All posts by medical

Virtual Cadaver Table Advancing Education at Union – Union College News

Its been featured on PBS, TEDTalks and numerous other journals; now a virtual anatomy table used by the worlds leading medical schools and institutions can be found at Union College.

The Anatomage Table, which arrived on campus Thursday, is the first life-size virtual dissection table of its kind and allows students to visualize anatomy exactly as they would if they were looking at the real thing.

(photo from Anatomage)

This technology provides an experience that is very unique the table displays images of real human anatomy and is so detailed that you can examine skin, veins, arteries, and even organs, says Dr. Marisa Greer, Vice President of Academic Affairs.

The college says they have had their eyes on the table since 2015 and it was finally made possible thanks to funding from the Good Samaritan Foundation, Inc., a ministry of the Kentucky Annual Conference of the Unite Methodist Church, combined with a matching donation from Union alumni Dr. Phillip and Anne Sharp.

We are so very grateful to Union alums Dr. Phillip and Anne Sharp and the Good Samaritan foundation whose support made possible this extraordinary teaching tool, says Union College President Marcia Hawkins, Ph.D.

Union is eager to blendthe table in with their current curriculum, allowing for greater opportunity for students there.

"Images can be rotated in all directions providing a 360 degree view which really allows us to bring our textbooks to life," adds Greer.

The table will be utilized by faculty and students in the health and biology programs which includes but is not limited to; nursing, athletic training, exercise science, health promotion, anatomy and physiology courses.

[Disclaimer: The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Good Samaritan Foundation, Inc.]

Go here to see the original:
Virtual Cadaver Table Advancing Education at Union - Union College News

Anatomy of a Play: Did the Patriots Really Double Team the Raiders Checkdowns in Week 3? – raidersbeat.com

There has been a lot of talk surrounding the Raiders 36-20 loss to the Patriots in week 3. In particular, many have focused on a defensive play call by New England Patriots Head Coach, Bill Belichick.

The play was first noticed by @TheMarcJohnNFL.

They were double-teaming the check-downs LOL Belichicks a damn genius I never have seen a defense do this before. pic.twitter.com/vQIGiDJchM

Marc is a hard working journalist and his keen eye provided some seriously needed comic relief after a stinging 36-20 defeat at the hands of a much reviled opponent. It also provided some ammunition for those looking to disparage the Raiders offense. While there were certainly some aspects of the teams performance that deserve and should be critiqued, the criticism over this clip isnt one.

The play in question is shown below.

After watching this play, it is understandable why viewers would think that this is a double-team on Raiders running back Jalen Richard. However, like many things in Bill Belichicks scheme, not everything is always what it seems. This wasnt a cognitive choice by the Patriots to take away the checkdown. It actually wasnt even a double team. Lets break down the play to see why.

To understand this clip, we first have to touch on Belichicks system. His Pattern Match coverage is exactly what the name suggests. Its coverages match the pattern of the receivers routes, which Belichick calls the Route Distribution. At their core, Belichicks coverages are designed to put his defensive backs into the best leverages possible against route distribution.

Now his system is a little complex, but for the purpose of this article we will just focus on the basics of those leverages to understand the play call we are studying. Well start with a simple look at how normal man coverage would cover the Slant / Flat concept in this diagram.

As this diagram shows, the X receiver is running a slant while the Y is running a flat route. The cornerback ( C ) covers the slant inside while the slot corner ( SC ) covers the flat outside. You can see how this route distribution could lead to either receiver getting a leverage advantage on the corners while also having open space to run after the catch.

A concept like this would also have coaching points instructing one of the receivers to attempt to Rub ( pick ) one of the defensive backs, freeing the other receiver of their coverage. Fans will certainly recognize those pick plays because they happen every weekend. These types of leverage disadvantages are a weakness of basic man coverages.

One the positive side, there isnt much that can go wrong from a mental standpoint. At its core, the coverage identifies a receiving target and the cornerback simply follows him everywhere he goes. That is an oversimplification because there is a lot of detail involved, but it is on a more individual level. Now lets check out how Belichicks system would cover that same concept.

