All posts by medical

Anatomy

Are you studying human anatomy? Are you not terrified that there’s bones inside you, let alone horrified by the concept of organs? – Strand

Hello! I assume you opened this article because you fit into one or more of these categories:

If youre studying anatomy and dont fit into the last two, good on you, youre probably the bravest person in the entire world.

Okay so, first off, I have a silly little disease called Ehlers Danlos Syndrome. Its silly because all my joints just go wooooo all the time. Basically, I spend a lot of time in medical settings, but still remain willfully ignorant to how anything in the body works other than joints, and even thats iffy. I just know mine are fucked up.

I dont feel like I have organs. Like, I know I do, but I dont ever think about it and if you remind me, Ill plug my ears and say, I cant hear you hahhaha. I just cannot comprehend how your organs are inside you your whole life (or, even worse, ARE YOU), but you never really have a relationship with them. Basically, Im saying like if you took my kidneys and put it in one of those police line ups with five other peoples kidneys, I wouldnt be able to choose which one is mine, which is pretty fucked up since its inside you forever, unless you get a kidney transplant. I should have picked a different organ for this analogy, but that would require me to think longer about which organs exist, and I refuse to do that.

So, I have the most issues with my neck, and have had lots of x-rays etc. before. But until the other day, I never looked at how the neck joints are actually supposed to move, so I watched this horrifying video of a skinless organ bone man, and boy was I confused. Honestly, I thought the neck joints went kind of like this:

But it looks like this???????

I guess I should have figured that out using logic and reason, but Im not Aristotle and I will not be tricked into reading something called The Organon.

Here is my interpretation of skinless organ bone man, since I dont want to get sued by sickos (people who made the skinless organ bone man videos).

Basically, I have some questions Id like you to answer for me.

Feel free to contact me at candyklaine@hotmail.com

*Yes, I did get an A in school biology, but I did it by separating it from reality using my brain (only good organ).

Continued here:
Are you studying human anatomy? Are you not terrified that there's bones inside you, let alone horrified by the concept of organs? - Strand

Anatomy

‘Grey’s Anatomy’ and ‘Private Practice’ Crossovers Stemmed From This 1 Crisis Off-Screen – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Fans who watchGreys Anatomyknow that the long-running medical drama is famous for its epic crossover events. First, the crossovers happened with characters from its first spinoff,Private Practice, but now they occur withStation 19. However, what viewers probably dont know is that these events only began because of this one real-life crisis during the filming ofGreys AnatomyandPrivate Practice in 2007.

In the early 2000s,Greys Anatomybecame a pop culture phenomenon. To capitalize on its success, ABC pursued a spinoff featuring Addison Montgomery (Kate Walsh). To test out the new series, ABC aired a two-hour special,Greys Anatomy, which aired on May 3, 2007.

The backdoor pilot featured Addison leaving Seattle Grace Hospital to visit friends in Los Angeles, California. While visiting Naomi (Audra McDonald) and Sam Bennett, she ends up performing surgery. Naomi is a fertility specialist, while Sam practices internal medicine. They both own and work at the Oceanside Wellness Group. Their private practice focuses on a whole-body approach to medicine.

Addison fell in love with the small practice and the beachside life that her friends lived in LA. Instead of returning toGreys Anatomy, Addison decided she needed a change in her life. She became the new OB/GYN at Oceanside Wellness and the star of the spinoff medical series,Private Practice. The backdoor pilot episodes were part ofGreys AnatomySeason 3. They garnished so many viewers that the spinoff became part of the fall lineup on ABC in 2003.

Private Practicebegan season 1 in the fall of 2007 with nine episodes airing. However, theWriters Guild Strike of 2007/2008caused a delay in the remaining episodes for the season. The spinoff series ended with 13 episodes ordered but never produced.

The strike lasted from Nov. 5, 2007, to Feb. 12, 2008. All 12,000 film and television screenwriters of the American labor unions went on strike to demand an increase in funding for the writers.

