Category Archives: Embryology

Raising Pro-Life Kids: 4 Ways to Teach the Sanctity of Life – Christianheadlines.com

Raising Pro-Life Kids: 4 Ways to Teach the Sanctity of Life

It was Nicks golden birthday. He turned seventeen-years-old on October 17th, and we celebrated in style. My wife made a special teriyaki chicken dinner at Nicks request. The decorations were Notre Dame football Nicks favorite team. The plates, napkins, tablecloths, and helium balloons were Fighting Irish top to bottom. The cake, naturally, featured a Notre Dame endzone scene complete with goalposts. Amid all the party goodies and celebration, my wife and I were thankful for our pro-life family and attitudes toward the sanctity of life that had given us Nick.

As the festivities progressed, the conversation around the table became boisterous. Along with a small cache of wrapped presents, the premier gift for Nicky was that two of his older siblings made it home from college for his big day. Much ribbing and laughter went along with celebrating the birthday boy.

When we got to the cake, the conversation ebbed. Nick stood up. He motioned for quiet, and we gave him our attention. I have a prepared speech for you, he said. Its my birthday, and I want to say that I am thankful for my life and that I was born. I know a lot of kids like me dont get to be born. I am glad that my parents decided to give me my life so that I could have a birthday.

Nick has made this declaration in various forms on different occasions over the years, but it never gets old. You see, Nick has Down syndrome. He is well aware that many kids with Downs are aborted before they ever see the light of day. Nicks right to celebrate his precious life a life fearfully and wonderfully made by God (Psalm 139:14).

On the other hand, the gratitude he expressed was hardly necessary. As do his six siblings, Nick knows that my wife and I would never have chosen abortion for any of our preborn children. My kids know that with absolute certitude, and theyve always known that.

I think this is at the heart of raising kids who know the sanctity of life: The witness of moms and dads who are utterly and unequivocally committed to protecting human life from conception until natural death. That witness can take a variety of forms. It just happened to be the case that the primary pro-life witness weve made in our family is Nick himself. His presence in the world and his rich and full life are testimony of Gods providence and grace. After you meet Nicky and see his smile, genuineness, and enthusiasm, youll have no doubt that the world is a better place because hes here. And thats absolutely true for all boys and girls with Downs. Ask their parents. Ask their siblings. Theyll be delighted to tell you.

But what if youre not blessed to have a child with Down syndrome, either by birth or adoption? How can we form passionate pro-life hearts in our children? This seems especially difficult in a world that seems obsessed with solving problems by destroying life instead of nurturing it. Here are 4 ideas that weve found helpful in our family. See if they resonate with you!

Talk about abortion a lot. Is it uncomfortable? Awkward? Only at first. Around our dinner table, hot topics like abortion come up frequently. We rarely attempt to curb discussion of controversial issues. Younger kids benefit by hearing the terms and the debate, which will generate interest and a desire to probe further.

To be sure, we managed those discussions to ensure age-appropriate themes. We always urged our kids, no matter their age, to ask for clarification if they didnt understand what we were talking about. Moreover, as parents, we made certain that we were thoroughly informed and up to date on the issues, which can be a daunting task. There are plenty of reliable resources to do that, including the organization National Right to Life, but Id advise you to rely primarily on local or state pro-life organizations. That way, youll be connected with a supportive group of folks whove been there with their own sons and daughters, and they can tell you what worked and what didnt in their own pro-life family formation.

Caring for the poor might seem like an odd prescriptive for raising pro-life kids, but I promise you its essential, especially as your kids grow into adolescence. Theyre going to hear that pro-lifers only care about babies (and their moms) beforebirth, not afterward, and you have to counter that argument with concrete action.

Its not enough to spout statistics about the charitable outreach the Christian community extends to moms and families in need. Instead, we need a family culture oriented to care for the poor. There are two ways to create this culture. The first way is through the checkbook. Let your kids see you giving money away to both organizations and individuals in need. The second way is to serve directly like volunteering at soup kitchens and food pantries, especially pregnancy care centers and homes for pregnant moms in distress.

A frightened mother is considering abortion

You can help her choose life through the power of an ultrasound.

Save Babies from Abortion Year-Round

Being a public witness takes the conversation from inside the home to outside of it. Like the suggestion to care for the poor, it further concretes our words into action. The reality of abortion may and probably should prompt us to do things that will make us plenty uncomfortable but will teach our children that defending the sanctity of preborn human life is serious business. Examples include a peaceful, prayerful protest at abortion centers in your community and even participation in pro-life family marches especially on the January 22 anniversary of Roe v. Wade in Washington D.C.

If our goal is to form our children in a pro-life mindset one that recoils at the idea of abortion and embraces the intrinsic, infinite value of all human life, no matter what then what better object lesson can we give than welcoming life ourselves?

Besides, what greater gift can we give our children than another brother or sister? Certainly, our greatest gift to our son Nicholas was his little sister, Katharine.

Adoption would be included under this rubric of family expansion as an expression of our love for life. There are also other less permanent forms of hospitality welcoming aging parents or other relations whod otherwise end up in nursing homes, for example. These kinds of steps entail tremendous risk and lots of unknowns, to be sure. But whats our goal? If we wish to ingrain a thorough pro-life perspective in our children, then theres no better way to demonstrate that than by incarnating sacrificial love in another family member!

Note that the previous four ways of demonstrating the sanctity of life altruism, education, activism, and radical hospitality do not depend on a Biblical worldview or Christian commitment. Clearly, its compatible with Biblical values. However, the four ways to teach the sanctity of life and create a pro-life family are defensible independent of any particular philosophy or faith orientation.

Thats crucial because, lets face it, there is a good chance that at least some of your own children may stray from the faith (at least temporarily) as they grow older. This is a trend that is hard to deny and one that is growing. We do what we can to steep our sons and daughters in Scripture and help them develop strong prayer habits as part of a personal relationship with Christ. Yet we cant protect them forever from broader cultures anti-religious undertow, not to mention the blast of godless propaganda that dominates popular culture and social media.

