Category Archives: Anatomy

Anatomy of an advertisement: The story behind Greenpeace’s terrifying turtle extermination – gotech daily

After the impact of the rank tan palm oil campaign, Aardman and Greenpeace unveiled Turtle Journey last week a heartbreaking stop-motion animation that encourages people to take action against the maritime crisis.

The campaign brought together Greenpeaces strength as an activist with the famous creative from Aardman Animations, the creators of Wallace and Gromit and famous voices such as Olivia Colman, Dame Helen Mirren and David Harbor from Stranger Things.

The drum went behind the scenes to find out how the major project came about.

One of Greenpeaces main concerns has been to raise public awareness of the problems the worlds oceans face as a result of climate change. What started as a Twitter joke in 2018 led David Harbor from Stranger Things to dance with penguins in Antarctica to raise awareness of their plight.

https://t.co/29mTHvLYOA

Here is a petition to create the largest protected area in the world. @ Greenpeace has 1 million characters.

Lets give them 1.8.

1.8 million.

1 for each square kilometer proposed

for the guins.

here i dance with them,

as promised.

they have no netflix. @ greenpeace? pic.twitter.com/jjLBk2XOIr

David Harbor (@DavidKHarbour), February 20, 2018

The same year, Radiohead singer and environmental activist Thom Yorke released a single in support of Greenpeaces mission to protect the Antarctic Ocean from the effects of climate change, commercial fishing and human interference. The message of the ominous instrumental was broadcast on the London Marble Arch.

To celebrate World Ocean Day 2018, people from 25 countries and all seven continents have painted blue and made waves of people to demonstrate their support for the protection of the oceans.

Happy World Oceans Day! Together we are committed to a rescue plan for the oceans that would create huge new marine reserves around the world. If it

Despite all the steps Greenpeace has taken to bring this message home, Chris Till, deputy director of fundraising at Greenpeace, admitted that it was not as effective as it would have liked.

If you spoke to most people, you would have no idea that the United Nations (UN) is in the process of negotiating a major new global ocean treaty, he said on Earth.

The Greenpeace team recognized that it needed to do something to break out of its support bubble and spread its message across the world.

Ahead of the UN negotiations on the World Ocean Treaty in March, Greenpeace wanted to draw up an action plan and file a petition to ensure that the treaty was brought to life.

Greenpeace also fought peoples resistance to shocking shots. For decades, bodies like Comic Relief and Children in Need have relied on painful footage to get people to donate. However, recent reports claim that hearts are persistent against excruciating content.

In preparing this campaign, Greenpeace quickly came to the conclusion that emotional animation would be a more effective tactic.

As a society, we quickly get used to pictures that used to be shocking, Till admitted. Animation can be different because it enables people to connect emotionally. You can see yourself in history as it is difficult in the real world.

The team had also learned a lesson from its highly successful rank tan campaign. Greenpeaces emotional story with actress Emma Thompson, who has summed up the harsh reality of palm oil and the effects of its cultivation on Earth.

(embed) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQQXstNh45g (/ embed)

With the help of Iceland, which converted the video for its Christmas advertising, the film brought the topic of palm oil into the popular mindset. This in turn encouraged more people to take this into account when buying food and products.

It really put it in the public eye, said Till. And we knew we had to do something similar in our next campaign to really get people talking and take action against the maritime crisis.

Around the time Greenpeace was designing this campaign, Aardman Animation contacted the company to let them know that it was interested in working with the organization.

It just felt perfect, said Till. We were looking for something that would create a strong connection with our audience, and Aardman is brilliant at it. Since we are both familiar names, it would help to get the word out.

After market tests for more extensive ocean communication, the study convinced the team to focus on turtles. Till argued that while Greenpeace talks about whales, they are received differently around the world. In contrast, turtles have a universal appeal.

The Greenpeace team then talked to the Aardman producers about what they wanted to get out of the film, what reaction they wanted, and soon they started working on a job.

This was then used to reach Aardmans director network, which asked 12 questions about what this film could look like. They were brilliant and varied and offered many different ways of dealing with a potentially very difficult topic, said Till.

We knew we wanted the animation to be instantly recognizable as Aardman, he said of Greenpeaces creative vision. We wanted something that was immediately accessible and that took people on a real emotional journey.

Till explained that emotional shock was a phrase that kept popping up in their discussions, as Greenpeace knew that while it is good to provide facts and figures, it is not always enough to clarify the case or that To get people to prioritize the problem .

According to Till, the decision for the director was a fun, if painful, decision-making process, in which the team refined and restricted ideas until they chose Gavin Strange.

Just hearing Gav talk about his vision showed that he really got to the heart of the problem, said Till. He not only understood it intellectually, but also had a strong emotional connection to history. As an added extra, Strange read it to boost its pitch, along with a real musical mood.

With the first premise agreed in mid-September, Aardman started animation while Greenpeace stayed in close contact all the time, with Till admitting that the main producer was his primary speed dial.

