All posts by student

The 1 Thing You Need to Write Down Every Night for Better Sleep, According to Neuroscience – Inc.com

Tossing and turning all night is the epitome of crappiness. If you've already tried the usual recommendations for heading into Dreamland--for example, turning off electronics, meditating or wearing a sleep mask--it might be time to try one more fix. According to neuroscience, writing out a to-do list before you head to bed might be just what you need to finally drift off.

The ability to get to sleep depends to a large degree on your body's ability to switch from your sympathetic nervous system, which tells you to be alert and physically at the ready, and your parasympathetic nervous system, which tells you to rest and recuperate. Techniques like meditation and deep breathing are often very helpful in facilitating this transition, with physical cues from the body telling your brain you're safe and can take a break.

But stress is a sneaky and dastardly little bugger. As David Spiegel, M.D., director of the Center on Stress and Health at Stanford School of Medicine, explains, stress activates your body's fight-or-flight response and keeps the sympathetic nervous system engaged. Subsequently, your brain doesn't want to shut down.

For many people, not having a game plan for the next day is part of the stress they experience. "When will I time find for that report?" "What if Joe comes in and gabs at me for half an hour again?" "How can I make my presentation better?" But when you make a to-do list, you force yourself to think about and prioritize everything that is on your plate. Sometimes just having that basic direction can be a relief. But take it one step further. Once you know what the priorities need to be, break them down into the steps you need to take to make them happen or reach your goal. Making your priorities actionable takes some of the uncertainty we all hate out of the future, which helps you feel more confident, capable and secure. With those feelings solid, stress levels stay under control, your sympathetic nervous system backs off and you can relax into sleep.

Based on the above neuroscience and psychology, using a to-do list is not all that different from using a worry journal to vent your frustrations and concerns, a technique that's been proven to reduce stress. But it's distinct because, as Joe Ojile, M.D., founder and CEO of the Clayton Sleep Institute in St. Louis, MO and a board member of the National Sleep Foundation, notes, worry journals don't give you an actionable plan for how to solve whatever problem you're having the way that a to-do list does

Writing a to-do list and coming up with action points forces you to make decisions rather quickly. Although it might seem counterintuitive, research indicates that there's good reason to go with your gut in decision-making. Not only is your instinct trustworthy, based on subconscious emotional memory and concepts, but fast decision-making has been shown to lead to more ethical outcomes and better confidence. To-do lists thus are a tool you can use to get past the bottleneck lots of choices sometimes bring to the creative process and overall productivity.

Secondly, when you go from awake to sleeping, your brain wave frequencies slow down. But this doesn't mean your brain isn't working--itmerely means that it's in a different mode. Slower brain waves are associated with creative thinking and imagination, so if you finally get more sleep thanks to your to-do lists, you might conjure up innovative concepts and solutions from in your subconscious. Finally getting a good night's rest can improve health and mood, too, leaving you more ready to collaborate, go out on a limb and tackle work issues.

As you give to-do list writing a try, keep in mind, insomnia isn't always related to stress alone. It's always good to talk to your doctor if your sleeplessness has become an ongoing problem, as it can connect to underlying health conditions. Similarly, stress from trauma or similar issues might require help from a qualified psychologist or psychiatrist. When in doubt, always talk it out.

More:
The 1 Thing You Need to Write Down Every Night for Better Sleep, According to Neuroscience - Inc.com

After failed phase 3, Accera appoints neuroscience vet to help revive fortunes – FierceBiotech

Two months ago, Accera registered a late-stage flop for its much-derided brain food candidate AC-1204 in Alzheimers, but now the company is looking to doggedly keep going, and has taken on neuroscience veteran Judith Walker, M.D., F.R.C.P.(C), as its chief medical officer to try and make this med work.

Walker comes to Accera from biopharma service provider QuintilesIMS, where she was VP of product development for drugs in neurology and pain; previously, she was senior director of medical affairs at Tevas neuroscience unit. She also served a stint at the neurology unit from German Merck unit Serono.

She has the credentials and the experience, but she will need it, as she faces a mammoth task: her new employer has charged her with leading its efforts on AC-1204, following its failure in March (and adding to the pile of failed Alzheimers medicines across the biopharma industry for the last decade), and trying to do it with a drug with that comes with some questionable science.

In the recent phase 3 failed study, Accera enrolled more than 400 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimers and randomized them to receive daily doses of AC-1204 or a placebo.

The idea was to improve scores on an Alzheimers diseases scale by addressing the slowdown in cerebral metabolism associated with the condition. AC-1204 is designed to restore the energy supply to the brain by giving it a source of ketones to top up the dwindling power it derives from glucose.

In phase 2b, a subgroup analysis of patients who lack the APOE4 gene gave Accera the confidence to move into phase 3. But, like many big names before it, Accera has found it impossible to turn a hint of potential in phase 2 into success in phase 3.

