Category Archives: Anatomy

‘Station 19’ Follows ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Crossover With Cliffhanger That Possibly Kills Fan-Favorite Character – PopCulture.com

While last week's crossover with Grey's Anatomy was very well-hyped, the most recent episode of Station 19 may have included a plot twist no one saw coming. Tonight's installment, which ended on a cliffhanger. As Us Weekly noted, the whole thing could mean curtains for one fan-favorite character.

Spoilers for the most recent episode of Station 19 below.

During the episode, Ryan (Alberto Frezza) returns to Seattle and ends up involved in an emergency situation and was left to babysit to young kids with Andy (Jaina Lee Ortiz). After a personal, surprisingly laid-back conversation between the two, one of the kids wanders in with a gun before shooting Ryan in the chest as he lunged forward to retrieve the firearm.

While Andy pleads with Ryan to stay with her as he bleeds out on the floor, the episode ended with the sound of a flat line, following by a message from Miguel Sandoval, who plays Pruitt.

"Consider this: 4.6 million children in the United States live in a household with at least one loaded unsecured gun. If you have a gun at home, store it, unload it, locked and separate from ammunition," the actor said. "No matter what, make sure you always ask about how guns are stored in other homes. You could save a life."

The clip also included a link to EndFamilyFire.org.

Last week, the drama had a crossover special with the long-running Grey's Anatomy, which made no secret before it aired that it would lead with the unexpected death of another beloved character. Still, things ended on a sentimental note, as a proposal between Owen and Teddy in the closing minutes left fans a little weepy-eyed.

Prior to the crossover's airing, Jason George, who plays Ben, told Entertainment Weekly that his character will be taking on a leadership role, which could factor into what happens to his character the remainder of the season.

"Ben's hit a spot now where he is, at any moment in time, kind of the guy who knows what he's doing," George explained. "If he's not in charge officially, he's capable of being in charge and will push the guy in charge. So in the bar, he definitely takes on a bit of that role, especially with some of the interns where hes barking orders at folks to get stuff done and they leap into action. But Ben is at that crossroads between firefighter and a doctor where he can bark orders at everybody."

New episodes of Station 19 air on Thursdays on ABC at 8 p.m. ET.

More here:
'Station 19' Follows 'Grey's Anatomy' Crossover With Cliffhanger That Possibly Kills Fan-Favorite Character - PopCulture.com

Is Jesse Williams Checking Out of Greys Anatomy? – Soap Hub

Doctors check in to Grey Sloan Memorial on Greys Anatomy both as doctors and as patients as we saw in last weeks back-to-back episodes of the hit ABC series and its sister show Station 19. But they also check out, too. Is that what is happening now that one of the shows actors is headed for Broadway?

Jesse Williams, who plays Dr. Jackson Avery, is making his Broadway debut in April in a revival of Richard Greenbergs Tony-winning play, Take Me Out. Does this mean hell have to temporarily hang up his stethoscope? Fortunately, no!

Ive known since the beginning of the season [about Williams play] and Ive been able to plan [Jackson]s storyline [accordingly], Greys executive producer Krista Vernoff recently told TV Line. Jesse is able to fly back one day a week; were just making it work [because] this was important to him.

The actors fans were thrilled when they learned he signed a new two-year deal with the ABC medical drama that will keep him on the show through Season 17. He joined the cast of Greys Anatomy in Season 6.

Many doctors have come and gone from Greys over the years. Last November, original cast member Justin Chambers suddenly exited as Dr. Alex Karev. Alexs absence has been explained as saying he left town to visit his mother.

There have been no announced plans for any specific returns but just because a doctor checks out of Greys doesnt mean theyre never coming back. Kim Raver, who originated the role of Dr. Teddy Altman in Season 6, left Greys in Season 8, popped up for a few episodes in Season 14, and then returned as a regular in Season 15.

Vernoff is both executive producer and head writer of Greys Anatomy. She also serves as the showrunner for Station 19, which airs Thursdays at 8 p.m on ABC. Greys Anatomy airs Thursdays at 9 p.m. on ABC.

Visit link:
Is Jesse Williams Checking Out of Greys Anatomy? - Soap Hub

Greys Anatomy season 16 episode 11 preview: The father of Amelias baby is – Culturess

After years of facing hardship and heartbreak on Greys Anatomy(and before that,Private Practice), Amelia finally found hope in the form of a surprise pregnancy.

Even though fans hoped the situation would progress without complications its hard not to love Link, after all if youve watchedGreys for a while, you know smooth sailing always takes a back seat to drama.

So far, Amelias pregnancy seems to be going smoothly unless you count the fact that Link might not be the father. Even worse still, Owen might hold that title instead.

The good news is, Amelia doesnt seem to have any desire to drag this drama out the same way she thankfully didnt wait to tell Link about the baby in the first place. In this weeks upcoming episode, it appears shes actually going to speak up.

At least, thats what the brief preview leads us to believe. Watch it below:

She doesnt say he definitely isnt the father because at this point, even she isnt sure. She says he might not be. Which technically means he still could be. Which means the entire fandoms worries and subtle threats to quit the show if Owen turns out to be the father are going exactly according to the showrunners plan.

There is still a chance Link really is the father after all, and this is just a curveball thats supposed to add more romantic drama to the season.

Will the episode even the season end up with Teddy and Owen getting their happily ever after, while Amelia and Link commit to each other for good for real? Maybe not.Greys never keeps even fan-favorite couples truly happy for long.

But there are still months worth of episodes to finish out what may or may not be the final season. Anything could happen. A major pregnancy complication could arise. Something could happen to Link. Owen could completely fail as a partner (again). Teddy could cheat on Owen with Tom (fingers crossed this doesnt happen, but it could).

One things for sure (judging by YouTube comments alone): Fans do not want Owen to be the father. The Owen/Teddy/Amelia love triangle (is it a love square if you include Tom?) isnt juicy and exciting anymore. Its gone on a little too long. Which means this is the season it might finally resolve, in some way or another, for good.

