Category Archives: Embryology

Rare Conjoined Bat Twins Found in Brazil – Live Science

The corpses of rare conjoined bats found in Brazil have given scientists a closer look into a phenomenon that has only ever been recorded twice before.

When Marcelo Rodrigues Nogueira, a postdoctoral researcher in biology at the State University of Northern Rio de Janeiro first saw the bat twins, he was "completely astonished," he wrote in an email to Live Science. "I have handled many bats [in my career], some with very impressive morphological characters (and bats are very special in this respect!), but none [were as] surprising as these twins." [See Photos of the Rare Conjoined Bats Found in Brazil]

Only two other pairs of conjoined bat twins have been reported in the scientific literature, one in 1969 and another in 2015.

Although it's not known exactly what causes identical twins to be conjoined, the phenomenon is known to occur when a fertilized egg splits too late. If an egg splits four to five days after being fertilized, two separate identical twins will form. If, however, the splitting doesn't occur until 13 to 15 days after fertilization, the fertilized egg will only separate partially, and the twins will be conjoined.

The researchers first became aware of the conjoined bats after the animals were donated to the Laboratory of Mastozoology at the Rural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. No one from Nogueira's team, which includes embryologists Nadja Lima Pinheiro and Adriana Ventura from the Area of Embryology at the Rural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, saw the twins right when they were found. Because of this, the scientists, aren't certain if the twins were stillborn or if they had died shortly after birth.

These conjoined bat twins, found under a mango tree in southeastern Brazil in 2001, were either stillborn or died shortly after birth.

The bats, found under a mango tree in southeastern Brazil in 2001, are dicephalic parapagus conjoined twins, which means they're oriented side by side with their whole trunks conjoined. X-rays revealed that the twins' spines form a "Y" shape, with two separate columns of vertebrae branching off at the lower back. Ultrasound images also revealed two hearts of equal size that researchers suspect are separate, the scientists said.

Since most bats have only one pup per litter, finding even nonconjoined bat twins is rare. In the five years Daniel Urban, a postdoctoral research associate in evolutionary developmental biology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, has been studying bats, he's only ever seen a single pup flying around or hanging onto its mother, he told Live Science. Urban was the lead author of the 2015 study on conjoined bat twins that was published in the journal Acta Chiropterologica.

It's even harder to find bat twins that are conjoined. But this doesn't mean conjoined twins are rarer in bats than in any other mammals, according to Scott Pedersen, a professor of biology and microbiology at South Dakota State University, who was not involved in the new study. It's just that humans find out about conjoined bats less often than they find out about other conjoined animals, he told Live Science in an email. [Image Gallery: Evolution's Most Extreme Mammals]

Even if conjoined bats are alive when they are born, it's likely that they'll die soon after, because their bodies can't sustain them, Pedersen said. Bats also tend to live in places humans aren't located, which means even if a person were to venture into a bat's domain, the person would need to find the conjoined bats before they degraded or were scavenged.

This is only made more unlikely by the fact that bats are nocturnal, said Urban. If a mother gives birth to conjoined bats during the day, it will likely be in a protected roost, which means people wouldn't see them. She may give birth while she's out in the open, but that would occur only at night, when the twins would be obscured by darkness, Urban said.

"If you combine all these factors together, it's amazing we even have any [conjoined bat twins]," he added.

This X-ray shows that the spines of these conjoined bat twins are joined at their lower backs.

Although little is known about the organs of the recently discovered conjoined bat twins, the researchers have opted not to use any invasive methods to further investigate the animals' bodies.

"It's so rare and precious that you find something like this, you don't want to do any type of destructive sampling to look further. You're, of course, very curious about it, but they're a one-shot deal so, for the most part, they're held onto until the future where a newer technology will allow us to pursue it further without completely damaging what we already have," Urban said.

The new study was published online June 16 in the journal Anatomia Histologia Embryologia.

Original article on Live Science.

