Category Archives: Cell Biology

Sonoma Biotherapeutics launches with $40 million in Series A funding to advance regulatory T cell therapy in autoimmune and degenerative diseases -…

Company founded by four pioneers of Treg cell biology and cell therapy and financed by a syndicate of leading biotech investors

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. and SEATTLE, Feb. 6, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Sonoma Biotherapeutics, a privately held company developing regulatory T cell (Treg) therapies for autoimmune and degenerative diseases, launched today in South San Francisco, CA and Seattle, WA with $40 million in its Series A financing. Sonoma brings together next-generation research, development and manufacturing capabilities in cell therapy and genetic engineering with an accomplished team of executives, scientists, board members and investors with extensive experience in the fields of cell therapy and drug discovery.

"With this team and our assembled expertise and technologies, we are in an ideal position to move adoptive cell therapy beyond cancer, to establish safe, effective and long-lasting treatments for a range of conditions where current drugs and biologics are simply not good enough," said founder and CEO Jeffrey Bluestone, PhD. "As the immune system's master regulators of protecting the body against self-destruction, Treg cell therapy is perhaps the ideal means to shut down unwanted immune reactions and provide meaningful treatment for patients."

The financing involves an investor syndicate that includes Lyell Immunopharma, ARCH Venture Partners, Milky Way Ventures and 8VC. "Treg therapies have the potential to transform the treatment of autoimmune and degenerative diseases," said Robert Nelsen, managing partner and co-founder of ARCH Ventures Partners. "Sonoma Biotherapeutics has assembled the team and capabilities required to make this vision a reality for patients and their families."

The goal of Treg therapy is to restore a state of self-tolerance by halting harmful inflammatory responses in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and multiple sclerosis, along with degenerative diseases including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Alzheimer's. Over 50 million Americans currently live with an autoimmune disease, and millions more with some form of degenerative diseases. For many, existing therapies are ineffective at controlling their disease.

Tregs have a clear role in many of these conditions. These cells' natural ability to migrate to inflamed tissues and control harmful immune responses make them ideal for treating a range of conditions. In addition, the ability to engineer Treg cells to target specific disease-causing antigens reduces the potential for unwanted systemic effects. The role of Tregs in tissue maintenance and repair offers the potential for effective, durable and restorative treatments.

Sonoma Biotherapeutics is co-founded by four of the foundational scientists in the Treg field:

Collectively, the founding team brings expertise and proprietary methodologies across the Treg drug discovery and development process, including selection, manipulation, editing, regulation and translation for clinical use. Together, Drs. Bluestone and Tang have pioneered adoptive Treg cell therapy in some of its first clinical uses in type 1 diabetes, lupus and organ transplantation. Drs. Rudensky and Ramsdell co-discovered FOXP3, a critical transcription factor for Treg development and function, and in 2017 were awarded the Crafoord Prize by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for their landmark studies. They are complemented by an experienced senior management team and seasoned board of directors.

"The Sonoma Biotherapeutics leadership are responsible for a significant portion of our understanding of the nature of Treg cells, their role in disease and their potential for use as a cell therapy," said Dr. Rick Klausner, CEO of Lyell Immunopharma and newly appointed Chair of the Sonoma Biotherapeutics Board of Directors. "Perhaps more importantly, they understand the requirements of a successful cell therapeutic and the corresponding challenges in defining the pathway to market. We look forward to a strong partnership between Lyell and Sonoma Biotherapeutics."

In this regard, Sonoma Biotherapeutics has entered into a strategic partnership with Lyell that provides both parties with access to technologies and know-how to enhance the durability, stability and specificity of cell therapies in their respective indications of focus. This partnership will further enable Sonoma's rapid translation of Treg therapies from target identification and discovery, through preclinical and clinical development.

Senior Management Team

Jeffrey Bluestone, PhD, Founder, CEO & PresidentFred Ramsdell, PhD, Founder & CSOPeter DiLaura, Chief Business & Strategy OfficerJoshua Beilke, MBA, PhD, VP Translational Development

Board of Directors

Rick Klausner, MD (Chair) Founder & CEO, Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.Maggie Wilderotter CEO, Grand Reserve Inn; former board member, Juno TherapeuticsToni Hoover, PhD Director, Strategy, Planning and Management for Global Health, Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationTerry Rosen, PhD CEO, Arcus BiosciencesDavid Moskowitz, PhD Principal, 8VC (observer)Jeffrey Bluestone, PhD, CEO & President, Sonoma Biotherapeutics

About Sonoma Biotherapeutics

Sonoma Biotherapeutics is a privately held, San Francisco and Seattle-based company leading the development of adoptive Treg therapies cell for autoimmune and degenerative diseases. Using next generation genome editing and target-specific cell therapy, Sonoma is focused on developing its best-in-class platform across the entire spectrum of Treg cell therapeutic capabilities. Founded by pioneers in Treg biology and cell therapy, the company brings together leading expertise and proprietary methodologies for the discovery and development of disease modifying and curative therapies.