Creating drama inside and outside the show in this regard is hardly accidental, of course. They could have easily kept Amelia and Link on their own happy-parents-to-be island for the rest of the season without this hiccup. But anything for the drama, right?

Judging by the fight Owen and Teddy are probably about to have, its likely safe to assume there arent going to be many happy couples left by the time this weeks episode airs its final moments.

See the article here:
Greys Anatomy season 16 episode 11 preview: The father of Amelias baby is - Culturess

Grey’s Anatomy Sparked Major Backlash Over the Confusing ‘Station 19’ Crossover – countryliving.com

Greys Anatomy has finally returned from its winter hiatus after leaving us all holding a collective breath after a grippingand potentially fatalfall finale.

Fortunately, the series is back on the air to finally address the aftermath of the car that plowed into Joes Bar, putting several of our favorite doctors, and later Station 19 firefighters, in grave danger.

ABC used the drama to create one one, big two-hour crossover episode with both the medical mainstay and its popular spinoff. At a glance, two hours of our favorite hotshots sounds too good to be true. However, some Greys fans lashed out on Twitter for a few different reasons.

The first was that Grey's and Station 19 are swapping times, with Station 19 now airing first on Thursdays at 8 p.m. EST followed by Grey's at 9 p.m.

Others were upset that they missed the first half of the two-episode event, unaware that they needed to tune in for both.

But even more seemed enraged over feeling forced to watch the spinoff in order to understand the new Greys that followed.

Since most of the overlapping events happened during the first hour as firefighters worked to free the victims from the rubble, it does sound pretty imperative to watch both.

Those who have never watched Station 19 seemed particularly annoyed, since they had to sit through a show in which they aren't familiar with the characters and arent super invested in.

It's not the first time the shows have overlapped, and it looks like more crossovers are to come. Krista Vernoff, the showrunner of both series, told Variety that plots will continue to intersect throughout the season. However, it sounds like it will be on a smaller scale, as Krista said that characters in Station 19 might become patients in the following episode of Greys (hence the time change).

Some fans picked up on the storyline possibilities with the shift in schedule as well.

Either way, it sounds like Thursday nights just got even more interesting!

Link:
Grey's Anatomy Sparked Major Backlash Over the Confusing 'Station 19' Crossover - countryliving.com

Anatomy of a Lie: How Iran Covered Up the Downing of an Airliner – The New York Times

When the Revolutionary Guards officer spotted what he thought was an unidentified aircraft near Tehrans international airport, he had seconds to decide whether to pull the trigger.

Iran had just fired a barrage of ballistic missiles at American forces, the country was on high alert for an American counterattack, and the Iranian military was warning of incoming cruise missiles.

The officer tried to reach the command center for authorization to shoot but couldnt get through. So he fired an antiaircraft missile. Then another.

The plane, which turned out to be a Ukrainian jetliner with 176 people on board, crashed and exploded in a ball of fire.

Within minutes, the top commanders of Irans Revolutionary Guards realized what they had done. And at that moment, they began to cover it up.

For days, they refused to tell even President Hassan Rouhani, whose government was publicly denying that the plane had been shot down. When they finally told him, he gave them an ultimatum: come clean or he would resign.

Only then, 72 hours after the plane crashed, did Irans supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, step in and order the government to acknowledge its fatal mistake.

The New York Times pieced together a chronology of those three days by interviewing Iranian diplomats, current and former government officials, ranking members of the Revolutionary Guards and people close to the supreme leaders inner circle and by examining official public statements and state media reports.

The reporting exposes the governments behind-the-scenes debate over covering up Irans responsibility for the crash while shocked Iranians, grieving relatives and countries with citizens aboard the plane waited for the truth.

The new details also demonstrate the outsize power of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, which effectively sidelined the elected government in a moment of national crisis, and could deepen what many Iranians already see as a crisis of legitimacy for the Guards and the government.

The bitter divisions in Irans government persist and are bound to affect the investigation into the crash, negotiations over compensation and the unresolved debate over accountability.

Around midnight on Jan. 7, as Iran was preparing to launch a ballistic-missile attack on American military posts in Iraq, senior members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps deployed mobile antiaircraft defense units around a sensitive military area near Tehrans Imam Khomeini Airport.

Iran was about to retaliate for the American drone strike that had killed Irans top military commander, Gen. Qassim Suleimani, in Baghdad five days earlier, and the military was bracing for an American counterstrike. The armed forces were on at war status, the highest alert level.

But in a tragic miscalculation, the government continued to allow civilian commercial flights to land and take off from the Tehran airport.

Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, commander of the Guards Aerospace Force, said later that his units had asked officials in Tehran to close Irans airspace and ground all flights, to no avail.

Iranian officials feared that shutting down the airport would create mass panic that war with the United States was imminent, members of the Guards and other officials told The Times. They also hoped that the presence of passenger jets could act as a deterrent against an American attack on the airport or the nearby military base, effectively turning planeloads of unsuspecting travelers into human shields.

After Irans missile attack began, the central air defense command issued an alert that American warplanes had taken off from the United Arab Emirates and that cruise missiles were headed toward Iran.

The officer on the missile launcher near the airport heard the warnings but did not hear a later message that the cruise missile alert was a false alarm.

The warning about American warplanes may have also been wrong. United States military officials have said that no American planes were in or near Iranian airspace that night.

When the officer spotted the Ukrainian jet, he sought permission to fire. But he was unable to communicate with his commanders because the network had been disrupted or jammed, General Hajizadeh said later.

The officer, who has not been publicly identified, fired two missiles, less than 30 seconds apart.

General Hajizadeh, who was in western Iran supervising the attack on the Americans, received a phone call with the news.

I called the officials and told them this has happened and its highly possible we hit our own plane, he said later in a televised statement.

By the time General Hajizadeh arrived in Tehran, he had informed Irans top three military commanders: Maj. Gen. Abdolrahim Mousavi, the armys commander in chief, who is also the chief of the central air defense command; Maj. Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of the Armed Forces; and Maj. Gen. Hossein Salami, commander in chief of the Revolutionary Guards.

