All posts by medical

Capital Markets Day 2021: Sanofi progresses on its strategy to drive growth across its businesses and innovation with emerging leadership in…

Capital Markets Day 2021: Sanofi progresses on its strategy to drive growth across its businesses and innovation with emerging leadership in immunology

PARIS February 5, 2021 Today, Sanofi holds a virtual investor event with key members of the Sanofi leadership team to share and discuss the overall progress in implementing the strategy in core parts of the business as well as the transformation of R&D. Capital Markets Day 2021 provides a comprehensive update on Sanofis General Medicines and Consumer Healthcare strategies as well as Dupixent (dupilumab) and multiple new immunology assets.

Since announcing our new strategic framework in December 2019, we have been relentlessly driving forward our actions to accelerate R&D efforts, building one of the industrys most differentiated pipelines in Specialty Care, including our work in immunology which has the potential to transform patient care across this therapeutic area, said Paul Hudson, Chief Executive Officer, Sanofi. We are tracking ahead of schedule on our plans for growth, efficiencies, and cutting edge science in our pipeline. The reshaping of our General Medicines and Consumer Healthcare business units will enable both to become even more significant contributors to Sanofis growth and profitability.

Key highlights to be presented at Capital Markets Day 2021

Financial Update: Sanofi confirms its target to expand its business operating income (BOI) margin to 30% by 2022, with the ambition for its BOI margin to exceed 32% by 2025. The company is tracking toward its 2022 target as planned, with the BOI margin up 120 basis points in 2020. Sanofi plans to announce today its expectation that Dupixent will become accretive to BOI margin by end of 2022.In 2020, Sanofi achieved around 1.7 billion of savings almost 85% of the 2022 target announced at Capital Markets Day 2019. Today, Sanofi is increasing its cost savings target by 500m to 2.5bn by 2022, to be derived from continued operational excellence. These extra 500m savings are intended to be fully reinvested to further drive top line growth and fund the pipeline.

General Medicines Update: Sanofi has prioritized core medicines with differentiated and/or established profiles that have significant opportunity for growth in key markets. Some of these well-established medicines are the standard-of-care for patients living with diabetes or cardiovascular disease.

We are focusing on our differentiated core brands in key markets to fully realize their volume potential, compensating for price erosion, and aimed at generating todays level of sales in 2025.1 This objective will be supported by the ongoing implementation of our innovative go-to-market model, while we continue to streamline the tail of the portfolio to improve profitability, said Olivier Charmeil, Executive Vice President, General Medicines.

Consumer Healthcare Update: Sanofi has advanced on its plan to establish a standalone business to unlock the value of brand equity and outperform the global market.

With the ongoing implementation of our fully integrated standalone model, we look forward to being more agile and reducing the complexity of our portfolio to drive growth with our consumer-centric, data-driven marketing approach, said Julie Van Ongevalle, Executive Vice President, Consumer Healthcare. We continue to make progress in bringing two potential over-the-counter switches to the market in the coming years that could lead to a blockbuster opportunity in combined sales.

Transformational Culture: Sanofi is engaging its workforce in a cultural shift towards Play to Win behaviors, including accountability, productivity, and increased focus. Sanofis 2025 People Ambitions are based on four key pillars and put patient lives at the center of the companys business purpose.

Our teams have embraced our Play to Win strategy and are confident to leave our old ways of working behind, said Natalie Bickford, Executive Vice President, Chief People Officer. A topic that is close to my heart is establishing a culture of diversity and an inclusive environment that reflects different patient populations. This includes better representing the diversity of our patients in clinical trials and involving all local leadership teams in their community projects.

R&D Update: Sanofi has taken a unique approach to transforming its R&D efforts and expanding its capabilities based on three pillars pathways, patients, and platforms. In 2020, 12 Specialty Care projects in the R&D pipeline entered Phase 3, demonstrating significant progress in moving forward a pipeline of potentially innovative medicines to address unmet patient needs.

Since I took on the leadership of Sanofi R&D, we have transformed our approach to the discovery and development of medicines with a focus on deep understanding of disease pathways informed by patient insights, while leveraging our expanding repertoire of unique research platforms, said John Reed, M.D., Ph.D., Global Head of Research & Development at Sanofi. Today, I look forward to sharing the breadth and depth of Sanofis rich immunology pipeline, which positions us to bring practice-changing innovation to patients.

Due to the current virtual environment, Sanofi intends to keep the investor community updated on its ongoing progress through brief and comprehensive events throughout 2021.