Read the original:
Rare Conjoined Bat Twins Found in Brazil - Live Science

Is It Art or Is It Science? – Scientific American (blog)

At first, it looks like a painting from the school of abstract expressionism. A red, central column spiked with narrow yellow bands stands brilliantly against a black field. But actually this is a photograph capturing bacteria in communication with one another, releasing signal molecules in a process known as quorum sensing. These bacteria have colonized the inside of a flow cell, a chamber that liquid courses through to simulate environments where bacteria live, such as water pipes or your intestines. Minyoung Kevin Kim, a graduate student, photographed this behavior during his research in the Bassler and Stone labs.

His photo, Bacterial Communication in Complex Geometry and Flow, is just one of sixty new works lining the light-filled hallway of Princeton Universitys Friend Center, an engineering library, as part of the eighth Art of Science exhibition. The exhibition showcases images scientists generate during their usual course of research in fields from embryology to plasma physics. These curated images are not merely scientifically relevant; they were chosen for the aesthetic qualities they also possess.

It is scientific data, but it is also art. The exhibitions strength lies in challenging us to hold in our minds these twoseemingly dissonant ideas simultaneously. As an artist and a fourth year doctoral student in chemistry, I love going to the Art of Science. The exhibition subverts the practice of segregating my two passions into mutually exclusive realms, an all too common division I find limiting.

This years exhibition complicates the usual program. I was excited to find, alongside aesthetically pleasing data, artistic works made in the spirit of scientific inquiry, liberally defined. This includes works of art created using scientific materials or pieces exploring scientific concepts in artistic genres, such as dance.

In one such scientifically-infused creative process, a visual arts major, Louisa Willis, experimented with an overhead projector, growing agar plates of bacteria with the projectors heat and imaging the plates with the projectors light. Willis then digitally colored and layered the resulting photographs. Her final product, Bumper Moons (Experiment 8), is eerily beautiful. Colonized dishes now overlap as transparent circles of aqua and ruby. In my own research, I am a frequent streaker of antibiotic selection plates. But Willis, rather than growing bacteria in the conventional way I do, playfully upended this process. By repurposing her projector as incubator and light box both, she created an elegant piece of art/lab equipment.

By including works inspired by science, not strictly products of formal research, the latest exhibition further blurs the traditional boundaries between science and art. Presented as equals, striking juxtapositions emerge. In one video, a ballerina mimics neurotransmission events in the brain, her sharp gestures recalling the opening and closing of gap junctions linking neurons. Looping on another flatscreen is an animation of a subjects fMRI-measured brain activity as they watched the first episode of BBCs Sherlock. I laughed at the absurdity of watching one of my favorite shows in frantic fast forward, perched in the corner of the screen. Looking just below, tiny dots raced around a slowly revolving brain, marking colorful pathways, thought patterns that could have been mine.

Though the images consistently entice, rather than intimidate, the accompanying captions are more inconsistent. Some captions read like obscure scientific abstracts describing a material or technology generally, rather than focusing on the particular image. The best captions explain the content of the image itself and how the image was created.

For example, in Crystalline Mondrian, triangles in shades of blue-gray fracture the frame, creating intriguing alternations of light and dark. Turning to the caption, I discovered that the triangles compose a thin crystal film of rubrene, an organic semiconductor, where each blue is a distinct crystalline domain. Within each domain, rubrene molecules align with each other, but deviate from the alignment of rubrenes gathered in surrounding domains. I was charmed to behold a concrete manifestation of an invisible phenomena: polarized light interacting constructively or destructively with crystalline domains. As the polarized light aligns with or deviates from the angle of each domain, the light reflected is either brighter or dimmer. A fundamental physics principle comes to life in this photograph.

In each piece, viewers glimpse an experts world. An entire field of research hides in a single image or 30 seconds of video. The limited space of each piece heightened my curiosity about the broad, underlying research more effectively than a longwinded lecture or a laboratory visit ever could. The limitations created a pointed strangeness that made me crave a deeper grasp of each subject.