Accera, again following a well-trodden path, has however refused to let the setback scuttle the program, and plans to keep going.

Prior to the results from the first phase 3, Accera was gearing up to start a second late-stage study that would tee it up to win approval in 2020. The plan now is to finalize the clinical development strategy for AC-1204 and discuss next steps with FDA. Its website still touts 2020 as the year slated for a potential approval.

That talk with the FDA will put Accera in the room with an agency that has slammed some of its activities. Accera began life as a developer of Axona, a product it marketed as a medical food for use in Alzheimers.

FDA hit Accera with a warning letter in 2013 on the grounds its marketing materials caused Axona to be classed as a drug. Accera continues to market Axona as a medical food for Alzheimers, but has tweaked its website since the warning letter.

Axona and AC-1204 both provide patients with a source of caprylic triglyceridealso known as fractionated coconut oilthat is intended to increase the availability of ketones to the brain. The potential of the therapeutic approach has enabled Accera to pull in more than $150 million from backers including Nestl, according to SEC filings.

But this candidate has been met with much derision from bio-Twitter; Walker, however, is betting her career move that it will work out.

She said in a statement: Accera has one of the few drugs in late stage development for Alzheimer's disease which addresses a differentiated and well-validated target. I am delighted to be joining Accera at this exciting time in the program.

More:
After failed phase 3, Accera appoints neuroscience vet to help revive fortunes - FierceBiotech

Pfizer cuts neuroscience meds from pipeline – FierceBiotech

Alongside its first-quarter financials today, Pfizer also sneakedin details of its discontinued projects, this year, which includes meds from its CV and metabolism pipeline and from its neuroscience unit.

The ax swungin the last few months forPF-06291874, a midstage med in testing for Type 2 diabetes;PF-06815345 for hyperlipidemia;and PF-06412562 for cognitive disorders, andPF-02545920, a PDE10 inhibitor in phase 2 for Huntington's disease saw the chop inthe first quarter.

Its diabetes med was a glucagon receptor antagonist, while its hyperlipidemia candidatewas, according to its FY update last February, new in to its pipeline for phase 1 testing, but with precious few other details about its MOA. The same goes for PF-06412562, also a phase 1 candidate, in its neuroscience and pain unit.

The phase 2 Huntington's disease candidate, out of its neuroscience department, was a small molecule NME that had orphan status in the U.S. According to clinicaltrials.gov, the: "Study terminated on 15 Dec. 2016 due to study A8241021 showing no significant difference on primary endpoint between PF-02545920 & placebo. No safety concerns."

In its financials, Pfizer also revealed that it spent $1.7 billion in R&D in the first quarter, a 1% decline on last year.

See the original post:
Pfizer cuts neuroscience meds from pipeline - FierceBiotech

Student enters insanity plea in killing of neuroscience professor – Daily Trojan Online

David Jonathan Brown pled not guilty by reason of insanity in the murder of professor Bosco Tjan on Wednesday. He also reaffirmed his not guilty plea in the use of a knife in Tjans death.

Browns mental state will be evaluated by Risa Grand, a forensic psychiatrist for the Los Angeles County Superior Court and former assistant clinical professor at USC.

Brown, a graduate neuroscience student, is charged with first-degree murder, including a special allegation of using a deadly and dangerous weapon to kill Tjan.

If Brown is found not guilty by reason of insanity, he could be sentenced to life in a state mental health institution, according to Deputy District Attorney Beth Silverman. If he is found guilty of first-degree murder, he could serve from 25 years to life in prison. If Brown is found guilty of second-degree murder, he could serve a lower sentence of 15 years to life in prison.

Brown was arrested at the scene of the crime in December, and police said Tjans murder was driven by a personal dispute. He worked in Tjans lab and had taken a leave of absence for personal reasons last year, according to the New York Daily News.

Browns next preliminary hearing is scheduled for June 21.

See the rest here:
Student enters insanity plea in killing of neuroscience professor - Daily Trojan Online

The shock tactics set to shake up immunology – Nature.com

Patrick T. Fallon for Nature

An implantable stimulator from SetPoint Medical would deliver shocks to the vagus nerve. It has not yet been tested in humans.

Six times a day, Katrin pauses whatever she's doing, removes a small magnet from her pocket and touches it to a raised patch of skin just below her collar bone. For 60 seconds, she feels a soft vibration in her throat. Her voice quavers if she talks. Then, the sensation subsides.

The magnet switches on an implanted device that emits a series of electrical pulses each about a milliamp, similar to the current drawn by a typical hearing aid. These pulses stimulate her vagus nerve, a tract of fibres that runs down the neck from the brainstem to several major organs, including the heart and gut.