And what if you do have children that reject the faith you raised them in? Theyll also be likely swayed by the worlds arguments in favor of solving problems by assaulting life abortion, infanticide, euthanasia, assisted suicide, the whole deadly morass of what passes as social (and, tragically, legal) norms these days.

But you have a say in that at least while theyre still home with you. Be proactive in forming their pro-life sensibilities. Ground them in reason and rational argument; teach them logic and embryology; show them videos of preborn human life, and bring them to the bedside of those who are living large at the end of life. Equip them with the old-fashioned common sense that once made abortion unthinkable and mercy-killing a contradiction in terms. Teach them the sanctity of life early and often.

Is it possible? Yes, I know its possible. In fact, its highly likely. The growing numbers of pro-life young people who reject God and religion provide powerful testimony of its feasibility. Theyre the ones who want to support progressive politicians but cant bring themselves to support those who promote greater abortion access. And theyre also the ones wholl be unlikely to choose abortion themselves when faced with a problem or inconvenient pregnancy.

Come to think of it, that last scenario provides one more powerful means of forming pro-life families an extension of the radical hospitality I mentioned earlier. If and when an adult child, regardless of faith status, decides to make sacrifices to welcome an unexpected human life God happens to send along, we do well to make like the prodigal sons dad and rush out with open arms and celebrate!

If you're not able to attend a March for Life event, you can still helpsupport Sanctity of Life with Focus on the Family by donating here.

Photo courtesy: Getty Images/Wave Break Media

Rick Becker is a husband, father of seven, nursing instructor, and religious educator. He studied theology at Seattle Pacific University and Franciscan University of Steubenville, and he is currently working toward a Doctorate of Nursing Practice at Indiana Wesleyan University. Rick currently serves on the nursing faculty at Bethel University in Mishawaka, Indiana.

Visit link:
Raising Pro-Life Kids: 4 Ways to Teach the Sanctity of Life - Christianheadlines.com

Infertility treatment: When will free IVF be introduced in Ireland? – The Irish Times

In 2019, the government committed to publicly funding infertility services, including IVF. Lynn Enright asks if it will happen this year and speaks to some people about the costs financial, medical and emotional of funding the process privately

Amy Gallagher and James Rowan have always known they would need help to conceive. Rowan had cancer first at age 15, then at 20 and the high-dose chemotherapy used to treat it destroyed his fertility. Before the first course of chemotherapy began, he banked sperm which remained frozen for the best part of two decades. When he and Gallagher got together and decided they wanted to complete their family she has a son from a previous relationship to whom Rowan is a loving stepfather they faced a dearth of information and options.

I asked my GP about it and he just pointed me in the direction of a private clinic, Rowan says. Thats all he could do for me.

The World Health Organisation is clear: infertility is a disease. It affects the male or female reproductive system and is defined by the failure to achieve a pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse. In those of reproductive age, it affects men and women equally, with male-factor infertility accounting for 50 per cent of cases, according to Prof Mary Wingfield, clinical director of the Merrion Fertility Clinic in Dublin.

Yet, in Ireland, people who cant conceive without turning to assisted reproductive technology (ART) receive little or no support within the public health system. Those who need in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) and other fertility treatments to start a family will find themselves immediately paying for treatment, a situation that compares unfavourably with most of our European neighbours. In Scotland, for example, eligible patients are offered up to three free cycles of IVF the number most experts agree gives a fair chance of conception. In Ireland, there is no comprehensive State-funded fertility treatment, even when patients are receiving care and treatment for a condition or disease that affects their fertility, such as cancer, colitis or endometriosis.

Forty-year-old Natalie Doyle needed to pursue IVF after her Fallopian tubes became encased in scar tissue following complications relating to colitis. She had been receiving expert care within the public health system but once it came to looking into ART options, a situation she found herself in as a direct result of the disease, she felt completely adrift.

Youre just left on your own to choose a clinic and theres no communication between your fertility clinic and your other doctors, she says. Theres not even a link between your GP and the clinic its just nuts, I cant get my head around it.

Doyle and her partner postponed moving in together, both staying with family while they funded cycle after cycle of failed IVF. Eventually, they conceived their daughter but Doyle is adamant that the Government needs to step in. The costs are too much for many couples to bear, she says.

It feels like youre spending money, just sitting in the waiting room. It bleeds you dry. The Government needs to help with the costs, she says. But they also need to help medically, so that patients like me have a continuity of care. There have to be more regulations, there has to be more support, the mind boggles that nothing has been done yet.

In Ireland, fertility clinics are regulated by the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) but there is no regulatory body that specifically oversees the fertility industry. In the UK, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) performs that role, ensuring fertility clinics and research centres comply with the law, as well as providing free, clear and unbiased information on all fertility clinics operating within the jurisdiction. Without such a body here, patients can find themselves feeling bewildered.

Amy Gallagher says she got most of her information from Google, Facebook and Instagram.

I just think there should be some form of support for people, not only financially but emotionally, she says. For people who experience infertility as a result of childhood cancer, theres nothing out there. Theres one Facebook group, thats all Ive found. There needs to be something like the citizens information service, somewhere you can get information. People have no one to turn to. Your GP doesnt know and a fertility doctor will charge at least 250 for a consultation, just to ask them questions. The situation is, she says, deeply frustrating and upsetting.

Prof Wingfield says Ireland desperately needs an equivalent of the HFEA. The industry is regulated by the HPRA but its more from the point of view of the quality procedures surrounding the management of human tissues and cells. Its not about the social, medical, ethical and legal realities. There are plans afoot to introduce such a body as part of an overhaul of the provision of fertility treatment but it is not clear when that will happen.

In October 2017, the cabinet approved the Assisted Human Reproduction (AHR) Bill, a piece of draft legislation that laid out regulations for AHR and the need for the establishment of a regulatory body.