Contact: media@sonomabio.com

View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sonoma-biotherapeutics-launches-with-40-million-in-series-a-funding-to-advance-regulatory-t-cell-therapy-in-autoimmune-and-degenerative-diseases-300999810.html

SOURCE Sonoma Biotherapeutics

Read the original:
Sonoma Biotherapeutics launches with $40 million in Series A funding to advance regulatory T cell therapy in autoimmune and degenerative diseases -...

Trillium Therapeutics Announces Changes to Its Board of Directors – BioSpace

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Feb. 07, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Trillium Therapeutics Inc.. (Trillium or the Company) (NASDAQ/TSX: TRIL), a clinical stage immuno-oncology company developing innovative therapies for the treatment of cancer, today announced that Paul Walker has been appointed to the Companys Board of Directors, and Dr. Ali Behbahani has been appointed as a Board Observer, effective February 6, 2020.

We are delighted to welcome Mr. Walker to the Board of Directors and Dr. Behbahani as a Board Observer, and look forward to their guidance as we work to bring to patients our CD47 programs, stated Dr. Robert Kirkman, Executive Chair of Trillium Therapeutics.

We are excited about Trilliums recent progress and look forward to working with the leadership team as they expand their clinical development program, said Paul Walker.

Mr. Walker and Dr. Behbahani are general partners with New Enterprise Associates (NEA), a global venture capital firm with more than $20 billion of cumulative committed capital invested in healthcare and technology companies. Prior to joining NEA, Paul worked at MPM Capital as a General Partner with the MPM BioEquities Fund, where he specialized in public, PIPE and mezzanine-stage life sciences investing. Previously, he was a portfolio manager at Franklin Templeton Investments. Paul received a BS in Biochemistry and Cell Biology from the University of California at San Diego, and holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation.

Dr. Behbahanis previous positions include a consultant in business development at The Medicines Company, a Venture Associate at Morgan Stanley Venture Partners and as a Healthcare Investment Banking Analyst at Lehman Brothers. He concurrently earned his MD degree from The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and his MBA degree from The University of Pennsylvania Wharton School.

The Company also announced that Dr. Robert Uger, Trilliums Chief Scientific Officerhas resigned from the Board of Directors effective February 6, 2020.

About Trillium Therapeutics

Trillium is an immuno-oncology company developing innovative therapies for the treatment of cancer. The Companys two clinical programs, TTI-621 and TTI-622,target CD47, a do not eat signal that cancer cells frequently use to evade the immune system.

The Companys pipeline also includes a preclinical STING (stimulator of interferon genes) agonist program. As previously announced, the program is earmarked for out-licensing.

For more information visit: http://www.trilliumtherapeutics.com

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable United States securities laws and forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities laws (collectively, forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements in this press release include statements about, without limitation, the belief that Trilliums programs could achieve best-in-class status for CD47 blocking agents and Trilliums future plans and objectives for its CD47 programs. With respect to the forward-looking statements contained in this press release, Trillium has made numerous assumptions regarding, among other things: the effectiveness and timeliness of clinical trials; and the completeness, accuracy and usefulness of the data. While Trillium considers these assumptions to be reasonable, these assumptions are inherently subject to significant scientific, business, economic, competitive, market and social uncertainties and contingencies. Additionally, there are known and unknown risk factors that could cause Trilliums actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this press release. Factors that may cause such a difference include, without limitation, risks and uncertainties related to the reliance on positive results of preclinical and early clinical research as such results are not necessarily predictive of results of later-stage clinical trials. A further discussion of risks and uncertainties facing Trillium appears in Trilliums Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2018 is filed with Canadian securities authorities and with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission, each as updated by Trilliums continuous disclosure filings, which are available at http://www.sedar.comand at http://www.sec.gov. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein. All forward-looking statements herein are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement, and Trillium disclaims any obligation to revise or update any such forward-looking statements or to publicly announce the result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future results, events or developments, except as required by law.

Company Contact:James ParsonsChief Financial OfficerTrillium Therapeutics Inc.416-595-0627 x232james@trilliumtherapeutics.com

Media Contact:Mike BeyerSam Brown Inc.312-961-2502mikebeyer@sambrown.com

Read this article:
Trillium Therapeutics Announces Changes to Its Board of Directors - BioSpace

Chopping Genes and Growing Brains – The LumberJack

Biology professor John Steele guided a cell biology lab his first year at HSU wherein he wanted to teach students that cells need nutrients to survive. After 48 hours, the lab discovered quite the opposite. James Gomez, a current student in the lab, had the opportunity to research more into the groundbreaking discovery.