RELATED: Greys Anatomy: Ellen Pompeo Hints at the Shows Ending Im Not Trying to Stay on the Show Forever

After the strike, ABC decided that Addison should return toGreys Anatomysince there were no furtherPrivate Practice episodesfor her to return to. She returned for only one episode, but it was so successful that the idea of a large-scale crossover event was born.

Both creative forces behindGreys AnatomyandPrivate Practicefelt that a crossover was something they wanted to do. The event was much larger than only Addison returning to the show. The crossover included stars from both shows.

Addisons brother was rushed to Seattle Grace hospital because of parasites in his brain. Derek Shepherd (Patrick Dempsey) performed the successful procedure that saved his life. Meanwhile, Addison treats one of Dereks patients. Both Sam and Naomi were also included in the crossover storylines.

Following the crossover events success,Greys AnatomyandPrivate Practiceproduced five more similar events. WhenStation 19becameGreys Anatomysnext spinoff, they did the same thing with the new series.

The rest is here:
'Grey's Anatomy' and 'Private Practice' Crossovers Stemmed From This 1 Crisis Off-Screen - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Anatomy

Katherine Heigl Kids: Does the ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Star Have Children? – Distractify

Katherine Heigl became a household name whenGreys Anatomy took over the airwaves in 2005, but after she was blacklisted in Hollywood for being "difficult" to work with, the 27 Dresses star became more infamous than famous.

Rather than try to fight it, Katherine decided to step back from the limelight and focus on herself and growing her family.

Given all the scrutiny she got in the early years of her career, Katherine decided to remain pretty private when it came to her family life. But in recent years, shes started to break her silence around her husband, two daughters, and son.

So, who are Katherine Heigl's kids? Keep reading.

Katherine met singer-songwriter Josh Kelley met in 2005 and the couple has been inseparable ever since. Katherine and Josh decided to make it official in Park City, Utah in 2007, coincidently around the time when Katherine was also filming 27 Dresses,a movie centered around weddings.

Two years later, Katherine and Josh adopted their first daughter, Naleigh, from South Korea. Katherines sister, Meg, was also adopted from Korea, and growing up, Katherine always planned on adopting as well.

I wanted my own family to resemble the one I came from, so I always knew I wanted to adopt from Korea, she told Scholastic.

Article continues below advertisement

Adopting a child was so important to her that Katherine talked to Josh about her plans even before the couple got engaged. Not everybody feels the way I do about adoption, she told InStyle. Luckily, Josh did.

Soon after Naleighs arrival, the couple started looking into adopting a second child, also from Korea. Unfortunately, by that time, the laws to adopt from Korea had become a lot stricter, so Katherine and Josh looked to adopt within the U.S.

Article continues below advertisement

The wait was short and in April 2012, the couple had adopted newborn Adelaide, their second daughter.

Katherine describes Adelaide as a fierce and bossy lover of animals, her sister, her cousin and her little brother. Katherine also credits Adelaide for bringing an abundance of joy, laughter, love, and purpose to her life.

After two successful adoptions, Katherine and Josh were surprised to discover that they were pregnant in 2016.

Katherine told People that although becoming pregnant was never a part of the plan, Im so grateful that I did. I think that if it hadnt been a surprise, Im not sure I would have done it.

Article continues below advertisement

Although her pregnancy with baby Joshua was quite easy, two weeks before her due date Katherine and Josh found out that Joshua Jr. was breech and had to schedule a last-minute cesarean section in Dec. 2016.

Thankfully, the birth took place without any further complications. Afterward, Katherine opened up about the difference between giving birth to her biological son compared to the experience of meeting her daughters.

I actually prefer the adoption way because I wasnt subject to hormones, she said of the emotional highs and lows she experienced right after giving birth.

But she said the hormonal swings were the only difference in her raising her children. The moment you hold your child, youre wholly in love, she said. And youll do anything to protect them and shelter them.