As you can see, they would be in much better position to cover these routes. Without getting into the rules of the scheme, the releases of these routes would tell both corners to switch off coverage responsibilities. The main takeaway is that while the secondary lines up within a coverage, their individual coverage responsibilities change depending on the route distribution. This is how Belichick gets his defensive backs into excellent leverage against most route concepts that the offense throws at them.

That focus on leverage advantages isnt limited to the receivers at the line of scrimmage, which brings us back to our play. We have all seen a running back release out into the flat, or for a screen, while a linebacker has to sprint across the field in an attempt to cover them. Belichick has an answer for that as well which he calls Funnel. Here is what it looks like.

To prevent that linebacker from having to run across the field while attempting to navigate the traffic in his way, Belichick will give some of his defenders multiple responsibilities. Again though, the final responsibilities are based entirely on the route distribution.

In the diagram above, if the running back ( H ) releases out to the left, the Sam ( S ) backer would play him in man coverage. The Mike ( M ) would then drop into zone coverage. Should the H release to the right, the Mike would play him in man coverage while the Sam plays zone. I cant state enough that while both of the linebackers are keyed on the running back, at no point are they both covering him. This is a basic design in Belichicks defense and one that was involved in our play. Here is a look at the defensive responsibilities.

The two defenders ( Black ) keyed on Richard are going to read his release. Should he break outside, the defender in the flat would cover him. If he goes inside, the defender on the hash marks would cover him. What transpires is comical but for a far different reason.

Here is the route distribution.

Richard is actually going to hook up at about 3 yards. The fact that he doesnt break inside or outside freezes the defensive backs and they arent quite sure how to play him. After a second or two, the outside defender gives up and rushes Carr.

This was either a designed 5-man pressure with the Funnel player that would typically drop into zone being the 5th rusher, or this was a blown coverage. Either way, it wasnt a designed double team on Jalen Richard.

Here is that play again.

If nothing else, hopefully this sheds a little light on why Belichick defenses can appear so simple, but are very complex. He doesnt simply stumble into excellent defensive units year after year.

As for the Raiders, they actually moved the ball reasonably well against the Patriots on Sunday, especially considering how many key offensive players werent on the field.

Derek Carr and company wont get much of a break this week with the Buffalo Bills coming to town. Certainly the Bills secondary will bring more than enough challenges for the Raider offense, but thankfully the one Bill that wont be on the Buffalo sideline on Sunday is the one named Belichick.

Twitter: @ChrisReed_NFL

Cover Image Credit: Raiders.com

Go here to see the original:
Anatomy of a Play: Did the Patriots Really Double Team the Raiders Checkdowns in Week 3? - raidersbeat.com

Bare Anatomy packs a punch with personalised skin and hair care products – The New Indian Express

One-size-fits-all doesnt work today. And customers know that well. They seek solutions suited for their specific needs. This development has seen the emergence of several players in the segment of personalisation in skin and hair care. This is expected to only increase. Conventional diktats of ideal beauty are being broken ruthlessly. Especially those based on the perfect skin colour, body shape and age are being sprung out of the window.

Science takes over for better health standards New entrants are using technology to secure a grassroots level understanding of the unique needs and formulations of products after factoring in relevant data on external factors like location and lifestyle. This data is then analysed by scientists and proprietary algorithms to offer a precise solution to the specific problem faced by the customer.

By receiving the exact ingredients that we require basis our type, we can avoid exposure to harmful chemicals. Transparently handpicked clean ingredients Personalised beauty brands conduct their diligent research, selecting only the most effective and suitable ingredients based on ones unique profile. Most brands are now going the extra mile to ensure the highest level of clean products by eliminating potentially irritating ingredient. Toxin-free beauty products have proved to be extremely beneficial for the health of skin or hair.

