All posts by medical

The Neuroscience Market To Be Accelerated By Technology And Reach US$ 520 Mn – The Think Curiouser

Market Report Summary

For Full Information -> Click Here

Read Full Press Release Below

With healthy CAGR of 6.4%, the globalneuroscience marketis likely to grow from US$ 301.6 Mn in 2016 to US$ 520.8 Mn by 2025 end. This growth is mainly fuelled by advancement in neuroimaging and increasing R & D in neuroinformatics. Neuroscience Market: Global Industry Analysis (2012-2016)and Forecast (2017-2025),is the new publication of Persistence Market Research that focuses on merger and acquisition, strategic collaborations and technology, and technology transfer agreements, which play a vital role in the global neuroscience market.

Get Sample Copy of Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/samples/13390

Company Profiles

North America and Europe are expected to dominate the global neuroscience market in the assessed period of 8-years that is between 2017 and 2025.

Global Neuroscience Market: Relevance and Impact of Factors

Get To Know Methodology of Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/methodology/13390

Global Neuroscience Market: Forecast by Component Type

On the basis of component type, the global neuroscience market is segmented into instrument, software and services. Instrument segmented is sub-segmented into MRI imaging systems and neuromicroscopy, while services segmented divided into consulting services, installation services and maintenance services.

Instrument segment dominated the global neuroscience market in revenue terms in 2016 and is projected to continue to do so throughout the forecast period. Instrument segment is the most attractive segment, with attractiveness index of 2.6 over the forecast period.

Instrument segment was valued at US$ 221.6 Mn in 2016 and is projected to be valued at US$ 408.1 Mn in 2025 growing at a CAGR of 7.2% during the forecast period. This segment is expected to accounts for high revenue contribution to the global neuroscience market as compared to software and services segments over the forecast period.

Software segment is expected to be the second most lucrative segment in the global neuroscience market, with attractiveness index of 0.3 during the forecast period. This segment was accounted for 15.4% value share in 2017 which is expected to drop down to 12.9 % revenue share in 2025.

Global Neuroscience Market: Forecast by End User

On the basis of end user, global neuroscience market is segmented into hospitals, diagnostic laboratories, research institutes, and academic institutes.

Diagnostics laboratory segment is expected to be the second most lucrative segment in the global neuroscience market by 2025 end. However, in terms of CAGR and revenue share, hospitals segment is expected to lead he market throughout the estimated period. In 2025, hospital segment is likely to grab 40.2% market share in 2025, expanding at a robust CAGR of 7.3% during the estimated period.

Research institutes segment is expected to be the least attractive segment in the global neuroscience market, with attractiveness index of 0.7 during the forecast period.

Access Full Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/checkout/13390

Global Neuroscience Market: Forecast by Region

On the basis of region, global neuroscience market is segmented into North America, Latin America, Europe, APAC and MEA. North America dominated the global neuroscience market in revenue terms in 2016 and is projected to continue to do so throughout the forecast period.

North America is projected to be the most attractive market with attractiveness index of 2.3 during the forecast period. Europe is expected to be the second most lucrative market, with attractiveness index of 1.1 respectively during the forecast period.

Europe Neuroscience market accounted for 23.9% share in 2017 and is projected to account for 23.1% share by 2025 end.

Explore Extensive Coverage of PMR`sLife Sciences & Transformational HealthLandscape

Persistence Market Research (PMR) is a third-platform research firm. Our research model is a unique collaboration of data analytics and market research methodology to help businesses achieve optimal performance.

To support companies in overcoming complex business challenges, we follow a multi-disciplinary approach. At PMR, we unite various data streams from multi-dimensional sources. By deploying real-time data collection, big data, and customer experience analytics, we deliver business intelligence for organizations of all sizes.

Our client success stories feature a range of clients from Fortune 500 companies to fast-growing startups. PMRs collaborative environment is committed to building industry-specific solutions by transforming data from multiple streams into a strategic asset.

Contact us:

Ashish KoltePersistence Market ResearchAddress 305 Broadway, 7th FloorNew York City,NY 10007 United StatesU.S. Ph. +1-646-568-7751USA-Canada Toll-free +1 800-961-0353Sales[emailprotected]Website https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com

Read more here:
The Neuroscience Market To Be Accelerated By Technology And Reach US$ 520 Mn - The Think Curiouser

Neuroscience Market Size, Share, 2020 Emerging-Trends, Services, Applications, Technological-Advancements, Scope, Growth-Analysis, Key-Players,…

The research report on Neuroscience Market gives thorough insights regarding various key trends that shape the industry expansion with regards to regional perspective and competitive spectrum. Furthermore, the document mentions the challenges and potential restrains along with latent opportunities which may positively impact the market outlook in existing and untapped business spaces. Moreover, it presents the case studies, including the ones related to COVID-19 pandemic, to convey better understanding of the industry to all the interested parties.

The recent market trend of increasingly using Neuroscience for understanding the development of a disease extensively fuel the growth of this market in the coming years. Another trend that will aid the growth of the global Neuroscience market is the escalating demand for personalized medicine. Extensive investments are being made by various organizations, pharmaceutical companies, and governments for the research and development of drugs, and this is another trend that is benefiting the growth of the global Neuroscience market. This is because Neuroscience techniques enable researchers to compare Neuroscience changes between disease samples and normal samples. Public health can thus be analyzed as the changes in Neuroscience are influenced by internal biological system and environment directly.