We had to do it right because its a big story to tell in a short video, he said. Due to the process of stop motion animation, the script, sentence and characters had to be signed off before the start of the filming, since all changes become more difficult, so to speak, once they have been set in sound. When you go back and revive, you lose days and a lot of effort.

Due to the nature of the stop motion function, the team used an animated storyboard instead of a script. In this way, they were able to calculate the timing of each shot to a fraction of a second.

One problem was how the characters should be presented, since they had to agree on the exact type of turtle to focus on the color of the shell. And this had to be reconciled with the story itself to ensure that each character was scientifically correct, with clear distinctions and personalities.

The team then had to keep to a tight schedule to ensure that it was ready by January to have enough airtime to make waves before the final outcome of the United Nations maritime treaty in March was known.

To manage the team. Aardman, who worked individually on recordings, attached boards with pictures of the individual recordings on the walls so that they could move between the studios to show how it worked.

In total, the stop motion recording took six weeks a tedious process, considering that the total length of the film is just under two minutes.

(embed) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVDciiQT4c4 (/ embed)

Well-known voices include Olivia Colman, Dame Helen Mirren and David Harbor as well as Bella Ramsey from Game of Thrones, Jim Carter from Downton Abbey and the comedian Ahir Shah.

In addition to the scientific data and facts, Greenpeace also has an extensive telephone directory of famous stars who want to support their campaigns.

Colman really did everything, said Till of the Oscar winners performance. She took the time to take the latest The Crown recordings and deliver them in less than an hour. She just got it.

Till said he was in Harbors ear while he was recording when the actor was working remotely in New York. He said the whole process was interesting to experience as each famous voice approached the shoot in different ways.

We dont want to be accused of being hyperbolic, Till explained why, alongside the video, a report was released about the threats that tortoises face in the real world. We know that as a lobby and science organization, it is vital for us to show that science is there to underpin this story.

Turtles Under Threat reports that six out of seven sea turtles are on the Red List of the International Union for Nature Conservation and are threatened with extinction, even though the creature has crossed the worlds oceans for more than 100 million years.

Unfortunately, our film is a fiction, but what happens to our turtle family in this film unfortunately happens to real turtles around the world, said Till dejectedly.

The campaign has not yet started last week. But Greenpeace said it had already collected over 280,000 signatures not far from its 300,000 goal.

(embed) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQB4RAZVMf4 (/ embed)

Continued here:
Anatomy of an advertisement: The story behind Greenpeace's terrifying turtle extermination - gotech daily

You’ll Worry About Everyone in ‘Station 19’-‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Crossover – TVInsider

Regarding the cliff-hanging return of Grey's Anatomy: "Watch with a whole box of tissues!" So says showrunner Krista Vernoff, who now holds the same job on companion series Station 19.

The Grey's fall finale closed with a car crashing through the wall of Joe's Bar, the watering hole frequented by staff from both Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital and the firehouse three blocks away. When Thursday's crossover kicks off on the new season of Station 19 (the Seattle-set shows have switched timeslots), there's a very real danger the building will collapse.

The firefighters hustle to save team members Ben Warren (Jason George) and retired captain Pruitt Herrera (Miguel Sandoval), along with a batch of doctors including Jackson Avery (Jesse Williams), Levi Schmitt (Jake Borelli), and an injured Taryn Helm (Jaicy Elliot), who are all trapped inside.

"The bar is underground, and the structure is unstable," Vernoff notes. "Arguably, we could worry about everyone [in there] which includes the responding [firefighters]."

(ABC/Eric McCandless)

You might also worry about someone outside. When we last saw Miranda Bailey (Chandra Wilson, above), the surgery chief and wife of Ben had suffered a miscarriage. Now she waits to see if she will lose her husband as well.

Looking ahead on Station 19, Vernoff says to expect a darker, grittier tone, "with more death and chaos." She also promises flashbacks illuminating who these heroes are "and what makes them want to run toward fire."

Station 19, Season Premiere, Thursday, January 23, 8/7c, ABC

Grey's Anatomy, Thursdays, 9/8c, ABC

Read more from the original source:
You'll Worry About Everyone in 'Station 19'-'Grey's Anatomy' Crossover - TVInsider

Kaitlin Walsh: Anatomy of the Senses, February 1 through 28 – River Cities Reader

Exhibit: Saturday, February 1, through Friday, February 28Opening Reception: Friday, February 7, 5:30 7:30 p.m.Berskin Gallery & Art Academy, 2967 State Street, Bettendorf IA

A celebration of the human body's most fascinating facets as viewed through abstract illustrations will grace the Berskin Gallery & Art Academy from February 1 through 28, with the Bettendorf venue hosting colorful, captivating works by Bettendorf artist Kaitlin Walsh in her new exhibition Anatomy of the Senses.

