Category Archives: Anatomy

Watch a Scary Story Come to Life in Candyman – The New York Times

In Anatomy of a Scene, we ask directors to reveal the secrets that go into making key scenes in their movies. See new episodes in the series on Fridays. You can also watch our collection of more than 150 videos on YouTube and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Want to hear a scary story?

That enticing question (or horrifying one, depending on your point of view) begins this scene from the new Candyman (now in theaters), which is both a continuation and a reimagining of Bernard Roses 1992 horror film.

The update is directed by Nia DaCosta and co-written by Jordan Peele (with DaCosta and Win Rosenfield). It still involves the menacing figure who comes after you if you say his name five times in front of a mirror, but this scene reaches back to the story of the original film.

Brianna (Teyonah Parris) and her brother, Troy (Nathan Stewart-Jarrett), are both hanging out one evening with their boyfriends when Troy turns down the lights and turns up the dread to tell a story. It concerns Helen Lyle, one of the main characters (played by Virginia Madsen) from the earlier film, and how one day she just snaps. Killings and snow angels in blood ensue.

Troys story retraces the steps of the earlier films narrative, with some embellishments. Rather than flashing back to footage from the 1992 movie, moments are depicted with shadow puppetry. Narrating the sequence, DaCosta said that she wanted each shadow puppet segment to be specific to the teller because she saw it as someones way of thinking about the story. Its not necessarily the truth. In this scene, hands move the puppets to convey a sense of how the storyteller, Troy, is also manipulating his tale.

Read the 2021 Candyman review.

Read the review of the 1992 film.

Sign up for the Movies Update newsletter and get a roundup of reviews, news, Critics Picks and more.

The rest is here:
Watch a Scary Story Come to Life in Candyman - The New York Times

‘Candyman’ | Anatomy of a Scene – The New York Times

Hi, my name is Nia DaCosta, and I am the director of Candyman. You guys want to hear a scary story? No. Too bad. So, this scene is Troy and Brianna theyre siblings and Briannas boyfriend, Anthony who is an artist and Troys boyfriend. And theyre all together trying to have a nice dinner, but Troy insists on telling a ghost story about the neighborhood that Brianna and Anthony have just moved into. You see Yahya Abdul-Mateen II playing Anthony, Teyonah Parris playing Brianna, Nathan Stewart-Jarrett playing Troy, and Kyle Kaminsky playing Grady. [LAUGHTER] This is a story about a woman named Helen Lyle. She was a grad student a white grad student doing her thesis on the urban legends of Cabrini Green. For research, she came down to Cabrini a few times. You know, asking questions, taking pictures of graffiti, people. And then one day she just snaps. So, the shadow puppets came about when Jordan Peele, whos the co-writer and producer on the film, he came to me and he was like, I think we should do shadow puppets instead of shooting actual flashback scenes. And I was super into it because I did not want to shoot flashback scenes, and I also didnt want to cut in clips from the first movie. And so, we kind of made a decision, O.K., the flashbacks will be shadow puppetry. But then, as I was working with the shadow puppets and trying to figure out where they fit, it turned out they actually were just going to be much more useful. So thats how they ended up in this scene. We wanted it to be very specific to the teller. So every shadow puppet scene has a very specific style and point of view because it is someones way of thinking about the story. Its not necessarily the truth. Helen arrives with a sacrificial offering. [BABY CRYING] And thats why we wanted to also create that separation between fact and fiction, real and fake. And thats why you see the hands moving because its about these people creating a story puppeteering the way we think about these people. And for Troy, because hes trying to tell a scary story, hes being very hyperbolic. Hes also saying things that didnt happen. We made the style very jagged and scary and very much not the sympathetic character of Helen that we know and love from the original film. Is my ros still in the freezer? You dont want the moscato? Moscatos a dessert wine. [CHUCKLES]

More here:
'Candyman' | Anatomy of a Scene - The New York Times

‘Virgin River’: These 3 Actors Also Starred in ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Virgin River has swept fans off their feet since it debuted on Netflix in 2019. The drama series which is based on the book series by Robyn Carr follows Melinda Mel Monroe(Alexandra Breckenridge), a nurse/midwife who leaves her life in Los Angeles for a new chapter in Virgin River. Upon settling in, Mel finds herself drawn to Jack Sheridan(Martin Sheridan), a retired Marine who now owns the towns bar.