The Revolutionary Guards, an elite force charged with defending Irans clerical rule at home and abroad, is separate from the regular army and answers only to the supreme leader. At this point, the leaders of both militaries knew the truth.

General Hajizadeh advised the generals not to tell the rank-and-file air defense units for fear that it could hamper their ability to react quickly if the United States did attack.

It was for the benefit of our national security because then our air defense system would be compromised, Mr. Hajizadeh said in an interview with Iranian news media this week. The ranks would be suspicious of everything.

The military leaders created a secret investigative committee drawn from the Guards aerospace forces, from the armys air defense, and from intelligence and cyberexperts. The committee and the officers involved in the shooting were sequestered and ordered not to speak to anyone.

The committee examined data from the airport, the flight path, radar networks, and alerts and messages from the missile operator and central command. Witnesses the officer who had pulled the trigger, his supervisors and everyone involved were interrogated for hours.

The group also investigated the possibility that the United States or Israel may have hacked Irans defense system or jammed the airwaves.

By Wednesday night, the committee had concluded that the plane was shot down because of human error.

We were not confident about what happened until Wednesday around sunset, General Salami, the commander in chief of the Guards, said later in a televised address to the Parliament. Our investigative team concluded then that the plane crashed because of human errors.

Ayatollah Khamenei was informed. But they still did not inform the president, other elected officials or the public.

Senior commanders discussed keeping the shooting secret until the planes black boxes the flight data and cockpit voice recorders were examined and formal aviation investigations completed, according to members of the Guards, diplomats and officials with knowledge of the deliberations. That process could take months, they argued, and it would buy time to manage the domestic and international fallout that would ensue when the truth came out.

The government had violently crushed an anti-government uprising in November. But the American killing of General Suleimani, followed by the strikes against the United States, had turned public opinion around. Iranians were galvanized in a moment of national unity.

The authorities feared that admitting to shooting down the passenger plane would undercut that momentum and prompt a new wave of anti-government protests.

They advocated covering it up because they thought the country couldnt handle more crisis, said a ranking member of the Guards who, like others interviewed for this article, spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. At the end, safeguarding the Islamic Republic is our ultimate goal, at any cost.

That evening, the spokesman for the Joint Armed Forces, Brig. Gen. Abolfazl Shekarchi, told Iranian news media that suggestions that missiles struck the plane were an absolute lie.

On Thursday, as Ukrainian investigators began to arrive in Tehran, Western officials were saying publicly that they had evidence that Iran had accidentally shot down the plane.

A chorus of senior Iranian officials from the director of civil aviation to the chief government spokesman issued statement after statement rejecting the allegations, their claims amplified on state media.

The suggestion that Iran would shoot down a passenger plane was a Western plot, they said, psychological warfare aimed at weakening Iran just as it had exercised its military muscle against the United States.

But in private, government officials were alarmed and questioning whether there was any truth to the Western claims. Mr. Rouhani, a seasoned military strategist himself, and his foreign minister, Javad Zarif, deflected phone calls from world leaders and foreign ministers seeking answers. Ignorant of what their own military had done, they had none to give.

Domestically, public pressure was building for the government to address the allegations.

Among the planes passengers were some of Irans best and brightest. They included prominent scientists and physicians, dozens of Irans top young scholars and graduates of elite universities, and six gold and silver medal winners of international physics and math Olympiads.

There were two newlywed couples who had traveled from Canada to Tehran for their weddings just days earlier. There were families and young children.

Their relatives demanded answers. Iranian social media began to explode with emotional commentary, some accusing Iran of murdering its own citizens and others calling such allegations treason.

Persian-language satellite channels operating from abroad, the main source of news for most Iranians, broadcast blanket coverage of the crash, including reports from Western governments that Iran had shot down the plane.

Mr. Rouhani tried several times to call military commanders, officials said, but they did not return his calls. Members of his government called their contacts in the military and were told the allegations were false. Irans civil aviation agency called military officials with similar results.

Thursday was frantic, Ali Rabiei, the government spokesman, said later in a news conference. The government made back-to-back phone calls and contacted the armed forces asking what happened, and the answer to all the questions was that no missile had been fired.

On Friday morning, Mr. Rabiei issued a statement saying the allegation that Iran had shot down the plane was a big lie.

Several hours later, the nations top military commanders called a private meeting and told Mr. Rouhani the truth.

Mr. Rouhani was livid, according to officials close to him. He demanded that Iran immediately announce that it had made a tragic mistake and accept the consequences.

The military officials pushed back, arguing that the fallout could destabilize the country.

Mr. Rouhani threatened to resign.

Canada, which had the most foreign citizens on board the plane, and the United States, which as Boeings home country was invited to investigate the crash, would eventually reveal their evidence, Mr. Rouhani said. The damage to Irans reputation and the public trust in the government would create an enormous crisis at a time when Iran could not bear more pressure.

As the standoff escalated, a member of Ayatollah Khameneis inner circle who was in the meeting informed the supreme leader. The ayatollah sent a message back to the group, ordering the government to prepare a public statement acknowledging what had happened.

Mr. Rouhani briefed a few senior members of his government. They were rattled.

Mr. Rabiei, the government spokesman who had issued a denial just that morning, broke down. Abbas Abdi, a prominent critic of Irans clerical establishment, said that when he spoke to Mr. Rabiei that evening, Mr. Rabiei was distraught and crying.

Everything is a lie, Mr. Rabiei said, according to Mr. Abdi. The whole thing is a lie. What should I do? My honor is gone.

Mr. Abdi said the governments actions had gone far beyond just a lie.

There was a systematic cover-up at the highest levels that makes it impossible to get out of this crisis, he said.

Irans National Security Council held an emergency meeting and drafted two statements, the first to be issued by the Joint Armed Forces followed by a second one from Mr. Rouhani.

As they debated the wording, some suggested claiming that the United States or Israel may have contributed to the accident by jamming Irans radars or hacking its communications networks.

But the military commanders opposed it. General Hajizadeh said the shame of human error paled compared with admitting his air defense system was vulnerable to hacking by the enemy.

