Category Archives: Anatomy

‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Season 17: From Teddy to Jackson, all the characters who have overstayed their welcome – MEAWW

Over the course of 16 years, 'Grey's Anatomy' has had a rich assortment of varied characters, many of whom have stayed with us. Others have fallen through the cracks because they couldn't quite leave an impact, to say the least, some have been unceremoniously killed off, while a precious few managed to leave the show unscathed. There have been car and plane accidents, George (TR Knight) got hit by a truck, Izzie (Katherine Heigl) survived cancer but left the show anyway, and there's a slight chance that Lexie Grey (Chyler Leigh) was eaten by animals *shudder*. Cristina Yang (Sandra Oh) is just one of those lucky ones, who got a promotion and took off.

We're on the verge of catching Season 17 of the show and keeping the favorites aside, there are still so many characters whose arcs have been stretched too thin, and honestly, it's time to say goodbye to them. Many have lost their spark and value and don't seem to offer anything to the show anymore. Here's our pick.

Teddy Altman (Kim Raver)

Haters gonna hate, but from having complexity of character in the earlier seasons with powerful storylines, Teddy is now just a character who is torn between two men....which leads to her infidelity. This was the arc for Season 16, and it's such an insult to her normally steadfast and compassionate character. What did they to do Teddy for Season 16? The best way for her story to end is, get her married off to Tom Koracick and both of them leave the show. Teddy has no chemistry with Owen, whatsoever.

Jackson Avery

Sorry, but not sorry. Jackson's (Jesse Williams) arc was best when he was with April (Sarah Drew) and he showed the full range of his acting capabilities. He didn't seem like just a playboy, who was unable to make up his mind, which is what he has now become. Like Maggie, we're pretty sick of his indecisive behavior. But what hurts is that he is slowly receding into the mass of forgettable characters on the show. He was usually a favorite. Get him a good storyline or make him leave for 'Station 19', so he has a better chance with Vic.

Tom Koracick

The Tom-Teddy-Owen drama was one of the most annoying arcs of Season 16. Tom Koracick, who is usually a snarkfest and an unlikeable soul, is in love with Teddy and wasn't pleased when she announced her wedding to Owen (Kevin McKidd). Due to some insecurity about Owen being the father of Amelia's (Caterina Scorsone) baby, Teddy slept with Tom a couple of times, even before her wedding. Unfortunately, Owen found out and stood her up at the altar. Tom Koracick and Teddy should get married and leave? Maybe?

Levi Schmitt

Levi Schmitt's (Jake Borelli) back-and-forth love story with Nico as the token same-sex tangent on the show doesn't have the same depth as Callie (Sara Ramirez) and Arizona's (Jessica Capshaw) turbulent tale. In fact, Levi and Nico's story just seems to be filled with bland gaslighting and manipulating and sometimes serves as a deviation from the actual storylines of the show. 'Grey's Anatomy' used to be known for its complex characters and at the moment, Levi seems to be receding into nothingness.

Nico

Like we said, Nico (Alex Landi) has turned into a gaslighting and manipulative individual. His storyline with Schmitt doesn't add any weight and is just plain annoying. Time to say bye?

'Grey's Anatomy' Season 17 will release on November 12, ABC Thursdays at 9 pm.

Continue reading here:
'Grey's Anatomy' Season 17: From Teddy to Jackson, all the characters who have overstayed their welcome - MEAWW

Greys Anatomy season 16 recap: What happened in Grey’s Anatomy series 16? – Daily Express

Baileys child

Viewers will remember how Miranda Bailey (Chandra Wilson) suffered a miscarriage in season 16.

However, by the end of the series, she had made a decision to become a foster parent, inviting a teen to move in with her family.

Amelia Shepherd (Caterina Scorsone) found out she was pregnant at the start of season 16.

However, there was a lot of mystery about who the father of her child was.

In the finale, she had her baby boy and it was revealed Link Lincoln (Chris Carmack) was his dad.

Greys Anatomy season 17 will begin on ABC on November 12, 2020.

More here:
Greys Anatomy season 16 recap: What happened in Grey's Anatomy series 16? - Daily Express

‘Grey’s Anatomy’: Arizona Was a Great Doctor But a Terrible Partner – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Greys Anatomy is undoubtedly one of the best nighttime shows to have ever aired. In all its 16 seasons, the showrunners have managed to keep audiences tuning in to find out what their favorite on-screen resident doctors have been up to.

The series has had its high and low moments, fan-favorite characters, and those that the fans couldnt stand. Such a character is the attending surgeon Dr. Arizona Robbins.

Arizonas character has been a confusing one, and fans are now speculating that Arizona, although an excellent doctor, was one of Greys Anatomys worst partners.

Greys Anatomy is a medical drama TV series that follows a couple of doctors in the fictional Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital trying to balance their challenging work life and personal affairs.

Although the series shows different doctors and their relationships in and outside of work, it primarily focuses on Meredith Greys life.