Capital Markets Day 2021 event details

Capital Markets Day 2021 will be held today from2:30-5:00 p.m. CET / 8:30-11:00 a.m. EDT, following the fourth quarter and 2020 full year results analyst call. For background slides and webcast (audio only) please refer to the following link: https://www.sanofi.com/en/investors/financial-results-and-events/investor-presentations/capital-markets-day-2021.

About Sanofi

Sanofi is dedicated to supporting people through their health challenges. We are a global biopharmaceutical company focused on human health. We prevent illness with vaccines, provide innovative treatments to fight pain and ease suffering. We stand by the few who suffer from rare diseases and the millions with long-term chronic conditions.

With more than 100,000 people in 100 countries, Sanofi is transforming scientific innovation into healthcare solutions around the globe.

Sanofi, Empowering Life

Quentin VivantTel.: +33 (0)1 53 77 46 46mr@sanofi.com

Sanofi Investor Relations Contacts North AmericaFelix LauscherFara BerkowitzSuzanne Greco

IR main line:Tel.: +33 (0)1 53 77 45 45investor.relations@sanofi.com

1 Excludes Industrial Affairs third party sales.

Continued here:
Capital Markets Day 2021: Sanofi progresses on its strategy to drive growth across its businesses and innovation with emerging leadership in...

Infant Diet, Eczema and Caesarean Section Birth All Impact the Gut Bacteria of Children – PR Web

Since there is a relationship between the type of bacteria in the gut and the development of eczema, we now need to find ways to manipulate the gut bacteria in early life to reduce the likelihood of eczema in babies predisposed to develop it.

MILWAUKEE (PRWEB) February 04, 2021

According to research published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (JACI) that examined the interactions between gut bacteria, diet and atopic disease, gut bacteria is impacted not only by eczema and infant dietbut also caesarean section birth.

The Enquiring About Tolerance (EAT) study examined 1,303 exclusively breastfed infants from three months of age. Stool samples were collected at baseline and additional sampling was done during month six and 12. Baseline samples that were obtained demonstrated that gut microbiota varied even before differences in diets. Researchers continued to examine each participant for eczema and food allergies up until they reached age three.

Infants at three months and one year of age who had eczema had a higher number of bacteria called Clostridium sensu stricto than infants who did not have eczema. Infants introduced early to allergenic foods such as cows milk, egg, and peanut starting at three months of age developed a larger variety of gut bacteria at a faster pace than infants exclusively breastfeeding. On the other end of the spectrum, infants born via caesarean section showed less diverse gut bacteria compared to infants born with a more traditional birth.

The study was funded by the British Skin Foundation and led by a group of researchers from Kings College London and Guys and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, along with collaborators from the National Institute of Health (USA), St, Georges London, and the University of Manchester.

Professor Carsten Flohr, PhD, the papers first author, commented on the study results. Our study has found a higher risk of eczema in infants with a higher abundance of Clostridium sensu stricto in their gut, and weaning from three months of age alongside breastfeeding speeds up the maturation of the gut flora. Since there is a relationship between the type of bacteria in the gut and the development of eczema, we now need to find ways to manipulate the gut bacteria in early life to reduce the likelihood of eczema in babies predisposed to develop it."

You can learn more about food allergy and eczema on the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology website, aaaai.org.

The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI) represents allergists, asthma specialists, clinical immunologists, allied health professionals and others with a special interest in the research and treatment of allergic and immunologic diseases. Established in 1943, the AAAAI has more than 7,100 members in the United States, Canada and 72 other countries. The AAAAIs Find an Allergist/Immunologist service is a trusted resource to help you find a specialist close to home.

###

Share article on social media or email:

Originally posted here:
Infant Diet, Eczema and Caesarean Section Birth All Impact the Gut Bacteria of Children - PR Web

Cancer patients weren’t responding to therapy. Then they got a poop transplant. – Livescience.com

For some cancer patients, a "poop transplant" could boost the positive effects of immunotherapy, a treatment designed to rally the immune system against cancer cells.

Not all cancer patients respond to immunotherapy drugs. For example, only about 40% of patients with advanced melanoma, a type of skin cancer, reap long-term benefit from the drugs, according to recent estimates. In trying to pinpoint the differences between patients who respond well to immunotherapy and those who don't, scientists have zeroed in on a likely suspect: the microorganisms living in their guts.

Now, a new study, published Feb. 4 in the journal Science, adds to the growing evidence that having the right gut bugs can improve a patient's response to immunotherapy, helping to stop disease progression or even shrink tumors.