Irans Civil Aviation Agency later said that it had found no evidence of jamming or hacking.

At 7 a.m., the military released a statement admitting that Iran had shot down the plane because of human error.

The bombshell revelation has not ended the division within the government. The Revolutionary Guards want to pin the blame on those involved in firing the missiles and be done with it, officials said. The missile operator and up to 10 others have been arrested but officials have not identified them or said whether they had been charged.

Mr. Rouhani has demanded a broader accounting, including an investigation of the entire chain of command. The Guards accepting responsibility, he said, is the first step and needs to be completed with other steps. His spokesman and lawmakers have demanded to know why Mr. Rouhani was not immediately informed.

Mr. Rouhani touched on that concern when he put out his statement an hour and 15 minutes later. The first line said that he had found out about the investigative committees conclusion about cause of the crash a few hours ago.

It was a stunning admission, an acknowledgment that even the nations highest elected official had been shut out from the truth, and that as Iranians, and the world, turned to the government for answers, it had peddled lies.

What we thought was news was a lie. What we thought was a lie was news, said Hesamedin Ashna, Mr. Rouhanis top adviser, on Twitter. Why? Why? Beware of cover-ups and military rule.

Read the rest here:
Anatomy of a Lie: How Iran Covered Up the Downing of an Airliner - The New York Times

Bowen Yang of S.N.L. Is a Smash. And a Mensch. – The New York Times

Once the therapy was complete, his father let Bowen go to New York University, where his sister, already a student there, could chaperone him.

The irony of it all is I went to the gayest undergrad in the country, he says, smiling, about his alma mater, which he mocks in stand-up routines as a real estate firm, celebrity day care center and a multicomplex head-shot studio.

I spent freshman year trying straightness on for size and failing miserably, he says. I sort of tricked myself into having a crush on a girl but it was just kind of a weird, weird, weird pit stop. Then I would look at a boy and be like, Oh, I want to talk to him. Mr. Yang has a tattoo on his arm, drawn by a nonbinary Chinese tattoo artist, with ancient signets. They represent his parents last names. He never got mad at them.

I had this second coming out with them while I was in college and went through this whole flare-up again with them, where they couldnt accept it, Mr. Yang says. And then eventually, I just got to this place of standing firm and being like, This is sort of a fixed point, you guys. I cant really do anything about this. So either you meet me here or you dont meet me.

It never got to the point of, I wont come home again. I was just like, Im not going to argue with them. Like my dad every now and then will be like, So, when are you going to meet a girl? And Ill just calmly be like, Dad, its not going to happen. I mean, its O.K. Both my parents are doing a lot of work to just try to understand and I cant rush them. I cant resent them for not arriving at any place sooner than theyre able to get there.

His parents and sister proudly came to his first show as a cast member last fall.

Bowen went to pre-med classes, got a chemistry degree, and took the MCAT, partly influenced by the character played by his idol Sandra Oh on Greys Anatomy.

See original here:
Bowen Yang of S.N.L. Is a Smash. And a Mensch. - The New York Times

Did Amelia Owen’s Baby on "Grey’s Anatomy"? It is a total mess – Daily Gaming Worlld

Advertisement

It wouldnt be another season of Greys Anatomy without anything going wrong in Amelias life. Shes got a bad hand in life right now and although Link did everything right, it could turn out that her unborn baby is Owens instead of that of her good-natured younger friend. In the autumn finale of season 16, she found that she was more advanced in pregnancy than originally thought, which means that her relationship with Link and her relationship with Owen overlap somewhat.

Now everyone is talking about whether Amelia Owens will have a baby or not. At this point, the baby could be either Link or Owens, but in either case, the conversations Amelia has to have to determine paternity will be uncomfortable at best. Hopefully it will work out for them someday, but it will definitely not be an easy way to get there.

Advertisement

See the article here:
Did Amelia Owen's Baby on "Grey's Anatomy"? It is a total mess - Daily Gaming Worlld

How Greys Anatomy and Station 19 Approached Its Crossover Death Count – Variety

SPOILER ALERT: Do not read if you have not yet watched the Station 19/Greys Anatomy crossover that aired Jan. 23.

Station 19 and Greys Anatomy kicked off the start of their official combined universe with a two-hour block that began with the third season premiere of the former Shondaland series. In the episode entitled I Know This Bar, there was fallout from a car crash as well as flashbacks to what what going on with the firefighters while the series was off the air.

Then, in the second hour, Greys Anatomys 10th episode of Season 16 (Help Me Through The Night) was rooted in the present as a number of doctors successfully fought to survive after that car crash; Bailey (Chandra Wilson) grieved the loss of her unborn child and Teddy (Kim Raver) and Owen (Kevin McKidd) took a big step forward in their relationship.

Here, showrunner Krista Vernoff breaks down the big moves on both shows.

Greys Anatomy hasnt featured a major character death in a number of seasons. At this point in the shows run, what is the debate amongst the writers and producers about when that device is best used?

That question makes me laugh because, for sure, it was a signature of Greys Anatomy for many years to kill off characters. When I came [back] in Season 14, youre looking at how do you surprise people anymore? And it continues to feel like the more surprising thing to not kill them. I often say to the writers, Then, when we do one day, it will be genuinely shocking. With this big crossover event, I will say that there was, in initial discussions, the intention to have someone die. But what happened is that we realized, as we were breaking [the season of] Greys Anatomy, that Bailey was going to lose her baby. And we realized as we were breaking the midseason finale, that we werent going to have time to properly process that loss. So as we were writing the [midseason] premiere of Greys Anatomy, the loss of Baileys baby felt so potent as a loss, that it felt if we were going to kill someone else, it almost felt like a hat on a hat. It felt like, lets grieve this baby. That scene [where she grieves the miscarriage] I weep when I watch that scene. I went up and watched the editors cutting it, and they were cutting it through tears. Chandra is so extraordinary in that scene, and every person I ever know whos lost a baby needs that scene. And that loss needs to be felt as deeply as any other character we might have killed. For us, Bailey losing a baby 16 seasons into the show, that feels like a death. And I wanted to give it its due. I didnt want to step on it with, Oh, and that intern died, too. So it felt like the better storytelling.