Each season of the show starts with a voiceover done by Grey, who gives viewers a glimpse of what that season will cover. In each installment, the physicians try to complete their various academic years to qualify for higher surgical field levels.

At the end of every season on the show, something huge and dramatic always happens, including the departure or death of one of the physicians. Greys Anatomy sometimes sets aside medical ethical concerns for character development.

Some of the shows favorite characters include Meredith Grey, Cristina Yang, Max Sloan, Arizona Robbins, and her partner Callie Torres.

RELATED: Greys Anatomy Needs to Give More Screen Time To Its Friendships

Arizona Robbins is a character on the cult medical show Greys Anatomy. Arizona was introduced to fans in season five of the show as the new head of pediatric surgery. As a pediatrician, Arizonas personality is usually described as quirky, especially in how she dresses.

She wears wheely sneakers and a pink scrub cap to make her younger patients feel more at ease. Arizona was first added to the show to play Erica Hahns love interest. However, the shows writer and executive producer Shonda Rhimes felt that there wasnt any chemistry between the two characters. Thus came in Callie Torres.

Rhimes said that her decision to cast Jessica Capshaw to play Arizona was a massive achievement for her.

Arizonas storyline follows that she joins the Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital as a replacement for Dr. Jordan Kenley. Here she meets the five-year resident Callie Torres and they fall in love. After Torres father refuses to accept his daughters sexuality, Arizona helps him see that Callies sexuality is a big part of who she is.

Throughout the show, Arizona is shown to share a loving yet tumultuous relationship with her partner Torres. Although Arizona is displayed as an experienced doctor who is good with her patients, fans cant help but feel like she is an awful person in general.

As revealed above, Arizona and Torres didnt have a perfect relationship. The two have had one too many fights in the past.

According to a Reddit thread, Arizona wasnt an excellent partner to Torres. The post went into detail about how the head of pediatrics was a nasty partner, including having cheated on Torres repeatedly and always being manipulative,

The thread continued to state that Arizona abandoned Callie at the airport and afterward demanded that Torres take her back without addressing it. When Arizona got involved in a plane crash, the doctors had to cut off her leg to save her.

After her recovery, she became mean and angry at Torres, not knowing that the latter had to make the tough call to cut off the formers leg to save her life.

Here is the original post:
'Grey's Anatomy': Arizona Was a Great Doctor But a Terrible Partner - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Greys Anatomy star Kate Walsh heaps praise on WA Premier Mark McGowans handling of COVID-19 pandemic – The West Australian

Greys Anatomy star Kate Walsh who has made WA home since the coronavirus pandemic has heaped praise on Premier Mark McGowan for his exemplary handling of the crisis and revealed her plans to bring a streaming show to the State.

Cocooned far away from her home in virus-ravaged New York and family across the US, the actor and producer has felt fortunate to have been grounded in WA after an impromptu holiday to Perth in March.

With little choice but to stay when COVID-19 prompted the Federal Government to close international borders, Walsh has since embraced the West Aussie lifestyle after settling in Cottesloe.

It's a really tricky time. Mark McGowan handled it so well with locking down and people were vigilant about social distancing, paid attention and adhered to the different lockdown phases.

HEAR HER ON THE WEST LIVE IN THE PLAYER BELOW

I wouldn't trade anything for being safe. People back home are like what, you don't wear masks? You're allowed to go to the gym? You can go to a restaurant?

As much as I would like to be able to go home and come back, there are surges and different rounds coming. How it's been handled here, like I said, is so exemplary and I feel very fortunate to be able to have a normal life here.

The Hollywood star has been making the most of her time in the State, from getting her diving ticket off Rottnest and seeing turtles off Exmouth to soaking up some Broome time Walsh has been ticking off bucket list destinations and experiences.

Speaking to The West Live podcast host Jenna Clarke, she revealed Ningaloo Reef was one of her favourite spots.

There's so much to explore and see part of what is so beautiful here. I'm just in love with it, she said.

Ningaloo Reef was like nothing I've ever seen before.

The reef is so pristine and I've gone snorkelling and diving everywhere. A lot of them are bleached out so it's just incredible how healthy Ningaloo is.

To be able to walk right out and snorkel and see there's just mass amounts of marine life we had a perfect day.

We just kayaked out and just snorkelled around, we didn't have to dive. Everything was there.

Mark McGowan handled it so well with locking down and people were vigilant about social distancing, paid attention and adhered to the different lockdown phases.

Walsh said another reason she loved WA so much was because it was literally the only place in the world that's doing theatre.

She has featured front and centre in American playwright Sharr Whites Tony-nominated Broadway drama The Other Place at the new Fremantle Theatre Company. The plays opening night on October 17 was to a sell-out crowd.

We've got an incredible cast of actors Dalip Sondhi, Lucy Kate Westbrook, Mararo Wangai, she said.

Chris Edmund who used to run WAAPA when Jai Courtney was there and Hugh Jackman he's in town so he has directed.