In the study, scientists collected stool from melanoma patients who responded well to immunotherapy and then transplanted their feces (and microbes) into the guts of 15 patients who had never previously responded to the drugs. After the transplant, six of the 15 patients responded to immunotherapy for the first time, showing either tumor reduction or disease stabilization that lasted more than a year.

Related: 7 odd things that raise your risk of cancer (and 1 that doesn't)

"The microbes really appear to drive the immunological changes we see in patients," said study author Dr. Hassane Zarour, a cancer immunologist, co-leader of the Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Program at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman and a professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh. The team linked the changes in gut bugs to changes in both tumor growth and the immune system; for instance, some of the participants showed an increase in specific immune cells and antibodies that appeared in their blood.

Despite the positive changes seen in some patients, fecal transplants likely won't help all patients whose cancer resists immunotherapy, Zarour said. In the new study, for instance, nine of the 15 patients did not benefit from the treatment. As part of their research, the team began to sift through the differences between those who improved after the transplant and those who didn't.

The idea for combining fecal transplants with immunotherapy first came from studies in mice with tumors, in which the rodents responded differently to the drugs depending on which gut microbes they carried, according to Science Magazine. By tweaking the mice's gut microbiomes the collection of bacteria, viruses and other microbes in their digestive tracts scientists found that they could improve this response, but they weren't sure which microbes made the difference.

That said, mice's responses to immunotherapy improved after they were given fecal matter from human cancer patients whose tumors had shrunk under immunotherapy. "When they took non-responding mice and gave them the right bugs they could convert non-responding mice into responding mice," Zarour said.

Other research showed that when human patients took antibiotics, which alter the gut microbiome, they were less likely to respond to immunotherapy, providing more evidence that gut bugs make a big difference in people, too.

Having seen the positive effects of fecal transplants in mice, scientists began testing the treatment in humans, starting with a few small clinical trials.

In two such trials, led by researchers at Sheba Medical Center in Ramat Gan, Israel, patients received both fecal transplants and oral pills containing dried stool. The patients then took immunotherapy drugs called "checkpoint blockades," which essentially rip the brakes off of immune cells and help amplify their activity against tumors. A subset of these patients, who had previously not responded to the drugs, suddenly began responding.

The new study by Zarour and his colleagues echoes these positive results, but it also starts to address a crucial question: How do gut bugs boost the effects of immunotherapy?

To answer this question, the team closely analyzed the microbes present in the donor stool samples and the recipients, before and after fecal transplants. The team also collected blood and tumor cell samples to assess the patients' immune responses over time, and computed tomography (CT) scans, to track tumor growth. They then used artificial intelligence to find connections between all these data points.

Out of the 15 patients, nine still didn't respond to immunotherapy after their transplant. But of the six who did respond, one showed a complete response to checkpoint blockade drugs, meaning their tumors shrunk so much they were no longer detectable; two others showed a partial response, meaning their tumors shrunk but did not disappear, and three have shown no disease progression for over a year. In all six of these patients, the microbes from the donor's stool quickly colonized their guts, and several of the newcomer bugs that were previously linked to positive immunotherapy outcomes increased in number.

Related: 11 surprising facts about your immune system

This change in gut bacteria triggered an immune response in the six patients, as their bodies began building antibodies that recognized the new bugs; these antibodies showed up in their blood. While the link between bacteria-specific antibodies and cancer is not well understood, it's thought that some of these antibodies can help prime the immune system to hunt down tumor cells, Zarour said.

"The bugs that increased in the responders were really correlated with positive immunological changes," he said. These patients also built up a larger arsenal of activated T cells immune cells that can target and kill cancer cells while substances that suppress the immune system decreased. For example, a protein called interleukin-8 (IL-8) can summon immunosuppressive cells to tumor sites and therefore blunt the effects of immunotherapy; but IL-8 decreased in the six responsive patients.

By comparison, cells that secrete IL-8 increased in the nine patients who didn't respond to the fecal transplant. Based on this new data, "IL-8 seems to really play a critical role in regulating patients' responses" to the two-part treatment, Zarour said.

Compared with the six responsive patients, the nine others also showed less pronounced immune responses to the transplant and lower levels of the noted beneficial bacteria; some even had dissimilar gut microbiomes to their fecal donors, suggesting the bacteria didn't take over their guts as seen in responsive patients.

In general, "the gut microbiome may be just one of the many reasons we don't respond to a specific treatment," Zarour said, so fecal transplants wouldn't be expected to work for everyone. That said, the immune changes seen in the six responders, including the decline in IL-8, provide hints as to why it works for some people.

