All posts by medical

Danny Wolthers: Anatomy of a long overdue story – Redlands News

Danny Wolthers, perhaps the greatest basketball player in over a century of play at Redlands High School, played for eventual coaching great Jerry Tarkanian from 1959 to 1961.

In weeks to come, youre going to see a feature on a 1961 Redlands High graduate named Danny Wolthers. Basketball player. 6-feet-4-inches. 25 points a game. All-CIF. Played with guys like Gary Sherman. Jim Weatherwax. Steve Taylor.

To some readers, it might seem like old news. Ive talked about it with a few readers. Theyre telling me get it out. One youthful observer, Donny Arthur, in his mid-30s, told me, Thats a great story for anyone.

Its old news, will be the cry of some readers. Why dont you try, Mr. Brown, writing on stuff thats fresh?

Its the time of year when, in non-COVID times, wed be observing results of the San Bernardino Kiwanis Basketball Classic. It started in the 1950s. One of those early Kiwanis tournaments included Redlands coming out as champions.

Been searching for Wolthers, incidentally, well, going on a few decades. He was All-Tournament in that 1960 event.

At the time, eventual Naismith Hall of Fame inductee Jerry Tarkanian was in town to get his masters degree at the University of Redlands.

Tark taught and coached at Redlands High. He had Wolthers on that Kiwanis team.

Tarks previous stop had been Antelope Valley. Its where he coached a guy named John Chambers, who tried to transfer to Redlands. Dude and his mother were living on Tarks property.

Chambers got chased back to the High Desert by CIF officials. He wouldve solidified a Redlands lineup with more scoring. Wolthers hit 25 points a game. Chambers was at 21 or 22.

When I ran a piece on Chambers there was plenty to that story Wolthers got hold of it. Now in late 70s, dude lives in Sacramento. He did the unthinkable. He sent me an email. Around five of them.

Heres one: Im a big newspaper buff, he said. I just subscribed to your paper.

Over the course of a few weeks, Wolthers mightve sent me 11,000 words. One of my pieces might I said, might - work out to 1,000 words. Way too long for this publication. It drives my editor, James Folmer, crazy.

Somehow, hes got to cram my overwritten stuff into two of the publications 16 pages.

Trying to give a heads-up to readers and trying to dance around my editor at the same time it aint easy.

(Footnote: Folmer sought a few photos from Wolthers for the piece.)

Chambers and Wolthers played against each other at the 1960 San Bernardino Kiwanis Tournament, which was then one of SoCals top hoops events.

It mightve been like watching Michael Jordan taking on Kobe Bryant. Who knows? Teammates? Wow! Chambers, who became a California JUCO Hall of Fame coach from nearby Mt. San Jacinto College, boldly pronounced, Wed have won (the CIF) championship if we played together.

Said Wolthers: He politely exaggerates my basketball prowess while playing down his. He was great.

Every word in Wolthers 11,000 words was a nugget.

Reminiscences on his high school days: Tarks legendary chewing towel, for instance or his way of motivating or his style of coaching or Wolthers love for the Dodgers long before they moved from Brooklyn to Los Angeles.

Wolthers recruiting experiences Cal or Stanford, or even UCLA. He couldve picked either one, plus Arizona or Arizona State.

A couple schools offered him money, including one very, very close to home. Wolters wont let me divulge.

UCLA coach John Wooden coming to Redlands on a recruiting mission.

No, says Wolthers, he didnt meet Sam Gilbert in Woodens pursuit of him to play in Westwood. (Check that name, Gilbert, on Google).

Accepted coach Howie Dalmars invitation to play at Stanford. And then, why he chose Cal over Stanford even after his promise to play on The Farm.

On why he believes Tark did his best coaching at Redlands, ahead of two highly successful stints at junior colleges, ahead of jobs at Long Beach State and, of course, Nevada-Las Vegas.

Drafted by the San Francisco Warriors, seventh round, in 1965. Misspelled his name (Wolters). Same draft as Warrior legend Rick Barry.

Wolthers played before those Cal crowds of 7,000 at Harmon Gym, outdrawing the Wilt Chamberlain Warriors crowds of 1,500 at the Cow Palace in S.F.

Three years of now-defunct AAU (semi pro) ball at $100 a week.

Cheerleaders. A baby. Marriage.

Just dont have room for all of that in one piece that turns the word count at around 1,300. Im only hoping to get it past my editor.

A warning: An ensuing feature on Wolthers might include a chaser, or two, some details contained in those 11,000 words. In other words, expect another feature or column.

I promise: Next week. Maybe. Got to make sure there arent any other Redlands stories out there knocking it off the page.

View original post here:
Danny Wolthers: Anatomy of a long overdue story - Redlands News

Grey’s Anatomy: 10 Friendships That Should Have Happened But Never Did – Screen Rant

There were many friendships on Grey Anatomy that have come and gone. However, fans are disappointed that these characters didn't get more screen time.

The hit ABC medical drama Grey's Anatomyhas always prided itself on deliveringthe perfect mix of love, longing, loss, pain, and death. Over the years, several amazing friendships have formed between the characters.

RELATED:Grey's Anatomy: 10 Things We're Looking Forward To In Season 17

From the touchingbond ofteam M.A.G.I.C.to other lovable friendships, such as that between April and Arizona or Miranda and Richard, the serieshas shownhow navigating complex human relationships is a part and parcel of daily life. However, that's not to say these were the best friendships. There were quite a few relationships that went largely ignored. In fact, there were several potential friendships the writers built up but never gave as much screen time to compared to the others. Just take a look at these examples...

Calliope Torres and Addison Montgomery were fan-favoritesand both actorscarved a niche for themselves on popular television with their beloved roles.

Callie and Addison were shown to be on the verge of a beautiful friendshipwhile going through challengesin their personal lives. Although their growing friendship was nipped at the bud as Addison left Seattle for good, this pairing could have, in time, becomeanother set of 'twisted sisters' like Cristina and Meredith.

Owen Hunt was Cristina's love interest for a long while and even ended up marrying her in season 7. The unfortunate thing was that Owen never became particularly friendly with Meredith who was his wife's best friend.

In fact, for some time Meredith wasn't on board with Cristina marrying Owen and her relationship with the trauma surgeon wasn't particularly smooth. In time, the two of them have become colleagues who respect one another but have never really been friends as such. However, asveterans of Grey Sloan, nothing would make more sense than for these two to be good friends.

Cristina Yang was one of the most beloved characters on Grey's as was the sprightly Callie Torres. Cristina was of course Meredith's best friend, but there was a brief period of time when Callie shared rooms with Cristina after both had broken up with their respective significant others.

RELATED:Grey's Anatomy: 5 Times Cristina Was Meredith's Best Friend (& 5 Times It Was Alex)

Callie and Cristina were on friendly terms but their relationship never culminated into one where they would confide in each other like good friends usually do. Of course, Cristina was never very attached with anyone other than Meredith but she and Callie would have made a great empowered duo, with both having such strong, quirky personalities.