It's just been delightful to be able to get the community together and in to see theatre. Local businesses contributed to help make (Fremantle Theatre Company) happen. It's just incredible.

She renewed calls for WA to become a filmmaking hotspot, after spruiking the State in June on Sevens Perth-produced current affairs program Flashpoint.

Walsh said WA had a unique opportunity to build a production studio that will not only create jobs for local talent but also attract big names.

It was one of the first thoughts I had. Because there isn't a studio here or sound station, you're not accessible to big international productions. WA is not on the map right now. It's not even a consideration, she said.

There's a lot of incredible artists right here in WA, cinematographers, camera operators, crew, post and pre-production and, of course, actors and writers and directors that come out of WAAPA.

You can not only create jobs for them... people can stay here and not have to leave. It'll just build jobs, community and another, I think, viable resource.

It's pretty exciting to bring in another business and be able to compete with the east. It has that ripple effect of catering, restaurants, hotels and rentals and property.

My aim is to also bring a streaming show here in early 2021. Even without a stage being built we could do one, so that's in the works now.

I have an idea already in mind but I'm just very excited to do it here. Hopefully it'll be sort of a bridge between now and when a studio is built.

Walsh will also take up a starring role at Telethon 2020 this weekend.

I'm going right after my play. Sunday night, I'm on the closing panel. I don't know exactly what that means but I'm looking forward to it, she said.

The amount of money that they raise it's just incredible, so I'm excited to be a part of that.

Visit link:
Greys Anatomy star Kate Walsh heaps praise on WA Premier Mark McGowans handling of COVID-19 pandemic - The West Australian

2020 MLB playoffs – Could the 2020 Astros join the 2004 Red Sox on Saturday? The anatomy of a 3-0 comeback – ESPN

The 2004 Boston Red Sox inspired a library's worth of books, special edition magazines and documentaries recounting their miraculous run to World Series champions. That team, affectionately known as "The Idiots," ended the franchise's 86-year-old World Series drought. Breaking the curse made them one of the most famous and beloved teams in baseball history.

Now the 2020 Houston Astros are trying to match one of Boston's historic achievements: The Red Sox are the only team in major league postseason history to win a best-of-7 series after losing the first three games. The Astros forced Saturday's Game 7 with a 7-4 win over the Tampa Bay Rays on Friday at Petco Park in San Diego.

The Astros, of course, do not have a cute nickname. Baseball fans around the country might have another name for them, but it's definitely not cute. The Red Sox rallied to beat the New York Yankees, not only their sworn enemy but a team that had played in six of the previous eight World Series. The Astros are trying to knock off the scrappy, low-payroll Rays, a franchise with 27 fewer World Series titles than the Yankees.

The Astros are aware of the history they're chasing. Alex Bregman made his teammates watch the "Four Days in October" documentary on the Red Sox before Game 5. Well, some of his teammates anyway; Michael Brantley said he hadn't heard about it. Still, with the Astros on the brink of matching Boston's feat, let's see what kind of comparisons we can find between what happened in 2004 and what the Astros are doing in 2020.

Think of all the mental baggage the Red Sox had to deal with: They were fighting the curse; they had lost a heartbreaking 2003 American League Championship Series to the Yankees in seven games; and then the Yankees trounced them in the first three games in 2004 by scores of 10-7, 3-1 and 19-8. On top of that, staff ace Curt Schilling was battling an ankle injury and had been bombed in Game 1. The Red Sox didn't know if he'd pitch again in the series.

2 Related

The Astros have their own baggage with the offseason cheating revelation that made them the most hated team in the majors (and their own ace, Justin Verlander, has been out since August after Tommy John surgery). One big difference here is that they had been close in the first three games. Jose Altuve made two crucial throwing errors, and the Rays played outstanding defense, especially in Game 3; but the Astros pitched well, and they not only outhit the Rays 26-18 but hit the ball harder more often.

The Red Sox had a carefree attitude, and perhaps being down 3-0 put less pressure on them. They also knew they were as good as the Yankees, after going 11-8 against them in the regular season.

The Astros knew they just needed a few breaks to start going their way and that while luck doesn't always even out in a short series, if they kept hitting the ball hard, good results were bound to happen.

"So far things really haven't been going our way," Houston manager Dusty Baker said after Game 3. "We really have our backs up against the wall. It is a steep mountain to climb, but it is not impossible. We just have to tighten our belts, put our big boy pants on and come out fighting tomorrow."

Despite the positive attitude heading into the game, the Red Sox found themselves down 4-3 in the bottom of the ninth with the invincible Mariano Rivera in the game. You know what happened. Kevin Millar led off with a five-pitch walk. Pinch runner Dave Roberts stole second -- barely -- and Bill Mueller singled him home. Forgotten: David Ortiz popped out with the bases loaded to end the inning. Ortiz delivered three innings later, however, with a walk-off, two-run home run off Paul Quantrill.

Most teams don't even get to a Game 5. Of the 39 best-of-seven series that were 3-0, 28 ended up in sweeps. Most teams, after a long season, are physically tired and mentally exhausted, and winning four in a row against a good team could feel futile.