In the future, these results will need to be validated in larger groups of melanoma patients, as well as other cancer patients whose disease resists immunotherapy, Zarour said.

Though small, the new trial provides "firm evidence that manipulating the microbiome can yield benefit when added to immunotherapy for cancer," said Dr. Jeffrey Weber, a medical oncologist and co-director of the Melanoma Research Program at New York University Langone Health, who was not involved in the research. Assuming these results hold up in other patients, though, fecal transplants may not be the best way to deliver helpful microbes into the gut, Weber said in an email.

The future may lie in ingesting the bacteria orally, after they've been freeze-dried, Weber said. This approach could include something similar to the oral pills used in other trials, for example. Either that, or scientists could isolate specific metabolites produced by the helpful bacteria and use those as drugs, Weber said. "The big question is, what metabolites from the 'favorable' bacterial species are actually responsible for benefit," he said.

Originally published on Live Science.

Continued here:
Cancer patients weren't responding to therapy. Then they got a poop transplant. - Livescience.com

A Worcester man was part of the Pfizer COVID vaccine trial, but didnt get the actual shot; His experience an – MassLive.com

When Paul Bolton, of Worcester, learned he was part of the placebo-controlled group in Pfizer-BioNTechs COVID vaccine trial, he was anxious to find out how long hed have to wait to actually get immunized.

I wanted to see if I could get the vaccine as soon as possible, Bolton, who is a prosecutor for the Worcester District Attorneys office, said.

Bolton, who is in his late 60s, was one of 131 trial participants enrolled in the study, which began in July 2020, through UMass Medical School. With COVID-19 sweeping across parts of the south and the Midwest, and with several prototype vaccines in production, the Worcester native says he just wanted to help in whatever way possible.

He responded to a call for participants in the trial posted on social media, and UMass Medical School contacted Bolton the same day. After being screened for COVID and having blood drawn, he received an injection that he suspected, not long after, was saline not the real thing.

They say if you got the vaccine, you get a kind of a cold feeling going into your arm, Bolton said. I didnt get that so I was pretty sure I had the placebo.

On Jan. 14, the college reached out to Bolton to let him know he was part of the placebo-controlled group during the trial, meaning he didnt actually receive the Pfizer vaccine. The placebo group is used to measure the results of those who did get the COVID vaccine the difference in, for example, immune system response, and other side effects.

Five days later, he got his first dose of the vaccine, which Bolton surmised was well ahead of schedule, according to the states timeline. He has an appointment scheduled for the second dose on Feb. 12.

Now that hes on the verge of being fully vaccinated, Bolton says he feels like a burdens been lifted. Per the trial, he will continue reporting any symptoms or side effects to the UMass researchers.

There were concerns last year over about the integrity of the vaccines ahead of trials during what was to become an expedited emergency approval process. Health experts had high hopes for the shots which, if effective, would have far-reaching consequences for the U.S. and the rest of the world.

We didnt know if theyd work, and we didnt know if it was safe, Dr. Douglas T. Golenbock, chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology at UMass Medical School, said of the Pfizer vaccine. But thats the nature of clinical trials.

The pace of the development of mRNA COVID vaccines (approved on an emergency basis in under a year of the virus taking root in the U.S.) and the sheer scale of their preliminary testing remains an unprecedented public health project. With the trials still ongoing, and with other companies working on their versions of vaccines in the middle of a national rollout, some experts worry about how willingly the public will participate in future trials and studies.

As we get closer to the time when people think they will get their vaccination, some are going to say, Yeah, Ill just wait it out, rather than take the risk, Dr. Eric Rubin, editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine and professor in the Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases at Harvard University, said. Thats inherent in having a simultaneous testing and rollout strategy.

Rubin says experimental trials typically generate more enthusiasm among those who sign up. That tends to wane over time.

And in the case of COVID vaccine testing, the more people are vaccinated, the harder it may become for other companies to recruit volunteers.

That might limit the development of vaccines that are very late to the game, Rubin said. Youre tapping into groups of people who are less and less excited.

Pfizer recently said it finished enrolling children aged 12 to 15 in a new clinical trial to gauge the efficacy of the shots in children. The Pfizer vaccine is currently approved only for adults over the age of 16. The Moderna vaccine, similarly, is only approved for adults older than 18.