For the girl whos not on the posters Most brands suit mass interest. But increasingly, many are jumping onto the bandwagon of personalisation to change that and attain the highest degree of exclusivity.Cleaning up the industry A few brands are amalgamating personalisation with sulfate and paraben-free clean formulations and sustainable packaging to bring the best-in-class products.While personalisation may seem like a luxury, it is something that is turning the skin and hair care industry on its axis for the better. Treating people as individuals and not as a number is going a long way in recognising that the cookie-cutter approach is pass.The author is CEO and Founder, Bare Anatomy

Originally posted here:
Bare Anatomy packs a punch with personalised skin and hair care products - The New Indian Express

‘Grey’s Anatomy’: April’s Crisis of Faith Would Have Been Even Better If She’d Stayed – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Greys Anatomy creator Shonda Rhimes has a tendency to drag fans in with her captivating plot lines and amazingly complex character webs, but over time that same chaotic nature of her shows that makes fans excited in the first place can also be their downfall.

Notorious for killing off characters with very few regrets, Rhimes has trained her fans to expect the unexpected and to wait on the edge of their seats to see what twist will come out of nowhere next.

This makes for thrilling television, but sometimes the abrupt exits through death or other departure can be disruptive to the larger narrative and the connection fans feel to the show as a whole.

Some fans believe thatGreys Anatomy took a serious turn for the worse when April exited the show.

Greys Anatomy premiered in 2005 and has been on the air for an impressive sixteen seasons with a 17th season premiering soon. After a long and, frankly, uncharacteristic stretch without any major character deaths, fans are bracing themselves for impact, expecting Season 17 to bring some heartbreak and tears.

They definitely have reason to be suspicious because if theres one thingGreys Anatomy has shown, its that no character is safe.

This includes Dr. Derek McDreamy Shepherd who was shockingly offed in an unceremonious car accident while trying to be a Good Samaritan and provide aid to people in need.

Fans were furious at the death of this major character who had been a core part of the story since the very beginning, and it proved that no one was safe. That certainly wasnt the only death that left fans reeling, but it was definitely among the most shocking.

RELATED: Greys Anatomy: Sarah Drews Recent Instagram Post About Jackson and April Has Fans Itching for a Reunion

April Kepner (portrayed by Sarah Drew)first appeared in Season 6 ofGreys Anatomy and had an endearing story that helped captivate fans over the years. After she was forced at gunpoint to tell her life story in order to avoid being killed in the tragic hospital shooting, fans learned about her humble origins from a farm in Ohio and her lifelong desire to be a doctor.

The surgeon was found responsible for an early death in an overcrowded ER and fired before being rehired by Derek Shepherd when he became Chief of Surgery.

In addition to her professional ups and downs, April captivated fans with her personal story of love and parenting. Going through a divorce just as she found out she was pregnant had left April in a vulnerable position, and viewers saw her handle it with grace and compassion.

April also leaned heavily against her devout Christian faith to get through the most difficult times in her story.

Aprils story hit a crisis point in Season 14. She was struggling with her faith and lashing out angrily at everyone around her. It was a rocky road, but she eventually found her way forward and into a rekindled relationship with Matthew Taylor.

Fans were definitely rooting for April, but after a life-threatening accident, she made the abrupt decision to quit her job and provide health care for the homeless community. With that, her characters nearly decade-long run on the show came to an end.

Fans took to Reddit to discuss the shows decline in quality, and many pinpointed Aprils departure as a piece of that descent. One fan wrote, the dismissal of April and Arizona left a bad taste in my mouth. I will never rewatch anything after S14.

Another agreed by adding, the cliff just fell out from under them after season 14 and then pointing to Aprils crisis of faith as great television.

Aprils descent is probably my favorite storyline ever. We got to see her completely change and grow. I just wish that she had stayed around for us to see her be the Badass that I always knew she was, another added.

Its clear that Aprils departure was a hard blow for fans and that it spoiled what could have been an amazing story arc for a favorite character.

Read the rest here:
'Grey's Anatomy': April's Crisis of Faith Would Have Been Even Better If She'd Stayed - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

New immunology study of UM employees seeks answers on coronavirus reinfections – University of Michigan Health System News

In ancient Greece, people who were sick would seek the help of IASO, the goddess of cures, remedies and modes of healing. Now, University of Michigan researchers are counting on a different IASOthe Immunity Associated with SARS-CoV-2 studyto provide a path to recovery from COVID-19.

The IASO study will investigate the level and duration of protection afforded by natural infection with the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 among U-M employees, including first responders, essential workers and anyone regularly working on campus.