Request a sample of this premium research: https://www.bigmarketresearch.com/request-sample/3927894?utm_source=Nilesh-ILL

The report covers extensive analysis of the key market players in the market, along with their business overview, expansion plans, and strategies. The key players studied in the report include: Lupin Ltd., Astrazeneca Plc, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (Sun Pharma), Biogen, UCB SA, Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Sanofi, Abbvie, Dr. ReddyS Laboratories Ltd., F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Avanir Pharmaceuticals Inc., Autism Therapeutics, Merck & Co, H. Lundbeck A/S, Eli Lilly And Co., Alexza Pharmaceuticals, United Therapeutics Corp., Allergan Plc, Novartis Ag, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Alkermes Plc, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Eisai Co. Ltd., Aurobindo Pharma, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd., Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Gedeon Richter Plc, Lannett Co., Inc., Apotex, Inc., Glaxosmithkline Plc, Mallinckrodt, Immunocellular Therapeutics, Ltd., Nextsource Biotechnology Llc, Mylan Nv, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co..

Neuroscience Market Segmentation:

In market segmentation by types of Neuroscience, the report covers-

Anti-Parkinsons DrugsAlzheimer DiseasePsychotic DisordersEpileptic DisordersAutism Spectrum DisordersOthers

In market segmentation by applications of the Neuroscience, the report covers the following uses-

HospitalsDiagnostic LaboratoriesResearch InstitutesOther

Regional Analysis for Neuroscience Market-:

1) North America- (United States, Canada)

2) Europe- (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Russia, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium)

3) Asia Pacific- (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam)

4) Middle East & Africa- (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Israel, Egypt, Nigeria)

5) Latin America- (Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Peru)

The report provides insights on the following pointers :

Market Penetration: Comprehensive information on the product portfolios of the top players in the Supply Chain Analytics market.

Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on the upcoming technologies, R&D activities, and product launches in the market

Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of the market strategies, geographic and business segments of the leading players in the market

Market Development: Comprehensive information about emerging markets. This report analyzes the market for various segments across geographies

Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the Supply Chain Analytics market

NOTE: Our analysis involves the study of the market taking into consideration the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Please get in touch with us to get your hands on an exhaustive coverage of the impact of the current situation on the market. Our expert team of analysts will provide as per report customized to your requirement.

Request a discount on standard prices of this premium research: https://www.bigmarketresearch.com/request-for-discount/3927894?utm_source=Nilesh-ILL

Table of Content

Chapter 1 Neuroscience Introduction and Market Overview

Chapter 2 Executive Summary

Chapter 3 Industry Chain Analysis

Chapter 4 Global Neuroscience Market, by Type

Chapter 5 Neuroscience Market, by Application

Chapter 6 Global Neuroscience Market Analysis by Regions

Chapter 7 North America Neuroscience Market Analysis by Countries

Chapter 8 Europe Neuroscience Market Analysis by Countries

Chapter 9 Asia Pacific Neuroscience Market Analysis by Countries

Chapter 10 Middle East and Africa Neuroscience Market Analysis by Countries

Chapter 11 South America Neuroscience Market Analysis by Countries

Chapter 12 Competitive Landscape

Chapter 13 Industry Outlook

Chapter 14 Global Neuroscience Market Forecast

Chapter 15 New Project Feasibility Analysis

Trending Market Research Reports :

2020-2025 Global and Regional Python Package Software Industry Production, Sales and Consumption Status and Prospects Professional Market Research Report: https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/python-package-software-market-business-growth-factors-top-manufacturers-revenue-demand-forecast-to-2025-2020-11-09?tesla=y

2020-2025 Global and Regional Brain Training Software Industry Production, Sales and Consumption Status and Prospects Professional Market Research Report: https://rejerusalem.com/288825/brain-training-software-market-analysis-focusing-on-top-key-players-sudoku-brain-age-concentration-training-my-brain-trainer-lumosity-queendom-more/

2020-2025 Global and Regional Flexible Workspace Industry Production, Sales and Consumption Status and Prospects Professional Market Research Report: https://illadelink.com/flexible-workspace-market-worth-observing-growth-iwg-plc-servcorp-garage-society-the-great-room-wework-companies-awfis-bizspace-limited-more/

About Us:

Big Market Research has a range of research reports from various domains across the world. Our database of reports of various market categories and sub-categories would help to find the exact report you may be looking for.

Contact us:

Mr. Abhishek Paliwal

Big Market Research

5933 NE Win Sivers Drive, #205, Portland,

OR 97220 United States

Direct: +1-971-202-1575

Toll Free: +1-800-910-6452

E-mail: help@bigmarketresearch.com

See original here:
Neuroscience Market Size, Share, 2020 Emerging-Trends, Services, Applications, Technological-Advancements, Scope, Growth-Analysis, Key-Players,...

