and they want to ensure this happens at some point in their lives. Perhaps its a woman who knows she wants to use a surrogate at some point and so egg freezing is a path to this; startup founders, who are super busy and want kids but know they need time to build their companies first; women who arent sure they want kids at all, but want the option later; basically, any woman who wants to take the pressure off and keep their options open.

We believe that in time, egg freezing will be as common as birth control, and it should not only be a luxury for a small group of society. While egg freezing might not have been part of our fairy tale stories growing up, it has become extremely common and is one of the most radical acts of self-care a woman can make. We don't want women to wait until egg freezing becomes an absolute emergency, at which point its either often too late to retrieve enough healthy eggs, or to do so would require many cycles and the corresponding costs that come with it, adds Atkins.

Lilia is under the medical leadership of Dr. Roohi Jeelani, who does the highest volume of ... [+] egg-freezing retrievals in the country

The time and cost savings are created to let the company deliver an outstanding experience to women for a predictable $9,000 all-in, instead of the nebulous $15,000+ women are usually faced with. Under the medical leadership of Dr. Roohi Jeelani, who does the highest volume of egg-freezing retrievals in the country, Lilia is able to deliver this breakthrough offering while maintaining the highest standards in medicine.

We have carefully selected clinic partners who are equally committed to making egg freezing affordable and accessible to all, and dedicated to together creating a better experience for women.

Atkins and her team spent a lot of time getting the offering right, ensuring they could drive down costs and improve the experience while maintaining a superlative standard of care. Now that theyve done this, theyre working on changing the entire narrative around egg freezing and normalizing this process as a regular part of womanhood.

Were especially interested in how dating and egg freezing relate, because we know when women freeze eggs early theyre able to date differently and that it gives them more power in their love lives. Were working on telling more womens stories about whove frozen their eggs so women see just how common this is. Something I realized when I froze my eggs is I had all these friends whod done it but werent talking about it, concludes Atkins.

Originally posted here:
Y Combinator-Backed Lilia Launches A More Convenient And Affordable Egg Freezing Offering Built For The Millennial Women - Forbes

The End of the Beginning of the End of Abortion | Hadley Arkes – First Things

The decision today in the Dobbs case, long awaited from the Court, can be appreciatedand savoredas a resounding first step. To rephrase Churchills line, we might say that we are only at the end of the beginning in dealing with the turbulence that abortion has imparted to our political life for the past fifty years. That turbulence promises to rise now to new levels of enmity, until our people can regain some moral clarity on the taking of innocent life in the womb. But something good has been done, and there is an analogy here to the Emancipation Proclamation:It freed only the slaves held in states at war with the national government;it did not free slaves held in border states such as Delaware.And yet it became clear that it was animated by an anti-slavery impulse, and thats how it came to be understood.In the same way, this decision will be seen as a decision affirming life. It will be seen as inviting legislatures in the states to begin casting the protections of the law over the unborn child in the womband it will do that even though the conservative majority goes out of its way to avoid any such invitation or encouragement.

Still, the decision will be seen as a pro-life proclamation even as abortions proceed at a massive level in the blue states.Our disappointment here mirrors that of people on the other side:They are feeling dispossessed, because they thought they bore nothing less than a constitutional right, which does not go in and out of effect when they move from one state to another. And for our part, we lament the fact that the Court does not move to put the critical anchoring point in place as it sends the matter back to the states: Namely, that as we draw on the objective facts of embryology, that offspring in the womb has never been anything less than human from its first moments, and not merely a part of the mother. If that predicate were put in place, there would be a clearer understanding of what makes it deeply justified for the laws in the states to cast their protections over the child in the womb. And what makes it warranted in turn for Congress and the federal courts to act when the protections of the law are withdrawn from a whole class of human beings in the states.

