Category Archives: Anatomy

Anatomy

From homelessness to hope: Anatomy of a London turnaround – The London Free Press

London has a bold plan to tackle its deadly homeless crisis, involving up to 15 service hub shelters and 600 supported housing units. It came together with a whos who list of people listening and talking to one another. It all began with regret. Randy Richmond reports

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

The apologies stunned.

The first thing she did was apologize.

I dont remember the exact words, she recalls in an interview with The London Free Press. I said that some of the things that have happened, policies and actions, have caused harm. And I apologized.

Other leaders at the summit, such as London Health Sciences Centre chief executive Jackie Schleifer Taylor, also acknowledged past mistakes.

The hospital had earned a reputation as a barrier to helping homeless people, and hadnt joined community efforts to solve Londons crisis.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

You might as well call it out, Schleifer Taylor says of her acknowledgement. Im just asking for the opportunity for LHSC to re-earn the trust of the community.

The acknowledgements of mistakes laid the groundwork for three successful summits that developed an entirely new system for homelessness in London, say the more than a dozen participants interviewed by The Free Press.

And they all point to Livingstone as the key to the success of the summits.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Only a few months ago, few in the social service field would pick anyone from city hall as the person to bring about uniting them all.

Even before the pandemic, social organizations often worked in silos and had to compete for city, provincial and federal dollars in funding streams that still ignore how addiction, mental illness, poverty, homelessness and health care are connected.

COVID-19 interrupted plans for follow-up forums and coverage, as the newspaper focused on the pandemic.

Those pandemic years werent kind to city halls reputation on homelessness. In the fall of 2020, people living in tents downtown were directed by city officials to encampments along the Thames River, which advocates and residents considered isolated and unsafe.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Advocates say there were a growing number of people sleeping and living rough outside, a contention city hall at first refuted.

In response to the coming winter, city hall and agencies worked together to build shelter and resting spaces. But by the next winter, the demand had grown and the city hall response building a shelter far from the core drew criticism.

I used to keep a sheet of paper on the wall in my office, and I would write peoples names down as we lost them, Dr. Andrea Sereda, a coalition leader and physician at London InterCommunity Health Centre (LIHC), says.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Then the page got filled up and I added a second, and then I tore it all off, because I couldnt look at it anymore. There were just too many names.

The citys initial response to the hunger strike was dismissive, Sereda says.

We were written off, patted on the head: Awesome, you advocates for homeless people. Now go back and do your day job.

Click here for a subscriber-only Q&A session with our Randy Richmond, starting at 9 a.m. on Monday Feb. 27.

But everyone could see the pandemic changed everything and now everything had to change, Livingstone says.

We werent seeing this number of folks struggling on the streets. We were not seeing this level of acuity before. I dont think anyone anticipated the boomerang impact . . . the explosion that the pandemic unleashed, she said.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Just walk through our community, look at the suffering. That was the spark that something different needs to be done.

In the summer, Livingstone began inviting the leaders at Londons hospitals and public health unit to discuss homelessness.

This is not just a homelessness issue. This is a health and housing issue, she says. When you have something impossible to solve, the way you do it is you bring everybody together, because thats how you get to solutions. And Londons done that a million times.

Those discussions led to the creation of a fall summit, one that first appeared to be about hospital and city hall officials leading a discussion that community agencies were invited to join.

I thought, here we go again, Scott Courtice, LIHC executive director, recalls. Theres a crisis and the city needs to do some sort of large public relations exercise to show that theyre taking it seriously.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Livingstone invited him to meet and chat one on one, Courtice says.

That really turned it around for me, because I really believe that she was thinking about doing something differently. The hunger strike earlier had created some tension and strain in our relationship as organizations and as leaders. It was a chance to talk about how that shook out and why it shook out in that way.

After an hour conversation, he committed full-out to the effort, Courtice says.

Livingstones apology at the summit made me really emotional because it had felt like so long that we were fighting this thing alone and like we were being gaslit, being told that actually youre not seeing what youre seeing with your eyes, holding peoples hands when theyre dying, he says.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

He had a similar response to Schleifer Taylors talk about LHSC, Courtice says.