When Teddy Altman joined Seattle Grace, she was at a loose end with no real friends. The only person she knew was Owen who chose Cristina over her. But some efforts were made by the likes of Arizona Robbins to make her feel welcome and comfortable.

Arizona, adorably, asked Teddy to join her, Callie, and Bailey for a girls' night. While none of the others particularly wanted to spend time getting to know their new colleague, they tried to be gracious nonetheless. Arizona also offered Teddy advice from time to time, such as hooking up with Mark Sloan to take her mind off Owen. The two wouldhave made good friends and could have even become a great couple if Arizona hadn't left.

Cristina Yang was no easy person to make friends with and definitely not when it came to interns or surgical residents who she couldn't care less about.

But there was one resident, Stephanie Edwards, who had something of the makings of another Cristina in her. She was smart, competitive, and driven. In fact, she could have, in time, gone on to become a second Cristina Yang of sorts, although more emotionally connected and less mechanical. A friendship between these two would have made all the sense in the world.

April Kepner was one of those people who was good through and through, albeit a bit annoying at times, and Lexie Grey was possibly the sweetest, most gentle character the show's ever had.

RELATED:Grey's Anatomy: 5 Of The Most Annoying Things Lexie Ever Did (& 5 Sweetest)

These two women could easily have been friends, makingeach otherstronger. In contrast to the twisted sisters, Cristina and Meredith, April and Lexie could have been something like the good sisters, helping people and fighting all the meanness directed their way together.

Two other people who would have made good friends were Maggie Pierce and her brother-in-law,Derek Shepherd.

In fact, when Maggie feltlost initially aftershe first joined the hospital, and Meredith was giving her the cold-shoulder, it was Derek who made efforts to make Maggie feel more at home. He even invited her home for dinner, trying to patch things up between Maggie, Meredith, and Richard. Had Derek lived, his cute camaraderie with his young sister-in-law would have been something to watch out for.

Another person who could have made a good friend for Derek was Bailey. Derek was shown to be on friendly terms with Burke and Webber, but he was also cordial with Bailey, who opened up to him about her past.

In fact, fans might recall a cute moment way back in season 4, when Derek and Miranda told each otherabout their respective history as teenagers. They found out that they were both in the high schoolband, and were, for the most part, lonely adolescents. Moreover, throughout Derek's time in Grey Sloan Memorial, he and Miranda often acted as each other's conscience, offering valuable advice, albeit in an off-hand manner. Although they never properly acknowledged it, these two could have been loyal friends intime.

Tom Koracick has been a polarising character from the start whenhe was introduced as Amelia's mentor and friend. He has a snarkysense of humor and is self-aggrandizing. However, the viewers know he has a softer side to him after learning of his profoundly tragic past.

RELATED:Grey's Anatomy: Miranda Bailey's Slow Transformation Over The Years (In Pictures)

One of those aware that Tom lost his only son is Bailey. Bailey started out by hating Tom but gradually learned to respect him grudgingly once she found out about his past. With both being strong personalities, the two would always be at loggerheads but can also be seen supporting one another in spite of disagreements. If Tom manages to recover from the Covid, the Bailey-Koracick friendship might be something to think of.

This might seem like an unlikely friendship but Alex Karev did respect Richard. When he initially joined the hospital as an arrogant surgical intern, Richard was one of the people who could keep Alex mellowed for all his insolent ways.

The two even sharedsome hilarious moments when Richard decided to help Alex give Jo Wilson's date, Jason, a hard time by teasing and humiliating him relentlessly. Alex also turned to Richard for advice more than once and asked him to take over as interim chief at Pacific-North Hospital when he was away. Let's not forget that Richard was also one of the few people Alex wrote to say goodbye to when he left abruptly in season 16.There was a strong bond here that went under the radar.

NEXT:10 Medical Dramas That Are Better Than Grey's Anatomy

Next 15 Best Miniseries In TV History, Ranked

Surangama, or Sue, as she is called by many, has been writing on films, television, literature, social issues for over a decade now. A teacher, writer, and editor, she loves nothing better than to curl up on a lazy afternoon with her favorite book, or with a pen and a notebook (a laptop would have to do!) and a foaming cuppa tea on the side.

View post:
Grey's Anatomy: 10 Friendships That Should Have Happened But Never Did - Screen Rant

Grey’s Anatomy: 10 Relationships That Should Have Happened But Never Did – Screen Rant

There are many iconic and memorable romances on Grey's Anatomy. However, have fans ever thought that a character was better suited with someone else?

The popular primetime medical drama Grey's Anatomy has been around for what seems like an eternity now. The show has, over the years, given fansa gamut of human emotions with a barrageof relatable characters, navigating a complex range of relationships.

RELATED:Grey's Anatomy Characters & Their Disney Counterparts

From couples that make no sense, like Jackson Avery and Maggie Pierce, to those that are absolutely adorable together such as Callie and Arizona, Jackson and April, and of course, Derek and Meredith, relationships on Grey'shave been an integral part of the show's astounding success and record run.

FHowever, do fans ever feel like there is often great chemistry between other characters that largely goes unexplored? Could these relationships have become the show's greatest romance ever? Here are some great contenders that unfortunately never happened.

Owen Hunt joined the hit medical drama early on and was introduced as Cristina Yang's love interest. Upon first impression, Owen seemed like the perfect match for Cristina as they both shared the same passion for medicine and their work.

However, over the years Owen's storyline went haywire, as he went from one woman to another, first cheating on Cristina, then hurriedly married Amelia, and getting Teddy pregnant by appearing at her door out of nowhere. Even at present, his relationship with Teddy is on the rocks with the latter having cheated on him. Owen might be a Grey's veteran but one wonders if, after Cristina, he might have beenbetter off alone. At least for a little while or until he figures things out.

Erica Hahn was the brilliant cardiothoracic surgeon who came like a gush of wind after Preston Burke left Seattle Grace and then left as hurriedly as she came.

However, in that brief period of time, she was shown to have developed a relationship with fan-favorite, Callie Torres. For both of them, a casual hook up turned out to be an eye-opener for the two women as Erica realized that she was happier dating women and Callie started exploring her bisexuality. Erica and Callie's story ended abruptly but it would have been interesting to watch them navigate their new-found sexuality together.

The 'Ortho god' Atticus Lincoln seems to be in a stable relationship with Amelia Shepherd at the moment although knowing Amelia, things could blow up at any moment.

RELATED:Grey's Anatomy: The 10 Hardest Hitting Break-Ups

But Link also sharesa pleasant, friendly equation with Jo Wilson, who he happened to know in the past. And seeing how things turned out between Jo and Alex, maybe Link would have been a better option, for he seems more anchored and understanding than Alex ever was. However, given that this is Grey's, there might be hope for Link and Jo still.

Another couple that seemed to be on the verge of happening but never culminated was Alex and Addison. For those who forgot, it was Addison who tried to mellow down the arrogant surgical intern in his early days and drew Alexinto pediatrics, which heultimately excelled.

The two were attracted to each other and sparks flew, which led to the couple hooking up. Of course, Alex was way too immature to be in a serious relationship with someone like Addison but that in itself would have been fun to watch. Addison'spartnership with Derek, although complicated, was never meant to be, so maybe she could have been in a quirky relationship with the smartmouth Alex Karev.