But the majority in Dobbs conspicuously held back from putting that premise into place. And that is why the dissenting opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer makes no contact with the opinion he is ostensibly opposing. Breyer charges that the Court today says that from the very moment of fertilization, a woman has no rights to speak of. A State can force her to bring a pregnancy to term, even at the steepest personal and familial costs. And yet that is what Justice Samuel Alito and his colleagues sought carefully to avoid saying. The issue of abortion has been returned to the states, and the Court has offered no directions as to how and when a legislature may choose to protect the child in the womb. The Court has simply decided that nothing in the text of the Constitution, or the legal history of this country, has ever recognized such a right to abortion. As one of my own friends among the justices once put it:

The matter will be sent back to the states and people will be invited to reach their own judgment on how much they value the life of the fetus in the womb. The dissenters take it as a given that the only persons with serious interests at stake here are the women who see their lives and prospects diminished if they are deprived of the chance to order an abortion at a timely moment. What is notably erased from the screen is any recognition of that small creature in the womb, as one who might have the standing of a human being, and whose injuries count.

What the dissenters pretend not to see is that the conservative majority in Dobbs has done nothing to refute that assumption. It has not moved to put in place the rival understanding that the child is indeed a human being with a claim to be protected by the law from its first moments. Justice Alito was quite crisp in pointing out that the test of viability made little sense here. Whether a child sprung from the womb has a decent chance of being sustained outside the womb may be an interesting question in incubator science, but it has no bearing on whether the child has ceased being anything other than a human being at any stages of the pregnancy. Alito came the closest, though, to insisting on that claim of the child to the protection of the law even at its earliest moment: The legitimate interests of the state in regulating abortion could tenably encompass, as he said, a respect for and preservation of prenatal life at all stages of development. But he evidently felt constrained from saying what James Wilson said in the first days of the Constitution. Wilson, one of the premier minds among the American founders, asked this question: If we have natural rights, when do they begin? And his answer was: They begin as soon as we begin to be. And so as he wrote:

For all we can tell, that sense of things was decisively rejected by Alitos colleague Justice Brett Kavanaugh in his morally curious claim that the Constitution is neutral on abortion: On the one side, he wrote, many pro-choice advocates forcefully argue that the ability to obtain an abortion is critically important for womens personal and professional lives, and for womens health. . . . On the other side, many pro-life advocates forcefully argue that a fetus is a human life. In other words, on this construction, a conservative jurisprudence on abortion must begin with the axiom that there is no truth to be known on the human standing of that child in the womb. But that is a jurisprudence that accepts, as its grounding, a radical falsehood. Whatever else it is, it cannot be a coherent jurisprudence.

Justice Kavanaugh is a thoughtful man, and some of us hope that he is willing to take a sober, second look at what he has put in place here. He catches the sense of the holding here: The Court will pronounce no truth on the human standing of that child in the womb, nothing that must provide the predicate for anything that will be legislated in the states. This grave matter, returned to the states, will be argued over in the domain of beliefs and value judgments, with no fixed truths on when human life begins. But in that case, we should not be surprised to discover people in the pro-life states complaining that they have been dispossessed of a deep personal right simply because it wasnt supported by the opinions and beliefs of 51 percent of the people around them.

It is a good thing that this first step has been taken, and the paths of persuasion and argument have opened again. There can be no question that the Court, over the past fifty years, has been the chief engine in changing the culture of this country on abortion. It did not merely pronounce a legal judgment; it tutored the country on the moral rightness of abortion, and the rightful sense of grievance for anyone deprived of that right. And so it becomes apt to ask just what rival teaching the Court will be putting in place now for our people as it sends the matter back to the states. We can be grateful for the decision in Dobbs, but if the American people come to absorb now the notion that the standing of human life bears no objective truth, that the respect for that life depends on the vagaries of opinions whirling aroundus, we can earnestly wonder how the Court is reshaping for the better the sensibilities of people who will be filling this landscape all around us.

And so again, this is the end of the beginning, and now the work begins anew.

Hadley Arkes is the Ney Professor of Jurisprudence Emeritus at Amherst College and the Founder/Director of the James Wilson Institute on Natural Rights & the American Founding in Washington, D.C.

HelpFirst Thingsexpand our community of co-laborers bysupporting our 2022 Spring Campaign with a tax-deductible gift today.