With humility, acknowledging that theyve got a lot of work to do, and wanting to be part of the team, it felt like, I dont know, like I would run through fire for everybody in that room.

As the frontline doctor at LIHC, Sereda had been a vocal critic of city hall homelessness policies. She had long insisted that the health care the centre provided could only do so much as long as people couldnt find shelter.

Very quickly, the tone was set that this was very intentionally trying to be different, she says of the first summit.

For the first time, executives of hospitals and agencies sat side by side with frontline workers from other organizations, she says.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

We were actually able to talk face to face with with folks that weve never been able to communicate with before. And I think that humanizes both sides as a starting point, she says.

To a person, summit participants interviewed for this story say a key to the success of the effort was the chance to sit with different people and listen.

I felt like I was a sponge, sitting at tables with people . . . running shelters for families and kids and youth, just to hear them talk about their realities, says Roy Butler, chief executive at St. Josephs Health Care London.

Everybodys putting skin in the game. That cross-pollination starts to create relationships and knock down walls.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

The sheer number and range of participants inspired, says Chuck Lazenby, executive director of the Unity Project shelter.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

London Health Sciences Centre is a big player that weve wanted to add to the table in a genuine way for a very long time, she says.

Having business owners and developers at the table to participate in understanding what homelessness is in our community, and asking how they can help, that is inspiring.

Livingstone refuses to take personal credit for bringing so many people from so many different sectors to the summits, saying any city manager would have done the same, and it took a city hall team to organize.

As well, she emphasizes that the new system was developed by the 200 people at the summits, and is a community plan, not a city hall plan.

I think that the city had an important role to play in creating the space for this conversation to happen. The city has an important role to continue to play to support this work, Livingstone says.The city has been told, clearly, we need to look at our policies, we probably need to look at some bylaws. We need to maybe fund things in a different way.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

All she will say about praise from participants is: That is very, very kind of people to say, very nice.

She does acknowledge that it was daunting to stand up and acknowledge city mistakes in front of 200 leaders and frontline workers.

Yes, absolutely. But it was necessary, right? If were going to have a different outcome, we have to be different.

Clockwise from top left: Steve Williams, Marcus Plowright, Alex Summers, Brian Lester, Lynne Livingstone, and Chuck Lazenby

Jackie Schleifer Taylor, chief executive, London Health Sciences Centre: Some of our wonderful community partners need our help on the human resources side for support and education. They need us to work with them to harmonize policies where the transitions of patients from our emergency department arent smooth. How can we share our resources for all of our patients together? How can we ensure people get the best care where and when they need it?

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Roy Butler, chief executive, St. Josephs Health Care chief executive: Even though Im proud of the work weve done as an organization, if there are better ways to integrate, better ways to support hubs and networks that provide a continuum of housing, and be more preventative, were in to see how we can lead and participate.

Chuck Lazenby, executive director, Unity Project: A big part of the hubs is ensuring you have places for people to stay that are stable and accessible and diverse and have some choice and accommodate everyone, regardless of how they present. We are going to need options where couples can stay together, women only, single occupancy or shared space. What makes people feel safe and supported until theres a permanent solution?

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Scott Courtice, executive director, London InterCommunity Health Centre: Weve been organized like, if you were to build a hockey team, where youve got the goalie, the defence, the offence, all with different coaches, all practicing in different arenas, bringing them together and expecting them to win. Weve never had a head coach, weve never had a coordinated approach. And thats what we so sorely need.

Mike Wallace, executive director, London Development Institute, an umbrella group for developers: We were direct with Lynn Livingstone: In the next round, you need to start formulating. Where can we help? What is it you truly need? How many square feet? How many people (are) you holding? Whats the layout? Where do you want the hubs? When were sitting in front of the minister, or a bureaucrat, well be saying, These people have the expertise in providing the service but sitting beside them is the industry thats able to deliver the physical plant.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Anne Armstrong, executive director, London Cares: I started to talk to my staff about some of the things that might be coming and how this direction is shifting. And you could just see their eyes light up. Hope will be the inoculation against the moral injury theyre suffering. Theyre so frustrated at banging their heads against a brick wall.