Two years on, in late 2019, details of a model of care for infertility developed by the Department of Health in conjunction with the HSEs National Women & Infants Health Programme were announced, with the then minister for health Simon Harris receiving Government approval to publicly fund infertility services. The announcement a clear commitment from the then Government was hugely significant and it looked as though Ireland was finally set to join most other wealthy and developed nations in providing care and treatment for infertile people. Harris told reporters at the time that he expected publicly funded IVF to be available in 2021.

The planned scheme would comprise three stages: the first stage would involve patients seeing their GP and if it was deemed necessary, they would proceed to the second stage and be referred to a newly established regional fertility hub (there are plans for six hubs, one in each of Irelands six maternity networks), where tests, diagnostic surgery and some non-invasive forms of ART would take place. The third stage would involve the provision of free IVF.

Now, another year has passed and there has been little progress with this ambitious undertaking.

The commitment is ongoing and the current Minister for Health, Stephen Donnelly, confirmed in public statements on the most recent Budget that additional funding is being made available in 2021.

Womens health and our maternity services must get more attention, Donnelly said in the Dil last October, noting that, We will . . .open two new regional fertility hubs in Galway and Cork.

In response to questions from The Irish Times, a Department of Health spokesperson said that 2 million has been made available to allow for the establishment of the first four hubs and a further 1 million has been allocated for the final two hubs.

However, while Covid-19 has not impacted the funding available for the project, the establishment of the hubs has been slowed by the pandemic and its impact on the HSE and the provision of elective health services. None of the six regional hubs are operational at present. Meanwhile, the AHR Bill has still not been signed into law - and without that, publicly funded IVF will not take place.

The Department of Health spokesperson says that it is intended that, in line with available resources, [the] model of care for infertility will be rolled out on a phased basis over the course of the coming years. When pushed for a more specific timeframe, the spokesperson said it is not possible at this juncture to give a definitive timeline.

Rowan and Gallagher arent holding their breath. Weve been promised this Government money for years but its just not coming, Rowan says. Every time you hear about it, you think: Oh maybe that will be through soon. But it seems to be taking years. You cant rely on it, you cant put your hope in it. Gallagher fears that any change will come too late for her: It sounds mad because Im only 32, but every year that Im older, our chances are lower.

Prof Wingfield says Ireland absolutely lags behind other developed countries when it comes to the provision of fertility treatment. The cost of fertility drugs prescribed by a consultant are covered by the Drugs Payment Scheme or a Medical Card and private patients can claim tax relief on the costs of fertility treatment but even so, Irish patients receive significantly less support than those in the UK, Germany, Turkey and most European nations. When asked why that is, she says the answer is complicated. In the past, it would have been because it was a difficult subject to discuss from a religious and moral point of view, but thats no longer the case.

However, when you remove any religious concerns from the discussion of fertility treatment, there remains two very powerful taboos: money and womens reproductive systems.

Because, over the years, its only been available privately not just in Ireland but in most parts of the world and the treatment is expensive. There was a perception that it was a luxury, something that only rich people can afford, Prof Wingfield says.

Rowan says that he and Gallagher have encountered an attitude that suggests fertility treatment is somehow extravagant: We have no choice but to do IVF if we want to have a child but sometimes it feels like people dont understand that. Its nearly treated as though Amy is going in for a boob job. People think its a luxury as opposed to a necessity.

A cycle of IVF usually costs between 6,000 and 10,000 depending on which treatment is required and which clinic you are using. There is not always evidence to support expensive add-ons, such as endometrial scratching and assisted hatching, but if you are already spending huge sums of money, it can seem churlish not to attempt to boost your chances by opting in. Treatment can be accessed at a cheaper cost abroad (most Irish patients go to the Czech Republic or Spain) but flights and accommodation will add up and being hundreds of miles from your doctor if something goes wrong is stressful and potentially dangerous.

Generally, only the most expensive private health insurance packages cover infertility treatment and even then, they do not cover the entire cost. The most comprehensive packages at Irish Life and VHI cover up to 2,000 towards a cycle of IVF, which can be accessed only twice per lifetime.

The vast expense can make patients feel that their clinics are rapacious. You have to pay 160 for a blood test to tell you that youre not pregnant. Its horrendous. It can feel like its just about money to them. says Gallagher. Prof Wingfield, however, makes the point that it is a very expensive treatment because its very labour intensive.

For one couple to do IVF, she says, youll have several nurses involved, one or two doctors and several scientists. Then youll have all the administrative staff because record-keeping is so critical. It is a very expensive treatment to provide. The Merrion Clinic is run as a not-for-profit organisation and has charitable status but costs there are not significantly lower than at the private clinics, which are run for profit.

Infertility often has an impact on mental health a study in the United States found that women with infertility felt as anxious or depressed as those diagnosed with cancer, hypertension, or who were recovering from a heart attack and stress about money adds to feelings of anxiety and helplessness.

Louise Hazlett (37) has private health insurance that has covered the surgeries and treatments she needed to treat her endometriosis, but it does not extend to fertility treatment, which she needs as a direct result of the disorder. Over the last four years, she and her husband, Kevin, have had five cycles of IVF. In 2017, she discovered she was pregnant with twins but she went into labour at 22 weeks and her sons died shortly after birth. Since then, she has had three more cycles of IVF.

She explains that they got a loan from the credit union for 20,000 and that went fairly rapidly.

We had to get another loan last year, she says. And we just save. Any spare money goes to fertility. We both work but its not easy. But I feel lucky that we are in a position to save and to pay back loans. Not all couples have that.

People assume that once you get married or reach a certain age that youre going to have kids. They assume its going to be easy. And people say things like, Oh still no sign? And at this stage, I just say, Well, Ive done five cycles of IVF. We hope the sixth one is going to be our lucky one. That shuts people up.