Related Content:

Go here to read the rest:
A Worcester man was part of the Pfizer COVID vaccine trial, but didnt get the actual shot; His experience an - MassLive.com

Jnana Therapeutics Expands Leadership Team with Two Experienced Biopharmaceutical Executives – BioSpace

Feb. 3, 2021 12:00 UTC

Company appoints Nick Pullen, PhD, as Senior VP, Head of Biology and Brian Danieli as VP, Head of Finance & Operations

BOSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Jnana Therapeutics, a biotechnology company targeting the solute carrier (SLC) family of metabolite transporters to treat underserved diseases, today announced that it has expanded its leadership team with the appointment of two accomplished biopharmaceutical executives: Nick Pullen, PhD, as Senior Vice President, Head of Biology, and Brian Danieli as Vice President, Head of Finance and Operations. These new executives join Jnana at a significant time in the companys evolution as it advances its first SLC transporter-targeted therapies toward clinical development.

Nick Pullen, PhD, Senior Vice President, Head of Biology

Nick is an experienced and passionate leader in drug discovery and development with deep knowledge in several therapeutic areas, including renal disease and inflammation, that are highly relevant to our R&D work with SLC transporters, said Joel Barrish, PhD, co-founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Jnana Therapeutics. We are delighted to welcome Nick to our team and look forward to his contributions in building our research and development strategy and helping guide our lead programs toward the clinic.

In the role of Senior Vice President, Head of Biology, Dr. Nick Pullen will work to further leverage Jnanas RAPID platform to systematically target SLC transporters and develop novel small molecule drug candidates. Dr. Pullen is an experienced drug discovery and development leader with 20 years of experience and a proven track-record of therapeutic innovation across multiple disease areas. Before joining Jnana, he was Vice President, Integrative Sciences, Inflammation & Immunology, Cardiovascular & Fibrosis, at Bristol Myers Squibb and prior to this, he served as Executive Director, Inflammation & Immunology for Celgene. In both of these roles, Dr. Pullen was responsible for scientific and strategic leadership of externalized drug discovery programs applying novel technologies and scientific insights to the expansion of the Inflammation & Immunology portfolio as well as more broadly. Dr. Pullen brings extensive experience in Inflammation & Fibrosis, following a career at Pfizer which spanned more than 15 years and brought multiple development candidates to clinical evaluation and touched many disease areas including renal disease, IBD and NASH, a breadth of experience with significant pertinence to the emerging Jnana portfolio. Dr. Pullen received his PhD in biochemistry from the University of Southampton in the UK.

The Jnana team have made remarkable progress in the development of technologies that open up the therapeutic opportunity afforded by targeting the SLC gene family. I am thrilled to be joining Jnana at this exciting stage in the companys growth and to help them build a pipeline of small molecules targeting SLC transporters, said Dr. Pullen.

Brian Danieli, Vice President, Head of Finance & Operations

Brians extensive finance background and expertise will be a critical addition to the organization, said Caroline Stark Beer, Jnanas Chief Business Officer. Were very pleased to welcome Brian to Jnana and look forward to Brians financial and operational leadership as we enter a new stage of growth.

As the Head of Finance and Operations of Jnana Therapeutics, Brian Danieli will expand the companys finance and operations infrastructure to allow for growth to a clinical-stage drug developer. Mr. Danieli is an expert finance leader with more than 20 years of global experience with fast-growing biotechnology companies. He joins Jnana from Momenta Pharmaceuticals, where he led Financial Planning & Analysis. Previously, he served for more than 20 years in roles of increasing responsibility at Sanofi Genzyme. His most recent position at Sanofi Genzyme was Head of Finance for North America Rare Disease and Rare Blood Disorders, and he drove all aspects of strategic financial planning and operations for the North American region for two business units representing $2B in combined sales with over 500 employees and 12 products. In his roles at Sanofi Genzyme, Mr. Danieli spearheaded the integration of Bioverativ and Ablynx acquisitions, implemented financial modeling and assembled franchise performance metrics for investor audiences. Earlier in his career, he held financial positions at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts and KPMG. He earned a BS in accounting from Boston College.

I am eager to leverage my experience to support Jnanas evolution in the next stage of its business, said Mr. Danieli. I see tremendous potential for Jnanas platform to bring innovation to a range of diseases, and I am excited to be part of a team that is committed to bring novel medicines to make a difference in the lives of patients.