Dr, Alex Summers, the London areas chief medical officer of health: We have people who are on the streets who have nowhere to go. So we need to create spaces for them to go and services to support them once theyre there. We need to find ways to resource them adequately. The amount of housing we have in our community that is affordable for people, needs to be increased. The amount of social supports available through a disability cheque needs to be higher than it is. These are preventive components that we need to address, as well.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Kapil Lakhotia, chief executive, London Economic Development Corp: We want to reduce (building) vacancy in our core, we want to bring more creative talent, more tech- and knowledge-based industries downtown. How are we going to fill the vacancies downtown until we achieve a certain level of vibrancy and safety? In order for us to continue sustainable economic growth in London, we have to build a strong foundation. The health and homelessness summit has clearly identified key issues that we need to rally around in order for that foundation to stay strong.

Marcus Plowright, realtor and donation organizer: We are at this enormous convergence of money and community engagement and brilliant solutions at the same moment in time. This is something enormously different to help people suffering and those frontline workers watching people die.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

London police chief Steve Williams: Quite often were the only 24/7 response. We can apply Band-aids to the immediate problem, but we cant really address the underlying issues. If we have another tool at our disposal, such as these hubs, then we can be more effective in handing individuals to the most appropriate service. There will be some training and education on our part to change our mindset, that were not alone.

Beth Mitchell, co-leader, Thames Valley Addiction and Mental Health Services: We have to listen to what people say they need instead of saying this is what we have, and you have to lie there. During the pandemic, we had the opportunity to experiment with some things. That funding all ends. To have something we can create that is sustainable, that when we hire staff we can say, this is a permanent job, you can invest in your career, that would be a game-changer.

See the original post:
From homelessness to hope: Anatomy of a London turnaround - The London Free Press

Anatomy

One Grey’s Anatomy Storyline Was Even Worse Than Infamous … – Startefacts

In the world of Grey's Anatomy, fans have been dealt their fair share of shockers over the years.

They were just starting to believe that the show was done with crazy, irrational storylines, and then came to the season 18 finale.

At the top of the list for the worst storyline was the infamous "ghost sex" scene that took place in season 5 when Izzie ends up having sex with the ghost of her departed husband Denny.

Despite the show's usual dedication to medical accuracy and science, this storyline made fans feel like all logic had been thrown out the window, and they were left uncomfortably scratching their heads.

It took fans a while to move on from that, and they eventually did, but then Grey's Anatomy writers and producers came up with a new storyline that fans feel is even worse than the one about ghost sex.

And no, it wasn't the one about Alex Karev leaving his friends and wife to be with Izze and start a family with the twins she had been raising that were his. (Although there seems to be a pattern with Izzie and weird storylines).

The storyline that was even more perplexing than the Ghost Sex was none other than Owen Hunt and Teddy Altman's dramatic exit.

This storyline has been dubbed by fans as the worst one to date, as it pushes the limits of believability and reality and makes the medical drama feel more like a soap opera.

Leading up to their departure, Owen was revealed to have been illegally giving drugs to dying veterans to ease their suffering and speed up their death.

When he refused a man's request to help his wife die peacefully, the man reported him to Bailey, who gave them a head start before calling authorities. With the police on their tail, Owen, Teddy, and their two children fled on a plane to an unknown destination.

Where are they going? What is going to happen next? Will they end up in jail?

The season 18 finale left fans with many questions and uncertainties. With the family now on the run, fans will have to wait for season 19 to see how it all unfolds. Grey's Anatomy is known for its dramatic twists and turns, and this latest plot has taken that to the extreme, and possibly, a little too far.