An independent artist specializing in abstract anatomy watercolor and oil paintings, Walsh, from a young age, exhibited an immense fascination with both art and science. She focused her studies on both disciplines, taking medical courses alongside fine art ones, and this culminated with a graduate degree in Biomedical Visualization at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Soon after graduation, Walsh married and had her first child, a son who spent several months in the hospital recovering from prenatal complications and an early birth. This experience motivated the artist to focus her career on her passion: portraying the beauty and complexity of the human body, as her sons initially precarious health status, while frightening, also compelled her to appreciate the things that were going well within his body.

Walsh was naturally impelled to convey this appreciation through her paintings, using the skills gained throughout her education. After spending some time honing her craft, increasing her inventory, and having more children, she opened up shop, saying, I feel incredibly lucky to have found success doing what I love. She is currently in the top 1 percent of Etsy sellers and has sold over 15,000 prints of her anatomical fine art paintings, and lives happily in Bettendorf with her husband and three healthy children. Kaitlin joined Berskin Gallery & Art Academy in December, says gallery owner Pat Berskin, adding, We are delighted to announce that she will begin teaching abstract watercolor in the spring. Her work is not only inspiring, but educational and aesthetically pleasing. Her positive energy and enthusiasm for the arts made for an excellent match with our programs.

A 5:30 p.m. opening reception will be held at the Berskin Gallery & Art Academy on February 7, and regular gallery hours are 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Wednesdays through Saturdays. Admission is free, and more information on the February 1 through 28 Kaitlin Walsh: Anatomy of the Senses exhibition is available by calling (563)508-4630 or visiting BereskinArtGallery.com.

Read more here:
Kaitlin Walsh: Anatomy of the Senses, February 1 through 28 - River Cities Reader

Anatomy of a one-on-one steal: is this how we want the game to look? – NRL.COM

A rule tweak at the end of 2017 allowing one-on-one steals to be executed in multi-tackler tackles provided only one defender was involved at the time of the strip saw the tactic proliferate last season.

As we head into the third season of the new rule interpretation, NRL.com Stats has taken a look at how the practice has evolved, how it may evolve further and what implications that may hold.

After little change in 2018, the first year of the new interpretation, one-on-one strips proliferated in 2019.

The Raiders in particular and also the Storm got better at surprising teams by using secret code-words to co-ordinate for extra tacklers to drop off, leaving one man to effect a steal before the ball-carrier realised he was in danger of losing possession.

There were 120 successful steals through the 201 NRL matches in 2019. That is up from 68 in 2018 when the rule was first changed (the Raiders again were top with 11), and 44 in 2017 under the old rule.

The Raiders (28), Storm (19) and Warriors (11) were the only clubs to hit double digits in 2019. Josh Hodgson (14) individually effected more than 14 other clubs.

Teams were generally good at ensuring they didn't infringe once they decided to attempt a steal there were 25 penalties for stealing the ball where it was deemed there was more than one in the tackle.

There were a further 232 penalties for a stripping action however these are the ones where the ball pops free in a tackle and it is deemed a defender hit or raked at the ball so there is no deliberate stealing action.

For the most part the officials did a remarkably good job of deducing in a split second at what point the extra tacklers dropped off and at what point the ball came free.

With the practice likely to increase further in 2020 as teams aim to emulate the Raiders' success, things won't get easier for the officials.

The officials have to make the calls in real time (unless there is a rare instance of the steal directly leading to a try) so they do not have the benefit of video replays.

They didn't always get it right; for example frustrated Warriors coach Stephen Kearney lashed out after a couple of tight calls incorrectly went against his side in a 24-22 loss to the Eels in round 19. "If they can't get it right just piss it off," Kearney fired.

Roosters coach Trent Robinson and, perhaps surprisingly, Raider coach Ricky Stuart have publicly criticised the rule.

Robinson believes it is not in the spirit of the game and says his team will not be coached to do it (the Roosters registered just three steals in 2019) while Stuart suggested referees were being forced to guess when the extra tacklers drop off.

The reception has been largely positive from fans on both social media and in official fan surveys.

For the most part fans appreciated the unpredictability and the chance for momentum swings in a game where possession is at a premium and can be hard to claw back once the tide turns against a team.

The NRL's head of football elite competitions Graham Annesley touched on issues around the rule during his weekly briefings several times and, while admitting it placed extra pressure on referees, broadly supported the positive reception around the increase in unpredictability and renewed contest for possession.

One of the looming issues for the rule in 2020 is what actually constitutes "one-on-one". NRL.com Stats has isolated a number of incidents from 2019 where a ball-carrier was effectively gang-tackled, with defenders wrapping up his legs and non-ball-carrying arm while another defender started prising the ball out.

The extra defenders drop off with the steal largely effected already.

So while defenders of the new rule say "if you hang onto the ball you won't have a problem" that doesn't always hold true, as the attached examples highlight.

Some have expressed concern coaches may become so worried about having the ball ripped away, players would be instructed to wrap it up tightly in carries and put the offloads away. There has been no evidence of this yet but 2020 could be the acid test if more clubs work on the strategy.