Mark and Callie were best friends with benefits and Callie even got pregnant with Mark's daughter. The two were very comfortable with each other and their camaraderie was mostly uncomplicated and fun.

As always, life and relationships are complex in Grey's Anatomy.So the two people who were best fit for each other don't end up together. Still, if Callie had decided she wanted to start a relationship with Mark, fans wouldn't have complained.

In season 4, young Lexie Grey encountered a patient with a giant tumor in his carotid artery, Nick Hanscom. Nick had a sense of humor, was flirtatious, and soon struck up a bond with Lexie who seemed to enjoy talking to him.

RELATED:Grey's Anatomy: 10 Couples That Shouldn't Have Worked, But Did

In fact, there were definite signs of chemistry between the two. After all, Lexie was soft by nature and Nick was the kind of guy who could make light of a very serious situation. Hewas also the first patient Lexie was entrusted with and his tragic death hit her hard. Had Nick survived, the writers might have considered giving the two a chance.

Grey's Anatomy is as much about the patients as it is about the doctors and staff at Grey Sloan Memorial. Meredith has saved numerous lives in the course of seventeen long seasons, but very few patients have dared to flirt with her.

One such patient was Nick Marsh in season 14, a handsome transplant doctor who had just undergone a kidney transplant himself. He might not have been 'McDreamy' but he was quite charming in his own way and was clearly hitting on Meredith, who didn't seem to mind the interest. Meredith and Nick would have made a really cute couple together, but that never happened.

Meredith went on a blind date in season 15 after her matchmaker patient, Cece, convinced her to start going out again. And who should she meet butHow I Met Your Motheralum, JoshRadnor, who appeared as software engineer Jon here.

The two connected instantly and Meredith even seemed okay with giving Jon a chance, canceling her afternoon to spend time with her date. However, once Jon mentioned that he wasn't comfortable with single moms, this ended her interest in him. Although the writers didn't take the narrative further, fans adored Jon with Meredith and wouldn't mind seeing him make a comeback.

Actor Martin Henderson appeared in season 14 as Nathan Riggs, an ex-colleague and former friend of Owen's and a potential love interest for Meredith Grey.

RELATED:Grey's Anatomy 10 Famous Actors You Forgot Were In The Series

Nathan seemed like a fitting replacement for Derek Shepherd although Meredith didn't give him a chance at first. And by the time she did, Nathan's ex-fiance Megan was back in the picture. Meredith and Nathan only had a few moments together but it wouldhave been fun to see them as a couple.

Remember the adorable George O'Malley, who died a devastating death in season 5 after throwing himself in front of a bus to save a random stranger? For those who don't remember, Lexie Grey had a phase when she was infatuated by George right after she joined Seattle Grace as a surgical intern.

The two even became roommates for some time, with Lexie trying to draw George's attention with her kind and thoughtful ways. But George's storyline had already become chaotic by the time and for some reason, he never noticed Lexie. Could one have imagined how sweet this pairing would have been ifGeorge had recognized how great Lexiewas?Unfortunately, fans never got to see them together.

NEXT:10 Medical Dramas That Are Better Than Grey's Anatomy

Next Parks And Recreation: The Main Characters' Story Arcs, Ranked From Worst To Best

Surangama, or Sue, as she is called by many, has been writing on films, television, literature, social issues for over a decade now. A teacher, writer, and editor, she loves nothing better than to curl up on a lazy afternoon with her favorite book, or with a pen and a notebook (a laptop would have to do!) and a foaming cuppa tea on the side.

See the original post here:
Grey's Anatomy: 10 Relationships That Should Have Happened But Never Did - Screen Rant

Patrick Dempsey’s Noble Reason for Returning to ‘Grey’s Anatomy,’ Plus: His New Water Campaign – Extra

Patrick Dempsey surprised fans when he made a long awaited return to Greys Anatomy this past season.

Now, hes opening up to Extras Rachel Lindsay about reprising his McDreamy role, his new TV show Ways and Means, and his collab with Poland Spring Origin water.

Patrick explained that the pandemic was the catalyst for him coming back to Greys after his character was killed off in 2015.

This season, Dempseys Dr. Derek Shepherd appears in dream sequences with Ellen Pompeo as her character Meredith Grey battles the coronavirus.

We got together, we were like, How can we bring more awareness to getting people to wear their masks, to listen to the science to all the people who are working on, you know, on the front lines right now, who are overcoming so much every day? So if we could bring awareness to that and get people to really think about wearing the mask and doing that that's where it came from and I'm glad we did.

Will he be back on the show in the future? He revealed, I'm done shooting, but I am coming back in but you will have to stay tuned.

How Ellen Pompeo Is Supporting Teachers, Plus: She Talks Greys Anatomy Reunions View Story

Right now, Patrick is working on the new political show Ways and Means about a politician who loses faith and is secretly working with the other side.

He told Rachel, There's so much movement right now, politically this week in particular, of course the tragedy of last week There's a lot of room for healing in this country and there's need for that. And hopefully, through entertainment and through the show, we can hopefully take a step in the right direction and find a path forward where we're working together not against each other. I think that's the most important thing.

Patrick added, I think the last four years have forced all of us to be much more aware of what's going on. It's a lot more work, fighting through the information and disinformation to find the truth It's unacceptable what's happening right now in Washington The world is watching. And we need to see some accountability.

Off screen, Dempsey is returning to his Maine roots with a new partnership with Poland Spring Origin water.

Hes getting the word out about the water, telling Rachel, Poland Spring Origin, it's this right here. This is a 100% recycled bottle, which is really exciting and Poland Spring has been around since 1845, not too far from where I grew up. So, it's the first time that it's been distributed nationally.

The company has been a big supporter of the Dempsey Center. Patrick explained, It's a foundation that I started many years ago in memory of my mother We approach people who have been impacted by cancer, and we try to take care of them, holistically complimentary medicine, and we do that at no cost for them.

He went on, We do an event called the Dempsey Challenge, which is a bike event, a walk event, and run event and Poland Spring has always been a supporter.

Link:
Patrick Dempsey's Noble Reason for Returning to 'Grey's Anatomy,' Plus: His New Water Campaign - Extra

The American Med Spa Association (AmSpa) Acquires the Academy for Injection Anatomy (AIA) – Yahoo Finance

The American Med Spa Association (AmSpa) today announced that it has acquired the Academy for Injection Anatomy (AIA), a clinical training program created by renowned plastic surgeon and anatomist Chris Surek, DO, that provides unique, hands-on facial anatomy education for injectors.

CHICAGO, Jan. 11, 2021 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- The American Med Spa Association (AmSpa) today announced that it has acquired the Academy for Injection Anatomy (AIA), a clinical training program created by renowned plastic surgeon and anatomist Chris Surek, DO, that provides unique, hands-on facial anatomy education for injectors.