While fans of Carrs books will certainly recognize the characters, fans who have been hooked on Greys Anatomy for 17 seasons will also see some familiar faces.

RELATED:Virgin River: Fans Might Not Find out Who Shot Jack for a Long Time

Virgin River has dominated the ratings chart since the third season debuted on Netflix in July 2021. However, Netflix has remained silent about renewing the show for season 4, let alone revealing a release date. Yet, fans shouldnt despair just yet. With such massive ratings, its almost inevitable that Netflix will renew the series. Moreover, some fans are convinced that filming for season 4 is already underway.

Netflix Lifeis reportingthat the cast and crew have been filming new episodes since July 2021 and that production is slated to end in November 2021. Also,The Watershed Grill in North Vancouver, which is the location used for Jacks bar announced on Instagram that they would be closed for filming on Aug. 17 and 18.

If Netflix Life is correct, wed estimate that Virgin River Season 4 will premiere in the spring of 2022.

RELATED:Virgin River: Jack Might Not Be the Father of Charmaines Babies

Fans of Greys Anatomy were probably delighted when they saw some very familiar faces on Virgin River. Fans of the medical drama will certainly recognize Henderson as Dr. Nathan Riggs who was Merideths (Ellen Pompeo) first love interest following the death of her husband Derek (Patrick Dempsey). Henderson starred in a total of 48 episodes of Greys from 2015 to 2017.

Though Zibby Allen portays Jacks sister Brie in Virgin River, in the second season of Greys Anatomy, she appeared in five episodes of the series as Nurse Zibby. Fans might be a little confused by this since Allens character initially wore a name tag that read Angela.

Jenny Cooper might star as Mels protective older sister Jo on Virgin River, but in Greys, she portrayed the villainous Bethany Tanner. Cooper appeared in episode 112 titled, Sledgehammer. Not only did she refuse to accept her daughters sexuality, but she also upset doctors so much that they were forced to call Child Protective Services.

RELATED:Virgin River: Fans Are Convinced Paige Is Already Dead

Greys Anatomy isnt the only place that Virgin River has sourced its actors. Daniel Gillies, who portrayed Elijah Mikaelson inThe Vampire DiariesandThe Originals also plays a pivotal role in the Netflix drama series. On the show, Gillies stars as Mark Monroe, Mels late husband who often appears in flashback sequences. In the first season of Virgin River, fans learned that Mark was a doctor and he and Mel had a whirlwind romance.

However, that fairytale was shattered when their first baby was stillborn. From there, amid their respective grief, the pair never got back in sync especially after continuous rounds of IVF proved unsuccessful. Sadly, in a flashback, we learn that Mark dies in a tragic car crash when a truck hits the vehicle that he and Mel are driving in.

Though Gillies only has a recurring role in the series, we expect to see a lot more of him in season 4 since Mel is pregnant and her pregnancy might be the result of an embryo that she and Mark created prior to his death. Heres what Ill say, somewhat enigmatically: the good news about being the dead husband is that you can appear at any time. Ill leave it at that, Gillies toldMr. WarBurton Magazine.

More:
'Virgin River': These 3 Actors Also Starred in 'Grey's Anatomy' - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

‘Grey’s Anatomy’: Why Sandra Oh Wanted to Play Cristina Yang – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

When the long-running medical drama Greys Anatomy began in 2005, the first batch of interns in the show was the most integral to the show. The show began exploring the surgical world and reality through the experiences of Meredith, Christina, Izzie, George, and Alex. In this group of five, Sandra Oh played the role of Christina Yang, an ambitious intern who aspired to be a cardiothoracic surgeon. Looking back at her career now, the Emmy-winning actor revealed why she was attracted to Yangs character in the show in a recent interview with Vanity Fair

At the outset, the drama had Meredith Grey, the titular character of the show, as the central role in the plot. Cristina emerged as Merediths closest friend and as the seasons progressed, her person. They were similar in some but different from each other in several ways and that became a driving force in their friendship. Oh said it was that difference between Cristina and Meredith that attracted her to the role.