ProMIS Neurosciences offers comments on recent FDA Advisory Committee meeting on aducanumab for the treatment of Alzheimers disease – Yahoo Finance

FDA Office of Neuroscience argues for approval; non-binding recommendation from the Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee is negative

TORONTO and CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Nov. 09, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ProMIS Neurosciences, Inc. (TSX: PMN) (OTCQB: ARFXF), a biotechnology company focused on the discovery and development of antibody therapeutics targeting toxic oligomers implicated in the development of neurodegenerative diseases, today commented on the November 6th FDA Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee meeting and its review of Biogens Biologics License Application (BLA) for aducanumab for the treatment of Alzheimers disease.

The key BLA components reviewed at the advisory committee meeting consisted of three clinical trials: two pivotal phase 3 trials of similar design (Study 301, 302) and one phase 1b trial (Study 103). Both Biogen and FDA acknowledged Study 301 (ENGAGE) was negative and could not contribute to the evidence for aducanumabs effectiveness. Demonstration of effectiveness for licensing generally requires two adequate and well-controlled clinical trials that are positive. However, under certain circumstances and consistent with the 1997 FDA Modernization Act, FDA can conclude that one adequate and well-controlled clinical investigation plus confirmatory evidence is sufficient to establish effectiveness. Whether Study 302 (EMERGE) provided adequate evidence as a single study a position strongly expressed by the FDA Office of Neuroscience represented the key issue debated by the Advisory Committee.

Dr. Billy Dunn, Director of the Office of Neuroscience, who convened the Advisory Committee and ultimately has the authority to approve the BLA, gave the FDA presentation; he summarized the Study 302 results, stating they were compelling, exceptionally persuasive, and represented a homerun. However, the written review by Dr. Tristan Massie, Office of Biostatistics, embedded in the FDA briefing documents for the Advisory Committee, addressed some Study 302 inconsistencies and argued against a conclusion of substantial evidence because of the conflicting results of the two phase 3 studies. FDA and Biogen conducted a number of subgroup analyses to explore why Study 301 and Study 302 were divergent in their results, but none of them provided a definitive answer and the committee members decided it was not possible to conclude aducanumab was effective for the treatment of Alzheimers disease.

Story continues

Thus, on the first and most critical question to the committee, Does Study 302, viewed independently and without regard for Study 301, provide strong evidence that supports effectiveness of aducanumab for the treatment of Alzheimers disease?, the committee vote was negative, with 1 Yes, 8 No and 2 Uncertain. To a large degree, the other three questions assumed a Yes vote to the first question, including the last question as to whether Study 302 could be considered as primary evidence of effectiveness.

It is important to note that, prior to and during the advisory committee meeting, the FDA Office of Neuroscience made several key arguments supporting approval of aducanumab, as outlined below:

Analysis of the data supporting the March 2019 decision to discontinue the trials because of futility did not provide an accurate reflection of individual studies. The futility decision was based on pooled data from both Study 301 and Study 302. However, if the two studies had been independently reviewed for futility, Study 302 would not have met the futility criteria and the magnitude of effect in the high-dose arm (10mg/kg) in fact improved over time as additional data were collected. FDA commented that it would have been more appropriate if futility had not been declared and noted that assumptions supporting the futility analysis had been violated.

In response to Biogens argument that anti-amyloid beta (A) antibodies differ considerably with respect to their molecular characteristics, FDA agreed that anti-A therapies do not represent a single class of drugs and previous late-stage failures of such therapies do not constitute a demonstrated class failure. During committee discussion, this point was briefly noted as members acknowledged that a more nuanced discussion of oligomers as the most toxic molecular A species was beyond the scope of the committees responsibility.

Although FDA will most likely accept the non-binding recommendations of the advisory committee, it is disappointing for patients, their caregivers and the research community that the committee viewed the inconsistencies in data as too significant to reach a conclusion that aducanumab is clinically effective, said Dr. James Kupiec, Chief Medical Officer for ProMIS Neurosciences. We are however encouraged by FDAs position on anti-A antibodies. The amyloid hypothesis is far from dead now that the research community is focused on the most toxic molecular species, and we anticipate that PMN310, which selectively targets toxic A oligomers, could demonstrate best-in-class effectiveness and safety in clinical studies.

After the Advisory Committee meeting, Mr. Michael Vounatsos, Chief Executive Officer at Biogen, expressed his gratitude for the patients and advocates who spoke at the meeting and reflected on the significant unmet need for a treatment for Alzheimers disease. Biogen noted they will continue to work with FDA as it completes its review of the BLA.

About ProMIS Neurosciences

ProMIS Neurosciences, Inc. is a development stage biotechnology company whose unique core technology is the ability to rationally predict the site and shape (conformation) of novel targets known as Disease Specific Epitopes (DSEs) on the molecular surface of proteins. In neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimers, ALS and Parkinsons disease, the DSEs are misfolded regions on toxic forms of otherwise normal proteins. In the infectious disease setting, these DSEs represent peptide antigens that can be used as an essential component to create accurate and sensitive serological assays to detect the presence of antibodies that arise in response to a specific infection, such as COVID-19. ProMIS proprietary peptide antigens can also be used to create potential therapeutic antibodies, as well as serve as the basis for development of vaccines. ProMIS is headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, with offices in Cambridge, Massachusetts. ProMIS is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol PMN, and on the OTCQB Venture Market under the symbol ARFXF.