Read the original here:
Katherine Heigl Kids: Does the 'Grey's Anatomy' Star Have Children? - Distractify

Anatomy

Anatomy of . . . gymnast Nia Dennis | Sport | The Sunday Times – The Times

A video of the UCLA gymnasts floor routine garnered more than 10 million views on social media last week and praise from the likes of world champion Simone Biles and Michelle Obama by Rebecca Myers

FactfileAge 21Height 5ft 1inTeam UCLA BruinsHighest score 9.975Viral video views 26 million

EarThe routine was set to a soundtrack of upbeat music by black artists and musicians, including Beyonc, Kendrick Lamar, and Missy Elliott, the latter of whom praised it on Twitter. The artists were chosen by Dennis for their impact on black culture. Last year, another of her routines also went viral, set to a medley of Beyonc songs. College gymnasts have greater freedom than Olympic athletes to express themselves and often use

Link:
Anatomy of . . . gymnast Nia Dennis | Sport | The Sunday Times - The Times

Anatomy

Bacteria: Anatomy and Functioning – The Great Courses Daily News

By Barry C. Fox, M.D., University of WisconsinBacteria are single-cell organisms that contain the most essential components to survive and reproduce. (Image: kridipol poolket/Shutterstock)What Is Bacterium?

The term bacterium was invented in the 19th century by a German biologist, Ferdinand Cohn, based on the Greek word bakterion, meaning small rod. However, there are three shapes of bacteriarods, spirals, and spheres.

Bacteria are extremely small, usually less than two microns in size, and are found everywhere. Bacteria are single-celled organisms that contain the barest essential components for staying alive and reproducing chromosome, ribosomes, cytoplasm, and an outer membrane.

Bacteria are a simple form of life known as prokaryotes. In the center is a genetic code material known as deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, which is bundled into a central structure known as a chromosome.

The DNA encodes for a specific sequence of building blocks known as amino acids, and these amino acids are combined into proteins at the ribosomal structure. Proteins are subsequently used to control cellular function. The internal fluid, otherwise known as cytoplasm, is surrounded by an outer membrane, and prokaryotic bacteria hence resemble a water balloon filled with bacteria.

Microorganisms that are more complex than the prokaryotic bacteria contain eukaryotic cells that have a nucleus that contains multiple strands of DNA organized into multiple chromosomes. They also have more complex internal structures such as mitochondria, which produce internal energy.

Eukaryotic cells utilize more formal membrane structures, such as a nucleolar membrane, to contain DNA. The simplest one-cell eukaryote is a protozoan called a paramecium. Other examples of multicellular eukaryotes are fungi, plants, and animals.

This is a transcript from the video series An Introduction to Infectious Diseases. Watch it now on The Great Courses Plus.

Prokaryotic bacterial reproduction is under the control of the DNA in the chromosome. Bacteria multiply rapidly by a process known as binary fission, but the repeat replication of DNA is prone to errors.

As a result, it can result in genetic mutations that can either lead to a survival advantage or disadvantage. For example, a germ might develop resistance to an antibiotic that is trying to kill it, or the mutation can be unfavorable and lead to the destruction and death of the germ.

DNA replication is controlled by an important enzyme known as DNA polymerase. DNA polymerase is a prime antibiotic target since the goal is to halt DNA replication.

Some DNA may not be in the center of the cell, but located in the cytoplasm, forming circles of DNA known as plasmids. Plasmid DNA may also be transferred from one bacterium to another through various mechanisms when bacteria touch one another.

Conjugation is one of these means. When this happens, genetic characteristics among bacteria are shared. This is important in the development of bacteria that are resistant to multiple antibiotics, or for other evolutionary traits that support their survival.

Learn more about notorious diseases like bubonic plague, malaria, and polio.

The synthesis of cellular proteins such as enzymes or toxins is under the control of DNA. It acts through the ribosomes, which combine amino acid building blocks in the cytoplasm. The ribosome is also an excellent target for antibiotics because it can interfere with protein synthesis.