Visit link:
One Grey's Anatomy Storyline Was Even Worse Than Infamous ... - Startefacts

Anatomy

Reddit Has Spoken: These 5 Grey’s Anatomy Storylines Were Total … – Startefacts

Grey's Anatomy has been a beloved staple in television for over a decade, with fans following the lives of doctors at Seattle Grace Hospital since its debut in 2005. However, not every storyline has been a hit with viewers.

In fact, fans on Reddit have made their opinions known on the show's storylines that just didn't make the cut. From love triangles to unexplained plot holes, Grey's Anatomy has had its fair share of disappointing moments.

Amelia And Owen's Adoption Battle

Despite being Derek's sister and such a good doctor, Amelia never earned as much love from Grey's fans as her brother did. Most fans on the Reddit thread labeled her a drama queen especially because of how she went about her relationship with Owen. The entire adoption fight for many felt like a baseless filler storyline.

Ellen's Idea for Grey's Anatomy Finale Is Better Than Anything Writers Can Come Up With

Amelia dragged Owen to the courts because she apparently loved Leo more than she hated him, only to pull out of the adoption at the end. She did it despite claiming she loved Leo and wanted to be in his life. Besides, she previously admitted she didn't want kids therefore fighting Owen for a child he single-handedly adopted just didn't make any sense.

The Entire Minnick Story

Eliza Minnick had one of the worst storylines in Grey's Anatomy which is why the character failed to click despite having such a great actor in Marika Domiczyk. Some fans think that the "Minnick saga" was a mass character assassination since it made Bailey and the other characters less likable.

Minnick was supposed to make the residency program better but her supposed innovative approach nearly ended it altogether. Everything about the character including a supposed romantic connection with Arizona ended in disaster. She disagreed with everyone and turned the ORs into war rooms destroying the very core of the show.

Izzie Dating George

There must be something really wrong with their romance if fans admit they'd rather see Izzy with Danny's ghost again than her relationship with George.

Izzie and Alex made a great couple, while George deserved some peace in his marriage to Callie, which is why it made no sense for the show to complicate the relationships.

After all those years of working together and staying professional, their sexual encounter ruined everything. The storyline proved to be even dumber when the two decided to stay as friends after discovering that they had no chemistry. The entire storyline only seemed like an excuse to break up George and Callie.

Meredith In Purgatory

The drowning scene wasn't bad in itself but getting Meredith stuck in purgatory with the likes of Dennis, Dylan, and her mother's scrub nurse didn't make any sense. Why she suddenly got so close with Dennis and Dylan when she hardly talked about them on the show when she was alive?

Interns Operating On Each Other

The "Interns practicing surgeries on one another in the basement" storyline didn't contribute to any part of the show's plot. The only excuse that Lexie gave for the whole thing was that it was the only thing she did that wasn't about George noticing her.

Surely the interns had received enough basic medical training to know better than try an appendectomy without the proper equipment and knowledge. Being frustrated by residents doesn't qualify as enough motivation for people to go suicidal. This storyline ended up doing just one thing making the entire group of interns look reckless and dumb.

Here is the original post:
Reddit Has Spoken: These 5 Grey's Anatomy Storylines Were Total ... - Startefacts

Anatomy

Ellen’s Idea for Grey’s Anatomy Finale Is Better Than Anything … – Startefacts

Grey's Anatomy has been a TV phenomenon since it first premiered in 2005, captivating audiences with its gripping storylines, complex characters, and romance. But all good things come to an end one day, and the hit medical drama is no exception.

While we may not know what will happen in the big finale, whenever that takes place, it certainly promises to be an emotional rollercoaster.

However, it seems that the show's longtime star and executive producer, Ellen Pompeo, has an idea for the finale that surpasses anything the writers can come up with.

Throughout Grey's Anatomy's long tenure, the series has seen a revolving door of cast members, with only a handful of the show's original cast making regular appearances. The medical series has welcomed and bid farewell to many talented actors, including Sandra Oh, T.R. Knight, and Patrick Dempsey. These departures have left a lasting impact on the show, with each exit shaping the narrative in many ways.

However, with last year's announcement regarding Ellen Pompeo's decision to step away from her role as the titular character Meredith Grey, changes are definitely on the horizon.