The technique, called vagus-nerve stimulation, has been used since the 1990s to treat epilepsy, and since the early 2000s to treat depression. But Katrin, a 70-year-old fitness instructor in Amsterdam, who asked that her name be changed for this story, uses it to control rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune disorder that results in the destruction of cartilage around joints and other tissues. A clinical trial in which she enrolled five years ago is the first of its kind in humans, and it represents the culmination of two decades of research looking into the connection between the nervous and immune systems.

For Kevin Tracey, a neurosurgeon at the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, New York, the vagus nerve is a major component of that connection, and he says that electrical stimulation could represent a better way to treat autoimmune diseases, such as lupus, Crohn's disease and more.

Several pharmaceutical companies are investing in 'electroceuticals' devices that can modulate nerves to treat cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. But Tracey's goal of controlling inflammation with such a device would represent a major leap forward, if it succeeds.

He is a pioneer who got a lot of people onboard and doing research in this area, says Dianne Lorton, a neuroscientist at Kent State University in Ohio, who has spent 30 years studying nerves that infiltrate immune organs such as the lymph nodes and spleen. But she and other observers caution that the neural circuits underlying anti-inflammatory effects are not yet well understood.

Tracey acknowledges this criticism, but still sees huge potential in electrical stimulation. In our lifetime, we will see devices replacing some drugs, he says. Delivering shocks to the vagus or other peripheral nerves could provide treatment for a host of diseases, he argues, from diabetes to high blood pressure and bleeding. This is the beginning of a field.

It was only by accident that Tracey first wandered down the path of neuroimmunity. In 1998, he was studying an experimental drug designated CNI-1493, which curbed inflammation in animals by reducing levels of a potent immune protein called tumour-necrosis factor- (TNF-). CNI-1493 was usually administered through the bloodstream, but one day, Tracey decided to inject it into a rat's brain. He wanted to see whether it would lower TNF- in the brain during a stroke. But what happened surprised him.

CNI-1493 in the brain reduced production of TNF- throughout the animal's body. Other experiments showed that it did this about 100,000 times more potently than when injected straight into the bloodstream1. Tracey surmised that the drug was acting on neural signals.

His follow-up experiments supported this idea. Minutes after he injected CNI-1493 into the brain, Tracey saw a burst of activity rippling down the rat's vagus nerve2. This neural highway regulates a handful of involuntary functions, including heart rate, breathing and the muscle contractions that push food through the gut. Tracey reasoned that it might also control inflammation. When he severed the nerve and the drug's potent effect disappeared, he was convinced. That was a game-changer, says Tracey. The finding meant that if one could stimulate the vagus nerve, the drug wouldn't even be necessary.

And so he tried a pivotal experiment. He injected a rat with a fatal dose of endotoxin, a component of the bacterial cell wall that sends animals into a spiral of inflammation, organ failure and death. The drug's effects roughly mirror septic shock in humans. Then, Tracey stimulated the animal's vagus nerve using an electrode. The treated rats had only one-quarter as much TNF- in the bloodstream as untreated animals, and they didn't go into shock3.

Tracey instantly saw medical potential for vagus-nerve stimulation as a way to block surges in TNF- and other inflammatory molecules. Companies were already selling implantable stimulators to treat epilepsy. But to extend the technique to inflammatory conditions, Tracey would need to present a clearer picture of how it might work and what the side effects might be.

Over the next 15 years, Tracey's team performed a series of animal experiments to identify where and how vagus-nerve stimulation acted. They tried cutting the nerve in different places4 and using drugs that block specific neurotransmitters5. These experiments seemed to show that when the vagus is zapped with electricity, a signal pulses down it into the abdomen, and then through a second nerve into the spleen.

The spleen serves as an immunological truck stop of sorts, where circulating immune cells periodically park for a while before returning to the bloodstream. Tracey's team found that the nerve entering the spleen releases a neurotransmitter called noradrenaline6, which communicates directly with white blood cells in the spleen called T cells. The junctions between nerve and T cell actually resemble synapses between two nerve cells; the T cells are acting almost like neurons, Tracey says. When stimulated, the T cells release another neurotransmitter, called acetylcholine, which then binds to macrophages in the spleen. It is these immune cells that normally spew TNF- into the bloodstream when an animal receives endotoxin. Exposure to acetylcholine, however, prevents macrophages from producing the inflammatory protein (see 'A shock to the immune system').

Tracey's findings lent new significance to research that had been going on for decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, David Felten, a neuroanatomist then at the University of Rochester in New York, captured microscopic images of hybrid neuronT-cell synapses in various animals7 not just in the spleen, where Tracey saw them, but also in the lymph nodes, thymus and gut. These neurons belong to what is called the sympathetic nervous system, which regulates body responses to certain stressors. Just as Tracey found in the spleen, Felten observed that these sympathetic neurons stimulate their T-cell partners by secreting noradrenaline and often, this stimulation serves to blunt inflammation.