If you do not already subscribe toFirst Things, visitwww.firstthings.com/subscribeto explore our subscription options.

Continue reading here:
The End of the Beginning of the End of Abortion | Hadley Arkes - First Things

Widower wins right to have baby using embryo created with his late wife – The Guardian

A 38-year-old widower has won a landmark legal case giving him the right to have a baby with a surrogate using the last remaining embryo created with his late wife.

Ted Jennings and his wife, Fern-Marie Choya, had spent years trying to have children and had sought fertility treatment, but Choya died suddenly while pregnant with twin girls in 2019. The fertility regulator, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), rejected Jenningss request to be able to use their last frozen embryo to start a family because Choya had not given written consent for posthumous surrogacy.

But on Wednesday, the high courts family division ruled that Jennings can use the embryo, in what could be the UKs first case of posthumous surrogacy. The couple had not been given adequate opportunity to consent to this scenario, the court found, in a judgment that will put pressure on the HFEA to review consent procedures.

In her judgment, Mrs Justice Theis, a family division judge, said: I am satisfied that, in the circumstances of this case, the court can infer from all the available evidence that Ms Choya would have consented to Mr Jennings being able to use their partner-created embryo in treatment with a surrogate in the event of her death. This is being considered in the context where, in my judgment, she had not been given relevant information and/or a sufficient opportunity to discuss it with the clinic.

The couple, both originally from Trinidad, met in London and married in 2009. After five years of fertility treatment and two miscarriages following ectopic pregnancies, they conceived in 2018 and were expecting twin girls. But 18 weeks into her pregnancy, Choya suffered a severe pregnancy complication and died, aged 40.

The couple had given consent to the embryos being used in the event of Jenningss death, the court heart in evidence last month, but Choya was not asked the equivalent question. Instead, her form stated that she should seek more information from the clinic if you wish your eggs or embryos to be used in someone elses treatment if you die. The court ruled that it was far from clear how this related to posthumous surrogacy and suggested that the HFEA may want to consider whether the form should be reviewed in order to provide the clarity required and avoid this situation occurring again.

James Lawford Davies, Jenningss lawyer and a partner at the firm Hill Dickinson, said: I am delighted that the court has found in Teds favour and that he can now proceed with surrogacy treatment. It was clear that this is what Fern would have wanted and this very thorough judgment allows her wishes to be respected.

In a statement, the HFEA said: This is a tragic case and the HFEA continues to have every sympathy for Mr Jennings. The act of parliament which governs fertility and embryology in the UK is clear that signed written consent is always required in such cases. The risk today is that this decision will undermine that position, and diminish the protection it gives to a persons express wishes about the use of their embryos after their death. We will carefully consider the judgment before deciding whether to appeal.

See original here:
Widower wins right to have baby using embryo created with his late wife - The Guardian

How Does Comparative Embryology Support the Theory of Evolution?

Comparative embryology supports the theory of evolution because scientists have found that the embryos of many different species show similarities, which implies they share a common origin. For example, in humans the embryo passes through a stage in which it has a gill structure similar to that of fish. Human embryos also have a tail, much like other primates, though the tail is usually re-absorbed before birth, and this suggests that, even though their adult forms are different, these various species all have a common ancestor.

Furthermore, the embryo serves as a microcosm for evolution. The embryo passes through many stages of evolution until it finally reaches its adult form.

While the appearance of ancestral traits in the embryos of many organisms is well documented and can provide insights into the evolution of a species, an early attempt to draw direct parallels between the development of an embryo (ontogeny) and the development of its species (phylogeny), known as the Recapitulation Theory, is widely believed to have been discredited by later science.

MORE FROM REFERENCE.COM

See original here:
How Does Comparative Embryology Support the Theory of Evolution?

IVF: Three key requirements before you can have fertility treatment on the NHS – Express

Speaking exclusively to Express.co.uk, Cynthia Hudson who works on behalf of TMRW Life Sciences revealed the eligibility criteria for IVF and what the process involves. "IVF is a treatment offered to people who are having trouble conceiving a child or are unable to have a child without medical help," Hudson began. "The IVF process involves extracting eggs from a woman's ovaries and fertilising them in a laboratory with sperm."