In the pilot episode, Cristina and Meredith work together on a difficult diagnosis and at the end, Meredith gets to scrub in the surgery. Meredith had told Cristina before they teamed up that the latter could have the surgery if they found the right diagnosis. But in the end, she couldnt refuse the opportunity to participate in surgery on her very first day and took it when it was offered to her.

After the surgery though, both Meredith and Cristina have a mature conversation about how neither of them wanted to compromise on their ambition when it came to surgeries. And just like that, both of them knew that things were good between them. In typical Meredith and Cristina fashion, they decided to not let that be a moment.

The reason why I wanted to play Cristina[Yang] in Greys Anatomy is because dramaturgically at least in the pilot, and again, you never knew if it would go past a pilot, she was the antagonist, Oh said after looking at the clip from the end of the pilot episode.

Oh continued that she found Cristina very interesting and prickly. She saw qualities in her that she didnt see in herself. She also thought that it was better to be able to play the role of a student because of the scope of possibilities a role like that offered.

I just was also at a point where I did not want to play a character of authority, Oh said. I was more interested in the role of the student because you have to find stuff out, you dont have answers. Youre the person trying to find stuff out. Thats where the story is.

Exactly as Oh planned, Cristinas character arc develops perfectly from a student to a renowned cardiothoracic surgeon and a teacher.

Oh also revealed in her interview that after auditioning for Cristina and impressing the show creator Shonda Rhimes with her acting chops, Oh first said no to the role. Her team informed her after her auditions that they couldnt get the studio to make the deal that they thought she deserved.

It was later that Rhimes asked for Oh specifically that she got the part. Fortunately, for the shows fans, Oh eventually played the part that became a favorite character for many.

RELATED: Greys Anatomy: Sandra Oh on Why Playing Cristina Yang Was a Gift

See original here:
'Grey's Anatomy': Why Sandra Oh Wanted to Play Cristina Yang - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Celebrity Wheel of Fortune Season 2: Grey’s Anatomy, Buffy, and Glee Stars Set to Compete! – TV Fanatic

ABC is ready to spin the celebrity wheel of fortune again.

The network on Thursday announced the full list of contestants for the forthcoming second season, and there are some big names.

Celebrity Wheel of Fortune returns with season two on its new night, Sunday, September 26 (8:00-9:00 p.m. EDT), on ABC.

Hosted by pop-culture legends Pat Sajak and Vanna White, the primetime edition welcomes celebrity contestants to spin the worlds most famous Wheel and solve word puzzles for a chance to win up to $1 million.

All of the money won by the celebrity contestants will go to a charity of their choice.

The celebrity contestants include Jason Alexander (Seinfeld), Tatyana Ali, Anthony Anderson, Tituss Burgess (Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt), Cheryl Burke (Dancing With the Stars), Brooke Burns, Lacey Chabert, Mario Cantone, Laverne Cox (Orange Is the New Black), Marcia Cross (Desperate Housewives), and Joey Fatone.

Other big names appearing include Vivica A. Fox (Empire), Jeff Garlin, Anthony Michael Hall, Melissa Joan Hart (Sabrina the Teenage Witch), John Michael Higgins, Vanilla Ice, Tara Lipinski, Loni Love, Von Miller, and Michael Mizanin.

Wanya Morris, Jason Mraz, Haley Joel Osment, Donny Osmond, James Pickens Jr. (Grey's Anatomy), Caroline Rhea, Andy Richter, Amber Riley (Glee), and Tori Spelling Beverly Hills, 90210) also star.

Shawn Stockman, Curtis Stone, Jodie Sweetin, Raven-Symon (That's So Raven), Karl-Anthony Towns, Michelle Trachtenberg (Buffy the Vampire Slayer), Nia Vardalos, Johnny Weir, and Ali Wentworth round out the cast.

This is an impressive cast for the series, which launched to bumper ratings during its inaugural celebrity run, so it will be fun to see whether it can keep up the pace in the fall.