The Astros took an early 2-0 lead, the Rays tied it, but then George Springer hit a two-run home run off Tyler Glasnow in the fifth inning -- the winning blow in the eventual 4-3 victory. Indeed, Houston's luck finally turned in the ninth when Willy Adames' RBI double off the wall in left-center missed being a game-tying home run by just a few feet.

Springer went 3-for-4 in the game, while Altuve went 2-for-4 with a home run and double. The Red Sox had Ortiz, one of the most clutch postseason hitters of all time, but the Astros have Springer and Altuve. Check out the career postseason lines for the three (entering Game 6 for Springer and Altuve):

Springer: .274/.353/.560, 19 HRs in 252 ABsAltuve: .298/.368/.560, 18 HRs in 248 ABsOrtiz: .289/.404/.543, 17 HRs in 304 ABs

Astros players held a pregame meeting, but Baker even laughed that off a bit after the game. "I think us as a society, we meet sometimes too much. All we do is state the obvious," Baker said. "We are in the process of about to be eliminated if we lose this game tonight, nobody is ready to go home, we are ready to go to Dallas." In other words, it's about talking with your bats, and it was no surprise that Houston's versions of David Ortiz came through with the big hits.

Only three of those 39 teams that were down 3-0 had pushed it to six games before the Astros. The Red Sox pulled off another dramatic victory, winning 5-4 in 14 innings on Ortiz's two-out, walk-off single. The Yankees actually led 4-2 entering the bottom of the eighth, but Ortiz homered off Tom Gordon, Millar walked and Trot Nixon singled. Only then did Rivera come into the game, giving up the tying run on a sacrifice fly. Maybe if Joe Torre brought Rivera in for a two-inning save -- like the manager often did -- things would have turned out differently. Rivera had thrown 40 pitches in Game 4, however, and Gordon had been outstanding that year.

Your guide to MLB's bubble ballparks ALCS preview: Rays vs. Astros Astros?!? How angry should you be? NLCS preview: Dodgers vs. Braves Why Braves are big threat to Dodgers Playoff bracket, schedule and more

The big difference between the Red Sox and Astros? The Red Sox had a pretty good No. 2 starter going in Game 5: Pedro Martinez. Dusty Baker had to improvise and go with a bullpen game, electing to avoid starting Framber Valdez on short rest and keeping No. 5 starter Cristian Javier in relief. The first five pitchers Baker used were rookies. The Rays hit three home runs, but all were solo shots. Springer homered in the first inning, and then Correa came up in the bottom of the ninth with the game tied.

Correa called his shot: "When I went into that at-bat, I told Altuve walking off the field [that] 'I'm gonna end it.' I could feel that my swing was in sync, I could feel that my rhythm was good, I could feel that I wanted to drive the ball and I felt like I could do it."

He did. And just like that, all the momentum was now in Houston's favor. They were still alive, they had their top starter ready for Game 6, the hits were falling and the pressure was now on Tampa Bay.

As it turned out, Schilling was able to pitch again. One important -- and often forgotten -- note about the 2004 series is that Game 3 was initially rained out, so the final five games were played over five days, with no off day before Game 6. Due to the rainout, Martinez was able to start Game 5 on regular rest, allowing Schilling to be pushed back another day. Schilling had a temporary procedure performed on his ankle, so this was the famous Bloody Sock game. He allowed one run over seven innings, Mark Bellhorn hit a three-run home run and the Red Sox won 4-2.

Refusing to panic in Game 5 meant Baker was able to start Valdez on full rest. Again, there was some luck here. If Game 5 had gone to the 10th inning, Baker said Valdez would have entered. Correa's home run not only won Game 5, but it arguably won Game 6, as well. Valdez allowed one run in six innings, and Kevin Cash's quick hook of starter Blake Snell in the fifth inning after a walk and base hit backfired as the Astros scored four runs to take a 4-1 lead.

Both managers in 2004 were in a bind. Terry Francona had no clear option. His rotation had gone Schilling, Martinez, Bronson Arroyo, Derek Lowe, Martinez and Schilling. Arroyo had pitched an inning of relief in Game 6. Francona went with Lowe on two days' rest. Torre's rotation had gone Mike Mussina, Jon Lieber, Kevin Brown, Orlando Hernandez, Mussina and Lieber. Javier Vazquez was the solid fifth starter, but he had thrown 96 pitches in relief of Brown in Game 3 after Brown lasted just two innings. The game eventually turned into a blowout, but Torre ended up burning two starting pitchers. Brown had thrown just 57 pitches, so Torre went with him on three days' rest. Bad choice. Ortiz --- yes, again -- hit a two-run homer in the first; and with the bases loaded in the second, Vazquez replaced Brown, and Johnny Damon greeted him with a grand slam. The Red Sox won 10-3.

Is your squad out of the MLB postseason? Here's what's on the offseason to-do list.