In 2014, neuroimmunologist Akiko Nakai of Osaka University in Japan reported evidence that sympathetic-nerve stimulation of T cells limits them from exiting the lymph nodes and entering the circulation, where they might stir up inflammation in other parts of the body8. But in many autoimmune diseases, this neural signalling is disrupted.

Lorton and her twin sister, neuroscientist Denise Bellinger of Loma Linda University in California, have found sympathetic-nerve pathways to be altered in rat models of autoimmune disorders9. The same is seen in humans. Sympathetic nerves are damaged by over-release of noradrenaline, which causes them to withdraw from the immune cells that they should be moderating. As the disease progresses, these nerves advance back into the tissues that they abandoned but they do so in abnormal ways, making connections with different subsets of immune cells. These rearranged neural pathways actually maintain inflammation rather than dampen it9. It happens in places such as the spleen, lymph nodes and joints, and is causing a lot of pathology, says Bellinger.

But she, Lorton and others are sceptical of Tracey's account of the pathway by which vagus-nerve stimulation lowers inflammation. Robin McAllen, a neuroscientist at the University of Melbourne in Australia, has searched for connections between the vagus nerve and the nerve that stimulates T cells in the spleen but so far, he has found none.

Vagal stimulation is acting indirectly through other nerves, says Bellinger. It's important that these neural circuits are properly mapped before moving onto treatment in people, she says. The anatomy makes a big difference in what kind of side effects you might see.

Yet, even these sceptics see potential in Tracey's methods. Bellinger points out that in many autoimmune diseases, not only do sympathetic nerves become overactive as they rearrange themselves into proinflammatory circuits, but also the vagus nerve, which opposes them, becomes underactive. Vagal stimulation might partially restore the balance between these two neural systems. It's a first step, she says. I believe that they will introduce it to the clinic, and they will show remarkable effects.

People given vagus-nerve stimulation for seizures or depression experience some side effects pain and tightening in the larynx, or straining in their voice, for example; Katrin feels a minor version of this when she stimulates her vagus. Shocking this nerve can also lower the heart rate or increase stomach acid, among other effects.

In this respect, Tracey has cause for optimism. The human vagus nerve contains around 100,000 individual nerve fibres, which branch out to reach various organs. But the amount of electricity needed to trigger neural activity can vary from fibre to fibre by as much as 50-fold.

Yaakov Levine, a former graduate student of Tracey's, has worked out that the nerve fibres involved in reducing inflammation have a low activation threshold. They can be turned on with as little as 250-millionths of an amp one-eighth the amount often used to suppress seizures. And although people treated for seizures require up to several hours of stimulation per day, animal experiments have suggested that a single, brief shock could control inflammation for a long time10. Macrophages hit by acetylcholine are unable to produce TNF- for up to 24 hours, says Levine, who now works in Manhasset at SetPoint Medical, a company established to commercialize vagus-nerve stimulation as a medical treatment.

By 2011, Tracey was ready to try his technique in humans, thanks to his animal studies, Levine's optimization of electrical stimulation, and funding from SetPoint. That first trial was overseen by Paul-Peter Tak, a rheumatologist at the University of Amsterdam. Over the course of several years, 18 people with rheumatoid arthritis have been implanted with stimulators, including Katrin.

She and 11 other participants saw their symptoms improve over a period of 6 weeks. Lab tests showed that their blood levels of inflammatory molecules, such as TNF- and interleukin-6, decreased. These improvements vanished when the devices were shut off for 14 days and then returned when stimulation was resumed.

Katrin, who has continued to use the stimulator ever since, still takes weekly injections of the anti-rheumatic drug methotrexate, as well as a daily dose of an anti-inflammatory pill called diclofenac but she was able to stop taking high-dose, immune-suppressive steroids, and her joints improved enough for her to return to work. The results of this trial were published last July in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences11.

In our lifetime, we will see devices replacing some drugs.

Findings from another vagal-stimulation trial were published around the same time12. Bruno Bonaz, a gastroenterologist at the University Hospital in Grenoble, France, implanted stimulators into seven people with Crohn's disease. Over a period of six months, five of them reported experiencing fewer symptoms, and endoscopies of their guts showed reduced tissue damage. SetPoint is also midway through a clinical trial of its own, using vagus-nerve stimulation to treat Crohn's disease.

Tracey and Bonaz aren't the only people looking to harness neural circuits to treat inflammation. Raul Coimbra, a trauma surgeon at the University of California, San Diego, is studying it as a way to treat septic shock, which affects hundreds of thousands of people each year. Many people who die from the condition are pushed past the point of no return by a singular event: the rapid deterioration of the gut lining, which releases bacteria into the body triggering inflammation that damages organs, including the lungs and kidneys.

Like Tracey, Coimbra has successfully counteracted this fatal sequence in animals by stimulating the vagus nerve, either with electricity13 or by administering an experimental drug called CPSI-121 (ref. 14). Coimbra hopes to carry this work into a clinical trial. But his research has also unearthed another major challenge that vagus-nerve stimulation must overcome: unlike rats, some humans are probably resistant to the technique.