"AmSpa has always wanted to provide best-in-class hands-on clinical and didactic training but, until now, we hadn't found the right partner," says AmSpa Founder and CEO, Alex R. Thiersch, JD. "When the opportunity to bring Dr. Surek and his team to AmSpa presented itself, I jumped at the opportunity, with enthusiasm. Dr. Surek's Academy for Injection Anatomy is unquestionably the gold standard in the industry for injectable training."

Unlike other anatomy-based injectable training programs, the AIA allows all course participants to take part in actual injection and dissection activities, directly under the instruction of Dr. Surek and the other renowned members of the AIA faculty. The program is perfectly in keeping with AmSpa's dedication to improving the medical aesthetic industry through compliance and safety, making the combination of the two organizations a natural fit.

"This is going to be a very special partnership," says Dr. Surek. "Over the past few months, behind the scenes, I have been working with my faculty, including our newest member, Steven Weiner, MD, to develop a fresh, unique and fully comprehensive one-stop-shop training course for injectors of all skill levels. This comprehensive injection training course will include full face anatomy, injection technique, rheology, toxin science, complication management and ultrasoundall assembled in a high-yield two-day course including our world-class, one-of-a-kind, hands-on cadaver lab curriculum. I am so excited to team up with AmSpa and take this vision and passion nationally and internationally."

Story continues

Dr. Surek is a board-certified plastic surgeon and internationally recognized facial anatomist. He is an assistant professor of anatomy at Kansas City University in Kansas City, Missouri, and is a clinical assistant professor of plastic surgery at the University of Kansas Medical Center. He specializes in cosmetic surgery of the face, breast and body, as well as non-invasive facial rejuvenation procedures. He has co-authored several book chapters and published original research in facial cosmetic surgery, facial anatomy and filler injection. Dr. Surek is also the co-author of Facial Volumization: An Anatomic Approach, an anatomy-based textbook for filler injections. He serves as a key opinion leader for several companies within the aesthetic industry and teaches cadaver-based facial anatomy courses nationally and internationally.

"Not only is Dr. Surek an incredibly dynamic and passionate teacher, but also his training as both an anatomist and board-certified plastic surgeon makes him one of the most qualified and sought-after instructors of aesthetic injections in the world," says Thiersch. "His knowledge of anatomy and aesthetic technique, coupled with a passion for teaching and a desire to get the most out of his students, makes him the unquestioned leader in injectables training worldwide. I am so excited to bring Dr. Surek and his incredible faculty into the AmSpa family."

The AIA is based in Kansas City, Missouri and, until now, injectors who wished to participate in the course had to travel there to do so. However, now that the AIA is part of AmSpa, it will be available to injectors throughout the country in conjunction with AmSpa's Boot Camps. Additional seating for the AIA two-day trainings in Kansas City on February 13-14, March 13-14, April 17-18 and May 15-16 will be released in the very near future. To register for these events, visit https://www.americanmedspa.org/page/injectionanatomy.

"Our goal in acquiring the AIA was not to change what Dr. Surek is doing, because he is already the best at what he does, but to add to it by increasing the scope and breadth of his offerings, all while keeping the course affordable and accessible to everyone in the industry," Thiersch says. "AmSpa will help pass his knowledge to more people, in more locations, than ever before."

About the American Med Spa Association (AmSpa) The American Med Spa Association (AmSpa) provides business, legal, and clinical training and resources to medical spas and aesthetic practices throughout the country. AmSpa's eventsincluding Medical Spa & Aesthetic Boot Camps, Academy of Injection Anatomy trainings and Medical Spa Showprovide business and legal best-practices to anyone entering the medical spa space or looking to improve their existing practice. AmSpa members receive access to legal summaries of laws governing medical spas in their state, discounts, a robust and growing webinar library, and many other benefits. For more information visit http://www.americanmedspa.org, call 312-981-0993, or email info@americanmedspa.org.

Media Contact

Michael Meyer, American Med Spa Association, (312) 801-5436, mike@americanmedspa.org

Twitter, Facebook

SOURCE American Med Spa Association

More:
The American Med Spa Association (AmSpa) Acquires the Academy for Injection Anatomy (AIA) - Yahoo Finance

Fujitsu Leverages Deep Learning in World’s Most Accurate Recognition of Complex Behaviors – HPCwire

TOKYO, Jan. 13, 2021 Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. has announced the development of a technology that utilizes deep learning to recognize the positions and connections of adjacent joints in complex movements or behavior in which multiple joints move in tandem. This makes it possible to achieve greater accuracy in recognizing, for instance, when a person performs a task like removing objects from a box. This technology successfully achieved the worlds highest accuracy against the world standard benchmark in the field of behavior recognition, with significant gains over the results achieved using conventional technologies, which dont make use of information on neighboring joints.

By leveraging this technology to perform checks of manufacturing procedures or unsafe behavior in public spaces, Fujitsu aims to contribute to significant improvements in public safety and in the work place, helping to deliver on the promise of a safer and more secure society for all.

Fujitsu will present the details of this technology at the 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2020), which is being held online from January 10th, 2021 (Sunday) to January 15th, 2021 (Friday).

Background

In recent years, advances in AI technology have made it possible to recognize human behavior from video images using deep learning. This technology offers a variety of promising applications in a wide range of real-world scenarios, for example, in performing checks of manufacturing procedures in factories or detecting unsafe behavior in public spaces. In general, human behavior recognition utilizing AI relies on temporal changes in the position of each of the skeletal joints, including in the hands, elbows, and shoulders, as identifying features, which are then linked to simple movement patterns such as standing or sitting.With time series behavior-recognition technology developed by Fujitsu Labs, Fujitsu has successfully realized highly-accurate image recognition using a deep learning model that can operate with high-accuracy even for complex behaviors in which multiple joints change in conjunction with each other, such as removing objects from a box during unpacking.

About the Newly Developed Technology

Complex movements like unpacking involve hand, elbow, and shoulder joints moving in tandem with the arm bending and stretching. Fujitsu has developed a new AI model for a graph convolutional neural networks that performs convolution operation of the graph structure by adopting a graph consisting of edges connecting adjacent joints based on the structure of the human body with the joint position as a node (Vertex). By training this model in advance using the time series data of joints, the connection strength (Weight) with neighboring joints can be optimized, and effective connection relationships for behavior recognition can be acquired. With conventional technologies, it was necessary to accurately grasp the individual characteristics of each joint. With an AI model that has already been trained, the combined features of the adjacent joints that are linked can be extracted, making it possible to achieve highly-accurate recognition for complex movements.

This technology was evaluated against the world standard benchmark in the field of behavior recognition using skeleton data, and in the case of simple behaviors such as standing and sitting in the open data set, the accuracy rate was maintained at the same level as that of conventional technology that does not use information on neighboring joints. In the case of complex behaviors like a person unpacking a box or throwing an object, however, the accuracy rate improved greatly, to achieve an overall improvement of more than 7% over the conventional alternative to reach the worlds highest recognition accuracy.

Future Plans

By adding the newly developed AI model for recognizing complex behaviors obtained with this technology to the 100 basic behavior already accommodated by Fujitsus behavioral analysis technology Actlyzer,, it will become possible rapidly deploy new, highly-accurate recognition models. Fujitsu ultimately aims to leverage this new capability to roll out the system in fiscal year 2021, and contribute to the resolution of real-world issues to deliver a safer and more secure society.