Prof Wingfield says: Most people grow up thinking that they will be able to have children and unless they run into problems, they dont realise that it is such a big issue. People who have not experienced infertility according to the HSE, 85 per cent of people conceive within one year will perhaps struggle to realise just how distressing and expensive the process can be.

Its like an obsession, Doyle says. You see all the people around you getting pregnant and having kids. I had to become distant for the sake of my own mental health I couldnt go to baby showers. People can say that they understand but unless you go through it yourself, you dont, you cant really.

This isolation can be compounded by silence around the subject. People who cant get pregnant sometimes feel that there is something wrong with them and it affects peoples self-esteem, says Prof Wingfield. So its hard to be vocal about it and people can be very private about it. Often peoples friends or family dont even know about it. That is changing and people are becoming more open about it and with that will come the realisation that it is a medical issue.

The people interviewed for this piece said they were keen to speak openly because they believe that raising awareness is vital. Gallagher says she didnt tell her employer during her first cycle because she felt there was a stigma and a lack of compassion: People ask Is it you or him? and How much is it? Those are the two questions I get asked all the time. When going through her second cycle, she was open about it in her workplace but felt like they didnt understand.

It was like: Youre not sick, why do you need time off?

Hazlett hopes publicly-funded infertility treatment will help to improve awareness of infertility and its causes and treatments.

There will be huge challenges to creating a functional and fair State-sponsored system of providing fertility treatment. It will be necessary to decide who is eligible for free fertility treatment and to establish criteria and cut-offs. In the UK, for example, gay women who are in a relationship can access free IVF with a sperm donor but single women are ineligible. The financial, legal and logistical concerns relating to the implementation of the Governments planned three stages will be complex, but if it is achieved it will be a huge step forward for our health system. Prof Wingfield laments the existing system: As a doctor, it is unacceptable to me that medical healthcare should be preferentially available to those in our society who can find the money to pay for it and not available to all.

Doyles daughter Sadie is just about to turn three. When she was 10 months old, Doyle and her partner David Smith could finally move into their own home after years of spending almost everything they earned on fertility treatment. They consider themselves the lucky ones and wish more people could get to experience their joy.

View post:
Infertility treatment: When will free IVF be introduced in Ireland? - The Irish Times

Nearly a Quarter of Americans 21 To 50 Years Old to Consider Having Children if Fertility Treatments Are More Affordable, Says Fertility Access Survey…

SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 13, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Nearly a quarter of Americans 21 to 50 years old would consider having children if fertility treatments are more affordable, according to the Fertility Access Survey conducted by Engine Insights on behalf of Lane Fertility Institute.

The survey finds that 23 percent of Americans in this age range, who do not already have children living at home, would consider having kids if access to fertility treatments is more affordable, with more women (24 percent) than men (21 percent) saying so.

From an annual household income perspective, respondents who earn less than $100,000 (41 percent) are more likely than those who earn $100,000 or more (35 percent) to consider having children with more affordable access to fertility treatments.

Drilling down even further, 21 percent of American households that earn less than $50,000 a year would consider having kids with more affordable access to fertility treatments, compared with 20 percent of households earning $50,000 to $100,000 a year.

Looking at race, the survey finds that 22 percent of African Americans, compared with 18 percent of white survey respondents, would consider having children if they received affordable access to fertility treatments.

On another note, 31 percent of married respondents say they would think about having children with more affordable access to fertility treatments, versus only 20% of those who are not married.

"As more people wait until later in life to have children, the need for affordable access to fertility treatments is growing exponentially," says Danielle Lane, M.D., who specializes in fertility medicine at her San Francisco Bay Area-based practice, Lane Fertility Institute. "Fertility treatments shouldn't only be an option for the rich and those who have stellar health benefits. We need to provide solutions for people from all income levels, races and other socioeconomic factors that influence who receives access to fertility treatments.

"The moral imperative is on us, as medical professionals, to provide quality access to affordable fertility treatments for those who choose to maximize their career potential, or perhaps wait longer to meet the right partner, before starting their families. We never want finances to stand in the way of anyone pursuing their dream of having a family."

The Cost of Fertility Treatments

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is among the most common types of fertility treatments, which can range from $10,000 to $15,000 per cycle. Other treatments include receiving a donor egg that can cost $30,000 to $50,000, and egg freezing, which costs as much as $10,000 to provide women with access to their eggs later in life.

Dr. Lane says a couple of decades ago, it made sense that fertility treatments cost a lot more than the average person could afford since the technology and access to fertility doctors were still emerging.

"Today, fertility doctors and treatments are relatively mainstream, and yet the cost of access is prohibitive, particularly among lower-income households and people who do not have health plans that cover these treatments," Dr. Lane says.

Another cost-effective alternative to IVF is INVOcell, which is a medical grade device that develops embryos within a woman's body instead of an embryology lab. The treatment can be a fraction of the cost of traditional IVF.

Dr. Lane says "shared donor cycles" are also a way to minimize costs by allowing two or more separate sets of intended parents to share the costs involved with retrieving and utilizing eggs from an egg donor, providing access to half of the eggs for each set of intended parents.

"Understanding your options should be a priority when considering fertility treatments," Dr. Lane says. "Talking to your doctor about cost-effective solutions is critical to building your family if finances are a concern."

Fertility Access Survey Methodology

The Fertility Access Survey was conducted by ENGINE INSIGHTS among a sample of 692 adults 21 to 50 years of age who do not have any children under 18 living at home. The online omnibus study is conducted three times a week among a demographically representative U.S. sample. This survey was live the week of January 4, 2021.

To view the full survey results, please contact Evan Pondel at [emailprotected].

About Lane Fertility Institute

Lane Fertility Institute is a leading provider of fertility treatments focused on providing care and treatment uniquely tailored to meet the individual needs of patients. Led by Danielle Lane, M.D., and her tenured clinical team, the practice is committed to the success of its patients and providing cost-conscious care. With locations in San Francisco and Novato, California, Lane Fertility Institute provides a wide variety of treatments ranging from basic fertility care to the most advanced in vitro fertilization (IVF) technology. For more information, please visit http://lanefertilityinstitute.com.