The Art of Science celebrates the visual outputs common to both disciplines. Art and science share a visual language and rely on creative processes. This can be challenging to recognize. Skeptical viewers might dismiss the beauty on display as unintentional, since it is not the primary objective of research. But to dismiss this beauty as accidental is too easy. Here, beauty is not an artifact, but a feature of compelling data.

The exhibition merges art and science at Princeton Universitys Friend Center until January 2018.

Read more here:
Is It Art or Is It Science? - Scientific American (blog)

Embryology, LEGOS AND geocaching among activities at Youth Building – Uniontown Herald Standard

Visitors to the Youth Building during this years Fayette County Fair at the Fayette County Fairgrounds in Dunbar Township will have opportunities to see an embryology project, build Lego structures that reflect local landmarks and participate in geocaching as well as learn about 4-H.

Jennifer Deichert, Penn State Extension assistant, explained this years programs are being set up to run in blocks of time to allow fairgoers more flexibility to stop by anytime during these segments to learn about the subjects being presented.

The embryology project, which will be available in an area of the building throughout the fair, teaches life development. The project, which has been undertaken in several local schools through the years, uses chicken eggs that hatch into young chicks.

A program called Explore Embryology with 4-H will be available from 3 to 6 p.m. Friday, July 28 where presenters will be able to explain the process and answers questions to those who visit.

Well let them look at the little chicks and talk about opportunities in 4-H, said Deichert.

Explore Geocaching with 4-H will be presented with Williams Energy from noon to 4 p.m. July 31 to Aug. 4. Geocaching is a hobby in which a participant uses a GPS to search for hidden items called geocaches. Deichert said participants will learn how to geocache to find sites and exhibits throughout the fair.

Steel City LEGO User Group returns with building activities from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. Sunday, July 30.

Im real excited. (Steel City LUG founder) Josh Hall will be here on Sunday with challenges that relate to something in the Laurel Highlands, Deichert said.

Without revealing specific commands, those challenges include:

Jumonville cross Participants will be asked to make a replica of the Great Cross of Christ that is a local landmark at this Christian camp in North Union Township.

Fallingwater Participants will be challenged to build a cantilever porch based on the concept used at Frank Lloyd Wrights internationally known Fallingwater in Mill Run.

Cave Those participating will be asked to build a cave similar to Laurel Caverns in Farmington, home to Pennsylvanias largest cave.

National Road markers Participants will try building a replica of the markers that denoted miles along the National Road, Americas first federal highway, that runs through Somerset, Fayette and Washington counties in Pennsylvania.

The 4-H Robotics Club will help with the LEGOS program and have their own demonstration from 1 to 2:30 p.m. Sunday, July 30. The club will also host LEGO challenges from 4 to 6 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 1 and Thursday, Aug. 3.

Carnegie Science Center returns with a liquid nitrogen Make It and Take It activity from 2 to 5 p.m. on Friday, Aug. 4.

Other programs being held in the Youth Building during the fair include:

Explore STEM with 4-H from 3-6 p.m. Monday, July 31, and 2-5 p.m. Wednesday, Aug. 2.

Explore Agriculture and Plant Science with 4-H, 2-5 p.m., Tuesday, Aug. 1; Cloverbud Day: Activities for youths ages 5-8, 2-5 p.m., Friday, Aug. 4 and Explore Health with 4-H, 3-6 p.m., Saturday, Aug. 5.

Agriculture-related videos will run in the Youth Building during the fair.

In addition, GoPro cameras will be available to 4-H members to use for filming a video about the fair. Deichert noted one of this years new clubs is a 4-H Video Production Club.

A Fayette County tourism grant is providing funds for a television with a DVD player to show the agricultural videos as well as 10 GPS units for geocaching, LEGOS for the building challenges and GoPro cameras.

The Youth Building is also the site of the opening ceremony for the 63rd annual Fayette County Fair during which Bill Jackson, fair board president, welcomes the public and introduces fair board members, visiting officials and this years candidates for fair queen. The ceremony takes place at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, July 28.