The human genome codes for an extra, non-functioning acetylcholine receptor protein not found in other animals. Todd Costantini, a collaborator of Coimbra's also at the University of California, San Diego, has discovered that if this abnormal receptor is produced in sufficient quantities, it can disrupt signalling and render macrophages unresponsive to acetylcholine. They may then continue releasing TNF- despite vagal stimulation15. There's a 200-fold range in the amount of this protein that people produce, says Costantini. He plans to test people to determine whether high levels really block the anti-inflammatory effects of vagal stimulation. Anecdotal evidence suggests that this might be the case.

The small clinical trials run so far have revealed that some people don't respond to vagal stimulation. It may be that testing could determine who will benefit from the treatment before people receive implants.

Despite the uncertainties, however, the field of electroceuticals is starting to gain momentum. Last October, the US National Institutes of Health announced a programme called Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions (SPARC), which will provide US$238 million in funding until 2021 to support research updating the maps of neural circuitry in the thoracic and abdominal cavities.

The UK pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline is also showing interest. It has invested in SetPoint, and it announced last year the formation of a joint venture with Google called Galvani Bioelectronics that will develop therapies for a range of conditions, including inflammatory diseases. Tak, who ran the rheumatoid-arthritis trial for Setpoint, joined GlaxoSmithKline in 2016.

Whether vagus-nerve stimulation lives up to expectations remains to be seen. The number of people who have been treated so far is minuscule just 25 individuals in 2 completed trials. And treatments often look promising in early trials such as these, but then flop in larger ones.

But people with autoimmune disorders are starting to take notice. Treatments for rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease carry some risks, and they don't help everyone. Katrin was one of more than 1,000 people who inquired about the trial for vagal stimulation. I had nothing else, she says. I wanted it.

See original here:
The shock tactics set to shake up immunology - Nature.com

Global Immunology Partnering Deal Trends, Players and Financials Analysis Report 2010-2017 – Research and Markets – Yahoo Finance

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Research and Markets has announced the addition of the "Global Immunology Partnering 2010-2017: Deal trends, players and financials" report to their offering.

Global Immunology Partnering 2010 to 2017 provides the full collection of Immunology disease deals signed between the world's pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies since 2010.

Most of the deals included within the report occur when a licensee obtains a right or an option right to license a licensor's product or technology. More often these days these deals tend to be multi-component including both a collaborative R&D and a commercialization of outcomes element.

The report takes readers through the comprehensive Immunology disease deal trends, key players and top deal values allowing the understanding of how, why and under what terms companies are currently entering Immunology deals.

Global Immunology Partnering 2010 to 2017 includes:

In Global Immunology Partnering 2010 to 2017, available deals and contracts are listed by:

Key Topics Covered:

Chapter 1 - Introduction

Chapter 2 - Trends in Immunology dealmaking

Chapter 3 -Financial deal terms for Immunology partnering

Chapter 4 - Leading Immunology deals and dealmakers

Chapter 5 - Immunology contract document directory

Chapter 6 - Immunology dealmaking by therapeutic target

For more information about this report visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/snnbxb/global_immunology

View source version on businesswire.com: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170503006019/en/

Here is the original post:
Global Immunology Partnering Deal Trends, Players and Financials Analysis Report 2010-2017 - Research and Markets - Yahoo Finance

Nektar Appoints Brian L. Kotzin, M.D. as Head of Clinical Development for Nektar’s Immunology Program – PR Newswire (press release)

From 2004 to 2015, Dr. Kotzin was previously at Amgen, where he served as Vice President, Global and Clinical Development and Head, Inflammation Therapeutic Area, directing the global development efforts for Amgen product candidates in the inflammation area. During his time at Amgen, he also served as Vice President of Medical Sciences, which encompassed early development, biomarker development, and clinical immunology at Amgen.

"I am excited to join Nektar and lead the development strategy for NKTR-358, which has the potential to be a first-in-class therapeutic in immunology," saidDr. Kotzin. "We know that suboptimal regulatory T cell (Treg) numbers, as well as their inactivity, are characteristics of many autoimmune diseases, including lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis and multiple sclerosis. As a Treg stimulator, NKTR-358 could help restore appropriate Treg levels and function and address a critical unmet need for patients with these serious and debilitating immune disorders."

Prior to joining Amgen, Dr. Kotzin served as head of Clinical Immunology in the Department of Medicine and as director of the Autoimmunity Center of Excellence at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center in Denver. He previously held the position of professor in the Departments of Medicine, Pediatrics, and Immunology at the National Jewish Medical and Research Center in Denver. In addition to previous academic posts in rheumatology and microbiology/immunology, Dr. Kotzin served at the Veterans Administration Medical Center in Denver as chief of the Rheumatology Section. He received his medical degree from Stanford and undergraduate degree in Mathematics from the University of Southern California. He is board certified in rheumatology and internal medicine.