The eggs and sperm either come from the couple trying to conceive, or a donor.

There is, however, eligibility criteria for IVF, set out by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's fertility criteria (NICE).

Firstly, to be eligible, you must a heterosexual women; secondly, you must be under the age of 43; and, thirdly, you must have been attempting to fall pregnant for at least two years.

"Alternatively, NHS-funded IVF is available to women who have undergone 12 rounds of artificial or intrauterine insemination," Hudson added.

READ MORE:Dementia: Scientists identify vitamin deficiency that may cause decline - millions at risk

"However, local clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) make the ultimate decision on whether someone is eligible for IVF on the NHS.

"And their criteria can differ from those stated by the national authority, NICE."

What IVF involves

Following a consultation with a doctor, people wishing to conceive may be referred to a fertility specialist.

From there, a physical examination, ultrasound scan, and hormonal tests will check how well a biological woman's ovaries are working.

DON'T MISS

A semen analysis may also be required from the male partner, or donor, before any steps towards IVF is taken.

Hudson explained: "The treatment includes many steps, beginning with ovarian stimulation."

Ovarian stimulation is "the process of using hormones to encourage the ovaries to create numerous eggs rather than the one egg that develops naturally each month".

"The eggs will then be extracted and either stored or utilised immediately to try to produce embryos," Hudson continued.

"If the treatment plan calls for creating embryos straight away, the laboratory will want a sperm sample available when the eggs are extracted."

The embryologist will then try to fertilise the eggs in a few different methods.

Examples include putting sperm in the same dish as the eggs, or injecting a single sperm into each egg.

"The embryology team will find out how many of them successfully fertilised the next day," Hudson added.

The next step involves the fertilised eggs cultured in a laboratory so that their growth and development can be monitored.

To manage expectations for those who decide to go through with IVF, Hudson made clear that not every egg will be fertilised and not all fertilised eggs will develop into embryos.

"Its important to understand that the number of viable embryos at the end will be smaller than the number of eggs that were retrieved," Hudson added.

Cynthia Hudson is the VP Clinical Strategy and Specimen Services at TMRW Life Sciences.

Go here to see the original:
IVF: Three key requirements before you can have fertility treatment on the NHS - Express

Harry Potter’s World Similar to the Magic of Endocrinology – Medscape

Clinicians don't cease diagnosing patients once our clinical work is done. Most of us can recall debating whether to point out an atypical mole or another concerning finding to a stranger in public.

Like the doctor back in 2018, who saw a lump on the neck of a woman on TV and reached out via a video on Facebook, which found its way to her. She was eventually diagnosed with thyroid cancer.

Patients even recognize their own experiences and help lead others to clinical care.

And our diagnostic abilities can sometimes prove entertaining when interpreting plotlines in all sorts of storytelling, with endocrinology often making appearances in literature and film.

For instance, much debate has ensued about what Tiny Tim probably suffered from in Dickens's A Christmas Carol; a combination of tuberculosis and rickets makes the most sense to me, as detailed in a report in JAMA.

Malcolm Gladwell pointed out that Goliath in the biblical story probably got his stature and his inability to miss a shepherd boy's slingshot from a pituitary tumor. And the plot of Steel Magnolias revolves around type 1 diabetes.

Most recently, I began to see endocrinology everywhere in probably the most successful series of stories of recent times: the Harry Potter chronicles.

If, like me, you have a Potter-obsessed household, you might have watched the Return to Hogwarts special on HBO earlier this year. One of the observations that piqued my attention was when Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe joked about the hormones running rampant as the characters and actors who played them navigated adolescence, growing from children to teens as they made successive movies.

Popular culture has picked up on the comedy of these sometimes awkward pubertal transitions, repeatedly skewered by Saturday Night Live. However, this line made me ponder other less-famous hormones that could explain some of the fantastical findings of the wizarding world.