Following this news, many devoted fans have started to wonder how much longer the medical show will remain on the air. Some are even speculating that the current season could be final, and if that's the case, viewers are eager to see how the show will bring its long journey to a close.

But while there's no real sign of the show coming to an end just yet, Pompeo has expressed her own idea for what she'd like to see in the big finale. When the actress appeared on The Late Late Show with James Corden in 2019, she revealed that she would love to have some of the original cast members reunite.

"The original cast is just like [puts hands over her heart]," she said before adding, "That probably won't happen, but that would be the most amazing way to [end it]."

Now, the reason why it's unlikely to happen is that some of the characters were killed off on the show. That said, regardless of how difficult it would be to pull this off, fans are excited about Pompeo's idea, with some even stating this would be the only right way to conclude the show.

With the future of the series unknown, it's anyone's guess how it will end. But no matter what happens, there is one thing fans can count on: Grey's Anatomy will go out with a bang, just like it has for the past two decades.

More here:
Ellen's Idea for Grey's Anatomy Finale Is Better Than Anything ... - Startefacts

Anatomy

Thursday TV Ratings: Greys Anatomy, Call Me Kat, Walker, CSI: Vegas, Law & Order – TV Series Finale

Thursday, February 23, 2023 ratings New episodes: Station 19, Greys Anatomy, Next Level Chef, Animal Control, Call Me Kat, Law & Order, Law & Order: SVU, Law & Order: Organized Crime, Walker, andWalker: Independence. Reruns: So Help Me Todd, Young Sheldon, Ghosts, CSI: Vegas, and The Company You Keep.

Note: If youre not seeing the updated charts, please try reloading the page or go here.

These are the fast affiliate ratings. The percentages represent the change since the previous original episode. (Percentages arent given for reruns or specials.) To see past ratings for a particular show, click the shows link. The show pages are updated with the daily final ratings when they become available. Those pages include season averages to date.

What were you watching last night? Original network programming, reruns, cable, or something else?

You are currently viewing the mobile version of our site. View the full site to get free email alerts, vote on your favorite shows, comment, and more.

Follow this link:
Thursday TV Ratings: Greys Anatomy, Call Me Kat, Walker, CSI: Vegas, Law & Order - TV Series Finale

Anatomy

Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack: 8 Stages of Operation [White Paper] – BlackBerry Blog

Its a dark and rainy night. Thunder rumbles. Lightning flashes. An unexpected crime takes place. Intrigue and deception follow, with a mystery to solve.

When it comes to fiction, you might enjoy reading a good mystery to figure out whodunnit. Not so, when that crime is a ransomware attack with a digital note telling you that threat actors have compromised your organizations network, encrypted all your files, and are demanding immediate payment to restore your operations.

In 2021, the average cost of a ransomware attack hit $1.85 million a 41% increase from the previous year. This includes the ransom, downtime, people time, device cost, network cost, lost opportunity, and more. But beyond the financial and reputational cost, theres another impact few companies talk about: leadership turnover. Recent research reveals that 32% of the time, C-level employees depart the organization after a successful ransomware attack. To add insult to injury, 80% of targeted organizations are hit by a repeat attack.

These are the reasons SANS Institutes Senior InstructorJake Williams, and BlackBerry Principal Incident Response & Forensics ConsultantRyan Chapman, joined forces in a recent SANSwebcastto explain the various stages of a ransomware operation, and steps organizations can take to lessen vulnerability. Their insights are also echoed in the free white paperAnatomy of a Ransomware Operation.

Ransomware is no longer just an executable that drops onto a device and then does bad things on that device, Chapman says in the webcast. Rather, it is an overall operation, and it's carried out by humans with their hands on the keyboard.

Threat actors are doing things human-operated, Chapman concludes. You should too. If you don't have enough security-minded folks, then that's where managed detection and response comes in.