Visit us at http://www.promisneurosciences.com, follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn. To learn more about protein misfolding diseases, listen to Episodes 11, 24, of Saving Minds, a podcast available at iTunes or Spotify.

For media inquiries, please contact:

Shanti Skiffington shanti.skiffington@gmail.comTel. 617 921-0808

For Investor Relations please contact: Alpine Equity Advisors Nicholas Rigopulos, Presidentnick@alpineequityadv.comTel. 617 901-0785

The TSX has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. This information release contains certain forward-looking information. Such information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those implied by statements herein, and therefore these statements should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results. All forward-looking statements are based on the Company's current beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to it as well as other factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release. Due to risks and uncertainties, including the risks and uncertainties identified by the Company in its public securities filings, actual events may differ materially from current expectations. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Read this article:
ProMIS Neurosciences offers comments on recent FDA Advisory Committee meeting on aducanumab for the treatment of Alzheimers disease - Yahoo Finance

Study pinpoints neural basis for the interplay between a close relationship with God and enhanced sense of … – PsyPost

A recent study offers new evidence that having a close relationship with God serves the psychological purpose of enhancing ones sense of control. The study was published in Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience.

Spiritual belief is a fundamental aspect of human culture, dating back to ancient times. Psychology researchers have explored this tendency toward supernatural belief, suggesting that a close relationship with God offers humans a sense of control and a coping mechanism

Study authors Shira Cohen-Zimerman and colleagues wanted to explore this interplay between a belief in God and a sense of control and to investigate the possibility that the constructs share a neural basis.

To do this, researchers conducted a lesion-mapping study among a sample of veterans who had served in Vietnam. The researchers were interested in exploring damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), an area of the brain that has been linked to emotionally meaningful religious experiences in addition to a sense of control. They accordingly divided their sample into veterans with vmPFC lesions, veterans with posterior cortex lesions, and veterans with no brain injury.

All participants responded to 17 items assessing their personal relationship with God (e.g., I can talk to God on an intimate basis.). They also completed a measure of sense of control which used the item, How often do you feel powerless to get what you want out of life?.

The researchers matched their participants according to age, handedness, and general intelligence pre-injury.

The analysis found that subjects with damage to the right vmPFC demonstrated an enhanced personal relationship with God when compared to subjects with posterior lesions or no lesions at all. The group with right vmPFC damage also showed greater perceived sense of control, compared to the group without brain injury.

Next, the researchers conducted mediation analysis to further examine the interplay between lesions in the vmPFC, sense of control, and closeness with God. They found that a stronger relationship with God mediated the relationship between lesions in the right vmPFC and increased sense of control.

This pattern of results, the authors report, supports a model of right vmPFC damage enhancing participants sense of control through enhancing their personal relationship with God.

As Cohen-Zimerman and team emphasize, their study is the first to pinpoint a neural basis for the interplay between a close relationship with God and a sense of control.

Our findings indicate the importance of the close link between belief in God and a sense of control, and strengthen theories claiming that religion originated, at least in part, from the desire to avoid the threatening experience of perceiving the world as random and chaotic, the authors highlight.

The authors further note that while functional imaging studies show that activation of vmPFC is associated with enhanced religious experience, this does not necessarily contradict their finding that damage to this area increased subjects personal relationship with God.

In our view, the vmPFC does not directly enhance ones personal relationship with God. In contrast, given that patients with stronger lesions in this area reported a personal relationship with God, we infer that it is likely that other, intact brain areas, enabled the strong personal relationship with God observed in these patients, and that the vmPFC normally plays an inhibitory role in modulating this effect.

The researchers propose that their findings may have implications for patients dealing with brain injuries, particularly those with damage to the vmPFC. Such patients might improve their sense of control after injury by drawing on their faith.

The study, Neural underpinning of a personal relationship with God and sense of control: A lesion-mapping study, was authored by Shira Cohen-Zimerman, Irene Cristofori, Wanting Zhong, Joseph Bulbulia, Frank Krueger, Barry Gordon, and Jordan Grafman.

Link:
Study pinpoints neural basis for the interplay between a close relationship with God and enhanced sense of ... - PsyPost

Taking a Peek at the Building Blocks of Brain Computing – Technology Networks

Synapses are specialized devices where learning and memory occur. The efficient transmission of synaptic signals relies on the delicate structure and complex molecular composition of the synapses. However, the small size (several hundred nanometers in diameter) and heterogeneous nature of the synapses pose significant challenges in direct observation of the molecules inside synapses.

Based on the proposed processing technique for in situ cryo-electron tomography, researchers from University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) and Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (SIAT) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) became the first scientists to observe individual GABAA receptors and their organization on the synaptic membrane, endowing the brain's ability for information processing.

"The advance of this study comes from the in situ cryo-electron microscopy, a method that preserves the cells in native states and has an order of magnitude of higher resolution compare to the super-resolution optical microscopy," said TAO Changlu, postdoctoral fellow from USTC and the study's co-first author, now associate investigator at SIAT.