4-H clubs will have to set up displays about their clubs, 2-5 p.m., Thursday, and 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., Friday, that will be judged later in competition.

The Youth Building will also hold the popular Pennsylvania Preferred Chocolate Cake and Cookie competition Sunday. Entries are accepted from 9 a.m. to noon with judging at 1 p.m.

On Sunday, the 4-H Robotics Club will have a demonstration, 1-2:30 p.m., while the annual 4-H Fashion Show is scheduled for 3 p.m. and the 4-H Communication Contest is slated for 5 p.m.

4-H entries for a variety of projects are being accepted 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday, July 31, with judging from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Tuesday, Aug. 1.

The LH Literacy Van is slated to visit the Youth Building from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m., Friday, Aug. 4.

Follow this link:
Embryology, LEGOS AND geocaching among activities at Youth Building - Uniontown Herald Standard

Senior IVF Specialist Dr. Sangeeta Jain Participates in ESHRE 2017 in Geneva, Switzerland – PR Newswire India (press release)

NEW DELHI, July 31, 2017 /PRNewswire/ --

Dr. Sangeeta Jain MBBS, MD (Obst & Gynae), Founder, JoyIVF Clinic, attended European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) 2017 that took place in Geneva, Switzerland earlier this month.This was the 33rdannual meeting of ESHRE which is aimed at promoting interest in, and understanding of, reproductive biology and medicine. It does this through facilitating research and subsequent dissemination of research findings in human reproduction and embryology to the different stakeholders.

A technical exhibition of pharmaceutical, surgical and laboratory products was organised in the sidelines of the congress. Several Pre-congress Courses were organised by ESHRE's Special Interest Groups on a variety of subjects including male infertility, enhancing endometrial receptivity, embryo transfer process and techniques, etc.

Several industry-sponsored sessions were also part of the programme. Some of the interesting topics included personalizing ovarian stimulation, natural diversity in ART outcome, insulin sensitizers and PCOS, amongst others.

JoyIVF believes that learnings from the annual meeting are valuable to the medical and scientific industry and it is important that they are brought into India.

Dr. Jain has close to 30 years of experience in fertility research and treatment and continues to advance this field. Dr. Sangeeta has had a brilliant career run with gold medals in academics and practice successfully from the past many years. After completing her MBBS and post-graduation in Obestrics and Gynaecology from King George's Medical College, Lucknow, she has been training with distinguished experts like Dr. R. Rajan and Dr. B. N.Chakravarty, the pioneers of India's first test tube baby at Institute of Reproductive Medicine.

She founded JoyIVF Clinic in New Delhi to maintain the set benchmarks in form of fertility services.

About JoyIVF Clinic:

Joy IVF Clinic,in East Delhi under brilliant guidance of Dr. Jain, has been able to achieve its aims with high rates of success. It has been able to help couples from all spheres of life toenjoy and celebrate the emotions attached to parenthood.

For more details, visit:

Joy IVF Clinic – Where dreams are born

Dr. Sangeeta Jain of JoyIVF Clinic participates in ESHRE 2017 in Geneva, Switzerland

Media Contact:Ms. Sucheta Sunderiyalmail@joyivf.com+91-8010790790JoyIVF Clinic

SOURCE JoyIVF Clinic

More:
Senior IVF Specialist Dr. Sangeeta Jain Participates in ESHRE 2017 in Geneva, Switzerland - PR Newswire India (press release)

New study shows benefit of treatment as alternative to IVF – New Zealand Herald

A new study has shown the benefits of a fertility treatment for the first time - finding a three-fold increase in pregnancy rates among infertile couples.

The research, carried out by Professor Cindy Farquhar of Auckland District Health Board's Fertility Plus, found intrauterine insemination (IUI) combined with clomiphene, a medication used to treat women who did not ovulate, was three times more effective than continuing to try to get pregnant without treatment.