NRL.com Stats has collated some examples that most clearly highlight the issue in the above video and still shots. Each was deemed a legal strip at the time, and resulted in the team executing the strip gaining possession.

These selected examples are at the more extreme end of a ball carrier being wrestled by one or more defenders while also being stripped by another. However, they do not represent the majority of instances of one-on-one strips.

In all, there were 120 steals in 2019, from 201 total games, at a rate of slightly over one steal for every two games.

Of those 120, some would have been legal one-on-one steals even under the old interpretation and in many more the stripping action largely occurs in a one-on-one scenario despite earlier involvement from an extra tackler or tacklers.

Less than a quarter which would equate to roughly one instance per round of eight games bears similarity to the attached examples.

So, at this stage, there is no epidemic of messy gang-tackle steals. However as we have seen with countless previous rules and interpretations, coaches are smart. Their concern is winning games. If they sense a chance to earn an advantage, they will explore it.

Will we see more cases like these examples in 2020? If so that would test the interpretation. If the above examples become more common that could have a detrimental effect on the game as a spectacle and raise questions about fairness.

How the Perth NRL Nines will work

The details are still being worked out but a challenge system will be in play in 2020.

A by-product of this is for the potential for steals to be adjudicated on by the Bunker with slow-motion replays rather than by on-ground officials on the fly.

If a captain believes his player has been unfairly stripped but play has been allowed to continue, he will be able to send that play to the Bunker.

This in turn could force some clarity around what happens in situations like those outlined above.

The reworded rule concerning stealing the ball is as follows:

a. The ball can be stolen from the player in possession at any stage prior to a tackle being complete when there is only one defender effecting the tackle;

b. If there are two or more defender[s] effecting the tackle and the ball is stolen a penalty should be awarded, except if the player in possession is attempting to ground the ball for a try.

So when it comes to a grey area where the ball is partway out while more than one player is still involved, it comes down to the referee's interpretation as so many other grey areas do.

Think forward passes that look backwards out of the hand but float forward, or when a player loses control in a play-the-ball while being crowded by a tackler. This is what could be tested by the Bunker this season.

The rule is certainly here to stay for 2020 at least the competition committee have already decided on rule changes for 2020 and the stripping law will stay as-is for at least this year.

Continued here:
Anatomy of a one-on-one steal: is this how we want the game to look? - NRL.COM

Anatomy of an Ad: the story behind Greenpeace’s harrowing tale of turtle extinction – The Drum

Following the impact of its Rang-tan palm oil campaign, last week Aardman and Greenpeace unveiled 'Turtle Journey' - a heart-wrenching stop motion animation that worked to urge people to take action on the ocean crisis.

The campaign brought together the activist strength of Greenpeace with the famed creative of Aardman Animations, the makers of Wallace and Gromit and famous voices like Olivia Colman, Dame Helen Mirren and Stranger Things' David Harbour.

The Drum went behind the scenes to uncover how the major project came together.

A major focus for Greenpeace has been bringing the problems facing the worlds oceans as a result of climate change into public awareness. Back in 2018, what started as a Twitter joke, resulted in Stranger Things David Harbour dancing with penguins in the Antarctic to raise awareness of their plight.

That same year, Radiohead lead singer and environmental activist, Thom Yorke, released a single in support of Greenpeaces mission to protect the Antarctic Ocean from the effects of climate change, commercial fishing, and human interference. The ominous instrumental tracks message was relayed on Londons Marble Arch.

Meanwhile, to celebrate World Oceans Day in 2018, people from 25 countries and all seven continents painted themselves blue and perform human waves to show their support for ocean protection.

Happy World Oceans Day! Together, we're campaigning for an ocean rescue plan that'd create huge new ocean sanctuaries all over the world. If it...

But despite all the action Greenpeace has taken to drive this message home, Chris Till, deputy fundraising director at Greenpeace admitted its not been as effective as it would like.

"If you spoke to most people, they would have no idea that the United Nations (UN) is in the middle of negotiating a big new global ocean treaty, he said. Despite the fact that that could arguably affect the future of life on earth.

The Greenpeace team realised they needed to do something that would help it break out of its bubble of support, and get its message out into the wider world.

Ahead of the UN global ocean treaty talks in March, Greenpeace wanted to take plan to action by launching a petition to ensure the treaty came to life.

Greenpeace was also battling against peoples resistance to shocking footage. For decades, bodies like Comic Relief and Children in Need have relied on distressing footage to spur people into giving. But recent reports claim hearts are hardening against distressing content.

In preparing for this campaign, Greenpeace quickly came to the conclusion that emotional animations would be a more effective tactic.

As a society, were fast getting used to images that used to be shocking, admitted Till. Animation can be different as it allows people to emotionally connect. They can see themselves within the story in a way thats difficult to do in the real world.

The team had also learned a lesson from its wildly successful Rang-tan campaign; Greenpeaces emotional tale starring actress Emma Thompson that hit home the hard reality of palm oil, and the effect its cultivation has on the earth.