Enzymes play a vital role and are responsible for controlling all the ongoing work in a cell. They are chemical reaction machines, which either break molecules apart or put them together.

Another function of an enzyme is to link amino acid building blocks together to form a protein. A bacterium may have over 1000 different types of enzymes floating around in its cytoplasm at any time.

For bacteria to interact, there are special structures called fimbriae and pili on the surface that can help them attach to other bacteria or even to human cells.

These interactions can be divided into three general categories. First, some germs are good bacteria and help humans directly, such as assisting in food digestion. There are some germs that are known as commensal bacteria. They coexist with other bacteria without causing any harm to humans. And finally, some bacteria are harmful and are known as pathogenic.

Learn more about respiratory and brain infections.

Bacteria can be beneficial as well as harmful for human beings. However, there are some good bacteria that help humans directly.

One of the main jobs of the bacteria in the intestines is to break down nutrients, such as sugars and fats, which humans otherwise cannot digest. Most of these gut bacteria do not like the oxygen in the air and are known as anaerobes.

Besides aiding in digestion, gut bacteria also synthesize certain vitamins and aid the immune system. Specifically, Escherichia coli or E. coli is a common bacterium in the intestine. Unlike others, this germ happens to like oxygen, so its known as an aerobic bacterium. It synthesizes vitamin K, which is essential for normal blood clotting. W

hen patients receive antibiotics, the antibiotics can kill the good E. coli as innocent bystanders and alter clotting function.

Bacteria are a simple form of life known as prokaryotes. The term bacterium was invented in the 19th century by a German biologist, Ferdinand Cohn, based on the Greek word bakterion, meaning small rod.

Deoxyribonucleic acid or DNA is a genetic code material that is present in the center of prokaryotic bacteria, which is bundled into a central structure known as a chromosome.

One of the main jobs of the bacteria in the intestines is to break down nutrients, such as sugars and fats, which humans otherwise cannot digest.

Read the original post:
Bacteria: Anatomy and Functioning - The Great Courses Daily News

Anatomy

Understanding the Anatomy of India’s High Fiscal Deficit – The Wire

Extraordinary times require extraordinary policy responses. Against the backdrop of macroeconomic uncertainty in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman has presented a significant fiscal deficit number which went upto 9.5% in FY21 from a position of strength. Simultaneously, commencing a fiscal consolidation path to execute an excessive deficit procedure in the Union Budget 2012-22 to bring down the excess deficit of 9.5% of GDP in FY21 to 4.5% by FY26 is inevitable. However, this narrative of deficit is good in the time of a pandemic is welcome.

The fiscal consolidation through expenditure compression rather than increased tax buoyancy affects the quality of fiscal consolidation. From that perspective, allowing the fiscal deficit to rise above the threshold level of 3% of GDP, without significant expenditure compression, is welcome. However, the anatomy of the determinants of borrowings decomposed by revenue uncertainties, economic stimulus-related spending, the narrowing of denominator GDP, lowering of rates of interest, etc. would be interesting to understand with precision which components have exactly contributed to the aggregate level of high deficits.

The cleaning up of deficit incurred from off-budget liabilities through public sector undertakings is still a matter of concern. Such borrowings do not figure in the concept of fiscal deficit. However, the Union Budget 2021-22 has not introduced the deficit termed as Public Sector Borrowing Requirement (PSBR), integrating the borrowings incurred through public sector enterprises. The details of extra borrowings are kept in an Annexure in the Union Budget document.

The new fiscal rules

The new Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (Amendment) is tabled in the parliament today. The existing fiscal rules have been amended to incorporate the revised threshold of deficit to GDP. This is the third time the FRBM has been amended in India. As per the second amendment, the revenue balance was eliminated and clauses about revenue balance were incorporated in the Financial Bill to move away from the golden (fiscal) rule of zero revenue deficits.