The process involves taking medication for about five days before having sperm inserted into the uterus.

The procedure was less invasive and cheaper than in vitro fertilisation (IVF). One round of IVF was about the same cost as three or four IUI cycles, Farquhar said.

While IUI had been used for many years, its success rate had never been studied and in 2013 the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommended the procedure no longer be used because of that.

Farquhar said her study had proven it was a technique worth using.

The study of 201 couples who were "relatively infertile" saw half continue to try to conceive naturally while the others were given up to three IUI cycles.

Nine of the women not receiving treatment conceived naturally during the trial while 31 of those who received IUI became pregnant.

Farquhar, who presented the results of the clinical trial at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Annual Meeting in Geneva, said the treatment gave couples a helping hand by encouraging more eggs to be released, timing it right and getting sperm halfway to the egg before releasing them.

Professor Cindy Farquhar of Auckland District Health Board's Fertility Plus has completed a study showing the benefits of intrauterine insemination. Photo/Supplied

The study gave women better information when they were considering fertility treatments, she said.

Many women tried IUI while waiting for the time frame to pass to allow them to qualify for publically funded IVF, and Farquhar agreed it was a good first treatment option.

"Now we've actually shown it has benefit, whereas people have been disregarding it for years."

Katrina Foster was 35 when she and her partner decided it was time to start a family.

They thought it would be easy but by the time she was 39 they had still not conceived naturally so they turned to fertility treatments.

Katrina Foster with her son Lochlan. Photo / Doug Sherring

"People say, 'your clock is ticking' but you don't know the facts," she said. She was told, because of her age, she had a 10 per cent chance of becoming pregnant.

Her specialist suggested intrauterine insemination and Foster was eligible to take part in the trial.

She expected it would likely take all three rounds of treatment to succeed, but just weeks after the first round, tests confirmed she was pregnant.

At the age of 40 she gave birth to her son, Lochlan.

Speaking to the Herald three years after he was born, Foster said having a fertility treatment was a big decision but one she is glad they made.

"We were really thrilled," she said.

A year later the couple decided to try again but after three rounds of IUI and one of IVF, they decided not to continue.

"Even thought I was really disappointed that I couldn't have number two, I have to remember that I'm lucky," she said. "It's a massive emotional rollercoaster."

Foster said she would encourage others in the same situation to give it a go.

"At the end of the day, what have you got to lose?"

Originally posted here:
New study shows benefit of treatment as alternative to IVF - New Zealand Herald

Livestock News – The Stokes News

Farming is a tough job by any measure. Hours are unpredictable, there is a lot of hard labor involved, and we are met with unpredictable challenges often. However, you would be hard pressed to find a more rewarding use of time. Some of my biggest pleasures are eating that first squash out of the garden in the summer or watching a newborn calf run around its mother as she watches cautiously. Those simple moments make the work and worry completely worth it all. It is nice to know that I am not alone in having these joys, and many people in the area are interested in beginning to farm as a hobby, second job, or career.

I can see nothing but a positive in the Back to Ag social movement that we are experiencing. High school agriculture classes and FFA groups across our high schools are growing, and those participating are taking what they are learning to serve their neighbors and community through service projects with the elementary schools and other groups. For example, South Stokes FFA students are raising chickens from elementary embryology programs, processing themselves, and donating them to the East Stokes outreach ministry. Pre-registration numbers for the small farmer courses offered through Forsyth Tech and Cooperative Extension show that there is significant interest in people moving toward agriculture. I am excited to assist in helping people learn how to farm as a part of this movement and look forward to see what happens as a result in our community.

Read the rest here:
Livestock News - The Stokes News

More women are freezing their eggs for a *way* different reason than we thought – HelloGiggles

More women are freezing their eggs because men are mostly trash, according to study "); } AFP/Getty Images

A new study out of Yale University found that more women are freezing their eggs after graduating from college and finding that there just arent any quality men to partner up with. This man deficit, as the study puts it, flies right in the face of other recent studies that assumed more women were freezing their eggs so that they could pursue their career and wanted to buy themselves some time to stack their dough. To be honest, theres nothing wrong with either reason: If you think you want kids at some point in your life, but not anytime soon,freezing your eggs is not a bad way to go.