Can you reveal who you were planning to kill off in the early discussions?

Everybody in that episode, at some point, was on the chopping block. The amount of times that weve decided were killing characters, and then were like, No, lets change it it would drop your jaw. And youd be amazed at how many people have been on the board for weeks; we come up with different codes that mean that character is dying. And then were like, No. So theres no one person. There were a lot of conversations about who might die in that bar, from both casts. At the end of the day, Baileys baby felt right.

Owen and Teddy are now engaged, but it came after they got a fair amount of external pressure about the status of their relationship. And theres also the fact that his ex-wife, Amelia (Caterina Scorsone), is no longer sure about the paternity of her unborn child, while Teddys ex, Tom (Greg Germann), seemed upset at the reveal. Whats next?

What Tom is feeling there is primarily is terrible pain. There is nothing clean or easy about this particular engagement at this moment, because now Amelia is keeping a secret. Shes not just keeping it from Owen and shes not just keeping it from Link shes keeping it from herself. We dont know who the father of that baby is. And that is a big messy story moving forward with the season. For sure, Toms feelings for Teddy, which I think are not entirely unmutual, are a factor moving forward. We talk about Tom and Teddy and Owen and Amelia as a quadrangle, and that story is certainly not complete.

Jo (Camilla Luddington) seemed attached to the idea of being a Safe Haven volunteer and made a comment about not being a mother yet. How much will the show be pursuing Jos maternal instincts, especially now that Justin Chambers, who played her husband Alex, has left the show?

For us, Jo taking that baby felt less about becoming a mother than about trying to mother her own inner child. It felt like she was holding a baby In her arms who represented her as a baby, and she was trying to find some healing through being a safe haven volunteer and holding that baby and beautifully, just didnt want to let that baby go. For me, that story was just another step on Jos healing journey.

So it was just a couple of episode arc versus being a significant part of her immediate future?

I dont know for sure about the future. But in this moment, yes, that isnt the story that shes pursuing.

Maggie (Kelly McCreary) was blindsided by the reveal shes being sued by her uncle for the wrongful death of her cousin. How will she be coping?

Maggie is going through a really difficult thing that most surgeons go through in their intern year. The writers room, we talked a lot about how Maggie is a genius. Shes incredibly good at what she does. Has she ever been through the death of a patient that may be in some way due to her error? And we realized we hadnt really seen it onscreen, which meant it probably hasnt happened. Which speaks to her seeming, sometimes, like almost like an immaturity. Kelly McCreary has often asked, When does Maggie grow up a little bit? And for us, this answered that question of, Oh, she hasnt been through the kinds of losses and failures that people who are less good go through. So that was an exciting thing for us to give the character and to give the actress.

Weve seen Bailey grieve her miscarriage, but her husband Ben (Jason George) was mostly concerned about his wife. How much will Station 19 be exploring his loss?

What I love about the way weve handled this miscarriage is that weve kept that loss alive on both shows throughout much of the season. So the people I know whove had late stage miscarriages and some of the people I know whove had early stage miscarriages, its not a thing that just is felt briefly and then gone. Its an ongoing loss. And theres an ongoing grief. And I think that sometimes thats misrepresented in television. Its done in one episode and never mentioned again. We came at it differently for both of those characters. Theyre both feeling it in different ways and discussing it and having various reactions to it throughout the season.

Pruitt (Miguel Sandoval) is keeping his cancer quiet for now, and given the tenuous relationship with his daughter, Andy (Jaina Lee Ortiz), it feels like a ticking bomb. Whats ahead there?

Pruitt is a big story this season on Station 19. We tried to tell it differently than the cancer story had been told in the past, and I think we succeeded. It allows the characters to go deeper. Andy has to grow up more and Pruitt has to face his mortality in a very real way.

There were also two different kinds of break-ups: Andy and Sullivan (Boris Kodjoe) imploded over career aspirations, while Maya (Danielle Savre) bluntly dumped Jack (Grey Damon). Is there hope for either couple? And would Andy and Sullivans relationship even be appropriate at this point?

Its not appropriate, but appropriate doesnt always make great TV. [Laughs.] For sure, were exploring the dynamics between Andy and Sullivan, which are really complicated. Thats exciting as a storyteller. Maya and Jack the way that Maya breaks up with him is so brutal, were exploring that as a character trait. Were really looking at Maya as a character this season and what makes her tick. [Its the same for] Jack and all of the characters.

We are leaning into a flashback motif this season where were looking sometimes at just a couple of years ago for the characters and sometimes at their childhoods to understand how they became the people that they are, why they became firefighters. So were doing some really exciting character work and and two of the characters that I think weve done a beautiful job illuminating in the early episodes are Maya and Jack.

Vic (Barrett Doss) seemed to move on from Ripleys (Brett Tucker) death fairly fast, especially in light of her relationship with Greys Anatomys Jackson (Jesse Williams), but the premiere had a poignant scene where she expressed how deeply she had been grieving. Was that a turning point in this recovery for her or is this the start of her being more open about the impact of the loss?

Were letting both of those things coexist. We are seeing a lighter version of her and were acknowledging how much shes been through. That is a joy for me. [Doss] is incredible, and she brings great emotional depth; she [also] brings lightness and joy and laughter. It all coexists. Were telling a story about grief that shows what I have experienced to be true: that ongoing grief intermingles with all the joy of life in a way where, often on television, grief is depicted as a dark, dark journey and then you come out of it and you can have joy again and then the grief isnt really touched on a lot. And Vic is having both: shes having grief for Ripley and shes having a new relationship. Shes having her feelings, her sadness, her tears, which allows her to also have a lot of laughter and joy and light and sex and fun. Its all happening simultaneously. Its really one of my favorite things were doing.

Is there anything else that can be teased about whats ahead on Station 19 or Greys Anatomy?