Celebrity Wheel of Fortune kicks off ABC's primetime lineup on Sundays and will be followed by a new season of Supermarket Sweep.

The Rookie rounds out the night for the network with its fourth season.

Celebrity Wheel of Fortune is produced by Sony Pictures Television, a Sony Pictures Entertainment company. Wheel of Fortune is distributed by CBS Television Distribution.

ABC also announced during its turn at TCA that Steve Harvey will be hosting a primetime court show titled Judge Steve Harvey.

Your thoughts on this cast?

Hit the comments below.

Edit Delete

Paul Dailly is the Associate Editor for TV Fanatic. Follow him on Twitter.

Original post:
Celebrity Wheel of Fortune Season 2: Grey's Anatomy, Buffy, and Glee Stars Set to Compete! - TV Fanatic

An exceptional fossil confiscated by the Brazilian Police reveals new details about the anato… – Market Research Telecast

A fossil that was confiscated in 2013 by the Brazilian Police during a raid in Santos (So Paulo state) turned out to be the specimen of the tapejrido clade, a subgroup of flying reptiles of the order of the pterosaurs. more complete and best preserved that has recovered so far in Brazil.

The limestone slabs in which the remains of Tupandactylus navigans were preserved in a way exceptional, they conserve the practically complete skeleton, including the skull and post-skull, as well as remnants of soft tissues adhered to the sagittal crest, a Brazilian research team detailed in a study published this Wednesday at PLOS ONE.

Although there is an abundant fossil record of these reptiles that thrived during the early Cretaceous, between 145 and 100 million years, in what is now Brazil. Most of them only preserve partial remains, so the confiscated specimen allowed paleontologists to describe for the first time the shape of the premaxillary crest, the proportions and shape of the dental crest, as well as the axial skeletal anatomy.

Some of the new features discovered, such as the length of its neck, the difference in size between the front and rear limbs, as well as the pronounced sagittal crest, suggest that the Tupandactylus navigans had a terrestrial foraging lifestyle, as These characteristics may have made it difficult to fly short distances, which is especially useful when escaping from predators.

However, the analysis of the fossil also showed that this pterosaur had the physiological adaptations to maintain a propelled flight, such as the presence of the notarium bone, formed by the fusion of the thoracic vertebrae, a wide anchoring surface for the pectoral muscles, as well as divisions in the composition of the wings that would have been fundamental during the glide.

Further research on the rare fossil will be necessary, the academics note, in order to determine how the newly discovered features contributed to a foraging lifestyle, as well as its potential to increase performance in flight.

From agreement to Victor Beccari, co-author of the publication, the sample studied was recovered along with 3,000 other fossils that were destined for the museums of the Global North [pases industrializados] or, worse still, for private collectors! However, thanks to the police intervention now the Tupandactylus navigans is protected by the Institute of Geosciences of the University of So Paulo and is part of the exhibition Fossils of Araripe

If you liked it, share it with your friends!

Disclaimer: This article is generated from the feed and not edited by our team.

View original post here:
An exceptional fossil confiscated by the Brazilian Police reveals new details about the anato... - Market Research Telecast

Pamplin Media Group – The anatomy of a wildfire response – Pamplin Media Group

Wildland firefighters in places like Southern Oregon work grueling hours and face sometimes-brutal conditions.

Last month's Game Hog Creek Fire, located 22 miles northwest of Forest Grove, burned just under 200 acres in a three-week span.

But while relatively harmless by wildfire standards it did not grow explosively, and it burned in a remote and unpopulated area its presence, coupled with Oregon's tragic fires over the past 11 months, has raised awareness of the dangers of these natural disasters, along with appreciation for firefighting work and the people who do it.

Dave Luttrell, who has spent 26 years working for the Oregon Department of Forestry fighting fires and who presently runs the South Fork prison camp nestled in the middle of the Tillamook State Forest, is keenly aware of the complexities that come with wildfires. They can start quick, move quicker, and regardless of the experience of those fighting them, they can be very dangerous.