American League

MIN | CLE | TOR | CHW | OAK | NYY | HOU

National League

CIN | MIL | CHC | STL | MIA | SD

For the Astros and Rays, neither Baker nor Cash are in the same scramble mode with their pitching staffs. Game 2 starters Lance McCullers Jr. and Charlie Morton will be on regular rest. Because Game 6 turned into a decisive loss, the Rays were able to save all their top relievers, with the exception of Diego Castillo, who threw 14 pitches. Manuel Margot's two-run home run in the eighth forced Baker to use closer Ryan Pressly for the third straight day, so that's a minor issue; but Pressly had a quick, nine-pitch inning, and he has thrown 39 pitches over those three games. He'll be ready.

But like the game at Yankee Stadium in 2004, you wonder if it will come down to the first two innings and not the ninth. You could see the dichotomy in emotions on one play in the sixth inning of Game 6. It was 5-1 at the time, but the Rays put two on with one out against Valdez, who had just walked Yandy Diaz, with the two exchanging words after Diaz barked at Valdez after ball four. Valdez was now approaching 100 pitches and tiring, but he induced Brandon Lowe to hit into a double play, Lowe slamming his helmet down on the ground as he crossed over first base. Valdez pumped his first and celebrated with Correa and Altuve as he walked off the field. After that play, I texted a friend, "This series is over."

I know. Baseball isn't supposed to be like that. Momentum is a word used by writers and pundits, not players. But the frustration for the Rays is there. We can see it.

"They are frustrated. We are all frustrated," Cash said. "I don't think they are tensing up. I think they are recognizing that we got an opportunity for the fourth time now to do something special. And have confidence that we can find ways to really compete and get the bats going, score some runs for Charlie and find a way to win."

Diaz's act of hubris reminded me off the infamous Alex Rodriguez-Bronson Arroyo incident from Game 6 in 2004, when Rodriguez swatted the ball out of Arroyo's glove and was called out for interference. As with Diaz, the thought was, "What was he thinking? Why are you shouting at the opponent after drawing a walk?" Similarly, when Snell was removed, he mouthed the words, "What the f--- are we doing?" Mike Zunino snapped his bat after a strikeout. That 3-0 series lead feels like a long time ago.

"We are relentless, and when we say we don't want to go home, we really meant that. We want to keep playing baseball, and we don't want this to be the end of our season," Correa said. "We took care of these three games, and now we got to care of one more. If we don't win that game, then this all meant nothing. We have to go out there tomorrow and get that win."

Continue reading here:
2020 MLB playoffs - Could the 2020 Astros join the 2004 Red Sox on Saturday? The anatomy of a 3-0 comeback - ESPN

Anatomy of an escape for the win: NY Giants survive with defensive touchdown, 2-point stop – NorthJersey.com

NorthJersey.com's Art Stapleton discusses the New York Giants' first win against The Washington Football team on Sunday. NorthJersey.com

EAST RUTHERFORD - The Giants needed someone on defense to make a play.

Twice.

And both times, unlike in the first five games of the season,they found a way to finish off the Washington Football Team for the first victory of the Joe Judge era Sunday, 20-19.

Tae Crowder, the last pick in the 2020 NFL Draft took care of the first one when he picked up a fumble and raced 43 yards for a decisive touchdown with 3:29 left.

Then Dexter Lawrence, one of their first-round picks last year, and Blake Martinez, one of this offseason's big free agent signings, managed to combine to smother Washington quarterback Kyle Allen as he rolled out looking for an open receiver on a potential game-winning two-point conversion with 36 seconds remaining.

"It was special, it's not like we won a playoff [game], we still have a lot of work to do, no bragging rights or anything like that," Giants defensive linemanLeonard Williams said. "But it was definitely - we've been working really hard through camp, we've been working really hard through the beginning of the season, and we finally got that win under our belt, it was nice to see guys smiling in the locker room after putting in that much hard work. We kinda got tired of going into the locker room and seeing sad faces."

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Those sad faces may have emerged if not for those two plays that keyed the Giant escape:

The Giants were on the ropes, and it was obvious. All the Washington Football Team needed was a field goal, and the collapse from up 13-3 late in the first half would have been complete.

But on third-and-6 near midfield, Kyler Fackrell beat Washington left tackle Geron Christian and sacked Allen, who inexplicably spun and lost the football in the process of going down to the turf. The ball bounced at the feet of Crowder, whose contributions as a rookie have belied the nickname of Mr. Irrelevant he earned with the selection as the last pick in the draft.

NY GIANTS: Wide receiver C.J. Board injured and carted off field after scary collision

Crowder bobbled his first attempt at scooping up the ball, but actually helped his second try by creating a bit of a bounce off the turf. Once the linebacker from Georgia secured the handle, he sprinted toward the end zone with Washington wide receiver Terry McLaurin chasing from behind.

Cam Brown, another rookie, knocked McLaurin off line just slightly with a block, creating enough separation for Crowder to go untouched into the end zone.