Researchers hope to learn details about the level and duration of protection afforded by natural infection with the novel coronavirus, and examine immunological risk factors for infection outcome and the immune response to infection across the disease spectrum.

This will include exploring potential correlates of protection as well as examining the duration of detectable antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 following infection.

"Basically we want to answer the question of if you've had SARS-COV-2 or been exposed to before, can you get it again? And if you can get it again, what does that infection look like?" said Aubree Gordon, associate professor of epidemiology at U-M's School of Public Health, who is leading the project along with pathologist Riccardo Valdez from Michigan Medicine.

"Maybe you can get infected again, but you don't really get sick and you don't shed virus. Maybe you don't get sick but can transmit the virus. And then, of course, there's the possibility that it doesn't protect or that the protection period is limited."

The study also aims to look at correlates of protection, measurable signs that someone is immune. While typical correlates of protection against viruses are antibodies, the study will also examine T-cells, an important cell of the immune system.

Correlates of protection are important for vaccine development and production, Gordon says. They are used to evaluate whether a new vaccine will likely be effective and can help prioritize vaccine candidates. For influenza, for example, because the virus changes every year, a correlate of protection is used on a yearly basis to license the vaccine.

"Thus, it is very important that we identify correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection to aid in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development and monitoring," Gordon said.

For the study, researchers hope to enroll 5,000 U-M workers who regularly work on campus or at U-M facilities, including health care providers and essential workers. They will be followed for at least a year. Researchers will collect a blood sample every other month to be tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Since the study will use U-M pathology labs for the main serological testing, results will be returned to participants throughout the study.

"Our clinical laboratories are excited to provide the testing and lab medicine expertise for this study aimed to help answer important outstanding questions about the durability of our immune response to COVID-19 infection," Valdez said. "The studies we performed while validating our clinical serology tests showed that people do produce antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 after infection, and this study will now provide information on the longevity of that response in a much larger cohort of individuals."

The study is funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in cooperation with the National Cancer Institute through Mount Sinai (federal contract 75N93019C00051). It also received $452,409 from the U-M Biosciences Initiative and Office of the Vice President for Research.

For more information: IASOstudy@med.umich.edu

Read more:
New immunology study of UM employees seeks answers on coronavirus reinfections - University of Michigan Health System News

Immunology and Infectious Disease Seminar Series – Gazette

Immunology and Infectious Disease Seminar Series

Thursday, Oct. 1, 12-1 p.m.

Online

Self-amplifying RNA SARS-CoV-2 lipid nanoparticle vaccine candidate induces high neutralizing antibody titers in mice presented by Joseph Duncan (Dr. Ken Hirasawas Lab)

https://mun.webex.com/mun/j.php?MTID=m1c6fe8fb181d44946dd6948e790448b6

Presented by Division of BioMedical Sciences

View original post here:
Immunology and Infectious Disease Seminar Series - Gazette

Researchers Identify Key Biomarker That Predicts Who Will Have Severe COVID-19 – SciTechDaily

Low glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression led to excessive inflammation and lung damage by neutrophils through enhancing the expression of CXCL8 and other cytokines. Credit: Professor Heung Kyu Lee, KAIST. Created with Biorender.com

Airway cell analyses showing an activated immune axis could pinpoint the COVID-19 patients who will most benefit from targeted therapies.

KAIST researchers have identified key markers that could help pinpoint patients who are bound to get a severe reaction to COVID-19 infection. This would help doctors provide the right treatments at the right time, potentially saving lives. The findings were published in the journal Frontiers in Immunology.

Peoples immune systems react differently to infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, ranging from mild to severe, life-threatening responses.

To understand the differences in responses, Professor Heung Kyu Lee and PhD candidate Jang Hyun Park from the Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering at KAIST analysed ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing data extracted from individual airway cells of healthy controls and of mildly and severely ill patients with COVID-19. The data was available in a public database previously published by a group of Chinese researchers.

Our analyses identified an association between immune cells called neutrophils and special cell receptors that bind to the steroid hormone glucocorticoid, Professor Lee explained. This finding could be used as a biomarker for predicting disease severity in patients and thus selecting a targeted therapy that can help treat them at an appropriate time, he added.