"You have to be concerned with safety first and foremost, because people die," Luttrell said bluntly. "We don't lose too many people, thankfully, but while we have safety officers on crews, we basically say everybody on the fire is a safety officer and tell them that if there's something they're not comfortable with, we encourage them to say something."

Those crews often come from everywhere. The Bootleg Fire in Southern Oregon which has burned more than 400,000 acres since igniting more than a month ago boasts more than 2,000 firefighters. Like many Oregon wildfire responses, many of those battling the fire work for the Department of Forestry. They also get a crucial assist from contractors, an oft-underappreciated component of wildfire response.

Brandon Knox, who lives in Bend, flies helicopters for Leading Edge Aviation. Knox spends half of his year fighting fires. He was based in Chiloquin and working the area when he and his spotter laid eyes on what would become the Bootleg Fire. As per protocol, they flew over and assessed the scene before calling it in. As they did, and as they waited for a response, they witnessed the just how quickly wildfires can progress.

"There wasn't any real water supply nearby, so we just circled it," Knox said. "When we initially got over the top of it, it was probably about a half-acre. Within an hour, it grew to 200 or 300 acres, and by the time we went back for the night, which would've been about six hours, it was close to 3,000 acres with 60-, 70-foot flames."

When he's on wildfire duty, Knox's job consists of scooping and dropping water, placing personnel in nearby locations, and helping those in charge eyeball the blaze from above. He normally works 10 days on, two days off, and typically 7 a.m. to midnight.

An average morning starts with a tour of the blaze with strategic personnel who are looking for the best angles of attack. Knox and his team will do that two to three times daily, providing vital intelligence to firefighters on the group. The remainder of his day will be spent doing pretty much everything else.

While he's now based in Oregon, Knox estimates he's worked in more than a dozen states, and he's been doing so for more than a decade.

And just because he's not on the ground doesn't mean his job isn't dangerous. Knox and other pilots on wildfire response have smoke, heat, varying altitudes, wind and trees to deal with not to mention the fire itself.

"You're constantly managing your power with the different winds and the turbulence, and with the added weight of the water or the amount of people you're carrying," Knox said.

He said there's an "oh, s--t" moment almost every day.

"When you're close to the top of a mountain or maybe the top of a ridgeline, the winds are always going to be shifting," Knox said. "And when you're out there with a long line or doing bucket work and that wind shifts, you often want to go one way, and the helicopter wants to go the other. There's always something."

And the ground has its own share of complexities. Luttrell said when Department of Forestry crews get called to a fire, they have to find or construct housing for hundreds to thousands of crew members, provide necessary supplies, and, of course, feed firefighters on the scene.

Fire crews work 12-hour shifts, either day or night. They start with a breakfast, take a lunch with them, then return and eat, and go to bed in preparation to do it all over the following day.

"It's hard work," Luttrell said. "There's not a ton of downtime, and these guys are dealing with a lot."

Luttrell said there are a number of ways to attack a fire, and technique often depends upon the size of the fire and the terrain in which it's burning. They'll do different things for grass fires, different things yet for fires consisting of fuels such as brush or oak savannas, and then if the terrain doesn't allow for trucks to get on site, they'll have to get crews directly into the area to attack it by hand as they did with the Game Hog Creek Fire, which largely burned in rugged slash lands.

"They often do what they call flanking maneuvers," Luttrell said. "They never try to take a fire head-on. They start at the back end, where it's not burning as hot, and they go around the edge."

Homes in the area can complicate things as well. Oftentimes, wildfires burn in remote areas of the state, like the Tillamook State Forest. When there are homes in the area, though, protecting them is a top priority as it was for firefighters battling blazes in Washington and Clackamas counties last September.

Luttrell said that starts with prevention. The Department of Forestry and other fire agencies tell homeowners to keep wood piles separate from the house, clear brush and trees so as to keep them a certain distance from structures, and keep flammable objects away from the house.

If an area with many structures is at risk, the Office of the State Fire Marshal typically gets involved, freeing up more resources to keep the fire at bay or, at least, help save what they can.

"We definitely don't want to see anybody's house burned down," Luttrell said. "So, if there's something we can do, we will, but we also won't put firefighters at risk."