About Fujitsu

Fujitsu is a leading Japanese information and communication technology (ICT) company offering a full range of technology products, solutions and services. Approximately 130,000 Fujitsu people support customers in more than 100 countries. We use our experience and the power of ICT to shape the future of society with our customers. Fujitsu Limited (TSE:6702) reported consolidated revenues of 3.9 trillion yen (US$35 billion) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. For more information, please see http://www.fujitsu.com.

About Fujitsu Laboratories

Founded in 1968 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. is one of the premier research centers in the world. With a global network of laboratories in Japan, China, the United States and Europe, the organization conducts a wide range of basic and applied research in the areas of Next-generation Services, Computer Servers, Networks, Electronic Devices and Advanced Materials. For more information, please see: http://www.fujitsu.com/jp/group/labs/en/.

Source: Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd.

See the article here:
Fujitsu Leverages Deep Learning in World's Most Accurate Recognition of Complex Behaviors - HPCwire

Seeing opportunity in every difficulty | Community | southernminn.com – Southernminn.com

Moods are a very real part of our daily lives but also an area we need to discern carefully. We seldom think about human behavior and why we fall into certain attitudes but I believe it would be worth our time to examine our thoughts on a regular basis. The Bible and psychology has much to say about the ups and downs of our emotions and its critical to understand how our human nature can resist and oppose our relationship with God. The fine line between our mental impulses and our spiritual line of communication with the Lord are difficult to understand, however this battlefield of the mind has everything to do with whether God or our feelings are controlling us. Whether you are beaming with happiness today or walking around in a melancholy fog, may you embrace the Lords goodness and recognize His mercy and love is all around you. Yes, much of the world is saturated with hatred and confusion but there is always perfect peace in His presence. I enjoy taking long walks where I can quietly talk with Him. I know that God loves us and wants us to live in His Spirit and truth.

His desire is that we learn how to know the difference between His voice and all the other voices in the world including our own. When we find ourselves in the valley of despair, the last thing we desire to do is to worship God, but praising and trusting Him is exactly what we need to do. There is no place so hopeless that God cannot deliver you! He is never distracted or too busy to hear your cries and there is no darkness where Gods light cannot find and save you! Jesus wants you and I to be filled with His confidence and reassurance but this includes ignoring the opinions of our emotions and embracing His truth. Be encouraged today in knowing that God desires to hold you in His arms of love but is waiting for you to trust Him. Yes, the three Hebrew children were in the fiery furnace but remember that Christ was also in there with them. Winston Churchill is quoted as saying, The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity, while the optimist sees opportunity in every difficulty.

We realize that life is filled with disappointments but we cannot remain curled up in a fetal position with the blanket over our head. After a season of prayer and receiving a more clear understanding, we are to arise, wash our face, put our armor back on and return to the battlefield in the faith that God will continue to heal, guide, and empower us. The apostle Paul wrote, It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery Galatians 5:1. This verse might sound confusing, but when a person is born again, they are delivered spiritually and are given the opportunity to be set free from mental and emotional deception. As Christians, let us remember our bodies and our minds are to be our servant not our master. We are an eternal spirit and have the opportunity to live victorious no matter how we feel or what is going on around us.

The Rev. William F. Holland Jr., DD., C.ED.D., is a Minister, Chaplain, and author. Learn more at billyhollandministries.com

' + this.content + '

Go here to see the original:
Seeing opportunity in every difficulty | Community | southernminn.com - Southernminn.com

3 ways to turn that failing New Year’s resolution into a habit – 4029tv

Have a bad relationship with New Year's resolutions? Many people start strong and then peter out by mid-January as work deadlines, home chores and the latest Netflix binge takes precedence over good intentions. Some even thought this year would be different due to being homebound. (Laughable!)Instead of a resolution, it may be worth trying a "tiny habit," a term coined by behavioral science expert B.J. Fogg, who founded and directs research and innovation at Stanford University's Behavior Design Lab. As Fogg explains in his best-selling book "Tiny Habits: The Small Changes That Change Everything," the key to building a better habit is tying each action to something you already do while also matching location, frequency and theme. Fogg's tips are based, he said, on mountains of research on human behavior modification and the many people he has coached over some 40 years.Here's a look at how tiny habits work:CNN: What's the secret sauce to making a new behavior a habit?B.J. Fogg: Emotion is what forms the habit. It's not repetition. It's not willpower. It's not discipline. It's the emotions you feel when you do a behavior. If you have a feeling of success when doing that behavior, it will start wiring as a habit. If it's an intense feeling of success, it will substantially wire.What doesn't work is trying to get somebody to do something they don't want to do. You can nag them into compliance, maybe but that's not a habit.What also doesn't work is picking a habit that's painful, or causes you to feel awkward or causes you to feel negative. You want to do the opposite you want the habit to help you feel successful or give you joy or pleasure or satisfaction in some way.CNN: A lot of the habits we want to do for our health are not necessarily enjoyable, at least at first. Fogg: If someone wants to exercise or feels they should, the key is to find an exercise that makes them feel successful or they find enjoyable one or the other.The third approach is to redesign your environment so the only way you can get to work is walking or biking, so you must do it. That's an environmental change sell your car. Then the only way you can do something is by walking or biking so you'll get exercise. That's not really practical for most people.In reality, the only habits that wire in readily are behaviors you already want to do, and you feel successful doing them.CNN: What are your three criteria for a successful habit?Fogg: My method is a system. As you're picking a new habit, it's got to match three criteria.Number one: It needs to be effective. Take meditation as stress reduction. For a lot of people meditation is not effective for reducing stress because all they do is become aware of how scattered their mind is, so that's a bad idea for those people.For me, what's effective is going out into nature. Even a short little walk to the ocean or a short walk into the garden is very effective.Number two: It needs to be behavior people want to do. If you don't want to do that behavior, maybe you can manipulate yourself into it a few times but it won't become a habit.Number three: It needs to be a behavior you can do. So I talked about walking out and looking at the ocean or looking at tadpoles. Well, I live in a place I can do that.If someone can't do that, they've got to pick something else, like hanging out with their dog.CNN: You say the new behavior has to fit into your routine to become a habit. I want to start drinking more water, so how should I do that?Fogg: That's one of the keys in my work. It's not just about picking the habit, you have to design it into your routine. And that means, what will that action come after naturally? Starting the coffee maker happens in the kitchen, it happens in the morning, and it happens once a day.After I start the coffee maker, after I feed the dog, then I will drink a glass of water. if you can design it into your routine, if you know what this habit comes after, then your chances of succeeding go way up.I call that an anchor. You want the anchor and the new habit to happen in the same location. If the new habit can be associated with the kitchen, then find a kitchen anchor for it. What doesn't work is like, "Oh, I start the coffee maker then I have to go out to the garage to do the new habit." That does not work. Location matters.Next is frequency. If you want the habit to happen once a day, then you want an anchor routine that happens once a day. Like, in my life I want to do push-ups throughout the day. So I attached that behavior to when I have to pee. So after I go to the bathroom, I do two push-ups because then I get to do push-ups throughout the day.The next thing that matters is the theme. Now this matters the least the first two matter more but if I see feeding the dog as a nurturing ritual, a good habit to follow would be a way that I nurture myself.You're looking for same location, same frequency, and if you can, the same theme. And if you get those lined up, then the habit can just click into place.CNN: Why doesn't your approach include such typical recommendations as repeating the behavior for 66 days so it becomes automatic?Fogg: There are a bunch of things that aren't required to create habits that people think they must do like, "Oh, you have to write, set a goal." You don't have to set a goal. That's not true.The whole thing about repetition is misguided. It's the emotion that wires the habit in if you repeat it and you hate it, it does not wire in as a habit. It will never become a habit.Or people say only work on one habit at a time. No, that's not true at all. You have to have an accountability partner is another recommendation. You don't have to.There are all these myths out there around habits and change. My work is saying, "No, people. Here's how to do it quickly and easily, and all those other old things are either wrong or optional."CNN: How did you come to choose these criteria for habit building?Fogg: In 2007, I discovered what I called the behavior model all human behavior comes down to only three things: Is there motivation to do that behavior? Is there an ability to do the behavior? Is there a prompt for that behavior?A prompt is something that reminds you, and you use an existing routine to prompt you. Feeding the dog is going to be my prompt. It's not going to be a Post-It note; it's not going to be an alarm; it's not going to be just trying to remember.You're hacking the prompt by using an existing routine to remind yourself.When you see how the pieces work, it's like, "Oh my gosh, is it really that simple?" And the answer is yes. CNN: You've launched a tool that people can use on their smartphones to help them form healthy habits. How does it work?Fogg: The tool provides "recipes" for successful tiny habits. It can be found at recipemaker.tinyhabits.com. It just launched and is still being tweaked but It's free, open to all. It's designed for mobile phones so people can use it anywhere.Along the top are various categories you might want to choose from, such as nutrition, fitness, brain health, productivity. Those aren't random, those are informed by my research at Stanford that finds these are the things that people want most. There is a lot of data and research behind it, but we keep the tool itself really simple.Under each category, you can swipe through the top cards to look at the new habits you might choose. I'm only including habits that I think are effective. And once you settle on one that you like, you go to the cards below and say, "When am I going to do this? When is it going to fit into my routine?'You can choose the card "think of something I'm grateful for" and pair that with the card representing an existing habit like "put my head on my pillow." And that's your recipe for a new habit you're going to practice. You're not going to be perfect, but you're going to practice and see if it works for you.The tool can be used without signing up for emails, but if you want to hear more from me about that habit, you can enter your email.The ultimate goal is anybody in the world can benefit from this without installing anything, without giving up your email. It's a tool to help me with my life's mission to help people to be happier and healthier.