In the webcast, Williams and Chapman list eight distinct stages in a typical ransomware attack:

View thewebcast, or read thefree white paperfor more details on each attack stage, and to understand opportunities to disrupt a ransomware attack as it occurs in your environment. You can also stay up to date on ransomware attack protection and prevention by visitingblackberry.com/ransomware.

TheBlackBerry Incident Response teamcan work with organizations of any size and across any vertical, to evaluate and enhance their endpoint security posture and proactively maintain the security, integrity, and resilience of their network infrastructure.For emergency assistance, please email us atDLIR@blackberry.com, or useourhandraiserform.

Link:
Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack: 8 Stages of Operation [White Paper] - BlackBerry Blog

Anatomy

The Anatomy of the Mets 2022 Collapse – metsmerizedonline.com

Credit: Brett Davis-USA TODAY Sports

When seasons dont end the way you want or expect, people look for a reason or a scapegoat. To wit, the New York Mets announced both Billy Eppler and Buck Showalter were returning next season. On the one hand, it would seem obvious that was the case, but there was a collapse, so it was best to state it outright.

Certainly, both Eppler and Showalter have their fair share of the blame for what happened. However, it is much deeper and much more layered than that.

The seminal moment most Mets fans point to is Starling Martes hand injury in the September 6 game against the Pittsburgh Pirates. Ask a Mets fans, and they staunchly believe the Mets win the division if Marte doesnt get hurt. To a certain extent, there is truth to that.

After all, it meant more Tyler Naquin, who was terrible in September batting .185/.232/.308. He was so poor he was left off the postseason roster despite his terrific numbers against Yu Darvish, a pitcher the Mets never hit.

Looking at Naquin, that should have us revisit the Eppler point. There was a post hoc analysis of the Mets trade deadline moves (which were debated in real time). Prior to the Daniel Vogelbach trade, Mets DHs had a 79 wRC+. From Vogelbachs firsts game with the Mets to the end of the season, that mark improved to a 102 wRC+.

However, that was mostly Vogelbach. Against left-handed pitching. Darin Ruf had a 20 OPS+ with the Mets. Mark Vientos and Francisco lvarez were throw into pennant races and struggled. Notably, Gary Cohen was highly critical of the Mets decision making process noting how the Mets didnt call them up when there was a chance during the season and put too much on them.

To that point, the Atlanta Braves called upMichael Harris and Vaughn Grissom well in advance of September games, and they got much better production. As an aside, the Braves are again extending their young core while the Mets arent, but thats a separate discussion for another day.

All of the above is a worthwhile discussion, however, it is still not getting to the root cause. The Mets collapse began at Citi Field against the Washington Nationals. The Mets would lose two out of three games. It was part of the Mets worst stretch of the season.

From September 3 to September 14, the Mets were 5-6 against the Washington Nationals, Pittsburgh Pirates, Miami Marlins, and Chicago Cubs. During that stretch, the Mets three game lead shrunk to a half game. Over a stretch where the Mets could put the division away, they put the division back in play allowing the Braves to sweep the Mets forcing the Mets to the Wild Card.

Fast-forward for a second to the Atlanta Braves series. There were a number of problems in that series. Chief among them was the starting pitching failed. Figuring out how to prevent this from happening again requires diagnosing how that happened. The answer may be unsatisfying to some, but it is as simple as fatigue.

Wendell Cruz-USA TODAY Sports

Carlos Carrasco, who didnt pitch in the Braves series, pitched a combined 121 2/3 innings over the previous two seasons. He would pitch 152 this season. At the 64 inning mark this season, Carrasco had a 3.52 ERA and was averaging 5 2/3 innings per start. After that, he had a 4.30 ERA averaging under five innings per start.

He had one of the Mets bad losses in September. On September 27, he allowed four runs to the Marlins over three innings. That was one of many games the Mets wanted back.

Taijuan Walker again had a poor second half, but he did salvage it a bit in September. Still, he faltered against the Pirates, and he took the loss against the Milwaukee Brewers. Both were big spots, and he and the Mets wish they had those games back.