In science, youre kinda looking for that unexpected stuff, Gomez said. Right after I came in, I was really excited to be a part of that. There was this thing that was happening that we particularly cant fully explain, and Im actually in the lab doing that science.

Steeles experiment for his class involved students starving the cells of nutrients to trigger a state of autophagy, which is when the cell starts to consume itself. Steele meant to emphasize that cells needed nutrients like amino acids and lipids to survive. It was assumed that starving cells of key nutrients eventually killed them.

Steele said the experiment was common, and was usually shut down after six to eight hours. Steele decided to run it for 48 hours instead, since that was the time between lab sections. When his class returned returned to the lab, rather than seeing a bunch of dead cells, they were decidedly more alive. The lab had made a discovery.

Despite the cells being in autophagy in Steeles experiment, they had stopped dividing and took on a strange morphology. Their metabolic rate was highthey were very much not dead.

Now the lab, including Gomez, are deep in research. The lab is introducing pathway inhibitors, or drugs, to block basic cell functions, narrowing down the essential and non-essential. The project is open-ended, as students methodically look at every cellular pathway to determine the needs of cells.

What I love about this project is that it was born here, Steele said. Nobody else that I know of is working on this, outside of HSU. Thats an awesome process to be a part of, where students get hands-on training in phenotypic genetic screening and drug screening, and we get to learn about the basic biology of cells in doing this.

Steele encourages the students in his lab to explore the boundaries of their knowledge. CRISPR, Cas9 and stem cell cultures are unique tools available to these students, and they offer an opportunity to think outside the box and do creative science.

Steeles lab combines bio-technologies using unique stem cell cultures and genome editing techniques. The lab cultures stem cellscells which can grow into any cell typeand chops up DNA using CRISPR, a revolutionary gene-clipping tool, to learn how rare neurodegenerative diseases develop in the brain.

There have been some really cool applications of CRISPR out there. And theyre just because somebody said, I wonder if we could do that? and they did.

Steeles graduate student Kyle Anthoney, on the other hand, is working on making a model of a rare disease called progressive supernucleogical palsy, which looks like a combination of Parkinsons and Alzheimers diseases. The disease is a tauopathic disease because a main characteristic of the disease is a buildup of the tau protein, which blocks some necessary cell functions. To understand the finer details of the disease, Anthoney developed a new method for growing neurosphere cell types into what is, effectively, a miniature brain.

Scientifically named 3D neural sphere cultures, these miniature brains offer a platform for researchers to study three types of brain cells at the same time. Anthoneys method allowed him to organically grow neurons, oligodendrocytes and astrocytes, three dominant cell types in the brain, from human stem cells, so they would develop naturally like they would in a growing brain.

Anthoneys research is up for review in a number of scientific publications and his name is on some breakthrough scientific papers. He is contributing to research about progressive supernucleogical palsy and other tauopathic diseases. His research concentrates the tau protein in a miniature brain to simulate the symptoms of progressive supernucleogical palsy, and he is exploring how the protein and disease impact his lab-grown brain cells.

There have been some really cool applications of CRISPR out there, Steele said. And theyre just because somebody said, I wonder if we could do that? and they did.

Like Loading...

Go here to see the original:
Chopping Genes and Growing Brains - The LumberJack

ID Literature and the Great Evolutionary Firewall – Discovery Institute

Peer-reviewed literature is supposed to be the gold standard in any given scientific field, though it both lets through junk science at times, and at others, excludes solid science, whether for ideological or other reasons. The gatekeepers are only human, prone to bias or wish fulfillment. The humans who police the gatekeepers are also prone to hallucinate. See a couple of posts on that subject from earlier this week, here and here.

These provisos having been stated, there is of course value in this literature. Thats why Evolution News spends so much time analyzing it. We havent talked about this in a while, but the body of peer-reviewed articles supporting intelligent design is impressive. You can find an extensive discussion of it here. Remember, this is just the literature supportive of ID. Criticism is valuable and significant too. Weve got a file of a hundred mainstream scientific papers that cite Michael Behe and his ID work. Yes, many are negative, but many are positive too.

In any case, as recent email inquiries have made clear, this body of published writing calls for some additional commentary.

First, do all of these articles use the term intelligent design explicitly? No. But dont let anyone tell you that that somehow disqualifies the articles in our bibliography as directly supporting ID. All of these papers are by ID sympathizers (at least one author, in each case) and they all make ID arguments or explicitly support ID. Some of them do use the term intelligent design but some use terms like teleological or goal-directed rather than explicitly saying intelligent design. The intended meaning is the same. Also, many of the articles provide explicit support for core ID concepts like complex and specified information, irreducible complexity, prescriptive information, and the like, even if they dont call it intelligent design.