Hormones invisible chemical messenger are truly magical. They are most famous for sexual development but also empower growth, bone strength, fluid homeostasis, weight, carbohydrate metabolism, salt balance, blood pressure regulation, and any other function you can imagine; indeed, thyroid hormone is crucial for almost every system of the body.

Perhaps, the notable transformation of the main characters through puberty isn't the only hormonal influence we should credit. (This article may contain spoilers: My husband didn't read the Harry Potter series until we read it to our second grader so sadly learned at the age of 37 about the tragedy that befell Dumbledore.)

Just for fun, here are some other hormonal diagnoses that could explain some of the dark arts represented in the series.

Could Hagrid the giant have acromegaly? Clinical signs include enlarged hands and feet as well as excess growth of the ears and nose. A good way to check for these changes is to compare old photographs with the present condition. The actor who plays Hagrid, Robbie Coltrane, looks very different from the character after his transformation. Someone check his IGF-1 the hormone that manages the effects of growth hormone!

Neville Longbottom, the series' late bloomer, is the poster child for teens with constitutional delay of growth and puberty. This often frustrating but benign condition that plagues the "slow developer" tends to run in families and causes those who have it consternation as they wait to grow while their peers surpass them in stature and other ways; it also leads for them to be underestimated, as we witness with Neville in the Harry Potter series.

Voldemort: Depicted without a nose, if He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named had congenital central abnormalities, he should be screened for central pituitary hormone deficits because the pituitary gland shares common embryology with other midline structures. (His evil has nothing to do with his possible underlying endocrinopathies.)

The Weasley family: if any of these redheaded wizards presented with adrenal insufficiency and rapidly progressive obesity, a POMC (proopiomelanocortin) mutation should be considered.

Nearly Headless Nick's near-decapitation might have affected his thyroid or parathyroid glands Hogwarts physician Madame Pomfrey should pay special attention to his thyroid stimulating hormone and calcium levels, at least if she is willing to take advantage of Muggle remedies.

Moaning Myrtle, who was killed by the Basilisk in the girls' lavatory, continues with tantrums and moans as she haunts the same bathroom at Hogwarts. Could it be that Myrtle's groans and psychiatric overtones were a sign of hypercalcemia, and she was using the facilities as she tried to pass a kidney stone? At the very least causes of polyuria should be investigated, including diabetes insipidus and diabetes mellitus. A unifying diagnosis of never being able to leave the bathroom and vision changes requiring serious glasses like hers would be untreated septo-optic dysplasia or other causes of pituitary malformation or disruption.

And though Dolores Umbridge doesn't have an obvious endocrine disorder, she seems like the kind of person who would visit an endocrine office after doing loads of "her own research" and arrive with a list of labs she demands.

Severus Snape provides a good opportunity to point out someone with excessively greasy skin and abnormal sweating (hyperhidrosis) as an adult, symptoms that perhaps would be best managed by our colleagues in dermatology.

The Dementors: These demons clearly work for insurance companies, tormenting the young wizards with denials and prior authorization requests.

Enzyme names sound a lot like spell incantations. Iodothyronine deiodinase? HMG CoA reductase? Future authors looking for new spells need look no further than their closest endocrine textbook.

Please note, I consider all my patients to be miraculous and worthy of admiration these comparisons are all in good fun and in no way diminish the weight of these conditions.

As Rubeus Hagrid himself said, "I am what I am, an' I'm not ashamed. 'Never be ashamed,' my ol' dad used ter say, 'there's some who'll hold it against you, but they're not worth botherin' with.'"

Like magic, endocrinology can't be seen with the naked eye, but it's everywhere we look, if only we choose to look.

For more diabetes and endocrinology news, follow us onTwitterandFacebook

Follow Medscape on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube

Read the rest here:
Harry Potter's World Similar to the Magic of Endocrinology - Medscape

L’Oral-UNESCO For Women in Science International Awards 2022 – Benzinga – Benzinga

On June 23rd, the Fondation L'Oral and UNESCO will be celebrating 45 eminent women scientists from over 35 countries and all regions of the world at an unprecedented For Women in Science International Awards Ceremony being held at UNESCO Headquarters in Paris.