This image processing technique is able to automatically locate the membrane proteins in their cellular context. "To ensure that we detect every receptor on the postsynaptic membrane, we oversampled the synaptic membrane and classified all the sampled 3D images without any template" said LIU Yuntao, graduate student from USTC and the study's co-first author, now postdoctoral fellow at UCLA. "We even used the negative control that sampling the presynaptic membrane to validate our observation."

Once the receptors were detected, researchers suddenly realized that the receptors are not randomly distributed on the membrane: they tend to keep the same 11-nm "social distancing" from each other. Intriguingly, the receptors can rotate freely, even though constrained by distance.

"The social distancing among receptors could arise from their interactions with scaffolding molecule--gephyrins", said BI Guoqiang, professor of neuroscience at USTC and senior author of the paper.

The scaffolding molecules form a 5-nm thick density sheet to support and regulate GABAA receptors on the membrane. Together, they form an absorbing semi-ordered structure called "mesophasic assembly".

A mesophasic state is in between the liquid and solid, which might be induced by the multivalent interaction between receptors and their scaffolding molecules and attract the readily-releasable vesicles containing neurotransmitters. The inhibitory synapses could store information by arranging the GABAA receptors in such a low-entropy Goldilocks state.

This semi-ordered structure differs from the previously proposed hexagonal lattice organization of GABAA receptors and gephyrins. Notably, each synapse tends to contain one mesophasic assembly, rather than multiple nano-domains as observed in excitatory synapses with super-resolution optical microscopy.

"This work represents the first nanometer-resolution observation at the inhibitory synaptic receptors and a critical step towards resolving the atomic details of the brain.", said ZHOU Hong, director of the Electron Imaging Center for NanoMachines at the California NanoSystems Institute at UCLA, also senior author of the paper.

Reference: Liu YT, Tao CL, Zhang X, et al.Mesophasic organization of GABAA receptors in hippocampal inhibitory synapses.Mesophasic organization of GABAA receptors in hippocampal inhibitory synapses. Nat Neurosci. 2020. doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00729-w

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Read more from the original source:
Taking a Peek at the Building Blocks of Brain Computing - Technology Networks

Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents Market Size And Forecast (2020-2026)| With Post Impact Of Covid-19 By Top Leading Players- NEOBIOSCIENCE,…

COVID-19 Impact on Global Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents Market Professional Survey Research Report 2020-2027

Overview Paragraph

Starting with the basic information, the report provides a complete summary of the global Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market. The summary discusses the outlook and specifications of products and services in the market and their application. The report also provides detailed information on the technology used for manufacturing and production. The report provides information on the production procedures that can increase productivity and efficiency of the overall system. The report classifies the global Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market into segments based on knowledge of the market. The report covers the key market players present in different regions and also studies the strategies used by them to enhance their presence and value in the Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market. The report predicts future trends and scope of the market for the forecast period 2020-2027.

Key Players

NEOBIOSCIENCE, Genscript, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wuhan Fine Biotech Co., and Ltd.

Get sample copy of this report: https://www.reportsandmarkets.com/sample-request/global-neuroscience-antibody-or-research-reagents-market-report-2020-by-key-players-types-applications-countries-market-size-forecast-to-2026-based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread?utm_source=icotodaymagazine&utm_medium=15

Market Dynamics

The report covers various factors that are responsible for the rapid growth and expansion of the Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market. The report provides information on the dynamic nature of the market, analyzes the pricing economic models, dynamics of demand and supply, market driving forces, market growth restraints, etc. The report covers factors such as the favourable government initiatives and policies, mounting population, geographical changes, etc changes can impact the stability of the market during the forecast period. The report assesses the internal and external factors that can cause abnormalities in the market. The report also focuses on the opportunities, challenges, and threats witnessed by the market participants present in the Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market.

Segmental Analysis

The report divides the global Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market into some key segments based on attributes, features, applications, and types. This information would help the new market entrants and emerging players to understand the overall structure of the market and get information on the various products and services available in the market. This information would also help the market entrants to understand the emerging trends that can dominate the market in the future. The Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents port includes detailed information on the critical market segments that can lead or drive the overall Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market during the forecast period. The report also covers the regional segments of the Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market. The major regional markets that are expected to drive the product demand in the future are also mentioned in the market report.

Regional Analysis for Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents Market

North America (the United States, Canada, and Mexico)

Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia, and Italy)

Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, and Southeast Asia)

South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, etc.)

The Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria, and South Africa)

The objectives of the report are:

To analyze and forecast the market size of Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents Industry in the global market.

To study the global key players, SWOT analysis, value and global market share for leading players.

To determine, explain and forecast the market different attributes of the products or services. This information would help the companies to understand the prominent trends that are emerging in the market and would also provide a wider by type, end use, and region.

To analyze the market potential and advantage, opportunity and challenge, restraints and risks of global key regions.

To find out significant trends and factors driving or restraining the market growth.

To analyze the opportunities in the market for stakeholders by identifying the high growth segments.

To critically analyze each submarket in terms of individual growth trend and their contribution to the market.

To understand competitive developments such as agreements, expansions, new product launches, and possessions in the market.

To strategically outline the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.

View Full Report @ https://www.reportsandmarkets.com/reports/global-neuroscience-antibody-or-research-reagents-market-report-2020-by-key-players-types-applications-countries-market-size-forecast-to-2026-based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread?utm_source=icotodaymagazine&utm_medium=15

Key questions answered in the report:

What is the growth potential of the Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market?