About Jnana Therapeutics

Jnana Therapeutics is a biotechnology company focused on opening the solute carrier (SLC) family of metabolite transporters as a target class to develop transformational therapeutics. Jnana uses its RAPID platform, a proprietary, cell-based drug discovery approach, to systematically target SLC transporters and develop best-in-class therapies to treat a wide range of diseases, including immune-mediated, neurological and metabolite-dependent diseases. Headquartered in Boston, Jnana is founded by world-renowned scientists and backed by leading life science investors. For more information, please visit http://www.jnanatx.com and follow us on Twitter and on LinkedIn.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210203005102/en/

See the original post:
Jnana Therapeutics Expands Leadership Team with Two Experienced Biopharmaceutical Executives - BioSpace

FDA weighs tighter restrictions for Pfizer’s Xeljanz on the heels of safety red flags – FiercePharma

The FDA already has restrictions on the use ofPfizers JAK inhibitor Xeljanz at a higher dose because of safety concerns. Now, thanks to new red flags, the agency is weighing a move to tighten those restrictions.

In a post Thursday, the FDAalertedpatients and doctors that a postmarket study has linked Xeljanz to an increased risk of serious heart-related problems and cancer compared with TNF inhibitors, a group that includes such drugs as AbbVies Humira. The problems applied to both the 5-mg twice-daily dose and the higher 10-mg strength.

The agency said itll evaluate the clinical trial results and consider what moves to take. The last time it made that kind of comment, it wound up puttinga boxed warning on the high dose and strippingit of its use in previously untreated ulcerative colitis.

In the meantime, the FDA asks patients not to stop taking Xeljanz without first consulting with their doctors.

The FDAs announcement came days after Pfizer unveiled the data from the postmarket trial, which were required by the FDA in granting Xeljanz its first go-ahead in rheumatoid arthritis in 2012.

In the trial ofabout 4,400 rheumatoid arthritis patients who were at least 50 years old and had at least one cardiovascular risk factor, the rate of major cardiovascular events was higher for Xeljanz takers at 3.37%, versus 2.55% for the TNF group. Cancers developed in 4.19% of Xeljanz patients, also higher than the 2.89% among TNF receivers.

RELATED:Pfizer's Xeljanz fails RA safety study, making a tough rivalry with AbbVie's Rinvoq even tougher

Pfizer first warned of heart-related safety issues tied to the trials 10-mg Xeljanz dose in 2019. The FDA took note, slappinga warning label on the drugpointing to an increased risk of blood clots and death. The European Medicines Agency followed with a similar but slightly different restriction.

But the regulatory red alert doesnt affect Xeljanzs larger rheumatoid arthritis indication, because the high dosing regimen is only meant for ulcerative colitis patients. In fact, Xeljanz, as Pfizers cornerstone immunology product, managed to grow sales by 9% at constant currencies to $2.4 billion in 2020, with U.S. prescription volume rising 12% year over year, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, Ph.D., said on the companys fourth-quarter earnings call Tuesday.

But its different this time. As the trials raised red flags for both those doses, all three existing Xeljanz indicationswhich also include psoriatic arthritisas well as a potential nod in ankylosing spondylitis could be under threat.

RELATED:Pfizer may have a lot going on in immunology, but all its drugs could be beaten by rivals: analyst

During the call, Pfizer management defended Xeljanzs place in those markets. Pfizer R&D chief Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D., said the postmarket trial participants belong to a unique population with increased severe risk, pointing to other clinical trial and real-world data it had accrued in larger patient groups.

As for the implications of the study on Xeljanz's label, Pfizer said its still too early to call. We still have a lot of work to do in terms of secondary endpoints, subpopulations and bringing all of this together to discuss this with regulators. So I think were still a ways off in terms of really understanding what impact it will be to our label, Angela Hwang, Pfizers biopharma president, said during the call.

Xeljanzs problems could hand fellow JAK inhibitors,such as AbbVies newly launched Rinvoq, an advantage. Although there are some concerns over potential scrutiny across the entire class, Rinvoq hasnt shown any imbalanced cardiovascular safety signals in the clinic. Pfizer also argued against reading Xeljanzs data into other JAK programs, mainly from the standpoint of its own follow-on programs such as abrocitinib, which is under FDA priority review in atopic dermatitis.

Excerpt from:
FDA weighs tighter restrictions for Pfizer's Xeljanz on the heels of safety red flags - FiercePharma

Evenings with Genetics: Race and Genetics | BCM – Baylor College of Medicine News

Do racial categories obscure our genetic similarities and differences? How do we quantify ancestry and is it important in precision medicine? This month, Baylor College of Medicine is hosting two Evenings with Genetics webinars to address these questions and other issues involving race and genetics.