With help from Iceland, which chose to repurpose the video for its Christmas ad, the film thrust the issue of palm oil into the popular mindset. This, in turn, encouraged more people to consider it when buying food and products.

"It really pushed it into the public spotlight," explained Till. "And we knew we needed to do something similar with our next campaign, to get people really talking and taking action about the ocean crisis."

Fortuitously, around the time Greenpeace was mapping out this campaign Aardman Animation got in touch to say it was interested in working with the organisation.

It just felt like a perfect fit, Till said. We were looking for something that would make a strong connection with our audience and Aardman is brilliant at that. As we're both household names in our own right, it would help get the word out.

Following market testing around wider communication for the oceans issue, the research persuaded the team decided to focus on turtles. Till argued that while Greenpeace has a strong track record of talking about whales, they are received differently across the world. Turtles, on the other hand, have universal appeal.

The team at Greenpeace then spoke to Aardmans producers on what they wanted to get out of the film, the reaction they wanted and soon they began working on a brief.

This was then used to reach out to Aardmans network of directors, which garnered 12 pitches as to what this film could look like. They were brilliant and varied and offered many different ways of tackling what could be a very difficult subject, Till said.

We were clear that we wanted the animation to be immediately recognisable as Aardman, he explained on the creative vision Greenpeace had. We wanted something that would be immediately accessible and would take people on a real emotional journey.

Till explained that emotional punch was a phrase that continued to surface throughout their discussions as Greenpeace knew that while it was good at delivering facts and figures, its not always enough to make the case or make people prioritize the issue.

Till said deciding on the director was a fun if agonising decision process where the team refined and narrowed the ideas until they settled on Gavin Strange.

Just hearing Gav talk about his vision showed he really got to the heart of the issue, Till explained. He not only understood it intellectually, but he had a really strong emotional connection to the story." An added extra, to heighten his pitch, Strange read it alongside an accompanying musical mood real.

With the initial premise agreed back in mid-September, Aardman got going on the animation, while Greenpeace stayed in close contact throughout this time, during which Till admits the main producer was his main speed dial.

We had to get it right as its a big story to tell in not so long a video, he explained. Further, because of the process of stop-motion animation, it needed to sign off the script, set and characters before filming started, as once its set in clay, so to speak, all the changes become more difficult. If you go back and reanimate it loses you days and lots of effort.

Due to the nature of stop motion, the team used an animated storyboard, instead of a script. This was so they could work out the timings of each shot down to a fraction of a second.

One issue arose around how the characters should be depicted, as they needed to agree on the exact species of turtle to focus on - down to the colour of the shell. And this needed to balance with the story itself, to ensure that each character was scientifically accurate, with clear distinctions and personalities.

The team then had to work to a tight schedule, to ensure it was ready by January to give it enough airtime to make waves before the final found of the United Nations ocean treaty in March.

To help manage the team. who were working individually on shots, Aardman put boards on the walls with pictures of each shot so they could move between studios to show how it was working out.

All in all, the stop motion recording took six weeks - a painstaking process given the total length of the film is just under two minutes.

The famous voices involved include Olivia Colman, Dame Helen Mirren, and David Harbour, alongside Game of Thrones Bella Ramsey, Downton Abbeys Jim Carter, and comedian Ahir Shah.

Other than the scientific data and facts, Greenpeace also has an extensive phonebook of famous stars keen to support its campaigns.

Colman really did put everything into it, Till said on the Oscar-winning actress' performance. She took time off from doing the final takes of The Crown to rush over and deliver the recordings in under an hour. She just got it."

Till said he was in Harbours ear during his recording, as the actor was working remotely in New York. He said the whole process was interesting to experience, as each famous voice approached the shoot in a different way.

"We don't want to be accused of being hyperbolic," claimed Till on why alongside the video, it has produced a report about the threats that are facing turtles in the real world. "We know it's crucial for us as a lobbying and scientific campaigning organisation we need to demonstrate that science is there to back this story up."

'Turtles Under Threat' reports that while the creature has traversed the world's oceans for more than 100 million years, now six in seven marine turtles are on the red list of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and are threatened with extinction.

"Unfortunately, our film might be fiction, but what happens to our turtle family in that film is sadly happening to real turtles all over the world," Till said dejectedly.

With the campaign launching last week, its still early days. But Greenpeace said it has already collected over 280,000 signatures - not far off its 300,000 target.

Read more from the original source:
Anatomy of an Ad: the story behind Greenpeace's harrowing tale of turtle extinction - The Drum

We ranked the most popular Grey’s Anatomy actors by salary – gotech daily

Greys Anatomy is the longest running medical drama on television that premiered in 2005 and is currently airing its 16th season. The show revolves around the protagonist Meredith Gray and her experience as a surgeon at the Gray Sloan Memorial Hospital in Seattle.