Luttrell said there is increasing concern about powerlines. Downed lines were the culprit behind some of the most prominent fires in Oregon last September.

"Certainly, with powerlines, there's a chance they can start fires," he said, "so in times of concern, they're working with local utilities to determine if and when they should shut off power."

One common question that arises around wildfires is defining "containment," which indicates how much of the fire has been enclosed by a control line. A wildfire with 25% containment means control lines have been completed around 25% of the fire's perimeter.

Control lines sometimes called firebreaks can be created with controlled burns or by removing dry wood, brush and other vegetation with dozers. The intent is to form a barrier that will stop a wildfire from spreading, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, which has borne the brunt of the United States' increasingly dangerous wildfires over the past decade.

And do firefighters ever really get these things out before the winter takes care of it in the end?

The answer is: sometimes yes, sometimes no. But often, it depends on the weather.

Obviously, cooler and wetter conditions are beneficial, but Knox says that even when wildfires appear to wind down, the process of monitoring them for flare-ups is just beginning.

"As they get things under control and they start to release resources, we'll take somebody up to monitor if from above," he said. "They're always making sure there's no hotspots near the line and nothing that can jump containment. That's always what scares them."

You count on us to stay informed and we depend on you to fund our efforts.Quality local journalism takes time and money. Please support us to protect the future of community journalism.

Read this article:
Pamplin Media Group - The anatomy of a wildfire response - Pamplin Media Group

Sandra Oh on the ‘Gift’ of ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ and Exploring Timely Topics on ‘The Chair’ (Exclusive) – Entertainment Tonight

Sandra Oh on the 'Gift' of 'Grey's Anatomy' and Exploring Timely Topics on 'The Chair' (Exclusive) | Entertainment Tonight arrow-left-mobilearrow leftarrow-right-mobilearrow rightGroup 7Gallery Icon Copy 2Video Play Button Copy 5Hamburger MenuInstagramYoutubeShare Button7C858890-6955-48EA-B871-66CE1E33590CVideo-Playbutton Copy Skip to main content

Read more from the original source:
Sandra Oh on the 'Gift' of 'Grey's Anatomy' and Exploring Timely Topics on 'The Chair' (Exclusive) - Entertainment Tonight

The anatomy of good health: | | azdailysun.com – Arizona Daily Sun

Chan refrains from focusing on weight loss in her practice. This is because the body is physiologically meant to survive, not lose weight. Rather, she helps her clients evaluate the role food plays in their lives along with nutritional counseling and meal preparation. Evolve Flagstaff also focuses on physical therapy and training.

Instead, Chan helps her clients embrace their body and learn fuel themselves to live life to the fullest.

"So much of our body shape and size is based on genetics, our economic situation, history so many different things that are completely out of our control that we may or may not be able to change our weight," Chan said. "Given the ideal environment of having access to food, to move or exercise and sleep enough will set you up in the genetic pool where you can actually let your genes express themselves.

However, that doesn't many people can't improve their nutritional intake.

According to Chan, many northern Arizonan diets don't get enough dietary fiber from not eating enough fruits and vegetables. This is even more common recently due to a surge in popuarlity in low-carb and keto diets. However, carbs are critical as they provide a good portion of fiber, nutrients and fuel for the body.

Northern Arizonans also have an inclination for plant-based, vegan or vegetarian diets. Chan said these options are fantastic, but people can become protein deficient without researching how to get enough plant-based protein into their diet or by working with a dietitian. Protein is necessary for muscle, neurochemicals, enzymes and hormones basically everything.

Read more:
The anatomy of good health: | | azdailysun.com - Arizona Daily Sun

Goldsmith: "The Anatomy of a Screw Up: The Biden Eviction Moratorium Saga" – Reason

I am not alone in raising red flags about the Biden Administration's conduct with respect to the eviction moratorium. (See my prior writings here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here). Today, Lawfare published two detailed pieces about the situation. First, Jack Goldsmith wrote a post titled "The Anatomy of a Screw Up: The Biden Eviction Moratorium Saga." Second, Alan Rozenshtein wrote a post titled "Did the Justice Department Give President Biden Legal Advice on the CDC Eviction Moratorium?" Read both of the pieces carefully. Here, I'll excerpt a few highlights.