The webinars will take place on Tuesday, Feb. 9, and Tuesday, Feb. 16, at 7 p.m. CST. Both sessions will address the role of race in genetic research and clinical care, as well as racial justice and bioethics in precision medicine.

This series focused on race and Black history is exciting and timely, said Dr. Debra Murray, assistant professor of molecular and human genetics at Baylor and co-organizer of the event. The invited speakers will bring to light several areas where genetics has been influenced by race. In order to pursue social justice, we must ensure science without bias. People with non-European ancestry should not be prevented from enjoying the promise of precision medicine.

The 15th anniversary of this series is the perfect opportunity to offer our community these discussions on the perception of race as we strive to ensure precision medicine is available to all, said Susan Fernbach, assistant professor of molecular and human genetics at Baylor and co-organizer of the event.

Panelists on Feb. 9 include Dr. Charmaine Royal, professor of African & African American studies, biology, global health and family medicine and community health at Duke University, Dr. Clayton Yates, professor in the Department of Biology and Center for Cancer Research at Tuskegee University, and Shawneequa Callier, associate professor in the Department of Clinical Research and Leadership at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences.

Panelists on Feb. 16 include Dr. Rick Kittles, professor and director of the Division of Health Equities in the Department of Population Sciences at City of Hope, Dr. Charmita Hughes-Halbert, professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Medical University of South Carolina, and patient advocate J.H. Jones.

The program is free and open to the public, but registration is required. A Zoom link will be sent to all registered participants. For more information, call 713-798-8407 or visit the event registration pages for Feb. 9 and Feb. 16. Videos of both sessions will be available online here at a later date.

This event is sponsored by the Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, the Human Genome Sequencing Center and Baylor Genetics.

See the original post here:
Evenings with Genetics: Race and Genetics | BCM - Baylor College of Medicine News

What 23andMe’s filing to go public says about the big genetics business – STAT

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

STAT+ is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis.Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

Go here to see the original:
What 23andMe's filing to go public says about the big genetics business - STAT

From Ancestry to Genetics-Based Drug Development, Richard Branson Takes 23andMe Public – BioSpace

Billionaire Sir Richard Branson believes in healthcare. This week he put more of his money where his mouth is by using his SPAC to take consumer DNAtesting company23andMepublic in a massive deal.

At Virgin, we try to partnerwith companies that can make a real difference in the world like healthcare companies...saidBransonin an interview.

The essentially reverse merger delivers $759 million to 23andMe and bumps up the companys value to $3.5 billion.Launched in2006,for most, it was a neat way to find out who youare, who your ancestors were, where they came from, and even your genetic predispositions that put you at higher risk for certain diseases.But the company has grownintoevenmore than that.

Ancestry and health have always been key components of the product but more and more the future is the health side. How is it that you can get your genetic information and really benefit from the Human Genomeand life a healthier life?saidCEOand co-founderAnne Wojcicki.

Its these exciting opportunities in the healthcare aspect that convinced Branson the company was ripe for his next big investment.

23andMe, for instance, just their drug development side could shorten the development of a new drug using allthe knowledge that theyve gained over the last twelve years by as much as 3 years which makes coming up with drugs that much quicker, said Branson.

Both Branson and Wojcicki personally contributed $25 million to the deal. Branson was also an early investor in the company, having contributed to 23andMes Series A.

23andMes first program,Move Forward, is now in humantrialswithpartnerGlaxoSmithKline.Theimmuno-oncologyprogram was GSKs, validated by 23andMes proprietary algorithm.Wojcicki was tightlippedfor nowon the timeline for any data.

If you think back on our mission statement, its about helping customers access, understand and benefit from the Human Genome. And the key thing that were doing right now is helping our customers benefit. Theyregoing to benefit in two ways. One is they are going to be empowered with information to help them live a healthier life. And second is on the therapeutic side. 23andMe is working hard to say how do we analyze all this data? How do weunderstand those genetics so we can develop very personalized therapeutics that could potentially cure diseases, saidWojcicki.

All data studied as part of the collaboration with GSK and all 23andMe research is from customers who opted-in to a separate research consent. Privacy is a majorconcern for consumers in todays data age.

Last January,Spanish pharma companyAlmirallin-licensed a bispecific monoclonal antibodyfrom 23andMethat blocksallmembers of the IL-36 cytokinesubfamily. Associated with multiple inflammatory diseases and dermatological conditions, Almirall is developing and commercializing the antibody for global use.