The show has seen quite a turn in actors over the past fifteen years. The characters of Meredith Gray, Alex Karev, Miranda Bailey and Richard Webber are the only actors who have appeared in all sixteen seasons. No heartbreak, but Alex Karev is also going. Season 16 will be his last on the Shonda Rhimes hit show.

Ellen Pompeo, who plays Meredith Gray, earns over $ 575,000 per episode. With an annual income of nearly $ 20 million, she is by far the highest paid actress on the show.

via Pinterest

Isaiah Washington had a rather dishonorable exit from Greys Anatomy. At the end of the third season, he was released because of the other actor T.R. Knight. The creator Shonda Rhimes declined to take him back, even after he made a public apology. He played Dr. Preston and Burke has a net worth of approximately $ 500,000.

via ET Online

Camilla Luddington appeared for the first time in season 9 as a recurring cast member and became a regular in season 10. She plays Jo Karev, the wife of Alex Karev. In real life, British actress Camilla Luddington is married to actor Matthew Alan and has assets of around $ 1.3 million.

about Hollywood Reporter

Kevin McKidd plays Dr. Owen Hunt and has been an integral part of the cast since the fifth season of the series. He has touched millions of viewers with his portrayal of a soldier suffering from PTSD. Before he got a role in the series, he was best known for playing the character Tommy in Trainspotting. His net worth is around $ 2 million.

about cosmopolitan

Sarah Drew played the role of Dr. April Kepner, who was featured for the first time in season 6 as a recurring actor, and from season 7 until her departure in season 14. Before joining the cast, she played the role of Hannah in Everwood from 2004 to 2006. Her net worth is $ 3 million.

about Paris Match

Martin Henderson most recently appeared in the original Netflix series Virgin River, but is also a Greys Anatomy alum! He played Dr. Nathan Riggs, the fianc of Megan Hunt, Owen Hunts sister. Although his character only appeared in seasons 12-14, he left a lasting impression on the fans. He has a fortune of $ 6 million.

about hustle and bustle

Eric Dane played the role of Dr. Mark Sloan, also known as McSteamy, from season 2 to 9 in the series. He started his career as a guest star in Gray and became a regular actor in season three. He is a respected actor with a net worth of over $ 7 million.

via IMDB

James Pickens Jr. is one of the original actors who appeared in every season of the show. As Dr. Richard Webber, he was the longstanding chief of surgery until his successor, Dr. Derek Shepherd takes over in season two. The estimated actor has a fortune of $ 10 million.

via Entertainment Weekly

Chandra Wilson is one of the best known actresses from Greys Anatomy and plays the role of Dr. Miranda Bailey. She has been a regular cast member throughout the series, and there are no discussions that shell be leaving soon! Her net worth is approximately $ 10 million.

about parade

Jesse Williams plays one of the most popular doctors on the set, Dr. Jackson Avery. He was in season 6 for the first time as a recurring actor on the set and in season 7 regular guest. He signed up for season 17 so we dont lose any more favorites! His net worth is $ 12 million.

about pop culture

Justin Chambers plays the revered Dr. Alex Karev, a character who has grown from a childhood visit to the interim director of the Gray Sloan Memorial Hospital. Although he retires after 15 years with the show, he leaves a legacy and enthusiastic fans. He said that after a long show, he wanted to spend more time with his wife and five children. His net worth is $ 18 million.

about Diply

Kate Walsh played Addison Montgomery, the ex-wife of Derek Shepherd. She appeared several times in the first seasons and was the main actress of the spin-off show Private Practice. She hasnt appeared on the series since season 8, but who knows what the future might look like? Her net worth is $ 20 million.

about good housekeeping

Sandra Oh played the role of Dr. Cristina Yang, Meredith Grays best friend and ally. Her farewell to the show at the end of season 10 shocked and saddened the fans. Although she had a great run, she wanted to explore different roles and opportunities in acting. Her net worth is $ 25 million.

via Today Show

There has been much speculation that the reason for Katherine Heigls departure from the show was her bad attitude and inability to work well with her co-stars. Although not confirmed, Heigl, the Dr. Izzie Stevens played, a history of bed behavior on set. Still, she is a very talented and successful actress with a net worth of $ 30 million.

about variety

Patrick Dempsey played the icon of Dr. Derek Shepherd until his tragic death on screen in season 11. As Merediths husband, partner and greatest cheerleader, his departure caused a stir in the script and changed Meredith forever. He continues to trade and spend more time with his family and car collection. He has a net worth of $ 60 million.

via Vanity Fair

Ellen Pompeo is the highest paid actress at Greys Anatomy, and rightly so. She was a constant throughout the series, and her role is an integral part of the plot. With a salary of approximately $ 575,000 per episode, she earns a good salary! Her net worth is $ 70 million.