Of course, neither Carrasco nor Walker were the biggest culprits, the ultimate blame seems to be directed at Chris Bassitt. Last year, Bassitt pitched 157 1/3 innings, and he had only thrown over 100 innings one other time in his career.

After his September 7 start, he hit the 161 1/3 inning mark. At that point, he had a 3.24 ERA while averaging a little over six innings per start. After that, Bassitt fell apart against the Cubs and Braves. He was very good against bad teams in the Pirates and Oakland Athletics.

Max Scherzer dealt with oblique issues. Jacob deGrom had a blister issue. Neither would ever admit it impacted their performances, but essentially, they were compromised pitchers. When you build a team on starting pitching, you cant have all five starters limping to the finish line. That is exactly what the Mets had.

Unfortunately, they did not have the hitting to overcome this. That was apparent in Atlanta when they scored all of seven runs. Over the final month of the season, in their losses, they averaged 2.5 runs per game. Part of this was the Mets approach at the plate.

Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

The Mets hit 171 homers this season ranked 15th in the majors. Pete Alonso and Francisco Lindor accounted for 38.6% of the Mets home run production. The next highest was Eduardo Escobar with 20, and he hit almost half of them in September. Essentially, for most of the season, if Alonso and Lindor werent hitting it out of the park, no one was.

Combine that with very questionable managing from Buck Showalter in Atlanta and the postseason, and you have a 101-win Mets team that fails to win the division. You have a Mets team who gets one hit in an elimination game.

With the Mets, it was no one thing. It was exhausted starting pitching who faltered. It was an offense overly reliant on two players. It was a manager who struggled in bad games making poor decisions in big games. And yes, it was a front office who failed to fully address the teams deeper issues at the trade deadline.

When all was said and done, this was a team built to sustain the rigors of the regular season. However, it was not prepared and built to last deep into the season and go deep into October. We didnt realize it at the time, but it is difficult to overlook now.

Go here to see the original:
The Anatomy of the Mets 2022 Collapse - metsmerizedonline.com

Anatomy

Will Bailey Ever Return to Grey Sloan? Greys Anatomy Boss Explains – TV Insider

After visiting her old workplace to get a glimpse of Grey Sloan Memorials new, bottom of the barrel intern class and getting an earful from the guy who wanted to be the vagina of the surgical program Miranda Bailey (Chandra Wilson) seemed all too happy to let Richard Webber (James Pickens Jr.) handle the situation.

Good luck with that, she said over her shoulder as she sashayed out of the Grey Sloan ER in Greys Anatomys Season 19 premiere on Thursday, October 6,

Bailey got really tired of carrying Grey Sloan on her shoulders last season, Greys showrunner Krista Vernoff explained to TVLine recently. And she made a decision to step away for her sanity and her well-being.

But how long will Baileys fun-employment last? Is she ever coming back to the hospital?

Greys Anatomy spoilers ahead!

Bailey will indeed scrub in again at Grey Sloan, per TVLine, which previously reported that the character will soon team up with Addison, played by returning alum Kate Walsh.Were telling a really powerful story about Addison and Bailey joining forces that is in turns funny and gut-wrenching, and through that story fans will learn a little bit more about Addisons life back in Los Angeles, Vernoff told the site last week.

The Greys boss added that the ABC show will delve into what an ambitious person like Bailey does when they sort of reach the top rung of where they want to go and need to find other areas where that ambition can be useful.

For Bailey, its in so many areas, Vernoff, who also handles the fate of Baileys husband, Ben, as showrunner of spinoff Station 19. It may also be a case of, in some ways, more being less.

Vernoff also teased that the key for Bailey may be finding the joy in taking a lesser title at work in favor of having a richer, happier life.

Nino Muoz/ABC

Actor Chandra Wilson told TheWrap recently that Bailey is too nosy to stay away from Grey Sloan for long. She is actually kind of going through that same transition that most folks in the world are going through right now, where your priorities change as a result of everything that weve been through in the last three years, at this point, she added.