The first few episodes of Station 19 are kind of dark and intense, because thats how we designed them. And then when you get to Episodes 4 and 5, more joy and more light is coming in. These characters, were going deeper and deeper and deeper. I really just want to invite everyone to come on that journey. I think fans of of the first few seasons of the show, it may shake them up a little because it feels a little bit like a different show stylistically. But these characters are the characters youve fallen in love with. And were going even deeper. I encourage fans of Greys Anatomy, whove maybe never come to Station 19, to come check it out because Bailey is recurring on that show. And Jackson is recurring on that show. And its an exciting fun show unto itself. I dont want anyone to feel like they have to watch both hours, but that they get to.

Station 19 airs Thursdays at 8 p.m. and Greys Anatomy airs Thursdays at 9 p.m., both on ABC.

Related:

Continued here:
How Greys Anatomy and Station 19 Approached Its Crossover Death Count - Variety

From The Wire to everything else, the Anatomy of an Islamist: Into the mind of Sharjeel Imam, mastermind of Shaheen Bagh – OpIndia

The EndGame of the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act has become evident after the mastermind of the Shaheen Bagh protests revealed his intentions of cutting off the North East from the rest of India. Sharjeel Imam, the mastermind, also happens to be a columnist at The Wire. If one had read his eulogy of Jinnah that was published on The Wire, then he or she wouldnt have been surprised with the path he has chosen for himself.

Sharjeel Imam can be heard saying in the viral video, If five lakh Muslims are organized then we can cut off the North-east from the rest of India. If we cannot do so permanently, then at least we can do it for months. Our responsibility is to cut Assam from India, only then will the Government will hear our voice. If we have to help Assam then we will have to cut Assam from the rest of India.

More disturbingly, he speaks of isolating Northeast India by blocking the Chickens Neck. The Chickens Neck is a narrow stretch of land of about 22 kilometres located in West Bengal, that connects the northeastern states to the rest of India, with Nepal and Bangladesh lying on either side of the corridor. Thus, Sharjeel has made his intentions very clear, he wants a Civil War in the country and ultimately, another partition.

- Ad - - article resumes -

Before we speak of his article published on The Wire, we need to focus on some of the extremely problematic posts he has made on Facebook. It would give our readers some clue into how Sharjeel Imam thinks. First, theres the usual apologia for Yakub Memon and Afzal Guru that we have come to expect from Radical Muslims. According to them, executing two dreaded Islamic terrorists is valid grounds for Muslims to lose their faith in the country.

Source: Sharjeel Imams Facebook profile

Then, there is the justification for the Pulwama Terror Attack. Again, while it is true that sensible people would find this rhetoric extremely troubling, the justification for terrorism is a regular feature of the mainstream media. And Sharjeel Imam, here, is no different. He also accuses the USA, Israel and India of Islamophobia because the three countries are not willing to entertain justifications for terrorism.

Source: Sharjeel Imams Facebook profile

With regards to the ongoing protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act, Sharjeels rhetoric is akin to the rhetoric peddled by the likes of Shehla Rashid and others who have continuously prevented secular parties from claiming that these are secular protests. Like others, Sharjeel, too, exhorts Muslims to stop liberals from hijacking what are essentially Muslim protests.

Source: Sharjeel Imams Facebook Profile

Now, we shall elaborate on the really problematic aspects of his ideology. It is pertinent to mention here that Sharjeel Imam is a student of Modern Indian History at Jawaharlal Nehru University. The most concerning aspect of his ideology is the fact that he places Jinnah in the context of India in the 21st century. He says about Jinnah, The more I read Jinnah Papers, the more I realize that almost all of Jinnahs political career was spent as the leader of a minority community, organising the community against odds, and against what he considered as the Hindu revivalist forces of his time, which intended to monopolize power after British left.

Source: Sharjeel Imams Facebook Profile

Sharjeel continues, Seventy years later, the Muslims and other minorities of India know too well what he meant. In other words, Jinnah who was an Indian Muslim for the first 71 of the 72 years of his life, is infinitely more relevant for the besieged Indian Muslim minority than for Pakistani Muslims. In very specific ways, as an Indian Muslim politician fighting for minority rights, his methods, his arguments, his successes and his failures are lessons for us.

Sharjeel Imam goes on to assert that Indian Muslims should study Jinnah in order to understand the myth of Secular Congress. This is extremely problematic rhetoric. Sharjeel hasnt limited himself to praising Jinnah in the manner in which Mani Shankar Aiyar of the Congress party praises Jinnah. From his portrayal of Jinnah, it is clear that he wants Indian Muslims to emulate Jinnah and seize power in the country.

Read: An enemy community was foisted upon the Muslims after Independence: Shaheen Bagh mastermind Sharjeel Imam reveals real-agenda behind CAA protests

Where his thoughts about Jinnah become really clear is his article published on The Wire. From his eulogy of Jinnah on The Wire, it is evident that Sharjeel does not find any fault with Jinnahs conduct that led to the partition of the country. He does not even believe that partition was necessarily a bad thing. He says, In order to demystify Jinnah and to resolve such contradictions, a fuller discussion of Partition should have been a part of our educational setup. However, it has been made impossible to know such a historic figure by attributing violence of Partition to him. This as an attempt by Congress to hide its failures to accommodate the genuine Muslim demands and aspirations for political proportional representation.

Sharjeel did not stop there of course. He says that the questions raised by Jinnah are just the starting point of a larger debate which will inevitably take place again and again, as the situation of Indian Muslims is made to worsen. He believes that Jinnah led a righteous struggle to protect Indian Muslims from Hindu rule. Also, Sharjeel goes to great lengths to prove that Jinnah was a leader of Indian Muslims. He says, Indian Muslims, despite having been indoctrinated for generations now, retain some memory of Partition and Jinnah. For many of them, Jinnah is the author of Partition and yet one of the greatest leaders of Muslim India in the last century, who made the Muslim League into a national party by mobilising millions of Muslims across British India.

He states further, Jinnahs communalism is positive communalism as discussed above, and need not be understood through the contemporary meaning of the word. He did not believe that India was a nation, as is shown by the frequent use of the term continent as well as subcontinent. He was merely representing one community in this grand ocean of communities, and in this process, he was trying to secure rights for all numerically inferior communities.