Second, its true that not every journal is respected equally. But the fact that ID proponents are publishing legitimate ID-oriented ideas in journals at all is what counts. Journals like Cell, Nature, Science, and many other high-level publications are never going to publish an article not in this corner of the multiverse that is pro-ID or positively cites Michael Behe or Stephen Meyer or William Dembski, no matter how strong the evidence and no matter how good the article is. Those in the ID community are well aware that you can sometimes publish modest critiques of certain evolutionary ideas, but the moment that you suggest that intelligent design might be involved or that you speak favorably of an ID proponents work, the great evolutionary firewall goes up and it blocks the paper. Many ID-friendly scientists who have tried to publish have had such experiences. Biologist Jonathan Wells recalls an exchange with a journal editor:

In 2003 I submitted an article on an aspect of cell biology to a very prominent biology journal in the U.K. My article did not mention ID or cite ID authors, but it presented a hypothesis based on an ID perspective. The article successfully passed peer review after I responded to some questions by the reviewers, and the editor wrote to me that he was ready to publish it. But then he asked me whether I was the Jonathan Wells of intelligent design fame. When I answered in the affirmative he sent the article out for one last review, which was a contemptuous hatchet job from start to finish. With that in hand the editor rejected my article.

Even having been cited positively by ID advocates can harm a papers chances. Thats why Evolution News hesitates to discuss preprint articles like those at bioRxiv. An article there, that has not yet been peer-reviewed or published formally, can be rendered ritually impure if Darwinists see that ID proponents have praised it. The perversity and unfairness of this situation hardly needs underlining.

Third, remember the phenomenon in social media that is called subtweeting. This refers to criticizing people without naming them, often compared with talking about them covertly behind their back. From the Urban Diction: Indirectlytweetingsomething about someone without mentioning their name. Eventhoughtheir name is not mentioned, it isclearwho the person tweeting is referring to. It often happens that science journals subtweet about ID arguments, those of Meyer or Behe or Dembski, without having the courage, frankly, to name them. As an example, the many desperate attempts to offer theories explaining the Cambrian explosion, the geologically sudden eruption of animal phyla into the fossil record, evidently have Stephen Meyers book, Darwins Doubt, on their mind.

The point is this: If youre going to engage people on the topic of ID publications, dont let them force two false assumptions on you:

And these observations apply not only to intelligent design but to other terms that tend to start arguments. Cast your mind back to the famous Dover trial. The ACLU and anti-ID plaintiffs cited a paper, Long et al., 2003, which they told Judge John Jones showed how new genetic information could evolve. The problem? The paper did not contain the phrase new genetic information. It didnt even contain the term genetic information! Judge Jones cited the paper anyway to claim that the plaintiffs had demonstrated that evolution could produce new genetic information.

But that was OK. In fact, this is not a criticism of what they did because the paper certainly was relevant to discussing the origin of new genetic information, and the fact that the paper did not contain the term genetic information did not prevent it from bearing on the subject, which it did.

That having been said, in reality, the paper by Long and his colleagues is not very successful in showing how new information arises, although it is certainly relevant from an evolutionary perspective. If you would like to see some critiques of the paper, please read Chapter 11 of Darwins Doubt.We see again that word searches often say very little about the implications of a paper for evolution or ID. Whats needed, always, is honest, critical analysis, as we try to provide here.

Photo credit:Andrew Martin viaPixabay.

View original post here:
ID Literature and the Great Evolutionary Firewall - Discovery Institute

Sonoma Bio Launches With $40M to Take Cell Therapy Beyond Cancer – Xconomy

XconomySan Francisco

Cell therapies have reached the market as a new treatment option for some cancers. But the scientists of Sonoma Biosciences say this approach also holds promise for autoimmune disorders, and the biotech startup has unveiled $40 million in financing to develop its technology.

The investors in Sonomas Series A round of funding include Lyell Immunopharma, ARCH Venture Partners, Milky Way Ventures, and 8VC.

Cell therapy involves removing a patients immune cells, engineering them, and then infusing them back into the patient to perform their therapeutic tasks. The cancer cell therapies that have been approved by the FDA are made by engineering T cells, the frontline defenders of the immune system.

Sonoma, which splits its operations between South San Francisco and Seattle, is working with a different immune cell called a regulatory T cell (Treg). Whereas T cells target pathogens, Tregs target other immune cells, suppressing excessive immune responses, CEO and co-founder Jeff Bluestone tells Xconomy. Research by Sonomas scientific co-founders uncovered evidence, in studies in mice and humans, that the absence of these cells sparked the development of some autoimmune diseases. Those diseases led to death in about one year without a bone marrow transplant, Bluestone adds.