Most Read Today

Read the original:
From Ancestry to Genetics-Based Drug Development, Richard Branson Takes 23andMe Public - BioSpace

Window into the genetics behind equine reproduction grows ever wider, say researchers – Horsetalk

The genetic origins behind reproductive traits are still far from clear, and this is especially so for horses, researchers say. Photo by Phinehas Adams

The knowledge of the reproductive architecture of horses on a genetic level is likely to grow considerably over the next few years, the authors of a just-published review predict.

The genetic origins behind reproductive traits are still far from clear, and this is especially so for horses.

Nora Laseca and her colleagues, writing in the journal Animals, said reproductive traits are complex and usually determined by multiple genes.

They also have low heritability, which makes them particularly sensitive to environmental and management factors, such as age, nutrition, training, temperature at mating, and breeding season.

By that reason, modeling reproductive traits from a genetic point of view is difficult, they wrote in their review of recent advances and studies analyzing genomic mechanisms affecting reproductive function in mares and stallions.

This is particularly important in equines, whose fertility is considerably lower than that observed in other domestic species, they said.

In addition, equine reproductive efficiency is limited by their own physiology, characterized by single births in almost all the foalings, seasonality in mares, long generation intervals delaying genetic improvement, and a lack of systematized collection of phenotypic information reproductive traits.

Nevertheless, a certain degree of genetic influence has been described and modelized from a quantitative viewpoint, in mares and stallions.

For instance, gestation length in mares is affected by maternal lineage or inbreeding, while changes in sperm traits are related to the genetic background of the individual, lineage and breed, as well as by the inbreeding value.

However, there are very few reports which describe the molecular mechanisms involved in such genetic influence or which detect the candidate genes involved in the biological processes.

The advent of genomics has led to the development of new approaches to genetic analysis in livestock, including the detection of specific mutations and other genetic issues.

However, their use in equines is still limited, probably due to the delay in the development of a reliable reference genome, in comparison with most livestock species, such as pigs or cattle, but also by a lack of reliable expected progeny differences and phenotypic values associated to the variations in fertility in the species.

Laseca and her colleagues noted that, although the use of genomic methods in horses has increased significantly over the past five years, studies focusing on reproductive traits remain few and far between.

There are even fewer which aim to dissect and quantify more accurately the influence of the genetic background and the environment in the expression of the observable traits, they noted.

Horse genomics is currently undergoing an exponential expansion, not least due to the adaptation of new genomic methodologies to the species, the existence of a new, accurate reference genome, and the exponential increase in the number of equines which have been genotyped.

It is, therefore, highly likely that our knowledge of the reproductive architecture of horses will grow considerably over the next few years.

However, large-scale datasets of reproductive phenotypes are still scarce in horses, probably due to the lack of availability of reliable reproductive phenotypes (particularly in mares).

Therefore, the development of new phenotypes to measure reproductive fitness more objectively and their systematic use by breeder associations are essential to allow a more in-depth study of the reproductive function in horses.

In addition, the search for candidate genes is a highly promising way to obtain a better understanding of the processes involved in horse fertility.

They not only can help to elucidate which physiological functions could be affected by a specific genotype, but also to predict which genotypes could be more affected by environmental challenges, and they can be integrated into breeding programs to detect, even at very young ages, the potential fertility (increased, normal, or decreased) of a given mare or stallion.

The authors said the lack of consistency observed in candidate genes associated with fertility detected in different breeds or populations of horses, (most of them detected by a single study) will be reduced only with an increase in the volume of evidence gathered.

In this sense, only 11 genes reviewed in their paper were detected by two or more studies, and only five were detected using more than one approach.

It was recently shown that combined genomic approaches in the same study can increase accuracy and reliability in detecting candidate genes. However, no combined studies have yet been reported in horses. Such combined approaches would constitute the best approach in our search for a better, more reliable understanding of genetic effects on horse fertility.

The review team comprised Laseca, Gabriel Anaya, Zahira Pea and Antonio Molina, with the University of Crdoba in Spain; and Yamila Pirosanto and Sebastin Demyda Peyrs, with the National University of La Plata and the Higher Council for Scientific and Technological Research, both in La Plata, Argentina.

Laseca, N.; Anaya, G.; Pea, Z.; Pirosanto, Y.; Molina, A.; Demyda Peyrs, S. Impaired Reproductive Function in Equines: From Genetics to Genomics. Animals 2021, 11, 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020393

The review, published under a Creative Commons License, can be read here.

View original post here:
Window into the genetics behind equine reproduction grows ever wider, say researchers - Horsetalk