The study interviewed 150women at eight IVF clinics in the U.S. and Israel, between June 2014 and August 2016. When asked why they were doing it, 90 percent of respondents said that they justcouldnt find a suitable partner.

Study authorMarcia Inhorn elaborated at theEuropean Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology conference in Geneva, Switzerland. She said,Women lamented the missing men in their lives, viewing egg freezing as a way to buy time while on the continuing online search for a committed partner. The desire to find a man who wanted to settle down, so to speak, was more common in women who were highly educated. The results, Inhorn says, show that women are outpacing their male peers, which is a phenomenon thats been brewing for some time.

The new survey is interesting. But it was merely 150 women at a handful of clinics, all in the same demographic, and mostly in their late 30s or 40s.Women are freezing their eggs more than they used to, likely thanks to better medical science and less stigma remember it wasnt until 2012 that theAmerican Society for Reproductive Medicinetook away the experimental label from the procedure.

Despite the high price tag, women are taking advantage of science, much like they did with birth control and emergency contraception, pretty much as soon as it was available. Now that they are freezing their eggs, though, the need to place women who do so in a box, like Cant Find A Man or Selfishly Wants A Career is not the way to go. However you interpret the results of studies like this, there still seems to be a lot of judgement about why women choose to freeze their eggs.

Inhorn did add that women were happy to be taking control of their fertility. She said, Almost all of the women that I spoke to were glad that theyd done it. They felt it had given them some measure of control, a kind of peace of mind, and it actually took the desperation out of dating and feeling like they were under the pressure of the biological clock.

Take Kaitlyn Bristowe, for example, who found her fianc on The Bachelorette (talk about a fairy tale!). The 31-year-old is happily engaged and employed, but decided to take advantage of her options. Im taking control of my future! she said in a tweet when a fan asked her why she was at a fertility clinic. Bristowe added, As a woman theres always pressure to have babies, and this puts my mind at ease for when IM ready.

Given the expensive nature of IVF treatments, its a privilege to be able to make that kind of choice, and many women who would like to take advantage of science, simply cannot. Its nice that as a society were finally starting to examine why women are choosing to freeze their eggs, now that the procedure is more common and accessible to some segments of the population. Lets do more science! But lets not assume that if women were able to freeze their eggs decades ago that they wouldnt have and that it might not have anything to do with men at all.

Go here to read the rest:
More women are freezing their eggs for a *way* different reason than we thought - HelloGiggles

Most couples do not get divorced after infertility struggles – Health24

11 July 2017 Most couples do not get divorced after infertility struggles A study found that couples who seek in vitro fertilisation are not at greater risk of divorce.

Most couples want to have children, and the inability to do so can put strain on their relationship.

It's been suggested that the disappointment of infertility and the stress of treatment can push relationships to the breaking point. However, those who undergo fertility treatment are no more likely to break up, according to a new study.

According to Health24, infertility can be diagnosed when a couple has tried to conceive for longer than a year but is unsuccessful. Normally, a couple will fall pregnant within six to 12 months of trying to conceive.

Benefits to relationship

A study of more than 40 000 women in Denmark who had fertility treatment between 1994 and 2009 found no link between the treatment and separation or divorce. Researchers said 20% split up within 16 years, compared to 22% of women who were not treated.

The study was presented this week at the annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology in Geneva, Switzerland.

Researcher Mariana Martins said the findings should reassure couples who have had or are considering in vitro fertilisation.

"Findings on the security of relationships and parenthood can be particularly helpful in supporting patients' commitment to treatment," said Martins, a psychology faculty member at the University of Porto in Portugal.