Sonoma is developing Treg therapies intended to shut down unwanted immune responses. The approach involves harvesting these cells from patients and engineering them with features that make them stable, durable, and targeted specifically to the site of inflammation. Those cells would then be infused into the patient to stop the autoimmune response. Bluestone says its too soon to talk about a lead disease target, but he adds that this approach has potential applications in rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and multiple sclerosis.

The hope is that a Sonoma cell therapy is a one-time treatment. Bluestone says that because these therapies are cells that multiply, they should survive in the patient on standby until theyre needed again to address an autoimmune response.

Theres another feature that could contribute to the longevity of a Treg treatment. When these cells shut down an autoimmune response, they influence other cells in the vicinity to join in, Bluestone explains. By educating these other cells to take up this immunosuppressive role, Bluestone says the effect of these therapies could be long lasting. But he cautions that the durability of a Treg therapy wont be known until more tests are done in humans.

Bluestones knowledge about Tregs stems from his own research. He and another Sonoma co-founder, Qizhi Tang, studied Tregs at the University of California, San Francisco, for 12 years. Their research included diabetes, organ transplantation, and lupus, among other conditions. That work led to small patient studies testing the technology for safety.

In addition to his UCSF research, Bluestone was the president and CEO of the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy. Over the course of a career that has bridged academia and industry, Bluestones immunology research has led to the development and commercialization of immunotherapies for organ transplants and cancer. He says he is joining Sonoma now because theres only so far that you can get in an academic lab if you want to impact peoples lives. Cell therapy could be the next major medicine for humans, he adds, and he wants to be involved as part of a company developing these treatments.

The other co-founders are Chief Scientific Officer Fred Ramsdell who, like Bluestone, joined Sonoma from the Parker Institute, and Alexander Rudensky, an immunologist at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Ramsdell and Rudensky are credited as co-discoverers of the FOXP3 gene that is critical to the development and function of Tregs.

Bluestone says that Sonoma continues the Treg research that he and the other co-founders had done. The company also builds on the successes and failures in cancer cell therapy research. While those therapies can treat blood cancers, its been much harder to use them to treat solid tumors. Bluestone hopes that Lyell, a South San Francisco cell therapy company, can help the company get its therapies into tissues. In addition to being a Sonoma investor, Bluestone says Lyell will be a research partner, providing access to its technology and cell therapy insights.

Sonoma also aims to go beyond autoimmune diseases. Bluestone says the companys approach could potentially address degenerative disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Alzheimers disease. In the nearer term, Bluestone says the company will use the funding to better understand Tregs.

The way were approaching this field is not to be in a hurry, in a sense of feeling this pressure or need to get into the clinic with these engineered cells as quickly as possible, he says. We want to spend the time to make sure were working with the best cells possible, that we understand the science and the biology, so that it has the best chance of success.

Public domain image by Flickr user NIH Image Gallery

Frank Vinluan is an Xconomy editor based in Research Triangle Park. You can reach him at fvinluan [[at]] xconomy.com.

See the original post:
Sonoma Bio Launches With $40M to Take Cell Therapy Beyond Cancer - Xconomy

Postdoctoral Research Associate – Department of Biosciences job with DURHAM UNIVERSITY | 195812 – Times Higher Education (THE)

The Role

Applications are invited for a Postdoctoral Research Associate to work on a project entitled

"Skin model engineering by harnessing the biomechanical forces exerted on skin cell nuclei".

As a collaboration between Drs Akis Karakesisoglou and Martin Goldberg, Department of Biosciences, Durham University and Steven Hyde, Oxford University we have designed new methodology to generate high quality in vitroskin models. The methodology works through using genetic engineering tools that re-program the biomechanical properties of skin cells.

We have gained funds from the Northern Accelerator (a research commercialisation collaboration between four North East Universities) to further develop the in vitro skin model and to commercialise the underlying technology.

The role of the post holder is to research and implement solutions in the fields of skin tissue engineering, skin tissue/cell biology and microscopy. The project will involve the creation and development of skin equivalent cell culture models using novel methods, then testing and analysing their structural and functional properties. The postholder will be helped by Drs Karakesisoglou, Goldberg and Hyde to find solutions and the candidate will need experience in the above fields to implement the solutions.

The post requires good skills in reporting research progress verbally, and in writing.

This post is fixed term for 9 months which is the extent of the currently available funding.

Read the rest here:
Postdoctoral Research Associate - Department of Biosciences job with DURHAM UNIVERSITY | 195812 - Times Higher Education (THE)

‘Stench of death’ compound helps your body feast on its own rotting cells – Livescience.com

The scent wafts from busy roadsides, broken meat lockers and grisly crime scenes; it's the signature stink of rotting flesh. Despite its putrid aroma, the chemical compound may serve an important purpose in the living human body, new research suggests.