Dr. Kotzin has won numerous honors, including elected "Master" of the American College of Rheumatology, the Kirkland Scholar Award for Lupus Research, the Henry Claman Chair in Clinical Immunology, the Gretchen Kramer Award for Outstanding Contributions to Medicine, and Chairmanship of the National Institutes of Health Autoimmunity Centers of Excellence. He is an elected member of the American Association of Clinical Investigation and the Association of American Physicians. Dr. Kotzin has also served as an appointed member of the Advisory Council of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases at the National Institutes of Health and served as an industry representative, Arthritis Advisory Committee, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (FDA). He currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors, Federation of Clinical Immunology Societies (FOCIS). Dr. Kotzin has published extensively and served on the editorial boards of Arthritis and Rheumatism, The Journal of Immunology and the Journal of Clinical Investigation.

About NKTR-358

NKTR-358 is being developed to treat a wide range of auto-immune diseases and inflammatory disorders. NKTR-358 selectively stimulates the growth and activation of regulatory T cells in the body in order to restore the body's self-tolerance mechanisms. Unlike immunosuppressant medicines that treat the symptoms of auto-immune disease by inhibiting the entire immune system which can cause unwanted side effects, NKTR-358 is designed to correct the underlying immune system dysfunction found in patients with immune disorders.

A Phase 1 dose-finding trial is underway to evaluate single-ascending doses of NKTR-358 in approximately 50 healthy subjects. A multiple-ascending dose trial evaluating NKTR-358 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is planned for the second half of 2017. NKTR-358 is being developed as a once or twice-monthly self-administered injection for a number of auto-immune diseases.

More than 23 million Americans have an autoimmune disease - nearly eight percent of theU.S.population - and the prevalence is continuing to rise.i,iiThere are more than 80 known types of autoimmune diseases, including lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis and multiple sclerosis.iii

Autoimmune diseases cause the immune system to mistakenly attack healthy cells in a person's body.ivA failure of the body's self-tolerance mechanisms enables the formation of the pathogenic auto-reactive T lymphocytes that conduct this attack. NKTR-358 works by optimally targeting the interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor complex in order to stimulate proliferation and activation of regulatory T cells. By increasing the number of regulatory T cells, the pathogenic auto-reactive T cells can be controlled and the proper balance of effector and regulatory T cells can be achieved to restore the body's self-tolerance mechanisms.

Data from non-human primate studies show that NKTR-358 drives proliferation and increased functional activity of regulatory T cells (Tregs). NKTR-358 has also demonstrated that it could suppress antigen-driven inflammation in a preclinical model of cutaneous hypersensitivity and that it reduces markers of progression in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

AboutNektar Therapeutics

Nektar Therapeuticsis a research-based development stage biopharmaceutical company whose mission is to discover and develop innovative medicines to address the unmet medical needs of patients. Our R&D pipeline of new investigational medicines includes treatments for cancer, auto-immune disease and chronic pain. We leverage Nektar's proprietary and proven chemistry platform in the discovery and design of our new therapeutic candidates. Nektar is headquartered inSan Francisco, California, with additional operations inHuntsville, AlabamaandHyderabad, India. Further information about the company and its drug development programs and capabilities may be found online athttp://www.nektar.com.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements which can be identified by words such as: "potential," "intend," "plan," "expect," "believe," "should," "may," "will" and similar references to future periods. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements we make regarding the therapeutic potential of NKTR-358, future clinical development plans for NKTR-358, and the potential of our technology and drug candidates in our research and development pipeline. Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, anticipated events and trends, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Our actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include, among others: (i) clinical study outcomes, including from the ongoing Phase 1 clinical study of NKTR-358, are very unpredictable and it is possible that a clinical study could fail due to efficacy, safety or other important clinical findings; (ii) NKTR-358 is in early-stage clinical development and there are substantial risks that can unexpectedly occur for numerous reasons including negative safety and efficacy findings in the Phase 1 clinical study notwithstanding positive preclinical findings; (iii) our drug candidates are in various stages of clinical development and the risk of failure is high and can unexpectedly occur at any stage prior to regulatory approval for numerous reasons including negative safety and efficacy findings even after positive findings in previous preclinical studies; (iv) the timing of the commencement or end of clinical trials and the availability of clinical data may be delayed or unsuccessful due to regulatory delays, slower than anticipated patient enrollment, manufacturing challenges, changing standards of care, evolving regulatory requirements, clinical trial design, clinical outcomes, competitive factors, or delay or failure in ultimately obtaining regulatory approval in one or more important markets; (v) scientific discovery of new medical breakthroughs is an inherently uncertain process and the future success of applying our technology platform to potential new drug candidates (such as NKTR-358) is therefore highly uncertain and unpredictable and one or more research and development programs could fail; (vi) patents may not issue from our patent applications for NKTR-358, patents that have issued may not be enforceable, or additional intellectual property licenses from third parties may be required; and (vii) certain other important risks and uncertainties set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2017. Any forward-looking statement made by us in this press release is based only on information currently available to us and speaks only as of the date on which it is made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Contact:

For Investors: Jennifer RuddockofNektar Therapeutics 415-482-5585

Jodi SieversofNektar Therapeutics 415-482-5593

iThe American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association. Autoimmune Statistics.https://www.aarda.org/autoimmune-information/autoimmune-statistics/ iiJohns Hopkins University.Autoimmune Disease Research Center.http://autoimmune.pathology.jhmi.edu/faqs.cfm iiiThe American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association. Autoimmune Statistics.https://www.aarda.org/autoimmune-information/autoimmune-statistics/ ivThe American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association. Autoimmune Statistics.https://www.aarda.org/autoimmune-information/autoimmune-statistics/

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nektar-appoints-brian-l-kotzin-md-as-head-of-clinical-development-for-nektars-immunology-program-300450566.html

SOURCE Nektar Therapeutics

http://www.nektar.com

See the rest here:
Nektar Appoints Brian L. Kotzin, M.D. as Head of Clinical Development for Nektar's Immunology Program - PR Newswire (press release)

Robert Plenge tapped to run immunology R&D at Celgene; Tesaro files LAG-3 IND – Endpoints News

Robert Plenge is taking the plunge at Celgene. The ex-Merck investigator is moving out of Big Pharma to take charge of immunology research for the big biotech.

President Trump had hoped to cut NIH spending this year as he looked for cash to build a wall with Mexico, among other things. But Congress isnt having any of it. Lawmakers agreed to a $2 billion increase for the NIH in a spending bill agreed to by Democrats and Republicans late Sunday.

Mary Lynne Hedley, Tesaro

Waltham, MA-based Tesaro which recently won its first drug approval has filed an IND for their LAG-3 targeting drug TSR-033. This antibody was developed with AnaptysBio. The IND for TSR-033 is the third application from our immuno-oncology franchise to be submitted to the FDA within the past 17 months, said Mary Lynne Hedley, President and COO of TESARO. Our vision is that immuno-oncology candidates such as TSR-033, TSR-042, our anti-PD-1 antibody, and TSR-022, our anti-TIM-3 antibody, could become a foundation of cancer therapy regimens across a variety of tumor types. A Phase 1 clinical study of TSR-033 is planned to begin in mid-2017.

News reports for those who discover, develop, and market drugs. Join 16,000+ biopharma pros who read Endpoints News articles by email every day. Free subscription.

Read the original:
Robert Plenge tapped to run immunology R&D at Celgene; Tesaro files LAG-3 IND - Endpoints News

New study: unborn baby experience pain during first trimester – The Global Dispatch

A new study is suggesting unborn babies in the first trimester may experience pain.

The scientific journal Cell, in a study etitled Tridimensional Visualization and Analysis of Early Human Development, published in March, sheds light on the advanced neurological development of the unborn.

Although the study comes to no definitive conclusion, embryologists now have a clearer picture of the extent of nerve development at early stages of gestation a greater level of development than previously thought. (Emphasis added, the Dispatch)

Human Fetus at 8 weeks photo Henry Gray

The study saysthat adult-like pattern of skin innervation is established before the end of the first trimester, showing important intra- and inter-individual variations in nerve branches.

Later they added that Sensory nerves and their branches in the hands of 14 embryos and fetuses were reconstructed in 3D using Prph detailing the process of examining the nerves in each hand.

The medical field has had much to say on the science of fetal pain, including as the unborn child moves in response to external stimuli such as touch as early as eight weeks.

The fetus starts to make movements in response to being touched from eight weeks, and more complex movements build up as detected by real time ultrasound over the next few weeks, said Vivette Glover of the Imperial College London in 2004.

After noting the incredible advancements in 3D and 4D imaging, the study the main limitations of our method are the availability of human embryos, the number of antibody combinations (a maximum of four at this time), the compatibility of the antibodies with our protocol (Table S1) and the storage of large size light-sheet image datasets. Nevertheless, the spectrum of future investigations and applications of this method in the field of embryology and fetology are countless.

Our work shows that it should be possiblein the near future to build a reference 3D atlas of the developing human. As a first step in this direction, all our 3D datasets aremade available on a dedicated website (https://transparent-human-embryo.com/) that will also serve as a repository for additional embryology 3D data generated from our laboratory and others. This reference 3D atlas of the developing human and specific organs and systems not only represents a powerful educational online tool for researchers, educators, and students worldwide, but will allow 3D printing of anatomical models for didactic purposes in health sciences education programs.