Have a bad relationship with New Year's resolutions? Many people start strong and then peter out by mid-January as work deadlines, home chores and the latest Netflix binge takes precedence over good intentions. Some even thought this year would be different due to being homebound. (Laughable!)

Instead of a resolution, it may be worth trying a "tiny habit," a term coined by behavioral science expert B.J. Fogg, who founded and directs research and innovation at Stanford University's Behavior Design Lab.

As Fogg explains in his best-selling book "Tiny Habits: The Small Changes That Change Everything," the key to building a better habit is tying each action to something you already do while also matching location, frequency and theme.

Fogg's tips are based, he said, on mountains of research on human behavior modification and the many people he has coached over some 40 years.

Here's a look at how tiny habits work:

CNN: What's the secret sauce to making a new behavior a habit?

B.J. Fogg: Emotion is what forms the habit. It's not repetition. It's not willpower. It's not discipline. It's the emotions you feel when you do a behavior. If you have a feeling of success when doing that behavior, it will start wiring as a habit. If it's an intense feeling of success, it will substantially wire.

What doesn't work is trying to get somebody to do something they don't want to do. You can nag them into compliance, maybe but that's not a habit.

What also doesn't work is picking a habit that's painful, or causes you to feel awkward or causes you to feel negative. You want to do the opposite you want the habit to help you feel successful or give you joy or pleasure or satisfaction in some way.

CNN: A lot of the habits we want to do for our health are not necessarily enjoyable, at least at first.

Fogg: If someone wants to exercise or feels they should, the key is to find an exercise that makes them feel successful or they find enjoyable one or the other.

The third approach is to redesign your environment so the only way you can get to work is walking or biking, so you must do it. That's an environmental change sell your car. Then the only way you can do something is by walking or biking so you'll get exercise. That's not really practical for most people.

In reality, the only habits that wire in readily are behaviors you already want to do, and you feel successful doing them.

CNN: What are your three criteria for a successful habit?

Fogg: My method is a system. As you're picking a new habit, it's got to match three criteria.

Number one: It needs to be effective. Take meditation as stress reduction. For a lot of people meditation is not effective for reducing stress because all they do is become aware of how scattered their mind is, so that's a bad idea for those people.

For me, what's effective is going out into nature. Even a short little walk to the ocean or a short walk into the garden is very effective.

Number two: It needs to be behavior people want to do. If you don't want to do that behavior, maybe you can manipulate yourself into it a few times but it won't become a habit.

Number three: It needs to be a behavior you can do. So I talked about walking out and looking at the ocean or looking at tadpoles. Well, I live in a place I can do that.

If someone can't do that, they've got to pick something else, like hanging out with their dog.

CNN: You say the new behavior has to fit into your routine to become a habit. I want to start drinking more water, so how should I do that?

Fogg: That's one of the keys in my work. It's not just about picking the habit, you have to design it into your routine. And that means, what will that action come after naturally? Starting the coffee maker happens in the kitchen, it happens in the morning, and it happens once a day.

After I start the coffee maker, after I feed the dog, then I will drink a glass of water. if you can design it into your routine, if you know what this habit comes after, then your chances of succeeding go way up.

I call that an anchor. You want the anchor and the new habit to happen in the same location. If the new habit can be associated with the kitchen, then find a kitchen anchor for it. What doesn't work is like, "Oh, I start the coffee maker then I have to go out to the garage to do the new habit." That does not work. Location matters.

Next is frequency. If you want the habit to happen once a day, then you want an anchor routine that happens once a day. Like, in my life I want to do push-ups throughout the day. So I attached that behavior to when I have to pee. So after I go to the bathroom, I do two push-ups because then I get to do push-ups throughout the day.

The next thing that matters is the theme. Now this matters the least the first two matter more but if I see feeding the dog as a nurturing ritual, a good habit to follow would be a way that I nurture myself.

You're looking for same location, same frequency, and if you can, the same theme. And if you get those lined up, then the habit can just click into place.

CNN: Why doesn't your approach include such typical recommendations as repeating the behavior for 66 days so it becomes automatic?

Fogg: There are a bunch of things that aren't required to create habits that people think they must do like, "Oh, you have to write, set a goal." You don't have to set a goal. That's not true.

The whole thing about repetition is misguided. It's the emotion that wires the habit in if you repeat it and you hate it, it does not wire in as a habit. It will never become a habit.