The compound, known as putrescine, flips a switch in certain immune cells that helps them gobble up dead tissues in the body, according to a new study published online Jan. 30 in the journal Cell Metabolism. That, in turn, could help the body stave off heart disease.

The authors studied both human and mouse cells, as well as live mice, to reveal how these corpse-crunching immune cells, called macrophages, concoct putrescine from the digested remains swirling around in their bellies.

If their putrescine supply runs short, macrophages struggle to consume additional cells, leaving corpses to pile up, break down and ooze harmful substances into the body. Dead tissues that leak toxic substances can trigger inflammation and contribute to diseases, including atherosclerosis, in which fatty plaques build up in the arteries and can burst, triggering heart attacks or stroke.

These leaky, "necrotic" cells are "really a hallmark of what distinguishes relatively benign athersclerotic lesions from those that cause disease," senior author Dr. Ira Tabas, a professor of pathology and cell biology at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, told Live Science. Putrescine is just one member of the body's housekeeping team, but understanding its role in cellular cleanup could someday help doctors treat atherosclerosis and many other ailments, such as autoimmune diseases and cancer, Tabas added.

"The ability of macrophages to eat multiple dead cells each is very, very important to avoiding these problems," he said. An estimated billions, "if not trillions," of cells die in our bodies every day, making corpse cleanup an absolutely critical component of our everyday health. "The basis of this study was to figure out what happens after [a macrophage] eats its first dead cell," Tabas said.

Related: The science of death: 10 tales from the crypt and beyond

The process of clearing dead cells from the body is called efferocytosis, a term derived from the Latin phrase "to carry to the grave," according to a statement describing the new study. Macrophages excel at engulfing and digesting cellular corpses. Other cells help remove dying and diseased tissue when necessary, but macrophages make their living gobbling up cellular debris.

An individual macrophage often has to clear dozens of cells, if not more, to keep efferocytosis running smoothly, said Dr. Nicholas Leeper, a professor of vascular surgery at Stanford University School of Medicine who was not involved in the study. But no one knew how a single macrophage could take on such a workload. "It's always been a mystery," he said.

Unraveling this mystery could be critical to treating people with atherosclerosis, Leeper told Live Science. Evidence suggests that efferocytosis becomes defective in diseased arteries, leaving mounting plaques to become unstable and leaky, according to a 2017 review in the journal Circulation. Once a plaque ruptures, proteins sequestered inside the structure burst out and signal an army of platelets to assemble at the site. The platelets perceive the rupture as a wound that needs to clot, but in effect, the platelets themselves end up clogging the artery, leading to stroke, heart attack or sudden cardiac arrest, Tabas said.

"It's the platelet plug that does us in," Tabas noted. Restoring efferocytosis to healthy levels could theoretically prevent tissue death and plaque rupture, but scientists must first understand how fully functional macrophages consume so many cells.

Related: Top 10 leading causes of death

So Tabas and his colleagues arranged a dinner party for human macrophages, complete with a buffet of dead cells.

To grab hold of a meal, macrophages use a protein called Rac1 to construct wiry filaments that extend from their cell body. The filaments latch onto cellular corpses and reel them into the macrophage, where the deceased cells then get broken down into their component parts. While consuming this snack, the macrophage also digests some of its own Rac1 proteins. The remaining Rac1 must be revitalized before the macrophage can take on another meal, the team found but first, the cell requires something to stoke its appetite.

Turns out, the first meal devoured by a macrophage helps spur the cell to eat more and more. Proteins in the dead cells get broken down into individual amino acids, including one called arginine. An enzyme takes up the arginine, transforms it into a molecule called ornithine and then passes that product off to a second enzyme. Ornithine gets turned into putrescine, which, in turn, sets off a chain reaction that drives any remaining Rac1 to flip into overdrive and build filaments more efficiently than before. The ramped-up Rac1 enables the macrophage to go after more food.

The team tried blocking the production of putrescine in both human and mouse macrophages and found that the cells could no longer consume multiple meals in one sitting. The researchers wondered how low putrescine levels might contribute to atherosclerosis. In a mouse model of the disease, the team found that animals with advanced symptoms lacked a key component in the putrescine production line: the enzyme that transforms arginine into ornithine, known as arginase-1.

In an attempt to treat the animals, the team added low doses of putrescine directly to the animals' drinking water. (When dissolved and delivered in low doses, the super-stinky compound no longer gives off an offensive odor.) After the treatment, the mouse macrophages appeared to consume cells more efficiently, and the animals' plaques began to shrink.