Wilson also said that well see a different side of Bailey in Season 19 as the character redefines her Grey Sloan role. We have seen a person who had goals from Day 1; we got to see her achieve those goals in real time, the SAG Award winner observed. And we also got to see the difference between who she thinks she is and who the audience knows she is. So I think in Baileys mind, shes still the person that you met in the pilot for the most part, but as an audience member, you know better now, right?

Greys Anatomy, Thursdays, 8/7c, ABC

Continued here:
Will Bailey Ever Return to Grey Sloan? Greys Anatomy Boss Explains - TV Insider

Anatomy

Nine Brains, Three Hearts and Other Octopus Anatomy Facts – Now. Powered by Northrop Grumman.

Octopus anatomy is strikingly different from the human body, unless youre Dr. Otto Gunther Octavius. Eight arms are the most obvious trait, but beneath the mottled skin theres actually an array of brains, one for each tentacle. And just how many hearts does an octopus have? The answer is a surprising three, and each has an important function, so theyre not just spares.

These facts are just the tip of the iceberg for one of the more specialized creatures under the sea.

With such a uniqueness in octopus anatomy, youd expect these cephalopods to live forever. Sadly, no. The usual life span in the wild is only around one to two years for most species, according to National Geographic.

The Nature Conservancy Council of Canada notes that the largest species, the Northern Giant Pacific octopus, is also the longest lived. It reaches up to around five meters in length and between 20 and 50 kilograms in weight (about 16.5 feet and between 44 and 110 pounds), and dies at around five years old, usually after mating or laying and caring for eggs.

Scientific American blogged about the loss of the National Zoos resident octopus, Pandora, who had been entertaining visitors in her tank for 27 months, which is quite a record for an octopus.

An octopus has not one, but three hearts.

Two of them the branchial hearts pump blood to the gills where it picks up oxygen. The third, or systemic heart, pumps the oxygenated blood around the body, fueling up the eight tentacles for whatever they and their suckers plan to do.

Octopuses are quite active as cephalopods, and its thought that the three hearts are necessary to maintain their power. However, when swimming, the octopus does not use its systemic heart and can tire quite easily. It creates water jets with its body mantle instead to power propulsion.

Octopus blood is blue due to the copper-based, oxygen-carrying hemocyanin it contains. Hemocyanin doesnt carry oxygen as well as a humans iron-based hemoglobin, and New Scientist explains this might be why octopuses need more than one heart. Unfortunately, hemocyanin doesnt carry oxygen so well in acidic conditions. Since climate change is gradually lowering the pH of the worlds oceans, the environment here may not be ideal for octopus anatomy in the future.

Another reason for the impressive array of hearts is due to another peculiar feature of octopus anatomy: They have a mini brain in each of the eight tentacles, which helps each arm act independently with speed and sharp reflexes. A ninth brain oversees the entire nervous system and can also somewhat override the mini brain to operate each tentacle.

The brain-to-body ratio for an octopus is the largest for any invertebrate, and they have around the same number of neurons as a dog. They are known to be extremely intelligent, learning to solve puzzles in lab simulations and are also able to recognize people.

Having such a powerful and extensive nervous system takes a lot of energy, hence the three hearts to pump blood around the octopus.

Tentacles, each covered in an array of powerful suckers, are used for locomotion and gathering food. Although octopuses can swim, their preferred locomotion is to crawl along the seabed. Octopuses can also use their tentacles to manipulate objects, unscrewing jars and holding food. Male octopuses use a specialized grooved tentacle called a hectocotylus to pass a spermatophore to the female during mating. The National History Museum describes how some male octopuses also leave the appendage with the female.

Octopus anatomy has inspired robot development; using biomimicry, researchers at Harvard developed a soft tentacle bot that can carefully grasp irregular objects. There have even been attempts to develop climbing robots based on their ability to grasp surfaces such as ladder rungs and rough walls.

Are you interested in science and innovation? We are, too. Check out Northrop Grumman career opportunities to see how you can participate in this fascinating time of discovery.

Follow this link:
Nine Brains, Three Hearts and Other Octopus Anatomy Facts - Now. Powered by Northrop Grumman.