James Bradberry was clearly being tongue-in-cheek when he said after the game he would take the 6-foot-4, 342-pound Dexter Lawrence in a footrace against most quarterbacks in the league.

The Giants had reason to smile, though, and Lawrence did force Allen to hesitate as he hustled to try and take an angle that cut off a path to the end zone.

The defensive play called by Giants defensive coordinator Patrick Graham was one they installed Friday, went over Saturday and decided to use in the biggest moment Sunday.

When Allen rolled out, both Lawrence and Martinez tracked him. It looked as though Allen had enough room to try and run to the goal line for the victory, but Lawrence tracked him well enough to prevent that. Jabrill Peppers was also in coverage near the goal line, and because of the hesitation, the Giants' safety would have likely been there to make a run at Allen as well.

Lawrence decked Allen to force the incomplete, andPeppers completed the stand with a pair of back flips in celebration.

Art Stapleton is the Giants beat writer for NorthJersey.com. For unlimited access to all Giants analysis, news, trades and more, pleasesubscribe todayand sign up for our NFC East newsletter.

Email:stapleton@northjersey.com

Twitter:@art_stapleton

Original post:
Anatomy of an escape for the win: NY Giants survive with defensive touchdown, 2-point stop - NorthJersey.com

Anatomy of a play: Breaking down the Rams use of fly motion – Niners Nation

Since the 49ers lost and there wasnt much to break down, that wouldve been interesting for this series, and since the Rams are in town for Sunday Night Football, this weeks Anatomy of a play will look at the Rams use of fly motions in the running and passing games and give a surface level introduction to the Rams base offense.

Before the season started, I wrote about where Rams head coach Sean McVay fits in with the west coast offense coaching lineage, and those can be read at length here and here. I also wrote an in-depth longer piece on the 2020 Rams offensive adjustments since their 2018 season that ended in a Super Bowl loss and left many wondering if the league had figured out the Shanahan/McVay scheme.

I covered several adjustments in that piece, but the Rams seem to add new wrinkles to old concepts every week since I hit publish, so there a couple more things to add to it.

Briefly, the Rams offense is the Shanahan offense but predominantly out of 11 personnel instead of 21 personnel. The Rams still run an outside zone-based running game and take shots off of play-action. But the outside zone is actually more of whats referred to as a mid-zone run.

The run action is still the same as the offensive line moving laterally to reach defenders. The main difference is that the play side tackle kicks out the edge defender instead of reach blocking like they do with the Shanahan version of the outside zone.

This changes the running backs primary read to the B-gap/inside hip of the tackle versus the C-gap/outside hip of the tackle or tight end. The idea is to get the running back to the open space quicker than it does with the outside zone.

In the play above from the 2018 Rams at 49ers, you can see that running back, Todd Gurley hits the running lane between the edge defender and first defensive lineman inside that edge defender because that second defender is reached and pinned inside.

Occasionally, this is important for understanding McVays evolution; the Rams would add a fly motion element away from the run call.

Fly motion must be respected by the defense because its another potential ball carrier that can gash them if they respond to its movement.

Usually, the fly motion gets the defense to bump over one gap to account for the numbers advantage it gives the offense. This will be important below later.

But McVays running scheme is not without its limitations. Eventually, the teams adapt, and in the latter half of 2018, Chicago Bears defensive coordinator Vic Fangio gave the rest of the league the blueprint when he shifted his front into a 6-1 tilt front.

The 6-1 was further utilized by the Patriots in the Super Bowl where they completely shut down the Rams offense.

The 6-1 prevents zone run blockers up front from executing double teams and instead puts pressure on the lineman to hold and win 1-on-1 matchups with the defensive line. McVays 11 personnel was not conducive to blocking the 6-1.

They struggled with those same front in 2019, and combined with injuries; the Rams would finish 9-7 for third in the division. Still pretty good!

So what has McVay done in 2020 to adapt?

In one of the above examples, the fly motion away from the run call was an almost regular feature of the run game but not enough that it became a staple. It was a nice wrinkle. In 2020 however, the Rams fly motion is as much of a staple of the offense as anything else.

However, with one small tweak, the Rams have added yet another layer to their arsenal of potent offensive capabilities: fly motion toward the mid zone. Its a very simple adjustment that has paid off tremendously for them through the first five games of 2020.

The fly motion creates favorable angles for the blockers up front. Since the Rams dont use a fullback create favorable angles, the fly motion acts as the de facto fullback by moving defenders into gaps that are easier for the offensive line to reach, especially in the second level. Also notice the kick out block by the left tackle.

As Goff motions the fly receiver across, notice how the linebackers in the second level shift over one gap to account for the numbers the offense moves to that side. Goff snaps the ball as the linebackers are shifting, and the defenders dont have time to execute a rocker step and fall back into the gaps they vacated to close off the cutback. (On the rocker step, the linebacker will take two steps toward the play side before folding back to play the cutback)

The result is defenders out of position and easy blocking angles for the linemen to execute their second-level blocks.