The past three years have been some of the most challenging for science in recent history. Women have been on the frontlines, addressing unparalleled issues related to climate change, disease, and health crises like the Covid-19 pandemic. Despite being essential to tackle today's emergencies, female scientists are not yet sufficiently visible and numerous.

PARIS, INTERNATIONAL RALLYING POINT FOR FEMALE SCIENTIFIC EXCELLENCE

Starting on June 20th, the entire week will be dedicated to making Paris a rallying point for some of the world's top scientific minds. A series of events will create interactions between these outstanding women scientists, including an Extraordinary Lecture at the Academy of Sciences and networking events, leading up to the Awards Ceremony at UNESCO on June 23rd.

In this special Ceremony gathering the laureates from the past three editions, 15 exceptional researchers will receive the L'Oral-UNESCO For Women in Science International Awards in recognition of their outstanding scientific achievements in recent years, along with 30 young female scientists, selected in 2020 and 2022, who will earn the title of International Rising Talents.

COUNTERING THE SIDELINING OF WOMEN SCIENTISTS

According to UNESCO recent data, the number of women pursuing scientific careers is increasing slightly, only one in three researchers is a woman globally1. In the research world, the glass ceiling persists: just 14%2 of senior academic positions in Europe are held by women and just 4% of the Nobel prizes in science have been awarded to women.

Alexandra Palt, L'Oral Chief Corporate Responsibility Officer and CEO of the Fondation L'Oral, said: During the COVID-19 pandemic we have seen how women scientists are essential to respond to existential threats to our health, to society, to the planet. But still they are invisibilized and often face tremendous obstacles during their careers and research studies. This situation is the result of systemic barriers, unconscious bias, self-censorship but also discrimination. This is not just a problem for women: this is a problem for research. To be relevant, research has to be inclusive and needs all its talents to be mobilized.

According to Shamila Nair-Bedouelle, Assistant Director-General for Natural Sciences of UNESCO: Many of the rising female talents being celebrated this year are excelling in fields that will be vital to decarbonizing our future, such as energy storage systems, hydrogen fuel systems and quantum optics, a field of study which is paving the way for more energy-efficient computers. Yet many of their peers working in similarly strategic fields are not getting the recognition that they deserve. UNESCO, as the UN agency in charge of science, which has made gender equality a priority, is determined to act to put an end to these inequalities. The L'Oral-UNESCO For Women in Science partnership is a relevant example of positive action in this field, giving a voice and visibility to women scientists and to their achievements to meet the challenges of our century.

Since its inception in 1998, the L'Oral-UNESCO For Women in Science program has honored and supported 3,900 women scientists. It continues to lobby for these women to receive the recognition that they deserve. These brilliant female researchers have contributed significantly to their respective scientific fields and to finding effective solutions to some of the most pressing and urgent challenges that we face as a global society. This year's celebration will be a way to acclaim them for their life's work and the many obstacles they have overcome.

DISCOVER THE LAUREATES AND INTERNATIONAL RISING TALENTS CELEBRATED THIS YEAR

More information on these 45 women in science awarded by clicking on this link

LAUREATES 2022

LAUREATE FOR AFRICA AND THE ARAB STATES

Professor Agns Binagwaho, PUBLIC HEALTH AND PEDIATRICS, Professor of Pediatrics and Vice-Chancellor of Global Health Equity University, Kigali, Rwanda

LAUREATE FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

Professor Hailan Hu, NEUROSCIENCE, Professor and Executive Director of the Neuroscience Center of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China

LAUREATE FOR EUROPE

Professor ngela Nieto, EMBRYOLOGY AND BIOMEDICINE, Professor at the Institute of Neuroscience (CSIC-UMH), San Juan de Alicante, Spain

LAUREATE FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

Professor Maria Guzmn, INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND VIROLOGY, Director of the Research Center of the Pedro Kouri Institute (IPK), Institute of Tropical Medicine, Havana, Cuba