"We have previously found that subjects who divorce, re-partner and come back to treatment are the ones that five years before had the most stress," she said in a meeting news release.

"We also know that despite all the strain that this infertility can bring, going through [assisted reproduction treatment] can actually bring benefit to a couple's relationship, because it forces them to improve communication and coping strategies."

Read more:

Treatment for infertility: is it ever too late?

Fertility get the timing right

The A-Z of infertility

See original here:
Most couples do not get divorced after infertility struggles - Health24

Treatment for Infertility Does Not Appear to Raise Risk of Divorce – Doctors Lounge

Category: Endocrinology | Family Medicine | Gynecology | Nursing | Psychiatry | Urology | Conference News

Back to Journal Articles

Study finds couples who seek in vitro fertilization are not at added risk of divorce

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

MONDAY, July 10, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- Couples who undergo assisted reproduction treatment (ART) do not have a higher likelihood of divorce, according to research presented at the annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, held from July 2 to 5 in Geneva.

The study included 42,845 women in Denmark who had ART between 1994 and 2009.

The researchers found no link between ART and separation or divorce. They added that 20 percent of women who underwent ART separated or divorced within 16 years, compared to 22 percent of women who were not treated.

"Findings on the security of relationships and parenthood can be particularly helpful in supporting patients' commitment to treatment," Mariana Martins, Ph.D., a psychology faculty member at the University of Porto in Portugal, said in a news release from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. "We have previously found that subjects who divorce, re-partner, and come back to treatment are the ones that five years before had the most stress. We also know that despite all the strain that this infertility can bring, going through ART can actually bring benefit to a couple's relationship, because it forces them to improve communication and coping strategies."

Press Release More Information

Link:
Treatment for Infertility Does Not Appear to Raise Risk of Divorce - Doctors Lounge

Surviving cancer means lower pregnancy rates in women – BioNews

Female cancer survivors are 38 percent less likely to become pregnant compared with women in the general population, according to a study presented at the annual European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology conference in Geneva.

Professor Richard Anderson at Edinburgh University, UK, and his team studiedpregnancy rates in 23,201 female cancer survivors of reproductive age on the Scottish Cancer Registry and matched controls, over a 30-year-period. They found that 29 percent of cancer survivors achieved pregnancy, compared with 46 percent in the control group.

Reduction in fertility after cancer is often attributed to the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Chemotherapy 'could add a decade to a womens reproductive age', commented Dr Gillian Lockwood, medical director of IVI Midland in Tamworth, UK. She emphasised the importance of accurate and comprehensive patient counselling.

Professor Anderson stressed that the results of his study only measure pregnancy post- cancer diagnosis, and do not indicate incidence of infertility. He explained that 'some women may have chosen not to have a pregnancy' and 'having a pregnancy after cancer does involve a range of complex issues' No increased risk of miscarriage or stillbirth was found.

The impact of cancer was more pronounced when it came to first pregnancies, with an almost 50 percent reduction in likelihood of a first pregnancy for women post-diagnosis compared with the control group. A reduction in pregnancies was observed in all types of cancer, but the largest effects occurred in survivors of breast and cervical cancer, and leukaemia.

The study highlights the need for renewed focus on fertility preservation, both in terms of driving forward further development in the field, as well as ensuring that there is consistent access to these medical interventions across the world. Professor Anderson described current fertility preservation services as 'very variable', even in the USA and Europe.

In 2016, Professor Anderson led the team which successfully re-implanted a section of ovarian tissue into an infertile cancer survivor, a decade after the tissue had been extracted. She gave birth to a healthy baby boy, becoming one of only a handful of women in the world to give birth after an ovarian tissue cryopreservation procedure, and the first in the UK.

While emphasising that this is very much an experimental procedure, Professor Anderson added: 'It comes at a time when NHS services for fertility preservation are developing across the UK, and we hope it will be the impetus to provide that to all who are in need.'

Here is the original post:
Surviving cancer means lower pregnancy rates in women - BioNews