Also read: Snapshot: Budget 2021 and Key Sector Allocation in Seven Charts

Though there was a debate regarding the choice of deficit whether revenue deficit, fiscal deficit or primary deficit was to be the operational deficit parameter in India in the FRBM Committee Report with a dissent note from Arvind Subramanian favouring the primary deficit (fiscal deficit minus interest payments), the Union Budget 2021-22 reiterated that fiscal deficit is still the operational concept of deficit in India. However, primary deficit is useful to understand the current fiscal stance without the legacy of past interest payments (Table 1).

Table 1. Levels of Deficit

Source: Government of India (2021), Union Budget 2021-22 documents

The enhancement of budget transparency with regard to deficit numbers, presented in the 2021-22 Union Budget, is welcome. The Food Corporation of Indias borrowing from the National Small Savings Funds will be stopped to bring in budget transparency. When FY21 fiscal deficit has reached 9.5%, the government envisions to borrow another Rs 80,000 crore in the next two months. For FY22, the fiscal deficit is pegged at 6.8% of GDP. The gross market borrowing will be Rs 12 lakh crore, which is 68.9% of total borrowings. The other sources of financing like National Small Savings Fund constitutes around 26% (Table 2).

Table 2. Sources of Financing Fiscal Deficit (Rs crore)

Source: Government of India (2021), Union Budget 2021-22 documents

Mini budgets in continuum for economic stimulus

In the Union Budget, creating fiscal space for continuous support to ongoing series of economic stimulus packages was a matter of concern. In the regime of revenue uncertainties, the ambitious asset monetisation programme announced in the Union Budget to generate revenue proceeds need a supporting regulatory framework.

In the Union Budget 2021-22. the economic stimulus is announced not as a macroeconomic stimulus to revive the demand by providing huge cash transfers or a universal basic income (UBI). The concern was that if the peoples propensity to save is greater than spending in the time of a pandemic, dropping helicopter money or a UBI in the hands of the people cannot lead to required demand stimulation. The statistics shows that precautionary savings by the private sector are on the rise during COVID-19. Instead of massive cash transfers, the Union Budget has provided targeted economic stimulus, especially to capital infrastructure and the public health sector. The total size of the budget for FY21 has increased to Rs 34.50 lakh crore. In FY22, total expenditure is pegged at Rs 35 lakh crore.

The emphasis on capital infrastructure spending for economic revival by increasing the capital expenditure for FY2021-22 by 34.5% to Rs 5.5 lakh crore is welcome. The estimates of capital expenditure for FY21 have been increased to Rs 4.39 lakh crore, as against the budgeted Rs 4.12 lakh crore. However, as percentage of GDP, the capital expenditure as share of GDP is still below 2%. The financing details of the other capital infrastructure projects announced in the budget through PPP models need further clarity.

The decision on intergovernmental fiscal transfers

The finance minister has announced a new centrally sponsored scheme (CSS) for enhancing public health infrastructure the PM Atmanirbhar Swasth Bharat Yojana with an outlay of Rs 64,180 crore over the next six years. This CSS will be in addition to the governments existing National Health Mission. The focus of a new CSS in the health sector will be on three areas preventive, curative and well-being.

Also read: Union Budget 2021: Election-Bound States Get Multi-Crore Infra Allocations

However, the finance minister has also announced a plausible convergence of CSS, as recommended by the Fifteenth Finance Commission report, which is tabled in the parliament today. This move will shift the composition of intergovernmental fiscal transfers from conditional grants to tax-transfer formula-based unconditional transfers (which is 41% of tax pool as recommended by the Fifteenth Finance Commission). The unconditional transfers provide flexibility to state governments to prioritise their spending, rather than designing top down programmes. However, designing a new public health infrastructure-related CSS can affect the fiscal autonomy of the states in dealing with the issues of the health sector, unless it is judiciously rolled out within the contours of cooperative federalism.