The Rams also have several ways theyll utilize fly motion in the passing, specifically on play-action passes.

In week one against the Cowboys, the Rams used fly motion to get a receiver out to the flat very quickly, giving Goff an easy read. If the defensive end pursues the quarterback out on the bootleg, Goff could just dump it off to the open flat receiver.

Here against the Cowboys, the fly motion gives the quarterback an easier, defined read and prevents the flat receiver from being eliminated by the flat defender because the flat defender has to make a choice between the quarterback or flat receiver. The read for Goff is easy; as soon as he identifies the defender vacating the flat, he dumps it off his receiver.

The Rams will also fly motion as misdirection away from the run call, too, similar to how they did with fly away from the mid zone.

The sift windback is another way to get favorable blocking angles by washing down defenders and moving them away from the point of attack. The play looks like mid zone to the left with Goff opening to the left and running back Darrell Henderson taking a step in that direction but its actually a counter step before he takes the handoff going to the right.

The fly motion to the left moves the defenders over to the next gap, and the flow at the snap takes them right out of the play as they try to fall back into the backside run fits. That movement makes the blocking angle easier for the offensive line as they get blocks just long enough to get Henderson free on the edge with Kupp lead blocking on a sift to kick out the edge defender.

Later in that same game, the Rams ran the same run action but with play action with the receiver assignments flipped for a touchdown.

TreDavious White has a Kupp man to man on this play and remembering the action from the play above, comes up to play the run when he sees Kupp simulate a down block.

Kupps delayed release into his route gets him wide open as White watches for the sift block and replaces the safety who got taken inside by Kupp. Kupp gets wide open for a touchdown.

In week five, the Rams added another wrinkle to their play action drop back passing attack with the use of fly motion to a go route down the sideline and they ran it twice, one for a touchdown and one for a 29 yard gain.

The play is just a basic play action sail concept with the slot receiver running the chase route (sail route) and the fly motion to go route down the sideline.

In this first clip, the route combination puts the Washington safety in a bind as he bites on the vertical sail route from the slot and takes himself out of position to play the vertical down the sideline. Receiver Robert Woods is wide open and finishes with a touchdown.

In this second clip(diagrammed above), the Rams run the exact same play but the Football Team defense is ready for the vertical with the corner playing off coverage and blanketing it deep.

But this left the sail route open as the down safety came into the box with Woodss motion. Josh Reynolds turns the safety with cut toward the post before he breaks it out toward the sideline, where Goff finds him for a nice gain.

The Rams offense is fun to study and contrast with the 49ers offense (when its firing on all cylinders), but the two teams do nearly the same things with different personnel that fit the style of offense both run. Its just unfortunate that right now, the Rams are a much more efficient team on offense than the 49ers currently are, and thats not a good thing for the 49ers right now.

More:
Anatomy of a play: Breaking down the Rams use of fly motion - Niners Nation

Anatomy of a Play: How the Buccaneers fooled Aaron Rodgers for a pick-six – Touchdown Wire

Aaron Rodgers came into Sundays game against the Buccaneers defense playing as well as he ever had in his first-ballot Hall of Fame career. Through Green Bays first four games and five weeks, Rodgers had thrown 13 touchdown passes and no interceptions. Hed been sacked just three times, and pressured on just 31 of his 146 dropbacks. Finally and firmly committed to the structure created by second-year head coach and offensive play-designer Matt LaFleurs system, Rodgers was having a renaissance season in which he firmly put himself in the MVP discussion. The 4-0 Packers were averaging 38 points pert game, the most in the NFL.

And then, Rodgers and the Packers went up against Tampa Bays defense, led by Todd Bowles, and it all fell apart. Rodgers completed just 16 of 35 passes for 160 yards, no touchdowns, and two interception. His quarterback rating of 35.4 was the third-worst of his career, and hes only had one other game in which he threw two interceptions and no touchdowns December 14, 2014 against the Bills in a 21-13 loss. This 38-10 embarrassment may have been worse.

How did the Buccaneers do it? With creative coverages and front packages designed by Bowles and his staff. This was completely evident on the interception Rodgers threw to cornerback Jamel Dean with 12:50 left in the first half, and the Packers up, 10-0. Obviously, Green Bay would score no further points after this as Bowles further unleashed his defensive game plan.

The first thing you should notice about this play is how the Buccaneers made the Packers wait to decipher which defensive linemen were standing up, and which had their hands on the ground. Bowles did a brilliant job from snap to snap switching this up, which made it very hard for Rodgers and his linemen to agree on protections. Rodgers was sacked five times and suffered 13 quarterback hits in this game, but it wasnt just the pressure that was the problem Rodgers was also confounded by dropping defenders and blitzing defenders from difficult angles. This caused Rodgers to doubt his short and intermediate reads as you will rarely see him do.

We were able to get after Aaron, head coach Bruce Arians said. Once we got the running game shut down it was just a matter of getting after him, and Todd did a great job with multiple looks and coverages.