Media Contact: Evan Pondel Triunfo Partners (818) 835-0677 [emailprotected]

SOURCE Lane Fertility Institute

Home

View post:
Nearly a Quarter of Americans 21 To 50 Years Old to Consider Having Children if Fertility Treatments Are More Affordable, Says Fertility Access Survey...

TMRW Adds Three High Profile Hires To Its Senior Executive Team – PRNewswire

NEW YORK, Jan. 12, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- TMRW Life Sciences("TMRW"), creator ofthe first and only automated technology platform for the management, identification, and storage of frozen eggs and embryos, announced todaythe recent hiring of Todd Ballard as Chief Marketing Officer; Rohit Gupta as SVP & Chief Biobank Officer; and, Gene Shkolnikov as SVP, Product.

With this exceptional trio, TMRW continues to strengthen its executive team as it prepares to announce acceleration into commercial operations.

Todd Ballardcomes to TMRW after a highly successful, 12 year tenure at GoPro. As Chief Marketing Officer, he directed the global marketing, brand development, and media vision for the $1B+ cutting-edge technology company. He joined GoPro when it was an early stage start-up, was instrumental in the company's IPO, and led its celebrated marketing involving annual budgets of more than $100 million and a dedicated team of over 140 people. Under Todd's leadership, GoPro invented an entirely new consumer category, elevating a camera company into a well-known lifestyle brand. Understanding the importance of fostering strong connections, he built relationships with hundreds of global celebrities, artists, producers/directors, and athletes. He also cut large business development and licensing deals with major broadcast networks and sports leagues, including NBC, Sports Illustrated, the NHL, MotoGP, Tour de France, PGA, and X Games, among others.

With a wide range of both B2B and B2C marketing experience, Todd's 25 years of expertise and entrepreneurial spirit will be pivotal to TMRW's success. As TMRW's CMO, Todd will develop and champion the marketing strategy, leading all aspects of product marketing and digital marketing, social media, as well as branding and PR.

Rohit Guptahas over 15 years of experience at the forefront of biobanking, data science, and research, earning him a well-deserved reputation as one of the elite biobanking experts in the world. He has a proven history of leadership in both cryo-management operations, innovation and research. Among his many accomplishments, Rohit was the Chief Biobank Officer at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) where he led that institution's landmark work to support cutting edge precision medicine research. His next generation approach to biobanking aimed at not only absolutely assuring the highest standards of care for specimens, but also at enabling cutting edge biomedical research. Earlier in his career, Rohit was the Executive Director, Stanford Biobank & Clinical Research Services at Stanford University,where he played a key role in supporting Stanford's entire medical research effort. His work was pivotal in securing over $100M in research grants at Stanford and UCSF. In addition to his biobanking roles, Rohit also recently served as Conference Co-Chairman of the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER), the global leading authority establishing standards, education, ethical principles, and innovation in the science and management of biorepositories. He has co-authored several industry publications and is the recipient of numerous honors, grants, and awards, and is a sought-after speaker and lecturer at global industry events.

As TMRW's SVP & Chief Biobank Officer, Rohit will focus on building on TMRW's commitment to the highest levels of operational excellence, particularly as it relates to the cryo-management aspects of caring for the human eggs and embryos in the TMRW platform. In addition, he will be deeply involved in TMRW's continued innovation including product/technology, data collection, privacy, and integration efforts, government and regulatory affairs activities and peer reviewed research studies.

Gene Shkolnikovjoins TMRW from Johnson & Johnson, where he built and led a large, global engineering team responsible for building and launching innovative Internet of Things ("IoT") platforms as part of a global digital business transformation. His work led to multiple new product lines spanning the Pharma R&D, medical device, and manufacturing sectors. Additionally, Gene collaborated across the organization on big data strategy, including analytics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. He holds several patents, having created breakthrough products in the mobile, IoT, healthcare, and wearable technology sectors. Highly skilled in operating at the forefront of emerging technologies and transforming them into innovative products and solutions, over the course of his career at both J&J and as an independent entrepreneur, Gene has built teams from the ground up, raised capital, become an industry leader, and launched award-winning products resulting in licensing deals with Fortune 500 clients.

As TMRW's SVP of Product, Gene will lead the development of all TMRW hardware, labware, and sensors.

"The simultaneous appointment of these three key executives, all proven leaders in their respective fields, speaks to TMRW's commitment to bringing together world class talent from diverse fields to make the management and storage of the frozen eggs and embryos that will be used in hundreds of millions of IVF procedures truly safe, secure, and reliable," says Joshua Abram, Founder and co-CEO of TMRW.

In the past year, TMRW has doubled its headcount. Launching commercially in late January, the company is poised to continue its exponential growth in the coming months. By the end of 2021, TMRW will be used in clinics accounting for more than 30% of all IVF cycles in the U.S. The company anticipates launching internationally in summer 2021.

About TMRW Life Sciences, Inc.TMRW has created the world's first automated platform designed specifically for cryo-management of eggs and embryos used in IVF. TMRW's RFID-enabled, complete digital chain of custody SaaS technology radically improves upon the error-prone manual and analog methods that have gone unchanged throughout the history of IVF, significantly reducing the chances of implantation mix-ups or loss of eggs and embryos. The TMRW team includes many of the world's most celebrated innovators in fertility, embryology, cryo-management, automation, software development and robotics to name a few of the disciplines involved. TMRW's co-founders, Joshua Abram, Alan Murray, and Dr. Jeffrey Port, are serial tech and life sciences entrepreneurs. Their immediate prior ventures sold for a combined sum of more than $1 billion. To date, TMRW has raised $50 million. For more information, please visit TMRW.org.