Read: Its official: Endgame of Shaheen Bagh protest is second partition of India. Listen to what mastermind and The Wire columnist says

Sharjeel adds, Jinnah argued that it does not matter if we are 15% or 25%, unless we receive safeguards, they have all the resources to monopolise power. In other words, the Muslim majority provinces chose to secede rather than stay in a Hindu-dominated centralised India, as they saw no other option. Hence Partition is not their responsibility, it is their compulsion by the conditions created by Congress.

Lastly, according to Sharjeel, Jinnah raised questions which are still relevant. As the largest religious minority in the world, Indian Muslims, are one of the major victims of majoritarian democracy. It is the political struggle of these hundreds of millions of besieged Muslims which will define the meaning of plural democracy for the coming centuries. He ends the article with the words, The AMU portrait of Jinnah must not go. If anything, we need thousands more.

Thus, it is fairly obvious by now that Sharjeel Imam wishes to replicate what Jinnah achieved in 1947. It is also clear that he considers Jinnah as an Indian Muslim who became disillusioned with politics in the country and thus embarked upon a righteous quest to partition India along religious lines. Whats really troubling here is the fact that a widely read Indian media outlet provided a platform to such an individual to spread his propaganda.

Questions must be asked about the mainstream media and intellectual elite who have provided cover to such individuals to run their propaganda. It also shows that the liberal class can be fooled by a Jihadi if he is good enough with words. The manner in which Sharjeel has eulogized Jinnah and portrayed his Jihad against India as a righteous struggle to protect the interests of Muslims should have been the first sign that he is an extremely dangerous individual. However, since he was able to cloak his bigotry in fanciful words, Sharjeel was given great respect by the liberal fraternity. It only serves to demonstrate how gullible the liberal establishment is.

Furthermore, the liberal establishment should at least now stop to reconsider the danger that their rhetoric poses to peace in the country. The love for Jinnah, the justifications for Islamic Terrorism in Kashmir, the whitewashing of Yakub Memon and Afzal Guru, liberals should at least now realize that they are only furthering the interests of Radical Islam by peddling such extremely dubious rhetoric. The liberal establishment should also realize what their whitewashing of history and peddling narratives of Islamophobia without any shred of evidence has led to. It has led to a situation where dangerous individuals like Sharjeel Islam are using the cover their rhetoric provides in order to further the cause of Radical Islam.

Read: Jinnah wali Azadi slogans raised at Shaheen Bagh: The true face of anti-CAA protests and what these slogans mean

It is also pertinent to mention here that Sharjeel Imams rhetoric eulogizing Jinnah is textbook Pakistani propaganda. He is regurgitating the propaganda points that the Pakistani establishment makes. Sharjeel doesnt once refer to the genocides that were committed by the Muslims in their pursuit of Pakistan, he doesnt once mention the call for Direct Action Day that led to the slaughter of innumerable Hindus. He conveniently ignores the genocide of Bengali Hindus that Pakistan committed in 1971. All of this was Jinnahs tree yielding fruits. And yet, Sharjeel doesnt once refer to them and continues to whitewash his legacy while demonizing the Congress party.

There is a certain kind of truth that only radicals like Sharjeel Imam are capable of saying. It is the king of truth that liberals try to whitewash for the cause of secularism. Where Sharjeel Imam really distinguished himself, prior to his recent call for civil war, is when he declared in a Facebook post that Muslims did not choose India due to ideals of secularism. He said, and it is true, that Muslims remained in India due to their property and other reasons.

Source: Sharjeel Imams Facebook Profile

The above Facebook post from September 2019 is the biggest slap on the face of the likes of Asaduddin Owaisi who like to boast about how they chose secular India over Islamic Pakistan. Imagine if a BJP politician had said such a thing. The entire liberal establishment would have nailed him to a cross. And here we have Sharjeel Imam who is provided a platform by The Wire and the liberal establishment which have helped the mastermind of the Shaheen Bagh protests at every turn by painting these protests as secular and about saving the constitution.

Sharjeel Imam has also flaunted the fact that Indian Muslims cheer for the Pakistan cricket team. He sees nothing wrong with it and, in fact, exhorts Muslims to not be on the defensive about it. Most conspicuously, however, he says that growing up, he had great knowledge about Saeed Answar but did not have much idea about Saurav Ganguly. He asks his audience to figure out the reason behind it.

Source: Sharjeel Imams Facebook Profile

The evidence of his bigotry is abundant in his Facebook posts. In another Facebook post, Sharjeel denigrates Idol-Worship and calls it Shirk. He also insults polytheism, the form of religiosity most Hindus subscribe to, by using it as an insult. He equates atheism, secularism, humanism, even nationalism, to Shirk.

Source: Sharjeel Imams Facebook Profile

Thus, what is clear from Sharjeel Imams Facebook posts and his eulogy of Jinnah is that he doesnt see any difference between Pakistani and Indian Muslims. He equates Nationalism to Shirk because the Ummah transcends national boundaries. He asks Indian Muslims to not be ashamed of celebrating Pakistans cricket team because he believes it is natural for Indian Muslims to identify themselves more with Pakistan than with India. In fact, he encourages Indian Muslims to feel that way. At the most fundamental level, Sharjeel Imam sees Jinnah as an Indian Muslim who revolted against Hindus in order to create the Islamic State of Pakistan. He sees Jinnahs Jihad as a righteous struggle for the protection of Muslim interests and he believes the oppressed Muslims of India should tread a similar path.

Read: Shaheen Bagh protests: Deep dive into how JNU student and The Wire columnist Sharjeel Imam went from let us burn Constitution to saving it

Let this not be forgotten. The liberal establishment helped a Radical Islamist like Sharjeel Imam achieve his objective perfectly. While the Liberal Establishment accuses ordinary BJP voters of being fascists, they are the ones who collaborated with someone who whitewashed a Jihadist who was responsible for the death of millions and millions of Hindus.