Which product segment will grab a lions sh are?

Which regional market will emerge as a frontrunner in the coming years?

Which application segment will grow at a robust rate?

What are the growth opportunities that may emerge in the Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents industry in the years to come?

What are the key challenges that the global Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market may face in the future?

Which are the leading companies in the global Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market?

Which are the key trends positively impacting the market growth?

Which are the growth strategies considered by the players to sustain hold in the global Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents market

List of Tables and Figures

About Us:

Reports And Markets is part of the Algoro Research Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Are you mastering your market? Do you know what the market potential is for your product, who the market players are and what the growth forecast is? We offer standard global, regional or country specific market research studies for almost every market you can imagine.

Contact Us:

Sanjay Jain

Manager Partner Relations & International Marketing

http://www.reportsandmarkets.com

Ph: +1-352-353-0818 (US)

Read more from the original source:
Neuroscience Antibody or Research Reagents Market Size And Forecast (2020-2026)| With Post Impact Of Covid-19 By Top Leading Players- NEOBIOSCIENCE,...

Pattern separation may not be present in the human hippocampus – News-Medical.Net

Nov 9 2020

NEUROSCIENCE EXPERTS from the University of Leicester have released research that breaks with the past fifty years of neuroscientific opinion, arguing that the way we store memories is key to making human intelligence superior to that of animals.

It has previously been thought and copiously published that it is pattern separation in the hippocampus, an area of the brain critical for memory, that enables memories to be stored by separate groups of neurons, so that memories dont get mixed up.

Now, after fifteen years of research, Leicester Universitys Director of Systems Neuroscience believes that in fact the opposite to pattern separation is present in the human hippocampus. He argues that, contrary to what has been described in animals, the same group of neurons store all memories. The consequences of this are far reaching, as such neuronal representation, devoid of specific contextual details, explains the abstract thinking that characterizes human intelligence.

In contrast to what everybody expects, when recording the activity of individual neurons we have found that there is an alternative model to pattern separation storing our memories. Pattern separation is a basic principle of neuronal coding that precludes memory interference in the hippocampus. Its existence is supported by numerous theoretical, computational and experimental findings in different animal species but these findings have never been directly replicated in humans. Previous human studies have been mostly obtained using Functional Magnetic Resource Imagining (fMRI), which doesnt allow recording the activity of individual neurons. Shockingly, when we directly recorded the activity of individual neurons, we found something completely different to what has been described in other animals. This could well be a cornerstone of humans intelligence.

Professor Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, Director of Systems Neuroscience, Leicester University

The study, No pattern separation in the human hippocampus, argues that the lack of pattern separation in memory coding is a key difference compared to other species, which has profound implications that could explain cognitive abilities uniquely developed in humans, such as our power of generalization and of creative thought.

Professor Quian Quiroga believes we should go beyond behavioral comparisons between humans and animals and seek for more mechanistic insights, asking what in our brain gives rise to humans unique and vast repertoire of cognitive functions. In particular, he argues that brain size or number of neurons cannot solely explain the difference, since there is, for example, a comparable number and type of neurons in the chimp and the human brain, and both species have more or less the same anatomical structures. Therefore, our neurons, or at least some of them, must be doing something completely different, and one such difference is given by how they store our memories.

The study No pattern separation in the human hippocampus by Rodrigo Quian Quiroga is published in the journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Source:

Journal reference:

Quiroga, R.Q. (2020) No Pattern Separation in the Human Hippocampus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.012.

Original post:
Pattern separation may not be present in the human hippocampus - News-Medical.Net

Study focuses on efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation across a range of neurological conditions – News-Medical.Net

Reviewed by Emily Henderson, B.Sc.Nov 11 2020

A new text by Kessler Foundation scientists focuses on the efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation across a variety of neurological conditions, with specific emphasis on treatment-related changes in the brain detectable via neuroimaging.

"Cognitive Rehabilitation and Neuroimaging: Examining the Evidence from Brain to Behavior," (DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-48382-1) is authored by John DeLuca, PhD, Senior Vice President of Research and Training, Nancy Chiaravalloti, PhD, director of the Centers for Neuropsychology, Neuroscience, and Traumatic Brain Injury Research, and Erica Weber, PhD, research scientist in the Center for Traumatic Brain Injury Research.

The authors conduct cognitive rehabilitation research at Kessler Foundation, home to the Rocco Ortenzio Neuroimaging Center, a research-dedicated facility, and collaborate with researchers in the U.S. and the international community.

Because the nature of cognitive impairment and rehabilitative interventions differ across populations, content is divided by neurological condition, with experts addressing aging, stroke, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and multiple sclerosis (MS).

The use of neuroimaging in cognitive rehabilitation trials is covered, as well as the need to design trials to establish Class I evidence for new treatments.

Neuroimaging has advanced cognitive rehabilitation by enabling us to examine brain processes and correlate them with alterations in behavior and anatomical structures. Using specialized techniques such as structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and electroencephalography, we are documenting how cognitive interventions effect changes in neural activation and connectivity that correlate with improvements in language, memory, attention, and motor function.