Media ContactEmily Grosser, Dini von Mueffling Communications[emailprotected] 757-645-5190

SOURCE TMRW Life Sciences

http://www.tmrw.org

Read more:
TMRW Adds Three High Profile Hires To Its Senior Executive Team - PRNewswire

The legal position of international surrogacy in England and Italy and the recognition of foreign parental orders – Lexology

In this blog, Connie Atkinson, Partner at Kingsley Napley, and Veronica Dindo, Solicitor at LawLab Studio Legale, look at the legal position in England & Wales and Italy and the recognition of foreign orders relating to the birth of children born following a surrogacy arrangement abroad.

Surrogacy in England and Wales by Connie Atkinson

The majority of parents we advise who have had a child using a surrogate have an international connection. One or both of the parents may have been born, or now live, abroad and/or the surrogacy arrangement may have taken place abroad. One of the questions I am regularly asked by parents is whether the legal position in either the country in which the child is born or the country in which the parents live is recognised in England. My answer is always no. There is currently no international convention on the recognition of laws relating to surrogacy arrangements and the ability to draft such a convention is likely to be difficult as surrogacy is viewed and treated so differently across the globe. England and Wales does not recognise the legal position in other countries even where surrogacy is a mature and well regulated practice.

In England and Wales, if a child is born following a surrogacy arrangement either here or abroad, the surrogate will be the legal mother (whether or not she is genetically related to the child) and her husband, if she is married, will be the legal father. This is the case no matter what the position is in the country in which the child is born. If the surrogate is not married, the biological father of the child may be considered the legal father under English law but he will not necessarily have parental responsibility (PR) for the child.

In order to extinguish the surrogates and her husbands PR and legal parentage, intended parents must currently make an application to the English court for a parental order (PO), which will formally recognise the intended parents as the legal parents under English law. In the case of an unmarried surrogate where the intended father is genetically related to the child, a PO is still required to extinguish the surrogates legal parentage, to give the intended mother or second intended parent legal parentage and, in the case of children born abroad, to give both intended parents PR.

In order to be eligible to make a PO, parents must meet the criteria set out in section 54 (for two applicants) and section 54A (for one applicant) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (s54 criteria).

Surrogacy in Italy - Veronica Dindo

In Italy, surrogacy practices are explicitly prohibited. In fact, anyone who creates, organises or advertises surrogacy commits an offense of criminal relevance (Article 12 paragraph 6 of Law 40/2004).

However, since surrogacy is legitimate in other countries, Italian courts have been faced, in recent years, with claims concerning the recognition of foreign orders and birth certificates for children born abroad by means of a surrogate.

Since there is no international convention on the subject, the criteria to be followed in relation to the recognition of foreign orders and birth certificates relating to a child born through surrogacy are those set out generally by the Italian Private International law (Law 218/1995). One of the requirements to enable the recognition of a foreign order is the compliance with public order(art. 64 - 68 letter g Law 218/1995; art. 18 Decree 396/2000; art. 23 EU Reg. 2201/2003).

Case law has arisen in cases involving parents by way of surrogacy because the parents, who are declared as such on the foreign birth certificates and/or orders, have had their requests for the recognition and registration of their status as parents rejected by the Italian authority (Birth Register Office).

The reason for the rejections was because to recognise them as parents would supposedly conflict with the public order, as those foreign orders and certificates related to the use of a practice that is explicitly prohibited and criminally sanctioned by Italian law. Same sex parenthood in itself was also considered as another potential reason of conflict against public order in Italy.

Decisions given by first instance courts (to which the parents resorted to obtain their formal recognition as parents in Italy) were inconsistent, causing uncertainty and unequal treatment. At the same time, however, the decisions are the only source of guidance or regulation in respect of the effects of surrogacy with regard to the childrens status and the rights of all parties involved, as no guidelines are provided by the Law (all the Law currently stipulates is that surrogacy as a practice is prohibited).

Recently, cases involving surrogacy arrangements have finally reached the Supreme Court of Cassation.

Italy is a civil law system, so there is no principle of the binding precedent (whereby precedents set by the higher courts must be followed by the lower courts) and judges are subject only to the law (art. 101 Italian Constitution). However, the rulings given by the Supreme Court of Cassation, especially when sitting in Joint Sessions, are particularly authoritative.

This Court has a function of ensuring the correct interpretation of the law and so if lower courts decide to deviate from the principles stated in its judgments, they need to explain their reasons why (art. 374 co. 4 Italian civil procedure code).

Summary

The above quite different legal systems and processes by which parents can be legally recognised as their childrens parents highlights the difficulties with creating families across international borders. It is imperative that parents take legal advice at home, the country in which their child will be born and in any other country in which they have a significant connection before embarking on any surrogacy arrangement.

This blog was originally published in the November 2020 issue of Family Law Journal.

See original here:
The legal position of international surrogacy in England and Italy and the recognition of foreign parental orders - Lexology

Fertility Treatment and IVF in Czech Republic During the Coronavirus Pandemic – Prague Morning

Fertility problems are common; one in six heterosexual couples worldwide experiences some form of infertility problem at least once. The Czech Republic is a desirable destination for all methods of IVF treatments.

The average cost in Czech Republic for IVF is between 2,700 and 5,700, with donors eggs between 4,500 and 8,000. In comparison, the price of IVF in the UK can hit a maximum of 10,000 and 14,000 respectively.

Czech IVF clinics are also amongst the best in Europe in terms of success rates. According to a 2014 report from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the average birth rate for IVF using the patients own eggs was around 33 per cent for those under 35 years old, 25.4 per cent for patients aged 35-39 and 13.2 per cent for patients over 40.

The average birth rate for IVF treatment with donor eggs was higher, at 46.8% for all age groups. As well as the traditional IVF, theres also the option to pursue social freezing, a relatively new treatment designed to freeze eggs or sperm at the peak of your fertility.

After collection, the gametes are cryopreserved until the owner is ready to start a family. Its possible to do this for years.

The Human assisted reproduction legislation in Czech Republic is one of the most liberal ones in Europe, perhaps worldwide.