Or people say only work on one habit at a time. No, that's not true at all. You have to have an accountability partner is another recommendation. You don't have to.

There are all these myths out there around habits and change. My work is saying, "No, people. Here's how to do it quickly and easily, and all those other old things are either wrong or optional."

CNN: How did you come to choose these criteria for habit building?

Fogg: In 2007, I discovered what I called the behavior model all human behavior comes down to only three things: Is there motivation to do that behavior? Is there an ability to do the behavior? Is there a prompt for that behavior?

A prompt is something that reminds you, and you use an existing routine to prompt you. Feeding the dog is going to be my prompt. It's not going to be a Post-It note; it's not going to be an alarm; it's not going to be just trying to remember.

You're hacking the prompt by using an existing routine to remind yourself.

When you see how the pieces work, it's like, "Oh my gosh, is it really that simple?" And the answer is yes.

CNN: You've launched a tool that people can use on their smartphones to help them form healthy habits. How does it work?

Fogg: The tool provides "recipes" for successful tiny habits. It can be found at recipemaker.tinyhabits.com. It just launched and is still being tweaked but It's free, open to all. It's designed for mobile phones so people can use it anywhere.

Along the top are various categories you might want to choose from, such as nutrition, fitness, brain health, productivity. Those aren't random, those are informed by my research at Stanford that finds these are the things that people want most. There is a lot of data and research behind it, but we keep the tool itself really simple.

Under each category, you can swipe through the top cards to look at the new habits you might choose. I'm only including habits that I think are effective. And once you settle on one that you like, you go to the cards below and say, "When am I going to do this? When is it going to fit into my routine?'

You can choose the card "think of something I'm grateful for" and pair that with the card representing an existing habit like "put my head on my pillow." And that's your recipe for a new habit you're going to practice. You're not going to be perfect, but you're going to practice and see if it works for you.

The tool can be used without signing up for emails, but if you want to hear more from me about that habit, you can enter your email.

The ultimate goal is anybody in the world can benefit from this without installing anything, without giving up your email. It's a tool to help me with my life's mission to help people to be happier and healthier.

Link:
3 ways to turn that failing New Year's resolution into a habit - 4029tv

UofSC faculty work to counteract the emotional power of misinformation – @UofSC

Posted on: January 14, 2021; Updated on: January 14, 2021By Carol JG Ward, ward8@mailbox.sc.edu, 803-777-7549

Don't believe the news.

I dont trust the media.

Im not going to look up anything. I have my opinion which is just as valid as yours.

How is fact checking possible within 48 hours of an incident? We believe what we believe.

These are actual comments posted on social media in the days following the Jan. 6 insurrection in which supporters of President Donald Trump breached the U.S. Capitol. They illustrate the gargantuan task of combatting mis- and disinformation that is circulated, consumed and believed by the public.

One of the challenges is that people connect and react emotionally to questionable information that aligns with their opinions.

As educators we can give people all of the skills, tips and techniques in the world, but it's going to come down to how they feel about the person or the source. That is going to have a really huge influence on whether or not they believe that information, says professor Nicole Cooke, the Augusta Baker Chair in the School of Information Science.

Cooke and her colleagues in the College of Information and Communications have conducted research to help improve media literacy, to teach people how to evaluate quality sources and to recognize clues for misinformation.

School of Information Science professor Nicole Cooke encourages critical news consumption.

A huge part of the threat and power of fake news, mis- and disinformation is that people tend to believe what they want to believe, Cooke says. It's very hard to overcome that emotional barrier, so the challenge becomes showing them how to be a more critical news consumer.

We've seen a lot of partisanship and politicization of sources, she says. I might believe The New York Times is a credible source, and someone else may say its biased and wont read it. I don't necessarily care where you get your information, but I do want you to have tips and techniques to transcend the source.

While there are plugins and tools that can be used to help identify fake news, Cooke says she wants to help news consumers build that capacity for themselves. For example, she recommends a technique called triangulation: Have you seen the information in at least three different places? She also suggests maintaining a healthy dose of skepticism. Pay attention if your instincts are telling you something looks or sounds questionable. Check out the credentials of the person writing or sharing. Dont get caught up in the moment; dig a little deeper to verify information before sharing it.

Cooke also recommends getting outside our filter bubbles and echo chambers. One way to recognize what those are is to keep a news consumption log for 24 hours. Note the news sources you rely on, the time youre reading or watching, the headlines and the source. As you see patterns for example, if you notice you get news only from social media or from podcasts you might want to start reading a newspaper or watching a nightly newscast.

The purpose is not necessarily to judge a source as good or bad; it's just a tool for taking a deeper dive into our habits to become more cognizant of our news environment, Cooke says.

Andrea Hickerson, School of Journalism and Mass Communications professor, says deepfakes are practically undetectable.

Technology in the form of deepfakes presents a different and perhaps more challenging disinformation dilemma for not only the public but for journalists as well.

Deepfakes are artificially rendered videos that are so believable they are undetectable.

Weve heard the phrase seeing is believing. Deepfakes turn that upside down because we could see things that aren't actually real, says Andrea Hickerson, director of the School of Journalism and Mass Communications. As deepfakes continue to get more sophisticated, the challenge in detecting them grows.

Hickerson is working with Matt Wright and John Sohrawardi, researchers at the Rochester Institute of Technology in New York, to build cloud-based software that will help journalists ferret out deepfakes. They are concentrating on journalists because they are seen as important arbiters of the truth and credibility and because they have a large outreach.

DeFake allows journalists to cut and paste a video link into a tool on a website to receive a score of the likelihood the video has been faked. The research team has been working in newsrooms to see how journalists will incorporate the software as a tool in news-gathering.

Some local reporters may think deepfakes are an issue that doesnt apply to them, Hickerson says. But what if its the mayor or a local hospital or financial executive who is being misrepresented. Deepfakes can be in any context, and there are a lot of local implications. Everyone should be on guard.

While deepfakes are often imperceptible to the human eye, Hickerson says the same questions for assessing the veracity of any information can be still be useful in deciding whether to believe what youre seeing: Where is this video coming from? Who is sharing it? Why are they sharing it? What are the implications of it? Is there an alternative explanation for what the person is saying? What are reputable reporters saying about it?

Deepfakes are created, obviously, to influence public opinion and perception. False information can diminish our decision-making capacity, manipulate emotions, beliefs, opinions and maybe even actions, Hickerson says. Thats not good for democracy or community.

School of Information Science professorAmir Karami researches bot activity on social media.

As with deepfakes, the strategy behind bots is to influence public opinion. This can be done with good intentions sharing links to reputable news sources or health information, for example or with a more malevolent agenda such as trying to sow division or influence an election.

Bots are developed with computer programming to produce content and emulate human behavior. They may use complex algorithms that analyze the content of a post and tailor a response, or they may use an algorithm that simply looks for a specific word in a post and then generates a standard reply. Bots also may automatically retweet all the posts from a celebrity or politician.

Human trolls who do nothing from morning to night but share misinformation and disinformation also fall into the bot category, says Amir Karami, a professor in the School of Information Science.