Sharjeel Imam has been at the forefront of the anti-CAA protests from the very beginning. In a video that had gone viral on social media by the 17th of December, he could be seen inciting Muslims to do Chakkajam in Delhi and wherever they have sufficient numbers. He called for Muslims to bring entire cities to a halt. There are over 30% urban Muslims in UP. Do you have no shame at all? Why cannot you do Chakkajam in UP? The area in Bihar where I am from, the rural Muslim population is 6% while the urban Muslim population is 24%. Indian Muslims mostly live in cities. So it is upon you. You can bring your cities to a halt. If anyone asks you not to, disown them he was heard saying in the viral video.

There is another aspect that needs to be investigated here. A thorough investigation needs to be conducted into the extent of the collusion, if there was any, between Sharjeel Imam and the students of Jamia who gave a call for Jihad. As we have reported earlier, days before violence erupted in the national capital, the students Barkha Dutt labelled Shero gave a call for violent Jihad. While Sharjeel Imam eulogized the man responsible for the partition of the country, the Jamia Jihadans eulogized the men responsible for the Moplah massacre which resulted in the slaughter of hundreds and thousands of Hindus. Like Sharjeel, one of them did express great grief at the execution of Yakub Memon.

The role of the media also needs to be investigated amidst the current unrest. Slogans such as Hinduon se Azadi and yet, they were whitewashed the media. Slogans of Jinnah Wali Azadi were raised at the Shaheen Bagh protests and still, these protests were painted as secular. It needs to be investigated whether the Liberal Media is doing so due to their ideological affinity towards Radical Islam or whether there are more sinister reasons behind it.

The role of politicians needs to be investigated as well. AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan was spotted with Sharjeel Imam, it also needs to be mentioned that Amanatullah himself is accused of inciting riots. Hehad created ruckus outside Delhi police demanding the release of a 22-year-old Muslim youth named Furkan who is accused of instigating riots in Jamia Millia University in December. There is every indication of a grand conspiracy here. And as had said earlier, this is truly the Khilafat 2.0.

Black Coffee Enthusiast. Post Graduate in Psychology. Bengali.

Read the original:
From The Wire to everything else, the Anatomy of an Islamist: Into the mind of Sharjeel Imam, mastermind of Shaheen Bagh - OpIndia

Performer of the Week: Chandra Wilson – TVLine

RELATED STORIES

THE PERFORMER | Chandra Wilson

THE SHOW | Greys Anatomy

THE EPISODE | Help Me Through the Night (Jan. 23, 2020)

THE PERFORMANCE |In Thursdays winter premiere of Greys Anatomy, as Bailey struggled to regain control following her miscarriage and the accident that had imperiled husband Ben, Wilson sketched a portrait of a woman on the verge that was so real, it all but ached.

Sometimes, the actress used broad strokes when Bailey pushed aside her roiling emotions by ordering Schmitt to do the same, for instance, and when she panicked that Helm was going to die on the operating table right in front of her. Other times, Wilson drew in fine lines as when she let terror and relief fight in her eyes in the moment that Helms heart restarted.

But what really made Wilsons portrait of grief and rage such a masterpiece was the finishing touch that she put on it. When Richard assured Bailey that her residents were fine everyone was fine, she at last allowed herself not only to express the feelings shed been choking down but experience them. Wilsons voice as raw as a fresh wound, Bailey replied that no, everyone wasnt fine she wasnt.

With that, her portrayer let boil a toxic cocktail of anger and sorrow as Bailey marveled that her daughter had been there one moment and the next, shed just been gone. And thered been nothing Bailey could do but stand there and lose her. In that moment, we were helpless, too. As Wilson submerged Bailey in grief, we could only sit there and watch, in equal measure heartsick and impressed.

HONORABLE MENTION | We know that the Powers That Be already have an idea of wholl get a spinoff once the crime drama ends in a few weeks. But if theres any wiggle room left, wed like to lobby hard for Elisa Marie because in Sundays episode, Mattea Conforti was gold. Weve always liked her portrayal of Proctors young daughter, but this weeks installment displayed her ability to play the aching reality of an innocent girl manipulated by a world full of very bad people. Elisa Maries internalized grief over her parents deaths came through in all of Confortis choices, cresting with the way Elisa Marie seemed unable to decide whether to fear Tommy or tell him her sad life story. If Conforti is this good this young, we cant wait to see what the coming years will bring.

HONORABLE MENTION | Anxiety is a cruel condition that creates an all-consuming inner torment while its sufferers struggle to maintain status quo. Niles Fitchs performance in Thursdays This Is Us proves that he absolutely understands that painful dichotomy. Fitch was so believable while college-age Randall tamped down his worries, and then heartbreaking as those worries resurfaced as inescapable nightmares. But we were most impressed with the scene in which he and new girlfriend Beth discussed the prospect of therapy. Fitch spoke quietly but firmly, showing Randalls hesitance to discuss this debilitating aspect of his personality but he allowed some vulnerability and hope to seep in, as well. Perhaps most impressively, Fitch closely mirrored co-star Sterling K. Browns approach to Randalls situation, lending the hour a throughline that strengthened the episode on the whole.

HONORABLE MENTION | In Season 2 of Netflixs Sex Education, Aimee Lou Woodsuperbly dramatized the rollercoaster of emotion that befalls a victim of sexual assault. But it was in Episode 7, when her character Aimee could no longer balance her myriad states of mind, that the actress really shined. If he could do something like that, then anyone could, she broke down to her friends. I always felt safe before and now I dont. As Aimee grew more cognizant of her feelings, Woods vulnerability and mannerisms sold her characters psychological damage. With support from her gal pals (and a trip to a junkyard), she pushed through the rage. Im angry that a horrible man ruined my best jeans and nobody did anything and now I cant get on the fking bus! she screamed while smashing a car to pieces. Woods performance allowed us to witness the devastating effects of sexual assault on a young woman. By the time Aimee courageously reboarded that bus, Wood had transformed her from fearful victim to brazen survivor.

Which performance(s) knocked your socks off this week? Tell us in Comments!

Here is the original post:
Performer of the Week: Chandra Wilson - TVLine