READ MORE HERE

photo Ivon19 via wikimedia commons

Read the original post:
New study: unborn baby experience pain during first trimester - The Global Dispatch

Deans Vanderlick and Cooley among those honored by YSEA – Yale News

Yale deans Kyle Vanderlick and Lynn Cooley, faculty member Dr. Arthur Horwich, alumnus Jonathan Ayers, and outstanding undergraduates were honored at the 103rd annual meeting and awards dinner of the Yale Science & Engineering Association (YSEA), held on April 28 in the Presidents Room at the Quinnipiack Club.

At the event, YSEA officials announced that the organization had created the Dean Kyle Vanderlick Research Grantin recognition of the deans legacy in establishing the Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science as a bridge between the sciences and the humanities on the Yale campus and beyond. YSEA President John Siemon credited Vanderlick with greatly expanding the scope of the School of Engineering and Applied Science (SEAS) since she was appointed dean in 2008. Through this transformation, he said, interest and enrollment in Yales engineering programs and student groups have flourished.

He also cited the numerous cross-disciplinary collaborations between SEAS and other fields of research at Yale. The grant will be available annually to Yale science and engineering undergraduates who demonstrate the values that Dean Vanderlick has exemplified throughout her tenure at SEAS.

YSEA officials also announced the awardees for three honors:

Lynn Cooley, dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, theC.N.H. Long Professor of Genetics, and professor of cell biology and of molecular, cellular, and developmental biology, received the YSEA Award for Meritorious Service.

Cooley has focused her research on the mechanisms and regulation of oogenesis inthe fruit fly (drosophila). In her work, she has elucidated numerous aspects of Drosophila biology, utilizing techniques for genetic analysis in Drosophila that she has pioneered in her career.

At Yale, she has served as a member of the Biological Sciences Advisory Committee (20052007), director of the Combined Program in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences (20012014), director of the Medical Research Scholars Program (20062014), and director of the China Scholarship CouncilYale World Scholars Program (20062014).

Dr. Arthur Horwich, Sterling Professor of Genetics and Pediatrics at the Yale School of Medicine and an investigator at Howard Hughes Medical Institute, received the YSEA Award for Advancement of Basic & Applied Science

His research into protein foldingestablished the existence of a large class of proteins termed chaperonins, which help proteins fold correctly in various cellular locales. Previously, researchers believed that proteins folded into shape by themselves

In addition to their significance in fundamental biology, chaperonins have been recognized as being of great medical significance: Derangement of protein folding has been connected with numerous disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases. Most recently Horwichs laboratory has been studying the role of misfolding of the enzyme known as superoxide dismutatse I (SOD1), which leads to a specific type of amyotrophic laterals sclerosis (ALS).

Jonathan Ayers 78, chair, president and CEO of IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. received the YSEA Award for Distinguished Service to Industry, Commerce or Education

IDEXX is a leading innovator in veterinary medicine, producing test protocols, novel chemistry, diagnostic equipment, and software to deliver rapid and accurate results. IDEXX also protects water supplies for millions of people worldwide through their drinking water and wastewater quality tests. In addition, IDEXX tests help to protect dairy, poultry and livestock around the world.

IDEXXs growing global workforce of 7,000 includes over 700 veterinariansand Ph.D.s who bring a consistent stream of diagnostic and software innovations to the veterinary industry.

Siemon cited the companys sponsorship of STEM activities in local schools and universities, adding that IDEXX expands this culture of innovation far beyond its walls, both retaining and attracting top talent.

The YSEA Awards for Outstanding Academic Achievement were presented to the science and engineering undergraduates with the highest GPAs in their classes after five and seven terms, respectively. The winners are

Malini Gandhi 17 Molecular, cellular & developmental biology, GPA of 4.0

Anna Russo 17 Applied mathematics, GPA of 4.0

Christopher Chute 17 Mathematics, GPA of 3.99

Yumi Koga 17 Chemistry, GPA of 3.99

Stan Swidwinski 17 Electrical engineering/computer science, GPA of 3.99

Christopher Chute 17 Mathematics/computer science, GPA of 3.99

Julia Borowski 18 Chemistry, GPA of 4.00

Martin Lim 18 Economics/chemistry, GPA of 4.00

Adam Lowet 18 Cognitive science/molecular, cellular & developmental biology, GPA of 4.00

Scott Stankey 18 Mathematics, GPA of 4.00

Sara Meyers 18 Molecular, cellular & developmental biology, GPA of 3.99

Lionel Jin 18 Molecular, cellular & developmental biology, GPA of 3.99

Ilana Kaufman 18 Physics, GPA of 3.99

James Diao 18 Molecular biophysics & biochemistry, GPA of 3.99

Alexander Epstein 18 Molecular, cellular & developmental biology, GPA of 3.99

Follow this link:
Deans Vanderlick and Cooley among those honored by YSEA - Yale News