Union Budget nudging the calculus of consent

Finally, the emphasis on state-level public infrastructure investment in the Union Budget, including the states like Kerala and West Bengal, invokes the calculus of voting behaviour. Does democracy determine public expenditure decisions? The Union Budget 2021-22 can answer this in the affirmative only in the forthcoming subnational elections.

Economists globally have analysed empirically whether positive public policy decisions by the dominant party in power or the economics of ethno-fragmentation and religion matter more for a median voter to choose their government. If it is the former, that the calculus of consent favours the party in power, then the Union Budget 2021-22 could effectively signal the benefits.

Lekha Chakraborty is Professor, NIPFP and Research Associate of Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, New York.

Read the original here:
Understanding the Anatomy of India's High Fiscal Deficit - The Wire

Anatomy

Which Original ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Star Has The Highest Net Worth? – TheThings

The original Greys cast has done well financially, and they will continue to roll in the dough as long as they keep doing what theyre doing.

The world of television is home to a variety of shows all looking to find their place in peoples living rooms each week. Whether it is a sitcom likeFriends or a reality show likeThe Bachelor, there is a place for seemingly any type of show out there, but the truth is that only the best and most compelling will find a way to last longer than a few episodes upon their release.

Greys Anatomy is undoubtedly one of the biggest shows in television history, and at this point, few come close to rivaling its legacy. The original cast of the show was an integral part of it becoming a hit, and through the years, these performers have all made a pretty penny in Hollywood.

Lets see who tops the original cast with the highest net worth!

Ellen Pompeo and Patrick Dempseyremain the two biggest stars in the history ofGreys Anatomy,and while there are plenty of other amazing performers that took part in the show, these two were the primary forces early on. So, it should not be too surprising to see that they are at the top of the pile when comparing the net worths of the original members of the cast.

According toCelebrity Net Worth, both Pompeo and Desmpey are currently worth $80 million each. Yes, a lot of their money has come from starring onGreys Anatomy and from royalties that they earned from the show, but there is far more going on for these performers than just a single show.

For Ellen Pompeo, the project that she is best known for isGreys, but the performer has earned money from other things through the years. She has appeared in projects on the big and small screen likeCatch Me If You Can,Old School,andStation 19. Yes, the latter was as a crossover event withGreys, but it was still something that wasnt confined to a typicalGreysscript.Aside from acting, Pompeo has also earned money through endorsements.

As for Dempsey, well, the performer has been pulling down money for years. Dempsey has been regularly appearing in projects since the 1980s and has been paid accordingly. WhileGreys has been awfully kind to the performer, he has also done projects likeEnchanted, Transformers: Dark of the Moon,andBridget Joness Baby. Dempsey, much like Pompeo, has also cleaned up with his endorsements.

Related:10 Celebs You Probably Forgot Made Cameos On Greys Anatomy

Dempsey and Pompeo are both at the top with $80 million, and other performers find themselves quite a ways away from that number. Katherine Heigl, despite not having been on the show for years, is actually the next cast member up with a comfortable $30 million net worth.

While Heigl has not been involved in the show for years, it should be noted that she was a primary character for the first six seasons of the show. This means that she made plenty of money and continues to make some from the airings of her episodes. However, the star had her sights set on the big screen, as well.

There was once a point when Katherine Heigl was thriving on the big screen, but things would eventually taper off after she made waves with her comments against the writers ofGreys Anatomy. Heigl landed starring roles in huge hits likeKnocked Up, 27 Dresses, The Ugly Truth,andNew Years Eve. Yeah, she was rolling the dough during this time and was a star.

Things have simmered down over time, but she is still regularly working and cashing in with her projects. In fact, her newest show,Firefly Lane, will be debuting on the small screen this year.

Related:Heres Why Patrick Dempsey Returned To Greys Anatomy

Katherine Heigls $30 million net worth is just a shade higher than Sandra Ohs, who, according toCelebrity Net Worth, is sporting a $25 million net worth. This is thanks to plenty of successful projects under her belt.