Severe illness in COVID-19 is associated with an exaggerated immune response that leads to excessive airway-damaging inflammation. This condition, known as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), accounts for 70% of deaths in fatal COVID-19 infections.

Scientists already know that this excessive inflammation involves heightened neutrophil recruitment to the airways, but the detailed mechanisms of this reaction are still unclear.

Lee and Parks analyses found that a group of immune cells called myeloid cells produced excess amounts of neutrophil-recruiting chemicals in severely ill patients, including a cytokine called tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and a chemokine called CXCL8.

Further RNA analyses of neutrophils in severely ill patients showed they were less able to recruit very important T cells needed for attacking the virus. At the same time, the neutrophils produced too many extracellular molecules that normally trap pathogens, but damage airway cells when produced in excess.

The researchers additionally found that the airway cells in severely ill patients were not expressing enough glucocorticoid receptors. This was correlated with increased CXCL8 expression and neutrophil recruitment.

Glucocorticoids, like the well-known drug dexamethasone, are anti-inflammatory agents that could play a role in treating COVID-19. However, using them in early or mild forms of the infection could suppress the necessary immune reactions to combat the virus. But if airway damage has already happened in more severe cases, glucocorticoid treatment would be ineffective.

Knowing who to give this treatment to and when is really important. COVID-19 patients showing reduced glucocorticoid receptor expression, increased CXCL8 expression, and excess neutrophil recruitment to the airways could benefit from treatment with glucocorticoids to prevent airway damage. Further research is needed, however, to confirm the relationship between glucocorticoids and neutrophil inflammation at the protein level.

Our study could serve as a springboard towards more accurate and reliable COVID-19 treatments, Professor Lee said.

Reference: Re-analysis of Single Cell Transcriptome Reveals That the NR3C1-CXCL8-Neutrophil Axis Determines the Severity of COVID-19 by Jang Hyun Park and Heung Kyu Lee, 28 August 2020, Frontiers in Immunology.DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02145

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea, and Mobile Clinic Module Project funded by KAIST.

Continued here:
Researchers Identify Key Biomarker That Predicts Who Will Have Severe COVID-19 - SciTechDaily

UConn Funds Five COVID-19 Research Projects, Announces Additional Funding – UConn Today

The Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR) recently announced a new internal funding program to support researchers at all of UConns campuses who are using their expertise in fields as diverse as wastewater and chemosensory testing to find novel solutions to help the nation and the world address this crisis. The program will award up to $50,000 to recipients.

The OVPR awarded five awards to researchers from UConn and UConn Health:

James Cole, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, Departments of Molecular and Cell Biology, $43,439Targeting the Endoribonuclease of CoronavirusesCo-PIs: Mark Peczuh, Chemistry

Bahram Javidi, School of Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, $49,999Compact Field Portable Biophotonics Instrument for Real-Time Automated Analysis and Identification of Blood Cells Impacted by COVID-19

Changchun Liu, Schools of Engineering and Dental Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, $49,149Rapid and Ultrasensitive SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Wastewater by SmartphoneCo-PIs: Maroun Sfeir, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Rachel ONeill, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, $50,000An integrated surveillance program for improved detection, containment and mitigation of COVID-19Co-PIs: Kendra Maas, UConn MARS; Joel Salisbury, Digital Media and Design; Michael Vertefeuille, UConn Digital Media and Design; Suzanne Onorato, UConn Student Health and Wellness; Mike Jednak, Facilities Operations; Jessica Healthcote, Information Technology Services; Emily Wilson, Center for Land Use Education and Research; Dan Schwartz, COR2E

Penghua Wang, School of Medicine, Department of Immunology, $50,000Elucidation of E3 ligases in SARS-CoV2 pathogenesisCo-PIs: Anthony Vella, Immunology; Tingting Geng, Immunology; Duomeng Yang, Immunology

In addition to these five awards, the OVPR has decided to rapidly launch a second funding cycle to provide additional support for promising projects.