On the interception in question, Dean said after the game that when receiver Davante Adams motioned from bunch right to stack left, he understood where Rodgers was likely to throw the ball to his favorite receiver.

When I saw the formation and then how everything started to develop, Im like, I have to make this play because I know whats coming.' Dean concluded. Then, once I saw him throw it, I was like yeah, its mine.

The Buccaneers had five defenders at the line of scrimmage pre-snap with what appeared to be Cover-0 behind aggressive blitz coverage with no safety help to the deep third. It was a blitz, but not the one Rodgers expected. Safety Antoine Winfield Jr. and linebacker Lavonte David dropped into coverage from the line, and cornerback Sean Murphy-Bunting blitzed from the defensive left side. Meanwhile, safeties Mike Edwards and Jordan Whitehead dropped from that alleged pre-snap Cover-0 look to two deep out of Bowles big nickel package, and Dean was more than ready to jump Adams route.

I think we needed a kick in the ass a little bit, Rodgers said after the loss. Theres a little bit of wake-up to stop feeling ourselves so much and get back to the things that got us to this position. I think this would be, unfortunately but fortunately, something we can really grow from.

That may be true, but the bigger story than the Packers possibly overlooking Tampa Bays defense is that Tampa Bays defense has become something that no opponent should ever overlook.

Originally posted here:
Anatomy of a Play: How the Buccaneers fooled Aaron Rodgers for a pick-six - Touchdown Wire

Video: ‘The Trial of the Chicago 7’ | Anatomy of a Scene – The New York Times

Im Aaron Sorkin, and Im the writer and the director of The Trial of the Chicago 7. Its Abbie. The scene is Abbie Hoffman on the stand. Hes being played by Sacha Baron Cohen. Frank Langella is playing Judge Julius Hoffman. He is either a terrible judge, or in the bag for the prosecution, or experiencing early senility, or some form of the three of those. The lead defense lawyer is Mark Rylance as William Kunstler a civil rights attorney at the time, who became a very well-known civil rights attorney because of this case. Abbie, do you know why youre on trial here? We carried certain ideas across state lines, not machine guns, or drugs, or little girls ideas. Its the final scene of the trial. But whats unusual is that ordinarily the last witness in a trial, thats usually the climactic scene. Somehow a lawyer breaks down that witness, and he explodes in ayou cant handle the truth kind of moment. That scene in this movie actually doesnt happen in the courtroom. It happens during a mock cross-examination that Mark Rylance as William Kunstler conducts against Tom Hayden thats Eddie Redmayne back at their offices where theyve been working. Hes trying to demonstrate to Tom Hayden why Hayden cant take the stand because theyll rip him apart, and he shows him how. That becomes the climactic courtroom scene. And the scene with Abbie on the stand is a kind of coda. Its something weve been waiting for. Its a serious Abbie telling us what he really thinks. [CHUCKLES] So Chicago was just a massive voter registration drive? The cross-examination is being done by the lead prosecutor, Richard Schultz, whos being played by Joseph Gordon-Levitt. We know from the beginning of the movie that hes ambivalent about prosecuting these guys. Hes going to do it. Hes going to do it fully because that is his job, and he has been directly ordered to by the new attorney General John Mitchell. But he knows that its a mistake for a number of reasons to do it. So hes a really interesting character. And Joe plays him beautifully. It was a crazy trial. Some of the crazy was bordered on the comic and some of the crazy was tragic. So I wasnt going to try to top all those fireworks with this scene, especially because I knew that I had a final scene coming right after that, which does have a lot of fireworks. So this was going to have to be the opposite. It was going to have to be the opposite of that in the writing of it. It was going to have to be the opposite of that in Sachas performance. And it was going to have to be the opposite of that in how we shot it. It was Sachas big day. And there was still, in some peoples minds, a curiosity as to how Sacha Baron Cohen would play a dramatic scene. On this day, there was a huge crowd watching him do it. Those extras, even when the cameras were pointed away from them, stayed there because they wanted to see Sacha do this. And take after take, he would just get a huge ovation from the crowd. Part of that ovation, by the way, was for Joe Levitt too. But people were really curious about Sachas performance. They were as knocked out by it as I was, and I think the audience will be too. Do you have contempt for your government? Ill tell you, Mr. Schultz, its nothing compared to the contempt my government has for me. The night before he shot it, I sent him an email saying, just a reminder, really the creative success or the failure of the entire movie depends on your performance that youre going to give tomorrow. We can have been great up until that moment, and you still have an opportunity to sink the film with anything less than a great performance. So knock him dead, pal. I was just going to tell him the truth. For real, you cant blow this scene. Weve been trying to make this movie for 14 years. So here its all in your lap [LAUGHS] He had no problem with it at all. Im concerned you have to think about it. Give me a moment, would you friend? Ive never been on trial for my thoughts before.

Read this article:
Video: 'The Trial of the Chicago 7' | Anatomy of a Scene - The New York Times