Next20 surprising things about Matthew Perrys time with friends

About the author

Ariane Signer has been writing her thoughts, fears and dreams in magazines since the early 90s. As a personal development and self-help junkie, she has been working as a freelance writer since 2016. The Canadian-born found her home in the small town of Switzerland, where she lives with her husband and two young sons.She is the author of Things That Shine: Poems

More about Ariane_S

See more here:
We ranked the most popular Grey's Anatomy actors by salary - gotech daily

‘Grey’s Anatomy’: Will Alex’s Exit Be Addressed When Season 16 Returns for the Winter Premiere? – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

To put it simply, Greys Anatomy wont be the same without Alex Karev (Justin Chambers). In January, the 49-year-old actor announced his departure from the Shondaland series after 16 seasons. And reportedly, fans have already seen Chambers final moments as Alex in the 350th episode milestone. But without a proper sendoff before the midseason hiatus, will Alexs exit be addressed in the Greys Anatomy Season 16 winter premiere? Heres what we know so far.

On Jan. 10, Chambers released a statement about his departure from Greys Anatomy, thanking everyone from his immediate family to the cast and crew of the ABC series.

Theres no good time to say goodbye to a show and character thats defined so much of my life for the past 15 years, Chambers said, per Deadline. For some time now, however, I have hoped to diversify my acting roles and career choices. And, as I turn 50 and am blessed with my remarkable, supportive wife and five wonderful children, now is that time.

He continued: As I move on from Greys Anatomy, I want to thank the ABC family, Shonda Rimes, original cast members Ellen Pompeo, Chandra Wilson and James Pickens, and the rest of the amazing cast and crew, both past and present, and, of course, the fans for an extraordinary ride.

Then when speaking with Page Six, Chambers revealed it was difficult leaving the show. Anywhere that you spend 15 years, its a big chunk of your life, Chambers said. Greyshas been very supportive of me and Im very grateful and its been a great ride.

[Spoiler alert:reys AnatomySeason 16 midseason premiere.]

Following the news, multiple outlets confirmed Chambers previously filmed his final Greys Anatomy episode the 350th episode aired on Nov. 14. Alex last appeared to support Meredith Grey (Ellen Pompeo) during her medical license hearing. He brought in previous patients and read heartfelt letters written by old co-workers. However, Alex did not show up in the midseason finale. Instead, he went home to take care of his mom in Iowa offscreen.

Naturally, Greys Anatomy fans are now curious to see how the ABC drama writes Alex out of the story. Of course, most individuals are worried the team will kill the character off, given the seemingly sudden departure. And others are concerned Chambers exit wont be addressed at all.

Nevertheless, TVLine confirmed the winter premiere on Jan. 23 will address Chambers absence. But fans might be a little disappointed, as the publication hinted it will not be in a way that will bring closure to the matter.

No matter how the Greys Anatomy team addresses Chambers exit, fans can still expect a dramatic winter premiere. When a fan asked TVLine whether they should expect tears during the episode, the publication couldnt reveal any major plot points or if someone dies. But the crossover event with Station 19 will certainly pack a punch.

There will be a major turning point for one couple and a big decision thats sure to haunt the doctor who makes it. Meanwhile, an emotional scene will emerge during the Station 19 Season 3 premiere. And it looks like Teddy (Kim Raver) will share a special moment with Ben (Jason George) at some point.

Then in an interview with People, Jesse Williams promised the Greys AnatomyStation 19 crossover will be scary as hell and startling.

And Station 19s Barrett Doss confirmed. The season premiere, everybody is in it together, she said. The stakes are super high and they all have to use all of their skills to solve this problem.

Read more:Greys Anatomy: These Jo and Alex Theories Explain What Happens to the Karevs After Justin Chambers Leaves

Continue reading here:
'Grey's Anatomy': Will Alex's Exit Be Addressed When Season 16 Returns for the Winter Premiere? - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Greys Anatomy: Fans Argue Over a Controversial Possible Ending to the Show – Sahiwal Tv

With the departure of yet one more fan-favorite character, viewers are discussing once more what they wish to see when Greys Anatomy lastlyinvolves an in depth. While we dont know the way or whenEllen Pompeo,Shonda Rhimes, andKrista Vernoffplan to finish the present, what we do know is what number of followers would hate to see it occur.

When the collection went onwinter breakin late November, we left off with Jo Wilson (Camilla Luddington) trying to undertake a Safe Haven child who was dropped off at Station 19. However, her husband, Alex Karev (Justin Chambers), didnt make an look on the midseason finale episode.

On Friday, Jan. 10, 2020, Chambers introduced he was leaving the present, which is now in its 16th season. His departure is what spawned the extreme discuss concerning the present ending.

Theres no good time to say goodbye to a show and character thats defined so much of my life for the past 15 years, Chambers assertion to USA Today learn.

Chambers cited his purpose for leaving as desirous to tackle new and totally different roles in his profession.

For some time now, however, I have hoped to diversify my acting roles and career choices. And, as I turn 50 and am blessed with my remarkable, supportive wife and five wonderful children, now is that time, the assertion continued.