To connect the dots from mice to humans, the team also sampled macrophages from people with early and advanced atherosclerosis and noted a similar pattern: Macrophages from those with the more advanced disease were equipped with less arginase-1. Given that the formation of putrescine works very similarly in mice and humans, theoretically, treatments that manipulate that formation could treat atherosclerosis.

"I wouldn't push putrescine as a treatment," specifically, but other therapies could be developed to boost efferocytosis in other ways, Tabas said. At high doses, putrescine can be toxic to people and animals and cause gastrointestinal distress, he said. The main point is that efferocytosis, when unfolding properly, helps maintain human health and prevent disease, Tabas said.

It may be possible that "one could drive the conversion of cells to a situation that would induce more efferocytosis and repair of damaged arteries," Dr. Ira Goldberg, director of the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism at NYU Langone Health, told Live Science in an email. "More important, this process is likely to be similar to that which occurs in other situations that [involve] cell death," said Goldberg, who was not involved in the new study.

For example, research suggests that efferocytosis goes awry in autoimmune diseases like lupus, in which dead cells accumulate in the lymph nodes and disrupt immune cell function. Cancer cells avoid being eaten by macrophages by sending out so-called "don't eat me" signals, so boosting efferocytosis at tumor sites could serve as a targeted form of cancer treatment. For now, though, insight into efferocytosis could mark a "major advance" in the treatment of heart disease, Leeper said.

"The importance of a pathway linked to cardiovascular disease can't be overstated Basically all adults in the Western world have some sort of atherosclerosis," Leeper said. Plagues can begin developing as early as adolescence, he said. Leeper himself recently developed a medication that helps macrophages recognize and eat dying cells in mice with atherosclerosis. As scientists continue to uncover the various chemical reactions involved in efferocytosis, drug developers can learn to promote the process through various therapies.

Leeper said the line of research could someday result in treatments to address "several of the top killers in the world."

Originally published on Live Science.

See the original post here:
'Stench of death' compound helps your body feast on its own rotting cells - Livescience.com

As bioengineering progresses, regulation will need to follow – Highlander Newspaper

Courtesy of YouTube

The first annual conference of Please Try This at Home took place in September 2019. At the cross section of biotechnology, body autonomy and anarchy, the conference represents an inclusive group of scientists concerned with using and discussing biotechnology in the hopes of moving the field in a more progressive direction. That being said, it is indeed a solid step in the right direction, especially when one takes into consideration how misunderstood the bioengineering field has become.

To get a sense of the state of bioengineering, a biohacker by the name of Josiah Zayner livestreamed an attempt to splice his DNA to give himself bigger muscles. If it was inserted in the wrong place in his body, or in the wrong place for the code, his DNA could end up producing weakened or ineffective proteins that could affect his body functionality. While that attempt was misguided and Zayner later regretted the stunt, the implication was that this technology should be safe and easy, which is a dangerous and untrue belief to hold. As biotechnology continues to improve, more research and regulation will be needed to ensure the safety of its use.

Ensuring said safety requires a basic understanding of cellular biology, and at its core is the central dogma of molecular biology. Simply put, most genetic material is encoded in DNA, DNA transcribes to RNA and RNA translates to proteins and those proteins are responsible for most functions in the body. Generally, bioengineering works by taking a segment of foreign DNA and inserting it into the rest of the genetic code, resulting in a production of proteins that will carry out a function specific to that DNA code. The described process is extremely complex and delicate, but despite that, genetic engineering has been used to treat Parkinsons disease and sickle cell disease among others.

That said, genetic engineering has a promising future outside of simple disease treatment. To reaffirm the purpose of Please Try This at Home, genetic engineering could be used for a different form of hormone therapy for transgender individuals. In a mostly speculative procedure, a geneticist could activate the necessary genes responsible for production of a specific hormone. That being said, it is important to keep in mind that this is a hypothetical experiment, and could result in potentially greater health problems later in life. These potential problems necessitate the need for greater experimentation and regulation in order to work out the difficulties.

Experiments in gene editing on a larger scale have already been proposed to fight Lyme disease. Normally, the disease spreads when a tick bites a mouse, followed by that tick biting a human. On Nantucket Island and Marthas Vineyard, where Lyme disease is particularly virulent, a project called Mice Against Ticks is under consideration, in which mice would be genetically modified to be able to resist and prevent the spread of Lyme disease. Kevin Esvelt, the scientist spearheading this operation is also acutely aware of the potential ecological ramifications of this project, cautiously choosing an isolated island with a low human population and low chances of dispersal if the project goes awry.

Esvelts caution in choosing an experimental site calls to mind the dangers of genetic engineering: the long term effects are not yet fully known, and it is understandable to be afraid of something that is not entirely explored. The chances of cascading ecological effects from genetic engineering is as present as the possibility for abuse of genetic engineering via eugenics. Simultaneously, those possibilities are also matched by the potential to eradicate Lyme disease, malaria or leukemia.