LAUREATE FOR NORTH AMERICA

Professor Katalin Karik, BIOCHEMISTRY, Adjunct Professor at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America, and Senior Vice President at BioNTech RNA Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, United States of America

LAUREATES 2021

LAUREATE FOR AFRICA AND THE ARAB STATES

Professor Catherine Ngila, CHEMISTRY, Acting Executive Director of the African Academy of Sciences, Former Deputy Vice Chancellor in charge of Academic and Student Affairs (DVC-AA) at Riara University, Kenya, and Visiting Professor of Applied Chemistry at the University of Johannesburg, South Africa

LAUREATE FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

Professor Kyoko Nozaki, CHEMISTRY, Professor of Chemistry at the University of Tokyo, Japan

LAUREATE FOR EUROPE

Professor Franoise Combes, ASTROPHYSICS, Professor and Galaxies and Cosmology Chair at the Collge de France in Paris, and Astrophysicist at the Paris Observatory - PSL, France

LAUREATE FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

Professor Alicia Dickenstein, MATHEMATICS, Professor of Mathematics at the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina

LAUREATE FOR NORTH AMERICA

Professor Shafi Goldwasser, COMPUTER SCIENCE, Director of the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing, Professor in Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences at University of California Berkeley, RSA Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT, United States of America and Professor of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics at Weizmann Institute, Israel

LAUREATES 2020

LAUREATE FOR AFRICA AND THE ARAB STATES

Professor Abla Mehio Sibai, MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES, Professor of Epidemiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Lebanon

LAUREATE FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

Doctor Firdausi Qadri, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, Senior Scientist, Head Mucosal Immunology and Vaccinology Unit, Infectious Diseases Division, International Center for Diarrhoeal Disease and Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh

LAUREATE FOR EUROPE

Professor Edith Heard, FRS, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, Director General of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany, Chair of Epigenetics and Cellular Memory at the Collge de France, Paris, France, and former Director of the Genetics and Developmental Biology Unit at the Institut Curie, Paris, France

LAUREATE FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

Professor Esperanza Martnez-Romero, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, Professor of Environmental Science at the Genomic Science Center, National University of Mexico, Mexico

LAUREATE FOR NORTH AMERICA

Professor Kristi Anseth, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, Distinguished Professor, Tisone Professor and Associate Professor of Surgery at the University of Colorado, Boulder, United States of America

INTERNATIONAL RISING TALENTS 2022

AFRICA AND THE ARAB STATES

Dr. Lina Dahabiyeh, BASIC MEDICINE, The University of Jordan, Jordan

Dr. Ndeye Maty Ndiaye, MATERIAL ENGINEERING, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal

Dr. Waad Saftly, PHYSICS, Al-Baath University, Syria

ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

Dr. So Young Choi, INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea

Dr. Van Thi Thanh Ho, CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, Hochiminh City University of Natural Resources and Environment, Vietnam

Dr. Pantana Tor-ngern, EARTH & RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

Dr. Daria Smirnova, PHYSICS, Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy

of Sciences, Russia

EUROPE

Dr. Natalia Bruno, PHYSICS, National Institute of Optics of the National Research Council, Italy

Dr. Karolina Mikulska-Ruminska, PHYSICS, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland

Dr. Ieva Plikusiene, CHEMISTRY, Vilnius University, Lithuania

Dr. Beatriz Villarroel, PHYSICS, Stockholm University, Sweden

LATIN AMERICAN AND THE CARIBBEAN

Dr. Maria Florencia Cayrol, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, Institute of Biomedical Research - UCA - CONICET, Argentina

Dr. Irene del Real, EARTH & RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, Austral University, Chile

NORTH AMERICA

Dr. Daphn Lemasquerier, PHYSICS, University of Texas at Austin, United States of America

Dr. Alison McAfee, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, University of British Columbia and North Carolina State University, Canada

INTERNATIONAL RISING TALENTS 2020

AFRICA AND THE ARAB STATES

Dr. Laura-Joy Boulos, FUNDAMENTAL MEDICINE, Institute of Applied and Human Neurosciences (INSAN), Saint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon

Dr. Nowsheen Goonoo, MATERIAL SCIENCES, BIOMATERIALS, Drug Delivery and Nanotechnology Unit, Centre for Biomedical and Biomaterials Research, University of Mauritius, Rduit, Mauritius

Dr. Nouf Mahmoud, HEALTH SCIENCES, Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology Laboratory, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

Dr. Georgina Nyawo, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, Clinical Mycobacteriology & Epidemiology (CLIME), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

Dr. Rui Bai, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, Structural Laboratory, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

Dr. Huanqian Loh, PHYSICS, Center for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Dr. Mikyung Shin, MEDICAL ENGINEERING, Nature-inspired Biomaterial Engineering Laboratory, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

EUROPE

Dr. Vida Engmann, MATERIAL ENGINEERING, SDU NanoSYD, Mads Clausen Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Snderborg, Denmark

Dr. Serap Erkek, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, Cancer Epigenomics Laboratory, Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey

Dr. Jennifer Garden, CHEMISTRY, School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Dr. Cristina Romera Castillo, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, Marine Biogeochemistry Laboratory, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Dr. Olena Vaneeva, MATHEMATICS, Department of Mathematical Physics, Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

Dr. Paula Giraldo-Gallo, PHYSICS, Quantum Materials Laboratory, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogot, Colombia

Dr. Patrcia Medeiros, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, Laboratory of Biocultural Ecology, Conservation and Evolution Institution: Federal University of Alagoas, Macei, Brazil

NORTH AMERICA

Dr. Elizabeth Trembath-Reichert, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, United States of America

ABOUT THE FONDATION L'ORAL

The Fondation L'Oral supports and empowers women to shape their future and make a difference in society, focusing on three major areas: scientific research and inclusive beauty and climate action.

Since 1998, the L'Oral-UNESCO For Women in Science program has worked to empower more women scientists to overcome barriers to progression and participate in solving the great challenges of our time, for the benefit of all. For 24 years, it has supported more than 3,900 women researchers from over 110 countries, rewarding scientific excellence and inspiring younger generations of women to pursue science as a career.

Convinced that beauty contributes to the process of rebuilding lives, the Fondation L'Oral helps vulnerable women to improve their self-esteem through free beauty and wellness treatments. It also enables underprivileged women to gain access to employment with dedicated vocational beauty training. On average, around 21,000 people have access to these free treatments every year and more than 27,000 people have taken part in professional beauty training, since the beginning of the program.

Finally, women are affected by persistent gender-based discrimination and inequalities, exacerbated by climate change. While they are on the frontline of the crisis, they remain under-represented in climate decision-making. The Women and Climate program of the Fondation L'Oral supports, in particular, women who are developing climate action projects addressing the urgent climate crisis and raises awareness of the importance of gender-sensitive climate solutions.

ABOUT UNESCO

Since its creation in 1945, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has worked to create the conditions for dialogue among civilizations, cultures, and peoples, based on respect for common values. UNESCO's mission is to use its unique expertise in education, science, culture, communication and information to contribute to the building of peace, the eradication of poverty, sustainable development, and intercultural dialogue. The Organization has two global priorities: Africa and gender equality.

UNESCO is the only UN specialized agency with a specific mandate in the sciences, symbolized by the "S" in its acronym. Through its science-related programs, UNESCO contributes to the implementation of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, helps developing countries build their scientific and technological capacities, and supports Member States in their efforts to develop science policies and programs. UNESCO also supports Member States in their efforts to develop effective public policies that integrate local and indigenous knowledge systems.

UNESCO promotes scientific research and expertise in developing countries. The Organization leads several intergovernmental programs on sustainable management of freshwater, ocean and terrestrial resources, biodiversity conservation, and the use of science to address climate change and reduce disaster risk.

UNESCO Science Report: the Race Against Time for Smarter Development, UNESCO Publishing (2021)

European Commission 2018 She figures report

WebWireID289989

Originally posted here:
L'Oral-UNESCO For Women in Science International Awards 2022 - Benzinga - Benzinga