Through advancements in neuroimaging analysis, we are learning more about the neuroplasticity of the brain in MS and schizophrenia, which will challenge researchers to apply these approaches to populations where more investigation is needed, such as children with brain injuries and individuals with brain tumors."

John DeLuca, PhD, Senior Vice President of Research and Training, Kessler Foundation

Source:

Journal reference:

DeLuca, J., et al. (2020) Cognitive Rehabilitation and Neuroimaging. Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48382-1.

More:
Study focuses on efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation across a range of neurological conditions - News-Medical.Net

Exploring Genetic Variation and COVID-19 Clinical Variability – Technology Networks

One of the biggest challenges that scientists and healthcare professionals are facing during the COVID-19 pandemic is the high rate of clinical variability. Whilst some patients present as asymptomatic, others are developing more severe symptoms such as pneumonia, and some cases are ultimately proving fatal. Why?The answer remains elusive; however, extensive research is exploring the possible contribution our genetics may be having. Genetic variation differences in the DNA sequences that make up our genome can impact our response to infectious diseases.

GoodCell uniquely measures and monitors inherited and acquired genetic variations in stem cells and other nucleated cells in our blood over time. Technology Networks recently spoke with Dr Salvatore Viscomi, chief medical officer at GoodCell, and attending physical at Baystate Health, to explore factors that might influence COVID-19 risk, and to discuss how the company is working to identify at-risk individuals through genetic variation analysis.

Molly Campbell (MC): For our readers that may be unfamiliar, can you discuss why medicine is moving towards a personalized approach, and why this is important considering genetic variation?Salvatore Viscomi (SV): Healthcare has traditionally taken the approach of one size fits all in defining individual risk for a disease and prescribing therapy for it. Understanding the differences between individuals on a molecular level optimizes assessment of an individuals susceptibility to a certain disease and predicting response to pharmacological therapy. Genomics plays the most important role in the emergence of personalized therapy. Identifying the inherited and acquired genetic variation will direct personalized screening and prevention plans and inform bespoke medical therapies.

MC: We know that there is high clinical variability across COVID-19 patients. How might genetic variation be contributing here, and what published evidence exists to support this?SV: Understanding immune response is critical to identifying individuals at high risk of severe morbidity and mortality. Emerging research suggests that accumulated genetic variation in our blood cells may be associated with a dysfunctional inflammatory response to COVID-19 leading to its pulmonary, cardiac and coagulopathic complications.

In a recent study published by JAMA Cardiology, researchers demonstrated an association between the presence of accumulated genetic change in our blood cells and a pro-inflammatory immune response that resembles the exaggerated cytokine release syndrome (CRS) manifested in COVID-19-positive patients. Direct evidence has emerged more recently; a study published in Cancers examined patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and found a significantly higher prevalence of accumulated genetic variation in all age groups compared to age-matched control groups.

MC: What impact might genetic variation in COVID-19 patients have on efforts to develop therapeutics or preventives, such as vaccines?SV: Identifying highly susceptible individuals through blood testing could have many applications. As an initial wave of vaccines move through Phase III trials and potentially come to market, we would have the data to determine prioritization of vaccinations when one is available. Business and government sectors need insight into risk factors that can inform inoculation strategies for societys most vulnerable, inform decisions around who should and should not be on the front lines, and give people more control when making personal decisions about how to mitigate individual risk. The broader field of genetics offers a window into the potential to correlate inherited and acquired gene mutations with immune response for the betterment of society, providing a more robust and accurate set of risk factors unique to every individual.

Furthermore, in high-risk individuals, targeting inflammation may be a clinical strategy to mitigate its clinical consequencesin COVID-19. For example, we may identify patients who are most responsive to pro-inflammatory inhibitors. Implementing measures intended to reduce subjects exposure to the infection or likelihood of contracting such infection through self-isolation, quarantine or social distancing may be advised.

MC: Can you explain the aims of GoodCell, and what the company does in terms of "banking blood for life"?SV: GoodCells mission is to extend and improve the quality of life through technology powered by our own cells. Blood is the author of our bodies, and can both cure as well as cause disease. Through our proprietary data aggregation and analytics technology platform, which aims to decode our blood cells and harness their insights to advance population and personal health, we empower individuals to identify, track and mitigate health risks. By getting ahead of their health risks, we enable the potential for a better life. In addition, through our personal biobanking service, long-term storage of your healthiest cells provides the opportunity for potential use in future therapeutics if you need them you are your best donor.

MC: Does GoodCell measure other "omics" parameters outside of genomics (DNA measurements and analysis), such as proteomics or metabolomics?SV: GoodCells platform leverages the power of blood to assess risk as such, we of course look at acquired and inherited genetic changes, but there are many more opportunities afforded by blood to understand and assess risk including routine blood chemistry tests, tests for biomarkers of disease, including emerging capabilities in liquid biopsy for earlier detection of solid tumor cancers. Ultimately, we are always looking to incorporate novel health and data insights into our product platform to better inform both an individuals health, as well as population-based health. Transcriptomics, epigenomics and metabolomics are but a few of the opportunities we are evaluating.