The best way to ensure safer practices and better opportunities for the future of genetic engineering is to regulate its practice. Clear distinctions need to be made between biohackers, like Zayner and practical, controlled applications like Mice Against Ticks. Genetic engineering could have world changing effects; it just needs to be regulated and perfected.

See the rest here:
As bioengineering progresses, regulation will need to follow - Highlander Newspaper

UH professor examines life cycle of drug-resistant persister cells in recurrent infections – News-Medical.net

A University of Houston engineering professor is examining the life cycle of stubborn, drug-resistant persister cells in recurrent infections to find a way to destroy them. Persister cells are non-growing cell subpopulations observed in many pathogenic bacteria and they certainly live up to their name - they persist, and are not phased in the least by current medications. Scientists believe they cause the recurrence of chronic health issues like airway infections in cystic fibrosis patients, urinary tract infections and tuberculosis.

"If we know how persister cells are formed, we can target their formation mechanisms to eliminate these dangerous cell types," said Mehmet Orman, assistant professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering, who is using a $1.9 million grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to explore persister cells.

Orman believes that self-digestion, or autophagy, stimulates persister formation. In self-digestion, cells recycle essential energy molecules by eating their own protein, lipids or other bits to stay alive or temporarily survive under starvation conditions. Self-digestion is triggered by extracellular stress conditions, such as nutrient depletion, hypoxia and overpopulation.

Orman will map the self-digestion-related mechanisms in E. coli to understand how self-digestion is linked to persister cell formation. Then, he will therapeutically explore these mechanisms to identify chemical compounds that can eliminate persister cells.

Mapping of this comprehensive bacterial pathway from its initial exogenous trigger, through its signal transduction, to the source of antibiotic tolerance, will enable us to develop affective anti-persister therapeutics."

Mehmet Orman, assistant professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering,University of Houston

Self-digestion inflicts damage on the cells and can make the cells dormant, putting them in a sleeping mode, and these dormant cells are not effected by antibiotics. The bacterium is less fit to produce protein and resume growth upon exposure to fresh nutrients, providing temporary protection against antibiotics until the self-inflicted damage is repaired.

From an evolutionary perspective, self-digestion is an important survival mechanism. This complex process, which is orchestrated by many regulatory proteins and enzymes, has been well documented in mammalian cells, but largely ignored in bacteria. "By integrating our expertise in bacterial cell biology with advanced current technologies, we aim to decipher the key components of this pathway to provide a clear and much-needed picture of bacterial self-digestion mechanisms," said Orman.

Orman, himself, is persistent. Previously he developed methods to directly measure the metabolism of persister cells. He has also discovered that persisters are mostly derived from stationary-phase cells with high metabolic activities maintained by self-digestion.

Continue reading here:
UH professor examines life cycle of drug-resistant persister cells in recurrent infections - News-Medical.net

Bernard Robaire honoured by Society for the Study of Reproduction – McGill Reporter

The Society For The Study Of Reproduction (SSR) unveiled its 2020 award winners today, honouring seven individualswho have made outstanding contributions to the scientific discipline ofreproductive biology. BernardRobaire, cross appointed in both the Departments of Pharmacology & Therapeutics; and Obstetrics & Gynaecology, was named recipient of the SSR Jansen Distinguished Service Award. The Jansen Award recognizes an individual for their unselfish service and leadership in advancing the discipline of reproductive biology.

Robaires research interests focus on aging of the male reproductive system, male-mediated reproductive toxicology, mechanisms of androgen actions, and the structure, function, and regulation of the epididymis.

The scientific research conducted by theseseven biology scientists, physicians and professors have significantly advanced thescience of reproduction, fertility and development, said Saima Hedrick, executive director, SSR, Their original researchon a broad range of topics in the field of reproductive biologyis helping lead us toward new discoveries, more mentorship opportunities and greater professionalism in the discipline. Their work has improved the lives of millions of humans and animals.

SSRsupports the scientific study of reproductive processes in animals and humans. Pioneering scientific contributions from SSR members have been made in areas such as stem cell biology; transgenesis; treatment of infertility; contraception; livestock production; pregnancy health; treatment of reproductive system cancers; and identification of environmental contaminants.

The annual award program recognizes significant achievements and contributions to advancing the science of reproductive biology in research, academic scholarship, professional leadership, mentoring and service. Award winners will be recognized at SSRs 2020 annual conference in Ottawa, Canada from July 912.

For a description of each award winners achievements and contributions click here.

More here:
Bernard Robaire honoured by Society for the Study of Reproduction - McGill Reporter