Karami has done research on bot activity following the 2018 mass shooting at a high school in Winter Park, Florida, and more recently analysis of bot-produced tweets related to the COVID-19 vaccine, the opioid crisis, abortion, LGBTQ issues, trust in science and government, and the effect of dis- and misinformation on mental health. The more harmful of these tweets use strategies such as baiting and spreading conspiracy theories to elicit emotional responses.

People are aware of bots, but they dont understand them or know how to identify them, Karami says. If you dont understand what a bot is, you cant understand the impact of sharing their disinformation.

Tipoffs that an account is a bot include a large difference between the number of followers and the number followed; no profile image or a suspicious image such as an animation (to check the validity of a real image, do a Google search); unusual activity such as hundreds of tweets per day or accounts that retweet only. For public figures accounts, check for the blue verified badge. Karami also recommends Botometer, an online tool that measures the probability an account is fake.

Brooke McKeever, School of Journalism and Mass Communications professor,says it's important to counteract misleading impressions from social media.

Sometimes simply the volume of social media posts by actual real people can create misinformation.

Brooke McKeever, associate dean for research in the College of Information and Communications, and Robert McKeever, a professor in the School of Journalism and Mass Communications, have studied communication and dis- and misinformation in relation to vaccinations. Their research shows that mothers who do not support or have reservations about childhood vaccinations are more likely to communicate about the issue both on social media and in person.

This outsized social media presence could give the impression of a false consensus, and people could start to believe that anti-vaccine sentiment or vaccine hesitancy is the norm when its really not, Brooke McKeever says.

In addition, some of the McKeevers research with others found that widespread social media posts about the myth that vaccines are linked to autism drove some mainstream media coverage, giving further credence to misinformation.

School of Journalism and Mass Communications professor Robert McKeeverresearcheshealth topics in social media.

To counteract these misleading impressions, McKeever says it is important for people who believe vaccines are safe and effective to speak out, to acknowledge concerns and answer questions by sharing trusted and legitimate sources, and to do so civilly dont pounce.

A lot of us have considered childhood vaccinations standard and never found the need to say, I just got my kids vaccinated, McKeever says. For those who are strongly anti-vaccine or adhere to conspiracy theories, you're probably not going to change their mind, but there's a whole swath of people who are somewhere in the middle.

With the unprecedented rapid development of the COVID vaccine, sharing accurate information is imperative for people who are nervous and have questions, McKeever says, but perhaps even more influential will be for citizens to see leaders, friends and neighbors in their own communities getting vaccinated themselves.

The more that people get correct information from trusted local sources and experts even in local Facebook groups dedicated to fact-sharing it will become a layering effect, she says, echoing her colleagues emphasis on encouraging the public to become more discerning in their media consumption.

The College of Information and Communications has a role to support democracy and should be the leader of the discussion about mis- and disinformation on campus and in the state, faculty members say.

We have a really important obligation to serve the public of our state by taking on the role of public editor or ombudsperson for news and information that reaches citizens in South Carolina, says Hickerson.

Believing misinformation and disinformation can hinder how people make decisions and can lead to wrong or even harmful conclusions.

We want to provide guidance so people can use information to their advantage and not be led astray, Cooke says. You can still make the bad decision if you want to, but at least you would have all of the possibilities at your disposal.

Share this Story! Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

Topics: Faculty, Research, College of Information and Communications

See the rest here:
UofSC faculty work to counteract the emotional power of misinformation - @UofSC

Letters to the Editor: January 15, 2021 – West Hawaii Today

Time to catch up

Last Fridays front page article showcased an upcoming Sustainability Summit, which will address food insecurity and ways our island can become more self-sustainable. This was followed by a Sunday article on Covid Cluckers, which lays (ha ha) out many good reasons for people on this island to have backyard chickens, which would seem to address these issues.

But, unless you live on AG land, you will be breaking the law if you have even one egg-layer at your house. This pandemic is illustrating the need for more food self-sufficiency on our island, but it doesnt matter whether you have a large lot, whether your chickens are cooped, or that you dont own a rooster. To have a chicken lay an egg for your breakfast is forbidden.

Thats this island.

Our neighbor island to the north allows backyard chickens anywhere in Honolulu as long as they are not a nuisance. And, in fact, many (if not most) major cities allow chickens, though with varying restrictions as to the number that are acceptable. Portland, Houston, Los Angeles even New York City; all permit chickens in urban areas. Seattle, for example, allows up to eight chickens and only requires that coops be placed at a minimum distance from houses. Chicago. Denver. Minneapolis. Dallas. Nashville. Anchorage. The list goes on.

Over the years, various council members have been contacted about this issue and none has been interested in getting this law changed. What a pity because what a lost opportunity. Chickens are easy to raise, they require little special food, being quite happy with table scraps, stale bread, old cereal, and are willing to eat bugs and the occasional coqui. They provide fertilizer for gardens, take up little space and seldom roam. Best of all, a happy hen produces an egg every day or two during laying season.

Isnt it time for the Big Island to catch up with the rest of the country by allowing backyard chickens and thus further promoting this important concept of food security?

P. Hanson

Keauhou

How its done

After all thats happened in the past four years, its good that people are asking the question, How do you get millions of Americans to believe things that arent true? Psychologists, sociologists, neuroscientists, marketers, cult specialists, scammers, political analysts, historians, dictators, conspiracy theory website designers all know the answer to that question.

There are numerous books that explain such techniques; gaslighting where doubt is conveyed that what you perceive as truth is actually false, propaganda where lies are repeatedly broadcast, reverse projection where you accuse others of doing exactly what youre doing, subliminal messaging and dog whistles where thinking is influenced with stealthily planted words or ideas.

Whats known is that none of these techniques will be successful unless our thinking brain is derailed by a flood of emotion. The scammer calls with a story about your grandson being in trouble. You send money because you feel fear and concern. The marketer insists youre smart for buying their product and your ego kicks in. Fox News tells you that immigrants are ruining this country and youre mad. Trump tells you that Democrats will tax your wealth or that they stole the election and youre outraged. Trump tells anarchists and racists that he loves them and they feel empowered.

Gaslighting was possible after Trump and Republicans first fueled emotions of loyalty and patriotism. Then they could successfully raise suspicion and disdain (feelings) against mainstream media and Democrats. Consequently, their voters would doubt any information (facts) that revealed the lies and psychological subterfuge. What it boils down to is that people will believe lies when emotions that they neither recognize or admit are put in play. Experts on human behavior understand how people can be made to believe lies but getting those believers to grasp that their emotions have been manipulated is a very different story.

Martha Hodges

Kailua Kona

Letters policy

Letters to the editor should be 300 words or less and will be edited for style and grammar. Longer viewpoint guest columns may not exceed 800 words. Submit online at http://www.westhawaiitoday.com/?p=118321, via email to letters@westhawaiitoday.com or address them to:

Editor

West Hawaii Today

PO Box 789

Kailua-Kona, HI 96745

The rest is here:
Letters to the Editor: January 15, 2021 - West Hawaii Today