MC: What work is GoodCell currently conducting in the COVID-19 space?SV: GoodCell is currently engaged in a research collaboration with the New York Blood Center to evaluate how specific acquired and inherited genetic variation contribute to COVID-19 severity and recovery. We are analyzing genetic variation in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients compared to hospitalized/ICU patients. GoodCell will evaluate the genetic variation in the collected samples using our proprietary assay platform to identify and validate their association with COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.

Salvatore Viscomi was speaking to Molly Campbell, Science Writer, Technology Networks.

Follow this link:
Exploring Genetic Variation and COVID-19 Clinical Variability - Technology Networks

Flaws emerge in modeling human genetic diseases in animals – The Conversation US

My lab, based at the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, uses zebrafish to model human birth defects affecting the face. When I tell people this, they are often skeptical that fish biology has any relevance to human health.

But zebrafish have backbones like us, contain by and large the same types of organs, and, critically for genetic research, share many genes in common. My group has exploited these genetic similarities to create zebrafish models for several human birth defects, including Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome, in which the bones of the skull abnormally fuse together, and early-onset arthritis.

Similar to fish, our bodies develop under the control of about 25,000 genes. The trick is finding out what each gene does. Stunning advances such as CRISPR-based molecular scissors, for which the Nobel Prize in chemistry was just awarded, allow us to precisely change genes, and designer chemicals can silence particular genes. In a recent study from our group published in Nature, however, we find that these tools are still far from perfect. Although CRISPR now allows us to efficiently generate lab animals that can pass human disease mutations onto the next generation, claims that simply injecting CRISPR into embryos or silencing genes with designer chemicals can accurately model human genetic disease are being questioned.

Finding the precise mutation that causes a particular birth defect or a late-onset disease can be tedious work. The human genome is made up of 3 billion building blocks called DNA nucleotides, and changing just one of these can cause devastating birth defects.

To figure out if we have identified the right disease-causing mutation in humans, we typically engineer the same change into the genome of a lab animal. We then breed these animals to generate babies with the disease mutation and look for the appearance of defects similar to those in human patients.

We study zebrafish because they are small, which means we can grow thousands of different genetically modified animals. We routinely use CRISPR to engineer fish that pass on a gene-breaking mutation to the next generation.

We then study the appearance of defects similar to those in humans lacking these genes in essence creating personalized zebrafish avatars of genetic disease. As zebrafish embryos are transparent and develop rapidly outside the mother, they are particularly useful for understanding how human disease mutations disrupt normal development.

Even in zebrafish, engineering animals to lack particular genes can be a time-consuming process. In my lab, we first create gene mutations in embryos, grow these fish to adulthood and then breed fish together to look at defects in the next generation.

This whole process can take a year or longer. Unsurprisingly, many labs are attempting shortcuts. Some are injecting large quantities of CRISPR molecular scissors into animals and then looking for defects in these same animals. Others are using chemicals to turn off, or silence, genes in the embryo rather than permanently changing the genes.

More and more frequently studies like this are calling into question the accuracy of these shortcuts. In animals that have been injected with CRISPR molecular scissors, not every cell is changed in the same way. And the chemicals used to silence genes appear to have unintended consequences, poisoning the embryo in a generic way.

For example, researchers in Spain recently reported that a gene called prrx1a was critical for the proper development of the heart. To figure this out, they silenced prrx1a in zebrafish with chemicals. Then, in a second experiment, they injected CRISPR molecular scissors into zebrafish embryos and examined them just one day later for heart defects.

In contrast, we completely removed the prrx1a gene and looked at generations of fish lacking this gene. Hearts in these mutant fish developed perfectly normally, showing that prrx1a was not critical for heart development. Instead, we showed that the heart defects seen upon chemical treatment in the Spanish study were due to a general poisoning of the embryos unrelated to the prrx1a gene. Animals simply injected with CRISPR also showed defects not seen upon complete removal of the prrx1a gene, although the exact reasons for these differences remain a source of active debate.

And not just our group has noticed these flaws. Using similar gene removal as we reported, the group led by Didier Stainier refuted a study that had used CRISPR injection and gene silencing to link the tek gene to blood vessel development. Given the number of studies relying on gene silencing in lab animals, as opposed to engineering the DNA mutations, the causative genes for many human diseases may need to be reevaluated.

The desire for speed in research must not come at a cost of accuracy and reproducibility.

The good news is that, with the ease of CRISPR, we now know how to engineer the right types of mutations in lab animals to validate human disease mutations. By creating lab animals such as zebrafish that have the mutations engineered into their genomes and then observing whether their offspring develop the same diseases as patients with the mutations, we can be confident in having identified the right human disease gene.

[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversations newsletter.]

Getting it right is important for accurately counseling prospective parents of their genetic risks for certain birth defects, as well as identifying the relevant genes that can be targeted to prevent or even reverse disease.

Science is constantly evolving. While the ability to engineer the genome with CRISPR is opening up endless possibilities for human genetics, researchers must also recognize the limitations of new technologies. Although rapid, directly injecting CRISPR or silencing genes with chemicals gives misleading results too often. In order to confidently identify causative mutations linked to human disease, we will need to continue to study lab animals engineered to carry and pass on the same DNA changes as found in human patients.

Link:
Flaws emerge in modeling human genetic diseases in animals - The Conversation US