With his departure, the present will now be all the way down to solely three unique solid members; Pompeo, James Pickens, Jr. and Chandra Wilson.

Greys Anatomy ought to finish quickly and it ought to finish with Meredith sitting in a house and a fairly black lady is sitting along with her speaking to her and Meredith is like Are you the doctor? And Zola is like No mom, but I am a doctor

JRS (@catsandteas) January 13, 2020

Greys Anatomy should end soon, and it should end with Meredith sitting in a home, and a pretty black woman is sitting with her talking to her, and Meredith is like Are you the doctor? And Zola is like No mom, but I am a doctor, wrote the fan.

Then Merediths like I think I was a doctor once, continued the Twitter person. And Zola hands her a ton of notebooks which she starts to read and its her journals from when she was a doctor before she got Alzheimers, and all of the writings are the monologues she says in every episodes beginning.

The unique tweet obtained 124,700 likes and 16,900 retweets. Many followers agreed that they wish to see the present finish with Meredith additionally getting Alzheimers illness, like her mom. However, a superb quantity of followers had been additionally appalled on the thought of Dr. Grey ending up like that.

So many Greys followers need it to finish this manner, and Id be sooooo pissed if it did,wrote one Twitter userin disagreement. After EVERYTHING they put her through, giving her Alzheimers would just be wrong. I get that it makes perfect sense for the storyline, but still. Let her be happy for once.

Although many followers appreciated the unique tweet, some really feel that it will be terrible so as to add yet one more tragic factor to Merediths life.

Nope, absolutely not, added one other fan. If they end her story with Alzheimers, I will scream.

Many customers on Reddit additionally agree that they are not looking for the present to finish this manner.

That would be the most predictable ending at this point, wrote one otherviewer on Reddit.

Several Redditors commented on the identical factor. If Meredith has Alzheimers, it will be extraordinarily predictable. Although most followers consider its time for the present to finish, nobody is in settlement on the way it may finish.

It appears like solely Pompeo, Rhimes and Vernoff know the reply to that one. You can catch the midseason premiere of Greys Anatomy Thursday, Jan. 23, 2020, at 9 p.m. ET.

Read the rest here:
Greys Anatomy: Fans Argue Over a Controversial Possible Ending to the Show - Sahiwal Tv

Scoop: Coming Up on a New Episode of GREY’S ANATOMY on ABC – Thursday, February 6, 2020 – Broadway World

"The Last Supper" - Jackson creates an uncomfortable situation when he invites new girlfriend, Vic, to what he thinks is Richard and Catherine's anniversary celebration, only to discover the dinner was called for different reasons. Elsewhere, Levi brings Nico on a trip to visit an ailing family member on an all-new episode of "Grey's Anatomy,"THURSDAY, FEB. 6 (9:00-10:01 p.m. EST), on ABC. Episodes can also be viewed the next day onABC.com, theABC apporHulu."Grey's Anatomy" stars Ellen Pompeo as Meredith Grey, Chandra Wilson as Miranda Bailey, James Pickens Jr. as Richard Webber, Kevin McKidd as Owen Hunt, Jesse Williams as Jackson Avery, Caterina Scorsone as Amelia Shepherd, Camilla Luddington as Jo Wilson, Kelly McCreary as Maggie Pierce, Kim Raver as Teddy Altman, Giacomo Gianniotti as Andrew DeLuca, Greg Germann as Tom Koracick, Chris Carmack as Atticus "Link" Lincoln and Jake Borelli as Levi Schmitt.Guest starring is Debbie Allen as Catherine Fox, Alex Landi as Nico Kim, Barrett Doss as Victoria Hughes and Okieriete Onaodowan as Dean Miller."The Last Supper"was written by Jason Ganzel and directed by Nicole Rubio."Grey's Anatomy" was created and is executive produced by Shonda Rhimes. Betsy Beers, Mark Gordon, Krista Vernoff, Debbie Allen, Zoanne Clack, Fred Einesman, Andy Reaser and Meg Marinis are executive producers. "Grey's Anatomy" is produced by ABC Studios. ABC Studios is a part of Disney Television Studios, a collection of studios comprised of 20th Century FOX Television, ABC Studios and FOX 21 Television Studios.

A TV parental guideline will be assigned to this program at a later date.

More:
Scoop: Coming Up on a New Episode of GREY'S ANATOMY on ABC - Thursday, February 6, 2020 - Broadway World

Chaos erupts inside Joe’s bar in exclusive Grey’s Anatomy-Station 19 crossover photos – Entertainment Weekly News

Grey's Anatomy-Station 19 crossover: Chaos erupts in exclusive photos | EW.com | EW.com Top Navigation Close View image

Chaos erupts inside Joe's bar in exclusive Grey's Anatomy-Station 19 crossover photos

this link is to an external site that may or may not meet accessibility guidelines.

Read the original post:
Chaos erupts inside Joe's bar in exclusive Grey's Anatomy-Station 19 crossover photos - Entertainment Weekly News