The introduction of Jack's piece captures many of my reactions to the Biden Administration's screwup:

It is hard to fathom how the experienced policy advisors and lawyers atop the Biden administration could have screwed up so badly in connection with the administration's defense of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) eviction moratoriums. The administration made it seem like it was acting blatantly unlawfully, when it was not. It made it seem like it needed bottom-covering arguments from law professors outside the administration when the arguments that the Justice Department of two administrations had made in defending the moratorium ban sufficed. And it made it seem like Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, rather than Attorney General Merrick Garland or White House Counsel Dana Remus, was directing legal decisionmaking in the Biden administration. All of this happened because the Biden administration over-reacted to a Supreme Court order that refused to halt the CDC moratorium. The administration's rule-of-law credibility is the big loser; and the Supreme Court's shadow docket the big winner.

Jack alluded to another credibility problem. OLC and the SG recognized that they had valid arguments, but didn't want to burn credibility with the Court. The Timesreported that administration lawyers felt lucky they got a reprieve from Justice Kavanaugh.

The department, and especially the Solicitor General, might have worried about credibility before the Supreme Court in light of its June 29 order, even if the order technically had no legal consequences. Or, more powerfully, the Justice Department might have worried that a likely and perhaps quick loss on the merits in the Supreme Court on a renewed eviction moratorium might limit the CDC's ability to take vital emergency action in the future. To say that the administration had legal options to renew the eviction moratorium is not at all to say that it would be a good idea to do so. The point is simply that no legal or ethical obstacle stood in the way.

Now the SG faces the worst of all worlds. I think Jack left out the most important aspect of the credibility problem. Biden said that he expected to lose, but hoped the policy would remain in place for a month so the money could be distributed. We are teetering very close to a bad faith abuse of legal process. And the Chief will not be pleased.

Finally, Goldsmith writes how these actions give the impression that DOJ "acted lawlessly.":

These revelations, in light of the earlier administration statements, made it seem like the administration had concluded that it could not lawfully renew the CDC moratorium but flipped its legal view under ferocious political pressure from Pelosi and Bush, with the assistance of cherry-picked legal advice from professors close to the administration. It seemed, in short, like the administration acted lawlessly to satisfy the fury of the left wing of the democratic party. This impression was deepened by the left's reaction to the administration's apparent flip-flop. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, for example, described the flip-flop as "a huge victory for the power of direct action and not taking no for an answer."

Now, let's turn to Alan's piece. OLC is in a very precarious position. The Office, which is staffed by leading law professors, was simply cast aside. After all, Pelosi said "get better lawyers!" And the President threw OLC under the bus by going to law professors outside the administration:

Taking this story at face value, the obvious question is: where was the Justice Department in all of this? What was the position of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), which would ordinarily be the last word on high-profile, complex legal questions such as this one, or the Office of the Solicitor General and the Civil Division, which have responsibility for defending the new moratorium in court?

There are presumably three options. The first is that the Department of Justice told the White House that the CDC did not have the authority to issue a new eviction moratorium and the White House ignored that advice. The second option is that the department wasn't consulted, either because of an oversight from the White House or because the White House, suspecting that the department would return an answer it didn't want, simply didn't ask the Department of Justice. The third option is that the department was consulted, told the White House that the CDC did have this authority, and this fact has simply not been disclosed in the White House's public messaging so far. More reporting is needed on this question, but it's notable that, when Politico's Josh Gerstein asked Attorney General Merrick Garland whether the department signed off on the eviction moratorium, Garland did not answer the question.

Alan concludes:

If Pelosi really did tell Biden to "get better lawyers" and Biden responded by going outside the Department of Justice, that should set off alarms about the confidence that Biden has in the department's traditional role as the main source of legal advice and analysis for the executive branch.

There will be much more fallout from this incident. People in DC who are burned tend to talk to the press. And the Supreme Court will not quickly forget about this incident.

Read the original post:
Goldsmith: "The Anatomy of a Screw Up: The Biden Eviction Moratorium Saga" - Reason