Cristina Yang, the character the Oh played onGreys for the shows first 10 seasons, is as loved and as popular as ever, and Oh was banking in on each episode that she appeared in during that time. The fans want nothing more than for her to return, and if that ever comes to pass, then she will be compensated handsomely.

Since 2018, Sandra Oh has been starring in the hit series,Killing Eve, which has been greenlit for a fourth season. The show has allowed the performer to showcase her acting abilities and it has been awfully kind to her bank account. Oh has also appeared in hit projects likeThe Princess Diaries, Arliss,andSideways.

Related:What Happened To Katherine Heigls Acting Career After She Left Greys Anatomy?

The originalGreyscast has done well financially, and they will continue to roll in the dough as long as they keep doing what theyre doing.

Next:Will Season 18 Of Greys Anatomy Happen?

Which Sex And The City Star Has The Highest Net Worth?

Read the original:
Which Original 'Grey's Anatomy' Star Has The Highest Net Worth? - TheThings

Anatomy

The anatomy of the perfect counter-attacking goal after Mohamed Salah’s stunner – Telegraph.co.uk

There is something about the devastating synchronicity of a well executed counter-attack that pulls you to the edge of your seat, even in these strange times when an abundance of live football can make the action grey and indistinguishable. Mohamed Salah's second goal for Liverpool at West Ham was one such moment.

Why does this category of goal resonate and delight to such an extent? Firstly, counter-attacks are an exhibition of the razor-thin margins that decide top-level football matches: a team can be camped in the opposition's penalty area before picking the ball out of their net less than 10 seconds later. What better encapsulation of the emotional swings a fan experiences throughout the 90 minutes?

They are also very difficult to pull off, demanding technical accuracy at pace which is the most sought-after combination in football. Players who can see a pass or produce a piece of skill at walking pace are two-a-penny, as are those with speed but the touch and awareness of a rhinoceros. What separates the great from theaverage is the ability to do both. Wayne Rooney and Cristiano Ronaldo were sensational exponents of this type of football at Manchester United, as were Arsene Wenger's title-winning Arsenal teams who galloped from one end of the pitch to the other like a cavalry charge. Jose Mourinho's best sides at Chelsea and Real Madrid were also famed for slicing through teams with fast breaks. Leicester's 2015-16 champions spearheaded by Jamie Vardy are also a must mention.

Like passing the baton in a relay race, one mistake and the entire sequence breaks down. How often do you see a team butcher a move when they have four-on-two against the defending team? It is not easy as it looks, yet the picture-book goals that result from a well coordinated counter look delightfully simple.

When analysed in its entirety, a 90-minute football match is really a story of mistake after mistake. Often, especially in an erawith so much focus on pressing, the victorious team is the one who makes the fewest. The best counter-attacks on the other hand, are harmonious vignettes of mistake-free football bordering on perfection. That is what makes them, and Salah's goal, so satisfying. Here we pick out some of the essential components.

"Speed is often confused with insight. When I start running earlier than the others, I appear faster," said Johan Cruyff.

Salah is fast by any measure, but the way he sensed what could develop was crucial. As soon as the ball popped out of the penalty area, Salah is sprinting into space before any West Ham players have broken into a jog. You would expect Salah to win the race starting level, but that moment of 'insight' to start sprinting before anyone else has seen the possibilities is what puts clear blue water between the Liverpool forward and West Ham's retreating players.

Follow this link:
The anatomy of the perfect counter-attacking goal after Mohamed Salah's stunner - Telegraph.co.uk

Biochemistry

Biochemistry researcher receives National Science Foundation Award – Newswise

Newswise OMAHA, Neb. (Jan. 27, 2021) Creighton University biochemistry researcher and assistant professor Lynne Dieckman, PhD, has been awarded a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation.

The five-year, $680,500 NSF Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER) award will be utilized to gain a better understanding of how improper DNA replication and compaction can cause changes in gene expression in offspring, which can play a role in the onset of diseases such as cancer, cell death or developmental issues. In addition, a major goal of the project is to create a comprehensive learning environment for aspiring high school-aged and undergraduate scientists who will have significant roles in the research.