This second funding cycle is expanded in scope. Researchers with proposals for earlier-stage COVID-19 seed projects, small scale pilot projects, projects related to the social and medical impact of COVID-19, and other relevant topics are encouraged to apply. The OVPR anticipates funding an additional 10 awards of up to $10,000 each.

Many researchers at UConn and UConn Health came forward with promising ideas to tackle this virus, says UConn Vice President for Research, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Radenka Maric, PhD. We are hopeful that these two cycles of UConn COVID-RSF will help advance as many research projects as possible to help address this crisis and support citizens in our state and the nation.

The UConn COVID-19 Rapid Start Funding Program (COVID-RSF) follows the example of several federal funding agencies that are providing emergency support to address key scientific problems related to the detection, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of COVID-19.

The program aims to fund high-impact projects that will be ready to launch in a short period of time in areas that have been identified by funding agencies like the National Institutes of Health as high priority. These include, but are not limited to, wastewater detection of SARS-COV-2, novel biosensing from skin and mouth, surveillance methods for high risk populations, automatic detection and tracing, use of artificial intelligence, and data management.

The UConn COVID-RSF program has an expedited submission schedule to quickly address this urgent societal need. Researchers interested in applying should submit proposals no later than Friday October 16, 2020 at 12PM EST. Award notices are expected to be issued by October 30, 2020 and awards will be issued by November 1, 2020, upon completion of compliance review.

To learn more, visit the UConn COVID-RSF website.

Follow UConn Research on Twitter & LinkedIn.

Here is the original post:
UConn Funds Five COVID-19 Research Projects, Announces Additional Funding - UConn Today

Cancer Immunotherapy ‘Uniquely Suppressed’ by Liver Tumors – UCSF News Services

Though cancer immunotherapy has become a promising standard-of-care treatment and in some cases, perhaps a cure for a wide variety of different cancers, it doesnt work for everyone, and researchers have increasingly turned their attention to understanding why.

For example, doctors have noticed that patients who initially respond well to the immunotherapy drugs known as checkpoint inhibitors, such as those that target a protein called PD-1, can develop resistance to these therapies if their cancer has metastasized from its initial location to form additional tumors in the liver even if their primary cancer is quite distant from the liver.

In a new study published Oct. 2 in Science Immunology, a UC San Francisco research team led by Hematology and Oncology Clinical Fellow James Lee, MD, MHS, used a unique mouse model to figure out how this happens.

Then, the researchers, including senior author Jeffrey Bluestone, PhD, adjunct professor of microbiology and immunology and the A.W. and Mary Margaret Clausen Distinguished Professor of Metabolism and Endocrinology, showed that adding a second type of checkpoint inhibitor in a combination therapy can overcome this resistance, and might significantly increase the effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with liver metastases.

The liver actually triggers differences in immune cells at distant sites, Lee said. And whats more, he added, the liver can choose its enemy what it wants to protect or not protect.

Cancers are sometimes able to avoid detection within the body by cloaking themselves from the immune system. They can produce large quantities of proteins like PD-L1, which switch off cells called regulatory T cells (Tregs; pronounced tee-regs), in turn tamping down the immune response of other T cells that attack cancer. Some checkpoint inhibitors counteract this cloaking process by preventing PD-L1 from binding to the PD-1 off-switches on T cells, allowing a normal defensive immune response against cancer cells.

The liver, which is tasked with filtering large quantities of blood directly from the digestive system and the rest of the body, plays an unexpectedly large role in regulating the immune system specifically, by signaling which of the scavenged proteins it encounters as it does its job are from hostile invaders and which should be ignored.

In work supported by the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, the scientists simulated metastasis by implanting mice with cancer cells in two separate locations, first under the skin and in then either the liver or the lung. They found evidence that when cancer takes hold in the liver it is uniquely suppressive, said Lee able to harness the livers powers to retrain the immune system and exert its influence on the immune response to related cancers that are distant in the body.

Compared to mice with secondary cancers implanted in the lung, survival rates were significantly worse in mice with secondary liver cancers after anti-PD-1 treatment: the immune system did not learn to recognize the liver tumor or, notably, the related tumor implanted under the skin.