The Czech law allows for properly tested people to donate their gametes. So, from anonymous reproductive cells donation programs to advanced genetic testing, couples that have depleted every treatment possibility at home can find adequate help at centres like PFC, Prague Fertility Centre, a well-known private clinic based in Vysocany, founded 11 years ago by Dr. Sonja Lazarovska, a gynaecologist and Dr. Daniel Hlinka, an embryologist; esteemed specialists who have both made significant contributions to the field.

We have seen the market evolve for the past 25 years. We are opening a completely new floor with modern facilities and state of the art Lab in 2021. We will offer better comfort and privacy to our patients, as well as increased treatment capacity. We will be able to help twice as many couples as we do todaysaid Dr. Hlinka.

Coronavirus related restrictions have changed the way that fertility treatments are carried out. But they are still safe to do. Prague Fertility Centre has adapted to the situation by offering online consultations, which as well as talking through treatment options, provides information for donors and guidance for women self-injecting hormones at home in preparation for egg collection and fertilisation.

This process, known as hormonal stimulation, is a key part of IVF, and so women are encouraged to self-isolate when doing so, as planning a pregnancy, even when doing so naturally, already means taking extra preventive measures to avoid getting the virus.

The ever-changing Coronavirus situation has led us to require a negative covid test before starting any treatment, this is in the best interest of our patients, a healthy pregnancy, and of course, of our staff. We would like to assure all our patients that there is no evidence about IVF increasing the risk of infection. With regards to Covid-safe facilities, PFC has upped the intensity of our usual cleaning regime, implemented mask-wearing, hand sanitising, and temperature checks at reception, said Dr. Lazarovska.

We have also increased the number of online consultations to reduce the number of people visiting us. Since we opened the Centre, online consultations have always saved our patients travel time and expenses, while still provided all the necessary medical help, she adds.

When Coronavirus first hit, a lot of people felt it was not the right time to start a family, but as the world seems to have learned to live with the virus, people have decided not to postpone their family plans any longer. Meanwhile, our single clients have decided to freeze their eggs or sperm while they are healthy and fertile.ExplainedDr. Svabikova,the Centres Senior IVF physician, dedicated to helping German and English speaking patients.

When asked about Brexit and how it would affect the travel of UK citizens for IVF treatment after January 1st, 2021,Dr. Svabikovacommented: We dont foresee any complications. Except for queuing in a separate lane at border control, all our British patients will continue to receive treatment like before.

As Im guided around the PFC clinic, Im shown the rooms where the coordinators speak to their patients in one of 12 different languages. I walk past the doors to the sperm collection rooms, the egg retrieval facility and the labs where fertilisation begins.

An estimated 9 million babies have been born through in-vitro fertilization (IVF) since 1978, and the popularity of the treatment shows no sign of slowing down.

So while fertility treatments are closed off to many, a couple struggling to start a family will find endless commitment and support at PFC We will not make false promises, but we will fully commit, from day one, to help all our patients achieve a healthy babysaid Dr. Svabikova.

Read more here:
Fertility Treatment and IVF in Czech Republic During the Coronavirus Pandemic - Prague Morning

Saviour siblings: the role of the welfare principle within the law of assisted reproductive technology in England and Wales (Part 1) – Family Law

Madeleine Whelan, Fourteen

In this article, Madeleine Whelan examines and explains the law governing the use of assisted reproductive technology to create children in England & Wales contained within the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. The article looks at this law within the context of 'saviour siblings', that is, a child born to provide an organ or cell transplant to a sibling who is affected by a (usually) life-threatening disease. Madeleine explores whether the existing law of childrens welfare, particularly the paramountcy principle, is appropriate for the law governing the creation (rather than continued existence) of children and how it fits in to the broader context of English law concerning the creation of children. The article looks at studies undertaken of saviour siblings and the potential impact the use of this technology may have on them and asks how the law in this area can justify a relational rather than paramountcy approach.

The full article will be published in the January issue ofFamily Law.

Find out moreorrequest a free 1-week trialofFamily Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

See the original post here:
Saviour siblings: the role of the welfare principle within the law of assisted reproductive technology in England and Wales (Part 1) - Family Law

Uncovered How Corals Adjust To Warming Oceans – Eurasia Review

The CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system can help scientists understand, and possibly improve, how corals respond to the environmental stresses of climate change. Work led by Phillip Cleveswho joined Carnegies Department of Embryology this falldetails how the revolutionary, Nobel Prize-winning technology can be deployed to guide conservation efforts for fragile reef ecosystems.

Cleves research teams findings were recently published in two papers in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Corals are marine invertebrates that build extensive calcium carbonate skeletons from which reefs are constructed. But this architecture is only possible because of a mutually beneficial relationship between the coral and various species of single-celled algae that live inside individual coral cells. These algae convert the Suns energy into food using a process called photosynthesis and they share some of the nutrients they produce with their coral hostskind of like paying rent.

Coral reefs have great ecological, economic, and aesthetic value. Many communities depend on them for food and tourism. However, human activity is putting strain on coral reefs including warming oceans, pollution, and acidification and that affects this symbiotic relationship.

In particular, increasing ocean temperatures can cause coral to lose their algae, a phenomenon called bleaching, because the coral takes on a ghostly white look in the absence of the algaes pigment, Cleves explained. Without the nutrients provided by photosynthesis, the coral can die of starvation.

In 2018, Cleves headed up the team that demonstrated the first use of the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing on coral. Now, his teams used CRISPR/Cas9 to identify a gene responsible for regulating corals response to heat stress.

Working first in the anemone Aiptasia, one teamincluding Stanford Universitys Cory Krediet, Erik Lehnert, Masayuki Onishi, and John Pringleidentified a protein, called Heat Shock Factor 1 (HSF1), which activates many genes associated with the response to heat stress. Anemones are close coral relatives that have similar symbiotic relationships with photosynthetic algae, but they grow faster and are easier to study. These traits make Aiptasia a powerful model system to study coral biology in the lab.