The program offers the foundations most prestigious awards to support early-career faculty who have the potential to serve as academic role models in research and education. Dieckman, an assistant professor with the Department of Chemistry in Creightons College of Arts and Sciences, is the first Creighton faculty member to receive the highly competitive NSF CAREER award.

Words cannot fully capture how proud we are of Dr. Dieckmans tremendous achievement. The CAREER award recognizes her future promise in science, as well as all her accomplishments, David Dobberpuhl, PhD, chair of the Department of Chemistry said. She often spends many long hours in the laboratory and mentors several research students each semester. She is a model scholar and teacher who is deserving of this recognition.

Dieckman and her team of student researchers will use program funding to examine protein interactions in DNA replication and the subsequent packaging of DNA into the nucleus of cells.

Maintaining proper gene expression relies on several important proteins that function together to compact DNA into active or inactive genes, said Dieckman. Just like people, we can learn a lot about how proteins work if we know what they look like physically and what kind of interactions they make throughout the day. My research aims to understand the function and three-dimensional structure of proteins involved in DNA replication and compaction and how they work together to maintain inactive regions of the genome.

The two main proteins Dieckmans research focuses on are called proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1). If these two proteins do not interact with each other in the cell, then certain genes get turned on when they should be off. This can result in genomic instability that can lead to certain diseases.

My team of student researchers will dissect these proteins to determine how PCNA and CAF-1 interact. This will help us understand how DNA is compacted to maintain gene expression and genomic stability. The completion of these studies will lead to a greater understanding of the link between DNA replication and nucleosome assembly and how disruptions in this regulation lead to aberrant gene expression, Dieckman said.

Another major goal of Dieckmans research is to build a firm foundation for a lifetime of leadership in integrating education and research. Creighton students will be heavily involved in performing all experimentation throughout the calendar year, as the NSF grant will cover stipends for three undergraduate students each summer.

In addition, six students from local high schools will participate in research projects every summer in a collaboration with the Haddix STEM Corridor program. Students in the program will attend weekly scientific development workshops on campus and present research results to other scientists and the public.

These activities are intended to inspire young students interest in science and prepare them for successful future careers in STEM, Dieckman said.

NSFs goal is to propel the nation forward by advancing fundamental research in all fields of science and engineering. The foundation supports research and people by providing facilities, instruments and funding to support their ingenuity and sustain the U.S. as a global leader in research and innovation. In 2021, NSF funds will reach all 50 states through grants to nearly 2,000 colleges, universities and institutions. Each year, NSF receives more than 40,000 competitive proposals and makes about 11,000 new awards.

See the rest here:
Biochemistry researcher receives National Science Foundation Award - Newswise

Biochemistry

Biochemistry Among the Stars – Physics

The model involves asymmetries in the way certain particles interact with biomolecules at the nuclear level. It works through selective destruction: If there are initially equal numbers of left- and right-handed molecules and one kind is destroyed preferentially, then theres an imbalance.

My colleagues and I realized that a nucleus within an amino acid could be destroyed in a spin-polarized way via the weak force, a parity-violating interaction. To explore this idea, we looked first at destructive interactions involving spin-polarized leptonsspecifically neutrinos, which are inherently chiraland nitrogen atoms in amino acids. The destructive mechanism we explored is inverse beta decay. In that decay, the nitrogen atom becomes carbon-14 or oxygen-14, a process that destroys the whole amino acid. Theres also a nuclear recoil, which can literally rip the molecule apart.

But this process is only chirality selective if the amino-acid molecules all align with each other. If that happens, only amino acids of one chirality will be pointing in a direction that allows their nitrogen atoms to interact with the neutrinos. This alignment could happen through crystallization, where the molecules all line up naturally, or it could happen in an electric field, for example.

Read the rest here:
Biochemistry Among the Stars - Physics