That level of immune-system discernment clued the team in on a possible mechanism, because only a few types of cells can be that specific in regulating the immune system, Lee said, including Tregs. Bluestone has spent decades studying these cells, and thats where the researchers looked for an explanation. Could a liver tumor change the response of Tregs, and thus other T cells, to a separate, but related, tumor?

Using single-cell analyses, the team showed that, in mice with liver tumors, T cells associated with the related primary tumor were not as highly activated. Finally, the researchers showed that liver tumors change which genes are expressed in Tregs and, through those cells, a host of other immune-system cells as well. It turned out that there wasnt a difference in the quantity of Tregs between the skin tumors of mice with liver cancers and the mice without liver cancers. It was a difference in quality, Lee said.

Since liver tumors caused Tregs to suppress the T cell response against tumors, the researchers tested two drugs to see if they could override the effect of the Tregs. The first was a drug that blocks the T cell checkpoint inhibitor CTLA-4, which unleashes these cells to attack cancer; in the 1990s, Bluestone did pioneering research on CTLA-4 that helped lay the foundations for cancer immunotherapy. The second drug, another anti-CTLA-4 compound, targets Tregs directly and depletes their numbers. Both restored the effectiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy, though the anti-CTLA-4 drug that depletes Tregs was more effective.

The researchers hope to apply this combination therapy in the future to patients whom they know ahead of time are less likely to respond to treatment.

Weve never had this kind of precision in immunotherapy in the past, Lee said. What if, right from the start, you could use a drug that depletes Tregs as a complement to immunotherapy in patients with liver metastasis?

Authors: Joining Lee and Bluestone, all from UCSF, were Sadaf Mehdizadeh, Jennifer Smith, PhD, Arabella Young, PhD, Ilgiz A. Mufazalov, PhD, Cody Mowery, and Adil Daud, MD.

Funding: In addition to the Parker Institute, support for this research came from an A.P. Giannini Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Award to Lee, and from the National Institutes for Health/NIAID (T32 5T32AI007334-28).

The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) is exclusively focused on the health sciences and is dedicated to promoting health worldwide through advanced biomedical research, graduate-level education in the life sciences and health professions, and excellence in patient care.UCSF Health, which serves as UCSFs primary academic medical center, includes top-ranked specialty hospitals and other clinical programs, and has affiliations throughout the Bay Area.

Go here to read the rest:
Cancer Immunotherapy 'Uniquely Suppressed' by Liver Tumors - UCSF News Services

Figures reveal rise in baby vaccination rates for MMR across the East Riding – Bridlington Free Press

The East Riding had one of the highest vaccination rates in the country. Photo: PA Images

Despite an increase in MMR vaccination rates across England, the British Society for Immunology warned that the national level was still below target and could mean diseases such as measles spreading to vulnerable, unvaccinated people.

Figures from NHS Digital show 95.9% of babies in the East Riding received the first dose of the MMR vaccination by their second birthday in 2019-20 one of the highest rates in the country.

This was an increase on the 94.1% of two-year-olds who were vaccinated the year before, but means 115 babies were not inoculated this year.

Across England, the proportion of children having their first dose of the jab increased from 90.3% in 2018-19 to 90.6% in 2019-20 though it is still well below the 95% needed for herd immunity.

Dr Doug Brown, chief executive of the British Society for Immunology, welcomed the small increase in uptake for most routine vaccinations but said none of them have reached the necessary uptake level of 95% at the correct timepoint.

He added: The slight rise in uptake of routine childhood vaccinations in England is a step in the right direction but we must still take urgent action to overcome the ongoing trend of missing the 95% target set out by the World Health Organisation.

Low levels of vaccination coverage matter as it means diseases such as measles have the potential to spread within our communities, infecting unvaccinated people, including vulnerable individuals unable to have vaccinations such as young babies or people with cancer.

In the East Riding, 93% of children had received both doses of the MMR vaccine before the age of five in 2019-20 compared to 86.8% across England.

Separate national figures from Public Health England show the number of vaccinations for the first MMR vaccine dipped in the weeks after the coronavirus lockdown was introduced.

See original here:
Figures reveal rise in baby vaccination rates for MMR across the East Riding - Bridlington Free Press