Then another Cleves-led teamincluding Stanford Universitys Amanda Tinoco and John Pringle, Queensland University of Technologys Jacob Bradford and Dimitri Perrin, and Line Bay of the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS)used CRISPR/Cas9 to create mutations in the gene that encodes HSF1 in the coral Acropora millepora, demonstrating its importance for coping with a warming environment. Without a functioning HSF1 protein, the coral died rapidly when the surrounding water temperature increased.

Understanding the genetic traits of heat tolerance of corals holds the key to understanding not only how corals will respond to climate change naturally but also balancing the benefits, opportunities and risks of novel management tools,said Bay, who is the AIMS principal research scientist and head of its Reef Recovery, Restoration and Adaptation team.

Added Cleves: Our work further demonstrates how CRISPR/Cas9 can be used to elucidate aspects of coral physiology that can be used to guide conservation. This time we focused on one particular heat tolerance gene, but there are so many more mechanisms to reveal in order to truly understand coral biology and apply this knowledge to protecting these important communities.

See the original post:
Uncovered How Corals Adjust To Warming Oceans - Eurasia Review

The Story of Evolution in 25 Discoveries Review: The Branching Tree of Life – The Wall Street Journal

The great but grumpy biologist J.B.S. Haldane was once asked what evidence would disprove evolution, whereupon he growled: Fossil rabbits in the Precambrian. He was referring to the evolutionary fact that complex multicellular creatures came along later than simple, unicellular ones. A bit surprising, perhaps, that one of the foremost evolutionary geneticists of the 20th century immediately reached for a paleontological example, but Haldanes reply was well-suited for public consumption, because thenas nowwhen most people thought of evolution, they were likely to conjure images of dinosaur fossils.

Donald Prothero is a research associate in vertebrate paleontology at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. When I learned he had written a book that examined 25 different discoveries relating to evolution, I assumed that he, like Haldane, would deploy paleontology in making his case. Mr. Protheros book is indeed tilted toward examples from the world of ancestral creatures, but, refreshingly, also guides the reader through impressive discoveries in embryology and molecular genetics.

The Story of Evolution in 25 Discoveries is a parade of self-contained vignettes, often including biographical sketches of the scientists who made and interpreted each discovery. This particular story begins (like everything else) with the big bang, followed by the fascinating tale of how science gradually came to understand the age of the Earth: From biblical literalism; through Lord Kelvins famous underestimate, in the 1890s, of 20 million years; to our current understanding of 4.5 billion years. Then comes a whirlwind tour of evolutionary change as it occurs, in real time, among microbes, plants, insects, fish, birds and mammals, obliterating the creationist canard that evolution hasnt even been witnessed, let alone studied.

Some of the most impressive evolutionary stories involve common body plans, technically known as homologies. Thanks to Mr. Prothero, I now know that Aristotle first noticed this widespread phenomenon, of which Darwin wrote: What can be more curious than that the hand of a man, formed for grasping, that of a mole for digging, the leg of the horse, the paddle of the porpoise, and the wing of the bat, should all be constructed on the same pattern, and should include similar bones, in the same relative positions? Curious indeed. And strongly suggestive of common descentor, for anti-evolutionists, of a Creators insistence on sticking with the same divine blueprint, or archetype, even when other more direct routes should have been available. The Darwinian story provides scientific insight into why homologies occur, whereas the theological story simply reiterates that they occur.

And on we go, to the embryonic similarities of otherwise distantly related creatures (ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny) and then biogeography (the sinking of Noahs Ark), which shows, among other relevant findings, that the flora and fauna of islands resemble those of nearby continentsa phenomenon that wouldnt necessarily be expected if each had been a special, independent creation. The story of life continues, detailing how living things within natural categories share those common body plans, or, as Darwin put it, how organic beings have been found to resemble each other in descending degrees, so that they can be classed in groups under groups. As a result, instead of being arbitrary, our system of biological classification conforms perfectly with the nested, branching patterns of evolutionary relationships demonstrated by anatomy, physiology and genetics. Moreover, as Mr. Prothero points out, if life had been specially created rather than evolved, there would be no reason for the molecular systems to reflect this pattern of similarity seen in megascopic features . . . [and] not even Darwin could have dreamed that the genetic code of every cell in your body also shows the evidence of evolution.

Original post:
The Story of Evolution in 25 Discoveries Review: The Branching Tree of Life - The Wall Street Journal

Richard Dawkins leaves everyone baffled with bizarre lion and spider conundrum – indy100

Richard Dawkins one of the worlds most influential evolutionary biologists and authors probably often finds that his posts on social media, notably, Twitter, often inspire a different kind of discussion than the ones hes used to having.

Dawkins was formerly a professor at the University of Oxford, and is a well known public figure. Hes courted controversy in the past for his views on religion, particularly as hes an outspoken atheist, and has devoted much of his professional life towards promoting scientific thought and scientific reason. He joined Twitter in late 2013, and has since been a figurehead on the platform, particularly as many of his musings have attracted public criticism, with over 2.9 million followers.

Earlier this week, he posted a bizarre question on his Twitter.

'If lions were discovered weaving antelope-catching nets ten lion-lengths wide, it would be headline news.

Yet spiders weave intricate insect-catching nets hugely bigger than themselves, and we treat it as commonplace. Whats the difference?

Spider webs seem remarkable because they involve externally visible behaviour.

But is web-weaving really any more remarkable than the unseen weaving of cells in embryology?

Web-weaving is Extended Phenotype embryology: just another amazing route by which DNA weaves phenotypes.

Its not entirely clear where this thought came from or even if he was looking for genuine answers. But it did lead to a lively discussion on Twitter.

Some people tried to answer it seriously.

Of course, its not the most controversial thing that hes tweeted or even the funniest.

View post:
Richard Dawkins leaves everyone baffled with bizarre lion and spider conundrum - indy100